All Episodes
May 26, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:35:14
Need to Know News (25 May 2023) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in Mission Viejo, California.
He just made the move.
And Brian Davidson in Houston, Texas.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
We begin with DeSantis declaring he's going to run for president in 2024.
He'd been coy up until now, pledges to lead a great American comeback if elected.
Florida Governor DeSantis announced he's entering the 2024 presidential race in a video posted to Twitter.
I'm Ron DeSantis.
I'm running for president to lead our great American comeback, he declared in the short campaign launch posted to Twitter minutes ahead of his Twitterspace conversation with Elon Musk yesterday.
Our border's a disaster.
Crime infests our city.
Federal government makes it harder for families to make ends meet.
The president flounders.
But decline is a choice.
Success is attainable.
Freedom is worth fighting for.
We need the courage to lead and the strength to win.
Hours earlier, he piled the paperwork.
He decisively won his gubernatorial in Florida last year.
In campaign funds and polling numbers, he's the most potent challenger to Trump, who's dominated the primary field since announcing his candidacy in November.
The other Republican contenders include Nikki Haley, former U.N.
ambassador and South Carolina governor.
Vivek Ramaswamy, a business mogul, very smart guy.
Former Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson and Senator Tim Scott of South Carolina.
Mike Pence, former vice president of considering Iran.
The choice of announcement format is novel.
The governor's largely walled off establishment outlets in favor of Fox, while Musk has petitioned Twitter as the alternative to establishment news.
The Senate scored well in polling in 2022, slipped early this year as Trump began attacking him relentlessly.
Trump got a boost following his indictment in New York as Republicans rallied.
He racked up endorsement from 11 Florida Congress members, more than half of the Republican delegation.
DeSantis was perceived as stumbling in remarks about the Ukraine-Russia war, prompting Maine to ask if his candidacy was over before it had even begun.
My governor didn't formally campaign this week.
He embarked on a book tour that amounted to the same thing, in camouflage.
The Senate has been buoyed by a steady flow of endorsements, including the top two Republicans in Florida's legislature, 99 of 113 GOP lawmakers, 51 in New Hampshire, 37 in Iowa.
This election is not about the past.
It's about the future.
Who can lift us up?
The Georgia Representative Rich McCormick, a Republican who endorsed DeSantis in a statement released by DeSantis' Never Back Down political action committee.
Who can inspire a nation?
Who can lead us forward?
That's Governor Ron DeSantis, a bold conservative, a man of character and conviction, a champion of our values.
Meanwhile, Trump repeatedly mocks the Santa's disastrous campaign launch in classic Trump fashion.
Former President Trump.
Couldn't contain his glee in mocking the catastrophe that befell Governor DeSantis' campaign launch yesterday.
DeSantis joined Musk in announcing a 2024 presidential bid, but it got off to an extremely rocking start when the Twitter space and platform was hit with technical difficulties and degladed beginning by at least 30 minutes.
Wow!
A desanctus.
Get that.
Desanctus.
As in sanctimonious.
Twitter launch is a disaster, Trump wrote in a post.
His whole campaign will be a disaster.
Watch.
In another, he pointed out Senator Tim Scott's campaign announcement earlier was far more productive, referring to DeSantis' opening salvo as a catastrophe.
Say what you will about Trump's criticism of DeSantis—much unwarranted, but that's politics.
He also showed his edgy sense of humor by boasting a parody Twitter Space's video featuring the devil Dick Cheney, George Soros, and Hitler.
Following the faux DeSantis announcement, a faux Trump interjects into the proceeding, Hold your horses, Elon.
The real president is going to say a few words that Trump voice says.
Devil, I'm going to kick your ass very soon.
Hitler, you're already dead.
Dick Cheney?
It sounds like you'll be joining Hitler very soon in the video.
Cheney can't stop coffee.
Mary Neufeld tweets, Trump just posted this video making fun of DeSantis.
I have to admit, I couldn't stop laughing.
Trump's face is soon.
Check it out.
Hi, everyone.
Welcome to our Ron DeSantis Twitter space.
Hello?
Is my microphone working correctly?
George, can you just wait while we... Hello?
Can you hear me?
We can all hear you, George.
Can you just hold on for a second?
I don't think they can hear me.
I can hear you fine, George.
Just speak to the microphone.
I don't think George knows how to use Twitter.
Hello?
Can you hear me now?
Can I please make my big announcement now?
Everyone just... Hello?
Just shut up, George.
Can somebody just mute George?
Dick, could you try not to cough on that one?
Okay, so how are we going to take out Trump, you guys?
Uh, uh, guys from the FBI, this is not a private call, this is a public Twitter space, everyone can listen in.
Goddammit.
Uh, anyway guys, we invited everyone to this, uh, this Twitter space, so Governor Ron DeSantis could...
Everyone just shut the hell up so I can make my announcement, okay?
You go, girl.
Wait, the devil is gay?
So what?
Everyone in this call is gay.
The entire generalist is a fighter!
I happen to know every single one of you has a secret gay lover!
You have to be a fighter!
I'm sorry, I can't let you know that the soldiers are fighting for you!
I'm a fighter!
Fight Jäger!
Guys, can we please just calm down?
*Cough* So anyway, guys, I just wanted to announce that I'm...
Okay, I can hear the governor very vellish.
Would you please shut up already?
I'm running for fucking president, okay?
Yeah, we kinda already knew about it.
We already know, governor.
Congratulations, governor.
Well, that concludes our Twitter space for today.
Thank you to all of our... Hold your horses, Elon.
The real president is gonna say a few words.
The devil, I'm gonna kick your ass very soon.
Hitler, you're already dead.
Dick Cheney sounds like you'll be joining Hitler very soon.
Klaus Schwab and George Soros, I'm putting both your asses in jail.
And Ron DeSanctimonious can kiss my big, beautiful 2024 presidential ass.
Trump 2024, baby.
Presidential ass.
Trump 2024, baby.
Let's go.
Hi, everyone.
Hey!
That was funny.
So with DeSantis speaking, rising up to the level of a governor in the lying, looting, illegal rogue state empire that we have, you only rise to the level of a governor if you're owned, propagandist, if you're part of the cabal.
But I'm willing to give DeSantis the benefit of the doubt.
Let's evaluate him by his words.
And that's the most Sanctimonious, usual bullshit, empty platitudes.
What leadership needs is to begin to approach what RFK Jr.
is doing by calling out the criminal elements that assassinate U.S.
presidents, that engage in lie-started illegal wars of aggression, and banks for looting.
But DeSantis has no discernible difference.
Why not just go ahead and have Joe Biden's script writers write for you too, sanctimonious?
And with Nikki Haley, former UN ambassador.
So these leaders rise to the top by facilitating war crimes and looting and other crimes against children.
Let's just leave it at that.
And DeSantis, you know, talking about that, making a U-turn from what he had said about the Ukraine and Russian war, he claims that Putin is a war criminal.
So he's just holding up the... He's only gone against the system regarding forced COVID shots or restrictions.
I don't think he said anything.
about the prima facie evidence of criminality.
And I'll provide a link for that for people to have the evidence, sufficient evidence of the crimes against humanity with COVID and bit shoot.
And that, I'm glad you included that video, Jim, that is funny.
Brian.
Well, DeSantis isn't exactly getting the traction that you would think he would be getting in the Twittersphere.
I went and checked that out and he's like way down in terms of trending.
Even Mike Pence is getting more buzz around what he's doing than DeSantis.
I would take DeSantis over Biden, but I wouldn't take any of them over Trump.
And the fact that DeSantis has teamed up, it appears, with Musk just shows that they're the platform for global domination, no problem.
I want a platform that's willing to drain the swamp and willing to gut the Department of Justice and the FBI and willing to change this government and give its power back to the people from the permanent bureaucracy and the uniparty that always seems to fall into lockstep with the military spending.
