All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 7, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:01:15
Truth vs. NEW$ Part 1 (6 November 2022) with Don Grahn, David Kenney, and Holly Seeliger
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome, folks, to Truth vs. News Incorporated.
I'm Don LaGuardia, producer at JD.Consultants at live.com, and we're live today.
It's November the 6th, two days before the big election.
There's 10 months left in this year of 2022, and, oh, it's been building as far as tensions and things.
Hopefully, we're going to get some relief here soon, but we've had A lot to report and the news has been awesome and we have the best people to report it.
Of course, we have here Jim Fletcher, the most dangerous mind in America, who is just on top of the news and on top of the Supreme Court and everything else these days with this case.
He's just doing everything.
He's wonderful.
And then we also have David Kinney, Los Angeles attorney, who's doing this fantastic work.
Exposing corruption.
Imagine that in Los Angeles, in the school boards.
And then we have Holly Seeliger, who's living in Florida now, and getting adjusted down there and coming back strong after being blown away by Fort Myers.
But we have some great stories here, Jim.
I guess we have to start off with Well, Zelensky says, don't worry about nuclear war.
Nothing to see here.
Just move on.
No need to fear Russia's ultimatums or take them seriously, he tells us.
The threat of a nuclear conflict does exist, but he doesn't see it as a likely possibility.
There's no need to be afraid of Russia.
Kiev will not make any compromises with Moscow.
We will only settle for victory, including Crimea.
If they do not leave Donbass and Crimea, it would not mean the end of the war, meaning the war will not end.
Meanwhile, he said the fact that Ukraine had not created a strong security and defense system in over 30 years of independence was its biggest mistake.
Moscow has repeatedly signaled it was ready for negotiations and the conflict.
In October, however, he rejected the very idea.
Putin thus vowed to defend Russia's territory and people using all the forces and resources we have.
Meanwhile, massive U.S.
preparation for a direct war with Russia.
This is very, very disturbing.
Military assets are being moved into place.
The U.S.
is deploying F-15s into Romania.
The Air Force Carrier Strike Group is moving into the Mediterranean.
Troops are being moved into Eastern Europe.
Very, very quietly, three weeks ago, the U.S.
began loading M1A1 and M1A2 Abrams drags on roll-on roll-off vessels in the U.S., sending them to Greece, and that they have been unloaded.
The U.S.
has also sent 35,000 to 45,000 U.S.
troops in the same time period.
It's the equivalent of one armored division.
Prior to this, the U.S.
had the equivalent of one armored division in all of Europe.
Now we have enough for three or two armored and two or three infantry.
Tomorrow, the Pentagon will begin airlifting weapons to Ukraine, so Russia's efforts to avoid conflict by diplomatic negotiation have been flatly and deliberately rejected.
The West clearly wants war, and it looks as though they're going to get what they want.
Here, however, is the problem.
If NATO enters any conflict, then all NATO countries will immediately become legitimate targets for Russia to attack, including the United States.
Given the fact Russia has hypersonic missiles the U.S.
cannot defend again, things won't go so well for us here.
You have precious little time to top off preps to keep you and your family safe, warm, and dry.
Serious, serious situation.
David, your thoughts?
Well, you know, I'm not afraid of a war with Russia.
I'm more afraid of the idiocy coming out of Kiev.
I think that's what we have to be most afraid of.
Zelensky's got no geopolitical experience.
His leadership of the Ukrainian people is suicidal, in my opinion.
It does nothing to enhance or to inspire people to want to go and lay down their lives for a country that's taking it in the shorts and continuing to do so.
So, Zelensky, as far as I'm concerned, is guiding his country into perilous waters.
I think they're going to quit wanting to die for his dream, which includes the Donbass and Crimea.
And, you know, I think it's a time that he needs to start compromising and do so quickly.
My understanding is there was a compromise already in effect back in March or April and the United States squished it.
And then when you see the recent movement by the United States, by the Biden administration, I just think he's out of his blinking mind to go over there and to start escalating with B-52 bombers I've heard are now en route.
This is just nothing but escalation in the face of an imminent election.
I hear that I just see this as being a mistake of monumental proportions by Zelensky.
telling everybody to be out of the city by 11-7-22, which is the day, of course, before our elections.
But I just see this as being a mistake of monumental proportions by Zelensky.
When I hear Jamie Raskin noting the success of the Ukrainian military because it's pro-feminist, pro-gay, and pro-trans, I just think this guy's got the wrong, wrong, wrong view of geopolitical and doesn't have any support whatsoever.
I think it's a tragedy in the making.
Putting it mildly.
Holly, your thoughts.
Yes, I think it's pretty obvious that Zelensky and the people in Ukraine, we've seen this going back at least to the color revolution in 2014.
It was to dismantle Ukraine, to genocide or kill as many people as possible in that area, to displease people, to have that society collapse.
I don't know exactly what for.
I don't know if it's part of a greater restructuring of the East and West, if it's part of the New Silk Road initiative or BRICS or it's America's attempt to try to undermine that by destabilizing the region.
So the region between, obviously, between Russia and Germany and Europe as well, trying to make sure that there isn't a trade or any availability to trade between Europe and Russia as well, and kind of positioning, using that as a strategic position geopolitically to destroy using that as a strategic position geopolitically to destroy this region, keep it destabilized so that the United States, mostly just contractors and all the money laundering that we see under the Biden administration can continue.
And the point of Zelensky is just to destroy that nation.
