All Episodes
Previous Next
June 16, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:14:07
Need to Know News (15 June 2023) with Carl Herman
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman and Vishen V. Aho, California.
Brian Davidson had his internet whacked, is unable to join us.
Meanwhile, the true goals of the Kiev offensive to kill everyone on the captured territory by their—they aren't just neo-Nazi forces, they are true Nazi forces.
Amid heavy battles in the Donbass, Russian forces have resumed drone and missile strikes on military facilities throughout Ukraine.
Explosions have thundered in the eastern and central region.
Footage from Kharkiv confirmed a large fire broke out The night was also sleepless for fighters on the front lines in the Zaporizhzhya region.
It doesn't stop in the settlements located after Russian forces stepped back to their positions.
Ukrainian forces claim control of several settlements.
So far, Ukrainian attempts to attack the Russian grouping in the area from the flanks have had no result.
Russian control remains, even though Ukrainians claim they are taking land.
It's not happening.
In other areas in the Zaporizhzhya region, the front lines remain unchanged.
Ukrainian military is yet to achieve any strategic gains, but Ukrainian officers are already describing what they will do with the local population.
A leaked chat from the 35th Brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine reminded everyone they're entering territory that's been under Russian control for a long time.
That they'll have to fight pro-Russian collaborators.
Since Ukrainian units can't afford to lose more servicemen, the best way to fight the Quislings is to remove everyone in the territory.
Any resident can be a potential traitor.
Really, they're going to slaughter everyone, and they're urging no film footage be taken.
Meanwhile, Ukrainian forces are ground out before they can reach the Russian main defenses.
The large-scale offensive of the Ukrainian army continues on the southern front line.
After a week of fierce fighting and horrific losses, the Ukrainian military has finally managed to achieve some tactical gains.
On the Zambosya front lines, they managed to occupy several settlements, as mentioned previously.
The Russian military has taken up defense along the northern outskirts of Makhakova and Urazynoy.
Fighting continues.
The Ukrainian army trying to move further south.
Attacks by the Ukrainian forces have been failing.
They've also tried to hit Russian grouping from the western flank.
They haven't achieved any success.
The tactical success of Advancing Unit was made for by heavy losses of the Ukrainian Army, including thousands of soldier lives and dozens of pieces of destroyed Western equipment when it has taken place on a piecemeal basis.
Meanwhile, the Russian defense in the Samurai region includes layered fortifications.
Ukrainian units haven't yet managed to even get to the first line of defense.
Elsewhere, the Russian military is identifying and advancing and inflicting maximum danger to the Ukrainian units who are advancing.
The so-called Sirk-Vikin line, named after a former commander of the Russian military operation in Ukraine, is a line of defense with fortifications, anti-tank structures, and minefields where the Ukrainian forces have yet to reach this milestone.
In recent days, the offensive capabilities of the warring parties have been hampered by bad weather in several sectors of the front.
Rain is washing away roads, slowing down the advance of tanks.
Fog and bad weather has reduced the defensive capabilities of the Russian troops, however, including the use of drones and aircraft, which have become a clear advantage for the Russian military.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, first thing is always going to be we're in the fog of war, so who knows really what's going on.
And that said, it is vital that we keep the prima facie evidence in front and the talking points for patriots for the victory of World War Three, and that by all appearances, the Russian special military operation is entirely justified because The Ukrainian government backed by the US and the UK and NATO were felt justified with war murdering about 14,000 of the Donbass who are artillery shelling after the 14 and 16 color revolution.
And of course, the Russian speaking people in the Donbass, the southeastern part of really the eastern part of Ukraine would reject such puppets.
And it looks like with the information that the Ukrainian military is just being ground down is that it.
Several analysts have posited the motivation of the Ukrainians in the U.S.
and the U.K.
and NATO is to empty out that region as a new sort of capital should the Khazarian Mafia be successful at evading defeat, which I don't think they'll be able to be able to accomplish.
Yes, yes, I quite agree.
And here's a great piece for your contemplation, Carl.
What happens after the Kiev's much-doubted counteroffensive fails?
It's hardly breaking news Russia has been fighting off a crawling invasion by NATO aided by America's global vassals and satellite states for well over a year now.
The neo-Nazi junta would have lasted mere days had it only been Moscow versus Kiev.
This fact is not Russia's claim but one by Joseph Borrell, European Union's top diplomat, whose skills in diplomacy are highly questionable at best.
It's precisely this that makes Russia's ability to withstand Western aggression all the more mind-boggling, especially considering the sheer discrepancy in population size, nominal military budget, size of Russian economies in comparison to the combined financial and economic strength of the U.S.-led political West, to say nothing of its geopolitical influence.
It should be noted that the virtually direct involvement of the political West has resulted in a strategic stalemate with tactical back-and-forth, as both sides have made gains somewhere or were forced to concede areas elsewhere.
However, The noble difference is that Russia is doing this for strategic reasons, especially to avoid heavy casualties, civilian and military, while the opposite is true for the Kiev regime.
This is because the neo-Nazi hunt of main goal is optics and keeping the narrative alive.
The narrative being that Russia is supposed to be weak and incapable of defeating the U.S.
NATO publics in Kiev.
The massive casualties suffered by the regime forces, however, are a clear indicator of just how much of a robbery this narrative turns out to be.
Perhaps the best proof is the ongoing counteroffensive.
Although experts have already predicted how it would go, precisely how it's been going as we have been reviewing, The Kiev regime is forced to keep up with it because its puppet masters don't really care about Ukrainian casualties, as long as they can portray Russia as weak and incapable of winning.
The stakes are as high as they could possibly be, so the belligerent The lassocracy needs to ensure that neo-Nazi junta at least doesn't lose the aforementioned narrative.
The prospect of actually defeating Russia, of course, is all but impossible.
Thus, the U.S.
led political wrestlers ready to engage in a kind of nuclear brinksmanship the world has never seen, including during the entirety of the Cold War.
Here are locations where U.S.
nuclear bombs are stored in Europe.
Estimated number in Europe?
100.
