All Episodes
Previous Next
May 3, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:05:06
Truth vs. NEW$ 2 (2 May 2023) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Michael Jay Anderson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome back, folks.
This is Truth vs. News Incorporated.
I'm Donald Reiner, producer at JD.Consultants at Live.com.
Anyway, welcome back.
It's the second hour of May 2nd, and we have a lot more to go here, so let's have it, Jim.
Give it to us with both barrels.
Well, the fact is, we've had a report from a former Army PSYOP expert about what's going on here, and he seems to have nailed it pretty well.
U.S.
Army PSYOP expert Fox News fired Carlson to maintain semi-lobotomized, quasi-retarded population.
Oh, Souser swells a death of American media.
A U.S.
Army warfare officer, former, says Tucker was fired by Fox because the regime's agenda to maintain an uninformed, semi-lobotomized, quasi-recorded population.
The remarks were made by U.S.
counterterrorism expert Scott Bennett.
Tucker and Fogg parted new ways, with speculation raging as the specific reason the network had its highest-rated and most popular host.
According to Bennett, Tucker posed too much of a threat to institutional power because he turned Americans into braver researchers and thinkers.
Tucker offered an intellectualism, truthfulness, and an analytical depth That no other news personality has ever done in the history of the United States as far back as I can remember.
Tucker needed to be silenced.
He represented too big a threat to the powers and principalities, institutions, and agendas that seek an unenlightened, uninformed, semi-lobotomized, quasi-retarded population That does not question, does not research, does not analyze, but simply digests and follows instructions.
Tucker also exposed the fraud and money laundering, racketeering crimes of FTX and the Democrat Party in Ukraine involving the U.S.
government.
He exposed our biochemical labs in Ukraine and their connection to the Democrat Party, President Barack Obama, Vice President Biden, Hillary Clinton, George Soros, Bill Gates and other U.S.
government agencies and pharmaceutical companies, Bennett told Sputnik.
The ex-host's anti-regime rhetoric Could no longer be tolerated by the corrupt American media and political establishments, said Bennett, adding that his exit signals the death of American media.
Uh-oh.
The former U.S.
Army PSYOP officer suggested Senator Chuck Schumer had threatened to utilize the CIA and the FBI to deploy secret government ops against Tucker to get him off the air unless he were fired.
The chairman previously called for Tucker to be taken off the air after he broadcast footage showing the January 6th riot leaders were actually allowed into the Capitol and chaperoned around by authorities, as we highlighted earlier.
One of the reasons behind his dismissal is a lawsuit filed by former talk show producer Abby Grossberg, who claims she was bullied and subjected to sexist and anti-Semitic harassment.
Grossberg's own lawyer, however, embarrassingly revealed she had never even met Tucker Carlson.
Here, by the way, is an attack on Tucker, but it's got a lot of clips that show Tucker doing his thing.
Tucker Carlson is out at Fox News and all the usual suspects are busy popping champagne corks.
Wave!
He is responsible for the degradation that we see somewhat of our democracy.
Because nothing screams democracy like silencing all dissenting viewpoints.
Tucker Carlson is out at Fox News deplatforming works.
Yeah, so does lying about people to get them censored.
When you look at what Tucker Carlson and some of these other folks on Fox do, it is very, very clearly incitement of violence.
No word yet on Tucker's replacement, but some of the more nuanced reasons as to why he was kicked off the network may surprise you.
The overriding reason is self-evident.
As someone who routinely, night after night, on the biggest and most visible commentary platform in the United States, in the world in fact, challenged and demolished foundational regime narratives, Tucker Carlson, increasingly becoming more and more volatile, could no longer be tolerated.
While the legacy media desperately tried to cover for Ray Epps' involvement in inciting the January 6th incident, Tucker Carlson repeatedly suggested that Epps was an FBI informant and the whole thing was a set-up.
A so-called conspiracy theory for which the LA Times said Tucker provided no evidence.
While Carlson simply played segments from the thousands of hours of footage given to him by speaker Kevin McCarthy, Showing the so-called rioters being invited in and chaperoned around the building by the authorities, it was this, along with Carlson's documentary Patriot Purge, that angered Loughlin Murdoch and caught Fox executives off guard, prompting contributors like Jonah Goldberg to quit the network.
This couldn't be tolerated.
Tucker Carlson was virtually the only prominent voice on television news to tell Americans the truth about what they're facing.
Not misguided policy decisions.
Not partisan political jockeying between whose vision best serves the country.
But the unbridled, malevolent, deliberate agenda to ram through the complete destruction of America and everything it represents.
From Tucker's final speech before he got cancelled.
But when the Treasury Secretary stands up and says, you know what you can do to help the economy get an abortion?
Well, that's like an Aztec principle, actually.
We're the largest crowd of people at all, which is the federal government.
The largest human organization in human history decide that the goal is to destroy things.
Destruction for its own sake.
Hey, let's tear it down.
What you're watching is not a political movement, it's evil.
That couldn't be tolerated.
Tucker Carlson was virtually the only prominent voice on mainstream television news to question the circumstances behind the war in Ukraine.
To oppose the Biden administration's endless slush fund of taxpayer money being sent to prolong the war.
Much of it going to fund weaponry that's simply disappearing.
Vast quantities of cash being embezzled by the Zelensky government.
Is opposing Russia and Ukraine a vital strategic interest for America?
What's our objective in Ukraine and how are we going to know when we've achieved it?