You can be assured that your military spending Raytheon is probably a huge supporter of the DeSantis ticket.
As for those two guys...
I don't trust either one of them.
I don't trust that they're not going to be controlled.
I get it that you've got to have money to run a campaign.
And that's what was so appealing about Donald J. Trump.
He didn't have to raise the money, although he did do a good job raising the money.
He was willing to put up his own personal fortune to do it.
Now, what kind of deal with the devil did he make?
I don't know.
You know, a lot of people say that the devil bailed him out.
Of some of his bad casino deals and helped him continue to be rich and that he owes favors back on that side.
As for Ron DeSantis, we don't know what deal he's made, but if you're going to make a deal with Elon Musk, then it's obviously a big deal.
So I don't really know what to think.
I want to see how it plays out.
I'm kind of excited to see how it plays out, but We really need a new ticket.
This Republican-Democrat thing, it's just not working anymore.
And Donald Trump, ever since 2016, has really shown that it's so important to set up a third party, which we're going to talk about Sweden later on in this presentation, but it's so important.
They have a third party that's doing very, very well.
And that third party wasn't even formed until 1969.
wasn't even formed until 1969.
It wasn't even dreamed up until 1969.
So now it's 2023.
It's time.
It's time.
The Uniparty has to go.
Trump has this genius for labeling people, you know, Slow Joe.
In this case, Sanctimonious DeSantis.
I'm telling you, the campaign is over before it's even begun.
This was a catastrophe for DeSantis.
The fact there were these technical glitches just was a harbinger of the future.
Meanwhile, we have RFK Jr., oddly, when he says, when my uncle left office in 1964, 80% of Americans trusted the government.
He left office involuntarily in 1963.
But it's certainly true.
80% of Americans trusted the government, even more trusted the media today.
22% trust the government.
Those are people who I would say are not paying attention.
How can any American trust a government after the recent revelation with the FBI, the lies told by the CIA, or the trillions missing from the Pentagon budget, time and time again?
The alphabet agencies have been caught mishandling everything they've been put in charge of.
They steal our money while they spy on us and throw us in jail for exposing them.
Here we have Citizen Prepress tweeting, When my uncle left office in 1964—wrong—80% of Americans trusted government even more trusted the media.
Today, 22% of Americans trust the government.
Those are people I would say are not paying attention.
Just to show how the mainstream can play contrary to the facts, which don't seem to bother them at all.
Joe Scarborough dismisses a Durham report as a complete dud.
MSNBC host Scarborough dismissed a Durham report as a complete dud Tuesday, despite FBI statement acknowledging the special counsel findings, even stating they've taken measures to correct it.
This is a guy who got humiliated time and time again.
Trump newspapers, Trump TV networks got humiliated by following a lot of the sort of breadcrumbs he's wrinkled around time and time again.
He had nothing to show for it.
Scarborough had said, introducing New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt, Now it seemed to be this argument the Republicans want to defund the FBI because they even launched the investigation.
It seemed to be a complete dud, Scarborough added once again.
Another dud by John Durham.
Special Counsel Durham released his report on the origins of the FBI investigation of allegations that President Trump's campaign colluded with Russia.
On Monday, finding the FBI did not and could not corroborate claims of the now-discredited Steele dossier.
Meanwhile, on the other hand, Chuck Todd surprises us all Finding the Durham Report so damning that it calls for a Church Committee-style investigation.
Todd, of course, also being on the left, but more reasonable than Joe Scarborough.
Meet Arrest Moderator.
Responding to findings published in the Durham Report, Chuck Todd believes that time may have come for a Church Committee-style hearing to restore confidence in the FBI.
President Gantz's interim report found the FBI did not have enough factual evidence to investigate allegations of Trump-Russia collusion revealed they failed to uphold their mission of strict fidelity to the law.
Even without evidence.
They launched an investigation against a candidate for president that would dog him for years to come.
By insisting the Durham report wasn't quite the bombshell conservatives had hoped, Todd still implies major trust issues befalling the FBI.
Special Counsel John Durham's actual sharpest conclusions after a four-year investigation, for the FBI suffered from confirmation bias and, quote, discounted or willfully ignored material information that countered the narrative of collusion between Donald Trump and Russia.
Well, confirmation bias really means looking only for evidence to support a predetermined conclusion.
It's a fundamental fallacy known as special pleading and logic, sometimes called the method of selection and elimination.
Select the evidence that supports your conclusion and eliminate the rest.
Colin Rugg tweets, NBC host Chuck Todd makes a surprising pivot, calls out the FBI for losing the trust of the American people while reacting to the Durham report.
It feels like we're in the moment we need a real church committee like when J. Edgar Hoover's FBI clearly was no longer trustworthy.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, first of that story of 22% trust the government, what we're witnessing, I'm at 95% certainty, is the show.
And it's a show by somebody.
95% is that this is a white hat show.
To do exactly what we're seeing is to erode those trust and confidence so that when the final push is made, then everything will collapse.
If it is black hats running the show, then it's a scenario like Brian was talking about.
They're just mocking us.
They're trolling us.
They're putting it in our face that it doesn't matter.
They can go ahead and tell us everything, but there are too few of us to do anything about it.
And that is consistent with my 46 year experience in the Great Awakening that only 2 percent of the people can engage with facts.
Now, if blackheads are doing this, then they're setting up a stage for civil war.
They want the chaos.
They want the confusion.
And they want people to be mad enough to fight.
And people aren't going to fight unless they're mad enough.
It could be a World War Three scenario.
It could be a financial collapse.
It could be all of them.
It could be another pandemic.
It just depends who is in charge.
Now, for Scarborough, calling it a dud, huh?
So the FBI admitted that they had no evidence of any contact, any communication between whatever Russia means.
You may as well have said the moon, that he was in collusion with the moon.
That's just as silly.
So, no evidence of any relationship, let alone reasonable suspicion of a crime that you can articulate.
Scarborough again, just puts it in our face.
And if I remember correctly, all I remember the big picture, but Scarborough had some young female die suddenly on him.
It may have been an intern when he was in Congress.
I don't remember the details of that, but that's probably blackmail to keep him in control.
And for Chuck Todd, I think that that is just empty virtue signaling for a CYA maneuver Nice.
Yeah, Scarborough had a dead intern problem.
I mean, it's unbelievable.
Swept under the rug.
Todd was one of the participants to strengthen and to push the narratives of the psychopaths.
Nice.
Yeah.
Scarbo had a dead intern problem.
I mean, it's unbelievable.
Swept under the rug.
Brian.
Well, as for Scarbo, it's obvious that he'll say whatever his handlers and controllers want him to say.
And he may even believe what he's saying because he's just so he's just agreed to engage his mind into that gear, which is why his audience continues to listen to him.
RFK Jr.
Well, this is a real interesting combination of stories.
You have all three of them sitting there, and of course, 22% trust the government, I would say that since Donald Trump took office in 2016, that that number probably went from about 45% down to 22% or even 50% down to 22%, but you're going to get your largest, most catastrophic losses over that entire time because it's so obvious that the mainstream media is just simply parroting a narrative
The lies, the gaslighting has become so clear that everybody can begin to see it.
And so you've got this massive drop from where it was in the 60s to where it is now.
And I think largely it's due to the internet and to Donald J. Trump attacking the media.
RFK Jr., he's right.
People don't think like the media tells us to think when they think independently.
It's only the people that settle into their couches to take the programming that think like the mainstream media thinks.
And boy, do they think it.
They really believe it, those people.
Scarborough, I think I've said enough about him, but basically it's a dud because it has no teeth.
The Durham Report has no teeth.
It has no authority.
It didn't take anybody out.
It didn't recommend anybody for charges.
