All Episodes
Previous Next
June 19, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:33:59
Need to Know News (19 June 2023) with Carl Herman & Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
All set.
This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in Mission Viejo, California.
We expect to be joined shortly by Chris Weinert in Fort Myer, Florida.
Meanwhile, we began with a former NATO chief admitting, we decided back in 2008 that Ukraine will become a member of NATO.
How outrageous is that?
Folks who think the Russia-Ukraine conflict began on 24 Feb 2022 may be surprised to learn it's been brewing since 2008.
Former NATO Chief Anders Rasmussen admits, We decided back in 2008 Ukraine will become a member of NATO.
The decision that caused today's troubles.
Vladimir Putin explained a key reason for the intrusion, this special military operation.
Was because they could not allow NATO to absorb Ukraine among its members.
Rasmussen points out the possibility U.S.
and NATO might give certain security guarantees to Ukraine before it is admitted to NATO.
The interviewer asked if such security guarantees might be worded similar to those between the U.S.
and Israel.
When Rasmussen made the stunning admission, we decided in 2008 Ukraine will be admitted to NATO.
Stunning stuff!
This was not previously publicized anywhere.
What it means is that present trouble between Russia, Ukraine, NATO, U.S.
all began with a decision made in 2008.
From that point, the U.S., NATO, and the Collective West did what they thought necessary to lay the foundation to do exactly what they promised Russia they would not do.
Back in 1991, then-U.S.
Secretary of State James Baker met with Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev and Baker on orders from then-President George H.W.
Bush.
Actually, it would have been Ronald Reagan told Gorbachev and his foreign minister That if the then-Soviet Union agreed to reunification of East and West Germany, NATO will not move beyond the Elbe River of East Germany.
Here's even an official statement.
Quadruple meeting of political directors, Bonn, 6 March.
UK circulates promise paper on security in Central and Eastern Europe.
Agreement that membership of NATO and security guarantees unacceptable.
Agreement to consider statement about NATO's interest in stability in Eastern Europe.
We need new ideas how to provide for the security of Central and East European countries.
We made it clear during the 2 plus 4 negotiation we would not extend NATO beyond the ELBA.
We could therefore not offer membership to Poland and others.
We might, however, consider referring to our interest in these countries in future NATO declarations.
So NATO knew in 2008 that back in 1991, US, UK, France, and Germany promised that then-Soviet Union NATO would not expand east of the Elba.
And now we see straight from the horse's mouth that they, in 2008, agreed to admit Ukraine.
They were not supposed to do it.
They well knew, but they did it anyway.
So the U.S., U.K., and Germany explicitly promised not to do it, but NATO went ahead and did it anyway.
That leads to who was in charge in 2008.
It was W, the son of G.H.W.B.
President Michael Hayden, a former director of the National Security, was director of CIA, Robert Gates, Secretary of Defense from 2006 to 2011?
These are those who needed a green light to move by NATO, and from Rasmussen's admission, clearly they did so.
We're all on the verge of nuclear World War III now because a decision made in 2008.
On several of my shows, I've wondered whether the people in our government are psychopaths based on things they're doing that are leading us to another world war.
This suggests, in fact, they actually are.
When the interviewer asks Rasmussen, what will the Russians think about giving security guarantees to Ukraine before it's admitted an aid, Rasmussen replies, I don't care.
There you can see the answer.
They are psychopaths.
We're facing nuclear in World War III because of what men like Rasmussen did and still doing, and in response to his questions about it, I don't care.
Prepare as best you can with emergency food, water, medicine, and a generator for what's coming.
Meanwhile, Vladimir Putin observes Russia has more nuclear weapons than all the NATO countries combined.
Answering a question on his stance on using tactical low-yield dukes as a deterrent, Putin stressed his attitude about such weapons is negative, pointing to Moscow's nuclear doctrine.
Nuclear weapons are created to ensure our security in its most broad sense, the very existence of the Russian state.
But we firstly do not have a need, meaning for tactical nukes, and second, the very fact of discussing them already lowers the threshold for their use.
The Russian president in Moscow will not engage in nuclear disarmament talks with the West, given reducing the country's arsenal would put it at a disadvantage.
We possess more weaponry of such sort, meaning nuclear, than the NATO countries.
They know that, and they're always trying to persuade us to start negotiation on reduction.
Nuts to them, you know, as our people say.
With regard to deployment of Russian nukes in Belarus, he said the entire batch will be deployed by the end of the year.
As you know, we have talked with our union state, with the president of Belarus, Lukashenko, on deploying some of these nuclear tactical nukes to Belarusian territory.
It has happened.
The first nuclear weapons have been delivered to Belarusian territory.
This is the first batch.
We'll complete this by the end of the year.
The measure will serve as a deterrent to that, and so anyone who's thinking about hitting us strategically will not forget about this fact.
Talking about the ongoing Ukrainian counteroffensive, Putin said the Russian military has destroyed 30% of the Western armor supplied to Kiev, and they keep wiping it out.
It's not us who refuse to hold a dialogue with them, the Western countries.
They simply move this dialogue to the sphere of arms delivery.
But we will torch all they've been supplied and see what they do next.
Some 30% of supplied heavy armor has already been destroyed.
I'm not talking about Bradleys and Leopards alone.
As many as 218 tanks, among them Leopard 418 armored vehicles, as I recall, including Bradleys, are the total quantity, but there's no doubt the process will continue.
Yeah, Ukraine would have been better off taking a different path and looking for peaceful resolutions, but it has not come down to that so far.
And we see they're trying to win a victory on the battlefield.
Let them try.
We will see what comes out of their attempt so far.
They're failing and will hardly achieve anything.
Furthermore, Russia will always respond militarily to Ukrainian strikes on its own territory.
He added that retaliation is not always reported.
We hit military targets with high-accuracy, long-range high-mule weapons and succeed.
It's enough to see arm depots, warehouses, and barracks, housing personnel, including foreign mercenaries, destroyed.
There always follows a retaliation.
We just avoid presenting it as breaking news very often, but this retaliation is sensitive and the enemy knows it.
Kiev must understand, in the case of continued attacks on Russian territory, Moscow will consider creating a sanitary corridor in Ukraine.
If these attacks on our adjacent territory continue, we'll consider creating a sanitary corridor on Ukrainian territory.
They just have to realize where they are heading.
The largest annual economic and business event in Russia is taking place.
The main topic is sovereign development as a basis for a just world.
Putin remarks there are no shift on Russian stance on the conflict in Ukraine and deteriorating relations with the West.
Moscow is apparently still determined to achieve all the objectives of the special military operation, either militarily or with diplomacy.
Carl, your thoughts?
Wow, it's a great example that when the US and UK and NATO talk about security, really they're just talking about expanding their empire and acquiring more members.
That is a stunning statement by the former chair of NATO.
So the history of this, Russia surrendered control of East Germany and the Warsaw Pact nations, eight of them, to allow their independence.
From the security promise that NATO would not expand one inch to the east, as it was said.
And of course, they reneged.
And that's what they always do.
And that's what the U.S.
always does.
And here on BitChute, I'll put again the article that the U.S.
has been a rogue state empire for over 200 years.
Now we face the threat of nuclear war.
And it's kind of championed by this 666 character.
I mean, the BBB character, the actor Biden in the White House.
And this is only after the people in Crimea and in the Donbass refused the US-UK-NATO puppet.
Now, Zelensky, that piano-playing-with-his-penis comedian, and of course, patriots would refuse to have a puppet.
We would.
So they received the attack, the artillery attack, 14,000 killed of the Donbass.
The Russians did step in, and here we are today.
And the options are kind of like, in the face of World War III, part of me is like, are we just a deer in the headlights?
Just saying, oh, look at that.
I wonder what's going to happen.
Or do we have more power than we think through what we think and what we say and what we do?
The only power that we do have is the latter, so that's what I'm taking and running with, and we do need to have a breakthrough from Friends in High Places.
Otherwise, the trend of events looks to be the worst imaginable.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, great points, Carl.
I'd like to add to Carl's point.
When the Berlin Wall fell and Russia pretty much opened up its country for Western businesses, most of these predatory capitalists came in and really exploited a very difficult situation economically and socially in Russia, trading loaves of bread for Yukos and Gazprom stocks.
And these are the very same people that are trying to coup Ukraine, mostly, or their puppet proxies for them are.
