All Episodes
Previous Next
April 15, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:16:37
Need to Know News (14 April 2023) with Carl Herman & Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in California.
We're hoping Chris Weinert in Florida will be joining us momentarily.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
Meanwhile—and this is a manifest display of arrogance—the U.S.
resumed its bilat program in Ukraine, according to the Russian minister of defense.
The U.S.
has quietly resumed its controversial biolab program in Ukraine, focusing on the construction of secretive new facilities and training of personnel.
A new trove of documents on U.S.-funded biological programs was presented by the commander of Russia's nuclear, biological, and chemical defense forces during a media briefing last Friday.
Kivlog cited a protocol from a meeting dated October 20, 2022, attended by representatives of the U.S.
Defense Threat Reduction Agency and multiple Ukrainian officials.
The meeting focused on the resumption of biological research in Ukraine paused due to hostilities between Moscow and Kiev, to put it mildly.
Now the project is resumed with a focus on renewal of legislative support, revision of train schedule, as well as conclusion and resumption of construction work.
The program was previously known as Joint Biological Research, but has been rebranded as Biological Control Research.
It cited concerns over an alleged Russian disinformation campaign on the issue, which was exposing that in fact it's developing harmful pathogens as biological weapons.
The U.S.
has engaged in damage control to prevent potential leaks from Ukrainian specialists on the true nature of the program.
Hiding from responsibility for participating in military biological projects, many suspects left the territory of Ukraine.
To prevent possible leaks about these illegal activities, the U.S.
is taking emergency measures to search for and return them.
U.S.
damage control began shortly after the conflict began on 24 Feb, 2022.
Another document suggests it.
The Russian military presented a draft on reducing the threat of Ukrainian expertise proliferating to U.S.
adversaries penned by Laura Denlinger, a senior counterproliferation advisor with the Department of State.
The Russian invasion has resulted in an exodus of highly capable technical experts from Ukrainian facilities that produce missile components and advanced conventional weapons, as well as those with expertise that can be redirected and exploited for a chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear weapon.
Moscow raid allegations of a sprawling network of secret U.S.-funded biolabs in Ukraine early in the conflict and has since published troves of documents substantiating it.
Meanwhile, U.S.
Sweating Bullets has officially realized they sent too much ammo to Ukraine.
We're running out of ammo.
In a whirlwind of hearings in March, the Pentagon revealed how much the Ukraine war has cut into American ammo stockpiles.
Massive rates of consumption from the war have caused the Pentagon to re-evaluate needs for a potential China contingency.
One of the big lessons coming out of Ukraine, the incredible consumption of conventional munitions and the conduct of what is really a limited regional war, so a great power war, if that were to happen, God forbid, the consumption rate would be incredible, said Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Mark Milley.
As reports of munitions shortages increase, on withdrawals from American arsenals to supply the war in Ukraine, defense leaders, intensifying before Congress, reveal deep concern about the U.S.
ability to sustain a military contest with China.
The U.S.
has devoted millions of rounds to Ukraine since Russia invaded, draining U.S.
stockpiles and setting off alarms in Congress.
Senior leaders, in statements that justify the Pentagon's budget request for the coming year, warned that the U.S.
had massive hurdles to overcome to rebuild to levels necessary to counter China.
I'm concerned.
I know who the secretary is.
We've got a ways to go to make sure our stockpiles are prepared for the real contingencies, said Mark Milley.
GOD has directed the military to review war plans and reassess munition expenditure estimates to inform future requests.
Should America keep sending its bullets to Ukraine, for example?
The number of Javelin anti-armor missiles in the U.S.
donated to Ukraine in the first six months of the war equaled seven years of production at normal manufacturing rate.
It would take up to eight years to replenish the U.S.
arsenal of Precision 155 rounds, Javelins, and HIMARS ammo as of January.
I think the biggest thing we learned is the expenditure rate.
It's caused us to go back, take a look at our own wargaming and analysis, what our predicted expenditure rate would be.
Admiral Mike Gilday, Chief of Naval Operations, told the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee.
Ukraine fires between 3,000 and 7,000 rounds each day, the equivalent of a yearly order for a small European country.
Wow!
It would fire orders of magnitude more if the supplies were not themselves constrained.
Meanwhile, Russia, whose military doctrine emphasizes overwhelming artillery fire concentrated against enemy positions, and as a former artillery officer, let me observe, most casualties in warfare are not Generated by the infantry tanks or even planes, but by artillery, at one point was launching around 50,000 rounds a day.
A sign the UK Ministry took to indicate constrained supply and inability to achieve battlefield gains after the rate of firing dropped in 2023.
One class of munition, a 155mm round, has begun a particular choke point.
The US has sent more than 1.5 million howitzers to Ukraine, as well as an additional 6,500 GPS-guided rounds.
For comparison, the U.S.
produces about 15,000 rounds per month.
Most of those, about 14,000 monthly, are consumed in U.S.
military regular peacetime training exercises.
Here you have a Marine Corps Corporal Carter Hughes carrying a 155 millimeter artillery round forward.
Chris, just join us if you can.
in.
I already sent the link.
Yeah, join us as soon as you can.
Thank you.
Thank you.
The Pentagon pledged to never allow American stockpiles to fall below critical levels, but officials worried as early as August that they'd fallen below what they considered comfortable.
The Biden admin's $842 billion budget for fiscal year 2024, the largest ever in nominal terms, Includes $30 million for building up weapons manufacturing and for DoD to buy the max number of munitions the American industry can produce.
Long since I reported that, as Mike Adams explained, it would take us two years to really get up to the munitions level if we were drawn into direct conflict in Europe in a conventional war.
Army Secretary Christine Wormuth told Congress the service will begin multi-year contracts for munitions to provide contractors with the guarantees they need to invest in more production capability.
Lockheed Martin announced the first multi-year contract is up to $4.5 billion over five years for Hellfile and JAGM missiles.
In addition, the army plans to invest $1.45 billion to increase production of 155 military shells—85,000 monthly—by fiscal year 2028.
Obviously, that would be way, way, way too late if any serious conventional war were to break out now in Europe or, for that matter, with China.
Gilday and other defense officials say Ukraine has informed their understanding of the need to supply a large-scale industrial conflict, such as if China were to invade Taiwan.
One of the biggest lessons is the incredible consumption of conventional munitions and the conduct of what is really a limited regional war.
Milley told the Senate committee on March 28th.
So a great power war, if it were to happen, the consumption rate would be incredible.
