All Episodes
Previous Next
June 17, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:16:55
Need to Know News (16 June 2023) with Carl Herman and Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Here we go.
This is Jim Fetzer of Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in San Ramon, California, and by Chris Weinart in Fort Myers, Florida.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
We begin the latest about Ukraine, where General Mark Milley, who is the head of the U.S.
Chief of Staff, claims it's going to be a very long and very violent Ukrainian counteroffensive.
I'd say he's got it half right.
It is going to be violent.
I do not believe it's going to be very long, however.
He said it's a very difficult fight.
It's a very violent fight.
It'll likely take a considerable amount of time and at high cost.
Milley claimed Ukraine has been making steady progress, but the battle lines haven't changed much since Ukraine launched its assault early last week.
According to the New York Times, it had been three days since Ukraine claimed any gains.
The Ukraine's deputy defense minister acknowledged it was very difficult to advance.
Asia Times reported that American and European observers in Ukraine described the attempted counteroffensive as a suicide mission because of how they were going about attacking Russia.
If you want to attack, conduct a counteroffensive and have a dozen brigades and a few dozen tanks, you concentrate them and try to break through.
Ukrainians have been running around in five different directions.
We tried to tell them to stop these peacefield tactics, to find a main thrust with proper infantry support, and then do what they can't.
The report is so far Ukraine lost 38 tanks, including German-made Leopard, on June 8th, sending them into minefields without deploying mine-clearing vehicles first, which is an amateurish action, totally irresponsible, Quite often our Secretary of Defense, or so he is supposed to be, downplayed Ukraine's losses, claiming Russia was showing different pictures of the same damaged vehicles.
This is just silly on his behalf.
Meanwhile, we have the report that Biden is trying to Contemplate how to move forward with Ukraine, whether to support full membership in NATO—and of course, since a war is being fought over that, it's a ridiculous idea—or simply to use the Israeli model, namely that we're going to continue to support weapons to the country.
The pledge would fall short of a collective defense guarantee, which Kiev and some Eastern European members are advocating, sign officials who are familiar.
Russians have described hostilities as part of a U.S.-led proxy war against the country and called expansion in Europe by NATO, one of the key causes of conflict about which they are 100% correct.
Ukrainian President Zelensky reportedly threatened to boycott the NATO summit in Vilnius, Lithuania, unless the country were given a roadmap to NATO membership.
The Times, New York, said Germany was the only member that has sided with Biden on the issue.
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg suggested a compromise entailing a pledge to maintain arm flows regardless of the outcome gives representation would be upgraded at council level what Russia used to have before its relations with the rest deteriorated.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, for Milley, first of all, I appreciate his statements.
He is the chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
That means that he is the leading U.S.
officer among the war criminals.
And these wars are, Orwellian, illegal, started with known lies.
I'll put a paper here at BitTube, a different one.
The one paper that you need to be able to explain that we've had two world wars treaties after each war and Article six of the Constitution says a treaty if you get a president sign on and two-thirds of the Senate to confirm that is US Supreme Law and after the two world wars World War one
The renunciation against war which is an active treaty last time I look at the annual publication of the State Department treaties in force says you can't use war and for World War Two it's the UN Charter which only allows a very narrow definition of self-defense similar to you or I walking down the street we can use up to lethal force If we're attacked or an imminent threat, but otherwise you just can't attack people.
And the U.S.
has done that over 200 times since World War II, killing 30 plus million people.
So anything that these psychopathic war criminals say, it should be rejected.
And the obvious call from the citizens should be to arrest them.
As far as the Israel model goes, this is just, they're just looking for more bullshit, whatever talking points that they can to continue their empire.
And it's all ridiculous.
And we should just laugh it off.
I think you got it right, Carl.
Chris?
Yeah, I'd like to see Millie and Lloyd Austin's stock portfolios.
I would bet that they are probably board members of certain defense contractors.
I know Austin was on with Raytheon.
Millie probably has his own interest involved with this in the private sector that are being that where they're using the resources in the military and the financial resources of the taxpayers and putting it on our tab.
But these guys are taking away some immense private kickbacks for the quote-unquote service of the quote-unquote country.
So yeah, I think that this is really a privateer effort that is going on where they're trying to use public debt to fund this private resource grab.
And yeah, until I see otherwise, I don't think anything's going to change my mind.
I think it's only getting worse.
And if you think about how many casualties they've lost trying to rebel against Russia, I think it's in the ratio of 9-10-1.
So I mean, that is just an absolute bloodbath.
So it's a complete disregard for the people they're supposedly trying to set free.
Yeah, in a way I think maybe the Israelis like the depopulation of Ukraine so they can bring in all the Israelis and they don't have to even mess with them, you know, just take their home, their property, whatever, to their own use.
They're taking the Pale of Settlement back.
Sorry, Jim.
Yeah, no, say that again, Chris?
They're taking the Pale of Settlement back.
That is absolutely their former homeland in the Russian Empire.
Yes, yes, exactly, the Khazarians, Khazaria, exactly, modern-day Ukraine.
Meanwhile, Gates of Hell representative holds first hearing on alleged abuse against January 6th defendants.
This is a target-rich environment.
A field hearing entitled, of January 6th, heard testimony alleging widespread abuse on the part of law enforcement with regard to January 6th and the treatment of those detained.
Among the defendants, Jeff Clark, a senior fellow at the Center for Renewing America, Ed Martin, President of Eagle Forum Foundation and Legal Defense, Jerry Perna, And of a deceased January 6th defendant, Matthew Berna, Sarah McAbee, the wife of January 6th defendant Ronald McAbee, January 6th defendants Brandon Straka and John Stratton journalist Taylor Hanson, who witnessed and filmed the fatal shooting of Ashley Babbitt.
Among the first testimonies was that Jerry Parna, who gave a tearful testimony about the circumstances under which her nephew, Matthew Bernard 37, killed himself following his conviction for non-violent conduct on January 6.
Gina said her nephew was arrested for spending 14 minutes in the Capitol building on January 6th, that the fallout had ruined his personal and professional life.
She said those responsible for defending him had betrayed him.
What followed was one betrayal after another.
From the moment Matt found the FBI was looking for him, he turned himself in.
The agent said it would make it easier for him.
That was a lie.
He was told his clean record would count in his favor.
It did not.
He was told having no affiliation with any organized group would help.
That was another lie.
Then he was told he would most likely face a fine and nothing more.
Not true either.
His attorney said his sentence would be less if he made a deal and pled guilty.
That was perhaps the greatest lie of all.
Gates retweeted a video.
So much of our work has uncovered things that initially were deemed conspiracy theories but now have sworn evidence to prove to be true.
Yes, surprise, surprise.
More at the Washington Examiner.
