All Episodes
Previous Next
April 9, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:00:26
Ron Paul & Tik Tok, Cryptic Crypto Deaths, RIP Country Music, Marvin Hagler, Bud Light
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to episode 29 of Gary King's Inconvenient Truths, where Gary presents video clips, news stories, and so forth I don't know are coming to get my spontaneous and unrehearsed response.
Gary.
Yes, sir.
You never know what's coming.
And I want to tip my hat one more time to Rudy.
Got the cool hat with his family name on the V right there.
So I appreciate it again.
All right, so Dr. Fetzer, we're gonna come out swinging.
I know you're always ready for that.
All right, let me move things around a little bit.
Okay, we're gonna take care of a couple of the difficult clips here.
I had to move that out.
All right.
Oh, wrong one.
Okay, here we go.
Come to find out climate change is changing baseball.
A new study out of Dartmouth College concludes that climate change is causing Major League Baseball players to hit more home runs.
I think that's good news, and Adam Sullivan explains that science behind the stats.
There have been numerous reports about how climate change affects the world we live in, from extreme weather to rising sea levels.
Now, for the first time here at Dartmouth College, America's pastime is being thrown into the mix.
We have temperature data, we have home run data, baseball is just a treasure trove of data.
The crack of the bat and the roar of the crowd are what many fans come to see.
And a new study, published in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, predicts that as the planet gets warmer, more balls will be blasted out of the park.
Chris Callahan, a PhD student in climate science, is the study's lead author.
Warmer air means that the molecules in that air are farther apart, which is what we mean when we say it's less dense.
And in less dense air with molecules farther apart, there's just less air resistance.
In some ways it's confirming the obvious, but it's doing it for something that's pretty important to most Americans.
The report found that more than 500 home runs between 2010 and 2019 can be attributed to higher than average temperatures resulting from climate change.
Those home runs account for about 1% of all home runs hit during that decade.
Nate Dominey, a professor in anthropology, is a co-author on the study.
If it's changing the nature of the game, That's a big deal.
Baseball's one of those things that has this traditionalist, it's purist, it's something we don't really want to change that much.
Dominique Callahan and the study's two other contributors, Jeremy De Silva and Justin Mankin, are all big baseball fans.
And while they say warmer temperatures play a role at the park, other factors likely have a much bigger influence over the game.
Things like changes in the construction of the baseball, changes in player performance, increases in analytics.
And of course, the data only affects outdoor stadiums.
Long ball hitters in climate controlled domes do not have a weather advantage.
Reporting from Hanover, New Hampshire, Adam Sullivan, Channel 3 News.
All right, Dr. Fetzer.
I don't want to say this is propaganda.
I want to say this is ridiculous.
Other factors, including that the teams know that when they have more home runs, they get a bigger crowd, they get more enthusiasm for baseball, propaganda, marketing, A whole lot of other factors.
If there were any difference in the temperature making an effect, it would be minuscule.
I label this report bullshit.
Pseudoscience.
Unreal.
And out of Dartmouth.
Where, by the way, they took in an FBI guy into Dartmouth who could claim that the backyard photographs were authentic when they're provably false.
That's how bad Dartmouth has sunk, Gary.
Oh my goodness.
Okay, we've got, um, this is a part of a 30 minute clip so I just want you to hear what James Corbett has to say about King Charles and the way he lives.
Crazy, isn't it?
James, it occurs to me that when I'm explaining eugenics to people, I will often say, oh, this is the way that people in the modern scientific era give the justification for why certain people rule over others.
It's your genes, man, because we've discarded the old royal The idea of, oh, there's some special family that was chosen by God to rule over you or whatever.
There's no special people like that anymore.
We don't believe in that.
But actually, and I often say, you know, it would be so much more comforting if there was that.
The person living in the castle on the hill.
That's your enemy, guys.
Do you understand?
Those are the people that are ruling over you.
It would be so much easier than in this age where everybody's wearing the same business suit and they all look kind of the same and they talk the same.
But no, actually, there still is the guy, literally living up in the castle on the hill, who literally believes himself to be of better blood than you, and a special human being who deserves all of these wonderful fancy privileges.
And we can scoff at the things that have been reported ad nauseum about...
King Charles and his preferences and habits, like how his pajamas are pressed for him every morning, his shoelaces are pressed flat with an iron, the bath plug has to be in a certain position, and the water temperature has to be just tepid, or the cooks scrambling around in the morning making his breakfast And they have to prepare dozens of eggs because it has to be just the right consistency.
So they'll prepare a number of different eggs and they'll number them.
So that if the prince felt that number five was too runny, he could knock off the top off of number six or seven.
So he could go down the line in order to get just the right consistency of egg.
Or we could laugh about how he travels the world with his orthopedic bed, his fresh linen, his radio, a chest of drawers, his personal toilet seat.
rolls of Kleenex premium comfort toilet paper and two landscapes of the Scottish Highlands and understand the type of person that is presuming to rule over the plebs.
But as you pointed out, the real hypocrisy here at the heart of this particular story anyway, is that yes, no, no, no.
King Charles doesn't just travel with a personal chef.
He has numerous personal chefs who bring his own personal food supply everywhere he travels in the world.
He doesn't eat other people's food.
