Need to Know (3 May 2023) with Joe Olson and Chris Weinert
|
Time
Text
This is Jim Fetzer of Madison, Wisconsin, delighted to be joined today by Joe Olson from Houston, Texas, and Chris Weinert from Fort Myers, Florida.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
Ukraine sent a drone to take out Putin.
It was destroyed, but we're getting a reminder of Trump's warning that Joe Biden would create World War III.
By now, most Americans realize the government, the U.S.
government, is conducting a proxy war against Russia and Ukraine.
The foundation began in 2014 with the buildup of weapons after we took out the pro-Russian government.
As part of these efforts, after threatening and then destroying the Russian gas pipelines, the Biden admin denied involvement, sought to blame Russia, as if Putin would destroy his own infrastructure, dumb as it gets.
Keeping with this continuum of escalating conflict, NATO has sent depleted uranium weapons to Ukraine.
Now, last night, a drone attack on the Kremlin was conducted.
Ukraine is denying any involvement, which would imply the United States, likely the CIA, carried out a direct attack without informing President Zelensky.
Regardless of whose line, Ukraine or the U.S., one of them carried out the attack.
It was a good time to remind us all of Trump's words and policy.
Every day this proxy battle in Ukraine continues that we risk global war.
We must be absolutely clear.
Our objective is to immediately have a total cessation of hostilities.
All shooting has to stop.
We have never been closer to World War III than we are today under Joe Biden.
A global conflict between nuclear armed powers would mean death and destruction on a scale unmatched in human history.
It would be a nuclear Armageddon.
Nothing is more important than avoiding antiwar.
We will avoid it, but we need new leadership.
Every day it continues.
The State Department, the Defense Bureaucracy, the Intel Services, the rest need to be completely overhauled and reconstituted and fired the deep state and put America first.
We have to finish the process we began under my administration of fundamentally reevaluating NATO's purpose and NATO's mission.
Our foreign policy establishment wants to pull the world into conflict with a nuclear-armed Russia based on the lie that Russia represents our greatest threat.
But the greatest threat to Western civilization is not Russia.
It's probably more than anything else ourselves and some of the horrible USA-hating people that represent us.
It's the abolition of our national borders, failure to police our own cities, destruction of the rule of law from within, the collapse of the nuclear family and fertility rates like no one can believe is happening, It's the Marxists who would have us become a godless nation worshiping at the altar of race and gender and environment.
And it's in globalist class that has made us totally dependent on China and other foreign countries that hate us.
The globalists want to squander all of America's strength, blood, and treasure, chasing monsters and phantoms overseas, while keeping us distracted from the havoc they're creating right here at home.
These forces are doing more damage to America than Russia and China could have ever dreamed.
Evicting the sick and corrupt establishment is the monumental task for the next president, and I'm the only one who can get the job done.
Meanwhile, Max Sennett tweets, the Kremlin says its military and secret service acted timely to shoot down the drones.
Russia reserves a right to take retaliatory measures when and where it sees fit.
Locals posted video overnight of the apparent aftermath.
Here you have one illustration.
check it out.
I dare say this is not going to go down well with Vladimir Putin.
And he most certainly has the ability to do something about it.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well in the last two years, Jim and I have done 350 interviews on BitChute.
I co-host on TNT Radio, so I do that program two hours every Saturday.
I've been a guest on over a dozen programs on TNT with other hosts.
I have other venues where I'm making presentations, including one with Vincent James at Red Elephant.
On and on and on.
Last month, I went to an event in Elgin, Texas with Scott Ritter.
Got a signed copy of his book, Disarmament in the Age of Perestroika.
And in that book, he said that in 1983, Russia had 12,000 nuclear warheads, 900 of them were 150 kiloton warheads, and that they were on command to So that's how close we were to snuffing the whole damn planet in 1983, and luckily we were able to pull ourselves back from that.
Now, I'm not going to give Trump a pass.
Russia by the United States or NATO.
So that's how close we were to snuffing the whole damn planet in 1983.
And luckily, we were able to pull ourselves back from that.
Now, I'm not going to give Trump a pass.
In 2017, he gave Zelensky $40 million.
In 2020, Congress passed $400 million of military aid to Ukraine, and Trump called them up and said, well, I want you to tell me what's going on with this Hunter laptop persecution that got squashed.
And that's why he got impeached.
And so he turned around and signed it.
So I'm not giving him a pass on that.
But other big things are happening.
We had yesterday the head of the Ukrainian Defense Ministry Resnikoff said that a big attack was coming soon, and all they got in the way of a big attack is to try to take out the military leadership in Russia, which will be all congregated on Victory Day, May 9th, in Red Square.
And then also, interestingly enough, in Bakhmut, Ihor Kansurya, who was the commander of the Ukrainian forces, a major general that was commanded in that location, was snuffed over the weekend.
So, you know, we have the potential.
And also, they dropped six Kenzar missiles on Kiev, and one of them was a kilometer away from where the presidential palace is for Zayolinsky.
So, you know, he kind of sent them a clear message.
That was after they attacked Crimea.
And so it's like, OK, you want to keep playing this little game?
I can play it better than you guys, because they're crushing them all across the entire front in eastern Ukraine.
And they've got air superiority all the way to the Polish border, and we can take out, Russia can take out anything they want, and NATO is feckless.
But the problem is, Joe Biden said that he is a leader.
He is the sole authority for starting a nuclear war in the United States, and nobody can question him when he decides to push the little red button.
And who knows when that little idiot's going to poop in his pants and decide it's time to stuff the world.
I hate that FJB bastard.
Thank you.
Well, Putin's just a puppet.
I mean, literally, this is an actor wearing a latex mask, Joe, so he's not actually pushing any buttons.
The real Joe Biden died in 2017.
This is just an actor.
But the risks are serious, without any doubt.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, you know, I'm thinking about this.
All these politicians who are massively trying to disarm us and dispossess us and depopulate us are these very same ones who are funding and directing these attacks and these coups and everything, not only in Ukraine, but even in our own country, their power has come as a result of what I believe to be a coup and certainly a usurped democratic election.
So you're really seeing what's going on when you got a maniac at the helm and I think really Not only the amount of debt, but the failures of diplomacy and the immense dishonesty of this administration is probably unparalleled in this national history and maybe even human history, and that's quite a statement.
Think about this, too, is how instrumental most of these very same politicians in power right now were in bringing in Obamacare so that everybody can afford to be vaxxed, too.
Yep, yep, yep.
Okay, good, good, good.
Meanwhile, Biden's team is worried about the aftermath of a failed Ukrainian counteroffensive, and I guarantee you, it will fail.
The Biden admin is quietly preparing that if the counteroffensive falls short, critics at home and allies abroad will argue America has come up short, too.
Ukraine's ever-imminent counteroffensive will attempt to retake Russian-seized territory, most likely in the east and south, though officials from Kiev had not detailed specifics.
You don't do that when you're talking about actionable intelligence.
In fact, talking about this counteroffensive, in my opinion, is about as dumb as it gets.
Biden's team has offered unwavering support, pledging to help it as long as it takes.
But if the impending season yields limited gains, admin officials have expressed privately they may be faced with a two-headed monster attacking it from both sides.
One will argue Ukraine's advance would have worked had the admin given Kiev everything it asked for—longer-range missiles, fighter jets, more air defense.
The other will claim Ukraine's shortcoming, believe it, can't force Russia out of its territory.
And believe me, they cannot force Russia out of its territory.
