All Episodes
Previous Next
April 29, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:06:23
Need to Know (28 April 2023) with Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Chris Weinert at Fort Myers, Florida.
Carl Hermans engaged in domestic responsibilities.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
We begin with Russia acknowledging that it destroyed NATO's Deep Undermanned Command Bunker in Kiev using a dagger missile.
This took out as many as 300 NATO officers, possibly more.
Russia's barrage of missile strikes on Ukraine not only involved daggers, but wiped out a camouflaged bunker with the shadowy headquarters of NATO officers.
As reported on March 12th by the Greek portal of political and military information ProNews, citing American sources, in the course of an operation to retaliate for a provocation in the Brancus region, a Russian hypersonic dagger missile struck a joint Ukrainian-NATO command and communication center buried deep underground.
According to pro news, dozens of NATO officers were killed in a terrifying strike by the MAK-12 missile, in all likelihood we're talking about the defeat of the shadow General Staff of NATO in Ukraine in a single blow.
The secret underground bunker, built at a depth of 400 feet, How several NATO officers retired and advisors in total, more than 300 people, personnel, military officers, to date, according to the portal, 40 have been pulled out from under the rubble of the underground headquarters, but more of those who died have yet to be found.
Here's a tweet about it.
Russians hit a deep bunker full of important NATO personnel with a hypersonic Kinzhal missile.
Second Kinzhal attack hits NATO's Western Command Center, 80 meters underground, 40 killed, number two low.
It's not known exactly how many Westerners and how many Ukrainians were killed.
Most of them, according to pro news, were British and Poles, but there were also Americans and representatives of private companies supporting communication and data transmission.
In the coming days, it'll be seen to what extent this will affect the conduct of Ukraine and Western operation and attempts to stop the final phase of the Russian offense in Bakhmut.
Here's Ty Basko.
I'm tweeting.
Ukrainian remain silent about the defeat of the NATO bunker and the death of Western servicemen.
However, Information in the Ukraine that a delegation of the General Staff of Ukraine visited American Embassy in Kiev, presumably to transfer lists of Americans killed in the strike.
This, sad pro-news, is the first such large-scale strike against military personnel in NATO countries.
It's not known how the Western capitals will react.
In the event of a reaction, it would be recognizing the active participation of military personnel from their nations in the war against Russia.
According to the official representative of the Russian Ministry of Defense, Lieutenant General Igor Konashenkov, the bases of attack drones have been destroyed.
The transfer of reserves and rail transfer of foreign weapons have been disrupted.
Production facilities for the repair of military equipment and the production of ammunition have been disabled.
According to the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Zelensky, on the consequences of the Russian strike on Ukrainian targets the nights of March 8 to 9, the Russian side fired 81 missiles.
According to Zelensky, it was a hard night, while the President of Ukraine looked like a beaten dog.
The statements of Ukrainian officials say nothing about the defeat of the NATO bunker and the deaths of Western military personnel.
However, Information is circulating that on March 9th, a delegation of the General Staff of Ukraine visited the American Embassy.
The use of hypersonic missiles has heightened U.S.
anxiety and demonstrated Russia has a hard-to-intercept nuclear-capable weapon, The Washington Post said.
The U.S.
has not been able to develop its own missile with similar characteristics, which makes Western countries even more vulnerable.
No doubt about it.
Here's information about the missile and the way in which it's delivered.
Kinzai is the latest Russian system with hypersonic aeroballistic missiles carried by especially equipped MiG-31K interceptors.
The missile has low radar visibility, high maneuverability, designed to destroy land and sea targets, The Kon-Sol complexes have been on experimental combat duty in the Russian Federation Armed Forces since December 2017.
Officially, the first combat use thereof took place on March 18, 2022.
Your IGNOT spokesman for the Ukrainian Armed Forces said, We cannot yet counteract these missiles.
They fly along a ballistic trajectory.
We have no means against them.
Tests last year of an American Hypersonic and a Y ended in failure due to launch problems, Bloomberg reported.
The Russian military launched a missile strike against Ukraine infrastructure with a wide variety of missiles and aerial drones, destroying NATO's secret headquarters in Ukraine.
They immediately reported that 34 missiles were allegedly shot down, eight as a result of an organized response, did not hit their targets.
It's doubtful Even for Ukrainians themselves who've seen a thousand flying through the windows, people believe the air defense if they were able to shoot down something in the attempt at most a couple of them.
Ukrainian and even American air defense can not shoot down the dagger at an altitude of 20 kilometers.
And after the missile gains altitude, it pulls a high speed on the target and nothing can be done.
In fact, The attack hit control and planning centers in bunkers as well as air defense radar stations.
Heavy losses of officers, including Americans, were recorded.
It seems that NATO's proxy Shadow Staff got quite a bit.
After that, representatives of the Ukraine General Staff came to the embassy with a list of dead.
It's also known of hits on the IRS and NASAM as air defense system powered by dummy missiles and destroyed by the X-Men flying after them almost immediately.
Public site posting information were blocked.
Chris, heavy hit.
Yes, sir.
Wow.
This whole war has been an unconventional situation, let's just say in terms of the amount of private sector interest, even mercenaries in terms of actual combatants rather than conventional military forces.
And of course that brings in whole new conventions of warfare and protection of these people who are being floated in amongst citizens and even mixed in with with official, you know, State Department covers or passports, United States or other countries, you know, mixed in with NGO operatives and even tourists, students or basketball players or travelers or these non-official cover agents are being snuck in.
And this is a combat situation that is not a declared war, but in theory it's getting very hot, and I don't think that...
Russia's going to keep taking all the bullshit, I'll just say.
And I'm glad to see them kind of hit back in some regard.
It sounds like they may have gotten one of the places that had been an underground bunker, as you say.
They talk about a lot of the things going on there in the black market, whether it's the child trafficking or adrenochrome markets, which is, by the way, last year was a $3 trillion a year cash industry.
And I bet with inflation and scarcity nowadays, that number's got to be up to five trill.
You know, these guys are addicts.
They are completely thriving on the life force and the souls of the innocent and are doing things like this, not only in the black market, but with official other things, too.