Gilday said the Navy had expected expenditure rates to fall in a modern conflict as munition had become more advanced and more expensive.
But conflicts can stand beyond just a few days.
In a conflict with China, munition consumption would be enormous.
The U.S.
would expend all of its long precision-guide munitions within a week.
The rest would take just a few weeks longer.
These gaps undermine deterrence, the linchpin of the U.S.
defense strategy, because they reveal to all that the U.S.
cannot endure a lengthy war, said Seth Jones, senior vice president at CSIS.
Adversaries could see us as constrained by paltry munition supply and feel emboldened to take actions contrary to U.S.
interests without fearing a response.
Meanwhile, Beijing is piling up munitions and other advanced equipment at a rate up to six times faster than the United States, and would have easy access to its industrial base during a Taiwan contingency.
In contrast, the U.S.
would have to depend on a supply chain to transport troop weapons by 7,000 miles across the Pacific.
Ukraine's war has taught us we must transition from just-in-time stockpiles to just-in-case stockpiles, said Susan Collins of Maine.
The Navy requested a 6.9 bill in its fiscal year, $2 billion more than the year before in the Air Force, 4.7 compared to 2.3.
They're going all out for more money, Carl.
They're seizing the opportunity to inflate their budget.
Your thoughts?
Well, the first story with the report of more U.S.
bioweapons development labs.
I mean, it's nice to have reports saying that the U.S.
is doing what's been dirty and they have been doing, but it's not going to be enough.
So the situation that we have Is we have one part of the world that is covered by corporate media thinking that the U.S., the UK, and NATO are good and Russia is bad, and the world that is more fully informed that is going to know that the U.S., the UK, and NATO are definitely bad with a neocolonial, looting, lying, Orwellian, illegal empire, and that Russia is not bad.
But for Russia to allow this situation to stay in a dangerous psyop, where they have the power to end this war.
But it's not just Russia, it's really any political leaderships that want to go ahead and expose JFK, RFK, MLK, 9-11, COVID, whatever.
So we're still in this dangerous psyop.
And where is the truth to end this psyop?
That is the important question.
I will give documentation this time for the 40 page white paper that I wrote that Congressman Kucinich leveraged to attempt to impeach Kucinich, not Kucinich, Bush and Cheney.
And part of that is the documentation that the US, the UK and NATO, they really are bad and the US is in violation of international treaties.
Concerning biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons, the U.S.
only virtue signals about the rule of law, they don't allow any inspections of their stuff.
Now, for the ammo dump, I think the most important context is that this is yet another illegal war of aggression by the U.S.
and cheerlead and supported by these other nations.
And we know that it's an illegal war of aggression by the West.
Take a look at it in historical context.
Okay, I'll put the series U.S.
illegal that we got 200 years that this is business as usual for the U.S.
to violate treaties and then dominate the resources.
But we have in context specific to Ukraine, NATO promised not one inch to the east and instead what they've done is they have encircled Russia.
You have the 14 and 16 color revolutions which put puppets in and that is consistent with the history of U.S.
illegal.
You have 14,000 dead in the Donbass when the U.S., the U.K., and Ukraine's puppet used those artillery shells against the east killing about 14,000.
Those are war murders and the two peace terms that the U.S.
rejects, Excuse me, along with the Ukraine and NATO is simply one to honor that not one inch promise that no NATO for Ukraine and that the Donbass actually has political independence.
And they've already indicated what they want via vote.
But yeah, we can have international people go in there and verify that people in the Donbass know it was Ukraine backed up by the US, the UK and NATO that shelled them for eight years.
Regarding the size of...
These munitions, so just to apply a little mathematics teacher, so we're told that 1.5 million 155 artillery shells that you saw that guy carry.
So that's a shells about 2 feet long, about 6 inches at the base.
It's going to weigh about 100 pounds and 1.5 million of those things would go on to an American football field.
And it would be 12 deep.
So imagine being a football field.
Whole thing is filled with these.
Shells and is 25 feet high.
That's what we had given.
And that also is part of the documentation that the U. S. is not allowed to supply and to back and to be the voice of the intelligence behind a war of aggression.
The U.S.
total military budget, the article informs us, is pushing $1 trillion.
And it'll get over that when we add all the supplemental bills that they throw onto that in the course of the year.
$1 trillion is about the total amount that it would take to save a million children's lives every month if you invested in long-term sustainability for their independence, that's what it would cost to make sure we had clean water, healthy land, and that these people could be independent.
But instead of that investment that would be over about 10 years and a world of work for everyone, we instead have that's the amount of money the U.S. spends in one year to engage in the ongoing lie-started illegal wars of aggression.
Indeed.
Indeed.
Meanwhile, Trump cleans the floor with his status in a brand-new poll.
All right.
Released Monday, showing early primary state in New Hampshire, former President Trump as a commanding lead over Republican rivals for the presidential nomination in 2024.
The St.
Anselm College survey of 1,320 New Hampshire residents found 42% of Republican voters support Trump.
Who has, of course, been arranged on multiple charges.
The survey went up between Saturday and Sunday.
The survey found 34% of Democrats backed Biden, who has yet to declare his nomination.
In the 2020 contest, Bernie Sanders prevailed with 11%.
That's got to be met by 21 at least, maybe even 31, followed by former First Lady Michelle Obama at 14 and Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg.
Kamala Harris had only 4%.
New Hampshire presidential are less than a year away.
In a press release, Neil Levesque, executive director of the New Hampshire Center, said Biden's popularity is still below those of his predecessors.
Both former President Trump and current President Biden are off to solid beginnings in their respective parties' primaries.
A strong candidate in either, of course, could collect enough for an upset.
There are lots of potential votes.
In 2024, the Republican primary will kick off, the margin in Florida 13 points higher than that of DeSantis, followed by Nikki Haley and Vivek Ramaswamy over New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu.
The sample area is plus or minus 4%.
Biden popularity just 45% in New Hampshire.
Only 15% feel the country is headed in the right direction.
Meanwhile, federal judge exposes Biden.
In moments like this, one must wonder, what the hell does a Biden admin think?
They had to know there was going to court.
They had to know the truth about their role in this tyrannical raid.
This is an expo about Mar-a-Lago showing that Joe Biden ordered the FBI access.
To the Mar-a-Lago Docs and President Trump Personal Belongings.
Here is part of the text.
On April 12, 2022, NARA notified plaintiff that it intended to provide the 15 boxes to the FBI the following week.
Plaintiff requested an extension on the contemplated delivery so he could determine the existence of any privileged material.
The White House granted the request.