What is the limit of money and weapons you'd be willing to send to Zelensky?
And does the United States face the risk of nuclear war with Russia?
You just can't have a strident critic of the military-industrial complex reaching 4 million people on television every night, millions more online.
That couldn't be tolerated.
Tucker Carlson was virtually the only prominent voice on mainstream television news to consistently highlight big pharma corruption.
Fox News routinely cans hosts who offend the sensibilities of their biggest advertisers, pharmaceutical corporations, and Tucker Carlson was the biggest example of that.
Case in point being this clip from the final episode of his show.
Sometimes you wonder just how filthy and dishonest our news media are.
You'll be in the shower and you'll think they're bad, but how bad are they?
Well, here's one measure of their badness.
You can try this at home.
Ask yourself, is any news organization you know of so corrupt that it's willing to hurt you on behalf of its biggest advertisers?
Anyone who'd do that is obviously Pablo Escobar level corrupt and should not be trusted.
The ultimate sin.
Tucker told the truth about how greedy farmer advertisers control TV news content.
That couldn't be tolerated.
And speaking about big pharma corruption, have you heard about the FDA's attempts to control the powerful supplement NMN?
Word on the street is that the sale of NMN could become- Well, we can skip that, but Scott, I'm willing to conjecture that you're in complete agreement with the Army PSYOP and anti-terrorism expert they were citing there.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, I think he got a few things right.
You know, the other thing to mention was that Tucker did expose the January 6th cover-up FBI informant collaboration plan, plot, scheme, false flag, using Ukrainian operatives too, wearing orange hats, to infiltrate the Trump supporters and engage in violence, window breaking, barricade demolishing, and
That was the PSYOP.
We had warned about that in November of 2020.
We said they were going to engage in these operations from the slides that we obtained from the AFL-CIO and their collusion with the senior executive service government officials.
These far-left, unapologetic, smiling, delusional government workers that seem to gleefully pronounce that they were engaging in a seditious conspiracy to overthrow the election before it even occurred.
This is in August and September, they were engaging in these Zoom calls.
Tucker Carlson exposed that.
It's the reason a lot of these people were released, because he showed the footage that there was no hooliganism.
There were police escorting and bringing in and inviting and removing barricades.
And Ray Epps is a U.S.
FBI informant, as many, many others are.
And he was exposed.
I think the preponderance of the evidence shows, you know, all of this was a Biden administration coup d'etat.
And that's where they were getting very nervous.
So I'll defer the rest of my time to you and Michael J. Go ahead, Jim.
Michael J. Thank you.
I'm persuaded because of the conversation Scott and I had with Tucker and Scott's explanation for the books he was offering him with respect to Scott had an opportunity to share his testimony.
about how the government threw him in prison because he was exposing the fact that they were financing the very terrorists that our American soldiers had to fight and that's why he was imprisoned for three years in a federal prison For filling out a housing form incorrectly.
And Scott's book is a life-changing book, if you look at it, and he handed a signed copy to him, plus a lot of other documentation.
So, Tucker, like many of us, if not all of us that are truth-tellers, Began to experience the support of people he had never met before because he was offered information that once you get on that path, you're not going to turn around.
You are not going to go back.
Once you accept what's going on and realize that our whole nation is at risk, And Tucker, I believe, realized that.
He was dedicated to, at a level, to telling the truth where his concern about his career or whatever, or pleasing of his bosses, was out the window.
Jim?
Yeah.
Tucker has a lot of balls.
I think we all agree.
Here's more about it.
Ripple effects of Tucker Carlson's exit from Fox.
Two days after his ouster, Tucker Crowe was silent with a video that had at least 22.1 million viewers, more than the number in the 8 p.m.
ET hour combined that day, let alone on Fox's The network rating have been down since they parted ways.
The anchor of the most watched show, not just on that channel, but on all of cable news.
The future is uncertain.
Tucker Carlson Tonight averaged 3.25 million viewers in the first few months of 2023.
In 2022, it averaged 3.3 million viewers.
Tucker had a unique appeal to impart to his unique perspective, unique at least to mainstream-adjacent media, said a Newsweek opinion editor.
How long that trend lasts is anyone's guess, but many, perhaps most, viewers will come back to Fox.
For now, at least, it helps confirm what many knew.
Tucker's audience is deeply loyal to him and his brand.
The 8 p.m.
slot is now occupied by Fox News Tonight, a rotation of personalities Brian Kilmeade has been hosting this week.
Meanwhile, former Fox News host Eric Brolin is now hosting on Newsmax.
On April 24th, when Fox announced his departure, 2.597 million viewers tuned in to Fox News tonight, a 577,000 decrease from the 3.174 million who turned in to his last show.
Meanwhile, MSNBC's All In with Chris Hayes and Anderson Cooper on CNN garnered 1.387 and 635,000, respectively.
Newsweek had an average of $531,000, an increase of $385,000 on the average, whereas Eric Bolling the balance.
NewsNation's Cuomo got $128,000, while Fox Primetime Shows outperformed those of their competitors, averaging $2.351 million.
the balance, NewsNation's Cuomo got 128,000.
While Fox primetime shows outperformed those that are competitors, averaging 2.351 million, it was nevertheless a drastic drop.
On April 25th, 1.704 million viewers tuned into Fox News tonight, and it's gone down and down and down.
Many of Tucker's fans are probably also fans of Laura Ingraham.
