All Episodes
Previous Next
April 20, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:21:32
Fertility Crisis: Top OBGYN Slams Pfizer’s Deadly Plot Against Babies and Women
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Vlad with RareFoundation.com and we're introducing our guest today, Dr. James Thorpe, an OBGYN and fetal medicine specialist with over 43 years of experience and upwards of 8,000 patients annually.
We're going to be discussing Dr. Thorpe's observations on the COVID vaccinations and their impact in particular on pregnant patients.
Specifically, we'll touch on Pfizer's internal data on COVID vaccines and pregnancy and any backlash Dr. Thorpe may have faced for speaking out against these gene therapy vaccines.
I'm very excited to get into this.
Maybe you could just start a little bit with your background and if you could spend a couple minutes describing your journey from initially thinking these vaccines were a good idea to where you are now.
Sure.
My name is Dr. Jim Thorpe.
I'm an MD, physician.
And I've been doing this for almost 44 years now.
I'm getting old, ready to hit the big 7-0 here this weekend, Sunday.
Wow.
Milestone for me.
You don't look it, but happy birthday.
Oh, thank you.
I feel it.
So I've been doing, I'm board certified in obstetrics and gynecology and I'm actually double board certified in the subspecialty of maternal fetal medicine as well.
So I've focused, my creator created me to take care of my pregnant women, my preborns and newborns.
That's why I exist.
And I've known that from a very early age.
I won't go into that.
But I focused my entire career on high-risk obstetrics.
It's a passion of mine.
I had the privilege of going to the top training center for OBGYN in the world at that time.
It was the The perinatal capital of the world was University of Colorado in Denver.
And so I've been very, very excited to practice in this area, and I'm still very, very motivated to do so.
I've had an extensive career.
I'm extensively published well over, probably somewhere around 200 plus, 210 publications, almost 30 publications just in the last three years, all focused on COVID.
I don't feel comfortable, you know, patting myself on the back, but I do want your listeners to understand that I didn't just fall off the turnip truck.
I've been highly decorated with honors and awards throughout my career.
I was actually asked by President Bush and his administration in 2003 to provide my expert testimony in the United States Senate for my area of expertise as treating the fetus as a patient.
And I was honored to be involved with that.
I've testified just recently again back in the Senate with Senator Ron Johnson and other experts this past December.
I couldn't make it down to the Mexico Senate a couple of months ago, about six weeks ago, but testified there by video.
and testified in the Mississippi State Senate.
I've received numerous awards for my research throughout my career.
I've always been a very, very busy clinician.
I've been actually honored by the American College of OBGYN, the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and the Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine, the latter of which I've received several research awards for top paper of the year.
So I have focused extensively on clinic, on my clinical activity.
I've never had dedicated, you know, sabbaticals or time off during the week to do research.
All my research is funded by myself and was done on my off clinical hours because I've always been a very, very busy clinician.
So, like you said, in the last three to four years, I've seen well over 26,000 high-risk obstetrical patients.
That doesn't even include my pro bono practice that I see all over the country.
So, ironically, those three organizations that have honored me my whole career are now attacking me and threatening me because I've threatened them and I've threatened their narrative And I have falsified, irrefutably, undeniably, as Sir Karl Popper said, science progresses by falsification and refutation.
I have clearly falsified and refuted the government narrative, the politically correct government narrative has been falsified, And undeniably, not only with my data, but the government's own data and Pfizer's own data themselves, which we'll get into.
So the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology won't engage with me.
Actually, nobody in the world will engage with me or debate me.
Why?
Because they know I'm right.
And apparently they don't have the courage to face off and debate me.
And they won't do it because they'll lose.
So all they can do is threaten me.
And take ad hominem attacks on me.
But you asked me, when did I realize the vaccine was a fraud?
About a year before it was rolled out or before then.
I knew it was a fraud because there was never ever a rational basis to roll this vaccine out in pregnancy and I knew that's where they were headed.
I knew it.
And I had intelligence at that time that I won't go into that I knew it was going to be rolled out.
So the other thing that was an obvious clue is that I've been using hydroxychloroquine for over 40 years in pregnancy.
It's one of the safest and most effective drugs that's on the market today.
And in fact, the CDC and the FDA acknowledge that.
paragraphs lifted off the CDC.gov and FDA.gov websites bragging about pushing it.
This was five years ago, how safe it is in pregnancy and in small children all over the world.
So why all of a sudden did that narrative change?
Why a year before the pandemic hit, did they remove it from an over-the-counter substance in countries such as France?
Why are there patents and publications on the mRNA technology going back to the turn of the century?
These are questions that I won't get into, but I think the data speaks for themselves.
I think I got your questions there.
Thank you.
So, you were actually aware of this being a problematic substance for multiple reasons before it was even rolled out.
That's actually very impressive and I like your reasoning an awful lot.
The same could be said of Ivermectin, by the way.
As one person brilliantly observed, you can now get Uber to deliver marijuana and hash, but you have to find a dealer on the street to get an effective cold medication.
Yeah.
Yeah, well, I guess it's the total moral inversion of our civilization at this time.
Can you speak to why you think the CDC and the FDA are corrupt when it comes to COVID vaccines for pregnant women?
Sure.
Well, 100%.
I can prove it to you right now.
I'll prove it to you right now.
And what I'd like to do, let me share my screen with you.
- Yes, please. - If I can, and I'm gonna do this live.
So what I'm gonna do for you and for your audience is we're gonna go, you gotta go to DuckDuckGo, right?
So here's DuckDuckGo, you can't use Google because they're fraudulent, you can use any other search engine.
And what I'm gonna do is I'm gonna type in Pfizer, right?
And then 5.3.6 and then just PHMPT.
And we're going to enter that.
And the first thing we come to right here is the 5.3.6 cumulative analysis post-authorization of adverse events.
Now let me, I want I want your audience to be able to do this themselves and I'm going to show you.
I'm going to show you, I'm going to prove to you right now that the CDC and the FDA are fraudulent killers and they know what's going on.
And I've known of this data for well over two years, and I've been screaming it off the rooftops.
So just for your audience's information, this is not Dr. Peter McCullough's data.
This is not Dr. Pierre Corey's data.
This is not Dr. Jim Thorpe's data.
