All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 7, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
59:44
Truth vs. NEW$ Part 2 (6 November 2022) with Don Grahn, David Kenney, and Holly Seeliger
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Three, two, one.
And welcome back, folks.
This is Truth vs. News here on the 6th of November, two days from the election, and all kinds of hot things are happening.
And we were having a great expose from Laura Logan.
We had to cut off, but let's continue with that because she is saying a lot of stuff.
Wonderful, wonderful, wonderful idea.
Larry, you're now a Texan human agency of people step up or step in the breach to become heroes.
You have 23 counties in Texas that have declared states of emergency.
You have this organization of sheriffs.
In your mind, and let's just focus on Texas because it's too overwhelming if you think of the big picture, but in Texas, the tip of the spear, Can individual sheriffs, could Governor Abbott, could Texas come together and say we're not going to allow our state to be destroyed and we're going to step up here?
You've already had 23 counties call in an invasion.
You've had two or three of these sheriff organizations.
What would be your recommendation there?
Well, we know that Texas can do it because they did it before in 2015 and they shut down the border then.
Texas has the Department of Public Safety, which is a fairly unique law enforcement agency that is able to step in the breach.
They know how to shut down the border.
They've done it multiple times.
But what they're lacking is the political backing to do so.
While Governor Abbott is doing a lot, and he talks a big game, at the end of the day, Texas hasn't shut down the border, have they?
They haven't taken your federal taxes and put them into an escrow account and used that to finance a state border force.
They haven't, you know, Abbott has done nothing about the fact that the federal government is derelict in its duty to uphold the Constitution, which then, in that case, some of these powers can revert to the states.
I mean, the states have the power, not just Texas, but they have the power to prevent the federal overflight of federal drones.
They can kick out every federal employee.
They don't have to be subordinate to these federal agencies who are clearly not doing their job, who are trampling on the rights of American citizens and so on.
In fact, it's gotten so bad that a number of people in Texas, some of them law enforcement, some of them private citizens, have come together and they have created a military-style threat assessment.
And I say military-style not in the sense that there's anything militaristic about it, but in the sense that that's what the military's job is traditionally, right?
We rely on our intelligence agencies and the military to write what is called threat assessments, national security threat assessments, that identify the true nature and scope of the threat.
Because by presenting that to the American people, you can start to get the policies that are actually going to affect change, and that are actually going to be targeted at the problem as it exists.
Not the fake problem that people in Washington are pretending doesn't exist, but the actual problem.
So they've written a threat assessment that will be presented You can do things like you can designate the cartels as a terrorist organization.
You can recognize the fact that law enforcement's model no longer works.
Yeah.
Lara Logan, first off, this report you're talking about, when will this be promulgated that the public can actually see this?
Tomorrow, Friday, in Houston.
It'll be presented at a workshop that's open to the public.
Anybody can come.
And listen, and they'll be made publicly available, anyone who's interested.
This event is at the VFW, and so people can find it online.
And, you know, Steve, it's really a first, right?
Because the government is so derelict in its duty and in identifying the true national security threat of opening the border to the most violent criminal organizations in the world, which are the cartels in Mexico, and documenting the transition Of those cartels from drug organizations to multinational criminal organizations who are now now that one of their number one product is human beings.
And so all these people say they care about slavery and you know, and all the rest of it.
They apparently just don't care that all these people are being trafficked across the border and put into debt slavery where they owe the cartels forever because they can't pay their debts or they're being trafficked for sex where you know, the average amount of time that a child lost stays alive.
after being trafficked for sex is two years.
Two years of being raped every single day for money until you're killed.
And then they're also trafficking people for labor.
So you got all these people in woke cities saying, oh, you know, aren't these immigrants good people?
They're working two, three jobs.
They're working two, three jobs because most of the money is going to those cartels.
And they don't see the light of day.
And their lives don't get better.
They get worse.
Okay.
We're going to talk to Lara afterwards.
We want to help promulgate this, get her ready to watch it, We'll try to get her tomorrow at this conference.
Lara, just hang on for one second.
I've got Dr. Seb Gorka, who for years trained the FBI in counterterrorism.
A big story coming out of Minneapolis nobody's covering except for the national file.
I want to bring in Frankie Stocks.
Frankie, give me a minute on this story.
You reported the other day about the public schools offering their jobs.
Give us an update on what's going on.
Hey Steve, thanks for having me on.
At National File, you know, last week we reported on the school spirit hijab program out of Burnsville, Minnesota, and we took a further look into this school district and what we found, to say the least, was disturbing.
Along with their open public embrace of Sharia law and Sharia head garb on small children, this district has produced at least three Islamic terrorists, one of which was killed on the battlefield in 2014.
His name was Hamad Mohalan and two other young men, Abdullahi Yousef and Hamza Ahmed, were busted by the FBI when they tried to flee the Minneapolis area to join ISIS, following Mohalan, their former classmate, at Burnsville High School's footsteps.
One of those young men, Abdullahi Yousef, was actually the beneficiary of a far-left reform policy where he was de-radicalized and released from prison after just two years.
Ahmed, for his part, he received a 15-year prison sentence.
Now, this is a community-wide issue, and it's fanning out of Ilhan Omar's Minneapolis.
There's been numerous adults in the Burnsville area charged with terror-related crimes, ISIS radicalization, the whole nine yards.