It is empty and useless words, just like the rest of the lies that they tell us.
And this one might have had some truth, but they only delivered it in a way where they could guarantee That there would be no prosecutions and no hangings in the streets.
And they deliver it in a way to try to keep the vigilantism down to a bare minimum.
Now, the third story, this is where it starts to get good.
The Church Committee, okay?
Formed in 1975 by, I think his name was... Frank.
John Church or Chuck Church?
Frank.
Rachel.
Frank Church.
Yeah.
A Democrat.
And he took shots at, or this committee was formed in the Senate by a vote of 82 to 4.
So everybody wanted to look into this.
This is post-Vietnam.
And what do they look into?
They look into the CIA.
They look into the NSA.
They look into the FBI.
And the IRS, and what do they come up with?
Oh, those conspiracy theories?
MKUltra and all the other crazy things?
Oh, yeah, that's a conspiracy fact.
COINTELPRO?
The control of our media?
Oh, that's not conspiracy theory, that's conspiracy fact.
Surveillance of political organizations?
Oh, Martin Luther King?
Politicians and others?
Oh, conspiracy theory?
Nope.
Conspiracy fact.
Project Camera.
Telecom.
Sharing with the NFI and with the FBI.
Conspiracy theory?
No.
Conspiracy fact.
All of that happened.
It wouldn't have happened without who?
Seymour Hersh.
Seymour Hersh was the one who wrote the articles that forced the Church Committee to take its position.
And it was the result of a free press, which we no longer have.
Obviously, we have a controlled press.
They didn't fix the problem in the Church Committee.
They talked about the problem and they wrote about the problem, but did they fix it?
No.
Here we are in 2023.
Obviously a completely controlled media.
Assassination of foreign leaders.
That's what was exposed.
That we were literally running assassination programs.
And so we had to come out and I think it was Carter who passed the law to get rid of the assassinations.
So basically, and it also resulted in the House forming a select committee on assassinations, and we also discovered during the church committee that the FBI was opening mail.
Now, who was the CIA director at the time?
George H. W. Bush.
So the Senate gave a wonderful gift to the American people.
They gave us A six book report called the Church Committee Report.
Six books of garbage that we did.
Who hung?
Was anybody hanging from the gallows?
Any beheadings?
Any guillotines dropped?
Any perp walks?
Jim, do you remember?
Sorry to say.
I can't remember, and it was nothing, and you're hitting on this great point.
I'll have a comment afterwards.
If you want to keep going, keep going.
I said everything I want to say.
This Durham report, that's all you're ever going to get.
That's it.
That's all I'm saying.
With that church meeting, if I remember correctly, it was William Colby, the previous or a previous CIA director who testified and seemed to cooperate with the hearings, and then he was suddenly removed from his position in favor of
Papa Bush, who claimed that he had never been a member of the CIA before, despite his father being involved with the predecessor of the Prescott Bush, member of Congress, being involved with the predecessor.
So it's just random that George Bush Sr.
became the director.
And one of the things that our government has done to kind of cover this over is just to say mistakes were made.
It's just mistakes were made.
Was excellent, was excellent.
And again, this jumps onto all of the empty platitudes of all the politicians not calling out the criminality.
And man, it is ugly.
And Brian, that was a great contribution.
Thank you, brother.
It was excellent.
It was excellent.
And of course, yeah, they used the occasion to bring in Bush Sr., claiming he was a civilian, but in fact he'd been covert CIA.
He ran the Bay of Pigs, which was codenamed Operation Zapata.
Two of the ships were Rechris and Barbara in Houston, which was his practice.
And of course he was on the ground supervising the shooters in Dallas.
So, I mean, They used the opportunity as a PR stunt to bring in a deep CIA operative, very sophisticated guy with a disarming demeanor.
He seemed like a very pleasant, cordial guy, but he was in fact a nasty piece of work.
As an undergraduate at Princeton, I was a member of the Whig-Cleo Society, a philosophical political debate society, and we featured Frank Church, and I actually shook his hand at the time.
He was a good man.
But as Brian observes, Durham reports and even church committee meetings don't yield action.
Meanwhile, polls call for a Swede exit, as Lidia, Sweden's second-largest party, renews criticism of Brussels, saying the country must accept, so we're prepared to leave the EU.
Calls for Sweden to leave the European Union grew as the leader of the country's second largest party renewed his criticism of Brussels.
The Sweden Democrats, an informal part of the government, have long been opposed to the country's membership in the European Union.
With Bolt suggesting the majority of Swedes want to stay, the party claims it will follow the will of the people, not push for a Swede exit.
Despite this, Jamie Atkinson, leader of the SD party, has now argued Sweden should not allow any further power to be transferred from national politicians in the parliament to lawmakers in Brussels without a referendum.
In an article written by Atkinson and Charles Weemers, a Swedish member of the European Parliament, the pair argue the Swedish government should take measures and steps so our country is prepared to leave the EU.
The Swede Democrats also argue countries should be prepared to leave the Union completely to give the country a better foothold in negotiations.
In order for preparedness to be credible, it's necessary we remove the writings in the Constitution that state Sweden is a member of the EU.
In addition, we should train a cadre of civil servants with expertise to negotiate trade agreements and other things we've delegated to the EU and study how Brexit could have been implemented better.
The better preparedness we have to leave, the more we will gain in future negotiations.
Atkinson's position has been criticized by some in the ruling government.
According to a source inside the Moderate Party, which heads up the country's leading right-wing bloc, some moderates feel Atkinson's actions are weakening the position of the Prime Minister, Uwe Christersen.
Sweden currently holds a presidency of the Council of the European Union, making Christersen one of the key faces of the EU at this time.
The source told British newspaper Aftonbladet that the EU's actions are viewed as an embarrassment to the coalition.
Some point out only other European figure openly blamed with leaving the EU is Hungary's autocratic leader, Viktor Orbán.
That would enact us in an undesirable company.
Some, however, would say Orban is actually an heroic figure, and therefore, the significance is the opposite.
The leader of the Swedish Democrats said the country should seek more exemptions from EU laws as part of a reset in relation with the 27-member group.
Atkinson, whose anti-immigration party has a big influence over Sweden's right-of-center government, then stopped short of directly calling for a Swexit A vote on whether to leave the European Union, as British voters did in 2016.
But he said the EU was heading in the wrong direction.
There are good reasons to seriously re-evaluate our membership in the Union.
A general election will soon cease to have any significance.
We can't allow that to happen.
He warned EU might impose more liberal immigration policies on Sweden, which has taken an increasingly tough line in recent years on asylum application.
Swedes are among the most positive in Europe regarding EU membership, 68% supporting, according to a survey by Gothenburg University.
In last year's election, his party got 20.5% of the vote, by the way, Which was crucial in enabling the minority Democrat, Christian Democrat, and liberal coalition to take party.
As part of the deal, Sweden Democrats, SD, have exercised considerable influence on policy, pushing for tougher immigration rules and watering down ambitions on climate change.
They've threatened to bring down the coalition if it doesn't cut taxes on fuels and stand up to the EU over asylum quotas.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, of course, anybody with half a brain is going to demand to exit from these political organizations similar to NATO, similar to the UN.
But the most important contribution, which was absent entirely from that article, is to be able to explain, document, and prove that the reason for exiting them is that they're Criminals!
And these crimes are centered in lie-started illegal wars of aggression.
And the probably the strongest argument for the people of those countries is the central banking argument is that this central banking scheme in the U.S.
I'll put a paper here in the show notes that bit you is that we can demonstrate that there is roughly a million dollars of benefits per average U.S.
household if we can take out And that would be based upon an average household income of $50,000 per year to get that million dollars that would be clawed back.
So the prime minister, so the article made another argument somehow weakening the stance of that prime minister of Sweden.
