Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 3, 2022 - Jim Fetzer

01:14:49

Truth vs. NEW$ Part 2 (2 October 2022) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and David Kenney

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	To Truth Vs. News Incorporated.
	This is October the 2nd, and we're having a great discussion here all about the Nord Stream and all kinds of things.
	And Scott, I think you have a great opinion on things, so take it away.
	We're talking about the bots business, Scott.
	How they're just manipulating the American people and the whole effing world.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, I just wanted to confirm that these internet interactive operations are military.
	They are usually contracted out by contractors in Britain or Israel, Mossad, British MI6, the CIA, Special Operations Command, McGill Air Force Base, notorious internet Operations, persuasion, changing and, you know, influence behavior.
	This is Psychological Worker.
	They've done this from Afghanistan.
	Dynology was a key company that did a lot of this.
	So, it's come out about how much the Pentagon has been creating fake bot accounts at Twitter and Facebook and just, you know, regurgitating this nonsense of Anti-Russian propaganda, pro-Ukrainian propaganda, anti-Trump propaganda, you know, pro-Democrat leftism.
	So we're witnessing the exposure of all of these influence operations.
	And the great irony, of course, is we always come back to the fact that The Smith-Month Act prohibited these sort of operations against the American people, and when Obama deleted it, when he did his executive order overwhelming it, you had the Pandora's box opened up, and now you have rampant, out-of-control influence operations with some of the stupidest, darkest, most perverted, twisted minds
	Pushing, you know, men with boobs and transgender this and all the other jazz.
	They've been pushing this throughout the social media companies.
	And it's just fully weaponized psychological warfare that is usually contracted out.
	But I think it's being exposed.
	That's one of the other reasons that Elon Musk pulled out of his Twitter deal was because all of this artificiality, Jim.
	Yeah, I think that's a great point that Elon Musk really exposed all this nonsense with Twitter.
	And he did us a good turn there.
	David, your thoughts?
	Well, this goes, you know, goes back to the cabinet level that is with Biden.
	And, you know, you've got In those, you know, of course I talk about the 17 areas of critical infrastructure, but the responsibility for those areas is the Department of Energy, the Department of Homeland Security, the Treasury, and with most of these divisions subject to the Department of Homeland Security.
	So the The fact that, as Scott mentioned, these are contracted deals that the government has to win public opinion and to influence public opinion goes without saying.
	The amount of, I mean just think about the amount of money that was made by information technology during the pandemic is astronomical.
	The amount of, and it was it's done in coordination with Energy.
	It's done in coordination with Health and Human Services.
	There's an attack on, you know, the biological attack on everybody by COVID.
	And you see Javier Becerra sitting up on the cabinet.
	So these cabinet members are of such Inane capacity that it really undermines any trust in the in the advice being given to the president and also being disseminated to the American public.
	I agree with Scott.
	This is all happened.
	You know, it was it was Obama who said it's time to brainwash the American people.
	And by God, that's what's happened.
	Yep, I think you got that exactly right, and it's stunning, the degree, the scope is breathtaking.
	Meanwhile, Ginny Thomas goes before the January 6th committee and rips them a new one.
	She laid out proof after proof that this had been a stolen election.
	So, of course, the chairman of the committee said they may incorporate her testimony if there's something of merit.
	But since she blows the whole premise for the investigation apart, obviously, you're not going to hear a word of what Ginny Thomas had to say.
	But I admire her for doing this.
	I mentioned in passing, she has a background as a lawyer.
	She's not only the wife of Clarence Thomas, who, by the way, has, in my opinion, been distinguishing himself of late as a jurist, though I thought it was an inexcusable appointment in the beginning.
	I now think he's doing a lot of good, and so is she.
	The information was typical of a lot of information we received from other people who were involved in this effort around January 6th, a lot of.
	Well, I believe something was wrong, select committee chair Bernie Thompson said, but the fact is they were laying out proof and evidence, and he's ignoring that.
	He's wanting to suggest it was merely a matter of subjective opinion.
	She was one of those we wanted to talk to, and ultimately we got there.
	He said Thomas had answered some questions.
	You know, it's all trivialization.
	Ginny sat with the panel for over four hours in the Congressional Office Building.
	She's one of their major outstanding witnesses as they seek to wind down their probe.
	They wanted to ask about her connection to John Eastman, the legal architect of Trump's last-ditch plan to subvert the 2020 election, misdescribing an effort to straighten out the theft of the election on behalf of the American people and the Constitution of the United States.
	She had conversation with him, was messaging John Eastman.
	We have questions about that, said Pete Gaguilar, Democrat of California.
	Thomas had invited Eastman to speak to an activist group in the aftermath of the election, though he's denied ever discussing Supreme Court-related matters.
	CBS and the Washington Post published messages from her to top Trump allies encouraging them to investigate what they're here claiming debunked, but that's false.
	That's a false claim.
	None of them have been debunked.
	Claims of election fraud and to fight harder to overturn.
	The, I will add my own word, wrongful election results.
	The select panel declined to comment on her appearance because she gave them so much evidence, so much proof, obviously they don't want to breathe a word of it.
	She answered all the committee's questions, said her attorney.
	He added she told the committee her election-related activity focused on ensuring that reports of fraud and irregularities were investigated.
	Meanwhile, the Select Committee is currently searching for a new date for its likely final hearing, which they postponed due to Hurricane Ian.
	The House plans to leave D.C.
	Friday, not scheduled to return until November, due to midterm campaigns possibly complicating efforts to reschedule the hearing.
	Let it die a grateful death.
	Check this out.
	We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.
	Amen.
	Let me say it again.
	The 2020 election was the most secure election in American history.
	Let me begin by asking a very simple question.
	Do we know the truth about what really happened in the 2020 election?
	I think millions of Americans know something went wrong, and they have little pieces, and no one's really put it together.
	I'm agnostic on this question, and I am awaiting more information.
	If I believed the president were a Nazi, I might steal an election.
	Bold accusations require bold evidence, and they haven't seen it.
	We have been working on something big.
	Show me the money.
	Can we meet?
	I've been working with Greg Phillips.
	He has a deep background in election intelligence.
	True The Vote has the largest store of election intelligence for the 2020 elections in the world.
	No one has more data than we do.
	We identified in Atlanta 242 mules that went to an average of 24 drop boxes.
	But Philadelphia alone, we've identified more than 1,100 mules.
	What is a mule?
	This is not grandma out walking her dog.
	Bad backgrounds, bad reputations.
	They are interested in one thing, that's money.
	This is organized crime.
	Four million minutes of surveillance video around the country.
	What you're about to see is disturbing.