They are in multiple different countries here, including Italy and Germany especially.
To this end, Washington is already resorting to what some experts call nuclear blackmail.
To prevent complete defeat of its favorite puppet, after Russia eventually launches its own counteroffensive, the U.S.
has placed additional nukes in Europe to increase pressure on Moscow and get most of its force on standby in case the ongoing Cold War turns hot.
Poland, one of Moscow's archenemies, has been insistent on having American nukes deployed on its territory.
Coupled with Warsaw's ambition to build perhaps the largest and most advanced land force in the European theatre of NATO, as well as station many other NATO troops, it is possible such aggressive actions at Bushrasha to deploy tactical nukes in Belarus as well as reinforce its Kaliningrad enclave.
Specific moves to ensure Russia's safety include expansion of its already massive military-industrial capacity, additional deployments of its state-of-the-art hypersonic weapons, which the entire political West lacks in entirety, and the overall change in its deterrence policy, which now includes the deployment of Russian tactical nukes in allied territories, specifically Belarus.
However, Minsk will not merely house such weapons, but will also be able to use them in case a political west escalates its aggression against Belarus, which has been under a crawling attack for years now.
Worse yet, The belligerent, the lassocracy has never given up on seeking to conduct another color revolution in Minsk, still insisting that President Alexander Lukashenko is supposedly illegitimate and that the opposition is the actual government in exile.
The Kremlin has correctly anticipated virtually all moves by the U.S.
and NATO and has revised its strategic posture toward them Making it perfectly clear it's ready for any unexpected developments.
And while Russia is certainly not the one that wants to be the first to use nukes, a political West is doing everything in its power, short of direct war, for now at least to push Moscow to do exactly that.
The latest warning by Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov that Washington is pushing the transfer of nuclear-capable F-16 to the Kiev regime illustrates this perfectly.
And while the mainstream propaganda machine insists this is Russian disinformation, baseless fear-mongering, Lavrov's no-nonsense, bearing in the sheer magnitude of his credibility in the diplomatic world, say otherwise.
Carl, your thoughts?
One of the big questions for any type of a contest is, what's the score?
Who's winning?
And in the fog of war, we know we're going to get the disinformation, not sports broadcasters accurately telling the score.
So by all appearances, it does look like Russia is winning this war.
And we can tell that by the previous votes of the Crimea of 90% plus to Be independent and allied with Russia, and in the Donbass that voting was about 98%.
In addition, you can take a look at the territory gained by Russia, you can take a look at the desperation of the need for more weapons called by US, UK, and NATO, and all of the on-the-ground reporting that I've seen by, regarding the civilians, the hearts and minds of the civilians are clearly with Russia.
Now, in terms of nuclear threat, the escalation for a possible Samson-type option makes perfect sense for these psychopaths.
If they're not going to win, then they're going to make sure that nobody else wins.
But I question if they have that power for the military, because Why haven't they used it while their optics are degrading so fiercely and so quickly?
We have the whole world knowing that the Nord Stream Pipeline was destroyed by the Americans and now covered by the governments within NATO.
We know that quid pro Joe received money, approximately $10 million, and those tapes from the Burisma CEO, or whatever the executive is who has those tapes, That could be game ending.
We have the chatter of the bioweapons labs that the Russians have destroyed and captured.
And we have plenty of film evidence of Zelensky snorting cocaine while on the job and criminalizing all political opponents.
All oppositional media?
So what it looks like to me is that this is a death by a thousand cuts.
We have all been anticipating some sort of a, or I have, a fierce, more of a violent breakthrough, which has been typical of the collapses of these puppet governments, these dictatorships that no longer can support itself.
They'll go ahead and give full propaganda until something breaks and collapses quickly, and we haven't seen that.
But we are seeing the death by a thousand cuts, so I am very optimistic, and it's hard to say pleased in the light of war, but I am happy with what we can see.
Very good.
Very good, Carl.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, as you're observing, the BRISMA owner allegedly recording Biden bribe conversations as an insurance policy in the FEI covered it up.
Senator Chuck Grassley, a formidable force, one of the most highly respected members of the United States Senate, has dropped another bombshell in recent spate of Biden corruption headlines.
A foreign national allegedly bribed then-Vice President Joe Biden, kept 17 secret recordings of Hunter and Joe as an insurance policy, 15 with Hunter, 2 with Joe.
According to the Washington Examiner, that foreign national is Burisma owner Mykola Zolchevsky.
Two of the recordings allegedly are between him and Joe Biden.
The 1023 produced to the House Committee redacted reference that the foreign national who allegedly bribed Joe and Hunter has audio recordings of his conversation with him, 17 in total.
These recordings were allegedly kept as an insurance policy for the Foreign National in case he got into a tight spot.
Attempt 23 also indicates that then-Vice President Biden may have been involved in BRISMA employing Hunter in the first place.
More than that, the FBI made Congress review a redacted, unclassified document in a classified facility.
That goes to show you the disrespect the FBI has for Congress.
So the FBI covered up that Burisma's owner had secret recordings between him and the Bidens as an insurance policy, according to Grassley, more from the Washington Examiner.
The U.S.
Attorney's Office in Delaware is handling the ongoing federal criminal investigation into Hunter.
It's allegedly up to U.S.
Attorney David Wise, a Trump-appointed holdover, to decide whether to indict the President's son.
In Feb 2021, Biden asked that all Senate-confirmed attorneys appointed by Trump for the resignation, with Weiss an exception.
This suggests to me, Carl, Weiss was already on the Biden team, so they didn't need to replace him.
He was already having his fingers in the dike to suppress any prosecution of Hunter.
What is U.S.
Attorney Weiss doing with respect to these alleged Joe and Hunter recordings that are apparently relevant to the high-stake bribery scream, Grassley asked Monday?
Sources previously told the Examiner, the Brisbane owner, discussed an alleged bribe of five mil to Joe, another five to Hunter, according to the paid FBI informant who said he heard this from Zolchavsky.
Well, sources said Zolchevsky said he believed it would be difficult to unravel the alleged bribery scheme for at least 10 years because of the number of bank accounts involved.
