All Episodes
Previous Next
July 22, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:09:53
Need to Know News (21 July 2023) with Carl Herman and Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
How's it going, fellas?
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in Mission Viejo, California, and by Chris Weinhardt, who's actually at home in Fort Myers, Florida.
I'm delighted.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
We begin with a report.
Russian forces wipe out signal center command posts of two Ukrainian army brigades.
This is just typical.
The Russians are mopping up the Ukrainians.
Russian forces struck a signal center command post of two Ukrainian army brigades over the past day in the special military operation in Ukraine.
Russian forces neutralized Ukrainian subversive group in Kubyansk area over the past day as well.
In the U.S.
direction, operational tactical and army aircraft and artillery destroyed the Ukrainian army's manpower and equipment in areas near the settlements of Volchanov and Kislovka in the Kharkov region and Selmankovka in the Luhansk People's Republic.
Russian forces have destroyed 60 Ukrainian troops in Krasnaya Liman area over the past day as well.
Russian forces destroyed roughly 60 Ukrainian troops over and above, 110 in the Kupyansk direction, and three artillery pieces in the Lusatsk-Liman area in the past day.
Russian forces eliminated another Ukrainian subversive group in the Kashny-Liman area.
Russian forces also rebelled two Ukrainian attacks in the past 24 hours.
Russian forces successfully repelled 16 Ukrainian attacks in the Donetsk area, destroying over 210 enemy troops in the past day.
In other words, this is business as usual.
The Russians are mopping up the Ukrainians.
They haven't been able to mount a counteroffensive.
They are going down big time.
Russian forces repelled more in the south than east direction through the activity of two Ukrainian subversives, 45 Ukrainian troops, howitzers in the Kursan area.
Russian air defense intercepted seven U.S.-made HIMARS rockets.
Russian air forces intercepted seven rockets of the U.S.-made HIMARS multiple rocket launcher system, destroyed 32 Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicles, During the past 24 hours, air defense capabilities intercepted seven rockets.
In addition, they destroyed 32 Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicles.
During the past 24 hours, operational, tactical, and army aircraft, missile troops, and artillery struck 94 Ukrainian artillery units at firing positions, manpower, and military equipment in 103 areas.
In all, The Russian armed forces have destroyed 456 Ukrainian warplanes, 243 combat helicopters, 5,140 unmanned aerial vehicles, 426 surface-to-air missile systems,
10,776 tanks and other armored 10,776 tanks and other armored combat vehicles, 1,139 multiple rocket launchers, 5,537 field artillery guns and mortars, and 11,767 special military field artillery guns and mortars, and 11,767 special military motor vehicles since the beginning of the special It's a wipeout.
Carl, your thoughts.
All reports of the battle status and the movement of the troops, the Russian advances, the Ukrainian Retreats and those numbers of the hardware, this all points to, and in addition to the US, UK, Germany, France, NATO being war murderers just to grind the Ukrainians into dust to remove them as a population force.
That means that this looks so bad to the West.
That the peoples of the so-called developed and cultured areas are withdrawing their support of those leaders and not coincidentally with those policies regarding the crimes against humanity of COVID and for election fraud.
So this is a huge.
Deal.
And if we can include in here the Biden's pay to play and connect that to other forces, such as I think it was Zelensky's daughter or a minister's wife or daughter just purchased a five million dollar French Riviera home.
If all of those can become visible, then we have a good chance for the corruption to be exposed in a way that would be terminal to our deep state opponents.
Excellent.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, I would have hoped that all the evidence we've seen of that so far would have done that already.
I think there's more than ample amount of evidence that shows widespread corruption and kickbacks in this political agenda behind the genocide that's going on in Ukraine.
There's obviously a strong demand for resources as well as for the geographical region there in terms of a strong point of isolating Russia from the south and There's a lot of geopolitical and strategic endeavors that are being brought forth, and none of it's being mentioned by the media at all.
This is all distraction and outrage and emotional provocation.
Certainly, there's no reason behind it that the media has been able to give the people who are paying for this.
More importantly, the narrative that they have been able to give has been one of an inversion that puts an accusatory tone towards Russia for defending its territory.
So the Ukraine has been subject to many color revolutions in the past 20 years under the Soros NGOs and many other things, the United States State Department and much, much more.
This is what's been caught and proven.
I can only imagine what hasn't been caught and proven has got to be far, far worse than some of the things we do know about.
So, they've been trying to wrestle this away from Russia for a long, long time, and I'm really honestly glad to see that Russia's not backing down.
And another point I'd like to make is the amount of financial commitment we have to supposedly dominating this war, or whatever it's called.
I don't know, Russia's spending, what, 1 20th of what we spend, and they seem to be obviously kicking our Kicking our butts here.
So, uh, if it is a profession they want to get into, they better get better at it and more cost effective at it.
Otherwise, maybe they should choose a different avenue in terms of diplomacy and military strategy.
Excellent.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, Russia military issues a maritime warning for the Black Sea.
All ships heading for Ukrainian ports will be treated as botanically carrying weaponry.
The Russian military issued a new navigational warning declaring certain areas in its international waters to be temporarily unsafe.
The military advised seafarers against attempting to reach Ukraine's ports, stating all vessels headed there will be treated as potential carriers of war goods.
Therefore, the flag state of a ship attempting to reach Ukrainian back-sea ports will be deemed as taking part in the Ukrainian conflict on the side of the Kiev regime.
The military also said it declared certain areas in international waters to be temporarily unsafe.
The areas are located in the northwest and southeast of the waterway, adding all necessary navigational warnings have already been published as required under existing law.
With the termination of the Black Sea Initiative and the abolition of the Maritime Humanitarian Corridor, From 0000 Moscow time on July 20th, 2023, all ships en route to Ukrainian ports in the Black Sea will be considered potential carriers of military cargo.
The new restrictions de facto reimpose a Russian naval blockade on Ukraine lifted under the so-called Black Sea Grain Deal in July of 2022.
The agreement, signed with mediation by the U.N.
and Turkey, enabled safe shipments of Ukrainian grain through Black Sea corridors amidst the conflict.
Moscow withdrew from the deal on Monday, citing the West's failure to keep any of the promises made to Russia under the agreement, including the re-enabling export of grain and fertilizer from Russia.
