All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 18, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:08:12
Need to Know News (18 January 2023) with Joe Olson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is it.
Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Joel Olson from Houston.
We're hopeful Chris Weinert may be able to join us from Fort Myers, Florida, to report to you all the news you need to know.
The latest has to do with divos.
Here's a partial report to share.
All right, let's get into it.
So the World Economic Forum in Davos and the globalists have flown in on their private jets.
I mean, the amount of private jets is unbelievable.
Now, they've cordoned off, according to reports, they've cordoned off about a two mile radius.
So they know that the media is interested in this, maybe not the mainstream media.
The mainstream media would love to go there and just hobnob and rub shoulders and, you know, hang out with all of these elites.
They are doing that.
They are the hosts of most of these panels.
And doing feature pieces and things like that, like the CNBCs of the world.
Like, that's fine.
They're not going to do any negative coverage or actual coverage, right?
So they've kept away anybody else, like independent media.
You're not allowed to get anywhere near this event if you are independent media, which, of course, is the case.
So these globalists come together.
This arguably could be one of the most important meetings they've ever had because there's a number of big pieces, things on the table right now.
First of all, a central bank digital currency.
The CBDC, right, where they will control all of the money supply.
They will tell you that you can't go to the store because you've already been to the store too many times.
You've driven your car too many times.
Your carbon footprint is too high.
They are very close to putting this in place.
That's just one of the pieces that they're going to be discussing during this week.
Yes, so you know the archetype of Davos man is unelected global leader who's making decisions for society at large without having the backing or the choice of the people, right?
So these are things that powerful people are choosing for us that we may not choose if we were given the opportunity to vote for them or put them in power.
So the program overview for this year's Davos, I spent the afternoon looking through it and thinking, well, what are they really talking about?
I admit, I'm going to go through this with a little bit of cynicism, but I feel like the last couple of years gives me license to do that.
So let's just kind of put on our cynical hats.
And if you feel less cynical than me when I present these and you think, well, that's probably benevolent.
That's OK.
You're free to say that, too.
But let's just see, OK?
Let's see.
What do you think about that?
I think that's great.
And by the way, yes, Rebel News is there trying to get in.
I don't know if they've... I'll check in with them to see what they've been able to get there.
But, you know, they're certainly rabble rousers.
And so I can't imagine that they're going to be able to get up close and get access.
They're going to try to get attendance on their way in and out if they can get access.
It'll be interesting to see how their credentials work to get into this area.
But anyway, go ahead.
Let's dive into these.
Okay, so let's just look at the program overview.
They say, you know, this isn't a critical Davos because the world is at a critical inflection point.
The twin triggers, they're calling it, of the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine rattled an already brittle global system.
Economic growth in the world's largest economies is stalling while navigating headwinds from rising food and energy crisis.
Now, my issue with this statement is that it implies that these things are just happening to us.
As if no humans made decisions about these things happening.
Even if COVID is a naturally occurring virus, the global response was, I think we can agree, disproportionate and run by the attendees of this conference.
Largely, that's putting it nicely.
That's giving them the benefit of the doubt.
The climate in Ukraine, well we're going to talk about how they talk about this one, as if none of them have any responsibility at all there.
So let's go over what they think.
Now there are plenty of climate conferences, business decisions with climate in mind, nuclear, energy, all kinds of energy companies talking about this.
They're not calling this a new world order, but I identified what I might think is a new term for this.
Tell me if you think this sounds like a rebranding of new world order.
De-globalization or re-globalization?
That's their panel name.
De-globalization or re-globalization.
Like, has globalization broken down to the point where we can no longer, you know, count on ketchup bottles or beer or whatever in the grocery store?
Or is this just a re-globalization?
Like, the... New World Order, basically, right?
Is that what you read into that?
Yes, exactly.
Okay, interesting.
And look at these panelists are... Ian Bremmer, of course.
We all owe Alex Jones a huge apology.
Who does?
Me?
We all.
Yeah.
And how do you re-globalize the world?
Well, information control is obviously very important.
So just like last year, there are a ton of panels on disinformation and misinformation, like this one here.
Clear and present danger of misinformation.
Public Speakers by the New York Times.
Yes, I really want to know what they think about misinformation.
U.S.
House of Foreign Affairs, Congressman Seth Moulton.
Interesting, so many...
So many American companies and U.S.
participants on this panel.
I wonder if they will address the fact that the U.S.
exports disinformation.
In fact, we know that from the Gattaca report that came out at the end of last summer.
We know that Central Command was perpetuating disinformation campaigns in Arab-speaking countries.
And what if just what if you don't want to participate in the type of information that they want you to?
And you may be more disinformation Leaning.
Maybe you're guilty of wrong think.
Well this panel gives me a clue to what they might do if they think that you are involved in disinformation.
Notice here, go ahead and put it up on the screen calling disrupting distrust.
Does anything jump out at you?
One panelist jumped out at me as extremely upsetting because why, I ask you?
Sarah Goss.
Salah Goss.
Why would MasterCard be participating in a panel about disinformation?
Why should our money and our banking system be connected to disinformation?
Well, we don't have to guess because we lived through the year 2022.
We saw it happen in Canada to truckers who had their bank account seized for protesting vaccine mandates.
We saw PayPal change policies.
to say that they can now fine you from disinformation.
So I don't like that at all, a banking company getting on board with a disinformation panel.
And what if you-- - Well, that's the-- - Go ahead. - I was gonna say that sets it up for what they've been talking about.
Like if you commit a crime or if you owe on your taxes that they can just go right into your account and either like pause it, freeze it and make it so you can do nothing.
You cannot exist in society without your money unless you've paid the fees that you owe the government.
Yeah, exactly.
That's what it sets up.
And Rebel News, I should point out, is Canadian, and so that's one of the reasons why they're there, because so many of these policies have adversely affected Canadians this past year.
Joe, I want you to comment.
I thought that was a wonderful overview and introduction of what's going on right now as we speak.
Yes, well, Rebel News got kicked out.
I saw that this morning on Bitchute.