So yeah, you can go back to the Harvard Trust or Larry Summers, the IMF, World Bank, you know, these guys really out of London and New York tried to, and D.C., tried to really dispossess the Russian people of their resources.
And this is, of course, when resources and fuel and energy were actually utilities.
before they could go to the private sector, even in America, in some of these larger markets.
Of course, they had to be deregulated and turned into a for-profit industry, as it was, supposedly for better service, for lower prices, things like this.
But the only thing that I've seen since that's happened is prices go up.
The CEOs and executive board members make trillions, and the people go broke, deciding whether they want to feed their kids or pay their power bill.
Good, good, good.
Good.
Meanwhile, Zelensky slams Trump for saying he would end the war in Ukraine.
I mean, During an interview with NBC, Ukrainian President Zelensky attacked former President Trump's pledge to end the war.
He argued if Kyiv does not defeat Moscow, Russia will attack NATO member states and pour the U.S.
into a direct conflict.
Are they ready to start a war instead of their children, he said?
Are they ready to die?
If Russia occupies Ukraine, they will move on to the Baltic country, to Poland, any NATO country, and in that particular case, the U.S.
will have to choose between dismantling NATO or fighting.
In other words, he has his own domino theory.
Kiev and Hawks in Washington assert Ukraine is a bulwark, protecting members of NATO from Moscow's expansionist ambitions.
However, there is no evidence the Kremlin is attacking other countries.
Putin views Ukraine as a unique security threat to his country, as he's explained in spades And seizing territory protects Moscow against the expanding NATO alliance, about which he is 100% correct.
Ukraine, of course, hopes to be added once the war is over.
We need an invite, and it needs to be clear that after this war, if we're ready, the Ukrainian army is ready to NATO standards.
After the war, we will be invited to join.
It's important to hear the truth and not tell us lies.
In 2008, we have learned, Ukraine was told it would one day receive full NATO membership.
At the time, Russia denounced the proposal, saying it violated red lines and from Russian perspective would create a significant security threat, about which there can be no doubt.
Despite Russian objections, NATO maintains its doors are open to new members, but Ukraine does not currently meet its requirements.
As Kiev is currently at war with Moscow, admitting Ukraine now would put NATO in direct confrontation with Russia.
In other words, would de facto put NATO at war with Russia.
He appears frustrated with NATO declining to make a formal commitment.
He's threatened Zelensky to sit out a coming meeting in July.
He went on to slam Trump, claiming he was unable to end the war when he was in office.
Why didn't he do it earlier?
He was president when the war was going on here.
I think he couldn't do that.
I think there are no people today in the world who could just have word with Putin and end the war.
The statement appears to be an admission that the war in Ukraine began before the Russian invasion of 2021.
Prior to that, Ukraine had an eight-year-long civil war beginning in 2014 with a coup engineered by Victoria Nuland in the United States.
This contradicts the claim by NATO and the U.S.
that the Russian invasion was unprovoked.
The Minsk Accords, moreover, were agreed to by Ukraine, Russia, Germany, and France with the intention of ending the then brewing civil war.
Zelensky, however, was unable to get his neo-Nazi pillar militaries to comply in the days before with a surge of fighting.
And, of course, we have others, including Angela Merkel, admitting the Minsk Accords were merely a cover to arm Ukraine.
Meanwhile, Putin says his Jewish friends call Zelensky a disgrace to the Jewish people.
Ukraine has pedestalized Hitler's followers as heroes, Russian President Putin has observed.
He shared the attitude of his Jewish friends who are the current leader of Ukraine.
I have many Jewish friends from my younger days.
They tell me, Zelensky is not a Jew.
He is a disgrace to the Jewish people, Putin said during a discussion at the plenary session of the St.
Petersburg International Economic Forum.
This is not a joke, not an attempted irony, because today neo-Nazis, Hitler's disciplines, disciples, have been put on a pedestal as heroes of Ukraine.
The Holocaust is the extermination of six million Jews, 1.5 were in Ukraine, first and foremost by the hands of the Banderites.
Putin said he'd been expecting a conversation so the night before he called Moscow.
As for material concerning statements by Nazis in Ukraine, he picked several out.
One, Joslav Stikenko, head of the Bandera faction, the organization of Ukrainian nationalists in 1939.
Moscow and the Jewry are Ukraine's greatest enemies.
I insist on the extermination of the Jews and on the expediency of applying German missions to how the Jewry is treated in the Ukraine.
He also cited Stepan Likovsky, who, speaking in July of 1941 about the notorious Lava Massacre, said, In relation to the Jews, we use all methods that will lead to their complete extermination.
What is this?
Asked an indignant Putin.
He also received post-war testimony from someone he described as a Banderite freak, recounting how he and his accomplice shot a Jewish family.
It's impossible to read this without a lump on your throat.
A man, the head of the family, was disabled, lost in harm.
His wife and two children, to my girls, 7 and 11, as I recall, were all grabbed, taken out to be shot.
All knew what was going to happen.
The moment they were forced out of the room, the disabled man, a cripple, hugged the dog with the one arm he had and cried.
They, the Nazis, took him out and shot him, including the little girls, 7 and 11.
He went on to say he might also recall the exterminated Russians and Poles.
By and large, the Poles' memories of Banderite atrocities in Ukraine are still fresh.
As for the Poles, okay, let's leave them be.
They have their own aims.
When they sleep, they dream about gaining a firm foothold in Western Ukraine, and it looks like they're moving gradually in that direction.
Putin wondered how the Holocaust could be denied.
We keep saying the same thing again and again that Bandera was an anti-Semite and a Nazi, but somehow no one wants to hear it.
Again, he said, Zelensky was a man with Jewish blood in his veins, but he covers for these freaks, these neo-Nazis, with his actions.
Lenin was discounted.
Okay, that's their business.
Though he's the founder of modern Ukraine, to hell with it!
But why do you put Nazis on a pedestal?
Carl, your thoughts?
All righty.
Chris, first, bro, you're going to have to mute while you're driving, while Jim's reading the stories that we're talking with you.
We hear the wind while you're moving there.
So first, the penis pianist President Zelensky, he's using that same tired domino theory.
What an insult to human beings that human beings are no more than a domino.
But that's the projection of what the evil ones always do.
See, they're the ones who are taking over the world, and they're going to blame that on their opponents, saying it's the Russians.
And the same argument that if you don't fight them here, you're going to have to fight them in your own backyard.
And the ridiculous part of it is that this Dr. Evil-like glee to take over the world is what they're trying to do.
And they've actually accomplished most of it.
We're just at this last endgame phase where perhaps we'll have an opportunity to wrest back control through the exposure of the corruption and the criminality, but we shall see.
The Minsk Accords, I'm glad the article brought that up, because that is key.
The Minsk Accords were basically a ceasefire, and then democracy.
And everybody should be fine with that, but that's just virtue signaling.
Because the US, the UK, NATO, and the other players there, all they employ is force and fraud.
They're going to virtue signal that they care, and then they're going to undermine everything that actually does work.
More peace and for human beings to have a say over their own lives rather than be a owned commodity and resource.
And for Putin to say that the Poles dream of empire.
Huh.
Well, if he wants to frame that in a larger context, that it is the government's controlling the polls, then I would say fine with that.
But there's far greater strength that you could pull across just to isolate these psychopaths at the top driving the wars from 99% of regular human beings who want Peaceful cooperation.
We'd love competitive cooperation, but the ordinary Polish person has no interest to acquire Ukraine.
That is just crazy talk, and that's what I see from this seat in the stands looking at World War III.
And of course, as Robert Forisson has reported in relation to the Zondel trials in Canada for Holocaust denial, Fred Lochter, the leading expert on gas chambers, visited the facilities in Europe and found nothing that could have served as a gas chamber.
But it's a legend or a myth they propagate because Jewish political power is rooted in a Western sense of guilt over the Holocaust.
Bruce, your thoughts?
Yeah, I'll just use it in modern terms and analogy.
There's no way you could bake six million cookies into easy-bake ovens in three and a half years.
That should be pretty much all you need to know about that bullshit they've been putting on with the Holocaust at six million.
The Red Cross Rothschild's own medical spy unit and whatever blood harvesting unit has said that it was 1.7 million, so I think their numbers have been greatly exaggerated as usual.