	So this is 1 o'clock in the morning.
	Don't we all vote at 1 o'clock in the morning?
	One night, this person, this mule, went across six counties to 27 different drop boxes.
	I call it the Mexican Mafia, seriously.
	Because they work like that.
	This is jaw-dropping.
	What you showed is frightening.
	It's just sickening to me.
	Now we come to the most important question of all.
	Was the magnitude of vote trafficking enough to tip the balance in the 2020 presidential election?
	It's not a leap to say this would have made a difference.
	They have ruined election day in the United States of America.
	That's provable.
	And that's enough for me to fight the left with every fiber in my body.
	Without free and fair elections, we are not a democracy.
	We are a criminal cartel masquerading as a democracy.
	I think they got it right.
	The Democratic Party is a criminal cartel masquerading as though they were American when they're undermining and defeating everything our Constitution stands for, Scott.
	I don't know how many different things need to erupt to make you ashamed to be an American, but it's like every day something new is popping up, and it is a criminal cartel.
	Going around the world destroying governments and civilizations and people to steal oil and precious metals and earth and occupying Syria.
	And Donald Trump is guilty of this too when he says, we're keeping the oil, we're keeping the oil.
	That's a crime.
	You're a pirate.
	You ought to be executed for that.
	Anybody that does that kind of thing.
	So we've transformed that into public policy all over the American government where we ransack other nations and we ransack and Deceive our own people with this kind of election fraud.
	Dinesh D'Souza is nothing special, but the people behind the analytics of the phone tracking certainly are, and that's only a small percentage of who were actually being tracked.
	You could easily probably say that is quadruple the size of mules I mean, you're not going to have a country if you allow this kind of activity to go on.
	Passive election fraud.
	It is criminal conspiracy, seditious conspiracy.
	I think it's an act of treason, and these people who did that should be executed.
	I mean, you're not going to have a country if you allow this kind of activity to go on.
	People should be executed for election fraud for doing this, because it is the highest level of treason.
	You might as well have a bunch of Chinese spies coming in and doing the same thing.
	What would you do to them?
	The same thing that you do to these other fools that are in there doing this.
	So the question is, how is this going to right itself, if at all?
	Is there going to be a rising up of efficient government political actors and policies and
	Prosecutions within the current government system of military, law enforcement, congressional and sheriffs all coordinating the shutting down of this disease of treason or is it going to allow to metastasize and become more chronic so that the healthy body politic is consumed by the cancer of corruption
	And I think if that is the way things are going, then a civil war is perhaps the only way to snap out of this and violently segregate and separate your jurisdiction, your county, your town, from any and all of these activities and policies.
	I think the Federal Republic is approaching the sunset of its existence, and we are entering a renaissance of tribalism, and that could be a very healthy thing, given the level of toxicity and madness that is afflicting our country now.
	Jim?
	Well, I may or may not agree with that conclusion, but certainly the premises are well-founded.
	For those who want a ballpark figure, remember, Mark Zuckerberg gave $410 million for votes.
	At $10 a vote, that's 41 million phony ballots for Joe Biden.
	It's just outrageous.
	You've got to wrap your mind around it.
	Most Americans just don't have the capacity to understand how massively this swindle has taken place.
	David?
	Yeah, I think even for the lawyers, it's beyond comprehension how to organize and present a case like this.
	The and I would hope that over the last two years have been a bastion or at least a protected group who've been able to start putting it together.
	But you certainly don't see our FBI doing any investigation.
	You certainly don't see our state attorney generals taking the bull by the horns.
	And it goes to what I've been saying all along.
	I've been saying You know, there's a drive to create the North American Union.
	I think Mexico politicians are involved in the corruption scandal that's taking place in the United States.
	I don't know that Canada really has any interest, but there's no question that the The interest of the Mexican government and in the southwestern states has become, in my opinion, very infective.
	And I don't mean that in a bad way.
	There are wonderful Latinos, wonderful Hispanic friends of mine, but there is this hand behind it that is very disconcerting at times.
	What I do want to point out is if you notice there's a there's a gentleman in the 2000 mules who starts out saying I'm agnostic at this point.
	By the time he'd watch the movie, he's dead set against the left.
	And so I join him with the distaste for this kind of stuff.
	But you have to remember, our federal law requires these records to be kept and maintained for I think it's 22 months.
	In my opinion, it should be a much longer period of time under the statute.
	It should be 46 years just to secure it.
	And I believe they're actually destroying a lot of those records already, David.
	So, you know, it's really outrageous.
	Meanwhile, doctor turns against messenger RNA, calling for a global pause.
	This is a guy was on board in the beginning.
	There's more than enough evidence.
	I would say the evidence is overwhelming.
	To pause the rollout of the vaccine, dead Dr. Racine Malhorta, a British cardiologist and evidence-based medical expert.
	A paper from Malhorta was published on September 26, detailing the evidence.
	Malhorta pointed out the lack of reduction in mortality or severe disease in the trials even, taking into account death rates and other figures, the number of people who need to be vaccinated to prevent a single death.
	This is a number who have to be vaccinated to prevent one death.
	This is a potential benefit from the vax.
	Ranges from 93,000 aged 18 to 29 to 230 for people aged 80 and over.
	He noted serious side effects have been detected, including myocarditis, a form of heart inflammation.
	Looking at the absolute benefits and drawbacks, it's time to halt the usage and allow authorities and others who examine the data to say if they should be used again, according to Malhorta.
	But of course, we know they shouldn't be used.
	Malhorta received the Pfizer primary series in January 2021 and became a promoter of the vaccine, even appearing on Good Morning Britain To advise the Indian film director, Garinder Shah to get the shot, which he did shortly thereafter.
	He began digging into the vaccine data further, however, after his father suffered a cardiac arrest at home about six months after getting Pfizer's vaccine.
	The post-mortem Showed two of Chandra's major arteries were severely blocked, even though Malharta described his father as a fit person who did not have any significant heart problems.
	He began reading about post-vax issues, including an abstract in circulation that identified a higher risk of heart attack following vax with Pfizer or Moderna.
	A study from Nordic countries with a higher risk of myocarditis.
	I hardly came to believe his father's death was linked to the Vax.
	I've always approached medicine and science with uncertainties because things constantly evolve.
	And the information I had at the time is completely different than the data I have now.
	And in fact, it is my duty and responsibility, as the information has changed, to act on that information.
	And that's what I'm doing now.
	After the new paper was published, Craig Snowden, he was a board member of the Journal of Insulin Resistance.
	He pointed out that it went through independent review.
	He has no financial links to the journal.
	He encouraged others to view his publication history.