It should be obvious to the people of Ukraine that the enemy is there in Ukraine and destroying and murdering the people there.
Yeah.
Ukraine is corrupt.
Loudspeakers, yes, as David was alluding, leave the city by November 7th.
Very strange.
Something is wrong, and it looks something really wicked is in the works.
Cars with loudspeakers are driving all through Pearson, warning citizens they must evaporate the city by November 7th.
Evacuation been going on for over a week.
The Russian flag has even been taken down.
What we have here is workers have been going about being told to leave.
Checkpoint posts in multiple locations have been empty now.
There's already widespread rampant public speculation, even the media.
This may be an attempt by Russia to create a 15 to 30 kilometer no man's land to lure the Ukrainians into a trap.
Others are speculating, and this is mere speculation, that Russia is going to lure Ukrainians into the area and vaporize it with tactical nukes and tell NATO, if you enter Ukraine, your countries will get this, too.
I find that, frankly, a bit much.
Whatever is actually taking place, the now-established fact is cars with loudspeakers are driving around Kirsten, telling citizens they must be out.
The day before the midterm elections here in the U.S.
Many have speculated the Democrats are going to try to prevent their shellacking in the midterm.
If Russia were to nuke Pearson on November 7th, there could very well be an actual nuclear exchange that very day.
The Democrats could then use nuclear war as an excuse to remain in power, even though there are no aspects of the Constitution or statutory law that allows for such a Rescheduling or avoidance of the election.
The terms for office of members of Congress expire.
Once the date in January comes, there are simply no longer office holders.
There are term ends.
There's no emergency or presidential order can change that fact.
Then there's the very fair question of why November 7th?
Why would Russia blame the U.S.
election by picking that particular date?
It cannot be a coincidence.
For quite a while, some folks considered to be on the fringe have argued this is all theater.
COVID, Ukraine, we're all of it.
That was planned years in advance.
Either a bread and circus is for the masters or a true effort to smash the world through catastrophe and fear into a new world order.
When you also factor that Russia went full COVID with the vaccine lockdowns, it seems entirely possible a small group of those who told us all these events are scripted might be right.
Whoever's right, something looks very, very wrong.
Remember, Congress cannot extend its terms of office under any circumstance.
Since 1935, in accord with the 20th Amendment, Congress has begun and ended at noon on January 3rd of odd number years.
Each two-year Congress typically includes two legislative sessions, though a third or a special were common in the past.
Afternoon on January 3rd, they no longer have constitutional power.
If they remain there after an election, it will be actual tyranny.
Meanwhile, Mike Adams warns, unmanned aerial vehicles over Ukraine appear to be equipped with biological—the capacity to spray—biological contaminants.
Evidence suggests a U.S.-NATO bioweapon operation are actually taking place in and around Ukraine, and that Russia's efforts are to dismantle the threat to the world.
The Russian Permanent Representative to the U.N.
revealed disturbing information in a recent speech about unmanned aerial vehicles with 30-liter containers and equipment that can be used to spray bio-agents.
Three such were identified on March 9 in the Kherson region.
A month later, ten more.
These are of particular importance considering a confirmed request from the Ukrainian side with regard to the unmanned aerial vehicle manufacturer about the maximum payload and the ability to equip with an aerosol generating system with a 20-plus liter capacity.
It turns out as of March 3rd, 2015, there was a U.S.
patent linked to these strange weapons they could actually be hauling biological in Ukraine.
U.S.
legislation requires a patent issue with a complete description of the actual machine assembly used, suggesting the U.S.
has, in fact, created and now potentially unleashing a bioagent-delivering aerial system to use against Russia.
Ukraine has failed to mention any of this activity or research dating back to 2016.
Ukraine has also failed to report funding it has received from foreign state militaries that is required in order to prevent or reduce the occurrence of ambiguity, doubts, and suspicions.
This thus raises the question of a violation of political obligations regarding the submission of data on confidence-building measures adopted by the stated parties to the Biological Weapons Agreement.
U.S. report also misses data on the programs and projects implemented outside of U.S. territory.
The specific section that the U.S. and Ukraine appear to be a violation of include Articles 1 and 4.
David, your thoughts.
Well, you know, I think back and I recall that during the Trump administration, there was all this concern about Biden's activities in the Ukraine.
Ukraine.
There was all this activity by Hunter Biden in the Ukraine.
There's all this activity by Hunter Biden in Ukraine.
We all see this activity starting about 2015, 2016 during the era of the Obama administration.
We all see this activity starting about 2015-2016 during the era of the Obama administration.
The fact that these threats started and then followed in the midst of the Trump administration really just leads me to believe that these biological threats and weapons threats have been lurking since 2013-14.
2015-16 when I think they were amplified by the Obama administration.
We see it, of course, in event 2001.
We also see the Wuhan release.
We have two weeks to slow the spread, which turns into stay home, turns into lockdown, social distancing, shutting down businesses, getting free money at marginal expense.
We have Governor Newsom out here in California locking down the entire state.
We have people locked out of churches.
We have businesses shut.
We've got our schools shut.
We've got all this going on.
And like we've been saying, Jim, for a couple of years, this has been evidence of a growing imminent threat that precursors to a national war.
And war is breaking, war is starting to break out now.
And if anybody denies that, just take a look at the headlines.
Well, remember, all's fair in love and war.
And it wouldn't surprise me if the United States and its contractors have developed agents that can deliver biological weapons.