Zolchevsky's alleged reference to Joe as a big guy appears independent of the apparent reference of the now president as the big guy by a Hunter business associate during negotiations with Chinese intelligence-linked businessmen.
The China-related reference occurred in a May 2017 email not made public until October 2020.
And just the news as noted, the FD1023 includes allegations from a confidential human source that the head of Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company, hired Hunter to serve on its board in order to use his father's influence to stifle An investigation by the then-Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin into the firm.
Shokin was removed from his post in 2016.
The FD1023 indicates that two Biden members were paid $5 million each for their trouble.
Also Monday, House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer subpoenaed Hunter's former business partner, Devin Archer, demanding he sit for a deposition this week.
In a letter, Archer's attorney Comer wrote that he had played a significant role in the Biden family business deals abroad, including but not limited to China, Russia, and Ukraine.
Additionally, while undertaking these ventures with the Biden family, your client met with then-Vice President Biden on multiple occasions, including in the White House, continuing Archer's potential testimony to the GOP House Oversight Committee is a significant milestone in the congressional probe.
Archer served alongside Hunter on the board of ERISMA.
During this period, then-Vice President Biden was deeply involved in Ukrainian policy, an era when his opponents say the energy firm was involved in corruption.
An independent forensic review of Hunter's laptop by CBS News confirmed hundreds of communication between Hunter and Archer, especially emails suggesting working meals were arranged before and after Burisma board meetings.
To brief, of course, before and debrief after.
Archer is widely believed to have facilitated Hunter's entry onto the Burisma board.
An independent review confirmed.
Meanwhile, And we're sure it's unrelated.
Biden had to cancel meetings today to take care of a sudden root canal.
Here, a nice image.
Prisma executive Pete Hunter and Joe has 17 recordings of them as insurance policy.
You can count on 51 intel agencies to declare that's just Russian disinformation.
Horrible.
Wow.
There are a lot of softballs there.
Go for it!
Well, first I would like to comment upon, there was a recording of Joe Biden shuffling down a hall and a reporter shouted out the question about what Joe wanted to say about the, or he asked them, do those recordings exist of a executive talking about paying the Biden family off?
And Biden actually stopped, or the actor playing Biden stopped, turned around, and then just laughed it off and shuffled on.
Now, the idea of 17 recordings, 17, that's an interesting number, We have in 2017 part of the news is that Joe Biden's federal tax return does show $10 million.
That would have been the year after this alleged deal had been made.
$10 million of undisclosed income.
That could be very interesting.
So the prima facie evidence again shows us that Hunter between 14 and 19 got paid approximately a million dollars a year from Burisma to sit on their board by its face.
This is pay to play because Hunter Biden has no academic training or professional experience to be of any assistance at all for an energy company.
He is a political influencer.
Uh, the FBI covering it up.
Yeah, that's what they do.
And I do want to make note here is that pretty much any agency has or every agency has been captured.
And if you want to know what they actually do, just take the title of their organization and then.
Take the exact opposite of that.
So the Federal Bureau of Investigation is they're not going to be investigating anybody of the criminals who pay them.
They're going to be a cover-up and protection agency.
And then the actual people who do need the greatest protection, like the President of the United States, JFK, RFK, and MLK, they're not going to protect them.
They're not going to investigate.
They're actually going to assist for their assassinations.
And finally, Similar to those 51 intelligence experts all claiming that Hunter's laptop was disinformation when they had no evidence and all evidence supporting was that to affirm that this was an actual laptop dropped off by Hunter Biden and the documentation in there would be authentic.
Yeah, of course, it's all going to be disinformation from our opponents until they either drop from a thousand cuts or we do have a breakthrough to expose and ban them.
Excellent comments, Carl.
Another, when he was questioned about the bribery scheme, he said, where's the money?
But notice how you got a report from Charisma saying it was distributed in so many banks it would take 10 years to find it.
I think Biden's reference of where's the money is confirmation that he is indeed corrupt and was a recipient and beneficiary.
Meanwhile, Tucker declares in a new monologue they're trying to take Trump out before you can vote for him.
Yes.
Yes.
Tucker released another episode, the third of his new show, on Tuesday, claiming the Washington establishment opposed former President Trump because of his anti-war views.
Tucker dropped a third episode on the same day Trump pled not guilty to federal charges that have been brought against him.
A popular media personality claimed comments Trump made during a 2016 primary debate marked the exact point at which Permanent Washington decided to throw Trump in prison.
Tucker featured footage of Trump saying the U.S.
should never have been in Iraq, that America had destabilized the Middle East, that the claims made about weapons of mass destruction had been a lie, and that they knew there were none.
He said Trump's statements regarding weapons of mass destruction being a lie sealed his fate.
Carson said Mike Pence, Nikki Haley, Mike Pompeo, Lindsey Graham.
It all described Trump as a visionary genius up until the moment he lost power.
Tucker said, they then achieved their real agenda, always the neocon war agenda.
They boiled on with maximum force and glee, I would add.
Trump running for president again in the 2024 cycle holds a decisive lead over the rest of the primary field.
Tucker, who claimed Biden is using law enforcement to lock up his chief rival, contended that the prosecution of Trump is ideological as well as political.
He said Trump is the one individual with a chance at winning who descends from Washington's long-standing pointless war agenda.
And for that one fact, they're trying to take Trump out before you can vote for him.
The new episode comes after Axios reported that Fox sent Carlson a cease and desist letter.
The tweet containing his new video has amassed more than 6 million views so far.
It's going to wind up much, much more, I have no doubt.
Carl, your thoughts?
So, so far, Tucker's views for his show exceed all of corporate media combined for any evening's presentation of the news.
And while Tucker is, in my view, holding back on his punches, it's the best that we have, and it is sufficient.
And with that show, with the revelation that The war, formerly known as on terror, was not what was advertised, and it was started with lies.
Now, if you really want to bore into that, and if that is true, then the charges against the political and military leaders who ordered our troops into harm's way based on false information, that's an attack on our military, that is treason, that is the death penalty.