This is the Pfizer's own data that they tried to hide from you Because they knew it was a deadly drug, they tried to hide it from you for 75 years, and a federal judge made them open it up and give it to the public.
So it was made public about one year ago on April 1st, April Fool's Day, the big Pfizer April Fool's joke on the whole world, except it ain't too funny.
It's worth crying over, but not laughing.
So we're going to go into this.
We're going to double click here.
And what you're going to see is that's the head.
This is the name of the paper.
Now we're going to go down to page 7.
And here you go is page 4.
Page 5.
Page 6.
And here we go on page 7.
Now what I want to show you here, and if I can highlight this, I will.
I don't know if I can.
I guess I can.
But what you see here is the number of people that were dead In the first 90 days of rollout from December 1st, 2020 to February 28th, 2021.
That's 90 days of rollout, 12 weeks of rollout.
What does it say right here?
Can you read this, Vlad?
What does it say?
Fatal deaths.
How many cases were there?
I'm just looking for that line right now.
Female, male, no data.
Fatal.
Fetal.
Fatal.
Fatal deaths.
Fatal. 1,223.
Okay, now recognize that that was for the first 90 days of rollout from December 1st.
Truth be told, it's probably only not 12 weeks of rollout, but 10 weeks of rollout because they really didn't start giving it December 1st, 2020, more like December 14th or somewhere around there.
But we'll give them the benefit of the doubt.
This is over a hundred dead people per week associated with the rollout of Pfizer's product.
Right.
1,223 dead.
12, 1,223 dead.
This is the largest, most deadly medical procedure, medical device, medical therapy, vaccine, drug, medicine, whatever you want to call it, ever rolled out in the history of medicine.
Ever rolled out in the history of medicine.
I challenge you or your viewers to find another medical intervention that's ever been rolled out that has killed a hundred people per week.
Now you may say, Dr. Thorpe, you didn't prove causation.
Well, we've never had to show causation.
In 1976, I was at Wayne State University School of Medicine, and the swine flu vaccine was rolled out.
There were 26 deaths, 2-6, and the drug was immediately removed from the market.
You say, well, Dr. Thorpe, You know, what's the denominator?
How many?
Well, they redacted that information, so we don't have that, but it's irrelevant what the denominator is.
When you have a hundred dead people per week after a vaccine, and the vast majority of those people died over 80% within two weeks of the vaccine, and a huge number within two days of the vaccine.
I will remind you that one of the lying, deceitful things the government has done is they've told you they've taken the vaccine status away from a patient that has died or had a vaccine injury, and they don't call the patient vaccinated until two weeks after the vaccine.
Otherwise, they're considered unvaccinated.
That was the second dose too.
They said you had to be two weeks out from your second shot to be considered vaccinated, which even at the time sounded like a con to avoid any obvious adverse events that happened before that.
So here's your proof right here.
Your proof right here, and it's irrefutable.
Nobody can debate me on it.
The government is corrupt.
The CDC, FDA, the Department of Health and Human Services, they knew this on February 28th, 2021.
They knew it was killing people.
And what did they do?
Did they take it off the market?
Hell no!
They doubled down and they printed over 13 billion dollars of money from the Department of Health and Human Services, created a new agency called the COVID-19
Coalition Core, CCC, and they distributed $13 billion to over 274 sectors of our society, bribing every single one of them with money, loans that didn't have to be paid back if they met the agreement on the loan, the contract, which was to push the vaccine.
And so every sector of our society was bribed with that money, including all the medical agencies, all the hospitals, all of the medical organizations, the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the American College of OBGYN, the Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine.
And the founding member of that, one of the founding members was the American College of OBGYN.
I've received a massive amount of undisclosed monies to push the false narrative and to kill the patients that they're supposed to be protecting and then to put exert pressure on their sister organizations, the American Board of OBGYN and the Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine.
So, you know, you're looking at this page, you know, look at the Look at the problems with this.
How many people were recovered and not recovered at the time of the report?
It's just really a travesty.
Now, if you go down to page 12, I'm going to show you the obstetrics.
They weren't even supposed to be doing this on pregnant women, but here we see that there were 274 fetuses in 270 pregnant women that were given it.
Now, look at this.
There were 146 complications in those.
that were given it.
Now, look at this.
There were 146 complications in those.
124 were not serious.
70, I'm sorry, 49 of those were not serious.
75 of those were very serious.
So that's in essence a 45% complication rate.
And we go down here and we see that this, First of all, it's written like a fifth grader wrote this, either purposefully or due to their incompetence or trying to obfuscate and hide real data.
But look at down here, you'll see that 238 of these pregnancies were not followed up.
When you read this very carefully, right here, no outcome was provided for 238 of the 270 pregnancies.
You have 124 cases, 49 with complications, 75 of which were serious.
170 pregnancies.
You have 124 cases, 49 with complications, 75 of which were serious.
They're talking about preferred spontaneous abortions, miscarriage, 25 of them.
They talk about uterine contractions during pregnancy, premature rupture of membranes, abortion, missed abortion, fetal death, other clinical events, you know, five cases for They talk about headache, vaccination site pain, on and on and on.
You have a fetus and baby.
You got fetal growth abnormalities.
And you really come down to, at the end of the day, I can only find one live baby that made it out of these 274.
Now, maybe that's due to their incompetence in writing it, or maybe that's the case.
But there's a, you know, when you look at if 238 weren't followed up, 238 Minus 70 is only 32.
So of the 32 that were followed up, you know, the vast majority of those were abortions.
I mean there's over an 80% abortion rate on this.
So this is, they knew this data.
They knew it was deadly in pregnancy.
Of course, if it killed 1,223 people, over 100 people a week, when it rolled out, duh, why would you push it on the most vulnerable population in the world, which is my pregnant patients?
So that's kind of what I'd like to show you there.
I'm going to stop this.
So this is Pfizer's data?
This is Pfizer's own data.
Now, at one point you had mentioned that the government had, quote, fraudulently deleted horrible outcomes in reproductive toxicology studies of pregnant women.
Can you speak to that?
Sure, yeah.
I'll speak to that.
There's absolutely No doubt about that.
And if you go back to August 15, 2022, Sasha Latipova, Alexandra Latipova, is a 30-year veteran.
She's a biochemist, 30-year veteran in the vaccine pharmaceutical industry.