Matt Gates held a house hearing with January 6th defendants and their family during which they outlined accusations of abuse of power by the government.
No doubt about it, are all your thoughts.
Well, if it gets good for him, and this is the type of testimony that we need, the J6 defendants, that what we've been shown has just been a ridiculous dictatorial regime, the most outrageous circumstances to treat these people, and the entry-level crime that you would consider against the U.S.
government for planning and enacting this would be entrapment, all the way up to, I don't know if it would qualify for an attack upon the U.S.
for treason, but we do know the following facts is that President Trump recommended the National Guard just as they did in the Summer of Love on the steps of the Capitol.
And if you want to look back at the documentation of that, you had 200 National Guardsmen dressed to party on the steps and no one was going to mess with them.
On J6, Pelosi and team declined that invitation.
And we have those magnetic doors of the Capitol building, the most secure locking mechanisms open from the inside.
You have acknowledged feds in the crowd.
How many?
100?
You have Ray Epps.
You have cops moving the little bike barricades aside and motioning people in.
You have all kinds of agents on the inside motioning people in.
You have Pelosi filming the whole scene with her family members to make a little documentary.
So this is all ridiculous on its face, and I hope that this is just another final piece before this show is closed down and the American people get to witness the arrest of these psychopathic criminal leaders.
Of course, I think January 6th was a stunt in part to implant the concept of domestic terrorists among the American people so that when martial laws eventually declared they've got a legal predicate to go after all the groups they don't like, whether it's Oath Keepers, Proud Boys, MAGA supporters, Trump Voters, conservatives, women who don't want their kids groomed in schools, and line them up and shoot them.
Honest to God, I think this is going to happen.
Watch the film The Czechist, 1991, for exactly how it was done in Russia after the Bolshevik Revolution.
Summary judgments, immediate execution.
Yeah, you know, it's kind of par for the course in terms of basic military strategy as far as I've been able to study.
Anybody that would be a preemptive resistor to the coup attempt is considered a traitor and then banished or exiled or swept away.
So yeah, this is pretty much how these things work.
In this case, it wasn't necessarily a military coup.
It was a coup by every aspect of the private sector, the media, the contractors, the defense department, the banks, pretty much everybody in the Fortune 500 was supposedly standing behind this.
And I think it's really a psychological operation as well to really create a polarizing effect, either pro or anti-Trump or pro or anti-Biden.
I think they're really trying to put the pretenses forward to create the animosity to build it up, the systematic frustrations of justice so that a civil war might kick off once the House of Cards financially fall apart.
So, yeah, I think it's part of the controlled demolition of this country.
And I think that it's all part of the show and part of the act.
And hopefully at the time this is said and done, people will wake up before it's too late and actually put these guys to justice.
'cause I don't think there's any military or white hats that are gonna do it for us.
I think it's going to actually be the citizens finally just piling together and getting them out of there and taking our country back.
But either way, nonetheless, none the more, I think you really need Acts 2, 3, 4, and 5 to build up to the crescendo of Scene 5, Act 5.
So, yeah, I think that's kind of what we're seeing.
And I think maybe you guys might be right as far as, you know, them laying the groundwork necessary to really trap the Biden, Obama, Democratic political corruption machine, the woke culture, the LGBTQ operation, all these things, hopefully expose them for what they are.
I don't know, maybe it'll just be a back-and-forth thing, though, like, you know, with the Republicans in queue, or these guys with this stuff, and really nothing will happen, just people will really get more frustrated, and it'll condition more helplessness.
So, I hope that's not what happens, but I think that's what they're trying to do here.
Oh, I congratulate Matt Gaetz.
It was like a tiger.
He is really going after this in a very thorough way.
Impressive.
Meanwhile, Georgia, knowing that their software, their voting machines are defective, is not going to correct them until after the 2024 election, but use them to steal one more round.
Georgia officials have been aware of existing vulnerabilities in their voting software for more than two years, but continue to insist the system is safe and won't be updated until after 2024.
A report finding focus on weaknesses in software for certain Dominion voting machines which had been previously verified by federal cybersecurity officials who urged them to update their systems.
Republican Secretary of State Brett Raffensperger, who of course is a rhino, recently told a federal court official would forestall installing Dominion security patches until after the 2024 presidential.
They insist it's highly unlikely the vulnerabilities will be exploited.
They say they've already carried out a number of security recommendations without having to update.
Upgrading the system will be a massive undertaking, and our election officials are evaluating the scope of and time required for the project, said Mike Hassinger, spokesperson for Georgia's Secretary of State.
Well, state and federal officials suggest it's unlikely they could be exploited.
The newly released report points out Georgia is far more dependent on this particular Dominion software than any other state, potentially undermining confidence in its ability to conduct a secure election.
Moreover, while they're dismissing this, the fact they're identifying the vulnerabilities makes it far more likely they are going to be exploited, even though Gabriel Sterling, top election official in the Secretary of State's office, asserts the opposite.
Adding safeguards are already in place to mitigate these hypothetical scenarios from happening.
Dominion last year updated its software in response to the attack scenarios described by the report's author, a University of Michigan computer scientist named J. Alex Halderman.
But Georgia has not implemented the recommended security patch.
State officials are waiting to do so.
Delaying the security patch until 2025 is worse than doing nothing, warned Halderman, since it puts would-be adversaries on notice.
The state will conduct a presidential election with that particular version of software, with those known vulnerabilities, giving them nearly 18 months to prepare and deploy attacks.
Georgia's Secretary of State maintains the attack's scenarios are unrealistic, given the wide-ranging access he was granted to the voting equipment and addressed by security controls at voting location on Election Day.
The report was produced two years ago at the behest of a coalition of election integrity advocates You've been embroiled in a year-long suit against this Secretary of State's office over concerns related to its Dominion software reliance.
It was placed under seal by a judge, given the serious election security concerns raised by its potential release.
Earlier this month, however, the judge ruled the report should be unsealed.
The ruling proposed redaction by the plaintiff appropriately managed the risk to election security while advancing security through transparency.
The report was filed on the docket Wednesday, publicly available for the first time.
A separate report commissioned by Dominion by MITRE Corporation found five of his attack scenarios were non-scalable, meaning they would impact a statistically insignificant number of votes on a single device at a time.
The sixth scenario was offset by access controls at voting locations.
That additional report previously under seal will also be made available to the public.
A Dominion spokesman referring to the mitery part said its findings about Halderman's attacks were operationally invisible.
In other words, let's not do anything so they can steal the election again, Carl.
Well, the article is talking about referring CNN to go look at something, and those were the chief propagandists, probably the number one propagandist.
So for Georgia, yeah, the documentation for the movies 2,000 Mules and Selection Code are sufficient evidence for anybody to reject these reports about elections, and the 2020 election fraud is certain by the numbers of what was reported after the election.
