All Episodes
Previous Next
June 13, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:19:39
Need to Know News (12 June 2023) with Carl Herman and Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Mazin, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in Mission Viejo, California.
We believe Chris Weiner will be joining us from Fort Myers, Florida, as we proceed.
Meanwhile, believe it or not, Trump's GOP primary lead has grown to 38 points after the indictment.
Anyone who thought this was going to hurt Trump is having the opposite effect.
The Democrats must be tearing out their hair.
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis getting in the race didn't cut into Trump support.
Special Counsel Jack Smith's indictment has only furthered his lead.
This is the latest CBS poll released Sunday.
He's stretched his lead to 38 points over DeSantis and 57 points over the rest of the field.
When likely GOP primary voters were asked which candidates they'd consider, 75% said they would consider Trump.
Here you got the numbers.
Trump, 61% has said 23.
Tim Scott, 4.
That's that 57% gap.
Pence, 4.
Tim Scott, four.
That's that 57% gap.
Pence, four.
Nikki Haley, three.
Vivek Daswamy, who may be the most intellectual of the bunch, one.
Asa Hutchison, a POS, won.
Doug Burnham, won.
Larry Elder, won.
Chris Christie, also in that category, won.
The poll, taken after the indictment Thursday, shows the bases sticking with him.
Sticking with him.
And he's picking up some support.
Thank you.
Catching on with likely primary voters too, just 26%.
This is Republicans, of course, who want their nominee to be someone unlike Trump.
An overwhelming 74% want their nominee to be like Trump.
And, of course, no one can be more like Trump than Trump.
Trump has at least been considered by three-quarters of the electorate.
That's already a critical measure at this early stage, when they have time to weigh the merits of multiple candidates.
Respondents here were free to consider as many or as few as they like.
Most Republican voters are still considering more than one candidate.
Here you have This is how many are being considered.
75% Trump, 51% Assange, 21% Scott, 16 Pence, 15 Haley, Raswami, 13 Elder, 9 Christie, 7 Hutcheson, 6 Burgum, 4.
21% Scott, 16 Pence, 15 Haley, Raswami, 13 Elder, nine, Christy, seven, Hutchison, six, Burgum, four.
The CBS News/YouGov survey was conducted with 2,480 residents between the 7th and the 10th.
Meanwhile, Judicial Watch, indictment won't survive scrutiny.
This is a short but powerful piece.
A judge had thrown out the federal indictment against Trump.
Federal Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton tweeted Friday.
Carefully reviewing the indictment, he concluded, if justice prevails, it won't survive scrutiny by honest constitutional judges and will be thrown out.
The Judicial Watch president, whom I admire, has noted his organization has almost three decades' experience in litigating federal and presidential record issues, wrote of the indictment that it dishonestly ignores the U.S.
Constitutional, the Presidential Records Act, legal precedent of the DOJ archive as previous position, White House records our president takes with him, When he leaves the White House, are presumptively personal and not subject to review, bipartisan Biden appointees at DOJ or the Archives.
I repeat, and not subject to review, bipartisan Biden appointees at DOJ or the Archives.
He stressed under the Constitution, federal law and precedent, None of the documents are currently classified or are national defense information that restricts Trump's handling thereof.
Emphasize all the documents are Trump personal records and frankly should be returned to him.
Carl, your thoughts?
I'm liking these stories, and I'm liking the trend that more of these public serpent puppeticians try in these tragic comic type of arguments, just Orwellian arguments, the worse that they're going to be able to look.
And this is setting up towards an Emperor's New Clothes type of discovery of a tragic comedy for the endgame.
Now, all this is based, now that article saying that this case shouldn't be applied is absolutely correct.
The Espionage Act is a 1917 act that was designed to end U.S.
protests of entering into World War I.
Now at the time when Woodrow Wilson was running for re-election, he campaigned on we're not sending our boys to Europe.
But sure enough, after he was elected for his second term, he demanded to be going in and the Congress responded by not allowing any oppositional voices.
So this went so far as Eugene Debs, the third party candidate, was thrown into prison merely for questioning the wisdom of war in general.
And I'll put a look here in bit shoot for the documentation of what that happened at the time.
The 1917 Espionage Act was followed by the 1918 Sedition Act.
And this all comes before, in the 1950s, the distinction of classified, unclassified, and declassified materials.
So I see that second article is absolutely correct, and that if this goes so far as to go into court, then the Trump attorneys are going to ask, what exactly are the documents you're concerned about?
And And the department Representing the psychopaths in the government, they're going to have to claim that they can't show it.
It has to be a secret document for national security.
So it's going to go down to does the Department of Justice and the current administration have dictatorial power to claim national security at will?
And I hope that they try that argument.
Because where we're at is at this Emperor New Clothes moment, in that we just need to force people to take a look at the facts themselves, and if the American public are too weak or unwilling to look at the facts, then yeah, go ahead and let them get rolled.
What an excellent commentary, Carl, especially about Eugene Debs being vilified because he would even question war.
I mean, what a gross abuse, just parallel to what's going on here.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, they threw him in jail.
That was something else that they did to him.
They ran him through a lot of stuff.
Before there was even an FBI, there was a private organization that was messing with him quite a bit too.
So yeah, they do this to a lot of people that stand up against the Federal Reserve or against this federal government.
And I have to wonder, what are these Emergency Powers Acts that are pushed in, whether it's the War Powers Act or the Selective Service Act or the Income Tax or the whatever, you know, go on and on.
If they supersede the Constitution or what?
You know, because I mean, even the Constitution, if you think about it, it was passed and then within 10 years they put out the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798.
So, they didn't even make it 10 years without really rescinding the whole free speech and everything like that, even the right to overthrow your own government if it becomes a tyranny, which it obviously is.
So, yeah, it's an interesting situation where they preemptively use the law to discourage and to prosecute anybody that has a form of resistance to what is becoming an obvious tyranny.
So, it's certainly a breach of democracy and certainly I mean, what we're seeing, we see it as a clown show and it is being manufactured.
And really, we're supposed to take the official narrative and embrace that as the truth and as some version of history.
And in reality, we're seeing an entirely different thing.
It's seeing through this whole act.
So, kudos to everybody that pays attention, that's been watching this and that's been in the game with this.
Back to you guys.
But great comments, Carl.
I like what you said about Debs.
Very, very similar.
Very good.
I do agree.
Meanwhile, Trump's indictment, the top five craziest reactions, this is from a website about which I've had serious concerns in the past.
Who, what, why?
Clearly they're showing their true colors in this instance.
From on-screen meltdowns and calls for more questionable legal advice and cryptic, as well as not-so-cryptic, incitements to violence, the reaction of leading right-wing figures to the news of Trump's indictment was everything you'd expect—insane, unhinged, hilarious, frightening, and ill-informed.