Just hang over a second.
I'm going to hold you.
I want to go to Lara before she punches out.
You've reported and done some of your most important work in areas Where Sharia law is ascended.
How dangerous is this to have it in a public school system and to have it concentrated in a city like Minneapolis, ma'am?
Well, it has the potential to be very dangerous and as you know, we heard from that reporting and there's evidence that it has been because what you're seeing is is really about ideology and indoctrination.
It's those standards that are applied to people who want to, you know, wear a hijab in the classroom or whatever.
They're not applied across the board.
It's while you're supporting rights for, say, one religion, you're attacking another religion, you know?
And there are more Americans concerned about the rights of Muslims to exercise their faith than of Christians to exercise theirs.
In fact, Christians are being demonized and mocked as domestic terrorists.
And, you know, the church has become synonymous with all evil, right?
While even Satanists are elevated in American society.
It's and it's also extremely dangerous because what you're talking about is you've got someone like Ilhan Omar, right?
This is her district.
Is it any surprise that she doesn't believe in the United States Constitution?
She hates white people.
She can't stand Israel.
They lie about that all the time because they don't want Jewish people across this country to wake up to the fact that this political ideology, this political movement is as far removed from anything that Americans support and believe in as is humanly possible.
So and then not only that, what you're essentially doing is you are, this is the other part and how this relates actually to the border.
The other part of this strategy is to dilute the pool of people within the United States who know how this country was founded, who understand those principles, believe in them and believe in the flag and are proud to be American and want to preserve this country as it was founded.
What you're doing instead is you're bringing in illegal immigrants and legal immigrants, and you're teaching them that America is bad.
It's full of racists.
It's systemically racist.
It never did anything good for anybody.
And you're encouraging, basically, the decline of this nation from within.
And for many of these people, I'll tell you, Steve, when I went, I just became a citizen.
And when I went to my seat and found the packet where the oath is and everything else that I needed to know, you know what the top page was?
The top page was a flyer from the League of Women Voters.
And anyone who knows anything about the League of Women Voters today and some of their history knows that this is not a bipartisan organization.
This is not a nonpartisan organization.
This is a highly partisan political organization, one of the many that hides behind their 5013C status and lies to people and comes to them deceptively and says, you know, we're just encouraging you to vote.
No, what they're doing is taking the new immigrants, taking these people who make to go to cities like Minneapolis and making sure that they have them in their clutches to get them to vote the way they want to and to think the way they want to and to believe what they believe.
So diluting the pool of patriotic Americans while flooding the country with people and ignoring the fact that really what we're doing is we have someone like Ilhan Omar and people in her district who the causes that they're signing up to They don't believe in the United States.
They don't like anything about this country.
They want to change everything about it, and they're at war with the people themselves.
But they're not the ones that the FBI is worried about, right?
The FBI is worried about people like you and people like me and Mike Lindell, the pillow guy, right?
Those are the ones they're going after.
And what the media is doing is helping them in that, because they are taking a knee to this ideology And they are playing down the fact that there are Islamic terrorists and breeding grounds for Islamic terrorists in our own cities and our own schools.
And that's truly an indictment on our leaders who know exactly what they're doing, because this is part of a bigger plan.
Let me just say, she's very impressive, and the idea of 100 million migrants that come into the United States to just transform the country is overwhelming.
David, your thoughts about all of the above?
Wow.
I'm going to probably take some time here, so you'll have to excuse me.
But, you know, if you remember back in 2014-2015, there was a 100,000 Strong program, where Obama was hellbent on bringing 100,000 students from China and having them educated in America.
Right after that, he started 100,000 Strong to get 100,000 people from Latin America to come north and to those students to come into the United States.
Then after that, it was 100,000 Strong out of the Caribbean to come into the United States and start educating.
And then there was a topped it off with 50,000 from Mexico.
50,000 from Mexico.
So there's 350,000 to start a trend of migratory patterns to flood the United States.
Think about it.
Remember when we were the withdrawal from Afghanistan?
There were 100,000 Afghanis, approximately 100,000 Afghanis that were flown into the United States.
There's more than ample evidence to support everything that Laura Logan said.
I've said for years that this whole policy is reflected in PPD 21 that was released by the Obama administration to demonstrate the tactics on how to dismantle the critical infrastructure of the United States.
As we see that starting to take place You have to remember that General David Petraeus was the one who developed the how do you defend the United States?
It's not the defense of the United States.
It's the defense of North America.
So what Petraeus was talking about was that the infrastructure of America has to spread out into Canada and down to Mexico.
So as we see this, this globalization starting to take place, you can look no California piece of legislation AB 311 that was introduced in February of 2013 by Victor Manuel Perez, a Latino legislator from the Riverside area, and what he talked with that legislation talks about is California began to form a new nation.
With Sonora, Mexico and Baja, Mexico.
Now, I've mentioned this several times on the program.
Thanks, Laura Logan.
I just say hallelujah.
Finally, someone's paying attention.
So, this has gone on for years under the water.
You know, this whole theory cost me well over $300,000-$400,000.
In time, effort, and energy just to try to explain it.
But I gave reports to the FBI, the CIA, the Comptroller of the Currency.
I spent hours and upon hours detailing the information, providing it to the federal government when I did to the Securities Exchange Commission.