He only eats his own organic food, and they make a big deal about this in a lot of the coverage.
The prince has often been noted for preferring fresh and organic food, which Carolyn noted as having incredible foresight about.
Blah, blah, blah.
Or, for example, he introduced organic food into all the royal palaces, with reports suggesting he would arrive at Sandringham with armfuls of organic produce from Highgrove.
Huh.
So, let me get this straight.
King Charles is obsessed and will only eat organic food, almost as if he knows something about the crap that is being shoveled down the gullets of the trusting plebes.
It's almost like he knows something about this, and he wouldn't do it himself, but hey guys, good enough for you.
Not for me, for you guys out there.
This is the person who's launching the Great Reset on the world, and literally, it was King Prince Charles, who literally launched the Great Reset at the original Great Reset launch back in 2020, or whenever that was.
This is the man who is doing this, and who is now giving his royal assent, his, oh okay, yes, good for the plebs, gene-edited food, whatever bio-produced, lab-produced crap you want to foist on the hoi polloi, that's fine, but I'm going to travel with my special personal chef with my own personal organic ingredients.
So keep that in mind, everybody.
This is the type of person who's doing it to you, and this is the absolute extreme of that, but this is the mentality of the eugenicists who are seeking to rule over you.
So, hey, in this case, maybe we should be more like King Charles.
Organic food, specially prepared, don't trust the crap that they are feeding you from the supermarkets.
Maybe we should all be a little bit more like the king in this case.
All right, Dr. Fetzer.
Well, Charles is royal scum.
When you have a hereditary monarchy, of course, everyone believes that it's a bloodline, the birthline that determines lineage as to who is going to rule.
Charles is a miscreant.
The King of England is also the head of the Anglican communion of what in the United States is known as the Episcopal Church.
And it was quite a scandal when Charles had the affair with Camilla, who was at the time still married.
Indeed, it's been unprecedented for a king to have now a wife who has, you know, divorced.
We had this before, way back when, that the king actually resigned because he cared so much about the love of his life, Wallace Simpson.
That was a stunning event.
But the points that Corbett's making at the end are very, very telling, yes.
Charles is a major proponent of the Great Reset.
Charles is out to murder billions of human beings.
Egomaniac, undeservedly so, but let me add what Carbo is mentioning.
A really good reason I believe that Charles was involved in and may have dictated the death of Princess Diana.
She was too good for him by far.
She was a real person of a regal character, admirable, beautiful, Selfless, caring about the people, campaigning against landmines.
But she had an affair with a Muslim, Dodi Fayyad.
She may have indeed been pregnant with his child at the time they arranged for the crash in Paris.
And let me tell you, Gary, Dye survived virtually unscathed.
They put her in an ambulance.
They sedated her.
And within about 100 yards of the hospital, they beat her mercilessly in the hospital to incur internal injuries which were unsurvivable before they delivered her to the hospital when she would be pronounced dead.
This was all arranged.
It was all deliberate.
And I dare say, then Prince Charles, now King Charles, had a major hand in that atrocity.
He, like much of the royal family, though I exempt William and Harry, who of course have different fathers from that pondemnation, but in general the royal family Charlatans, cats, phonies, frauds, especially exemplified by the present document of the throne.
Yeah, we've been dealing with King Charles, or Prince Charles, a very long time.
All right, we're going to turn it around and pick up the pace a little bit, Dr. Fetzer.
I label this one rest in peace country music.
Last night Kelsey Ballerini proved she is a true country queen and LGBTQ+ ally.
Yes, the singer co-hosted the 2023 CMT Music Awards alongside Kane Brown, but she also made a powerful statement with her performance of If You Go Down, I'm Going Down Too, sharing the stage with RuPaul's Drag Race stars Manila Luzon, Kennedy Davenport, Jan Sport, and Olivia sharing the stage with RuPaul's Drag Race stars Manila Luzon, Kennedy
Kelsey's powerful performance comes after Tennessee recently introduced the horrifying Senate Bill 3, known as the Tennessee Drag Ban, which thankfully has been temporarily known as the Tennessee Drag Ban, which thankfully has been temporarily Her performance clearly took a stance against the bill, and she ended the song with confetti that was illuminated with rainbow stage lights.
Sadly, it's quite rare for A-list country stars to show their support for the queer community, but Kelsey has showed she has no time for queerphobia.
GLAAD gave props to Kelsey in a statement that read in part: Now this isn't the first time that Kelsey has shown her support for the community.
Back in 2019, Kelsey tweeted, Happy Pride!
Sending my love to my LGBTQ friends today, this month, and always.
Hashtag love is love.
And she recently teamed up with queer artist Fletcher on the song Better Version, a song and video proving that love is love.
And I was some other person to get the better version of me.
Yeah, Dr. Fezer, sometimes I'm glad that you have to comment on some of these. - Gary, I'm a different strokes for different folks kind of guy.
I don't care what people do in their personal sex lives.
Unrestrained, that's their business.
But, if you want to have drag shows, just like stripper shows, just have them legalized.
You know, have them at clubs where you have to be an adult to enter.
The problem is trying to impose all this nonsense on our children without the consent of their parents.
That's what's outrageous, and I find it disgusting and revolting.
And I cannot excuse this performer if she doesn't differentiate between men who like to dress up as women who gives a damn.
