All Episodes
Previous Next
June 19, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
59:28
Truth vs. NEW$ Part 1 (18 June 2023) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Cruz vs. Cruz.
This is Sunday, June 18th, Father's Day.
And what a day it is.
And also, I will say that this is the Pride Month.
And I want to say, for Pride Month, what are you all proud of?
Well, as Father's Day, I am very proud of this.
These are my pods in here.
This makes me proud.
I'm a PP, Proud Parent.
And here's my other kids.
This makes me really proud.
What are you all proud of?
I'm so happy that all my kids turned out great.
It's really wonderful.
Also, we're going to have your Juneteenth tomorrow.
That's going to be a heck of a day.
And then also, Summer Solstice is coming up.
Oh yeah, I see your pictures there.
We also have a show here today that's going to be fantastic.
Show that again, Brian.
It didn't get caught on mine before you showed the photos.
Go ahead.
Okay, continuing on here, and we'll have a... Okay, anyway, we have quite the panel developing here.
We have the most dangerous minor in America who's written the most significant books about American history of anybody.
This, uh, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook just tells it all.
And how about this?
American Nukes on 9-11 and of course JFK and other books.
This man is a man of the hour, man of the year and we got to pray for him because he's going in for some surgery this week and he needs all the strength he can here because he's a wonderful gentleman.
He's been with me for 20 years.
This is going to be the first time he's going to be missing a shoulder.
And I also have Brian Davidson who's this fantastic private investigator down in Texas who's You've got to give me screen sharing, Don.
And joining us soon will be Scott Bennett, who has written this powerful book about shield game, about what really happened with all the different agencies and moving money around.
I think Biden might fit in there somewhere, too.
So let's see.
I guess we've got some things happening in Ukraine that are pretty significant, right, Jim?
You've got to give me screen sharing, Don.
I'm surprised we overlooked that.
Well, we didn't.
I did.
Most disabled screen sharing, yeah.
I know what to do.
I said, "No, it says, I know what to do.
Hang on.
We're good, Don.
Here we go.
Here we go.
Milley, our chairman of our Joint Chiefs this half, suggests that the Russia war in Ukraine is going to be long, drawn out, and very violent.
I think he's got it half right.
It's going to be very violent, but it's not going to be long or drawn out.
Milley claims Ukraine has been making steady progress, but the battle lines haven't changed much since Ukraine launched the assault early last week.
In fact, the latest reports I have is Russia's beating the hell out of Ukraine.
They're using regular Russian army now instead of the Wagner group, a private army.
And the ratio, the kill ratio is like 10 Ukrainians for every single Russian.
The U.S.
has announced a new weapons package to replace Bradley and Stryker armored vehicles Ukraine has already lost, and they're asking for more tanks, which are also being taken out.
Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin downplayed Ukraine's losses, claiming Russia was showing different pictures of the same damaged vehicles.
What a joke.
Meanwhile, Biden is mulling over the Israeli model.
Rather than become a full member of NATO, he's mulling over the idea of a time-limited commitment to provide a flow of weapons to the country.
But, you know, if it goes forward, it will be forever.
Opponents of Ukraine's accession to NATO are concerned it would further escalate the crisis with Moscow.
Hard to see how it could be much more severe than it is already.
Russian officials have described the hostilities as part of the U.S.-led proxy war against Russia and called NATO's expansion in Europe one of the key clauses of the conflict about which they are 100% correct.
NATO Secretary General Jen Stoltenberg reportedly suggests a compromise that would entail a pledge to maintain arms laws regardless of outcome, but not being a member of NATO.
We have Scott with us.
Scott, your thoughts about these developments in Ukraine?
Well, you know, a thought occurred to me that no one else has talked about and mentioned in this entire two, three, even 30-year relationship with Russia.
So I'm going to say it tonight for the first time.
Russia has a particular aversion and reprehension and, I would say, spiritual hatred of betrayal and lies.
And it was betrayed and lied to by Adolf Hitler in Germany in 1938, 1939, when they entered into the agreement, the non-aggression pact with Germany and Russia.
And then Germany completely turned against Russia, backstabbed them, and went on Operation Barbarossa, and then went through Ukraine and rallied a bunch of Ukrainian Nazis to kill tons of people and fight all the way to Stalingrad and stuff.
until Russia pushed them back.
That was a great deception.
The United States has essentially entered into that same non-aggression agreement with Russia In 1992 with George Bush Sr.
first and then with Bill Clinton, the sodomite rapist, lunatic, and then Al Gore and Strobe Talbot and Lawrence Summers and all of the CIA.
Oh yes, we're friends with Russia while they rape and pillage and dismember.
So that was another similar non-aggression pact.
And then the U.S.
completely backstabbed Russia by taking over Ukraine, taking all these countries into NATO, launching a genocide war, launching a coup d'etat, setting up Nazi regimes, setting up biolabs, setting up brainwashing camps, and doing another ethnic cleansing of Russia in and doing another ethnic cleansing of Russia in eastern Ukraine, as Nazi Germany had done.
So with those two major components, and never mind the Cold War in between, but those major backstabbing operations, I look at Russia now, and they have turned a different color.
They have brought the visor down.
They have a sternness that they haven't had, I've seen, ever.
And I hear that when Putin says at the St.
Petersburg Economic Forum, they're trying to get us to the negotiating table because they know we have more weapons than they have.