Over the past two days, Russia has also ramped up its cruise missile and suicide drone attacks on Ukraine, extensively striking targets in and around Odessa, the key port city of the country.
The strikes come in retaliation to the new Ukrainian attack on Russia's Crimean bridge, which coincided with the termination of the Green Deal.
Meanwhile, and this is staggering, Senate rejects congressional war powers over NATO's Article 5.
An amendment to the NDAA declaring NATO's Article 5 does not override congressional war powers failed by a vote of 16 to 83.
The Senate Wednesday overwhelmingly voted down an amendment To the National Defense Authorization Act for 2024 that would declare NATO's Article 5 does not override congressional war powers delegated under the Constitution.
The amendment introduced by Rand Paul states It is the sense of Congress that Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty does not supersede the constitutional requirement that Congress declare war before the United States engages in war.
In other words, it allows NATO to override the War Powers Act of the United States.
The amendment failed in a vote of 16 to 83.
It received no support from Democrats.
It should have been an easy vote to affirm the Constitution.
to vote against affirming the Constitution actually places doubt in the Constitution, but it was defeated.
The Senate also approved an amendment introduced by Senator Tim Kaine that requires Senate approval for a president to leave NATO in a vote of 65 to 28, with only Republicans opposing the measure.
The Kaine amendment reads, The President shall not suspend, terminate, denounce, or withdraw the United States from the North Atlantic Treaty, except by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, providing that two-thirds of the Senators printed concur or pursuant to an Act of Congress.
Versions of the K-9 Ball Amendment were previously introduced as stand-alone bills.
When Ball and other Republicans introduced legislation to reaffirm Congressional war powers over NATO commitments, he noted that while NATO members are required to assist each other in the event of an attack, military action is not thereby mandated.
Furthermore, Article 11 of the NATO Treaty states that provisions of the Treaty are to be carried out in accordance with each country's respective constitutional processes.
Once the Senate passes its version of the NDAA, it needs to negotiate the final version with the House.
Both allocate $886 billion for military spending.
But a partisan battle is expected to ensue as Republicans add amendments to the House version relating to social issues in the military, including abortion, transgender surgeries, and diversity policies.
The House passed its version last Friday in a narrow vote of 219 to 210.
219 to 210. Carl, your thoughts. - Well, war blockade is typical business.
And I wanted to point out in that article, that slight little mention, that with the grain deal a year ago, that Russia was promised, so the deal was, okay, so Ukraine can export grain, we're going to let them do that.
But in exchange, Russia also gets to export grain.
And And that part was not honored according to the article and and to allow Russia to export fertilizer.
So it would be typical business for the US as usual to violate treaties and to just virtue signal and.
I'll put into the show notes and into the comments the history of the war formerly known as on terror.
I documented nine treaty violations in that war of the US.
Now, NATO is a treaty.
And it should have been the right thing for our members of Congress to always uphold the Constitution.
In fact, they have an oath to do so.
And to say that there's some other type of legislation that would supplant the Constitution is just wrong.
Now, that said, Paul did the next best thing that he could, because the language of Article 5 of the NATO Treaty states Clearly, that the US Constitution will be upheld in terms of going to war, as will any other nation's constitutions.
On paper, there isn't any concern.
But the Democrats, I mean, they just throw away the Constitution and their oath as usual.
And this reminds me of the typical line of presidents of both parties claiming that it's my job to protect the American people rather than uphold the Constitution.
And this means if NATO declares Article 5 to have been violated, they have brought the United States to war regardless of congressional sentiment.
Chris?
Yeah, I think they've done that quite a bit, especially since 9-11 and the War of Terror and the authorized use of military force, the NDAA, many of these other things.
They've had forward military operations going back to the end of World War II, if not going back much, much further.
I don't think there's many years the United States has been in existence where it hasn't been at war.
Whether it's been formally declared by Congress or not is an entirely different story.
Whether it's an actual declaration of war, completely different story.
What we're seeing in Ukraine is it's been a probably 15-20 year war that's been waged against their people just on different levels of participation, whether it's actual military occupation or whether it's mercenary groups or NGOs going in and doing what they do.
So this is a very unconventional form of political dominance and I think that it's It's definitely getting a little bit old from the global populations definitely getting sick of this and I think the United States is a representation of this and it's been a proxy for this for a long time.
The UN colonialization effort after World War II is something that really people got to think about and re-look at and really our country needs to re-evaluate our position with NATO and the UN and all this stuff because this is a blood oath that is really certainly at best insane.
I don't know.
Hopefully they'll look at this again.
I don't think really the legislators are going to come through for us in this regard in any way, shape, or form.
And yeah, as far as the Ukraine grain deal, I'd also like to point out this is the largest and probably one of the only supplies of non-GMO wheat that's going to hit the international marketplace.
So this is a pretty valuable thing and If NATO forces can pirate that thing from hitting the market and corner the market with their GMO crops, they can continue their push for depopulation across the globe and by the food supply as well.
So yeah, this is really bad on many different levels, I have to say.
Excellent.
Congress just delegated the war power declaration of the Constitution to Congress exclusively to NATO so that if there were a false flag attack that NATO treated as real and declared Article 5 in vogue, the United States would be at war.
And this is just reprehensible in the extreme.
This is absolute abdication of responsibility.
Meanwhile, Biden $10 million bribe file released.
The Burisma chief said he was coerced to pay Joe, stupid Hunter, in bombshell allegation.
Remember, Joe has said Hunter's the smartest guy he ever knew.
But according to the head of Burisma, he was dumb.
A bombshell FBI file describing a $10 million bribery allegation against President Biden and his son, Hunter, was released Thursday by Senator Chuck Grassley, showing that a Ukrainian oligarch claimed he was coerced into making the payments.
Mikola Zolchevsky, owner of Burisma, told the FBI informant in 2016 while meeting at a coffee shop in Vienna, it cost $5 million to pay one Biden and $5 to another.
Zolchevsky made some comment that although Hunter was stupid and his dog was smarter, he needed Hunter.
On Burisma's board, so everything will be okay.
