Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 3, 2023 - Jim Fetzer

01:27:55

Need to Know (2 May 2023)

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Owen Stevens from Grand Rapids, Michigan, and Brian Davidson from Houston, Texas.
	We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
	We begin with Russians acknowledging a Ukrainian drone attack that set a Crimean fuel depot ablaze.
	An oil storage facility in a Crimean point of Sevastopol was hit by a drone causing a massive fire.
	This comes amid escalation of attacks against Crimea, which was annexed by Russia in 2014 in accordance with international law, as the imminent Ukrainian counteroffensive in the south and east is expected to fail.
	The Blaze was assigned the highest ranking in terms of how difficult it would be to distinguish.
	Reportedly, the fire has now been contained.
	A Ukrainian military intel official claimed over 10 oil tanks had been destroyed with roughly 40,000 tons of fuel for the Russian Black Sea Fleet.
	Ukraine has not taken official responsibility.
	As is the case with the latest drone strike, the Ukrainian military official said the attack was God's punishment for Russian air raids the previous day.
	The punishment will be long-lasting, better for all residents of temporarily occupied Crimea, not to be near military facilities or those that provide for the aggressor's army.
	Meanwhile, former CIA Director David Petraeus talks about the U.S.-trained Ukrainian counteroffensive to begin in May.
	The very idea of announcing this is going to take place seems to me to be ridiculous in the extreme.
	You lose the element of surprise.
	Petraeus announced the U.S.-trained counteroffensive will begin in May to sever Russia's land route to Crimea.
	The speech took place before the leaked documents that Ukraine has been suffering major losses and that U.S.
	forces were already on the ground in Ukraine prior to the Russian intervention.
	Former Director Petraeus says the U.S.-trained counteroffensive is scheduled to begin in May, the goal of sovereign Russia's land route to Crimea, while demonstrating to Putin that Ukrainians are willing to out-suffer the Russians.
	What we need to watch is not what's happening on the battlefield, it's what's happening at training centers.
	The U.S.
	runs in Germany, Ravenwald, Hohenfels, the U.K., Poland, and Ukraine itself, where entire new brigades are being established with new recruits from Ukraine, but also some seasoned commissioned and non-commissioned officers.
	Over time, it'll be equipped with Western tanks, residual Soviet block systems, Western infantry fighting vehicles, Western wheeled armor, quite an extraordinary array of systems, according to Petraeus.
	I believe they're going to achieve, for the first time, true combined arms effects, because they will, for the first time, have them.
	Russians have not at all done this.
	They failed from day one.
	They have sent tanks just right down the road without infantry.
	Ukraine will have tanks with infantry and infantry fighting vehicles.
	They'll have electronic warfare to jam the Russian networks.
	They'll have artillery and mortars.
	They'll have all command and control logistics right up behind them.
	They did not have this in the events of Kharkov last fall.
	That was very impressive, but basically ran out of steam because humans can only go for about 72 hours before they no longer can endure.
	Retreat that point, by the way, according to Petraeus.
	We proved during the fight to Baghdad, I believe, what's going to happen.
	We might actually ask D.A.
	later, can Putin over time be convinced he'll not be able to out-suffer the Ukrainians, the Europeans, and the Americans?
	Here we have Can I come with a great tweeting?
	Border CI Director David Petraeus says the U.S.-trained Ukrainian counteroffensive is scheduled to begin in May.
	With the goal of severing Russia's land route to Crimea, while also demonstrating that Putin and the Ukrainians are willing to out-suffer the Russians.
	Meanwhile, get this, Russian bombers launched a preemptive strike on the counter offensive, and it didn't take any time at all.
	Judging by the hit targets, the Russian Aerospace Forces thwarted the expected counter offensive.
	The strike was delivered in two waves, at least 15 strategic bombers, 95% of the missiles and kamikaze drones were shot down by air defense, but footage from the scene refutes those claims by the Ukrainians.
	Explosives sounded all over the place.
	Nikolaev, Odessa, Plovdiv, Sumy, Kyiv, Laudis, and Pavlograd in the Dnepropetrovsk region.
	X-101 missiles flew over railway junction where the enemy was accumulating machinery and ammunition.
	As a result, at least two divisions of S-300 air defense system were destroyed.
	In addition, Russian bombers destroyed supply vehicles with reserve ammo.
	UAV kamikazes worked out At the facilities of Ukraine, the drones carried out strikes on enemy positions in the Kharkov region.
	Targets were hit all over the place.
	No reports of power cuts in the areas of arrival of Russian missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles.
	But it does appear to have done serious damage to the prospects for the counteroffensive.
	Owen, your thoughts?
	Yeah, this is a really, you know, it's escalating faster than I thought it would, and I think that might be a result of the leak, and the fact that this was leaked out, that, you know, the plans for the counter-offensive were leaked out on, you know, by this one hero, but it's leading to a lot of severe consequences.
	I mean, now you have, we're tweeting about battle plans right now.
	It's just, I don't understand.
	What is happening or why on earth we're tweeting out battle plans, tweeting out dates that we're starting a counter-offensive, but everybody knows already because of the leaks and Russia knows as well.
	I mean the lie, the other thing I want to just briefly mention is that we're being spoon-fed lies from the media telling us that Russia's running out of bombs, they're running out of artillery, they're running out of bullets, they're running out of ammunition.
	They're running out of everything.
	But when you actually look at what's happening, it doesn't seem to be the case at all.
	So the human cost of the war is something I'll also mention briefly.
	There was a U.S. Marine, a former U.S. Marine that was killed just an hour ago.
	That news just came out.
	He was from Cleveland.
	So this is this is affecting Americans.
	It's affecting Ukrainians.
	It's affecting Russians.
	The human cost continues to compile.
	Brian, your thoughts.
	Well, let me see if I can sum this up over here.
	These leaks indicate that there's been 15,000 casualties already this month.
	No, I'm sorry, in the month of April.
	Now it's May 2nd in Ukraine and 125,000 overall, according to the Washington Post.
	So, of course, the mainstream media comes on and talks about this Ukrainian drone strike where the Russians sent in drones to Blast a Ukrainian oil tank, or I'm sorry, I'm sorry, the Ukrainians sent in drones to blast this Russian Oil reserve and of course it went up with black smoke.
	So what is the mainstream puppeteer media do?
	Oh big win for Ukraine.
	Wow.
	We got one of their 40,000 40,000 gallon tanks knocked down.
	Of course, there's hundreds of them over there.
	So they managed to slip a single drone through the rest of them.
	They didn't say how many were launched.
	They only said how many actually made it through.
	You know what?
	Keep poking that bear.
	Let's see their claws come out.
	That leads into the next story.
	U.S.
	trained Ukrainian counteroffensive.
	Okay, so we've got American mercenaries in there training the soldiers that remain in Ukraine to fight back.
	We're providing them They're munitions to fight back.
	We're giving them our intelligence to fight back and they're still losing.
	So apparently Russia's plans to run this thing are getting pretty ugly and it's getting to be springtime when you're going to have your major ground battles begin to break loose here as soon as the ground thaws out and The mud is gone.
	It's going to get uglier all day long from here on out until one side or the other.
	I don't see Petraeus out there.
	I mean, his enthusiasm for nuclear war is one of the most alarming things I've ever seen.
	He's willing to sacrifice every last Ukrainian soldier for this neocon political agenda in this war between Russia and Ukraine.
	And just to give you a little reminder of the layout here, Russia Got into this thing because all those Western weapons ended up in Ukraine, including whatever biological weapons may or may not have been there.
	Of course, there's been lots of talk about different chemical weapons factories, and so I just want you to think of this like from an American perspective.
	What if Russia put a bunch of missile silos on the Mexican side of the U.S.
	border?
	That's exactly what Russia was responding to.
	It's the exact same scenario as Western allies and NATO countries putting military installations on the Ukrainian border of Russia to threaten them.
	Why are we as American taxpayers supporting this?
	You've got this US-trained Ukrainian counteroffensive taking place.