Certainly the COVID-19, in my opinion, was the first instance of a bioweapon.
And I think is, I guess Bill Gates said it when he kind of laughed and snickered and said, wait till you see the next round.
But I think that the, I think this presents a threshold issue, which is every American and every human being, I don't care where you are, have to begin to ask themselves, does this intentional, do these have to begin to ask themselves, does this intentional, do these intentional acts by politicians leading to the killing or the genocide of people justify our immediate intervention and the removal of those political people from
No.
And I think so.
And I'm hoping on November 8th, Everyone in the United States will not, you know, vote the Democratic Party out of contention.
I just don't think they're responsible, they're flippant, and we're just heading into disaster after disaster.
The whole nation feels that way, David.
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, I'm very concerned about a lot of the early voting and the way that a lot of different states are doing their early voting right now.
I think we have a repeat, in some ways, of a bunch of ballots suddenly appearing or disappearing.
It should be pretty obvious to the American people which party is set to lose a bunch of seats here in the United States.
I think that there is preparation.
Democrats would probably try to up this Ukrainian-Russian war, if not physically, just through the propaganda here in the United States.
If they can't get Russia to jump in with a world war, they would love that.
It would be another opportunity for them to money launder, for them to drum up You know, the support as far as financially, so they can continue money laundering, it would be a break from the media, the inflation, the economy, everything that's collapsing here in the United States, the coming food issues that we're seeing, infrastructure issues here in the United States.
And then as far as biological weapons or the haplotargeting that's been, you know, I don't know if they're successful with this or not, or what the long-term prospects are of this, I think
There are ways in which people can heal even despite being injected with some of this, but we do know there were whistleblowers, journalists, people talking about how Eastern Europeans, particularly in Georgia, there were several bioweapons labs funded by the United States and some of these offset groups.
And then, of course, We had found out about some of the bioweapons labs, which were all throughout Ukraine as well, trying to create this haplotargeting of Russian people and Eastern European people.
People complaining about this, particularly being very vocal about it since the 2004 color revolution over there and the United States and the Lugar Center under Obama, all of this really exploding as far as them trying to hop below target certain people over there.
So I think Eastern Europeans and Russians have been keenly aware of the attempt to try to wipe out people through bioweapons for several years now.
Very good.
Very good.
Meanwhile, even white suburban women favor the GOP by 15 points and prefer Donald Trump over Joe Biden.
Fascinating.
White suburban women—this has been a mainstay of the Democrat Party—are moving away from the Democrats by 27 points since August.
These women represent 20% of the electorate, a key indication which party will control Congress after the midterm.
Among their greatest concern is soaring inflation.
66% say inflation is causing major financial hardship, up from 54% in August.
Moreover, a similar percentage believe Biden's economy is in a recession.
Seventy-four percent say the economy is headed down the wrong track.
Abortion, the issue Democrats have most touted, is less relevant than the sagging economy.
It's absolutely true.
These women have shifted their gaze more on the economy than abortion, said Democrat pollster Molly Murphy.
Overall, 74% of white suburban women said the nation is headed in the wrong direction.
Only 65% said so in August.
And that, of course, is usually the key indicator of how a midterm is going to poll.
Biden's approval rating among the demographic has also shrunk.
It was above water, 51 to 48, in August.
But now it's underwater, 38 to 60.
Former President Trump is more favored than Biden in 2024.
If the election were now between Biden and Trump, 41% of white suburban women said they'd vote for Biden, but 52% for Trump.
In August, 55% said Biden and 39% Trump.
Hillary insists women, the voters, just don't understand how important the election is.
Of course.
With Joy Reid, who's a major propagandist for MSNBC, she said, With all the noise we got in this election season, I don't think people really grasp how important it is.
I'm not sure they understand the threats to their way of life.
Represented, of course, she believed, by the Republicans, but I think actually the public understands the threat is from the Democrats.
Even the Washington Post, a liberal venue, admits that GOP loves Trump and that the Democrats dislike Biden.
The mega love for Trump dwarfs the temperate support for Biden even the Washington Post now concedes.
He's unpopular with members of his own party, often self-servingly calling for him not to run again.
He's also already the oldest president in history, older at the start of his first term than Ronald Reagan at the end of his second.
Bob lamented, Biden's hits at a run for re-election, despite tabloid support soaring inflation and a sagging economy, is troublesome.
Trump may need to be treated for a sprain after winking so aggressively at the idea of running for his office again.
He pointed to the results of a YouGov poll where Republicans are strongly coalescing between Trump or DeSantis, while Democrats are fractured and unsure whom they would support.
Democrats, despite having the incumbent, are more splintered in how they view the field.
Republicans are more likely to say DeSantis or Trump.
Republicans were or are more likely to identify Trump as DeSantis than Democrats to say the same of Biden.
Indeed, nine candidates pass a 20% mark in terms of the Democrat Party, even though they have an incumbent.
David, your thoughts?
Yeah, the thought of Biden making it long enough to run for reelection is stunning to me.
I think he'll you know, I think I forget what was that the 25th Amendment will be used against Biden.
I think they're running late on that.
You know, it doesn't surprise me that white women in America have abandoned the Democratic Party.
You know, look at two things just before we even get to economics.
You've seen kids pulled out of school.
You've seen them subjected to mandatory vaccination.
I think those two things alone are enough to just rile any parents against any administration.
You've also seen new members of our armed forces subjected to mandatory vaccinations.
Those kids have parents.