The source asked whether Hunter or Joe told Zelchevsky he should retain the younger Biden.
He replied, they both did.
The F.E.I.
informant, a Ukrainian-American, has been a trusted, highly credible F.E.I.
source for over a decade and has been paid six figures, according to Grassley, described for a conversation with Josefsky beginning at a meeting near Kiev in 2015 or early 2016, continuing through a 2019 phone call.
The informant said each of his conversations occurred in the presence of a man named Alexander Ostapenko, giving the FBI a possible supporting witness.
Ostapenko introduced the informant to Tsiolkovsky and works in some office for the administration of President Volodymyr Zelensky.
Solzhenitsyn allegedly claimed to have 17 recordings of conversations with the Bidens, two of which involved Joe, as well as many text messages and documents the informant understood to be financial records of payments to the Bidens.
According to Solzhenitsyn, the recordings and other evidence show he was somehow coerced into paying the Bidens to ensure Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin was fired.
In their final discussion, Zolchevsky allegedly told the informant over the phone that he had been in an oracle warning against partnering with the Bidens due to political controversy in the U.S.
CHS mentioned Zolchevsky might have difficultly explained suspicious wire transfers that may evidence illicit payments to the Bidens.
Zolchevsky responded he did not send any funds directly to the big guy, which CHS, that's the confidential source, understood was a reference to Joe.
He asked Zolchevsky how many company bank accounts he controls.
He replied it'd take them 10 years to find all the records of illicit payments.
Here we have him, Mykola Zolchevsky, who told the FBI he paid $5 million each to Joe and Hunter.
The big guy reference is significant because the same nickname is used to describe a tentative 10% cut for Joe in 2017 as part of a partnership with Chinese government link CEFC China Energy.
The moniker wasn't publicly known until October of 2020, months after the informant file was created.
At the Vienna meeting in 2016, Zolchevsky allegedly described Hunter as a conduit to his father when asked about Shokin's investigation of Burisma.
Zolchevsky replied something to the effect, don't worry, Hunter will take up all those issues through his dad.
The informant did not ask further questions.
Joe Biden has publicly said he used a billion in U.S.
loan guarantees as leverage to force Shokin from office, which happened in March 2016.
Well, son of a bitch, he got fired.
He bragged at a 2018 event hosted by the Council on Foreign Relations.
We have the video.
Hunter Biden's employment with Burisma emerged as a major U.S.
news story in 2019, when then-President Trump was impeached for pressure in Ukraine to investigate the Bidens.
House Democrats pointed out that although Shokin's office had investigated Burisma, evidence indicated its firing also was sought by U.S.
allies in Europe due to its own corruption.
We're getting just more details here.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, these are game-enders.
But first, I want to go back and say that Jim has it right, and the importance of that NATO vote, because even though the technical language of NATO Article 5 says, oh yeah, you've got to respect the U.S.
Constitution if they go to war, they're going to ignore that the same way that they ignore the War Powers Act, saying the same thing, that all treaties have to be respected.
If it goes to that, they'll use a false flag and a motion, and corporate media will never mention the fact that NATO Article 5 restricts the use of war to the nation's constitutional legality.
Senator Grassley!
How much longer can this show go on?
$10 million documented.
Pay-to-play bribery to the Bidens on an FBI form and backed up by Burisma's owner's claim of 17 recordings with the Bidens.
So this is a, oh, and for the big guy, for, you know, some people might be confused the same way that George Bush Senior, when he was being interviewed as director Yep, yep.
Nice, nice.
as director of the CIA, was asked if he had ever worked for the CIA.
He said, no, no, no, that George Bush on the official forms, that must be some other George Bush.
So the big guy, that's what Biden put on his personalized license plate.
The big guy.
That's him.
Yep, yep.
Nice, nice.
Chris?
Yeah, I think that the Democratic Party has been a longtime advocate of this type of shakedown of foreign countries.
Look at the Clinton Foundation.
They amassed, what, $40 billion going into the 2016 election cycle?
They haven't even been investigated, haven't even been looked at, despite mountains of evidence and many people disappearing and all the stuff they're complicit in, whether it's Epstein Island or whether it's, you know, Russian energy companies or on and on and on.
This is absolutely despicable and until this corruption is dealt with in a manner that is somewhat congruent with justice, I don't really see our country ever getting out of this.
I think this same collusory power will basically hold the strings and hold this country over a barrel until we basically Sweep out this type of corruption from the highest places of office.
And, you know, as far as Biden is concerned, and this evidence, I bet this is just a molehill compared to the mountains of additional kickbacks and bribes and loans and whatever else they've gotten.
So they've served this 1% aristocracy for a long, long time.
Bo Biden, like I said, made his bones as Attorney General in Delaware getting the DuPonts and Duke heirs off for raping their own children.
So no prison time.
So I'm sure these guys have been ghouls and henchmen for this cabal for a long, long time.
And I don't think the cabal is going to use any of their resources at their power to investigate them in a serious manner.
So maybe it's going to be on the citizens to go outside the law and outside the box to seek justice.
I'm convinced all the piling on to Trump with all these absurd indictments and charges is to distract the public from the real evidence of the real perpetrators of crimes, the Biden crime family.
So it's all an elaborate PR op as I see it.
Meanwhile, Jim Cavill, the star of Sound of Freedom, calls Joe Biden a demented pervert.
The star actor of Sound of Freedom joined Benny Johnson on Wednesday and talked about his new box office hit.
At one point, Benny switched things up and asked Cavazel what he thought about when he saw Biden nibbling a child last week in Finland.
Cavazel responded to Benny's question by saying, I would never let a demented pervert like this anywhere near my children.
Sound of Freedom.
I would never let a demented pervert like this anywhere near my children.
Jim Conville acts—reacts to Biden sniffing and nibbling at a stranger's child.
It was disgusting.
I would have pushed him off real quick.
Secret Service would have had to tackle me, as I would have popped him.
Later in the interview, Cavazel shared with Benny that he had no fear of the devil.
I don't have the same fear of the devil most people have.
I fear God.
I don't fear the devil.
My God would have kicked the devil's ass without a glance.
Jim Cavell.
More.
Saying this.
Again.
