All Episodes
Previous Next
May 26, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:21:22
Need to Know News (25 May 2023) with Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Chris Weinert in Fort Myers, Florida.
Carl may or may not join us, but he's making his move to Mission Viejo, and I believe it's in the process of completion.
We begin with Kiev's miserable revenge for Bakhmut.
The fall of Bakhmut, one of the largest defeats for the Ukrainian military since the beginning of the operation by Russia.
Kiev has yet to admit Russia controls the city.
The loss of the battle, which claimed tens of thousands of Ukrainian servicemen, deals a heavy blow to the regime.
Another debate also worries NATO countries that have paid millions to the losing side in this conflict.
The Russian flag is waving over Bakhmut.
Zelensky's brazen lies are increasingly undermining the trust of his audience.
Yeah, we'll have to admit the truth, but military will try to soften the blow, claiming Bachmann had no strategic importance.
It's necessary to prepare the audience, however, in the face of the inevitable, where Kiev created another media victory, but paid for it with the lives of its servicemen.
On May 22, Ukrainian sabotage resources groups attacked a Russian border village in the Belgorod region.
The attackers consisted of fugitive Nazis from Russia who became members of the notorious Russian Volunteer Corps.
The grouping was mainly supplied with American Max Pro Hummers, a tank, and SUVs.
Following an intense shelling of Russian villages, the saboteurs broke through the first line of defense, advanced 8 kilometers to the villages.
The Russians stopped the saboteurs, however, thereafter.
The fighting was complicated because there were civilians in the villages, which the Ukrainians traditionally use as human shields.
Ukrainian militants were pushed out of the settlements.
Intense fighting continued at night.
They attacked the Belgorod region from the air.
Several drones dropped explosive devices on buildings, on private houses and an FSB building.
The Russian ministry declared the remnants of the saboteurs have been thrown back into the territory of Ukraine.
During the operation, seven saboteurs were killed, four IFVs and five pickups destroyed.
The attack had no military goals.
It was nothing but an information and sabotage action.
It was supposed to be symbolic.
The same Ukrainian saboteurs attacked a village of the Baransk region in March without achieving success other than headlines.
The shooting could not conceal Kiev's major defeat in Bakhmut.
Meanwhile, Ukrainian intel says it's trying to assassinate Vladimir Putin.
Surprise, surprise.
Putin is noticing we're getting closer and closer to him, said Vadim Skibinski, deputy head of Ukraine's main intelligence directorate.
Putin is number one on their kill list because he coordinates and decides what happens.
The Ukrainian intel official claimed that he had failed to kill him because he stays holed up.
He suggested another attempt would be made as soon as he sticks his head out.
Ukrainian officials have admitted to previously attempting to kill Putin.
Last year, the head of the Chief Intelligent Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine said there was an attack to assassinate Putin.
Absolutely unsuccessful, but really happened.
In March of 2022.
Three weeks ago, unmanned aerial vehicles were downed over the Kremlin.
I was not present at the time, but Moscow considered the drones to be another assassination attempt.
In the first month of the war, the Israeli PM, Navalny, engaged Putin and Zelensky in talks that nearly ended the war.
The Vystok were blocked by Washington, but Putin pledged not to target Zelensky with assassination attempts.
The Kremlin appears to have upheld that agreement until the most recent.
It's unclear if Moscow will continue to abide by the pledge.
Zelensky has spent weeks outside of his nation traveling to allied countries meeting counterparts.
In response to the drone attack, Dmitry Medved, a high-ranking Russian official, called for Zelensky's physical elimination, declaring Russia has a right to take countermeasures whenever it deems appropriate.
Let's reveal another name on the kill list, the Wagner Group head, Yevgeny Pryzantkin.
We're trying to kill him.
My priority is to eliminate him who orders his men to attack.
This guy is very, very formidable.
Intelligent official named to others.
In the end, everyone will have to answer.
Chief of the General Staff, Valerie Gerasimov, and Defense Minister Sergei Shogun planned the attack, and they cannot turn back.
Asked if civilians in Russia could be added to the list.
We are at war.
These are our enemies.
If an important figure manufactures and finances weapons for Russia, then his elimination would save the lives of many civilians.
According to international conventions, this is a legitimate goal.
You have to believe Kiev has already carried out targeted assassination, including Darya Dugina, killed by a TAR bomb, where her father, Alexander, appears to have been the target of the attack.
Here, by the way, is the report.
Joe Biden performs a loaves and fishes in reverse.
He claims Russia lost 100,000 people dead in Bakhmut.
Yes, yes, yes indeed.
back moot, although the Ukrainians claim it hasn't been taken.
100,000 dead means 300,000 casualties, and there were only 20,000 Wagner troops to begin with.
I'm not making any of that up.
Yes, yes, yes, indeed.
Chris, your thoughts?
All right.
You know, this, in my opinion, has always been a proxy war.
And, you know, Putin seems to be one of the few people that actually stood up to the people that had basically taken apart the former Soviet Union until when it became Russia in the late 80s, early 90s.
He's one of the few people that actually tried to jail Abramovich or Khodorkovsky or some of the people in the Gazprom and Yukos scandals.
And certainly, the Harvard Trust was behind many of these things.
You know, the Larry Summers and the Jeffrey Sachs guys and the Boston Consulting Groups.
You know, they basically extorted the nationalization of Russian energy in the early 90s.
And of course, used Yeltsin as a puppet proxy as well.
And I think Putin came in and cleaned a lot of that up.
And I think they're having a little trouble with that whole notion.
Whether it's real or theater, I couldn't quite say, and I'm not qualified enough.
I'm just speculating on my own opinion.
But, you know, this does seem to have a lot of parallels to many of the stuff we've seen in the 90s and even the 2000s with the color revolutions or even with Yugoslavia and Serbia in the 90s.
You know, to me, these are not only resource extraction but extortion politics of the civilian populations who are really the mass casualties in most of these wars.
Yeah, I think it kind of has a lot of eerie similarities to like the Castro rise in Cuba, where the DGE is infiltrated by military intelligence from the NATO forces, but somehow or another, they can't necessarily kill this guy, but they always talk about it very publicly.
And even they recruit some sketchy people, some shady folk to come in and do this in the case of the 60s and the Castro thing was the mafia to try to assassinate quote-unquote these leaders.
So it doesn't surprise me that they're, quote-unquote, trying to kill him, or at least publicly stating that they're trying to do this.
Whether they actually do or will, hard to say.
You know, there's a possibility that Putin could be part of the Gideon Masonic Cabal and they're just partitioning the world off in these different quadrants, the four corners of the world like they've done in historic past.
So something to think about.
I really don't know entirely what the situation is there, but my instincts and some of the research that I've seen kind of leads me to that as a possibility at least, and I don't want to turn a blind eye to that.
Yeah, so, you know, interesting stuff.
This is definitely failures of diplomacy and, you know, them going to this amount of mass casualties in the Ukraine and even threatening to assassinate a foreign leader.
So, yeah, I don't know.