And even if you think about it, they're doing the gain-of-function research there.
They're doing a lot of nasty stuff, you know, drugs and prostitution and stuff like that coming out of there, too.
There's a lot of light that's being brought onto these dark places, as well as maybe missiles from Russian jets.
I think it's probably something that is an infrastructure that is crucial to the NATO pipeline.
And the funding of this, I think, is involved with maybe some of these endeavors I mentioned earlier.
So, yeah, how do the NATO forces have underground bunkers in Ukraine anyways?
You ever ask yourself that question?
That seems like an interesting thing, too.
And as far as I've been told or figured out or I've seen so far, the only thing these Ukrainian rebels can seem to hit are commercial airliners like the MH-17 or whatever, right?
Chris, I think they used, you know, the Minsk agreement and cover to dig these underground bunkers and to beef up the military strength of Ukraine such that it ought to have been a two-week operation from Russia, but instead, because of NATO fortification and all these secret moves, which are completely in violation of international law and the solemn agreement struck with Russia,
They have not only discredited themselves, but now they're paying the price, and it's turning out to be very high.
It's going to get nasty.
Meanwhile, Ukraine's Zelensky upbeat after talks with China's Xi.
Ukrainian President Zelensky said he and Chinese leader Xi Jinping had a long and meaningful phone call.
The first known contacts in Russia invaded Ukraine over a year ago.
Beijing appointed an envoy to pursue a political settlement.
The nearly hour-long call came two months after Beijing, along the line with Russia, set up one act as mediator and a month after Xi visited Moscow.
The timing was relevant because it comes as Ukraine is relenting its forces for its swing counteroffensive, which may or may not ever take place.
Zelensky was upbeat about the call, offering them a chance to insert his views into what's been a bilateral dialogue between Moscow and Beijing.
President Putin is eager to keep side close as a counterweight to the United States, which of course has sided with Ukraine.
I believe this call, as well as the appointment of Ukraine's ambassador to China, will give a powerful impetus to the development of our bilateral relations, Zelensky said on Facebook.
An official readout called the conversation productive, said it leads the way toward possible interaction with the aim of establishing a just and sustainable peace for Ukraine.
Mind you, Zelensky insists that he would not agree to anything with Russia unless Russia withdrew from all Ukrainian grounds, including the Crimea and the Donbass, which ain't gonna happen.
Zelensky emphasized the need to regain all Ukrainian territory and stated, there can be no peace that these wets of territorial compromise.
In an indirect reference to U.S. reports, China considers supplying weapons to Russia.
Zelensky's office said he asked countries to refrain from doing so, because any supportive and partial is converted by Russia into a continuation of its aggression into its further rejection of peace.
Stunning, because, of course, Ukraine has been taking weapons from NATO and the United States all over the place.
But if there's no peace at the expense of territorial compromise, there will be no peace.
Here's the military situation in Donbass.
All the Reddish areas are controlled by Russia.
Here's some reports.
The Russian army made tactical advances.
The APU repelled an attack.
Artillery struck Russian.
Clashes between Russian forces.
Continued clashes.
This is very detailed.
Up to 80 Ukrainian servicemen, 2 armored vehicles, howitzers destroyed by Russian artillery.
Up to 360 Ukrainian servicemen, 7 motor vehicles, 8 armored vehicles, the howitzers destroyed.
Up to 120 Ukrainian servicemen, 1 armored vehicle, 9 motor vehicles destroyed.
Here's the situation in the country as a whole.
Clearly, Russia has complete dominance of the Donbass area, and needless to add, of Crimea.
More reports?
The Russian army destroyed an ammo depot.
The Russian army destroyed a Ukraine S-300 system.
The Russian artillery struck a Ukrainian position.
Russian forces struck two armored vehicles and a pickup truck.
Destroyed seven Ukrainian infantry vehicles, eight armored vehicles, seven vehicles.
Russian forces destroyed U.S.-made M-777 artillery system.
Clashes between Russia and the AFU continue.
Russian air defense system shot down 15 Ukrainian drones.
Continues.
Chris.
Yes, as far as I can see it, you know, the demands that Zelensky seems to be issuing are meant to be unreasonable and certainly out of the question as far as the people that he's demanding him from.
Oh.
Oh.
How many coups have they committed?
Go ahead, you're left off.
Okay, yeah, I think that Zelensky's demands were meant to be unreasonable by design.
I don't think Russia would ever yield that Crimean territory, not only because of military significance, but also natural resources and pipelines.
Natural gas coming from the Black and Caspian Seas are very important sources of revenue.
And I think that Zelensky is really trying to take everything he can from this region and from this negotiating tactic and this position that he's in.
And I think it's going to fail miserably.
I really think that it's going to backfire on him because I think Russia and China are going to have a pretty strong alliance.
And I think after he's run out of resources with NATO, you see where he's going to next.
And, you know, it's kind of an interesting situation because he's a middleman, I think, really, for a different group that's maybe not able to be mentioned on the mainstream media without being.
Yeah, no, I really.
Yeah, I think that this whole thing is really getting out of hand by design.
And I think it's a depopulation event.
And I think that if you look at the amount of times that the Ukraine has been couped into becoming the Zelensky government and who's been behind these things for the last 20 years, you'll find the same people that are pushing the Zelensky-Ukraine war for the NATO and allied forces.
And also playing the Chinese against this whole system, too, in the trade and the one belt, one road.
And like I say, all roads probably lead to Goldman Sachs and some of those type of folks.
I'll just say that.
Nice.
Yes.
All roads lead to Goldman Sachs.
Indeed.
Meanwhile, Biden to change the legal definition to help illegals.
This is awful.
By the end of the month, according to President Biden, the new meeting of lawful presidents will be put into effect by his government.
Why?
The Biden admin has stated its intention to amend legislation to broaden eligibility for assistance programs supported by American taxpayers, such as Medicaid and Obamacare, to illegal immigrants.
But the American taxpayers don't support doing that.
Biden has revealed plans to make illegals participate in DACA, a vast amnesty program illegally implemented by presidential order circumventing Congress eligible to enroll in taxpayer-funded Medicaid and Obamacare.