They were trying to get into the event and they were manhandled and thrown out of the building.
So that's answered that question for him.
And then there was a great interview with Steve Bannon and a woman named Nours Bin Laden.
So I'm pretty sure she's from the Bin Laden family, but she's wealthy enough to live in Switzerland.
So she's just around the corner from there.
So she was visiting.
And he was talking about the prostitutes were having a bumper crop weekend in Davos because every one of the perverts that's there has to do it over age person every once in a while just to, you know, mix in with their pedophilia.
So anyhow, he did an interview with her, and she said that they've come up with a new term in addition to the rebranding of the Disinfo, Misinfo, whatever it was that they were talking about doing, and Reset.
But anyhow, he said it's called the Polycrisis.
And we don't have just one crisis.
We've got four or five really big crises.
Like, you know, we've got this deadly virus that's going to exterminate everybody on the planet if we don't jab them.
And then we've got this food crisis.
And then we've got this energy crisis.
And we've got this climate crisis.
And so we've got poli-crisis.
There's only one group in the planet that could solve that problem for us, and that's the Pali people that are meeting there in Davos.
Absolutely disgusting.
If you could pray for an asteroid to hit one place on the planet one time in the history, it would be that place, and it would be this week.
But I've also heard that it's real lightly attended because the It's got a lot of real negative impact.
In his opening remarks, Klaus Schwabberger said, this is so terrible that people not not like us anymore.
It's like, they don't know that we are are the ones that are going to rule the world and they must love us and they don't love us and we don't know why they don't love us.
It's because you're fucking evil.
That's why.
How sick is that, Joe?
We're the ones who are going to rule the world.
Yeah.
In your dreams.
Unbelievable.
Meanwhile, Kevin McCarthy shares best way to release a January 6th tape with what the lie to the smears generated by the Democrats.
The federal government has denied the American media and J6 defendants 14,000 hours of official footage, admitting the shocking details show it happened and the truth would change the official government narrative and destroy the weaponization of the House effort to smear President Trump, his supporters, and participants.
Rumored to be among the footage is shocking and bombastic scenes of people being killed and videos showing the Capitol Police and other officials being extremely aggressive on citizens who had gathered to show their support for Donald Trump.
The founder of Stop Hate spent an extensive time looking over open source documents footage as an official J6 investigator of 14,000 hours.
Eyewitness accounts of the brutality of the Capitol Police have been swept under the rug, and those who discount the government's agenda have been demonized.
Phil Anderson was staying next to a woman named Roseanne Boylan, who was killed that day.
Her point of view indicates the rest of the footage we have not seen will be horrific.
The Capitol Police almost killed me on January 6th.
If it hadn't been for the Trump supporters, I would be dead.
I have no doubt the Democrat government would have lied about my cause of death the same way they did about Roseanne Boyles.
I was holding Roseanne's hand when she died.
I was being crushed, gassed, maced right alongside her.
The Capitol Police killed her and the media.
The January 6th Committee and the Capitol Police have lied about everything.
There's also rumored to be footage of Ashley Babbitt, who was shot and killed by a Capitol Police officer, knew she was unarmed, but I'm sorry to say that appears to be fake.
January 6th was a deadly day.
At least five people died, all of whom were supporters of Trump.
The media pushed a narrative that Trump supporters were acting as terrorists, and it caused a deadly uprising.
The reason the footage now will have complex consequences exposing the likelihood Americans have been detained over their participation in January 6th, even tortured in prison, had their civil liberties denied.
Actually, the right to a trial to proper—you know, there are multiple amendments that are violated here.
For two years, Americans have been set up false to stream of media, falsehoods to demonize citizens as extremists and terrorists.
New Speaker McCarthy has made people very, very nervous, saying he wants to release all those hours of footage to the public.
Now he's talking about how to do it.
McCarthy told Maria Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures he wants to release the tape because of the politicalization he believed foisted by Nancy Pelosi, who is a disgusting human being, just a rat and a traitor to the United States.
The speaker reviewed how Twitter, under the leadership of Elon Musk now, has given access to troves of internal communication to groups of independent journalists who've been sharing details via the Twitter file threads.
The best way to handle this is the way Elon Musk has.
Just put all the information out there and let people see what's true and what is not.
So the best thing to do is to release the tapes.
People can know for themselves instead of picking and choosing what views people want to see.
Capitol Police say their system of cameras captured more than 14,000 hours between noon and 8 a.m.
that day, disrupting the effort to certify Biden's victory, actually disrupting discussion of evidence of electoral fraud.
One member of the House Conference, Matt Gaetz, has hit the airwaves, insisting this footage will give more full context than the cherry-picked moments of the January 6th committee.
No doubt.
On CNN, Gaetz said the footage could provide exculpatory evidence for January 6th defendants.
He dismissed concerns about how disclosing the case could jeopardize security, basically as bullshit.
I don't think that's an argument made by the DOJ, because they don't want to expose the extent to which there might have been federal assets or agents enhancing criminal acuity.
Your view is Joe.
Yes, well, I got an email this morning from Larry Klayman, who was the founder of Judicial Watch, and he's still involved with some of their stuff.
Breaking January 6th kangaroo court seals records for 30 to 50 years.
This is pretty troubling.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi de San Francisco already named the House Committee on House Administration the custody of records.
Under the current House rules, the committee is obligated to hand over the official records to the House clerk, who then transmits them to the National Archive with the rules that prevent the National Archives from releasing committee records for at least 30 years.
And the state of the House is going to be held for 50 years before being made public.
They want to bury the police body camera footage, on-site security camera footage, countless smartphones, emails, texts from federal agencies and law enforcement, and much more.
So yeah, that's pretty evil on their part.
But I also saw a report from a lawyer who said that basically the House of Representatives has jurisdiction Over the D.C.
Police Department and the D.C.
Court System, and they can order a release because these guys have been held for over two years on a pretrial with no trial, and that's a violation of their speedy trial requirements, so we could release all of those prisoners tomorrow if some of them Committed acts of violence and need to be re-arrested?