Well, screw them!
That's the first time I've ever heard Vladimir Putin say in a very diplomatic, professional way, screw the West!
As if you want to try and fight?
Screw you!
We'll see who wins and dies at the end of the fight.
And he means it.
And anybody who's done tactical analysis understands Russia is in a far better position militarily, technologically, than the United States is for a battlefield fight.
They're in their element.
We're not.
They're the heartland.
We're Oceania.
We're playing on land bridges and land aircraft carriers.
They are based to fight for their country, their culture, their language, and this once again has been proven to them by our betrayal.
Our betrayal at the Minsk agreements is another example of this non-aggression pact, but it was totally tore up.
Putin mentioned that too in his meeting.
He held up the signed documents that Zelensky had signed and then had totally thrown away when the West told him no.
So I see Russia going down this road of, you know, fool me once, shame on me.
Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me twice, shame on me.
They're saying no more.
We're done with you.
We don't want to know you.
We don't want to see you.
Yes, we'll leave the door open for diplomatic purposes for a conversation, but we're done with you.
And having said that and having that attitude now is going to reorient their military operations and that is probably going to destroy more NATO weaponry than we've ever seen before because the NATO operators, Jen Stoltenberg,
Biden, Schultz, Reese Schoenack, all of these fools in Europe think they can just fly F-16s over into Ukraine and somehow they're going to do a Colin Powell type of operation similar to the first Gulf War and just annihilate the Russian tanks and all that and everything's going to come back to equilibrium and then Russia's going to sue for peace?
No.
Every single F-16, every single plane that NATO flies into Ukrainian airspace is now going to be blown out of the sky, and as Putin said, they will be burning.
And I'm not glorifying that or relishing that or encouraging that or looking forward to that, but it is how they are going to react because they're Russian.
They're going to react this way because they've been betrayed in 1938, in the 1992 U.S.
pact with them, in the Ukrainian pact, in the Minsk agreements, and now I think they're totally done.
And the world is totally shifting over to Russia.
So I'll just say they're going to be blowing out every NATO piece of armor that comes across the border, Jim.
Brian, before I take your comments, let me add further reinforcement to what Scott's saying in the next story.
A former NATO chief admits, we decided back in 2008 Ukraine will become a member of NATO.
This is shocking.
Those who think the conflict began on February 24, 2022 may be surprised to learn it has been brewing since 2008.
Former NATO Chief Anders Rasmussen admits in the video below, we decided back in 2008 Ukraine will become a member of NATO.
That decision caused today's troubles.
The video released now, he speaks of the present Russia-Ukraine conflict and how NATO is trying to find a way to admit Ukraine, even though it's in conflict with Russia, pointing to the possibility the U.S.
and NATO might give certain security guarantees before it's admitted to NATO Asking if such security guarantees might be worded similarly to those between the U.S.
and Israel.
He makes a stunning admission.
We decided in 2008 Ukraine will be admitted to NATO.
This is a stunning fact not previously publicized anywhere.
It means that President Troubles all began with a decision back in 2008 made by the U.S., NATO, and the collective West doing what they thought necessary to lay the foundation to do exactly what, as Scott was emphasizing, they promised Russia they would not do.
Back in 1991, then-Secretary of State Baker met with Secretary General Mikhail Gorbachev and then-Soviet Foreign Minister, and they all agreed to the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the reunification of East and West Germany.
NATO will not move beyond the Elbe River in East Germany.
Here's a part of it.
Promised paper on security in Central and Eastern, yet general agreement membership of NATO and security guarantees unacceptable.
Agreement to consider statement by spring, indicating NATO's interest in security and stability in Eastern Europe.
We need new ideas to provide security.
We've made it clear during the two-plus-four negotiation, we would not extend NATO beyond the Elbe.
We could not, therefore, offer membership to Poland and others.
We might, however, consider referring to our interest in these countries in future NATO declarations.
So NATO knew back in 2008, back in 1991, The US, UK, France, and Germany promised then-Soviet Union NATO would not expand east of Germany.
Now we see straight from the horse's mouth.
The very chief of NATO back in 2008 agreed to admit Ukraine.
He knew they weren't supposed to do it, but they did it anyway.
The US, UK, France, and Germany explicitly promised not to do that, but went ahead anyway.
That leads to who was in charge in the U.S.
George W. Bush, the son who was president.
Michael Hayden was the director of CIA.
Robert Gates was secretary of defense.
These are the men who needed a green light to move by NATO, and clearly, from Rasmussen's admission, they have actually done so.
Here we are, 15 years later, on the verge of nuclear World War III, because of decisions they took in 2008.
We are facing a nuclear.
With people like this, I've seen no hope of avoiding World War III at this point.
Prepare as you can with emergency food, water, medicine, and a generator.
Meanwhile, and this is also consistent with Scott's observation, here's Putin declaring, Russia has more nuclear weapons than all the NATO countries combined.
Answering a question about his stance on using tactical low-yield nukes as a deterrent, he stressed his idea of using such weapon was negative, pointing to Moscow's nuclear doctrine.
Nuclear weapons are created to ensure our security in its most broad sense and the very existence of the Russian state.
But firstly, we do not have such a need, meaning for tactical nukes.
And second, the very fact of discussing already lowers the threshold for the use of nuclear weaponry.
We possess more weapons of such a sort than the NATO countries.