The Securities Exchange Commission just finished a prosecution of one gentleman who was involved in this.
He used to work with the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank.
He was then found to be violating federal law in connection with Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations.
He was sentenced to pay $50,000 and forever barred from participating in the exchange of securities in the United States.
But this is this whole outline that she's talking about is mentioned in Jerome Corsi's book, The Late Great USA, which I think was published in about 2015 or 16, maybe later, maybe earlier.
And I mentioned in our last program that this globalization plan is definitely underway.
There's no question that the comments that she's made, this is to dismantle the United States, it's to dismantle the United States Constitution, to get rid of the Declaration of Independence, you know, I think to enslave Americans across the board.
That's just my view.
But one of the things that I mentioned was that Cardinal Archbishop Horacio Gomez wrote Immigration in the Next America.
That was released in about 15 or 16.
Following that, The Pope flies over and holds mass on the border.
Following that, Cardinal Bogano, if you remember Cardinal Bogano, was trying to reveal all this information to the American people.
And he was being ostracized from the Catholic Church as being critical of the Pope.
And he was talking about this whole globalist plan for America.
There's no question that it is taking place.
The browning of America is at issue.
The usurpation of the Judeo-Christian ethic that America has known since its birth is under attack now.
And it's under attack by the Chinese, under attack by the Mexican left, it's under attack by the Saudis, it's under attack by the Russians.
You know, it's just across the board, all these different agencies and these globalists are attacking the United States.
But it's not just the foreigners, because there are corporations There are people, you know, I think there's Bill Gates.
I think there's Zuckerberg at Facebook.
I think there are others who are engaged in an all-out blatant attack on the United States of America on the Constitution.
And we hold several truths to be self-evident.
I don't want to sound like a constitutionalist or anything, but the freedoms that we hold Uh, we hold dear.
And those are expression, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom to assemble.
All these things have been under a vicious attack since 2019.
They're all set forth in the United States Constitution and our Bill of Rights.
And this is just an ongoing attack.
I think a lot of it is sponsored by the Aspen Institute, because one of the corporals from the Army ended up taking the job, I think, as the president of the Aspen Institute.
And this is all in a framework to dismantle, as she says, to dilute the United States, to flood it with people, and to change the operative effect of America.
And I think that when we look at what's going on, we especially see what happened in Wuhan.
And that was, you know, I've always said that was the first attack on the United States.
And it's just an ongoing and increasing in magnitude and amplification.
I just want to say two other things.
One, You have governors like Whitmer in Michigan, you have governors like Newsom in California, who shut us down, who made us mask, who mandated vaccines, who told people they couldn't work, and put them off of employment.
So we see these, these shocking examples of infringement of freedom of people of the United States.
And yet, there's a, there's like this tacit approval, the corporations are, you know, Big Pharma, Big Pharma is just all all over because it's nothing but profiteering big media is all over it because it's nothing but profiteering national public radio i remember i was driving out to santa monica i was just trying to get away from all the vaccine crap i turn on national public radio and all it is is facts get vaccinated get vaccinated get vaccinated
i mean it's just horrific in terms of its breadth scope and determination there is in my mind no question that there are corporations there are foreign entities that are absolutely convinced on destroying the united states while we americans sit by and a
Let it happen with our tacit approval, because all we want to do is make it through the next week, pay for our gas, pay for our food, and see our friends and neighbors, and do so in a very loving fashion.
But I think this isn't it.
Like I said, there are a myriad of examples of this in interactions between President Obama and Enrique Peña Nieto in Mexico.
You can just follow some of the legislation.
Let me introduce this to you.
The nation of Mexico is working hand-in-hand with the state of California through its consulates to introduce into California what are called centers.
hold on, it's communities to have them start introducing, teaching people more English and teaching English more Spanish so that the population in California teaching people more English and teaching English more Spanish so that the population in California becomes essentially bilingual, but with a pushing it more and more and more.
This is the beginning of the transformation of the United States.
I've been hollering it and shouting from the rooftops.
Jerome Corsi wrote it about it in the great late USA.
And now Laura Logan has it.
And thank God in heaven, now Steve Bannon's got it too. - Wow.
Well, thanks for that David.
Polly, your thoughts. - Well, I had heard this before.
I think it was Amnesty International.
I remember they used to be on my college campus when I was in school, and they were always talking about open borders and how people should just be able to travel and be free and go whatever country they want to at any given time.
That's freedom for everyone.
And then, do you remember the journalist Benjamin Fulford, who was in Japan, talking about how he's Canadian, he's a Canadian citizen, and he said that there was a big globalist plan, basically, to combine Canada, the United States, and basically all of North America, at least, Mexico.
And he was saying it would be good as a redraw, as a global system, because it would Make things better for the Canadians and for people in Mexico, which could very well be the case.
Maybe their situation will improve, particularly under Trudeau.
It seems pretty obvious.
Things are dire for the Canadians with the lockdowns, but I think it would lessen the United States' power.
We would need, well, we'd just scrap the Constitution at that point.
I don't think Canada and Mexico would take the United States Constitution and have to be Complete redrawing of America or the new corporation, it would be a re recharging of a corporation, if you will.
And so that's kind of the thoughts on that.
And I definitely think that we're seeing a complete.