Reacts to media outlets like Bloomberg and Rolling Stone running cover for human traffickers and child abusers.
Better a millstone be hung around their necks than they be cast into the sea than they should ever hurt one of these little ones.
Sound of Freedom is now netted over a hundred mil.
Per the Washington Examiner.
Sound of Freedom is once again shocking the box office with the expectation of reaching nearly 23 mil in its second weekend.
The film grossed more than 7 mil Friday, putting it on pace to finish the weekend with 81 mil and to break 100 million gross receipts.
Sound of Freedom continues to beat Sonny Pictures' insidious The Red Door overall, in addition to besting Disney's latest Indiana Jones film on a daily basis for nearly a week.
You can catch the entire interview here.
Check it out.
The Benny Show live.
Carl, your thoughts.
Well, it's good a demented pervert.
That's good to start hitting him up.
That hair-sniffing, child-groping, plagiarist, war criminal, election fraudster, COVID, criminal against humanity, war criminal, Biden.
You know, he keeps those actions, he's going to be nibbling away at even his 9% approval rating.
So, the optics are just, you know, I want to say great, and they are great, to be able to expose him as Oh, it's grotesque.
It's just grotesque.
And I like him calling him out in such a direct, straightforward fashion.
Meanwhile, here's the guy.
It's unclear when exactly the alleged payments would have been made by Burisma, which first added Hunter to its board in April 2014, even though he had no discernible qualifications in gas or knew anything about Ukraine.
Meanwhile, Parent's Fury, as it claimed children as young as seven are being told they can be pangender.
Parents were left outraged to find children as young as seven are being told they can be pan-gender by teachers at a primary school in England.
After seeing their children's lesson plans, which show they were being taught about contested gender identity beliefs, parents launched a complaint to the Church of England school's leaders.
Pupils at Swanton Morley V.C.
Primary in Durham, Norfolk, are also being taught about being born with a vagina but feeling like a boy.
The controversial teaching material on relationships and sex education was provided to the school One outraged parent with two children said the material was taught without any consultation with families.
She told The Telegraph.
It was age-inappropriate, partisan, unscientific, and dangerous.
Adding, I love my children.
I will not allow them to be exposed to radical ideologies at an inappropriate age and in an imbalanced way.
What a sensible observation.
Here's a photograph of the school.
Telling seven-year-old girls they can be born like a girl but feel like a boy and that there are more than two genders is simply wrong.
These aspects of the teaching materials are based on highly contentious and contested views that put great emphasis on emotion and belief rather than biological reality.
It comes in the wake of the government launching a review of sex education in schools after evidence was found of age-inappropriate content being taught.
A Norfolk County Council spokesperson told The Telegraph, Primary schools are enabled and encouraged to cover LGBT content with RHSC lessons if they consider it age-appropriate to do so.
What is taught and how is ultimately a decision for the school, which has responsibility for developing a policy and curriculum in consultation with parents, which is compliant with statutory guidance in the Equality Act of 2010.
We trust and support head teachers to make decisions that are in the best interest of their pupils.
The controversy in primary schools has come as hospital chiefs come under fire for listing 18 gender options on a patient platform, including two-spirit and agender.
The Sun reports a survey was given to a woman in her 70s at Darlington Memorial Hospital in County Durham.
She said, I have no idea what some of these are.
I need to learn.
A survey listing 18 gender options, the photograph of the hospital there.
It seems like a box-filling exercise.
Probably from some administrators should focus on getting waiting lists down.
The form listed male and female, as well as 16 others, including passing two-spirit, third gender, agender, bigender, cisgender, gender expression, gender fluid, gender queer, and gender variant.
An insider told a publication it's a method to offer respect and humility to patients.
The DHS, the NHS, that's the National Health Service, has been actively trying to gather information on how patients identify to benefit future health care.
Carl.
That photograph of Hunter Biden at the beginning, part of what always strikes me with pictures of him is how pathetic His body language is.
He is not a happy camper.
He is not inspired.
He is not on fire.
He seems subject that he has been abused himself.
Not that there should be any stop from going after the law with the Biden family for that.
So in the UK, this would be equal to a second grade student coming in, learning about and being taught pan genderism.
Huh?
Are they going to teach pan morality?
Next, are they going to teach pan driving lanes?
So it doesn't matter.
You can just drive on whatever side of the street that you want to.
And I wonder for that, for the language of the law, that the parents are going to be consulted with that.
I hope that the parents get involved in there and that the parents who do get involved are not going to be subject to what happened in the United States with the FBI considering parents going to board meetings and stating things that are contrary to the Yep, good.
the declared way of doing things as being indicative of being a domestic violent extremist.
Yeah, good.
Chris?
Yeah, I almost think that they're trying to provoke some sense of curiosity and many of these kids are targeting in some way, shape or form.
I definitely think that this is a very aggressive campaign to try to corrupt the innocent and the children in such a way.
And it's along the lines of population control, really.
If you think about it, none of those kids that are choosing these 18 different genders are going to actually have a functional family and children and things like that.
They're pretty much going to own pets and wear blue hair to the grave.
I hate to stereotype, but probably 9 out of 10 of them, that's going to be the case.
So yeah, they're really turning these kids into janissaries against their own culture, their own best interests, and the future of humanity.
So I really feel sorry for these kids that are being prematurely targeted and swooped up into these demographics because there's a lot of organization behind it and a lot of money behind it.
Yeah, certainly not any good long-term benevolence issues or hopes for people that choose these lifestyles.
They're being used, ultimately, like many of the other caste groups and demographics, and it's unfortunate to see this being so hyper-sensationalized.
Something that shouldn't even be a conversation is, you know, now the focus like this.
So, yeah, I don't know.
They're changing history, so you might as well change biology, but you're changing English, too, and most of the Latin languages to facilitate this insanity.
So, might as well make the absurdity the normal, I guess.
I don't know.
That seems to be what these people are doing.
And they're banning the romance language just because they recognize only two genders.
Carl?
And I forgot, until Chris mentioned it, is that the UK schools, they've gone past pan-gender, they've gone to pan-species.
There's that story of that school that demands that you respect the students who identify as kitty cats who just meow back at the teacher.
Just how effing absurd is all of this?