On May 10, 2022, NARA informed plaintiff that it would proceed with providing the FBI access to the records in question, as requested by the incumbent president, beginning as early as Thursday, May 12, 2022.
The government's filing state the FBI did not obtain access to the 15 boxes until approximately May 18, 2022.
Joe Biden lied.
The White House lied.
Now they're caught.
Biden denied it all.
Meanwhile, Curtis Hook, AB Zeke Miller, the FBI, served a warrant on Trump's residence.
Was he or anyone at the White House aware that he had been briefed in the aftermath of that being executed?
Press Secretary, no.
The President was not briefed.
No one at the White House was given a heads up.
How bad is that, Carl?
Your thoughts?
Well, first, DeSantis is a governor.
Everybody who is a governor has to be considered as dirty until proven otherwise.
You just can't rise to power.
The conservative standard, just to give them the benefit of the doubt, is that DeSantis either knows or should know of violations of law that is critical to the central policies that we're talking about.
Just with COVID, if you want to acknowledge DeSantis for standing up to COVID, Well, okay, then there's a follow-up question of just what did you know when, because you also have an oath of office to uphold the Constitution.
And I'll put more documentation underneath, is that Federal Title 21 requires that every person have the full right to decline experimental medical products without any influence of coercion, and DeSantis has got to know that, or he should know that.
And for Biden to lie, well of course he's lying, he's not telling the truth about anything except maybe what flavor the actor likes as an ice cream, but anything that that guy says is going to be a lie, and of course he's going to lie about that raid, and remember it's just an actor.
Anyway, so this is an ongoing clown show, and that our audience should be paying attention to how ridiculous it is, But also not to get too emotionally upset for it, we still do need some kind of a breakthrough so that these facts can be interpreted by the sheeple.
And until we get that breakthrough, yeah, it's going to be this crazy.
I think the breakthrough we need, Carl, is just honest votes.
We need paper ballots and hand counts, and everything would straighten itself out.
Trump won overwhelmingly in 2020 if you had an honest count.
The Republicans won overwhelmingly in 2022 if you had an honest count.
It was all manipulated by the voting machines that draw boxes and such.
I don't see any salvation absent.
Dropping all that ridiculous nonsense that's being used to steal one election after another.
Meanwhile, court rejects Bragg's request for a restraint order against Jim Jordan.
Manhattan District Attorney Bragg's urgent request to have a restraint order was rejected on April 11, the same day it was filed.
U.S.
District Judge Mary K. Verisco, a Trump appointee, turned down Bragg's emergency request.
The court declines to enter the proposed temporary restraining order in order to show cause, noting she had not yet received several documents referenced in Bragg's filing.
If you're adjourned and others to respond to the lawsuit, schedule a hearing for April 19, meaning moving forward.
Earlier, Bragg had sued Jordan for allegedly infringing on state sovereignty.
Jordan subpoenaed a former Bragg deputy and demanded docs from Bragg's office regarding the prosecution of former President Trump, a Republican indicted by a grand jury.
Jordan has no power under the Constitution to oversee state and local criminal matter, Bragg claimed.
His office also asked the court to enter an order that would block Jordan and the House Judiciary Committee, which Jordan chairs, from enforcing a subpoena to former Manhattan prosecutor Mark Pomerantz and prohibit Pomerantz from complying with it.
Evidently, Bragg doesn't want Pomerantz testifying in upsetting his apple cart.
The judiciary subpoena to Mr. Pomerant marks a first time in our nation's history Congress has used its compulsory process to interfere with an ongoing state criminal case.
The DA is likely to succeed on the merits because the subpoena exceeds Congress's authority and obstructs New York's sovereign right to enforce a criminal law.
Sabina was also irreparably injured the DA by, among other things, interfering with an ongoing criminal case, compromising grand jury secrecy and the attorney-client privilege, disrupting his preparation for trial.
Finally!
The balance of the equities and the public interest favor the DA because the subpoena undercuts federalism principles and the fair administration of justice by injecting politics into a state criminal case.
The arrogance!
Defendants have yet to lodge any filing.
Jordan said Bragg is obstructing a legitimate congressional investigation.
We have a constitutional duty to get the facts, particularly when you have a DA interfering with the most important election we have, which is of the Commander-in-Chief of the President of the United States.
Trump, President until early 2021, of course, is running for a second term.
Bragg asserted Jordan and other members lacked the authority to probe the Trump prosecution.
But Jordan disagreed, pointing that federal funds were used to investigate Trump first.
They indicted the president for no crime.
Then they sued to block congressional oversight.
When we asked questions about the federal funds they said they used to do it.
Pomerantz, a former prosecutor, left Bragg's office because he was upset Bragg was not preparing to bring charges against Trump.
Jordan said in a letter that Pomerantz had no basis to decline to testify.
Based on your unique role as a Special Assistant District Attorney heading the investigation into Trump's finances, you are uniquely situated to provide information relevant and necessary to inform the Committee's oversight and legislative reforms.
Jordan noted the book, Pomerantz's book, as he questioned the new lawsuit.
He takes us to court because we want to talk to someone who left the DA's office a year ago?
Who went out and wrote a book on this very subject?
It's unclear if Pomerantz will comply with his subpoena.
Jordan initially requested voluntary cooperation, but Pomerantz said in a letter, Bregg's office has instructed me not to provide any information or materials in response to your request.
Carl, your thoughts?
Excuse me, so this is a funny case.
You have Greg claiming that there are 34 felony violations, but he won't cite this supposed underlying crime that the business record falsification is causing.
It's even difficult to be able to articulate what he's talking about because he hasn't cited the underlying Crime, felony crime that is associated with this.
Now, he is saying that this is a falsification of records, but in my reading the articles, you know, all of this is always, always bullshit, but I don't know what exactly the record is that they're claiming to have been falsified.
I know they're pointing to the payments to this Stormy Daniels and that Stormy Daniels has Uh, documented testimony that she's saying that this affair never happened.
And she, in the written letter that she made denying the existence of the affair, she has, there are like seven or eight times during the years that she has said that it never happened.
Now, later, she recanted that testimony, which means that her statements are unreliable.
But I don't even know what records the district attorney of New York are saying that was falsified.
We know that the federal court examining those same records found no crime at all.
So.
I think that this is going to be, again, useful to drag this into the light.
And if it's dragged into the light, people will see that there's nothing there.
This is a cheap political stunt.
But if it doesn't get dragged into the light, then it'll be the same as all of the other smears.
It'll just be a generalized smear.
