All Episodes
Previous Next
July 10, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:07:42
Need to Know News (10 July 2023) with Carl Herman and Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in San Ramon, California, and Chris Weinert at Fort Myer, Florida, on the road.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
We begin with the supplying of cluster bombs to Ukraine.
How low can the U.S.
go?
This is a terrible, terrible idea.
Instead of supplying a ceasefire and peace talk, the Pentagon is sending illegal weapons to a conflict zone.
Congress can block the transfer whenever they want, but they need to hear from you.
There's a reason over 100 countries have banned the use of cluster munitions.
Shells that contain hundreds to thousands of small old bomblets are dropped from the air to litter areas the size of football fields.
The shiny bomblets often do not explode until children, thinking they are toys, pick them up and have their limbs ripped off.
During the secret war in Laos, the U.S.
blanketed the country with almost 300 million bomblets.
Many never detonated, killing and injuring tens of thousands of Laotians in the decades after the U.S.
pulled out.
Has the U.S.
not learned its lesson?
Cluster bombs don't end wars.
They prolong the killing years after those wars end.
111 states have signed the Convention on Cluster Munition, but it does not include the United States or Israel.
This is really disgusting.
We expect such nastiness from Israel, but by dodging the Convention, the U.S.
too divorces itself from all norms of human decency.
The very idea that he's preparing to do this is embarrassment and shame, Paul.
The latest development is concerning on many levels.
The White House has announced its decision That said, when you overlay the reality of Ukraine policy, driven in large part by a psychological operation challenging to figure out from a reality perspective, in other words, why are we there?
I would suggest the answer is because Israel wants Ukraine to be the new Israel and because Congress is Israeli-dominated, occupied territory.
In combination with very unstable people in the government playing war with a larger policy agenda, one should look at this from a Russian perspective.
Is a Biden admin really willing to deploy cluster bombs, or is it simply a PR narrative to give the impression the U.S.
is willing to up the stakes regardless of the consequences?
This is all very, very bad.
Jake Sullivan, National Security Advisor, responded to humanitarian concerns.
We recognize that cluster munitions create risk of civilian harm, he said during a briefing, which is why we deferred the decision as long as we could.
But there's also a massive risk of civilian harm if Russian troops and tanks roll over Ukrainian positions and take more territory.
The fact of the matter is that Joe Biden himself, who regards Zelensky as his buddy, has acknowledged that the U.S.
is low on munition, does not have the conventional 155 artillery shells, which Mike Anna pointed out at least six months ago, that Ukraine couldn't possibly win because the U.S.
couldn't provide the munitions.
There it is.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, first, Jen, Psaki, the previous Press Secretary at the White House, there's tape of her saying that if Russia were to use those same munitions that the U.S.
is promising to use now, those would be definitive war crimes.
And here on BitChute, I'll put it in the notes again, the 40-page white paper that Congressman Kucinich leveraged for the attempted impeachments of Bush and Cheney that document nine treaty Violations of the US on the war formerly known as on terror, including bombing, water treatment plants, electrical generating facilities, and the US allows no inspections on their facilities, nuclear, chemical or biological.
And with COVID, you got to wonder about the denial of any access outside of the US to the biological weapons.
research facilities.
And then I like, too, about that story, just the usual projection of the U.S. saying, well, we're only doing it because they did it.
That's the cover that they always use.
And the remedy, as always for me, is just to be able to rest confidently on the history that we can demonstrate, withdraw consent, demand their arrest, and don't listen, don't entertain any validity of proven liars.
Chris?
It's amazing to see NATO doing this every decade in a different place and really conquer and colonialize.
Think about the 90s in the Balkans and Yugoslavia and former Soviet territory, the Bosnian War.
They basically put Milosevic on trial for war crimes on that stuff and most of the stuff he was using was minor compared to what was being used against him and his people, more importantly.
So yeah, this is an effort to occupy Further territory towards Russia and encircle them.
Think about Europe being occupied territory since World War Two under these pretenses and held ransom by these central bankers.
Think about the United States being even used as a proxy puppet for London and Israel.
This is really disgusting to see what democracy and freedom, quote-unquote, is bringing to us.
And it's obvious that this is a tyranny and a rigged election and certainly a coup in this country.
And there's nothing good that can come from this at all, using cluster bombs in Ukraine.
Other than just optimizing the maximum carnage, which it seems to be their goal all along, is sending these people into certain doom, and to encircle Russia, and to really go after Russia for trying to go along with the different financial system.
I think this whole thing is like the Cold War 2.0, and the group of central bankers in the middle are the same guys that did the Cold War in such a way.
So you're going to see Gladio going on in European countries all over the place.
Yes, one more sign the U.S.
This is nothing different.
This is just the same formula, same playbook being used on a different generation.
Just one more sign.
The U.S. has no moral standing among the nations of the world, most certainly not one of leadership.
Meanwhile, ironically, in relation to the uprising across France, arms sent to Kiev by Paris are being used by French rioters.
French weapons originally supplied to Ukraine have surfaced in their country of origin, being used by rioters to attack police.
Maria Zakharova, Russia's Foreign Ministry spokesperson, she's very impressive, told a press conference Western countries' years-long support of radical Ukraine nationalists has now emboldened like-minded forces on their own soil.
According to multiple media reports, neo-Nazi groups are taking direct action in the riots in France.
What happens is the lever to Kiev ends up in the hands of those very protesters that are being used against the police there in France.
The weapons and funds provided by the U.S.
and its allies are boomeranging, damaging their own people.
Paris is fueling the black market for arms and sponsors international cross-border crime with its assistance to Kiev.
France may suffer blowback after training national militants to fight Russian forces, she added, noting Paris plans to teach combat tactics of 4,000 Ukrainian troops this year.
No one should be surprised if the same French-trained personnel would be spotted during some future riot in the streets of Paris and other French cities.
Meanwhile, Muslim immigrants are viewing migration as recolonization.
We will colonize them for life until death, until the end of time.
They colonized us for 132 years.