The point is, It's seeking to indoctrinate our children into believing that that's an acceptable lifestyle for them as a viable alternative when they're young, impressionable, and yet to have discerned or identified their own sexuality that I find objectionable in the extreme.
And we're getting manifestations here in the United States, not just my parents' outrage, Over some of the absurd textbooks they have on teaching kids in the third grade about anal sex and masturbation.
But now we have the The tranny in women's sports phenomenon that is coming to a boil right here in the United States, Gary, and I predict this is going to be a big, big, big deal.
Big deal.
It's going to be inescapable, and it could even lead to various kinds of conflicts that in a more civilized and rational society we would not undergo.
I'm telling you, it's getting serious right here in the USA.
Yeah, they're trying to get serious in Tennessee.
Okay, along the same lines, this is, um... Grandpa's feeling a little frisky today.
Today we salute you, Mr. Budweiser Head of Marketing Guy.
Only you could take a beer and make it queer.
Grandpa is feeling a little frisky today.
Let me say something to all you and be as clear and concise as possible.
I like Johnny Cash and Grandmaster Flash Flash Flash Flash Flash Flash.
Fuck Bud Light.
Fuck Anheuser-Busch.
Have a terrific day.
There's something happening here.
All right.
Very good.
ain't exactly clear.
There's a man with a gun over there telling me I got to beware.
Think it's time we stop, children.
What's that sound?
Everybody look what's going down.
All right.
Very good.
Yeah, you know, Featuring a tranny on a Bud commercial.
I mean, that is about as dumb as you can get.
There's a saying, go woke, go broke.
Well, it's happening to Anheuser-Busch.
They even had to cancel a Clydesdale exhibition, Gary, because of threats to Budweiser.
I mean, this is moronic.
I cannot believe whoever made a decision like this.
They're gonna pay for it, Budweiser.
Man, oh man, is there a stock crashing?
I mean, they're going right into the toilet and deservedly so.
I'm all with him.
Shoot up all that Bud Beer.
Go to hell, Anheuser-Busch.
F you.
Yeah, I never drank their beer anyway.
Okay, Dr. Fetcher, a conspiracy calling!
Do you think this was an inside job?
Over 106 million people in the USA and UK believe in at least one conspiracy.
And with this first of its kind coin collection, with a unique cutout design, you can own a piece of the unknown.
With each coin collected, you will uncover a new piece of the puzzle, a new perspective on the world, and a unique look at the world's greatest conspiracies.
Get your Conspiracy Theory coin collection and save 75%.
Starting with this 9-11 coin and free collector album.
Don't let the opportunity to add something truly unique to your collection slip away.
I can't help but smile on that one.
Well, I like that, Gary.
I mean, talking about the 9-11 coin.
If you look at the videos of Flight 175 approaching the South Tower, we have one, Evan Fairbanks, hanging from the base of the building straight up.
And you can see what's supposed to be a real airplane passing its whole length into the building in the same number of frames it passes its whole length through air.
Which makes sense, from the point of view of physics, only if a massive 500,000 ton steel and concrete building provides no more resistance to the trajectory of an aircraft in flight than air!
We're witnessing an absurdity!
You cannot violate the laws of physics, or chemistry, or biology, for that matter, when it comes to the difference between men and women and a sexually reproducing species.
It's not possible!
So if you're seeing a presentation that violates the laws of physics, as we had on 9-11, you're witnessing a fantasy.
It's got to be created.
Indeed, I've done extensive research on this, including an interview with Major General Albert Stubblebine, U.S.
Army retired, who was in charge of all U.S.
military signals, intelligence, including photograph.
He was a talk dog in the military.
We're analyzing photographic evidence, and I shared with him all the proof I had that all four of the 9-11 crash sites had been fabricated or faked, albeit in different ways.
And General Stubblebine not only agreed with me, but added more reasons why I was right.
Now, in the case of Shanksville, there was no plane there.
Colonel George Nelson said it looked to him like they took a bulldozer, dug a trench, filled it with trash, and blew it up.
The two Reporters first on the scene both said the eerie aspect of the crash site was there were no signs any plane had crashed there.
Well, the easiest way to explain that it appeared as though no plane had crashed there is there's no plane had crashed there!
And in fact, pilots for 9-11 were tracked!
Light 93 and found it was over Champaign-Urbana, Illinois, after it had officially crashed in Shanksville.
And I tracked down the FAA registration records that showed the plane was not even taken out of service, officially retired, until 28 September 2005, similarly at the Pentagon.
The Pentagon lawn is bereft.
There's no sign of any plane having hit there.
The entry point's about 10 feet high, 17 feet wide.
There's a chain-link fence, two automobiles, two spools, unbroken windows.
No massive pile of debris from a 100-ton airliner.
No bodies, no seats, no luggage, no wings, no tail.
Not even the engines were recovered from the Pentagon, Gary.
Well, how can we explain no debris from an airplane crash?
Well, it's simple.
No plane crashed there.
It's impossible to have a plane crash with no plane debris.
And in New York, they had originally planned to use remotely controlled planes until they discovered it wasn't physically possible to get them inside.