Except if you look at what Tom Fitton, who's as expert an expert as we could have on these issues, their reactions are anything but.
To illustrate how wild things got on Fox and social media, we compiled a list of the top five craziest responses.
Let's start with Fox host Mark Levin, who absolutely lost it on Sean Hannity's show.
During an impressive seven-minute rant.
He made the case it was a well-documented indictment of Trump that was an insurrection.
Not the actual insurrection from January 6th, frankly.
I think Mark Levin has it right.
Let's listen to part of what he had to say.
President Trump is 76 years old.
If the Department of Justice gets his way, he will die in federal prison.
Just by one of these counts, conspiracy to obstruct justice, which has a 20 year maximum sentence.
This is a disgusting, disgusting mark on American history for the future to come by these bandits in the White House, by the Democrat Party that don't play fair anymore.
They don't want to just win elections.
They want to take control of this country.
They want one party rule.
And they have used the Department of Justice and the FBI to get what they want.
Merrick Garland is a mob lawyer.
That's what he is.
Jack Reed is a rogue, Soviet-style prosecutor.
The Presidential Records Act is not a criminal statute, and it was never intended to be.
The Espionage Act of 1917 was passed under Woodrow Wilson, another corrupt president.
Woodrow Wilson used it to go after his adversaries and they imprisoned 2,000 people.
So I suppose over there at the Department of Injustice, and this clown prosecutor spent a lot of time at the Hague, they probably figured these laws could be used to try and entrap Trump.
All these obstruction issues that they claim, where the former Attorney General Bill Barr comes up here and Bloviates about it, and all the formers coming on talking about obstruction.
They have them on obstruction.
There'd be no obstruction issue of any kind, not even in anybody's imagination, had they not criminalized this case.
This is a document case.
A document case where a president of the United States or a former president faces a hundred years in federal prison?
Is this some kind of a sick joke on the American people?
Joe Biden says he never told them what to do.
Joe Biden had to sign off on what's becoming a National Archives case to have it go to the Department of Justice.
Who does he think he's lying to?
The American people?
This is a guy that's got documents from the time he was in the U.S.
Senate, for God's sakes!
In his garage!
I don't want to hear from the legal analysts the technicalities about false statements and obstruction.
This should never have been a criminal case!
Willful retention of documents!
Well, what's the unwillful retention of documents mean?
They're throwing all these process crimes and all these crimes that grow out of the criminal investigation against Trump.
What did he do with the documents?
Did he sell them to the enemy?
No!
That's why we have an Espionage Act, not the trick of a president.
What did he do?
Did he burn them all?
No!
The government has all the documents back.
So there is no violation of the Presidential Records Act at this point.
But they throw the book at him.
They go after his attorneys.
They make them testify.
Their attorneys, under the crime-fraud exemption, to attorney-client privilege.
That means he didn't have due process.
His own lawyers were being subjected to interrogations.
And they had hundreds of In person, people testifying in front of grand juries.
Thousands of collections of documents.
For what?
For what?
And they indict him today?
They indict him today in Miami?
All of a sudden it's in Miami?
All of a sudden we have a Florida grand jury?
Because the moron in Washington figured out that there are venue issues.
That could lose him his case.
This guy, this prosecutor, he lost 8-0 in the U.S.
Supreme Court when they overturned the conviction of the former governor of Virginia because this jerk took a statute and expanded it.
A jury in North Carolina wouldn't convict John Edwards, because this jerk took a campaign statute and expanded it, and he's taken this case, and he's undermining the country, and he's interfering with a presidential election.
And let me be clear, as Jared said, The Attorney General of the United States made this final decision.
This is not the independent counsel statute.
This is a special counsel, appointed by the Attorney General, under a Department of Justice regulation.
This Attorney General, who pretends he's Helen Keller, he made the decision to indict the former president, and they made the decision to interfere in this election.
You want to talk about an insurrection?
This ...is an insurrection!
And that's exactly what's going on here.
Let me... Let me say, I think that was wonderful, that everything you said was accurate, and I'd observe that Thomas Aquinas, no less, said anger in the face of injustice is appropriate, that it's morally wrong Not to be angered by injustice.
I think this was absolutely righteous on his part, and we need more of it in this country.
But Levin wasn't done.
What's going on here is a disgusting disgrace, and it's a war on Trump, a war on the Republican Party, and a war on the Republic, he said.
He was so worked up.
At times, one had to be concerned he would suffer an aneurysm and become the first victim of that war.
Fortunately, he lived to fight another day.
Speaking of war, Republican lawmakers offer plenty of bellicose rhetoric.
Take Representative Andy Biggs, Republican of Arizona, who subtly tweeted, We have now reached a war phase.
Eye for an eye.
However, he left us guessing which Democrat he wants to charge with keeping highly classified information in a chandeliered bathroom.
Equally cryptic.
Much more disconcerting was a tweet from Representative Clay Higgins, Republican of Louisiana.
President Trump said he'd been summoned to appear at the federal courthouse in Miami on Tuesday at 3 p.m.
I watched his plane land, by the way, just before the show.
This is a perimeter probe from the oppressors.
Hold or POTUS has this.
Buckle up.
Five out of 50,000 know your bridges.
Rock steady calm.
That is all.
In case you're wondering, or POTUS means real President of the United States, and the rest is just some weird military jargon.
It's unclear whether Higgins simply wants a sound top or earned himself an incitement of violence charge.
Maybe his ultimate goal is to become bunkmates with Trump.
It's tough to imagine what exactly went through his mind when he composed this masterpiece, but anything other than, I probably shouldn't be in Congress, would be deeply troubling.
But it wasn't just Republican men who were openly threatening violence.
Last year's Arizona gubernatorial candidate, and in her mind Arizona governor, Carrie Lake, said at a rally she had message for Attorney General Merrick Garland, Special Counsel Jack Schmidt, President Joe Biden, and the fake news media.
If you want to get to President Trump, you're going to have to go through me, and you're going to have to go through 75 million Americans just like me, she told a fired-up crowd.
And I'm going to tell you, most of us are card-carrying members of the NRA.
That's not a threat.
That's a public service announcement.
There she is.
But Republicans had more to offer than a Declaration of War and threats that are actually public service announcements.
Noted legal scholar and former Representative Jason Chavis went on Fox to offer a brilliant theory Trump should totally try out at trial.
ACYN tweets.
Chavis!
These are documents generated by computers.
There's an argument we made.
They already have these documents.
They are run off of a printer.
A president has the same security clearance as he did as president.
He continues to have that clearance.