Restructuring of America as far as population wise, I think that, you know, the arguments constantly made that we need immigrants because the population is collapsing.
Well, if you look at the number of people who are actually having children, especially after the lockdowns, it's just not happening.
I just don't see babies anymore.
And I know that's just me saying that, but I really just don't see that anymore.
So there's a big restructuring as far as bringing people into the United States because I think Obama is a good example of why the Founding Fathers said no one who is not a naturally born citizen of the United States should ever serve as president, and he has betrayed the nation in a way more grotesque than any American could ever have imagined.
Meanwhile, you murderous hybrids, outrage ensues after the Atlantic suggests amnesty for the pandemic authoritarians who brought about so many deaths, who have devastated our lives for a virus with a 99% survival rate.
We need to forgive one another for what we did and said when we were in the dark about COVID, said Brown Professor Emily Oster.
Just absolutely stunning.
A huge lockdown proponent who now wants mercy from the one shot.
They acknowledge it.
We were in a state of deep uncertainty and then tried to work together and move forward, except they weren't in the dark about COVID.
There were many sources pointing out actual science ran contrary to the claims.
They ran a mass media campaign.
It wasn't a simple matter of overreaction.
There was collusion to remove all counter-information.
Nice try, Emily.
As Michael Singer put it, there's a lot wrong here.
First, no, you don't get to advocate policies that do extraordinary harm to others against their wishes and then say, we didn't know any better at the time.
One epic winter threat.
Claremont Institute senior fellow Matthew Peterson excoriates Auster's entire premise.
Hey!
Sorry you lost your job because of the vaccine doesn't work and your grandmother died alone and you couldn't have a funeral and your mother's business was needlessly destroyed and your kids have weird heart problems.
Let's just admit we were all wrong and call a truce.
It's too bad we shut the entire economy down and took on tyrannical powers that had never been used before.
Looking back, you should have been able to go to church and use public park while we let people riot in the streets.
But it was a confusing time for everyone.
Hey!
I'm sorry we scared the hell out of you and lied for years and persecuted and censored everyone who disagreed, but there was an election going on and we really wanted to beat Donald Trump, so it was important to radically politicize the science, even if it destroyed your children's lives.
Okay, yes, we said unvaccinated people should die and not get health care, while never questioning Big Pharma once.
But we are compassionate people.
Which is why, even though we shut down your entire economy, we also bankrupted the nation caused in place.
You're welcome.
Let's be friends.
This is absolutely stunning stuff.
A minority of the media and Democrat demanded these people be removed from society and jury-subjected to scorn and ridicule the anti-vaxxers.
Now, in a moment many of us knew would eventually come, apologies are being made for how the unvaccinated were treated.
As Fox wrote, The Premier of Alberta, Canada, says she's working on a Blandin Park resident who were fined or arrested for breaking coronavirus protocols.
Apologize!
Unvaccinate Canadians who face discrimination!
In New York, a Supreme Court found that employees who were fired from their jobs for being unvaccinated were entitled to compensation.
The court found being vaccinated does not prevent an individual from contracting or transmitting COVID.
Mayor Eric Adam claimed earlier that his administration would not rehire employees who have been fired over their vaccination status.
They would not rehire them.
The problem was not ignorance of the facts.
It was organized antagonism and censorship against anyone presenting data contrary to the mandate agenda.
This is saying aside, proclamations like those from the L.A.
Times argue that mocking the death of anti-vaxxers might be necessary and justified.
After two years of this type of arrogant nonsense, it's hard to imagine people are going to be willing to pretend as if all is well.
The active effort to shut down any opposing data is root crime, though, and no, it can never be forgotten or forgiven.
People are livin'.
Bill McMorris tweets, They were tossing terminally ill people off the organ transplant list and now call for mercy.
Carrie Lake tweets, I want to have a commission to investigate COVID, how it was handled in this state, and not have any civil or criminal charge need to be made because we're not just going to forget what happened when our lives were turned upside down.
Or roll a Tassimo.
This is where I spent the last seven months with my mother before she died alone on December 3rd, 2020.
You murderous hypocrites have nothing but my undying contempt wrought in hell.
Dr. Sidney Watson, reshaping this because let's forgive, right?
Nope.
As QTR further notes, Americans whipped themselves up into such a terrified hypnotic frenzy they found themselves clinging to big government to impose their will, advocating for the same draconian and fascist-sounding policies they always claimed to be fighting against.
Here's examples.
Fines for the unvaccinated.
58% of voters would oppose a proposal for federal or state government to fine Americans who choose not to get a vax.
House arrest.
59% of Democrats would favor a policy requiring citizens remain confined to their homes at all times if they refuse to get a vax.
Imprisonment for questioning the Vax.
Nearly half Democrats think federal and state governments should be able to fine or impose individuals who publicly question the efficacy of the existing Vax on social media, TV, radio, and online or digital.
Forced quarantine.
45% of Democrats would favor governments requiring citizens to temporarily live in designated facilities or locations if they refuse to get Vax.
Stripping people of their children.
29% of Democrats would support removing parents' custody of children if parents refuse to take the facts.
More than twice the level of support in the electorate.
7% of Republicans.
11% of unaffiliated.
Unbelievable.
Unsurprisingly.
The American Federation of Teacher Chief Warry Weingarten, who flunked the pandemic by pushing school shutdowns as long as she possibly could before parents revolted, is a big fan of amnesty.