	This is just an obvious ad hominem trying to attack him.
	They don't like the message.
	They're attacking the messenger.
	I don't think there's any validity to question the integrity of the piece.
	People can argue I have an intellectual bias.
	We all have intellectual biases, but there's no financial bias for me.
	Others have said his paper is important.
	We fully believe that vaccines are one of the great discoveries in medicine that has improved life expectancy dramatically.
	However, mRNA genetic packs are different, as long-term safety evaluation is lacking but mandatory to ensure public safety.
	This was from Sheriff Sultan, President of the International Vascular Society.
	Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology at Stanford, who has impressed me a lot.
	Malhorta makes a good case there's considerable heterogeneity across age groups and other comorbid conditions and the expected benefits and side effects, and he finds that while there may be a case for older people, that harm may not be the case for younger.
	It's much worse even than that, but at least this is a bit of a breakthrough, Scott.
	You're mute.
	You're muted.
	I think we're, again, you're witnessing the perfect storm of completion, of competing ideologies, of this desperate grasping for power.
	It's almost like the last death throes of a political regime.
	And I think it is the Democrat Party that is approaching that level.
	There's a Palpable fear, desperation, worry, frantic, hysterical tantrum.
	And that was the other word that Putin used in his speech.
	Tantrum-like behavior.
	So the behaviors that are being manifested and the idiocy and the hypocrisy and the arguments are really just disintegrating, you know, disintegrating America's reputation like an ice cube under the sun, Jim.
	Yeah, very good, David.
	Yeah, we still see this taking place in California.
	I mean, it's amazing.
	I drive to work and I see the You know, Gavin Newsom's got the ads up all over the state, time to get your booster, time to get your booster.
	They've got the booster in Spanish, all these, all these ads.
	You know, it's just astounding to me.
	You know, it's, it's just the brainwashing.
	It's the bioweapons, the brainwashing is taken over and over.
	At my 50 year reunion last night, I was talking with a couple of my friends and I know their personalities.
	I've known these people for over 60 years.
	And it was really great because There are a few I know really well, and I could predict who had taken the vaccine and who hadn't, because I found the ones with personal fortitude had not taken the vaccine.
	And the other people who I would say were part of trying to get into the in-group or trying to be, you know, trying to go mainstream and be accepted by their peers and everything, all these people had taken the vaccine.
	I was just shocked at it.
	But I think, you know, in California, we've got crazy things going on here.
	I mean, we have definitions of gender that are mandated now by the state.
	They're not, these are not being discussed.
	But you know, I have this, I have this great friend of mine, who's a campus security officer.
	But he's also a coach for the debate teams at, at one of the high schools, a wonderful gentleman, very, very bright.
	And You know, we haven't seen this.
	We have not seen a national debate on the efficacy of the vaccines.
	We've seen no program.
	I'd like to see a program dedicated, how about two or three hours on the national network that had the leading scientists just debate it outright.
	Let's see the information.
	Let's make it transparent.
	Not going to happen in the media these days.
	It's very sad.
	And the most disturbing thing about it is hundreds, thousands, even millions of lives have been affected by this.
	And Newsom is called bubble California, a big state with a large population, more opportunity to kill people.
	I mean, that's what Newsom is involved in.
	They know the more shots you get, the higher the death rate.
	It skyrockets.
	If you've had three or four shots, your death is inevitable.
	It's absolutely disgusting.
	You know, there's.
	Yeah, go ahead, Scott.
	Let me just say, I we've all had our stupid family.
	You do this.
	But, you know, I saw it yesterday.
	I went up and saw, you know, a family member.
	And her husband says, I'm going to get my shot.
	And it was almost like, yeah, it was like he's giddy about it.
	He's, oh, I'm going to get my shot.
	I'm just going, you poor simpleton fool.
	You are pouring bleach into your veins.
	You are, you are a dead man walking and your lifespan has now been shrunk down to a matter of months.
	And they don't, they don't even get it.
	It's like their brain has been lobotomized.
	And they're in delirium.
	Scott, I think that's absolutely right.
	I think that's absolutely right.
	Meanwhile, U.N.
	Education Agency launches a war on conspiracy theories.
	Of course!
	What better could they do?
	According to the Paris-based U.N.
	Education Agency, conspiracy theories cause significant harm and form the backbone of many populist movements.
	Not that they're giving us any illustrations.
	Among other concerns, they foster and reinforce harmful thinking patterns and exclusive worldviews, the report said.
	This is such rubbish.
	They reduce trust in public institutions.
	Absolutely.
	In scientific institutions, when they're peddling fake science, which can drive people to violence or decrease their desire to reduce their carbon footprint.
	Because, of course, if you discover the whole climate change thing is a scientific fraud, yes.
	While all conspiratorial thinking threatens human rights values, the department says without elaboration, some are more dangerous than others.
	In some cases, teachers are even encouraged to report their students to authorities.
	Examples of conspiracy theories cited?
	From the widely held and respectable belief that climate change is not real and manipulation of federal elections is in the United States, as though those were somehow mere theories when they're actual facts, to more far-fetched notions such as Earth is flat or Michelle Obama's a lizard.
	Those are just silly.
	Just completely silly.
	There are plenty of crazy thoughts on the internet, many of which are patently false.
	We all know that.
	Explain Citizen for Free Speech director Patrick Wood.
	This is a Citizen for Free Speech guy?
	The only thoughts being corrected are those contrary to the globalist narrative, yes.
	This proves the focus is on protecting their own narratives and nothing else.
	Yes.
	UNESCO now joins a censorship cartel, including the European Union, the U.S.
	government, the WEF, social media, Facebook giants, Twitter, notably Google.
	Anyone who does not parrot the globalist narrative is, by default, considered to be a conspiracy theorist.
	At the heart of the program to combat these ideas are teachers and schools.
	Also, the battle online and in the media.
	The latest strategy unveiled, International Symposium on Addressing Conspiracy Theories Through Education, held in June in Brussels.
	The summit brought together academic, government, civil society, and the private sector to promote joint action against conspiracy theories and those who believe or spread them.
	This is just absurd beyond belief.
	The plan includes strategies to prevent people from believing in conspiracy theories in the first place, as well as tools for dealing with those who already believe them.
	Gee, let's see.
	Would it be a conspiracy theory that Lee Oswald didn't shoot JFK?
	Would it be a conspiracy theory that 19 Islamic terrorists didn't attack?
	The United States on 9-11, that it was not led by Osama bin Laden from a cave off in Afghanistan, is a conspiracy theory that we never went to the moon when it was impossible to do so.
	Experts on propaganda and free speech warn UN effort represents a dangerous escalation of what they portray as a global war on free speech, free expression, questioning official narratives and dissent more broadly.