Now it's our turn to come here, and how can I explain it?
A shocking revelation came to light in a dialogue between a rebel news reporter and a Muslim immigrant in France.
When questioned about the significant influx, despite allegations of rampant racism, the response took an historic turn.
The immigrant made a bold admission, hinting at an impending long-term colonization of France as retribution.
They colonized us for 132 years.
Now it's our turn to come here.
We'll colonize them for life until death, until the end of time.
Another Muslim migrant admitted they're only in France for welfare in the Red Passport.
Another showed Muslims chanting.
Paul Akbar, we are not afraid.
We were born Muslim.
If the police kill us, we have the right to kill.
It's written in the Koran.
Critics argue France will be the first Islamic republic in Europe.
Muslim pop in France is the largest in Western Europe, an estimated 5.7 million.
Compared to the general population, Muslims have a far higher unemployment rate, 14% than other groups.
The tragic death of this Muslim attempting to escape the police sparked nationwide rioting.
According to reports from Middle East Eye, The riots are a form of political dissent expressed by a generation of Muslims and non-white teenagers whose lives are deemed inferior, cheap, and meaningless by the French state.
Meanwhile, the government of the Netherlands has collapsed Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte announced his resignation and that of his cabinet, citing irreconcilable differences within his four-party coalition about how to rein in migration.
The decision by the Netherlands' longest-serving premier means the country will face a general election later this year.
It's no secret the coalition partners have very different views on migration policy.
And today, unfortunately, we have drawn the conclusion those differences are irreconcilable.
Why, I will immediately offer the resignation of the cabinet to the king.
Opposition lawmakers wasted no time calling for fresh elections.
Ert Wilders, leader of the Anti-Immigration Party for Freedom, tweeted, Quick elections now.
Jesse Klaber, leader of the Green Left Party, also called for election and called the Dutch broadcast, This country needs a change of direction.
No doubt.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, with what's happening in France with Macron, a big part of the impetus for that was Macron unilaterally informing the French people that they were going to increase the pension age requirement up two years, and that sparked a flash.
But it was right.
It's been going on for, I believe, two years now.
And here on BitChute, if that The idea that you contribute to pensions for government workers, that's a scam here, at least I can demonstrate that for the state of California, and I'm sure it's everywhere else.
And that, for example, when I looked at the comprehensive annual financial reports, the CAFRs in California, pensions were told, we have $600 billion withheld and invested to pay for those pensions.
And the question that I asked that nobody else apparently had was, So you took $600 billion and invested it to pay for pensions.
What's the rate of return on that?
What's the net income that we get to pay for those pensions?
And the answer in the documents was one billion.
So we invested six hundred billion and we only got one back.
So one sixth of one percent return.
And of course, that only happens when corporate media is going to be complicit to cover that up.
And I'll put that documentation here.
And for France, the recolonization, that's a nice talking point.
I like that.
But instead of an eye for an eye and committing atrocities upon an atrocity, I work with my mentor Buckminster Fuller and your contemporary The Venus Project.
I haven't worked with them, but I like their work.
And the 1990 World Summit for Children that I helped through results as a key volunteer to create, we have all the technology for a world that works for everyone with no one left out.
We can generate this Star Trek-like future pathway if we decide to go in that direction, but that's only going to happen after we have a breakthrough and victory for the Unleashment.
of this suppressed technology.
And for the Netherlands government, good, good, good, good.
So key parts of what destroyed the Netherlands government was the prima facie illegal immigration policy.
And that's the same for all of the countries.
Anybody asking reasonable questions is just censored and lied to.
And the official reasons are obfuscations.
And in addition, for the Netherlands, you have those I think it was 3,000 farms that they were planning on confiscating that might have turned into migrant camps.
So maybe the Dutch will be able to have a leadership role and go into another direction that's more attractive.
We'll see.
The problem with the Netherlands is it's a major supplier of food for the whole world, and problems in the Netherlands therefore affect the whole world.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, not only food, but distribution of food to the rest of the world, no doubt.
They're still a prominent shipping country, just like the East India and the Dutch companies and things like that.
A lot of mercantile trade has gone through there for hundreds of years.
I would also like to say that in the case of What Carl was mentioning, some of these people that have spoken out and have stood up against the official narrative have been targeted by their own government or even third-party entities that are ordained by our government in many ways to not only censor us, silence us, you know, and we're trying to expose the bullshit in real time.
You know, I can't tell you how hard I've had to fight just to keep a platform where I can speak I'd imagine everybody else that's out there trying to stand against this in the right time in the right place three four years ago whatever the vaccine and even the Ukraine thing a year late you know a year ago whatever 500 days ago, whatever it is.
But you know, like we're saying, it's not only just being censored, we're being targeted in many ways and really gone after.
And I think that all social media is going to be like a reverse Fifth Amendment, where anything you say will be used against you in a court of law, when this crooked law and this kangaroo court takes over the world with the robotics and the AI in the new world.
And I think that you're seeing The transition of the old exchange systems, you know, retail stores, restaurants, things that we normally would socialize in, being destroyed and rendered unsafe by, intentionally I'll say, by guerrillas and even inmates that they're letting out of some of these countries to inflood not only the United States but Central Europe.
So, uh, this is not an accident.
This is an absolute, uh, controlled situation where they're trying to bring in, uh, maximum destruction, chaos.
And from this, it's the people.
Awesome.
Yeah.
Excellent comments.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Finish.
Final comment, Carl.
Okay.
Chris.
Yeah, go ahead.
Go ahead.
No, no, go ahead.
You were finishing the session.
Oh, yeah, all right.
Yeah, that's fine.
Yeah, no, I'm pretty much done anyways.
That's fine.
Was it good?
It was very, very good.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, Joseph Jordan has brilliant insights here, in my opinion.
The government, the U.S.
government, is responsible for France's anti-white race riots.
Get this.
Cap McGuire sent it to me with the following preface.
Not just U.S.
State Department, but Hollywood as well, has played a role in fomenting the riots in the form of Charles Rivkin, a movie mogul appointed ambassador to France by Obama.
