All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 4, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:32:56
Need to Know News (3 October 2022) with Joe Olson and Carl Herman
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Joe Olson in Houston and Carl Herman in San Ramon, California.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
Today, it's pretty serious stuff.
We have a hurricane that appears to have been weather manipulated.
This is, oh, the Biden admin was bombing Florida.
Entirety of Hurricane Charlie from 2004 can sit inside the eye of Hurricane Ian 2022.
It is mind-boggling.
Not only that, but we had a lot of study and reporting about it, including Jane Wigington from Geoengineering describing the weaponization of Hurricane Ian, that modern tech can control the direction and intensity of storms and droughts, that Florida's phosphate fertilizer industry was in the direct path, that there are global attacks against the biosphere targeting crops, fertilizer, and food production,
The total devastation will take years to recover in some regions.
A fragile supply chain means parts and supplies won't be easily sourced for rebuilding.
Many injuries, deaths, body bags.
The latest estimate I have is that the insurance payoff is going to be in the 57 to 58 billion dollar category.
Check out this conversation between Mike Adams and Dane Wiginton.
All right.
Welcome, folks.
We are joined by none other than Dane Wigington, who agreed to join us on a kind of an emergency basis here because of what's just happened with Hurricane Ian.
And of course, Dane Wigington is the founder of geoengineeringwatch.org.
Extraordinary man, extraordinary individual.
He's been sounding the alarm on the destruction of the biosphere.
And we did an interview a couple of weeks ago that was just bombshell.
Mr. Wigington, I just want to thank you so much for joining me tonight.
It's great to have you back.
Well, Mike, it's always a pleasure.
And again, the same gratitude to you and your organization and all you're doing to help pull back the curtain and expose the insanity.
Well, we are all certainly subjected to massive insanity each and every day, so let's just jump right into this.
I was watching the actual live tracking of Hurricane Ian as it entered kind of the southwestern shoreline of Florida, and then it moved in, and then it stopped, and then it took a turn to the east, like a sharp turn, like it had a turn signal on or something, and then it stopped, and then it hovered, and then it moved around, and then it decided to go north, and I'm thinking,
I gotta call you and find out like because this is crazy this is not natural looking and you you you told me off the recording that that's correct so go ahead what what did you notice about the storm track and and is it was it weaponized and so on?
Within a few minutes we'll we'll send you the link to the recordings of the frequency transmissions that are used to Repel the storm in different directions.
That's how it's steered.
And we have the actual recordings of that in real time while it's happening, maneuvering that storm.
Same thing happens with so many other storms, Mike.
You remember Hurricane Sandy that they knew seven days in advance was going to make an unprecedented left westerly turn?
Remember that?
Yeah.
They can't know things like that unless that is actually the scheduled weather, unless they have the means to actually manipulate the storms.
And they do.
And Mike, if you didn't see it, in the case of Hurricane Ian, it was just a drifting mass of unorganized convection.
And that makes the storms much easier for them to steer until it gets closer to the land-based transmitters.
So until it got south of Cuba, it basically was completely unorganized.
And then with ionosphere heaters, they can affect the convection that allows the storm to start forming and strengthening, which it did right before it hit Cuba.
As it migrated northward by the southern end of Florida, the transmitter in Key West is part of the NEXTRAD transmitter network.
And again, this will all be shown on the video we're about to send you.
We'll post in a few minutes at GeoEngineeringWatch.org.
That transmitter again with the repelling effect when they saturate the air mass full of electrically conductive particles that's part of climate engineering those particles can be moved and repelled by the transmissions.
If you're repelling the particles that are saturating that air mass, you repel the air mass, thus you repel the storm.
And they can, in this way, maneuver those storms, steer them where they want to go.
They de-energize the transmitters on the side that they want the storm to migrate to, so they're not being repelled.
It's very, very clear on the video that we'll be sending you shortly.
And here's the video itself.
Check this out.
Is our weather and our climate being manipulated?
Examine the data in this short report.
Decide for yourself.
Frequency transmission manipulation of hurricanes are patented processes.
The technology is not new.
The list of weather modification patents numbers into the hundreds and continues to grow.
This is Hurricane Ian passing near the NEXRAD transmission facility in Key West, Florida.
When the transmission facilities are fully energized, they have a repelling effect on any air mass that has been saturated with electrically conductive climate engineering elements.
Patents call for such seeding into storms to be carried out from above by jet aircraft.
The NEXRAD transmission network then interacts with the storm air mass, determining where a storm will migrate and where it won't.
As Hurricane Ian is allowed to make landfall, the Frequency Transmission Facility in Melbourne, Florida is fully engaged.
This effectively slows Ian's migration inland.
The transmissions can diminish precipitation in some regions while augmenting it in others.
It lays the predicate and the foundation for the development of a weather satellite that will permit man to determine the world's cloud layer, and ultimately to control the weather, and he who controls the weather will control the world.
Weather modification climate engineering patent holders like Raytheon and Lockheed Martin do all the weather modeling for the nation's weather forecasting personnel, the National Weather Service and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Both agencies have an illegal federal gag order on their personnel.
The scheduled weather forecasting scripts are then passed all the way down to the local meteorologist level.
The official narrative must be controlled.
All must follow the same script.
Is it any wonder that the script readers miraculously know, up to a week in advance, that a storm like Ion, which was completely unorganized, a mass of convection migrating across the Atlantic, would end up where it did?
The same with Hurricane Harvey, Sandy, and so many others.
The U.S.
military first officially deployed hurricane manipulation operations 75 years ago, Project Cirrus.
Disastrous results were reported.
In 1962, Project Stormfury surfaced as a continuation of the U.S.
military's hurricane manipulation efforts.
During the 1960s, the U.S.
military continued to expand its weather warfare efforts and knowledge in Vietnam with Project Popeye, a historical fact of record.
So the bottom line question is this.
Is hurricane manipulation real and ongoing while illegal gag orders and paid-off politicians are utilized to keep climate intervention operations out of public consciousness?
Connect the dots and decide for yourself.
Share credible data from a credible source.
I don't think there's any doubt about it.
And the gagging, keep it quiet, I mean, it's outrageous.
I think this is absolutely stunning.
This is an unprecedented event of a federal government attacking one of the states using weaponized weather.
Joe, your thoughts?
Oh, well, there's no doubt in my mind that they weaponized Harvey and made it park over a five-county area in Texas and rain over 44 inches in 48 hours.
So yeah, I can agree with him on that.