The swing states stopped voting in the middle of the night, or stopped counting, The votes in the middle of the night or so we're told and then when they resumed counting they had mathematically impossible numbers such as Pennsylvania claiming one vote batch had 600,000 votes for Biden, 3,000 to Trump.
A 200 to 1 ratio means that that's election fraud and proven by the odds that it was honest would be The number with 50 to 60 zeros behind it making it more likely that you or I would win three consecutive super lottos than that election not being fraudulent and for to frame this as software weaknesses, huh?
And saying it would be to update the software would be a massive undertaking.
Really?
Well, a hard reporter would go in and find out, well, what actually would have to be done?
That seems to be pretty typical update stuff for an election, is that you would go and check the software.
That would seem to be routine.
As a matter of fact, I would bet that all of the states have such as a regular maintenance item, and for Georgia to make that claim that they can't do it or won't do it, that seems to be criminal intent to me.
Good, good, good.
Cruz?
You know, I don't want to discount the concept of fractional reserve banking and how this thing is used to not only create the despair necessary to create an entire demographic of dependents that are entirely relying upon the charity of the government through a political party and certainly the handout and giveaway type thing.
You know, they can't earn a livable wage on their own.
They're pretty much going into credit card debt to stay alive.
And, you know, of course, they're being subsidized heavily to just Stay in, you know, so yeah, I guess, you know, you got to look at the big picture in this because it certainly creates a tension where a situation where people create a an animosity to say between each other over the direction of these initiatives and what's going on with the political system.
So yeah, I'm really kind of frustrated a bit here by the driving here in Florida.
I'm sorry, but yeah.
Anyways, getting into the concept of the Democrat Party and how they've always done things like this, though, they've always had, like, if you look at Boss Tweed or Harry Hopkins or Mendel House or any of the guys, even Podestas, they've always had a way to, and even like you're talking about, Carl, with 2,000 Hills, they've had a way to really gain the system where they We do have people that are voting in higher multitudes than the actual constituency ratings.
So, I know Detroit and Flint, they do that all the time, every time Democrats would get 500,000 more than there are actual people in there.
So, the numbers are really, they speak for themselves.
And they're creating a system where people go in and just pretty much game the voting process.
And I've always said, why don't people use blockchain for voting instead of for debt slavery or for cryptocurrency or things like that, CBDC?
You know, you could really have an efficient system there where one person, one vote would really be easier to keep track and verify and certainly to calculate honorably and honestly, instead of really going through the shit show every four years like they have with a different fall guy company that pretty much takes the hit for electioneering.
Yeah, shit show indeed.
Meanwhile, The Wall Street Journal has a thoughtful editorial about the indictment against Trump.
Do the federal prosecutors understand the dangerous forces they are unleashing?
Whether you love or hate Donald Trump, his indictment by President Biden's Justice Department is a fraught moment for American democracy.
For the first time in U.S.
history, the prosecutorial power of the federal government has been used against a former president who is also running against a sitting president.
The indictment levels 37 charges against Trump.
That are related to his handling of classified documents.
Since he left the White House, 31 of the counts are for violating the ancient and seldom-enforced Espionage Act or the willful retention of national defense information.
But it's striking that the indictment never mentions the Presidential Records Act that allows a president access to documents, both classified and unclassified, once he leaves office.
It allows for good-faith negotiation with the National Archives.
Yet the indictment assumes Trump had no right to take any classified documents.
This doesn't fit the spirit or letter of the Presidential Records Act.
If the Espionage Act means presidents can't retain any classified documents, then the Records Act is all but meaningless.
This will be part of Trump's defense.
The other counts are related to failing to turn over the documents or obstructing the attempts to obtain them.
As usual, Trump is his own worst enemy.
This would have gone nowhere if former Attorney General Bill Barthold CBS had the President just returned the documents.
But he jerked them around for a year and a half.
That being said, if prosecutors think they will absolve them of the political implications of their decision to charge Trump, they fail to understand what they've unleashed.
In the court of public opinion, the first question will be about two standards of justice.
Biden had old classified piles stored in his Delaware garage next to his sports car.
When that news came out, he didn't sound too apologetic.
But the Justice Department isn't going to indict Biden as for willful.
How about the basement email server Hillary Clinton uses as Secretary of State?
FBI Director James Comey said in 2016 that she and her colleague were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.
Comey ended by declaring Clinton free and clear, since no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.
This is the inescapable political context of Trump's recent indictment.
The special counsel could have finished his investigation with a report detailing the extent of Trump's recklessness and explained what secrets it could have exposed.
Instead, the Justice Department has taken a perilous path.
The charges are a destructive intervention into the 2024 election.
They also make it more likely the election will be a referendum on Trump rather than on Biden's economy and agenda or a GOP alternative.
This may be exactly what Democrats intended with their charges.
Greatest irony of the age of Trump is that Roe is violating of Democrat norms, his frenzied opponents have done and are doing their own considerable damage to democracy.
Meanwhile, Paul Craig Roberts describes the gang of criminals trying Trump.
PCR says with the latest arrest and prosecution of President Trump, freedom and liberty are dead in America.
What they do makes it clear they have no claim that they are representatives of justice holding lawbreakers responsible.
They are the lawbreakers, they themselves.
You go to trial and it's the criminals who are trying you, and that's what's happened in the United States.
This is happening to President Trump.
This is exactly what's happening to him.
The Department of Justice, which is a gang of criminals, is trying Trump, and they are getting away with it.
I can't predict, but we're going to find out by the next presidential election whether we are a country or not.
What's going to happen?
Are people going to wake up and stop this?
If this coup stays in place, the United States no longer exists.
What is being done is a lesson being taught to all future political candidates.
If you try to represent the people instead of the elite, we are going to destroy you, period.
So if they succeed in destroying Trump, and if the people permit that and don't rise up to prevent it, Then what you have from now on in the United States is tyranny.
If democracy cannot put into office someone who stands for the people who elected that person, then there is no democracy and there is no rule of law.
If you have no rule of law, you have the rule of whatever is in power.
In other words, it's a total end of any claim there's any freedom, any civil liberty, or any accountability.
This is extremely serious.
This is an all-out assault.
The elite are attempting to completely destroy any accountability that would ever get in the way of their agenda.
So this is only to be the agenda of the elite and never any agenda of the people.
Yes, the United States is the Constitution.
If the Constitution is destroyed, the United States is destroyed.
So, if they destroy it, they have destroyed us.
Meanwhile, remarkably, Trump's polling records only increase, including his lead over DeSantis in New Hampshire.
Among likely New Hampshire primary voters, former President Trump leads Florida Governor DeSantis 44-12 in a multi-candidate ballot.
Trump has increased his lead by 5% since last month, when he led DeSantis 39-18.