In a prerecorded video message, Biden announced his plan referred to illegal immigrants as Americans.
Maybe he doesn't understand the meaning of that word either.
He said health care should be a right, not a privilege.
He boasted how his admin has worked to expand health care.
He said more people in the United States now have medical coverage.
Today's announcement is giving DACA recipients the same opportunity.
He also says he works alongside DREAMers to provide them with the opportunity and support they deserve.
To bolster his case, he said many illegals were crucial employees on the front lines of the pandemic.
This justifies paying taxpayer funds on illegals, who, by the way, are not required to take the fax or test it or whatever.
An unprecedented number, $2.7 million.
I'm predicted to enter the U.S.
during fiscal year 2022.
Five million have entered the country instead of residents, and Biden became president.
This is in addition to the roughly 30 million currently living in the country, and those are only the ones the government knows about.
I assert again, the objective is to bring in 100 million.
Five million is just the tip of the iceberg.
The coordinated attempt of America's foes to engage in a soft invasion of the United States over the Boris Sovereign border is evidenced by the discovery of large numbers of Chinese nationals of fighting age entering the U.S.
through Mexico.
This change incentivizes more indigent and needy people to cross the border into the land of the free healthcare.
Here, by the way, is an interesting piece.
Check this out.
Breaking news right now.
Do we have public servants in office who are acting as elected officials without swearing an allegiance to the Constitution?
A writ of quo warranto has been filed in the U.S.
Attorney's Office in Washington, D.C., stating that numerous oaths of office cannot be found on file for many of our federal public officials, including Vice President Kamala Harris and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin.
Also on the list of missing oaths of office include the CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, Secretary of Treasury Janet Yellen, Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm, the FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock, Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg, Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, And the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Alejandra Mayorkas.
Secretary of Education, Dr. Miguel Cadorna.
Secretary of Commerce, Gina Raimondo.
The Attorney General, Merrick Garland.
And the Commissioner of the FDA, Robert Califf.
Secretary of Labor Marty Walsh, Deputy Secretary of Labor Julie Hsu, and the remedy sought for those individuals who have failed to refuse to produce an affidavit as required by 5 U.S.
Code Subsection 3332 demand that those persons provide the U.S.
Attorney and the court in Washington, D.C.
with the compulsory affidavit within 10 days.
For those individuals who do not produce the affidavit within the 10 days, and who have admitted that they do not possess the requisite affidavit, and those who have produced defective affidavits, they must immediately terminate their appointments or positions.
Render all official acts, bills, laws, regulations, or any official actions whatsoever, including the appointment of any subordinates, void ad initio, as well as replace and restore all proper and former officeholders until competent replacements can be lawfully appointed.
In order to be effective as a sworn declaration, it must either be sworn before a notary public or sworn under penalty of perjury per 18 U.S.
Code Subsection 1746.
Once again, the issue before the U.S.
Attorney is straightforward.
Petitioner has sought the required affidavits prescribed in 5 U.S.
Code Subsection 3332 from all appointees referenced via the Freedom of Information Act and this request and not one of the aforementioned appointees have produced a compliant affidavit consistent with applicable statutes.
Either the affidavits are non-existent Chris, stunning stuff.
or the appointee has failed or refuses to provide the mandated affidavit to hold their respective offices.
Follow RightNow.News and at Ann VanderSteel on CloudHub Twitter Truth and Getter for more on this story as it develops. Chris, stunning stuff. The lawlessness is beyond comprehension. Yeah, it's pretty crazy to see how this stuff is like a subtle invasion, but it's happening in all different points of access and all different fronts. And with all different ethnic groups, we're the same purpose.
And dark money seems to be really funding these operations and facilitating these illegal and legal immigration efforts.
You know, if you think about it, I'm really thinking about these guys getting health care and Obamacare.
And I almost think that that's a Trojan horse or a poison apple at best in terms of, you know, these medical institutions and your rights as a patient in terms of right to refuse treatment or right to select your treatment.
Once you sign in and turn yourself over to the legal custody of these hospitals, you're on pause, aren't you?
Nope.
Did I lose you?
I'm sorry.
We're good.
I thought they were going to drop me out again, man.
I usually don't get 30 seconds in a row.
Anyways, yeah, thinking about these, you know, the Oregon trade, the adrenochrome, like I mentioned before, the medical murder and incentivizing that, selectively tokenizing these immigrants in this way.
They're easy pickings for political manipulation and certainly experimentation of the medical institutions.
Also, they can be plugged into the public school system and program with that as well.
Most of them have very little literacy.
And in many cases, like I said, they're subsidized by mysterious forces and money that comes in.
So I think it's kind of interesting when these baby entitlements or whatever you call them, like, you know, EBT or whatever, when they pull the plug on those things.
What do you think is going to happen in that regard when you have a bunch of military age subversives that are not part of the U.S. Constitution?
culture nor part of the legal immigration process?
And how do you think that these politically manipulated people are going to be in terms of domestic instability?
This is like the siege of Vienna all over again, man, as far as these guys just sneaking in and really pretending like they're nothing until it's really something.
So I think it's a boiling frog situation.
And like I said, a subtle invasion.
And these guys are all compliant with these insane medical laws and UN laws because they've been colonialized under these pretenses for the last century by the same forces that they're now subverting.
And look how many key officials have never taken their oath of office.
For instance, outrageous!
This is unbelievable, Fetz.
I know.
I mean, I can't believe—you know, it's like, there's so many of these things flying at you, you've got to almost prioritize your obligations in terms of these crises that they're all systematically dismantling and destroying this country with.
It's like the controlled demolition of Tower 7 of this country, in the middle class.
So, yeah, I don't know what to say other than, you know, we're going to have to do something.
And it's happening before our very eyes.
We see it's happening.
We know it's happening.
We know how it's happening, just like Building 7.
Meanwhile, Tucker emerges on Twitter and doesn't mention Fox.
Tucker emerged Wednesday, two days after Fox fired him, with a two-minute campaign-style monologue.
Did not address why he became unemployed.
He posted a video on Twitter shortly after 8 p.m.
Eastern, the time his show used to begin, talking about a lack of honest political debate in the media.