That doesn't even account for the reaction of America's allies, who may see a peaceful negotiation as a more attractive option if Kiev can't brew victories around the corner.
Officials stress they're doing everything possible to make this spring offensive succeed, We've nearly completed the request of what Ukraine said it needed.
We've searched weapons and equipment over the past few months.
The official who, like others, has granted anonymity.
But belief in the cause is one thing.
Belief in the tactics, another.
Behind closed doors, the admin is worried about what Ukraine can accomplish.
Those concerns built out into the open due to the leak of the Air Force National Guardsman, who followed in the tradition of Edward Snowden and, in fact, Ellsberg Daniel, the assessment which showed that American forces had been in Ukraine before the Russian intervention and that Ukraine is losing the war.
Ukraine hoped to sever Russia's land bridge to Crimea.
Officials, however, in the U.S.
are skeptical that'll happen.
There are hopes in a Pentagon.
Ukraine will hamper Russia's supply lines even if a total victory over Russia's newly fortified troops ends up too difficult to achieve.
Moreover, U.S.
intel indicates Ukraine doesn't have the ability to push Russian troops where they are deeply entrenched and the similar feeling about the battlefield elsewhere in Ukraine.
There is belief Kiev is willing to consider adjusting its goals, that a more modest aim might be sold as a win, as a ceasefire rather than permanent peace talks, but I have seen no indication Zelensky's even remotely interested in discussing.
Incentives that could be offered?
NATO-like security guarantees?
Right.
Economic help from the European Union or military aid to replenish and bolster Ukraine's forces?
They've expressed hope of re-engaging China to push Putin to the negotiating table as well.
Not much likely of that, but it would still lead to the dilemma of what happens next.
If the counteroffensive does not go well, the admin is only itself to blame for withholding certain types of arms and aid at a time when it was most needed, said Kurt Volker, special envoy for Ukraine during the Trump admin.
A counteroffensive that doesn't meet expectation will also call to allies to question how much more they can spare if Kiev's victory looks further and further away.
European public support may wane as European energy and economic costs stay high after taking out the Nord Stream especially.
A fracturing of transit lag support will likely hurt U.S.
domestic and Congress, and the Biden admin may struggle to sustain it.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, so I'm glad you mentioned Nord Stream because there's a great interview with Patrick Henningsen.
He is a talk host on TNT on a weekly basis, but he also did an interview, and also he's the founder and editor at 21st Century Wire for the last 10 years, but he did a great interview with Kim Iverson, and they've got absolutely more corroborating evidence that Seymour Hersh was 100% correct in his Biden group knocking out the Nord Stream.
And that's nothing but environmental terrorism against our allied Germany.
So also, we heard that Schultz said that no weapons that Germany has provided to Zyolinski can be used outside of the Ukrainian borders.
And if they are, there'll be serious repercussions.
And then we also had that Ritchie Sunak idiot over in UK saying, yes, we sent Challenger tanks and we also sent a nuclear bomb.
depleted uranium armor-piercing shells.
And those things, we dropped 300 tons in the first Iraq war in 91 Desert Storm, and then we dropped another 1,700 tons during Iraqi, quote, freedom, during Iraqi, quote, freedom.
And we turned all of Iraq into a poisonous waste zone for the next 1,000, 2,000 years because that stuff, when it goes through the armor of a tank, the kinetic energy of the artillery shell causes it to vaporize, and then it forms a uranium poisonous dust cloud that and then it forms a uranium poisonous dust cloud that fills an entire 50-meter area.
And that's insane.
And Putin's already said, if you use that, we consider it a dirty weapon, and that's nuclear warfare.
So, you know, we just keep ratcheting up until we can say, oh, they sucker punched us the same way the Japanese did.
And wait till Jim and I do our episode on FDR.
You're going to be shocked at the number of dominoes that that dirt bag allowed to be set up in order to create World War II.
And then he was the tyrant that stayed in office four terms.
What a rotten piece of crap FDR was, and we're going to prove it to you.
Well, Putin's made it very clear how he's going to regard these depleted uranium weapons, Joe, and yet the UK has already sent them to Ukraine.
This is just ludicrous, stupid, colossal stupidity, in my opinion.
Meanwhile.
Do we want Chris to comment?
Yeah, I had to bring him back in.
Chris, go ahead, comment on the counteroffensive and Biden concerns it's going to fail, which it will.
Yeah, I was even going to comment about some of the stuff you were talking about with the Biden front and the coup and everything like that.
I really think this is some sort of a test to see how much shit America will take before they finally do something, and I think that really we're seeing a whole lot being done by this group that has basically usurped power and done what it's done and is still doing what it's doing.
The absurdity and the inversions and the occultic type of celebrations these guys hold from most of these offerings To me, it should be very indicative of where their hearts, minds, and souls are at.
And it really seems like it's a controlled demolition of this country.
And I think a lot of the things that was mentioned in with Snowden or the new kid, I don't know enough about him to comment, but in Ellsberg, I come to find out that Ellsberg was involved with Lance Dale in the Phoenix program and many other things, and a contractor through Rand, and obviously a dual citizen of Israel.
So I'm wondering, you know, what the heck is really going on in terms of our country and this group that seems to be in control of it.
If you study things like the Society of the Cincinnati and what Cincinnati really did in Rome, it was to give the Romans the impression, the plebs an impression of that they had some sort of a vote in the Senate and had some sort of power of democracy.
But truly, it was nothing of the sort.
It was, you know, just a rhetorical deliverance and certainly not any sort of a pragmatic one.
So I just wanted to add those thoughts to that.
And then Snowden, of course, I think was put in.
Maybe he's he's legit or maybe he has some legit parts of him.
But I think that he was really put in to provoke the whole U.S.-Russia conflict, you know, preemptively.
And, of course, to disclose the overwhelming surveillance that would have to be disclosed for this big data selling our information like they are, you know.
Fascinating. - Good evening.
I know I'm all over the place, but I think it ties together.
No, that's great, that's great.
Former Trump advisor hits at Donald's VP choice.
This is Steve Bannon.
He said he'd definitely love for Carrie Laker, one of these strong women, to be Trump's choice.
I believe it will be Tulsi Gabbard, but there are extremely compelling reasons for him to think of Bobby Jr.
instead.
Kennedy, the 69-year-old son of former Attorney General Robert Heff, and, of course, nephew of former President John Heff, launches candidacy for the Democrat nomination in 2024.
Recent polling data actually shows him coming up very strongly.
Ralph Lindgren, a colleague of mine who's into polls right here in Madison, said he's already up over 20%.
According to a recent poll, 70% of respondents, including 51% of Democrats, believe Biden, the most elderly president ever to take office, should not compete for re-election.
And they're just being polite about it.
According to a USA Today poll, only 14% of Biden's 2020 followers have cast their votes for Kennedy.
It's got to be overwhelmingly greater than that.
If he doesn't get the Democrat nomination, he might still have a road to the White House.
Now here's where Bannon's acknowledging some of his baggage.
He's awful on guns.
He ain't terrific on Ukraine.
But he is talking about going against the admin deep state in an extremely significant way.
It would prove insurmountable if we pulled together a unity ticket with Trump and Kennedy.
It would draw many left-wing populists over.
I believe we could gain two-thirds or 70% of the overall American people.
It would be a dynamic duo.
Man, it's sad.
In addition, Bobby would make a good alternative, especially if Carrie Lake were to run for the Senate instead.
Carrie, in my opinion, although a wonderful person and candidate, is just too inexperienced to be put up as vice president.