As if Prime Ministers were anybody to listen to or have faith in.
What, like Boris Johnson?
Tony Blair?
Those Prime Ministers?
Big Jack of New Zealand?
These are owned script reading Competition public serpents and the de facto position should be to consider all of them as criminal because that you can't be you can't rise to the top without the support of the corrupt corporate media so.
We shall see.
I think that that article is somehow trying to do damage control to make an admission that there is a strong public conversation against those unions.
And if you take a look at some of the key positions where the European Union has not spoken out, we have the Brian?
of NATO on Russia via Ukraine.
You have the loss of the gas supply to heat homes in the winter, and you have, again, the ongoing banks are looting.
So I hope that the public is rising.
Brian?
I had to do a lot of research on this particular one because I did want to figure out how Sweden really works.
Well, it's a parliament.
It's got 349 different seats.
They're voted into the parliamentary positions as a result of the electoral college, and you basically have a third party running that calls themselves the Christian Democrats, which only gained their first seat Back in 1985, and then they got a lot of traction going as high as 40, 42 seats once in 1998.
But they, they all, the people that are there right now, there's only 19 of them, but they hold very powerful positions on a lot of very important committees.
Now the reason that that third party was formed, and this is important to the discussion, was because when they took God out of schools, Around 1960, in the early 60s, that's where this group started to come together and coalesce and gain some traction, but they didn't actually have anybody in an actual seat until 1985, and then by 1991, they had 26 seats.
Again, 1998 had gotten up to 42, and 2022, it's dwindled down to 19 seats.
Again, 1998 had gotten up to 42, and 2022 it's dwindled down to 19 seats.
Now, Sweden is well-known and well-respected as sort of a bankster, sort of cartel bankster platforms.
They've got their Swedish bank accounts, which it's well known for.
They're very tough on immigration issues.
It's a very law-abiding, Western-minded society that has a very well-developed sense of fair play.
Violence is at a minimum.
Education is at a maximum in comparison to the United States of America.
And so I have no complaints about how Sweden has managed to put their things together, but this discussion related to this article, Swexit I think is what they called it, is Because even the Democrats over there, these are independent minded thinking people who are not just controlled puppets and it's obviously that this guy has an independent mind and he can think as well because what he's worried about is that EU is going to force the issue.
They're gaining so much traction with all the politicians that they do have that they want to open up the borders and flood it and destroy their middle class just like they've done to us.
So he's worried about it and he's standing up and he's stepping up to the plate on this.
So good for him, as far as I can tell, to even mention the issue or to bring the issue up.
And since he's the leader of what would be, let's see, I can't remember if the Moderates or the Democrats.
He's a sweet Democrat.
There's moderates, which would be akin to our Republicans.
There's Christian Democrats, which would be akin to our Tea Party or MAGA Party.
And then there's liberals, which would be akin to today's breed of liberal.
And I think the moderates pretty much have control of the votes over there, but it's the committees that are real interesting.
So, hey, what can I say about it except that Open borders is a disaster, and even these guys can see it.
Even these guys can see it.
And they don't want it to happen to them.
It'll change their lifestyle.
It'll change everything about it.
Crime, the lifestyle, everything will change.
Excellent.
Very, very nice, Brian.
Opinion polls show us how radically different American opinions are from those being produced by the media narratives.
This is quite stunning.
Journalist Glenn Greenwald has highlighted a new Harris-Harvard poll, covered practically nowhere in the mainstream media, but displays how Americans hold almost wholly opposite opinions to liberal corporate media narratives.
A newly released Harris-Harvard poll, he tweets, conclusively demonstrates how radically out of touch is liberal corporate media with the views of Americans.
It's not just that corporate media rejects Americans' views.
They don't permit those views to be heard.
Because once you recognize the alternative, you start thinking about it, and you may realize the evidence overwhelmingly supports something different than you're being told.
Greenwald noted majorities consider Russian collusion a false story, believe the Hunter laptop story was never misinformation, despite relentless media propaganda stating the opposite.
Majorities of Americans say it's false that Trump colluded with Russia, that the Steele dossier is also false.
In other words, they view the story the U.S.
media aggressively centered for three years as a hoax and a fraud, yet NBC and CNN won't even air this view.
Again, Americans also believe material on the Hunter Biden laptop are real or not were never Russian disinformation.
Again, Americans view the claim that the U.S.
corporate media and C.I.s wed for weeks before the 2020 election to help Biden win as a fraud.
Greenwell also noted how majorities believe the Bidens have engaged in criminal activity and that the M.E.I.
is refusing to investigate.
You know that both out large majorities want sweeping reform of the FBI and are not surprised it has abused its power to help Biden.
Majorities, he tweets, also believe Hunter Biden engaged in criminal influence peddling using his father's name.
The FBI is not investigating these crimes.
Joe Biden participated in Hunter's illegal influence peddling and profiteering schemes.
Larger majorities, moreover, say they're not surprised to learn the FBI abused its power in 2016 Trump-Russia probe to help Biden.
Large majorities also say they are deeply worried about U.S.
security state's manipulation of U.S.
politics and sweeping reform is needed.
A poll found the vast majority don't believe Biden is mentally capable of being president.
And the most popular political figures are Trump and DeSantis.
Large majorities of Americans have serious doubts about Biden's mental fitness, Greenwald tweets, and believe he is too old.
Unsurprisingly then, Trump leads Biden by 7 points for 2024 and Kamala by 11.
Can the media be more out of touch?
The three political figures viewed most favorably by Americans are Elon Musk, Donald Trump, and Ron DeSantis.
Bernie comes next.
Musk has by far the highest favorability, plus 14.
AOC, by comparison, is minus 13.
Mitch McConnell, minus 24.
Tim Scott and Vivek are at plus 7.
The poll also found just 40% of Democrats intend to vote for Biden.
Only 40% of Dem voters say they intend to vote for Biden in the Dem primary.
For whatever reason, the bully excluded a challenger near 20%—RFK Jr.
But even many Dems say Biden lacks mental fitness, and they don't want to vote for him.
What's so striking here isn't that the corporate media relentlessly advocates views and ideology that the majorities of Americans, often large majorities, reject.
It's that the views held by majorities are all but banned on NBC, CNN, New York Times, and Washington Post thus.
This is not a mystery.
If this doesn't demonstrate how despised the leftist media has become, then nothing will.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, that's great news pointed to you by Glenn Greenwald, and I appreciate that.
So he's talking about what Americans believe, which is important.
But as a reporter, he should be augmenting what people believe with the comprehensive and objective facts to be able to point out that what they believe is actually correct.
So he's missing this emperor's new clothes, obvious conclusion and thing that a reporter should say primarily and up front, which, Glenn, I don't know what's true on every case, but that has been a theme that I've noticed that I don't know what's true on every case, but that has been a somewhat far but not far enough to be able to say that this is a crime and again crimes require arrest to end that.
He says that out of touch is his conclusion with corporate media.
No, no, no, they're very well in touch.
This is criminal complicity of a rogue state empire to literally cover the crimes and lies that are centered In these lies targeted at legal wars of aggression to control resources, both natural and human, the banks are looting, and the crimes against humanity for the COVID culling.
Glenn's conclusions are not reasonable, and I have concluded that people like Glenn have an important part to play, and I appreciate it and admire him for going as far as he can go, but people can only see so far, think so much, and asking people to join us that these are crimes.
They've assassinated people.
They've lied for wars.
We can quantify that they're killing millions, so you got to be able to call it a crime.
He doesn't do it, but for what he did, I appreciate it.
Brian.
It's going to seem a little ways off base, but in order for something to be healthy, like let's take a plant, for instance, or a garden, it needs to have a certain amount of nutrients and minerals in the right balance, in the right way.
All of nature works like this.
Everything has a balance to it.