One of the things he noticed when you step away from the noise for a few days is how nice some people are and how hilarious others.
The thing you notice also when you take a little tum off is how unbelievably stupid most of the debates you see on television are.
They're completely irrelevant.
They mean nothing.
In five years, we won't even remember we heard them.
Trust me, it's somebody who participated.
The mystery about why Fox, Rupert Murdoch, and his son decided to dismiss Tucker lingers.
The company is not explaining.
Some media centered on material uncovered during the Dominion voting lawsuit but redacted from court papers.
Private messages sent by Tucker with highly offensive and crude remarks were a catalyst, according to the New York Times.
Don't believe it.
Both the Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, and a redacted message included a slur against a senior Fox executive.
So what?
Each relied on sources that were not identified.
Some of the demeaning evidence that has been publicly revealed showed some offensive remarks by Carlson.
By the way, any remark by anyone can offend somebody, including the use of a vulgarity to refer to Sidney Powell.
I was wishing what they're calling here bogus election conspiracy theories, except they were all true.
They weren't bogus at all.
A Fox representative did not comment on the report for Pucker's re-emergence, simply said, we thank him for his service.
Fox fired his most popular personality without explanation on Monday, less than a week after saying in a lawsuit about What were supposed to be lies about the 2020 presidential election, but in fact were well-founded factually.
And the very idea that they didn't put up a fight over it is beyond distressing.
As Donald Trump observed, it should have been easy to defend and defeat.
Tucker dressed in a suit and tie for his Twitter.
I didn't mention Fox.
It was reminiscent of monologues he delivered for the last six years talking about the people in charge hurting the country.
Debates on big topics like war, civil liberties, emerging science, demographic change, and corporate power are not permitted by corporate media or political powers.
Where can you still find Americans saying true things?
He said there aren't many places left, but there are some, and that's enough.
As long as you can hear the words, there is hope.
See you soon.
Offensive messages Tucker Carlson sent showing contempt for Fox News management and colleagues were a major factor in the company's decision to oust him Monday, according to people familiar with the matter.
The move took Carlson off the air, a shock to the host and his large audience, making the previous Friday's show his last.
And we'll be back on Monday.
In the meantime, have the best weekend with the ones that you love, and we'll see you then.
Culturally, it's a big deal because Tucker Carlson was one of the most well-known TV personalities and the highest-rated primetime host.
Here's a look at the private messages that led to Carlson's surprise ouster and what's next for the former host and the network.
Ahead of Fox's defamation trial against Dominion Voting Systems, people familiar with the matter say Fox News lawyers presented Carlson with what they thought was good news.
They told him the court would redact from a legal filing the time he called a senior Fox News executive the c-word.
But Carlson wasn't impressed.
He told his colleagues he wanted the world to know what he said about the executive.
Internal messages, many of which were from Tucker Carlson to other colleagues, were made public in the discovery process, and some of those ended up being redacted, but in them, Mr. Carlson made disparaging remarks about some of his colleagues and other people at the network.
The court filings also revealed an exchange where Carlson called for the firing of a Fox News reporter for fact-checking Donald Trump's false claims about the 2020 election.
Please get her fired, Carlson wrote.
It's measurably hurting the company.
In another message, Carlson is shown complaining about the network's news coverage, including its decision to call Arizona for Joe Biden on election night.
According to one document, he wrote, We devote our lives to building an audience, and they let Chris Wallace and Leland Vittert wreck it, and included an obscenity.
In the messages, Carlson also made disparaging comments about on-air guests and former President Donald Trump.
He wrote in a January 2021 text message that he was very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights and that I hate him passionately.
Although many portions of the Dominion Court documents are redacted, there was concern among Fox executives that if the redacted material were to become public, it would lead to further embarrassment for the network and the parent company.
And on Monday, the network said it would part ways with the popular host.
Tucker found out about 10 minutes before it was announced by the company.
Fox News Media and Tucker Carlson have mutually agreed to part ways.
Carlson declined to comment on his departure.
Within Fox, people familiar with the matter said reservations had been mounting about risks Carlson presented for the network.
Landing blue-chip advertisers for his show was an issue.
Fox struggled with getting advertisers at 8 p.m.
on Tucker's show partially because of controversial remarks he made on a number of different topics.
His commentary had grown more extreme and expanded beyond a conservative viewpoint on politics.
Female athletes are losing NCAA championships to men dressing up as women in order to cheat their way to victory.
Democrats hate the police because they don't control the police.
Very simple.
So what is equity?
Well tonight, finally, we know what it is.
Equity, it turns out, is racism.
Carlson trafficked in what critics and even some higher-ups within Fox felt was thinly-veiled racism, such as this recent show where he's talking about one of the Tennessee lawmakers protesting for stricter gun control.
Justin Pearson wasn't white, that's probably how he got into Bowdoin in the first place, but he did a fantastic impression of it.
What a nice young man!
Has he considered the apprenticeship program at Citibank?
The former host is also a defendant in a separate lawsuit that was filed last month by Abby Grossberg, a former producer for Carlson.
I was hoping that it would be more professional and what he was portraying on air was just a show and unfortunately that wasn't the case.
The Abby Grossberg lawsuit against Fox and Tucker is also named as a defendant in that suit describes a culture of misogyny and religious discrimination at the network Carlson had no comment on the lawsuit.
Fox at the time said it hired independent outside counsel to investigate the concerns raised by Grossberg.
Fox and News Corp., the parent company of the Wall Street Journal's publisher, share common ownership.
Carlson, now off the air, has declined to comment on his future plans.
Some people have speculated that he might take on a career in politics.
Some people have talked about him launching his own media venture of some sort or joining another network.
But he hasn't commented on what he's going to do next.
For Fox News, his ouster leaves a primetime hole.
The network is currently relying on a rotation of hosts until it names a permanent anchor for the APM slot.
Historically, when anchors have left Fox, the network has survived.
There are a number of examples of really prominent people who have left the network and launched their own careers.
Megyn Kelly, Bill O'Reilly, Glenn Beck.
But Fox, nonetheless, has found talent to replace them.