	It's so obvious now that we're not even pretending that this is a proxy war anymore.
	This is a Western war against Russia and Petraeus is just another neocon globalist who doesn't care how many people get obliterated in this process.
	Can you imagine being a poor Ukrainian person dealing with This kind of destruction and death in your own country, your jobs are gone, your job hopes are gone.
	Oh, but we've promised that Vanguard and BlackRock are going to roll on in and rebuild the infrastructure.
	Great.
	Yeah, that's all good.
	But I mean, think about Russia launches a preemptive strike and I saw the video.
	This is two minutes and 25 long.
	It looks like a fireworks factory going off because all these munitions, all these massive arms are firing off because they're burning into the air.
	Well, there's a really good use of taxpayer money at the largest railroad junction Where all these arms and munitions that America and U.S.
	allies have paid for just going up in flames.
	That's of course why the video is so popular.
	You can see everything.
	It looks like a fireworks factory.
	I predict that soon we will be in absolute awe of the bear.
	They have held such restraint against this thing for so long and I just have a feeling they're about done with it and they're gonna go They're going to go out of control at this.
	And I just have one question for America and its leaders.
	Has anyone advocated for balance?
	Or is this just a swinging sword competition between the U.S.
	mainstream media and Russia's mainstream media with all these people in the middle getting mowed down?
	Anybody talking about balance?
	No, there's not even been a consideration of a declaration of war, whether the U.S.
	ought to be involved.
	They've just gone ahead and done it.
	You're absolutely 100% correct, Brian, and Petraeus is among the very worst.
	Meanwhile, Syrian security forces seize loads of weapons from ISIS hideouts in Daraa.
	ISIS, of course, was created by the United States by John Brennan, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama in 2012, a terrorist army to bring pressure on the democratically elected government of Bashar al-Assad of Syria in the name of bringing democracy to Syria.
	It's monstrous!
	Syrian government forces have seized loads of weapons and ammo from ISIS hideouts in the southern governorate of Daraa.
	A state-run news agency reported weapons and ammo were uncovered during a recent combing operation thanks to info provided by locals.
	Authorities are still working to pursue terrorists and clear liberated areas from terrorism by removing booby traps and weapons.
	Photos shared by the Senate show dozens of assault rifles, rocket-propelled grenades, hand grenades, heavy mortars seized by the Syrian security forces.
	Earlier, the 4th Division of the Syrian Arab Army, a military intelligence directorate, deployed reinforcements in the eastern and western countrysides of Darayya to conduct counterterrorism raids.
	Despite losing its leader and several senior commanders, In recent operation by government forces and local fighters of the neighboring governorate, ISIS influence in southern Syria remains strong.
	An officer of the Syrian police was killed in a drive-by attack lately.
	ISIS confirmed responsibility.
	Recent raids indicate the government forces are preparing to step up counter-offensive.
	Meanwhile, five Arab states plus Iran are among 19 nations ready to join the BRICS.
	Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Algeria, Egypt, Bahrain, and Iran have formally asked to join BRICS.
	19 nations altogether have expressed interest in joining the emerging market bloc of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa.
	What will be discussed is expansion of BRICS and modalities of how it will happen.
	Thirteen countries have formally asked to join.
	Another six have asked informally.
	BRICS will hold its annual summit in Cape Town the first week in June.
	Of course, ministers of all five member states have confirmed their attendance.
	Earlier, Bloomberg revealed BRICS is expected to surpass U.S.-led G7 in economic growth expectation.
	Further analysis on G7 and BRICS each contribute equally to global economic growth in 2020.
	The Western bloc performance has recently declined.
	By 2028, G7 is expected to make up just 27.8% of the global economy, while BRICS will make up 35%.
	The estimates come a few weeks after Deputy Chair of Russia's State Duma Alexander Babikov revealed BRICS is working on developing a new currency to be presented during the organization's upcoming summit.
	Brick member states account for over 40% of the global population of Earth and around 25% of the global GDP.
	The interest from global South nations that join the bloc comes when more and more governments are moving away from the U.S.
	dollar.
	The greenback has become more unreliable for dollarized economies due to rising interest rates and the bank's weaponization of the dollar through financial sanctions.
	In addition, the West, especially Europe, is facing a growing energy crisis from sanctions targeting Russian energy markets due to the invasion of Ukraine and U.S.
	sabotage of the Nord Stream pipeline.
	Owen, your thoughts?
	Yeah, I think for our purposes right now, it's the de-dollarization push coming from BRICS.
	A lot of countries signing on to join.
	Indonesia was one of the countries that also signed on to join right now, following the lead of BRICS Group and its policy of shifting away from our dollar in trade and financial transactions.
	I think this follows a really dangerous and scary trend.
	I think that pretty soon what we're going to see is the collapse of the U.S. dollar.
	A lot of countries stating that they want to implement this practice with a number of countries in combination, Thailand and Malaysia, China, Japan also.
	They're planning to sign corporation agreements with South Korea, too, in regard to local currency trading.
	All of this just moving and shifting away from the U.S. dollar, and I understand why.
	I mean, this is what happened in 2014.
	Russia began this push when we sanctioned them over Crimea.
	And I think as we're losing this proxy war against Russia, as we're losing all this and Iran is poised to attack and everything that's going on right now as a result of our policy, it's a very, very scary thing.
	So, you know, as a U.S.
	citizen, as somebody who, you know, this is going to affect and everybody listening, this is going to affect you as well.
	This collapse of the U.S.
	dollar as every single other country unanimously decides to move and shift away from it.
	Brian.
	Okay, so the first article, Syrian security forces seize loads of weapons.
	Nothing to see here, folks.
	Let me summarize.
	Look, loads of NATO weapons provided to the terrorists planning to Implement a Western-style coup against the democratically elected government.
	Does this sound familiar?
	Does it sound like the same ridiculous old play they did in Ukraine when they installed Zelensky?
	You know, this is what happens when we see underhanded tactics and techniques of the CIA coming in and assassinating important police chiefs Or, you know, I guess I'm speculating that it would be something that was run by them trying to build a militia or a group of terrorists inside of a democratically elected government to and then arming them to go to war with the current government.
	Hey, you know what?
	Maybe they ought to consider trying to get an uprising going here in the United States.
	Of course, since we're running it, that's the last thing they're going to see happen in this situation.
	But this is the same play that's always been running.
	Oh, we don't like your policies.
	We don't like which way you're leaning.
	We don't like your leadership.
	They're talking bad about us powerful Western nations.
	Maybe they're letting their media a little bit too loose.
	So we're going to go ahead And go in there and build a small army of guys to go up against the incumbent government.
	Okay.
	And as for BRICS, you know, the deeper I look at this story, the more I begin to understand how important this BRICS Summit in South Africa is really becoming.
	In theory, you've got 19 new nations.
	So right now, BRICS includes 40% of the population of Earth.
	And we're talking about Basically, there's 52 nations that are based in the petrodollar.
	Bricks has managed to attract 12 currently, joining into whatever provisions are going to be tied to the use of this new type of currency.
	And trust me, it's going to be a digital currency, just like the U.S.
	dollar is going to become a central bank digital currency the same way.
	It's the same thing.
	And the question becomes, what sorts of strings are going to be attached to these currencies?
	And right now, you've got, in theory, 127 nations that are caught in the middle in terms of, well, we'd like to take BRICS money and we'd like to take the U.S. dollar.
	And we just really don't know.
	But there's two camps that are beginning to form in terms of the world's money.
	And these 127 nations are going to be caught in the middle.
	I suspect that what's going to happen in South Africa, you're going to see a traditional summit where they bring in loads and loads and loads of hookers and influencers and all the worst people in the world.
	You're going to see American-style terrorism or American-run false flag operations threatening the summit.
	You're going to see every sort of dirty underhanded trick in the book that's going to possibly take place, or that could possibly take place, is going to take place at this summit.
	I think it's going to be very, very interesting to see.