And lies, well, how do we know?
Oh yeah, you can take a look at the documentation from the U.S.
most authoritative agencies to demonstrate that all of the statements, all of the reasons to go to war in Iraq were known to be false as they were told.
And I'll prove that through the documentation on the BitTube channel through two documents.
One is my 40-page white paper that Congressman Kucinich leveraged for the impeachment of Bush and Cheney.
That's 200 footnotes onto that.
I wrote that in academic, professional language.
And I'll also put that the U.S.
is a rogue state empire.
And that's more of a popular voice with the top 10 examples going through history to show that the US, they violate treaties at will, and that the quantification of the damages is that the US has killed over 30 million in the 200 interventions, the illegal.
War murders since World War Two and that it's a ridiculous parody of limited government.
It is a rogue state empire.
And that documentation makes that very clear.
And those of us who have this documentation, we would love to debate anybody on that topic.
But of course, they're never going to want to debate us.
Indeed.
Well said, Carl.
Excellent.
Meanwhile... Another reason they can't stand Trump, they fear him.
They're shitting in their pants over the prospect he should resume the presidency.
He himself tweets, Now that the seal is broken in addition to closing the border and removing all the criminal elements that have illegally invaded our country.
Making America energy independent, even dominant again, and immediately ending the war between Russia and Ukraine.
I will appoint a real special prosecutor to go after the most corrupt president in the history of the USA, Joe Biden, the entire Biden crime family, and all others involved with the destruction of our election border and country itself.
Marvelous statement.
I am impressed.
Meanwhile, Pfizer COVID vaccine safety report identifies nearly 1.6 million adverse events early on, early on, by June of 2022.
Pfizer had identified over 10,000 categories of nearly 1.6 million adverse events.
A recently released safety update report shows Pfizer's pharmacovigilance documents were requested and released by the European Medicine Agency.
The EU's drug regulator, Conservative Review's Daniel Horowitz, reported Wednesday.
The 396-page confidential Pfizer report Dated August 18, 2022.
Reveals Pfizer was well aware its product was causing an unacceptable level of serious and debilitating injuries early on.
In the reporting period of 19 December 2021 through 18 June 2022.
The company observed 1,597,673 adverse events in 508,351 case reports, a third of which were classified as serious.
673 adverse events in 508,351 case reports, a third of which were classified as serious.
The report shows women reported adverse events three times the rate of men, though many of their complaints were not considered serious.
Here you have the actual breakdown statistically in category one after another after another after another.
Signals that were addressed and inexplicably determined not to be risk included heavy menstrual bleeding, loss of taste and smell, appendicitis, hemologic anemia, oovitis, flare-ups of autoimmune system and inflammatory disorders, and vasculitis.
Signals determined to be important identified risks include anaphylaxis, myocarditis, and pericarditis.
Curing loss was catalyzed at an ongoing signal.
The report also acknowledged that vaccine-associated enhanced disease and vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease were important potential risks of taking the shot.
The report indicated it was missing information on the potential risk for pregnant or breastfeeding mothers, immunocompromised individuals, and use in frail patients with comorbidities.
Regardless, the mRNA injection was strongly recommended for everyone, and for most working-age individuals, it was mandated.
The Pfizer data shows more than 60% of cases were classified as either outcome unknown or not recovered, indicating a concerning number of the injuries were long-term.
Only 35% were listed as recovered or recovering.
The highest number of cases occurred in the 31 to 50 age group, 92% of whom did not have any comorbidities prior to the jab.
Here's more data.
Very thorough, very comprehensive.
Conservative Review highlighted a recently released Pfizer summary documenting serious and non-serious adverse reaction as of 18 June 2022.
in 2022. Pfizer was aware of 73,542 cases in 264 categories of vascular disorders from the shots, many of them rare conditions.
There are hundreds of categories of nervous system disorders total.
totaling 609,6508.
There's 61,518 AEs from well over 100 categories of eye disorder, unusual for a vaccine injury level.
Likewise, over 47,000 ear disorders, including almost 16,000 cases of tinnitus, which even Mayo Clinic observed as a common but often devastating side effect early on.
There are roughly 225,000 cases of skin and tissue disorder.
5,000 cases of skin and tissue disorder, roughly 190,000 cases of respiratory disorder.
Disturbingly, there were over 178,000 cases of reproductive or breast disorder, including disorders you wouldn't expect, such as 506 of erectile dysfunction in men.
Very disturbingly, there were over 77,000 psychiatric disorders observed following the shot.
Lending credence to Dr. Peter McCullough's research, observing case studies showing psychosis correlating with vaccination.
3,711 tumors benign and malignant.
Of course, there are almost 127,000 cardiac disorders, covering the gamut of about 270 categories of heart damage, many rare disorders, in addition to myocarditis.
There are over 100,000 blood and lymphatic disorders, for both of which there's a wealth of literature linking them to the spike protein.
When reading what Pfizer knew early on, juxtaposed with independent studies, it's clear nobody could have mistaken most of these AEs for mere incidental ailments.
Here's a list of 3,129 case studies chronicling vaccine injury in every organ system observed in this Pfizer doc.
What is so jarring?
is that there are hundreds of very rare neurological disorders that reflect something so systemically wrong with a shot, a reality that was clearly of no concern to the manufacturers or regulators alike.
One of the infamous cases of vaccine injury was Maddie DeGrazi, an Ohio teen, who became disabled for life immediately after participating in the Pfizer clinical trial.
Her story is chronicled in chapter 16 of my book.
I checked this confidential document and found they knew of 68 cases of her rare diagnosis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.
The broad scope of injuries affecting every single organ system is simply extraordinary.
Yet to this day, the FDA continues to criminally label the Pfizer shot safe and effective.
To this day, the label indicates the shot is a fully protective vaccine and fails to mention all of these side effects as required by law.
Horrible.
Stunning stuff.
It is, it is, it is.
So first, with the Trump tweet, I agree that that is a strong tweet, and I would say that what's missing is the documentation for the public proof.