I think a lot of this should fall onto the realm of the Biden administration for bringing this unnecessary tension and this failure of diplomacy and completely, you know, forging a new economic system that was a Goldman Sachs initiative in the BRICS from 2001, creating the situation that we quote unquote have now where forging a new economic system that was a Goldman Sachs initiative in the BRICS from 2001, creating the situation that we quote unquote have now where 100 and some odd countries with 80 percent of the Their assets were seized.
They were sanctioned in such a way.
And, of course, this ham-handed diplomacy and these coup attempts are certainly not helpful either.
You know, how many times have the United States and the NGOs and Soros and the Golden Dawn been caught in with the U.S. State Department and trying to coup the Ukraine and many of the surrounding satellite former Warsaw countries?
Oh, Chris, those are all spot on.
I gather 30 more countries want to join BRICS.
I think the United States created a catastrophe for itself.
Stupidity in leadership.
There's no excuse for it.
The Biden administration has done more damage to the United States in two and a half years than ever before.
All foreign enemies combined in our history.
No question.
Fats, can I add a point to that, too?
In Biden's administration, they have made 42% more of the U.S.
dollar's currency.
So you talk about inflation or just a flood of the money supply.
This is absolutely another thing that has been absolutely catastrophic to our economic situation.
It's all thanks to Joe Biden.
Just want to add that in.
Very nice.
Very nice.
Yes, yes, yes.
Well, when you put totally incompetent or corrupt individuals in charge, the outcome can be catastrophic.
The problem is it's going to affect all Americans and not just the cabal at the heart of it.
Meanwhile, Twitter founder Jack Dorsey calls for the dismantling of the FBI, the CIA, and the NSA.
In a cryptic tweet with a photo of JFK, that's actually a painting, that is not a photograph.
Former Twitter Dorsey called for a U.S.
intel agency to be broken up into a thousand pieces and scattered to the winds.
The line, of course, from JFK.
Splinter the CIA, NSA, and FBI into a thousand pieces and scatter them to the winds.
The news comes after RFK Jr., nephew of JFK, went on a roundtable and told the host he believed the CIA was involved in the murder of his uncle.
Kennedy Jr., who announced he's challenging Biden for the Democrat nomination, said there's overwhelming evidence the CIA was involved in his murder.
I think it's beyond a reasonable doubt at this point, with which I do agree.
Bobby Jr., whose father was also assassinated, added, I'll tell you the book that probably distilled millions of documents of evidence-agreeing confessions involved in the crime, 60-year cover-up, the best kind of desolation, a book called JFK and the Unspeakable by Jim Douglas, adding he's read a hundred books on this subject.
Bobby Jr.
noted the evidence is overwhelming.
CIA was involved in the murder and in the cover-up.
A report, of course, claimed Lee Oswald had acted alone in killing JFK less than 48 hours.
In fact, it was the very evening of the assassination, three and only three shots being fired less than 12 hours after the commission of the crime.
Last year, Tucker examined the idea the CIA was involved during an episode on Fox.
You know, the psychiatrist who visited Ruby had deemed him insane.
Louis Jolent West was working for the CIA in the House of Representatives and paneled a special committee to investigate in 1976.
Final review, the HSCA reviewing JFK and MLK came to the conclusion Jack Kennedy was almost certainly murdered as a result of a conspiracy.
This is not getting it quite right.
They concluded there'd been a second shot.
Leaving it open as to whether it was an independently motivated, that at the same time, same place, there'd be a second shot when the grassy knoll based upon acoustical evidence from a motorcycle patrolman who left his mic open.
I believe the evidence is authentic.
But in fact, there's an unsigned letter in the National Archives disavowing the conclusion that there had been a conspiracy and claiming that the Warren Commission, in essence, got it right.
Carlson claims CIA was the obvious suspect.
In 1992, Congress passed the JFK Assassination Records Act, mandating full disclosure by 2017, 54 years after he was killed.
The last admin promised to apply fully with the law, but under intense pressure from CIA Director Mike Pompeo, withheld thousands of agents' CIA documents.
Today, this afternoon, the Biden admin did exactly the same thing.
The reason obvious.
Tucker added a source had told him the agency had a hand in the murder of JFK, which I can confirm.
Last year, Matt Tiabi revealed in the Twitter files that during Dorsey's tenure at the company, the CIA and FBI spent years meddling in Twitter's internal content moderation.
According to Tiabi, The FBI acting as doorman for a vast program of social media surveillance and censorship encompassing agencies across the federal government from the state Pentagon to CIA.
He at it!
Twitter had so much contact with so many agencies, executives lost track.
Is today the DoD, tomorrow FBI?
Is it the weekly call, the monthly call?
It was dizzying.
Gabby also documented relationship between the social media company and the CIA.
And open secret at Twitter, one of its execs was ex-CIA.
And of course, the saying is, one CIA always.
Additionally, the government was in constant contact, not just with Twitter, but virtually every major tech firm.
Tab even called Twitter an FBI subsidiary.
Tiabi was tapped to expose Twitter's secret when Elon Musk took over the company.
Earlier, Dorsey said Musk was not the best leader for the social media giant and that it all went south after the Tesla CEO bought the company.
I would dispute that 100%.
Meanwhile, State of the Nation even published my Real Deal Special.
You can find it on my blog, my video blog.
Mitch, you channeled Jim Fetzer.
For anyone who wants an overview of the assassination, this is a distillation of roughly 30 years of collaborative research with the best experts to ever study the case.
Check it out.
Chris, your thoughts?
Sorry there, Betts.
I'm going to jump in the other room so I can give you my undivided attention and speech there.
Yeah, so, wow, I guess the CIA, as I've always come to recognize it since the National Security Act of 47, seems to be like the Judeo-Masonic cabal's Gestapo, very similar to the FBI.
Maybe they just have different legal ranges that they can operate within in terms of constitution or in terms of legal rights or opportunities.
Now, as far as RFK and JFK, they always have been noted as a popular sovereignty type of candidate or president, even in the case of JFK, and they have met violent deaths at the hands of the deep state.
As far as the Twitter and Dorsey's concerned, you know, they seem to me to be proven to be deep state in the face of the COVID thing and the censorship and all the stuff with that.
So it's going to be interesting to see this new World Economic Forum CEO taking over the Twitter and turning it into the X as it were.
So yeah, I think really this is kind of a World Economic Forum control opposition offering, you know, where they have the enemy of the enemy and export binary psychology of the onlookers that maybe might not be able to connect the dots.
I also think that it is a deep state mechanism a DARPA tech offering in terms of Twitter, that would be used for the purpose of like agenda 21 in the 90s to analyze the threat assessments of each citizen against its own government.
I guess the CIA and being scattered to the wind, uh, interesting sentiments from a person that probably is CIA.
So, uh, you know, I'd say right now, maybe they're in a position where the private sector, uh, has gained all the IP, the money, the infrastructure, the legal precedents, uh, uh, to, to uphold these apparatus of surveillance and analytics gathering, uh, and can basically remove the government entities that would be susceptible to oversight or congressional limitations or funding limitations.
All this stuff is basically subsidized through the Fed in some way, shape or form, whether it's Fed direct or through Black Market or Skunk Works operations.
It reminds me a lot of in the 60s with Howard Hughes, you know, a proxy puppet guy that was set up.