Fine, but we should let all of them go, and then they can start telling their own stories when they're locked in a cage in solitary confinement.
And maybe they have access to their own cell phones if the feds didn't gather, or they've got witnesses, or they've got all kinds of other testimony that can be brought forward, and we can finally expose that this was 100% A DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA inside operation to overthrow the 2020 election.
It was Nancy Pelosi off, you know, she just brought in all the rest of the miscreants to aid and abet her.
Absolutely disgusting.
Meanwhile, did Biden sow the seeds of his own destruction in 1977?
A key event may come back to bite him.
On January 12th, just a few days ago, the president tried to waive off the question about the lack of security for the document, saying the ones found in his garage were in a locked garage, not sitting out in the street, as though that were appropriate.
As more and more illegally kept documents turn up in various unsecured places in Biden's homes and offices, one cannot help but think of the criticism he gave Trump for having classified docs in his possession.
This may seem like a one-time occurrence, but in 1977 he also used the improper possession of docs against others, against then-President Jimmy Carter's nominee for CIA Director.
That may come back to bite him.
So far, at least three batches—actually, now four—of illegally held documents dated from when he was vice president have turned out of Biden's Washington, D.C., office in the garage of his Delaware home and in the home itself.
The latest revelation just announced when multiple outlets, including Fox and the New York Times, reported the president's attorneys confirmed a third batch of classified docs have been found at his home in Wilmington, Delaware.
The first batch was reportedly found on November 2nd, a week before the midterm elections, but wasn't, of course, announced as having been found at Biden's former office at the Ben Biden Center, but neither the DOJ nor the National Archives bothered to mention it until January.
Then a second was found in Biden's home in Delaware.
On January 12th, he tried to wave off questions about the lack of security, saying the ones found in his garage were in a locked garage and not sitting out in the street.
In 1977 and 2022, Biden was shocked—shocked, I tell you—over the impropriety of documents sitting literally in the hands of a official, but suddenly he's not all that worried about it.
Well, he was quick to dismiss criticism of his handling of documents that he should not have even had in his possession.
He's been even quicker to use that possession against others.
Naturally, Biden attacked Trump in the aftermath of the unprecedented raid on Mar-a-Lago.
How could that possibly happen, Biden said.
How could anyone be that irresponsible?
And I thought, what data was in there that might compromise sources and methods?
But his scolding of Trump is far from the first time he's used possession of docs against his political opponents.
He also did that to scuttle Jimmy Carter's nominee for CIA director in 1977.
Carter nominated Ted Sorensen to run the CIA, who would have been a brilliant choice.
But after questions arose over his handling of the cover-up and the death of Mary Jo Kopechny from Ted Kennedy's chappaquiddick incident, Carter withdrew Sorensen's name.
But the Kennedy problem wasn't the only thing torpedoing his elevation to the CITOP post.
He was also assailed by Biden and others for mishandling classified docs.
During the time Carter nominated Sorensen, he admitted to taking classified docs for a biography intended right of his longtime friend JFK.
One of the outspoken detractors of Sora's handling was none other than then-Senator Joe Biden.
He initially acted as though he were a Sorensen friend and said it helped him through the confirmation process.
But when Republicans honed in on Sorensen's mishandling of the classified docs, he turned on a dime and used the accusation to knock Sorensen out of contention.
In fact, Biden dug up an affidavit never filed in court as a weapon against him.
The former White House counsel later said Biden's abrupt shift and subsequent throwing in with the Republicans was shocking.
It was like being blindsided by a truck, describing the campaign to prevent it from taking the CIA possession as a result of many little dirty streams flowing together to make a large one.
Mine went further than just helping Republicans even suggest that Sorensen could be prosecuted under the Espionage Act.
Quite honestly, I'm not sure whether or not Mr. Sorensen could be indicted or convicted under the espionage statute.
Then he asked whether Mr. Sorensen intentionally took advantages of ambiguities in the law or carelessly ignored it.
Naturally, after all that, Carter had to remove his name from consideration.
Sorensen later blasted Biden and said he should win the prize for political hypocrisy in a town noted for political hypocrisy.
The most important factor in my judgment, Joe, is that when Biden did these things, he was vice president.
He did not have declassificatory authority, unlike President Trump, who even had a standing rule that any documents he took with him were automatically disclassified, which he was entitled to do.
Biden's egregious acts are overwhelmingly more serious than those attributed to Trump.
Your thoughts?
Yeah well they definitely are egregious and I can't be enough of them come back and fight him because he's a hydra snake if there ever was one and he deserves to to rot in hell and as quicker he can get there the better.
Yeah as far as uh the secret Uh, Intelligence Community's sources and methods?
I'll explain them both.
Their sources are the Grimm Brothers, and their methods are fairy tales.
So, anyhow.
Nice show, yes.
Yeah, we've got a lot of information to cover on the death count that's gone up just since December of 2020 when they started rolling out the jabs, but majority of the jab enforcement was done under the FJB administration, so he will end up bearing most of the weight for that, and it's getting really horrible.
I'm not sure how much we're going to get to talk about it today, but interesting.
Oh, you're 100% correct, Joe, 100% correct.
Meanwhile, a GOP bill would ban the Feds from working with big tech to censor Americans.
The First Amendment actually already covers this, but we might as well emphasize it.
Leading Republican lawmakers in the House have filed new legislation that would ban federal employees from working with big tech companies to censor Americans.
It comes as ongoing reports show federal law enforcement and the White House have regularly communicated with social media like Facebook and Twitter, pressuring them to remove posts and accounts for a range of issues, including questioning the COVID facts.
The collusion between bureaucrats and big tech has gone on for far too long.
Government agencies shouldn't censor the free speech of Americans, said Jim Jordan, head of the Judiciary Committee, who is helping to lead the effort.
The Protecting Speech from Government Interference Act is an important first step toward transparency and accountability for Biden bureaucrats and big tech.
The bill would prevent federal officials from using their influence or authority, including contracting, grantmaking, rulemaking, licensing, permitting, investigatory, or enforcement actions, to promote the censorship of lawful speech or advocate that a third party or private entity censors speech.