And they had to get them inside before they exploded so they could claim that was a cause of the building's collapse when it was physically impossible for the buildings to collapse Just to illustrate, Charles Baldwin, a retired high school math, physics, chemistry teacher calculated
With regard to the Northing Tower, where we have the top 14 floors or so, represent one unit of downward force, or 199 units of upward force.
It wasn't even possible for those buildings to collapse.
And how did they fake?
You cannot have had a real plane enter the building.
There's a fellow in the UK named Richard D. Hall, who undertook an analysis and, I'm convinced, discovered what had actually happened.
They used holographic projections to enter the building.
That's why there was no physical resistance.
Gary, there's even the nose-out phenomenon.
The nose of a plane showed up on the opposite side of the building when the network went to black.
Fade to black.
How could that happen?
It's because there was a hand-eye coordination problem.
The nose of these planes is the most fragile part.
There's no possible way a nose could survive an attack going through a building, but it happened because...
It was a holographic projection, and those who look at my work on this find I was even sent a manual from an Australian, a page from an Australian military manual for an airborne holographic projector showing exactly how it's done.
Two of those planes, by the way, weren't even in the air that day, 11 North Tower and 77 Pentagon, and the other one, 75 again.
Pilots tracked it, Gary, and they found it was over Harrisburg and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, after it officially hit the South Tower.
And again, when I tracked the FAA, registered it like Flight 93.
The plane used, and remember the same plane, one day from Tampa to Chicago, next day New York to San Francisco.
Same planes can be used for many different flights.
The plane used for Flight 75, like the plane used for Flight 93.
Wasn't even formally deregistered until 28 September 2005.
So, how can planes that weren't even in the air that day have crashed on 9-11, and how can planes that crashed on 9-11 have still been in the air four years later?
Gary, we have been played.
I think we made a lot of headway on 9-11.
Okay, speaking of coins, they also had Paul Coins, they had Elvis Coins, Space Coins.
Something really weird is going on in the world of crypto and high-tech finance.
And don't just take it from me, take it from the facts.
43-year-old Bob Lee stabbed to death on the streets in San Francisco.
2.35 in the morning, Tuesday morning.
Found alive, but barely.
Died in the hospital.
And this guy is like a tycoon.
He was the founder of Cash App.
That's like Venmo, like a cash transfer thing.
It's huge.
He was the top executive of Square and also MobileCoin, a cryptocurrency startup.
And he had moved away from San Francisco, but was there for like an event.
It was a MobileCon Leadership Summit.
He leaves behind a wife and two kids, and they don't have any suspects in custody on this death.
Really weird.
But maybe what's even weirder is that a lot of crypto guys have been dropping dead just since October.
Three top crypto executives have dropped dead.
And joining me now with all these details is Caitlin Becker.
She's a senior reporter with TheDailyMail.com.
So who are the others and what are the circumstances, Caitlin?
They're all very different circumstances, Ashley.
I mean, and we're talking international heads of crypto.
Nikolai Mushegian, who's only 29 years old.
Tian Tian Kulender was only 30.
There was a head of a Russian crypto.
We also have Gerald Cotton, Matthew Mellon, one of these are from Canada.
This is going back to 2018.
There was about five.
I believe this makes the sixth head honcho in crypto who's died under mysterious Circumstances.
Vyacheslav Taran, who is Russian, died in a mysterious helicopter crash.
The circumstances around that are still kind of up in the air.
30-year-old Tiantian Kolinder died in his sleep.
I mean, this is 30 years old, and the circumstances around Mushegians, which he was a crypto leader, He drowned off the coast of Puerto Rico the same day that he was tweeting very paranoid, very disturbing messages about the CIA and Mossad being after him.
You know, following his death, it was revealed that he obviously had mental health issues, which I think was very clear, but it's hard to look away from the fact that all of these deaths happened very bizarrely and in pretty quick succession in a relatively small field.
Yeah, so the Mushegian was found floating, you know, in the waters off Puerto Rico.
Like you said, having tweeted, someone's going to murder me.
That's bizarre.
Tian Tian was worth, what, three billion dollars?
Is that what his that's what I'm just wondering if it was his group, like the Amber group, his company?
The Amber group was valued at three billion dollars at the time of his death.
And shortly before he passed away, they did have to lay off some people.
So all of these deaths have raised some big, big questions, especially since these three that happened within weeks of each other that you mentioned at the top of this all happened after the kind of the fall of crypto.
So this is no longer sort of on the rise.
And some of the earlier ones in 2018, Gerald Cotton, for example, he.
He died with the information and the assets to his crypto wallet in his possession.
So that was hundreds of millions of dollars.
Either there is a curse or there are some very angry crypto customers who lost their shirts, maybe.
But Caitlin, follow this for us and tell us if you find out anything more about it.
Absolutely.
Yeah.
Or the CI in Mossad are after him for whatever reason.
I mean, this is ridiculous.
You got the Daily Mail reporter who seems to know her shit.
Then she says he was issuing his paranoid concern, maybe he knew what the hell was going on.
And she says later they decided he had mental health issues.
He didn't have mental health issues.
The improbability of these individuals dying in that span of time by coincidence, by chance, Would be fewer than one in a trillion, Gary.
This is just absurd.
Obviously, there's a plot out to assassinate these guys.
It's obviously related to crypto.