Well, let me just say, I think that was a mixed review, but I like the clips they had from Tucker, because they're all cases where he's cutting through the smoke and mirrors and telling it like it is.
And I don't believe that that lawsuit or this Abby person, who, by the way, it turns out, has never even met Tucker.
This woman who's claiming he created a hostile work environment never even met him.
Because he does recording from his homes in Florida and Maine, and she's in New York City.
I mean, they're just piling on, Chris.
I don't see much justification or warrant for it.
Yeah, I often wonder if maybe that whole thing was part of the settlement going on between Fox and Dominion and this absurdity that the courts ruled in their favor.
Continue.
You said you wondered if it weren't part of the settlement, Chris.
Go ahead.
Oh, yeah, sure.
I didn't know where I got dumped off at.
Okay.
Yeah, I wasn't sure if Tucker being fired was part of that settlement or part of the disclosure from that settlement.
It makes a lot of sense.
I think it has an eerie feel to it, kind of like the Sandy Hook Winchester settlements or the Alex Jones Sandy Hook settlements.
It seems to be a lucrative amount of money that's going to the wrong side of justice and certainly the wrong people are being hurt by this and the villains are being rewarded once again.
So I really think that as far as Tucker being fired, I think they're trying to fracture a big part of the Fox News demographic.
You know, to split that ticket, so to speak.
It's an obvious majority, and it seems to be growing more and more every day.
As people become domestic immigrants in their own homeland, as these state governors and attorney generals are running people off their own property ownership in many states because of these lucrative COVID laws or the lockdowns or the vax mandates or the absurdity of what they're trying to push through in social acceptance in the public schools and things like this, they're driving multitudes away or into smart cities, you know, give or take the demographic.
In such an alarming way.
And as I say, they're subsidizing people, you know, these immigrants that are, you know, taking over the missing, disaffected group that's walking away from the political spectrum.
And I think they're more or less being forced out of that.
And those who are citizens who are still fortunate enough to own property are going to be next on this agenda in terms of Many of the things you're seeing, most people are being victimized by now in terms of selective predatory lending, doubling interest rates, and people really being under the microscope in terms of financial predation.
And I have to say, Tucker says equity is racism.
I think equity is what's being stolen or denied to most U.S.
citizens by these moves.
And most people are renting or worse.
So I don't think people are really prone to being able to own property now or being paid livable wages.
And all these things coming to the mix at once and coming out into the open at once, it's going to cause a pretty interesting situation, especially with, you know, the M2 money supply being reduced by 5%, which is more like 15% if that's what the stat they're giving you is.
So, yeah, it's going to be a liquidity crunch.
It's going to get nasty.
There's going to be a lot of competition for very few jobs and certainly for supplies and many other things coming soon.
And I think it's an intentionally forced thing.
And I think Tucker being fired is very much part of the plan.
Equity is just a word the Democrats use to justify anything they do that's illegal or improper.
Oh, yeah.
That's their whole fantasy land definition of that shit.
I know that.
Meanwhile, check this out.
On Wednesday night, the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party hosted a war game around a fictional conflict in the Taiwan Strait in 2027.
Republicans and Democrats came together, laser-focused on how we prevent war.
And credit goes to ranking member Christian Morthy, who had the great idea to add an economic component to the game.
Let's look at what happened.
First, the PLA massed an invasion force and preemptively struck our positions in Okinawa and Guam.
Deterrence failed, in other words.
Second, through six days we sunk 80 PLA ships in the strait thanks to our undersea capabilities and long-range anti-ship missiles.
Third, nevertheless, 80,000 PLA troops gained a lodgement on the main island of Taiwan.
And fourth, we used up almost all our best ammo, long-range precision fires within a week of the fighting.
Just a week.
Fifth, U.S.
economic sanctions imposed crippling costs on Chinese banks, but many allies, even G7 partners, hesitated to join our sanctions regime.
And sixth, PRC losses were heavy after six days, but we were nowhere near breaking the PLA's will to fight, and they were starting to use commercial ships to continue the invasion.
So what did we learn?
Neither the U.S.
nor Taiwan had nearly enough critical munitions in the theater to deter the CCP.
We severely degraded the invasion, but we could not fully deny it.
If we want to have a hope of stopping World War III, we need to therefore arm Taiwan to the teeth right now and clear the $19 billion worth of foreign military sales backlog that is frankly an embarrassment.
Something I've talked with every Taiwanese leader about.
We also need to reinvigorate our defense industrial base and start cranking out critical munitions like long-range anti-ship missiles.
It's also imperative to get our allies and partners on board with the idea of economic deterrence long before the shooting starts.
Russian sanctions negotiations will look like a cakewalk in comparison to what we'd have to put together against the CCP.
All the more reason we put it together now.
In previous war games, I've seen how quickly the military side escalates.
What took me aback in this game was how quickly the economic side escalated.
By day six, global trade had ground to a complete halt and we kicked Chinese banks off the SWIFT system.
Markets were tanking and the PRC's aggression had created an economic and humanitarian catastrophe.
Companies need to prepare for this.
Failing to do so is a dereliction of their fiduciary duties.
The biggest lesson though?
Well, to paraphrase Eisenhower, the only way to win this war is to prevent it.
And that means strengthening deterrence and making it clear to Xi Jinping that attacking Taiwan would be a disastrous mistake.
On Wednesday night, the select committee.
I think all the evidence he adduces is that it would be impossible for the U.S. to sustain.
I mean, the logistic lines across the Pacific.
Chris, as a former Marine Corps officer, and he was as well.
I say it's preposterous for to try to think that we could defend Taiwan against China if the mainland decided to take it.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, you know, these war games, you almost can maybe wonder if the people controlling this scenario can control the outcome in terms of the on-paper calculations.
these theories.
I think that really a lot of these theories are arrived at from conclusions that are based upon many unrealistic assumptions.
For example, assuming that other nations would want to join in the sanctions is absurd.
There's 100 plus nations right now that have gone over to the BRICS that are currently going to ditch the U.S. dollar as its primary reserve currency.
So think of how many nations are going to probably stand up if the World Economic Forum comes up with some other bullshit through the CDC or the WHO or the U.N. or whatever.