Some will go to Newsmax, others will probably go to non-cable internet.
It appears to be the case the Bumpin' Bowling Show can be attributed to Tucker being taken off the air.
I think Fox viewers have seen Dan Bongino not have his contract renewed.
Now Tucker be fired.
It's been an eye-opener for them.
Fox has always been seeking to censor Trump in many ways.
A large percentage of Fox base is very supportive of Trump.
Meanwhile, Newsmax does not censor Trump.
Carry all of Trump's rallies and live events.
This is the type of program Fox viewers seek.
So they're coming over in droves to Newsmax.
Yep.
His next stop, as anyone's guessed, one American news network, not carried by the major cable providers, is looking to bring him on board.
Boys TV has expressed a desire.
Even Russia's state media outlet RT appeared to offer Tucker a job.
All right.
Here's the point of how much more Can Tucker do it?
There's a good question, said a former edit at Media 8.
He gets bored pretty easily.
I'm not sure that's how he thought it was going to end, but he can start a podcast tomorrow and have Joe Rogan level people.
He also discussed the prospect of Tucker doing a joint venture with Twitter CEO Elon Musk.
One of his final major interviews.
He'll reemerge But will Fox re-emerge in the eight-hour slot?
Fox shouldn't be counted out quite yet.
When Bill O'Reilly left under far different circumstances, under a cloud of repeatedly alleged examples of sexual harassment, there were concerns.
What are we going to do?
O'Reilly had been the most watched in cable news for many, many years.
A managing editor of the conservative media watchdog Media Research Center blog Newsbuster told the Epoch Times, Foxville has a unique standing in our body politic that suggests this leaves him dead in the water.
I really don't think you can say that.
Jesse Watters, who helms us at 7pm, will succeed Tucker and that viewers are basically going to hear Jesse come up and say the same stuff Tucker said he predicted.
Meanwhile, Rupert Murdoch held an unreported call with Zelensky weeks before firing Tucker Carlson.
Fox News executive Rupert Murdoch held a previously unreported call with Ukraine President Zelensky this spring, where the two discussed the war and the anniversary of the death of Fox News journalists.
The Ukrainian president had a similar conversation with Lachlan Murdoch on March 15, which Zelensky noted in a little notice aside during a national broadcast last month.
The conversation came weeks before the Murdochs fired their biggest star and most outspoken critic of American support for Ukraine, Tucker Carlson.
Senior Ukrainian officials had made their objections to Tucker's coverage known to Fox executives.
But Zelensky did not raise it on the cause with a Murdoch's, or so we are told.
The Murdochs have not revealed which of Tucker's many provocations triggered his firing.
And there's no particular suggestion that Zelensky, whom Carlson had called a dictator, delivered the final blow.
But I'll tell you, I believe that is exactly what happened.
Tucker's firing will immediately relieve pressure and keep a tackle with all Ukraine supporters Tucker had criticized on the air.
Texas Representative Michael McCaul had been one of the most outspoken Republican supporters of the war in Ukraine, stepping out occasionally to reprimand figures in his own party who don't share his views.
In a segment last year, the Fox News host told viewers the Republican chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee had privately called his show Russian disinformation.
In other words, not only are we wrong, which is fine, we are disloyal Americans.
We're doing the bidding of a foreign power, Tucker said.
That is not fine.
That is slander.
According to two familiar of the conversation, The host made his displeasure to McCall known in a tense private conversation in which Tucker criticized the Congressman's comments, describing him as having a low IQ.
The populist Republican right remains hostile to the war and at times openly sympathetic to Russia.
Other top figures seem to share Tucker's zeal.
Clearly, He spooked a lot of members into not being fully supportive of Ukraine, a senior Republican aide told Semaphore.
Tucker's ouster probably reduces the loudest voice out there against U.S.
support.
Tucker floated the prospect he could be fired by Fox over his anti-war stance on Ukraine during an interview with redacted host Clayton Morris on March 11, seemingly about the same time as Rupert Murdoch's call.
Tucker told Morris one of the top people he worked for at Fox had texted him the other day for the record.
I really disagree with you on Ukraine, and I wrote back and said, I know you do, and I'm so grateful you let me disagree with you in public.
This is someone I work for, a well-known person.
Whatever you think of Fox, they're allowing me to say things they disagree with, and I think that's wonderful, Tucker said, but it was not going to endure.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, that's a good way to summarize all of the arguments that are trying to be put up and pose against Tucker and the general conservative consensus.
The arguments by, you know, the moderate Republicans, the Lindsey Grahams, these, you know, these people that think, oh, America should be helping Ukraine.
They're not going to endure because they don't understand the context.
They're delusional.
All of them are delusional.
That's why Tucker really was very hard hitting and deeply rooted.
He wasn't delusional.
He was very, very well, well grounded and had a panoramic understanding of the issues because he came out of a generation that was the last best educated generation in America.
Nothing has emanated out of the high schools of America since 1989 that is worth a damn.
Everything after 1990, when Clinton came into office, everything began to corrode and rust and melt and degrade in every form.
And you see now a fruit of toxic, schizophrenic, dysfunctional, transgender, lunatic young people between 35 15, completely gone, and even younger than that.
So the country has become so toxic.
That's one thing that people really haven't got the full weight of just how damaged this country is inevitably going to be because of the suicidal education policies.
So he's been calling out all of these things, from education to the transgender issues, the destruction of women, how men wearing wigs and putting on bras are not women, but they are destroying women, destroying their scholarships, destroying their opportunities.