Why would it be surprising the CIA Mossad could be involved in it?
They were targeted.
They've been murdered.
And if you're going to kill a group of people and they happen to fall in a similar category, you're going to try to make their deaths, a mode of death as dissimilar as possible.
So one's stabbed, one drowns, one's hit by a train.
Who the hell knows, Gary?
I mean, it's all ridiculous.
But there's no doubt, in my opinion, that this is deliberate assassination of these guys.
And the one who figured it out, the Daily Mail reporter was played here.
She thinks he had mental health issues.
No.
He was letting the world know what the hell was going on.
He got it right.
She got it wrong.
Yeah, there's certainly a war on crypto.
because it's definitely a threat to this status quo. - There has been a frenzied effort to censor and revise our written history to accommodate those who may have hurt feelings should they read certain books.
Not much is being said about what words are being inserted, or the philosophy of the people replacing the words.
Are we being protected, as the revisionists imply?
Or is history merely being rewritten for the latest configuration of mental programming?
Brainwashing.
Another set of classic books are set to be rewritten based on language that could be considered offensive.
We've already told you about Roald Dahl, Ian Fleming, and R.L.
Stine books being altered.
Now, Agatha Christie's books will read a little differently.
It's the latest classic collection to become censored.
Christie's Poirot and Miss Marple mystery novels will have language rewritten and some sections removed entirely.
Descriptions of characters' appearances have been taken out.
Terms such as Oriental, Jewish, Natives, and Gypsy have also been removed.
Similar edits were made to Roald Dahl books and R.L.
Stine's popular Goosebumps series.
And in Ian Fleming's James Bond novels, a disclaimer paragraph is now included on the top that warns content could be considered offensive by modern readers.
Publishing house Harper Collins has approved the revisions for new prints of Christie's novels.
Agatha Christie is no longer around to approve such edits of her work.
She was born in 1890 and died at the age of 85.
Considered a pioneer author in murder mysteries.
How about revisionist?
Completely disgusting.
This is contrary to everything the Enlightenment ever stood for—freedom of speech, freedom of thought, classic works being revised.
This is a Stalinist revision.
They take photographs, and when someone fell out of favor, they'd redo the photograph with a missing.
This is on a par.
This is a sort of action taken by tyrants.
And, you know, controllers who don't want anyone to be able to think for themselves.
What the hell?
Being offended has nothing to do with truth.
Truth can be offensive.
So they're going to censor the truth because they find it offensive.
This is disgusting, Gary.
This is completely wrong.
100% in error.
I mean, Not just an ordinary kind of mistake.
This is a blunder of enormous magnitude.
This is having an impact on civilized society and not for the good.
Yes, sir.
I agree 100%.
Okay, Dr. Fetzer, if you remember during COVID, one of the first people to get vaccinated and were famous were Marvin Hagler.
So I want to pay a little tribute to Marvin Hagler and I think Hank Aaron was the other one.
The people that took the vaccine and died suddenly.
So this is my tribute to Marvin Hagler.
That's what I feel.
War.
That's what's on my mind.
The undisputed middleweight champion of the world, Marvillie.
That really rocked him another right hand.
He's got him in trouble.
He's on the road for that's it.
On the left high-hander, Hurd comes back.
Another right.
That one's done Hurd.
And down goes Tony Simpson.
And down goes 96.
Turns his back!
Takes another right!
Turns it deep!
Troubled again!
Turns it down!
- Turn this down! Turn this down in the third round! - Turn this down in the third round! - Turn this down in the third round! - Turn this down in the third round! - Turn this down in the third round! - Turn this down in the third round! - Turn this down in the third round! - Turn this down in the third round! - Turn this down in the third
round! - Turn this down in the third round! - Turn this down in the third round! - Turn this down in the third round! - Turn this down in the third round! - Turn this down in the third round! - Turn this down in the third round! - Yeah, one of the first victims of the...
Well, you know, Gary, I think, I think, uh, he was a middleweight.
Was he not a heavyweight?
He had one of the hardest punches.
I mean, he's right up there with Mike Tyson and Rocky Marciano, in my opinion, I mean, for packing a punch.
But the fact is, you know, Giving the vax to prominent figures like this was supposed to be an inspiration to the nation, so you hear they took the vax, you don't hear they then died suddenly, Gary.
I mean, you know, this is just outrageous.
And they're still pushing the vax, they are still pushing the vax, and I'll be damned if there aren't a lot of really gullible people out there who are still willing to take the vax, have their kids vaccinated, This is staggering stuff, Gary.
A very worthy tribute to a great champion of American boxing history.
Yeah, when I was in Italy, it was nothing but masks.
I would say 20 to 25% of the people.
All right, we haven't talked about Ron Paul in a long time.
There's this Restrict Act.
I think we need to talk about more.
Hello, everybody, and thank you for tuning in to the Weekly Report.
The Restrict Act restricts more than TikTok.
Supporters of expanding the federal police state have found a new boogeyman to scare the people into surrendering their liberty.
TikTok is a social media platform that allows users to upload their own videos.
It is used by tens of millions of Americans and is one of the most popular websites in the world.
TikTok's popularity and the fact that it is owned by a Beijing-based company, ByteDance, has led to the spread of a claim that the site is controlled by the Chinese government.