Chaffetz, widely considered to be one of the great legal minds in U.S.
history, suggested that a former president should not be charged for hoarding top-secret files because those documents were copies.
Because everybody knows that once you make a copy of nuclear launch codes or illicit covert operatives and take them home, that's totally legal.
Mind you, this is just a disgusting piece of propaganda.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yes it is, it is.
I enjoyed that propaganda for how disgusting it actually was.
And the article gives the adjectives of the projection to be able to rightly describe it.
So the crazy, insane, unhinged, hilarious, frightening, ill-informed.
So this is maybe among the top few Trump derangement syndrome articles that I have seen.
So reporting, what they should do for reporting is to talk about, well, OK, let's take this seriously.
What is the procedure for presidents to have documents?
And my understanding from what I've read is that Trump followed all the procedures.
And what is unhinged and hilarious is the article attempts to ignore the history of, well, what was it that Hillary Clinton did with those emails?
What was it that her husband did?
What was it that that Biden has done with all those documents to ignore that that's that's frightening and to Be ill-informed is to ignore the history of the Espionage Act that I just explained that the whole purpose was to criminalize dissent against war and if you think if you know one of the
Commentary talking points at the time, when dissent was criminalized for World War I, is that people at the time said, well, they would have to arrest Jesus then for speaking out against war, and blessed are the peacemakers, they'd have to put him in prison as well.
Now, for Mark Levin, Jim, I think you're right that the passion, the righteous passion is what we need.
And I think that's a precursor of what we're going to see.
And part of what we're going to have the challenge is to have the discipline, the mental discipline and the integrity to be able to have the facts tell the story and not any type of exploding anger that our opponents will try to use for stampedes.
And finally, just, you know, I did have I think it was three years where I was the advisor for Jefferson High School's yearbook, and that was a long time ago.
But in working with the English teachers and working with some basic journalism, I just happened to note that if the persons who wrote that article that we just took a look at submitted it to me, ooh, that would not be a passing grade for any type of news.
It would be ridiculous.
Propaganda to ignore those facts and to create just tragic comic strawman arguments instead.
Oh, you're spot on.
Absolutely right.
It was juvenile.
It would not have passed me in any essay evaluation whatsoever, Chris.
Yeah, it's kind of interesting to hear Barr kind of take that position.
And more importantly, if you got to really consider what Barr is and who he's been, his track record speaks for itself.
He was, I think, an attorney general in the 90s that was brought in to cover up a lot of the Boys Town and the SNL and Millican junk bond scandals and what become a lot of anti-patriot PAC-CON type stuff they bring into the Justice Department, working in conjunction with the ADL and many other alphabet agencies, we'll say.
Going after patriots and people that really are for the Constitution, freedom and free markets and standing up against the UN colonialization of America at the time were pretty much targeted in the same way they're being targeted now for resisting their other new Ponzi schemes.
And now with the military, I hear people saying that they're going to come along and sort this out or there's a real military in charge of all this.
I would have to say that has got to be a definite impossibility.
And if it is somehow possible, why the heck are they letting so many people get dispossessed and murdered and depopulated from many of these experiments and many of these shenanigans that are going on?
And certainly the widespread corruption, even the Ukraine thing and many other things as well, the Biden coup, you could go on and on.
So, yeah, I think that there's really no military coming to save us.
I could definitely see the former military, the patriots of this country, easily coming together to form a 5-10% group that would certainly be capable of doing something like that quite easily.
And I would bet the military, you know, even though they're really bound to follow orders at some point in time, would not turn on its civilians and have to probably turn the same way and go after their puppet masters.
That'll come, I guess, in time, I think, because right now I haven't seen anything close to that.
All I've seen is a bunch of, I think, stuff that they're doing for analytics online and with analytics online, where they're telling people what they want to hear just so they don't do a damn thing about what's going on right now.
Yeah, as far as this stuff that we're going through with many of the corruptions that are being exposed, they are certainly being overlooked in exchange for this distraction of persecuting Trump for a complete bullshit charge, so I would put that to that as well.
Yes, yes.
I think that's a major motive, just as we have here.
FBI docs said Burisma exec paid Biden $5 million alleged bribery scheme.
There it is!
An executive of Ukrainian gas firm Burisma Holding paid then-Vice President Biden five mil as part of a bribery scheme, according to the FBI doc that's now part of the House Oversight Committee probe into the incident.
Biden's son Hunter was a member of the board at the time.
The unclassified FBI FD1023 doc has been central to a whistleblower probe Republicans on the committee have been trying to get turned over to them.
Fox reported it did not see the doc, but was briefed by sources who have.
It is dated June 30, 2020, based on an FBI interview with what's described as a highly credible confidential source who talked of meetings he or she had with a top exec at Burisma over several years beginning in 2015.
I believe with high probability this is a Tony Bobinsky was their financial manager who was featured by Tucker during the first debate and nearly leaped out of his chair when Biden, a candidate, declared he'd never had any conversation with his son, Hunter, about his business dealings.
Bobolinsky.
The form does not indicate the information is true, but the informant is one of the higher paid informants and worked with the agency since 2010.
According to the document, the Burisma exec asked the FBI source, who's a business professional, for advice on getting U.S.
oil rights, becoming involved with an American oil company in 2015 and in 2016.
The source asked the exec why they didn't ask Hunter for his advice as he was on the board, and the exec reportedly answered that Hunter was dumb.
The BRISM official then reportedly told the source the company had to pay the Bidens because the company was being investigated by Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin and that it would be difficult to enter the American market while under the probe.
The source then said he or she suggested they pay the Bidens $50,000 each.
But the BRISM exec replied the figure wasn't $50,000 but $5 million.
Five million for one Biden, five million for the other.
One source described the payments as retainer for the Bidens that deal with several issues, including the Ashokan probe.
Another called it pay to play.
The source had told Fox, the FBI source believes the payments to Joe and Hunter were the result of his or her conversation with a Burisma official.
The exec reportedly told the FBI he paid the Bidens through so many different bank accounts that anyone investigating the case wouldn't be able to unravel this for at least 10 years.
Meanwhile, Marjorie Taylor Greene is dumbfounded that her colleagues aren't enthusiastic about taking action.
A House Republican firebrand is irked Many House colleagues are a wet blanket when it comes to impeaching Biden over allegations contained in this document.
Last week, Director Wray, under threat of being found in contempt, shared with members of the House Oversight Committee a document making an allegation against President Joe Biden from the time he was vice president of the Obama admin.
Fox reported the source, on an FD1023 form, said Biden was paid five mil by an exec of Burisma Holdings Which had been paying Hunter, his son at least 50 thou a month from 2014 to 2019, to sit on his board of directors, even though he had no background in the energy field or any knowledge of the Ukrainian language, even.