For violators, it has the same penalties as the Hatch Act.
Removal, fines, or reduction in pay singles out high-level officials, banning them from personally advocating for censorship.
The House, of course, now has a Republican majority emboldening them.
However, the legislation will have a tough time in the divided Senate.
It pays a potential veto for Biden, which will probably do it in.
That legislation, however, can give a window Into what action Rebubbling will take if they win the White House and the Senate in 2024, which I guarantee you they're not going to do if we can't get rid of these electronic loading machines.
Forget about it.
The action taken by the Biden admin to pressure Big Tech to censor are an attack on our fundamental right to free speech, said the Energy and Commerce Committee Chair, McMorris Rogers of Washington, who's also helping to lead the effort.
Just a reminder, the First Amendment.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or of the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and a petition to government for a redress of grievances, which this Biden administration has violated again and again and again.
The proposal comes alongside an investigation from House Oversight digging into federal law enforcement in the White House.
One particular instance that's rallied opposition to tech companies.
Billionaire new owner of Twitter, Elon Musk, has authorized a series of doms called the Twitter Files, which expose more details about the tech company collusion with federal law enforcement and the Democratic Party behind the scene.
Especially to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election.
So far, the Twitter files have featured, most notably, internal communication between top Twitter executive, the Biden admin, and federal law enforcement.
Last year, the Oversight Committee launched an investigation into the DHS after news broke that Facebook had an online portal where federal law enforcement could flag content it wanted to remove.
The DHS Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency relied heavily on the portal, flagging posts to be removed.
This ever began after CISA partnered with the left-leaning organization Big Tech Companies to launch the Election Integrity Partnership.
Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas was deeply involved here.
The EIB provides an outline complaint processing platform that permits groups, including the DNC, on at least four occasions to submit tickets reporting narratives they flag for concern.
Tickets were frequently resolved by taking one of several actions, banning the user from posting his or her lawful speech, or deplatforming the individual entirely.
I was myself deplatformed.
Algorithmically restricting the reach of speech on the platform, or Adding other information such as a warning label to alert users to its disfavored status.
The White House has downplayed the portal, but former Press Secretary Jen Psaki admitted the White House had a hand in regulating information.
We are in regular touch with the social media, and those engagements typically happen through members of our senior staff and members of our COVID team.
Such as, given as Dr. McMurthy conveyed, this is a big issue of misinformation, especially on the pandemic.
Referring to the U.S.
Surgeon General, Dr. Vivek McMurthy, who's a very strange guy.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well, a great article on this is the House Select Committee on Weaponization of the Federal Government.
Yeah, it was so bad.
There was over a thousand intelligence agencies and not just them.
It was people with the FDA, the CDC, the EPA.
All of them were contacting Twitter and saying, you need to remove this text.
You need to remove this content provider.
You need to censor this.
You need to block this purpose perfectly.
It was so bad that the FBI went ahead and authorized over three million dollars to Twitter to pay for the time that they had to dedicate staff to to go through and vet all these things before they illegally pulled them.
And they had to come up with some excuse for each one of them.
So they were constantly rewriting their protection of speech.
I agree, Joe.
rules and changing their terms of service so that they could be able to be at least somewhat presentable to the public.
And thank God for Elon Musk.
I don't agree with about half of what he's doing, but as far as what he's doing with Twitter, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.
Yeah, he's doing a great job with Twitter.
I agree, Joe.
Sensational.
I seem to have missed.
Huh.
Oh, here we go.
Outrage!
Stephanie Warner murdered after being choked by securing a Toronto hospital for wearing her mask too low.
This is stunning stuff.
The security Gestapo terrorists were just doing their job on behalf of one world government psychopathic overlord when they choked a helpless and sickly woman who was already having difficulty breathing.
The MKUltra mask that does less than zero in terms of viral transmission was always the mind-controlling, mask-induced fear tool that served as the ultimate gateway for the death, maximum uptake, and mindless, never-ending compliance.
The deprived technocommunist experiment that's Canada is still going on in terms of enforcing jock science demo side to wit.
Stephanie Warner died after being choked by security in a Toronto hospital for having her mask too low.
A coroner's report stated she died due to restrained asphyxia following struggle and exertion.
Let me say, I have, in those occasions when I've been forced to wear a mask, such as going to my clinic, worn my mask too low, namely beneath my nose, so I can breathe.
Evidently, that's a capital offense in Canada.
Outrageous.
I'm reminded of Thomas Aquinas' observation.
He was not angry when there is just cause for anger is immoral.
Why?
Because anger looks to the good of justice.
And if you can live amid injustice without anger, you are immoral as well as unjust.
He got it exactly right.
That is a profound observation.
Meanwhile, The FAA has quietly tacitly admitted that the EKGs of pilots are no longer normal.
We should be concerned.
Very concerned.
Steve Gersh has been doing brilliant reporting.
In the October 2022 version of the FAA Guide for Aviation Medical Examiners, the agency quietly widened the EKG parameters beyond the normal from a PR max of 0.2 to unlimited.
They didn't widen the range by a little, they widened it by a lot.
It was done after the VAX rollout.
This is extraordinary.
They did it hoping no one would notice.
It worked for a while, nobody caught it.
But you can't hide these things for long.
This is a tacit admission from the U.S.
government that the VAX has damaged the hearts of our pilots, not just a few, a lot of pilots, and a lot of damage.
The cardiac harm, of course, is not limited to them.
My best guess now is over 50 million Americans sustained some amount of heart damage from the shot.
That's a lot who will be very upset when they realize the facts they took to reduce their chance of dying from COVID actually worked in reverse, making it More likely that people will get COVID, be hospitalized from COVID and other diseases, die from COVID and other diseases.
You also have an excellent chance of having lifetime heart damage for no extra charge.
But don't worry, you can't sue them.
They fixed the law, so none of them are liable.
The doctors, the drug companies, the government.
After all, you took the facts of your own free will.
It's not like you were forced or coerced to take it or anything like that.