I have a little bit of a problem with Dane.
He has a background in solar energy.
He's a former employee of Bechtel.
And was a licensed contractor in California installing solar cells.
So he's 100% on with solar cells, he's 100% on carbon dioxide warming the planet, he's 100% on with the Montreal ozone protocols, and he refuses to listen or discuss anything or return emails from anybody that wants to educate him on things.
I can't find any evidence that he's ever had any amount of scientific education, but that doesn't attract from the What we need to realize is what I've mentioned repeatedly with Jim and repeatedly on other shows water vapor absorbs in 37,000 spectral lines.
Those include almost everything in the entire electromagnetic radiation spectrum.
Including all of the microwaves.
And when we had the problem of the disappearing MH370, there were some great articles at Veterans Today saying that during World War II, American radar was about a million to one signal to noise ratio.
So you have a great big antenna that rotates around on the top of the ship.
It sends out like a hundred watt signal.
It gets back a milliwatt reflection off of something that's only line of sight.
And if the line of sight was behind a thunderstorm, you got nothing.
You could hide an entire fleet of Japanese vehicles behind a thunderstorm.
If the weather was clear, you had a 20-mile range, and you could spot a 10-man lifeboat floating in the water.
So that's how effective radar was then.
By the time of the disappearance of MH370, Veterans Today said there is so much ambient radio waves in the atmosphere that you don't even have to send out a base signal.
You can just pick up the reflection of all the ambient radars.
So we've saturated the atmosphere with radiance, and then all it takes is just focusing it on the particular water molecules on the particular location you do want, and that's done with triangulation.
According to a video that Amazing Polly did, they've been using silver iodine since the 1890s, and she goes into a bunch of those patents in her latest little rant, which is pretty good, but I'm not sure that silver iodine is the thing that they're using.
And then Max Egan says that they're using Doppler radar.
Well, probably they're using Doppler radar, but now they've also got a planned 42,000 Starlink satellites that can also be used to triangulate.
So definitely you can heat up one side of a storm that will make those water molecules expand because they've absorbed energy and they will exert pressure.
And so you can create high pressure.
You can steer something.
You can get on the other side, triangulate and make it stop and you could increase the amplitude of it.
I'm absolutely convinced, Carl.
is, is this possible?
Yes.
Is this what was done?
Most probably, yes.
Yeah, I think so too.
I'm absolutely convinced.
Carl, your thoughts?
Wow, great article.
I learned about weather manipulation probably about 15 years ago on the website wanttoknow.info that I recommend for a whole host.
But yeah, it goes back to World War II, and we understand the manipulation of the direction of weather patterns through pressurized system, high pressure, low pressure.
So, you know, obviously people who would be involved in that area would start thinking to themselves, hey, Can we manipulate those pressures?
And they have.
I remember for the Beijing Olympic Games that the Chinese government bragged about dumping all the rain the previous two weeks before the Olympics outside of Beijing so that there would be no storms, summer storms, in Beijing during the Olympics.
And I thought, wow, they just admitted it!
They just said it out loud!
So yeah, they can definitely do that.
I don't think it's a coincidence that the fertilizer processing facility was targeted, and I don't think it's a coincidence it's in Florida.
I think that our Blackhats may have thought something like that.
So DeSantis is going to send some migrants to to the Obamas in Martha's Vineyard.
Well, bitch, just wait and see what we got to send back to you.
And it's just on the other side of the peninsula.
I think so too, Carl.
I think that the fact that the Santas embarrassed them was one of the motives here.
It's not the only.
I mean, they're devastating Florida.
It's going to be very hard to conduct primaries.
It's going to be difficult to rebuild.
A lot of elderly people don't have the resources to, you know, it was, they bought cheap and they have real estate, very valuable.
I can see BlackRock and Vanguard coming and buying it up.
I can see Biden bringing in a bunch of immigrants to try to turn this red state blue.
I mean, I can see all this going on.
Is that, in your purview, likely to be taking place as well?
Well, yes, those are all great points.
And it's just on the other side of the peninsula, the Florida peninsula from Mar-a-Lago, so it might have been a heads up to Trump to back off.
Now, I think that most of what they have left is just going to be talk.
But the storm was a big hit.
And the last part that I wanted to go ahead and comment upon for those federal workers who have been given a gag order.
Well, you were first given an oath to have the job, to uphold, to support, and defend the Constitution against all enemies.
Foreign and domestic.
And you, the people who have taken this oath to uphold criminals, that's why employees are given this oath to uphold the Constitution.
They are a line of defense.
And basically the oath is that you uphold limited government that is underneath inalienable rights.
So those people are not violating Any type of a non-disclosure agreement, but if they're silent, they are violating their oath.
That's a great point, Joe.
Yeah, I wanted to bring you back, yeah.
Yes, yes.
Well, anybody that's questioned the ability to do this, just look up Wikipedia.
Operation Sober Popeye was a military cloud seeding project carried out by the U.S.
Air Force during the Vietnam War, 1967 to 1972.
I remember being in elementary school when a jet would fly by.
All the boys would jump up and run over to the window.
The teacher would go, sit down, sit down, sit down, and go, It's a jet, teacher.
It's a jet.
We'd see fighters, and then occasionally back then you'd actually hear a sonic boom because they still allowed supersonic flights over the United States before they had enough broken windows to stop doing that.
But I never remember Contrail lasting more than about three or four times the length of the airplane up until 1995 when the Yeah, I couldn't agree more.
It's just outrageous.
started doing chemical trails.
And that's when I became aware of it and started checking into it.
I think even Alex Jones had information on his channel about in the early 90s.
So bottom line is these SOBs have been treating us like a bunch of lab rats for the last 500,000 years.
And it's time that this ends.
I mean, absolutely 100% ends.
Yeah, I couldn't agree more.
It's just outrageous.
Every day count.
Meanwhile, climate scientists demand war crime charges for whoever ordered the pipeline sabotage.
This is out of the Biden admin.
Both Biden himself and Victoria Nuland were saying they'd bring an end to the North Stream if, in fact, Russia were to intervene in Ukraine.
A Stanford climate scientist called for war crimes against whoever ordered the sabotage of the North Stream.
Which is the largest required release of methane emissions in history.
Whoever ordered this should be prosecuted for war crimes and go to jail, said Rob Jackson to the AAP.
Swedish authorities announced the discovery of a fourth leak in the network carrying Russian gas at Germany under the Baltic.