The democratic leadership and the rhinos will continue to go ahead and talk if you know, of course, this is just another example of orange man bad.
Hey, Chris.
Welcome brother.
Chris, we're glad you could join us.
We're talking about the conflict between Bragg and Jordan, where Bragg claims there's no justification for Congress to review his state crime investigation.
Carl's made the important point that the elevation of these minor infractions about business dealings to felonies depends upon their use to suppress a larger crime, which has never been identified.
Therefore, as Greg Gerrits observes, it violates his Sixth Amendment right to know that crimes are charged against him.
I think it's severely constitutional flawed.
But Jordan has replied that they use federal funds to conduct part of their investigation, and therefore congressional review is warranted.
Your thoughts?
Well, I'd have to say definitely he's overreached his jurisdictional boundaries and perhaps his legal ones, too, in terms of brag.
And yeah, I really don't know the nature of what you guys were commenting on, but in my opinion, it's definitely seems to be something where he doesn't like to have the law presented back to him.
He only likes to be the one using it as the hammer and shield.
And I think that really it's going to come back.
His charges are going to be pretty much unwarranted and probably He might have a little bit of explaining to do himself when the hammer of justice comes back for him after his abuse of power, in my opinion.
Yeah, it's very clearly just a political, a public relations stunt, and it's actually been backfiring because the support for Trump has been increasing dramatically in the aftermath of the indictment.
Meanwhile, Roger Stone, whom I know personally identifies a vice president that Trump might consider, which may surprise you.
Roger Stone shared this on Substack.
What about Bobby Jr.?
Stone shared his observation about Bobby Jr.' 's announcement he'll be running on the Democrat tickets with some observations and an idea.
Your excerpt from his substat.
With authoritative polls showing only 37% of Democrats want Biden to seek re-election, a potential candidacy of Bobby Jr.
is both intriguing and potentially impactful on the 2024 presidential race.
Kennedy, the scion of the Kennedy political legacy, nephew of JFK, son of former Senator and Attorney General Orafke, has a long record of environmental activism and support for other progressive policies, but has this long-time criticism of the safety and efficacy of vaccines for which he is best known.
Kennedy raised concern about the link between vaccines and autism way back in 2015 and has emerged as the best-known critic of the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine, culminating in his landmark book, The Real Anthony Fauci.
The Democrat Party has changed dramatically since Bobby's uncle, John, ran as an ardent anti-communist, supporter of a major defense buildup tax cutter, and supporter of a silverback dollar in 1960.
JFK also became deeply suspicious of the intelligence services after being fed the flawed plan for the Bay of Pigs invasion.
As well as being surprised that U.S.
intel provided no early warning that the Russian had mounted U.S.-targeted missiles in Cuba in 1962.
Indeed, it is his vow to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds that was among the probable causes of his assassination in 1963, as I document in my New York Times bestseller, A Man Who Killed Kennedy, the case against LBJ, where Roger and I converge in our conclusion, Lyndon, it was all the way with LBJ.
Just as the Democrat Party machinery cheated Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders out of the presidential nomination in 2016 and again in 2020, that same machinery, now within the firm control of Barack Obama, can be counted on to kneecap RFK Jr.
in the Democrat nominating process.
With Bobby emerging as a leading vaccine skeptic in the country, staking out an anti-globalist, America-first foreign policy, those in Trump world would be wise to carefully monitor the progress of his candidacy.
Just as a third of Bernie Sanders voters wound up voting for Trump in the 2016 general, the votes garnered by Bobby Jr.
could easily end up in the Trump column in November of 2024.
Given America's state of peril, if RFK Jr. performed better than expected, a former president should consider drafting him as a Republican vice president of candidate in a bipartisan unity ticket.
The idea is not without precedent.
John McCain really wanted Senator Joe Lieberman, McCain the Republican leader, and the Democrat, as his running mate in 2008, but was ultimately talked out of the idea. - Yeah, it's likely Bobby Jr.
will be railroaded by the anti-American Obama gang.
He's not on the side of destroying America.
This will cost him dearly in the 2024 presidential race with D.C.
elites.
Carey Lake and Ron DeSantis have been discussing potential VP picks, but DeSantis may have blown his opportunity.
Now, Bobby Jr.
is a potential suggestion.
I would say, Carl, that I think Bobby Jr.
might be the only candidate who I would say might be stronger for Trump than Tulsi Gabbard, especially because Trump's greatest vulnerability is on the vaccine side with warp speed, and this would be a marvelous compensation.
Your thoughts?
The only way that is going to be enough is if we get a breakthrough with the truth and not with the Kennedy name.
So RFK Jr.
has to honor his dad, his uncle, 9-11, and he has to expand that truth mantle with COVID.
To all areas, and especially regarding election fraud, you can't outvote your way out of election fraud.
So he's going to have to be up front, and that is the only way that we can get through.
Otherwise, the machinations are going to go through, corporate media is just going to spin whatever it is that they want to spin, and we'll be subject to the same actions of 2020 and 2022, unless the election fraud issue is resolved.
Chris, your comments.
Yeah, I think it goes even a little bit a step beyond the election fraud thing, and I think it's all tied together.
I think JFK especially knew the full weight and power of the intelligence services in terms of personally blackmailing him.
He was known to maybe step out into the night with a nice woman or two here and there.
And of course, he probably found it on his desk the next day, the pictures from that night and these people using these instruments to try to steer him in terms of policy direction or things of the sort.
So I would have to say he has seen this entire belly of the beast and RFK probably in the shadows of his father and his uncle have seen as well.
So man, I think RFK would bring a tremendous punch to the ticket in terms of a cross ballot beyond the partisan agenda, let's say, in terms of a Trump and RFK thing.
That would kind of be an unbeatable situation.
I don't see it really going that way, though I see it really coming down to maybe RFK or Trump and maybe DeSantis and really getting into a pretty tight quote-unquote race to try to rope people back into this political theater as well.
It's going to be interesting to see what time will bring us in the next few months and year and a half or whatever, but I look forward to watching this and tuning in.
I think it's starting to get good right now.
You're right about JFK having his share of dalliances, but apparently he wasn't a great lover.
Angie Dickinson said her affair with JFK was the greatest 15 seconds of her life.
But I'm saying, Fetz, there's a whole industry of, like, debutantes.
Like, look at his wife.
She was one of these debutantes of this foreign entity, this group that actually turned 17, 15-year-old kids out, you know, for marriage and into the political circle as well in Bouvier.
So, both these families came from a tremendous amount of political and noble, quote-unquote, power in terms of European history and American history.