And she came out just swinging and blowing the whistle.
And so she has She has irrefutable data from both the Pfizer and the maternal reproductive toxicology studies that I've seen that were not only were they horrible outcomes, but they fudged them and lied to the American people and to people of the whole world and said that there was nothing here to see, that they were all reassuring.
And they published that, hiding that data and fraudulently making that statement.
You know, I've been looking at reproductive toxicology studies, Vlad, for 40 years.
That's the first thing I do when I see a drug that I'm not sure about and don't have a lot of experience with.
I go immediately.
And what they found in these studies was unbelievable.
Massive number of pregnant losses.
massive number of malformations, including absent brains, absent skulls, absent eyes, severe rib malformations and the like.
So this, if I saw any of those in any reproductive toxicology study, I would never prescribe the drug, period.
No ifs, ands, or buts about it.
So they not only lied and said that they were safe, but they published them.
And now Aleksandra Latipova has those internal documents and share that data with the world.
Unfortunately, like this Pfizer data, none of the mainstream media or the hospitals or anybody will really focus on truth.
They're too busy making money, hands over fists, Pushing the vaccine and protecting their bride money.
Extraordinary.
Can I ask you a couple of questions about shedding or exuding by the vaccine?
Sure.
Do you think that people who've been vaccinated, you know, I guess at this point, anyone who's had them has had two or more shots.
Do they pose a threat to non-vaccinated pregnant women or to the newborns just by their presence?
We don't have definitive data on that yet, but I am very, very concerned that indeed there is.
And let me share the data that I do have with you.
We have data that we published in the Gazette of Medical Sciences over a year ago, about 14 months ago, 13 months ago, and the co-authors, it was myself, Tiffany Parato was the lead author on that paper.
Deservedly so.
I was the second author.
There were many other authors.
Many of the authors were located all over the country.
Several of them were in Bobby Kennedy's organization, Children's Health Defense.
Sue Peters, Maureen McDonald, they work with Bobby.
And others, you know, Lisa Newman was a statistician, Lenny Murphy, many others.
But what we found was that at the rollout of the vaccination, there was just an unbelievable massive number of menstrual abnormalities.
And Tiffany Parato had kept track of these on social media, Facebook.
She had tens of thousands of women that had reported menstrual abnormalities.
And it was so concerning to her when it started being inconvenient to the narrative of the government and Fauci and the hospitals and the American boards of OBGYN.
And they tried to whitewash it.
So what they did was they destroyed, they deplatformed, they threw all those patients, tens of thousands of patients that were vaccine injured under the bus. - Yes.
under the bus.
So Tiffany started her, Tiffany Prado started mycyclestory.com and mycyclestory, M-Y-C-Y-C-L-E-S-T-O-R-Y.com go there.
And that's her website.
And we are continuing to use that and accumulating more data.
But what we found was that in the study last year that the most extreme form of menstrual abnormality is called decidual cast.
A decidual cast is pretty rare, but it's the extreme form of menstrual abnormality or vaginal bleeding, uterine bleeding, if you will.
What it's caused, it's caused by a shedding of the entire inside lining of the uterus.
And it's kind of triangular because that's the inside shape of the uterus.
So it comes out, they call it a decidual cast because that's what it is.
The decidual is the internal lining of the uterus and it's actually tissue and it becomes large and then the whole hunk of tissue is shed.
It's a massively bloody, painful, emotionally traumatic event.
There are only about less than 50 of those reported in the medical literature over the last 110 years.
Repeat that again.
Less than 50 of those reported in the medical literature in the last 100 years.
In seven months of 2021, after the rollout of the vaccine, we had 294 cases reported to us by patients.
294 cases.
And that's just the reported ones?
Yeah, so clearly something very, very bizarre was going on.
Now to ask, this is a long-winded answer to your question.
We are about ready to publish another landmark article from this and it will be published within the next month.
But what I can tell you is that the question you just asked and the nightmare may be getting worse.
We have evidence that of the women that had significant menstrual abnormalities that were not vaccinated, what we found, Vlad, was that the vast majority of them came in close proximity
3 to 5 days before the onset of their severe menstrual abnormality to somebody who was vaccinated either in the house or at work or socially.
So that tells us that there is a Huge issue with shedding from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated, causing the menstrual events.
Wow.
So, that's extraordinarily disturbing.
Now, we know what is being shed.
I don't know.
What are the most likely candidates?
Well, we got the spike protein, could be one of them.
It could be the lipid nanoparticle, or it could be exosomal pseudo-uridinated mRNA.
And that's really, really scary.
There are now two publications, two publications that document that intact this man-made, fake, pseudo-uridinated mRNA in the body's own exosome lipid package is shed intact in the breast milk.
And no doubt, it's absorbed by the baby's gut and affects and may permanently alter the baby's DNA.
That's extraordinarily concerning.
And now, with the animals, some are actually suggesting that that's present in cow's milk as well.
So, they're putting this in, as you know, animals now.
It's extraordinarily concerning that this is going on.
So the lipid nanoparticle, there's anywhere from 20 to 70 billion lipid nanoparticles that are injected in the arm muscle.
And we were told a big fib, a big lie, and they knew it.
It doesn't stay in the arm.
Within minutes to hours, they're in the bloodstream, and they traverse every known barrier in the body.
The blood testis barrier, the blood ovarian barrier, the blood brain barrier, The maternal, placental, fetal barrier, and then the fetal ovary or fetal testes or fetal brain barriers, all broken.
Everything, it goes everywhere.
Because that's what it was designed to do.
It was designed decades ago to carry poisons to tumors everywhere in the body.
So they purposefully developed it that way.
Now, we knew way back in 2012 by the Schladlich study in Sweden that these lipid nanoparticles are concentrated in the ovaries.
And they appear to be concentrated in the testes too.
And they're extremely toxic to the sperm progenitors and the ova, the egg progenitors.
So this is very, very concerning.
And this is why we've had the massive reduction in fertility.
There's a massive increase in infertility because of this.
Not just the abnormal menstrual periods, but because of the poisoning of the ova and because of the poisoning of the sperm.
And then because of the adverse consequences of this in early pregnancy.
So, So there's no doubt about it.