We as a society have been very sick for a very long time in terms of achieving balance, the same sort of balance that we recognize in nature.
We're beginning to get so far out of balance that we're sick, just like a plant would get sick if it didn't have the right balance.
Glenn Greenwald's article here is showing That we've lost our ability To think in a straight line.
And people are beginning to recognize that something is out of balance.
Something is getting very sick here.
Something isn't right.
Our kids spend all their days in front of their telephones, too many hours.
Our people spend too much time in front of their televisions or their gaming machines.
Our neighbors are not talking to one another.
People are sitting inside the house and allowing these psychological operations to influence and control their mind and their thinking and their objectives.
Black magic might have some interesting effects at the very beginning, but it doesn't last forever because the spell begins to wear off when people break loose from the narrative.
What Greenwald's saying is that right now people are beginning to see that something is very, very wrong and they're breaking loose from the narrative.
I'm proud to see that article out there.
I'm proud to see a guy like Glenn Greenwald pick it up.
We are talking to those people who are breaking loose from that narrative in this very show.
And our goal is to free people one mind at a time.
That is our game.
And I'm glad to see that we are making progress.
We, as a community of independent thinkers, I'm proud to see that happen.
Well said.
Well said, my friend.
Meanwhile, Stu Peters, doing sensational work.
Look at his Died Suddenly video.
If you want a splendid example, well, here's another.
Talk about conflict between what the government and the press tell us and the facts.
It turns out remdesivir, which has been recommended as the treatment of choice for COVID, contains fluorine and cyanide and brings about deadly organ failure.
What exactly makes remdesivir so deadly?
Thomas Bain here to detail his findings on the chemical composition of deadly redemesivir.
Cyanide is listed as a component in the drug's literature.
Remdesivir is discontinued as part of an Ebola study because the drug was observed to be fatal 53% of the time.
53% of the time!
Hitler used Zyklon B in concentration camps to murder Jews.
Not quite right.
Zyklon B was used to kill body lice, which is spreading typhus and dysentery, in order to maintain the health of the inmates, because you cannot get work out of a corpse.
These were labor camps, not extermination centers.
Zyklon B, however, is a cyanide-based drug, a mild form.
Donald Rumsfeld was the chairman of Gilead, which manufactured Remdesivir, national security study memorandum 200 long ago.
Research the idea of population growth was a threat to U.S.
national security.
Remdesivir is a chemical weapon and playing its part to depopulate Earth by killing many who take it.
The molecule of redemsevir is similar in structure to deadly sarin gas.
We must share this information with as many doctors as we can and get them to stand up and stop taking or using this poisonous drug, killing their patients.
Let's check out just a few moments.
Welcome back!
So if you've been with this show for a long time, you know that we've been talking about remdesivir from the very beginning.
And you know the truth about this drug, which is still one of the only treatments that the FDA and the NIH and NIAID has approved for treating COVID, all while rejecting other treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.
They actually criminalized, they demonized ivermectin.
Horse dewormer paste.
You were a conspiracy theorist if you wanted to administer to a patient or take yourself this Nobel Prize winning wonder drug that's used for so many things.
We've actually read studies recently that say that ivermectin is the cure for breast cancer.
So if you've been with us from the beginning, you know that remdesivir would be better named as remdethivir.
You know that it was a failed Ebola drug that they dragged out and repurposed as a COVID drug.
You know that it causes severe side effects, including organ failure.
You know that it's not COVID that turned our hospitals into the killing fields, the modern day progressive death camps, the ovens of 2020 and 2021.
No, it was the remdesivir death protocol, which took mildly sick people and put them on a combo of remdesivir and ventilators until they died.
But what actually is remdesivir?
Why does it cause such dramatic and lethal side effects?
What's in this mass-produced drug that turns into a death sentence for so many people?
Thomas Bain is the founder of Alpha Omega Energy.
He's an early stage clean energy startup company.
Thomas is trained in science.
He's a scientist.
He's an engineer.
He's a physicist.
He's also an official advisor to an ongoing anti-remdesivir class action lawsuit.
Well, Thomas says that this deadly nature of remdesivir is connected to two ingredients.
Cyanide and fluorine.
You've probably heard of that first one, cyanide, haven't you?
Well, Thomas said that he discovered these two ingredients by reverse engineering remdesivir, and he believes that it's the breakdown of these two components inside of the bloodstream that causes the dramatic full-body organ failure that kills off so many COVID patients.
There's more to it, but that's the idea.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, that's true.
Then that's another game ender.
It wouldn't surprise me.
So, uh, the data that I understand, oh, Stu Peters, you got to acknowledge him.
He has been a superstar and I appreciate the passion that you can hear and his intellectual integrity and his competence to be able to explain, document, and prove the comprehensive data, which includes that I believe that 88% of those put on that protocol ended up dying as a consequence of it, which, you know, it's great that we're pointing to the facts.
And again, the central part and the purpose of the show is we need to have some sort of a breakthrough.
Otherwise, we're just going to keep talking about all these game-ending data points as the game goes on and on.
Brian.
The star of life is the medical services symbol.
It's basically a hexagram with a A rod of Asclepius, the Greek mythology, the rod of Asclepius, which has a snake wrapped around a pole going on up.
It was a very powerful symbol back in Greece because early medicine, what they do is they put the sick people in a room and they put a couple of snakes on the ground and the snakes were supposedly going to bring healing.
And they began to adopt the serpent as a symbol to express the dual nature of the apothecary.
Snakes and man, snakes and power, the rod, the staff, all of its old time stuff.
I highly recommend David Whitehead's I think it's an eight-part documentary series called The Cult of the Medics, which takes a close look at the historical symbolism and nature of what we've adopted as modern medicine.
These days, pharmaceuticals represent almost 23% of the overall medical spend in the United States.
Now, pharmakia was something that was generally frowned upon for years and years and years because it was akin to biblical, black magic, demonology, ritualistic.
They would use it in different fertility rituals.
They'd use it in different types of Rituals to induce sort of an abnormal mental state where you were open to suggestion and they'd use basically drugs to do it.
Now, we think that we're smarter because we have science.
Now, we think we're smarter than the natural order because we have all these institutions and all these people being paid all this money and all these academic places to tell us all the new combinations of chemistry and biology that we can put together to solve problems.
I tend to think that the best solutions are the oldest ones, the ones that maybe we simply haven't studied or don't understand, but I am definitely a proponent of eat straight out of the garden.
Get rid of all the garbage.
Go back to the natural order of things.
I'm always talking about how important it is to get back to that natural order of things, that which you can observe within nature.
Healthy food, healthy water, healthy lifestyles, balance, nutrition, good things.
And if that all happens, the human body will work properly.
I believe that the pharmacy industry is so powerful and so influential and so rich that they're literally conducting rituals, death rituals, at the very top echelons.
You know, I'm not talking about the doctor at the local hospital.
I'm talking about Yes.
Very good.
level stuff that it is a weird blend of cultish medicine that exists at the highest level of these institutions.
And I, for one, and one just comes out and says, observe nature.
There is no lie in nature.
Find out what's healthy and look for an alternative source other than popping these pills.
Yes.
Very good.
Very good.
Meanwhile, anti-gun Biden leads away an arms deal selling to 57% autocratic governments. - Yes.
A recent analysis by The Intercept reveals Biden has been arming some of the worst countries in the world.
Through weapons sales, Uncle Sam and Joe have been facilitating the transfer of weapons of death to countries who actively oppress their people and kill their own citizens.
They say money makes the world go around.
I'd argue it's bullets and bombs that keep the international order clipping around down the track.
The cold hard truth is the U.S.
has fueled some of the worst conflicts in recent history, all the while preaching peace and righteousness from the podium.
By administration on both sides of the aisle, it contributed to this environment of mayhem.