And I'd also like to add that the whole reason that this whole war started in the 30s was because these Jewish bankers sent armies around through every nation on earth to try to take their gold and silver and certainly depopulate the people in the resistance.
The Ukraine alone, killing between 80 to 100 million people from the time of 1917 to about 1939.
So, you know, as far as crime, you know, victim in this, they are clearly the perpetrator and they have controlled the historic narrative.
They have controlled the money.
They have controlled really the whole script.
So, yeah, it's amazing to see these people and the boundless audacity that they have And certainly the historic amnesia that they seem to grip, because it is certainly an asymmetrical version of history, and it's certainly not one that tells both sides.
And Putin is obviously showing his ties to the Shabbat Lubavitch, in my opinion as well.
So yeah, I think this whole Putin-East-West struggle is a Masonic charade, a theater, and really it's going to get a lot of innocent people, and even people that know better, severely injured or killed from this whole struggle that they're going to force on us.
So, yeah, I think that's what's going on here.
It's a depopulation effort.
The International Committee of the Red Cross recalibrated their numbers in 1993 and found a total of 396,081 had died from all causes, combined none of whom had been put to death by using Zyklon B in a gas chamber.
Carl, yours.
Yeah, and as a professional historian, I do appreciate and respect Jim's expertise to the people who have stated those facts.
And I would agree that the prima facie conclusion from all the available evidence from the Red Cross documentation and from the Easy-Bake Ovens is that it would seem to be ridiculous to hold up the Holocaust narrative based upon those facts.
And then all we have is just bluster, force, and fraud on the other side.
And for what Chris was talking about for The banksters de-golding the world in the 1930s.
I do want to bring that home to the United States that Roosevelt campaigned on against the banksters.
He coined that phrase, or somebody coined it, and that's where I got it from, the banksters.
But after he got elected, he shut up and then did not criticize the Federal Reserve ever again.
Look up Louis McFadden for His history of how he met his end, or maybe why, and they made it illegal for Americans to own gold.
And they demanded that Americans turn in their physical assets and receive back the paper receipts instead.
And as Roosevelt campaigned for this, or informed the American public that this was happening for the greater good, he refused.
Nobody put their name on it.
Not a single person.
He just said it was experts.
Experts indeed.
Meanwhile, Barack Obama proposes a digital fingerprint to help the regime combat what they deem as online misinformation.
In other words, he's all for censorship and wants to make it even more sophisticated.
Obama's proposed the implementation of digital fingerprints online to assist the regime in regulating viewpoints that are not aligned with their agenda.
The proposition was made during an appearance on The Axe File with David Axelrod.
Axelrod brought up misinformation, disinformation, and deepfakes, especially directed at Obama.
As I've told people, because I was the first digital president when I left office, I was probably the most recorded, filmed, photographed human in history, which is kind of a weird thing.
He claimed this collection provided a rich source of raw material for the creation of manipulated content.
Usually all deepfakes start with some version of Obama doing something, dancing, dirty limericks, whatever.
Right?
That technology is here now.
He expressed concern about the next election cycle.
If the government doesn't control what they call misinformation or opinions that oppose them, it could impact the election.
Recall current Secretary of State Blinken was reportedly behind the effort to put together a list of government intel leaders to claim the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation to help Biden with his election.
Obama also spread the false claim that then-candidate Trump conspired with Russia to secure victory in 2016.
Obama advocated for the development of watermarking or digital fingerprint technology to tell apart true news from false.
And the need for us, for the general public, I think, to be more discriminating consumers of news and information.
The need for us to, over time, develop technologies so we know what is true and what is not true, as though this technology would allow you to tell the difference.
There's a whole bunch of work that'll have to be done here, but in the short term, it's going to be up to the American people to have their say.
More from Fox?
Obama and Axelrod went on to say today many consumers are only viewing information from sources they are predisposed to agree with and will likely believe what they see.
Obviously.
We saw that during the backstop, so I'm concerned about it, added Obama.
I think the best we're going to be able to do is constantly remind people this is out there.
The former president thinks most people are now aware not everything on your phone is true.
That misinformation can be used to discourage people from voting by characterizing the system as rigged and corrupt.
And oftentimes it makes them powerful.
I'm worried about that kind of cynicism developing further during the course of the next election, as though the administration and the election were not rigged and corrupt.
I mean, Carl, this is almost a joke!
What kind of a presentation is this with Axelrod and Obama giving us a whole bunch of lies to conceal all the other lies they're distributing ad nauseum?
And that's the contest, brother!
That's the race to see who's gonna win this.
And, of course, we're suggesting that where people stand is just to flip the script for the narcissist, most filmed ever, Obama, to talk about himself and to talk about, to determine that what is written on the documents of whether people can determine if it's true or not.
So, people lie, and what is written So it's a rogue state empire, and all we could do is withdraw our consent, demand arrest, and we can document the damages of the annually killing millions, harming billions, looting trillions, but it is that contest of whether the American public are going to believe People like Obama, and the Bushes, and the Clintons, and Adam Schiff, and Nancy Pelosi.
All those repulsive characters, just to believe what they say, and to take what they say at face value.
That's dictatorship.
dictator dictate what is said and you do, or we have the first amendment to be able to not be censored, to have a contest of ideas, and then that the facts are going to win out.
And that's what they have to evade and avoid at all costs.
They will not debate us.
They cannot.
They have no facts on their side.
Chris.
Yeah, well, You know, if I were a fly on Obama's face, I would know that he's probably one of the most corrupt people on earth.
He led one of the most, I think, the largest psychological and social engineering operation with his two election campaigns.
Obviously, consensus management.
I think that he didn't have the support he had in hindsight, but I think that really the way that they applied the race card and many things like that, that That it was one of those things that if you second-guessed that, then you were a blank.
So, you know, it's kind of the same thing you're seeing now, and it's the same formula, it's the same people in power, same people that are, you know, looting the American public blind and replacing their cultures with this absurdity.
I'd have to say also that Biden probably told the truth for once in his life when he said they have the most comprehensive voter fraud organization in human history.
And I think that he's probably right about that, too.
So I don't think Obama is really interested in using this technology for voting.
Right.
Because, I mean, that would be something that would assure fair elections.
And if they did have the majority, they have nothing to fear with that.
They understand they don't.
So they really can't have that.
This is, of course, to prevent online misinformation.
So I don't know how they would necessarily do that.
But, you know, he could definitely have used certain instruments to assure election integrity.
But then, of course, they wouldn't be in a position of power that they are in if that were, in fact, assured.
So, yeah.
I think there's a lot of hypocrisy coming for this guy, and they use this type of inversion as a weapon, a preemptive gaslighting measure to really keep their opponents from criticizing or calling out what they've been doing all along, or to make it look infantile when they do, like a middle school type of argument.
Oh, no you are, no you are, you know?
So it's a Clinton tactic, goes back a ways, and both parties are involved in this charade, this extortion and embezzlement charade that goes on.
Very, very telling points, Chris.
Indeed.
impact in the CFR, and our foreign policy devised by the National Security Council.
So really, the American people don't vote on any of the stuff we're seeing.
And it's a damn shame, because I thought that's the whole purpose of democracy, right?
Very, very telling point, Chris, indeed.
Meanwhile, Trump's lawyer dropped a brutal truth bomb about Jack Smith.
The Biden admin has fully weaponized the justice system against Trump, but he's fighting back.
Alina Hobbs is one of the lawyers defending Trump, and she's dropped a brutal truth bomb about Jack Smith.
Hobbs appeared outside the Miami courthouse, where he pled not guilty to the politically motivated 37-count indictment.
It's about the destruction of long-standing American principles that have set this country apart for so long, Haba declared, that the Biden administration that brought these charges does not love America.
Its sole motivation is hatred of Donald Trump.
Really, it's rooted in fear.
We're witnessing the blatant and unapologetic weaponization of the criminal justice system.
She blasted Smith, Biden, Merrick Garland, Attorney General.
For having pulled a page from the playbook of the Third World Banana Republics by using the justice system to take out their top political opponent.
The targeting and prosecution of a leading political opponent is the type of thing you see in dictatorships like Cuba and Venezuela.
It's commonplace there for rival candidates to be prosecuted, persecuted, and put in jail.
What's being done to President Trump should terrify all citizens of this country.
These are not ideals that our democracy is founded upon.
This is not our America.
Wholesale Republicans agree.