The Japanese FOIA study looking at the Pfizer biodistribution data was obtained by FOIA, Freedom of Information Act, by your own Canadian physician, Dr. Byram Bridal.
And what they showed, and they knew this, within 48 hours of injection, the baseline concentration of lipid nanoparticles went up almost 120 fold from the time of injection to 48 hours later.
And that slope was like this.
I mean, it was going way up.
So they had to kill those animals because it probably would have been in 48 hours because in 72 to 96 hours, there probably would have been 100 or 1000 fold concentrations because that's where it concentrates in the lipophilic tissues.
So it's devastating to think that when you bring this back to my business with my female preborn baby girl in the womb, she only has a million ova combined for the rest of she only has a million ova combined for the rest of her
And those million ova, as soon as birth occurs, as soon as the baby girl is born, those ova are irreversibly begin dying off in a program cell natural cell death called apoptosis.
So there's very few ova that a woman has for her lifetime compared with a man.
A man makes 20 million sperm an hour.
When a man ejaculates, there's 200 to 400 million sperm each ejaculation.
But again, we had an autopsy that was published in Germany on a 28-year-old man that died from the vaccine, proven vaccine death.
And he fathered a baby.
He had at least one child.
And what did his testes show at autopsy?
Zero sperm, complete massive inflammation from the spike protein and zero sperm.
So this is no surprise.
So it almost seems like the vaccine has zero or negative efficacy for COVID, but it has very high efficacy for sterilization.
Quite an interesting combination of facts, I would say.
Do you mind if we just do a slightly deeper dive on how the vaccine affects breastfeeding women and babies that are recipients of breastfeeding women?
Yeah, I'm very concerned.
You asked me the question before, is it possible that shedding could cause harm to breastfeeding babies or to babies or pregnant mothers?
Yes, it's absolutely possible.
Let me go one step further.
What did Pfizer and Moderna tell their study participants before this drug was rolled out?
What did they tell them that they didn't tell the rest of the world?
I'll tell you what they told their patients because it's in writing and everybody knows it before the vaccines were rolled out.
You know, in early 2020, the vaccinated people in their studies were told not to come in proximity to pregnant women and not to have close intimacy with unvaccinated.
That's what they were told.
So they protected They're study participants, but then they roll it out to the general population.
Crickets.
No mention of it.
Actually, I have a short video by a fellow named Dr. Marks.
I think he's with the FDA or with CDC.
And he specifically does a public service announcement explaining that it's perfectly safe for pregnant women.
Pregnant or breastfeeding women can certainly receive a COVID-19 vaccine and should discuss the potential benefits and risks of vaccination with their health care provider. - Sure.
There's currently no evidence that any vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines, cause fertility problems in either men or women.
If you're pregnant or breastfeeding, or might become pregnant in the future, the CDC recommends getting vaccinated.
Have them debate me.
I will see if I can arrange that.
I'd love to debate him, and I'll be respectful and collegial, but nobody will debate me.
He's dead wrong, and he's got a massive conflict of interest.
You know, now we're saying that doctors are being paid to push the vaccines.
Paid!
Large sums of money.
Look at Dr. Peter McCullough's Substack.
Every single pediatrician in the United States of America gets a bonus from the FDA and the CDC based upon how many Patients they've inoculated, vaccinated.
That's why they get so pushy with the vaccines.
Their income depends on it.
The entire system is corrupt.
It is so discouraging.
Do you have any advice, though, for women who have actually taken the vaccines and are pregnant or breastfeeding?
Is there any mitigating factors?
Is there any therapeutics, any protocols they can follow that might help mitigate this horror show?
Yes.
First and foremost, don't ever take another vaccine again.
You've been bamboozled.
And don't feel bad about it.
Like I said, the federal government spent, this is fifth generation warfare.
They spent over $13 billion trying to convince you and everybody else that this was necessary, which it never was because we had early treatment for this disease.
It was never necessary.
It was illegal to get an EUA.
The only way they could get the EUA was to fraudulently suppress early treatment, which is what they did to me and many others.
around the world.
So there's 6 or 10 million people around the world that died from COVID-19 in 2020 or whenever.
Guess what?
They were killed by the medical-industrial complex because they thwarted everybody from using therapies that we knew were safe and effective.
Let me give you one example.
Just one example, and there's millions more.
You know, Dr. Ben Marble, the CEO and founder of MyFreeDoctor.com.
Dr. Ben Marble treated over 300,000 patients with early therapy for COVID-19 early on.
300,000 and he treated them all himself in his company, pro bono, free in all 50 states.
You know how many people died from his regimen, which is the same as a McCullough protocol or Zelenko protocol?
I'm going to guess none.
Six died.
But they had advanced disease and multiple comorbidities and he didn't get to them until late.
99.99% success rate.
The people who died, died of COVID, not from the protocol, not from the therapy.
Correct.
They were too far gone and too many comorbidities.
The clue to early treatment, the clue to successfully curing the disease is early aggressive treatment with these nutraceuticals.
Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, zinc, Vitamin C, iodine, corcetan, melatonin.
You know the protocol.
I mean, and you can choose a lot of different drugs.
The fact of the matter is if you have those four or five, there's gonna be a 99% cure rate.
So it was a complete fraud from the beginning.
I knew that because they were lying to me.
They illegally would not fill my scripts for hydroxychloroquine and they threatened me.
And they illegally, the pharmacist illegally withheld and wouldn't fill my scripts.
That's illegal!
A pharmacist can't do that to a physician.
That's illegal.
They're practicing medicine.
So this was fraud from the very beginning.
Now, if you've taken the vaccine, to your question, and you think you've been damaged, the first thing to do is be aware of it.
Admit it about it.
Admit it to yourself.
Don't cover it up.
Talk to your friends about it.
And don't ever take another vaccine again.
And then get on the vitamin D3 K2 supplement.
I personally prefer that ordered off Amazon.
It's the cream.
And you can just Google it on Amazon.
You'll come up with a pump, a bottle.
I should have brought one in here.
But it's much more effective than the oral stuff.
It's a little bit more expensive.
But you just put it on your skin, it's rapidly absorbed.
And I would take at least 10,000 units a day, which is one pump a day.
And I would get your vitamin D levels, oh, three months later, I'd like to see I'm up 80 or north of 80.
And then vitamin C, a couple grams a day.