And this is a bigger element than I think that most Americans consider is the European banking involvement and this Judeo-Masonic cabal using this Intelligence Service and National Security Act in the way that they do.
Oh, I can tell you want to add a thought.
Go.
Nancy Pelosi might have been one of those young ladies who were around and might have gotten a special introduction to the president.
Can you stop saying gross things for a minute?
God damn.
Meanwhile, We'll be right back.
Here it is.
Check this.
This is Biden in Ireland.
Biden in Ireland.
Watch this.
If you haven't seen this, you're going to be astonished.
North Carolina.
Bob, we got ready.
He was a very conservative guy who was very, very...
Oh, my gosh.
That's a mask.
African-American.
Holy cow.
He always had quite...
Well, the key to success...
Let me play it again.
North Carolina.
Carl, your thoughts?
Oh, my gosh, that's a mask.
Holy cow.
Fairly stunning.
Carl, your thoughts?
So, yeah, we've been pointing this out for a long time, that this is an actor, and any honest system would arrest that guy and find out, but we don't have an honest system.
For our opponent's side, all they do is they have a tendency to democracy, so they don't care who these actors are.
They can be dead.
They can be somebody like Fetterman or Feinstein.
It doesn't matter, because you're just having them read a script about why they voted the way that they voted, and you just count the votes and push the policy the way that you want it.
So we know this guy is an actor.
Because of that evidence of the mask, we know the difference of the pre-Biden had dangling earlobes, and this Biden has attached earlobes.
The pre-Biden had a wider forehead.
This one has a more narrow forehead.
So we are in a psyop, and if people need another reason to withdraw consent to demand arrest, there's another one for you.
And how can Washington not be aware?
Everyone in Washington has got to know this is fake.
Chris, your thoughts?
I almost think that's part of it, is that people will really just lose their mind one way or another over this, or just completely tune it out.
And maybe that's part of conditioning apathy through these type of deepfake type of situations.
I don't know.
It's obvious that they have not only used actors like this in the political spectrum, but even crisis actors for all these agenda-pushing hoaxes and things of the sort.
So it doesn't surprise me at all.
These guys are by any means necessary and possible.
Will they try to steer people and dupe them into supposed volitions of their own free will?
I think it's more of a sign up there, too, in terms of democracy or anything like that.
Free markets.
You go on and on.
So free speech.
So, yeah, I think this is really part of the authoritarian play is to do these type of things with these type of situations and just to watch people divide themselves over the conclusions of what's going on.
I just have to say, tally one up to the conspiracy theorists once again, because we are right on this from the get go.
Yes, yes, yes.
Once more.
It is.
It's a mask.
Holy cow.
Meanwhile, NI New York Times.
Oh, my gosh, that's a mask.
Holy cow.
It is.
It's a mask.
Holy cow.
Meanwhile, anti-New York Times rebutting.
New York Times claiming China and Russia formed an alliance of autocracies.
Chinese broker deal upends Mideast diplomacy challenges U.S.-Russia exerts growing influence in Africa, worrying many in the West.
China winds economic role in Latin America.
With Afghan collapse, Moscow takes charge in Central Asia.
Are Wooing Indonesia and Beijing as the Edge China is Winning in Asia Biden's Plans Won't Change That Here are the N.I.
New York Times.
The Rothschild-Soros New World Order is dead.
Long live the multipolar world in which regional powers keep their peace in their own backyards while respecting the sovereignty of even the smallest nations.
From Central America to Latin America to Africa to the Middle East to Central Asia to the Far East, the pattern of nations freeing themselves from the yoke of American tyranny, itself a function of globalist tyranny, is unmistakable.
It was Putin and Tsai who set this geopolitical transformation in motion years before Trump came onto the world stage.
But it was Trump's peaceful foreign policy, so masterfully concealed by strategic bombast and bluster, which dealt a final blow to the century-old scheme to conquer every nation on Earth for the New World Order.
Look around the globe.
As far as we can tell, other than the limited military action in eastern Ukraine, which will soon be resolved in Russia's favor, and some minor flare-ups in Gaza-West Bank, there are no wars, proxy wars, or even potential wars on the horizon to be seen.
Syria is recovering.
Saudi Arabia and Iran have kissed and made up.
Arab states are recognizing Israel as a shitty little state itself, boxed in by greater powers now, is behaving itself.
The CIA-Mossad-front ISIS, once active in 30 countries, is gone.
The two Koreas are at peace.
Even the PM of Pakistan is calling for good relation with India now.
What the heck happened to this crazy, bloody, violent world all of a sudden?
Answer?
Former and also current President Trump happened.
That's what.
War and peace is breaking out all over the world.
War is a necessary blood beverage of globalist vampires, but within the New World Order's meddling, marauding, murdering, mercenary U.S.
hitman and its intelligent proxies no longer bribing, blackmailing, and bombing, the subject nations of the world, saner heads, under the protection of Russian China, are prevailing everywhere.
As Xi Jinping recently stated during his visit to Moscow, China and Russia are ready to stand guard over the world order based on international law.
Tell it, Xi!
Tell it!
Be not alarmed over Xi's use of the term world order, which he and Trump have always said is that the international situation must be based upon respect for national sovereignty.
These men are talking about keeping the peace and establishing harmonious commercial relations.
Not a tyrannical one-world government built upon satanic degeneracy.
Here, is the United States creating a legion of doom?
The immediate emerging China-Russia-Iran accident may force the U.S.
to choose between some unappealing options.
The Jerusalem Post.
Russia-Israel tension will continue to mount, Russian experts.
Moscow might activate Iran's Syria of Hamas.
Without considering the outcome, former Putin's speechwriter tells the media line.
More!
Oy vey!
Our American ally pulled out of the Middle East.
Don't worry, shyster, as long as you behave, the lion, the dragon, and the bear won't hurt you.
As the world breaks free of the cabal and embraces the Trump world order model of mutually respectable nationalism, it was with great delight and sidesplitting laughter to behold the master pretend, for the sake of optics, that this is a bad thing brought about by the incompetence of Joe Biden.
With multiple exclamation points, an angry Trump posted his disgust over what is happening on Biden's watch to Social Truth, a boast picked up by many media outlets.
Have a good look and a good laugh.
Peace out.
Donald J. Trump.
China, Russia, and Iran, not to mention North Korea and other countries, have placed the U.S.
in a very bad and dangerous position.
They're dividing up the world as we sit around and let them do it.
They no longer respect the U.S., but they will.