One survey found 81% think the charges are politically motivated.
Impossible to see how this is not the case.
Smith filed an indictment in the midst of a presidential election where Trump is a frontrunner for his party's nomination and polls show Trump reading Biden.
But Mylon Gardner-Smith don't seem to care.
Democrats have the power to weaponize the judicial system against Trump.
They're using that authority to the fullest while they can.
This is what's driving the rally around Leader in effect.
The GOP balls for Trump.
The fact that Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Hunter Biden don't face any criminal charges for events that are similar, in my opinion, far, far worse than anything Trump is accused of, only makes it more blatant there are two standards of justice.
Meanwhile, Trump exposes Smith for hiding this crucial fact.
He made a huge mistake.
On his Truth Social feed, Trump slammed Smith for never telling the grand jury about the Presidential Records Act and the Clinton sock drawer case.
The grand jury was never told about the Presidential Records Act or the Clinton socks case, both exonerating.
These are critical aspects of Trump's defense.
Smith is seeking to railroad on bogus charges.
Fraternical Michael Kesha represented Judicial Watch in the Clinton sock drawer case.
That suit revolves around a series of recordings Clinton made as president for the book The Clinton Tapes, wrestling history with the president, centering on various crises and decisions Bill Clinton made in office.
He took the recording with him and put him in his sock drawer upon leaving office.
Judicial law sued for access, but the National Archive claimed the recordings were Bill Clinton's personal property and not subject to the Presidential Records Act.
In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, Kesha wrote that the Obama Justice Department defended the archives, saying it had no duty to hunt down every document a president took with him upon leaving office, and Congress had settled the question with the Presidential Records Act, which allows him to take whatever he wants upon leaving office.
In defending NARA, the Justice Department argued NARA doesn't have a duty to engage in a never-ending search for presidential records that were provided to NARA by the president at the end of his term, nor, the department asserted, does the Presidential Record Act require NARA to appropriate potential presidential records forcibly.
The government position was that Congress had decided the president, and the president alone decides what presidential record and what isn't.
He may take with him whatever records he chooses at the end of his term," McAsher wrote.
He also cited Judge Amy Berman Jackson's ruling in the Soctor case that the Presidential Records Act gave the president sole discretion over his records as further evidence that Trump did nothing wrong.
Since the president completely entrusted with the management and even disposal of the presidential record during his time in office, Jackson wrote, it would be difficult for this court to conclude that Congress intended he would have less authority to do what he pleased with what he considers to be his personal records.
She also wrote, the Presidential Record Act contained no provision obligating or even permitting the Archivist to assume control over records that present categorized and filed separately as personal records.
At the conclusion of the President's term, the Archivist only assumed responsibility for the Presidential Record.
The act does not confer any mandatory or even discretionary authority on the archivist to classify records.
Under the statute, his responsibility is left solely to the president.
Trump thus has a far stronger and more robust defense against the manufactured charges hit with him by Smith than the media wants to allow.
Indeed, I would say, Carl, those points are definitive, decisive, in my opinion, that this whole thing had no basis, no foundation whatsoever, purely political.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, yeah, and people are going to write whole books to be able to explain, document, and prove that.
So, as I'm looking at these stories as a retired U.S.
government, U.S.
history, world history teacher, I'm going to frame this as the final exam of humanity, of whether we continue as Americans defined by our Constitution or not.
And this is after that all of, pretty much everyone who's graduated from high school has gone through a school career understanding the Constitution.
And this is after, also as well, that we've witnessed the factless Russiagate, the primeless impeachment, the election fraud, to claim that 81 million votes went to basement, hair-sniffing, child-groping, plagiarist, war criminal, criminal against humanity, Biden.
This is after, let's just say from 2016 to 2023, the most hardcore propaganda from corporate media to push these narratives.
The immediate foreground of World War Three, where we witness what we talked about in the first stories with the US, UK, NATO attempting to saber rattle a nuclear weapon, rattle Russia with World War Three as the stakes, and the witnessing that we all have for our government's desires for forced injections in 15-minute cities.
It's the final exam for human beings, especially, I'll frame it, for Americans.
It's open response And the general question is, what are you going to do about it?
Where do you stand, given that you've learned that the U.S.
Constitution is a promise of limited government under the Constitution and defending inalienable rights?
It is an important question, and where human beings will go next will be determined by the quality of the answers.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, strangely enough, in democratic regimes, these liberal laws that supersede the Constitution are often put in place, with the exception of the Bush administration, who was basically a neocon, now they're, you know, the two-party system, whatever it is, what it is.
You know, I think what's going on here is Obviously, selective accounting, obviously, and certainly distortion of truth, but a parallel universe of propaganda between each partisan and each agenda, whether it's the pro or anti-Trump scenario.
I think a lot of what Trump has faced has been absolutely fabricated, and it seems to be redundant, and these people seem to really face no sort of repercussions for not only perpetually accusing him of false crimes and wasting the court's money and the people's money investigating absolutely phantom accusations, But more importantly, I think it's a way of putting Donald Trump in check from really going after these guys publicly in the way that he'd like to.
You know, I think really that's kind of like attacking his credibility, obviously, but certainly preoccupying him with, you know, throwing a bee's nest in his chest, so to speak.
Kind of like what they're doing with the American people, all these perpetual crises, all this misery index, you know, the no wages, inflation, everything's expensive, taxes are rising, interest rates, you know, all this stuff, right?
So, if you got all these different battles to fight, you know, of course they can hit you when you're getting blitzed and really be more effective in persuading you or even confounding you.
So, I think they're doing the same thing to Trump that they're doing to the American people, and I think it's all part of the show, too.
Yeah, what a farce.
How could you bring these charges and not base them on the key legal Statutes that apply.
Meanwhile... Baseless claims.
Feds.
You remember how many times they always say baseless claims?
All these Democrats.
Baseless claims.
They are the royalty of baseless claims.
They are the inventors and the usurpers of this type of strategy.
They throw all these accusations out and pull the full weight of the media behind it and they never get held to account.
Ever.
I mean, at some point in time, they got to be exhausting their credibility at some point.
I don't know.
I mean, these people really are deranged.
How could you have a more egregious case than this?
Stunning.
Meanwhile, the Wisconsin State Journal reports, Dane County board by a 25 to 1 vote.
25 to 1.
Trans non-binaries have a sanctuary.
Dean County has become a sanctuary for transgender and non-binary.
Madison may soon follow suit.
The Dean County Board passed a resolution to become a sanctuary city.
A similar resolution will be introduced at Tuesday's Madison City Council meeting.
That would be tomorrow.
Dozens spoke at the County Board meeting, including transgenders and allies.
Some who supported the resolution talked about a growing number of incidents of hate against the transgender community and the need for support.
The measure also faced opponents.
Some signed religious reasoning and concerns over gender reassignment surgery, particularly for children.
Here you have a transgender speaking to an attendee of a transgender rights rally on the steps of the Capitol in June of 2021.
Dane County became an official sanctuary for transgender and non-binary in the early hours Friday morning, with the County Board passing a sanctuary resolution in a 25-to-1 vote.
I stand with the one who voted against it.
Meanwhile, If vaccines don't cause autism, how do you explain all the evidence?
We've seen an odds ratio of 5 when comparing autism in vax vs. unvax in multiple studies.
The before-after odds are even more extraordinary.
How can we ignore the evidence?
Steve Kirsch, smart guy.
Evidence that vaccines cause autism.
Here's my four favorite short lists of evidence that can't be explained if vaccines don't cause autism.
Does anyone think I'm wrong and can explain the list in no particular order?
If there's a hypothesis that's a better fit than that vaccines cause autism, I'd love to hear it.
One, medicine studies.
Even in this heavily plotted study, the raw data showed strongly elevated risk of autism.
So they never showed the raw data odds ratio.
Did you know the rate of autism was 45% higher in the vaccinated group than the unvaccinated?
And the paper only showed adjusted numbers.
That's unethical.
You can read the flaws in a study that was widely cited to prove there was no association.
Over a thousand scientists didn't see anything wrong with the study.
It's really stunning how easily bad science propagates into the mainstream.
No, this is the single best study cited to prove vaccines don't cause autism, and it is deeply flawed.
The authors wouldn't provide the underlying data and refuse to answer any questions.
Is that the way science works?
Second, 214 papers in the peer-reviewed literature linking vaccines and autism.