And the ridiculousness of the language, the ridiculousness of waging war.
He also exposed the Nord Stream pipeline being destroyed by none other than the United States and, you know, wasn't afraid to say it.
He wasn't quite so blatant about it, which, you know, he sort of danced around the subject.
But Ukraine and Russia and all of these things, he drew very intelligent questions.
And only dullards or maniacs would disagree and go on the other side because their position cannot endure.
The American empire, which never was, never will be because we have Not only have the wheels fall off, but the entire structure is now collapsing and disintegrating and will only quicken in its disintegration, and the federal continental United States is going to dissolve into an archipelago of conservative islands surrounded by a tar pit of insane LGBT anti, you know, Black Lives Matter fools.
Jim?
Heretofore, I'd suppose it was Big Pharma who was upset with Tucker because he would criticize the Vax and the pandemic, but I now believe it was, in fact, Zelensky and the Israeli lobby that got him axed because they want Ukraine to be the new Israel, and that Tucker speaking out against it has got to infuriate them.
Michael J. Very good points, Jim, and you also, Scott.
We're looking at somebody who was, in Tarker Carlson, who was made bold because he so enjoyed sharing the truth and pointing out to the American people how the foundations of our nation are being intentionally eroded.
And this is a horrific thing that you're not going to hear people like Rupert Murdoch defending America.
You're not going to hear big media defending the America we used to be.
You're hearing them use their psychological weaponization of language and pointing out that real freedom is allowing Black Lives Matter and And the, what was that, the fascist group, what was that?
Antifa.
Yeah, that they, their freedom and the freedom of gay rights and the freedom of transgender people reading things as they look like demonic clowns, reading things to children in kindergarten and first grade, that this is real freedom.
And yet these people are morally and psychologically pathetic And essentially, they're promoting perversion, and they're promoting the moral turpitude of the next generations.
And this is all of a sudden the new definition of liberty and freedom in America for those people who find a benefit in believing in lies, believing in deception, believing in things that essentially are pushing an agenda that demoralizes a whole generation believing in things that essentially are pushing an agenda that demoralizes a whole generation And what Scott has pointed out, and you also, Jim,
is that the psychological defeat of moral masculine courage has been occurring because of a program designed to emasculate Americans that believe in national is that the psychological defeat of moral masculine courage has been occurring because of a program designed to emasculate Americans that believe in national sovereignty, that believe in getting rid of the UN, that that believe in getting rid of the dishonest structure of the Federal Reserve, that they believe in constitutional government.
These things are all now labeled as...
white, misogynistic, anti-American, what, terrorism?
The issue is we believe in homeschooling.
We believe in protecting our children from immorality.
But this is something that is antithetical to the people that want to destroy the moral foundation of our body politic.
Jim?
I think you got it right, Michael J.
I think you got it right.
Meanwhile, Chelsea Clinton says banning sexually explicit books from schools is harmful to children.
She ought to know.
Chelsea came out in favor of porn for kids.
Bill Clinton's only daughter, Ashley Webster-Hubbles, said banning sexually explicit books from school is harmful.
Bizarre.
In its annual book censorship report, the American Library Association documented 1,269 challenges to more than 2,500 books in 2022, a 75% jump from 2021, which held a previous record.
Of the 13 books that made the ALS list the most challenged, seven titles, including three of the top four, were challenged for having LGBTQ content.
Chelsea said porn books for kids are a vital way for kids to learn about themselves.
Chelsea Clinton tweets, Over 50% of the attempted book bans last year involved books with LGBTQ plus characters and themes.
Books are a vital way that children, adolescents, and adults learn about themselves and our world.
Bans such as these are nothing but harmful.
Chelsea got roasted.
Cavalry dog tweeted from genderqueer.
Anyone who thinks this is appropriate for a K-12 school library should have their hard drive searched for CB.
Hastings kids have access to genderqueer books with sexually graphic pictures.
It comes down to exposing children to sexually explicit material without parental knowledge or consent.
Chad Felix Green.
The photo in the article you're quoting features a book with explicit illustrations of sex acts.
A book about incest.
One a sex story about two 10-year-old boys.
One about man raping and isolating a 12-year-old girl.
One about a teen girl seduces a man who kidnaps her.
Meanwhile, a transgender reporter tried to defend Chelsea Inadvertently proving she's pushing porn for kids.
A far-left transgender reporter was mocked and ridiculed after she inadvertently proved critics of Chelsea Klippner right after she criticized restrictions on controversial LGBTQ books in public libraries.
We know the quote from Chelsea.
Readers added, Genderqueer.
The book shown in the photo features sexually explicit material.
The book contains visual depictions of oral sex, masturbation, and adult sexual contact with a minor.
In the thumbnail of the image was prominently displayed a controversial book, Genderqueer.
The book is described in the NSNBC article as a chronicle of non-binary author Maya Kobabi's journey of self-identity, but doesn't mention a very graphic scene of oral sex in the book.
The article does quote Kobobe, saying the book's message is vital, life-saving for some children, even though Kobobe admits some parts are not appropriate for grade school kids.
Imagine how sick and depraved you have to be to call this a children's book.
Hey, Seth, I think you mean this for my DMs.
You just sent me an unsolicited drawing of a blowjob.
So your position is you're sexually harassing another man, and you think that will go over better with your audience?
