All Episodes
Previous Next
July 24, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
59:21
Truth vs. NEW$ Inc. Part 1 (23 July 2023) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, folks!
This is Truth vs. News Incorporated, and today is the 23rd of July, in the continued heat of the summer.
I'm Donald Ryder, producer, and we're in the heat of the news here at JD.Consultants at ProtonMail.com, and it seems like everybody's a target these days for things, and we've got the best people who know how to aim here.
We got, of course, we got Jim Fetzer.
He's the most dangerous man in America, but There's books here.
The Sandy Hook book is still as strong as ever.
And of course, America was nuked on 9-11.
And I think JFK, RFK, JFK, it's all happening right here.
And we're the hub and center of it.
And we appreciate you expanding and giving us the airtime every place.
We're really going around.
Thanks to Jim.
And we also have Scott Bennett, the most intelligent military intelligence officer around.
He's doing Well, we're all the work in Russia and other places.
He just knows what's going on, and he's spot on.
And we also have Brian Davidson, who's a private investigator out of Texas.
He's enjoying the heat down there, and he's fishing it out, too.
So, let's fish it out here.
Jim, what's happening there in Ukraine?
Well, Don, it looks like NATO is preparing to go to war with Russia.
In June, as soon as the counteroffensive began, Ukraine's military intel claimed the army had almost run out of its Soviet-era 152mm artillery munitions, was forced to use the NATO standard 155.
These claims caused a stir in NATO, looking for ammunition for poor Ukraine.
In fact, Kiev's Western patrons have been supplying Kiev with shells non-stop.
And Kiev launched its large counteroffensive despite the alleged shortage.
Washington, referring to the depletion of conventional ammunition, has sent dangerous cluster ammunition to Kiev.
On July 19th, conventional 152mm artillery shells were already included in the next package.
At the same time, Russia announced it's going to increase the production of these munitions.
The problem being it takes a year to two years to set up a production chain.
London proudly declared it had delivered 15 times more critical artillery to Ukraine than it had planned a year ago, more than 200,000 rounds instead of 16,000.
The Fraterno-Plaza Group has reportedly concluded two contracts with the Kroboron Group for the production of 155 military shells for Ukraine.
In 2022, the capabilities in tarps were drastically increased with an investment of about 15 million euros over three years.
Even Bulgaria, which officially refused to produce shells for Ukraine, claiming it did not have the facility, has been supplying artillery munitions to a third party.
According to documents, it turns out Sofia had been supplying 155mm shells to Washington since the beginning of the hostilities.
These are some of the efforts made by NATO to support Ukraine.
In its turn, Kiev declares its desire to shoot 18,000.
152 or 155 caliber rounds per day, but can only use four.
Despite the loud claims, the price of production, the pace of production leaves much to be desired.
Currently putting out about 20,000 shells per month, Washington increased the number to 70,000 if it can do it.
The EU wants to reach a production goal of more than 1 million shells of all calibers per year.
These are pretty odious plans.
Moreover, not all shells are going to be sent to Ukraine.
According to the most optimistic forecast, NATO will be able to provide a combined total of 130,000 of 152-155 shell per month.
That's only 10% more than Ukraine is using now.
The West has no goal to lead Ukraine to victory, but rather only to prolong the conflict.
International hype with a search for shells is aimed not at arming the Ukrainian army, but strengthening the capacities of NATO itself, which is preparing for war with Russia, since the Ukrainian army has demonstrated its impotence.
Meanwhile, and this is in my opinion absolutely shocking, Senate rejects congressional war powers over NATO's Article 5.
In essence, this means if NATO declares Article 5 to be in vote, the U.S.
override congressional war powers paid by a vote of 16 to 83.
In essence, this means if NATO declares Article 5 to be invoked, the U.S. will automatically be at war, notwithstanding that the North Atlantic Treaty that created NATO specifies nation's constitutions are not to be overridden.
The Senate has just gone for that whole hog, placing our fate as a nation in the hands of NATO, where I fully expect a false flag attack to take place that is then going to be used to invoke Article 5 and drag the U.S.
into a war with Russia forthwith.
The amendment introduced by Rand Paul states, is the sense of Congress that Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty does not supersede the constitutional requirement that Congress declare war before the United States engages in war and failed.
In a vote of 16 to 83, it received no support from Democrats.
It should have been an easy vote to affirm the Constitution.
To vote against affirming the Constitution actually places doubt in the Constitution, but it was defeated.
The Senate also approved an amendment from Kim Kaine requiring the Senate approval for a president to leave NATO in a vote of 65 to 28 with only Republicans opposing the measure.
In other words, they are locking us in.
The Keen Amendment states, The President shall not suspend, terminate, denounce, or withdraw the U.S.
from the North Atlantic Treaty, except by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, provided that two-thirds of the Senators present concur or pursue it to enact a Congress.
Versions of both McCain and Paul amendments have been previously introduced as stand-alone bills.
When Paul and other Republicans introduced a reaffirmed congressional war powers over NATO commitments, he noted, while NATO members are required to assist each other in the event of attack, military action is not thereby obligated.