The Biden admin is driven for the biggest numbers, all while spewing hypocrisy for the adoring progressives and our European freeloaders, er, I mean partners.
Let's take a look, see how far and wide our machines of death span.
R.T.
tweets, U.S.
to bolster weapons sales.
The U.S.
State Department is seeking to expedite arms sales to its foreign allies and partners amidst a new age of heightened strategic competition and soaring global tensions.
The Intercept found the U.S.
sold to at least 57% of the world's autocratic countries just in 2022.
They found by comparing State Department data with the regimes of the World Database, uncovering that Biden admins sold weapons of 48 of the 84 countries defined as autocracies last year.
However, this estimate is probably low.
The report The Intercept used from the State Department uses the term various in its commercial arms sale database to obfuscate the resilience.
Given that knowledge, roughly $11 billion of equipment sales are essentially undisclosed due to vague labeling.
It's no wonder we have so many unaccounted-for assets.
How convenient.
Interestingly, within Joe's first year, he surpassed Trump's highest year at Trump's peak.
He sold $192 billion, while Biden sold $206 billion in his first year alone.
You may, of course, think the amount is higher.
We've been helping to fight the good fight against the Russians in Ukraine.
On the contrary.
Ukraine has largely been in the form of grants and transfers, not from sales.
So how does this system of weapons sales from the freest nation on earth to the most oppressive go down?
Russia and RSA tweeting.
The Intercept.
Weapons sale by U.S.
to other countries reached $206 billion in 2022, exceeding six-year highs.
57% recognized as autocracies by the University of Gothenburg.
Is there anything Ambassador Bidgety would like to comment in this regard?
There are two ways in which a foreign country buys weapons from the U.S.
Direct Commercial Sales, DCS, and Foreign Military Sales, FMS.
A DCS happens between a foreign government and a company directly.
An FMS happens between a foreign government and the Department of Defense, contacted via their embassy to purchase U.S.-made weapons.
Regardless of method, the U.S.
government must approve each sale.
Though these two systems of purchase, the U.S.
has been the largest arm dealer since the Cold War, making up about 40% of all arm exports each year.
This past year was an absolute banner, all signs pointing to another big year, sales riding up 49% from last fiscal year, last October.
The Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft released a report detailing the increase of sales in that four contractors were the primary beneficiaries—Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, and General Dynamics.
It explained the concentrated lobbying power of these companies, including a revolving door, The U.S.
from the Pentagon Arms Sales Agency and the leveraging of weapons, export-related jobs into political influence, has been brought to bear in efforts to expand U.S. weapon exports to as many foreign clients as possible, often by helping using exaggerated threats. often by helping using exaggerated threats.
But I thought we were the good guys, Max LeBlanc tweets.
The U.S. is a champion of democracy, freedom, and human rights.
That's why 23% of its weapons say, I'll go to Saudi Arabia.
Chop up dissidents?
Check.
Hide from lawsuits over complicity in 9-11?
Check.
Committee genocide in Yemen?
Check.
All true of Saudi Arabia.
The increase in sales to autocracies goes counter to everything Biden has preached from the basement campaign to State of the Union.
During the election, attacking Trump, he pledged not to check America's values at the door when it came to arms sales.
Since taking office, he even adjusted the conventional arm transfer policy governing weapons sales to emphasize human rights over economic benefit, as President Trump had dictated in various speeches, including State of the Union, Biden said.
We're in a battle between democracies and autocracies.
The U.S.
is on the side of peace and security.
We're in a battle between liberty and repression, and a rules-based international order, and one governed by brute force.
Finally, in his national security strategy, the admin lays out The most pressing strategic challenge facing our vision is from powers that layer authoritarian government with a revisionist foreign policy.
So how is it that President Biden has managed to sell more weapons to these governments we are in a fierce battle with?
Is that his idea of tipping the rules-based international order scale?
Seth Binder, the State Department announced a new route tooling of foreign military sales to improve efficiency and competitiveness in an age of strategic competition.
But the share of U.S.
arm exports globally—40%—increased over the last four years, while Russia—16%—China—5.2% fell.
War is the conduit through which the elite get richer, the powerful gain more influence, and the everyday man and woman are subjected to more control.
The Quincy Institute explains.
Current U.S.
armed policy and practice too often fuel wars rather than deterring them.
Probably two-thirds of current conflicts—34 out of 46—involve one or more parties armed by the United States.
What's good for the bad guys is good for the defense contractors, which is good for the Pentagon and the political establishment.
It allows the lining of pockets, the churning of the status quo, and the expulsion of platitudes of peace from the mouths of bureaucrats and politicians.
It's interesting to think that after every mass shooting, Biden and his liberal Second Amendment haters always call for the disarming of American citizens.
After the recent Texas mall shooting, Biden said, Once again, I asked Congress to send me a bill banning assault weapons in high-capacity magazines, enacting universal background checks, requiring safe storage, and ending immunity for gun manufacturers.
He said all this in the name of peaceful streets in America.
So while Biden aims to disarm your law-abiding parents and hunting-enthusiast husband or brother, He unashamedly sells weapons to countries that don't allow their citizens to bear harms, vote, or live freely.
Where is Saudi Arabia's background check?
Where is their guarantee of safe storage?
Where is the defense contractor's culpability in lives lost at the end of the weapons sold to our autocratic rivals?
Seth Venter adds, the fact sheet acknowledges 95% of the annual $45 billion in foreign military sales are approved by the State Department in 48 hours.
Carl, your thoughts?
This is ongoing and this has been for decades that I've reported that the top for the US arms sales, the top five leading arms sellers are the five nations at the UN Security Council supposedly committed to peace.
So of course, closed, satanically inverted, it's hit the critical, however you want it to say, that's what we have.
And it's a neo-colonial empire, that's what we have.
And so you want to be able to create poverty to pit the poor people against themselves.
It's like the Hunger Games.
You want them to kill each other, and you're providing them with the weapons to do so.
And then the U.S. corporate media and the leaders can point to those areas and say, oh, that's why we came in as a neo-colonial power.
or just look at them, but we need to save the children over there or some virtue signaling like that.
And the article points out the typical president of the United States, in this case, Biden, talking about security and peace and honor.
And basically the line has been forever is that we, the United States, want nothing for ourselves, but peace.
And it's the opposite of that.
They want to be able to loot and rape the resources, both the natural and the human resources.
As usual, what Americans need to do, and the point of Need to Know News, is to flip that script and recognize the satanic inversion of it, and to demand arrest of the leaders, because those are the people who are using the guns for really bad things.
And again, we can quantify that annually, killing millions, looting billions, and harming billions.
Devoutly to be wished, Brian.
Well, I got some goosebumps thinking about this story.
There's a couple of issues I kind of want to bring up really quickly.
Does anybody remember what year the book 1984 was written?
48.
You just invert the 8 and the 4.
That's right.
That's right.
1948 by George Orwell who it was a warning against totalitarianism and there were a couple of things and of course the book obviously dealt with a very chilling dystopian future that made a deep impression on its readers about what totalitarianism really looks like and I think if you do a little research on George Orwell's personal history you'll understand why he wrote the book and why he had the insights that he did
But a couple of words in that article really caught my ear, and that's they're being sold to authoritarian governments with a revisionist position.
Authoritarian combined with historical revisionism.
That's the first thought.
The second thought, I saw an article or I saw a news source the other day from Sky News Australia.
Of course, when I do try to find the television, I'm looking for some truth somewhere.
And I found it in Sky News Australia dealing with the Uyghur people of Northwestern China.
And Sky News had a reporter that had managed to escape from that system.
Now, They're putting the people in literal re-education camps, of which only a percentage actually emerge.
They're being re-educated according to the CCP's agenda, and they're not given freedom.
Guys, this is what happens when you cannot defend yourself from your government and your government's authority.