Former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, South Carolina Senator Tim Scott are tied for third with 7%.
Sununu's presence on the ballot is not siphoning votes away from DeSantis, as some assume.
When Sununu is taken out of the equation, DeSantis did not benefit.
A majority of Sununu's vote share went to Scott and Christie.
Carl.
Well, from the Wall Street Journal, I see that as damage control and that what they're trying to do is to pretend to care about ethics while they're preemptively predicting what the shitshow is going to continue to show.
The first thing that they lie in omission is that Trump is being charged under the 1917 Espionage Act, and that act Was put into place to criminalize and make it illegal for Americans to disagree with the no national security foreign war that approximately 80 to 90% of Americans were against in World War One.
Um, let's see.
Oh, and a forced draft as well with that.
And for Barr as the twice Attorney General.
See, this guy's job is to obfuscate and to lie by commission and omission, and for him not to mention any of that.
Or actually, what you would need to do if you wanted to have the truth is you would outline the procedures that presidents have used.
With records after their administration, and Trump claims that he followed all of those procedures, showed everything, everything was detailed out there, and then to contrast that with what happened with both of the Clintons, and then with Senator Biden, apparently since 1974, not a president, and his vice president, not a president, having records that on their face would be illegal to have.
And that also connects to Rachel Maddow talking about MSNBC's policy to never have President Trump speak for himself.
And Maddow said that, well, the reason that we're not having Trump speak for himself is in order for the news to remain truthful.
So, this type of anti-First Amendment is really anti-American.
The First Amendment, and kind of the power of the American dream and the American promise, is you allow people to speak.
And if you wanted to attack a liar, if you wanted to make clear that somebody was giving false information, give them the stage.
Let them talk.
Tell them.
Tell me everything.
Because that's how professionals do it.
See, if you were an ethical lawyer and you had somebody volunteering to talk, you would say, ooh, let's record it to make sure that we understand everything.
But we don't do that.
It's all censorship because they're trying to push a narrative, not with facts.
And Paul Craig Roberts gets it absolutely correct.
These are the criminals.
They're war criminals.
They're COVID criminals against humanity.
These are poverty-murdering criminals against humanity, enacting policies that they know kill people via poverty.
And that's about a million children a month around the world from preventable poverty in these areas that are economic hitmen.
And the good news through all this, as much as you can say there are good news to be found, is that the American people in all the polling stories that we've covered, is that every poll seems to increase
The public confidence or the bet of the public that they would have some hope with Trump and a rejection of the people who are clinging to these false narratives and official stories.
Yeah, MSNBC Rachel Maddow, what a disgrace.
Chris?
Yeah, you know Barr also was brought in to cover up a lot of the stuff that was tied to the Iran-Contra scandal and many of the departmentalized hangouts that brought an end to that.
Think of the Milliken-Drexel-Burnham-Lamberts junk bonds.
Think of the rise of BlackRock out of Blackstone from their pilfered junk bonds.
Think about them foisting this off to the Japanese economy for 30 years of destruction of that.
Think about the savings and loans scandal or the RNC stuff with Lawrence King.
Think about Boys Town.
Think about all these different scandals.
Keating 5 tied all together and Barr came in and swept that under the rug.
While bringing in and laying the groundwork for the FBI to bring up things like PatCon and the ADL and the ATF and many of these other alphabet agencies to start targeting American patriots as the number one enemies or putting them into a situation adversarially with their own government.
So yeah, I think really Reno did a big, big job of that when she came in after Barr left.
But Barr covered up a lot of this pedophilia stuff, a lot of this stuff that's tied with the economics, the child trafficking.
All this stuff.
So, sorry, my phone's trying to reset.
That's okay, Chris.
Keep going, yeah.
Sorry about that, Fats.
Every time I try talking, either the internet goes down, my phone tries to reset.
Well, we can still hear you clearly.
Okay, great, yep.
So, yeah, I was talking about Barr a little bit, but, you know, going on to the bigger thing, like I said, a lot of these Iran-Contra people came back into the prominence of the Trump campaign even as well.
You know, Abrams and some of them guys like that on the Republican end.
So I think that each party has its own operatives has its own partisan private interests, and certainly their own quote unquote adversaries and allies in terms of nation states or factions within nations.
So, really, you see like this this polarity create itself by design and very intentionally that It's kind of like a tug-of-war that will never really address the issues at hand.
It will only keep the people struggling against each other in this political theater.
So, yeah, I think that this is part of the long game.
Bringing Trump back will probably be a way that they can rein back in the quote-unquote people and the concept of patriotism and national sentiments and things of the sort, and maybe even to deal with the restructuring of the United States and bankruptcy, because he's got a lot of experience in that with his own personal stuff.
So, interesting to see what they're doing here.
I don't really know what's going on, but I think the more they try to prosecute him for these absurdities, the more it really gives him the street credibility, and it also gives him this publicity.
It's kind of like 2016, where they, you know, give him five, ten billion dollars of free publicity before the elections, and then he wins, and then the whole term, they're going after him the whole term about stuff that they completely ignored during the election cycle.
So, you know, while they gave him all this free media.
So, I think they're doing the same thing here, and I think that he's going to benefit from this long term, and I think that it's going to callous his base immensely to where they're going to stop listening to any sort of criticism from the other side because of the absurdities of what we're seeing now.
Biden is such an unmitigated disaster.
They can't allow any focus on Biden.
Whatever they do to keep off of Biden, even if it gives Trump benefits, they're going to do.
It's that bad for them.
They're in quite a predicament.
Meanwhile, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Matt Gaetz, indoors.
This morning I'm writing an appropriation rider to defund Special Counsel Jackson's office and entire investigation.
I will not vote for any appropriation bill to fund the weaponization of government.
I hope every one of my Republican colleagues will join me.
Another exercise of imagination and integrity by Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Meanwhile, Yuval Noah Harari says, non-organic entities and emotionless algorithms will soon dominate Earth.
In other words, an AI takeover is coming.
An Israeli-born World Economic Forum member and advisor to Klaus Schwab by the name of Yuri Harari is eager to see this happen.
The world taken over by non-organic entities, meaning lifeless entities, artifacts, technology, and emotionless algorithms, meaning no more humans and lots of artificial intelligence-driven robots ruling the world.
In an interview, Herr Erich explained over the next several decades, Earth will be dominated by entities that are not organic, meaning not created by God.
They don't breathe.
They don't have emotions.
The potential of AI is much, much bigger than any historical revolution.
It's really a biological revolution, claiming that up until now, life is organic.
But soon that will no longer be the case.
This is at least the idea of inorganic life forms.
That's the biggest thing that's happened on Earth in over 4 billion years.
If you take it seriously, of course.