	And just so you know, the rumors out there are, okay, we've got Saudi Arabia, Iran, Argentina, UAE, Algeria, Egypt, Burma, Iran, Iraq, Zimbabwe, Yemen, Somalia, and Congo, who are all applying to become part of this new BRICS reserve currency.
	And of course, China owns over 25% last I heard of U.S.
	security bonds.
	And so if BRICS can get strong enough, they could simply go nuclear.
	Sell them all.
	Sell them all.
	It'll crash the dollar.
	It'll crash the American petrodollar.
	BRICS will get stronger every day.
	Guys, we're looking at something that's very, very serious that's going to be rolling out this summer related to these BRICS developments.
	And of course, why BRICS?
	Why did BRICS get the momentum?
	You had G20.
	You had the UN.
	You had the Shanghai Corporation Association.
	Why is BRICS?
	Suddenly attracting all of this interest among all the competitors that have risen up over the years for the U.S.
	dollar.
	I don't know, but I imagine that the influence operation going on behind the scenes on this particular deal is probably one of the darkest, most nefarious things that we've ever witnessed in humankind's race for its soul.
	I think your advisories about dirty tricks to try sabotage are well-founded, Brian, and none of this would surprise me.
	I think you're spot-on.
	Meanwhile, the White House threatens a new jaw-dropping veto.
	The sole piece of legislation raising the national debt being considered by Congress is in danger of a veto from the White House.
	The Republican-led legislation to increase the debt limit and reduce government spending was denounced by the White House with a policy statement as a careless attempt to gain severe concessions as a condition for our country to repay the bills it previously incurred.
	The 2023 Save Limit and Grow Act would increase the debt while addressing the national deficit.
	The plan would reduce spending by about $130 billion during the upcoming year while raising the debt limit to around $1.5 trillion.
	The White House declared the President made it clear he will not tolerate these attempts at hostage-taking, alleging the GOP will be to blame if the country fails.
	The debt ceiling must be discussed by House Republicans without demand or restriction, exactly as Congress achieved three times during the last administration.
	The White House claims the proposal would cause severe cutbacks to programs hardworking Americans and middle class depend upon, risking recession default, job losses, and increased interest rates.
	Despite a California congressman asking the White House to organize meetings to discuss the issue, Biden has declined to meet with the House Speaker over the national debt.
	Joe Manchin, who will soon be up for re-election, has criticized Biden's deficiency of leadership for not meeting with the Speaker.
	The plan will go to a floor vote this week.
	And a required 218 votes to succeed.
	The Senate, however, will have trouble approving the bill because Democrats now have a 51-49 majority there.
	Meanwhile, Jean-Pierre depends Biden's normal cheat sheet for a news conference.
	Biden faces consistent criticism for his reluctance to hold press conferences or even to respond to questions from reporters, as many express concern he doesn't have the cognitive function required to do the job.
	He's even implied his White House handlers have ordered him not to engage with journalists.
	The DNC has confirmed he's not going to be required to debate any primary challengers.
	Earlier, he took part in a rare news event, but cameras captured the cheat sheet he brought along, including the question at least one reporter would be asking, as well as instructions about how to pronounce the reporter's name and even her photograph.
	In his part, new concerns about his ability to communicate clearly, but the admin once again circled the wagon and attempted to portray it as all entirely normal.
	In addition to a sheet with a header, Question 1, he had a piece of paper listing his top accomplishments, the names of individuals serving in his administration, Kanekoa the Great tweeted, Joe Biden was caught red-handed with a cheat sheet containing the names and questions of reporters he was scheduled to answer.
	Listen as this reporter goes along with a scam and functions in a propaganda arm of the U.S.
	political establishment.
	There you can see a photograph of the cheat sheet with the reporter's photograph, questions, and the like.
	During a subsequent press conference, the press secretary, Jean Pierre, Phil did a question about the cheat sheet saying it's entirely normal for a press to be briefed on reporters who'll be asking questions.
	She went on to deny that the White House pre-approves questions.
	We do not have specific questions in advance.
	That's not something we do.
	This was not the first time Biden spotted carrying incredibly detailed notes ahead of a news conference more than two years ago.
	He brought a sheet instructing him to call his specific reporters in June, spotted with a card that spelled out everything, including when and where to sit.
	During one 2021 event, he openly referenced a cheat sheet asserting, ladies and gentlemen, he gave me a list here.
	The first person I was instructed calling is Kelly O'Donnell from NBC.
	How bad is this?
	Owen, your thoughts?
	Well, I think the debt issue is a very, very serious one.
	I don't see the point of a debt ceiling if it's been raised 78 times since 1960.
	The idea of a debt ceiling is that once you reach it, you don't raise it, you don't surpass it, because that's the ceiling.
	It doesn't matter if it's in place if every single time we reach it, we just raise it.
	You know, there's a bunch of—and the liberals, leftists, love to blame tax cuts for the issue, but that's not the issue.
	How about $5 trillion that we spent as a country on stimulus checks because people didn't want to work over a fake disease that they were never at risk of dying from?
	What about spending on LGBTQ services across the world, instituting transgender drag queen shows all across the world, spending money on gay museums, millions of dollars going to social things like that?
	Worthless things that the government has no part and should have no part in.
	This is a serious issue.
	I mean, if we default, I don't think we're going to because in all honesty, our government working in tandem with the big banks and BlackRock and Vanguard and every single thing that we see, it's really just a sham.
	But as far as the everyday American goes, this is a very serious issue, and ideally we want to get to a place where we institute an actual limit on spending.
	Right now we're spending, I think our debt limit is set at $31.4 trillion.
	That's absolutely insane.
	That's absolutely ridiculous.
	It's more money than basically exists that we have in deficit right now, in debt right now, which is really, really bad.
	We're spending about 400 billion to 300 trillion dollars each year over the last decade, always spending more than we take in.
	So it's a very serious issue, a very serious problem.
	And frankly, I'm not surprised to see many people move away from the US dollar as we incur $31.4 trillion in debt as of December 2021.
	So it's even more than that now.
	In regards to Joe Biden, I would just say this is more of the same There's a hilarious thing if you guys look this up, you look up all of Joe Biden's gaffes, all of the things that he said that are just absolutely ridiculous mumbling statements where he just forgets where he is entirely.
	I think that's the whole point.
	The whole point is that he's a houseplant.
	He's a puppet that sits there and does exactly what he's told to do.
	That's not surprising at all.
	I think this is something that we've been saying about Joe Biden since Since he got elected.
	I mean, this is since before he got elected and running, running against Donald Trump.
	It was it was very clear that he wasn't present.
	He wasn't all there.
	And, you know, it's a bad look for our nation.
	It's embarrassing to be an American right now.
	And so I think the the fastest that we can the faster that we can expose what's actually going on to get some, you know, maybe reporters will see this.
	Maybe, maybe we'll have a brave reporter that actually asks Biden a serious question instead of a question that doesn't matter.
	I mean, any all of the reporters that we have in there are agents of the federal government doing their bidding, acting as the propaganda arm for the U.S. federal government.
	So, you know, hopefully maybe we'll see a reporter with some kind of dignity, with some kind of integrity that ends up asking a question that we all know Joe Biden won't be able to answer.
	That'll embarrass him and his administration.
	But until that happens, I have little faith in a little faith in journalism in the States right now.
	I think it's called fake news.
	Yeah.
	Brian.
	I'm beginning to believe that it's absolutely all fake.
	I don't know how much is out there.
	I'm tired of people using the name Joe Biden because Joe Biden is nothing more than a puppet.
	So let's just replace the idea of the President of the United States.
	Let's just replace the idea of Joe Biden as a man with the concept of the puppeteers.
	So if we're going to retitle the first article, which was put out by the Liberty uh liberty planet who obviously is like a tea party style fiscal responsibility type of publication um the title is puppeteers will veto all financial accountability oh surprise surprise surprise uh ever heard the term quantitative easing i mean we've been printing money out of nowhere and for years and years and years
	this whole system is based on people's belief that money has power and that money has some value to it.