Rivkin's seven-point plan was to undermine French institutions for being overwhelmingly white.
By mobilizing black and Maghreb French youth, with much of the same woke protest tactics unleashed in the U.S.
in the wake of the George Floyd death.
French police are obligated, by the way, by a 2017 law to shoot reckless drivers trying to escape arrest.
Similar to the subordination of Penny Rossi, the French people are staying behind a police officer who killed the driver.
This business here of this Ambassador, in my opinion, is extremely serious.
One of the earliest records of an intelligent op of a series of classified U.S.
embassy cables from 2010 published by WikiLeaks.
In these memos, the Hollywood Jewish mogul Charles Rivkin, then appointed ambassador to France by the Obama admin, outlines a seven-point plan for mobilizing blacks and Maghrebs in France as a political cudgel against their hoes.
In the nefarious memo, Rivkin laments that French institutions are overwhelmingly white and draws up a plan to build State Department-backed parallel media outlets, NGOs, and educational entities to undermine and replace the established order.
In pursuit of the goal of de-Europeanizing France, the Jewish Ambassador calls for mobilizing U.S.
influence to intensify our work with French museums and educators, to reform the history curriculum taught in French schools, using new media to indoctrinate non-white youth in France, and support training engaged media and political activists who share our values.
The Cable summarizes the agenda, instructing Washington agents to build on expansive public diplomacy programs already in place and develop creative additional means to influence the youth of France, employing new media corporate partnership nationwide competition, targeted outreach events, especially invited U.S.
guests who identify and influence future leaders.
He recruited American celebrities like Samuel Jackson to come with him.
Several anti-white activists and institutions dedicated to inciting non-whites against the beliefs of the French that France has chosen to live in have since emerged from this conspiracy.
Figures such as the aforementioned Dalio is now arguably the most prominent French activist on the planet.
And the Jew Tara Dickman of the Collective Against Racial Profiling, an anti-police group, were brought to America by the U.S.
Embassy and affiliated anti-Atlantisist NGOs to be trained in Bolshevik agitation techniques in cities such as Chicago.
Following this outreach, Dickman noted she applied American strategies back in France to lead an avalanche of racial profiling lawsuits against police in the hope of hamstringing their ability to enforce the law against African and Algerian criminals effectively willing a previously non-existent issue into existence.
As a result, Cops in France have been neutered in respect to non-white crime under immense coordinated legal, media, and global political pressure.
The once relatively safe European nation is now consumed by ethnic and interracial violence, as seen in shocking videos of toddlers and their grandmothers being brutalized in the street by blacks, stories of 12-year-old white girls being abducted and tortured to death by Algerians.
At the time of this writing, France is more dangerous than Mexico.
The consciousness of what's happening is high among the French.
Little is being done to counter influence from its NATO allies, which aggressively spy on its political leaders—that's really the United States—with no diplomatic consequences.
Several influential French figures and leaders, such as former President Francois Hollande and Nicholas Skarsgård, who is Jewish, are alumni of Washington's influence and asset recruitment operation, including the State Department's International Visitors Leadership Program.
French elites are highly compromised by the United States, which has prevented meaningful solidarity from forming against Washington's meddling.
With Macron apparently attempting to convince Europe to follow a more independent foreign policy path away from the United States, Washington may see forcing more rootless Americanized non-whites into positions of power over France via the threat of State Department-backed race riots and accelerated affirmative action programs as a permanent solution to an indigenous Gaullist streak.
At times, the anti-American idea of a sovereign France animates both the native left and right, but Jews perceive this consensus as a potential threat to the globalist Atlanticist effort seeking to prevent Europe from emerging as an independent power in a multipolar world.
The never-ending nightmare the Jewish rulers of America subject us to at home is for export.
As current Secretary of State Blinken co-wrote with his fellow Jew accomplice Robert Kagan, Blinken makes clear any nation in the economic and military sphere of Washington will have its native culture and people targeted for attack, and those who resist must be crushed if they happen to be white.
A policy will take on a particularly cruel and ferocious form.
This appears thus to be a manifestation of the clergy plan, consisting or promoting the genocide of white people.
Through miscegenation, mixed marriage, and mass immigration of non-whites to Europe.
The plan, drawn up in 1923 by Count Richard Galergi, is inspired by human mastery over farm animals.
It seeks to generate a passive, tame, predictable, and manipulable mixed race of inferior character and intelligence Over which the Jewish aristocratic elite could eternally rule, since this inferior mind would prevent them from organizing to rebel, or even realize they are dominated.
The term Eurasian Negroid Race can be found in clergy's books.
That is what the supremacist Zionists are desperately trying to achieve.
The extinction of all cultures and races, particularly the European.
Calurgy shared the opinion of Joseph Arthur de Grubenow on the high performance of the white race, especially the Nordic sub-race, but did not aspire to the promotion, conservation, and strengthening thereof, but to its destruction.
Hitler was aware of the Calurgy Plan, did everything to prevent it.
Like Rubenow, Hitler considered the Aryan race to be the noblest, best armed for the struggle for existence, most beautiful and energetic, with the greatest amount of creative genius.
What this race lost by mixing was not compensated by what the others gained by ennoblement.
It has always happened.
The decline of civilizations has occurred because they contaminated their blood.
This is the inexorable law.
For National Socialism, the cultural integrity of European people can only be achieved through the Raston Steele's idea of religion in the blood.
The idea of race unifies people spiritually and supreme values, such as heroism and honor, can be achieved.
Through the instrument of Marxism, however, Zionism wants to destroy everything—race, nation, religion, property, family, culture, art, you name it.
It is clear what they hope to achieve is the internal collapse of Western society, giving the chosen people universal triumph.
The ultimate achievement is an inferior human class, easily governable, and without any cultural ties, identity, or character.
There's much about it, even in Wikipedia, which, of course, is a Zionist awe.
Thus, they suggest the clergy plan is a far-right anti-Semitic conspiracy theory, the problem being it's actually being implemented today.