	What they mean by conspiracy theory is any claim or argument or evidence that differs from the propaganda pumped out by the government and media.
	Warned Mark Christman Miller, who, by the way, is a very good man at NYU, who studies propaganda and government misinformation.
	I can't think of anything more dangerous to free speech and free thought, and therefore democracy, than this effort by the UN, which has no business telling us what is true and what is not.
	That distinction is not theirs to make, but ours, as free people capable of thinking for ourselves and unafraid of civil argument.
	Official efforts to clamp down on conspiracy theories and misinformation are nothing new.
	Western governments have been leading the charge for years.
	In 2010, the U.S.
	State Department, with help from its Counter Misinformation Team, published Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation on America.gov.
	Claiming to debunk various of them.
	More recently, the Biden admin has turned its focus to conspiracy theories.
	DHS suggested belief in widespread voter fraud during the 2020 election or alternative views on COVID and public health measures represent a major terrorist threat to the United States.
	How absurd is that?
	While the Biden admin's proposed disinformation governance board appears to have been shelved, the government's been working closely with technology giants to suppress free speech surrounding election fraud, Hunter Biden's laptop, alternative views on COVID, and more.
	NPR, a tax-funded op, has published numerous pieces echoing UNESCO's talking points.
	Outgoing senior health official Anthony Tony the Rat Fauci has chimed in too.
	What we're dealing with now is just a distortion of reality.
	Conspiracy theories that don't make any sense at all, pushing back on sound public health measures, Making it look like trying to save lives is encroaching on people's freedom, he said on, yes, guess where?
	The Rachel Maddow Show on August 22nd.
	The WEF, which has become a lightning rod for criticism around its Great Reset, is also working to counter ideas it labels as misinformation or conspiracy theories.
	The key to stopping the spread is educating people to be on the outlook for misleading information and teaching them to be suspicious of certain sources.
	The UN has been central to the global effort.
	The new program is actually an extension of a 2020 initiative by UNESCO and the European Commission dubbed Think Before Sharing to combat conspiracy theories online.
	That effort includes urging citizens to post links of fact-checking services and even report journalists who may be engaged in conspiracy theorizing to your local national press council or press ombudsman.
	Scott, this is just disgusting.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, again, it's something Putin talked about, interestingly enough, in his speech, that the West and these globalist powers are seeking to
	Dehumanize and enslave people into a state of stupidity and blindness and, I mean, degenerate, immoral, you know, walking death, really, where notions of gender and things like that are completely erased.
	He said, this is not the way we're going.
	And I think the majority of the thinking people in this world think exactly the same thing.
	To have a UN conspiracy theory, you know, militarized information war against anyone that speaks against the narrative, I mean, that's That's inciting a global war like we've never seen.
	I can't see an institution or a structure like that being kept around long.
	I can't see it not being blown up.
	But this is the nature of the battle space that we're in, is they're constantly trying to push and bully these nonsense fake narratives that are fitting a globalist agenda, and the COVID-19 vaccine is not a vaccine.
	It's a death jab that leads people down this road of mental dullness that makes them susceptible and takes away their impulse to challenge or be aggressive or be suspicious or be belligerent.
	You have to be those things Uh, to, uh, protect and guard against your integrity, uh, against manipulations and such.
	And that, you know, military guys, I think, are endowed with that, trained with it.
	It's part of their nature.
	But, uh, for the most part, you know, these people who just go along to get along, They're the first ones who are going to be chewed up.
	And you see that in the mask, too.
	The mass sign up of the mask that turns these.
	You still see these simpleton fools wearing their mask inside their cars.
	And they're doing it pridefully.
	It's like they lose their entire identity.
	They want to lose their identity because there's no sense of self-respect.
	And of course, UNESCO got a point to our show in promoting the conspiracy theory that the U.S.
	blew up the Nord Stream Pipeline, or that weather manipulation by the Biden administration took out Florida to promote its political agenda and to punish Ron DeSantis for embarrassing the Democrats.
	Those will be the latest examples, Scott.
	Oh, we'll see you guys in Warsaw then.
	When I was back in college, I read a great book.
	It was by Eric Fromm and it was called Escape from Freedom and it talked about the authoritarian organization of society.
	and how it constitutes a threat, because the goal of government is to create automatons.
	You know, the people who don't have individuality, who are, you know, just automatons are easier to manage.
	They're easier to plan behavior, to expect behavior.
	And that's contrary to what we hold dear in the West, which is the notion of freedom.
	But I would just want to go back to this for a second, because we had the vaccine mandates.
	And like I said, I'd love to see high school debate on this.
	I'd like to see it in this order.
	High school debate.
	College debate, university debate, law school debate, and physicians debate.
	And quite frankly, I would suggest that National Public Radio hosts these debates, but they're on by Pfizer, you know, it's just run by Pfizer.
	So it'd be, it'd be, you know, It would be beyond my expectations that a channel somewhere would host this debate on a vaccine mandate, and then after that, tackle the issue of the gender mandate.
	In California now, under AB 1825, there's sexual harassment training, and there's defining genders.
	And here's, I'm not going to express an opinion, I'm just going to express the fact of what the training requires.
	Knowing what is agender, knowing what is androgynous, bigender, binary, cisgender, crossdresser, gender dysphoria, gender expression, gender fluid, gender non-conforming, gender questioning,
	Genderqueer, intersex, misgender, non-binary, passing, queer, sex itself, sexual orientation, transgender, transitioning, Transsexual person.
	And then, of course, they identify drag queens.
	So that's just a part of the, what I'm going to call, the new gender mandate that's taking place in the wonderful state of California.
	What happy horseshit, how ridiculous is that?
	I mean, to make that a part of the curriculum or official documents?
	And here we get, you know, talk about conspiracy theories.
	If you don't understand the nature of conspiracy, you don't understand what's going on.
	Here, Wisconsin Senator document big tech rigging the 2022 election, the 2022 election next month.
	Big Tech's acts of information suppression against Republicans are just concerning.
	They are deliberate election meddling.
	Fed up with the repeated censorship of his work, Ron Johnson, my senator whom I greatly admire, penned a letter to YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki Demanding Big Tuck Company answer for its attempts to silence him online.
	For more than a year, YouTube's answers have suppressed banned or limited content from Jackson and his team.
	They aren't just censorship, but blatant meddling in his re-election.
	Big Tech's effort to subdue Johnson's rigorous commitment to exposing the truth are joined by corporate media and Democrats.
	Knowledge about Johnson's work in the Senate is key to his re-election.