So it doesn't surprise me that white women have abandoned the Democratic Party.
And I think you're going to see more of it.
I think the Democratic Party, quite frankly, is toast.
And I think you can thank Obama.
And I think you can thank Eric Holder.
Thank Anthony Blinken.
And you can kiss Biden's ass goodbye.
Holly.
Well, I think at the end of the day, if you're talking about like suburban white women, which is like a dwindling number of people in the United States anyway, but I think they're the ones traditionally who would go to the grocery store and do the but I think they're the ones traditionally who would go to the grocery store and do the shopping, kind And they're just getting completely punched in the wallet over the past couple of years.
It's just not even feasible to make ends meet as far as inflation right now.
So I think at the end of the day, they have to look around and say, look, You know, 6 months or a year ago, we could afford twice the amount of groceries that we're purchasing at this point.
And I think also the school closures over the past couple of years has really destroyed families and destroyed children's educational prospects right now.
So we're seeing these horrific statistics coming out right now of children.
Oh, their math and literacy levels have just completely collapsed over the past couple of years.
And this next generation of kids, they're in school.
In some states, they went through two years without schools being open.
And I think that this is really coming to head.
I used to live in Michigan during the lockdowns, and I don't think Gretchen Whitmer was even put into office legally in the first place.
She's running for re-election against a woman named Tudor Dixon, and she's got many children, and she's a mom, and she's really sick of what has gone on with Michigan, and Gretchen Whitmer was straight up lying, saying that the schools in Michigan were only closed for two months.
They were closed for over a year, and kids were not allowed to go back to school.
The online learning was absolutely atrocious.
That, like I said, the math and English levels are just really completely collapsed.
These kids can't even read.
They can't even look at each other in the face.
We were complaining about this when talking about masking kids for several years.
How are they even going to have any sort of emotional intelligence at this point?
We've seen what few children are actually being born and going through school at this point are severely behind right now.
And so much of that parents and mothers can look at the Democratic Party for, unfortunately.
Oh yeah, the devastation has been enormous and kids don't even know how to form words because they don't have the expression and how to interact.
Social interaction learning has been a calamity.
It's been truly a catastrophe, a cultural catastrophe.
Meanwhile, you're screwed.
Fetterman can't even convince Don Lamond that he's fit to serve.
In the News and Wide Matters, BlazeTV host Sarah Gonzalez and guests discussed Democrat candidate from Pennsylvania Fetterman's disastrous interview with CNN host Don Lamont, who immediately questioned him on whether he intends to let doctors take questions from the press before the election.
Fetterman's answer could best be described as word salad.
Do you think it'd help if you let your doctor leave the press before election night, Lamont asked?
I think we've been pretty transparent.
You know, we've had our doctor just to be very clear that they're what we're able to and to fit to to to serve.
From my point, you know, we've been we've also been very transparent in terms of showing up at the debate and very transparent about, you know, Having events in front of thousands and thousands of Pennsylvanians for months, and I was again, no, it was no secret that I was going to miss some words.
I was going to mush some words together, and as we've been very clear in the debate and during this interview, I've been using captioning as well too.
I believe we've been plenty transparent to give all the voters to make it their choice.
Wow.
I'm asking a question for the voters because the voters may ask.
Is there a reason you don't want your doctors to take questions?
That's why I keep asking.
Long pause.
Fetterman adds, I just believe that we have a doctor just weighing in on that and they believe that I'm fit to serve.
Sarah questioned Fetterman's claims of transparency, that he's refused questions, requests to release his full medical records.
And you know, and this guy, Lamont, this CNN hack, who is actually pressing you in this manner, and you're a Democrat, you're screwed.
Watch the clip.
Meanwhile, another.
Watch Ho's face as her Democrat guest destroys her theory and admits how bad the Democrats have screwed things up.
Americans are sick and tired of the Democrats' failed policy, destroying the states they live in.
And the thriving state of Florida is a best example of what happens when strong Republican leaders take charge.
Under DeSantis, Florida stood out as one of the freest and most prosperous states in the nation, even as the federal government pushes its devastating COVID tyranny.
With Democrats steering federal policy, America's decline has been painfully obvious.
Despite how dumb the Dems may think voters are, they know exactly who's at fault.
Even some Dems within Florida have realized what an incredible job DeSantis and other local Republican leaders have done.
The former mayor of Miami Beach, Democrat Phil Levine, acknowledged during a recent sit-down with CNN, where he delivered remarks the liberal hosts were not pleased to hear.
He said the Democrats don't stand a chance of winning Florida, saying they're too little, too late.
He said Florida's been hitting on all cylinders, and I'm a Democrat telling you this.
Levine thinks Florida is a lock for the Republicans.
Watch the priceless reaction from the smug left-wing host when he tells them exactly that.
David, your thoughts?
Well, you know, it's kind of like, you know, the Democratic Party has two options.
They They can default to the likes of Fetterman.
So it just seems that the party itself is imploding.
And when it comes to a Democratic Party steering public policy, I beg to differ with that.
It's a political party that's flying the aircraft into the ground.
You know, what we've seen, you know, we've had doctors and nurses at hospitals having parties during the middle of the COVID.
We've had all these forced vaccines.
We've had people losing their jobs.
We've had, you know, people providing essential services and then being just beaten to death by the pulp of what the Democratic Party leaves for us in terms of public policy.
And then how dare they approach the American people and say, trust us.
I mean, look what they've done to us over the last two years.