Moreover, Article 11 states that provisions of the treaty are to be carried out in accordance with each country's respective constitutional processes.
Once the Senate passes its version, it needs to negotiate the final with the House.
Both will allocate $886 billion, but a partisan battle is expected to ensue as Republicans add amendments to the House version related to social issues in the military, including abortion, transgender surgery, and diversity policies.
The House passed its version last Friday in a vote of 219 to 210.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, I think the writing on the wall is that the Senate Democrats and the RINOs and the Biden administration want to drag the United States into a war with Russia.
It thinks erroneously that it can declare a timeout anytime during that war and that it's a War with gloves and the Queens of Marksbury rules and everyone's going to ship a champagne glass before they go into the ring.
You know, dance around like they're boxers in 1905.
And that's just not the case, not with Russia, not now, not with the horrific tortures that the US CIA and the Germans and the British and all of the other participants in Ukraine have been doing to the Russian population, in addition to killing civilians and killing children and women.
All of this is also metastasized into a diplomatic war.
Where the International Criminal Court has the mendacity to try and charge President Putin with, you know, abduction of children, the very things that the Democrats do and the Ukrainian area was used for in the sex slavery and human trafficking.
This is expanding beyond military operations.
It's going into the economic siege with the economic sanctions, the diplomatic war, and the military.
And yet the U.S.
and NATO are all miserably defunct and disqualified from engaging in any military operation.
They don't have the manpower.
A bunch of guys in high-heeled dresses and rainbow flags do not stand up to the fortitude of spetsnaz.
They do not have the money.
They do not have the weapons, the British especially.
They're a Trojan horse.
I think you're going to witness the Biden administration, the Democrats, however, they are going to declare some kind of a war.
They're going to engage in a false flag event to justify that war.
They're going to justify a draft.
They're going to try and get behind a World War II.
It's us versus them.
And then you're really going to see a delusional America descend into chaos and civil war, revolution, things that we've never seen in this country since its founding.
And I think we're very close to that.
The Congress should act.
The Republicans should act.
Marjorie Taylor Greene and others should take the lead and say the Republicans in Congress do hereby declare, similarly to what they did to Trump, saying that he couldn't take any actions against Iran, the Congress can do the same thing.
The United States is not going to take any direct military confrontation against Russia.
It's not going to allow itself to be dragged into a NATO appeasement.
NATO is defunct.
NATO is the North Atlantic Treaty Organization that was founded to defend against communism, not against to interfere with the Russian special military operation that it is engaged in for defensive purposes because of bio labs, DNA weapons and not against to interfere with the Russian special military operation that
weapons and and other genocides that Zelensky and the Ukrainians and the Nazi thugs under him were committing against Donetsk and Donbassk and the rest of the Eastern European or Eastern Ukrainian area.
So Congress should act.
This is a terrible indicator, of course, of the traitors we have in our own midst in the Senate.
But I do think they're going to try and trigger a war, trigger a draft.
They're just maniacal and delusional enough to think they can get away with it.
But I think you'd see the American people and people in the military and elsewhere say, no, we're not going that way.
And you're all dead men and need to be impeached and hung immediately.
And I hope that happens, Jim.
Well, of course, I agree with all those sentiments, Scott, but whether we have the wherewithal to do it is a question, Brian.
I'm still curious as to why Russia is such a threat to stop the global dominance Um, it doesn't, it doesn't, everything's not adding up with this.
It doesn't make any sense.
We, I agree that we gave up some of our sovereignty and 2% of our gross domestic product to be a part of NATO.
But now NATO, now we've got our Congress and senators totally giving up the sovereignty, the ability to declare war to these guys.
Who are fighting a proxy war.
We're fighting the proxy war in Ukraine.
How is NATO doing this?
Ukraine's not even a member of NATO.
This is so far out of bounds for what the world ought to tolerate.
However, what it shows you is that the world is truly captured by the network of global corporate control.
And these NATO Western powers, is this really the Jewish takeover of the entire world?
Is that what we're looking at here?
If NATO leaps over Ukraine to start a direct conflict with Russia, when all Russia was trying to do was protect itself at its borders,
Then there ought to be an absolute international uprising against these guys, not to mention what's going to happen in each sovereign country that has to join NATO and fight the mission action.
This is a problem I've been dealing with.
I'm going to have to just, you're just going to have to grin and bear it.
I'm getting emails from people telling me that it's bad, so I'm sorry.
You're doing fine.
You're doing fine.
It's because this is like 9-11, an Israeli operation.
They want Ukraine to be the new Israel.
Our Congress took this action because it's Israeli-controlled territory, Israeli-occupied territory.
Our Congress None of this makes any sense until you understand it's a proxy war, not between the U.S.
and Russia, but between Israel and Russia.
Russia is not going to give up the Crimea, not going to give up the Donbass, but Israel wants it all, and they're expending every resource they have to achieve that, no matter what destruction might befall NATO nations or the United States.
That is what explains it.
And we have to face up to it.
Meanwhile, Russian military issues a maritime warning for the Black Sea.