Thus the claim the Chinese government is using TikTok to collect data on U.S.
citizens.
Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Mark Warner introduced last month the Restricting the Emergence of Security Threats that Risk Information and Communications Technology Act.
The bill is being marketed as a way to protect Americans from foreign governments that use social media to spy on Americans.
The Restrict Act makes no mention of TikTok or ByteDance.
The Chinese government is mentioned only once in the bill, when it is designated as a foreign adversary, along with five other governments.
What the bill does do is give the Secretary of Commerce power to identify, deter, disrupt, prevent, prohibit, investigate, or otherwise mitigate any risk arising from any covered transaction by any person or with respect to any property that the Secretary of Commerce determines poses an undue or unacceptable risk in a laundry list of areas.
Among those areas are coercive or criminal activities by a foreign adversary that are designed to undermine democratic processes and institutions or steer policy and regulatory decisions in favor of the strategic objectives of a foreign adversary to the detriment of the national security of the United States.
So the U.S.
should shut down an American social media company based on the Secretary of Commerce's determination that a website, while not actually doing anything to weaken America, poses an unacceptable risk that it will.
The TikTok controversy has taken attention away from the disturbing Twitter files, a release of communication between Twitter employees and governmental agencies.
The communication shows how much government influence beat tech companies' decisions regarding suppressing stories and deplatforming users.
If the Restrict Act becomes the Restrict Law, any site that refuses to cooperate with future efforts by the U.S.
government to suppress certain stories and individuals on social media could find itself accused of working to advance the strategic objectives of a foreign adversary.
Those who doubt this should consider how people who question U.S.
foreign policy are smeared as Russian agents.
The Restrict Acts potential victims are sites like Rumble.
Rumble is a censorship-free alternative to YouTube.
Rumble's commitment to free speech is so strong that it chose to block access to its site in France instead of complying with a new French law banning Russia Today and other Russian news services from French social media.
Like the Patriot Act, the Restrict Act plays on people's fears to make them silent while Congress takes away more of their liberty.
This bill is a blatant violation of the First Amendment that the founders intended to protect our right to engage in political speech and share political information and opinions with others.
We should stop Congress from violating our right to discuss and share ideas on TikTok and elsewhere that challenge the political class.
Thanks for listening.
All right, Dr. Fetzer.
Rumble, you're on rumble.
Well, Gary, Ron Paul, like Ross Perot, were unsung American heroes.
They spoke the truth.
And they were censored!
I mean, for God's sake, are they going to rewrite Agatha Christie?
I mean, how ridiculous is that?
What they're doing, Gary, and it occurred to me watching this segment, is using these computers to go through all the text that's been scanned online to find anything that could be interpreted as remotely offensive to some extremist group, like the LBGTQ advocates.
And then going after it hammers and tongs.
I mean, they're not actually reading these books.
They're doing searches.
I mean, these computers can do a trillion operations a minute.
I mean, it's absolutely staggering what they can do, and they can find this stuff so I can rewrite it and censor it.
What Ron Paul is doing here is calling out, going after TikTok is just an example.
Once you let any censorship begin, it's a Hold a slippery slope, meaning there's really no way to stop it.
So, you know, the standards should not be what is offensive.
Who gives a damn what's offensive?
You can't even make the standard of what's false versus true because people don't know.
You've got to be exposed to all points of view.
You've got to have unfettered deliberation and debate.
You've got to have access to all the evidence and available arguments to sort out the difference between the truth and the false.
Karl Popper, the great British philosopher, has signed with emphatic about it, that unrestricted rational discourse and debate is our most effective instrument in the discovery of truth.
They're out to circumvent it.
They're out to suppress it.
They don't want us to be able to think things through and figure out the difference.
So we'll be the pawns of their dictates.
We will be manipulated by any garbage they want to promote.
Because we won't be allowed to challenge your question at Gary.
We're in dire straits and I compliment Ron Paul for speaking out.
Yeah, I was actually a national delegate during Ron Paul.
I was big into Ron Paul.
Okay. - The Justice Department says it's agreed to a nearly $145 million deal with the victims of the 2017 church shooting in Sutherland Springs, Texas.
The tentative agreement would end a years-long legal battle for the more than 80 survivors and families of the 26 victims.
Joining us now is NBC News Justice and Intelligence Correspondent Ken Delaney.
Hi Ken, so walk us through how this deal came together.
What are the details here?
Hey Savannah, well this comes after a federal judge ruled that the Air Force was negligent in failing to inform the FBI about a domestic violence conviction of this shooter.
They had six different occasions where they could have submitted this information, they failed to.
And so the judge awarded these families $230 million.
But the Justice Department then appealed, but there were settlement negotiations, and this deal is the fruits of those negotiations.
Both sides have agreed to it.
Take a listen to a lawyer for the victims.
Getting this type of closure for them, I think, solidifies and justifies the courage they showed in taking on the federal government, but also making the country safer by proving that background checks work.
And when they're implemented, they can and will keep dangerous weapons out of the hands of dangerous people.
This is the largest settlement of its kind among a series of deals where the federal government has had to pay out in cases where the government was negligent in mass shootings, Savannah.
Are you serious?
Ken, I mentioned tentative.