Trump was always a dove after he became president.
He often concealed true peace agenda by talking like a warmonger.
Candidate Trump in January 2016.
Wouldn't it be nice if we actually got along with Russia and China and all these countries?
Wouldn't it be nice?
If you pay attention and utilize Mike's maxim of reversal, the slimes will always tell you who the good guys are.
Psy, Putin, and Trump.
The strongman follies.
They're the real good guys.
Meanwhile, Boobus Americanus.
I read in the New York Times today that Russia and China are flexing their muscle all over the world.
Boobus Americanus, too.
That's scary.
I'll say one thing about Trump.
Russia and China were afraid to mess with him like they are with Biden.
St.
Sugar.
Pot of Haze.
I just can't with these frickin' two-ass clowns no more.
I just can't.
Editor.
It's okay, baby girl.
That's exactly what Trump wants them to believe.
It's much simpler.
Your thoughts, Carl?
Well, in the background, you have a context that the U.S., the U.K., and NATO are going to be good, and that's going to be the myth that corporate media wants to spring upon people, that this is the advancement of civilization and technology, and that the U.S.
is only looking for the good of democracy.
Connected to that is going to be the mythology that the Russians and the Chinese and the Iranians are bad, and the article is pointing out, so Mike King is from the precept that Q is true, and what we're seeing is the show, and the U.S.
military is in charge, and we already have a victory, and what is being played out is a show for the normies to catch up as the military is taking out these That's deeply entrenched black hat assets that have been around the world for hundreds of years.
Now, I am in that position also.
I have limited proof.
I'll provide that proof in the show notes.
But basically, it is the evidence for Trump's 2017 world tour, where he basically embarrassed the Israelis, the Pope, and the Central European powers and the Queen.
in going around and showing that they had capitulated to those white hats.
And again, I am serious about being able to say what is demonstrable, and I can't demonstrate that other than the absurdity of what went on in that 2017 Trump break.
We can definitely demonstrate that Q, whatever that is, is a white hat insider with the coordination of the timing of Trump tweets and the language of Trump tweets with the Q post.
But, you know, everything else is a psyop.
So who knows?
For Mike King, we're talking with St.
Sugar.
I didn't know that his cat Sugar had passed.
Best wishes to the King household.
Our household will probably have St.
Lola soon, our 18-year-old cat.
We do have the Fog of War, and again, as always, People don't get too upset by what we can't really see.
Just stick to the truth.
And we are going to have to have some assistance with a break so that the truth comes out cleanly and not in chaos and not as something that will allow our opponents to impose martial law.
Chris, your thoughts?
Oops, it's frozen.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Your thoughts, Chris.
Is Mike King right?
Is this multi-polar world a good thing and not a bad one?
Well, I think that there's a lot of layers to this script and this theater and this political theater that I talk about all the time, the real politic behind the actual theater.
And I do think that in terms of national support, Trump has a lot of people that are in his corner.
And I almost think that part of the whole trials and tribulations and the insane clown world persecution of Trump is really strengthening his credibility.
Being that the enemy of your enemy is your friend type of psychology is probably very easy to locate in terms of seeing who's going after him and what these people have been doing for a long time.
The scum of the earth don't like him, so he must be a hero, you know.
So I think that there's, you know, a lot of shades of gray.
It's not quite simply black and white here.
As far as white hats going, man, I think there's a lot of collateral damage that's occurred for this whole theater to play out in terms of mustering national support or public support in a way that it supposedly has to have been done.
And certainly I think that there's more to this than really in a simple explanation or a simple Trump anti-Trump type of polarized event that they're trying to manufacture.
So I don't know.
It's going to be interesting to see how the next few weeks and months play out.
But but, yeah, I think there's possibility.
But I think that this group that's behind this whole Judeo-Masonic theater, they really like to toy with people's hope.
And it's part of conditioning helplessness.
So I really hope that this is not the case.
Yeah.
And of course, as Carl, I agree without fixing the voting system.
I mean, even the best candidates in the world, such as Trump and Bobby Jr., for example, even though they'd have overwhelming public support, they're still going to lose to a ham sandwich because of Dominion changing the way we vote.
Yeah, our economic system is very inextricably tied to this too.
A lot of the instruments of complete fantasy that are supposedly the pinnacle of our economic powerhouse and financial system are all crumbling down.
They're all built on a house of cards and they're all tied to this as far as this group staying in power politically to not be getting massacred economically for their mismanagement and complete dereliction of duty and betrayal of the American people in terms of a lot of derivative markets and Yes, yes, yes.
They're about to go down with some of these banks and some of these money laundering operations that they've been known to have.
Yes, yes, yes.
Good, good.
Meanwhile.
Four in ten drivers may go electric.
That turns out to be a grossly exaggerated number when you read the text carefully.
8% of households have EVs.
8% of hybrids.
That's far removed from 4 in 10.
About 4 in 10, or at least adults, are at least somewhat likely—somewhat likely—to go electric for their next vehicles, the new Polo shows.
But the history-making shift from our love affair with gas-driven vehicles is still a ways to travel.
A poll by the A.P.
Nork Center and the Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago shows a Biden admin planted to dramatically raise EV sales could run into resistance from consumers.
About 8% of U.S.
adults said they or someone in their household owns or leases an electric.
Just 8% say their household has a plug-in hybrid.
Even to ask credits up to $7,500 to buy a new EV.
It could be difficult to persuade drivers to ditch their gas-burning cars and trucks for vehicles without tailpipe emissions.
About 19% of adults say it's very or extremely likely they would purchase an electric vehicle the next time they buy a car, according to the poll.
22% say it's somewhat.
About half say it's not likely they would go electric.
6 in 10 said the high cost is a major reason.
A quarter said it is minor.
Only 16% said high cost would not be a factor.
New electric vehicles now cost an average of more than $58,000, according to Kelly Blue Book.
The average vehicle sold in the U.S., by contrast, runs just under $46,000.
Tax credits approved by last year's Inflation Reduction Act were designed to bring EV prices down and attract more buyers.
But new rules proposed by the Department of Treasury could result in fewer electric qualifying for a full $7,500 federal tax credit.
Many might only be eligible for half, $37.50, amount not enough to entice them away from less costly gasoline-powered vehicles.
About three-quarters say too few charging stations is a reason they wouldn't go electric, about half calling it a major.
Two-thirds cite a preference for gas as a major or minor reason they won't go electric.
Bina has set a goal of 500,000 EV charging stations nationwide.