Just in two years, we've been subjected to unbelievable tyranny.
Fetterman is a classic example of what Holly was talking about, where you get people coming out of the pandemic and I've heard.
They can't execute their thoughts.
They have difficulty in delivering just common ideas or expressing themselves.
So when we see the likes of Kamala Harris and Fetterman, I think the Democratic Party is, for all intents and purposes, doomed.
- Have hurt.
Holly. - Yeah, I don't think really they can rebrand themselves coming back from this.
I mean, I think a new party or something like that's going to have to form after.
It's so obvious that it's basically just corporatization and big tech and money laundering and everything that, you know, even the few redeeming qualities that they had, you know, like pro-union or pro-working class or just basic appealing to To working class Americans, they can't even relate to their base anymore.
So they have nothing really to go off of at this point.
So they're going to have to completely rebrand.
And that's why I'm very concerned about some sort of big event, false flag thing tying in around the election season, because they have to just keep going bigger and bigger as far as threatening people and trying to obfuscate from rigging the elections at this point.
Yes, yes, yes.
Indeed.
Not only that, but nearly.
8 out of 10 Americans believe the country's out of control.
Democrats are breaking hard to the GOP.
79% of Americans believe the country's out of control.
Only 21% saying things are under control.
It's stunning.
Here's a CBS poll.
This is since the dark Biden was unleashed upon the country.
It's been downhill for the Democrats.
Eight out of ten voters think the country is out of control, and of those who think it's out of control, 58% are voting Republican, 34% Democrat.
Views on the direction of the economy are similar.
73% believe things are going badly in America, 42% very badly.
in America, 42%, very badly.
Only 26% say things are going well, 6% very well.
69% say the economy's bad.
40% very bad.
27% say the economy is good.
7% say very good.
I have no idea where they come from.
On a generic ballot, the Republicans have a two-point advantage.
Actually, that represents quite a bit more, because there are many conservatives who do not participate in these polls.
So historically, it's probably like a six-point advantage, generically.
Independents favor Republicans by an astonishing 49 to 33 percent.
Two weeks ago, the Democrats were favored 40 percent to 38.
Look at the reversal.
October 14th, Democrats were plus 2.
October 28th, Republicans plus 16.
Stunning stuff.
Independents Generic, GOP, plus 16.
Biden, job approval, disapproval, 68.
Approval, 32.
Intensity, strongly disapproved, 52 percent.
Strongly approved, only 12.
Meanwhile, with just over a week to go before the midterm, the latest battleground tracker finds Republicans within single digits among Hispanics.
Even Hispanics are going heavily for the Republicans.
The poll offers a myriad of questions on many topics.
One stood out was the failure of the Biden admin to buy political support by draining the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to lower gas prices at the pump after Biden's own policies had raised him several dollars per gallon.
Only 11% credit Biden and the Dems for the price of gas.
52% blame them.
Similar numbers for the economy.
Meanwhile, the Republicans have an edge with more voters on who economic policy would help them more.
46% Republicans, 40 Democrats.
Just as more than half voters blame Biden and the Democrats for the economy and gas prices.
Obama said he took a shellacking in 2010.
Bush said he took a thumping in 2006.
What will Biden say?
Call next week's election.
It's going to be a slaughter.
Trying to figure out how Biden won a record low of only 16.7% of all U.S.
counties, yet supposedly won the election with the most votes in history.
Gee, I wonder how he did it.
David, your thoughts?
Well, the way he did it was election fraud.
The Democratic Party under Joe Biden as its front person with the behind the scenes hand of Barack Obama, I would say that nearly wrecked him.
But I think that The Democratic Party has been losing ground continuously over the last couple years.
The continued pummeling that it's going to take, especially after this round of elections, is not going to be the least bit surprising to me.
The party has lost confidence in its speakers.
You can't have You can't have a party with a myriad of speakers who have different agendas and follow different pathways.
And I think that more and more, as you see the Democratic Party trying to coalesce and bring a popular thought to America, they can't.
The only thing they bring is the LBGT The trans, the pedophilia, the unnatural interest in what happens to the sexuality of people under the age of 18 years.
And, you know, the country's just sick and tired of hearing all this crap.
And quite frankly, guess what?
You can indeed blame it on the Democratic Party.
All right, David.
Very well said.
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, I definitely think that they've gone too far.
I think David's right.
I think that the average person, you know, the person who doesn't really read between the lines of news like you and I, can just look around and see the insanity now at this point.
I don't know how much further it has to go.
Like I said, I'm very concerned about election rigging.
I don't think they can rig it this hard to really overthrow a bunch of elections.
I could be surprised.
I probably shouldn't say that.
I think the American populace is ready for something completely different at this point.
They've been force-fed these strange agendas, like David explained, and people just don't want to deal with it anymore.
At the end of the day, it comes down to money, economy, and family, and with all of that falling apart around them, the American people aren't going to tolerate it anymore.
Very, very good.
Meanwhile, Fascinating story.
Please, dispatch audio.
Paul Pelosi, when calling cops, said he doesn't know who the male is, but he admires that his name is David and he is a friend.
Huh?
How does that work?
He doesn't know who the male is, but he's his friend and his name is David and he doesn't know who he is?
This is a reporting person.
This is actually from the police dispatch.
States that there's a man in his home and he's going to wait for his wife.
Reporting person says he doesn't know who the male is, but he advised that his name is David and that he is a friend.
P.R.R.P.
Sounds somewhat confused.