Palsy, however, is quite the opposite.
Many of Bobby's stated goals are hardcore mega-population appealing.
He said he worked to end the corrupt merger at corporate and state power, threatening to impose an entirely novel form of corporate feudalism on our nation.
To devalue our children, our Purple Mountain's magnificence, to contaminate our kids and our fellow Americans with chemicals and drugs, to strip minor assets and ultimately hollow out our middle class and keep us in an ongoing state of war.
As a further sign why I believe Tulsi is the pick, She's endorsed at least 12 Republicans this election season.
The so-called Rethinker has only endorsed Republicans since leaving the Democrat Party.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, Tulsi, unfortunately, is pretty much a gun grabber, too.
And there's video going around of RFK Jr.
saying anybody that denies global warming belongs in jail for the rest of their life.
They deserve three hots and a cot.
Well, I thought, and somebody in the comment section put yes, but that was an old news clip.
So I searched for Bobby Kennedy and his connections with the climate, and in 2020, He co-authored a book called Climate in Crisis so he's 100% on board and I've heard recent statements just in the last month where he's supporting sustainable energy and we've got to you know cut back on fossil fuels and so he's still Mindset with that.
He did great.
I've got a copy of his book about the real Anthony Fauci.
He did great on the vaccine issue.
And then he turns around and says, but it's only the bad vaccines.
The good vaccines are great.
There's no vaccine that's great.
Absolutely.
Every one of them, even going back to the polio vaccine, caused 90 million cancer cases in the United States.
Absolutely insane that this guy would continue to say, well, it's pretty much good, but there's this little bit of bad.
And what he knows about climate science, I'd be glad to educate him, but he knows nothing about it.
I believe Tulsi's educable on the Second Amendment if she learns that millions of Americans use guns for defensive purposes, saving an estimated 200,000 lives every year, compared to maybe 70,000 who die from gun violence, over half of whom are suicides.
I think she can be persuaded.
But what you're saying about Bobby and climate change, that to me is totally unacceptable, Joe.
I agree with you.
In my opinion, that by itself disqualifies him.
We have trouble technically with Chris staying on board, so add a few more thoughts until he joins.
Jim and I, Saturday, did an episode of Real Deal on climate change, and we go into the cargo cult mentality, and this was exemplified by an anthropologist named Robert Zepper in a 20-minute long video on the cargo cult, and the folks in Micronesia about how
They had lived in a tropical paradise where nothing existed outside of their boundaries and then all of a sudden the Australians came in and landed forces and dropped off uniforms and food and all kinds of mechanized stuff and they said well where did this come from and then all of a sudden the Japanese invaded and overthrew Australians and the Japanese brought in materials and food and technology and they said, well, where'd this come from?
And then the Americans and the Australians came back and took their islands over and they said, well, these naughty white people, they stole this.
Our ancestors created all of these wonderful gifts for us and the white man stole them from us.
And this same particular mindset is the form of tribalism that's used by BLM, the mainstream media, the climate cult, the DNC, every one of these socialist mindsets is based on this same form of tribalism, this ludite behavior that, you know, the cotton pickers are the one that invented everything and it was all stolen by the plantation owners.
The whole thing is a horrible mindset.
Chris, your thoughts on Ben and Bobby, Tulsi and the like?
Well, I'd even like to add what Joe's talking about.
I agree with him completely.
And I think that it really is being foisted on the people that are being probably dispossessed the most by this entire racket and this Ponzi scheme and everything else that's being put on.
So, yeah, not only are they taking everything that we've ever worked for, but then, of course, leaving us with a political debt and capital in terms of You know, this type of global tyranny or globalization or something of the sort, this conquest that has been achieved by the same people that ran the slave trade and now currently run the slave trade through these economic means of the Federal Reserve and central banking systems.
So, yeah, if you really ask me, I think it's kind of interesting to see these guys not only sidestepping this, but putting the onus onto the actual people that they're victimizing the most.
And turning people that they've victimized for generations against them in such a way.
It's truly playing the caste system against itself and absolving the top 1% from any sort of, I guess, suspicion.
They're really above suspicion in terms of this.
And I think really, as far as the RFK thing, I think we're all worried about that, too.
president come from, or that's not part of this Judeo-Masonic bloodline that is the cadet branch of the royal crown.
If that happens, you know, then I think we might have a chance.
But basically, all these guys are in one way, shape, or form related to this bloodline.
So I think they literally have blood and skin in the game in terms of maintaining the Ponzi scheme and the rackets over the common men.
I think we're all worried about that, too.
Meanwhile, something bizarre is going on in New York City.
The Crazy Rape Lady trial against Trump is as baddy as expected.
This is bizarre.
The Crazy Rape Lady is underway.
The trial in New York City.
Author Lady E. Jean Carroll is suing Trump on fake rape charges.
The trial's become every bit as batty as we predicted.
It's going so badly, the mainstream won't even cover it.
Her story's so loopy and full of holes, MSNBC won't cover the allegation Trump raped his dean back.
I gotta correct that.
My wife's addicted to MSNBC, and I heard him talking about it just yesterday.
People forget the entire Me Too movement was one of the endless efforts to get Trump.
Once the big Harvey Weinstein allegation came out, E. Jean Carroll sprang into action, wrote a book, All the Men Who've Ever Raped Her, which is apparently enough to fill a good-sized baseball stadium.
The book was a total flop.
No one bought it.
Trump called her a liar for accusing her of rape.
He noted at the time she was ugly, not even his type.
It's observably true.
She's a hard four on her best day on a 10-point scale 30 years ago, and that was before she hit the Nikki Haley wall.
For those who don't remember, the crazy rape lady did a media blitz in all the TV stations when her book came out.
She told Anderson Cooper on CNN that rape is sexy and sensual and that all women like it.
Because she's totally not crazy.
Proving she really knows her way around men.
She then presented a hit on Anderson on live TV.
Maybe she thought she was so foxy she'd be able to convert him?
Anyway, the book was a flop.
Now the crazy gold digger is suing Trump based on fake allegations.
Trump's attorney, Joe Takapia, has been having a field day.
Her story is she was trying on lingerie at Bergdorf Goodman on Fifth Avenue back in 1996.
Actually, she can't even remember what year it was.
That's when Trump burst into the changing room.
Unable to resist a crazy ring later, he supposedly had her there.
If this gentle rape fantasy sounded familiar, that's because it copies a plotline of a 2012 episode of Law & Order Special Victims Unit.
When Dacabena asked her why her story sounded exactly like that episode, she claimed she was shocked.
In her book, she also claims CBS chief Les Moonves raped her.
She was in an elevator when Moonves got on.
Seeing the crazy rape lady, he apparently couldn't resist himself, pinned her against the wall, and ravished her, according to her book.
Tapakena asked her why she didn't sue Moonves for raping her.
She said he hadn't said mean things about her when she accused him of rape the way Trump did.
Huh?
You can get a pass for raping Eugene Curl as long as you don't issue a mean tweet about it.
Is that how it works?
She also claims she was raped by Hunter Thompson at his hot tub in his compound in Colorado.
That story sounds just like a bored housewife fantasy as all the others in her book.
In fact, a skeptic might think all of her tales of being raped by every man she's ever been in contact with seem just a little bit sketchy.
The fact that she can't even pinpoint the month in 1996, when she was supposedly raped by Trump, gives the whole thing shades of the fake Brett Kavanaugh allegation, not that the judge is making things easy.