	But if Big Tech's track record suggests anything, there's nothing stopping companies like YouTube from limiting key information voters need to formulate an opinion about Johnson and his opponent.
	As he documents, Big Tech was more than willing to blacklist the Senate over discussions about COVID, early treatment, the jab, and the 2020 election.
	YouTube has displayed a troubling track record of censoring a sitting United States senator, the proceedings of the United States Senate, journalists who interviewed me, and the display of data that's entirely generated from the U.S.
	government's own health agency, he explained.
	He demanded Google own YouTube cough up documents by October 5th, right around the corner, related to the company's long history of hiding his work from the public.
	At the behest of Democrat-controlled federal agencies, YouTube wielded its censorship power against Johnson during crucial moments, including banning him from uploading new content for days at a time.
	I'd point out, the First Amendment specifically restricts the United States government from exercising this kind of influence and control.
	That's a blatant violation of the Constitution.
	In January 2021, YouTube denied Americans the right to explode questions about early COVID treatment by removing footage from a U.S.
	Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee hearing.
	How outrageous!
	Days later, YouTube took down the same video, which had garnered nearly 8 million views from a Fox News YouTube channel.
	YouTube justified the censorship, claiming it was removed for violating our COVID misinformation policy, where they simply decide what's true and what's false, as though they had the right to do that.
	Something they admitted it did to comply with demands from unelected government employees, which they are forbidden to do.
	In October 2021, YouTube removed another HSGAC hearing from Johnson's page.
	This time, they claimed the clip, featuring a congressional discussion on public record about election integrity and laws, alleged widespread fraud or errors that change the outcome of the election, That video was uploaded on December 20th, 2020, meaning YouTube made it nearly a year to remove it.
	Just a month later, they personalized its vendetta by suspending his account over a COVID-19 roundtable he hosted.
	It was excellent.
	Several highly credentialed, world-recognized medical experts discussed the importance of natural immunity, heard stories on the disastrous consequences of the vaccine mandates, highlighted the lack of transparency from federal health authorities, and gave voice to the vaccine injured.
	Other things Big Tech doesn't want Americans to know include his interview about vaccine mandates and the FDA's rush to approve the vaccine for children with Wisconsin talk show host Dan O'Donnell, or his speech at the Milwaukee Press Club Newsmaker Luncheon about how ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine are both safe and effective drugs.
	YouTube didn't just penalize him for those comments, but extended its suspension to O'Donnell, who posted the relevant interview on his website.
	YouTube's interference with election outcome by manipulating public opinion is not lost on Americans searching for answers about COVID and election integrity, nor on Johnson.
	His letter shows how censorship is consistently brandished against facts that might lead people to vote Republican, not against facts that would lead to voting for Democrats.
	It's not a coincidence a major lawsuit recently exposed that Democrat-run White House have been secretly telling companies, including Twitter, Google, and Facebook, specific information to hide from the American people.
	That's why during a recent hearing he asked why Democrats' false statements are never flagged as misinformation.
	Biden has repeatedly lied.
	You can't get the virus or be hospitalized or die from COVID if you're vaxxed.
	But he's received no treatment, no punishment from social media.
	Even those are big lies.
	Big tech execs, YouTube, Twitter, TikTok, and Facebook never even attempt to answer or acknowledge his inquiries.
	Who do you think you are to censor information from eminently qualified doctors who had the courage and compassion to treat COVID patients, he asked during the hearing.
	You guys bear a fair amount of responsibility for hundreds of thousands not being treated, and I would add, probably dying.
	Who didn't have to die.
	Hope you are proud of yourselves.
	Big Tech's acts of information suppression against him aren't just concerning, but deliberate election meddling.
	When voters don't have access to the full story, they can't make an informed choice.
	They believe they are choosing, but if Big Tech controls the message they can read, their choices are predetermined.
	By companies that are obeying a Democrat-controlled White House and federal bureaucracy.
	His re-election bid is reportedly tight.
	No one knows how tight it would be if Big Tech weren't controlling what Wisconsin voters are allowed to learn about his record and his opponent.
	And that's a huge problem.
	Scott, your thoughts?
	Well, first of all, Johnson, Senator Johnson, should be writing letters to the Department of Justice demanding the immediate prosecution criminally for YouTube and its president and these other social media companies that are taking down Truth.
	Uh, for violating his rights.
	Conspiracy to violate his rights.
	18 U.S.
	Code 241, 242.
	There's criminal violation.
	They're not doing it out of conscience.
	They're doing it out of conspiracy.
	They're doing it out of I'm tired of these politicians saying, shouldn't you be ashamed?
	a conspiracy to deprive the American public of truthful information.
	They're doing it because they're being paid by Pfizer or other actors or out of a political agenda.
	But it needs to be amplified to criminal prosecution and civil prosecution.
	I'm tired of these politicians saying, shouldn't you be ashamed?
	These people don't have the capacity to be ashamed.
	You have to go at them and attack them And even if the Justice Department refused to act, you have to take the step forward of demanding, making the demand that they be prosecuted.
	We certainly could be amicus brief character witnesses for the dysfunction of Twitter and of YouTube when they took down our pages for publishing the New Zealand shooting that was exposed in the video as being completely fraudulent, firing blanks.
	And having actors.
	My page was immediately taken down on Twitter and YouTube when we did that show.
	And Don, you and I, and Jim did it with Michael J. And we blew him out of the water.
	So what they did to us, they're now doing to others.
	But it needs to be challenged and attacked and come to an end.
	They do not have protection.
	This is not taking down someone's profane language.
	This is not taking down a video that is beyond moral decency standards.
	This is entirely different.
	This is a conspiracy to stop truth tellers and advance lies and fraud for political or financial purposes.
	And the sooner they get into the real knife fighting of this in courts and challenges and congressional hearings and investigations, Uh, you know the the healthier it'll it'll it'll be we need to break these companies up in a sense and uh this this uh strangulation of truth And the hijacking of the internet is one of the greatest crimes ever.
	I mean, these people ought to be ashamed, but they also ought to be imprisoned and fined, especially these Indian communist CEOs that come into companies like Twitter and elsewhere that have no fathoming of what the American Constitution, the American liberty is.
	They've come from a garbage country, essentially, created enormous success here in America, been hired in a top company in America, and then have the gall to violate and contradict everything that America was built upon through the Constitution and the freedom of speech and the freedom of ideas.
	It's absolutely loathsome, Jim.
	Well said, Scott.
	You know, the censorship that, you know, in law school, we're taught that the protections of free speech are, in a public environment, the most, especially in a public hearing, are the most, that's when the most protections kick in.