They know that and are always trying to persuade us to start negotiation on reduction.
Nuts to them, you know, as our people say.
So, we held talks with our Union State with President Lukashenko on deploying part of these nukes to Belarusian territories that haven't.
The first nuclear warheads have been delivered to Belarus.
This is the first batch.
We'll complete more by the end of the year.
It will serve as a deterrent so everyone who's thinking about hitting us strategically will not forget about this fact.
Regarding the Ukrainian counteroffensive, It's not us who refuse to hold a dialogue with them.
They have simply moved the dialogue to the sphere of arms delivery.
But we will torch all they have supplied.
We'll see what they will do next.
Some 30% of supplied heavy armor is already being destroyed.
I'm not talking about Bradleys and Labyrinths alone.
As many as 218 tanks, among them Labyrinth, 418 armored vehicles, as I remember, including Bradleys, are the total quantity.
There's no doubt this process, meaning of annihilation of this weaponry, will continue.
He added Ukraine would have been better taking a different pathway and looking for a peaceful means of resolution.
So let's not come down to this.
So far we see they're trying to win a victory on the battlefield.
Let them try.
We will see what will come of their attempts.
So far they are failing.
It will hardly achieve anything.
Kim must understand in the case of continued attacks on Russian territory, Moscow will consider creating a sanitary cordon in Ukraine.
If these attacks on our adjacent territories continue, we'll consider creating a sanitary cordon on Ukrainian territory.
They just have to realize where they are headed for.
Well, first of all, let me preface this.
Russia's stance on the conflict and deteriorating with the rest.
Moscow is apparently still determined to achieve all the objectives of this special military operation militarily or with diplomacy.
Brian, your thoughts.
Well, first of all, let me preface this.
I am out of the lake house and Internet is very unstable during the summers because all the neighbors run the Netflix and there's no fiber cable around here.
So it's all run off cell phones and hotspots around here.
That said, don't forget the real reason that we are supporting this pawn war in Ukraine.
The real reason is that Russia is an obstacle to the globalists.
They've been setting up globalization for years and years and years, even so far back as 2008.
Now, the 2014 Minsk agreements were obviously a major, you know, what we did was we went in, we basically had our fingers crossed behind our back when we promised not to let NATO pass this particular line in the sand, and we lied.
Well, Therefore, you have to have a war, because words become meaningless when you tell lies and keep your fingers crossed behind your back in official packs.
So, Lavrov is a very important guy in terms of the way he positions this war.
And Lavrov is out there saying, we can never trust the West at its word again.
And that this war, what's happening on the ground is a tiny fraction of what's happening in terms of getting positioned for globalization.
So what he's saying is that this little ground war is just a little tiny ground war that happens to be taking place so that we can show Ukraine that they're going to have to break itself up and accept certain facts about the world and the way it is.
Russia and Putin believe that they are right makes might, that they're right, that they want to.
What they're saying to their people, at least on RT, is that they've changed their mind.
This isn't the same KGB-run Soviet Union that came out of the Cold War.
They want to give power back to the people.
They want to give resources back to the people.
But the real problem, you've got to look at the big picture.
Bricks.
Bricks.
That's the major Obstacle to globalization, and Russia happens to be the biggest piece on the chessboard related to that.
And right now, America and the Western hegemony is going nuclear on these guys, and I wouldn't put it beyond Russia to have to go nuclear back.
Now China, according to the Wall Street Journal this week, shipped a whole bunch of tanks down to Chechnya.
They shipped it down via railroad, I believe.
And so China's now taking the side, hey, if Russia can resist globalization, we can resist globalization.
India is following, South Africa is following, and all these other nations.
So that's why this war is so important.
And I have come to respect Russia a lot more.
For fighting this thing out.
I think they could have ended it much quick, much faster, but the very fact that they see it as a war against globalization.
Gets my respect.
Excellent.
Excellent.
Jim, let me, yes, sure Scott, but we do have another round on this subject.
So I'm going to want your comments would go ahead and.
One thing is interesting, it just occurred to me.
When I knew Russians and trained with Russians, they all hated and despised Gorbachev as the traitor to Russia.
Gorbachev sold out Russia to the U.S.
and allowed it to completely disintegrate and come apart.
That's the average Russian attitude towards Gorbachev.
He sold out Russia and we fell.
Isn't it ironic and interesting that I could see the same hatred and loathing for Gorbachev that the Russians felt, that the American people have the same hatred and loathing for Joe Biden, who is similarly selling us out to China and will inevitably break us apart, break us down, flooding the borders.
We are having our own perestroika.
The difference is Russian people had stronger character.
Our character, sadly, aside from, you know, us and our audience in America, is full of vanity, TikTok, narcissism, Facebook, arrogance, LGBT, perverted corrupt education, and that leads to an extraordinarily fragile population.
But it's ironic that what Gorbachev did to Russia, Biden is doing to the United States, and I just find it poetically interesting.
Go ahead.
Well, it is.
I've always thought Gorbachev was a much finer person than Biden, but I get it.
Here's Zelensky slamming Trump for saying he would end the war in Ukraine.
Can you imagine?
In an interview with NBC, Zelensky attacked former President Trump's pledge to end the war.
He argued that Kiev does not defeat Moscow.
Russia will attack a member state and force the U.S.
into a direct conflict.