Ferrari's a believer in Darwinian evolution, which he claims occurred through natural selection, but with AI.
There is an intelligent design that supersedes even what God Almighty is able to do.
Here we have intelligent design, but not the intelligent design of the creation in the Bible, a real intelligent design.
We are designing the AI, then the AI will design maybe the next generation of AI, so it's a completely different kind of process.
Homosexuality is natural, because otherwise it wouldn't be possible, according to Harari.
Using example of how bank loans are processed not by actual humans, but rather by computers today, he explained how the future involves robots and computers replacing all humans, a new kind of evolution.
It's very practical.
Today, when you apply for a loan and the bank lets the algorithm design your fate, and the algorithm says, no, don't give this lady a loan, and you ask the bank why, and they don't know, the algorithm just said no.
Even those who design don't understand the decision it's making.
And he's suggesting this is a good thing?
Over the last 20 years, Harari went on to reveal the smartest people in the world have been working on the problem of how to hack human beings and control them through the screens, through the smartphones.
I'm no match to them, he says.
If I give them access, they win.
Smartphones, it turns out, are designed as spying devices to monitor people 24-7 without the need for actual human agents.
Keep an eye on them.
Rory spoke of all this, using KGB as an example from the past, of how things had to be done before the age of computers, AI, and smartphones.
On the topic of homosexuality and other LGBT lifestyles, he said they're all natural in any shape or form they take, because were they not, such acts of behavior would not even be possible.
If homosexuality were against nature, it just couldn't exist.
Things against nature are, for example, driving faster than the speed of light.
You don't need human rules against them.
They just can't happen.
It's impossible.
Ignoring that, yes, homosexuality can occur on a small scale, but if all society were homosexual, it'd go extinct immediately.
I dealt with a lot of these issues in my book, The Evolution of Intelligence, Are Humans the Only Animals with Minds?
Here's a brief recap.
Exploring the nature of consciousness and cognition in human beings and other animals, Fetzer addresses inadequacies of computational conception and expounds an alternative theory based on the study of signs, really, minds as signs using systems and symbols as elements of communicative behavior.
He offers a new theory of intelligence by which machines can be intelligent without possessing minds, meaning they can perform complex tasks that in the past have required minds even though they do not have them.
But Harari's vision of a robotic future is frankly insane, Carl.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, he's a proven liar and you wouldn't want to take any of that stuff.
So, for MTG, first of all, alright, alright.
So, defunding the witch hunt against Trump?
Okay.
Just be strong with the documentation about why this is wrong and criminal and go back to Paul Craig Roberts that, given the history of these people, they're criminals and stop working with them, but I don't think she's going to go that far.
For the WEF's Klaus Schwab's lead advisor, this Harari guy, first of all, he's a liar, all right?
So for him to say you go into for a loan and saying that it's somehow mysterious, that smacks to me of somebody who is just looking for another excuse against weak-minded human beings to control them through dictatorship.
Dictatorship, dictate, is just, you just tell them something and they're supposed to do it.
And then you say, oh yeah, you got to do it because of the AI said so, and who knows?
That's bullshit.
To get a loan, it's going to be based upon income, credit history, and collateral.
If you satisfy those requirements, then the bank will go ahead and bet on you, because with the collateral, they're going to win either way.
They're going to either take the hard asset that you're taking a loan for, or they're going to collect the interest payments and the payments over time.
Uh, so as usual, you just have to reject that type of testimony.
And just on a side note, I have been watching lately on YouTube, Bunny the dog with the talking dog buttons.
And I have seen research that the dogs are about as smart as a two year old human with vocabulary.
Nice, Carl.
to up to 400 words and that has just little buttons with icons and words on it and the dogs are and even some of the cats are able to maintain pretty sophisticated conversations with their masters so i would rather develop the intelligence of our dogs to better enjoy their company rather than the heartless soulless future of klaus schwab and harari nice carl chris
if you really think about all the departmentalized uh aspects of this combination of phoenix and mockingbird and mk ultra oh jesus again he's going he's going he's going We can hear you, Chris!
Every time I try talking and it seems to recap... We can hear you!
I know, that's... Alright, okay, I hear you.
Thank you, thank you.
Alright, so what I was trying to say is this seems to be a despot's wet dream, all these things that they're working towards in this technocratic feudalism.
So yeah, it's a lot more than just going into just a bank and then shooting you down for your whatever, your debt-to-income or your tooth-to-gum ratio or whatever the fuck they want to say programs, the algorithm.
This is about even free speech and your ability to do that, your ability to get on certain platforms, your ability to even get a job, your ability to do just about anything in this day and age is completely restricted by this, and it will even get worse and worse and worse if it's allowed to continue.
So this big data grab, this asymmetrical surveillance dragnet that they've got on the citizens, And they exempt the government and the courts from having you know, this is this is all like I said part of the design and this is part of building a new digital plantation and putting us all into debt slaves on this type of service the ones that are not soft killed or hard killed by these these measures as well.
So that being said I think that really malice of forethought complicity is more than evident at this point in time.
And you can find guys like Schwab and Harari behind many of these initiatives.
Even the giving pledge of Bill Gates and Warren Buffett.
They're funding most of these depopulation attempts and things of that nature.
Trying to integrate the human body with Neuralink and Neuralase.
A human being who advocates a world without human beings is a lunatic.
These things are working towards the same features and functions all at once.
This is a program.
This is an agenda.
This is them really trying to take over the world.
So whether we allow them to get away with it or not will ultimately dictate what humanity will become in the next 5, 10, 20 years.
A human being who advocates a world without human beings is a lunatic.
Carl.
I forgot to add in that one essential compound of the social credit score.
So if her opponents were able to take the next steps forward, guys like Harari would say, Oh, well, the AI is very complicated, but we can trust his judgment.
And one of the factors that it has, and he'll give some academic language saying it's a floating social credit score algorithm.
And for the people who got denied.
their credit or even got denied their bank accounts, then they could go ahead and just say, oh, it's just the AI's social credit score.
Because our opponents, what they want to do is they want to obfuscate everything.
And as long as they have some plausible type of bullshit to tell us, then they can go ahead and pretend that it's justified and legitimate and ethical.
Carl, can I add in the DEI rating, the carbon footprints, all these things are all shakedown.
Phantom metrics that they're going to really start to impose and restrict freedoms with and certainly shake down people from competing with their oligarchies.
So I think this is also a tactic that's being used in a very, very draconian witch hunt style of fashion, just like every other one of these Inquisition tactics and soft kill measures.
Absolutely right.
Very good.
All these comments.
Spot on.
propaganda campaign and under the guise of benevolence, but it is certainly some of the most evil, duplicitous things that anybody could ever think of.
And the innocent people don't even apply the possibility of guilt to the people that have this track record of trying to kill us all the time.