Sweden detected two underwater blasts the same day the first three leaks were discovered.
While speculation and finger pointing abound, your opinion in suggesting Russia's to blame, which is idiotic.
How can Russia be to blame?
All they have to do is turn off the spigot.
It's not clear who is responsible.
Well, in my opinion, it's all too clear.
NATO said, all currently available indication this is a result of deliberate reckless and irresponsible acts of sabotage, where causing risk to shipping and substantial environmental damages.
This is NATO trying to deflect responsibility.
There's no question whatsoever but that the United States did this.
Danish authorities have estimated the two pipelines contained 778 million cubic meters of gas when they were breached, which is still flowing out of the pipelines.
This is a colossal amount of gas in really large bubbles, said Grant Allen, an environmental expert at Manchester.
If you have small sources of gas, nature will help out by digesting the gas.
In the Deepwater Horizon spill in Mexico, Gulf of Mexico, there was a lot of attenuation of methane by bacteria.
My experience, however, is telling me that the methane in this case will not have time to be attenuated, so a significant proportion will be vetted as methane bad.
This is as much as five times as much of the potential greenhouse gases released by the Aliso Canyon disaster, the largest known terrestrial release in U.S.
history, which unleashed back in 2015 in California.
100,000 metric tons into the atmosphere.
Rona Imsell, a spokesman with the Clean Air Task Force told CNN, the unprecedented aspect of this is we don't think we've seen a leak this large, this fast before, which is why it's so worrying.
Meanwhile, the U.S.
puts energy operators on heightened alert.
This is consciousness of guilt or fearing retaliation by Russia.
U.S.
Energy Secretary Granholm warned the American energy industry, including liquid natural gas tanker operators, to be on high alert.
Everybody should be high alert.
Multiple officials have labeled the explosion as apparent sabotage.
Well, of course it's sabotage, but only the United States has the motive, the means, and the opportunity.
Biden said in early Feb the U.S.
would end Nord Stream 2 if Russian troops entered Ukraine.
I promise you, he told a reporter, we will be able to do it.
With NATO having tested underwater drones near Bornholm, off the coast of which this occurred, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova called on Washington to confess to destroying the pipelines.
Random Swine suggests the U.S.
is concerned about attacks on its own, where its LNG shipments are a vulnerable point.
The Sandia National Lab warned in 2004 a deliberate attack on one of these ships could cause a fireball that would be hazardous to human health as far as a mile away.
I think it's all too likely those ships are going to become targets LNG shipments to Europe should take even more precaution.
We have to be on heightened alert.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well we've discussed this before.
This is your atmospheric radiation.
This is the amount of methane and where it absorbs.
Yeah, methane has a specific gravity of 0.43.
It rises into the atmosphere.
It's naturally produced all over the planet by multiple sources including volcanic outgassing as well as decomposition of organic matter all across the planet.
It has an atmospheric concentration of 1.7 parts per million.
It absorbs in two spectral lines, which we just showed you on this chart.
Two spectral lines for methane.
One of those spectral lines is the 3.3 micron range, which equates, according to Wien's law, as 600 degrees centigrade.
That is Hotter than anything on the Earth, which means it can only absorb incoming sunlight.
And when it absorbs, it immediately emits a longer wavelength, lower energy.
It filters out energy cooling the Earth.
The other absorption band is a 7.7 micron, which is 104 degrees centigrade.
And for you people that are metrically impaired, That's 219 degrees Fahrenheit.
There's no place on the surface of the Earth that's 219.
That means it cannot absorb anything other than incoming solar radiation, which means methane cools the Earth and every bit of this crap about methane being 17 times more powerful than carbon dioxide.
Yeah, every bit of that is crap.
The whole Global warming science is the worst science since the world is flat, and none of these lukewarmers will debate me, and none of the warmest will debate me.
So that's why we have our debates on BitChute.
See the interviews that Jim and I did on Global Warming Series 1 through 9.
At this point, we still are overdue for doing number 10 on proxies.
Joe, well, now's the perfect time to do it, but let me just say, you're saying, in essence, this methane release will actually cool the Earth, not warm it, right?
It can't do anything else.
That's basic physics.
I love it.
I love it.
Carl, your thoughts?
So, Joe, you think the global change scientists have it wrong?
Yeah, that's why they won't debate you, because they don't want to be embarrassed.
Yeah, I like the pivot that they did to incorporate climate change as a secondary effect for the multi-purpose use false flag that they have.
So, on the surface, this is an attack by the U.S., the U.K., and NATO to weaken Russia and to force the Europeans to go all in on this war to destroy Russia.
But, you know, because I am 95% in certainty that this is a White Hat operation and the White Hats are in charge of anything, try this one on for size.
If the White Hats are in charge of the military, rather than whatever elements there are of the Dark Hats, why not just turn the pipes off?
Say there was an explosion or fake it.
Get some people to say that there was an explosion.
Get some nice photo ops.
And then, see, because the effect of this is the same that I've seen with everything else.
So let's just even assume that this was a black dark operation.
The Europeans are going to be fucking livid about this.
They're not going to take this.
Governments are going to fall.
I don't think that The European governments are going to be able to survive this.
They're the ones whose assets are going to be freezing soon because they're going to be thrown out of their offices and the people are going to demand some sort of a negotiated settlement so that they can have heat in those six months of cold winter.
So that's what I think.
And as well, this is a huge, devastating exposure of the U.S. military being the rogue state empire that it has been for pretty much its entire history.
Now, that said, I do want to point out is that we are we're so vulnerable as well.
And this is a war, all the dangers of war.
And in addition, part of what our masters have constructed for society is that we specialized human beings have no idea how to produce food.
Most of us can't do anything with our hands.
We can't do anything with our cars.
We don't know how to build anything.
We don't know how the lights work other than just flipping on the switch.
That's about all that we know.
So the extinction event risk is real, and we're going to have to win this thing and then have substantial changes if human beings are going to be a successful and thriving species heretofore.
Just change one premise, Carl, and then I'll ask Joe, too.
Look, the explosion was real.
We got the seismic reports from Sweden.
It was all bona fide.
You got these bubbles coming up.
Assume it was real sabotage by the United States.
What then is the political fallout, Carl, as you see it?
Oh, the Europeans aren't going to take it.
And the rest of the world has really jumped the shark.
The script for The Dark Hats has gotten crazy bad.
And when you get open governments in Europe saying that this was sabotage, along with The documentary evidence of these reports of the seismic data of the radar of the U.S.