	Well, the day will come when money is not going to deliver anybody, including the United States, from our problems.
	Our problems are based in the fact that our character as a people and as a government have declined beyond control.
	Look, Everybody inside the Congress is part of the Uniparty.
	They all get their money for their secret pork spending projects.
	That's how we get votes.
	Look, a law should be six or seven pages.
	I mean, it ought to be simple and elegant.
	It ought to say, this is what a law is.
	This is the new law.
	Not these things.
	These are 7,000 page spending bills that include every pork barrel project for Everybody and their brother designed to control every modicum of information that moves around and pay off everybody that's involved and from the people that fix the votes to the people that run the police forces to the people that Build the roads.
	I mean, the entire system is based completely on being able to steer a contract here or steer a contract there so that this person gets what they want in order to support the spending bill.
	There is no more master that's above it that decides, hey, Our house is not in order.
	We've taken on too much debt.
	We're over leveraged.
	All the things that we've bought are getting older and they're falling apart.
	All of our bridges are coming apart.
	All of our roads are coming apart.
	We're not able to recruit and retain decent police forces anymore or a decent military anymore.
	Let's destroy the whole thing and gut it and suck the life out of every dollar that's left.
	And by the way, at the end of the day...
	I'm not supposed to say that anymore.
	I'm trying to watch that.
	By the way, everything we do is based on our intellectual ability to buy low and sell high.
	Every dollar produced in America is based on one's ability to Build a widget at a price and sell it at a higher price, whether it's intellectual things or whether it's things produced in factories or whatever it is.
	It's all built on the gap between what it takes to make it and what it takes to sell it.
	That's what creates the profit margins that make the economy go on.
	Guys, we as America are not that strong intellectually anymore.
	This is being propped up by a force.
	And as for Jean-Pierre defending the cheat sheet, well, I guess if I was doing a A press conference, I'd probably want a cheat sheet too.
	Biden's been on the teleprompter.
	So, I'm sorry, the puppeteers have run their puppet off of a teleprompter for so long.
	He's gaffed it.
	He's out of control.
	He's eating his ice cream.
	Nobody wants to talk about the elephant in the room with this guy.
	And this is Weekend at Bernie's version two.
	I mean, like, it's the sequel.
	We had Weekends at Bernie's during the first election.
	Now it's the very bad, very poorly made sequel that's coming out behind it, and all these Democrats and media People that are listening to CNN and MSNBC are walking around with blinders on.
	They literally have no idea that it actually takes a mind to run that office.
	And this guy is not the mind.
	He's not running the office.
	I say that I don't believe the guy will get 10 million votes for real.
	I think the whole system is rigged and it's going to show 90 million votes for the guy this time around.
	Yeah, when he actually gets 10.
	I think you got it exactly right, Brian.
	Exactly right.
	Meanwhile, here we have actual footage of Joe at the town hall meeting.
	Check it out.
	First question from Courtney of Los Angeles Times.
	Thank you, Mr. President.
	Your top economic priority has been to build up U.S.
	domestic manufacturing in competition with China.
	But your rules against expanding chip manufacturing in China is hurting South Korean companies that rely heavily on Beijing.
	Are you damaging a key ally in the competition with China to help your domestic politics ahead of the election?
	And one for President Yun, there have been concerns since last year that North Korea will soon be conducting its seventh nuclear test amid growing domestic support in your country for your own nuclear weapons.
	Meanwhile, Russia has suggested it could send its latest weapons to North Korea if South Korea sends lethal aid to Ukraine.
	How do you seek to manage the North Korea risk amid obligations to Ukraine and NATO?
	I mean, it's ridiculous.
	The guy's incompetent to answer any question.
	Meanwhile, excuse me.
	Pentagon top brass, please, with Carlson accent.
	Coming from Politico, senior Pentagon official welcomed the departure of Tucker Carlson.
	He regularly criticized military diversity and inclusivity policies, claiming they were imposed at the expense of battle readiness, as though that weren't an obvious truth.
	We're a better country without him bagging on our Military every night in front of hundreds of thousands of people.
	They don't even know he averages around 3 million.
	The source claimed Tucker had made a mockery of the free press, repeatedly cherry-picking department policies and using them to destroy the DoD as an institution.
	Commenting on his exit, another official reportedly said, good riddance.
	The popular former primetime host regularly accused the Pentagon of undermining U.S.
	fighting capabilities for the sake of ideologically motivated inclusivity, which he demonstrated again and again and again.
	In a March 2021 segment, he blasted flight suits for pregnant aviators, suggesting Washington was headed in the wrong direction, unlike its rival Beijing.
	Well, China's military becomes more masculine as it assembles the world's largest navy.
	Our military needs to become, as Joe Biden says, more feminine.
	This is a mockery of the military and its core mission, which is winning wars.
	The remarks triggered a rebuke from the Pentagon, John Kirby's spokesman saying, what we absolutely won't do is take personnel advice from a talk show host or the Chinese military.
	We know we're the greatest military in the world today, and even for all the things we need to improve, we know exactly why that's so.
	When asked by Politico why he thought the reported gleaner's departure among senior Pentagon officials was taking place, he replied in a text message, huh, I'm sure.
	The news, Tucker and Fox were parting ways broke shortly before his prime time show was to be broadcast.
	Meanwhile, Rasmus and Pohl, Tucker more popular than Fox.
	Former Fox host is more popular than the network that fired him, according to Rasmussen.
	A likely voter surveyed 59% had a favorable view of Tucker compared with 52% for Fox.
	More believe Paulson's departure will make Fox worse, not better, 32-19.
	Among Republicans, 47% voting Tucker go would make Fox worse compared with 13% otherwise.
	Fox, of course, said it had agreed to part ways.
	In a press release, we thanked him for his service.
	Not surprisingly, Tucker is most popular among Republican voters and self-identified conservatives.
	He's viewed at least somewhat favorably by 71% of Republicans, 55% of those unaffiliated, and even 48% of Democrats.
	55% of conservatives have a very favorable impression of Tucker, but only 18% of liberals and moderates share that view.
	48% of liberals have an unfavorable view.
	Owen, your thoughts?
	Yeah, I love Tucker Carlson.
	I think that he's one of the most entertaining hosts that we have today, which explains why he's so popular.
	He's good at what he does.
	I think the reason that they're happy with his exit is simply because he's the only, you know, legacy news media host that holds people accountable.
	And I think that he should have left a long time ago.
	I don't think that his talents were much used at Fox.
	I think that he would be far better off doing something with the Daily Wire, even though I don't even like the Daily Wire.
	I really think they're controlled opposition, but he'd do a better job, you know, being more independent with a YouTube show, with a podcast, going independent.
	We already know that he'll average, you know, I don't even know.
	It's like three million a night he gets on Fox News.
	We know it's going to be way more than that if he goes to YouTube, if he goes somewhere I think that's exactly what he'll probably do.
	But now that he has this newfound freedom, it's going to be interesting to see what he does next.
	Now I also want to see why he was released from Fox News.
	There's a lot of alternate reports, but one report that came out about two hours ago from The Hill says that he was likely released because of his criticism of top news execs, such as Rupert Murdoch, top executives at Fox, who we all know are bought and paid for by BlackRock, by Vanguard.
	These are the same people that are controlling by CNN.
	Fox is owned by the same people that own all of the legacy liberal news media.
	that MSNBC, CNN, all of the media is bought and paid for.
	Fox is not different.
	It never was.
	Just because it's giving you the illusion that there's two sides to this fight, it's really one side.
	That's what this whole thing is.
	The illusion that we are fighting against one another, that conservatives should be fighting liberals, that CNN should be fighting Fox.
	And yes, there might be a fight there in terms of the ideology, but overall, the real fight is humans who desire to be free fighting against elites who desire to take their freedom.
	Brian.
	Well, let me just remind you that way back from 1954 to 1961, there was a The president of CBS News was a guy by the name of Sig Mickelson, and he interviewed the current CIA director, who was William Colby, who was, at the time he was interviewed, the former one.