You remember Intertel?
It was like a private sector thing.
It was supposedly like the CIA, except they got paid three, four times as much.
And I think that really by doing things like that, you can have the same type of range or extrajudicial operating capacities while subverting, like I said, the oversight and the budgets of the Fed and Congress.
So I think it's all being used to facilitate a breakaway civilization for the 1%.
And Elon Musk, in my opinion, is very much part of this.
I know that he's been a white hat in public recognition recently, but I almost think of him as today's Howard Hughes.
And I don't know if it's the Mormon Mafia or the FBI or whoever's properly running his gambits or his operations, but a lot of it has been subsidized heavily by the federal government or by, you know, NGOs or these World Economic Forum dark money operations.
I don't have much trust in Elon Musk.
I think that he's a puppet of the private sector that is going to basically do the same shit that the government has done without the limitations of actual former bureaucracies of government.
I think the parallel with Howard Hughes is perfect.
I think that's excellent.
Very, very astute, Chris.
Meanwhile, Secret Service refuses to release visitor logs for potentially compromised Biden residences.
Whether they are records related to his massive document hoarding scandal or more evidence of a crime family, one thing is plain.
Biden doesn't want logs of visitors to his Delaware homes to be made public.
Freedom of Information and Secret Service agencies cite a decision made in Trump's document mishandling case A New York federal appellate court turned down a request for visitor logs pertaining to Trump's home.
It's important to notice that the termination in Trump's case is related to New York and does not influence rulings in D.C.
and Delaware.
The first request for the logs came out in October of 2022 with more following.
The agency flatly refused to provide the records after more than a seven-month wait, during which the agency said it was coming through thousands of emails to comply with a request.
In January of 2023, Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi admitted the Secret Service does generate law enforcement and criminal justice information records for various individuals who may come into contact with Secret Service-protected sites.
The source also promised that they are prepared to provide available background information on vetted guests of Biden's residence if requested by Congress.
A promise, however, led to more stonewalling and denials, culminating in flat-out refusal to comply with ongoing investigations earlier this month.
A FOIA representative stated, Please be advised emails reflecting visitor to Biden residence in Billington will be above each Delaware not agency record subject to the FOIA.
C. Doyle vs. U.S.
Department of Homeland Security finding email regarding expected visitors to the sitting President's residence were not agency records subject to FOIA.
The visitor logs are crucial pieces of information needed to help investigation into multiple Biden scandals, however.
The Justice Department is weighing evidence linking Hunter Biden to crimes such as foreign lobbying, tax fraud, money laundering.
House representatives are investigating Biden family-linked crimes, including influence peddling.
Special Counsel Robert Herr investigated potential legal ramifications related to Biden mishandling classified documents.
The visitor logs will prove or disprove Hunter Biden brought Mexican business associates to then-Vice President Biden's home and met with Ukrainian, Russian, and Kazakhstan associates.
He also allegedly introduced his father to two Chinese business partners, all at odds with the President's continued denials of any knowledge or contact with Hunter's business associates.
Visitors to Biden Delaware Residence matter, especially since he took no action to hide classified documents from foreign visitors.
Hunter even has photos of various boxes labeled Important Docs, presumably taken in the garage alongside the now-famous Corvette.
Stored in his laptop.
Hunter claimed to be in residence of family homes in 2017, sharing his home with classified docs, partaking in sketchy business dealings and receiving visits from foreign nationals.
House Oversight Chair James Comer expressed frustration.
Friend of mine pledged to have the most transparent administration in history, but continues to hide information at every turn.
Given that Biden's influence, peddling schemes, and Joe Biden's stassing classified docs for years, Americans need to know who visited Biden's homes and properties.
Despite his repeated denials of son Hunter's business dealings, the then-Vice President attended a 2015 dinner with a group of his son's associates, including an exec at the Ukrainian gas company Burisma.
Hunter also invited Russian billionaire Yelena Baterina Who made a $3.5 million payment to a firm associated with Haunter.
It's unclear what is in the Secret Service visitor logs or hiding.
Highly unlikely the public will ever know.
But given reluctance to release the records, the overwhelming evidence stacking up supporting claims of criminal activity within the Biden family is a pretty sure bet that shenanigans were afoot.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, I'm sorry, I've got to open an ice cream for the little one here.
No problem, go for it.
I'm all for first things first, an ice cream for Valentina.
I've got to bribe her.
It's okay, sweetie, you'll be okay.
All right, sorry.
But anyways, Fetz, what I was going to say is, you know, the Trump-Mar-a-Lago raids and things of that sort seem to have, like, a two-tiered system of investigation as well as justice.
You know, if you think about all the stuff that, like, Hillary Clinton or, like, the Bidens have been caught with, like, hard evidence.
This is not just the speculation of somebody, like, on a media pundit or a deep state operative.
This is actually like paper trail stuff that can be provable, traceable, servers, laptops, kill lists, paper trails, you know, there's a lot of money that leads to, you know, the Podesta, the Bidens, the Hillary Clintons, that seems to be getting completely disregarded and ignored by the investigatory agencies.
Uh, and of course, the mainstream media, they haven't even mentioned Burisma.
They've been talking about Ukraine and standing with these guys for over a year now, but haven't even mentioned Burisma once, and it ties to Biden.
So I think it's, it's pretty obvious what's going on here.
I mean, they seem more like janitors than they do investigators, if you really ask me, in terms of the media or these investigatory agencies.
As far as Hunter and his ties as a middleman for Burisma, that seems to be very obvious that there's a vested interest in the Ukrainian war that's causing so many casualties.
These are technically war crimes that have been completely just forgotten about, null and void, disregarded by anybody of importance in the Washington loop.
Yeah, this is a big effing deal.
And if you remember, before Beau Biden was quote-unquote killed in Iraq, he used to be an assistant prosecutor in Delaware and basically got the DuPont and Duke heirs completely out of jail time.
No prison time served whatsoever for molesting and raping their own children below the age of five years old, which is absolutely appalling.
Right, right.
And this is not just a one-off thing.
These things happen, you know, a couple of times.
This is how Bo really made his quote unquote bones.
This is 08, 09, big, big deal.
So how the media has given these guys such a consistent pass on these atrocities and gone after Trump for such such molehills and stuff that is arguably not even, you know, I don't have to sell you on this Fats.
I'm sure you probably could preach to the choir, but you know, it does to me seem to be a two-tier system of justice and investigatory reach.
So I don't know what these guys are doing.
It's obvious, you know, for me, but as far as in the scope of the public discourse, this to me, I don't know how this is even a thing.
Very important addenda there, Chris.
Excellent, excellent.
Meanwhile, here are a couple of contemporary memes.
Meanwhile, before Bud Light, Bruce Jenner athlete.
After Bud, one sip.
Woman with breasts, stunning.
Here is something really, I think, rather definitive.
Don't believe Michelle.
Michael Obama is a man.
This is on Ellen DeGeneres.
Dancing.
giving meaning to the phrase swinging dick.
Hit it.
Go.
Thank you.
Cool.
Chris, your thoughts?
Okay, sorry, I got bounced again.