Start sending me this stuff, Seth.
It's creepy.
In 2021, the book was targeted by critics after it was found in the library at the Fairfax County Public Schools in Virginia.
The author defended the book, citing ancient Greek poetry and pottery art.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, on so many levels, we've seen the degradation and the transformation very rapidly of the United States when a coordinated psychological warfare campaign by the mainstream media, far-left lunatic politicians, even some Republicans, the Coca-Cola, Bud Light, big advertisers and products, you know, pushing this
It's child sacrifice, really.
The transgenderism, transforming America into a fertile, unable-to-produce country, chopping off penises and breasts and calling it freedom and liberty, that transgenderism, it is remarkably similar to the child sacrifice that the Jews have done For thousands of years, kidnapping little boys in the forests of Germany or Britain and then bleeding them and drinking their blood.
There's all sorts of video and documentary and expert historical analysis of that reality that explained why the Jews were kicked out of Spain, incidentally, and others.
There's a very exhaustive material on that.
This seems to be reflective of precisely that.
That they're pushing this transgender castration of children, girls and boys, as a form of this blood sacrifice evil.
And that's really what it is.
This is pure evil.
And Putin has said it.
Vladimir Putin has said, wokeism, which is the umbrella of this insanity, is a crime against humanity.
It is.
But it's becoming, you know, the source, I think, of the Civil War.
There's going to come a point, Jim, where parents and people are not going to tolerate school officials, school administrators, teachers, or anyone else teaching this or trying to bully their way into women's bathrooms.
There's going to come a point where these people are going to get killed.
They're going to get run over.
They're going to get shot.
They're going to get beaten.
They're going to disappear.
They're going to be put into woodshedders.
I don't know.
But there's going to come a point, not because the Republican conservative traditional family values people are going to go explosive and they're going to get revenge.
No, it's because the left and these schizophrenic, delusional, psychopath zombies who've had how many COVID-19 shots and boosters are only becoming worse and worse and worse.
They're becoming rabid dogs.
They're becoming the demoniac.
They're never going to come out from this delusion.
They're going to go into full kamikaze mode and more violent, more aggressive, more pushing, more hysterical.
And as they get more aggressive in attacking the traditional family values people, the traditional family values people are going to have to stand up and defend their lives, and that will result in the death of these lunatic psychopaths.
We don't see it everywhere around us, but we see it in pockets and we see it amplified, but this cannot be tolerated or allowed.
And you also see the political backlash with states like Florida and Texas and others saying, None of this will be taught in our schools, and attorney generals and others that try and advance this are being removed.
This is pornography.
It's child corruption.
Now, everyone should go down to their school boards and serve them legal notice saying, any attempt to teach transgenderism was a violation of the Constitution's prohibition on teaching religion.
Thank you, Jim, and Scott, thank you for what you said.
teaching to our children, or you will be violating the Constitution.
You've been served notice.
You'll also be sued.
You'll also have criminal filings, and worse things may happen to you.
People need to go down to their school boards and their supervisors and their towns and their counties and quench this black flame of death and evil that they're trying to ignite.
Jim?
Michael J.
Thank you, Jim.
And Scott, thank you for what you said.
Scott and I have both gone down to school board meetings where they were promoting the creation of a safe place by making every bathroom, including multiple stalls to excuse me, multiple stall bathrooms including multiple stalls to excuse me, multiple stall bathrooms in high schools and junior highs so that everybody and anybody can go in there, boys with girls room and girls and boys rooms.
And And it was going to protect them because they were so-called gender-fluid people.
And the great objection to all these policies, the 95-plus percent of the people in there saying, you can't do this, but we found out, and it was exposed and we rebuked the obvious policies that were being promoted by then-Governor Jerry Brown in California, that they had already been paid To give an answer and to open these doors to sexually confuse all of these school children.
And America should be in mourning, Jim.
It should be in mourning because this is not the America we grew up in where we were confirmed in our manhood or confirmed in being feminine and understanding that the way any nation can prosper is holding standards that protect Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.
our young boys and girls from sexual confusion, because what has been happening, what's been proven is exposing little children to what is sexually explicit material often leads to gender confusion and gender confusion often leads what's been proven is exposing little children to what is sexually explicit material Over to you, Jim.
Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.
You both made excellent points.
Meanwhile, the New York Times has just published another pathetic Sandy Hook sob story.
Bye.
They saw the horrific aftermath of a mass shooting, should we?
Editor's note on my blog, jameshfessler.org.
For background, those unfamiliar with the evidence related to Sandy Hook might want to watch two presentations from my Volkswagen Conspiracy Conference 2020, which you can download to your own desktop.
Kelly Watts, Sandy Hook, A Mass Illusion, and Jim Fetzer, Ph.D.
What Happened at Sandy Hook, perhaps better titled, What DIDN'T Happen at Sandy Hook, as the following explains.
There must be over a hundred proofs that suggest that Sandy Hook was staged.
Here I'm going to review only a half a dozen as illustrations.
While time treats these claims as facts, there is the tiniest chance that something more just might be involved here.
As a long-time student at Sandy Hook, who's had his book banned, been sued and attacked, and the target of innumerable smears, up to and including in the Chronicle of Higher Education, I find it offensive, extremely offensive, when rags like the New York Times publish disputable claims about Sandy Hook as though they were facts.