	And let me just see if anybody can, if this rings a bell with anybody, I'm going to try something here.
	Can anybody hear that?
	No, not hearing a thing.
	Okay, well.
	Describe it.
	What is it?
	Oh, it's William Colby coming in and CIA's blowing the whistle on how CBS had been contacted by the CIA in the public affairs operations and the shifts that established and basically the CIA basically came out and said, look, you're going to play ball with us because everybody else, we already own everybody of any significance in The mainstream media.
	Well, I guess Tucker Carlson lost his way somewhere and began to believe in the power of straight thinking and intellectual thought and critical thinking because he simply didn't fall into the talking points that the rest of the mainstream media was put out there.
	I suspect that he knew That there were strange things happening with the one subject that we cover so well here on this channel that nobody else covers at all, which is the false flags.
	And it's the big elephant in the room.
	Everybody else can talk about The economy or talk about the treasury or talk about war, talk about whatever, but nobody, nobody anywhere is allowed to talk about the Pulse nightclub shooting and the anomalies that surrounded that.
	Nobody's allowed to talk about Columbine.
	Nobody's allowed to talk about 9-11.
	Nobody's allowed to talk about any of these false flags that have been operated on the American public.
	To get them to be so dumbed down, fearful, sheeple.
	When this is all said and done, that's going to be the issue.
	Sooner or later, people are going to wake up because right now there are millions and millions of Americans who are going down the rabbit hole and beginning to try to figure out what's at the bottom of it.
	And you know what they're finding?
	They're finding money won't save you.
	They're finding that the mainstream media won't tell you the truth.
	They're finding that nothing that they thought was true is actually true.
	They're finding that everything's a lie everywhere you look.
	And when you go down that rabbit hole and you go down deep enough, you begin to realize something and something very important.
	We're just people.
	We're all trying to get along.
	But there is something behind the scenes that's got control of this.
	And we don't see justice in this world.
	We don't find it anywhere.
	We don't find truth.
	So they're looking for it.
	They're looking all over for it.
	What's at the bottom of the rabbit hole?
	I'm going to tell you right now, I believe that the Bible is right at the bottom of the rabbit hole, and anybody who digs deep enough, long enough, is going to figure it out.
	Now, on that topic, Ireland just passed a law making it illegal to read non-mainstream news sources.
	Illegal!
	Finable!
	Who made it illegal?
	Ireland!
	Lawmakers in Ireland have passed a new law that makes it illegal to read non- or share non-mainstream news sources.
	They're making the alternative media illegal in Ireland?
	That's what the article says.
	It was written by Sean Adi Tabai.
	May 1st, 2023.
	It's not getting a lot of, but it has been blue checkmarked.
	It is absolutely true.
	Now, Laura Loomer just covered DeSantis making his secret trip to Jerusalem with Representative Mike Caruso so that Governor Ron DeSantis in Jerusalem Could sign House Bill 269, the strongest anti-Semitism bill in the United States, to Florida's Nazi thugs.
	Basically, at the end, basically, DeSantis signed a law that says you can't speak out about the Jews.
	This is becoming dystopian, 1984-ish.
	Insanity.
	And people are starting to smell it.
	They're starting to feel it.
	Rod, what happens with national broadcasts and so forth that violate Florida law?
	Could I be criticized if I were critical of Israel or the Jews be sued in Florida?
	I mean, this is bizarre.
	I don't know.
	I didn't get to the bottom of it.
	My point was, There is an erosion.
	Of our ability to speak freely.
	And Tucker Carlson is just like the boulder rolling down the mountain, but the mountain is being leveled.
	Our ability to use our words to fight back against these people has been destroyed.
	And look at the propaganda we're going to find out at the end of the show today.
	Look at the propaganda that they roll out against truth-tellers.
	Stay tuned for that.
	You're going to be shocked.
	You're 100% right.
	No doubt about it.
	Here it comes.
	They saw the horrific aftermath of a mass shooting, should we?
	The New York Times had published a piece suggesting that Americans shouldn't have access to crime scene photographs from Sandy Hook because it was so horrific.
	Find it on my blog under the title, The Latest Pathetic New York Times Sandy Hook Sob Story.
	Editor's note.
	For background, those who are unfamiliar with the evidence related to the Sandy Hook event might want to watch two presentations from my Volkswagen Conspiracy Conference 2020, which you can download to your own desktop.
	Kelly Watt, Sandy Hook, A Mass Illusion, and Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., What Happened at Sandy Hook.
	Perhaps a better title, What DIDN'T Happen at Sandy Hook, as the following explains.
	There must be over a hundred proofs that suggest that Sandy Hook was staged.
	Here I'm going to review only a half a dozen of his illustrations.
	While time treats these claims as facts, there's the tiniest chance that something more just might be involved here.
	As a longtime student of Sandy Hook has had his book banned, been sued and attacked, been the target of innumerable smears up to and including the Chronicle of Higher Education, I find it offensive, extremely offensive, when rags like the New York Times publish disputable claims about Sandy Hook as though they were facts.
	I brought together the 13 experts, including six PhDs, where we provided evidence strongly suggesting that the school had been closed by 2008, that there were no students or teachers there, and that it was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control, as officials in the Obama Department of Education confirmed to Paul Preston at the time.
	Look at this!
	Sandy Hook Redux.
	Obama officials confirm it was a drill and no children died.
	I think a lot of sources in regard to what's going on with the president, the administration, and so on, and everyone, I have a lot of sources in regard to what's going on with the president, the administration, and so on, and every one of my sources said it was a false flag, Paul Brunson.
	Sophia Smallstrom, who produced and directed the documentary Unraveling Sandy Hook, which many regard as the best video study of the event, recently interviewed L.A.
	school expert Paul Preston about Sandy Hook and his knowledge of what had transpired.
	Governor Bloyd held a press conference that day explaining he and the lieutenant governor had been spoken to that something like this might happen.
	It was raised the question, what something like this did he mean?
	Had he been told a school shooting massacre took place or a drill that would be presented as a real event, which appears to be what took place?
	Remarkably, we now have confirmation from an unexpected source.
	Paul Preston had obtained information from officials in the U.S.
	Department of Education of the Barack Obama administration who confirmed to him on the basis of their own personal knowledge that it had been a drill, that no children had been killed, and that it had been done to promote an anti-gun agenda.
	So, why was this piece published?
	Let's start with the overall character of this latest from The New York Times, as Ron Avery has observed.
	It could probably be called a short story about the experiences suffered by three Connecticut State Police crime scene investigators who say they were involved in the Sandy Hook mass shooting investigation.
	Virtually nothing in this story has to do with actual evidence related to the crime scene notice, but rather what these parties who claim to be crime scene investigators have suffered emotionally as a result of working the Sandy Hook crime scene.
	As Avery explains, the title explicitly asks, should we see and be exposed to the same?
	Their implied answer is, no, we should not.
	Let it stop with these three.
	The whole New York Times article is a pathetic, useless attempt to justify the concealment and redaction of conclusive photographic evidence that anyone was actually killed at Sandy Hook Elementary on 14 December 2012.
	The essence and core of the whole is summed up here.
	Even though the Attorney General is convinced in this moment Reeling on the threshold of this tiny, obliterated bathroom, that if the American people only saw what he was seeing, Congress would be forced to do the right thing.
	Nothing would change in the end.
	Tragedy in America would prevail.
	Some would say nothing has changed because we have not yet been made to see, after each new mass shooting, the question the debate returns.
	Would seeing the crime scene photos have an effect on the gun crisis in the same way images of Emmett Till's body in an open coffin had on the civil rights movement?
	The Sandy Hook photographs have been redacted by Connecticut state law since 2013, even if the law were to change with the consent of the families of the victims who pushed for the legal restriction.
	Public viewing of the photographs would require one outlet or another to first make the decision to publicize the images.