They're going to probably meet a lot more resistance than they did the last time around with COVID.
It's going to take a lot more convincing.
And the SWIFT system is being abandoned and replaced by the BRICS offering too.
So I think China is not interested in going into a ground war or an exchange war like that.
I think that they're just fine waging the economic war they're waging and they're going to win fighting on their terms and playing to their strengths.
I think that's right.
And they have overwhelmingly more resources for such a undertaking than does the United States.
Meanwhile, Boussie admits Orwellian mandates fueled anti-vaccine.
Amen.
it.
Thank you.
He championed those mandates, but they fueled vaccine hesitancy and were counterproductive.
In a wide-ranging interview with the New York Times, the now-retired Fauci admitted, man, I think paradoxically, you had people who were on the fence about getting vaccinated thinking, why are they forcing me to do this?
And that sometime-beautiful independent streak in our country became counterproductive.
His comments came as fewer people are getting vaccinated for diseases that were once considered deadly, particularly among children's vaccination for measles, pertussis, and polio.
As the Daily Mail notes, the percentage of kindergartners who have taken the required immunization, including measles, mumps, and rubella, fell to 93% for the 2021-22, dropping to 2% below the recommended levels for herd immunity, well below vaccination rates in 2020 and 2021.
Though approximately 66% of U.S.
children aged 5 months and over were up to date on all childhood vaccinations recommended by the CDC in 2016-19, that number declined to slightly over 49% by May of 2020.
That number declined to slightly over 49% by May of 2020.
Good.
In all U.S., adults and adolescents missed more than 37 million routine vaccination during the pandemic.
Good!
Many experts believe the COVID shot requirement fueled vaccine hesitancy that had been brewing in the U.S.
for decades.
Good!
Fauci, who gave conflicting information in both public and private regarding the efficacy of masks and quashed dissenting opinions about the origin of COVID when a prominent scientist suggested it looked potentially engineered in a lab with NIH funding,
is believed to be one of the architects of the federal mandates, such as those issued by the Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and the DoD.
In 2022, a review of vaccine mandates worldwide found they could exacerbate cynicism and mistrust of government.
Compulsory COVID vaccines would likely increase levels of anger, Especially in those who are already mistrustful of authorities and do little to persuade the already reluctant.
Reads a review published in BMJ Global Health.
Two experiments in Germany and the USA found that a new COVID vax mandate would likely energize anti-vaxation activists and reduce compliance with other public health measures and decrease acceptance of future voluntary influenza or very seller chickenpox vaccines.
In December, Cornell found mandates eroded public confidence in vaccine even further.
In December, Cornell found that mandates eroded public confidence in vaccine even further.
While significant percentages of vaccinated Americans and Democrats said a vaccine mandate would make them more likely to re-engage in various aspects of re-pandemic social and economic life, many fewer unvaccinated Americans and Republicans said the same.
Federal mandates have since largely been struck down to rescind and amend multiple lawsuits with Biden's order all federal workers be vaccinated blocked in court last month, while the Supreme Court issued a similar block on the private workers in early 2022.
In the fall of 2021, Fauci had repeatedly defended state and private mandates for masks and vaccinations.
When you're in a public health crisis, sometimes unusual situations require unusual actions.
In this case, it's things like mandating be they masks or vaccinations.
The top-down push to get people vaccinated reaffirmed millions of Americans feeling that their personal autonomy was under threat and must be rejected wholeheartedly.
This bread Widespread anti-vaccine sentiment, as many people believe cynically, that the government was flexing its muscles to an authoritarian extent.
Nothing so effective could reasonably be made free for all.
Why would the government force the shots on the public if they failed to prevent infection?
They were developed on such an accelerated timeline, there's no way they can be safe and effective.
And any effort by the government to sidestep individual liberty must be sinister.
I thought it was good.
Yeah, why is anybody still even listening to Fauci?
the Daily Mail.
And because of it, you have that smoldering anti-science feeling of visiveness that palpable politically in this country, said Tony the Rat.
Chris, your thoughts?
I thought it was good.
Yeah, why is anybody still even listening to Fauci?
I think the only time anybody would really want to see or hear from him is maybe when he's on the wall of a firing squad, in my opinion.
You know, as far as schedules and timelines go, I really want to point out in 2005, the World Bank and even several other population census companies put out that the United States population was supposed to be reduced to 67 million people from 325 or so, maybe 350 million people.
You remember the stat in this situation, and many of us going nuts back in 2005 about this.
And of course, it was revised in 2009 to lead out to 72 million, which is still abhorrent by the year 2025.
These are expectations by the year 2025, by the way.
So as far as being on schedule with Agenda 21, which was also supposed to take place in 2021, these things are on time.
And I just have to also point out a fact that I just heard earlier today was that 26 million people have filed for disability this last year alone in terms of the Department of Labor.
And I don't think they're going to put that statistic out in its real number.
So all these people that are pushing these type of agendas with the Giving Pledge or with the U.S.
military or the taxpayer dollars, the NGOs or the Wall Street money.
Bill Gates and his Mission Impossible burger and controlling the food supply and farmlands, you know, going to put GMO, Monsanto GMOs out or mRNA recombinant infected livestock.
This is all to disrupt the control group of the unvaccinated.
This is all to muck the waters.
This is all to control the world, and especially the country, by the food supply, in my opinion, and to taint that control group of unvaccinated, most importantly.
And I also have to say that over the last 30 years, the Department of Agriculture, the Fed, and many other instruments have been used to bankrupt farmers, to run out mom-and-pop shops to small business stores, hitting them with slap suits or patent infringement suits against Monsanto GMOs cross-pollinating their products, Or just running them out of town in terms of competing in a free market with subsidies against the corporate oligarchies.
So yeah, this is I think something that has been planned for a while.
And I think it's being exposed and it's being seen for what it is.
But the next question is what the hell are we going to do about it?
Yes, yes.
We gotta do something.
There's no way we can let this go, and there's no way we can say this is a hostile file, this is an accident, this is a happenstance situation, a byproduct of a hostile file.
Bullshit, man.
This is cold calculation.
You're absolutely right, Chris.
No doubt.
No doubt.