And then zinc, 30 to 50 milligrams a day.
And then iodine, if you get a super saturated iodine solution, get one at your health food shop or order it on Amazon.
And two drops a day, just put it in a quarter glass of water, swish it around in your mouth and drink it.
Those are all very, very potent immune enhancing substances.
There's many, many others.
But what I would tell those who think they've been injured with a vaccine is to get on all of that.
And I would probably get on hydroxychloroquine and or ivermectin as well.
Now, you can go to MyFreeDoctor.com.
Dr. Ben Marble, you tell them I sent you.
And they're an incredible organization.
Or you can go to FLCCC.
Dr. Pierre Corey and Dr. Paul Merrick have many protocols for vaccine injury, for long COVID, for early treatment.
And I've helped them out with our protocols from the perspective of women's reproductive health.
So just one more word about this cream.
So this is a topical vitamin D only or I thought I heard you say K3 or K2?
Yeah, vitamin D3, K2.
Let me bring it up on the screen here and let me show it to your audience here.
This will help mitigate some of the consequences of having actually injected this.
Yeah, vitamin D3, especially when it's activated into its 125 dihydroxycholicalciferol, which is the most active form, about 500 times More active than just the vitamin D3.
So yes, it regulates over 500 genes associated with the immune response.
It's the most effective single therapy probably that there is.
It's extremely safe, extremely effective.
You know, you can't really overdose on it.
You know, if you start getting way up levels above a hundred, you know, you could theoretically start getting some calcification of some of your tissues.
So you do want to, you know, at some point in time keep an eye on it.
But I can tell you that in the winter months that almost everybody is deficient unless they're on it.
And there's Hundreds and hundreds of studies showing the efficacy of this, and not just for coronavirus, but for any infection, influenza virus, any viral infection, any infection, it's very safe.
Here's the other product that I use.
I've given away all my secrets here, which is fine.
It's very appreciated.
Yeah.
I use this J. Crows and you can order it off Amazon and it's very, very effective.
You just put two drops and you can even get one of those nasal spray bottles and put, if you take a cup of water and put a half a teaspoon of salt in it, That equals normal saline or 0.9% saline.
And if you get one of those nose squeezers, instead of paying 50 or 60 bucks over the internet, just put a drop of J. Crow's in that saline solution and squirt it up your nose, immediately sterilizes.
So you come to the mall, come away from the mall, or a large crowd, or a bus, or an airplane, or exposure anywhere, being around somebody, Do that just prophylactically.
It works extraordinarily well.
But swallow a couple of drops of that a day.
It's very, very helpful for pregnant and non-pregnant women.
It's very, very safe.
I'm going to stop the screen there.
What kind of repercussions have you faced for speaking out against the orthodoxy?
I mean obviously the pressure on all medical personnel and frankly on everybody to advocate for these gene therapy injections has been unprecedented, unprecedented.
And those who spoke against it have seen all kinds of repercussions.
Can I ask what sort of consequences have you faced?
Pretty severe.
You know, pretty severe death threats.
Lost most all of my friends.
Lost a lot of my family members.
All of my colleagues hate me.
I've been gaslighted by everybody.
Called every four letter word in the book.
Trying to take away my license and my board certification formally.
And I don't, my attorney has asked me not to talk about that, so I won't.
I have an in-house attorney, too.
My wife, my beautiful bride, is an attorney.
Both of us have published a lot and researched a lot.
It's been really devastating, the attacks that we've undergone.
I'm here to tell you, Vlad, that I'm not afraid of death.
What I'm afraid of is not honoring my vow to my God, my vow to my patients as a physician patient relationship to always honor my Hippocratic oath.
And also I'm a veteran, as you probably can figure that out from my background.
I'm a veteran and I took an officer's oath and I swore to uphold the constitution.
There's nothing about this horrific event which is constitutional or legal.
Every single one of these people are killers and they need to be called out.
So I don't care about losing my job or losing my life or losing my assets.
I care about not speaking the truth out.
Yeah, thank you so much for that on behalf of Rare Foundation and all of humanity because those few people who are speaking up are saving the lives of anybody who still has a faculty for a reason and I guess we're quickly finding out who those are.
Dr. Thorpe, I know that you have a slide presentation to go into some details about the nature of these shots and what you've learned about them.
Did you want to go ahead and present them?
So what I want to start out by just really saying that this study was just published We were honored to have this as a featured article in the spring edition published just a couple of weeks ago in a peer-reviewed medical journal.
It's the Journal of the American Physician and Surgeons Journal.
It's a highly, highly elite journal.
It's not owned by the pharmaceutical company like the major medical journals, the fraudulent medical journals are.
So I want to acknowledge my co-authors on this paper because they're just an incredible group.
Claire Rogers is from Rome, Georgia.
She's a physician's assistant.
Mike Deskovic is a Ph.D.
in mathematical modeling.
And when you see the sophisticated analytics that we did with his leadership, you'll be blown away.
Stuart Tankersley is a famous, incredible man of God, military, army, family practice doctor, whistleblower, subsequently retired and in practice in Montgomery, Alabama.
Albert Benavides is in California, Northern California, probably one of the top CDC, FDA billing VAERS experts in the world.
Megan Redshaw is lead counsel attorney for Trial Site News, prolific, prolific She doesn't write and publish in peer-reviewed journals, but I think she's published more invited articles, peer-reviewed articles, short articles on COVID-19 than anybody else I know in the world.
I'm guessing at that, but I don't think it's hyperbole.
And then, last but certainly not least, is Dr. Peter McCullough, who, in my opinion, is the most qualified expert in the world to lead the world out of this greatest, colossal, catastrophic, clutter, In the history of medicine, he can do it and I hope he does.
So what we did was we used the FDA and the CDC data.
This is not the author's data.
This data is owned by you, the people.
It's governmental data, CDC and the FDA, and we handled the data and analyzed it exactly as required by the CDC and the FDA.
And they require a kind of a very biased analytics that is biased in favor of pushing vaccines.
What they don't want to do is compare with a placebo group because, interestingly, there's not one vaccine on the market right now.
Not one has ever been tested in a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial.
Zero.
So the reason is, is they want it compared to another vaccine.
So we did just that.