Now, as a professional historian, that is always, and just as an academic, if you're going to make a factual claim, you've got to be able to back it up, and you've got to be able to link it with the documentation to explain, document, and prove what you're talking about, and in this case, Because these crimes are so serious, you have to call for arrests, and an arrest is the lawful tool to stop apparent crimes in progress.
But he's not alone with that.
You'd think that Trump would do that.
As a president whose job it is to enforce the law, RFK Jr.
isn't doing that either.
He's powerful statements, but he needs to provide the documentation and call for the arrest.
By the way, for RFK Jr., You may recall that I did attend an event in San Diego on May 29th and made the request of Dennis Kucinich, his campaign manager, and his team, for Jim, me, and whoever else, to brief at least Kucinich and RFK Jr.
too, if you would like to accept, on what we know about the assassinations of RFK Jr.' father, uncle, and MLK.
I've now sent my third request, no responses so far, but I will tell a story at that RFK event.
Del Bigtree opened up and he said that he was at a meeting with Bobby Kennedy Jr. and Anthony Fauci and Del Bigtree, or maybe it was Bobby, said, "We're here to see the Pfizer safety studies "We're here to see the Pfizer safety studies before the shot was introduced." And And you didn't do those safety studies or something to that effect.
And the opponents on the other side claimed, oh, of course we did the safety studies.
Of course we did them.
And then Bobby simply said, great, let's see them.
Del Bigtree telling the story said that the room fell into silence.
And finally, it was Anthony Fauci who barked out, we didn't do the safety studies because it would be unethical.
And that would have been a perfect place to dive into that because that's the testimony that you want the most to be able to expose that the ethical part of it, that's following the procedures.
And if you're going to do a safety study before you have a vaccine, then you weren't Ethical, you're making a case that it would have been immoral.
It would have been wrong because what happened is that those safety studies were interrupted because the control group were all given the vaccine because of some, some, uh, uh, preliminary background assumption.
That the vaccine was what was necessary.
That's the story that they're going to tell, but it was unethical and they didn't follow the practices of science.
The Pfizer document of the injuries.
Yes, that is important.
And just as I like to do, those are the most authoritative documents to use.
I don't know if it's going to be any different this time.
I hope so.
Because, you know, going back to that 40 page white paper, our most authoritative government documents Same thing.
All lies, all crimes.
And then you have corporate media and the all of the related law enforcement agencies are all captured and they do the Orwellian satanic opposite.
They cover that crime up, which means that they are criminal accomplices, both before and both before, during and after the fact of crime.
And I'll provide the documentation here on Bitude for my best shot, which is my 4700 word paper that gives sufficient evidence that these are crimes against humanity.
So we just need to keep pointing to the facts, but I think we all can agree that we're seeing a major escalation of these facts coming, and I just hope that they keep coming until we get a breakthrough or the death by a thousand cuts.
Excellent, Carl.
And, of course, a way to sabotage a study is to mess with a control group, giving them the same so they can no longer function as a control group.
Very significant.
That Anthony Fauci had to speak up is shocking.
In depth.
Trump indictment arrest on untested legal theory, experts say.
The Espionage Act has never been used to prosecute in this sort of a setting, says a former federal prosecutor.
This is quite detailed, but I believe well worth the review.
The indictment of former President Trump holding military docs and obstructing the government is built on a novel legal theory with multiple weaknesses.
The case had been portrayed as being about Trump retaining classified docs from his presidency.
The charges, however, sidestep that issue.
And instead use a clause in the Espionage Act that criminalizes a failure to hand over national defense information.
The indictment claims Trump and staffer Walti Nata hid docs when the government demanded them.
The alleged Espionage Act violation imposed a high burden of proof, raising the question whether the statute should have been applied to begin with, and if not, Whether the underlying investigation should serve as a basis for obstruction charges.
The key legal issue here is the interplay between the Presidential Records Act and the espionage acts that William Scarp, a former federal prosecutor.
The Presidential Records Act of 1978 stipulates that after a president leaves office, the National Archives and Records Administration, NARA, takes custody of all his official records.
By the way, prior to 1978, all those records were regarded as belonging to the president.
The law allows former president to keep personal docs, such as diary journals or other personal notes, not used for government business.
If a former president or vice finds presidential records among personal matters, he or she is expected to contract NARA in a timely manner to secure the transfer of those records to NARA.
However, the Presidential Record Act isn't a criminal statute.
If a former president refuses to turn over some docs or claims obviously official docs as personal, the worst he could face is a civil lawsuit.
There's little case law in such matters.
In 2012, Judicial Watch sought to force former President Bill Clinton to turn over dozens of interview tapes he kept from his presidency.
Clinton claimed the tapes were personal and the court sided with him.
Judge Amy Behrman Jackson, an appointee of President Barack Obama, went so far as to argue that the court had no way to second-guess a president's assertion of what is and isn't personal.
Since the president is completely entrusted with the management and even the disposal of presidential records during his time in office, it would be difficult for this court to conclude that Congress intended that he would have less authority to do what he pleases with what he considers to be his personal records, Jackson wrote.
However, The DOJ is now arguing that former president can be charged under the Espionage Act of 1917 for possession of documents they kept in their presidency.
That's a totally novel legal issue, Scharf said.
It's never been tested before.
The Espionage Act has never before been used to prosecute in this sort of a setting.
Some lawyers believe it can't be used this way because it wasn't meant to be used in such a fashion.
Before 1978, former presidents owned all documents from their presidencies, including any national defense information.
There's never been any suggestion their holding to such docs violated the Espionage Act.
Congress has been very, very clear that the act applies to presidents and former presidents, as is the Presidential Records Act.
The act that applies to everyone else is the Espionage Act, which has different requirements, suggesting a banal lawyer represented Trump in another matter.
Mike Davis of Conservative Article 3 Project voiced a similar opinion.
Even if a president declassifies his presidential records and takes them when he leaves the office, he can still get charged under the Espionage Act.
I promise that theory won't fly with the Supreme Court, he said.
Much of the indictment relies on allegations Trump kept national events documents willfully with criminal intent.