	So when there's a record being developed the interest in that speech, whether it can be critical of government, all that stuff, you have an absolute protected right to rail against the government of the United States.
	I forget the case, I think it's Brandenburg versus Ohio, it's been so many years, but this is when speech is at its most protected, the highest protection takes place.
	So, So when you have Senator Ron Johnson, and he's being censored and he's being cast aside by Twitter, Facebook, TikTok, so on and so forth.
	It just shudders the imagination and it strikes the imagination because here is a person who's doing his damnedest to tell the truth and to deliver the facts and to give this information to the American people.
	And he's being subjected to interference, obstruction.
	It's mind-boggling to me that this can take place in America in the middle of the 21st century.
	You would think that these debates would take place, that these would be open for discussion, for sharing ideas.
	You know, you have Zev Zelenko, the doctor, you have Stephen Corey, I think, the other doctor who are railing against the COVID vaccines, and they're being shut down and they're being marginalized.
	And this whole effort to strangle the speech of people People who are in disagreement is stunning to me.
	It's offensive, it's disgusting, and it's a flagrant violation of the First Amendment.
	And I think our Justice Department ought to protect that rather than engage in the same practices.
	Oh, I think we all 100% agree, David.
	You're absolutely right.
	Meanwhile, get this.
	Ford electric truck completely fails a towing test.
	Not practical.
	We're told to go to Green Energy.
	We should all have electric vehicles.
	Well, look at the consequences.
	A man tried to use his brand-new 2023 Ford F-150 Lightning electric pickup truck to tow a 1930 Ford Model A truck, but the attempt ended in a complete and total disaster.
	Here's Breitbart tweeting, a YouTuber with 1.4 million followers attempted to tow a 1934 Model A truck with his brand new 2023 Ford F-15 Lightning.
	Spoiler alert, it sucked at it.
	If a truck towing 3,500 pounds can't even go 100 miles, that is ridiculously stupid.
	And here we got Biden promoting electric trucks.
	This is my new 2023 Ford F-150 Lightning electric pickup truck we noted in a video where he tested the vehicle's towing capacities, which ended in a complete and total disaster.
	He planned a simple test in which he drove the EV truck towing an empty trailer just 32 miles away.
	Then loaded up a 1930 Ford Model A pickup that he'd recently purchased and towed it back the same way he can.
	My plan was to make two trips today, he said, about 32 miles each way, so that's about 64 times two, 128 miles round trip.
	I had this thing charged to just over 200 miles when I started my day.
	So ample margin for error when it comes to range and towing, and also considering the fact the trailer was going up empty two times.
	After loading the Model A onto the trailer and driving back to his neighborhood, he already got the driving range low warning.
	He then noticed he had only 50 miles of range left, despite the fact he charged for 200 miles at the start of his 128 mile trip.
	Are you kidding me?
	That's almost 90 miles of range in 30 miles?
	Are you serious?
	That's nuts!
	What a joke!
	So yeah, that was abysmally bad, and if the future is electric, there has to be some kind of solution for this.
	I have no idea why EVs tow so bad.
	My guess would be it doesn't have a normal transmission where there's gears and cars in a lower rev range.
	If a truck towing 3,500 pounds can't even go 100 miles, that is ridiculously stupid.
	This truck can't do normal truck things.
	You'd be stopping every hour to recharge, which would take about 45 minutes a pop, and that is absolutely not practical.
	The YouTuber concluded saying the electric truck was apparently just for getting from point A to point B, not for actually doing truck things, referring to actual labor trucks are designed for, such as towing.
	The F-15 Lightning It's more like a truck that most people use their trucks for just to get around AWB and not really using it to do truck things.
	They just want something big and comfortable.
	It does great at that.
	But as far as doing truck things well so far, just with towing, not good.
	And this is part of what they're trying to sell us.
	What a pile of shit.
	Scott, your thoughts.
	Yeah, I think the overall infatuation with electric vehicles is fast waning and it'll especially come into a complete abandonment as energy wars begin to ignite.
	I think it's not beyond the pale to think massive EMP electromagnetic blasts will not cripple America's energy infrastructure.
	Anything that triggers a social, societal, schizophrenic, nervous breakdown, which is very easy in a society that doesn't know what gender is and has 13 different cisgender, bigender, every other form of perversity and sexual insanity, that's a society that's right for a nervous breakdown.
	And the absence of electricity, the absence of luxury, the absence of things that they in this country have become so drunkenly and arrogantly dependent on whether it's staring into their cell phones for the voyeurism and narcissistic hedonism of social media.
	All of these things are setting up the personality of America to fall apart and the energy crisis is going to, I think, trigger it.
	So you could see a lot of things make it impossible for electric vehicles to really be anything.
	I mean, taking eight hours to charge it, the absence of electrical outlets and the fall of an electrical grid because of its incapacity to sustain these electrical vehicles.
	This is the sort of thing that causes Gavin Newsom to have his head put on a spike and the Democrats be overthrown because they are trying to advance a religion of climate change through economic violence that is going to Cause great harm to the economy and people's ability to eat and live That's where things hit a French Revolution.
	So, you know all over again So I think we're on the verge of that and it's this arrogant again the arrogance of these Democrats who who you know, just not a snotting Lee say oh, I'm driving my electric vehicle from Chicago to Washington and uh-huh and And, you know, I'm better than you kind of a thing.
	These people deserve to get the guillotine that's coming for them.
	Jim?
	Well, there's so much stupidity out here.
	So Biden is even getting money from the federal government to remove gas stations from the United States.
	This is insanity!
	If you want to destroy America, I can't think of a single more effective way than to get rid of gas-powered engines and gasoline automobiles, restrict our freedom, and destroy anyone's enthusiasm for life.
	That's what they're doing here.
	David, your thoughts?
	Yeah, my concerns are not just the gas.
	I've heard that they're attacking diesel now to raise the prices so we can't even run our old diesel trains.
	But when it comes to electric vehicles, I'm shocked that the Ford F-150 can't tow an old Model A.
	I'm a big car guy just like everybody.
	I had a friend of mine who was just telling me last week he purchased a 1987 Bentley in pristine condition with 40,000 miles on it for $12,000.
	That's, I think, an indicator of where things are headed.
	You know, when it comes to cars, the love and the attraction that people have, I mean, it's like they want to reflect their identity in the car that they drive.
	It's an integral part of Of being a Californian, especially, but being, you know, it's an essential part of identification.
	So talk about maybe it should be automobile identification theory.
	You know, I'd be a cis-auto guy, I guess.
	But I think this whole deal by Gavin Newsom across multiple fronts is just going to really detract.
	And I'm glad it is.
	I just don't think he's a viable candidate for president.