So their thought is that if you compare it to another vaccine that's been proven safe, well, none of them are proven safe.
They all cause death and injury.
It's just a matter of to what extent.
So that's we, we said, okay, fine, we'll do that.
And, and, you know, the other, uh, Dr. Albert Benavidez says, Jim, you can't use the CDC and the FDA data.
It's all throttled.
They're taking out all the deaths and injuries, and I have proof of it, he says, and he showed me the proof, and he's right.
They have throttled it, but I said no.
Albert, we're not going to mess with this data.
We're going to use the exact data and we're not going to change the data even though they are changing it and manipulating it.
We're going to use their data and their rope to hang them and that's what we did.
So, they say a two-fold increase in adverse events of a novel vaccine compared to a standard vaccine breaches their danger signal.
So, we chose the influenza vaccine.
Why?
Well, the influenza vaccine was a vaccine that I've pushed in pregnancy.
I'm not an anti-vaxxer.
I've had all my vaccines up until about 10-15 years ago.
I pushed all the vaccines in my kid.
I was misled by the vaccine industry.
It was a colossal mistake.
I made a huge mistake.
I publicly confessed that, apologized, and repented.
And it feels really good to be able to do that because I'm a human being and we all deserve to make mistakes.
The question is, do we have the integrity?
Do we have the ethical, moral, and intellectual integrity to own up that we've made a mistake and do a 180 degree academic metanoia?
Well, experts around the world, psychiatrists and many have told me that only 1% of the population has the qualifications to do that.
What are the qualifications?
Ethical, moral, and intellectual integrity.
99% of people don't have the ability to admit they were wrong and apologize.
So you heard me do that.
And if I'm wrong on this, I'll do it again.
But I know I'm not wrong because I'll stake my life on it.
So what we found, Vlad, was not a twofold increase.
No, no.
We had such an egregious increase That we had to make the X axis a log.
Notice it goes one, 10, 100, 1,000, 10,000.
That's a log graph.
A linear graph would go 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
And we had to make it a log graph, otherwise these data points would be about a mile over towards the right side of my screen.
Wouldn't fit on the graph.
So another way to put that would be that the gene therapy vaccine creates abnormalities in orders of magnitude greater than A standard vaccine.
That's what I'm hearing.
That's exactly right.
Now, one of the things that is confusing to many doctors and everybody is that, you know, what's the difference between an odds ratio and a relative risk versus this risk ratio or proportional risk ratio that we're using.
And the differences that we're looking, we're comparing the novel vaccine, COVID-19 vaccine with a standard vaccine.
And then we're looking at the relative rate of adverse events between those two.
So you can't ever take, get an odds ratio or a relative risk from this type of analytics.
What you can get is there's a massive danger signal.
But let's, for example, say on the menstrual abnormalities, there's almost a 1,200-fold increase in menstrual abnormalities with the COVID-19 vaccine compared to the influenza vaccine.
Now, the mistake that people can't get in their head is that Oh, you mean that there's a 1,200 greater risk if a patient, if there's a 1% risk of having a menstrual abnormalities, if you take this vaccine, there's a 1,200, you know, increase?
No, no, no, no, no.
No, this is a risk ratio.
That would be an odds ratio.
And you can't get an odds ratio or a relative risk from this type of study.
But I can tell you what the relative risk is from clinical experience.
But it's not 1200-fold, but it's substantially greater.
Here you saw is a 57-fold increase in miscarriage.
57-fold increase in miscarriage And then in fetal death or stillbirth, there's a 38-fold increase in fetal death or stillbirth.
Now, there's 16 other adverse events in pregnancy, all of which far exceeded the danger signals for the CDC and the FDA.
For example, chromosomal abnormalities increased.
Malformations of every organ system, specifically cystic hygroma and cardiac malformations, but all malformations.
Substantial increase in fetal growth abnormalities, fetal growth restrictions, small babies, severe Fetal testing abnormalities as in the non-stress test or the biophysical profile.
Severe organ malperfusions as documented by sophisticated color Doppler ultrasound techniques.
Severe early onset preeclampsia was significantly increased.
Preterm premature rupture of membranes, oligohydramnios or low amniotic fluid volume, placental clots, placental blood clot, placental calcification, significant abnormalities in preterm premature rupture membranes, preterm labor, Preterm delivery, subsequent death, and premature babies.
All of these far exceeded the danger signal threshold of the FDA and the CDC.
Now.
I do have one.
What has.
Sure.
Are there any solid numbers about the difference between live births Say 2019 and now?
Yes.
Yes.
They're substantially reduced all over the world.
I can give you graphs on over 15 countries that have suffered a three sigma, a two to three sigma reduction in birth rates.
Okay.
So that would be great.
That would be great.
What I have on this slide is, I know it's a busy slide, but I only put it up there to show your audience that I can produce 34 other completely independent sources that completely verify and validate what we found in this study.
Now, I'll tell you right now, that don't be deceived.
The military medical industrial complex, including the pharmaceutical companies, own all the main medical journals.
So they know what they did was fraudulent.
They know they've killed a lot of people.
So what they've done is try to stack the deck after they've committed that egregious violations and try to justify themselves retrospectively That'll never happen.
There's probably somewhere close to 15 studies now that are published in these journals and every single one of them that I've reviewed has major conflicts of interest and major flaws and I'll show you some of those.
But one of the things is that they will never overcome the Pfizer's data that they had two years ago that they're still sitting on.
Remember what I said opening up?
By Pfizer's own admission, this is the deadliest medical Uh, medicine, call it a vaccine, medical intervention, uh, drug, uh, that's ever been rolled out in the history of medicine, killing over a hundred people a week for the first 12 weeks by Pfizer's own data, which I showed you in the last hour.
So it's irrefutable.
And all they try to do is say, well, look at, we've published these studies and it looks like it's safe.
Well, no, you didn't.
You publish purposefully fraudulent trash to try to justify your killing of my patients all over the world.
And it's not going to happen.
And I'll show you some of those problems and conflicts of interest.
But included in these 35 sources, I want to make real clear, is guess what?
The same governmental database that the United States has, they have their own over in UK.
It's called the MDHR Yellow Card System.
Their data is worse than what I just presented to you.
Well, how about the European Medicines Agency, EMA's Eudra Vigilance Program?
That's for all the European countries.