It's his own version of the domino theory.
Zelensky was asked about Trump's claim to immediately engage and bring the war to a negotiated settlement.
Are they ready to start a war to send their children?
Are they ready to die?
He said when the interview was published, if Russia occupies Ukraine, they will move on to the Baltic, to Poland, to any NATO country.
And in that particular case, the U.S.
will have to choose between dismantling NATO or fighting.
Just ridiculous.
Kiev and Hawks in Washington have asserted that Ukraine is a bulwark, protecting members of NATO from Moscow's expansionist ambitions.
However, there is no evidence the Kremlin is attacking another country.
Putin views Ukraine as a unique security threat and says seizing territory protects Moscow against the expanding NATO alliance, about which he's 100% correct.
Ukraine hopes to be added as a member once the war is over.
We need an invitation.
It needs to be clear that after this war, if we are ready and if the Ukrainian army is ready to NATO standards, then after the war, we will be invited to join.
It's very important to hear the truth and not tell us lies, says one of the great liars of our time.
In 2008, Ukraine was told it would receive full NATO membership.
Moscow denounced that proposal, saying it violated red lines and would create a significant security threat from Russia.
Despite their objection, NATO maintains that doors are open to new members, but NATO does not currently meet the requirement.
As Kiev is currently at war, admitting NATO would put NATO in direct confrontation at war with Russia would mean NATO was at war with Russia.
At times, Kiev appears frustrated with NATO refusing to make a formal commitment.
He's threatening to sit out a coming meeting in July because Ukraine will not receive a pledge.
Zelensky went on to slam Trump, claiming he was unable to end the war in Ukraine while he was in office.
Why didn't he do that earlier?
He was president when the war was going on here, explained.
I think he couldn't do that.
I think there are no people in the world who could have a word with Putin and end the war.
The statement appears an admission from Zelensky the war in Ukraine began before the Russian invasion of 2021.
Prior to the Russian invasion, Ukraine was embroiled in an eight-year-long civil war.
Washington, D.C.
justified their support for Kim, claiming the Russian invasion was unprovoked, meaning it was the origin.
Zelensky's contradicting.
The Minsk agreements were agreed to by Ukraine, Russia, Germany, and France with the intent of ending the war.
However, Zelensky was unable to get neo-Nazi paramilitaries to comply in the days before the incursion.
There was a surge between Ukrainian forces and rebels.
Meanwhile, Putin says his Jewish friends call Zelensky a disgrace to the Jewish people.
This is not a joke, not an attempt at irony, because today neo-Nazis, Hitler's disciples, have been put on a pedestal as heroes of Ukraine, the Russian leader said.
Ukraine has pedestalized Hitler's followers as hero, Putin has pointed out.
He shared the attitude of his Jewish friends toward the current leader of Ukraine.
I have many Jewish friends from my younger days.
They tell me, Zelensky is not a Jew.
He is a disgrace to the Jewish people, Putin said during the St.
Petersburg Economic Forum.
His remark drew instant applause from the audience.
This is not a joke, not an attempted irony, because today neo-Nazis, Hitler's disciples, have been put on a pedestal as heroes of Ukraine.
The Holocaust is the extermination of 6 million Jews, 1.5 million exterminated in Ukraine, first and foremost at the hands of the banderites.
Putin said he'd been expecting a conversation, so the night before, he called Moscow for some material containing statements by the Nazis in Ukraine.
He picked up several sheets of paper and read out.
But Yaroslav Stetko, head of the Bandera faction, the organization of Ukrainian nationalists, 1939.
Moscow and the Jewry are Ukraine's greatest enemies.
I insist on the extermination of the Yids and on the expediency of applying German methods to how the Jewry is treated in Ukraine.
Then there was Stepan Lakhovsky, who, while speaking in July 1941 about the notorious Love Old Massacre, said this, In relation to the Jews, we use all methods that will lead to their complete extermination.
What is this?
asked an indignant Putin.
He also said he once read post-war testimony from someone he described as a Banderite freak, in which he recounted how he and his goblins had shot a Jewish family.
It's impossible to read this without a lump in your throat.
The man, the head of the family, was disabled.
He'd lost an arm.
His wife and two children, both girls, to my recollection, 7 and 11, were all grabbed and taken out to be shot.
All of them knew what was going to happen.
The moment they were forced out of the room, the disabled man at Kribble hugged the dog with a one-army-heading pride.
They took him outside and shot him, including the little girls, 7 and 11 years old.
He wanted to say he might also recall the exterminated Russians and Poles by and large.
The bold memories of Banderites' atrocities in Ukraine are still fresh, he remarked.
As for the Poles, okay, let's leave them be.
They have their own aims.
When they sleep, they dream about gaining a firm foothold in Western Ukraine, and again, it looks like they are moving gradually in that direction.
Meanwhile, Scott on RT has been discussing potential nuclear war, false flag by the Biden admin.
Scott, your further thoughts?
Well, you know, as Brian has said, and you've said before, Jim, this whole thing is about the globalist war, the globalization of the world, and wokeism, climate change, homosexuality, rainbow flag, all of the nuances of wokeism, which is a religion.
It's an atheistic religion, it's a humanist religion, it's a secular paganistic religion, versus the You know, the multipolar world, sovereignty, independent nations, independent faiths, you know, by the way, various religions.
So, you've got the Hispanic, you know, South America, Central America, Christian.