Yeah, the ball should speak for itself.
I think that that's pretty obvious what's going on there.
It's not a biological story problem or a puzzler situation that, you know, people should have a struggle with.
You can see this Masonic Ball and how they really use this perception, deception, inversion operation formula that they use.
I think Michelle Obama is no different.
I would have utmost more respect for him and Obama if they actually just came out and leveled with the people and told the truth.
Since they are supposedly supporting the LGBTQT and all these other initials, alphabets situations, I think that that would appeal to the sensitivities of people that fall into that quote-unquote manufactured demographics.
So it's puzzling to me why they wouldn't just come out and say, hey, this is the dude, you know.
I don't know what they get out of this, but certainly it seems to be the satisfaction of knowing they're hoodwinking the multitudes in the way that they are.
I think they want to run Michelle for president or vice president.
They just fear that there'd be a tremendous backlash.
But I agree with you.
There'd be more honesty from them and greater respect than contempt if they would only deal in a straightforward fashion about it.
I think your point is excellent.
Meanwhile, Australian Senate votes not to investigate excess deaths.
This is rather stunning.
In one of the most grotesque votes ever taken in the Australian Senate, a majority of senators voted not to investigate the unexplained non-COVID excess deaths that have occurred since the introduction of the COVID vax.
Horrifying and terrifying at the same time.
They don't even want to know the truth.
If there were any doubt whatsoever the government is willfully blind to the death and destruction they've caused, this is it.
A vaccine linked to a 737 plane load of passengers unexpectedly falling from the sky every week since January 2021, and our government is not even curious as to why.
As documented by the Australian Bureau of Statistics, more than 10,000 Australians above historical average are dying of heart attack, stroke, cancer, diabetes, dementia, and other neurological diseases since the COVID vax was released near the start of 2021.
These numbers do not include COVID-declared deaths.
This is a worse death rate than World War II, and the government has not offered a credible explanation.
This is more than incompetent and dereliction of duty.
In my view, this is sinister.
It implies connivance, participation, cooperation, collusion, and mass death.
The video has astounded many.
Our local heroes who have fought to expose the truth about the danger of the COVID vaccine include Senators Antic, Babel, Hanson, Rennick, Roberts, Russell, Broadbent, M.P., remember their names, who have fought to expose the truth.
Chris, the Australian Senate doesn't even want to investigate?
That's pretty sad.
Why not?
These guys...
Chris.
Oh, okay.
Okay, man, I keep getting bounced at all the right times, or wrong times.
Yeah, so as far as the Australian Senate, it's probably the same rules go for our Congress.
You know, these guys are all complicit, waist-deep in the blood of the innocent.
I would bet they don't want to investigate themselves too much in this, and if they do, I doubt it'll be a serious investigation that gets to any substantial details.
So, yeah, my guess at this point in time, they're trying to just misdirect, redirect, and obfuscate.
So, yeah, same as our Congress, same as Australia, same as most of these countries that went along with this hoax and this scam.
In terms of a Hegelian dialect, if you think of a problem-reaction solution, you know, they needed the COVID to introduce the vax to deliver the endgame of the depopulation effort.
So, yeah, I think that really this is making them look entirely more sinister and more complicit the more that they keep trying to cover this up and misdirect.
So, yeah, as far as like the mens rea or the psychological aspect of being a criminal, I think that they're very much well aware of this and that's very much showing in their behavior and this is not how Yeah.
Your point about mens rea, I think is exactly right, Chris.
They're revealing they have this criminal mindset to conceal this mass murder.
Absolutely, without question.
I keep having quote-unquote internet trouble, so hopefully I'll be able to get a full sentence in here.
But yeah, absolutely, this is not how the innocent behave.
This is how the guilty do it all day long.
So yeah, it doesn't shock me at all.
Yes, yes.
Very good.
Excellent.
That's for sure.
And I'd have to say that until there's like an investigatory authority that's really oversaw by the citizens instead of this complicit government anywhere around the world, I don't think we're going to get to the bottom of this until the people actually can can actually represent the data, present it to the multitudes and actually have a course of legal action in terms of recourse. present it to the multitudes and actually have a course Yes.
Yes.
Very good.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, in a surprise move, New York says it'll land the COVID vaccine mandate for health care workers.
Minutes after oral argument began in the New York State Court of Appeals on a lawsuit challenging the state's vaccine mandate for healthcare workers, an attorney representing New York announced the state's intention to repeal the mandate.
In other words, they didn't want to get all this evidence into the court record.
The state requested that court overturn a previous ruling striking down the mandate, a move attorneys opposed because it leaves open the very real possibility that this constitutional violation could happen again and ruin many more lives.
The plaintiffs' attorney are absolutely spot on.
They should not overturn the previous ruling striking down the mandate.
The Children's Health Defense, this is Bobby Kennedy Jr.' 's outfit, sponsored the original lawsuit filed October 20, 2022, by medical professionals for informed consent, practitioners affected by the mandate, and several additional plaintiffs, including two doctors, a nurse, a radiological technician, and a medical lab specialist.
Defendants included the New York Department of Health, New York Governor Hanshaw, and Mary Bassett, Health Commissioner.
New York Supreme Court Appellate Division was set to hear arguments today, but the plaintiff's attorney cut short by the state's announcement.
State showed up at court today and announced they're repealing the VAX mandate for healthcare workers.
Jonathan Hitsos, an attorney for the state, told the court New York no longer intends to enforce it.
I would like to advise the court the state health department has just informed me they intend to repeal the regulation that is being challenged here.
The reveal is going to be done through the notice and comment process, but what I can confirm is the department no longer intends to enforce this rule and will be sending out guidance to hospitals and other health care facilities within the upcoming week.
The New York State Supreme Court on January 13 struck down the mandate for health care workers declaring it null, void, and of no effect.
Holding the New York Department of Health lack the authority to impose it.
The state appealed, but separately won a stay against the initial ruling.
The stay reinstated the mandate, affecting an estimated 34,000 health care workers.
Hintze said the result of the pending appeal, the original lawsuit, is now moot.
However, he requested the lower court decision striking down the mandate be vacated.
Sgt.
Gibson, Attorney Representative, plaintiffs oppose the request on good grounds.
According to a joint statement issued by CHD and Gibson, In what can only be described as pure gamesmanship, New York State asked the court to withdraw their appeal but overturned the lower court's decision without looking at the merits on the ground that it was now moved.
What this means is New York wants the victory Sipsha Gibson and Children's Health Defense already obtained in the lower court to be thrown out because they announced a plan to withdraw the mandate for health care workers.
Gibson told CHDTV, the law does not allow an agency to voluntarily stop an illegal activity and then claim they shouldn't be held legally accountable.
Well said.
According to Gibson, because the state did not follow proper procedure for repealing, the reveal is not yet official and therefore cannot serve as basis for declaring the lawsuit absolutely right.
New York State—surprise, surprise—misrepresented itself in court today by not making clear the lengthy process required to rescind the mandate.
There needs to be a public comment period, as well as hearings for the mandate to actually be rescinded.
Moreover, There's been no official announcement.
What the attorney has asked the court to do is take their word for it that they will eventually rescind the mandate.