It's even worse than our data.
How about the World Health Organization's Uh, official database called VigiAccess.
It's worse.
How about the World Health World Council for Health?
Over 100 countries involved in support this organization.
They cried out for a moratorium on the vaccination two years ago because of all their data.
Then, you know, let's not forget the data from every other sector of our society.
Let's look at the insurance industry.
You know, look at Mr. Davis's data from One America that was published almost 18 months ago.
It's a 40% increase in all-cause mortality.
A 10% increase is a devastation.
You know, one in a couple hundred year event.
This is disastrous to the insurance industry.
A 10% rise in all-cause mortality is devastating.
They had a 40% rise.
Look at Edward Dowd's new book, again, the all-cause mortality.
Dr. Spyro Pentazitos, same thing.
The disability, the healthiest sector of our population in the United States of America, and I'm sure that of Canada, is the working population.
They have the lowest incidence of illness and disability.
Well, guess what?
The disability and illness and deaths in the working population has skyrocketed all over the world.
This is a severe abnormality.
You know, we look at... I could go on and on.
Also included is the Pfizer data that we talked about, but also included is three whistleblower sites I have from your country, Vlad, that I'll review.
At least one of those from British Columbia on subsequent slides, but also in Fresno, California, from my postpartum nurse whistleblower, Michelle Gershman.
So it's irrefutable.
Now, here's another, this is a publication from my research team, COVID-19 and the Unraveling of Experimental Medicine, three separate parts that are separate publications in the Gazette of Medical Sciences.
And this slide, Senator Ron Johnson loved this, and he focused in on this in my testimony in the United States Senate on this past December 7th.
And what we did was I read, I pulled, I studied the literature from the very first rollout of the vaccine until 15 months into the rollout.
And I printed out, I studied, I looked at, I documented every single publication that documented a known death or injury Uh, be it a case report or a case series of injuries from the vaccine.
I read there were 1,366 of them.
I'm going to repeat that again.
There were 1,366 peer-reviewed publications in the world literature documenting injury and death that the authors thought were caused by the vaccine, and they published it.
So in those 1,366 peer-reviewed published reports, probably well over 4,000 authors Put their name on a publication that put their life and their professional work at risk.
But they did it anyway.
And this, the Gazette of Mad Maxes was so impressed with this that they published it as a separate archive in this article.
And you go to this article.
For your viewers, you know, if you just go to Google Scholar and you put my name in there, Thorpe JA, you'll come up with many of our publications.
But you can go there and not only did I review all these studies, all 1366, but I categorized them by subject of the vaccine injury.
And this is what I came up with.
And you'll see the most common vaccine injury, no surprise to Dr. Peter McCullough, is cardiac disease, myocarditis, and death.
You can see it here with my pointer.
336 of those publications involved carditis, myocarditis.
The second most common cause was vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia, 209 case reports.
I had an OBGYN colleague in South Florida that was killed from the vaccine by this mechanism about 15 months ago, young man, he's dead.
He is no more.
His children have no father, his wife has no husband, all because of the vaccine.
The third most common cause, no surprise to anybody, is the arterial and venous thromboembolism.
Now, I just want to ask a rhetorical question.
You know, if you already know this is the deadliest drug that's ever been rolled out on the market, Pfizer themselves told us that, but how can you have 1,366 publications showing death and injury from a vaccine in just 15 months.
How can you say that that's a safe drug?
It's ludicrous!
Now look at this.
It's the same data.
I plotted it a little bit differently.
Let's see over here.
Let's see over here.
Can you see my pointer?
Actually no, for some reason your pointer is not... Can you see it here?
You see that this is a bar graph and you'll see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 bars.
The bar all the way to the left is the red bar.
The other six bars are green bars.
The red bar represents the 1,366 publications in just 15 months for Death and destruction of the COVID-19 vaccines.
15 months.
Look at the next most common cause of complications and death from a vaccine, influenza vaccine.
For 784 months, it was only 39 cases.
Amazing.
Think about that.
And for the MMR vaccines for 616 months, only 8 cases reports.
Hepatitis B vaccine, 8 case reports published.
Tdap vaccines for 436 months, 6 cases.
Zella or chicken pox vaccines, full 48 months, 3 cases.
Meningococcal, spinal meningitis vaccines for 556 months, only 2 cases.
This is unbelievable.
The fact of the matter is, Vlad, you add up all the vaccines that have been in use over the last century, and you look at all the published complications in the medical literature, for a century, pale in comparison to that of the COVID-19 vaccines for just 15 frigging months.
Now this is the whistleblower data that I want to show you from nurse Michelle Gershman.
Incredibly courageous young woman that put her life and her job on the line.
This is not Michelle Gershman's data.
This is a hospital administration data that sent a page and a half email to over a hundred nurses saying, oh we have a problem here.
We're wasting so much time It's so time-consuming taking care of all these stillborns and dead babies.
I'm so sorry.
There's such a pain.
I want to show you how to handle these dead babies and throw them in the bucket.
It was a really offensive email.
And my nurse got so upset that she went to Bobby Kennedy and presented this data.
And Bobby Kennedy's organization got a hold of me.
And she's been and I have been on the circuit for the last six months preaching this.
This is the hospital administration data and I want to walk you through this because the fetal death rate in the United States of America is very, very low and it's very steady with very little variation.
This is measured 5.83 fetal deaths per thousand live births and stillbirths, all births.
So 5.83 per thousand births.
And if you look at the aggregate of the three years preceding 2020, the aggregate rate was 5.83.
And when you compare that aggregate rate with 2020, before the vaccine was rolled out, when there was massive death and destruction, allegedly from the COVID-19 infection, look what happened to the fetal death rate.
It didn't go up.
It actually went down.
So COVID-19, and this is consistent with what I observed, COVID-19 did not cause pregnancy complications that I saw, not in my busy clinical practice.
They all started after the rollout of the vaccine.
And this is proof that my clinical observation was absolutely correct.
You cannot tell me by any stretch of the imagination that COVID-19 infection increases fetal death.
There's the data right in front of your face.
This is national data.
And unless they go back and corrupt it, which they might try to do, and I think all the data from here on out will be corrupted.
But look at what Michelle Gershman, when I plot this out, Michelle Gershman was seeing only one to two stillbirths every two to three months.