Autism mom Ginger Taylor compiled the list of 214 showing the link between vaccines and autism.
Three, Wakefield, 1998 paper.
His retracted paper reported, We investigated a consecutive series of children, onset of behavioral symptoms associated by the parents with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination in 8 of the 12 children, with measles infection in one child and otis media in another.
So 66% of the cases were associated with the MMR vaccine.
Four!
2022 Morocco study.
70% of the 90 parents surveyed affirmed the first autistic teachers appeared after vaccination with the MMR vax.
Rates were nearly identical to the 66% rate in the Wakefield study.
Estafado paper evidence destruction.
CDC scientist William Thompson was ordered by his boss at the CDC to destroy only the evidence linking vaccines and autism.
Furthermore, the race subgroup analysis showing the link was omitted from the paper, which is unethical.
When Congressman Bill Posey tried to get Thompson to testify before Congress, they shut him down to be no testimony.
The cover-up was what convinced Wakefield he was right.
Vaccines cause autism.
Sixth, Simpsonwood meeting.
CDC scientist Thomas Verastraten did a study in 1999 linking thermalisol with autism.
They tried to make the autism signal go away, but they couldn't.
The original ratio was R7.6, which is a huge signal.
See my article for details.
7.
Paul Offit lied to JFK Jr.
about the Marisol.
RFK Jr.
told me the story personally, but now it's on the Joe Rogan Podcast, episode number 1999.
Start listening at 23 minutes in.
The punchline is at 2833.
Basically, the ethylmercury in the thermiosol makes a B-line out of your blood and deposits into your brain, unlike the methylmercury in fish, which has a harder time entering your brain, so it stays in your blood longer.
Offit tried to convince RFK the mercury gets excreted by referring to a paper, When RFK brought up the Birkbecker study, there was dead silence on the line because Zoffit knew he'd been caught in a deception.
In short, their Marisol can seriously damage people's brains.
Vaccines are not supposed to cross a BBB discrete biological plausibly needed Possibility needed for causality.
Meanwhile, a CDC study showing how the measles vac caused permanent brain damage.
The most remarkable paper showing MMR caused permanent brain damage is a 1998 acute encephalopathy followed by permanent brain injury or death associated with further attenuated measles vaccines.
A review of claims submitted by the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program written by CDC authors and has not been questioned or retracted and cited by 90 others.
This excellent Substack article shows a statistically significant peak at days 8 and 9 after the shot.
That's causality.
So the CDC knew in 1998 the measles vax was causing brain damage, but the paper said the relationship may exist.
Right.
Nor the way to explain the data of it were not causal.
This gives us more biological plausibility.
Studies of the vax and unvax All show a significantly higher rate of autism and other chronic diseases in the vaccinated, roughly five times more for autism.
One.
All Thomas studies shows the unvaccinated did better on a wide range of health outcomes.
The more vacs, the more office visits you had.
Hooker!
5.03 odds ratio for autism in the Vaxworthy Unvaxed.
MOSSA, 4.2 odds ratio for autism in the Vaxworthy Unvaxed.
666 in the study.
4.2 odds ratio for autism in the Vax versus the unvax, 666 in the study.
Control group, 82 odds ratio for autism in the Vax versus unvax.
For those with zero exposure to post-birth vaccines, pre-birth vaccines, or KSHOT, the total rate of autism in the entire CGS is 0% out of 1% of the population.
During the NOAARC calculation relative to my survey of 10,000 children, This is all completely stunning insignificance level.
Lyons-Weiler, the study was too small to assess autism, but showed better health outcomes among the unvaxxed than the vaxxed in other conditions.
A new study of 50,000 kids, moreover, submitted for publication not yet published, shows the same odds ratio for chronic diseases as the Hooker and Mawson studies.
The authors well respected the data site very large.
The Generation Rescue GR study, done on June 26, 2007, showed VaxKids were significantly worse off in every category they looked at.
For less than $200,000, we're able to complete a study that the CDC with an $8 billion-a-year budget has been unable or willing to do.
Where is the CDC survey?
Nowhere to be found.
They simply don't want to do it.
Read the survey, see the articles.
GR couldn't tamper with the study or manipulate the results because it was done by a third-party survey firm with no conflicts of interest.
If the drug companies didn't like the result, they could have easily commissioned a different polling company, but they didn't.
Or maybe they did and simply chose not to publish the result because they were so bad.
In any event, the lack of a bull showing the opposite of the GR bull is very, very problematic for the safe and effective narrative.
There are large cohorts with no vaccination policy that have no autism.
One, the Amish.
We couldn't find an Amish child with autism who wasn't vaxxed or adopted.
Two, a large clinic called Pediatric Practice I'm personally familiar with has eschewed the use of all vaccines and has said a morphine and achieved a zero autism rate over the past 25 years.
Even though autism was skyrocketing in adjacent clinics.
Moreover, despite the lack of vaccination, kids were also uniformly healthier than the kids in any of the surrounding clinics.
That means we can end the autism epidemic merely by altering individual choices.
Unfortunately, This clinic cannot go public with this information because the medical board would take away their license and practice because they failed to publish the vaccines on their patients like they were told to do by the medical establishment.
Third, There are other pediatric clinics in the U.S.
that is due a vaccination.
For example, Home First Medical Services.
We have 30,000 to 35,000 children we've taken care of over the years.
I don't think we have a single case of autism in children delivered by us who never receive vaccinations.
What makes this believable is that other clinics who didn't vaccinate report the same result.
Or my survey of the parents of 10,000 kids shows more vaccine means that autism diagnosis is more likely.
Omer's Clinic in Chicago, run by Mayor Eisenstein, had tens of thousands of patients, but not a single case of autism over 47 years.
He died in 2014.
From this article in UPI.
In the past, public health officials said that an approach to surveying the public to look at health outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated would be impractical due to the low number of never-vaxxed children.
But this caught tens of thousands of such children, beginning with the Amish, in various locations in the U.S.
In our anecdotal and unscientific reporting, the rate of autism seems strikingly low in the never-vaccinated children.
Here.
How large we've got is...
We've got this.
I have not seen autism with the Amish, said Dr. Frank Noonan, a family practitioner in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, who treated thousands of Amish for a quarter century.
We'll find all the other stuff, but we don't find the autism.
Right in the heart of Amish country and seen none, and that's just the way it is.
In Chicago, Home First treats thousands of never-vaccinated children whose parents received exemptions The Illinois Relatively Permissive Immunization Policy.
Home First Medical Director.
Mayor Einstein told us he's not aware of any case of autism in never-vaccinated children.
The national rate went into 175.
We have a fairly large practice, 30 to 35 children, and I don't think we have a single case of autism.
He bore four after-odds measure.
The most stunning pieces of evidence are for vaccine-causing autism.
Many parents notice a sudden dramatic change in their children after vaccination.
The funny thing is, none of them noticed this right before the appointment with their physician to get the shot.
It's simply nearly impossible to achieve a disparity like this if the shots were saved.
This isn't observer bias either.
If a child suddenly developed autistic behavior right before a doctor's appointment to get vaccinated, you can bet the first thing out of the Barrett's Woodbound would be telling the doctor before the shot of the sudden change.
What pediatrician in the world can recall that ever happening?
Yet we are inundated with stories of parents saying their child got a fever right after the shot, the parent may have given the child Tylenol, which makes everything worse, and within hours the child is never the same.
There clearly aren't anti-vaxxer parents who believe Wakefield, because if they were, they wouldn't have vaccinated their child.
So there's no way to ignore these reports.
First, pediatrician Doug Huggs said statistics.
We had a 150-autism patient have where the parents linked the autism to the vax.
He said there are 44 cases where autism signed a bill very quickly in every single case.
The regression happened after a vaccine, rather than days or weeks before.
That is statistically impossible if the vaccine is a placebo.
Even more devastating, you cannot find a pediatrician in the world where the before-after stats are comparable.
Why not?
If the vaccine were safe, every pediatrician should have comparable stats.
It would be impossible to find a single Doug Hulstead.
Second, my survey of parents of 300 autistic kids showed a 0 to 66 odds for getting autism the month before a vac shot versus within a month after.
That's in remarkable agreement with Doug Hulstead's numbers.
Other evidence?
Autism is brain injury.
The only thing that can cause such an injury is a pathogen that's either injected, ingested, inhaled, or absorbed by the skin.