I agree with her 100%.
The court proceeding should go forward, vitiate the mandate, make it a formal legal proceeding, and put an end to this.
Commenting on today's news, Kim Mack Rosenberg, acting outside General Counsel for CHD, reported, In a surprise move at the top of the argument, the state's attorney notified the court the state would be rescinding the order, a clear victory.
However, the state nonetheless asked the court to overturn the lower court victory for the health care workers who lost their jobs due to the mandate.
Representing those workers, Ms.
Gibson clearly and effectively demonstrated to the appellate panel the state's attempt to avoid accountability.
The mandate devastated the lives of over 30,000 health care workers.
Accountability is important here, both for the mandated issue and with respect to future potential actions by the state.
The January 13 ruling found the mandate to be arbitrary and capricious, noting COVIDVACs do not stop transmission, contradicting the stated purpose of the mandate to stop transmission.
New York appealed the ruling on January 24th, challenging each and every part of the decision.
Initially, the ruling remained in effect despite the appeal.
However, on February 28th, the Appellate Division granted an injunction requested by the Department of Health, placing a mandate back in effect, banning appeal.
Bad move.
In their April 17th brief responding, The plaintiffs argued the effects of the mandate were predictably devastating.
Over 34,000 health care workers have been pushed out of the field because of the mandate, causing an unprecedented crisis in New York's health care system.
Then-Governor Andrew Cuomo enacted the mandate on August 16, 2021, as an emergency regulation.
It was subsequently adopted as permanent, even on June 22, 2022, even though New York ended its emergency on June 24, 2021.
24, 2021.
In a brief submitted April 22nd, New York claimed wide authority under the law to require healthcare workers to receive the facts, argued the lack of religious exemption within its mandate was impelled by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.
The state was referring to a settlement challenge against the mandate filed by 16 health care workers.
That challenge was rejected by the Second Circuit in November of 2021.
In June of 2022, the U.S.
Supreme Court declined to hear the Workers' Appeal.
In its April 27th brief, the Department of Health claimed it narrowly tailored its mandate to protect New York's health system and, by extension, all New Yorkers from communicable diseases.
And yet, as we can see, it does not inhibit transmission.
Therefore, it has no point.
The state also claimed it relied on empirical information to determine the vaccines are effective, both because they reduce the overall number of cases and mitigate consequences of infection by reducing the likelihood of serious illness and hospitalization.
I would submit there's a mountain of evidence that they work in precisely the opposite fashion.
In a separate brief filed by the state, They claim the legislature had broadly empowered the Department of Health to issue rules that protect the public health.
The COVID vaccines are a safe and effective way, nonsense, to protect against the virus and the severe outcomes it can cause, the state argued.
In their April 17 briefs, the plaintiffs countered, only the state legislature has lawmaking authority and has opted not to add the vaccine to the list of inoculations that can legally be mandated in the state.
Plaintiffs added, the legislature enacted a statute balancing public health regulation with religious rights.
They added, too, when the vaccine mandate was codified, it was already beyond dispute that the vaccine cannot stop the spread.
Nevertheless, the mandate was made permanent, even though the regulatory impact acknowledged that the vaccine did not stop transmission.
In the initial lawsuit plaintiffs argued there was no rational basis for the mandate when they acknowledge that the vaccine do not accomplish the goal of preventing the spread.
By enacting the mandate, the department violated the separation of power doctrine by usurping the authority of the state assembly.
Moreover, by accommodating only medical exemption but not religious, the mandate violated the state's human rights law.
The lawsuit also alleged that plaintiffs had lost or at imminent risk of losing their jobs, that several had religious objections, but the mandate did not recognize them.
The original lawsuit referenced the acute health care worker shortage in New York, also recognized by Governor Honcho.
According to the lawsuit, Governor Honcho admitted her mandate was causing a crisis, preemptively declaring a state of emergency, and with that invoking emergency power the night before it took effect.
Due to the health care workers shortage and the other respondents' cause.
Despite calling in the National Guard, the crisis has only deepened since last year, and the governor has continuously renewed the State of Emergency Declaration on the ground the state faces a staffing crisis in health care, which I would add, is brought about by the mandate of January.
Nineteenth letter drafted by ten lawmakers sent to Governor Honshaw argued the mandate exacerbated the staffing shortage in the state, which is obvious.
Lawsuit also argued that the mandate was made permanent in 2022, even though the state had entered its emergency a year earlier.
According to the plaintiffs, this is a violation of multiple sections of New York's public health law.
In its January 13th ruling, the court generally agreed with the plaintiff's arguments, finding the defendants acted outside their legislative grant of authority and are clearly prohibited from mandating any vaccination outside of those specifically authorized by the legislature.
As a result, wrote the court, The mandate is beyond the scope of respondents' authority and is therefore null, void, and of no effect.
And respondents, their agents, officers, and employees are prohibited from implementing or enforcing the mandate significantly.
The court noted the mandate did not draw upon special expertise in the field, finding it clear such expertise was not utilized as a COVID shot do not prevent transmission.
While the term fully vaccinated within the mandate was defined at the whim of the state and therefore arbitrary and capricious.
Notably, Even though New York's emergency has not been in effect since June of 2021, state taxpayers continue to fund Excelsior Pass, New York's digital vaccine passport, to the tune of $200,000 a month, according to the New York Post.
This expenditure relates to the cost of maintaining the personal information of 11 million New Yorkers stored within the platform.
Chris, this governor of New York is just a monster.
I mean, how pathetic is this?
Seems to be a tradition there.
I think Cuomo was pretty bad.
What he did with the lockdowns was atrocious enough and then the mandates on top of that.
You know, this goes next level in terms of jacronian overreach and violation of civil liberties and even the HIPAA Act and everything else too.
I could go on and on for hours.
Won't take up your whole show talking about this as we talked about it before.
Yeah, the two-week lockdown was supposed to be turned into two years.
And if you think about it, they really created an entire sociological experiment, like something that made the Stanford experiment in the 70s look pretty mild.
Live Nation banned people who were unvaccinated from attending live events or sporting events, things of that, public assembly, things of the sort, completely subverting the Constitution on so many different levels.
Even free speech in terms of censorship and gaslighting and censoring the victims.
This is just next level stuff.
If you think about the mandates then being brought on with DoD contractors, government employees, medical personnel, first responders.
To get something like this so wrong, the COVID thing and then the Vax thing even worse.
Like I say, you get into that cover-up in the mens rea and them trying to crawdad away from this type of situation.
But you can really see them putting in these steps and orchestrating the quote-unquote need to declare the emergency so that they can bring in the vaccine.
And if you think about it, not only do they withhold the data on the safety or the dangers of this, they completely undermine that with the safe and effective advertising campaign subsidized by the Federal Reserve and put onto the debt of the taxpayers.
So it goes beyond just withholding data.
It goes to censorship.
Like I said, gaslighting victims, the infantilizing, the discourse, the peer pressure they put on through social influencing and mainstream media, the economic vested interest as well.
Think about how much these medical institutions were getting paid to not only diagnose the COVID thing, the incentives for that, the test of the COVID, and then, of course, the vaccines as well.