Navy hovering around that exact spot ten times in September.
I don't think that the U.S.
government can survive this.
The Dems are going to know this.
They're going to do everything they can to cancel the midterms.
Well, we know that already.
Joe, further thoughts?
Yeah, yeah.
The initial investigations indicate that the crater size and the chemical traces left behind Indicate that this was two 500 kilos, which is, you know, 2.2 pounds, so 1,100 pounds of TNT at each one of the blast locations.
So that's a little hard to explain as being accidental.
It had to be a state actor that did it, but the lines are about 300 meters deep, so it's beyond anything you could do with even hardhead diving.
You'd have to do it with a submersible sub, and we have the capability of doing that 100%.
Let's see, there was something else I was going to mention.
As far as white hats, we need to talk in a little while about Teresa Long's latest release on that, because that's pretty damaging as well.
Well, this next story...
You know how they say, don't let a crisis go to waste.
Secretary of State says it's an opportunity to remove Europe's dependency on Russian energy.
This is Blinken.
Secretary of State Blinken said the attack on the Nord Stream connecting Russia to Germany offer a tremendous opportunity to end Russia's dependence on Russian energy.
Tremendous opportunity to once and all remove the dependence of Russian energy and take away Vladimir Putin, the weaponization of energy as a means of advancing his imperial designs.
Except Putin has no imperial designs.
This is a purely commercial transaction.
It was beneficial to both sides.
This is trying to put a spin on this that I find really obscene.
That's very significant and offers tremendous strategic opportunity for years to come.
Secretary Blinken says the North Stream pipeline bombing offers tremendous strategic opportunity for years to come.
Too bad.
This tremendous opportunity for D.C.
bureaucrats will come at the expense of everyone else, especially this coming winter.
Lincoln made the comments when asked what the U.S.
and Canada are doing to ease Europe's energy crisis.
Lincoln said Washington has been working to provide Europe with more energy and, as a result, is now the biggest supplier of liquefied natural gas.
We're now the leading supplier of LNG to Europe to help compensate for any gas or oil it's losing as a result of Russian aggression against Ukraine.
Over the years, the U.S.
worked hard to oppose Nord Stream 2 by imposing sanctions but failed to stop its construction.
The project was paused by Berlin on February 22 after Putin ordered troops into the Don Pass.
There was always a chance Nord Stream 2 could be brought online if relation between Europe and Russia thawed, but the damage now could be irreparable.
Russia recently ceased delivering gas through Nord Stream 1 as a result of Western sanctions.
At this point, it's not clear who was behind it, but the U.S.
certainly had a motive, and I assert for a fact the U.S.
did this.
Putin blamed the Anglo-Saxon for the incident, pointing the finger at the U.S.
and its allies.
Sanctions are not enough for Anglo-Saxons.
They have turned to sabotage.
It's unbelievable but true, having organized explosions on the International Gas Pipeline in the Nord Stream.
The U.S.
has rejected that it was behind the attack, Western media hinting Russia was responsible, even though the pipelines are owned by Gazprom, Russia's state gas company, and the claim is absurd.
The AP called the assertion the U.S.
was involved in a baseless conspiracy theory being pushed by the Kremlin and Russian state.
How long are they going to keep up that complete nonsense?
One of the most significant allegations came from Radek Sikorski, a former Polish former minister and member of the European Parliament, who thanked the U.S.
for the incident on Twitter, a since-deleted tweet.
The AP also left out that the AP had been trying to stop Nord Stream 2 from being constructed under sanctions and pressures on the German government.
While neither one nor two were delivering gas to Europe at the time, both pipelines were holding gas under pressure.
The leaks caused by the explosion could amount to the largest single-ever release of methane gas discovered last Tuesday.
Danish authorities said Nord Stream 2 finally stopped leaking Saturday while Nord Stream 1 stopped on Sunday.
Joe, your thoughts?
Well, according to Global Fleet, there's 600 vessels that are capable of shipping LNG worldwide.
So that's not going to be enough, considering that most of them are already in captive markets where they're supplying LNG to other markets.
And the amount of distances involved is pretty extreme on these things.
And I remembered what I was mentioning in my earlier comments was that the people that are running this world are really demonic.
And when you do medieval crimes, you deserve medieval punishment.
And I think we need to have public punishment.
And so maybe the people in Europe this winter can stay warm by roasting a few bureaucrats at burning steaks alive like they did during the last Inquisition, because we got some demons we need to get rid of on this planet.
Joe, there's no doubt about it.
Carl?
Well, gentlemen, the appropriate category of speech for what Blinken said Gaslighting.
It's gaslighting.
So Blinken is trying to lie, saying that less gas is going to be more for the freezing Europeans, and that it's a tremendous opportunity, is it?
So that's all these psychopaths are going to do, and this is why I don't think they're going to get out of this, no matter how much they try.
Corporate media, the Biden administration, are all damning themselves by just denying it when anybody who takes a look at the report of the documentary evidence would conclude, of course, it was the U.S.
And as Jim said, they had the motive, they had the means, and they're the number one culprit, along with the history of psychopathic lies.
And it doesn't matter if Blinken says, oh, we got to put a red line and we got to make it illegal to buy that commie red gas.
It's not going to work.
Yep, yep, yep.
And Russia's already got this before the United Nations, and I expect they're going to make a rock-solid case.
Meanwhile, a columnist notes White House keeps walking back Biden's comments.
The question being raised, then, who is our real president?
Have you noticed how frequently the White House walks back and contradicts statements made by Joe Biden almost every time he speaks?
Glenn Reynolds, a professor running the popular Instabundit blog, focused on this in a new blog.
He's asking the question, who is the real president?
Joe Biden or the staffers that keep walking back his comments?
Is Joe Biden president?
That's a question to ask after staffers walk back his latest remarks on Taiwan.
Doing a rather uneven 60-minute interview with Scott Pelley, Biden firmly and clearly announced the United States would defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion.
This was a dramatic statement, a substantial shift from America's policy of strategic ambiguity, in which our response to Chinese saber-rattling was essentially, fool around and find out.
Mine was not at all ambiguous.
If China went to war with Taiwan, it would be at war with the United States and its allies.
That departure made some sense.
Back in February, he seemed to grant Vladimir Putin a green light to invade Ukraine.
When he seemed to do that, White House spokesman quickly walked it back.
But the green light coming directly from Biden's lips apparently convinced Putin he could launch an invasion without blowback.