There may also be genetic causes.
This limits our solution space.
Second, there's not a single cause for autism.
If you remove the major causes—vaccination, use of Tylenol, etc.—autism will still happen, but at a much lower rate.
Third, A pathogen must be relatively new, because autism rates didn't take off until 1983, when the CDC recommended a total of 10 vaccines for children up to the age of 5.
In 2007, the CCC recommended 36, an increase of 260%, or 3.6 times.
You can see the slope change at both those dates in the graph below.
Stunning!
This rabbit Klein was not due to a change in criteria to diagnose ASD.
Such a change would create a quick step function and just shift the existing line up where the slope would not change.
Growth also is not due to a genetic issue because genetic traits don't replicate exponentially over short time periods like this.
The fact we can dramatically reduce the rate of autism by withholding all vaccines suggests that the vaccines are the major dryer.
Distortion of truth When people on the other side have to lie and distort the truth to make their point, you have to wonder why they have to do that.
For example, Matt Carey, when he wrote about William Thompson's study, claimed there was nothing wrong with excluding the race subgroup analysis from the published paper or being ordered to destroy only the docs related to the race subgroup, that is, only destroy the data that goes against the CDC narrative.
Harry excels at gaslighting people who don't know how science works.
He wrote another article deliberately misrepresenting the results of the Generation Rescue Survey.
Matt claimed they showed the opposite of what they actually did.
Nobody can read the results of the GR survey and think that vaccines are bad.
But he deliberately didn't link to the source, so you can't easily check that he's lying as a result.
None of the comments pointed out the huge misdirection.
Professor Anders Hewitt had to create a bogus study that was designed not to find a signal.
When I notified another paper proved his underlying data was inaccurate, he ignored me.
When I asked to see the data, he blocked me.
Finally, in general, anti-anti-vaxxers will not engage in civil dialogue to discover the truth.
That should be very concerning.
Can they simply explain away everything in this article?
Can we talk about it?
More evidence.
The admission of a top autism expert.
The biggest piece of evidence comes from James Lyons Weiler, who got a call from one of the top autism experts in the world, Edel James.
We all know vaccines cause autism.
We just aren't allowed to talk about it.
If they admitted this, they would lose their funding, their job, their license to practice, their hospital privileges, their board certifications.
That's why I can't get a debate.
When I try to reach out to one of these experts, they ghost me.
And that's why there's never the before-after studies, and why there are so many studies designed not to find the signal.
Carl, your thoughts?
Oh, what an article!
Okay, so first, for Dane County, that's Jim's County, that's where Madison is, about a tenth of the state is in that county.
25 to 1 vote!
I would hope that some of those people who voted yes will receive election challenges coming up.
Steve Kerr, she's one of my favorite writers, and I want to acknowledge her audience for hanging in there with that article.
It is game-ending with the data, and the real contest is what's going to win, the force and fraud of our psychopathic Opponents or the objective and independently verifiable data.
I want to connect this to what RFK Jr.
was interviewed by Joe Rogan.
I've watched part of that interview, and I've heard a lot of RFK Jr.
Bobby talking, so I really don't need to invest a couple of hours in there, but one of the points that he made that I hadn't heard before is regarding his book, The Real Anthony Fauci.
He said his wife told him that she wanted to read the book for support and Bobby told her don't.
It's gonna be too depressing for you.
You already know enough, but don't go into it.
And that's part of the experience and part of why it's how difficult it is for us to win, because the data points are damning.
For myself, in 2004, I could no longer keep track of the lies and the crimes for the war, formerly known as On Terror, targeting Iraq, and I had to write it down, and that turned into a 40-page, 200-foot-note white paper that Congressman Kucinich used to help It is an attempt to impeach Bush and Cheney.
And then, more recently, I wrote a 4,700-word essay last school year that I shared with 100 of my teachers at Hayward High School.
None of them supported it.
All of them abandoned me after that.
But I really had to limit myself to keep that down to 4,700 words.
Then my point is, is that the data are so damning and overwhelming.
And again, as we've talked about as the theme for the show, our opponents cannot debate us.
They cannot confront the data.
The only thing that they can do is say, we can't debate them.
We can't give a platform to conspiracy theorists.
And that's all that they have is in the academic brain.
for their response is called denial.
And that is also an important term in criminal law enforcement because cops are trained.
Is that one of the first things that you're gonna see from the guiltiest idea?
No, it was me.
No, no, no, that's not true.
So game on. - Chris.
Yeah.
You know, one point to add to what you're saying, the cognitive dissonance level of some of the parents that may have been duped by the medical community, they would never accept them.
It could be on the defense mechanism of accepting the fact that they could have possibly willingly or voluntarily damaged their child from medical misinformation.
So this is a thing, you know, they're not experts.
they get gaslit into trusting these people and then gaslit into thinking that somehow or another it was something else other than this obvious factor because it really ascribes accountability, not only to them, but to the medical community as well.
You know, it's another thing in the vaccine statistic, it's why they didn't count you as vaccinated within a 14 days of the jab, because if you died very suddenly, it would seem to be probably a little bit more obvious.
And of course, if you did, they would count it as a COVID death, of course, but certainly not a vax death, right?
Just kind of like how when they had the medical murder incentivized the remdesivir and the ventilators, they counted that as COVID deaths as well.
Pandemic of the unvaccinated, Chris.
Pandemic of the unvaccinated.
Sure, sure.
All these gaslighting things, this fear-mongering.
Absolutely.
To think of what they're doing and the incentive behind this.
The Federal Reserve paying, what, $13,000 for every TCR test?
$39,000 for every positive diagnosis?
However much for a ventilator?
I mean, the survival rate is 12% on these ventilators with Remdesivir.
That's no mystery, either.
You don't hear that in terms of selective accounting when they talk about statistics.
You know, they've obfuscated these statistics, the VAERS data.
I said this two, three years ago, that the instant damage will be obvious, but it will be ascribed to something else.
But then once it's compounded with the accumulated damage, it's going to be too overwhelming in terms of these numbers.
Then they're going to be forced to departmentalize into the different demographics or different breakdowns in terms of these injuries.
And, of course, adding additional culprits along the way, if you really think about that, you know, there's a full spectrum assault on us, you know, with chemtrails or GMOs, 5G, the APO mRNA adjuvant.
You know, these adjuvants are acetone, glycol.
I mean, stuff that you don't want to ingest, let alone inject.
So, yeah, and it's all part of, like you said earlier, the insurance and the medical boards.
This is part of the standard operating procedure and training.
These doctors are not given all the stats.
They are just given the information as marketed to them by Big Pharma.
So, yeah, there's a lot of sketchy behavior going on.
And if you trace it, it all goes back to following the money and the incentive and these depopulation agendas.
They all seem to be centered around the Rockefeller Board of Medicine or their trained henchmen.
Uh, you know, think of Rockefeller when he was Undersecretary of Health and Human Services in the Eisenhower administration is when they really started pushing his vaccine agenda in the 50s.
53, I think it was.
So, you know, this is a propaganda campaign where they're running around saying safe and effective, putting $8 trillion into the COVID hoax and the business and this whole thing and destroying the small business, the mom and pop shops, the actual grocery stores that are not part of the mega Cisco logistics infrastructure.
You know, and these are ways that they can force social compliance as well.
In addition to vaccine passports, social credit scores, media censorship, social media censorship, media obfuscation, the profit margins, the marketing that comes from the big pharma in terms of media, what 65% of the ad revenue comes from big pharma.
I mean, this is an incestuous relationship.
There's a damn well good reason that hotels won't sit there and talk to somebody that can put these facts out and even more.
So yeah, it's a real hard explanation in terms of the court of public opinion when you have this type of bullet point.
gone down against their track record, which is the complete tale of two cities.
So, yeah, this is amazing to see how many of these operatives that are coming out waist-deep in the blood of the innocent coming up with these defense mechanisms and these gaslighting campaigns to really, really undermine Rogan and RFK for questioning the almighty science.
Excellent, excellent, excellent.
I mean, the evidence is simply devastating.
Hey Fetch, can I add something to that?
It's almost like they got like a debt ceiling removed and all this funding came through and flooded in immediately and now all these guys are on the internet and social media telling you about safe and effective again and oh we were just trying, they were hustle fowls and oh you're gonna take the word of a podcaster and whatever over the medical doctors and You know, the whole full gaslighting tactic is coming back again.