Based on what she has seen, Green has called for the president to be impeached and then jailed her colleagues, however, do not seem interested.
Here is Marjorie Taylor Greene tweeting, Brisma saw hiring Hunter as a way to make their problems vanish.
Then Hunter and the big guy each got five mil in their bank accounts.
When any high-ranking U.S.
official receives a bribe, our Constitution spells out very clearly they must be impeached.
And indeed, bribery is among the high crimes and misdemeanors specifically articulated in the Constitution.
Asked what might spark interest, she replied.
To be honest with you, I don't know.
That's the part that literally leaves me dumbfounded.
I've already been texting a ton of my colleagues.
We have to impeach Biden.
We have to impeach Biden.
Being said, the question boils down to a willingness on the part of House members to show the courage of their convictions.
Another tweet.
Joe Biden shouldn't just be impeached, he should be handcuffed and hauled out of the White House for his crimes.
It's no coincidence that the Department of Injustice came out with phony charges against President Trump the same day GOP oversight reviewed damning evidence against Biden.
We have to impeach him in the House to show and prove to our voters we're willing to do these things, willing to bring accountability if we don't do it.
Then why do they want to vote for us?
Green said, based on what was disclosed Thursday, subpoenas have been sent to four banks to gather information about Biden family finances, and the committee will investigate further allegations.
An FT1023 report contains unverified information given the FBI by a confidential source.
According to Fox, the 2020 report summarized the conversation the informant had with a Burisma executive as far back as 2015.
The company would dole out 5 mil for one Biden, 5 mil for the other.
According to the source, the payments were made through so many different bank accounts, it couldn't be unraveled for at least 10 years.
A Brisbane exec said he didn't pay the big guy directly.
The big guy interpreted it to mean Joe Biden.
Another tweet from Marjorie.
Trump was impeached over a perfect phone call asking questions about a Ukrainian prosecutor who was fired at the direction of VP Biden.
All while the FBI and information that Joe Biden and his son were paid five mil to get this prosecutor fired in a political bribery scheme.
She added, they are going to keep digging.
We will continue to follow this investigation, look into everything we can uncover.
We need the FBI to keep cooperating with us.
That's extremely important.
I have very high expectations of Christopher Wray that he'll do the right thing and continue to show us the information we're asking for.
Carl, your thoughts?
The actor playing Biden was recently asked about this and he stated, where's the money?
Okay, that's that's a really good question.
And I think we should help by showing them that and put the Canadian trucker test to work to be able to track where all that money went.
Some people may think that this is somehow too ambiguous to really lay into.
Okay, if you don't like this one, then why don't you go after Biden as a war criminal, as a criminal against humanity with COVID.
You can go after him for election fraud.
You can go after him for the documents that he has.
However many thousand that is.
You can go after him for the ongoing support for the assassinations of previous leaders JFK, RFK, MLK or MTG.
She's hitting hard there and those are a couple of good points.
So we have a testimony of what the FBI Okay.
Now, testimony is the weakest form of evidence, but in light of Hunter being on Burisma's board of directors for five years, that's almost $5 million that he got alone, and that is prima facie evidence of buying off a politician.
So, whatever people want to do with this, I do recommend that you arm yourself with three areas to be able to demonstrate to anybody and point to the evidence about why you've withdrawn your consent to the government and why you are insisting on their arrest and why you refuse to play any more of their games.
And for MTG to be complaining about a lack of interest, yeah, I have flashbacks back with Dennis Kucinich with the attempted impeachments of Bush and Cheney to which I contributed a 40-page white paper detailing that all of the reasons to go to war were known to be false, as they were told, and that the war was Orwellian illegal.
Dennis could get no traction with colleagues for that as well, and Dennis is now the campaign manager for RFK Jr., and I'm sure giving a lot of insight of what RFK Jr.
can expect.
I sent several reasons for the lack of enthusiasm.
Number one, he's so obviously incompetent.
There's no possible way he would be legitimately reelected.
Number two, if you take him out now, It gives the Democrats the opportunity to move somebody up.
Number three, Kamala Harris would potentially be even worse.
So I think there's a feeling that actually we're in pretty good shape.
I mean, When the other team is destroying itself, why lend them a helping hand?
Chris, I know, now we have you, now we don't, but we'll pull you back in.
Chris, Chris, Chris, your thoughts, your thoughts, my friend, your thoughts.
Yeah, as far as the RFK thing, I think he's definitely got to explain a lot of connections and fondness for Israel.
I think that these are bloodlines in many ways that are cadet branches of the Royal Family.
If you think about what happened when the Berlin Wall fell and a lot of stuff they tried to do with Gazprom and Yukos, it was mostly the Judeo-Masonic Anglo-Saxons that were involved with this, in conjunction with, of course, the Russian Triple Echo Mafia, who all took asylum in Israel after Putin tried to prosecute them.
But the same guys now are the ones that are pushing for the Ukraine coup.
Oh my god, this thing sucks.
Chris, we can still hear you.
Pretty much.
I'm sorry, this phone is something.
Yeah, keep talking.
Yeah, wow.
Go, go.
Maybe you want to get back in the car and drive around.
I guess, man.
This is unbelievable.
This is why I thought we'd go ahead while you're still in the car, because you have a much better connection than when you're home.
I'm not going to drive around.
Yeah, I'm not going to drive around.
You're on this thing.
Yeah, that's a pool there.
Anyway, sorry to take up so much time on my own.
No, go ahead.
Just stating, though, that they're losing sight of a lot of the criminal enterprises that are at hand here and chasing these puppets.
Would he call the big guy, though?
I think that could even possibly stand for Michelle Obama, but you never know.
Indeed it could.
Indeed it could.
Meanwhile, get this.
Just to contrast, Hunter Biden, zero indictments.
The big guy, zero indictments.
The Clintons, zero indictments.
Epstein clients, zero indictments.
Anthony Fauci, zero indictments.
DC inside traders, zero indictments.
Iraq war criminals, zero indictments.
COVID criminals, zero indictments.
Only the guy who wants to put America first.
Meanwhile, RSN, which of course is left-wing, but that does not mean everything they publish is wrong.
This one seems to be pretty much on point.
NATO members may send troops to Ukraine, warms former alliance chief.
A group of NATO countries may be willing to put troops on the ground in Ukraine of member states, including the U.S., to not provide tangible security guarantees to Kyiv at the alliance summit in Vilnius, a former NATO Secretary General Anders Rasmussen has said.
Rasmussen has been acting as official advisor to the Ukrainian president, for which I'm sure he's been very well paid.
Vladimir Zelensky, on Ukraine's place in a future European security architecture, has been touring Europe and Washington to gauge a shifting mood before the critical summit starts on 11 July, which, by the way, is the day Victoria Nuland has declared World War III will begin.