All ships for Ukrainian ports are going to be treated as potentially carrying weaponry, Russian Defense Minister has declared.
Russian military issued a new navigational warning for the Black Sea, declaring certain areas temporarily unsafe.
The military advised seafarers against attempting to reach Ukrainian ports, saying all vessels headed there will be treated as carriers of war goods.
Therefore, the flag state of a ship attempting to reach Ukrainian Black Sea ports will be deemed as taking part in the Ukrainian conflict on the side of the Kiev regime.
The military said it also declared certain areas to be temporarily unsafe.
They're in the northwest and southeast of the waterway.
Noted that all the necessary navigational warnings have already been published as required under existing law.
With the termination of the Black Sea Initiative, abolition of the Maritime Humanitarian Corridor from 0-0-0 Moscow time on July 20, 2023, all ships enroute to Ukrainian parts of the Black Sea will be considered potential carriers of military cargo.
The new restriction imposed de facto the Russian naval blockade on Ukraine, lifted under the so-called Black Sea Grain Deal of July of 2022.
The agreement, signed with mediation by the UN and Turkey, Enable the safe shipment of Ukrainian grain through Black Sea corridors amidst the conflict.
Moscow, however, withdrew from the deal Monday, citing the West's failure to keep any promises made to Russia under the agreement, including re-enabling export of grain and fertilizer from Russia to take place.
Over the past two days, Russia has also ramped up its cruise missile and suicide drone attacks on Ukraine, striking targets in and around Odessa especially, the key port of this country.
The strikes come in retaliation to the new Ukrainian attack on Russia's Crimean Bridge, which coincided with termination of the Green Deal.
Meanwhile, the Hal Turner Show has published a flash bulletin, which we need to assess.
About 2 a.m.
Eastern Sunday, NATO instructed Ukraine to abandon the front line and have all troops return to the cities immediately to seek shelter.
Something big is apparently planned very soon.
Will NATO intervene directly?
Will peacekeeping forces enter western Ukraine to freeze the war?
Will NATO simply outright attack?
Sadly, At 10.43 a.m.
Eastern Sunday, there are no apparent answers to any of these questions.
Last night, former NATO Supreme Allied Commander and U.S.
Admiral James Starvida stated NATO may be planning to attack Russian ships in the Black Sea.
Russia will also be preparing for NATO to attack.
He said NATO ships should accompany grain carriers in the Black Sea and, if necessary, open fire in response to Russian warships.
Frankly, insane advice.
Last night, also Ukraine President Zelensky pled with NATO Secretary General to urgently convene Ukraine-NATO Council against the background of the defeat of the armed forces of Ukraine in Odessa and the loss of NATO equipment.
Zelensky asked NATO Secretary General Zen Stoltenberg to urgently convene the Council.
Stoltenberg heard the request of the Vassal.
He called a meeting for July 26.
The official agenda of the future meeting is consultations on the latest developments in Ukraine and discussion of the transportation of Ukrainian grain.
What's apparent to everyone right now is that something very, very big is about to take place.
Get right with God, he suggests.
Scott, your thoughts about these developments or reports?
Well, if, you know, NATO and the U.S.
are under this delusion that Russia is intimidated by them, that Russia is afraid of a conflict with NATO, and it's not.
Russia is hesitant, it doesn't want a conflict, it doesn't want war, it never has, but it's not afraid of war, it's not afraid, and it's got the temperament to go into a fight.
If you unleash the bear, if you unleash Russia, To defend its life and its existence, it will, in an absolute annihilatory way.
Russia, the 89% of the people are behind Putin.
The country is more united than ever.
It has been united because of the sanctioned economic war that has been launched since 2014, 15, 16.
It's united because of the diplomatic Russophobia and the rejection of Russian culture and the attacking of the Russian people in Europe.
There's been horrific prejudices shown for no reason whatsoever.
And you've also got the War of Values.
Russia is a religious, Christian, conservative country that resembles more of the Tsar's Russia, not the Soviet Union, but the Tsar's Russia that was more religious and family-oriented than ever before.
You've also got their Their military actions that have been taken against them, the media actions that have been taken against them.
So this has all boosted Russia's strength of personality.
And I think they're more than ready and capable, and they have far superior weaponry and amount of munitions than NATO or the United States has.
So if NATO is foolish enough to enter into a conflict with Russia, I could very easily see Uh, Russia annihilating, and it would have losses, but it would annihilate every NATO plane, uh, truck, uh, blue helmet, uh, peacekeepers, anyone that came in.
They would give them notice.
Putin's a lawyer.
He knows how to do this.
He would give them appropriate legal notice in advance, uh, but at the end of that notice, at the end of that, you have 24 hours to get out or something like that, or you'll be annihilated.
They would be annihilated.
And I don't think they've really considered the other parties that would step in.
I could see them very easily, as Doug McGregor had said, if NATO and the West tries to trigger a war and it invades Ukraine, or it launches attacks on Russia in St.
Petersburg, or Moscow, or anywhere else, or through Dagestan, or Georgia, or any of those places, I could see a reaction where Iran shuts down the Persian Gulf, Uh, Saudi Arabia stands down and says, we're not going to have a dog in this fight.