Unbelievable.
Meanwhile, Charles Barkley, his attack on the Bud Light boycott, which just astounded me, backfired in an unbelievable way.
The Bud Light Boycott is one of the biggest stories of 2023.
Woke leftists are losing their minds seeing the backlash of their agenda sweep across America.
And Charles Barkley's attack on the Bud Light Boycott backfired in an unbelievable way.
NBA All-Hire Hall of Famer Charles Barkley, we call him King Charles, I love the guy, is considered by many to be the greatest sports commentator of all time.
But like many athletes, when Barkley strays out of his lane and wades into politics, he gets into trouble.
At a celebrity golf tournament in California, a video of Barkley went viral where Barkley cursed out Americans boycotting Bud Light and declared he would buy everyone in the bar a Bud Light.
So I'm gonna buy some drinks for y'all and I'm gonna buy Bud Light, Barkley exclaimed.
Hey, let me tell you something.
All you rednecks are a-holes who don't wanna drink Bud Light.
Hey, F y'all.
Hey, y'all can't cancel me, Barkley declared.
Hey, I ain't worried about getting cancer, because let me tell you something.
If y'all fire me and give me all that money, I'm going to be playing golf every effing day.
So listen, as I said last night, if you're gay, God bless you.
If you're trans, God bless you.
And if you have a problem with them, if you barkly ranted, Former NBA player Enos Freedom blasted Barclay on social media for ignoring the root cause of the Bud Light boycott and a pushback against the woke agenda with regard to homosexuality and transgenderism.
Freedom Explained, The Backlash, grew out of the realization among a broad swath of the American public that the real purpose of injecting woke ideology into schools or corporations like Anheuser-Busch, entering into sponsorship with transgenders like Dylan Mulvaney, is to target children and recruit them into these dangerous lifestyles.
I hear what you're saying, Charles Barkley, and yes, we shouldn't have any problem with the LGBTQ or trans community, Freedom wrote.
However, the problem starts when they try to comfort innocent kids.
Stop pushing this agenda on our youth.
Leave kids alone.
We do not need to have literature in school that show boys how to suck dick.
The Bud Boycott was the first organized attempt to punish a company for going woke and insulting the values of its customers.
By any measure, the boycott succeeded by anyone's wildest imagination, and there is no end in sight.
Meanwhile, big man on campus, Dylan Mulvaney, is looking for speaking gigs at universities.
Trans influencer and biological male Dylan Mulvaney appears to be trying to cash in on his newfound infamy after sparking a national Bud Light boycott by soliciting speaking gigs on college campuses.
Looking for speaking opportunities for the upcoming 23-24 school year?
Would love to come visit!
Mulvaney told his 1.8 million followers in an Instagram story Wednesday, according to a report in the New York Post.
The Trans Influencer included an email address for serious inquiries before signing off with Loveya.
Notably, the Creative Arts Agency talent lists Mulvaney on its website as a speaker who can talk about topics like LGBTQIA+, advocacy, social media, and ironically, women's empowerment, among other things.
Mulvaney, who claims to have transitioned from male to female in March of last year, was a frequent panelist, speaker, and podcast guest before gaining national infamy via controversy involving bod lie.
Earlier this year, an azarbush fell under fire after executives chose Mulvaney to advertise its Bud Light beer.
So, I kept hearing about this thing called March Madness, and I thought we were all just having a hectic month.
But it turns out it has something to do with sports, and I'm not sure exactly which sport, but either way, it's a cause to celebrate, Mulvaney said in a bizarre video promoting the beer.
This month I celebrate my Day 365 of womanhood, and Bud Light sent me possibly the best gift ever, a can with my face on it.
Mulvaney added before signing off with, love ya, cheers, go team, whatever team you love, I love too.
After that, Bud Light VP of Marketing, Alyssa Hendershide, took a leave of absence among the beer parent company, Anheuser-Busch, facing a major boycott, resulting in Bud Light losing its spot among America's top ten favorite beer bands.
Actually, it was number one.
As Breitbart News reported last week, Modelo Especial has topped Bud Light as America's top selling beer for its second consecutive month in June.
Recently, Costco customers have been saying the retail chain may stop restocking Bud Light after the emergence of something they call the Star of Death on product price tags.
Meanwhile, Anheuser-Busch has lost more than $27 billion in market value.
Chris, I mean, Carl, your thoughts?
So the way our opponents play the game, this Dylan guy, trans man, he has to be rich and famous forever.
They want to show that you have a reward for speaking up.
Now that captured in woke universities, they're going to try to pay him for Ever.
And be talking at universities until he can't walk anymore.
And the universities as well.
These are all captured in a system of an empire.
You have to capture the education system.
They're also going to shame any protesters.
And they're going to probably hire Antifa to come and support his diversity, equity and inclusion talks and to defend You know, I'm so disappointed in Charles Barkley.
I really like the guy, but here he turned out to be a complete asshole.
Dylan as another victim.
Instead of going to universities, Dylan, I got a better idea for you.
Why don't you be in Barbie 2, just volunteer for that?
I think they'd hire you.
You know, I'm so disappointed in Charles Barkley.
I really like the guy.
But here, he turned out to be a complete asshole.
I can't believe it, Chris.
I can't believe I forgot to talk about Charles Let me jump in and talk about that part.
Sorry, Chris.
So Charles, I love the guy as a player.
I love the guy as a commenter.
And what I love about Charles, and in general, the black community, they have a propensity to speak out.
Now, this opens a door.
Now, Charles is probably trying to do the right thing, but what's to stop another commenter from speaking out now about another political issue?
Let's say the sound of freedom.
Let's say about COVID.
Let's say against the wars.
Let's say about election fraud.
This opens a door and it won't be long until somebody takes that opening.
Bruce?
Yeah, one thing I want to say about Charles Barkley is, I'll say that most of these pro athletes that still have a career in pro sports after their professional career ends, they understand the Lex Scripta in terms of the social engineering efforts that are being brought forth by the league or by the organization.
And they will never speak out against those.
Even if they think and they're anticipating an absurdity in terms of these things, they may not know that it's an actual thing or may not know to the extent to which it is.
They will not put their careers on the line to go out and speak the truth of the way they truly feel against these things.