The Austrian neo-Nazi writer Gerrit Horsnick, among others, wrote about it in his book, The Callergy Plan.
The independent Italian newspaper, Linkist, investigated and described it as a hoax, comparable to the fabricated anti-Semitic document, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
The Southern Poverty Law Center described a clergy plan as a distinctly European way of pushing the white genocide conspiracy theory on the continent, with white nationalists quoting Clodagh of clergy's writings out of context.
Unfortunately, that appears to me to be pure propaganda to dismiss a serious threat to Western Europe and to the white races generally.
Carl, your thoughts?
So this Charles Rivkin guy, he was the former ambassador to France of the US, and he is now the CEO of the Motion Picture Association that generates the ratings and they work to promote American film companies and Netflix around the world.
This type of attack on the developed nations and blaming the ordinary people of those nations, like in the U.S., officially, it is the domestic violent extremists, the DVE, who are the number one threat, according to the administration.
And those are the people just challenging, questioning our own government's policies.
And so what our opponents are Choosing to do as they always do is a race to the bottom.
They don't want any human creativity.
They want a cold and passive group of work animals, and they're engaging in their usual tactic of creating a problem, a false flag to generate a problem, and then they blame the target, us, among the targets, for this.
And we see that, and what the people are countering with, And what we with, among hundreds of people on independent media, we're saying, no, no, no, flip the script is the people blaming us.
These are the war criminals and the criminals against humanity, and they've been doing it forever.
And we provide the documentation for it.
And instead, it's the contest, whether the people are going to be cowed into surrender as work animals, or if we're going to get a breakthrough, and we're going to be able to flip that script.
Now, the Calergy Plan, Yeah, that's just to domesticate humans as farm animals.
True, true, true.
And the French and the German and the British and other people have opportunity to stand up against it.
And they are.
They are.
And with the Americans, with the Second Amendment.
So they have to be able to defeat us.
And that's a big part of the contest.
And we're going to be told that we have to have this forced austerity because of climate change.
And we're being pushed in as well with this prima facie, all these nations, this forced mass illegal migration.
And then we're being told as well, is that we have to accept.
Yes, indeed.
emergency, we have to reduce the farmland, we have to eat the bugs, we have to stay within 15 minutes of where we live in order to protect the climate and own nothing and be happy.
And once we have, once our opponents have the pieces in place, then they'll use false flags and riots and then come in with more control.
So the contest is as dire as you can imagine.
Yes, indeed.
Chris?
Yeah, you're seeing this entire financial system being gained by this 1% insider group that we're calling the Anglo-Saxon, the London Theatre Company, the Hollywood Jews, the whatever you want to call it.
These guys are working together to use our financial systems and our authority and our legal systems to really keep us enslaved and to keep us, I guess, unable to have any sort of recourse or justice in terms of actually having some sort of fair appraisal.
They're above the law.
They're beyond suspicion.
And we're under the scope with everything we do.
So, you know, this is kind of like I was saying with Twitter and all these social media things, too, that this is a fly trap, an intellectual one, I think.
You know, they're trying to cul-de-sac that with censorship and shadow banning and things of the sort.
This is certainly not something that honest people do and honorable people do.
So there, Think about how much debt they foisted onto our children and ourselves.
30 some odd trillion so far and counting to bring forth this war of terror which served the benefit Israel more than any country and the central bankers that are trying to rule the world with this CBDC thing they're doing now.
So they have to crash the old system to bring in the new one and I think that's what they're doing with this orchestrated destruction.
And I think that there's There's a reason why they go through these Kabuki theater things that I call politics.
It's because they create justifications and situations where the caste system will be played against each other, one way, shape, or form.
Whether it's by race, by nation, by religion, or anything of the sort.
Even, you know, your favorite Celebrity even now these days.
But you know, this is something that is absolutely a culture of enmity that is being created.
And if you look at, they're trying to take everything away from the common man, the middle class, everyone except for this 1% group who is accumulating every asset on earth right now withholding companies like BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan, things of the sort.
And using the Federal Reserve to consolidate the banking system under their control furthermore.
So this is a wake up call.
This is not a clarion call to the Kalergi plan or the Odin-Yinan plan or the Great Israel plan or the Port of Caza Elders of Zion plan or the Morgenthau plan.
Or I mean, how many plans do these guys really need to have departmentalized to all bring the end to the every species that's not them?
So yeah, this is the most racist, the most ruthless plan on earth.
And you can't even talk about it.
You can't even say who's behind it.
So yeah, these guys, our silence is how they get away with it.
So we got to just stay on it.
Great points in exemplifying Voltaire's observation.
If you want to know who rules over, you ask who you cannot criticize.
Carl?
And just to punctuate Chris's excellent remarks is that the top 1% now own more assets than the bottom 99% combined, and I'll put that documentation in the BitChute show notes.
Yes, it's absolutely stunning.
Meanwhile, get this.
Demonstration in front of the Bundestag with photographs of fatalities injured by the COVID jab.
They got a wheelchair.
The numbers, of course, are massive.
Meanwhile, help roundtable for JFK, RFK Jr., with Mercola, Tenpenny, Cory, and Tampa McConnell, G. Willis, Big Tree.
Here's a story at a glance.
RFK Jr.
held a health policy roundtable with a panel of health freedom advocates.
They included him, Joe Marcola, and a host of others.
He wants to implement a digitized medical information system so correlation studies can be rapidly done to determine the impact of drugs and vaccines.
He intends to redirect federal grants away from infectious disease research to study chronic disease instead.
He vows to end gain-of-function research and will work to get all nations to sign treaties to ban it.
There's more here.
I'll just pick out a few of the keys.
McConnell asked Kennedy how he intends to transform our current disease care system into a health care system that takes account and effectively addresses root causes of illness, the underlying issues of the chronic conditions that are plaguing our nation.
He replied, That's one of the issues that really makes me excited to be able to debate.
And my capacity to actually get something done on the issue is one of the things that really attracted me to make this run for President of the United States.