He also warned that even if a group of states were to provide Ukraine with security guarantees, others would not allow the issue of Ukraine's future NATO membership to be kept off the agenda.
He made his remarks as current NATO chef John Stoltenberg said the issue of security guarantees would be on the agenda at Vilnius, but added that NATO, under Article 5, only provides full-fledged security guarantees to full members.
U.S.
Ambassador to NATO Julian Smith said, we're looking at an array of options to signal Ukraine is advancing in its relationship with NATO.
Think about the profound stupidity of all of this, given Russia's adamant opposition and that having been the primary precipitating cause for the incursion.
Rasmus has said, if NATO cannot agree on a clear path forward for Ukraine, there is a possibility other countries individually might take action.
We know Poland—this now is reminiscent of all the Polish jokes we've ever heard—is very engaged in providing concrete assistance to Ukraine.
I wouldn't exclude the possibility.
would engage even stronger in this context on a national basis and be followed by the Baltic states, possibly including troops on the ground.
I think the Poles would seriously consider going in and assemble a coalition of the willing if Ukraine doesn't get anything in Vilnius.
We shouldn't underestimate the Polish feelings.
The Poles feel for too long Western Europe did not listen to their warnings against a true Russian mentality.
He said it would be entirely legal for Ukraine to seek such military assistance.
His striking suggestion some states might regard the stakes as momentous enough to use their own troops could be seen as a warning to countries that the risks, including the threat to NATO unity, do not only come if Ukraine is provided a quick path to NATO membership or powerful security guarantees.
Germany remains wary of going too far.
Fearing it would provoke Russia, Rasmussen said it was imperative that Ukraine should receive written security guarantees, preferably before the summit, but outside the NATO framework.
These need to cover intelligence sharing, joint Ukraine training, enhanced ammunition production, NATO interoperability, and a supply of arms sufficient to deter Russia from further attack.
He said after a slow start, momentum was now building behind these ideas, including in France.
But he warned security guarantees would not be enough.
He said, some NATO allies might be in favor of security guarantees to actually avoid a real discussion of Ukraine's membership aspirations.
They hope that by providing security guarantees, they can avoid the question.
I don't think that is possible.
I think the NATO issue will be raised at the summit in Vilnius.
I've spoken with several European leaders.
There's a group of hardcore Eastern European allies who want a clear path for Ukraine toward NATO membership.
He said, history has shown it's dangerous to leave Ukraine in a NATO waiting room indefinitely.
Even if an invitation to join NATO could not be provided at the Vilnius Summit, a possibility of extending an invitation next year could be referenced.
That path to membership, he said, should exclude setting preconditions, such as a NATO membership action plan, something neither Sweden nor Finland have been required to adopt as part of their membership path.
Anything less than that would be a disappointment to Ukraine, he said.
He rejected the argument Ukraine could not be offered a bath to NATO membership until the war was over, saying that would provide Putin with a veto.
Meanwhile, just to illustrate the stupidity of all of this, the east and west coast of the U.S.
are swarming with Russians and Marines.
Check it out.
This was not observed even during the Cold War.
They used to live once and the best of four people.
I just did not break.
They used to live once and the best of four people.
According to the US military project, the suffering movement mostly against the American coast of the United States, the land which is a country and a country.
They used to live once and the country.
No doubt about it.
That's what he's doing.
He's telegraphing.
You cannot act with impunity.
Carl, your thoughts?
Should we go with Chris first since we have him right now?
Yeah, Chris.
Chris, go.
I got all tranced out from that Euro rave music there, Fats.
That was pretty loud.
Turning into the old guy here, I guess.
Yeah, I'll try to jump in before this phone gives me Tourette's.
The whole thing right now, I think, is World War III, and I don't think it's any exaggeration.
Maybe she's talking about the formal declaration of war, but pretty much we're at war with them and have been for a while.
And if they were interested in trying to bring democracy or anything good for the Ukrainian people, they'd be building infrastructure.
They'd be doing that even at home, for that matter.
But, of course, they have priorities, and it seems to be depopulating.
And, of course, putting in this fog of war so that they could sneak out many, many assets and maybe even drive people off their land so that they can harvest the minerals beneath it.
Talk about not learning from experience.
Russia's in Ukraine because Ukraine wanted to become a member of NATO.
And now they think they can go ahead and make Ukraine a member of NATO?
This is ludicrous.
It's pretty much been a Warsaw country.
So, like, I would think it's Russia's there because they've been there.
It's been part of Russia for a long, long time.
You know, give or take a few different years and a few different conflicts.
But for the most part, yeah, it has been.
You can make the same argument for Poland as well.
Yeah, I mean, talk about dumb!
Poland eager to get in a war with Russia?
Carl?
All right, so the first thing with the zero indictments, that would draw the question, how long have the United States been this corrupt?
Let's just go back 60 years to 1963 with the ability of insiders to cap a sitting president.
With the article that I'm going to provide here at BitChute with Rogue State Empire, I can make that argument that the U.S.
has been violating treaties for 200 years to steal resources, and I'll make the argument as well that World War III and AMREP 2.0, the scope is going to be much broader than people can imagine, and I lay that foundation on the megalithic architectural evidence that advanced civilizations being able to work with materials NATO's meeting!
Alright, so they're gonna double down, and again, I like that.
I want this fucking story to end.
Today, somehow got great reset wiped out so badly that there's just no history of these people.
NATO's meeting.
All right.
So they're going to double down.
And again, I like that.
I want this fucking story to end.
And the way that it is going to end is the polarity is going to become so great.
Something is going to snap.
Something is going to break.
Julianne Smith, nice testimony there, sister.
This was an Obama and a Clinton and a Biden tool.
And as Chris is talking about, yeah, you can tell the difference between the people who are good and bad because the people who are good, they do good things like infrastructure.
That's what they talk about, helping people.
And the bad people, they talk about war and death.
Now, for the Russian subs, Yeah, for 40 years, of course, maybe even longer than that, the Russian subs have had patrols on both coasts and along the Gulf of the United States with MIRV missiles, multiple independently targetable re-entry launch vehicles, and the power of those MIRVs is that, let's say a sub is just carrying eight of those MIRV missiles.
Okay, well, each one of those MIRV missiles can separate into, I believe, 8 to 12 different independent drones.
So if you just had 8 of those MIRVs, 8 times 12, that's 96 nukes, each one of which has a capacity of power greater than what was launched on Japan for atomic weapons at the end of World War II.
So it has been dangerous, and we're just being reminded of the wisdom of challenging these people to a threat of World War III nuclear war.
It's insane.
Yes, very nice.
Both your comments, just excellent.