They're going to come out and appease to the censors and to the praetors, the people that would definitely rescind their checks in their careers if they said the wrong thing about the wrong issue.
I'd like to remind people that are pro sports how that has been used not only for patriotism and that type of a peer pressure, but also how it was used for the COVID thing.
And how anybody that refused the vaccine, you know, look what they did with Aaron Rodgers.
They went after him.
They went after so many people that chose to not do this gaslighting.
Full on blitz, shame, you know, it was like an Inquisition tactic and then some.
So, yeah, I don't think it's an accident that this stuff is going on and that it's being thrust out in such a manner.
And the people like Dilma Roudi, or whatever his name is, has, you know, 1.8 million subscribers and someone like myself can't even have more than two or three.
So that's kind of like shows you the world and what people are really, you know, into and what they want to focus on.
Or maybe it's being sensationalized.
Maybe these optics are even part of it as far as the manufacturing consensus.
So, yeah, I think they're really playing mind games with a lot of people in terms of the social engineering and the social influencers.
And they're rewarding this selective tokenism in such a way that it's encouraging kids to choose this as an option.
I'd also like to point out in 2005, I talked about the Wolfowitz memo and the vaccine damage and how they anticipate will impact the labor force.
And that was one of the stipulations as well.
And that was that he said they would be Technically proficient, punctual, they would not be socially adept enough to organize for higher wages or labor conditions.
And it also said about this compliance thing and even like the LGBTQ thing and things of that nature that they will be indifferent to these type of things.
So, yeah, it's really apathy is the word that they use.
That's almost the perfect description.
This is a 2005.
And, you know, like I said, Google scrubbed this out, but it's it's out there just like their population report, just like the deagles report in 2025.
This stuff, once it gets out, you can't put it back in the bottle.
And too many people have seen it.
And I think this is a, you know, people word on the street is getting a lot louder than rumor and echo at this point.
Great.
Very good.
Meanwhile, warning to parents.
Barbie movie is woke propaganda, doll-smashing, woman-bashing, anti-mother, pro-trans filth aimed at little girls.
The Barbie movie is set to be released where it's getting out on its vile anti-mother, anti-woman propaganda.
Left is indoctrinating your child with her woke feminism.
Dr. Ted Bear warned parents away from the movie in his Christian Broadcasting Network interview.
Dr. Bear, we saw the movie on Sunday night, and the movie is worse than you could possibly expect.
It's hardcore propaganda.
Barbie is just terrible.
In the first few minutes, it's got a bunch of little girls playing with little baby dolls.
Now, I've got 17 grandchildren.
Most of them are little girls, and they love playing with baby dolls.
And the girls take the baby dolls and bash them and slap them and say, we don't have to be mothers anymore.
In Barbie land, men are the problem.
With all of society, it's hardcore feminist.
So they banish men so they have a better life.
In fact, Ken is the villain in the movie.
Ken.
And Barbie has to leave because she's not adapting to this hate of the patriarchal society.
Although she hates Ken.
So men are the villain.
And there are a couple of trans people playing.
So, you know, men play better Barbies than women play Barbies, by the way.
Unbelievable.
What a shame.
Such a wonderful product that brought joy to millions of little girls over the years.
Take heed and protect our babies from the wiles of the devil, he mourns.
The Barbie movie also kowtows to Communist China.
The movie shows a map of what's the South China Sea within China's boundaries.
Because of that, the movie is banned in Vietnam.
Meanwhile, Fox News leaves a white freak out over a Barbie movie according to the Daily Kos, which is about as left-wing as you get.
Do you have Republicans freak out over the gender politics of the Barbie movie on your 2023 bingo card?
I, for one, did not.
Yet here we are.
The movie hasn't even been released yet, but Fox is leading the charge against it, giving a host of right-wing influencer types the space to whine that, as one chyron predictably put it, the Barbie movie goes woke.
According to one of its stars, Simu Lee, I'm so glad this movie exists because I think it puts a final nail in the coffin of that very heteronormative idea of what gender is and what is or is not gender.
Writer and activist Charlotte Clymer tweeted a compelling review of the movie, writing that it feels like an especially potent Trojan horse, beckoning us with well-earned laughter into a larger conversation on gender and how Barbie, the defining cultural symbol of high feminine expression, has shaped that discourse over the past six decades.
She can begin to see the problem from the right-wing cultural warrior's point of view.
Even without a trans actress playing a Barbie, the cultural warriors of the right probably would have had at least a minor freak-out over the movie.
Ginger Gates laid out some of the arguments that would have been used, as silly as they are.
Has Ken never seemed especially high-T to you?
After all, it's a slow news month of July.
Teachers aren't in the classroom to present targets for attack.
But the movie's use of a trans actress in the hallowed feminine role of Barbie guaranteed that the temper tantrum would be loud and sustained.
There is a right-wing project afoot to drive trans people from public life to make their existence unspeakable in the sense that it cannot be mentioned and in the sense that the miseries inflicted upon them would be impossible to convey in words.
Carl, on Barbie, your thoughts.
you Yeah.
So, Michigan Governor Whitmer, he decided that she would have some sort of a PR gig and support by becoming Governor Barbie and having a Barbie doll like her play and dress up for that.
And her catchphrase is, come on Barbie, let's go govern.
By the way, a fun side fact is that in 1979, I was at an event with a bunch of volunteers, and there was this guy with a name tag that said Ken, who looked exactly like the Ken doll.
So I finally had to ask him.
I said, you probably get this all the time.
And I looked at his name tag.
And he said, yes, I was the model for the Ken doll.
So I met the guy.
Now, for the Daily Cox, I want to point out – I had a quick question to myself of, I wonder if they covered the sound of freedom, and they did.
This is what the Daily Kos had to say about the Sound of Freedom.
The QAnon movie Sound of Freedom is based on fake stories told by child trafficking grifter at Tim Ballard.
He went on Fox News to spread Wayfair conspiracies.
He says a pedophile network trafficking children from Ukraine to Poland has the same agenda as the woke left.
This is the payload of this entire operation.
Make a traumatic, manipulative, thigh-op video about children being hurt and then tie it to the Democrats and liberals.