Yet the docs fall short in providing evidence for such intent.
On May 11, 2022, the DOJ obtained a subpoena compelling Trump to turn over all docs with classification markings, including electronic.
One of the key claims is that Trump instructed Nata to move boxes of docs around before his lawyer came to search the boxes for docs in response to the subpoena.
NADA allegedly moved 64 boxes out of a storage room where Trump kept items and documents from his presidency and moved them to Trump's residence at the resort.
NADA then moved back 30 boxes shortly before Trump's then-lawyer, Evan Corcoran, Search the storage room for the subpoena documents, according to the indictment, which refers to security camera footage obtained from Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort via a subpoena.
The indictment alleges the boxes were moved to hide responsive talks from Corcoran.
It presents a text message.
It was noticed that Trump told him to put some boxes in his room.
There's no word of whether Trump in fact went through the boxes, and if so, what he was looking for.
On August 8, 2022, when the FBI raided Trump's Mar-a-Lago home in West Palm Beach, 102 documents with classified markings were found in the storage room in Trump's office.
Some lawyers have argued Trump should have challenged a subpoena in court because it was too broad.
It's likely Trump had made docs with classification markings that had been declassified.
Reams of such documents are available online.
Also, the subpoena mentioned nothing about national defense information, which doesn't need to bear classification marks.
The indictment states Trump's alleged crime of willfully retaining 31 specific national defense-related documents started on 21 January 2021 after he allegedly caused boxes of material from his term to be shipped to Mar-a-Lago.
That, of course, would be the day that Joe Biden assumed office.
Details about moving the boxes remain unclear.
Newsweek reported 27 were shipped to Trump's home by accident.
Former lawyer Timothy Barlore said the docs were moved by the General Service Administration.
The indictment doesn't explain how Trump was supposed to know of these specific documents.
It presents no evidence of any criminal intent on Trump's part to take and keep these documents.
There are serious, serious legal infirmities in the argument that they're using, Sharf said.
If the Espionage Act charges won't withstand judicial scrutiny, the additional obstruction charges shouldn't stand on their own.
There's a long-standing DOJ practice that you don't indict for obstruction, or really any process-related crime, unless there's underlying criminality.
Sharp said.
So if the DOJ launches an investigation into something, somebody allegedly obstructs that investigation, but it turns out the investigation itself wasn't well-founded.
That typically won't result in an indictment.
When it comes to investigation involving Trump, however, prosecutors have commonly brought process crime charges alone, such as in the case of Trump's former National Security Advisor, Lt.
Gen.
Michael Flanagan, and in 2016, campaign advisor George Papadopoulos.
I think in this case especially, you're seeing this weaponization of process crimes that the FBI has begun to use, where they will, under some flimsy or circumstantial premise, open an investigation on somebody for something, and then during the course of the investigation hope they can bring charges that are process crimes, said former FBI agent and whistleblower Steve Friend.
There are indications that Trump expected to be able to deal with the government similarly to Clinton and his wife, former Secretary of State Hillary.
In a CNN town hall earlier, Trump said, based on the Presidential Records Act, he was allowed to negotiate with NARA on what he could and couldn't keep.
NARA has rejected such an interpretation, but Trump was likely referring to the 2012 Clinton case.
The indictment also indicates Trump questioned his lawyers on whether he could handle a subpoena similar to how Hillary did in 2015, when her lawyers infamously sorted through her email from her State Department tenure and had about half of them deleted, claiming they were not work-related.
The FBI later found out thousands of work-related emails were missing.
Wouldn't it be better if we just told them we don't have anything here Trump allegedly asked and recounted their Clinton episode multiple times?
But now that said, those were absolutely valid legal questions for Trump to raise.
You're saying, well, wait a second, if legally Hillary's lawyers were able to do this and it worked, why can't we do it the same way?
The case has been brought by Jack Smith, the former federal prosecutor appointed special counsel by Merrick Garland on 18 November 2022.
Smith has been criticized by Republicans for allowing his prosecutors to go rogue in this case and in prior role as a head of the DOJ's Public Integrity Section.
But now recall how a decade ago, Prosecutors under Smith violated a defendant's constitutional right before a grand jury, leading the court to dismiss charges against the defendant in the same case.
Prosecutors seized his client's phone and failed to use a filter system to prevent the investigator from seeing Bunnell's privileged communication with his client.
In the Trump case, Smith may get a judicial order to pierce Trump's client-attorney privilege, but the issue could be re-litigated but now suggested.
I think you're going to see motions to suppress evidence based on the violation of attorney-client privilege.
Trump's lawyers may also try to remove from trial evidence obtained during the Mar-a-Lago raid on the ground the search warrant was overbought.
According to William Shibley, a former federal prosecutor, who now represent many charged in relation to the January 6, 2021 Capitol protest and riot, the issue is a failure to describe with particularity the items to be seized.
Banal also predicted attempts to have the case tossed for prosecutorial misconduct.
Perlator told the media he saw multiple instances of such misconduct and he voluntarily sat for questioning before a grand jury.
One of the prosecutors accused him of refusing to answer a question that pertained to privileged attorney-client conversation.
Perlator had to remind the jurors he wasn't refusing, but was rather barred by ethical rules from answering.
There have also been reports that prosecutors implied to the attorney, Fernanda, that his application for judgeship in Washington could be tied to his client's willingness to cooperate.
That's another clear example of prosecutorial misconduct, Brunel said, arguing Garland's appointment at Smith betrayed his bias.
Personnel is always policy.
Merrick Garland knew exactly what he was getting when he appointed Jack Smith as special counsel.
He appointed a zealot.
He appointed a Trump hater.
He appointed someone he knew was going to stop at nothing to go after and get Trump.
The contrast between Smith's aggressive pursuit of the case compared to the FBI's cautious approach in its investigation of Hillary's email speaks to unequal application of the law.
What we have right here is the very idea that it was always finding an excuse to give a pass to people like Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton, and always find an excuse to go after Donald Trump.
But now, Carl, that was a masterful review.
Your thoughts?
It is, it is.
It's looking better and worse and worse for old 666.