You've got Middle Eastern, Islamic faiths.
You've got the Russian Christian Orthodox Church.
All of these countries are coming to the side of Russia, including Africa.
Which is very, very powerful and interesting.
Africans are showing an adoration for Russia.
Russia, I mean, I'm very impressed.
My background was in political theory and all of it, and psychological operations.
I look and I think, my god, Russia is so masterful in how it is diplomatically doing this Fred Astaire, Ginger Rogers dance, and while the Americans look like Pinocchio with some of the strings cut off, just fumbling and bumbling and clappening around.
So Russia is behaving masterfully on the diplomatic stage, and that's why, as Brian and I said as well, why Russia didn't rush in and crush them would have, yeah, they would have won the battle, won the war, but they're winning far more by this demonstration of exceeding patience and endurance.
And when Zelensky, let me comment too on Zelensky, he said something very truthful, Jim, the first time I think I've ever heard him say something truthful, and that is Donald Trump could have ended the war when he was in office, and he didn't.
And then he said, but he couldn't do that.
There's a lot of depth there that we're all aware of.
He was in office, he got elected to office because of his promise to be friends with Russia, to pull us out of the Middle Eastern wars, He did to some degree and he failed to some degree.
He kept us in Syria and had some stupid comments like, I like the oil.
That's a dumb thing to say.
And then he did all sorts of dumb stuff with the Jerusalem move and stuff like that and anti-Iranism.
And, you know, I know he was listening to Bolton and Pompeo and these other traitors, but I hope he's learned his lesson and other people have said that too.
But when Zelensky was in office, Trump You know, sending them weapons and stuff.
He should have instantly been smart enough to say, hold the phone.
This whole game that you guys have planned since 2008 is not the American people's game.
They put me into office to overthrow this game, to say, done.
We're done with this.
And he didn't do it.
And I know they were threatening to impeach him, and they did impeach him twice for this Ukraine issue.
But Zelensky's right.
He was in office.
He could have stopped this.
And it got out of control, and that's where we are now.
And Zelensky, when he says no one can talk to Putin and end it, he is wrong there, because Trump—not because he is anything great, but because Putin wants someone who is honest that he can deal with.
And honestly, I think Putin recognizes Trump is an honest man.
He's flawed, he's failed, he's inexperienced in a lot of ways, but he's an honest man with a heart in the right place, which is pro-America.
Pro-family.
Plus, I've said on RT, Trump was married to his first wife, who was, I believe she was Czech, and his second wife, Melania.
They're both Slavic women.
They're both Russian-speaking women.
They both have that sensitivity, that femininity that Slavic, Russian-oriented women, Christian, Orthodox culture, whatever you want to call it, have.
far superior to anything the West has.
I mean, tattooed lesbian bull dykes, man-hating, you know, transgender, that's what American women have become, but not what you see in the Slavic cultures.
So Trump has a natural affection, and he's not got the Catholic mindset either, which is what drives Poland and many of the Germans.
So I think Putin really does recognize, and I've said this on RT, if Trump is reelected, he could end it overnight.
And I'd be the man, if he put me in office as an ambassador, I would end it overnight.
And I know how to do it and I do it with an ass kicking and I grab generals by the throat and throw them around like ragdolls and do the same thing with the CIA and do the same thing with their inspector generals.
That's how you take control of the government is like you're jumping on the back of the horse and you grab the reins and yank its neck back.
Until they stop doing what they're doing.
That's what Trump tried to do.
The horses got away from him.
But I think he's learned his lesson.
But more importantly, I think Russia will recognize the American people.
And many others have said this, too.
Larry Johnson, Phil Giraldi, Scott Ritter.
I think Russia is waiting to see how America's pendulum comes back.
with the revolution, civil war, because of what the liberals are trying to do, and that is take us over in a communist overthrow.
The American people aren't gonna let that happen, and I think Russia is waiting to see how America's pendulum comes back.
Jim? - Just remember, the Minsk agreements were supposed to be a peace agreement between, except NATO is lying about it.
I do not believe Trump would have subscribed to that.
I like your point about his wives.
That's extremely interesting.
Brian?
Well, on this issue, I'm going to have to disagree with you.
East Texas girls, in my opinion, are the best in the world.
Well, I would, I would agree.
There are nothing like an East Texas girl.
They come from the right families and have the right blood.
Okay.
One of the main things that comes up in this discussion to Jew or not to do now, there are plenty of evil people on both sides.
Okay.
Let's we got, we, the whites, we get, we get to lay claim to Joe Biden, Barack Obama.
Is he in?
It's not, it's not in the box!
Hillary Clinton, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Colin Powell, Nancy Pelosi, Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham, James Comey, Valerie Jarrett, Condi Rice, Al Sharpton, Rupert Murdoch, Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates.
Just, those are just a few, okay?
And on the Jew side, okay, you've got some pretty heavy players as well.
You've got your George Soros and your Mark Zuckerberg and you've got Karl Schwab and others.
Now, what's really interesting about this is you would think that the Chinese don't have a dog in this hunt in terms of to Jew or not to Jew.
But it's my understanding that there has been a drastic rise in anti-Semitism that's originated in China.
Why?
They're studying their history.
That's all there is to it.
They've run the cartels, the global bankster cartels, and the push toward globalization.