And there were plenty of people warning you not to take the shot, even though they censored most of them.
Here, I'll explain the evidence and thinking behind all my claims.
As I learn more, I will refine my estimate.
Introduction.
22 October 2022, the FAA quietly, without any announcement at all, widened the AKG requirements necessary for pilots to be able to fly.
The PR, a measure of heart function, used to be in the range of 0.12 to 0.2.
It's now 0.12 to 0.3 and potentially even higher.
This is a very wide range, dominating people who have cardiac injury.
Cardiologist Thomas Levy is appalled at the change.
Why would they do that?
I'll take an educated guess.
Because they knew if they kept the original reign, too many pilots would have to be grounded.
That would be extremely problematic.
Commercial aviation in the U.S.
would be severely disrupted.
Why did they do it quietly without notifying the public or the mainstream?
I'm pretty sure they won't tell me, so I'll speculate.
It's because they didn't want anyone to know.
What could be more obvious?
In other words, the VAX is seriously injured, lots of pilots, the FAA knows it, and says nothing, because that would tip off the country the VAXs are unsafe.
And you weren't allowed to do that.
Why are we sure the VAX did it?
There are several clues consistent with it was a vaccine and not COVID.
One, they were quiet about it.
If it were COVID, you could be public, but the vaccine is supposed to be safe.
Two, the timing, October 2022, is late for COVID.
If it were due to COVID, It would have happened well before now.
Maybe it can make changes every month.
Third, the vaccine creates far more injury to the heart than COVID, which creates no added risk, per a large-scale Israeli study of 196,992 unvaccinated adults after COVID.
6,992 unvaccinated adults after COVID.
Four, anecdotally, cardiologists only started to notice the damage post-vaccine.
5.
All the sudden deaths occurred post-vaccine.
I know from a study of 171 in Puerto Rico, 97% of whom were vaccinated ages 8 to 84, 70% of them, when screened for cardiac injury using an FDA-approved testing device from HeartCareCorps, exhibited objective signs of cardiac injury.
A study was done on pilots.
It will be published in the Epoch Times later this week.
That indicates heart damage in over 20% of pilots screened.
The Thailand study showed nearly 30% of kids were injured, but kids are indestructible.
So a 30% injury rate in kids translates to a higher rate for adults.
A virus shows cardiac damage happens at all ages, not just among the young.
Here from the January 6, 2023.
Reverse of Averse Data.
141 case or vaccine is COVID-19 and symptom is atrial tracardia.
Bottom line, the most logical conclusion FAA knows the hearts of our pilots have been injured due to the VACs.
Coerced into taking the number of pilots affected being huge, the cardiac damage extensive, passenger safety is compromised by lowering the standard to enable them to fly.
The right thing to do, of course, would be for FAA to come clean and admit to the public the VAX has injured 20% or more of the pilots based on their limited screening, but I doubt they will ever do that.
The change?
From 200 microseconds to 300 and beyond.
They were made on October 24, 2022, to the Guide for Aviation Medical Examiners.
Here's the log where you can actually see the change listed.
Here's what it looked like as of October 24, 2022.
With a PR interval of less than 300 ms, if no symptoms, first-degree AV block with PR interval of 300 ms or more, submit the following or current Holterin cardiac evaluation.
Now, for the two rows for less than 300 ms, it used to be 200, and it's second now to handle 300 ms or more.
In the U.S., we're not allowed to do lab tests on people before and after the vaccine.
The reason is simple.
It would be crystal clear the vaccines are unsafe.
That's why there are no before-after studies in the U.S.
and never will be.
Why?
Because that's how science works in America today.
It's unethical to design a study that might expose the facts they force on us causes harm.
Think I'm kidding about how they game the trials?
Get yourself a copy of Turtles all the way down and just read the first chapter.
It's eye-opening.
Even though we can't do it before or after studying the U.S., they did such a study in Thailand on 301 kids.
They found 29.24% of the participants developed cardiac injury without days after the second shot.
But here's the most important part about that study.
None of the tests that were done in Thailand Included doing a cardiac MRI with contrast to all participants since that would be expensive and invasive, but that is a gold standard for cardiac injury.
In other words, the 29% rate of injury was a lower bound.
If you need a cardiac MRI, you're gonna find stuff you'll not find using the cheap and easy tests.
Maybe a lot of stuff.
Summary.
I believe the actual rate of heart injury from the VAX will be found to be over the 29.7 rate of heart damage in a Thailand study.
At a more conservative 20% injury rate, we're looking at 50 million Americans with heart damage caused by the jab.
And it's over 3075 million.
As more studies are done, it will be crystal clear why so many are dying suddenly, especially kids.
It's also going to explain why nursing homes have lost up to 33% of their residents in 12 months, whereas in the past they were losing only 1-2% a year.
It's going to explain why I was unable to find even a single nursing home where the all-cause mortality dropped after the vaccines rolled out.
It's going to explain why none of the nursing homes wanted to talk to me about what happened to people after the shots were rolled out.
Confidence in the CDSM medical community should hit rock bottom after it's revealed how expensive is the damage caused by the VAC.
The fact that Thailand said it was published in a peer-reviewed journal that only did easy-to-do assessments, which only found a portion of the damage, that the FDA quietly changed their EKG guidance, should at least open your mind to the possibility I might be right.
The narrative is going to start falling apart at an accelerated rate.
Stay tuned.
The best is yet to come, and it's going to be epic.
Joe.
Yes, well, on your first story, that's by a guy named Dan Dix.
And his website is PressForTruth.ca, and that's about a 15 minute long episode where he goes into more detail about that woman being murdered for wearing her mask the wrong way.
So that's enough on that particular subject.
Now getting back to the Steve Kirsch article, he also mentioned that this change was done by, or that he contacted the medical officer in charge at the FAA.
A person named Dr. Susan Northrup, a colonel in the U.S.
Air Force, and she looks exactly like Rachel Levin's twin sister, twin trans sister.
Yeah, she's an absolute, I mean, Fugly, as we used to say in college.
Yeah, she's pretty damn fugly.