When your words no longer work, you have to have a means for action.
Now, our founding fathers recognized this.
And so they built in a requirement into the Constitution, not a requirement, strong suggestion, That we would be a member of a well-regulated militia in order to and be well-armed in order to defend ourselves, not from the bad deer, but from the government itself.
Why are we spending all of this money to equip authoritarian, revisionist governments around the world Why are we doing that?
And it's what Jim has said time and time again.
They don't want us to have the guns because they're going to do something that we would kill them.
And I think that combination of those different thoughts, it's here, boys.
It's here.
Don't think it's not.
We know what the re-education camps look like.
We know what 1984 looks like.
And we can see the signs everywhere we look.
Spend that extra money that you have on some ammunition.
Make sure you have big stockpiles.
It might be the new currency in the New World Order.
Terrific.
I do agree, Brian.
I do agree.
Meanwhile, U.S.
to Accelerate Weapon Sales is coming from RT.
The State Department wants to speed up military shipment by embracing a more flexible approach encompassing sales to entire regions as opposed to individual nations.
The State Department is seeking to expedite arms sales amid a new age of heightened strategic competition and soaring global tensions.
While the government authorized weapons sales and training averaging $45.8 billion each year from 2019 to 2022, the time has come to reassess and adapt security cooperation to meet new and emerging challenges, pointing to the ongoing Ukraine conflict and tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
According to a Wall Street Journal report, the new program comes as state scrambles to rectify delays in sales to foreign militaries caused by a risk-averse and sluggish system.
Yes, let us not be risk-averse or sluggish in getting weapons into the hands of authoritarian governments.
These issues have resulted in fears some of America's partners could start shopping for arms from America's adversaries, such as Russia and China.
Good God, let's not lose a profit!
As part of its plan, the department seeks to save time on the policy approval process by anticipating demands of Washington's international partners based on prior requirements of the regional natures.
The reform intends to make the system more flexible, moving away from selling weapons on a case-by-case basis.
Another plan is to change the approach to notifying Congress by prioritizing consultations on critical potential arm transfers and sharpening policies in the field of exporting U.S.
drones abroad.
Last year, as global tensions soared amid the Ukraine conflict and the Taiwan standoff, U.S.
foreign military sales skyrocketed by 49 percent, reaching some $205 billion.
The U.S.
also emerged as a main source of weapons for Ukraine amidst its conflict with Russia, having committed some $37 billion in security assurance to Kyiv.
In recent months, however, U.S.
media reported Washington was running low on several types of weapons and ammo as the military industry was struggling to keep up with demand.
Some of the comments on this in the prior article are striking.
Pharma S.A.D.S.
wrote, Free Rocket Launcher with Every Gender Reassignment?
Richard D. Since 1945, the U.S.
has been involved in five major wars—Korea, Vietnam, Gulf War, Iraq, and Afghanistan—of which the Gulf was the only one the U.S.
won.
University of Sweden has identified some 285 armed conflicts since World War II, in many of which the U.S.
has been the main arms provider.
The U.S.
ranks number one in the world, the profits of which are a critical part of the economy.
It often doesn't matter if the U.S.
wins a conflict.
What matters is they are the ones profiting the most from any armed conflict, be it weapons sales, sales of all types of resources, supplies, food necessities, as well as profits from spoils of war they grab from the battlefield.
It's the U.S.' biggest business.
And by strategically planning, orchestrating, and initiating conflicts, inventing whatever reason may be acceptable, They ignited them at will all over the world, so it can't keep its war machines well-oiled and fed.
Roscoe writes, after spending nearly $2.5 trillion in Afghanistan, did the U.S.
win the war?
Is their nation any richer or more powerful for it?
Talk sense to a fool, and he calls you foolish.
Observe your ribbities.
Z3 and IT Alpha.
Call your brokers and ask for another put option on Raytheon, Lockheed, IBM, General Dynamics, more.
Kung Fu 242.
In the aftermath of the defeat of the unpatriotic Patriot missiles, the American arms industry will start nosediving.
Who will be interested in buying glorified metal craft in the name of switchblades and what have you?
Roadrunner.
In the last three years alone, IRS has spent $10 million on weapons, ammo, and tactical gear.
Reports the blaze.
According to an April report released by the Watchdog Group, open the box.
The IRS has spent $10 million since 2020 on guns, ammo, and other tactical gear in an effort to militarize the agency.
The report revealed IRS and 102 other agencies outside DOD invested a combined total of $3.7 billion since 2006.
Adjusted for inflation on weapons, ammo, and military-style equipment.
Opened a book stating 76 of the 102 are rank-and-file regulatory agencies, such as the EPA, Social Security Administration, Veteran Affairs, and Health and Human Services.
There are now more federal agents with arrest and firearm authority, 200,000, than U.S.
Marines, 186, the Watchdog Group Report noted.
Meanwhile, Obama destroyed after revealing what keeps him up at night.
Before we turn to that, let's discuss these.
Carl, your thoughts.
So that one article of streamlining Armsdale, so the 95% approval rate within 48 hours isn't good enough, and America's wanting to improve that.
So you're going to streamline, you're going to coordinate regions and your customer bases.
And again, this is just so important that Americans flip The script and to be able to recognize that, you know, the same rhetoric that they tell us for common sense gun control.
Well, we need common sense control of the guns from the government psychopaths who are war criminals and who are now arming their agents so thoroughly to outgun the or to outnumber the Marines with guns.
Yes, yes, yes.
Yeah, 48 hours is sluggish.
We ought to send them the arm before they even order them, Brian.
The cat's out of the bag.
I hate to say it.
I've believed for a long time.
Well, not for that long.
I mean, I think it was only after the Nashville shooting that it began to dawn upon me what was really happening.
And I'm going to say it again.
I know a lot of our listeners have already heard me say this.
I'm hoping there are new people out there.
I believe that the reason that our false flag events have a commonality, the military gear, the manifestos, the guns, the troubled youth, the schools, The churches, the synagogues.
I believe that part of it is so that these lobbyists, these boys that run these military machines can walk through the halls of Congress and tell their congressmen that they need to pass this spending bill and spend more money on this military apparatus for their company.
I believe it's purely financial, and I believe that their goal is to create a wall of separation, a buffer between the people And the Elite.
A military, a militarized security apparatus that protects those people from the likes of us.
Because when all hell breaks loose, they're really worried about us.
And I think they're willing to.
I think they're willing to take it all down.
I believe that this story ties together directly with these false flags events, which are just like many 9-11s, followed by a Patriot Act-style spending bill on a state level.
I believe that's why we see the fakery and that's why we show it.
These people are just getting richer every day based on this deception.
I think those are great points.
And I would add, there's a whole industry of turning schools into fortresses with all kinds of high-tech equipment at fabulous expense to the American taxpayer.
I mean, it's unbelievable.
Yeah.
I will tell you, It was not one month.
Now, I live in one of the richest school districts in the state of Texas.
This is our border.
It's also maybe one of the whitest.
We're basically sitting on a massive oil and gas salt dome, natural gas dome, and there's massive amounts of tax money.
And we have nice new schools.
Two of them.
Two big high schools, plus all of our elementary and middle schools.
Real nice place to live.
Real good people.
Good East Texas.
Good, solid oil and gas, hard-working people.
After Uvalde, it was not a month or a month and a half when my wife says to me, Oh, did you know that they're going to tear down the school and redesign it?
What are you talking about?
I said, yeah, as a result of Uvalde, they're now talking about, hey, they've got to have, we don't have the latest security apparatus, the latest security mechanisms in place.
And so we're going to tear down the school and rebuild it to stop the active shooter problem.
That's how much, that's how much money there is in false flags.
That was post Uvalde.
Now I have a feeling all those plans were in place prior to the event.