They've pulled the strings with the Chinese Communist Party for years and years and years.
So there is a rise in anti-Semitism that's going on with this.
Now, people are evil and people are good.
That's why I gave you the list of the whites that we get to put on the list of just despicable, evil people.
So I think that it discredits the truth movement.
When people overemphasize the Jew issue, it's partially that, in that that Kazarian blood just rotten, just rotten, that old gypsy mentality, that old blood sort of, it that old gypsy mentality, that old blood sort of, it doesn't have the same sense of Western values In the West, we have a very well-developed sense of fair play.
It's sort of an English thing that's behind our American mentality.
These people, man, they take pride in deception.
They take pride in getting away with something or stealing something from somebody.
So, I tend to think that it discredits us to overemphasize the Jewish issue and instead look at just the straight-up evil issue.
Now, if Joe Biden is so brazen that he thinks that he can get away with a $5 million bribe among others, I mean, how long had he been doing it with how many people, where, when, why, and what?
It's a big world.
And the man was busy under Barack Obama, who, by the way, I think a lot of that policy that began to originate with Barack Obama was Victoria Nuland's policy that Russia stood in the way of globalization.
She's a Jew.
That's Victoria Nuland there.
Married to a bad guy.
She was pulling the strings on this whole thing.
I don't know what to say.
All I'm going to say is this.
You should recognize evil for evil, whether it's Jewish or not.
And it's evil.
Amen.
I think those were simply excellent comments, Brian.
Just wonderful, wonderful.
Jim, one thing in 1998 in the book Irregular Warfare that the Chinese generals authored, which I read, which is very interesting.
It lays out their whole psychological warfare plan over 20 years.
In that book, the Chinese were Extraordinarily condemning towards George Soros for precisely what Brian said.
So in 1998, when the Chinese generals wrote Irregular Warfare, their plan to go to war with the West without going to war, they laid out a whole chapter in the beginning about how George Soros had financially caused the crippling of the Asiatic markets.
They have a long historical memory, so you're right.
The Chinese have this hate, I mean, just like for Soros and recognize the bankers.
The other thing that's interesting about that is that the Chinese premier just invited the Palestinian leader to come to China and has said, we believe there needs to be a Palestinian two-state solution.
So the Chinese have embraced Palestine, the Russians have embraced Palestine, and Israel and Netanyahu are coming apart.
That's great.
Good stuff.
Really good stuff.
Love it all.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, Hal Turner is reporting of what appear to be military operations.
I have an interpretation of what's going on here.
Tanks and troops deployed inside USA and Canada.
Citizens in many areas are startled that tanks, troops, and assault aircraft are being deployed on the streets throughout the USA today on Saturday, June 17.
Videos show tanks on the highways in Idaho, Osprey choppers in California, trainloads of military armor in Montreal, Quebec.
We begin in Larksphere, California, where a Marine Corps Osprey chopper is dropping troops into residential neighborhoods.
Oxford gives the military direct control over the 101 Highway out of San Francisco via the Golden Gate Bridge, as well as the I-580.
Hope you have emergency food, water, medicine, generator, fuel for that communication gear like CB or ham radio.
Have some cash money from an ATM because if the shit hits the fan, credit debit cards may not work, ATMs may be down without cash.
You'll be S.O.L.
if you need food or fuel until this blows over.
Here's more info coming in.
Here's a military convoy in a freeway in L.A.
Here's more tanks and troops.
This is on the highways in Idaho, Bakersfield, California, showing their equipment, active, deniable sound system weapons.
Here's more.
In Pennsylvania, trucks clearly carrying rolls of razor wire, used to keep people in or keep people out.
I say, this may be part of a provocation to try to get militias to react to declare martial law, as I have been emphasizing.
January 6th, in my view, was to imprint upon us a category of domestic terrorists, including oath keepers, militias, conservative Trump supporters, even parents.
Why?
Because under martial law, domestic terrorists can be tried and shot.
That's why they want our guns.
Watch The Checkist, exactly what happened after the Bolshevik revolution in Russia.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, as a former officer in psychological warfare, I'd say the American military is far more fractured and splintered than anyone really understands.
And that's because people like me, who are still wearing the uniform, are We haven't simply turned our brains off because Joe Biden has become, quote, the Commander-in-Chief.
In fact, we've been in a heightened sense of alert, and most of the military, I'd say 75%, even today with the fag rainbow flag stuff, are traditional, conservative, Republican-oriented people.
That's all I found in the military.
Disciplined people.
Sacrificial people who put their life on the line not for a college scholarship because they had a love for the pageantry and the military and all of the things that go with it.
And a sense of virtue and service and all of those things.
But those things are gravitated towards the preservation of the Constitution and the rights.
Now, the difference is Biden and some of his perhaps senior officers, like Mike Milley, have an attitude of control and Americans only move and do what we tell them to do.
So your job, junior officers, is to go control and do this town and no one gets out.
That's not going to work.
No one really understands that the military and the junior class officers below the rank of major are the ones that really have the most gumption.
No one likes colonels.
No one likes lieutenant colonels.
And very few really like majors either.
It's always under majors because majors have a certain political training to go through.
But captains and lieutenants are the ones who are on the line with the enlisted.
And it's very easy to frag and kill officers that do unlawful orders.
And when they say, your job is to go and round up militia members or something, you're going to have junior officers saying, that's an unlawful order, militias are constitutional, and you are demonstrating you're incapable of command.