Later in the day, the FBI visited a Berkeley home linked to DAPAP.
David DAPAP, which neighbors call the Hippie Collective.
Here we have it.
Take a look.
More to come.
There have been fascinating comments about all of this, which were actually more penetrating and relevant than what you were getting from the mainstream.
For example, Biden is a fraud, wrote.
Some police verified they were both in their underwear attacking each other with a hammer.
Paul Pelosi's lover, David DePauw, Barclay, Green Party members, very likely the unidentified person who was with Paul when he got busted for a DUI.
A lot more what is going on than meets the eye.
Dick Turpin.
Police seem to have dropped the assailant, broke into the house tag.
The assailant was in the house but did not break in.
What does that tell us?
The White Hats.
I want to hammer this home.
The Reagan story is beyond far-fetched.
The Pelosi's have security up the ying-yang under normal circumstances.
This is likely a drug-fueled party scene or a lover spat.
Suspicious voter.
Definitely, and this cockamamie story in the press is ridiculous.
Consider this, Sad.
One story said the alarm went off and police were doing a welfare check.
This story has so many holes it was probably concocted by the corrupting FBI.
Live free or die.
There was no forcible entry into the house or Paul.
Dorothea 76.
Broken glass was found outside the house, not inside the home.
Breaking in would cause glass to be inside the house.
The man found in only his underwear with Paul Belosi was also in the car when Belosi was arrested for DUI.
In some sites, sites claim the guy's a male prostitute and the hammer they were fighting over is a sex toy.
The 9-1-1 call has been released and Paul B. sounds confused per report.
John Gall.
The confusion in the reports of The Hammer is because it's a 24-ounce dildo called The Hammer.
Sources confirm.
Nick Fasciato.
Pelosi got pounded by a prostitute with a plastic penis?
Good for you, Doug.
No forcible entry into the house door, Paul.
Let it be me as backside was forcibly entered.
You can bet your undies on that, Mr. Freedom Fighter.
More.
Eric, can you blame him?
Naked Hammer Man sounds more appealing than Denture Malfunction Nancy.
Anacorto, gross.
Fred L. Nasty Nancy could be the cause of erectile dysfunction worldwide.
John Mansville.
Little Paul even getting into a lot of trouble lately, while Mama Pig glossy away.
John Campbell.
David DePapp was a nudist, so maybe underwear was his way of wearing armor?
Delta Blue.
Misidentified as a nudist if underwear is involved.
Turns out the hammer is indeed a vibrator.
I found it online.
Amazon.com.
There it is.
$94.33.
Batteries not included.
You fill it up with batteries, it'd be like hitting someone over the head with a heavy hammer.
That's not gonna feel very good.
Fractures, skulls, sure.
A sex object, indeed.
Preferred by gays.
Meanwhile, nice overview.
No break-in.
911 calls for over a half hour.
Paul is in underwear.
Assailant in underwear.
Both or only one had a hammer.
Assailant took hammer from Paul and hit him with police present.
Police were only doing a welfare check in this gated community with private security.
Broken windows from inside as glasses on outside.
Methinks a man like Paul who hangs out in gay bars and brings young men home late night, as attested by neighbors, had a spat with his date.
His date is a radical leftist.
His date is not a MAGA man.
The date is registered green and lives in Berkeley in a nudist community supporting BLM.
Due to sex lover of Paul Pelosi attackers, a female pedophile who harassed a boy at the age of 14 and bought sex dolls for their sons to use.
Meanwhile, Pelosi's asshammer Harry Box lays it out.
Notice.
David DePopp tells investigators he and Paul Pelosi were engaging in gay sex in an argument ensued over drugs.
Pelosi's are refusing to turn over surveillance video of their home, fueling more speculation of homosexuality at the home.
And get this.
Tucker's been doing a great job with this.
In particular, this segment was hilarious.
Stand up and defend.
I'm outraged for Nancy Pelosi.
This woman has taken the hard-earned money she's made from insider trading and invested in a pair of cans at 82 years old and comes home to find out that her husband's playing hide-the-hammer with a Black Lives Matter guy?
You talk about disrupting the nuclear family, the Black Lives Matter crew must be ecstatic because this guy's doing it, and so is Paul Pelosi.
I'm upset for Nancy.
She spent her hard-earned money on a parachute, and he's not interested.
Well, of course we can't confirm or deny your suggestion, but I must say I did notice that the second people started speculating about what might have really happened, which we are not doing and haven't done, but some have, because in the absence of the body cam video, why wouldn't they?
I saw these liberals on Twitter saying it's disgusting that you would suggest there was any alternative going on.
I thought they were defenders of the alternative.
When did that become immoral in the eyes of the Democratic Party?
Tucker, I don't want to put you in a tough spot, but I gotta correct you again.
Are you suggesting that my information, that she spent her money on a pair of cans, are you saying that's bad information?
I've seen a lot of evidence.
I feel real comfortable she's trying to entice her husband But he's interested in playing hide-the-hammer on a Friday night with some weirdo.
I think there's an issue.
This is what needs to be investigated.
This is the whole endgame for Black Lives Matter.
Disrupting the nuclear family?
Start with the Speaker of the House.
I mean, what do we got here?
David, your thoughts?
Oh, we've got a degenerate circus.
That's what it boils down to.
plorable in and of itself.
You know, the, the public display and the exhibitionism, it's only appropriate that all of this political policy is reflected back right inside the house of Speaker Nancy Pelosi. it's only appropriate that all of this political policy is And maybe she invested in the wrong set of cans.