	That's for damn sure.
	But this social engineering, the economics, the destruction of going after the car is, in my opinion, the worst game in the world.
	I would just say, look, they're making great strides in more efficient engines.
	Put the science there, and I'm all for it.
	But like I said, I'm just waiting for the opportunity to ride a Ruckus, a Honda Ruckus, across the United States for a couple hundred bucks.
	David, you're 100% correct.
	I mean, gas efficiency has become increasing.
	We all know gas motors.
	We all know what they can do.
	Our whole society is built around it.
	And the idea of gutting it and just taking it out in short order is insanity, unless your objective is to bring America to its knees to destroy the economy.
	Don has graciously invited us to extend our discussion to one further story.
	To wit, Mary Maxwell.
	Sandy Hook is definitely a hoax.
	I repeat, Sandy Hook is a hoax.
	By Mary Maxwell, Ph.D., LLB.
	Editor's note, The photo is of Wolfgang Halbig, a former Florida State Truman School principal, asking questions about the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting during the public participation section of the Board of Education meeting at the Newtown Public Center Council Chambers in Newtown, Connecticut, Tuesday, May 6, 2014.
	I was there and spoke second.
	Wolfgang was my guest on The Raw Deal just this past week.
	Listen live via freedomslips.com.
	Mary, let's start with a recap of the cult story.
	A 20-year-old boy named Adam Lanz at his home in Newtown shot his mom dead on the morning of Friday, December 14, 2012, using a rifle from her collection.
	He then proceeded to drive to the San Diego school, arriving by 9.30 a.m., where he broke a glass door to get in.
	He then murdered 20 children, six and seven, plus six staff members.
	There are no video shots of this happening, no sound of it on the school's audio.
	A few people saw holes in the story early on.
	Not me.
	I fell for it.
	Among the noisiest complainers, some were arrested, sued, or sacked.
	Respectively, Wolfgang Helbig, James Fetzer, and James Tracy.
	An angry local, William Shanley, was, we surmise, killed.
	I won't mention the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones as he is a gatekeeper.
	He has been part of this system all along.
	I never fell for him.
	I call for the immediate arrest of all persons, including the parents and media reporters who conjured up this tragic event.
	The only thing tragic about it is it gave the U.S.
	government time to string us along for 10 years while they increased their lying.
	By this point, the lies of Sandy Hook should be considered Olympic bronze medal material.
	I'm saving the silver for the Boston Marathon bombing and the gold for 9-11.
	This article presents a six-part outline of the exhaustive sleuthing done by Wolfgang Hallberg, a Florida guy who had been a state trooper and therefore knew what type of reports should have been logged in by police that day in December of 2012.
	He had also been a school safety consultant, so knew what kind of protections are standardly in place.
	Being American?
	How McNew the Congress passed the Freedom of Information Act in 1966, and that the state of Connecticut has similar law.
	Oopsie!
	C.T.
	Legal Advisor, you forgot to get that one repealed before Adam Lanza Day.
	Oopsie!
	Halberg learned a huge amount about this terrible false flag by sending FOIA requests.
	Even when he doesn't get a reply after many tries, that's good evidence of crime.
	Remember the maxim, omnia praesimunter contra spoilior?
	Everything can be charged against those who hide or destroy the evidence.
	Six parts.
	By Wolfgang Halbeck.
	I'll quickly divide Halbeck's findings into six parts.
	You can see many further details at therealcolorado.org, as penned by Alison Maynard.
	Part 1.
	A Breast Party at Crown Plaza Hotel.
	As admitted by sales manager Kate Trudeau, that hotel in Salisbury, Connecticut, now renamed the Wyndham, Was heavily booked on the day before the massacre by government and media person.
	Boy, does this ring a bell with Aussies.
	Major media persons assembled the day before the 1990 Port Arthur massacre in a local hotel for a conference.
	Even funnier on that occasion, a teach-in for emergency room physicians was also being held in nearby Hobart.
	That massacre had actual casualties.
	Part two, dash cams.
	Please have mandatory cameras on the dashboard of their car which show the hood.
	To the small extent Halbig received any requested videos from cop cars, none were dashcam time.
	They may have been shot out the window.
	Why?
	Their timestamps are a major giveaway that nothing went according to the narrative that we suckers in a public were fed example.
	Three photos from Car 13, purportedly driven by Officer Chapman, all have the same timestamp for the same moment.
	9-21-43 AM.
	This can't be real.
	Part 3.
	Proof there was no school operating in December 2012 at the campus.
	We were all shown San Diego Elementary School at 12 Dickinson Drive, Newtown, near a firehouse near the home of Gene Rosen.
	I think that Rosen's ever-changing story at interviews was a strategy that got Sluthers involved from day one, looking at unprovable minutia.
	Same for the press conference of Robbie Parker.
	Halberg ascertained the campus lay empty since the beginning of the school year in September 2012.
	He got this from the minutes of school board meetings and from tracing the delivery of lunch food to the wrong location, namely To Chalk Hill School, which is where the real Sandy Hook pupils attended.
	Also, Halberg found, from a whistleblower, that Google Earth had been providing, since March 29th, nine months before the shooting, an image of Sandy Hook.
	Readers asked for the address, 375 Van Hill Drive, Monroe, Connecticut, which is Chalk Hill School's address, Part 4, GoFundMe.
	Sometimes, with the help of anonymous conspiracy theorists, Halbeck has learned of eulogies and fundraising, having been uploaded to websites on the day before or several days before the tragedy.
	Fathom it!
	Such sloppiness!
	But I thank those sloppy people.
	Part 5.
	A surviving witness lies.
	Ms.
	Caitlin Royke claimed to have herded 15 kids into a small bathroom in her classroom and locked it for safety.
	How did Wolfgang find official evidence that this part of the story is fake?
	First, there was no inside lock on that door.
	Second, the CPS, Kinetic Police Service, report includes two photos of the alleged classroom of Royke, one with a round window on the day, one with a square.
	You may be wondering how such a small piece of evidence could out the whole hoax.
	I believe it could.
	The district attorney could charge Ms.
	Roig with perjury and let the jury work things out.
	Even without Roig, the police should be forced to testify about the discredited photos.
	By the way, Helbig could sue under the tort of malicious arrest for what happened to him in Florida in the middle of the night.
	We would thus learn which member of the Connecticut government or mafia, as the case may be, instructed Florida police to grab Helbig.
	This is going to be a blast.
	Part six, porta-potties.
	We have all seen in early videos, such as the on-site interview of neighbor Rosen, that there were porta-potties near the school, as would be normal when a FEMA drill is in progress.