	In a culture where reality is no longer agreed upon, many will not believe what they see unless it's funneled through the propaganda of choice.
	So until that unlikely moment arrives, the whole truth of these images and those of shooting after shooting For the decade after Sandy Hook and into the future, we'll live on only in the atrocity exhibition that exists in the memory of those who photograph, measure, and collect the foul evidence.
	Crime scene photos, however, surely ought to be available to the public.
	The purpose of this paragraph appears to be to defend themselves from their own conscience and awareness that, as Avery observes, sealing crime scene evidence does not result in good individual reactions or good social policy.
	Sealing evidence that crimes make crimes easier to conduct and conceal whether we are investigating fake crimes or real ones.
	A case of this kind, which is immersed in controversy, especially deserves thorough and meticulous investigation, which cannot be properly conducted when evidence is so oppressed.
	In this instance, based upon the evidence I and my colleagues have amassed, The Obama administration appears to have conducted, let's call it, an act of faux-terrorism by faking a mass murder of children to instill fear into the hearts and minds of their target audience, American parents, to make them more amenable to political manipulation.
	It was an act of domestic terrorism.
	And that it was also fake can be considered in relation to the photographs they included here.
	What do they tell us about Sandy Hook?
	Do they help to resolve whether this event was reality or illusion?
	The answer, surprisingly, turns out to be yes.
	The CSI van parking lot photograph.
	Because my edited book, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, it was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control, 2015, 2nd edition, 2016, has been taken improperly, in my view, and under review.
	I shall not rely upon photos from that source.
	Most of them originate elsewhere.
	Even though they may also appear in the book, they are not derived from the book, and therefore using them does not violate the book's contested copyright.
	Let's begin with the first paragraph about the presence of a CSI van in the parking lot following the event.
	The crime scene van was parked next to the black Honda Civic already identified as belonging to the shooter, yellow tape marking its perimeter, juddering in a helicopter gust.
	Earlier that morning, when the van was cleared to move closer to the school, Jeff Covello, the crime scene van's supervisor and his team, were crowded around the dry-erase board.
	Art Walkley, the only one on the van who's so far been inside, sketched out what he said were the two main areas of impact.
	He arrived with the other first responding officers and stormed the school as children were running out, his gun drawn, ready to kill on sight.
	In fact, quite eager to pull the trigger once he glimpsed classrooms 10 and 8.
	Here's the photograph, which comes from the Connecticut State Police Archives on Sandy Hook, where you want to focus on the four windows at Classroom 10, which, of course, are right here, just above the van roof.
	When you compare the four windows at Classroom 10, discernible immediately above the roof of the CSI van, notice they are intact, but they would subsequently be presented as shot out.
	Here you can see the difference along with a photo of the burp study in the window frame and what they did to simulate shots.
	In the book, we had suggested the CSI van photo was taken the morning of 14 December 2012, before the event had taken place.
	Brian Davidson, a licensed private investigator, however, has taken a closer look and discovered it was taken the evening of 14 December 2012, before they had completed staging the scene.
	In other words, Even though officially the shooting has already taken place.
	This photo proves they have not quite completed its staging.
	The parking lot photograph.
	So we have proof the entire event was fake right off the bat.
	Implicitly, if you know the evidence in this case, which the Times anticipates you do not possess, by its irresponsible efforts to mislead and deceive you in its latest attempt to promote a hoax as though it were real.
	With similar intent, they include other photos.
	You might notice, if you don't think about it, but there is no handicapped parking space in this parking lot, nor any of the familiar blue and white signage required under the American with Disabilities Act, which means that this cannot have been an operating school at the time, under either federal or Connecticut law.
	Moreover, if you look at other photographs of the entire parking lot, additional missing elements stand out.
	It was a 38 degree Fahrenheit ground temperature day above freezing, but cold enough that you could not conduct classes unless the rooms had been heated.
	Yet there is no heat or steam rising from the building.
	No doubt because the school had been closed for so many years that the boilers were dysfunctional.
	And notice the rows of cars in the middle of the lot, which are all facing the school.
	Following the driving instructions on the roadway, you would have come in and turned to the right, then curled around to the left and parked facing away from the building.
	So what's going on?
	So, just as you thought you were being given information about the SCI van, but which turned out to be only partial and incomplete, you thought you were being given information about the parking lot, but it, too, is only partial and incomplete.
	The fallacy involved here is known as special pleading, like the case of a used car salesman who emphasizes the leather upholstery in the stereo system but neglects to point out that the rings are shot and the car needs a new transmission.
	That's what you get today from our nation's newspaper of record.
	A blown-out window.
	Notice here that, in spite of the blown-out window, none of the furniture appears to have moved even an inch.
	It's all there exactly as you would expect had the window remained intact.
	What you don't know about this photograph is that Wolfgang Helbig, a former Florida State Trooper and U.S.
	Customs agent who has been a school administrator and remains a nationally recognized school safety expert, has found 10 sworn affidavits by Connecticut State Police who claim they entered the building through that blown-out window.
	As Wolfgang has observed, no trained law enforcement officer would have entered that window without first breaking it out using his baton.
	Moreover...
	To avoid the risk of getting their uniforms on shards of glass, instead of all ten entering that way, one of them would have entered that way to open the door for the others.
	The three Stooges would have done better.
	Curly would have come in and then opened the door for Joe and Mo.
	Just how dumb are we supposed to be?
	Apparently, they think.
	Dumb enough.
	The hallway photograph.
	Or consider the hallway photo they include in the picture of the broken window at the front of the building at first.
	You might think you are being given important information once again.
	But what's important is what they are not telling you.
	A hallway photo, for example, doesn't explain what the official narrative maintains.
	Brian Davidson, D.I., accessed the photographic files of the Connecticut State Police and discovered, among others, that a hallway photo that should have included the body of the Sandy Hook principal, Dawn Hawkspring, and the school psychologist, Mary Sherlock, included neither, which means this and similar photographs contradict the official account.
	But you would never know unless you had background knowledge that Times does not provide.
	The caption here Looking down the corridor, the shooter walked to the end of room 10 after passing room 12 immediately to the last notice room on the right of room 9, the conference room, where the principal, the psychiatrist, and the teacher were killed.
	This is the floor area described as having Hawkswing and Sherlock laying in pools of blood.
	While some evidence of a red substance is present, in my opinion, it is not consistent with the statement, pools of blood, again.
	The time proffered a photo from inside Classroom A. But what gives a visual impression of a busy, active classroom?
	None of the photos in the Connecticut State Police Archive have their metadata identifying the place and the time each photograph was taken, which has been removed clearly not by accident.
	Absent that data, these photos would not normally be admissible in a court of law, except in this instance as circumstantial proof that the Connecticut State Police were involved in the scam, since what other reason could they have had to delete it?
	The classroom photograph.
	Once again, Ryan Davidson found other photos of Classroom 8 where the furniture is shoved up against the wall, and there are not only no student desks or chairs, but no teacher desk or chair either, which means he discovered proof not only that this was not the scene of a mass murder, but that Sandy Hook was not an operating school.
	Other evidence you're not going to learn about from the New York Times includes that we located the FEMA manual for a two-day exercise, technically.
	A mass casualty drill involving children and, more recently, found this exercise on the agenda of events to be conducted by the Connecticut FEMA office, which is located in Bridgeport, Connecticut.
	Complete with a map of how to reach the Sandy Hook School, which some may find rather persuasive as proof that it was a FEMA drill, present as mass murder to promote gun control, just as the banned book explains.
	The Connecticut FEMA scheduled map from Bridgeport to the San Diego School, by the way, were an appendices to my U.S.
	Supreme Court petition for reconsideration of the 7th and 14th Amendment issues, which I raised regarding my bizarre case in Wisconsin.
	Where the court was entitled to set aside any evidence it considered to be unreasonable, including the reports of two forensic document experts supporting me against the plaintiff, who claimed to have been defamed by fore-assertion I'd made that the death certificate for his son was not authentic.
	Covering up, Sandy Hook.