Meanwhile, we have an absurd case of a writer of an advanced advice column for LA Magazine claiming Donald Trump raped me.
It's at trial now as we speak.
It began Tuesday.
Here's a photograph of the woman.
I'm here because Zandra Brabian, when I wrote about her, he lied and said it didn't happen.
He lied and shattered my reputation.
I'm here to try and get my life back, says Z. Jean Carroll.
This looks to me very much on a parallel with the Democrat women who come forward in the Brett Kavanaugh Hearings before Congress and made up totally fantastic stories about rape, group rape, and the like.
It was ridiculous!
Here she is.
Trump raped me and then hurt her reputation by lying about it, except if he's speaking the truth, he's not lying about it, and she doesn't deserve a reputation.
She's seeking unspecified damages.
I think this is totally phony, Chris.
Totally fake.
They're just trying to keep one attack after another on Trump, and they're spacing it out in various ways in the hope something will stick.
Chris.
Chris.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Oh.
Your thoughts, Chris? - Thank you very much.
Yep.
As far as the Donald Trump's rape trial, I don't know enough, I haven't followed the case, but it seems like another one of these manufactured sensationalized accusations that are meant to slander this guy and run him out of the ability to run for office, or at least the public's interest in him if he did run for office.
I really think they're trying to erode at his personal character and these people are coming out of the woodwork mysteriously and suddenly all seemingly at once in an orchestrated effort again.
So I don't know if it's intentional or accidental or if it's just a bunch of people trying to go after him at the same time, but it seems like a formation, like an orchestration.
Well, it's like 30 years ago and she can't even remember what year it was, Chris.
I mean, how dumb is that?
If you've been raped, you're going to remember the minute and the day and the week and the month and the year.
This is just rubbish.
Meanwhile, transgender lawmakers censured by the Montana House Republicans.
Zephyr slammed Republican legislators over a gender-affirming care ban.
And remember that phrase, gender-affirming, that really means genital manipulation.
Montana House voted to censure the state's first openly transgender, Zooey Zever, who called her colleagues to vote against a gender-affirming care ban for transgender youth.
The House voted 68-32 to censure Zephyr, barred from participating from the House floor.
Zephyr said she'll continue to stand behind her beliefs.
As I left the House chambers, I pressed my lightest feet.
A reminder, this legislature is removing $11,000 from discussion on every bill going forward.
I will always stand on behalf of my constituents, my community, and democracy itself.
Here's Zooey tweeting, as I left the House chamber, I pressed my light to speak, a reminder that this legislation is removing 11,000 Montanans from discussion on every bill going forward, meaning that's the number of constituents in her district.
I will always stand on behalf of my constituents, my community, and democracy itself.
The bill passed is on the desk of Governor Greg Greenfort, who signaled his support.
Wednesday in a hearing before the vote, she defended her words.
I rose in defense of my community that day, speaking to harms the bills bring that I have first-hand experience knowing about.
I've had friends who've taken their lives because of these wills.
I have fielded calls from families in Montana, including one whose trans teenager attempted to take her life while watching a hearing on one of the anti-trans wills.
It's ever sad.
When the Speaker asks me to apologize on behalf of the quorum, what he's really asking me to do is be silent when my community is facing bills that get us killed.
The Youth Health Protection Act would restrict the use of hormone therapy, puberty blockers, and surgeries on people under age 18 for the purpose of gender transitioning.
Gender-affirming care has been found to be associated with improved mental health of transgender adolescents and teenagers, according to research in the New England Journal of Medicine and Janna Pediatrics.
I guarantee you that is false.
Gender dysphoria, the stress one may feel when they don't desire the gender identity associated with their assigned sex at birth, can lead to negative mental health outcomes for transgender people.
If you're denying gender-affirming care and forcing a trans child to go through puberty, that is tantamount to torture, and this body should be ashamed.
She continued, if you vote yes on this bill, I hope the next time you bow your heads in prayer, you see the blood on your hands.
She knows ABC.
She believes she's being silenced by those in power who don't want to be held accountable.
When I stood up to speak on Senate Bill 99, I chose my words with precision.
I spoke with clarity.
You guys see the real harm these bills bring.
I won't be apologizing for my remarks.
Zephyr told ABC she's been stonewalled from debate or comment on the Montana House floor for over a week by Republican leaders who said her comments broke the rules of decorum.
All representatives are free to participate in the House debate by following the House rules.
The choice to not follow House rules is one that Representative Zephyr has made, said Speaker of the House Matt Rieger in his statement to reporters.
The only person silencing Representative Zephyr is Representative Zephyr.
Here's a study, Suicide and Suicidal Behavior Among Transgender Persons, in the Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine.
Contradicting the claims that Zender was making.
Suicide rates and suicidal tendencies among transgenders are considerably high compared to the general population.
Hence, this review is an attempt to understand the issues around the suicide and suicidal behavior among transgender persons.
Result?
Suicide attempt rate among transgender ranges from 32 to 50% across countries.
Gender-based victimization, discrimination, bullying, violence, being rejected by the family, friends, community, harassment by intimate partner, family members, police, and public, discrimination and ill-treatment, and healthcare systems are all major risk factors that influence suicidal behavior among transgender persons.
Conclusion.
In spite of facing a number of hardships in their day-to-day life.
The transgender community holds a number of resiliency factors.
Further, this community needs to be supported to strengthen the resiliency factors and draw culturally sensitive and transgender-inclusive suicide prevention strategies and increase protective factors to tackle this high rate of suicidality.
Which, by the way, I mean stunningly high in comparison to the general population.
So that, I think, Holding back on young people until they're 18?
If they want to change their sex when they're 18, by God, go ahead and do it!
But doing this to children who have no idea what all this means is absurd, irresponsible, immoral, corrupt, and must be banned.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, if you ask the Democrats, they probably would insist that you put a loaded gun to one of these kindergarteners' heads and make them decide on the spot, you know?
And after, you know, they've been subjected to many of these predatory social influencing campaigns from the same people.
And of course, embracing the hypocrisy of the Second Amendment and all that they're trying to do with that.
You know, I think it's almost like a Shakespearean cruel irony or something of that nature.