I brought together 13 experts, including six PhDs, where we provided evidence strongly suggesting that the school had been closed by 2008, that there were no students or teachers there, and that it was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
As officials in the Obama Department of Education confirmed to Paul Preston at the time, Sandy Hook Redox.
Obama officials confirm it was a drill and no children died.
I have a lot of sources in regard to what's going on with the president and the administration and so on, and every one of my sources said it was a false flag, Paul Preston.
Sophia Smallstorm, who produced and directed Unraveling Sandy Hook, which many regard as the best video of the Sandy Hook event, recently interviewed L.A.
school expert Paul Preston about his knowledge of what had transpired.
Governor Malloy held a press conference that day, explaining he and the Lieutenant Governor had been spoken to that something like this might happen, which raised the question, what something like this did he mean?
Had he been told a school shooting massacre would take place, or a drill that would be presented as a real event?
Which appears to be what took place, remarkably.
We now have confirmation from an unexpected source.
Paul Preston had obtained information from officials in the U.S.
Department of Education of the Barack Obama administration who confirmed to him on the basis of their own personal knowledge that it had been a drill, that no children had been harmed, and that it had been done to promote gun control.
So why was this piece published?
Let's start with its overall character, as Ron Averys observed.
It could probably be called a short story about the experience endured by three Connecticut State Police crime scene investigators who say they were involved in the Sandy Hook investigation.
Virtually nothing in the story has to do with actual evidence.
Related to the crime scene, notice, but rather what those parties who claim to be crime scene investigators have suffered emotionally as a result of working the Sandy Hook crime scene.
As Avery explains, the title explicitly asks, should we see and be exposed to the same, their implied answer?
No, we should not.
But it stopped with these three.
The whole New York Times article is a pathetic, useless attempt to justify the concealment and redaction of conclusive photographic evidence that anyone was actually killed at Sandy Hook on 14 December 2012.
The essence and core of the whole is summed up here.
Even though the Attorney General is convinced, reeling on the threshold of this tiny obliterated bathroom, that if the American people only saw what he was seeing, Congress would be forced to do the right thing.
Nothing would change in the end.
Tragedy in America would prevail.
Some would say nothing has changed because we've not yet been made to see.
After each new mass shooting, the question, the debate returns.
Would seeing the crime scene photos have an effect on the gun crisis in the same way images of Emmett Till's body in an open coffin had on the civil rights movement?
The Sandy Hook photos have been redacted by Connecticut state law since 2013.
Even if the law were to change, with the consent of the families who push for the legal restriction, public viewing would require one outlet or another to make the decision to publicize them in a culture where reality is no longer agreed on.
Many will not believe what they see unless it's funneled through their propaganda of choice.
So until that unlikely moment arrives, the full truth of these images and those of shooting after shooting for the decade after Sandy Hook and into the future will live on only in the atrocity exhibition that exists in the memory of those who photograph, measure, and collect the foul evidence.
Crime scene photos, however, surely ought to be available to the public.
The purpose of this paragraph appears to be to defend themselves from their own conscience and awareness that, as Avery observes, stealing crime scene evidence does not result in good individual reactions or good social policy.
Sealing evidence of crimes make crimes easier to conduct and conceal, whether we're investigating fake crimes or real ones.
A case of this kind, which is immersed in controversy, especially deserves thorough and meticulous investigation, which cannot be properly conducted when evidence is suppressed.
In this instance, based on the evidence I and my colleagues have amassed, the Obama administration appears to have conducted, let's call it, an act of faux-terrorism by faking a mass murder of children to instill fear into the hearts and minds of their target audience, American parents, to make them more amenable to political manipulation.
It was an act of domestic terrorism, and that was also fake, can be considered in relation to the photographs they included here.
What do they tell us about Sandy Hook?
Do they help to resolve whether this event was reality or illusion?
The answer, surprisingly, turns out to be yes.
The CSI van parking lot photograph Because my edited book, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, it was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control, has been taken improperly, in my view, and under review.
I shall not rely upon photographs from that source.
Most of them originated elsewhere.
Even though they may also appear in the book, they are not derived from the book, and therefore using them does not violate the book's contested copyright.
Let's begin with the first paragraph about the presence of a CSI van in the parking lot following the event.
The crime scene van was parked next to the black Honda Civic already identified as belonging to the shooter, the yellow tape marking his perimeter, juddering in a helicopter gust earlier that morning, before the van was cleared to move closer to the school.
Jeff Covello, the crime scene van supervisor, and his team were crowded around the dry erase board.
Art Walkley, the only one on the van who had so far been inside, sketched out what he said were the two main areas of impact.
He arrived with the other first response officers and stormed the school as children were running out, his gun drawn, ready to kill on sight, in fact quite eager to pull the trigger once he glimpsed classrooms 10 and 8.
Here's the photograph, which comes from the Connecticut State Police Archives on Sandy Hood, where you want to focus on the four windows at Classroom 10.
They are right here.
When you compare the four windows at Classroom 10, discernible immediately above the roof of the SCI van.
Notice that they are intact.
Well, they would subsequently be presented as shot out.
Here you can see the difference, along with a photo of them studying the window frame, and what they did is simulate shots.
In the book, we had suggested the CSI van photo was taken the morning of 14 December 2012, before the event had taken place.
Brian Davidson, a licensed private investigator, however, has taken a closer look and discovered it was taken the evening of 14 December 2012, before they had completed staging the scene.
In other words, Although officially the shooting has already taken place, this photo proves that they had not quite completed its staging.