So, yeah, these guys are getting paid a lot of money to put this damage on the American people.
And then now that I think the people are a little bit pissed, they're kind of slowly trying to step this down and walk away from it like as if nothing ever happened without making too much of an obvious move.
So yeah, as far as New York City and many other of these Democratic states, pretty much everyone except Florida has incringed on the life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness, and more importantly, the right to own property in many of these places.
Most people moved out of these places to come to the sanctuary of Florida and even other places, Canada as well, and many other places that have been locked down with this bullshit.
And if you think, Cuomo got misdirected with that groping scandal after he killed, what, 40,000 seniors in these retirement homes or in these assisted living facilities, locking them down, basically isolating them from their loved ones, neglecting them in terms of medical treatment.
And then in the place of medical treatment, they actually give them this death shot in this This whole thing.
I mean, to get this so wrong, you know, the stupidity is not this consistent.
And I just have to say that this seems to me something entirely more malevolent.
And they really have created not only A psychological warfare and damage on the people that have been put through this, but a social destruction as well.
If you think about this lockdown situation and the atmosphere that it created, the element of fear, everyone's a bio-warfare threat.
This whole thing turned into an absolute witch hunt at best.
And of course, like I said, it's a violation of HIPAA and health insurance and privacy acts.
So, yeah, I think they crossed so many lines on this that it's almost like they're just going after some of the minor stuff when really there's even some more major stuff that has to even be acknowledged or even dealt with or in terms of restitution dealt with completely.
Yeah.
So I'm hoping that a citizen's tribunal will come out and the data will be presented and that these people will get what they righteously deserve.
Anybody that stood behind this madness.
Excellent.
Excellent, Chris.
Meanwhile, check this out.
Well, Canada is seeking to roll out a central bank digital currency, and right now is sort of an open period where they're asking the public for feedback on a central bank digital currency.
How is this going right now?
This public period where they want feedback from its citizens?
Well, the answer is it's not going very well.
Dan Cohen, our Washington correspondent from Redacted, joins us now to dive deeper into the story.
So, Dan, I'm surprised.
That the public is not really taking to the idea of total surveillance currency in Canada.
A total shocker.
I don't know how the Canadians couldn't go for this, Clayton.
So the Bank of Canada rolled out a survey this week saying that it's seeking public input on digital currency.
Watch the video that goes along with it.
Here at the Bank of Canada, we're exploring the possibility of issuing a digital version of cash.
Not to replace cash, but to ensure Canadians always have access to a safe, stable and official payment option in an increasingly digital world.
You may be thinking, I don't need a digital Canadian dollar right now.
And you'd be right.
But Canadians may need one in the future.
So the Bank has to be ready if and when Parliament makes that decision.
Part of being ready is hearing from you.
Your input will help us make choices about the design of our digital dollar, ensuring it's convenient, easy to use, and meets your needs.
So please head over to our website and fill in our survey.
So that was senior deputy governor Carolyn Rogers and you know first of all note that she says that this CBDC is not a replacement for cash.
Now that's false.
Here is the Atlantic Council's description of Canada's CBDC project.
Quote, as per the BOC, that's the Bank of Canada, the BOC's 2020 paper, the primary motivations for issuing a CBDC would be a sufficiently cashless economy, which could make the use of the Canadian dollar in its physical form limited.
So that is totally false.
from that deputy governor in Canada, who's promoting this survey.
So they actually put the survey on Twitter, and it's pretty glorious.
The responses are, as you can imagine, overwhelmingly negative.
Turns out Canadians do not want CBDC, or at least according to this government survey.
Check these out.
We have Anne Roll who says, I have a digital dollar.
I have my bank card, Visa, Visa Debit, PayPal, Apple Wallet, Apple iPhone, Apple Watch.
I also carry cash in my wallet.
Big fat no from me.
Then we have Eileen Osorio says, definitely not voting against the digital Canadian dollar.
I'm not okay with surveillance and having my money cancelled at the whim of the government.
And then she says, also not sure what the benefits are given it still loses purchasing power.
So, I mean, I think those are great points.
We saw what happened with the Canadian truckers when they protested against vaccine mandates while their accounts were frozen for engaging in peaceful protest.
Yeah, and we should point out that when people tried to donate money to those individuals, that money was also frozen.
So GoFundMe accounts and Venmo and PayPal and all sorts of things were taken away from these people.
And it's refreshing to hear the idea, of course, that this would, I mean, we know that this is, the plan is to replace cash.
We know this from the World Economic Forum, the plan is to get rid of cash.
So it is heartening to hear these Canadian citizens aware of this process, that this is the first stage.
Removing cash out of the society is the next step in this process.
Chris, no doubt.
I mean, I expect they're going to go forward anyway.
The government don't give a damn about what the people think.
It's just a charade.
It's a pretense.
It's faux democracy.
They could care less.
They're going to do it anyway, come what may.
Absolutely.
The government is proving itself to be just an instrument of this aristocracy, this self-appointed nobility that seems to take hold over the entire public and use this notion of democracy to not only use it as an instrument of perception management to serving the will of the quote-unquote majority, but it manufactures this and everything else in terms of propaganda.
And as far as CBDC and blockchain is concerned, I am an advocate against it.
I think it is a digital tally stick, an intangible value.
It is an airbasket.
It can be flipped on or off in the second that you defy any sort of issue that these guys don't like.
It's a great way to keep the voodoo supply-side economics going.
It is the ultimate carrot and stick mechanism, if you ask me, to bring in this technocratic feudalism.
And if you ask me, back in 1913, the creation of the Federal Reserve and this quote-unquote cash and the dollar was the exact same thing to get off the gold and silver species.
So, yeah, this fractional reserve banking system and factored in with compound interest and selective tokenization in terms of lending requirements and lending insider lending.
This is an absolute way to take over the entire world and to create the perception that is somehow a democracy.
This is a hostile takeover and acquisition at best.
Think about what they're doing with consolidating the small and medium banks under the House of Morgan and JP, who I think is a Fed proxy from the get go.
So yeah, these are the guys manipulating the big time markets and just about everything in terms of derivatives or hypo allocated Commodities or things of the sort you go on and on with the mortgage backed securities and everything else JPMorgan has got 56 trillion in derivatives alone and somehow or another they're taking over these banks that are being rendered insolvent by this economic upturn.
So yeah, I don't think this is an accident.
I think it's a controlled demolition.
This is like a consolidation of the banking sector in the same way with the crypto sector, as you saw maybe with the dot-com bubble and software companies in the late 90s.
So this is the same formula, same playbook run by the same group of cabal banksters and criminals, if you ask me.
Organized crime has taken over the will of the people by this, and it's using the governments as a proxy.
And then the second that the people realize this, they'll turn over the governments, which is the last line of regulation or some sort of compliance or authority over these institutions in itself.
And And then from there, the people are really going to be in a bad spot.
You know, Skynet's going to rule the world.
Very nice, Chris.
Yeah, I think the threat of dirt oil currency is simply huge.
Meanwhile, how Black Lives Matter got police violence wrong.
In the early 2000s, the U.S.
enjoyed comparative racial optimism.