Why is it that the deal is still tentative and what does that mean for the victims?
Just very simply that the judge has to approve any kind of settlement and make sure that it's fair and in the interest of justice.
But generally in cases like this where both sides agree and there's been a process, generally these settlements get approved.
All right, Kendall, I need and thank you so much.
Yeah, that's Jeffersonian girl. that's Jeffersonian girl.
I've been following her a while.
She's excellent, Gary.
She's got a piece on Nashville that's also brilliant, showing how they've got fake prices, witnesses, people who, you know, one's supposed to have also lost a child at the Walhalla shooting, another up in Highland Park, and they just happened to converge in Nashville.
It's such bullshit.
Think about it.
$144 million?
The government's paying big bucks for all these events that take place.
Emily Parker and Vicki Soto recently went on the air out of a private radio station in Florida and talked about how Eric Holder came down to Newtown and gave the community $140 million to participate in the scam that would come to be known as Sandy Hook.
So you're getting big bucks.
They also observed that among the Nashville crisis actors, some had been trained in Connecticut, and that, well, Vicky had been paid $210,000 to reprise her role at Uvalde as Eva Moraldes, you know, another teacher, dying.
For $210,000 that these guys are being paid $100,000 more.
$310,000 to fake your role in the government.
The public has to understand.
They're talking about it because they're under non-disclosure agreement.
They have contracts.
They're getting money.
They're being paid.
They get no taxes, they get free college.
I mean, I'm telling you, Gary, this is a major industry, and Eric Holder and Barack Obama are the brain trust behind it.
Outrageous.
Sutherland speech, completely ridiculous.
It was a joke at the time.
It happened.
And you're just seeing a further follow-through on more and more effort to, in the words of Eric Holder, brainwash the American people.
Gary!
These laws aren't saving any lives!
Americans use guns to defend themselves from assaults millions of times every year, saying an estimated 200,000 lives every year, Gary, by virtue of being an armed citizen, legally armed.
They typically don't have to fire the weapon, just show they're armed with the assailant's skedaddle.
Well, look, there are only 70,000 on the average gun deaths every year, and more than half of those are suicides.
So you're talking about, say, 35,000 max gun deaths.
200,000 is six times 35,000.
25,000 max on deaths, 200,000 is six times 35,000.
So you'd have six times more deaths if they took guns away from law-abiding people.
The Democrats and these scumbags won't ever acknowledge the facts of the matter, but those are the facts of the matter.
It's outrageous, scary, and disgusting.
And I, too, like you, am a huge fan of the Jeffersonian girl.
Yes, and she's a big fan of you, no doubt about it.
All right.
I pulled this out of my war chest from COVID, so this is...
One that I played a while- Hi everyone, just a very quick video which could be a real game changer over the whole coronavirus thing.
Obviously there's a huge shortage of masks around the world at the moment, but my friend just showed me this and it's a great idea.
You're gonna think I'm stupid, but trust me, if you haven't got these in your house, maybe you don't have young kids, you can go and buy them and they're dead cheap.
Take me seriously, nappies.
They've got various layers in them, they have velcro on the back, you can wrap them around your face, they'll cover your mouth and your nose as well, and to be honest with you, the bigger the better.
You can cover around there and absolutely spot on, you can breathe just about, you can talk, and this could be a real game changer in the fight against coronavirus.
So, just take this seriously, get out there, cover that face, cover the nose, and stay safe everybody.
That is pretty funny, Gary.
The face diaper was full of shit.
I love it.
I mean, you know, and the whole thing is full of shit.
Yeah, I mean, that was good.
That was very effective.
Very nice.
I liked it.
Yeah, I have put that on Facebook and they censored it.
How about that?
Of course!
Alright, yeah, I'm pulling some old stuff out, but this is our current stuff, our weekly guest.
Hello, my friends, and welcome to the Weekly Roundup, where we discuss just a fraction of the insanity that takes place in the world each week.
Our top story today, just three weeks after Tennessee became the first state to ban drag shows, a transgender man shot three children and three adults at a Christian private school.
Wow, that's a lot of threes.
If I were a conspiracy theorist, I might say the Freemasons had something to do with this one.
But luckily, I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
I'm a reasonable person who takes the news at face value.
Of course, before the parents of the slain children had a chance to mourn their passing, the ghouls took a break from painting rainbows on crosswalks to dance provocatively on their graves.
One especially wicked little troll is David Pakman, who tweeted, Very surprising that there would be a mass shooting at a Christian school, given that lack of prayers is often blamed for these horrible events.
Is it possible they weren't praying hard enough or correctly, despite being a Christian school?
After he received backlash for the tweet, he acted in true demonic form and accused his critics of being anti-Semitic.
You know, because apparently even the Semites hold Christians to a higher standard than themselves.
Hey, I got no complaints about that.
David isn't the only one shifting blame for his sins.
Our friend AOC robbed me of a few more brain cells this week after posting this brilliant psychoanalysis on child predators.
Many of these disgusting and insinuating attacks on trans and LGBT people are actually projections of what predatory, cisgender, and often straight men do when left alone in the presence of women, or sometimes horribly, children.
So instead of getting you to challenge the patriarchy, they're trying to get you to challenge the very gender expressiveness that challenges patriarchy.