If they object, call them pedos.
So that's the type of reporting we get from the Daily Cops.
Nice.
Chris?
Yeah, I want to point out that a lot of the intelligence operations, even before there was a CIA, they had a social engineering movement to have like a suffragette or a woman's movement in the 1900s.
Going to the roaring 20s and again in the Steinem generation and even now with the women's independence and the patriarchy movements and things like this.
They really play on the binary and bipolar nature of women and their emotional reactions and certainly appeal to much more things that have feeling and provoke those type of triggers in them.
And they really create an entire demographic not only from this type of provocation, but also from incentivizing the woman in terms of More rights in terms of like parenthood or things like that.
Child support, things of that other nature.
So, you know, giving them a lot of entitlements or, you know, siding with them in terms of defaults on a lot of things involving kids.
So, you know, parents split up is basically what I mean.
So, I mean, they create a demographic of dependence on that, not only for the EBT and the assistance programs, but also in the nutritional programs.
If you think about this, the United States government's the largest purchaser of formula, right?
And by them using formula for kids instead of using breast milk from the mother, they create or more importantly, they destroy a connection that a mother has to a child in terms of oxytocin exchange.
And certainly a lot of other health benefits in terms of breast milk versus formula.
But I'm starting to think this might have been known for a while and they're even playing this psychology and going after like little kids in such a way.
Even encouraging C-sections instead of natural births or, you know, freaking out about that and forcing people into that option.
So, I think there's really a lot of stuff psychologically that's at play with these type of connections between mother and child and the female traditional roles.
And certainly an effort to isolate them and to destroy the glue of every family in terms of their psychological capacities and their dreams and hopes.
So I know it's a little long-winded, but I think it all ties together.
And yeah, I just wanted to share my thoughts on that.
Good points, good points.
I think that this Barbie movie is going to flop, that it's going to be subjected to the kind of treatment that Bud Light has received, and deservedly so, in my opinion.
Disney putting out products like this has disgraced itself.
I can see even the Magic Kingdom, Disney World, and all that really dropping dramatically In enthusiasm and visits by the American people.
This is disgusting.
Disney should have stayed 100% out of politics and having to try to warp little girls' attitude toward men or even dolls and having children is just disgusting beyond words.
This is a repulsive development Disney is going to regret.
Meanwhile, Today we're supposed to be celebrating the Apollo moon landing, but were they real or a mass illusion?
How we know we didn't go.
Here's one of the stunning developments.
During the Apollo moon landing, I interviewed Scott Henderson on The Real Deal, and he discovered in the background there, this was apparently filmed in a landfill in either New Mexico or Arizona, you can find a Corvette had been buried in the dirt.
Here's another.
We couldn't have navigated the Van Halen radiation belt.
It would have required six feet of lead to protect the astronauts.
No possible way.
We didn't have the propulsion power to escape low Earth orbit.
We didn't have the navigating capacity.
We didn't have communication to get back and forth between midnoon.
Here's a new proof coming from the temperatures that spacecraft would have had to endure had we gone to the moon.
NASA admits we never went to the moon on ForbiddenKnowledgeTV.net on 21 September 2017.
We learned that the melting points of the material of which the spaceship was made, aluminum alloy, stainless steel, titanium, nickel steel alloy, And heat-resistant glass have melting points that would have been exceeded in passing through the thermosphere en route to the Moon.
In other words, a spacecraft made of these materials would have melted in flight.
Temperatures in a thermosphere up to 400 miles above our surface can reach between 932 Fahrenheit to 3,632, which exceeds the melting points of the materials of which the spacecraft is made.
Aluminum alloy?
Melts at 671 Fahrenheit.
Stainless steel, 2750.
Titanium, 3034.
Nickel steel alloy, 2647.
Heat resistant glass, 1400 degrees.
Steel, 2,750. Titanium, 3,034. Nickel steel alloy, 2,647.
Heat resistant glass, 1,400 degrees.
If it were passing through, 3,632 degree Fahrenheit heat, for example.
Temperatures, and if we're allowed to heat up, it would melt.
Meanwhile, yes, what it takes to escape Earth's gravity is massive.
What it would take to escape from Moon's gravity is less, but look at the difference.
A spaceship to get out of Earth to the Moon, and what we were told was allowable To get back from the Moon to Earth.
In other words, if we'd gone, we could never have returned.
Interestingly, Elon Musk, talking about getting a spaceflight to the Moon, has talked about a zero gravity point where Moon's gravitational and Earth's gravitational offset to establish a massive fuel supply depot with hundreds of thousands of gallons of fuel to make the trip.
None of that was done in this case.
Here's a humorous aside.
Get this.
29 November 2016 in the Telegraph.
Help NASA solve its space boot problem and win $30,000.
NASA wants your help to solve a rather complicated issue affecting the comfort and safety of its astronauts.
After all, when you gotta go, you gotta go.
And sometimes you gotta go in a total vacuum.
Astronauts have previously relied on adult nappies while wearing their launch and entry suits, a temporary solution that is only good for around a day.
NASA is now sponsoring the Space Loop Challenge, through which it's seeking the public's help to devise an in-suit waste management system for astronauts to use up to 144 hours at a time.
There's a $30,000 prize up for grabs for whoever comes up with a solution NASA judges to be the most promising for implementation and use on missions in the next three or four years.
So what we've had is only good for around a day, but the flights back and forth to the Moon took seven or eight.
This means the entire story of going to the Moon is simply a massive pile of space poop Now here's the actual relative size of the Moon in relation to Earth, which is 55 times more dense.
Nevertheless, here what we're told is a photograph of Earth from the Moon.
But clearly, this is a photograph of the Moon from Earth, where the Moon has simply been photoshopped to look like Earth.
Here we have two different covers of National Geographic.
December 1969 on the Apollo moon landing, with Buzz Aldrin walking across the surface.
But here we have another, more recent, about the war on science, that actually is far more accurate, showing the whole thing was shot on a soundstage.
It was fake.
Carl, your thoughts?
First, I want to acknowledge my friend and colleague, Professor Jim Fetzer for that presentation, as well as the very many other presentations where Jim goes after the most important facts and lays it out, and the data does speak for themselves.