	So how much more proof do you need that it was a drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control?
	And don't expect to see photos of the alleged victims.
	As Wing Carver MD explained during his R.E.S.C.
	conference, they did not allow the parents to make contact with their children, but instead identified them on the basis of photographs, which made sense that most of them only existed in the form of photographs.
	Check out more of my work for additional proof, which they don't want you to find after all.
	That is why they banned the book.
	This article was clearly intended to explain away why you should not have access to Sandy Hook crime scene photographs.
	But even the few crime scene photographs they do include are damning evidence that this was a FEMA drone presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
	That Sandy Hook photographs have been redacted by Connecticut state laws in 2013 tells you all you need to know about the state of the state of Connecticut.
	From then-Governor Daniel Malloy to the state legislature to the Connecticut State Police and beyond, they all played their roles.
	Now they are playing the public for suckers and saps with the complicity of the New York Times.
	Maybe it's time to do something about it, at the very least.
	Don't let yourself be Played.
	The photographic center here are innocuous on their face.
	You probably thought that they supported the official narrative of mass murder at Sandy Hook because you did not know enough about it.
	But the facts appear to show it was an illusion and not a reality, which has encouraged them to run this scam again and again and again.
	So if you want to know why there are so many school shootings, now you have an explanation.
	Owen, your thoughts.
	There is very little that I could add to the content of all of that because it's something that I am still looking into.
	You still...
	It's not my area of expertise at all.
	I mean, I can remember up until maybe 2021-ish, you know, I think I thought most of these These, you know, mass shootings were real.
	I thought most of them were tragedies.
	I think I bought the narrative just like many others did and that's just a result of not knowing.
	It's just being ignorant.
	You know, ignorance is something that you always try to fight and that's the case here for me.
	I will say that in terms of everything coming to light, the darkness coming to light, we know that the Bible talks about this a lot.
	That the truth is going to set us free and that the truth will be revealed eventually.
	That's something that I do believe in.
	I think that's going to happen but When?
	You know, I believe it's God's timing when a lot of this is going to be revealed.
	When are people ready?
	My question to both of you would be, when do you think people are going to be ready?
	The climate right now in America is not one that I think is ready to come to terms with a lot of this stuff.
	We just saw Alex Jones sued for everything he was worth, more than everything he was worth, up to a billion dollars.
	Something that I just don't think that America has an appetite for.
	Maybe they don't even know That they have an appetite for it.
	Maybe they don't even know how this feels to have the truth revealed.
	It feels really, really weird at some level, but it's a positive feeling at the end because you're freer than before.
	Information, this kind of stuff sets us free.
	It sets us free from this trap.
	It sets us free from this scam, from this sham.
	That we've been subjected to in America for a very, very long time.
	And I think this is something that needs to happen with these mass shootings in particular because of how egregious the accusations are because of what they, you know, have meant for a generation of kids growing up in a school thinking that at any moment, it could be your last day.
	You know, this is something that is not trivial.
	It's incredibly important, something that's meaningful, that needs to be brought to light.
	And, you know, when that can happen, when America is ready for that, is not something that I'm sure of.
	But I hope it happens soon.
	Let me just ask, Owen, if you took this article at face value, if you assume what is said there is accurate and true, would you find that persuasive evidence that, in fact, it had been a stage event and not a real mass murder?
	Yes.
	And then the thing that, the interesting critique that I get from a lot of other people is that, well, how do you know that that evidence wasn't faked?
	How do you know that the evidence suggesting that these things, you know, suggesting that Parkland, suggesting that Sandy Hook or Columbine never happened, You know, how do you think, what's to say that those pieces of evidence are true?
	That's something that I think a lot of Americans are in right now when they see, you know, contradicting evidence that contradicts this narrative that's been driven into their heads so hard.
	And I think that's something that we have to take into consideration is that this is something that's been driven into people's heads very hard.
	On social media, social media is a huge part to play.
	Documentaries, popular streaming, Platforms like Netflix, like HBO Max, like Hulu, all of these feeding into one narrative.
	And I think, you know, I grew up thinking that all of these were true.
	I grew up thinking and, you know, I didn't even question it.
	It was never something that I thought to question.
	Brian.
	And that's the problem.
	Maybe it's not that people aren't questioning it.
	Maybe it's that people don't think to question it.
	Maybe it's that questioning things nowadays in America is something that we seldom do.
	We do not question things as much as we should.
	There's not an appetite to question things around us because what we're taught in school is what to think, not how to think.
	Brian.
	Yeah, Owen.
	The major force that's at play here is called groupthink. - Yeah.
	And that groupthink has a strength to it.
	There is safety in numbers.
	Look at the idea of a social credit score.
	If you hang out with the group, you're gonna get a nice high social credit score.
	It's when you begin to get to the outer edges that your social security, your social credit score goes down.
	And if you step outside of the circle, And another group begins to form around your ideas.
	That's the biggest threat you can possibly get.
	Everybody's social credit score is going to drop.
	And so it's really easy for people to say, well, wait a second.
	I don't have the critical thinking skills.
	To be able or I don't have the time to go through all this evidence or I don't have the knowledge to fight back against this academia or these crime scene photographers or I don't have the skill set that's going to put me on that level.
	So I've got to look to somebody else who's going to tell me that what I believe.
	Is okay.
	And so it's the psychology of groupthink which drives and when you blend that with emotionalism and the idea of babies being shot by the dozens inside three foot by four foot closets, which is what happened in that photo of that actual thing.
	The officer claims in his affidavit that he pulled 10 bodies out of the bathroom.
	That's three foot by four foot with a toilet.
	And place them on the floor right where that photo was looking at in classroom 10.
	Place them on the floor right there.
	There's no blood on the carpets.
	10 babies, all shot dead, all killed instantly with heart shots because they didn't bleed, because there's no blood being tracked out of the room or around her.
	Hey, but look, I know what my eyes are telling me, but these professional people are telling me something different now.
	Groupthink is what drives the coagulation of minds around these ideas.
	And I want to point out to you a scene from The Matrix.
	Do you remember that scene from The Matrix after Neo had taken his red pill?
	And they rebuild his body because they just freed him from the machine.
	And now Morpheus is going to roll on into the room and Neo's like, okay, I'm rebuilt.
	I'm out of the system.
	What just happened to me?
	And he says, you can't handle it.
	You're not going to be able to handle it.
	You're not going to be able to understand it.
	And we normally don't free a mind once it's reached a certain age, because once it's reached a certain age, it gets too hard.
	You can't free the mind.
	It'll break instead.
	And so what he says, you want to know the truth?
	And of course, this isn't the truth, but it shows a point.
	He picks up a Duracell battery.
	And what does Neo do?
	It dawns on him.
	Oh my God, I've been tricked.
	I've been deceived.
	I've been I've been, uh, it was all a lie.
	It can't be true.
	And he turns and he vomits right there on the floor.
	And it's, it's kind of a powerful scene in the matrix, but what that scene is describing is something called cognitive dissonance.
	Okay.
	And only a few of us are able to go through the process and complete the process.
	And the process is my mind has two conflicting beliefs, the groupthink and the independent thought.
	The group think, and they, yeah, but this is what I'm seeing.
	And these two forces are like magnets working away at each other inside the human mind.
	And so what happens is you literally get a sickness that begins to develop inside your gut when you begin to realize the extent of the deception.
	And the extent of the deception, you're a Bible guy, so you can get it, okay?
	The extent of the deception, is so beyond your capability of understanding.
	Because it goes so deep.
	Your kindergarten teachers were wrong.
	All those cartoons were wrong.
	Your junior high was wrong.
	The philosophy instructor was wrong.
	Every news anchor I've ever seen, Megyn Kelly and Bill O'Reilly and Tucker Carl, every television, every show that's programmed my mind has been wrong.
	Thank God there are some people that go through that process.
	Yeah.
	Some people that break, that vomit the poison out and break through on the other side, new and empty, literally tabula rasa, ready to rebuild, ready to rethink everything.