I did get in contact with one person that said that commercial pilots are required to have one of these EKGs at 35, and then starting at age 40, they're required to have them annually.
So I wasn't content with just that particular source.
I contacted my former U.S.
Air Force captain for 20 years, and then an American Airlines captain for 20 years following that, and I think they got mandatory retirement at like 60, but I forgot to ask him about EKGs when he was in the military.
But he said at American Airlines he was required to have one every six months.
Well, probably he started as a captain at American over the age of 40.
So instead of doing it once a year, they were doing it twice a year.
But this brings up a whole range of other problems.
It's not just the pilots, kids.
It's all of the ground crews, the maintenance workers, The ticket agents, the stewardesses, every person involved in the air transportation industry has been damaged, and they're going to have enormous repercussions in a really short period of time.
But this brings up an even more difficult problem, because most of the, all of the commercial airlines that fly passengers are required to have two pilots, and the probability of both pilots croaking on the same flight at about the same time
is pretty remote but enormous number of military aircraft have a single pilot and that's your attack helicopters and all of your fighter planes and a lot of the other mission sensitive helicopters rather than carry an extra pilot they'd rather carry an extra paratrooper and so it turns out that we have an enormous exposure with our $33 billion a piece.
Well, actually not.
I think they're about $100 million F-35s.
And so what happens when that pilot has a problem?
They're going to be flying, you know, close to the speed of sound or even beyond that, depending on where they're located.
And when they have a malfunction of the pilot, there's not going to be anything that's going to save the pilot of the plane, and that's going to be landings on aircraft carriers where they're under a little bit of extra stress trying to do that, or also landing at Air Force bases, or just flying over cities when the pilot just all of a sudden...
Joe, you're absolutely 100% right.
It's unbelievable what's going on here.
and there's no way to stop it.
So expect planes to be falling out of the skies continuously and the World Economic Forum people just go, well, if we were in total control of everything on the whole planet, none of these bad things would happen.
It's just some more of that poly crisis we need to solve.
F you.
Joe, you're absolutely 100% right.
It's unbelievable what's going on here.
Meanwhile, Dr. Ariett Hall, a staunch critic of the anti-vaxxers and alternative medicine, dies in her sleep.
Gee, I wonder why.
Dr. Harriet the Skeptic Duck Hall, author of a signed medical blog shaming anti-vaxxers and critic of alternative medicine, died suddenly in her sleep last week.
Surprise, surprise.
She's a retired Air Force physician and plight surgeon who writes about pseudoscience and questionable medical practices.
This is Kirk Hall, Harriet's husband.
I know her work was followed and admired by many.
It is with great sadness I must tell you my beloved wife passed away quietly and unexpectedly in her sleep last night.
At this moment, she would probably simply ask you to have a kind thought for her, be kind to each other, and continue to support her belief in the truth.
Except she was promoting falsehoods.
As Managing Director of Science Waste Medicine, I'm greatly saddened to have to announce our reader, Dr. Harriet Hall, passed away unexpectedly last night, said Ron Jedout, Managing Editor of Science Waste Medicine.
He sent out an email.
It's with profound sadness.
I report to you my good friend, Dr. Harriet's skeptic, Dr. Hall, passed away in her sleep, quietly and unexpectedly, last night in Seattle.
Kirk Hall, Harriet's husband, has kindly allowed me to notify you of Harriet's passing.
We are currently working on the January edition of the newsletter.
The final edition will be delivered within the next few days if you, like her, believe in truth and science made medicine, and I know you do, please have a kind thought for her.
I will miss her dearly, and I know you will too.
Well, frankly, the fact that she was a proponent of the VAX mandate and all against natural remedies suggests to me we're not going to miss her passing.
She was a force for evil.
Are you contemplating a second booster for COVID?
Check out my Skeptic Docs corner at Inquiry to find out why I say your decision should be a resounding yes.
Here are some of her blogs.
Just disgusting, Joe.
Just disgusting.
Here's one.
Why isn't everyone getting vaccinated?
Don't write the vaccinated off as stupid idiots.
Try to understand their thinking.
Here's another.
Fears of future infertility are keeping some parents from vaccinating their children.
Are these fears supported by evidence, or is this just another social media myth?
It's, in fact, the fact.
Many speculated after her death that the vaccine played a role.
No doubt.
Back in 2021, she announced she'd received her third dose of Pfizer.
My husband and I, both well over 65, got our third dose of COVID.
The Pfizer is a safe way for everyone.
Very convenient, only a short while.
No appointment needed.
To get yourself jabbed with a death vax, rush down there right away.
It's not too soon to subject yourself to an early sudden death.
Dr. Hall's colleagues at Widow were outraged about these claims she died from the vax.
After Dr. Hall died last week, anti-vaxxers began blaming the COVID vax.
Med doctor Gorski goes beyond his anger to explain this conspiracy theory.
After I got over the initial shock and sadness that hit me, I learned of the unexpected death of our friend and colleague, Dr. Harriet Hall.
I must confess, as well the case with Buffalo Bill's safety to Mar Hamlin's on-field cardiac arrest, most likely from commiodo cordis, my next thought was how long it would be before anti-vaxxers start blaming her unexpected passage on the vax.
Of course, and rightly so.
Here's Dr. Jonathan Stee tweeting.
The same anti-vaxx propagandists jumping on Lisa Marie Presley's cardiac arrest are also attacking Dr. Harriet Hall's grieving husband and friends.
I'm desensitized to trolling at this point, but this makes me sick.
Scientific illiteracy is overshadowed by moral bankruptcy.
What a denialist!
This isn't science-based medicine, this is complete fabricated bullshit!
Kirk Hall, her husband, responded, "The anti-vaxxers are a loathsome, despicable group who seem to be able to plumb the deepest levels of depravity to push their agenda.
Harriet had been in delicate health for many years before the pandemic.
Years ago I took over household chores after she experienced blackouts and fell in San Francisco and at TSAC within a week.
Recently, Harriet's doctor at the Madigan Army Medical Center was having her worked up for possible congestive heart failure.