Right on.
Meanwhile, Swedish Prime Minister, massive immigration just doesn't work!
Sweden's Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson has acknowledged massive immigration just doesn't work, announcing changes to the country's border control policy to make it the strictest in the European Union.
He made his comments to mark the National Day of Sweden, insisting it's too easy for migrants who can't even speak Swedish to obtain citizenship.
Let me be clear.
Massive immigration and poor integration just doesn't work.
This is why we're now changing Sweden's migration policy, making it the strictest in the EU.
The leader of the center-right moderate party said the new measures would ensure migrants have not committed crimes in their home countries and tested to ensure they respect Swedish culture and heritage.
Not likely.
A no to asylum means no, and you have to leave the country.
That should be obvious, but it's not said to be equally important.
A yes should mean that you really get involved in Swedish society.
Christensen said citizenship is not just about obtaining a passport.
It should be a social contract that contains both rights and obligations.
He added, until now, there's been absolutely no expectation anyone who comes to Sweden will really learn our language, which is a glue that binds us together.
The measures are being introduced thanks to political lobbying from the right-wing Swedish Democrat Party, which is now second largest in the Riksdag and is keeping Christensen in power via confidence in supply agreement.
As we previously highlighted, even Christensen's predecessor, left-winger Magdalena Anderson, vowed to abolish ethnic ghettos, asserting she didn't want to see the emergence of Somali towns in the Scandinavian country.
Following ethnic riot leaving over 100 police officers injured, Anderson warned, segregation has gone so far we have parallel societies in Sweden.
We live in the same country but different realities.
Having been one of the safest countries in Europe for 20 years before mass uncontrolled immigration, Sweden is now the second most dangerous in terms of gun crime behind only Croatia.
In 2021, Germany's Bild newspaper ran the headline, Sweden is the most dangerous country in Europe.
Meanwhile, California takes a big step toward legalizing shoplifting, working in the opposite direction.
State Senator Dave Cortez SB 553, which recently passed the California Senate and is moving to the Assembly, has raised concern among retailers who believe it will exacerbate the state shoplifting problem.
The bill, supposedly aimed at curbing workplace violence, prohibits employees from approaching shoplifters.
Rachel Mechlin, chief of the California Retailers Association, argued it will allow people to walk into stores, steal, and leave without consequence.
See, this is another example of virtue signaling.
Sending the message California turns a blind eye to shoplifting, which criminals will undoubtedly exploit.
In San Francisco, the impact of such leniency on shoplifting is already evident.
The city's downtown area, with its exorbitant real estate prices, is witnessing the departure of major retailers due to rampant theft and other lifestyle crimes.
The closure of a Whole Foods after just a year, along with the upcoming closure of two Nord Stream, Saks Off 5th, H&M, and Ewing Glow, Reflecting the deteriorating retail environment, even Walgreens has shuttered several stores across the city.
The pattern is not limited to San Francisco.
It has been observed in other parts of California in recent months.
Democrats often justify their lax stance on shoplifting by invoking sympathy for the impoverished, claiming it's unreasonable to prosecute someone for stealing basic necessities.
However, The reality is, much of the shoplifting is orchestrated by well-organized severings operating out of neighboring Oakland.
Criminals are aware that law enforcement, including district attorneys, will not act.
If SB 553 becomes law, even store security staff will be rendered ineffective.
Consequently, high-end retailers will continue to flee.
The remaining stores will adopt a highly secured retail model resembling a prison, where customers are restricted and transactions occur through protective barriers.
The situation contrasts starkly with the past, when people from suburban and rural areas would visit cities like San Francisco specifically to shop.
The current trajectory threatens to erode the appeal of urban shopping, with retailers seeking safer locations.
The consequences of these policies extend beyond economic concerns, impacting the vibrancy and liveliness of urban areas.
It's crucial to strike a balance between compassion and maintaining law and order, ensuring that retailers are protected and customers can enjoy a safe shopping experience.
Chris, go ahead.
Carl.
Go, Chris.
Sorry, I'm getting my daughter right now.
I'm just carrying her in the house.
Can you guys skip me for a minute and I'll come back?
Sure, you got it.
You got it.
Tom, go ahead.
Go ahead.
So Sweden's Prime Minister says massive immigration doesn't work.
I got two responses.
One is, duh.
The other is, great.
Because again, the more that the ridiculousness of these policies become visible, I think it's going to be the faster we get to this Emperor's New Clothes moment.
And I hope this continues to move from a drip drip into a flood.
And I'm Pretty sure that there are millions and millions of Europeans who are asking questions about, okay.
So we have all these migrants here.
Why are they here?
And then to be able to take a look at the lie-started illegal wars of aggression supported by their pimp-puppetitions.
Now, for California, that story, yeah, having just moved down from the Bay Area in San Francisco, and I've told these stories many times, you can, the last times that I was at San Francisco, you just stand within sight of City Hall and just look around and do a quick count.
And the last time I did that, I had about 200 homeless people that were within view on Market Street, within view of City Hall, looking around, and you can also get the scent of urine, the sight of feces, and the view of trash and needles the sight of feces, and the view of trash and needles on the So they really are trying for this race to the bottom.
And the California public attempted to impeach, via recall, Governor Newsom, but that's with those Dominion voting machines, and Newsom got 666 of that recall vote.
I mean, 66.6% of that recall vote.
Isn't that remarkable?
Chris?
Yeah, I sometimes think they're just toying with us with these things.
But yeah, it's just my conclusion.
Yeah, you know, I'm thinking about a lot of the stuff that has been going on.
And it's really an inversion of perception that seems to be happening anywhere you look.
And as far as the shoplifting thing goes, I almost think there is some sort of an organized liquidation of inventory for the sake of maybe insurance claim or even, you know, security measure budgetary appropriations.
Things of this sort.
Even community destabilization, you know, is something that is a big part of this.
As you remember, let's say, how the formula worked to take the land back from the Native Americans, you're seeing a similar thing happening almost right now in the same formula being used against the white American middle class that is being targeted at this point in time.
And I think they're doing the same thing in the same way.
They're infiltrating the culture and steering it into debauchery.
They're doing the same thing with debasing the currency.
They're really destroying any means of sustenance, if you truly think about it.
You know, they're buying up the mom-and-pop shops and the farms and everything like that and running them out of town and, you know, crushing them with predatory lending even.
So there's a lot of stuff that is, you know, being waged in terms of warfare on us in the same way that it is around these These nations around the world.
And I think it's the same group that has waged this war and they're just using different factions, I guess, in the binary psychologies of the populations to play them against each other and us against each other.
And ultimately, I think when we see through this and stop going along with their charades and maybe even holding them to account in terms of justice, I think this whole thing can sort itself out.