We don't like Biden anyway, so have at it.
So Iran would shut down the Persian Gulf, uh, and they're invulnerable.
They're, they're very capable of fighting and, and, uh, we would, we would lose in trying to get in there.
China would step up.
China could shut down some things.
Panama Canal, you could sink some ships.
Our nuclear, uh, submarine fleet is, what, 40% in dock being repaired.
So China would step in, Russia would step in.
So you've got Russia, China, Iran doing a defensive military operation to halt, stop, not invade Europe, not invade the United States, but to stop the hostility and the aggression that the U.S.
is trying to do.
Because they all recognize the writing is on the wall.
If Russia falls, then Iran falls next, and then China falls next.
And those countries have created the BRICS and the multipolar world to stand up against that.
That's the agenda.
That's the military full-spectrum dominance that the West has been pursuing as a homicidal maniac for the last 20 years.
It's never stopped.
So if they amplify and accelerate into an operation against Russia, which is totally illegal, they don't have the right to do it.
Ukraine isn't a member of NATO, as Brian said.
But if they do that, I think you will see the annihilation of Europe politically, the disintegration of Europe, the disintegration of NATO, the disintegration of the EU, like just a house of straw going up in flames.
And the same with the United States.
That could trigger massive uproars, which then the U.S.
may conveniently, in a Norwellian 1984 way, allow or try and trigger Biden or Gavin Newsom or whoever he puts as his vice president who's going to take over for him.
It could enable this American lockdown police state because You know, the Trump supporters are getting ornery, and we need to unleash Merrick Garland upon them.
So, I anticipate China, Iran, and Russia will do a synchronized counter-move, a defensive operation, a containment operation, and the U.S.
and NATO is just gonna become frothy and bubbly and spatter over the pot, but at the end of the day, it's all gonna go nowhere, and they're all gonna collapse, Jim.
I'm in, Brian.
Wow, really good.
Remember that NATO recruits countries to join NATO in exchange for a promise.
What good is a promise if your word is worth dog crap?
And that's, we started learning that in the Minsk agreements.
And so you've got NATO is in a very difficult situation right now because Ukraine has been fighting this proxy war against Russia almost like there's some sort of sacrificial lamb that's being laid on the altar of of the battle.
It appears now that the Ukraine war was just nothing but a weakening agent prior to NATO really choosing to step in, which is America and Israel and other nations that have joined it, stepping in to try to shut down Russia.
Again, why is Russia such a threat?
Oh, Oh, I'm sorry.
Israel can't have Iran.
Israel can't have Iraq.
Israel can't have France or Europe or any of the other eight.
We've got to have the weakest one of the bunch, which is Ukraine.
Yes, I get it.
There's great farmland there.
There's been a real transportation infrastructure that was built.
I don't know what It's in right now, but definitely that port was very, very important.
The trains were very, very important on the entire transportation structure that was built in there.
And Russia was very careful to protect that.
But when you really break it down, NATO is fighting for its very life because if their promises in exchange for 2% of gross domestic product turn out to be garbage because they can't win a war, and that's what they promised NATO is fighting for its very life because if their
after all, then membership is going to decline dramatically, which is going to reduce the amount of money that they have to work with, which is going to destroy the entire alliance of NATO members.
Uh, NATO countries.
Is Putin that smart that he understands this?
I mean, did Putin see this down the line that NATO could come apart?
On the other hand, NATO now might be the tiger in the corner that's fighting for its life.
And it wouldn't surprise me if a false flag was launched, blamed on Russia, and used as an excuse to jump into a war and protect itself from its own Rapid demise, which is going to come as a result of them getting their butts handed to them on a plate because nobody wants to fight for them.
And those are all very handy.
Go ahead.
Remember this, as Brian said.
If they did this, you know, invasion, provocative action, I could very easily see the euro and the dollar and the pound be completely ostracized as if they're radioactive, as if they're plague, as if they're diseased and nobody wants to touch them.
So you could have the BRICS nations, the 40 different nations that are joining BRICS in the multi-polar world, have a complete Ideological, philosophical, spiritual paradigm shift away from war, away from the empire, away from the bloodshed.
And they've got 200 years of, look at the world under the French, under the Germans, under the British.
Look at all of the wars they've done in Vietnam, in Africa, all over the place, Iraq, Afghanistan.
This is the imperial, colonial, white, German, French, British, American empire.
And do you want that?
Or is it time to shift humanity away from that death and carnage and madness and homosexual transgender demonism?
And you very well could have a very compelling argument that is the straw that breaks the camel's back and shifts the majority of nations away from the dollar the euro and the pound and i already see that on the wall in central america and south america and africa and these other nations there is no one on the u.s euro side except australia canada the united states britain
Uh, France and Germany that are teetering and they could be overthrown because of all sorts of political instability.
Uh, and Scandinavia are kind of clueless Swedish chefs in a Muppet show anyway.