He's forbidding Trump's defense from presenting a lot of evidence that she truly is a dingbat.
She famously called her second husband a black man and ate in public.
The judge refused to let Habakkina present the evidence because the jury is mixed race.
Still, if the mainstream is avoiding the trial, it seems likely the jury feels the same way.
Her rape fantasies are more in line with Stephenie Abrams' softcore and porn novels than with real life.
Let's hope they see through her lies and let Trump off the hook because this trial is a complete farce.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, it's all part of the DNC lawfare, where they use the corrupt judicial system to go after everybody that's an enemy of the DNC, but especially after Trump, including that dingbat brag in
District Attorney in New York City, but also over the weekend we had an interesting discussion on TNT radio with Larry Klayman, founder of Judicial Watch, and then after he left that organization he found Freedom Watch.
He's an outstanding attorney.
He's got criminal prosecutions working in dozens of jurisdictions in the United States to arrest Tony Fauci and a whole bunch of the other people that are involved in this medical But it was what was really interesting was that we were discussing several different cases that he had worked on before.
He was involved in the Bundy Ranch episode, and I had heard talk show host Pete Santilli, who had his own Las Vegas talk show, and was out at the ranch discussing what was going on.
He was arrested along with seven other people.
By the FBI, they totally framed him.
They said, okay, if you plead guilty to these misdemeanors, we'll drop all these felonies against you.
He said, I'm not going to plead those.
And so Klayman was not his attorney.
He says, I can't speak to his case, but I can tell you 100% they tried to frame the Bundys.
And the whole reason was that Harry Reid was trying to steal their land so he could sell it to a Chinese company who was going to come in and build a big solar cell plant.
But then the other interesting thing, I mentioned something and I've talked to you before on previous episodes about the number of judges.
There's eight and one Supreme on the Supreme Courts.
That's nine justices.
But then we have 179 judges that are on the 11 different district courts, and under those we have circuit courts, and under those we have district courts, and there's 670 district courts, and when they can't handle a case or they don't want to do it themselves and get their fingerprints all over it, they're allowed to appoint a magistrate.
The magistrate in the case of the Mar-Logo warrant, which was issued, is restricted to nothing but misdemeanor trial cases or civil cases between two parties that agree to have a magistrate hear their case because the magistrate was never approved by the Senate or the House, and And what happened was they picked a guy named Reinhardt.
And Clayman says, I know him 100%.
I've got a documented record of him having decades of opposition to every Republican imaginable and all of the vicious statements he made about Donald Trump prior to his appointment to sign an illegal warrant to go in and search Mar-a-Lago.
So that's the extent of the criminal justice system in this country.
It's as criminal as it could possibly be.
Oh, you got it exactly right, Chris.
Well, you know, the way they were making Trump sound, it was almost like I was visualizing an orange-flavored Kool-Aid man crashing through the locker room walls at the regional beauty pageant, you know?
It's kind of an absurdity, but, you know, these people that come off of these strong allegations that have no basis in claim or that have proven to be false face no repercussions.
I'd like to add that, too.
This is the Me Too generation.
Well, I'd like to add that everybody in some way, shape, or form has been emotionally raped by Harvey Weinstein in the Hollywood propaganda complex, so there's that as well.
As for the Hunter Thompson thing, I don't want to discount anybody's allegations, especially of a nature like that, because it's a big deal, you know, but I'd have to say it sounds way too prude for Hunter S. Thompson.
More from what I heard about him.
is from like Paul Benacci, if you remember, talking about the Boys Town scandal and Hunter S. Thompson actually forcing him to be in a snuff film.
And, you know, of course, this all ties to many of the things like the RNC chairs and the Keating Five and the Drexel Bond thing, the Milken scam, you know, which is also an extension of the Iran-Contra thing if you want to get into six degrees of separation.
And I think really that's maybe what this lady has had, too, is, you know, six degrees of separation in a lifetime of poor decision making by putting herself in some pretty awkward and bad situations, it seems.
So, not to put the onus on the victim, but I have to say that maybe she's fabricating for the sake of sensation or for self-aggrandizement, or if this is a legitimate thing, then I hope that it is investigated and justice is served.
Oh, she's totally mentally unstable, I don't have any doubt.
She can't even remember the year.
A woman who's raped only remembers the year, the month, the day, the hour, the minute.
I mean, it's just ridiculous that even this was allowed to go to trial.
I'm just astonished.
Meanwhile, Here we have John Rich tweeting.
Yes!
Joe stands up for fundamental freedoms unless it involves a first or second amendment, search and seizure, or the ability to exercise bodily autonomy when it comes to rejecting a dangerous and feckless vaccine.
Other than that, he's all about freedom.
This is in response to a tweet attributed to Biden.
Every generation has a moment when they have to stand up for democracy.
To stand up for their fundamental freedoms.
I believe this is ours.
That's why I'm running for re-election as President of the United States.
Join us.
Let's finish the job.
What bullshit.
Unbelievable.
We've never had a worse Dr. Fauci on mistakes made during the pandemic.
We have to get away from the blame game, of course, because he's the one who's being blamed, and with justification 100%.
Tony the Rat said in an interview this week, people should stop blaming public television for mistakes made during the pandemic.
CNN Christiane Amapora, Fauci, what do you think he and the scientific community got wrong with the policies they pushed and implemented?
What are the real takeaways, the real lessons for public health, he asked.
I think we have to get away from the blame game, because so many of the things you have mentioned were unknowns at the time he responded, so easy.
This is really big time Monday morning quarterbacking, which is what it is.
So rather than have a blame game, one of the things we have to stay away from, because there are things that happened, it was a moving target, there were things that you didn't know at the time, you had to out of necessity made a decision.
He knew better in every single case.
Here's Christian Amaportuiti, just about exactly what's said.
He says a school where his daughter taught shut down for two weeks and they didn't do too badly.
Some schools stayed closed for too long.
But this is pathetic.
Shutdown were not necessary, even though he's still claiming they are.
Christian, I'm a poor—you know, there are many instances, we can play and repeat many, fisticuffs with people in Congress, presidential candidates, senators, governors, dissenters, others who just basically blamed you.
They said everything you did was contrary to saving lives, as if you were in full charge.
So I realize you're going to say, well, no, I was in full charge, but I want to know what you think you and your community got wrong.
Was the closing of the schools too draconian?
How much of a delay did the fact that nobody fully understood the asymptomatic spread?
Nobody figured out it could actually bust through certain vaccine levels as well?
Fauci.
Yes, yes.
Amanpour.
What are the real takeaways, the real lessons?
Fauci.
I think we have to get away from the blame game, because so many of the things you mentioned were unknowns at the time.
It's so easy.
And I made that comment in my response to one of the questions David Wallace Wells asked me, and that is, is this the New York Times profile?
In the New York Times profile.
And I didn't mean it as an affront to him, but I said, you know, this is really big time Monday morning quarterbacking.
So rather than have a blame game, That's one of the things that happened.
It was a moving target.
There were things you did not know at the time.
You had to, out of necessity, make a decision.
Sometimes the decision was partially right.
I'll give you an example of a partially right.
When you're having trucks that were cooler trucks pulling up to hospital to put bodies in because the morgues were overflowing and the hospital beds were being challenged, you had a triage, you had to shut down.
I think anyone who has any realistic evaluation know you've got to do something dramatic.
I'm telling you, this was all bullshit.
Jason Goodman went down to the big hospital in Brooklyn where it was supposed to be overflowing and it was deserted.