I think I know how to fix a problem, and a lot can be fixed from the Oval Office, even without the cooperation of Congress.
So it can be done pretty quickly.
The regulatory process usually takes about seven years, but you can change policy and guidelines overnight.
I'm going to intervene directly with the journals.
I'm going to call them, tell them that we believe they're involved in racketeering with a pharmaceutical industry to systematically lie to the public.
through their retractions, through their financial entanglements, which encourage them to publish false information about pharmaceutical products.
One thing I can directly do I'm most excited about, terminate a lot of grants to infectious diseases and virologists, redirect them to study chronic disease.
This is really good.
Show me association between children's hepatitis B vaccine within the first 30 days and diabetes.
ASD and autism.
He's asking to look at correlations are indicative of causal relations.
I'm impressed.
If you have two competitive diabetes medicines, why don't we know which is most effective?
Why don't we know which is most likely to result in heart attacks or whatever?
Preventing political bias in research.
Corey wanted to know how he intends to ensure political bias is kept out of future funding decisions, especially for research.
I'm going to end that to the extent I can, he said, which has to do with the agency collecting royalties on developments.
That's just wrong.
Regulators should not be making money on products that they worked on at taxpayer expense.
I don't think NIH should be in the business of incubating drugs for the pharmaceutical industry unless there's some compelling reason that pharmacy is not going to develop the drug on its own.
We must end gain-of-function research.
He vowed to end it all.
It's just a disaster.
It's given us no benefits.
It's given us everything from Lyme disease to COVID and many other diseases.
RSV, now one of the biggest killers of children, came out of a vaccine lab.
There's good evidence even the Spanish flu came from vaccine research, which has actually created some of the worst plagues in our history.
He was asked how he intends to prevent the destruction of constitutional rights in the name of health care.
He'll have to go to Congress and change the criteria for the Declaration of Emergencies in this country that the Constitution is inviolable.
Even in the most dire emergency, you can't waive the Constitution.
You have to go through the democratic process.
He wants to redirect the Democratic Party to its original values.
The barrier to Kennedy winning the Democratic nomination seemed to be nearly insurmountable thanks to DNC super PACs.
He'd have to get 66% of the vote to win those state delegations.
So why has he chosen to run as a Democrat when the party has a massive arsenal to prevent him from winning?
He replied.
I'm not asking you to support the Democrat Party.
I'm trying to recall the party to its initial values that I grew up with, that my uncle and father represented.
I think, to me, the best path to victory is through the Democrat Party, though at this point people can look and say it's insurmountable.
But I think we have a pretty good plan for getting there.
I ask you to have faith and watch what we do, and I think you'll be pleased.
That little cheese is science team.
I'll have a diverse medical advisory team.
I feel pretty much an expert on parsing medical information and figuring it out.
I'm going to have people who are dissidents.
I'm going to have people who are moving away from the pharmaceutical paradigm.
I really want to move this country away and to show better health.
Are we reducing chronic disease?
Are medical bills going down?
Are children healthier?
Do we have better infant mortality on the pandemic treaty?
Under my presidency, we're not going to be submitting to any WHO treaty, he replied.
I'm going to be re-evaluating U.S.
relations with WHO.
They got away from what it really did well, which was nutrition, hygiene, local economic development, things that were really helping, locally-based strategies rooted in local culture.
Where does he stand on climate change?
This distressed me, by the way, of all of his answers.
This bothered me very, very much.
I am aware the climate change narrative has been grossly exaggerated by power-hungry politicians, he said, but How does he feel?
I believe the climate is an existential threat.
I believe carbon contributes to climate change.
As for how it was caused by carbon dioxide, it's not sure.
Climate change is so complex, requires so many disciplines.
I don't understand the mathematical modeling of physics or chemistry well enough to make an independent assessment.
However, he believes climate scientists predict dire outcomes are correct.
Well, it's interjected.
I'm most concerned about the way politicians have exaggerated the narrative.
So we have a generation of young people vowing never to have children because they think our world is going to end.
It's a doom narrative that is terrorizing so many Americans, particularly young people.
I'd love to know, are you going to carry on with that narrative?
Or what do you do to put our next generation at ease such they won't pass up one of the greatest gifts ever of creating a family?
Kennedy agreed the climate narrative had been hijacked by the W.E.B.
Bill Gates and the like, and is being used by globalists to consolidate power, diminish democracy, and construct civil rights and human rights.
I'm not against vaccines anymore than I'm against medicine, but if you show me a vaccine that works, so people who take it 10 years from now are safer and healthier and more alive in every aspect, I would take that vaccine and urge others.
I wouldn't ever mandate it.
I'm against vaccine mandates or any kind of medical mandates.
I'm against mass AIDS, so mandating those is something I would not allow as president.
In closing, McDonnell asked him how he intends to unify this sorely divided country, and he said that it's got to do with honesty and no longer being lied to.
Journalists have become propagandists for official narratives, and people know they're being lied to.
They look for other sources of information.
The first thing I'll do when I get in, besides pardoning Julian Assange and other things I promised to do, put out an executive order saying federal agency cannot participate And either propagandizing the public or censoring the public.
That'll be step one.
And then I'm going to do a lot of other strong stuff to make sure it never happens again.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, in Germany, they're engaged in the practice with the art and the science of demonstrations.
And this goes with the lessons of Gandhi and King, figuring out that they have all the data, but how can you communicate?
The data and part of what Gandhi and King emphasize was the necessity of a press to be able to communicate to the general public for the end result of withdrawing consent and good luck getting around corporate media for RFK to.
Yes, he has all of the data to end Fauci, Hotez, everybody associated with COVID.
I like what he said, they're going after the journals as well, because when you take a look at what the journals have done, it isn't any type of an excusable action.
This isn't an innocent mistake or something that is reasonable.
It's a violation of the previous ethics of science.
And that's all that that is.
And RFK2 has not had a debate with anybody of importance, he says.
For 18 years he hasn't been able to get any debate, and that's what is going to continue.