But until we reach that point, we're just going to be lost in the fog of war.
Very nice.
Very nice.
Meanwhile, J&J's COVID vax, taken by 19 million Americans, has been pulled by the FDA after it was paused out of an abundance of caution over rare blood clot concerns.
And of course, blood clots has been a major problem with all of these vaxes.
The FDA has revoked authorization of J&J's COVID vax.
The move was not unexpected because J&J's parent company, Janssen, requested federal regulators withdraw authorization after it was revealed that the last tranche of doses, about 12.5 mil, had expired.
As of Year three of the COVID pandemic, nearly 231 million Americans have received either one J&J shot or two doses of mRNA from Pfizer or Moderna.
Vaccine fatigue has swept the U.S., millions frustrated by the fact that a shot does not guarantee immunity from the virus, but rather, we're told, falsely, protects against severe illness.
And all those who had planned on getting fully vaxxed are believed to have done so by now.
With a renewed wave of demand for J&J's single dose highly unlikely, coupled with a beleaguered history of production hiccups and health concerns that have eroded public trust, the pharmaceutical company has opted to step away from the COVID max fuel.
Notice here, the administration of Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna overwhelmingly outshadows those of J&J.
Citing ever-shrinking demand, Jane Jay told the FDA it would not update its formulation to confront emerging strains better, a step that their advisor took last year to address a devastating Omicron variant.
But it's well known, and it has been historically, that these viruses, coronaviruses, mutate so fast vaccines are ineffectual.
Because by the time you get a vax out, it's already mutated into a different storm of which the vax is ineffective.
This has long been known to be the fact.
Dr. Peter Marcus, Director of the FDA Center for Biologic Evaluation and Research said, because FDA understands that Janssen has requested withdrawal of the EUA for the COVID vax, FDA has determined it's appropriate to revoke the authorization.
A fraction of Americans receive the J&J compared to the others.
Nearly 367 mil have received a Pfizer, 232 a Moderna.
A paucity of shots administered, just over 19 mil made by J&J, which was plagued by controversy since it entered the market.
By that time, more than 2.1 mil mRNA shots had already been administered.
And those from Pfizer and Moderna became the gold standard.
Yes, if you want a death jab, a gold standard indeed.
Less than a month after J&J was granted, it became mired in controversy, a small but growing number of severe blood clot disorders.
Symptoms typically come on between 4 and 42 days following the vax.
FDA and CDC issued a sweeping pause on administering the shots, citing six cases of the rare clotting disorder, but the fact is millions have died from blood clots from one or another.
The agency performed an investigation and concluded that confidence the vaccine was safe and effective in preventing COVID-19, and that the available data showed the vaccine known of potential benefits outweighed its known of potential risks, which is untrue for any class whatsoever.
This is just categorically false.
Meanwhile, it's been revealed the Baltimore-based emergent biosolution plant-making J&J had inadvertently ruined about 15 million doses after cross-contamination with that vaccine is similar from AstraZeneca meant for the UK.
U.S.
regulators stripped Emergent of its responsibility—really, its authority—to produce the AstraZeneca and granted J&J full control.
When all was said and done, J&J was ordered to toss out 60 million doses out of contamination concerns.
Despite the federal government lifting the pause, The damage to its reputation had been done.
Public trust in the single-dose vaxxer eroded drastically and it became the object of derision.
Comedy superstar Dave Chappelle quipped he chose the third best option when it came to getting vaccinated.
All have what the homeless people are having.
But J&J was widely expected to be a boon for people experiencing homelessness and other disenfranchised who could not able to get the requisite second shot of Moderna or Pfizer.
One online jokester quipped, Johnson & Johnson made the temporary tattoo of vaccines.
Another said, Johnson & Johnson is the godfather part three of vaccinations in December 2021.
A panel of vaccine experts voted to recommend is a Moderna and Pfizer over J&J.
They pointed out, well, the problem is rare.
Only one case in every 100,000 was given to women aged 30 to 49, which was the group with the highest risk.
Subsequently, the FDA limited its use to adults 18 and older who were unable to get an mRNA vax due to allergy or lack of availability.
Carl, this is all disgusting beyond words.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, it is, it is.
But again, I like it because the prostitutes are being forced to have more rabid rhetoric, and the Daily Mail certainly demonstrated that.
Now, the title of the article got my attention, that phrase, out of an abundance of caution.
Heard that for when I was a teacher when I was challenging Hayward Unified School District's health orders, Principal Dave Seymour and Assistant Superintendent Lisa Davies both gave that line in justification for illegal required health.
Orders that were nowhere in any of the recommendations from the CDC or the state of California.
That's how they justified pushing our students to illegal acts.
And when I challenge them with that and said, oh, yeah, you got to show me in writing the authorization for that.
Then they back down for me.
I guess they had an abundance of caution for something else.
So the article states that these cases are rare and six cases in April of 2021 caused their concern.
I will provide my best shot here at BitChute to be able to demonstrate that anybody who took a step back without a prostitute propaganda agenda would see that all these shots need to be stopped and the people who push them These people lied from the beginning.
There was no authorization for emergency orders at the state because hospitals were not overrun.
and Moderna, the gold standard.
Yes, yes.
So I'm feeling some of that passion from Mark Levin.
The benefits outweigh the risks.
So these people lied from the beginning.
There was no authorization for emergency orders at the state because hospitals were not overrun.
They have all of the leaders, the CDC, the WHO, all admit they have no sample of COVID.
So they designed these tests with generic flu material.
They lie about these over-sampled PCR tests that find everything.
They lied about 99% of flu disappeared.
No, they called it COVID.
They lied about anybody who had tested Positive and died, even if they were a gunshot victim or on hospice, they claim that that was a death and that anybody who received any damages after being shot by these experimental vaccines, any damage that occurred within 14 days.
It wasn't because of being shot.
It was a damage to the unvaccinated.
So, and all of that is from the highest sources of government and the agencies involved with this to be able to explain, document, and prove these criminal lies and crimes against humanity.
Yeah, this is certainly not a breach of trust or a hustle file or an accident.
This is an absolute betrayal.
And what they're doing under the guise of medicine should go down in history as one of the most sinister and most complicit organization depopulation efforts that has probably ever, humanity's ever seen.
And I think at the end of the day, maybe it probably will.
I think it's going to take a little bit more time for the casualties to pile up to where they're so insurmountable that they can't manipulate the selective accounting.
And when that happens, I think that they're going to really have a big problem on their hands.
In addition to a lot of the compounding problems that are going to happen all around the same time, too, whether it's the political or economic or religious or even cultural, you're going to see a lot of issues that are going to come into play.
And I wouldn't be surprised if these are the catalysts for what they're trying to kick off all along.