Don't get it twisted, because a lot of people attacking drag are projecting.
Ah, the old takes-one-to-no-one defense.
Looks like AOC has the same speechwriter as Kamala Harris.
Space is exciting.
Space, it affects us all.
And it connects us all.
You can check out more words of wisdom from AOC, such as, I know you are, but what am I?
I'm rubber and you're glue.
Whoever smelt it, dealt it.
And my personal favorite, nuh-uh.
All jokes aside though, this transgender shooter thing is a very obvious ploy to send a message to the American people.
This agenda is top priority, and if you get in our way, we will come for you and your children.
And this isn't just a wild guess on my part.
All week, the mainstream media has been sympathizing with the shooter, painting her as the real victim of this tragedy.
The Mirror published an article about Audrey Hale, claiming her artwork was whimsical and childlike, implying that if she wasn't driven to murder children, she might be drawing cute little pictures for them instead.
The Guardian claimed the right is desperate and bigoted for using the shooting to malign trans people.
And of course, even Bluecheck Twitter piled on as user Oliver Willis likened the New York Post to a pro-Nazi paper for accurately describing the incident.
A few months ago, I wrote about Der Stürmer, a pro-Nazi paper in 1930s and 40s Germany, laid the groundwork for the Holocaust by linking every crime to Jewish people.
Anyhow, here's the front page of Rupert Murdoch's New York Post today.
And the headline reads, Transgender Killer Targets Christian School.
So after a decade of being bludgeoned with demands to properly identify the gender of trans people, you're suddenly a Nazi and a bigot for doing just that.
It's almost like the rules are completely arbitrary.
And if you think all of this is bad, you haven't seen anything yet.
This was the official statement from the White House Press Secretary on the tragedy.
Our hearts go out to the trans community as they are under attack right now.
And this was President Biden's statement in his first official appearance after the incident.
My name is Joe Biden.
I'm Dr. Joe Biden's husband.
And I ate Jenny's ice cream, chocolate chip.
I came down because I heard there was chocolate chip ice cream.
By the way, I have a whole refrigerator full upstairs.
You think I'm kidding.
I'm not.
These are the people who will tell you Christian nationalists are the real protected group in Western society.
I don't care if you think I'm Satan reincarnated.
All right, Dr. Pessett.
Well, she's wonderful.
She's absolutely wonderful.
I could watch her all day.
I'm already in love.
You know, I mean, it's fantastic.
So you got a transgender—the story is, a transgender shoots kids in a Christian school, and that means transgenders are under attack?
Eerie!
That doesn't compute!
That's the opposite of the facts of the matter!
It's the Christian kids who are under attack by the transgenders!
But the whole thing is a farce.
I think the idea Because this is one of the most amateurish of all these false flags, more so than Uvalde, more so than Sandy Hook, more so than, you know, the Texas thing where they're giving a 144 bill.
I mean, you know, give me a break.
The Christian parents are supposed to say, oh my goodness.
If we don't take the guns away from the transgenders, they're gonna shoot up our kids.
So, we gotta take guns away from everyone.
It's idiotic.
It's about as stupid as you get.
Not only that, but get this.
I've done a huge amount on Nashville.
Totally phony.
You got...
Driving up, the parking lot's empty!
Empty!
This appears to have been done on a Saturday or a holiday.
Coming in, sets off an alarm.
No one rushes.
There are no secretaries, no students, no teachers, no consultants.
No one runs anywhere.
The place is empty.
It walks around, walks around.
When they bring in this SWAT team, they rush down the halls, they're opening doors, they don't see a single soul anywhere until they purportedly shoot.
We've done all kinds of studies on this, Gary.
There's no recoil in the weapons, there are no bullets hitting any walls, there are no ricochets, there's no blood on the body, and get this, coming in, The shooter is wearing one type of sneaker.
I think it's called a Puma.
It's a black and white stripe that's been around quite a while.
When the body's lying there dead, it's got a different kind of sneaker called a Vans.
It's multicolored!
So what?
This reminds me of the case at Kmart in Colorado where the kid comes in wearing one kind of short.
And then he's arrested wearing another, and I guess, what did he do?
He decided, well, while I'm in Kmart shooting up people, I'm gonna pick up a new pair of trowel?
She didn't change her sneakers!
This was filmed on two different days where they had two different actors.
And get this, a chiropractor who's very, very good has done an analysis.
And it turns out the girl, this Audrey, who's supposed to be a 28-year-old transsexual, has a long neck!
Compare her—it's all on my blog at jameshfetzer.org—compare her to the shooter.
He's got a normal neck.
Not only that, but the shooter appears to be very young, a boy, whereas she is a woman.
So we're seeing two different—that photograph that she showed there was actually the boy who was the perp, not the 20— Eight-year-old trans.
So, Gary, the whole thing is as fraudulent as it comes.
And get this, the government is paying big bucks—that's taxpayer money—to manipulate public opinion to support their political agenda.
And mark my words, it goes back to Barack Obama and Eric Holder.
Damn them both.
I agree, Dr. Fetzer.
All right, I want to thank you again for another good show.
The sands of our hourglass, like the days of our lives, has expired.
So we'll call it there, Dr. Fetzer.
Thanks for being on.
My pleasure, Gary.
▲
Export Selection