All this is bullshit.
Once that's done, Fauci continues, you have to go back and analyze.
I don't think anyone would argue the fact you had to shut down.
How long you keep shut down, how complete, how that relates to schools when you shut them down.
I've been very vocal.
I think people like the point fingers.
I say, go look at the tape.
You know the tale of the tape.
I keep on saying over and over, we got to get the children back to school as quickly as possible.
Got to get them in school safely.
Got to make sure they're not essentially out of school at home, getting it over the negative consequences.
Different parts of the country interpreted that differently.
There were schools that stayed closed far too long and longer than they should have.
And there were those that essentially didn't close at all.
You know, my daughter is a schoolteacher in New Orleans.
They closed out for two weeks and were essentially open for the rest of the time.
In other schools, the result was, and the result was, you know, they didn't do too badly.
I mean, the kids got infected a lot.
Virtually.
It was very difficult to determine and say, well, if you shut down this long, you get no negative effect on the child and minimum effect on the infection.
Those studies weren't done.
It was just trying to do as best you can in the circumstances you're in.
What a rotten bastard.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, so here in Harris County, we have a Soros-funded county judge, which is not really a judge.
It's not legal.
It's just she's the one that's in charge of the Commissioner's Court for our county.
Legacy back from when Texas was an independent republic.
But anyhow, she squandered $60 million of government money to have an emergency overflow facility at Reliant Center.
And it was open for six weeks and it never treated a single patient because there wasn't a single hospital in Harris County that was overflowing with patients.
So that was absolute 100% true.
But then we have an interesting little thing happening that Maybe another little threat vector for the FJB crowd, and that is Hunter is having a child custody, I mean a child support payment.
hearing in Arkansas and just revealed today is that he has been paying $20,000 a month in child support and so far has given $750,000 to Luden Roberts that he met while she was dancing at a strip club.
So just a word to the wise men out there, do not play fallopian tube roulette with a lot lizard.
Yeah, he shows up wanting to reduce his child payments in an entourage with five limousines.
Chris, your thought?
Claiming poverty while he's got the most expensive lawyer at his desk for legal counsel, too, right?
I tell you, Bush I think had it right.
America, they hate us because of our freedoms.
And fool me once, shame on you.
While I'm throwing Bush-erisms around, it almost reminds me of Fauci in that regard, of why does everyone want to point the finger back at him after He's had his finger in the face for three years with this COVID bullshit, this gain-of-function biowarfare weapon, and the vaccine, more importantly, that I'm referring to, not the COVID.
And of course, the malevolence is not only becoming more apparent and more obvious, and you can't excuse it to ignorance or negligence or anything like that.
The mens rea, they cover up the guilt.
That no admission of guilt is very much part of the factor.
Like I say, they'll never break a Fabian in terms of this.
So they're going to still hand you that safe and effective bullshit.
They'll tell you flatten the curve two weeks, whatever.
While 29.6 million and counting Americans have filed for disability.
as a result of injury from this product, 30% of the labor force pretty much has been decimated.
And of course the COVID-polstering excuses for these labor shortages, you know, stimulus, nobody wants to work for slave wages, of course, but I don't say that.
You know, I think they're really seeing all this stuff starting to come through and the excuses are running thin and the numbers are speaking for itself.
So if you were a customer in a free market and you had this being offered to you in terms of government or leadership, would you pay for it?
Would you take on debt to finance it?
I mean, with APR like this, how could you afford not to?
So yeah, these depopulation rollouts and supply-side economic tricks Oh, I think you got that right, fellas.
And the Ponzi schemes are starting to come to an end.
And these guys are doing nothing but, you know, dancing, trying to keep the musical chairs going.
And I think it's going to come home to roost.
I think too many people are onto them.
And I think they're going to have a real hard time collecting the debts that they've created and the taxes that they demand for this level of service or disservice to its constituency.
Oh, I think you got that right.
Oh, she's not going to escape responsibility.
Meanwhile, the ripple effect of Tucker Carlson's exit from Fox Two days after his ouster, Tucker broke his silence with a video that had at least 22.1 million views, more than the number of viewers in the 8 p.m.
hour combined that day.
Fox News ratings have been down since the network parted ways with Tucker, who anchored the most-watched show not just on that channel, but on Channel News.
The future of the coveted time slot is unclear.
Tucker averaged 3.25 million viewers in the first few months.
In 2022, the show averaged 3.3 million.
Tucker had a unique appeal, due in part to his unique perspective.
Unique at least to mainstream, mainstream adjacent media, said Joss Hammer.
How long that trend lasts is anyone's guess, but many, perhaps most, viewers will come back to Fox.
But for now, it helps confirm what many already knew, Tucker's audience is deeply loyal to him and his brand.
The 8 p.m.
slot is now occupied by Fox News Tonight.
Brian Kilmeade has been hosting this week.
Former Fox News host Eric Boiling saw his ratings nearly trouble this week on Newsmax.
On April 24th, when Fox announced Tucker's departure, 2.597 million turned into Fox News Tonight.
turned into Fox News tonight.
It was a 577,000 drop from the 3.175 who tuned in the previous week.
Meanwhile, MSNBC all in with Chris Hayes and Anderson Cooper on CNN.
Newsmax had an average 531,000 and increase of 385,000 on average for its 8 p.m.
635,000 respectively.
Newsmax had an average 531,000, an increase of 385,000 on average for its 8:00 PM show.
While Fox News primetime outperformed those of their competitors, averaging 2.351 million, It was nevertheless a drastic drop for Tucker not being there.
In April, 1.704 million tuned into Fox News Tonight.
Winning the 8 p.m.
hour with a decrease of $893,000 from the previous night and a decrease of $1.519 million from the $3.223 million of the previous week.
Many of Tucker's fans are probably also big fans of Laura.
Some will go to Newsmax.
Some will probably go to non-cable internet.
Indeed, it appears to be the case that the Bumpin' Bowling Show can be attributed to Tucker being off the air.
I think Fox viewers have seen Dan Bongino not have his contract renewed.
Now Tucker fired.
It's been an eye-opener.
Fox has always been seeking to censor Trump in many ways, and a large percentage of the Fox base is very supportive of Trump.
Meanwhile, Newsmax does not censor Trump.
They carry all of Trump's rallies and live events.
This is the type of program Fox viewers seek, and that's why they're coming over to Newsmax.
Meanwhile, and I regard this as very revealing, Rupert Murdoch had an unreported call with Zelensky weeks before firing Tucker.
Scoot!
Fox News exec chairman Rupert Murdoch held a previously unreported call with the Ukrainian president this spring, in which the two discussed the worthy anniversary of the death of Fox News journalists last March.
The president had a similar conversation with his son, Lachlan Murdoch, on March 15.
The conversation came weeks before the Murdochs fired their biggest star and most outspoken critic of American support for Ukraine, Tucker Carlson.
Senior Ukrainian officials have made their objection to Carlson coverage known to Fox executives, but Zelensky did not raise it on the calls with Murdoch, according to one person familiar with the details.
Don't believe that for a second.
The Murdochs have not revealed which of Carlson's many provocations triggered his firing.
There's no particular suggestion of Lewinsky, whom Carlson had called a dictator, delivered the final blow.
Frankly, I don't any longer have any doubt about it.
Carlson's firing will immediately relieve pressure on key Capitol Hill Ukraine supporters, whom Tucker had criticized on the air, sometime pressed behind the scene to change their position on the war.