	Now there are very few people that are capable of breaking through society's deception on that level.
	I thank God I was one of them.
	Yeah, that's a great point, Brian.
	I think, you know, one thing I'd add is just it's for me, you mentioned the Bible.
	I think that's absolutely the fundamental core of it.
	You know, the Bible talks about the renewal of your mind, but that's something that we do as Christians born again into the spirit.
	That's exactly You know the point that I would always make with that and this this happened to me I think when I was in college and I think it's happening to a lot more kids right now who are in college as a result of you know for me I gotta be honest you know even though I don't like him now it was a guy like Ben Shapiro a guy like Jordan Peterson guys like you know maybe I could say Alex Jones was in there you know and and you know when you're inspired on that level as a kid As a teen, you know, it's an eye-opening moment.
	I'm lucky that I didn't go my whole life, you know, believing some of these things, and I was, you know, exposed to true things, the truth, relatively early.
	That's a blessing that I have.
	Very good.
	Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
	Send fan mail, broercont, a live need-to-know at gmail.com.
	Live need-to-know at gmail.com.
	From my blog!
	This is standard operating procedure for so many of these alleged mass shooting events.
	We are told the event was so horrific the public cannot see any evidence.
	It's like the alleged election of Demented Joe.
	We're told he won with a massive number of votes.
	But there are no audits to substantiate the alleged win.
	If you even suggest an audit, you're called unpatriotic and trying to undermine democracy.
	Notice they did the same thing with J6.
	As soon as Tucker had some actual video showing it was a very peaceful protest, other than for the deep state hired agent provocateurs like Ray Epps, Tucker was immediately taken off the air.
	Once again, and as always, the truth was so oppressed.
	You have to be pretty stupid to believe a demented, incoherent fool got the most votes in any presidential election.
	The Deep State is playing the public for complete fools, and the real tragedy is the Deep State is correct.
	By and large, the American public has been totally brainwashed.
	Meanwhile, self-destruction is the new D.C.
	norm.
	Regardless of what anyone in government or medicine claims, the whole COVID-19 bioweapon and the bioweapon jabs are distinctly a high-level effort to demean, disable, and destroy the human population and its ability to reproduce.
	Any future humans would have to be test tube-created because they plan to destroy male and female sex roles and have only one gender—transgender.
	The globalist kingpins who are on top of the world hierarchy that are directing this are sad to say not human themselves, but strange hybrids called Nephilim.
	They control monetary production and distribution and at this time mandate the use of interest-bearing debt notes as money when they are not.
	This is blatant fraud.
	These nephilim want to eventually eliminate the human race and create their new one called transhumans.
	No use for saying these ideas publicly because they're far too incredulous for the public to face values of discrediting.
	As far as all the millions of illegal immigrants, it's a fact that globalists pay their transportation by truck and bus and give them money which originates from the U.S.
	taxpayer.
	Folks like Mayorkas, in my opinion, seem to have lost their very souls in her hive.
	The strange part of all this is that top U.S.
	government and state officials destroying the country right now are setting up eventualities that in turn will destroy all their children, families, and relatives, as well as themselves.
	It's expected that all top cutouts will be quickly disposed of when the fall of America comes.
	Final thoughts.
	Yours, Owen.
	Yeah, I'll go to that one comment that you had about Nephilim.
	I think that's an incredibly interesting insight.
	That's something that I think is a rabbit hole that I love going down into.
	That's biblical truth right there.
	Something written a lot about in the book of Enoch.
	Something that you should check out if you Have the time.
	Additionally, there's a great book called The Roots of the Federal Reserve.
	One of the things that I point out a lot on my own show that I've talked about a lot has been the real true history of the Federal Reserve, where it came from, who controls it, who dominates it right now, and the agenda behind the Federal Reserve.
	And exactly what money is, the fractional reserve banking system, all of these things that just really serve to liberate you from the idea that we live in a country that cares about us, that we live in a country set up to defend and protect our rights when in fact we do not.
	The whole shift right now, the transhumanist shift, is all about destroying God's creation.
	It's corrupting God's creation, whether it's transgender denying God's purpose for sex and gender, whether it's the vaccination, altering our immune system, fundamentally our God-given immune system, our perfect immune system created by God, whether it's, you know, any of these things, whether it's social media or
	Screens taking us away from the natural world that we were supposed to enjoy whether it's big pharma giving us medicines Instead of natural things that grow in the earth that can actually cure us that can actually help to benefit us or whether it's just completely ignoring the healing power of the Holy Spirit.
	This is what's happening right now.
	It's an attack and an assault on what's natural, an attack and an assault on what's normal.
	You know, and as soon as we recognize that, this is the thing that I love to tell people about.
	These are the kind of things that I love to let people know, you know, that they have a God-given immune system that you were made, you're human, the human body is an incredible, incredible thing, you know, and we're a lot more We're a lot more capable of healing and of so many more things than people really realize.
	And that's really the goal of these elites, of the globalists, is to convince us that we're imperfect, that we're destitute, that we need them.
	But once you realize that we don't, I think the world's going to be a much better place and we can freaking get on to ridding ourselves from these people once and for all.
	Brian, your final thoughts?
	I don't know if I have too many final thoughts on today's episode.
	I didn't cut my teeth on Sandy Hook.
	It was Jim that inspired me to look into Sandy Hook.
	I did.
	I spent hours and hours and hours studying the crime scene photos, but this was after I knew.
	And I knew Already, because I watched Orlando develop right in front of my face, and I saw something impossible on television.
	It was impossible that Norman Cassiano was shot six times or four times in the abdomen with an AR-15 rifle at close range inside of the Pulse nightclub, and here he stood, sat in a Honda Civic, 48 hours later, lifted up his shirt and showed a piece of gauze on Fox News.
	Okay, had I not seen that, I wouldn't be here today.
	Okay?
	And the fact that they happen, the fact that they've continued, now I've made it a bit of a passion to try to break these things out and figure them out and figure out how they work and why they work and what they do.
	And I'm probably, I don't know, in the top 40% of researchers in this area, at least.
	But it doesn't matter.
	It doesn't matter, because at the end of the day, and I hate to say that, but once you break it all down and get down to the bottom of it, the whole world is full of this type of deception.
	Socrates was the wisest man they said that ever lived, and he claimed to not know a thing.
	Will that blow your mind?
	He claimed to not know anything, and he questioned everything.
	And I think, as a society, we'd be a lot stronger if we stepped into a little more of that role.
	Oh, Brian, that was wonderful, and Noah and I thank you so much, yes.
	And just for the sake of an audience who may be unaware, Brian has done not only sensational work on Sandy Hook, he authored Appendix E to my Supreme Court petition for reconsideration, going through the state police archives, and I can't tell you how important it is his discovery that the metadata had been removed
	Meaning that, under normal circumstances, being unable to authenticate the location and time at which the photographs were taken, they would not be admissible in courts of law.
	But think about it.
	The fact that Metagata has been removed is evidence that something is terribly wrong.
	It cannot have been by mistake.
	It cannot have been inadvertent.
	It shows that Connecticut police were Deeply involved in this whole shenanigan, and indeed, based upon my research, I assert with great confidence, they're actually running the show behind the scene and they were photographing everything.
	Stunning stuff.
	Over and beyond.
	Ryan's done sensational work on Buffalo, just blowing it apart, on Uvalde, and now most recently on Nashville.
	You've got to take advantage of this research.
	Once you open your mind just a crack, whether it's Sandy Hook, Orlando, Parkland, whatever, get your mind just a leap in a jar, take a look at the work, He and he and I have done in collaboration.
	Go to my BitChute channel, Jim Fetzer.
	Check it out.
	Brian Davidson.
	You'll find it there.
	Take the time.
	You'll find it was well worth the effort.
	You deserve to know the world you live in and not merely be manipulated by an illusion.
	Thanks for being here.
	Spend as much time as you can with family, friends, people you care about and love.
	We do not know how much time we have left.

▲