And you can hear these people talking about people that don't buy into this should be murdered or should be shot or should be killed.
You know, they understand that people on the other side of this are certainly not dehumanizing the people that are trying to murder them in the way that the people trying to murder are dehumanizing the people that resist it.
So it's an interesting situation.
Chris, you got it exactly right.
Very nice.
Meanwhile, Elon Musk has a conversation with RFK Jr., reported by Dr. Joseph Mercola.
Story to glance.
June 5, 2023, Democrat candidate RFK Jr.
and Elon Musk all hosted a live Twitter discussion about issues they believe should be at the forefront of debate going into the 2024 presidential.
Topics included free speech versus censorship, destruction of democracy, Ukraine war, foreign policy, humanitarian crisis at the border, COVID, link between mass shootings and antidepressants, the dangers of AI, and more.
If elected, Braz said it.
Kennedy will issue an executive order forbidding federal agency from participating in any effort to censor speech by the American public.
He's adamant about stopping the ever-growing influx of illegal immigrants across the border, currently formulating policy to make the border impervious while simultaneously opening up legal immigration pathways.
He wants to shut down gain-of-function research and bioweapon development.
All of which are commendable.
Not surprisingly, the liberal media chastised him for championing right-wing ideas and misinformation during the interview.
In fact, that was the New York Times headline.
They wanted to smear him as a leading vaccine skeptic and promote conspiracy theories.
Sounded like a candidate in the mushrooming presidential primary contest.
Translation?
He's a rational realist who doesn't shy away from difficult truths and inconvenient facts.
You see, Blaine had traveled to the Mexican border this week to formulate policies that'll seal the border permanently, called for the federal government to consider the war in Ukraine from the perspective of Russia, and said pharmaceutical drugs are responsible for the rise of mass shooting in America.
Adding, he claimed without evidence, COVID was clearly a bioweapon problem.
American Intel Agency do not believe there's any evidence indicating that is the case because, of course, they were all in on it.
Similarly, CNN wrote him off as a marginal candidate who espoused debunked medical claims.
Khomeini attacked the Coliseum Church's social distancing and government track and trace surveillance.
I'd suggest listening to the discussion yourself, as most mainstream discussion reporting does not do it justice.
Here are some of the key issues, with a focus on his stance and election promises, seeing how the establishment is doing everything in its power to prevent people from hearing what he stands for on social media censorship.
Proving ties between the Biden admin and Big Tuck are alive and well, Instagram recently suspended his official presidential campaign page after reinstating his personal page, which had been banned for the last couple of years.
Kennedy commented, I was evicted from Instagram in the swing of 2021.
at 2021.
The day I was evicted, I about had 770,000 followers, but I'd been up to 900,000.
Whenever I hit 900,000, they got it back to 800 or 700,000, so I was losing followers all the time.
They said it was because I was promoting misinformation.
But the term is information, and it has nothing to do with factual accuracy or inaccuracy.
It was simply a euphemism for any statement that departed from government orthodoxies and government proclamations.
If elected, he vows to call the heads of social media to the Oval Office and not walk out until we figure out how to make it work and make it consistent with democracy.
Like Sachs, Kennedy doesn't believe social media companies want to center any of their users.
Rather, they're pressured to do so by advertisers and the government itself, using private companies to circumvent the Constitution.
Were social media companies to continue censoring anyway, then taking them into common carriers, turning them into common carriers, would be one solution.
I'm pretty much a free speech absolutist, he said.
I think the remedy for misinformation is more information.
The remedy for bad speech is more speech.
It's never censorship.
Censorship is by far the worst solution.
There are forms of speech that are not protected, such as inciting violence and pedophilia, and you can censor those.
But if it's protected speech, I don't think it should be censored.
In any case, we should understand the logic, the algorithm, methodologies, and all have access to those.
That's key.
Because these institutions, meaning the Internet, are now the public square.
They're a place where speech takes place, and we have to figure out a way to integrate them into our democratic value system.
Musk is also adamant about the need for free speech.
I think if we don't protect free speech at all costs, we don't have a functioning democracy.
If we don't have a functioning democracy, nothing else matters, he said.
Ironically, since his acquisition of Twitter, the Democrat Party and its press allies have routinely portrayed Musk as a threat to democracy, primarily based on his support of free speech.
Malik brought up an interesting point.
Kennedy has frequently discussed the problem we have with regulatory capture.
In fact, most of our regulatory agencies, including the FDA, CDC, and EPA, are controlled by the very industries they are supposed to regulate.
As a result, there's no one to make sure the public is not harmed by dangerous drugs, vaccines, and chemicals.
A reverse kind of capture is also taking place as elements within the Fed are pressuring private companies to violate the Bill of Rights on the government's behalf while pretending these companies are doing it of their own volition.
How do we prevent our Bill of Rights from being violated by private actors when the government uses them to do their dirty work, Malik S. Kennedy?
I'm not just talking about censorship here.
I'm actually talking about deprivation of economic liberty.
He replied, In terms of the role of these agencies and compelling behavior from U.S.
corporations, it is appalling.
And as soon as I get into office, I'm going to issue an executive order forbidding the federal agencies, whether it's NIH, CIA, or FBI, from participating in any effort to censor speech by the American public.
Or to compel other behavior from the American public not legally required.
That's what we saw during the pandemic.
We saw it in the vaccine mandates, in the censorship of speech.
I will forbid that and make sure it does not happen again.
At least not during my term in office.
Immediately the first week in office, I'll sign that executive order on the border crisis.
He's also adamant about stopping the steady and ever-growing influx of illegals across the southern border.
We need to seal our border, he said.
A key existential function for every nation in the world is to be able to control immigration at its borders.
Having millions flowing across a border is not something any nation can or should put up with.
Over the next three days, I'll be meeting with people from border control and elsewhere to try to formulate policies that will seal the border permanently.
That's what I will do as president.
I will make that border impervious.
I'll also open up legal immigration.
So the immigration we do need that's going to be beneficial to our country and economy will continue.
Shutting down gain-of-function research.
He's equally adamant about shutting down any functional research, which is nothing more than a convenient cover for bioweapon development.
According to him, the CIA continued developing bioweapons in secret after the Biological Weapon Convention went into force in 1975 and has never stopped.
We should shut the whole thing down.
COVID was clearly a bio-weapon problem, and you saw what it did to us.
What if it were a real disease?
A disease that had a 50% mortality by dengue fever or Ebola or one of these other real deadly viruses.
They got those in the labs too, but shut it down around the world.
Let's have a real shutdown of all bioweapon development.
Make sure that one country does not develop a weapon that's going to kill all the rest of us.
He expressed mild disagreement with Musk on some points.
Noted even self-driving cars poses a significant threat to a society considering some 40% of American jobs involve driving.
What kind of productive work can we replace all those lost jobs with?
Good point.
On the Ukraine war, he didn't miss words as to comment on the Ukraine war.
He pointed out that people of the West have been massively propagandized with comic book depictions of President Putin as a bad guy who attacked Ukraine unprovoked.
The problem is, we're being victimized by our own agencies, which are leaving out contextual information, leaving out nuances, leaving out the entire history, in this case, of U.S.
provocations, which brought us and Ukraine into a war that is not helping Ukraine.
Ukraine has now lost probably 350,000 kids.
They're in a much worse position than when they began.
There's credible information there are seven Ukrainian deaths for every Russian killed.
It's now up to ten.
And the Ukrainians are not going to win this war.
They cannot afford to win this war.
This war is existential for Russia.
He continued elaborating on the importance of the Minsk agreement.
France agreed, Germany agreed, which was a reasonable settlement.
Keep NATO out of Ukraine, my uncle.
President Kennedy used to say, the only way to have peace is if you put yourself into the shoes of your adversary.
In that speech, he was explaining for the first time to the American people the role and the suffering Russia endured during World War II.
I grew up in a generation where we were told America had won the war against the Nazis.
Without America, the world would have been lost.
My uncle was telling the American people, that's not true.
We beat Hitler with the Russians.
They made a sacrifice that is unimaginable to everybody else in the world.
Hitler invaded Russia through Ukraine and killed one out of every seven Russians and leveled one-third of the nation, he said.
Imagine if all the American continent was reduced to rubble between the East Coast and Chicago.