It's truly extraordinary to see how naive a lot of people are about underestimating this.
Absolutely right.
Very good.
All these comments, spot on.
Meanwhile, former head of the FBI on January 6th, Mom Investigation, reveals key obstacles to identifying the suspect.
Namely, the FBI doesn't want you to.
The FBI captured data on people around the site where the pipe bombs were discovered on January 6th, 2021, but some of the data was not usable.
Agents did a complete geofence of the area.
Steve D'Antonio, a former FBI official, said, we have complete data.
Well, not complete.
There's some data that was corrupted.
Geofencing is a technique creating a zone locating all devices within the area.
The FBI has utilized the data it obtained through geo-fencing and charging docs against people in January 6.
He said the data was corrupted by one of the providers before claiming it was not done intentionally.
It's just an unusual circumstance.
We have corrupt data from one of the providers.
I'm not sure.
I can't remember which one, which is, in my opinion, a cover-up all by itself.
He did not want the information to trigger conspiracy theories, oh God forbid, but acknowledged that the data would have been good, and it was painful not to have.
He, who departed from the FBI in 2022, was speaking to the House Judiciary Committee on June 7, portions of the interview released on June 14.
Video footage showed a person using a phone before placing the bombs at the Republican National and the Democrat National Committee headquarters.
Thomas Massey, who by the way is nobody's fool, who was questioning D'Amato when the former official made the comments, called the data corruption disclosure unbelievable, meaning literally not worthy of belief.
Massey, Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan, Andy Biggs, Barry Loudmaker, highlighted the remarks in a letter to FBI Director Wray.
They said the testimony raises concerns the FBI handling the pipe bomb investigation.
More than 890 days following the placement of the bombs, and despite your statement, you have total confidence the FBI will apprehend the subject.
I guarantee it.
They know who the subject is.
He's one of theirs.
The congressman reiterated the request for a briefing, asking for all docs and communications.
The FBI declined to comment because of its being ongoing.
Yato said in a message to the public on March 2021, the bombs were viable devices that could have been detonated, resulting in serious injury or death.
The FBI lab at Quantico concluded, too, they could explode or cause harm or death, but he acknowledged that timers could not have detonated.
Do you think it's technically possible for a kitchen timer with a one-hour duration to detonate a bomb 17 hours later, Massey asked?
No, I don't.
I saw the same kitchen timer as you.
I agree.
I don't know when they were supposed to go off.
Maybe they weren't supposed to go off.
We don't know.
We honestly don't know.
Right.
It's all a mystery.
Former FBI agents Kyle Serafin said the bombs could not have exploded.
They were inert devices, he said.
They just looked good.
Surfhead said investigators were able to figure out which DC Metro Rail card the suspected bomber utilized after planting the bombs.
Discovered the card was purchased by a security contractor who used to be in the Air Force.
He said he was part of a surveillance team surveilling the contractor, but his supervisor would not let him speak to the party.
It seems like they had a good lead and they could have run it down.
But as far as I know, they never did.
During another portion of the interview, DeAntonis said he didn't know whether the FBI interviewed the person who discovered one of the bombs.
He says he's confident the person seeing this surveillance footage is the person who planted the bombs, but that investigators do not even know whether the person is a man or a woman.
Here you see a photograph on the left, one of the devices on the right, inert, with a kitchen timer.
It's a fake!
The FBI raised an award of $500,000.
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearm, and Explosives identifying the person remains a priority.
The bombs could have gone off.
The suspect may still pose a danger to the public authorities upset.
Ray, FBI director, claimed he has enormous confidence in the team investigating.
We have devoted loads and loads of effort to that specific.
They're working very hard.
Question by Massey and April.
ATF Director Steve Dettelbach would not say whether the bombs were operable.
And that, of course, is because they were not.
That's a significant matter, he said.
It's an ongoing criminal investigation.
I'm not going to comment on an ongoing criminal investigation.
Carl, what a pile of bullshit.
Yours?
It is.
The comment that it was unbelievable is Understated.
Incorrect.
So this guy, his job is to obfuscate, so he has an invitation to testify on this topic, and he comes up and says, I don't know who was...
Why did you even come if you didn't come prepared here, homie?
So the idea of this pipe bomber was to distract on the J6, and it's still there, too, just as a distraction.
But that said, okay, so Massey and Goetz are getting interesting testimony.
All right, all right.
But I gotta put that in historical context that the American public, their confidence rating in the and the trustworthiness of Congress is about at 10%.
So I would say that we just have to rate all of this as bullshit and theater until proven otherwise.
And as always, I'm hopeful that some of this is going to lead somewhere to a breakthrough of truth.
I think it had the role of creating a clear example of a domestic terrorist.
So they could emphasize that domestic terrorist idea A guy who's planting bombs is a domestic terrorist.
So they just introduce the label, he's an exemplar, and then they subsume everyone else they want under that rubric.
Grits.
Let's look at this from just a basic four-year timeline.
Let's say if you were a politician in charge of the COVID rollout in the VAX agenda and you found out, the people found out that it was as harmful as it is and what its true purpose was behind it and the sinister nature of all these offerings.
Wouldn't you have to create some sort of a stronghold on power so that the people couldn't rise up and exercise their natural constitutional rights?
You know, kidnap a governor with 19 out of 20 FBI informants involved with this.
Uh, the Pelosi thing with her daughter recording her own quote-unquote siege in the Capitol building, uh, you know what I mean?
This is all bullshit.
And every six months you got something crazy like this coming from Pelosi, whether it's the deep pave hammer or the congressional Jake Dix thing.
And the people that actually are standing up and trying to stop this coup are being prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, beyond the scope of the law, super judiciously, might I add, and really for exercising their constitutional rights against tyranny and the takeover of their country.
So yeah, this is kind of to send a message.
This is a psychological operation to condition helplessness and to keep people from doing the same thing that these people did.
Good.
Very nice.
Excellent.
Spot on.
Meanwhile, Senator Graham predicts a major outrage coming within days.
and Alex Jones bets with the Sandy Hook thing.
You know, I mean, you call bullshit, you have the dead and the rights, and then, you know, they're just going to just use the hammer and nail thing.
Good, very nice.
Excellent, spot on.
Meanwhile, Senator Graham predicts a major outrage coming within days.
Senator Lindsey Graham predicts major outrage at former President Trump were to face a third indictment regarded at January 6th.
Because a grand jury is convening in Washington, D.C., this is a real possibility.
If the special counsel indicts Trump in Washington, D.C.
on anything related to January 6th, that will be considered a major outrage by Republicans Because you could convict any Republican of anything in Washington, D.C.
And I fear that is where this is going, as kind of an insurance policy.
Both the January 6th and the Mar-a-Lago document case are being handled by Special Counsel Jack Smith.