Majorities of black and white felt race conditions were improving.
Even left-leaning NPR highlighted colorblindness as an ideal.
A generation later, however, race relations have nosedived.
We regularly hear about systemic racism and white supremacy.
Colorblindness is now considered racist.
The whiplash may leave people wondering what happened.
The 2014 collapse in race relations.
The collapse began in 2014.
Exactly why is unknown, though it coincided with the debunked, heads-up, don't-shoot framing of the Michael Byron killing and a larger Great Awakening where extreme identarian views became more influential on the political left.
Since 2014, little data suggests race disparities have gotten worse.
Racist attitudes are at an historic low.
However, news media coverage worrying about racism soared.
I studied this empirically in 2021.
I wanted to see whether actual police shootings of unarmed black men correlated with race relations or whether news media coverage highlighting police shootings was a better predictor.
It turned out race relations are unrelated to actual police shootings.
But correlate with news media coverage, which tend to obsess over shooting of black Americans while ignoring shootings of other individuals, especially white.
Look at this!
Here's what black lives matter with protesting the minuscule percentage of blacks killed by whites.
Call that one percent.
Ten times as many whites are killed by blacks and blacks killed by blacks.
Whites killed by whites, but blacks killed by blacks 55 times more often.
The moral panic over the 2020 murder of George Floyd, which appears to have been fake, the U.S.
experienced a racial reckoning.
News media claim police were systematically targeting black Americans for fatal violence.
Defunding or even literally abolishing policing became serious policy proposals.
The U.S., we were told, was systemically racist.
That policing and race is complex and nuanced.
Police killings of unarmed suspects are rare.
And they've been declining.
The number peaked at 95 for all races in 2015, declining to 32 for all races in 2021.
When it comes to police shooting unarmed individuals, white suspects are shot more often than black.
By contrast, Asians are rarely shot by police compared to either group.
Though more unarmed whites than blacks are killed by police, black suspects are indeed proportionately overrepresented.
However, commission of violent crime is also ethnically disproportional.
Black and Hispanic men commit violent crime disproportionately more often than white or Asian.
Police shootings and commission of violent crimes so neatly track one another is no coincidence.
One might conclude over-representation of black Americans as perpetrators of violent crime might be due to over-policing of black communities.
However, when we look at victims of homicide, most of whom are the same races or killers, we see the same pattern of black victims being over-represented.
This means the over-policing hypothesis does not fit the data.
It's also worth noting most young men of any ethnicity do not commit violent crimes.
Race itself is no determinant of violent crime.
In one recent study, although racial composition in neighborhoods predicted violent crime, race no longer predicted violent crime, What's other community factors such as insufficient food, housing issues, air pollution, and proportion of single-parent homes are controlled?
Here you see race bi-capita.
The overwhelming majority of crimes in all categories are committed by blacks throughout the United States.
The only area in which that's untrue has to do with alcohol-related because Native Americans have a genetic incapacity to absorb alcohol.
In every other category, blacks predominate, committing overwhelmingly more crimes than any other race.
Studies largely find the same thing when it comes to excessive use of police force.
We found class issues, particularly communities experiencing higher levels of mental health issues, not race, Predicted reports of excess police force, except for Latinos, who reported less, to be fair.
Studies on this do vary in conclusion.
However, in my view, a weight of evidence suggests that class, not race, predicts excessive police force.
We found higher levels of mental health problems among community residents.
Predicted reports of excessive police force.
This is probably because police are coming into contact with mentally ill residents who may escalate an encounter that began over something trivial.
Other studies suggest The chronically mentally ill more often experience physical force during police encounters.
The mentally ill may struggle to respond to aggressive police commands.
Thus, relatively minor encounters initially may intensify into dangerous situations.
Better police training with mental illness may help.
We have crime statistics, however, confirming blacks and Latinos commit most of the violent crimes.
This is back in 2014.
Shootings.
75% black, 22% Latino.
That's 97% black or Latino.
teens, 75% black, 22% Latino.
That's 97% black or Latino.
Murder, 62%.
32% Latino.
94% murders Black or Latino.
Rape.
Latinos higher.
46% Black.
43.
89% of rape, Black or Latino.
If New York City were all white, rape would be down 83%.
Murder, 91.
Shooting, 96.
Black 43, 89% are rape, black or Latino.
If New York City were all white, rape would be down 83%, murder 91%, shooting 96%.
Progressive fixes have often made matters worse.
Though often ostensibly speaking on behalf of minorities, progressive theories on race have often made practical situations worse.
The most obvious cost to low-income neighborhoods has been in delegitimizing or even defunding police and the predictable surge in crimes that create it.
Evidence suggests George Floyd protests and riots were associated with increased resignations of police officers and decreased policing in high-crime neighborhoods.
These, in turn, were associated with increased violent crime.
Surprise, surprise!
There are more subtle harmful impacts as well.
Informing people they're at ever-present danger from police can be traumatizing.
Research has long demonstrated that convincing people they're victims causes them to perceive injustice where it may not actually occur.
It doesn't help BLM.
That they have undermined confidence in their mission through a lack of transparency on financial matters and spending millions on mansions for their leaders with a comparative leader to show how they've helped ordinary black poor or working class people.
There's a wide gap between thinking the U.S.
is a racial natopia and that it's an early 20th century apartheid state.
But if we promote pessimistic narratives that are not well grounded in data and focus on solutions that emphasize our differences in complex, we may actually risk the exact bad outcomes we had hoped to alleviate.
Here you see, for example, all the gun control laws in the Democratic cities has promoted murder in those cities.
Taking weapons away from law-abiding citizens does not decrease homicides, it exacerbates them.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, you know, one thing I really think you need to focus on, or not you particular, but the actual person that may be looking at all this go on, is that the certain haplogroup that ran the actual slave trade is now the one leading this whole social justice type of NGO movement and doing so through third-party proxies.
They're the same polluters that are running the climate change racket too in that shakedown.
So they're the same guys that put on the tough on crime or the war on drugs or the for-profit prisons or the trade deals for that matter, the IDF trained police for that matter.
How about giving them excess military surplus weapons too to the police?
They're the same ones that have left to the currency debasement and the culture debauchery that has gone on using instruments like rap or mainstream media or Hollywood to create this this aggrandizement of the quote-unquote thuggy population.
They did the same thing in India back in the 1800s.
So yeah.
They're the same ones that are, you know, doing this predatory lending in all these inner-city neighborhoods.
They're the same ones that put on these subpar educational systems.
The LBJ Greater Society, they're the same ones that were behind that whole thing.
the selective tokenism in terms of reparations and creating this whole thing.
Uh, they're the same ones that have gained the judicial system and certainly are pandering to this minority demographic in such a way that they weaponize it against the, the other parts of the caste system.
Uh, seems to me the middle class in the white, uh, Anglo American, uh, uh, families are being targeted more by, by the, uh, super predators in Congress and in these banking institutions and being dispossessed and depropper, uh, relieved of their property at a higher rate.
So like now in the face of that righteous outrage, they of course have to find a way to get that to be channeled towards or against something that really had nothing to do with it.