One of my favorite clips, and I don't remember the gentleman's name, but it's the NASA spokesperson claiming, oh, we'd go back to the Moon in a second, but We've lost that technology, and it would be very painful to get it back.
He actually said that.
And that space poop problem, that ended up being a topic on the sitcom Big Bang Theory.
That was one of my wife's favorite shows, and I remember that episode of them designing a technical solution for that problem.
Nice, nice.
Chris?
Yeah, I think maybe there could be even a situation where there's forces higher than say the United States or NATO or something like that that would not allow us to leave Earth's orbit and go beyond.
Maybe some sort of a treaty or a pact has been signed in secret that maybe prohibits that or limits it to a certain group of people that get permission through the Space Force or whatever the hell they got going on now.
But yeah, this is It's a little beyond my scope in terms of whether that happened or not.
I couldn't say one way or another, but I've seen a lot of research that has been very persuasive to indicate that much of it was faked.
I think they did that as well just for some sort of a backup plan if anything went terribly wrong.
But I think in reality you remember Nixon was like calling them from the phone in his office while they're on the moon and it's like they have better connections then than they do on my cell phone now you know so like I don't know I think it's a lot a lot of it's fabricated the coke bottle and you know the Kubrick stuff and there's a lot of stuff that really kind of screams WTF.
And yeah, I don't know, I think that's always part of the information disinformation thing.
So yeah, I think there's some very plausible proof that supports that notion without question.
And I don't know, maybe they have the technology and they're going to start coming out with it now with the Space Force, different means of, you know, air travel and space travel now.
So, you know, they have it, but they just aren't showing it to the common people.
Well, even the Nixon phone call shows the whole thing was a sham.
You would have had a delay.
You're talking about 250,000 miles at one point.
Huffington Post published a letter that was supposed to be a famous physicist debunking moon landing skeptics, and it said something as banal as that.
Anyone who thinks we didn't go to the moon needs to have a brain transplant.
Well, I started publishing proof after proof we hadn't gone.
And one of the most interesting comments that came in was a guy who said he'd been in television communications in that era, which of course was 1969-70, and in order to broadcast, it required a van the size of a bread truck.
Well, there were no vans the size of a bed truck on the moon.
The whole thing was ridiculous, and just as you have said, Chris, that connection with Nixon is better than—between him and the moon, allegedly, than yours and mine right now on the internet.
So, I mean, listen, you can take it to the bank.
We didn't go.
I must give a hundred different lines of proof in the video.
You can find it on my blog at jameshfetzer.org.
Go to The 65 Shows.
It's number two of The 65 Shows.
Or go to my Twitter at Jim Fetzer.
I posted in there a link.
Watch it.
It leaves no room for doubt.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, Broughton, to live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
Live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
And here, too, I have a book about it, and I suppose we didn't go to the moon either.
A title suggested by Mike Palachuk as a response to someone hearing the title of our first book, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, to which they might well have replied, and I suppose we didn't go to the moon either.
The answer is yes.
We did not go to the moon either, and nobody died at Sandy Hook.
Chris, I mean, Carl, your final thoughts?
I'll give an anecdotal report.
I went to high school at La Cañada High School, and that's literally the property next to JPL.
And in 2007, I was at a pizza place waiting for a pizza, and right behind me there were three JPL employees.
They all had their lanyards there.
Waiting for the pizza, and one of the guys was mocking people he had spoken to on the phone during the day.
He had called about UFOs.
One of the, there were three guys.
One of the guys says, so, did you get any calls today?
Now, I'm facing away from them, and they're right behind me.
They're just chatting among themselves, and this guy snickers and says, yeah.
I got another one.
I told him the same thing I always tell him.
We have no credible evidence of any evidence of any off-world beings or Spaceships!
And they all chuckled and laughed, and I turned around and had a little conversation with the guy, and included everybody waiting for their pizza.
And finally, I said, Dr. Edgar Mitchell, he's one of the few guys who has gone to the moon.
You know his name, right?
And the guy was kind of upset, but he said, yes, yes.
He goes on the radio regularly and says that we have reverse engineered ET technology for our own craft.
Are you saying that he's not a credible witness?
And the guy tried to claim that he had no idea what Dr. Mitchell had been saying.
And so we're being gaslit by these guys, was my point.
And I just happened to be in front of the guy realistically giving his appraisal of how much joy he gets in lying to people.
Final thoughts is that every movement in the broad aspect of World War III and AMREV 2.0 is exposing our opponents more than ever in history.
We seem to be so very close to a breakthrough, and yet we've been close for a while or so it's felt, and so that I have been reporting.
But hang in there.
The trend is good.
Chris, your final thoughts?
Yeah, I hear you.
I've been hearing that for a while.
It sounds kind of like you're explaining the report a bit.
But I know what you're saying.
I'm with you.
I was going to ask, Spencer, have you ever been punched by Buzz Aldrin?
But his asses swear that he'd actually gotten to the moon, stepped on the moon.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I know, I know.
It's ridiculous.
It's so ridiculous.
That's funny.
Sorry.
But yeah, no, you jump in, Fats.
I'd love to hear what you've got to say.
If you've got anything more on that.
Oh, that's good.
That's good.
You guys were just terrific, as always.
I just want to add how serious it is for the Congress to abdicate its responsibility, in this case the Senate, to delegate the decision whether or not the United States goes to war to NATO.
I guarantee you this is all deliberate and by design.
It's only happening because Congress is Israeli-occupied territory.
Israel wants Ukraine to be the new Israel.
They are exercising all their muscle.
Anticipate.
I guarantee this will happen.
There's going to be a false flag, a staged attack.
NATO is going to declare a violation of Article 5, and the United States will be at war with Russia.
This is going to lead to the incineration of 100 to 200 million people, and it's because a damned Israel controlled the U.S.
Congress, and the congressmen are doing their bidding regardless of their obligation to the people and the Constitution of the United States.
This will happen.
I wish I could leave on a positive note.
I just tell you I can't.
Spend as much time as you can with people you love and care about.
We do not know how much time we have left, and because of this act of Congress, our life, man, has, in my opinion, been dramatically abbreviated.
▲
Export Selection