Meanwhile, we have this fascinating development If you listen to the liberal media, you might think the Democrats are in great shape heading into the 2022 midterms.
It's simply not true.
New polling from ABC News and the Washington Post indicates Republicans are surging, and in battleground states, no less.
Listen to this.
Eye-opening poll shows GOP far ahead in battleground states.
Makeup policies may be out if you listen to President Biden, Speaker Pelosi, and other Democrats spending hundreds of millions on negative campaigns directed at Republican candidates, but those very same policies are very much in as far as common sense Americans are concerned.
Completing this poll entitles you to pro-Trump news updates.
Hold on to your hats for this one.
In an ABC Washington poll of registered voters, shall Republicans are up 21 points against Democrats in battleground districts across the country.
That's right, 21 points.
They aren't even just likely voters.
They are registered voters.
Many key pollsters think Republican voters don't even want to answer polling surveys because the FBI might take their cells away.
Looking just at races rated as somewhat competitive by ABC's 538 model, Voters favor GOP candidates 55% to 34%.
Overall, the likely voter subheading showed a 51% to 46% Republican-Democrat split.
In other words, 5% lead nationwide, and in battleground states, 21 points.
Here's the actual most important message.
The GOP is favored in three of the four issues rated most important.
The economy, considered important by 84%.
Education, 77%.
Inflation, 76%.
77%, inflation 76%, and crime 69%.
On the economy, the GOP is plus 16, on inflation plus 19, and on crime plus 14%.
This is huge news for Republicans and Independents who want the Democrats out.
In ABC, Washington Post poll showed Republicans are 21 points up against Democrats in battleground districts.
That's right, 21 points, said Ned Ryan.
A new ABC Washington Post poll released Sunday show Republicans have a 21-point lead on the congressional ballot in key battlegrounds districts across the district.
Keep this in mind the next time someone in the liberal media claims the Democrats are bouncing back.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well, we had an interesting vote two days ago that we didn't get a chance to talk about yet.
U.N.
Security Council resolution introduced by the United States and Albania condemning Moscow's annexation to parts of Ukraine fails to pass after Russia's veto with China, India, Brazil, and Gabon abstaining from the vote.
So yeah, it doesn't look like the whole world's lined up with the West against Russia.
So that's item number one.
Item number two, Jen Psaki was out over the weekend and she said the Democrats better not try to run on FJB's coattails because he's toxic.
Yeah, and we know that because nobody's inviting him to come stump speed for him anytime during this election cycle.
And then we have another hero of the Democratic Party.
AOC, who's being promoted as a future and near future presidential candidate.
Three years ago, she had a net worth of zero.
She's been in Congress three years.
Her salary is $174,000 a year.
Her current net worth is $29 million.
I think people are going to be fed up with this.
a year.
Her current net worth is $29 million.
I think people are going to be fed up with this.
And also, Nancy Pelosi just tabled a bill that had bipartisan support on barring legislators and their immediate family from any stock dealings.
And she says, oh, we're just like normal citizens.
We should be able to trade and make money on the stock market the same way anybody else does.
Yeah, like you just bought into Exxon and Mobil back when you knew the prices were going to increase 60%.
Yeah, we know how you made your money, you dirtbags.
That's right.
Pelosi is a criminal.
She's benefited from Inside Trader from the beginning.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, just follow the money.
And my historic favorite is that substitute school teacher who just happened to make a lot of money in public office.
Millions and millions named Lyndon Johnson.
That's one of my favorites.
So that's a great story.
And according to the narrative that we see on the news, that explains a lot about why Biden's handlers don't let him talk and don't let him just speak out and answer questions.
I mean, it's perfectly in line.
But the effect is, again, the Democrats aren't going to survive.
And assuming That the Democratic leadership, the dark side, has some capacity to still plan and execute their plans.
They have an exit strategy engaged for how to get rid of Biden.
They could just replace him.
But I'm with what, I forget who said it, maybe it was Jim, maybe it was Joe, maybe I got it from someplace else, I don't know.
But I like the idea of having a false flag assassination.
If you think of how the Dems would answer the question, how are we going to get back control?
Alright, well, assassinate Biden, have some outrageous story of some MAGA complicity thing connected to January 6th, connected to Trump, whatever.
And then, in order to get the votes back, You would have the Obamas.
You would have Big Mike come on TV.
And you would have people begging the Obamas to come back to office.
And Barry would have to say, it's just my great respect for the Constitution that prevents me.
And somebody will say, well, Michelle, why don't you do it?
And they'll say, I think that actually would be a cover story that would be effective for at least the Democrats to believe that they won the 2024 election.
But we shall see.
The other key fact is in 20, it was 3 to 1 to 4 to 1 for Trump.
And that now is probably somewhere between 4 to 1 to 5 to 1 who would back a Republican candidate.
So wild and crazy endgame.
Well, I think that's right.
I think that's right.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Biden wants to provoke a violent response from patriots or have the FBI stage one so he can declare martial law and cancel the election.
I think that's one of the options they're contemplating.
I think this is exactly right.
This is something that's on the table at the White House.
Meanwhile, U.N.
Education Agency launches a war on conspiracy theories.
Makes you want to gag!
According to a Paris-based UN education agency, conspiracy theories cause significant harm and form the backbone of many populist movements.
Well, look right there.
Obviously, populist movements, which represent the people, cause significant harm to the interests of establishments.
No wonder they're damaging.
Among other concerns, conspiracy theories foster and reinforce harmful thinking patterns and exclusive worldviews.
Yes, critical thinking, trying to figure out what really happened, is a bad idea.
It does foster thinking things through, which we can't have.
They reduce trust in public institutions, which have been betraying us, and scientific institutions, which have defrauded the public, too, when it comes to the medical community, which can drive people to violence or decrease their desire to reduce their carbon footprint, meaning by showing the whole global warming story as a myth.
While all conspiratorial thinking threatens human rights values, it's ridiculous when conspiracy is the most prosecuted crime in the United States.
The document says without elaboration, some conspiracy theories are more dangerous than others.
Maybe that Lee Oswald wasn't the lone gunman of JFK?
Maybe that 19 Islamic terrorists didn't perpetrate 9-11?
Maybe that Sandy Hook was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder?
Are those among the more dangerous?
In some cases, teachers are encouraged to report their students to authorities if they have impure thoughts.
Examples of conspiracy theories cited in the report conclude everything from widely held and respectable beliefs such as climate change denial and manipulation of federal elections, which we've proven in spades right here on this show, to more far-fetched notions such as Earth is flat or Michelle Obama is actually a lizard.