I have to say my heart goes out to that poor little dude that's disguised as a woman.
Yeah, as far as genital manipulation, I don't even know what they're talking about in terms of that.
Is that like a Tucker Carlson?
I mean, you'd probably have to ask a middle school kid to even find out what the heck that means.
You know, that could be trouble in itself in many different possible courses of action.
So, yeah, I don't know.
As a 47-year-old man, I'm asking for a friend.
What the fuck are they even talking about with all this insanity?
And I think that these people committing suicide are literally being confused to death by this predatory, you know, manipulation.
in my opinion.
And, you know, like I said, instead of banning this type of social influencing in the target demographics that they're doing and the sensationalizing of it, they're blindly funding it, it seems.
And I don't think it's an accident.
I think it's designed to be outrageous.
And I think that's very much part of the operation.
It's a selective distraction, so to speak.
Yeah, I think you're exactly right.
Meanwhile, the New York Times had an article about the boss and mommy.
Boston strong, ten years later.
But they're not repeating the truth about it, not even remotely.
I mean, the Boston Globe was tweeting.
Police will have a controlled explosion at the 600 block on Boylston Street.
Officials!
There'll be a controlled explosion opposite the library within one minute as part of bomb squad activities.
Within a minute later, opposite the Boston Public Library, there was one of these explosions at a former artillery officer in the Marine Corps.
I can assure you, these explosions were not powerful enough to kill anyone unless perhaps you were actually sitting right on top of it.
This was all a fantasy.
When you peered in through the smoke, you saw, yes, there were bodies lying there missing arms and legs, but there was no blood.
The bloody only showed up later and it came out of orange duffel bags like the one you see here in the foreground.
This was all fake.
And they use amputee actors to achieve the desired effect.
As Lorraine Day, who has had a trauma surgery for San Francisco General Hospital for 25 years, has observed, it's a physiological impossibility to have explosions blowing off arms and legs and there to be no blood.
It was staged.
Here you have one of the key players, by the way, who allegedly had his leg blown off.
They attached an artificial bone prosthesis.
You can actually see it.
Here he is in the center circle.
If you look to the left, there's a guy in an orange hoodie who's attaching this, apparently for dramatic effect.
But when they wheeled him off, the vibrations were significant and it came detachment.
They had to stop and reattach it and do it again.
His actual name, Nick Boyt, former army officer, lost his legs in Kandahar, Afghanistan.
They called him Jeff Bauman.
But it was all fake.
All fake.
So, you think the New York Times.
Given the Boston Globe was even tweeting about it, would be able to do a better job.
But they're in on it, Chris.
They're all in on the propaganda and the fakery.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, I think that the Crisis actors seem to be the only actors working these days, and you know, it's been steady for 10 years or more, it seems.
So there's been a lot of false flags, and I'm glad you saw that, and I'm glad that you posted that, because I think it's important.
Most people, they get that cognitive dissonance.
They don't even want to think about the horror of this being a possibility.
And they more or less transfer that type of outrage onto the messenger, the people asking things that invoke critical thought.
It is very self-destructive in terms of cognitive dissonance and its impact on society and most normal people.
So it takes a special kind of love and a special kind of person to dig in and find this type of stuff and to present it to people and to stand and hold the trench and to call bullshit in the face of these deceptions.
Yeah, that was pretty much all I had.
I was just saying it takes a special kind of love to stand up and tell the truth in the face of these universal deceptions.
And I'm glad people like yourself and others that have been doing so are out there and trying to expose this, because this is absolutely atrocious what's awaiting for us if we follow this course of theatrics and allow this to manipulate our society and our people.
And it just goes on and on and on, and the Democrats are behind us running the show.
It's gotta be stopped.
We want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, broercontolive, needtoknowatgmail.com.
Live, needtoknowatgmail.com.
It's amazing how these people refer to a Donald Trump or some other right-wing demagogue who's going to try to undermine American democracy or take away a woman's right to choose or not address the crisis of gun violence or racism, sexism, or homophobia, when Demena Joe is an absolute illegitimate despotic dictator who unquestionably destroyed democracy in America using racism and gun violence and a rigged election as the lever.
I believe it was the Supreme Court who turned abortion over to the decision of individual states.
This is a prime example of how undemocratic Democrats use lies as the vehicle for their destructive agenda.
Show me a single valid election audit that proves Domenico's legitimacy.
Black box computer tallying of unverified mail-in ballots with secret proprietary software that cannot be verified does not represent election integrity in any sense of the concept.
Why was Ray Epps so intent on encouraging peaceful protesters of the very obviously rigged 2020 presidential election to enter the U.S.
Capitol building?
Was he an agent provocateur working directly under the control of the dishonest Dirty Dems?
81 votes is not 81 million votes just because Domenico is a multiple zero.
Domenico has been 81 million times worse than Donald Trump.
Chris, your final thoughts.
Go.
Okay, final thoughts.
Well, I think that we presented more than enough evidence that would warrant some sort of awareness, awakening, and action with the consideration of such sentiments.
And I think that we're being pretty much hijacked and run by psychopaths that are sent to destroy us.
And we need to take our government back, our way of life, and we need to stop funding these destruction rackets that are being used against us.
That's pretty much all I got.
Well, thanks, Christian.
You take care of your wonderful daughter and give her my love.
I so appreciate your contributions.
As do I. That's why I do them.
Thank you.
Meanwhile, let me just add my own final thoughts, which is we're being played again and again.
The Democrats right and left.
They're liars, phonies, cheats.
I mean, it's a disgrace.
I, myself, Voted Democrat for most of my life, right up until Donald Trump made his appearance coming down that escalator.
Life hasn't been the same for me ever since.
Much of my family continues to believe In the myths, the lies, the propaganda being propagated by the mislabeled Democratic Party.
They're very undemocratic, authoritarian, traitorous, frankly, if you come right down to it.
They're doing everything they can to destroy America in the fastest possible way.
I'm astonished and dumbfounded.
By their success today.
And if we don't do something about it now, it's going to continue and it'll be too late.
Meanwhile, spend as much time with your family, the people you love and care about.
We literally don't know how much time we have left.
▲
Export Selection