I mean, BBB built back Biden.
The Espionage Act of 1917, and I'll have documentation here at BitTube, this was a World War I law that has never received sufficient constitutional examination because it was meant to crush dissent into World War I, a lie-started war with no national security threat to the United States that both my grandfathers were.
Lied into participating in and the this was followed in 1918 by the Sedition Act so And the Espionage Act was used to imprison political opponents against the war, including the third-party presidential candidate Eugene Debs, who was thrown into prison for four years.
This all took place before the Truman administration made the distinctions of classified, unclassified, and declassified.
The commander-in-chief, the president, has the power to declassify whatever it is that he wants, and according to Trump's testimony, he followed all the procedures, had everything checked, and so what
We should have if we wanted to have this in the public domain and if people wanted to be good citizens then you would just demand well what are the procedures and what do we know of what Trump did and then what happened with both Clintons and what happened to Biden saying that he's got documents from 1974 when he was a senator.
That isn't a president, that's a senator and then he has those documents from when he was vice president.
Those would be the questions to ask and Again, this looks so, so bad for our political opponents.
So, it keeps on inching and inching closer and closer to this endgame, and I have no idea how much longer this story can drag out.
Yeah, I don't think there's any substance whatsoever.
There's no legal merit to the case whatsoever.
I will not be surprised if it gets tossed entirely.
Meanwhile, Major League Baseball quietly tells teams to pitch their Pride uniforms.
Major League Baseball has quietly told teams they can stop forcing players to wear uniforms and hats adorned with gay Pride rainbow colors during their Pride night games.
The decision comes as the L.A.
Dodgers are taking major heat for inviting the radical, non-anti-Catholic hate group, the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, to its Gay Pride Night game on June 16th, and also as several major corporations, including Bud Light and Target, are facing serious economic losses thanks to their wild-eyed support of the far-left LGBTQ agenda.
The Tampa Bay Rays were the first team to announce that players would not wear any rainbow-colored patches or jerseys during the June Pride game this year.
But the league kept this change to its Pride celebration very quiet, since giving teams dispensation to dump the bright colors and special jerseys back in February.
The Rays had trouble with the Pride night plans last year when several players balked at being forced to wear rainbow collars.
Half the time, several rebelled against a Pride jersey and refused to wear them during last year's Pride game.
Not all teams are dumping the force field team to the groomer agenda.
The L.A.
Dodgers and San Francisco Giants have announced their intention to continue wearing the Pride jerseys.
There has been one team that has shooed the Pride business from the beginning.
The Texas Rangers is the only team consistently refused to indulge in any demonstration of pride and has never scheduled any Pride night games.
Pro baseball is not the only sport of growing resistance to have pride forced on players' games and their sport.
A growing number of National Hockey League players and teams are also turning away from blatant expressions of the groomer agenda.
Teams, including the Chicago Blackhawks and the Buffalo Sabres, have experienced issues with using pride juries.
In addition, Senator Jose Shark Goalie James Reimer opted out of wearing the jersey, citing his religious convictions.
In January, Philadelphia Fire Defenseman Ivan Horovod also decided not to wear his team's gay bride jersey for similar reasons.
The same month, the New York Rangers opted out of wearing the gay bride jersey.
It seems to all be part of a growing trend of Americans finally getting sick and tired of the gay agenda being shoved down everyone's throat by multi-billion dollar corporations.
Major League Baseball was one of the last major sports to succumb to the extreme woke agenda.
It's time it goes back to being the sport that welcomes everyone to come play baseball, not to be inundated with politics.
Meanwhile, U.S.
state of money's partisan book bans.
Illinois will defund public libraries that prohibit literature for political reasons.
Illinois has adopted a law That will cut off government funding for public libraries that prohibit books for partisan or doctrinal reasons, requiring them to sign on to a library bill of rights and renounce bans on literature.
Governor J.B.
Pritzker signed the bill into law Monday at a children's library in downtown Chicago.
Later declaring the book bans are really about censorship, marginalizing people, ideas, and facts.
Today, Illinois makes history as a first state in our nation to officially end book bans once and for all, the governor said, claiming the followers of A dangerous strain of white nationalism are seeking to determine whose histories are told in Illinois.
Introduced by Democrat State Representative Ann Sava-Murray following a spat over content in school libraries in her own district, the new legislation is set to take effect on January 1, 2024.
It will force public libraries to adopt the American Library Association Library Bill of Rights in order to receive state funding.
The law adds that materials should not be proscribed or removed because of partisan or doctrinal disapproval, echoing similar language used in the ALA Pledge.
The Rowan-Stafford-Murray District reflects a broader debate over children's reading material across the nation.
Florida, Arizona, Iowa, Texas, Missouri, Oklahoma, and other states have proposed or passed laws to restrict books in libraries and schools over the last year, citing the need to protect children from inappropriate or mature content.
According to the ALA, 2022 saw a record number of attempts to ban or restrict books, nearly doubling the figure for 2021, which itself had broken the previous record.
Carl, your thoughts, my friend?
All right, so first with MLB, I'll try to find this clip that we showed on a new show maybe about a month ago, and I'll put it in the BitTube show notes of a fan in Boston's Fenway Park observing and filming that at the Bud Light beer stand.
Nobody was there, and their display case was 100% full, and then the beer vendors to the left were all filled up with people, 15 people deep, Uh, in line and, uh, the Bostonian said that that was bizarre to be able to see that at Fenway Park and said that this was true all throughout.
So, if is making that stand, then maybe they are getting a reality check and maybe the players and.
Personnel are beginning to speak up now.
Uh, the data as far as I can tell is approximately 2 to 4% of human beings self identify as homosexual.
And for most people, we don't have any problem with adults managing their sexual experience and expression.
However, they so please, but.
The idea that you can go ahead and influence children, no no no no no, that's where most Americans are going to draw the line there.
And this idea of self-identification for these trans people.
Okay, well, that is a self-image.
And they can have a self-image, but we can also have the power, and we do have the power, to be able to describe what we see and base it upon our reality that these people are biological males pretending to be females.