And that's a giant civil war where, you know, the rabble will depopulate the rabble under certain pretexts and prejudices.
And certainly from there, these guys will go.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send VanMail Brogan to LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
going to have ourselves in terms of population.
So I hope humanity wakes up, sees what's going on, and sees through this, and actually delivers justice to the people that really deserve it and need it.
It's a nice thought, my friend.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send handmail, Brogan, to LiveNeedToKnow@gmail.com.
LiveNeedToKnow@gmail.com.
A couple of comments.
I watched a Tucker Carlson Twitter broadcast.
I found his mixing of sarcasm with fact very confusing.
And was he being sarcastic when he said that Ukraine blew up the Nord Stream pipeline?
We know that now.
Or similar, he said.
Comment, I don't know if you're deliberately trying to misinform, disinform, or whether you're sincerely confused.
I choose to interpret you charitably.
It seemed obvious to me when he said Ukraine did it, he meant the Ukraine side.
He wasn't saying it was America, EU, UK assets acting on behalf of Ukraine.
He was saying it was not Russia.
Another comment.
When it was called—what was it called in the 1750s when British soldiers were allowed to build it in any home they wanted to?
An outrage?
It's certainly unconstitutional.
Of course, immigrants, legal or otherwise, are not being housed as serving soldiers of one's own state or of an enemy state.
So it's not unconstitutional.
Also, if I understand the policy correctly, it is wholly voluntary.
And this is the mayor of New York suggesting private residents take migrants into their homes.
American citizens have the right not to house immigrants in their own homes if they see fit not to do so.
But Jenna408 adds, the pseudo-American revolution.
Old theater.
Meanwhile, final thoughts.
Chris, let's take yours just in case.
Okay, yeah, well, I'll try to keep it brief.
Yeah, I think humanity's at a crossroads right now, and I think that it's going to be up to the chosen few that can see through this to really stand up for the rest that can't and refuse to, and that are too chicken shit to do a damn thing about it.
So I don't think it's going to take more than 5-10% of the population, like I estimate, and with strong leadership and certainly the ability to communicate without censorship or without complicity, Are essential but you're seeing a lot of these things being used against us in terms of analytics and subversion and I think it's being done by the very government that supposedly claims to want to help and protect and if that's the case, which it clearly is it's going to really destroy the credibility of said government.
In the eyes of not only the people that have known all along the levels of corruption and its true purpose, intended purpose, but even the people that maybe have been on the fence or not sure, or that have been drastically impacted by the mismaneuvers of the last few years, we'll say.
So there's a lot of people that are feeling that.
There's a lot of homeless.
There's a lot of people that are really struggling.
And I think that, you know, when these people finally put their heads together and put their work and their labor together, Maybe there's a possibility that we can take our country back.
I know that I would certainly like to see something like that, and I'm sure you would too, Fetz.
And yeah, I don't know.
I'm just waiting for the day for people to be serious enough to actually get off their ass and do something.
You make a hell of a point.
Karl, your final thoughts?
The situation is crazy, out of our hands, out of control, way above our heads.
So I want to give respect to the seriousness of the situation and at the same time point to the kind of sense of humor that we all got after Yet, after fighting in this for years and decades and decades, the commenter Retsudo Yagyu, I do appreciate that individual's attention to detail and the trend to be able to see more and more of the hypocrisy that we're pointing to all the time.
I appreciate you there, brother.
The answer to the question of what was that called, the Quartering Act, and to point back and make the connection from AMRAF 1.0 to 2.0,
The Quartering Act was really a response to the illegality, the main point of the Americans, is that as citizens, British citizens, our own government, I always have a hard time trying to frame this, I try to frame it in the present, we could not have a standing army on our own soil.
And yet there they were in the colonies, and the Americans were just outraged.
I mean, what type of a visual reminder do you need?
Soldiers on the streets, and it is illegal.
It would never happen at home.
It would never happen on the home islands, yet here they are in America.
And who are those soldiers there to guard against?
Now, The idea of mercantilism and the economic raping of the colonists, they understood what was going on.
They were set the terms of trade that the British government would determine what they could sell, what the prices were, what they could buy.
And this was all favored companies working out of the crown in London.
Now, today we have similar corruption where we see the oligarchs, we see the parasites, we see the illegal war.
And as Chris was talking about, all we're going to have is this fog of war until we get some sort of a breakthrough.
Now, I'm not going to say any more about when this breakthrough is going to happen.
I thought for sure we weren't going to make it out of May based upon the financial data that I was looking at.
But here we are.
into June and pushing into this NATO meeting.
So we shall see what happens.
And all I can do is encourage our audience just to be strong, be confident with what you think, what you can say, and what you do for the truth, and to trust that you do have a place in use.
Once we get this breakthrough and people are upset and looking for the truth, you'll have work to do.
Well, thank you, Carl and Chris, both wonderful comments throughout.
I'm going to look at this from a slightly different point of view.
If you were, say, the Chinese communists or Jewish supremacists and you wanted to upend the United States and take control, Who would you most want to discount, sabotage, neutralize?
It would be groups of individuals who are already organized who might have the wherewithal to oppose you by force of arms.
How about militias?
How about Oath Keepers?
How about Pratt Boys?
How could you do it?
How about setting up a situation where they could be demonized and even labeled as domestic terrorists?
Why would that work to your advantage?
Well, if you think about it, if you have a conflict breaking out in the United States, maybe because you're pouring millions of migrants into the country and you declare martial law, At that point, domestic terrorists, like combatants out of uniform, can be subjected to summary judgment and execution on the spot.
Go back and look at the Chekas, a brilliant film about what happened in post-Soviet Union, in Russia, after the Bolshevik Revolution.
When anyone who is viewed as an enemy of the state was simply declared to be an enemy and shot summarily.
Watch the whole bloody thing.
Hour and a half?
You're going to be dumbfounded.
That's why they want to take your guns.
They can't line us up and shoot us with impunity if we can defend ourselves.
That's why they're going after the guy who can actually provide the leadership essential to oppose a massive takedown of the United States, subjecting him to all kinds of absurd impeachments and indictments and all this other happy horseshit.
They want to distract him.
They want to tie him up in court so he can't exercise the leadership the situation requires.
And remember, the list of domestic terrorists today includes parents, Trump supporters, conservatives, NRA members.
Those are the people they fear.
If they gain control, they're going to use that domestic terrorist heading To summarily judge and execute a hundred million Americans.
Mark my words, it's hard to believe, but that's what's coming.
Watch The Checkist, something we must understand and never forget.
So I say, be prepared to defend yourself because the terror is on its way.
Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with family, friends, and people you love and care about.
▲
Export Selection