Holly, your thoughts.
Thank you.
Well, I think this is dangerous from like a security standpoint.
I mean, isn't she like third in line for the presidency and like somehow this house got breached and they don't know what's going on at the house and obviously everyone knew or knows what goes on in that house and all these All these politicians, obviously, it's a big blackmail ring.
They're engaged in horrible things at all times.
You know, it's a kakistocracy, a race, you know, the worst ruled by the worst.
I mean, these people are just blackmailed beyond all comparison.
Reminded me of the, it was Ed Buck.
I think he was in San Francisco.
He was a major donor to the Democratic Party, and he was constantly found to have people overdosing at his house, and in fact, people dying at his house.
And it was just expected that that's what was going on because he was a major donor.
Very similar to Paul, I guess he's had a long history of having people using drugs in and around him.
Just reminded me of Ed Bach, where it's like you bring in people who will engage in those types of behaviors and drugs.
You know, they think it's celebrity, or they think that they're important because they're around, you know, the Speaker of the House's family, but at the end of the day, these people are just used and abused, and this is obviously a case of that.
Don?
It certainly is a wild case here, and did you mention that this Pappy guy was in the back of the car when he was, when Paul was arrested a month or two ago with that accident?
Yeah, for DUI, right, for driving under.
These guys are, these are, I guess, buddies, pals.
I mean, so the whole story that they're putting out is totally gone.
These guys are perverts.
And I mean, this is hell.
What kind of leaders do we have here?
This is beyond gross and this obscene.
How could it be?
How could it be more embarrassing?
I mean, you got stunning reports that DEA is saying there's no evidence they knew each other when Paul Pelosi in the initial call says his name is David and he's a friend.
How could the DEA say?
And the D.A.
says this was political.
This wasn't political at all.
And the D.A.
says there were only two people at the house when the chief of police actually sent another party and let the police in.
And they looked in and they saw Pelosi and this guy, you know, struggling over the hammer.
I mean, the lying that's going on here is so blatant from the officials that you expect to be upholding the law.
And they're totally politicized, Don.
Oh, yeah.
It's really wild.
So by the way, how does that hammer work there, Jim?
Anyway, it is beyond, and those people have no business being in charge of our government.
I mean, the family, what kind of structure?
This is corrupt to the absolute core of hell.
The timing couldn't have been worse.
Right at the tail end, coming into the midterm, and this story is so salacious, it's so lurid, that it suppresses every other discussion, and the attempts to defend it are so completely absurd that everyone can see that this is a total farce.
Everyone's lying their face off, and the guy's obviously involved in this gay sex thing, and they just want to cover it up.
It's time to lay it all out the line.
Everybody got to see it and have this thing get resolved and get them out of here.
I think everyone sees it.
I think everyone sees it, Todd.
I'd like to see the video.
David or Holly.
Yeah, I just think, you know, it comes down to what Holly mentioned when the it's this corporate approval, this tacit approval of all this conduct that is going on in our by our corporations, by our by, you know, first you have the political element, then you have the business element.
And it's just nothing but tacit approval and moral degradation, in my opinion, is from my perspective.
The worst of the worst.
And get used to it.
Get used to it.
You're going to see more and more stories like this.
A lot of us stay in office.
Yeah, I agree.
I think this is just a race to the bottom and these people are just beyond corrupt and beyond blackmailed and that's why they're in office.
It's just stunning.
I mean, it's catching up with them, all their lives, all their hypocrisy.
It's absolutely stunning.
Meanwhile...
Here we have further reflection.
This is Laura Loomer on the border.
Check this out.
Laura Logan.
Laura, you're now a Texan.
You live in Texas.
You've been throughout the world.
Your reporting has taken you to some of the toughest assignments in the world and the battlefields, you know, huge migrations, border conflicts in the third world, Sub-Saharan Africa, everywhere.
Is Kamala Harris right?
Do we have a secured border?
As you see it as an objective journalist, not someone that has political inclinations or perceptions, but as just a journalist looking at facts, is the border of the United States not only not secure, but is there definitionally an invasion of this country, ma'am?
The border is wide open because we are living under a globalist policy of open borders.
So there is no border security to speak of.
Weapons are flowing across, drugs are flowing across, people are flowing across, money is flowing across, you know, illicit funds, and so on and so on.
I mean, everything that comes with an open border is what's flowing.
And the reason it's happening, Steve, it's not just an invasion.
It is an invasion, but an invasion that is part of a long-term plan and political ideology to obliterate the sovereignty of this nation and change the way the world looks forever.
It's not just America's sovereignty that's on the chopping block.
It's sovereignty all over the world.
It's just that this is the place that is the light and the guide for the whole world.
And so this is the country that has to fall first in order for the other countries to fall.
And what I learned from a source, who is a very unique source, having infiltrated the globalist cult at the UN level, is that he was in high-level meetings that required a number of security clearances, Where they actually discussed the plan to bring 100 million people into the United States in order to pave the way for a regional government of U.S., Canada, and Mexico.
And that was to bring in 100 million people from Latin American countries together with a strategy of creating these cartels, making life unbearable.
It's called a push-pull strategy where they push all these people out of these countries where it's unbearable living like this, and they pull them into the United States.
And then once you've reached that critical number of over 100 million in this invasion, they will then propose that, well, for your family and friends back home who need, you know, you need ease of travel, they need a better life, and so on and so on.