And the idea that we have to somehow sacrifice and cater to their self-image, no, no, no, no, no, no.
Illinois.
Good for them.
No political censorship, I like that.
And so that means that we should be able to have in that standard, which most people would embrace and consistent with the First Amendment, you would be able to challenge the COVID narrative, you'd be able to challenge the Ukraine war narrative, you'd be able to challenge the fairness of US elections.
And the power of the First Amendment is never censorship, because that's going to raise questions and doubt.
If you really want to destroy an argument, Let them speak.
Say, give it to me.
I want to hear all of it.
And then you get all the story out, and you get the documentation, and then you professionally, academically destroy their argument.
And that is something our opponents can never tolerate.
They have to resort to censorship.
They have to bully and herd people and make some story up in order to have just a one-sided debate.
So this is good for the Illinois librarians and the people associated with that.
Carl, excellent, excellent comments.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
Live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
Here's a comment from my blog.
Jim Stone just did a major update.
Does not look good.
Do with it what you will.
From the tone of it, there's not much we can do.
Things are picking up.
The Bible said the final war against Israel would be fought by the East.
I always figured that would be Russia.
But as it turns out, China just signed a new strategic pact with Palestine and has vowed as part of that pact to provide protection from Israel.
That ought to go well.
Meanwhile, it appears war preps are escalating.
America is open flying nuclear bombers over Europe.
Russia is escalating as well.
If you put on prepping, This is probably it over the next while.
All the pieces are in place.
Now Trump is being handled, communist-style handling of political opposition, and those pieces are signaling more strongly than ever that the end is near.
What to do?
Nothing, really.
I think I bitched on time, and Alex Jones certainly did so also.
I remember him back in the 90s, which was soon enough.
But due to the fact that people just clicked off to the next story and did nothing, it's definitely over now.
There's literally no point in running this site.
Wow.
Carl, your final thoughts?
I very much appreciate that writer to be able to communicate exactly what it is that we're being shown.
So the conclusion, there's not much we can do.
Yeah.
It's what it looks like after 46 years of participating in the Great Awakening.
I agree that it appears that there isn't much that we can influence.
My own experience is that about 2% of human beings are able to think and process through the challenging information that we have, and that 98% of the people are some kind of a easily stampeded Herd animal.
So if we account for what we do control and be responsible for it and have the wisdom of acceptance of what we have.
We have what we think, we have what we say, and we have what we do.
And again, after 46 years of experience, for me, it's like, yeah, there's not much we can do.
I definitely am committed and attracted to and practice the sharpening up of my own tools, and that's all that I have.
I do conclude that we do have some sort of a, well, whether You conclude this or not, this is a realistic, on-the-ground test of character, and for people to reflect on their most important spiritual, religious, philosophical background, and to be able to take a stand in what appears to be the most dire circumstances of AMREF 2.0 and World War III.
Personally, I'll share my own personal conclusions.
I mean, It's worthless everyone has to come to their own conclusion, but I think that we are in some sort of a simulation and the simulation would be managed controlled by.
Higher dimensional beings, which would be akin to, I mentioned this before and I'll put it in the show notes again here at BitChute, that if you had a third dimensional being communicating with two dimensional beings, the third dimensional beings would be, if you had a flat plane, if the desk that are in front of you had beings on top of it and they had no ability to recognize anything above or below that plane, you would be able to see as a third dimensional being everything going on there.
I think that this, whatever this life is that we have, if there is dimensional powers above this one that manage time, then this would be similar to some sort of a video game where you could go back in time and make adjustments.
So, paradoxically, you know, you should be freaked out as much as you can freak out over events.
And at the same time, based upon what your own philosophical underpinnings are, I have absolutely every confidence that I have managed ethically and responsibly what I can control, and I invite our audience members to do the same and to be proud of who you are with that respect.
Wonderful commentary today, Carl.
I'm simply delighted.
In my opinion, there are three reasons for bringing the indictments against Trump.
Number one, to distract from the charisma revelations of the profound corruption of the Biden crime family this afternoon, the same day the charisma information goes to the House Oversight Committee, is not merely a coincidence.
Number two, as Rachel Maddow revealed the other day, there might be a political solution to the criminal charges, revealing they're not really criminal charges.
They're actually merely political.
They might be dropped if Trump were to agree to withdraw from the race.
But of course, that's a whole idea.
Number three.
To get Trump so wrapped up in dealing with his immediate indictment charges, he does not have time to provide the nation with the leadership it so desperately needs at a time when millions of migrants are flooding across the border.
And I believe are going to be provided with arms that have already been stocked up by non-law enforcement, non-DOD related agencies, spending $4 billion to acquire those weapons.
And now DHS has provided them with cell phones so they can direct them where to secure those weapons and to coordinate in order to bring attacks on the American people.
This, I fear, is what is coming.
I also believe, as I've said before and shall reiterate, the whole category of domestic terrorists, which is emphasized by the fabrications, the manufacturing, the illusions of the January 6th fake insurrection, ...is to implant in the public a category that, in a time of martial law, would be subject to summary trial and execution on the spot.
They are declaring NRA members, Pride Boys, Oath Keepers, MAGA supporters, Trump voters, conservatives, even moms, You want to have their children free from indoctrination to change their gender and the like, classified as domestic terrorists?
You must watch the film The Czechist, released in 1991, which reveals what happened in the aftermath of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.
Millions of ordinary civilians like you and me We're giving summary judgment and shot.
I'm sorry to say, I believe this is what they have in mind.
They're just trying to provoke conservatives, Trump supporters especially, to take some action that would justify their doing so.
And then under the rubric of domestic terrorists, they're going to summarily try and execute millions upon millions upon millions.
You think it sounds like a fantasy?
It's happened before.
Watch The Checkist, and you'll be seeing the future of the United States if we're unable to cope with the threat now posed by the Bolshevik operation taking place out of the Biden administration.
It's stunning.
Meanwhile, Spend as much time as you can with your family, friends, and people you love and care about.
We do not know how much time we have left.
▲
Export Selection