Gentlemen, remove the colonel, remove the lieutenant colonel, remove the general, remove whoever it is.
You're going to have that kind of a schism and a kickback, I think, by the enlisted and the junior officer class, especially in special operations.
Rangers, SEALs, Special Forces, Marine Raiders, Recon, PSYOP, Civil Affairs.
These are the smartest guys, the most educated guys, the older of the guys.
They're not just infantry, although infantry are good too.
But you're going to have a major schism.
The moment the Biden administration thinks that they can have some peacock officer with a rainbow-flagged lapel give orders to Americans to corral or control or do anything worse is the moment you're going to see the military begin to fracture.
You're going to have independent, you know, sorry, I can't obey that order, sir.
Sorry, and you're going to have defections.
You're going to have officers going and giving orders, hey, go get the sheriff.
I want to have a conversation with the sheriff, and the sheriff's going to come.
You're going to have a whole black market of military intelligence operations by conservative traditional military officers that say, we are preserving the Constitution.
We are not going to recognize any unlawful orders, and any officers that try and give them are going to be removed or killed.
That's where the military really gets kinetic.
When officers try and give orders that are totally unconstitutional and that are harmful to the people, that's when the junior officers have to say, That's the landmine you just stepped on and you're out.
So I think you're going to see a civil war in the military if they try and push an extreme martial law crackdown.
I just don't see it happening because they should realize there are people like me who are not wearing the uniform but are still under oath that will treat them as domestic enemies accordingly, Jim.
Yeah, I don't think the higher-ups realize this, Scott, and I do think it's all too tempting for them to stage a false flag, a fake militia attack, responding to which they can reply with overwhelming force and declare martial law.
I wouldn't be surprised, but I appreciate all your observation about the lower ranks and how they may respond.
Brian, your thoughts?
They can do whatever they want.
They've already got us where they want us.
Most of us are fat, gay, and stupid.
And we were built that way by our educational institutions.
I hate to say it, but the American man, all you're gonna see that's left of the American man is inside the MAGA movement.
And a well-regulated militia?
Please.
We are so weak.
There are fragments of people here in Texas, maybe Florida, Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana.
Fragmentary groups that might be able to survive more than three weeks without power or water.
I doubt that they'd even make it three weeks.
Uh, or even more.
I mean, all they got to do is flip the switch and they can shut us down.
So look, I remember back in 2016 when it looked like Donald Trump was going to get elected that a lot of people said, Oh, these guys, these guys are so evil.
They're going to burn it all down.
They're just going to burn it all down before they give up power.
They'll burn it all down.
Think about this.
If this Biden bribery scandal hits the mainstream media, The way it ought to, and Tucker Carlson is really, I mean, he's on it.
If this thing hits, think about how these geopolitical dominoes will begin to fall, and how will those people respond if they're literally the ones looking at the noose that the American people is going to put on their neck?
How will these rotten, evil dogs respond?
Yes.
Seriously.
If they're being threatened with actual death or actual punishment for their actual crimes, they will lash out like tigers.
They will take everything under their control.
Blackrock, Vanguard, Everything that they do to try to keep us down, which means they'll have to institute a global currency so they can decide who gets to spend and who doesn't get to spend.
And we will be shut out.
We will not be able to buy our food or our fuel.
We will be shut out and shut down.
So while I have watched this narrative develop ever since Sixteen.
About, you know, the sky is falling, martial law, what's going to happen.
I have thought a lot about it, and to be honest, God help us.
Because we are not a well-regulated militia.
We do not know how to defend ourselves, and we and our educational institutions, we've allowed it to happen to ourselves.
We are fat, Gay and stupid.
Just like they want us.
Amen.
Very well said.
What a wonderful glass of ice water in the face, Brian.
I really appreciate that.
A dose of reality.
It ain't pretty.
Meanwhile, a former head of the January 6th bomb investigation reveals a key obstacle to identifying the suspect.
Really?
They just don't want to find him because he's one of their own?
Yes.
The FBI captured data people around the site where the pipe bombs were discovered January 6, 2021.
Some of the data wasn't usable.
The former head of the Bureau's investigation has claimed agents did a complete geofence of the area, said Stephen DeAntuono, the former FBI official.
We have complete data.
Well, not complete.
There's some data that was corrupted.
Geofencing is a technique creating a zone locating all devices within the area.
Yep, I utilized the data obtained through geofencing and charging documents against people over January 6th.
Yato said the data was corrupted by one of the providers before saying it was not done intentionally.
Right.
It's just unusual circumstance we have corrupt data from one of the providers.
I'm not sure I can't remember which one.
Right.
Let's not pin any tails on any donkeys.
He didn't want the information to trigger conspiracy theories.
No, God forbid.
But acknowledge having the data could have been good.
It was painful for us not to have that.
He, who departed the FBI in 2022, was speaking to the House Judiciary Committee.
Video footage shows a person using a phone before placing the bombs at the RNC and the DNC.
Representative Thomas Massey was questioning D'Ato when the former official made the comments called the data corruption disclosure unbelievable, meaning not worthy of belief.
Massey, Chairman Jim Jordan, Andy Biggs, and Barry Loudermake highlighted the remarks in a letter to Christopher Wray, Director, FBI.