One cannot help but notice the timing of the Atlantic's appeal for passive forgetfulness coincides with the swiftly approaching midterm elections, to which polls suggest a much greater chance of a conservative upset than Democrats previously expected.
Though the Atlantic won't admit it, There's a growing political backlash in the last two years of meaningless lockdowns and mandates, where Democrats were instrumental in implementing both.
A large swath of the population is one party that caused so much of the COVID-era strife.
Perhaps the mainstream is suddenly realizing they may have to pay some payback for the COVID solitary?
We didn't know.
We were just following orders.
It all sounds rather familiar.
David, your thoughts?
You don't want my thoughts on this.
First, it goes back to Event 201.
It goes back to Wuhan, China.
It goes back to COVID-19.
Two weeks to slow the spread turns into two years.
Stay at home.
Social distance.
You're getting locked down.
Your business is going to now be shut.
We're going to give you some money from the federal government and you don't have to pay it back.
But you're going to be shut down.
So what does that do to commerce?
And you have Governor Newsom, who I have always said in his speech in March of 2021, talked about using IA, an AI, artificial intelligence mechanism to control the phases artificial intelligence mechanism to control the phases of shutdown of lockdown.
So now you have, you know, he's he's gonna be running for office in another two years.
Absolutely not.
No way.
No way.
Biggest guy who's voted voted against the constitutional rights of Americans, you know, and pleading to be back in office.
I don't think so.
But you have all the personal people, all the harm that's been done, not only on people and their loved ones, but also on businesses that have been wiped out.
When they showed, I think it was Steve Bannon, showed how much money had filtered up to the wealthy, You know, you have Walmart, you have Home Depot, you have those big ownership entities that continue to stay open, and you've got the little hardware store on the corner that has to close, you got the little corner market that's got to close, you know, and then, oh, you can go back to work, but you've got to be vaccinated, you can go back to school.
If you're, listen to this, in the state of California, if you're going to the University of California with one of its 10 or 11 Universities, you have to be vaccinated and boosted to get into school.
I mean, it's just shocking when you now know that myocarditis has been recognized in thousands of kids between the ages of 20 and 30, that they're now going to have a disease that impacts the rest of their life, that probably takes them out of athletics, could cause a heart attack.
I mean, it's just shocking.
And then you have the whole vaccine creation, you know, Operation Warp Speed.
Here's this big, big pandemic, but within about three weeks or three months, they've suddenly got these three companies that come out with this miraculous mRNA solution to it.
And, you know, first we're going to recommend that you get the shot, but now we're going to mandate it.
You know, you have to get it to go back to work, to go back to school, to go back to college.
Or you're going to lose your job, you're going to join the doctors and nurses who are partying in hospitals.
So you see this, and then you have the election chaos.
And then you see the media frenzy, and you see this complete bastardization of everything we know in Western culture.
We see the attack on just every forefront.
Attacks on our families, attacks on our businesses.
Attacks on our bank accounts.
You know, I couldn't believe that you were just pointing out where it got, you know, that, hey, 29% of Americans, you know, supported the idea, or 25% of Democrats supported the idea of losing your job.
You know, how about the time when they were talking about rounding up the unvaccinated and putting them in camps?
I remember that.
I remember, like, my gosh, are they actually doing this in America?
We have this all going on.
We have it in the midst of a contested and disputed election.
We've got censorship just streaming out of the media.
And we've got Twitter and we've got Facebook that are shutting people down, censoring them, de-platforming them.
People build their businesses on these platforms and then suddenly they're just shut off.
They've got Shut off.
Quieted.
Hey, you're not adopting the party line.
You're not National Public Radio saying get vaccinated, get vaccinated, get vaccinated, get vaccinated, get vaccinated, get vaccinated, get vaccinated, get vaccinated.
That's all you hear for just months on end.
So what we see is when we see people advocating camps for the unvaccinated, penalties for the unvaccinated, you know, what we really are seeing is hyper-authoritarianism.
We're seeing violations of the Nuremberg Code.
We're seeing violations of constitutional rights.
You know, my question, when you think about it, is such a way as to materially affect democracy as we in the United States have experienced it.
And they have tacitly approved of myocarditis, of people developing blood clots and dying.
And there's evidence, I think, in the absence of trials or in trials that are taking place now that show people are being killed by these vaccines.
So the question is, has Big Pharma knowingly and intentionally allowed these vaccines to go on despite evidence that they kill people?
And I think the overwhelming The basic evidence shows that there are increased risks of myocarditis.
There's effects.
There are people who are dying suddenly, you know, and it really raises the question whether or not these CEOs should be targeted, should be brought to trial and tried for the actions that they took against the American people as a whole.
And I think it's high time that someone somewhere starts putting them on trial.
I think we all agree, David.
Well said.
Holly?
Well, I think there is overwhelming evidence of a RICO case going forward too.
Dr. David Martin has talked about that quite a bit as far as the collusion and the foreknowledge and following the patent laws and the filing of patents for all these different pharmaceuticals and everything leading up to the event.
And also, I think this is why That focus upon science and scientism and using that term so you know, trust the science and Well, we were just hammered with that, where it's like, you know, you're anti-science if you don't trust everything that these individuals say.