And of course going after the whites from the blacks is another thing, you know, saying that the whites ran the slave trade, you know, or whatever they're saying.
You know, it's the same thing.
It's them playing the caste system against one another.
And, of course, in the course of that outrage and the misdirection, the true culprits get away, and they reside above suspicion in terms of dialogue and discourse.
Yeah.
Wonderful, Chris.
Wonderful.
Just stunning how bad the situation is and how much worse the Democrats have made it.
Meanwhile— I think— Sorry to jump in on you.
I think the Democrats have always been the party of slavery and I think right now that they still are if you think about it Wilson brings in the Federal Reserve, and they use this whole freedom independence model to put people into further slavery, you know that the slaves when they know their slaves won't work as hard but if they think they have an opportunity of freedom or it's like some sort of a, you know, a thing that they're at stake with or they can hustle and work their way out of that of course.
Brilliant.
You're going to basically put these people on an eternal hamster wheel and carry it and stick them into their own self-destruction.
So I think that's very much a part of the model that they have.
It's maybe not slavery by its proper nomenclature, but it's debt slavery nonetheless.
And it's every nation, every race is pretty much dealing with this thing in a departmentalized fashion.
Brilliant.
Great.
And meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail to live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
Live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
Here's a comment from a dear friend and colleague, writing to Will.
As for the case of every president since JFK, Biden—this should probably read Obama—totally relies on his national security state apparatchiks.
They are long since fed up to their eyeballs in the Ukraine case, way too far in reverse course.
A reversal would make them look like idiots.
Read National Security and the Double Government, 2015, by Michael J. Glenn and C. Wright Mills, back in 1956.
Centralization of power among officials who hold a common worldview and also operate in secrecy produces a military metaphysics.
The end result is the maintenance of a permanent war economy.
Irving Janis, groupthink.
The greater the esprit corps of a group, the greater the danger that critical independent thinking will be shut down by groupthink.
Witness the wise men during the Vietnam War.
Justice Douglas, a Kennedy family friend, saw this national security state firsthand.
In reflecting on Jack's relation to the generals, I slowly realized that the military were so strong that no president could stand against them.
We all know what happened when JFK actually tried to do it.
The courts have never stopped a war except for once.
In 1973, Justice Douglas issued an order to stop bombing in Cambodia.
That cessation lasted for nine hours, after which the Supreme Court overruled it.
National security apparatchiks have no time to examine the global implications of their long-held biases.
They are too busy working nights and weekends.
As Robert McNamara said after the Vietnam disaster, We often did not have time to think straight.
Here is the bottom line for a national security state.
Whether the policy is the most effective or the most realistic is not the point.
All that matters is appearance.
For that, the chief requirement is that policy must be seen as hard-hitting.
Our Ukraine policy perfectly meets this requirement.
Since Truman established the CIA in 1947 and the NSA, purely by presidential edict in 1952, Benjamin Franklin's republic has vanished.
The very existence of the NSA was not even publicly admitted until the 1970s.
Don't look for help from the court, for example, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
Between 1979 and 2013, the FISA granted 35,311 of 35,333 requests for surveillance warrants.
They turned down only.
I think that would be 22 if the numbers were right, which is six hundredths of a percent.
As one executive described it, this is our robust legal regime.
It really is all about appearance.
Substance is irrelevant.
Substance has long since been vaporized, and it will never return.
Too many powerful jobs and pensions depend upon it.
So keep sending those wizards your tax dollars.
David Pantic, MD, PhD, the leading expert on the medical evidence in the assassination of JFK and my dear colleague since 1992.
A response from Will?
David, I think given Ukraine F-16 jets is putting us one step closer to Armageddon, I think Biden and the people running the war do not realize that a nuclear war is an extinction-level event.
Humans will not survive.
Final thoughts, Chris, yours.
Well, you know, it makes me think about the JFK thing, and when Lyman Lemnitzer brought over the Operation Northwoods program about taking down Jets, basically 9-11 of the 1960s, JFK said he never wants to see that guy again.
I think that was Army Chief of Staff at the time, or it might have been his Chief of Staff, I don't know.
Oh, he was the Joint Chiefs, Herman, the Joint Chiefs.
Yep, okay, good, good.
Yep, thanks.
Yeah, so yeah, there's definitely a group of power mongers that are in charge and unelected in charge of our government, more importantly our military activities.
In terms of like coups and these type of situations, you can obviously see this war has been waged abroad and now it's even waged domestically against their own populations through maybe different means, maybe through the private sector and the NGO now more so than the actual intelligence or military.
But nonetheless, it is still being waged.
And as far as this whole thing's concerned, man, I don't know what to do with it.
I just will say that at some point in time, you know, the truth has to matter and justice has to be relevant too.
I'm really hoping that at some point in time, the multitudes will just come together and really get rid of this aristocracy, this 1% that has tried to create confusion and contempt amongst our ranks.
And basically that this contempt and confusion should be seen through and redirected towards a better purpose.
Also, since it's Final Thoughts, I will put on that I recently just got on Twitter, CWynert21.
If you guys ever want to get on there and hear what I got to ramble about or whatever, I only get a few characters per post, but that's kind of what's going on there.
We'll see how long I last before I get kicked out of there, but I'm going to give it a shot and see how it goes, you know, the old Twitter test.
So, I know it's slightly unrelated to the topic at hand, but since it's Final Thoughts, I wanted to throw that in there too.
CWiner21 at Twitter, I recommend you follow Chris.
This guy is brilliant.
I love his commentary.
They're absolutely sensational.
Program after program after program, Chris is spot on and adding many points that deepen and enrich our understanding of what's going on.
You don't want to miss any of it.
Any of it.
Let me say on Memorial Weekend, Spend as much time with your family, friends, and people you care about.
Nuclear war is a real prospect now.
Wargaming is going on.
It's absolutely catastrophic.
There will be, I don't know, 90 or 100 million dead in the first hour.
In the first hour.
And that's before it comes to your neighborhood.
And if the nukes don't get it, the migrants are gonna be next.
They're gonna be arriving.
They're going to be coming in fully harmed?
The Biden admin has been using non-law enforcement related agencies like the Environmental Protection to acquire billions in arms for which they have no discernible programmatic use.
They are stockpiling them for the millions of migrants being brought across the border.
So you got an army coming in without arms.
You got the arms awaiting them and DHS, of all things.
Think about it.
The Department of Homeland Security is supposed to be protecting Americans.
They're facilitating the invasion of America.
And they're giving cell phones to all the migrants so they can communicate and coordinate, tell them where to find the weapons to use to kill Americans.
I'm not joking.
This is what's going on.
This is what's happened when you put miscreants in charge.
Actually, it wasn't voluntary.
They stole the election so they could destroy America.
Mark my words.
If you're unable to defend yourself, you're going to find yourself in the near future, sad to say, in a real predicament.
Even dead.
We can count on the constitutional chefs if they'll only demonize their fellow citizens of their states to create enormous posses to cope with this invasion.
But absent that development, and it's by no means assured it's going to happen, America is dead.
Don't let it happen to you.
Put up a fight.
That's certainly my intent.
Think about it.
▲
Export Selection