A recent echocardiogram—we've not received the full results—showed she had leakage in two of her valves.
She also had transient heart arrhythmia, which was of many years' duration.
Neither of us have had COVID and Harriet's exposure to life outside the home had for the last several years, and limited to her doctor and her dentist.
Tributes poured in.
Atheists for liberty.
Deeply saddened to hear about the death of Dr. Harriet Hall, an advocate of science, truth, and skepticism.
The world of science, atheism, and skepticism has lost a tremendous inquiring mind.
Really, a massive propagandist.
Just embarrassing.
Absolutely embarrassing.
Here's another.
Britt Marie Herms.
I'm so saddened by the news.
I read Dr. Ball's book early on in my journey out of neuropathy and found it inspiring.
I'm grateful I got to know her.
Another from Real Clear Science.
H.J.
Skeptox had passed away unexpectedly.
We linked to numerous pieces by Dr. Hall over the years.
She was an outstanding doctor, writer, and skeptic.
Finally, science-based meds?
We just learned the day of Dr. Harriet Hall's passing last night.
Please join us in remembering her as a friend as well as her lifetime contributions to science-based meds, and to skepticism and science in general.
She will be missed.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, one of the guys on my subscriber list is a guy named Jim Crenshaw.
He's got a 15 minute long video.
I haven't been able to watch the whole thing, but the title is another ABC producer drops dead from the vaccine, and he lists a whole bunch of other people in the course of this.
It just starts off with that particular I'm sick of trying to be nice to these people.
I was ordered to not go to friends' funerals because I wasn't fully jabbed.
Dex, Tejera, and it goes on and on and on.
And after three years of flattening the curve, I'm sick of trying to be nice to these people.
I was ordered to not go to a friend's funeral because I wasn't fully jabbed.
I had people that shamed me because I talked their relatives out of being jabbed.
And then they ended up having to go to the hospital and have their gallbladder removed because it was full of clots.
So it's like, I'm a completely non-apologist about it.
I've convinced a dozen of my friends that the jabs were totally evil.
And I've written a dozen articles at Principia Scientific.
And Jim and I have spoken about this repeatedly.
I'm an unapologetic anti-vaxxer.
And it goes back to when my daughter had a febrile seizure from a DPT shot before they made it on a schedule where you couldn't sue anybody because they were having the same problem with children everywhere in the 19th century.
1980s And that's why Ronnie Raygun, the idiot, went ahead and signed the 88 bill.
Yeah, I have no use to these SOBs.
seen on every level.
Yeah, I have no use to these SOBs.
And then when the Lancet, owned by Murdoch, who also owned a lot of Merck stock, was delicensed in England because of his causation of MMR shots and autism, he was a very good person.
He had his medical license pulled.
He moved to Austin.
He's been undercover, but he's been doing a little bit of speaking and I followed his work since 1995.
We lost Joe, but I expect he'll be right back.
I'm so very happy with all of his reports.
Let me continue with our stories for today.
Stunning!
San Francisco's reparation panel suggests a $5 million payment to black residents.
This is astonishing, but I suppose in many ways unsurprising.
San Francisco's reparation committee has proposed a $5 million payment in total debt forgiveness to each black long-time resident due to decades of systematic repression.
The San Francisco African-American Reparation Advisory Committee, made up of all Black members, AARAC, presented a draft to city leaders last month.
The AARAC was created in December 2020 by the City Board of Supervisors.
It will submit its final proposal to Mayor London Breed the Board and San Francisco Human Rights Commission in June.
The proposed reparations are not for slavery, because California technically was not a slave state.
Instead, the payments and debt forgiveness would address a public policy explicitly created to subjugate black people in San Francisco by upholding and expanding the intent and legacy of chattel slavery.
Neither San Francisco nor California formerly adopted the institution of chattel slavery.
The tenets of segregation, white supremacy, and systematic repression and exclusion of blacks were codified through legal and extra-legal action, social codes, and judicial enforcement.
The board's legislation to create the committee allows city leaders to reject or outright ignore the committee's work.
The suggested one-time $5 million payment would be a lump sum to each eligible individual.
A lump sum would compensate the affected population for the decades of harm they've experienced, or redress economic and opportunity losses Black San Francisco's have endured collectively as a result of both intentional decision and unintended harms perpetrated by city policy.
Applicants who need to be at least 18 years old have identified as black or African-American on public documents for at least 10 years.
They must also approve at least two of eight additional criteria, including having been born in San Francisco between 1940 and 1996, and proof of residency in San Francisco for at least 13 years, and or personally or to direct the Senate as someone incarcerated by the failed war on drugs.
The AARC plan calls on San Francisco to supplement lower-income recipients' income by about $97,000 for at least 250 years.
That would reflect the area median income according to the draft.
Racial disparities across all metrics have led to a significant racial wealth gap in the city of San Francisco.
By elevating income to match AMI, Black people can better afford housing and achieve a better quality of life.
The plan also seeks to establish a comprehensive debt forgiveness program, clearing each individual person's student and housing loan credit cards debt, etc.
Stunning stuff!
Joe, Glad to have you back, my friend.
And continue your thought and add those about the reparation program in San Francisco, which is beyond belief.
Yeah, I was going to mention something about the other side of it on AGW, and that's this Neal's.
We'll get to that in my closing comments.
Yeah, the Civil War, the Union Army lost 360,222 dead.
The Confederate Army lost 258,000 dead for a total of 620,000.
And then at least that many, probably double that many, that had permanent injuries.
That's like a hand cut off, a leg cut off, an arm cut off, an eye blown out.
death from being around cannons.
These were enormous amount of injuries, and there were injuries, and there was only about 20,000 blacks that were killed, and about a quarter of those blacks were members of the Confederate Army, because there was a lot of Confederate blacks.
Let's hope Joe's able to rejoin us momentarily, because we're right at a crucial part of the where we're tying together the loose ends, Joe, please continue.
Bottom line, yeah, there's another group of the same race baiters that are constantly sitting on their butt, under a deep end on absolutely everything, and blaming everybody else for their inability to be able to compete on a level playing field.