Texas Representative Michael McCaul has been among the most outspoken Republican supporters of the war in Ukraine, stepping out to occasionally reprimand figures in his own party who didn't share his views on the subject.
Last year in a segment, Tucker told viewers the Republican chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee had privately called his show Russian Disinformation.
In other words, not only are we wrong, which is fine, we are disloyal Americans.
We're doing the bidding of a foreign power, Tucker said.
That is not fine.
That is slander.
According to two familiar with the conversation, Fox News hosts also made his displeasure to McCall known in a tense private conversation In which he criticized a congressman's comments, describing him as having a low IQ.
I'm sure that is true.
A populist Republican right remains hostile to the war effort, at times openly sympathetic to Russia.
But none of Fox's other top figures share Pucker's zeal.
He spooked a lot of members into not being fully supportive of Ukraine, a senior Republican congressional aide told Semaphore.
Tucker's ouster probably reduces the loudest voice out there against U.S.
support.
Tucker had bloated the prospect he could be fired by Fox over his anti-war stance on Ukraine during an interview with redacted host Clayton Morris on March 11, just around the time as Murdoch's call.
Carlson told Marcus, one of the top people he works for at Fox, had texted him to save her the record.
I really disagree with you on Ukraine.
And I wrote back and said, I know you do.
And I'm grateful that you let me disagree with you in public.
This is someone I work for, a well-known person.
Whatever you think of Hawks, they're allowing me to say things they disagree with, and I think that's wonderful.
Or so it may have been.
I believe Ukraine was the decisive issue.
Joe, your thoughts?
Oh, I could spend an hour talking about all the defects of Mickey Mouse McCall, our rotten congressman here in Texas.
But just to put the quickest thumbnail on it possible, he married the daughter of Clear Channel.
They own 800 radio stations.
He has a net worth from that marriage of $400 million.
He bought his seat because they put Tom DeLay in In court, in Austin, the whole thing stinks.
If you knew the Texas politics behind this, that guy is absolutely a rotten globalist 100%.
But we don't need to go on anymore about him.
I'm just telling you, heads up, well, these people that run these news media companies, they've got cutouts that are more than willing to stand in place of every one of the ones that they take down.
And Fox was a takedown.
But Amazing Polly did a deep dive on Newsmax.
It's run by Chris Reddy.
I won't go into all the details that she presents, but you ought to go on BitChute, look up Amazing Polly, and look up the information on Newsmax, because it's absolutely shocking.
And then, we also have the other little thing that happened on the same day that Fox settled with Dominion Lawsuit for $787.5 million.
The day before, True the Vote was in a law case with a CCP affiliate and Dominion subsidiary, Contact, K-O-N-N-E-C-H.
They filed charges against her for her slandering him.
She's the one, True the Vote, that did 2,000 mules, absolutely stunning evidence of intentional widespread voter fraud nationwide in every county in the country.
She's an absolutely incredible woman.
I met her in person in January 2011.
Anyhow, on April 17th, she released three terabytes of data on Koenig with all the connections for CCP.
And there's over 300 terabytes of data that are in possession of the Soros-funded district attorney in Los Angeles.
Who's holding and got all that stuff sealed so that it won't come out.
But when she put that information out, it absolutely proves that Dominion has been rigging elections in dozens of countries for decades, decades and decades.
And that's the problem of, BlackRock is the controlling owner of Dominion, and Dominion owns all the other voting companies.
They own Sequoia, Park InterCivic, Election Systems and Software.
You name it, they own them all.
The problem was that if Fox went to court, they would actually be able to get discovery and prove that Dominion had rigged elections in every country, and so that was more damaging.
And guess who else is a big shareholder in Fox?
Dominion.
So is it impossible to believe that Murdoch said, well, I'm going to short Fox and I'm going to buy Dominion?
Dominion stock, because they're going to go up when I give them this settlement, and I don't care if Fox goes down or not, it's already been as useful as it needs to be, and we've got a fallback.
And one more thing about Tucker Carlson, this is going to blow your socks off.
There's a guy that does a series, Ed and Guy.
Eric Dudley, and I'm trying to remember his partner's name right this minute, it slipped my mind, but they've got a YouTube website called America's Untold Stories.
They've done probably two dozen episodes on everybody involved with JFK.
Absolutely stunning research and all kinds of stuff, but they did one recently that they just put up called, Who Was Dick Carlson?
Dick Carlson, not his real name, he changed his name when he became a reporter out in California, but that is Tucker Carlson's daddy.
And what did Tarkel Carlson do as an investigative reporter?
He outed a woman named Geraldine Elizabeth Carmichael, who was a man pretending to be a woman, had his nuts cut off and said, well, now I don't have nuts.
So that makes me a woman was involved in a car scam called the Dale Three Wheeler.
And then he also outed the tennis star Renee Richards as being a transgender.
So he outed two transgender.
His career ended there.
Then he ends up going to a bank, working for a bank for a while.
Then he ends up getting appointed to be head of Radio Free Europe.
Then he gets appointed to be head of PBS.
And then he gets.
So bottom line is he is his daddy is 100 percent CIA.
And that's exactly how this stuff happens.
Now, you know, like one of the comments, when I mentioned this earlier, somebody said, so the apple doesn't roll fall from the tree?
It's not that, that's the fact.
The fact is, the apple had to have a tree, and if you don't know the tree, you might get astroturfed, or Gaslighted by somebody that you trust.
And so far, I haven't seen anything that Tucker did that I didn't have 95% agreement with.
So I want to believe him, but by the same token, lie to me once, shame on you.
Lie to me twice.
You can't lie to me twice.
Yeah, ain't that right, Baby Bush?
Well, I have watched Tucker for years, and I'm a huge fan of Tucker, and I remain a fan of Tucker.
And I don't give a damn if his father was a mass murderer.
Tucker is a person of great integrity, and I continue to believe and have confidence in him.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, I would have to agree with that.
You're talking about Mark Grover is the other guy's name for the humbly.
Yeah, I saw that too and I've known that actually before.
I was talking a couple days ago about Tucker's family and he comes from a pedigree that has a long line of, you know, the Radio Free Europe and his father as well.
I think it's part of Mockingbird, and I'd have to say that maybe, you know, they probably keep this in the family, so there's a possibility that he could be from that lineage or from that pedigree.
And I have to say, sometimes I don't disagree with what he says, but I have to say that he was silent in some of the biggest times where maybe I'd like to have seen him say something, whether it's the COVID thing, whether it's even 9-11 and some of the other things there.
I think that really, if he were truly a groundbreaking journalist, and Ben on doing this, he would maybe put that out there, but he's also working in a very tight media restriction where he's scripted.
He's got to stay within the lanes of the acceptable topics and conversations.
I'm sure he's got to try to play that game to even have a platform to begin with.
It's a tricky slope, and I'd like to believe that he's legit.
I honestly, I'm too jaded.
I think that you don't see anybody in the mainstream media that is.
That's correct.
Thank you.
I'll just add that on many occasions I've observed, I felt it was naive about conspiracies.
They might still think 19 Islamic terrorists took us down on 9-11 and that Lee Oswald shot JFK, which are probably false.
Meanwhile, Judge Rules, Soros-funded St.
Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner must go to trial over willful neglected duties.
Joe put me onto this story today.
Gardner came under attack last week after her office skipped out on another St.
Louis shooting trial.
This person is terrible.
What's required to prove willful neglect is a public official was aware of their duty, made a conscious decision not to act in accordance.