That's a new one to me.
But why would anyone give a damn about either?
There are plenty of crazy thoughts on the internet, many of which are patently false, explains Citizen for Free Speech director Patrick Wood.
The only thoughts being corrected are those contrary to globalist narratives.
This proof the focus is on protecting their own narratives and nothing else.
Well said.
UNESCO joins the consensorship cartel that now includes the European Union, the U.S.
government, the World Economic Forum, social media giants like Facebook and Twitter, and notably Google.
Anyone who does not parrot the globalist narrative is, by default, considered to be a conspiracy theorist.
At the heart of the global program to combat these ideas are teachers and schools.
Also central are in the battle online and in the media UNESCO documents explain.
The latest strategy was unveiled at their international symposium on addressing conspiracy theories through education held in Brussels last June.
Which brought together academic, government, civil, society, and private sector to promote joint action against them.
The plan includes strategies to prevent people from believing in conspiracy theories in the first place, as well as tools for dealing with those who already believe them.
Several experts on propaganda and free speech, however, warned the UN effort represents a dangerous escalation of a global war on free speech, free expression, questioning official narratives, and dissent more broadly.
What they mean by conspiracy theory is any claim or argument or evidence that differs from the propaganda pumped out by the government and the media.
For an NYU professor of media studies, Mark Crisman Miller, a good guy, studies propaganda and government misinformation.
I can't think of anything more dangerous to free speech and free thought, and therefore democracy, than this effort by the UN, which has no business telling us what's true and what is not.
That distinction is not theirs to make, but ours, as free people capable of thinking for ourselves and unafraid of civil argument.
Official efforts to clamp down on conspiracy theories and misinformation are not new.
Indeed, Western governments, including the U.S., have been leading the charge for years.
In 2010, the State Department, with help from its counter misinformation team, published Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation on America.gov.
Claiming to debunk various conspiracy theories more recently, the Biden administration's focus to conspiracy theories with DHS has repeatedly suggested belief in widespread voter fraud or alternative views on COVID and public health measures represent major terrorism threats to the United States.
While the Biden admin's proposed disinformation government board appears to have been shelved for now, the government has been working closely with technology giants to suppress speech surrounding election fraud.
Hunter Biden's laptop Alternative views on COVID and more.
NPR, a tax-funded op, has published numerous pieces echoing UNESCO's talking points about the alleged danger and prevalence of conspiracy theories in schools and beyond.
Outgoing senior health official Tony the Rat Fauci has chimed in too.
What we're dealing with now is just a distortion of reality.
Conspiracy theories don't make any sense at all.
Pushing back on sound public health measures, making it look like trying to save lives is encroaching on people's freedom, he said on, guess where?
The Rachel Maddow Show on August 22nd.
The World Economic Forum, which has become a lightning rod around the world for its Great Reset agenda, is also working to counter ideas it labels misinformation and conspiracy theories.
Key to stopping the threat of conspiracy theories is educating people to be on the outlook for misleading information and teaching them to be suspicious of certain sources, said a senior WEF writer.
The UN program has been central to this global effort.
Indeed, it's actually an extension of a 2020 initiative by UNESCO and the European Commission, dubbed Think Before Sharing, to combat conspiracy theories online.
That effort included urging citizens to post links to fact-checking services and even report journalists who may be engaged in conspiracy theorizing to your local national press council or press ombudsman.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, one year ago today, the world's greatest chant was captured live on TV.
Let's go, Brandon!
This is that Gateway Pundit.
NASCAR driver Brandon Brown, October 2nd, last year, won a race.
It was historic, but not the win.
The crowd was chanting, F Joe Biden!
The interviewer says, oh listen, they're so happy, they're chanting, let's go Brandon!
Yeah, so we're still a year later, we're still going, let's go Brandon.
As far as conspiracies, every one of them I've investigated, except for there's no such thing as nukes and the earth is flat, but every other one has been 100% spot on.
On September 12th, I did an interview two hours on TNT Radio with Jeremy Nell on the nuclear vaporization of the World Trade Center buildings.
One of the, quote, conspiracies, but absolutely 100% provable.
Then on Sunday, September 18th, I did a 90-minute video on his germ warfare site on false flags, and he said, man, we didn't even scratch the surface of this.
Can you do two hours tomorrow on false flags?
And yes I did on September 19th do another two hours on TNT Radio.
Jim and I have almost 300 videos up at BitChute and almost every one of them involves conspiracies either in the daily current events or in past events and you know corrected history and false science and we've covered the whole entire gamut and I can tell you I'll debate Anybody, anytime, anywhere, because I know the facts, and I know they're lying, and they know they're lying, which is why they won't debate anybody.
And that's why you have to have some power like the U.N.
come in and say, you're not allowed to talk about any of this anymore.
Yeah, well, you can take your Orwellian New Think and go poke it up your butt.
Look how stupid it is just to take for granted that everything the government says about controversial events must be true by definition because of the source.
It's irrational, it's irresponsible, it's unscientific.
Colossally stupid.
It's such obvious propaganda I can't believe anyone would be played by it.
Carl, your thoughts?
And it's un-American.
We wouldn't even be a country if we didn't have conspiracy theorists pointing out the difference between what we're guaranteed as citizens under our own government versus the Orwellian, they didn't have Orwell back there, but the opposite of that by having a standing army on our own shores, having taxation without representation.
And it became so egregious that Thomas Jefferson wrote a pamphlet on it.
One of the reasons why he volunteered and was encouraged to be the writer for the Declaration of Independence is he wrote a prelude to that of the rights of British citizens that were being denied by our own government.
So yeah, we will debate anybody because we are confident the facts are on our side.
MIT economist Simon Johnson, who was the former chief economist for the IMF in Carl B. Herman Blockspot, In the looting trillion section, I quote him, and he says it all.
He had an interview with somebody who has won like 30 different Emmys.
He was President Johnson's press secretary, and the name isn't coming to mind, but he's done a lot of interviews, and Simon Johnson just flat-out said, he says, yeah, our opponents in the big banks, they won't come out and debate with us, and they won't because they can't.
We have all the facts.
All they have are lobbyists.
So that story, that article is awesome.
And so the propaganda talking points of our opponents is that harmful thinking patterns and exclusive worldviews.
Oh, you mean like the ongoing never-ending wars and the exclusive 99% of the 1% own more assets than the 99% excluded?