	Federal Emergency Management Agency is part of Homeland Security.
	We can also see the electronic sign.
	Everyone must sign in.
	Remember that?
	So what do you think Halbick thought about that in a FOIA request?
	Why, the logbook of those who signed in, of course.
	Do you think he got a reply, as is mandated by the Freedom of Information Law?
	Oh, please.
	My recent efforts on the legal front.
	There's much, much more to the list of Helbig's clever investigations, owing to the fact that a crucial date is coming up.
	The U.S.
	Supreme Court is siding on October 3rd, now moved back to the 7th.
	To take or not take the case of Posner v. Fetzer, I've tried to add some new material to the public file.
	Please see at granitegrok.com my 23 August 2022 item, Update on Alex Jones' Affirmation of Sandy Hook Families and the Marine Crowley Quote, or my gumshoenews.com article of September 25th, A Suggestion for SCOTUS, Certiorari for Posner v. Fetzer, or read my 2022 book, On Reality, Sandy Hook Messes Minds.
	We need to jump at this.
	It will have to be a citizen action.
	Clearly, no one in office will touch it.
	I'll start by sitting outside the New Hampshire State House.
	This plaza is geared up for this, thank God, in case anyone wants to chat.
	I'll be there today, which was last Tuesday, and tomorrow, last Wednesday.
	I am short, old, and have reddish hair.
	I will wear black.
	You can email me to discussandyhookatmarymaxwellllb at gmail.com.
	Why not invite me to speak at your venue?
	I'm still walking the earth, and who knows for how long.
	Last week, I sent the chief clerk of a court in Waterbury, Connecticut, a petition for a writ of error, quorum nobis, which is a writ of right.
	I use return receipt requested for my mailing, but have not received a signed green postcard in return naturally.
	I'm very inclined to use strictly the available judicial mechanisms, but my track record of success is zilcho thus far.
	Gotta think of a way to stop being lied to wholesale.
	It will be the death of us.
	Have you thought that too?
	Think of what?
	The Vax Live still proceeding, full blast from the media.
	Onward, Christian soldiers!
	Come on, get into the action, do something.
	Meanwhile, I have a press release updated on the 24th of September.
	Contact for further information.
	Notice of Sandy Hook's SCOTUS case.
	Fetzer v. Posner.
	Coast number 21-7916.
	Petition for stay.
	22A200.
	Update.
	Sandy Hook.
	Is the Alex Jones trial a gag order for America?
	The Alex Jones case is at the trial level, while my case is before the U.S.
	Supreme Court.
	My case concerns my book, Nobody Died at San Diego's La Fima Drill to Promote Gun Control, 2015, second edition, 2016, which Jones admits he's never read.
	All the pleadings filed to U.S.
	Supreme Court for your review and analysis are available at the Supreme Court docket.
	I'm available to answer any questions you may have.
	The above case comes up for review by the court on 7 October 2022, and I should know whether the court will hear my case by 10 October.
	Scott, your thoughts?
	You know, the interesting thing about your book, Jim, is it is your constitutional expression of the freedom of speech.
	You are not, in a sense, establishing an opinion.
	You are gathering all of the available information and saying, ladies and gentlemen of America, Here is all the available information that has been coming to me.
	I'm putting it into a book form for you to look at and review and draw your own conclusions.
	You are not calling anyone a liar.
	You're not saying anyone is false and all the rest of it.
	You are saying, ladies and gentlemen, here are other people, other documents, other information.
	I am just providing a clearinghouse for you to sift through it.
	And I have a right to collect all of this and put it out for you to access.
	You have a right to read whatever I put out there.
	And that changes the complexion and the orientation of this whole case.
	You are not attacking Posner.
	You're not attacking his character.
	You are presenting available materials that people would sift through to arrive at their own conclusion.
	So their attempting to stop that is a deprivation of all Americans' rights Not only for you to speak to them, but for them to be spoken to.
	They have a right to hear you.
	They have a right to listen and read what you're presenting to them.
	And Posner and the courts trying to intervene, trying to stop that communication, that relationship from happening, calling it defamation, is completely false.
	And the court should recognize that.
	That you are, you are simply providing a clearinghouse of information, not originating any information.
	You're just, you're collecting and assembling it and presenting it, Jim.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	If anyone wants to learn more, they can check out GiveSendGo.com slash FundingFencer, where I review the whole case, which I originally thought was a First and Second Amendment case, very long along the lines you sketched, Scott, but it turns out
	It was a summary judgment procedure in Wisconsin, which is peculiar, allows a judge to decide what are facts and what are not facts based on his own subjective opinion, which denies me of my right to a jury trial because juries resolve disputed facts, not judges.
	And this sets up a wonderful opportunity for the Supreme Court to clear this up.
	David?
	Yeah, I had a petition for a certiorari back, I probably think in the maybe early 2000s, and I remember working on the brief religiously.
	I mean, I polished it as much as I could.
	It was Patricia Holster versus the And I wrote the brief as well as I could.
	I cited plenty of authority and filed my petition.
	And it was really interesting because I was very pleased with the brief.
	And there was a periodical, I forget the name of it, but it was like National Interest Law Review or something.
	And it talked about these five cases are before the United States Supreme Court stellar cases.
	And and I was complimented on the way the brief was written by the authors of the article.
	So I thought that would at least increase my chances somewhat of getting a petition granted.
	But it was nice to get the review in the article.
	But when I got the result from the petition, it was petition denied.
	So I know how disheartening it can be.
	What I do like about your case is there is an underlying current in that of a compelling national interest.
	And I think that's maybe the hook that the Supreme Court might find to take it for review.
	Oh, I like those comments, David.
	Yes, and the surprise is the Supreme Court has never actually ruled that the Seventh Amendment alone, among the first 10, applies to all 50 of the states.
	They've never formally done that.
	I was astonished to learn that when the Posner team was opposing my motion to have a stay on their taking of my blog and the book until after the Supreme Court ruled and they brought up this point, which I've been able to deal with now in my Appeal for a stay until it's decided, which Justice Gorsuch has shared with the entire court.
	So I'm hopeful that David's exactly right.
	It's a unique historical opportunity.
	I believe they're going to do it.
	Don, thanks for the extra segment here and take us out.
	Oh, yeah, it's quite a good segment here.
	The whole hour and a quarter is well worth it here on Truth vs. News Incorporated on October the 2nd.
	And I'll say, this is one to share.
	The whole two hours and a half are just wonderful.
	So it's very important stuff.
	We're at a critical time now.
	What's going to happen here soon?
	We got to stay tuned and find out from us, I guess, because we're on top of it, like nobody else in the news business.

▲