If they refuse to perform their duty, then they are guilty of willful neglect, whether their refusal is the result of corruption, indifference, or simply inattention.
On the other hand, if they're attempting to meet their duty but do so poorly, no willful neglect may be found.
The lawsuit to remove Gardner from office is known as a Quo Warranto Petition.
Team must prove Gardner is willfully neglecting her duties.
Formitsy determined the Attorney General's arguments that Gardner willfully failed to prosecute, make charging decision, kept victims informed, and ensured defendants and victims received speedy trial do fall within the Quo Warranto Law.
The facts allege also permit the reasonable inference.
Gardner was aware of occurrences, yet took no action.
It's also reasonable if subordinates were acting on her direction or in accordance with her policies.
In February, the Missouri Supreme Court appointed Judge Torbinsky of the Eastern District A court of appeals to adjudicate the legal action by Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey to remove her from her elected position as St.
Louis Circuit Attorney.
The source funded the circuit attorney refused to perform the duties of her position.
The homicide rate and car thefts in St.
Louis rival the numbers for many major cities of a third world country.
She refuses to prosecute criminals and releases dangerous criminals back on the street.
She throws out court cases because she says the police are racist.
The final straw was an horrific crime in February when a repeat offender, 21-year-old Daniel Riley, Out on bail after violating his bond multiple times struck teenager Janae Edmondson in Iraq.
The young teen volleyball sensation lost both her legs as she was walking from a volleyball tournament with her parents.
She had a scholarship to play volleyball in college.
Riley had violated his bond over a hundred times and was still roaming the streets.
Gardner is so disliked that St.
Louis City judges asked the state Supreme Court to be excluded from deciding whether to keep Barona's circuit attorney, freeing them up to testify against her.
Once again, more background.
In August, she announced her attorney will no longer accept cases from 28 different St.
Louis City Police officers.
She called her exclusion list because they're racist.
She didn't tell the officer what they did to get on her list, but that they were being censored.
In 2019 now, for example, she refused to charge a drug dealer who is found with 1,000 opiate pills and 30,000 cash because she didn't like the cop involved.
Meanwhile, Bud Light Beer giveaway free to employees before expiration date.
Here we go.
Our data is showing the devastating impact of the Anheuser-Busch decision to reban Bud as beer for the transgender community.
The number one and number two best-selling beers in the U.S.
are now fully rebranded to consumers and destroyed.
The irony of Bud Green, the born-on-date and fresh-in-estate system in the beer industry, is just too damn funny.
Here's why.
Gracia's wholesalers are on the hook for inventories of Bud Light and Bud products that no one is buying.
They have an expiration date, thanks in part to the previously mentioned freshness campaign created.
In other words, it was a publicity, a promotional stunt to have a freshness date.
The wholesalers have to swap out the closed-dated products that are not being sold in retailers or restaurants.
They're then stuck with out-of-date product.
They turn back to corporate from help.
According to the Wall Street Journal, A.B.
N. Ezra Bush is telling them to give the product to their employees for free, rather than Tomahawk.
By law, they cannot give it away to consumers, and they cannot cross-promote the beer by bundling with another.
products such as buy chips, get free beer.
The story is being promoted as they be being magnanimous.
In reality, as a product hits its expiration or sell by date, they only have that option other than to dump it in the garbage and recycle the containers.
There's so much unsold territory, they're now giving it away.
Data.
In the week that ended April 22nd, Bud Light's retail sales fell 21.4%, while sales of rival brands Coors Light and Miller Lite grew about 21%.
It's not just Bud Light collapsing.
It's a face-flat brand for all Budweiser products.
Sales for other AB brands declined, including Budweiser, Bush Light, Michelob Ultra, At a cursory glance, you might think 21.4 drop is not as significant.
Keep in mind the data is only the initial evaluation of year-over-year sales impact.
Regionally, where beer drinking is heaviest, the amount of sales loss is much higher.
Bud Light and Bud are the number one and two products across the entire beer industry.
Within the AB wholesaler sales work, those two brands represent well over half the retail beer sales combined.
It depends on the region and wholesaler product mix, but Bud and Bud Light might easily make up more than half of the specific portfolio of distributor gross product sales.
Well, number one and number two, Prozac, that consists of more than half your gross, dropped by 20 to 25%.
Essentially, your company has dropped by the same percentage.
A $50 million beer distributorship is now worth $40 million and falling fast.
Additionally, we're still, the sales of the competitors have increased by the same amount.
Coors Light and Miller Light have picked up the customers.
That's what's known as hard brand switch, meaning it's likely to be very difficult, if not impossible, to regain brand position.
Maybe just gave Coors and Miller their biggest sales increase in history, and it's likely to be permanent.
Bud and Bud Light have created a no-win situation as they're now being targeted by the transgender community activists for failing to support their tranny beer rebranding efforts strongly enough.
In the Hill, a letter sent this week to AB Head of Resources, Jay Brown, vice president of the Human Rights Campaign Foundation, slammed the company's response to the controversy as insufficient and cowardly.
In this moment, it is absolutely critical for AB to...
to stand in solidarity with Dylan and the trans community.
However, when faced with anti-LGBTQ+, and transphobic criticism, A.B.' 's actions demonstrate a profound lack of fortitude to uphold its values of diversity, equity, and inclusion to employees, customers, shareholders, and the LGBTQ plus community.
According to the HRC letter, the group is preparing to lower AB's long-staying 100% Corporate Equality Index score, a national benchmark tool on corporate policy practices and benefits for LGBTQ employees.
As noted in the journal.
They didn't need to take this risk.
Adding how now he was worried the brand might swing the other direction.
I lost my cowboy bars, and I could lose my gay bars too.
Sorry, but this is just too damn punny.
Bud and Bud Light inventories are piling up.
The product's going out of doubt, out of date to lack of scales.
Beer drinkers don't want to be viewed with weird side-eyed looks if they pick up a Bud in a bar.
Retail customers are walking past a product, wholesalers seeing their distributor's ship being destroyed or calling the home office for help.
Meanwhile, alphabet activists are stamping their feet, riding their bicycles in slow circles at the bottom of the AB corporate office, glaring in the window while telling Bud they need to worry about their feelings.
I cannot stop laughing.
AB has declined several meeting requests from the Human Rights Climate in the wake of the right-wing pushback over its partnership with Mulvaney.
The letter also recommends they meet with their LGBTQ employees to understand their concern.
And has their Bush a solution?
Screw it!
We're effed!
Just give it away!
Bud Light Maker offers distributors free beer, more ad spending after Delane Muldaney backlash.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, whiskey for my men and beer for my horses, so the horses and fairies can have all the Bud Light they want because nobody else wants it.
Back to the first story, we have a Soros DA here in Harris County.
We got one in Bexar County.
We got one in Travis County.
We got one in Dallas County.
There's a great article, and I'll put the link in the comment section below, 24 USA Soros-funded DAs and all the crimes that they've committed.
Well, one of the crimes that they committed is we had ample evidence A voter fraud here in Texas, including several that were caught red-handed in San Antonio, which is Bexar County, and the DA refused to prosecute them.
So our lovely Attorney General said, well, if you won't prosecute them, I will.
And so the The defendant's attorney said, well, the state constitution doesn't allow the state attorney general to do criminal prosecutions.
It went all the way to the state Supreme Court, nine Republican GOP judges on the Supreme Court, which is the total Supreme Court.
I think actually it's five.