Well, guess what?
Now they can turn around and say, well, the science was flawed.
It wasn't us.
We had bad statistics.
It was the science.
And so they create this, you know, golem, if you will, of using this term of science and scientism.
And then they can turn around and blame all the facts and the figures and the science was incorrect, even though we were told to trust the science.
It's built up like a false religion, and then instead of going after the actual individuals who have filed these patents, etc., and corporations, then they can just blame this concept of the science, which was flawed at the time.
Very, very good.
Very nice point.
Yeah, Don?
Yeah, they want you to trust them and do good things.
You should never trust, but verify.
You should verify very much first before you ever consider even trusting anything.
Verify.
Do your own research.
Right, I think it was an attempt to violate free will, I think, too.
I mean, just quickly, and to convince people to give up their own power as individuals and, you know, for the greater good, or for your family, or you're going to kill grandma, or for your job, or your pension, or whatever they could throw at you, and to see what it would take for people to give up free will.
Yeah, if you give it up, you're giving up everything.
Do not.
Stand strong.
Verify.
Be tough.
Question everything.
Go ahead.
It was coercion and constraint to overcome informed consent, which they knew they could not provide.
Right.
Meanwhile, YouTube alternative and free speech champion Rumble refuses France's request to pull Russian news sources.
This is excellent.
A free speech champion refuses to bend the knee to the French government's demand for censorship.
Rumble's very public response has now placed it in boss status along with the likes of Elon Musk and Governor Ron DeSantis.
There's a general explanation of media and technology do not publish or broadcast Russian-backed media under the argument that to do so is to support and elevate Russian propaganda and misinformation.
The French government has demanded Rumble block Russian news sources.
Like Elon Musk, I won't move our goalposts for any foreign government.
Rumble will turn France off entirely.
France is not material to us, and we will challenge the legality of this demand.
Elon Musk tweets, Starlink has been told by some governments, not Ukraine, to block Russian news sources.
We will not do so unless at gunpoint.
Sorry to be a free speech.
Absolutely.
In many ways, the fear the left has of Rumble is the same they have of Musk and Twitter.
Rumble Chief and new Twitter owner have similar thoughts of what they should and shouldn't allow—to protect a free and open Internet.
No wonder the video content has increased interest for viewers of all stripes tired of big government and big tech deciding what they can and cannot consume from the Internet.
That's quite different than Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube, which have actively worked with DHS and FBI to decide what content is allowed and what is not.
Glenn Greenwald tweets, Think how important this story is.
France, like all EU states, legally barred any platform premiering RT or other Russian outlets, even if those platforms wanted to.
It's legally required to censor.
France demanded rebel obey.
It thought It's as though Rumble isn't a French company.
For those familiar, Russell Brand, too, has also spoken out about this.
About a month ago, known as a conservative but more thought of a progressive, talked about it.
He stated on one of his broadcasts that the NIH had added ivermectin when they were Uh, trialing the drug.
Once Brandon was aware of this accidental error, he issued a correction and an apology.
However, that wasn't enough for the YouTube watchdogs.
Gave him a one-time warning.
Interestingly, he pointed out that Rachel Maddow had said the same thing, and the video's still on-site.
The virus stops with every vaccination.
Pointing out that we all know it isn't true, he asked a great question.
Is there one standard for independent channels and another for mainstream?
Saying he would start broadcasting on Rumbly, observed, I support, love all of you.
If you love Donald Trump, I love you.
If you love Joe Biden, I love you.
I want us to create new systems together.
I don't believe these institutional systems in financial government or media are ever going to save ordinary people.
I believe we're at a point of crisis.
Things need to radically change and fast.
I think we'll be able to communicate more freely on Rumble.
Rumble's refusal should not be controversial.
Allegedly, we live in a plural society, welcoming those with different viewpoints.
Four shows in particular have a home at Rumble, from the Russian Sputnik, fault lines, political misfits, by any means necessary, and the backstory.
When By Any Means Necessary was blocked from YouTube, they tweeted a screenshot.
This is what democracy looks like in the U.S., folks.
These bans are quintessential corporate censorship and cahoots with the government's political agenda.
Our voice is being blocked not for what we say, but for who we are.
There was a time it was considered poor form to watch Al Jazeera.
Now it's almost considered mainstream.
I don't support the Russian invasion and the atrocities in Ukraine, but I know you can't—that you don't prove your point is better than another by silencing the counterargument.
Instead, you fight against unpopular opinion and those that boil your blood by countering that with your argument in the same space or same example for the rest of us to follow.
David, your thoughts?
Yeah, hallelujah.
I'm a big believer in freedom of speech.
I mean, you know, it is the end all be all of communication.
To coerce people is to take away the art of convincing people or persuading people.
And when you coerce people, you use force.
And that is not, it doesn't last, because when you use force, you get force, you open up the opposition of force.
You actually justify the use of force by the opposition.
So, when you have a allows the best ideas to rise to the top.
It's actually one of the fundamental precepts, one of the fundamental notions of our First Amendment.
The art of convincing people, the art of persuading people, is the art of convicting people to move in the right direction.
And it's something that takes place in the heart.
For years, I've always been great advocate of poetry because poetry has in it the power to change a person in their heart all at once.
And I just, I find that very comforting, much more so than being forced to make decisions at the threat of losing your job, threat of being ostracized from your family.