Any type of debate target like RFK, any of us, we're going to be demonized as unfit To be put onto a stage and instead they're going to use the tactic to demonize us as domestic violent extremists or some form like that.
And I'll put documentation here a bit shoot is that the CDC already published a paper saying that anybody who challenges the health orders along with the.
Department of Homeland Security is that we're the problem and that we need to be isolated in camps to protect the vaccinated.
And I'll put the documentation with those official US government reports.
And the real end result is we're either going to have, as RFK2 was talking about, the Constitution, or you're going to allow some bullshit rhetoric.
Some magic words, some sort of a dictate, because that's all it is.
They're going to say something, and that's what dictatorship is.
It's you do as we say for as long as we say, and that isn't how a constitutional republic works.
That isn't how the game of baseball works, is that there is a set of rules, and we're playing by those rules, and the rules are known to everybody, and there is a process to change the rules, but that has to be upfront and declared as such.
For RFK2 to talk about that he isn't going to mandate anything, I don't like that either.
He has an opportunity to hit, and the golden phrase that I keep going back to is he has to be able to say that these are crimes committed by our own government.
And it's not even close.
Title 21 is absolutely clear as federal law, supported by Article 6 of the Constitution as supreme law, that would supersede any type of mandate or requirement That there is no allowable medical experimentation on America that's already been decided and the people who have violated by title 21.
So, RFK2 has to up his game, because I don't think he's going to get far enough without making it clear that he's the one upholding the Constitution, and the other ones aren't just, like, not upholding it as well or making bad choices, but this is prima facie criminal activity.
Carl, there's no one in the Democrat side that even comes close to RFK Jr., not even remotely.
So, I don't think his not being strong enough is going to be the problem.
It's that DNC doesn't want him.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, I think they'll do away with him like they did with Bernie Sanders in 2016, where the people really show up for the rallies, they support the hell out of this guy, he's saying all the right things at the right time about all the wrong people.
But the Democrat Party will pretty much just run him out in the primaries and just render him obsolete in terms of media coverage, other than ridicule or things of the nature.
So, yeah, gaslights, all that other stuff.
You know, this is kind of interesting stuff.
I think RFK is definitely a genuine good thing for the election because it's going to push the envelope in a positive manner.
It's not going to be infantilized.
But this is a bipartisan thing where they took everybody's rights.
They were trying to make people, force them to take this stuff.
Some employers would fire you if you didn't take the VAX, right?
So this is a major big thing.
They were talking about having max passports, lockdowns, things like this.
They destroyed the Constitution by this medical mania.
And I think that the whole entire journalist organization was sold out humanity completely along in this operation.
So both parties were involved with this.
there was really only a few people that were speaking the right thing at the right time about holding the rights and holding the line and, you know, ignoring the absurdity that they were trying to put on with this inquisition tactic, a psychological operation.
So yeah, this is a big deal.
And people can't forget about something of this magnitude because this cannot happen again.
And certainly the people behind this have not even faced judgment, nor punishment, nor even been, even admitted wrongdoing in this.
I mean, these guys were absolutely wrong.
They were absolutely incorrect.
They were morally wrong, scientifically wrong, medically wrong, socially wrong, and nobody's done a damn thing about it other than let these guys take your business, take your rights, take your freedom, even force you to take this toxic mRNA poison that they're trying to jab you with.
And I'll tell you, all these assholes that are forcing you to take this and putting money behind this thing, these guys don't have to take these shots.
They don't have to put vaccine passports out.
They got charter jets.
They'll fly around and lecture you about carbon emission and shit like that.
And certainly, I guarantee you, Bill Gates ain't eating an Impossible Burger either, and he's certainly not vaxxing his kids.
So this is some bullshit here, and this can't slide.
I'm sorry.
R.F.K.
Jr.
is a major problem for the Democratic Party because he's speaking too much truth to the people who support him and for the DNC to sideline him.
And I agree, Chris, that's what they're going to attempt to do.
It's not going to play well with Bob Blake.
Their plan to run Biden in the same basement operation they did before and then just steal the election.
He hasn't formed a campaign committee.
He hasn't got a campaign headquarters.
There's no plans for him to make any appearances.
It's clear they're just going to rub our nose in it.
I don't think that's... They do last two times.
Yeah?
I don't think it's going to go down in the hell.
Yeah.
They don't even have to campaign.
They're not even doing it.
Like, he didn't campaign last time, right?
I mean, if this guy gets baited one time, you're absolutely right.
Carl, I know you want to add.
Go ahead.
Yeah, yeah.
Jim, you hit on what I wanted to do, and they are going to escalate it.
They're moving it up.
No headquarters.
No debates.
No primaries.
They're just going to assume that everyone loves Joe and 81 million votes.
And everyone hates, everyone despises this piece of shit.
I mean, the idea he's in the White House is absolutely embarrassing beyond words.
Meanwhile, I made a huge mistake.
Tucker's first interview since Byrne fired weighs in on Fox, Trump, RFK Jr., suggests Jenner was filled with federal agents.
Absolutely.
Tucker gave his first interview with Russell Brand, talked about leaving Fox, loving Trump, admiring RFK Jr., that the war, however, is a red line at Fox.
He suggested, too, the Capitol riot was filled with federal agents.
I think he's got it right on every single issue.
Bran began interviewing how he's dealt with being fired.
Tucker claims someone attempted to leak the fake story he was a racist.
He's enjoyed his initial time off fishing, being with his dog late breakfast.
However, he wants to get back in the harness.
This is not the first time I've been fired.
You know, you say what you think, there's an expectation you could be fired, so I've always known.
Graves go unvisited.
In the end, I always think I was surprised, expecting fired that morning in April.
So I was shocked, but not really.
I wasn't mad.
It's not my company.
When you work for someone else, I don't know why I was fired.
I don't really care.
You can believe me or not, but you know I wish Fox well.
There was ugly leaking.
I'm a racist or whatever.
Some would leak to the New York Times, but it's not true.