But anyhow, the Supreme Court in Texas ruled unanimously that the attorney general doesn't have the ability to prosecute.
So in the state of Texas, if you get a crooked DA, you can walk anything through in the whole damn state.
And this is a problem that he mentioned to the Heritage Society that he was going to get corrected in the current legislature.
So apparently that's in the process of happening.
But in addition, since he can't do criminal prosecutions, This came up yesterday.
The Attorney General Paxson is going to sue all of the vaccine manufacturers for giving us COVID.
So he can still do civil lawsuits, and that's what he's going to be doing.
And during that, we ought to get some interesting discovery, because a lot of the company that Brooke Jackson worked for, That company has eight offices in Texas and they did the experimental trials on thousands of Texans and they forged every bit of that stuff.
So there's criminal stuff that can be done.
If he gets discovery in civil cases, he can refer it to counties where they don't have that kind of DA and where they've got sheriffs and they can do investigation and they can start bringing criminal charges against the companies that were the front companies for the testing here in Texas.
Yeah, I got cut off a few times, but yeah, I'm back in.
I've been kicked out of finer places than this before, I guess.
I have to say, it's amazing to see how much effort that the average Americans are having to go through to just get them to stop pushing this vaccine out through mandates and even to see some sort of investigation, let alone justice.
If one-tenth of the diligence required to do that was actually required from these companies to prove that their product actually works and that it is safe and effective as it is claimed to be, I don't think we'd have this problem.
But I think that the whole point was not only to rush this through under the pretense of an emergency, but also to usher in the amount of damage and destruction from this in terms of creating dependence in a depopulation event as well.
So I really am Disgusted by the legal process and how it protects these culprits and certainly drags the victims through coals to just simply stay relevant in terms of discussion or recourse.
Nice.
Nice points.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, Broercon, to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Citizen Mattisella not taking any more Beverly rides.
We may see some of the citizen justice in the U.S.
if things keep going down the toilet.
Alleged Haitian gang men are killed, burned in public.
Final thoughts.
Joe, yours.
Yes, well, the head of the ATF was in front of Matt Gaetz in Congress, and he was questioning on the uh gun restrictions the uh pistol braces and uh brings back something else that uh we need to bring to met gates attention and that is a book is called guns across the border written by ffl licensed
firearm dealer in arizona named mike dd d-e-t-t-y uh He was contacted by ATF to sell weapons to known cartel members, and that the ATF would buy the weapons, send them to him, and then he was to deliver them to the cartel members, and they were trying to frame him in case the system of gun smuggling was made public.
But when it was made public, he said, well, guess what, ATF?
I kept logs of everybody, every time, every amount, all the gun numbers, all the serials, everything.
I gave them 450 guns at your total direction.
This was Operation Fast and Furious, and in his book he said that this was just one of the ATF gun smuggling operations that covered all of the Western Hemisphere.
They were smuggling guns to Canada and every place in the Caribbean and South and Central America, and the other ones were Operation Castaway, Operation Too Hot to Handle, and Operation Wide Receiver, all of those started before Operation Fast and Furious.
Fast and Furious delivered 2,200 highly specialized military weapons to the cartels in Mexico without notifying the Mexican government, without any real attempt.
to be able to track them.
They left tracking devices on them that were easily discovered and removed, and the cartels knew exactly what they were doing.
These were like .50 caliber Beret sniper rifles, ARs, the Beretta, Those are really important points, Joe.
Thank you for that.
They wanted nothing but military-grade weapons.
This is an act of war that resulted in the immediate deaths of over 300 journalists and over 300 politicians in Mexico.
And all that floods on Barack Obama and Eric the Red Holder's hands, and nobody's being held accountable for any of those war crimes.
Those are really important points, Joe.
Thank you for that.
Chris, your final thoughts.
Chris.
Oh, no.
Well, I'll begin by adding, here he goes.
Thank you.
Chris, your final thoughts.
Me, final thoughts?
Yes.
Okay, sweet.
Yeah, Joe, I heard most of what you said and I got cut out again, but yeah, you think about the ADL and the ATF and the DEA and the FBI and the CIA and the JTTF in the past 30, 40 years of just our lifetime, and how many things that they put out on the American public in terms of entrapping, you know, nationalists, racist white nationalists, as they like to call them.
or patriots.
The Patcon conspiracy in the Clinton administration in the 90s was abhorrent.
The gang wars and the color wars, the rap wars, abhorrent.
Operation Chaos, COINTELPRO, and many of the other entrapments that we've seen even with Whitmer and many others.
These guys are really the orchestrations of an organized group that has access to unlimited amount of money.
A private sector group that can print as much money and put it...
Where'd I dump off at?
Where'd they get me at?
It's okay.
Anywhere you like.
What I was trying to say is, citing many of the operations against the American citizens and the taxpayers, people that try to stand up for their constitutional rights and their ability to assemble freely.
I talked about the Clinton administration, the PatCon conspiracies, where the ADL funded many of the alphabet agencies, FBI, CIA, DEA, ATF, and even in the War of Terror with the JTTF, the Joint Terrorism Tax Force.
Think about COINTELPRO or Operation Chaos, many of the other ones.
Right now they're currently going after people in the GDL for speaking out against Israel.
If you want to look more you can go to gtvflyers.com and they're passing a bill called HB 269 to make it illegal and even put jail time on people that criticized this haplo group that seems to be dispossessing the world and using these financial mechanisms to enslave us through debt and many other means.
They're a private institution that can create public debt to fund these operations with unlimited financial power and absolutely no oversight.
FASB 56, many of these things took the congressional money off the board.
The Fed money's taken its money supply off.
Yeah, okay, I'll try.
I was talking about the Federal Reserve is a private entity that can put public debt out and use unlimited amount of money, can print whatever it wants on a fractional reserve basis, can fund whatever.
I was talking about the Federal Reserve is a private entity that can put public debt out and use unlimited amount of money, can print whatever it wants on a fractional reserve basis, can fund whatever.
It's off the oversight in terms of congressional oversight by FASB 56.
And certainly it's not even publishing its money supplies through FED reports and things through the Fed.
So there's a lot of dark money, a lot of dark capital that's being used to fund these NGOs and these counter-American movements.
And while they're also using our pensions and our savings and our wealth against us in such a way to fund these technocratic feudal offerings as well, I think it's really people are going to have to wake up to this and realize what's being done.
And this is definitely an orchestration that needs to be dealt with.
And you can see what they're doing as far as creating a preemptive resistance to any sort of scrutiny or even discourse or recourse for that matter.
And I think that it should alarm a lot of people.
I think those are great points, Chris.
And it's wonderful to have Joe back in the saddle.
You were both excellent today.
I'd like to reflect a bit about George Soros.
His dream has been to destroy America.
I have no doubt that SARS was instrumental not only in getting a whole lot of DAs into office who are going to weaken the criminal justice system, turn them back on the street, have rising crime rates as one way to weaken America, and others by the open border and bringing in millions of Illegals to alter the demographics.
A third, I'm convinced, is to introduce sexuality at low levels in the elementary schools and create chaos and demoralize American parents.
There's more at work here, but I have no serious doubt that those were among the George Soros efforts to bring about the destruction of this once great plan.
If we don't do something about it, his dream is going to be fulfilled, and it's happening faster than you could possibly have imagined.
Spend as much time as you can with your friends and family you love and care about.
We do not know how much time we have left, especially with the risk of nuclear war growing and growing and growing.
Trump's right about all of that.
He may have his flaws, but he really does believe in putting America first.