The parking lot photograph.
So we have proof the entire photo is fake right off the bat implicitly if you know the evidence in this case, which the Times anticipates you do not possess by its irresponsible efforts to mislead and deceive you in its latest attempt to promote a hoax as though it were real.
With similar intent, they include other photos.
You might not notice if you don't think about it, but there are no handicapped parking spaces in this parking lot, nor any of the familiar blue and white signage required under the American with Disabilities Act, which means this cannot have been an operating school at the time under either federal or Connecticut law.
Moreover, If you look at other photos of the entire parking lot, additional elements stand out.
It was a 38 degree Fahrenheit ground temperature day above freezing, but cold enough you could not conduct classes unless the rooms had been heated.
Yep, there's no heat or steam rising from the building.
No doubt, because the school had been closed for so many years, the boilers were dysfunctional.
And thus arose the cars in the middle of the lot, which are all facing the school.
Following the driving instructions on the roadway, you'd have come in and turned to the right, then curled around to the left and parked facing away from the building.
So, what's going on?
So, just as you thought you were being given information in the SCI van, but turned out to be only partial and incomplete, you thought you were being given information about the parking lot, but it, too, was only partial and incomplete.
The fallacy involved here is known as special pleading.
Like the case of a used car salesman who emphasizes the leather upholstery and the stereo system, but neglects to point out the rings are shot and the car needs a new transmission.
That's what you get today from our nation's newspaper of record.
The blown out window.
Notice here that, in spite of the blown out window, None of the furniture appears to have moved even an inch.
It's all there, exactly as you would expect had the window remained intact.
What you don't know about this photograph is that Wolfgang Hallberg, a former Florida State Trooper and U.S.
Customs agent who has been a school administrator and remains a nationally recognized school safety expert, has found 10 sworn affidavits by Connecticut State Police who claim they entered the building through that blown-out window.
As Wolfgang has observed, no trained law enforcement officer would have entered that window without first breaking it out using his baton.
Moreover, to avoid the risk of cutting their uniform on shards of glass, instead of all ten entering that way, one of them would have entered to open the door for the others.
Three stooges would have done better.
Curly would have come in and then opened the door for Joe and Mo.
Just how dumb are we supposed to be?
Apparently, they think.
Dumb enough.
A hallway photograph.
Or consider the hallway photo they include in the picture of the broken window at the front of the building at first.
You might think you're being given important information once again.
But what's most important is what they are not telling you.
A hallway voter, for example, doesn't explain what the official narrative maintains.
Brian Davidson, P.I., accessed the photographs of the Connecticut State Police and discovered, among other things, that the hallway photo should have included the body of the Sandy Hook principal, Dawn Hawkspring, and of the school psychologist, Mary Sherlock, included neither, which means this and similar photographs contradict the official account.
But you would never know unless you had background knowledge the Times does not provide.
Thus, Davidson's comment, looking down the corridor of the shooter, you walk to enter room 10 after passing of room 12, immediately to the left.
Notice the room on the right is Room 9, the conference room, where the principal, the psychiatrist, and the teacher were killed.
This is the floor area, described as having Hawkspring and Sherlock laying in pools of blood.
While some evidence of a red substance is present, in my opinion, it is not consistent with the statement, pools of blood.
Again, The time proffers a photo from inside Classroom 8 gives a visual impression of a busy, active classroom.
None of the photos in the Connecticut State Police Archive have their metadata identifying the place and the time each photograph was taken.
Which has been removed, clearly, not by accident.
Absent that data, these photos would not normally be admissible in a court of law, except in this instance, as circumstantial proof that the Connecticut State Police were involved in the scam, since what other reason could they have had to delete it?
A classroom photograph.
Once again, Brian found other photos at Classroom 8, where the furniture is shoved up against the wall, and there are not only no student desks or chairs, but no teacher desk or chair either, which means he discovered proof not only that this was not the scene of a mass murder, but that Sandy Hook was not an operating school.
Other evidence you're not going to learn about from the New York Times includes that we located the FEMA manual for a two-day exercise, technically a mass casualty drill involving children, and, more recently, found this exercise on the agenda of events to be conducted by the Connecticut FEMA office, which is located in Bridgeport, Connecticut,
Complete with a map of how to reach the Sandy Hook School, which some may find rather persuasive, as proof that it was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control, just as the banned book explains.
The drill on Connecticut FEMA's schedule.
Lookie there.
Sandy Hook Elementary, 18 miles away, at 935.
The Kinetic Athena schedule and the map from Bridgeport to Sandy Hook School, by the way, were in the appendices to my U.S.
Supreme Court petition for reconsideration of the 7th and 14th Amendment issues, which I raised regarding my bizarre case in Wisconsin.
Where the court was entitled to set aside any evidence they consider to be unreasonable, considering the reports of two forensic document experts supporting me against a plaintiff who claimed to have been defamed by four assertions I'd made that the death certificate for his son was not authentic.
Covering up Sandy Hook, So how much more proof do you need that it was a drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control?
And don't expect to see photos of the alleged victims.
As Wayne Carver, M.D.
explained during his press conference, they did not allow the parents to make contact with the children, but instead identified them on the basis of photographs, which made sense since most of them only existed in the form of photographs.
Check out more of my work for additional proof, which they don't want you to find.
After all, that is why they banned the book.
This article is clearly intended to explain away why you should not have access to Sandy Hook crime scene photographs.