Those who run the company know it's not true.
The only thing that bothers me is I'm 54 when you get a bit older.
We believe in nature, God, you know, you can lose your drive.
It's just a little bit too nice, kind of.
And I do feel like we know people who are healthy and aware, can read, have an obligation to be engaged.
In other words, he wants to get back at it.
My only fear has been maybe being a little too happy.
I spent a lot of time trout fishing, a lot of time with our dogs, with my wife, like breakfast, but life has got to be more than that, so I'm back to work.
I don't know if my views have changed dramatically over 20 years.
I've said many times I was a half-hearted booster of Iraq, hard to believe.
That was in 2003.
My views for the last 20 years have been, I repented that.
I feel sick even thinking about it.
They remain pretty much the same.
I've been skeptical of storylines, all kinds of different things.
Not one time at Fox did they tell me not to say anything, so I was always grateful to Fox.
And in retrospect, that never changed, right up to the moment they called me and said, we're taking you off the show.
Yes, if there were a specific viewpoint that caused Fox to fire him.
He noted, Ukraine war is a red line.
The war in Ukraine is a red line for a lot of people in business and politics.
You see it in the U.S., where our leaders of the Republican Party are repulsive, in my view.
They're now supporting sending cluster bombs to Ukraine.
Ukraine is losing the war, obviously.
Ukrainians are dying in huge numbers.
The country is being destroyed.
The U.S.
could force a peace like tonight.
They could uniquely.
They have the power, but they won't.
They're continuing to allow Ukraine to be killed and the country to be devastated.
So I don't know their motive.
I can only guess.
But I know that if you criticize their intent on making it be quiet.
And I believe that's why.
He was criticizing the war in Ukraine.
Tucker says he loves Trump personally, but admits making a huge mistake last year.
Where am I on Trump now?
I love Trump personally.
I made a huge mistake in getting involved in American politics, meaning becoming basically an advocate, something I've never done before, and making calls, you know, this guy's going to win.
I think that's going to happen here.
Meet your new governor.
I was wrong on almost every call.
I'm not a very astute political analyst.
I'm not interested in politics.
I never have been.
I'm interested in ideas.
I'm interested in people.
So if there's a primary going on between Trump and a bunch, especially DeSantis, but others like Vivek Ramaswamy, for example, I haven't said one word about it, and I don't intend to.
Looking back on this 10 years from now, I think we'll see Trump's emergence as the most significant thing that happened in American politics in 100 years because he reoriented the Republican Party against the wishes of the Republican leaders.
But when I think about Trump right now, I'm struck by his foreign policy views.
You know, he's the only person with stature in the Republican Party who's saying, wait a second, you know, why are we supporting an endless war in Ukraine?
Leaving aside whether Trump's going to get the nomination or be reelected, all I can say is I'm grateful he has that position.
He's right.
Everyone in Washington is wrong.
Everyone else.
Trump is right, and it's a big question.
That war is reshaping the world, reshaping the economy, reshaping populations.
I was just in Romania last week, which shares a border with Ukraine.
The refugees, the number killed.
Europe will never be the same because of this war.
It really matters.
And Trump alone, among popular figures in both parties, understands that.
And I'm grateful for whether he gets a nomination or gets elected.
You know, words really matter.
Saying something true out loud matters.
And he's saying the true things about Ukraine, and God bless him.
That's how I feel.
Here's Colin Rook tweeting just in.
During an interview with Russell Brand, Tucker says he loves Donald Trump, specifically his stance on the war in Ukraine.
Trump is the only person who's saying, wait a second, you know, why are we supporting an endless war in Ukraine?
Benny Johnson tweets.
Breaking.
Tucker says a chief of police at the Capitol told him the crowd on J6 was filled with federal agents.
Tucker declared the Capitol riot was not an insurrection, but rather a spasm of rage that Trump definitely helped inspire at the election results, except he's underplaying the extent to which it was in fact a conspiracy by the Democrats to cut off any debate about the stealing of the election and to guarantee Trump wouldn't have a chance of claiming the presidency.
Carl, your thoughts?
Lot going on there.
So Tucker's Twitter account, his podcast that he gives via Twitter, they get more views than all of corporate media news combined.
So that's a lot of power.
It might be that AMREP 2.0 is going to go at the pace of Tucker's script.
So Fox removed their number one show, huh?
Yeah, yeah, you got it right.
It's about that war.
It's the same way with Donahue.
He had the number one show at the time, and his show is also canceled.
For his complaints and his questions and challenges about the war formerly known as on terror.
Now, Zelensky said the same thing.
He said that the U.S.
could end this war immediately and all that they would need to do is accept the peace terms that the Russians have offered from the beginning.
No NATO for Ukraine.
And independence for the people to be able to have an actual honest election to choose their political affiliation rather than be a US-UK-NATO puppet.
Trump said the same thing.
He could end the war in 24 hours, and he could.
Now, for Tucker, again, you know, he's the best that we got, just like RFK2.
And I don't want to nitpick, but I'm going to point out a couple of areas where he could actually have some stronger ammunition.
He frames it that he was sick to his stomach about supporting the war in Iraq.
He should say why.
And then again, as always, because maybe it was a lie-started Orwellian illegal war of aggression with war crimes within that illegal war.
And he just says it's an endless war in Ukraine where he could say that this is just the latest in a history of lie-started Orwellian illegal wars and that Zelensky is a puppet And he has said that he has demonized and criminalized opposition candidates and opposition media.
So, you know, it's getting close to where we need to go and we still need a breakthrough before anything is going to change with policy.
But the Netherland PM being attacked and having to concede and drop out and resign, that is the direction where we need everybody to go.
Bruce.
I'm going to make an outrageous claim right now.
I'm going to say that RFK is going to get the snub from the media and all the pundits.
They're going to gaslight him out of an opportunity to win the primary against whoever they pick on the other side of the DNC.
But I think that Trump will actually either pick him for an attorney general or maybe even as a VP.
So that would be a heck of a thing, you know, in WWF style.