Maybe one a month.
It went up to 22 a month and that didn't even include them all according to the hospital administrator that wrote this.
22 was the highest level that they ever achieved and they reached that level on at least two months if not more.
And they said that there's probably more than that.
These only included the stillbirths that went to labor and delivery.
The ones that went to the emergency room or the operating room and didn't involve labor and delivery, they didn't include.
They didn't include stillbirths that delivered outside of the hospital or other facilities or at home.
They didn't include.
So if you do the calculations based upon 9,000 per year, The fetal death rate went up to 29.3.
Now you divide 29.3 divided by the baseline rate of what it should be, say 5.8, that's a five-fold increase.
Now this is legitimate to say, okay, the relative risk of the odds ratio is about five, and that's about right.
So, but this is perfectly consistent with a 38-fold increase in the risk ratio that I showed you from the government data.
It's just that we can't give an odds ratio or relative risk from the government data because you're comparing a novel vaccine with the flu vaccine.
But we can use this data to give a five-fold risk.
And I'm going to go on to the next slide.
Which is your country.
This is Lionsgate Hospital in Vancouver, Canada.
This is two doctors, Dr. Michelle, Dr. Mel Bershea, and Dr. Danielle Nagas, and then three doulas, support, labor support ladies.
All five of them, they testify.
They've protested out in front of this hospital.
They had 13 dead babies in one 24-hour period, 21 dead babies in one week.
This far exceeds.
This is not 29.6.
This is 160 fetal deaths per 1,000 births, almost 16%.
This is 160 fetal deaths per 1000 births, almost 16%.
This is over 300 sigma surge, 300 standard deviation surge.
Dr. Boucher paid a heavy price for blowing a whistle in that Vancouver hospital, I might add.
Yeah, and he's my hero.
He's incredible.
So has Dr. Daniel Nagas.
Yes, that's correct.
Now, I wanna show this slide to you, and it's because Tommy T. Shimabukuro is an operative.
He's a vaccine pusher from the CDC, and he published, this is such a gross, this is a lead author of the New England Journal of Medicine study that was published in June of 2021, pushing the safety of the vaccine in pregnancy, saying it's necessary.
And why did he say it's necessary because pregnant women are at greater risk?
False.
It's not true.
He's saying it's effective and it's safe.
Totally false.
He manipulated the data.
When you look at the data, he shifted 700 patients that got the vaccine in the third trimester to those in the first trimester And he had to do that because there was an 83% miscarriage rate, 80%.
So in order to make it look better, he shifted 700 patients that got the vaccine in the third trimester and pretended that they got them in the first trimester and diluted the miscarriage rate down to about 13%, 12 or 13%, which is still three times higher than it should. which is still three times higher than it should.
So why did he do that?
And let's just look at Dr. Jim Thorpe compared with Tommy T. Shimabukuro.
What's the specialty?
And then just ask yourself, who would you trust with your fetus in the womb?
Or you're about to have a baby.
Are you gonna trust Dr. Thor or are you gonna trust Dr. Shimabukuro?
I don't care who you trust, but you better make a wise choice here.
And I think if you look into this slide and you validate it yourself, and many have validated, the situation will speak for itself.
I'm an OBGYN, Dr. Thor, myself, OBGYN doc, board certified.
I've been in practice 44 years.
You know, I'm board-certified maternal-fetal medicine.
He's a family practice doc.
My recommendation?
This drug is absolutely contraindicated in pregnancy.
It should have a black box warning, and it should be Category X. His recommendation?
It's safe, effective, and necessary in pregnancy.
Okay.
Who benefits?
Cui bono.
Who benefits?
Certainly not me.
I've been severely punished.
Dr. Shimabukuro is rewarded with job security for pushing the politically correct narrative, the false narrative.
He is a vaccine, known vaccine pusher, and he's got multiple perks from pushing this dangerous drug.
Funding source, I've funded all my own research out of my own wallet, my wife's and my own coffers out of our own time.
How about him?
Massive lucrative contracts, massive lucrative grants supported by Big Pharma and the United States government.
Who's the employer?
I'm employed by a large Catholic health care system.
He's employed by the federal government.
And all 21 authors on that New England Journal of Medicine paper were employed by the federal government.
Conflicts of interest.
For me, zero, nada, zilcho, none.
I've been severely punished and excoriated and threatened.
For speaking the truth.
What about Dr. Shimabukuro?
He's got massive conflicts of interest.
He's deeply entrenched into pushing vaccines.
He's a federal employee.
He has a head title of CDC post-authorization Post-licensure safety monitoring for COVID-19.
He's also on the vaccine safety team of the FDA and CDC.
He's captured by the military medical industrial complex.
What about benefits from the vaccine profits and patent royalties?
None for me.
Zero.
For him?
Massive lucrative The CDC and the FDA just look at RFK data.
Almost 50% of their funding comes from pushing vaccines or vaccine royalties.
Res ipsi loquitur, the situation speaks for itself.
How about publications and royalties from our books?
Well, you know, I'm really proud of this book.
Okay?
It's a really, really good book.
And I really encourage you, Vlad, to have Sally on this book.
But the fact of the matter is, I don't take any royalties from this book.
Zero.
Nada.
Zilcho.
I give them all away.
And I give 100 times more than that away to charities.
I get zero monies from the stance that I've taken.
How about him?
I don't know.
I can't speak to him.
How about, does he have any personal stock in the company's pharmaceutical company?
I don't know.
I could probably go look it up.
I wouldn't be surprised if he did.
And then availability.
He won't return anybody's call.
He won't return my calls.
He won't debate me.
He goes dead silent.
Me?
I'm available to everybody in the world.
I take care of everybody in the world who calls me up.
I testify for anybody that wants my help.
And I don't charge a dime.
Thank you very much, Vlad, for this opportunity.
I've overstayed my welcome here.
Not at all.
Not at all.
I cannot thank you enough for taking all of this time and effort to speak to our audience at Rare and wherever else this interview will find itself.
I'm sure it will be on a number of websites.
I can't thank you enough for doing this.
I'm somewhat speechless because the horror of this is beyond comprehension.
And to really grasp it, I think, would be soul crushing.
This is an incredible resource.
It's an incredible resource for your patients.
▲
Export Selection