$5 billion from the 2021 infrastructure law has been set aside to install or upgrade chargers along 75,000 miles of highway, coast to coast.
Electric car Tesla will, for the first time, make some of its charging station available to all U.S.
electric vehicles by the end of next year under a plan announced by the White House in February.
That, to open the nation's largest and most reliable charging network to all drivers, is a potential game-changer in promoting EV use, experts say.
High prices and lack of available chargers are cited by at least half of Democrats and Republicans as main reasons for not buying EVs.
There's a partisan divide in how Americans view it.
About half of Republicans, 54%, say a preference for gas-powered vehicles is a major reason for not buying.
Only 29% of Democrats make that claim in an encouraging fine for EV proponents.
The poll shows 55% of adults under 30 say they're somewhat likely they'll get an electric, as do 49% of adults aged 30 to 44, compared to just 31% of those 45 and older.
People in the U.S.
do see the benefits of an EV.
Saving money on gas is the main factor.
About three-quarters call it major or minor.
Making an impact on climate change is another.
They would buy an EV 35%, saying reducing their personal impact on the climate is a major reason 31% a minor.
A poll was conducted with 5,408 between January 31st and Feb 15th in a combination of sampling methods.
But take a look here.
might cause pause for others to think about buying an EV. - Electric cars have always seemed like the wave of the future.
Countless movies have made us yearn for cars that run on batteries and can be charged from the owner's home.
What we weren't prepared for is the possibility of these cars exploding like cell phones.
Here's how to survive an exploding electric car.
As of 2020, there were an estimated 6.8 million battery-powered vehicles in use around the world, with more than 3 million new vehicles added that year alone.
Tesla, with more than 200,000 vehicles sold worldwide, is leading the charge, but most major manufacturers are developing their own electric models.
Tesla is quick to point out that fires are still more common in gas-burning vehicles than in electric ones.
But as your electric car goes up in flames, that may be of little comfort.
Should you pour water on it?
Are you safe when the fire is out?
Why can it be more dangerous to be a passenger?
Tesla claims that there have been roughly one Tesla vehicle fire for every 330 million kilometers traveled, compared to one fire every 30.5 million kilometers traveled in gas-powered vehicles.
Europe is the biggest market for electric vehicles, with Norway reporting 7 of every 10 cars sold in that nation are running on batteries instead of fossil fuels.
Electric vehicles are anticipated to make up about 1% of all U.S.
vehicle sales by 2040, or an average of 2.5 million all-electric or hybrid cars sold every year for the next 20 years.
As these numbers continue to increase, so does the possibility of you finding yourself in this dire predicament.
Here's what you need to do.
Step 1.
Get out.
As with many survival scenarios, leaving quickly is always a plus, but never more so than when a car is on fire.
Get out of the car as quickly as possible, and put some distance between you and the flames.
If your car has doors with retractable handles not working properly, grab whatever you can to break out the windows or sunroof.
And if you are a passenger, you are probably at the highest risk, since the exploding battery case is very likely underneath your seat.
When help arrives, firefighters will need to find the core of the fire, and keep dousing it with water.
According to a guide released for first responders, an electric car fire can take 24 hours to extinguish and almost 800 liters of water.
Once the fire has been put out, do not try to reenter the vehicle.
Some cars have been reported to have reignited several times over a few hours due to lingering hotspots.
So it may not be a good idea to go back and look for the ring you dropped as you ran for your life.
It's important to remember that a battery explosion can be a threat to you even if you're not in the car.
Just ask the California couple who were sound asleep when their Tesla Model S alerted them that its charge cycle was interrupted.
Less than 15 minutes later, they received another notification, this time a loud alarm letting them know their vehicle was damaged.
It also alerted them that their house was on fire.
The couple, who had two electric cars, were able to get out safely, but the original fire quickly spread to the other.
This incident prompted warnings about not charging cars in garages overnight when they're left unattended.
If an unlucky crash into a power line is the cause of your battery's explosion, or you happen to be near a fallen line when a fire starts, Take extra precaution since the car is still electrified.
Throw some rainy weather into the mix could make the entire situation a major hazard, not just for you, but everyone around you.
If you find an electric current heading towards you, don't worry.
We'll tell you what to do to avoid that jolt right here on How to Survive.
I gotta say, that's a real antidote, true antidote to buying an electric vehicle.
Carl, did that last video increase your enthusiasm for buying an EV?
Maybe two?
Well, truth be told is that we have had EVs, and I think they're great cars, just from getting here to there.
They're quiet, they're smooth, they're very, very quick.
But in terms of recognizing it as a narrative, is that, ah, we shouldn't accept any of the narrative.
So four out of 10, that's an AP story, so of course it's gonna be fishy, and that may be signed.
So currently the data is 8%.
All right, so that's about two out of 25.
And they're saying that it might jump up to 40%.
That's 10 out of 25.
That's going to be a five times increase.
So we are being pushed.
Into that narrative and our opponents want to make it illegal to have any power that could be outside of their control.
So apparently the 1 electric ring to rule them all is a preferred way to control their sheeple and they don't want to have any type of of a gasoline engine or a gap or a natural gas engine or stove or power.
They're moving to control everything.
Everything.
Everything.
So.
We can't trust corporate media, we can't trust any of their agendas, and I will give a link.
Again, what we have for wanttoknow.info, we do have demonstrated free energy devices, and that is something our masters for sure don't want to have.
They want us to have to pay for everything, and as we were talking about just yesterday, they want to have this social credit score, they want to monopolize the digital currencies, and then they want to be able to cut off Absolutely, you got that 100% right.
Meanwhile, Babylon B nails it again.
Riley Gaines arrested for making trans activists assault her.
San Francisco.
Former NCAA swimming champion and current women's rights activist Rhyda Gaines has been arrested and charged for forcing trans activists to physically assault her after giving a speech regarding protecting women's sports at San Francisco State University.
Ms.
Gaines has been taken into custody in books at University Police spokesman Phil Shaw.
She has been charged with forcing supporters of the trans community to assault her.
This is a serious crime and will be treated as such.
Any victims of violent beating by trans activists will face swift justice.
Keynes has become an outspoken critic of biological males being allowed to compete against biological females in women's sports, leading to activists calling for her to be silent.
Who is this woman who says women have rights?
That's one angry activist.
Those words are literally violence and are forcing supporters of the trans community to physically beat her.
How dare she commit such a horrible act and make someone punch her?
It's disgusting!
In this instructional video, Chinese soldiers are trained how to shout the wrong pronouns at American forces.