The fact that Rumble is taking on France, I'm delighted to hear it.
I'm surprised France, except for the fact that it doesn't surprise me under Macron, because I think that guy's a bloody idiot.
But I think it doesn't surprise me that it's taking place in France, but it kind of surprises me that France would take the position that has a right to censor and dispel and diminish free speech.
It's just shocking to me. - Holly. - Well, I think we have to see these other platforms step up.
I mean, there is some attempt to address some of the censorship that's going on.
But in so many ways, I mean, the internet, it's like too little, too late.
The internet is so censored.
And the chilling effect has really harmed so many people as well.
I mean, people self-censor now.
Society has really changed as far as what people are afraid to say now, especially online.
So these platforms that used to be Just open even like Twitter.
It's just not available now.
And I think even I would love to see more availability for people to speak the truth on some of these platforms.
I personally haven't had any issues with Rumble, but I've moved to so many different platforms at this point.
And I do self-censor.
I do.
I mean, it's just something that I've become accustomed to because that's Just how the internet has become.
And also this thread of the social credit system and everything like that, where people are going to be given a score based on what they think or do or say online is really out there.
And people need to be aware of that as well.
We've seen that with people's bank accounts being shut down, big tech going after people.
As Jim knows, we all know our lives can be destroyed over what's said or done online.
It's ridiculous.
Very nice.
Meanwhile, Earth is an oil-producing machine we're not running out.
Ever since M. King Hubbard in 1950 convinced the lobby with a peak oil theory that production would collapse and we'd exhaust our crude supplies, the clock has been running and running and will continue to run as technology and new discoveries show there's still an ocean of oil under our feet.
Engineering and Technology this week reported that BP, the company that once wanted to be known as Beyond Petroleum rather than British, is saying the world is no longer at risk of running out of resources.
Thanks to investment into supercomputer robotics and use of chemicals to extract the max from available resources, the accessible oil and gas reserve will almost double by 2050.
A VP official told the magazine energy resources are plentiful.
Concerns over running out of oil and gas have disappeared.
Things are so good, in fact, that they say with the use of innovative technologies, available fossil fuel resources could increase from the current 2.9 trillion of oil to 4.9 in 2050, almost twice as much as projected global demand.
It could even reach 7.5 trillion.
If exploration techniques advance even faster.
That backs up the idea Earth is actually an oil-producing machine.
We call energy such as crude oil and natural gas fossil fuels based on the assumption they're products of decaying organisms, maybe even dinosaurs, but the label is a misnomer.
Research has shown hydrocarbons are synthesized abiotically.
They're naturally produced by the Earth.
That imply hydrocarbons are produced chemically from carbon found in Earth's mantle.
Nature calls the product of the process an unexpected bounty of natural gas and building blocks of oil products.
So don't feel guilty about exploiting the bounty.
There's going to be plenty to go around, and there'll be still a lot left when technology, not hurried by government mandates and subsidies but guided by market forces, produce practical and affordable renewable energy.
But for now, Enjoy our cheap, abundant, and efficient fossil fuels.
The fact of the matter is, it's an infinite resource, and it's obviously a potential to reduce the cost of gas and oil dramatically, just at a time the green energy movement is trying to abolish completely.
I cannot imagine a more absurd agenda.
David, your thoughts. - Yeah, it just shocks me.
The, you know, I'm a big advocate of sustainable energy policy.
I think that to the extent possible, if we can use wind, if we can use the waves, if we can use solar, if we can use those as energy sources, I'm all behind it.
I think that's fine.
But I just think this, you know, the The terror of oil and gas and the terror of coal is not what we think it to be.
I think that, you know, I recognize the fact that they produce pollutants and those pollutants have to be minimized as much as possible.
But to the extent that, you know, it doesn't give us this license to just continue to producing pollutants.
So even though it operates on an abiogenetic, not platform, but on abiogenetic principles, that you have this ongoing sustainability of a supply that you have this ongoing sustainability of a supply of petroleum or hydrocarbon products to be used as fuel, still doesn't justify the amount of pollution.
So in that sense, in that sense, I get it.
We should be working more on pollution control.
And when we see things, when we see, for example, all the pollution taking place in China, I remember living in Los Angeles in the 60s.
It was terrible.
But since we got, you know, developed, you know, catalytic converters and other ingredients and the products of oil products themselves, we've done much better off.
But, you know, this era of electricity is going to be short.
I don't think it's going to be effective.
And I think it's going to be over soon.
And actually, the pollution problem has been coming down and down and down and down.
So that's grossly exaggerated, no justification for anything.
Holly, your thoughts?
Right, I think pollution has always been more of the issue than the scarcity, the manufactured scarcity of the Abiotic oil that we've seen, and that term's been thrown around as the scarcity of oil in order to control prices.
It was especially important with OPEC, and as we see OPEC collapsing, it's becoming more and more clear that there's plenty of oil and gasoline to go.
Around I don't approve of fracking.
I think there's there's got to be better ways to not poison the water supply and stuff like that by while addressing our need for oil and the dependence on it.
I mean, plastics, everything that they just all of this has to do with eugenics and creating the scarcity and reducing the population.
And so that's why they're creating.
Now that this, the idea that people are realizing that oil is abiotic, they've got to move us onto the credit card, the carbon credit structure and all this stuff that can just be completely made up.