You mean like that?
It erodes trust in public institutions, like the war criminals and the looters and the liars.
And that conspiratorial thinking threatens human rights values.
Yeah, just the human rights from the psychopaths at the top that think they have a dominating position over the sheeple.
Yeah, it threatens them.
That's true.
And it's just their straw man.
Michelle Obama isn't a reptile, but she does have a snake down her pants.
I'll give you that.
Partly right on that.
And Fauci, part of this, what they're going for, is about three weeks ago, Fauci began the talking point of anti-vaxxer attitudes.
And what our opponents, I'm sure, would like to do is connect the January 6th insurrectionists to some current false flag.
If they can assassinate Biden, they're going to link them all together and call them all domestic violent extremists who are a threat to their own safety, to public safety, and to throw them all away.
And finally, I'll tell you one more quick story.
So the first of four times I got fired without cause as a public school teacher was in 2009.
And before they fired me, I got an email from the principal coldly saying, on your teacher's website, have only government approved links.
And I wrote back and I said, that's the most uneducational thing that you could possibly imagine.
Only government websites to share communications regarding AP U.S.
government and AP He didn't respond, but that was the first time I was shortly thereafter fired by refusing to comply.
Carl, you're a brave man, Joe.
Yeah, and if you want some further proof about conspiracies, the number one conspiracy, the conspiracy that underlies all the rest of the fraud worldwide is the fiat banking system, which is unconstitutional Federal Reserve passed in 1913.
But Neil Oliver has a great video up.
It's linked at the Conservative Treehouse.
It's like article number two or three today.
Trot down, take a look at it.
It's about a 20-minute discussion.
of the banking system beginning in England in 1694 and coming up to the current date and he absolutely exposes how this phony baloney sham has been produced on us and why these people need to lie about everything so we can't turn around and discover they're lying about money too kids and that's the bottom line to all of this crap.
It's these greedy psychopaths that run the planet.
And if you want the best history that I found as a retired AP Macroeconomics teacher, I recommend Bill Stills' The Money Masters documentary.
It's three and a half hours.
When I first saw it, I watched it back to back.
It goes all the way back to the history and walks people through in such a way that, you know, I would show excerpts of that to my Economic students and about three quarters of them could articulate the reason why our monetary system is a fraud and essentially the bottom line that I always say is that the banksters have the legal right to create what is used for money as a debt owed back to them with interest.
This is adding negative numbers forever and will have you understand the mathematical certainty of the mechanics of an exponential growth curve.
Very nice, very nice, very nice.
And you wonder if we're not supposed to talk about Matt Tiabi's video demonetized by YouTube because YouTube doesn't like the narrative deniers when it comes to figuring out how to boot a video off a platform because it would look too obvious they knew to the next best thing and prevent content creators from making money off of their effort.
YouTube did that to a video disseminated by former Rolling Stone Current Substack journalist Matt Tiabi, who became a thorn in the elite's side by challenging the prevailing narrative, hit Democrats where it hurts by publishing a five-minute video of Democrats in abundance claiming the 2016 election was stolen.
Isn't that a conspiracy theory?
It's a pretty damning video given how Democrats have been pounding Trump and Republicans for being election deniers, asserting their threats to the country.
Democrats compared Trump's victory of Clinton to 9-11, implying Trump was a greater threat than terrorism.
Tabby sent an email to his subscribers informing them of the YouTube decision.
Today we're releasing a video Matt Ophelia has been working on, showing years of audio and video clips, tweets, and headlines where Democrat Party politicians and media figures describe Trump's presidency as illegitimate.
Before it was even published on this site, Matt received the above notice.
I'd like to thank YouTube for making our point.
The material in this video does not promote the idea that any election was stolen or illegitimate.
On the contrary, it shows a great mass of comments from Democrat, partisan, and pundits who make that claim about the 2016 election.
Those comments were not censored or suppressed when made the first time around by the likes of Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Karine Jean-Pierre, Adam Schiff, Rob Reiner, Tom Hartle, and Chris Hayes, among many others.
Nor did any platform step in to issue warnings when my former boss, Keith Olbermann, promised with regard to Trump's ascension to the White House, it will not be a peaceful transfer of power.
However, the decision to assemble these materials in one place, inviting audiences to consider their meaning, apparently crossed a line.
Now we know.
You can deny election results on a platform like YouTube as much as you want.
You can even promise disruption.
But drawing attention to that behavior angers the algorithm.
It's hard to imagine a better demonstration of the double standard in content moderation.
Led by the losing candidate of 2016, Democrat politicians, along with law enforcement and intel officials and media, spent years Four years denying the legitimacy of Trump's residency based on an equally specious, dishonest formulation.
The election was hacked.
Moreover, the instigated removal effort based on the same declared-guilt-now-prove-it-later mentality that gripped figures like Trump and Giuliani in 2020.
How different really is just say it was corrupt and leave the rest to me from we just have to dig deeper, do the investigation and find it.
The January 6 hearings ironically are not both of the Democrats own six year long election denial endeavor involving the same people.
Bush attempts to remove Trump based on manufactured theories of foreign collusion.
Conspiracy theories, by the way.
There's an automatic boy-who-crawled-wolf factor built into the hearings that include the likes of California's Adam Schiff.
I can't go into the particulars, but there's more than circumstantial evidence now.
For Maryland's Jamie Raskin, Donald Trump is a hoax perpetrated on the Americans by the Russians.
Moreover, Congressional Democrats successfully pushed for censorship on platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube.
A campaign that began even before January 6th revealed the party considers the act of denial itself illegitimate and bandworthy, if not criminal.
But how can that be if, as the video shows, the party's own leaders engage in the same behavior?
How can declaring the 2020 election illegitimate be prohibited if saying the same thing about the 2016 election was and is encouraged?
Democrats' obsession with Trump is something to behold.
They have spent eight years talking about little else.
Whatever.
If they wanted to make stupid claims, let them.
But mobilizing all the resources of the government and the social media to shut up opponents?
It proves that they, not anybody else, are the threat to democracy.
Joe, your thoughts?
Oh, Matt Tabahi is an outstanding researcher.
I highly recommend his article called The Great American Bubble Machine on the mortgage-backed security housing fraud back in 2007 with Lehman Brothers and the rest of those bandits.
And he called Wall Street the Great Vampire Squid because that's exactly what it does.
It wraps its tentacle around it and then it pokes its beak in and sucks anything of value out of it.