That's what happened to Russia.
You've got to understand that we're going to have peace with Russia, if we're going to have peace with Russia.
And we need to understand today, we need to put ourselves in their shoes either way.
It's not just Putin.
The Russian leadership back in 92 made an agreement with us, they said.
We'll pull our 400,000 troops out of East Germany.
We'll turn East Germany over to a hostile army, the NATO army.
The concession we want for you, however, is you not move NATO to the East.
And President Bush famously told them, we'll not move NATO one inch to the east, in short.
Everyone knew that inching NATO eastward would be viewed as direct confrontation and a formula for war.
Yet that's what NATO and the U.S.
have done.
NATO kept expanding eastward until only Ukraine was left.
And that was Russia's red line that could not be crossed.
It's dumbfounding.
We're picking a fight with a country that has a thousand more nuclear weapons than we do.
It's just insane.
On gun violence and the Second Amendment?
In closing, the foundational principle that guides him no matter what the issue is the Constitution, he views himself as a constitutional absolutist.
So while his grave concerns about rising gun violence, he opposes placing restrictions on the Second Amendment.
I want to stop the school shootings.
It comes down to protecting schools the way we protect the airlines.
I also look very closely at the role of psychiatric drugs in these events.
There are no good studies right now.
That should have been done years ago on this issue, because there's tremendous circumstantial evidence that SSRIs, benzos, and other drugs are doing this.
You have to look at almost all these drugs.
Look at manufacturers' inserts.
They include a side effect of homicidal and suicidal behavior.
And prior to the introduction of Prozac, we had almost none of these events in our country.
I will do these studies immediately when I get into office.
The only way we're ultimately going to get gun control is through consensus, and that consensus cannot happen when we're all at each other's throats.
We need to assure the people who feel insecure about the Constitution that our Constitution is no longer under threat, and nobody wants to come and take away their guns.
Harl, your thoughts?
Well, a great article.
I appreciate all the truth bombs happening with that interview.
The historian in me has to remind people in 2016 and 2020, Bernie Sanders held a very popular position among the Democratic base and would have won that nomination if democracy had moved forward.
And Sanders' move in response to that, when threatened, was to roll over and to surrender the nomination to Hillary and then to Biden.
Choices, choices.
Now, for RFK and Kucinich, I had told people that on Memorial Day, I attended a San Diego event with RFK Jr., and I attempted to contact and meet and say hello to Dennis Kucinich, his campaign manager, the former candidate among the Democratic Party, candidate for president in 2004 and 2008.
For three weeks, they've ghosted me.
in 2008.
For three weeks, they've ghosted me.
And the invitation is for RFKJS.
Jr.
and for Kucinich to be briefed on what the research assassination community led by Jim's work can demonstrate about the assassination of Bobby's father and uncle and MLK.
And that really has to be addressed.
Otherwise, there's no way that Bobby can make it anywhere through the election fraud, through the Dominion voting machines and through the poison of corporate media.
And even if he did get there, what's going to happen to him as president?
He has to make this war has to be won.
Otherwise, he does not have a chance.
And I am going to I have one more contact I'm going to reach out to within his campaign.
And then I'll write an article about it and we'll see.
I mean, choices, choices.
It is a big playing field and who knows what's really going on in the background.
For what Bobby was saying about the Russian sacrifice in World War II, yeah, so we have about one in seven Russian dead.
So to give a frame, that would be almost 50 million dead Americans today, given the USA population.
That is what the Russians experienced in World War II.
Uh, this reneging of what the US, UK and NATO had promised Russia with NATO not expanding one inch to the east.
Yeah, that was under President George Herbert Walker Bush, who had been the director of the CIA.
But really, Papa Bush was the president during Reagan's term as well.
After the false flag assassination attempt of Ronald Reagan in 1981, which was another orchestrated hit by the CIA, it seems clear to me that the power behind the throne after that became just a manipulation of using Reagan as a puppet to push the policies forward and to take advantage of Reagan's acting ability to make it appear as if this was all patriotic.
Yes, yes, yes.
The shooting was not by Hinckley, but by a Secret Service agent.
Shot Ronald Reagan under the armpit with a blushette that barely missed his heart as he was pushing him into the vehicle to get the message across, let George do it.
Chris, your comments.
Yeah, I don't think George was even on the ballot with him.
I think it was Bob Dole, and then he got replaced when he got the nomination, right?
So, yeah, interesting how he strong-armed his way on there.
And then as soon as Reagan gets hit, you remember Al Haig is running around saying, I'm in charge.
He was Secretary of State at the time, UN General.
You know, this whole thing that's going on is the UN-NATO thing is an act of aggression.
And it really seems to be, like I say, a child smuggling thing, going back to the Clinton administration and the war in the Balkans and Yugoslavia.
former Soviet satellites.
So yeah, interesting to see how they're doing the same thing in Ukraine now with the Biden thing.
It really seems to be par for the course with these guys and maybe just a different victim of geography or different haplo targeting.
But yeah, the same people behind it and the same thing going on beneath the fog of war or more importantly, diplomacy or whatever they're calling this because it's not a formerly declared war, right?
It's everything but that but certainly there's a lot of money being spent at taxpayer behest to to hire these mercenaries to go in and clear out the population like this.
So yeah, I think there's a lot of vested interest involved in this depopulation tactic and certainly the the black market that's involved with it as well.
Yes, yes, yes.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, Broadcom, to LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
Here we have a comment from Patty about RFK.
I'm still going back and forth with the New York City official about the Sherman Monument to see what they could do to improve the area, which is currently a disaster.
We'll have that article soon.
Meanwhile, I didn't list a musk in RFK Jr.
too long.
Here's one of Dr. Marcola's highlights, which matches his ideas about drug and mass shooters.
I wrote to Children's Health Events Press and sent info from you and Brian about mass shooters that it has nothing to do with drugs.
Meanwhile, he's still espousing erroneous material.
Perhaps you can contact him directly about this foolishness.
He said he planned to travel to the Mexican border this week to try to formulate policies that'll seal the border permanently, called by the federal government to consider the war in Ukraine from the perspectives of Russians, and said pharmaceutical drugs were responsible for the rise of mass shootings in America.
Meanwhile, final thoughts.
Carl, yours.
Yeah, the same theme that I've been pointing to for weeks is that I don't know what's holding up the narratives and we haven't had some sort of a breakthrough or a breakout or a breakdown.
But the the polarity, the gap of what Chris was talking about of having really two separate.
America's two separate narratives.
This thing will break and it will break sometime, or so it appears, and it hasn't done it yet.
So all I can do is just encourage people to be comfortable and confident with what, as far as I can tell, are the only things that we have control over is what we individually Think, say, and do.
And then you just have to have the wisdom to surrender that there are broader events that come in, and you just have no power regarding those events, and to just be humble and grateful and strong with what you do have.
Excellent, Carl.
Thank you for your wonderful comments, and Chris, too.
I'd say there are several messages from today Number one is that the lawsuit against Trump over the docks has no basis whatsoever.
It's such a dishonest piece of work that it doesn't even cite the central law that regulates these issues, the Presidential Records Act, because it shows there's no case, no basis for it, and previous decisions by the archives have supported it.
This is rubbish!
Second, evidence about autism as a function of vaccines is beyond conclusive.
There's no question, no room for debate about it whatsoever.
If you followed what was reported today, you get it.
Vaccines cause autism.
The solution?
Get rid of the vaccines and you'll get rid of autism.
No doubt this is being pushed by the big pharma because it makes a lot of money.
They don't benefit from keeping you well, they benefit from having you sick and dependent on their drugs and procedures.
Don't let yourself be played third.
I found it extremely refreshing to hear RFK Jr.' 's talks about this Second Amendment, for example.
Yes, Patty's right.
These stage events are being manufactured by the government to promote their gun control agenda.
But in spite of it, he's an absolutist on the Second Amendment.
I feel so much better about Bobby after reviewing his conversation with Elon Musk.
He's a serious guy, a serious candidate, and head and shoulders above anyone else the Democratic Party is going to be able to produce.
I recommend him highly.
Meanwhile, Spend as much time as you can with your family, your friends, those you love and care about.
We do not know how much time we have left.
NATO is provoking a nuclear war.
Who knows what might happen?
Putin's not going to back down.
Have no doubt about that.
▲
Export Selection