They don't even need to have anything tangible.
They can just declare that, you know, you've utilized this many carbon credits, or you need to reduce your carbon.
And that way they can control the manufacturer's scarcity a lot easier than the oil scheme that they came up with as far as Yeah, that's a great point about fracking, by the way.
We don't need fracking!
There's plenty of oil to go around!
Meanwhile, a development in my case before the Supreme Court.
I have submitted a petition for a rehearing that is on the docket.
Get this, here it is, for the denial of a writ of certiorari, just filed on the 1st of November.
Included in my appendices is the FEMA manual for the Sandy Hook exercise.
Included is Connecticut FEMA, Schedule showing they had it on their agenda for the Sandy Hook Elementary.
Included is this scene where the crime scene vehicle is there either before the event took place or before they'd finished fabricating the data.
Included is an additional appendix studying crime scene photographs from inside Sandy Hook Elementary from the files of Connecticut State Police showing no blood, no bodies, No reason to believe there was any.
In fact, in the classroom, there's not only no blood and no bodies, there aren't even any students' chairs or desks.
In other words, there's no possible way they were conducting school here.
And you see all the furnishings pushed up against the wall?
There's not enough blood.
And this is coming, by the way, from a licensed private investigator in Texas.
There's not enough blood on the floor to convince me the events took place as described.
As we venture down, we find the shooter would have had to travel the corridor.
There's more about it.
Here's his conclusion.
At this point in time, my position is that the evidence appears to be more consistent with the alternative account of a FEMA exercise presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
Signed and warranted.
Brian Davidson, Panoramic Investigations.
David, your thoughts?
You know, Alex Jones just took a multi-million dollar hit, and it surprised me when— I'm sorry?
Billions.
Billions.
Yeah.
Hundreds of millions?
Okay, it took a huge hit.
But what surprised me was there wasn't a scientific review of the instance as alleged at Sandy Hook.
I would think after the insurance companies have to pony up this money, they'll be the first ones interested in ensuring that there is a moment-by-moment, second-by-second review of everything that took place At the elementary school when you see this site activation called down drill exercise plan, the testimony and all the other documentation.
I think it really supports the fact that your case ought to be reheard.
Yep.
David, the insurance company made an investment of 73 mil because they expect it's going to result in insurance being required for every gun and every gun owner, and they're going to make billions.
So they viewed it as an investment.
Paulie, your thoughts?
Well, I think your case is unique, Jim, because I know I'm going to be getting this wrong, but it's basically your argument in your case is that the judge was able to basically dismiss the desire of you to present evidence, right?
So this isn't even necessarily about, you know, the incident itself.
It's more about the judge, these judges who have been doing this en masse across the United States of just being able to You know, basically be activists and throw out whatever kind of evidence they want.
That's right.
That's right.
Wisconsin has a peculiar summary judgment that allows a judge to decide whether it's reasonable or not.
I mean, it's reasonable.
It might as well not exist.
And I'm saying this is all wrong.
Other states don't do that.
And the Supreme Court ought to correct it and make summary judgment standard and reinforced.
The right to a trial by jury for all 50 states, which historically, oddly enough, they have not done.
I can't imagine a more suitable case for the Supreme Court than mine.
Documented right here.
Meanwhile, finally, Let me just mention, the third annual False Flag and Conspiracy Conference will be held on the 3rd and 4th of December.
I'll be moderating.
It'll be broadcast through the internet.
You can find more about it if you go to jameshfetzer.org.
FFC-2022.
FFC for False Flag Conference 2022.
Get the speakers and biographies.
It's a wonderful lineup.
This is just about how many conspiracies we've had this year.
Stunning stuff, we all know.
How many books have been banned?
Some of the speakers, just wonderful.
Dina Pollard Sachs, Joaquin Hagopian, Catherine Horton, Dennis Camino, Joe Holson, William Binney, Scott Bennett, Russ Winter, Any comments?
I think we're there, my friend.
Well, yeah.
name, Ron Avery, Alexander Baker, Oli Dhammigard, Monique Lukens, Alex Scott.
Again, jameshfetzer.org/ffc-2022-speaker-biographies/.
Don't want to miss it.
I think we're there, my friend.
Well, yeah.
Any comments first?
Hey, listen, best of luck in your conference.
I'll tell you one thing.
It's really opened my eyes to look at events in terms of analyze them from the perspective of whether or not it might be a false flag put on by some Democratic Party.
Well, I'm definitely excited to be on the list again this year.
I had the pleasure of presenting last year on Shays' Rebellion, which was the event during the American Revolution.
So hopefully I'll have another interesting presentation this year.
And thanks for another year of doing videos with you guys as well.
And I know I do have my PayPal and my Patreon going.
I've got a GoFundMe too for what happened to me with Hurricane Ian just over A month ago so fundraising so hopefully I'll have a permanent studio set up here this soon or definitely by next year.
John you want to take us out?
Okay well we've been pursuing truth here and always pursuing truth versus news on this 6th of November right before the election and what a time it is and what a show this has been.
I mean this shows this shakes you up I mean we've already hit some heavy targets here and I think it's really been worth it so you want to share this and Get ready to come back next week.
We thank you so much for your time and interest in our show.
▲
Export Selection