So, this economic collapse of the euro and the dollar and the pound, because of their hubris and their aggression and their NATO warmongering in a fight that they don't have any right to be in, I think that is going to be the last straw, and Putin is smart enough to have seen that.
Give them the Bud Light treatment, Scott.
Meanwhile, the U.S.
warns of false flag attacks as Russia targets civilian ships off of Ukraine.
Actually, the false flag attacks are going to come from Ukraine and NATO, not from Russia.
U.S.
is warning Russia could use its own sea mines in a pulse-like operation to justify the ongoing targeting of civilian grain vessels in the northern Black Sea.
John Kirby, White House National Security Council spokesperson, told a report a Biden admin feels it's necessary to issue a warning about Russian disinformation.
The hubris!
Moscow, he said, released a video alleging to demonstrate the seizure and detonation of a Ukrainian sea mine.
Despite the claim, Kirby said, Russia is placing sea mines at the entrances to Ukrainian ports and targeting civilian ships carrying food to and from the region.
Our information indicates additional sea mines in the entrances to Ukrainian ports.
Yesterday, we observed Russia release a video of the detection and detonation of what they claimed was a Ukrainian sea mine.
We believe this is a coordinated effort to justify any attacks against civilian ships in the Black Sea and then blame it on Ukraine in what we would consider to be a false flag operation.
Kirby's comments came just days after Moscow announced it would not renew the Black Sea Grain Initiative, which allowed ships to carry grain to and from Ukraine, provided they were inspected by a third party to ensure they were not being used as smuggled weapons.
Ukraine is the world's fifth largest exporter of weed, delivering more than 18 tons of food to the world's nations every year.
18 tons doesn't sound like a hell of a lot.
I wonder if that means 18,000 or something.
Since the deal ended, Russia has begun targeting civilian infrastructure in an apparent effort to destroy Ukraine's food supply, including its capacity to import or export grain.
Russia has already announced that all ships receding in Black Sea waters will be considered potential carriers of military cargo.
At least 27 were reported hurt in Russian airstrikes on Ukrainian ports this week.
In addition, Moscow's declared it will track any such ships and their flag countries will be viewed as parties to the war on the Ukrainian side.
Kirby said the White House was watching very closely for any sign of a Russian false flag operation.
Likewise, he said, the Biden admin is issuing sanctions against nearly 120 entities it says are responsible for helping Russia obtain access to international financial and military technologies.
Russia's refusal to renew the Black Sea Grain Initiative comes as both Moscow and Kiev contend increasingly narrow pathways to ensure victory.
Moscow continued to deal with a fallout from the Wagner mercenary group's aborted mutiny.
Technically, since Wagner is not a part of the Russian army, it wasn't truly a mutiny, more a protest against Russian military leadership.
Which has allegedly—I don't actually believe this—undermined confidence in Vladimir Putin at home and raised doubts about the country's ability to continue finding warm bodies for the front line.
That is Ukraine's problem, not Russia's.
Kiev's long-awaited counteroffensive, meanwhile, has stalled.
Ukrainian forces are making excruciatingly slow progress.
Actually, they're being decimated.
The Ukrainian armed forces have not been without their victories.
A breached-on attack critically damaged a section of the only bridge linking Russia to Crimea, which, of course, caused really serious problems for Russia with Ukraine.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, it's always interesting to reflect on history.
The United States of America in 1776 declared its colonies independent of Britain because of horrific treatment that it was undergoing.
The same moral justification and even more was used by the regions of Donetsk, Lugansk, the Donbass, Crimea to separate itself from the Ukraine coup that occurred.
And yet somehow that's deemed illegal by the United States.
The hypocrisy is sickening and the stupidity is sickening.
And it's even laughable, if not outrageous, to hear Kirby utter the words false flag.
We're watching for a false flag.
Well, you should know, Kirby, you're one of the experts on that.
You've seen the false flag in the blowing up of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.
You've seen the false flag in the blowing up of the dam.
You've seen the false flag in all sorts of false claims of Russian atrocities, you know, killing people.
You've seen actual Ukrainian assassination of civilians like Alexander Dugin's daughter, Alexandra Dugina.
Dugin is a philosopher.
He's a media guy.
Dugina, the girl, was a journalist.
You've seen like three or four other journalists being bombed and attacked.
These are acts of terrorism.
The West is a terrorist state.
Zakarova has said that, too.
And it's not showing favoritism.
It's just simply attaching the facts and the actions to the appropriate party.
And the facts and the actions are acts of terrorism.
And who's enabling them?
The United States.
You're now dropping cluster bombs and sending all sorts of artillery that will be used for terrorist strikes, terrorist weapons.
155 howitzer shells are wonderful roadside bombs.
We've learned that in Iraq.
I could see those winding up in all sorts of places in Russia and also Europe.
The cluster bombs, the same thing.
They're now dropping these on villages.
Dropping cluster bombs on villages, not on military targets, but on villages where old people live, women, children.
This is what the West, this is what NATO, this is what the European nations are all about?
This is precisely the behavior and the mentality of madmen that I think God is allowing the West to degenerate into in order to shift, again, the world away from the Western civilization like never before.