That one just put the icing on the cake.
And Yuvaldi was so shabbily done, I mean, it's embarrassing anyone fell for it.
Meanwhile, Barack Obama destroyed after revealing what keeps him up late at night.
Calls for confiscating guns from law-abiding Americans.
Former President Obama was ridiculed by Americans after he revealed in an interview what keeps him up late at night and called for gun confiscation.
He was interviewed by Far Left CBS News journalist Nate Burleson, a former NFL player.
Burleson opened the conversation asking Obama what needs to be done about gun violence in America.
Obama responded talking about how proponents of firearm confiscation need to engage with gun rights advocates.
Part of that work has to be done not just in those communities that already want to do something about gun violence.
We also have to actively reach out to communities where gun ownership is an important tradition, he replied.
Burleson responded, whining about how guns are as common as garden tools in certain communities, as though that were a bad thing.
Obama agreed, and said America needs to do something about the flood of military-grade weapons on the street.
The interview then took a darker turn when Burleson asked Obama about his radical solution to guns in America.
Obama replied, in Australia, you had one mass shooting 50 years ago, and they said, we're not doing that anymore.
That is normally how you would expect a society to respond when your children are at risk.
And I tell you, embedded there is the motivation behind Sandy Hook.
He thought they could have one mass shooting and we'd give up our guns.
immediately following the nineteen ninety six event australia confiscated six hundred and fifty thousand firearms from law-abiding owners obama wants lawmakers to run roughshod over the constitution and do the same right here in america Burleson later asked him at Sawpaw about the issue that most concerned him.
His response was completely asinine.
Burleson, post-presidency, what keeps you up at night, Obama?
The thing I'm most worried about is the degree to which we've now had a divided conversation, in part because we have a divided media.
When I was coming up at three TV stations, people were getting a similar sense of what's true and what isn't, what was real and what was not.
Today, what I'm most concerned about is the fact that, because of the splintering of the media, we almost occupy different realities.
Now people will say, well, that didn't happen, or I don't believe that.
Nate Burleson.
Americans mock the disgraced former president in epic style.
First, his answer on guns.
Proud Elephant wrote, Is he volunteering to help collect them?
I would love to see how that works out for him.
General Gen X abolishes Secret Service protection detail first, and I will still refuse.
Pam Bible, well, he does like his lecturing.
He is more than welcome to move there, meaning Australia, if he's so in love with her government.
Annie, come and take him.
And on his divided media answer, Tuska Austin says the most coddled president ever with a press corps who served his admin on bended knee or cranky pants.
We almost argue by different realities.
He is definitely working on that.
Carl, your thoughts?
Ooh, Obama wants to disarm the victims of empire.
Of course he does.
And he's virtue signaling about the children at risk.
All right, all right, all right.
I'll end this show notes.
Part of the quantification of the damage of the empire is the U.S.
has war murdered approximately 30 million people with over 200 armed invasions since World War II.
There's about a million children who die In the most horrific, gruesome, slow motion for preventable poverty, every month, and every post, like that scum Obama has promised, dented since 1969, and the total death toll just since the Clintons were in charge, that's about 400 million human deaths,
which is a greater death toll than from all wars, all murders, all acts of violence, and all known human history.
So these guys are just, they're just talking points that they think are going to register somehow.
And then Obama says the splintering of the media based on belief.
Now I like that line that he's given us because that's the whole problem is that our opponents are trying to keep human beings below the level of intellect.
They want human beings as herd animals that will be their slave force forever.
Brian.
to do with what they want.
And need to know news and the point of any type of education is to discern the lying sacks of spin from the leaders with objective and comprehensive data that anybody can check out.
And that's what we're advocating for.
And the belief and the manipulation of belief is what our opponents want.
Brian.
I would venture to say that our audience, Every single person out there remembers that moment when they woke up to that colossal megalithic fact that the media is in mass lying to you.
We are glad that you are here.
We are glad that you're putting us into your mind.
We appreciate the opportunity to help guide and change and adjust or at least reinforce that thought that you have that something isn't quite right with this world.
We do this volunteering our time and our energy and we only have a fixed amount of resources in which to help.
But I'm going to tell you something.
I am very appreciative, and before we even went on the air today, I told Jim, you have to have a plan, a plan, because he just had, he'd just been in the cath lab.
Who is going to carry the torch?
What is it going to look like?
Where are we moving forward?
How do we put our organization together?
Because I can tell you something.
Right now, more than any other time that I can remember in my life, people are beginning to wake up to the fact that we're being constantly gaslighted by these same people that controlled the puppet Obama, controlling the puppet Biden, who controlled the puppet Clintons, who controlled all of that.
I am hoping for a revolution.
I am calling for a revolution.
We just have to figure out how to get organized and do it legally and properly.
And I'm glad that you're here, and I'm glad you're listening.
We read the comments and we're open to suggestions.
And I'm glad that you and Carl are here.
Indeed, we do want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to live, need to know at gmail.com.
Live, need to know at gmail.com.
Turning to your final thoughts.
Carl, yours.
ours.
Yeah, well, it's fascinating that the ratcheting up of the tensions, the drip of the data, everything is poised for some sort of a breakout or breakthrough.
And I don't have anything new to add, but just to articulate what I see is the key point to keep in mind.
Something is going to break.
I believe it's going to be in the financial sector, but it could be in anywhere.
It could be multiple areas all at once.
And in the ensuing chaos, our masters will attempt to use emotion Wannabe masters are in charge, then Obama will have a script to read and he'll try to calm down from what people believe.
And instead, we're just taking a look at whatever false flag they enact, whatever crime du jour our opponents attempt, we have the established history where we have, you know, hundreds of people, myself, Jim, Brian's excellent work with exposing False flags.
We have sufficient documentation to withdraw consent, flip the script and demand their arrest.
So the challenge of the game is when this breakout comes, will it ensue into the chaos and will human beings be herded again?
Or will we have a breakout of some sort of a truth?
And as we've documented and demonstrated on this show, and Jim has been a pioneer for decades, and my writing going back for decades, is that the facts can be explained, documented, and proved as objective and independently verifiable.
Will that be enough?
We shall see.
Very good.
Brian, final thoughts?
There is some power left in the government.
The House does have the power to cut the funding to the FBI.
Since they're not going to do a perp walk, and they haven't even since the church committee, don't expect it to happen.
But if these people are serious and Kevin McCarthy is anything at all, You'll start to see funding cut to some of these organizations.
And when you start to see that happen, they will retaliate.
And you just watch.
Good people will be accused of terrible things, and they will use all their power to try to keep that money flowing for those different agencies that are corrupt.
I'm most worried about the Department of Justice.
The FBI, good stuff.
Excellent commentary from Brian and Carl today again, exactly as we would expect.
I find it ironic that Obama's talking about different realities when he has been a major contributor to creating them.
Very thematic with the fact the American people aren't buying it.
He's been behind the officiation of the Smith-Mudd Act that precluded the use of the same techniques of propaganda and disinformation within the United States that were being used abroad.
Staged events, phony riots, events just like Sandy Hook.
Barack Obama may go down in history as the sole president who did the most damage to the United States, barring the President Administration, which many believe to be Obama's third term in our entire history.
Thank God the American people are seeing through the smoke and the mirrors and figuring things aren't the way we're being told.
If we believed it all, we'd be cooked.
Meanwhile, as Brian and I have suggested, and Carl would agree, stock up, be prepared, brace yourself.
We can't count on the police.
The Democrats defunding the police are destroying the American military.
I believe our constitutional sheriffs Well, the ability to deputize fellow American citizens of their state to create posses may be our final bulwark against an invading horde that is taking place before our very eyes.
Don't let yourself be played.
Take the steps you need to protect yourself, your family, and our nation's future.
Thanks for joining us today.
Export Selection