Both are being heard in federal court in Miami.
Republicans have made strides in recent elections.
Judge Aileen Canada, chosen by Trump, is overseeing the case.
He has previously sided with a former president.
His second indictment in less than three months infuriated Trump and his Republican allies.
He was charged March 30th in New York State for his involvement in the Stormy Daniels hush money case.
Then he disclosed he was charged federally with mishandling sensitive information.
The indictment is being made public Friday.
It seems to be selective prosecution, Graham complained.
Trump and the Republicans bring up the fact that during her time as Secretary of State, Hillary was revealed to have secretly stored information on her own email server.
James Comey, in charge at the time, reprimanded her for her negligence, but insisted her actions weren't criminal since they weren't deliberate.
He, Trump, faces 37 counts of maintaining secret material, obstructing justice, making false statements, to relocate mountains of paperwork from the White House to Mar-a-Lago after leaving office seen as a crime.
He still stands a possibility to further indictments, one in connection with January 6th, the other Georgia State Inquiry about the results of the 2020 election.
Graham projected Trump's increasing legal issues would result in a rise in the polls.
I think politically it probably makes him stronger in the primary.
In real clear, politics average polling trip now leaves Governor DeSantis by margin of 30.4 points.
And this is just an image to reiterate my point about domestic terrorism under martial law.
Watch the film The Czechos.
You can find it online about what happened in Russia following the Bolshevik Revolution.
I predict this is exactly what they have in store for us.
Stand by.
Carl, your thoughts.
Yeah, first with Lindsey Graham, that senior senator of 20 years.
So he's going to be one of the major swamp creatures, and we've seen more than enough of what he has communicated against what Trump has communicated that apparently is for the American public.
And I want to point out the long-standing friendship that Lindsey Graham has had with John McCain as well.
So this is all Working to increase the polarity, to make it more and more difficult to stay in the middle.
And that might be what life is intending here, and that the collective forces of evolution, life, God, whatever, is forcing people to take a side.
And there are three basic sides.
The good, and that's the side that you can discern good from evil, and that's the side that we're on, of course.
And we can point to the lies and the crimes.
The bad, those are the people who are obfuscating And pretending that all is good as they're trying to cull and control human beings as their own personal resources for their own material benefit.
And then the third category are the people who are incapable, unable, and or unwilling to discern good from evil.
But certainly people are getting every opportunity to take a look and to consider for themselves and to choose their own position.
Bruce.
Yeah, I think they've actually gone out of their way to weaponize some of these people, They're almost like weaponized retards, and I hate to use that word because it's an insult to handicap.
But yeah, a lot of these people are being used as weapons in the Janissary culture, this woke thing and everything like that.
I'd also like to point out, Carl talked about the association between John McCain and Lindsey Graham.
I'd like to point out that these guys are essential in reinstituting what is now becoming the Holodomor in the Ukraine again, a hundred years later, almost to the day.
So, yeah, I think that really what you're talking about facts in the in the check is talks about the load them here, which was oversaw by Stalin's third in charge, a guy named Kaganovich, who was related to the Kagan's of Supreme Court fame and National Security Council fame the husband of Victoria Nuland.
This whole thing seems to be an orchestrated depopulation tactic that they seem to put in a hundred year cycle in this region and start these things off here.
And of course they escalate into what become world wars and major wars after that, historically speaking.
So I think that they're running the same formula, the same maybe sacrifice of the innocent or whatever this occultic ritual might be.
I think it's something to do with that and the same bloodlines of the same families orchestrating these mass depopulation tactics in the same geographic regions.
And the butchering of those they regard as political opponents.
That is staggering.
Yeah, no doubt.
I'm just adding to your point without question.
No doubt.
I am stunned.
Meanwhile, hidden video.
Mayor Adams' plan to dump immigrants out of New York City hits a huge snag.
Mayor Eric has a problem on his hands.
He runs a so-called sanctuary city at a time when the president he supported has let millions pour in over the Mexican border.
Now they need somewhere to live.
The largest city isn't ready for this kind of influx, so he's sending them upstate.
But to work it out, he needs to make shelter arrangements.
He's been striking deals with hotel managers to rent out rooms by the boatload.
This brings in a zoning law issue.
Hotels are zoned as hotels, not as homeless shelters.
So however much the hotel manager is getting paid, he's already on shaky legal ground more than that.
Having an influx of migrants into smaller towns puts a heavy strain on municipal resources.
The hotel manager might be making bank on housing these people, but the municipalities are not.
Here you have a couple images from it.
Like a migrant facility and under zoning laws, you can't be anything other than a hotel.
Another.
I just wonder whether the hotel thinks they're actually going to get away with this or not.
Now health inspectors arrived before the wave of migrants were supposed to show up and close the hotel for violations.
His Honor wants these people out of his city.
The hotel owner wants to make some cash.
The locals don't really want a sudden influx of people.
Meanwhile, the local government is not only on the hook for a whole host of expenses in caring for them, Mayor Adams didn't even give them a slice of the pie.
The hotel is closed.
The disputing parties are in court.
All because Major Eric's emergency scheme didn't play out as well as he hoped.
Deals like this, however, are being swung with hotel owners all across New York.
Meanwhile, in Southern California, Orange County has banned pride flags from being flown on county properties.
The Orange County Board of Supervisors voted to ban pride flags on county property, including public parks.
The motion passed by a 3-2 margin, with Supervisor Vincente Samarenta and Katarina Foley being the two in dissent.
Republican Vice Chairman Andrew Doe introduced a bill to stop divisive flags from being blown on county property.
The LA Times reported, Pride flags will not fly at Orange County government-owned properties after a vote Tuesday by the Board of Supervisors to permit only U.S.
government and military-related flags to be flown at county properties, effectively barring pride flags.
A policy proposed by Supervisor Andrew Toe stipulates only flags representing the U.S.
state and country, or for prisoners of war and military members missing in action, will be raised at county properties, including parks.
Supervisor Katrina Foley, who was against the measure, told the Times the vote was part of a larger picture of trying to coalesce a viewpoint together that is not about progress, not about a diverse, inclusive community, but holding on to some remnant of the past that isn't really reflective of mainstream America.
I think she's got that exactly backwards.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, the first thing is that on its face, these are illegal migrants.
Alright, so if it's against the law, then you need to uphold the law.
And for Mayor Adams and all these people to declare themselves as a sanctuary city, that is a talking point that they have gotten, and they decided to use that language because it was the least offensive.
But really, what you're looking at is an illegal policy to Engage in this illegal immigration.
Another word for that would be an insurrection against the lawful practice of government.
So, who are the insurrectionists here?
But it's really a race to the bottom.
We have talked about this before.
You want to flood in the successful areas and you want to be able to call and control these natural and human resources.