And I see massive uprisings over this.
This is not going to be accepted and swallowed By Americans, by Britons, by French, by Germans who have any brain, any character.
Maybe the COVID-19 vaccinated lobotomized zomboids are going to be, you know, in their rooms unable to even utter a word.
Maybe they'll just have their hand moved over the checkbox and vote electronically.
But I think the people in America really are the ones who need to rise up and take the lead.
And, you know, not back down.
Use all means necessary.
And I think in some cases, as the founding father said, when a government becomes tyrannical and destructive, it is the right and the duty of the people to overthrow such government and reconstitute one which seems appropriate under them.
And this FBI weaponization of the Department of Justice certainly seems to be the trigger point that Americans can act upon.
Well, their currency is trust.
They've given up their currency in the American public.
This is what the rise of Donald Trump really is.
Brian.
Well, their currency is trust.
They've given up their currency in the American public.
This is this is what the rise of Donald Trump really is.
This is what the breakdown of there's a great debate taking place between the left and the right related to who gets to gaslight.
the American people.
And what's happening is that the currency of trust in the traditional Western media has gone so far downhill that now it has to be obliterated with a wrecking ball in order to bring it back.
That's the problem.
That's why they need false.
They have to use false.
Everything's a false flag.
Because there's no more trust anywhere, anyhow.
And this is a global problem, not just a United States problem.
People are beginning to see through all the lies, even college students, even young kids in high school and even younger are beginning to see that everything is a lie and that old traditional currency of trust and the gaslighting is getting really old among young people.
They just don't want to tolerate it anymore.
I saw a debate between Matthew Taibbi and Malcolm Gladwell on YouTube yesterday, and I couldn't believe how much gaslighting took place between the left media representative and the right, you know, somebody who's an actual journalist.
It was, and all it was, was straw man arguments and Garbage critical thinking coming from the West that didn't make any sense at all, and Taibbi was just basically rolling his eyes.
Meanwhile, all the college students that were there during the debate, their view of the media swung 25% just during the course of one debate in terms of trustworthiness.
Now, that said, have you heard the latest Donald Trump commercial?
Have you heard what he's saying in there?
Tell us.
I don't know how this is going to sound, but just one second.
Oh, we lost you.
No, he's playing a tape, Don.
Oh, okay.
With you by my side, we will demolish the Deep State.
We will destroy the warmongers.
We will clean up the media and clean them all out with you by my side.
I mean he sounds like a fanatical religious leader saying he's going to clean out the swamp.
Donald Trump is a threat to these people's continued existence right now and I think that's a good We have to destroy the system, and I think it's going down, and I think they have less than two years to pull it off.
So, false flag, whatever, we'll move the timeline up.
It's coming.
What will it look like?
I don't know.
I agree.
I agree it's coming, and I think you're spot on.
Let me just say, I'm glad Brian played that clip, because I believe the more militant, aggressive rhetoric is going to win the presidency.
I know they're not going to allow a free and fair election.
I know they're going to try and sabotage it.
I know all sorts of things are going to go on, but in the hearts and minds of the people, The man who rises and uses that rhetoric of demolition, of destroying the deep state, smashing everything, exposing everything, using the military to go in and expose and arrest these warmongers and all of the fraud.
That's the language that I think Americans are ready to hear, because this isn't 20 years ago.
This is right now in 2023.
We're on the brink of nuclear war.
We're on the brink of economic collapse, and it is entirely because of the aggressive bad choices that America has made.
And the only way to fix it is to go in and demolish everything and everyone that's been behind this.
So I just say the rhetoric of that language, That's exactly what needs to happen.
More militant, destructive language of the deep state is going to resonate with the independents and the conservatives and even the Democrats.
And if Kennedy comes on Trump's side, you know, I don't know, BP or some sort of endorser, then you really have a hurricane to reckon with.
Trump's already 40 points ahead of DeSantis.
Listen, let me mention, Russia has so much equipment, they're so superior, they actually used this T-14 Armata in a surprise attack, and then they took it out after a kind of a test run.
The Russian military dropped a bomb by officially announcing the new T-14 unexpectedly hit Ukrainian targets in the Donetsk region.
They repeated the arrival of the state-of-the-art tanks on the Donbass Front.
This is the first report of the participation of a large number of these tanks in Ukraine.
This is a serious, major development.
And Putin has said, we have weapons like no other.
Welcome the tank Armata T-14.
Another source stated that they've already been put in operation with a southern military district.
A few months ago, there were reports that a new generation of tanks had been deployed in Ukraine, but they had yet to participate in direct attacks.
Earlier, WARNEWS247 revealed the presence of the new tanks at a military base in southern Russia.
In particular, the Russians claim many T-14 tanks participated in combat to see first-hand the tanks' performance and efficacy, and then were withdrawn.
The Southern Troop Group used the state-of-the-art Armata in the Special Military Operations Zone.
Several tanks took place in the battle.
Many units participated to see how they would perform.
At the end of April, the Army began using T-14 in the Zone of Operation.
This information was confirmed by another Russian source.