Yes, that's certainly the way they're going to defeat us, our woke military.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, this is the most ridiculous and the most vulnerable area of propaganda for our opponents, and Riley Gaines is actually suing UCSF for, after this assault, and that is the name of the crime, it's an assault, it's a physical assault upon her, UCSF has not taken any steps to uphold the law or protect her, so it is a double standard of hypocrisy where the crazed aspect of the left
Is going to virtually signal that they're for diversity when actually they are against diversity.
They are pushing for this narratives and it goes all the way in so far as some of the left pundits are suggesting that, you know, all guns should be banned, except maybe.
Trans Americans, trans Americans should be armed to protect themselves.
And that ties into this, this day of vengeance where they're claiming they're promising violence and acting outside of the law.
So it is upside down and the agenda to allow these people, the group that is being pushed for this drag queen story hour, is that those are the people who are sexualizing the children.
So it's an attack upon our children.
It's an attack upon women.
Again, this part, I do like the status only because of the power of the situation that Americans have given a free, informed choice.
It would be, you know, conservatively 90% plus would want the biological female athletes to have their own separate areas of athletic competition and to be separated in the locker rooms from that.
And if we had the data, again, It's our children that are under attack by whatever it is the 70-plus injections claim to be vaccinations for their health.
Our children are being poisoned by the Roundup drenched food, the GMO food, and from the lies.
So we're going to have to win this.
Otherwise, all of the areas that we're being worried about that we're thinking could happen and that we're seeing being pushed step by step, they're going to realize all of them.
They have to be stopped.
They will not stop on their own.
They will not go back on their own.
The way forward is for enough Americans to declare the obvious that these are obvious crimes centered in war and money, and that these people have to be arrested to be removed from causing any more problem in any of the areas.
Oh, I think you got it right, Carl.
I think you do.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
Live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
Oh my God, look what they're doing to cover up the vaccine death of Lance.
He's a popular black actor from the John Wick movies.
Without doing an autopsy, they're saying he died of heart disease.
But this is what his lawyer said.
I have represented that critic for many years and continue to represent his wife Stephanie.
The coroner's statement on the death certificate is not a result of an autopsy.
No autopsy was performed on Lance.
To my knowledge, no medical examination of Lance during his lifetime ever indicated such conditions.
Lance was the most physically fit person I've ever known.
He exercised daily at his home gym, including extensive cardio work, And the availability of gym facilities was a contractual requirement for his work away from home.
He ate as if a dietician were monitoring his every meal.
The information appearing on the death certificate is wholly inconsistent with his lifestyle.
On behalf of Stephanie Redick, the death certificate information is not corroborated and is inconsistent with the facts known to the family.
Meanwhile, Bud Light's parent company, Anheuser-Busch, InBev, has lost more than $6 billion in market cap in just six days after Milind Devaney partnerships sparked the backlash, coming from David C. Martin.
My guess is that this decline in their stock price is relatively trivial compared to what their decline in sales in the United States has been.
The unsold product must be really piling up.
With all the choices available, what self-respecting beer drinker would purchase an Anheuser-Busch product?
What were they thinking?
By the way, I would expect these Brits at the Daily Mail to have a little better command of their mother tongue.
Also, the best-selling beer in the country, Try Bud Light, began their partnership with Mulaney by sending the influencer, whom began transitioning from male to female in 2021, custom cans featuring her face and pro-LGBTQ language to commemorate her being a woman for over a year.
Their incorrect use of whom here sounds really wrong, because it is really wrong.
Forget that count Tritivo.
Who is the subject of the clause which began as of her?
Are British schools deteriorating like ours because they're wasting their time on leftist indoctrination too?
Good question, Dave.
Good question.
Carl, your final thoughts?
I think our audience members for their intellectual integrity and moral courage to speak up that's what it's going to take.
And for the 1st, 1, yeah, we do have a lot of data for people who have died suddenly.
And all of that data, the tragedy of the deaths is going to spark.
Motivation for the truth, and that is exactly the motivation is do or die.
You know, we've talked about the data of the United States killing 30,000,000 plus since World War 2, when the lies started illegal wars of aggression and engage in other countries.
But this died suddenly.
You have to speak up because our opponents, they do want us cold, dead, and survived.
And then Dylan Mulvaney.
So I guess you could say that he's kind of sparked a boycott rather than a girlcott with this one.
That was the joke I was trying to think of yesterday, but couldn't.
Maybe it's just as well that I didn't.
So, with all this, I think one of the things, and my final dominant theme here, is that it is crazy.
And again, with Dante, abandon all hope, ye who enter here, and Shakespeare, hell is empty, all the demons are here.
Yeah, so if you really embrace the craziness of it, that Is powerful because it allows anybody of sanity to take a step back and say, hey, that's not my service.
It's not my craziness and to not be upset by the craziness of the situation.
Our opponents, they had crazy ideas, so they have to normalize the crazy.
Our job is to not normalize the crazy while not being crazy and to do our best so that these sheeple aren't pushed into this chaos and to be an easy soft target for this manipulation.
So just stand up for the truth and not be upset by the crazy.
And again, understand that for the size of peace we are on the playing board.
We really have to be humble with the apparent lack of power that we have, and at the same time be serious about our intent of inviting help from friends in high places for the truth, because it also is an Emperor's New Clothes situation.
The truth will destroy the lies.
We just haven't had the truth recognized.
Well, thank you for all your comments, Carl, per usual, and for Chris, for those he was able to add while we were connected.
I do think the Anheuser-Busch story is a fascinating commentary on the state of politics in the United States today.
We may be unable to register our vote properly because Dominion Machines are changing the way we vote from Republican to Democrat, but we sure as hell can register our opinion by not buying beer that we find offensive now.
It's outrageous what's happened here.
The fact is it appears to have been a marketing executive with Anheuser-Busch who thought it would be a great idea to push this Mulaney character onto the front of their Campaign for Bud Light.
It was the best-selling beer in America.
It ain't no more, never will be.
The hit to Anheuser-Busch is a reflection of how much the American people are repulsed by this effort to shove transgenderism down our throat.
We're not going to take it, and we're not going to drink it, to hell with Anheuser-Busch, Baudin, and Delaney.
Thanks for joining us, for being here.
Spend as much time as you can with your friends and family, because we do not know how much time we have left.
Yes, hang on.
Unlike Epstein, Unlike did kill himself.
Say that last part again.
Unlike Epstein, Bud Light did kill itself.
Bud Light did kill itself.
Yeah.
Thank you, Carl.
Thank you very much.
▲
Export Selection