You know, I could just see, you know, all the American flags and, you know, the Patriots getting all misty-eyed over something like that.
I don't know, maybe I'm reading too far into this.
I think that there's definitely a lot of pageantry involved with this Trump situation, him being disenfranchised, him being cooed out by the election of 2021 that we all know is rigged.
The subsequent persecution and targeting of legal Lawsuits, we'll just say.
Things of that nature, even him being slandered publicly, it's creating a psychological effect, not only with his base, but people that are on the other side.
It's either you love this guy or you hate him, and they're going to try to make the country pick a side between this.
And I think they're doing what they're doing now as part of it.
Look at the absurdities of policy that Biden's put out, whether it's dealing with Russia, dealing with COVID, any of these things, right?
Financial stuff, go on and on.
The Ukraine, Yeah, so they're trying to forge this theatric, this narrative, to really put the United States into a corner, so to speak, and to make them, I think, be taken away from being the primary reserve currency of trade.
So this is a big deal, and I think that the American people really haven't felt it yet, but it's coming, and this is going to really hurt America, and I think maybe Trump could be something that could bring us back from that.
Yeah, I tend to agree with all that.
nationalist support.
And certainly I think when the pendulum comes back the other way, it's going to swing pretty hard.
That's going to take a lot for them to rig this one.
And I said that about 2020, but this is going to be, you know, obvious and I don't think it's going to fly.
Yeah, I tend to agree with all that.
I'll say more in my closing thoughts.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
So, Send fan mail to live-need-to-know at gmail.com.
Live-need-to-know at gmail.com.
Here's a comment.
Yes, Mickey, Willis, Bobby, your position on the issue of climate change being a man-made aberration from a naturally occurring phenomenon that has characterized the earth and driven its geological, geographic, and biological evolution since its inception is concerning.
And the solutions proposed by the left are driven by political profit, power, and control motives And are already doing significant environmental damage, like the most ill-conceived short-sighted solutions for non-existent problems.
The absurdity of the solution being implemented for a non-existent problem, such as population, Congo, biologically and environmentally destructive windmills, batteries and solar panels, constitute an absolute fraud, just like the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and the toxic, often lethal, COVID-19 vaccines, which are still being pushed and destroying lives in the present.
Meanwhile, final thoughts.
Chris, yours.
Well, I think you said it very well about these absurdities that are being provided in terms of problem reaction solution and the Hegelian dialect.
Yeah, they're absolutely becoming evident and obvious to the people that are paying attention, even to some that maybe don't normally pay attention.
So I think really you're seeing a lot of waves on social media coming forward and having this revolutionary spirit go on.
I think there's a lot of resentment, and rightfully so, against the people that have deranged our foreign and domestic policies in the way that they have, and created not only the debt, but the political and public enmity that comes from these type of theatrics that produce very real casualties, and have very real victims that they are really
There's a repercussion, a wave that's coming from that naturally, an organic reaction, let's say, from some of these abhorrent policies that have been foisted on this country and that we've paid for with our tax dollars and with our debt.
So I think at some point in time, there's going to have to be either some sort of course of action that will bring us back to our sanity and back to our reason and back to our humanity.
And if there's not, then we better really be prepared to fight a lot of different countries and more.
Carl?
Same final thought.
It's the best of times and it's the worst of times.
There are like a dozen of these cards in the House of Cards that look So close to falling over.
You got the Hunter Biden situation with the, what is it, 400 crimes documented from the laptop.
You have the pay to play.
You have the COVID crimes against humanity.
You have the situation in Ukraine.
You have the idea of the Great Reset.
All of this seems like it could have fallen at any time.
And I'm surprised that the narrative is all still sticking together.
But it is out of our hands.
And there has to be a surrender to that for individuals.
What we're in charge of, for what we can think, what we can say, what we can do, and that said, by all appearances, we still need to have some sort of a state change, like a chemistry state change of water changing from a liquid into a solid, something like that, a breakthrough, something that is unimaginable and unpredictable, because what we're shown just goes on and on.
And that might be how it continues to look until, historically, when these things fall, it happens in an instant, and then people say, oh yeah, it was a Black Swan event, and then people like us will say, oh yeah, we saw it coming, but we've been seeing it coming for a long time, and apparently a little bit longer.
Excellent comments from Chris and Carl, who've done a wonderful job in my absence while I've been Sustaining recovery from my double bypass surgery.
I have three comments to make.
One about Tucker saying he was wrong when he was making predictions.
He was basing it on the assumption the election was legit.
He was looking at the poll numbers.
His predictions were accurate had it not been a stolen election.
That's what undermined his credibility.
He didn't make a mistake.
He's simply naive about the extent to which our American electoral system is called raw.
Number two, many think that Trump and Bobby Jr.
would be the dream ticket.
I can certainly see the reason, especially since Trump's greatest weakness and vulnerability is his warp speed production of the Vax, which many hold against him.
I think Trump would be open to it.
The catch is, Bobby rejected the idea out of hand that he would never consider it.
Now maybe he'll change his mind.
Until that should happen, however, I do think he'd be a wonderful candidate for health and human services, for example, in a Trump administration.
Give him a major role to get things straightened out.
And finally, with regard to ending the war in Ukraine, You have two irreconcilable objectives here.
The Russian will not give up their territory.
They will not give up Crimea or the Donbass or the other four different little regions that they have declared.
They will not give them up.
Zelensky, but more importantly, Israel, will not stop until they can take back all of Ukraine.
You cannot satisfy both.
There's no way in which Trump or other forces could resolve this war overnight.
Russia will prevail, and that has enormous consequences, because it was no less an eminence than Jacob Rothschild himself declared Vladimir Putin is an enemy of the New World Order, and the New World Order cannot move forward without Ukraine.
So be it.
If this means the end of the New World Order, nothing could be more welcome.
To all of humanity.
Thank you for joining us today.
I continue to encourage you to spend as much time as you can with everyone you love and care about.
We still don't know how much time we have left.
▲
Export Selection