The main tank of the Russian troops is still the T-72B3, T-80BV, and T-90M.
Together with the T-14, they constitute an incomparably powerful steel fist.
The T-14 is a tank with an unmanned turret, equipped with a 1,500 to 2,000 horsepower diesel engine, a 125mm gun, controlled by remote control.
It also features an additional 30mm autocannon with selective ammo supply, a 7.62mm PKTM machine gun, and two twin ATGM cornet launchers.
It has a crew of three, auto cannon, remote controlled, new frontal armor, up to 1,400 RHA, active countermeasures against anti-tank missiles, passive countermeasures against laser beams, low combat profile, high speed, ability to destroy a target with a cannon from a distance of 8,000 meters, and reinforced anti-mine floor.
Now let me compare here.
The conventional NATO tanks have a range of two and a half kilometers.
This tank has a range of twelve and a half kilometers.
Look at the enormous advantage!
The battle tank has a number of unique features, equipped with a new generation of active protection complex, a flag net capable of intercepting anti-tank missiles, it has the world's first electrodynamic armor, Capable of intercepting anti-tank missiles before they hit the tank.
How many T-14s the Army has is unknown, but here's just an image of what it looks like.
I'm telling you, this is a devastating weapon.
NATO has nothing to compare.
Scott, your thoughts?
No, we've said that, Jim, from the beginning.
Russia has far superior technology, And it is operating on its own ground, its own strategic military theory has for the last 200 years, if not a thousand years, always originated in the preservation of the motherland.
Using the land as a weapon system itself.
So they're not about speed and maneuver and fancy-schmancy, you know, radar and, you know, all sorts of technical stuff.
They're about long-distance firing.
So they can fire their shells at the longest, farthest distance away from the enemy and destroy the enemy.
And that is the key to this sort of a land battle.
The air power is already there.
That's not a tank's operation.
The tanks are to destroy the personnel and the weapon structures of the enemy in a slow, methodical burn, right?
So it's like a wildfire burn.
They encroach and they gradually advance.
They don't need to do blitzkrieg.
They don't need to do zigzag and all sorts of speedy operations.
That is not what the Russians are about.
That's what the Americans were about in Gulf War I and Gulf War II, but more in Gulf War I, where they, you know, did all sorts of dancing and fancy, you know, maneuvers and capture.
Well, that's fine, as Doug McGregor said, when you're fighting a bunch of guys in robes and sandals and AK-47s, but not here.
You're dealing with Russians.
They don't like the rainbow flag.
They don't like the faggotosis and the homosexual transgenderism in the military and the drag queen this and all sorts of other perversions.
And that is an extraordinarily strong motivator.
For their conservative soldiers to advance.
They're stopping a plague from coming into Russia.
And Africa has stopped that too.
So their tank division is to destroy the enemy at long range and to be invulnerable.
And the other systems you'll see are the same under the nuclear torpedo.
Fire around the world and destroy the enemy from a long distance away.
and then maintain air power to keep the enemy from being able to fire and penetrate into Russia.
It is a defensive strategy and it is not about conquest.
It's about defending the motherland of Russia.
And against a strong defense like that, NATO and the United States has no chance, especially when Iran and China enter the mix and do their own sabotage operations.
Oh, and then maybe Central America and Mexico enter the mix and do their own little mushroom cloud on the south of the border.
This is a war that America will lose, and we could be turned into a second world country overnight, and perhaps we need an ass-kicking to remind us who's really in charge, God or us.
So, you know, I hope it doesn't go that way, but the writing seems to be on the wall that it is going that way, Jim.
Well, you're right about a conventional war.
Russia has all the cards, but I think that's why the West wants to go nuclear.
Brian, your thoughts.
Brian. - Okay.
Okay, we'll return when we hopefully get reconnected with Brian.
The West is going to have to go nuclear.
The old... No, no, I'm good.
Go ahead.
Go ahead.
The West has to go nuclear.
Go ahead, Brian.
I'm sorry, can you hear me?
Yeah, we can now.
Go ahead, go ahead.
About why the West has to go nuclear.
We have to go nuclear because victory through deception is no longer attainable.
Victory through deception is no longer attainable when your word means nothing.
There's two paths to victory.
There's victory through deception and there's victory through brute force power.
And the Mossad tactic of victory through deception isn't up to those Western tactics.
Look at our military right now.
It's victory through weakness, victory through deception.
It's a mental victory that they're having over us.
And that's weakened us to such a point that we'll not tolerate it.
They won't fall for it.
The old gypsy style of warfare, the old Khazarian Jewish style.
Hey, so bring out the big guns.
Let's see who wins.
Excellent points, Brian.
Excellent points.
Meanwhile, the indictments are solidifying Trump's dominance on the GOP.
The indictments against former President Donald Trump have become prominent features of his campaign for the White House and a quandary for his Republican primary opponents.
A former commander-in-chief informed the world this week of a third imminent indictment.
This is by a grand jury in Washington.
As with the previous two news, the special counsel Jack Smith's potential charges against Trump in the January 6th event captivated the media and sucked the national attention away from other Republican hopefuls jockeying for the spotlight.