So, in order to discourage the Americans, which is your primary target to be able to take down.
A successful, independent, and entrepreneurial thinking group.
For Orange County, where I live, those supervisors, I think that that also is damage control, similar to what the Wall Street Journal did to virtue signal some sort of care, but the Orange County supervisors are under lawsuit, and that's one of the participants is Peggy Hall in the Healthy American, and the charges are that the Orange County
They still believe that we're under a condition of emergency with COVID, and as we've talked about again and again, and I'll put documentation here on BitTube, is that the definition of a health emergency is overrun hospitals, and for them just to go ahead and declare an emergency without overrun hospitals is illegal.
And for that Orange County supervisor to be tone deaf, maybe they feel emboldened by those Dominion voting machines being used for their own elections.
But the primary concern of the public, of course, is that our children are not being groomed.
We don't want pornography in the school libraries.
We don't want Adult males dressed up in sexualized clothing of females that everyone associates with the desire for sexual pleasure.
So grown men are going to be dressed in those types of clothing and they want to hang out with the kids just to to read them stories, eh?
That is what we're against and we have no problem with adults doing whatever it is that they want to do.
But the attack on children, that is tone deaf by that supervisor.
But There's no price to pay, at least so far, for her.
Three cheers for Orange County supervisors doing the right thing.
Chris?
Yeah, I've noticed that there seems to be a formula with that, too, where they create an emergency so they can declare an emergency, so they can exploit an emergency, and I think that that's par for the course with much of this stuff.
These sanctuary cities, they're using these politically correct jargon terms that are completely Inverted in terms of rhetoric and actuality.
If you think about it, these are not sanctuary cities.
That's for like women and children.
These are military-aged men that are crashing the border.
You look at all the footage.
There's no kids in there.
There's no women in there.
These look like they're people that are being trained overseas in Africa or in South America, Central America, brought here to destabilize and subvert the communities of the white middle class while they're being dispossessed and depopulated.
They're doing selective tokenism, selective prosecution with these things, too.
And it seems to be sensationalized on the Internet to accelerate this type of behavior.
So I don't think it's an accident at all.
I think this is very much called calculation.
They're trying to get people worried about this replacement theory while they're actually doing the silicon replacement to the carbon thing.
Yeah, they want us fighting with each other.
They want the middle class and the poor to clash it out in the streets until all the crumbs are gone and basically they forget there's even pies on the table.
So, yeah, I think this is what they're doing here.
Great points.
Spot on.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail.
Pro or con?
Pro or con?
To live, need to know at gmail.com.
Fan mail, pro or con, to live, need to know at gmail.com.
Beverly writes about our show of the 14th regarding DeSantis' authenticity.
I still like, but am more wary of DeSantis.
He's done a great job in Florida fighting the COVID and woke mafias, but I am wary of his foreign policy.
Do you think I'll put in a gas station attendant masquerading as a world leader?
That sounds like a deep state line.
Is Israel ass-kissing is a problem, but every president we've had in the modern era has kissed Zionist ass.
I don't think there's any getting around that.
The question is just how far will a president go in kowtowing to Israel.
More troubling is the establishment GOP writing a lot of checks at the DeSantis campaign.
As for his authenticity, not everyone is charismatic and rah-rah.
The most important thing is the candidate's position on issues of importance to the nation.
We've had plenty of charmers and great communicators in the White House who have screwed over the average voter and launched needless wars and aggression worldwide.
Excellent, Beverly, excellent.
Final thoughts.
Carl, yours.
I do appreciate our audience for their intellectual integrity and their moral courage to fight their way through these facts, and Beverly has been one of the leaders for years to be able to make those contributions, and I appreciate you, sister.
It is tough in the fog of war.
We don't know what we're looking at, but we can prove a criminal history going back hundreds of years for the raping of resources and the violation of treaties.
That said, here we are at 2023, and we're seeing these events that would give you hope if you want a breakthrough for truth.
But the key word there is we need to have breakthrough because on this side of the breakthrough, we're in dire peril.
And all we're getting is the controlled lies and propaganda from corporate media.
All we're getting is we're being told that Biden is president.
We're being told that Zelensky is upholding democracy.
So it's a ridiculous parody of justice.
And all we can do, as always, is all we can control is what we individually think, say, and do.
So all we can do is make those count and hope for some sort of a breakthrough and be wary about what's coming.
And in good faith effort, be apprised of the facts and have something to say and to do about it.
Chris, your final thoughts?
Yeah, I think it's sad the way that most of our leaders have kowtowed and put on the little beanie and wailed at the wall of Jerusalem.
I think that's really disgusting.
They obviously hold a loyalty that seems higher to Israel than it does to our own nation, and in many cases they put it above our own national interests.
So I don't think there's really any way around this.
I don't think you can really Negotiate with with anybody that's that's in that mentality.
I think that really it has to be a situation where you can't underestimate the severity of this situation and the spies of Joshua infiltrating our entire bureaucratic and economic systems and our political ones too.
So I think at some point in time people are going to have to summon the will and the fortitude to quote BB net and Yahoo to really sort this out.
So Yeah, I think there's no way around it.
I don't think you can do a greater greater good or lesser of two evils with any person that holds a loyalty to that.
So I don't know.
I think that's important to realize, recognize, understand, and actually implement.
Chris and Carl, just excellent, top-notch comments today.
I come to expect this from you guys again and again and again.
It's been said that the reason they want to take our guns is they're planning to do something they know we would shoot them for.
How about opening the border, bringing in millions of invaders?
How about no longer enforcing the law, allowing shoplifting and other crimes to go on a pace?
How about teaching our kids that they ought to be gay or lesbian or change their sex?
Those all seem to me to fall in the broad category being actions that we might shoot them for.
They want to take our guns.
They're setting up the predicate.
January 6th, really, I'm convinced, increasingly, was to set up the category of domestic terrorists so they can apply it to every group they don't like.
Oath keepers, Proud Boys, mega men, Trump voters, conservatives, mothers who want their kids to get a decent education.
It may boggle your mind that they would have a plan on a scale that this would entail.
Maybe shooting up 100 million Americans in the back of the head just for political purposes by claiming they're domestic terrorists after declaring martial law?
It may boggle your mind.
It doesn't boggle theirs.
They've seen it happen before.
They know what they want, and they have a pretty damn good idea of how to get there.
Don't give up your guns.
Don't let down your guard.
Brace yourself, because ultimately the defense of your rights may be up to you.
Spend as much time as you can with your family, friends, and people you love and care about, but we do not know how much time we have left.
Thanks for being here.
Back tomorrow with more of the news you actually Monday.
Enjoy the weekend, but take these words to heart.
Watch The Checkist on TV this weekend.
You'll find it, and you will understand.
▲
Export Selection