The testimony raises concern about FBI handling the pipe bomb investigation more than 890 days following the placement of the bombs.
And despite your statement, you have total confidence the FBI will apprehend the subject.
They reiterated their request for a briefing, asked for all docs and communication concerning the phone records.
FBI has declined to comment.
They had not yet sent in a message.
The bombs were viable devices that could have been detonated, resulting in serious injury or death.
FBI Lab and Quantico conclude the bombs could explode and cause harm or death.
However, the timers couldn't out of work.
Do you think it was technically possible for a kitchen timer with a one-hour donation to detonate a bomb 17 hours later, Mazzy asked?
No, I don't.
And I saw the same kitchen timer as you.
I agree.
I don't know when they were supposed to go off.
Maybe they weren't supposed to go off.
We can't.
We don't know.
We honestly don't know.
Former FBI agent Kyle Serafin said in May the bombs could not have exploded.
They were inert devices, he said.
They just looked good.
Serafin said investigators were able to figure out which DC Metro rail card the suspected bomber utilized after planting the bombs.
He discovered the card was purchased by a security contractor who used to be in the Air Force.
Surprise, surprise.
So I've been part of a surveillance team that surveilled the contractor, but his superiors would not let him speak to the person.
It seems they had a good lead.
They could have run it down, but so far as I know, they never did.
During another portion of the interview, Duantuono said he didn't know whether the FBI interviewed the person who discovered one of the devices.
He says he's confident the person seen in the surveillance footage is the person who planted the bombs, but investigators do not even know whether it's a man or a woman.
There's a device on the right that looks good, but it appears to be a toy.
You got the suspect on the left.
I'd suggest that's a young man.
The FBI raised the reward for 500 thou, as the FBI Bureau of Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives said.
Identifying him remains a priority.
The bombs could have gone off.
The suspect may still pose a danger.
Ray?
Sit on Fox the following month.
He had enormous confidence in the team investigating the matter.
We have to divide loads and loads of effort into that specific investigation.
We've done publicity, calling for the public's health.
Well, there's the solution.
Call for the public's health.
Our folks are working very, very hard.
Folks, these FBI agents, analysts, professionals, I have total confidence in them.
Questioned by Massey and Abrel, ATF Director Dettelbach would not say whether the bombs were operable, which of course means they were not.
That's a significant matter.
It's an ongoing criminal investigation.
I'm not going to comment on an ongoing criminal investigation.
What bullshit.
They don't want to identify the guy.
He was one of theirs.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, picking up Brian's wonderful slogan, which I think certainly defines much of the American population and government, they are fat, gay, and stupid.
And the gayness afflicts a lot of these congressmen, Massey and the rest of them, who don't have the manhood to say, let me tell you something, Ray, I don't believe these bombs were ever real to begin with.
I think they were a psychological operation to distract the American people.
I think you planted them.
I think one of your informants planted them.
One of your agents planted them, like you planted yourself in the Capitol Hill to pretend to overthrow the Capitol.
So you could have a distraction operation to rush in this fake president, Joe Biden.
You've demonstrated your treason against the United States and the people of the United States from covering up everything regarding Russiagate to Clinton to now Hunter Biden, and now you've got these bombs that you're inventing.
The FBI needs to be destroyed and everybody in it brought forth and said, you have one chance.
Tell the truth or stand trial as an enemy of the United States because this entire agency has engaged in activities that undermine the Constitution.
No one said the balls to say something like that and let these fools blabber about it's an ongoing investigation.
The whole pipe bomb thing is a particular false flag distraction, Jim.
Yeah, in my opinion, not to accent the obvious, had the bombs been real, it would have been a perfect example of a domestic terrorist.
They didn't have any, so they had to invent one.
Ryan, your thoughts?
I'm sure the author of this article is going to win a Pulitzer Prize for his extraordinary writing about this particular thing.
How stupid do you really think we are?
Do you really think that we are that stupid?
Let me tell the audience something that you may or may not know, and those that are following us probably already do, but maybe if you're new to it.
They used bombs in the Dallas shooting in the Orlando Pulse nightclub.
He supposedly had bombs in his van.
The Nashville Christian shooter, the SWAT team, showed up.
And there were bombs, bombs, bombs everywhere.
There's always bombs.
Why?
Oh, because the military industrial complex produces bomb disarming robots and they're very expensive.
So they've got to be able to walk through the halls of Congress and say, look, We have to defend ourselves from bombs.
So we need more money for bomb dogs, bomb sniffing robots.
Look, look, Congress, you need to spend all this money.
This is what they're doing, and it's so obvious.
It's so obvious to me.
They're building a security apparatus between the people And themselves.
And they're beefing up the security industry complex to create that wall, that barrier between them and us.
So they have to stage false flags to get the funding that they need in order to spend on building a bigger security apparatus.
Because they know we are going to come after them.
I think that's wonderful, Brian.
That's wonderful.
Don, we're there at the point.
Give us a takeout right now, my friend.
Oh, wow.
What a heavy message.
This is not our father's world right now.
It's really being controlled by other people.
This is Truth vs. News here on June 18th.
I'm Donald Weiner, producer of JD.com, Portland's approach on Mail.com.
On our first half of And it's really heavy.
You've got to get this information out, folks.
You're not going to hear it anywhere else.
And it's important.
And it's a matter of survival now.
So thank you so much for watching here.
▲
Export Selection