A CNN interview of Ram Desantis was slotted into near-non-slot coverage of a former president's newest legal woes.
The unprecedented indictments of Roy May 2024, the most consequential election cycle in recent history, both fuel the kind of media carnival which Trump has learned to harness in his own favor.
Now with the possibility of two more indictments before the end of summer, Americans can expect two summer political blockbusters.
Republicans and Democrats alike will have no choice but to watch them both.
In the aftermath of the spectacle of the first two, one thing is clear.
The charges help Trump in the polls and make the rest of the Republican field struggle for relevance.
The first indictment marked an inflection point in primary polling.
On March 30th, a day before the indictment, DeSantis was arguably within reach of Trump trailing by 16, according to an average of polls from RealClearPolitics.
But after the New York indictment broke on March 31st, Trump polling numbers soared while DeSantis collapsed.
By April 30th, Trump had doubled his lead to 32 points.
That gap widened to 37 in the days leading to the DeSantis campaign launch.
Candidates usually enjoy a bump around the time of their announcement, as was the case for DeSantis for a few days.
Then, news of the second Trump indictment marked another trend reversal.
After DeSantis had narrowed the gap to 30, his ascent turned into a plateau amid wall-to-wall coverage of Trump's federal indictment in Miami beginning around June 8.
Trump has since maintained a steady 30-to-30-point lead over DeSantis, now up to 40.
The counterintuitive impact of the indictments on Republican support for Trump suggests voters remain steadfast in their belief the American judicial system has become irreparably compromised by establishment interests.
Trump consistently warned the public about this during his 2016 campaign, his four years in office, and after he depouted the White House in the wake of the irregular 2020 election.
That dynamic leaves DeSantis and other serious candidates with no viable option for harnessing the entitlements to their own advantage in voters' eyes.
If these candidates don't condemn the weaponization of government, they will fuel suspicion of being part of the Uniparty persecuting Trump.
But if they don't seize the opportunity to land a blow, the former president will sail the ship of martyrdom straight to the nomination.
While lots can change before the first primary, if the first two indictments are an indicator, the next two will help Trump continue dominating the Republican field.
A resident said this week he received a letter from a grand jury suggesting he'll soon be indicted by Smith in connection with the protests of January 6th.
Meanwhile, anonymous sources told The Guardian prosecutors in Georgia are preparing to charge him with racketeering.
The Washington case, if it goes forward, will come preloaded with a jury selected from a pool in what is arguably the most anti-Trump locale in the world, the District of Columbia, to which Trump refers as the swamp.
Trump supporters already see the treatment of January 6th defendant by prosecutors and juries in D.C.
as oppressive.
Any verdict against Trump will fit that pattern and fuel the passions of his supporters.
While the overall political impact of such a sentencing is unpredictable, a sentencing would not prevent the former president from running for re-election.
The supporters of former Trump find the charge it brought against him in New York and Florida as an indictment of the system, especially since they were brought after he announced his candidacy.
The pattern suggests every new indictment will solidify the inevitability of Trump's triumph in the primaries.
The president, who is innocent until proven guilty, appears well aware of this trend, and whether he admits it or not, is campaigning on his indictments.
"The Democrat prosecutors waited years to bring charges "so they could interfere with a 2024 presidential election," Trump wrote on Truth Social.
They are getting, however, big blowback.
Don, I think we may be at the point of time to take our break. - Time for a quick comment from Scott.
- Oh, wait. - Well, this hasn't even translated into political rhetoric yet.
After September of this year, 2023, you will see all of this translate into political language.
The strongest thing is Jim Jordan, Matt Gaetz, Marjorie Taylor Greene, the House Republicans having hearings on everything, because these hearings translate into the stagecraft That then translates into videos, commercials, political election materials, and the stagecraft and the drama of Jim Jordan, who was an ass-kicking Muhammad Ali super wrestler, when it comes to this.
He just has a flair that just goes after them like the punching bag, and he's got the mind of it.
He can lay out the entire past four years of corruption, and this is what the American people need, to remind them what's happened, give them the language to attack and define it as treason and corruption, And the next political labeling will be, what they do to Trump, they do to you, and they do to your children and your grandchildren.
Do you want to have stars put on your chest?
Do you want to be labeled a domestic terrorist?
Do you want your children taken away from you and put into transgender castration camps?
Then stand up and vote for President Trump.
It's not about a Republican or a Democrat.
It's about you and a man fighting the corruption of the American government and these left-wing lunatics that are trying to steal everything and turn us into an Orwellian world.
That's the political language that I think is going to start developing.
So everything they're doing is going to work to Trump's advantage and the advantage of America overthrowing this tyranny.
And that's when they're going to do a false flag nuclear event, blame it on Russia, and try and take us into a draft in a war.
We'll get Brian's comments when we return from this break.
Go on, take us out.
What a way to end the show here, and end this half.
Truth vs. News here on Sunday, the 23rd of July.
Hot times, hot news.
You got to come back in the second hour, folks, because it's going to be another barn burner.
Okay.
▲
Export Selection