But even the few crime scene photographs they do include are damning evidence that this was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
Sandy Hook photographs have been redacted by Connecticut state law since 2013.
Tells you all you need to know about the state of Connecticut.
From then-Governor Daniel Malloy to the State Legislature to Connecticut State Police and beyond, they all played their roles.
Now they are playing the public for suckers and saps with the complicity of the New York Times.
Maybe it's time to do something about it.
At the very least, don't let yourself be played.
The photographs presented here are innocuous on their face.
You probably thought that they supported the official narrative of mass murder at Sandy Hook because you did not know enough about it.
The facts appear to show it was an illusion and not a reality, which has encouraged them to run this scam again and again and again.
So if you want to know why there are so many school shootings, now you have an explanation.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, Jim, every element, every item, every document, every affirmation or questioning that the government may have been involved, or the government confirms it was a FEMA drill, or that there was any Government role or any official role in any of this matter anything that hints that was that it was in any way controlled artificial dramatized in the smallest degree
Instantly shatters and destroys the legal case that was brought against you and newly discovered evidence motions should be filed in court saying this has been fraud upon the court.
Newly discovered evidence has risen and it is in the interest of justice that this court review this because it nullifies the entire case.
It exposes the entire case as fraud.
Otherwise, this will be an obstruction of justice, and it could go to the Supreme Court again.
But the confirmation of the government role in this, or the artificiality of it, I think needs to be brought and filed again.
and do it tirelessly and mercilessly.
And I would also say, yes, the entire point of this was to generate a psychological operation that developed, cultivated, and implanted or impregnated a mindset of guilt and fear and sadness that poor little children are dead because of guns, so they can strip away guns and and implanted or impregnated a mindset of guilt and fear and sadness that poor little children are dead because of guns, so they can strip away guns and turn
the rest of the country into a half-lobotomized, semi-retarded society that would just bend semi-retarded society that would just bend over, get their COVID-19 vaccines and boosters, assume their role Jim?
Michael J. Jim, everybody that knows you understands that you were attacked.
Are you there?
Go ahead.
Not sure what just happened there.
But okay, Jim, we know that you were attacked.
We know that your scholarship was attacked, and the group of people that you gathered to look at the evidence here And we see that how complicity with the lies was organized at the highest levels in the state government and in the federal government.
It was a psychological operation, and I believe that's the real issue here.
This was a psychological operation to demoralize America.
It was using shock tactics, it was using deception, easily proven deception, but the real psychological attack was the complicity of the government in their obvious hatred for the truth, their obvious willingness, and this was essentially everybody involved in this operation was spitting in the face of the American people, and they were using you as the poster child for
You were defending the right of the American people to have the ability to defend themselves.
You were defending that right and you were promoting what can only be seen as the truth is the only justification and foundation for legal and lawful operations of the government.
But let's realize what happened here.
Sandy Hook was in a county where it was the head of the Eastern United States Church of Satan.
That place there, Newtown, Connecticut, was the headquarters of the Church of Satan in Connecticut.
Okay, that's right.
It was also a place where they had a very large insane asylum that was being used to house people that didn't go along with the program.
I say that from personal experience because they threw my grandmother in there.
And the reality is her sister raised me.
So the issue is we're dealing with something where there was wickedness involved in this.
We also know that there was a great deal of money brought in for the so-called victims and that included many townspeople who got new homes paid for and many other benefits with millions of dollars.
Okay, this was a plan.
It was a part of a an operation that spread around America, including a Stoneman High School, including that gay club in Florida, including the attack, the so-called attack in Las Vegas.
All of this were operations and there were many more that were essentially trying to capitalize on the trauma we had experienced earlier on years before in the Columbine incident, where psychologically
And the issue is, what we're seeing is essentially the delusional hope that the wicked people have and continue to promote because they don't understand that millions, tens of millions of Americans Thank you.
Tens of millions of Americans were actually looking at this, but through a filter of having taken an oath, Jim, Scott, taken an oath to defend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights with respect to having the ability in the Second Amendment to defend every one of these rights.
And the issue is that these kinds of things, where many of us saw on the basis of our
These pictures you're hanging out there are very distracting, Don, on the basis of the oath that we took, where we saw people around us die and being blown up in other false flag operations like Vietnam and other places like the First Gulf War, the Second Gulf War, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria.
The reality is the people are trying to demoralize the American people by Forcing down their throats the fact that our courts, including the Supreme Court, will not in any way be allowed to defend the rights of the American people, including our defense of the Constitution.
This nation is morally bankrupt with people like our Supreme Court who rejected your case And what we see is, this is the real focus of the psychological operation that is telling the American people that the people running America don't believe America is worth defending.
And they've got another thing coming, Jim.
The reality is millions of us in America have never and will never give up their Second Amendment rights to call for justice and call for holy judgment against people who in our government have been destroying and murdering the American people, not the least of which is the abomination, the monstrous crime and treason and genocide that occurred on 9-11.
Jim, over to you.
Well said, Michael J., and I want to thank you for joining us today.
You've made excellent contributions.
Scott, as always, Don, take us out.
Okay, well, what a show today.
We've gone through a lot of stuff, and I think you're going to want to share it, because on Truth vs. News Incorporated, you ain't going to see this anywhere else, that's for sure.
I'm your producer, JD.Consultants at Lab.com, and I think this is worthwhile And exceptional, actually.
So share it, and we hope to see you next week.
▲
Export Selection