An ample proof of that is the fact that Asians in the United States are a very small minority, and they are picked on enormously by the blacks and browns, and it's amazing, the blacks decided that the Asians have privilege because they're the blacks decided that the Asians have privilege because they're white adjacent.
If you can't figure out where all of this crap is going let me explain it to you.
If they can create a white race war Yes, yes, yes, if they can create a race war.
Trying to divide and conquer the country means set against itself.
It's outrageous.
As recently as Trump's presidency, the country was in good shape, economically viable.
We had a closed border.
We had energy independence.
All this has happened in the short period of two years plus since Biden came into office.
Joe, continue.
Yes.
The overall plan is extermination of 95% of the people on the planet.
All they're doing is dividing us by color.
It's just one additional way to kill each other.
They're dividing us by age, by education, by sex, absolutely religion, absolutely insane.
But if you think that these people have any love in their heart for Brown people, black people, yellow people, or red people—get over it!
They hate all people, and they're just— Yes, yes, yes.
And the population of San Francisco blacks, I recall, around 49,000 times 5 million is $250 billion.
How San Francisco could possibly come up with money like that to cover this program is beyond belief, Joe.
Yeah, you gotta wonder because every one of their businesses is dying and every one of their landlords is going out of business because nobody wants to live in their shithole cities.
It's like absolutely incredible.
Yeah, it has more defecation per square foot than any other city in the world.
It's absolutely unbelievable.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
John Kerry at Deep House.
It's pretty extraordinary that we, a select group of human beings, because of whatever touched us at some point in our lives, are able to sit in a room and come together and actually talk about saving the planet.
It's almost extraterrestrial.
And to think I actually believe this guy was a decent human being when he came back from Vietnam as an anti-war activist.
He's turned into a massive pile of human excrement.
Sad to say.
Joe, your final thoughts, my friend?
Yes, well he came back from Vietnam after having four student departments and then when he got to Vietnam he was joined the Navy because he thought he would be far enough away from the action.
They put him on a swift boat where he could actually get shot at.
So he managed to get three Purple Hearts because he found out if you got three Purple Hearts you could be dismissed from service.
So he nicked himself with a razor and that's how he ended up being a war hero.
And that's why he didn't mind throwing one of his Joe will rejoin us.
We regret the technical conflict.
Go ahead, Joe.
didn't have to earn it to begin with.
What a rotten piece of human garbage.
Yeah, I was mentioning something about Neal's...
Joe will rejoin us.
We regret the technical conflict.
Go ahead, Joe.
Neal.
Joe.
The interview this morning with Stephen Kirsch that I really admire and Jimmy Dore, And they were talking about how stupid Neil deGrasse was about how there's no way you can question science and vaccines are 100% safe and blah, blah, blah.
That guy is the biggest sock puppet I've ever seen in my whole life next to probably Bill Nye, the fake science guy.
But anyhow, I'll challenge you, Mr. Vondergrass, any time to discuss global warming, green energy, peat oil, or Big Bang, or the stupid Apollo missions.
But over the weekend, I met a lady who had just graduated with a petroleum engineering degree, which you would think, you know, pretty sharp cookie from one of the major four engineering universities in Texas.
Yes, yes, yes.
Joe will regain to complete his thought, and then I'll add a few closing of my own.
Joan. Joan. Joan.
So I've met engineers from all four of the premier engineering schools in Texas, and they have had decreasing cell levels repeatedly in the last three decades.
Just absolutely astounding.
But I started explaining to her how global warming was impossible, And I was explaining some of the laws involved.
She said, I don't understand what you're talking about.
I said, well, didn't you take thermodynamics?
Oh yeah, we took two semesters, but I don't remember any of it.
And it's like, oh, okay.
Well, then I started explaining to her, A by Jenny Coyle, this is a petroleum engineer.
She said, you don't think it comes from dead dinosaurs?
I go, not only do I don't think, I know it doesn't.
And so I started explaining to her nuclear fission.
She goes, well, I don't know anything about that.
And it's like, You know, unbelievable the level of ignorance from our college-educated engineers.
It's absolutely astounding.
So, Joe, you're just doing a great job with all of this.
I'm concerned whether—yeah, go ahead.
Even educated people have closed minds, Joe.
That's what you're observing.
People who should be able to absorb scientific information, where they've even studied the subject in the past, are unable to absorb anything that goes against their hardcore beliefs.
And not only do they not have any curiosity to find something else, they will actually challenge you for challenging their dogma.
It's unbelievable!
It is, Joe.
You've done a great job today.
We regret Chris Weiner was unable to join us.
But Joe, as he does show after show after show, just knocks it out of the ballpark.
I wouldn't normally address a different program I've done, even on the same day.
But on the raw deal on my Revolution Radio program today, I featured Dennis Camino, whom I've known for a very long time, featured as a speaker at the Vancouver hearings in 2012.
He's an expert on a multiplicity of issues.
He was the Navy's leading electronic troubleshooter before he resigned and went to work for Raytheon.
He's knowledgeable and experienced in a wide range of issues.
I had him on my show today, and he was giving us a very sober report of how the extinction of life on planet Earth is overwhelmingly probable.
Whether it's from a nuclear exchange that appears now to be inevitable, or from the chaos being created in the United States which is going to lead to mass starvation, this is one you do not want to miss.
Go to my BitChute channel, Jim Fetzer, check out The Raw Deal with Dennis Camino just this morning.
You won't be happy, but you'll learn some hard facts about the way things are, and also be fascinated by an exchange from my Caller.
Most frequent caller.
Paul from California.
With Dennis about the existence of nuclear weapons, where to my astonishment, Paul and others who call into the show seem to believe they don't exist, this is an area in which Joe himself is also an expert, especially with his studies of the nuclear demolition of the Twin Towers at the World Trade Center on 9-11.
This is a program you do not want to miss.
It's also reason why you must spend all the time you can with your friends, your family, the people you love and care about.
We literally do not know how much time we have left.
Thanks for being here.
▲
Export Selection