And we can do all this better with a regional government than we can with a U.S.
government.
And they will have enough critical mass inside the country in order to effect that policy.
That's the globalist plan that we're working towards.
But what we're already doing is living under their policy.
Well, they've made the right to migrate a human right, recognized the UN in 2018, and that now supersedes our sovereign right, thanks to the Biden administration and the open border ideologues who are in this government, who were never asked to be honest about their strategy and the campaign trail, who have bypassed the legislature and are implementing a strategy and a policy that not only did no Americans vote for it, because they weren't even given the opportunity
But most Americans don't support.
You know, if you just look at the statistics, the New York Times said, hey, there's a million unauthorized, basically migrants or illegal aliens here trying to get asylum.
But if you go back to look at the numbers, you know, the government admitted there's 13 million, right?
There's other people, other commentators and CIS have done the math.
There's really 30 million illegal aliens have been here.
If you look at the difference of the 4.9, we've had Todd Bensman and others from CIS said, no, the number's probably closer to maybe seven or eight now in the first 18 months of the Biden administration.
If you add those two top line numbers, and I'm not saying they're accurate, but maybe directionally, you're already, you could arguably say you're at 30 or 40 million right now.
So when Larry Logan sits there and goes a hundred million and people go, that's impossible.
That's a conspiracy theory where you could argue we're 40% of the way there, ma'am.
Why do you, why?
He actually said that they were talking about a hundred million over some period of time.
Yep.
Yep.
He was in the meeting.
He heard it with his own ears and, um, you know, and the strategy then, uh, made sense.
And that was a couple of years ago, right?
That was, um, even before the Biden administration, what they've done since they've got into office, you can see it all around you is they have escalated these policies, right?
They've escalated the implementation.
And, you know, there are a number of people in intelligence and others who I talk to say that the plan was that Trump wouldn't exist, right?
It would go from eight years of Obama to eight years of Hillary to eight years of another Democrat to never seeing another Republican administration.
So if you look at this as a long term plan over several administrations, in fact, even Democrat and Republican, because both have failed on the national security element of the border, then what you see is that this This plan is not very far away and it's not it's not at all unrealistic in a sense.
And then when you look at that and you connect the dots.
Right.
You remember when Chris Matthews, he compared Bernie Sanders to the Nazis and to Hitler.
And that was in the election campaign.
I think it was 2016.
And so he was immediately dethroned.
Right.
Because you couldn't have that.
You couldn't have that comparison coming from the left because because people would see that it was true.
So when he when that happened and Chris was actually removed, his spokesperson was out everywhere saying that the days of milk white America were over and that the future of America is diverse.
And he spoke with the same kind of certainty that people have, for example, when they don't write a concession speech because they know that they won the election.
Right.
As Hillary Clinton failed to do in 2016.
And she was so shocked when she didn't ascend to the throne.
Because they reversed the cheat, right?
They saw it coming and reversed the cheat.
And I know this from intelligence people who are involved in this and other people who are familiar with what happened then.
So when you connect those dots, what you see is here's a guy saying the future of America is diverse.
And yet at the same moment, 70% of the American population is still white.
So how is he so certain?
Well, because there's a plan.
That's what you start to see behind all of this.
That's what I try to do as an investigative reporter is not react just emotionally to the fact that Kamala Harris is a complete liar and obvious.
It's obvious to anyone with eyes.
I mean, Texas is overrun.
The reason they're sending, you know, migrants to Martha's Vineyard and so on isn't just to make a point.
It's because these towns have gone past capacity, right?
The Border Patrol is past capacity.
I mean, the number of Border Patrol agents who are experiencing extreme trauma because they've got hundreds of thousands of unaccompanied minors crossing that border, many of them are babies.
You tell me that.
How are the parents, right?
Because remember, unaccompanied minors, are they supposed to be reunited with their parents in America who are here without their children, right?
This is to rejoin families that have been separated.
Well, how are they separated, you know, if they're just babies?
What families are they going to?
Why are they still in the custody of Health and Human Services months and sometimes even longer later or in the custody of NGOs?
Because what do they love?
They love shoving these kids into NGOs and then they disappear, right?
And nobody ever knows what happens to them, whether they reach their families or they don't reach their families.
And you don't have any reporters who are interested in even asking the question because most of the media is completely captured.
And just in the tank for the Biden administration, and they're not asking any difficult questions about anything.
So if you imagine the impact that this has on your border patrol agencies, they're all past capacity.
Suicide rates are up and through the roof.
And it's the same in the DEA, Drug Enforcement Agency.
They're not being able to do their job.
And what they are seeing is an endless stream of people, while terrorists come across, while national security is obliterated,
But what they're actually looking at, if you step back from that emotion of the moment, is they are looking at a very carefully crafted strategy that is backed by the most powerful people in this country, some of whose names we know, and some of whose names we don't know, and dark money and all the other things that go behind it, protected by layers and layers of deception, masked with the NGOs, that is part of a broader strategy to annihilate not just the society of this nation, but of every nation on Earth, because they seek
This is just wonderful stuff.
Don, I think we will do our comments after the break.
Am I right?
Are we there?
Yeah.
We're past it, so you all come back here.
This is Truth vs. News here on November the 6th.
Oh, wow.
And what a heck of a first hour this is.
Come back and we'll pick it right up.
And hopefully you can hang on to your chairs here and weather the storm is about to hit.
So thank you so much.
▲
Export Selection