But then he followed it up in 2012 with another great article.
The true story of Mitt Romney and Bain Capital, and I call him Willard the Bain Bandit, but he used the leveraged buyouts in order to bankrupt Ampad, KB Toys, Beals Store, Palais Royal, Dunkin Donuts, Baskin Robbins, Sports Authority, Payless Shoes, and Toys R Us because he's a squid himself.
He just wraps his tentacles around it, sucks all the value out of those corporations and then bankrupts the owners, the stockholders, and the employees end up with no jobs because Willard is a Bane bandit.
Yeah, absolutely.
Carl.
Matt Taibbi, we invited him, I think, 10 years ago to an event that we had to promote public banking, the Public Banking Institute.
I recommend for information about that breakthrough.
And yeah, he is one of the most effective writers to be able to document and prove that Wall Street is a rigged casino.
And that's all that you can really say about it.
It is criminal looting.
And they give us a few scraps from the table and then the owned corporate media say that it's all good for us.
So that is also interesting in light of the recent disclosures that the federal government had 50 plus agents working with Facebook and Twitter to censor information for counter narratives with COVID.
And Matt, God bless him, so he was just basically writing about the hypocrisy of that He seemed to be absolutely clueless that election fraud actually happens as often as fraud happens among the big banks.
I don't know how he could miss that one.
I guess maybe to try to keep his sanity from understanding that all the institutions have been captured.
So where we're at and what this all means is that there is a polarization into two camps.
One is going to be the Great Awakening, which is us.
And that means that we just have the truth and the truth demonstrates the tremendous lies and crimes against humanities and and the requirement to arrest these psychopaths at the top and the other side is going to be the great reset.
And the Great Reset is just going to have the one political party, the one unicorn rainbow political party, the one official source of information with the fact checkers.
And they're going to require that for the good of the group, you do things like take your shots and do whatever is ordered of you.
Very well said, Carl.
Yes, I think you got it exactly right.
Here's another.
Former congressman sentenced to prison for stuffing Pennsylvania ballot boxes.
Gee, that sounds like a conspiracy theory.
Despite declarations of safe and secure election, history showed past Pennsylvania elections were subject to corruption.
Former U.S.
Representative Michael Ozzie Myers, a Pennsylvania Democrat—surprise, surprise—pled guilty to conspiracy to deprive voters of civil rights, bribery, obstruction of justice, falsification of voting records, conspiring—conspiring—to illegally vote in a federal election and orchestrating schemes to fraudulently stuff ballot boxes for specific Democrat candidates
In elections in Pennsylvania between 2014 and 2018, he was sentenced by U.S.
District Judge Paul S. Diamond to 30 months in prison, three years supervised, pay 100,000 fines with 10,000 due immediately.
Directly after the hearing, he was taken into custody.
He's 79 years old.
He served in the House from 79 to 80 when he was caught taking bribes in an FBI sting operation.
That was part of an old, completed investigation.
Today's sentencing was a new matter where he admitted he bribed Dominic DiMuro, a Democratic judge of election for the 39th Ward, 36th Division of South Philadelphia, over several years to add votes for certain Democratic candidates.
Some candidates campaigned and hired Myers.
Others were candidates he favored.
He admitted he was paying consulting fees in cash or checks, then used portions to pay election officials that tampered with the results.
Gee, that sounds like a conspiracy to me.
This included judicial seats in various federal, state, and local offices.
He also admitted to conspiring to commit election fraud with another former judge of elections.
Myers' accomplice was the de facto judge of elections and effectively ran the polling places in her division by installing close associates to serve as members of the Board of Elections.
Myers added he gave his accomplice directions to add votes to candidates supported by him.
Myers told the court that on most election days, he drove Barron to the polling station to open the polls.
During the drive, he told Barron which candidates he supported so she knew which candidates should get fraudulent votes.
When the polls were open, Barron told in-person voters to support Myers' candidates and cast fraudulent votes in support of Myers' preferred candidates on behalf of voters she knew would not physically appear at the polls.
On Election Day, Meyers kept in contact with Barron by cell, monitoring the number of votes cast for his candidates.
Barron told him how many legitimate votes his candidates have.
If voter turnout was high, Barron added fewer fraudulent.
Sometime Meyers told Barron to shift her effort from one preferred candidate to another if it looked like his top preferred candidate was comfortably ahead.
Barron and his accomplices would then falsify the polling books and the list of voters and party enrollment for the 39th Ward 2nd Division.
By recording the name, party affiliation, order of appearance for voters who had not physically appeared.
Barron took pains to ensure the number of ballots cast on the machine was a reflection of the number signed into the polling book in the list of voters.
The Bureau was responsible for overseeing the entire election process and all voter activities in the 39th Ward, 36th Division in South Philly.
The voting machines at each polling station, including the 39th Ward, generate records in the form of a printed receipt documenting the use of each voting machine.
A printed receipt called the results receipt showed the vote totals.
The judge of election and other election board officials attested the accuracy thereof.
He admitted to bribing DeMuro to add votes.
After receiving payments ranging between $300,000 and $5,000 per election, He added fraudulent votes on the voting machine, also known as ringing up votes, for Meyers' clients and preferred candidates.
At Meyers' direction, DeMiro added the fraudulent vote to the total and later falsely certified.
The voting machine results were accurate.
In a 1980 FBI op dubbed ABSCAM, undercover FBI agents disguised themselves as businessmen and Arab sheiks and ultimately criminally charged seven members of Congress alleging they'd accepted money from the phony sheik, promising favors in return.
Meyer was among those charged and sentenced to three years.
The FBI videotaped showing members accepting cash or stocks.
In one, an agent added Meyers an envelope stuffed with $100 bills to Magnum.
$50,000.
Sane.
Spend it well.
To which he responded, pleasure.
In response, the Health Ethics Committee unanimously recommended his expulsion.
Convinced of his innocence, he took the case to the House floor, where he pled, when you push the yay button on this voting machine, it will have the same effect as hitting the button on the electric chair on move.
The House voted 376-30 to expel him, or by his analogy, electrocute him.
He was the first member expelled since the Civil War, first ever to be expelled for misconduct other than treason.
After leaving prison, surprise, surprise, he started a political consulting firm, Joe.
Yes, well, anybody that thinks that there was a wonderful election in 2020 has not spent a moment of their time reviewing the Mike Lindell Symposium, which was a two-day long event last summer, which is absolutely unequivocal proof.
I haven't watched the 2000 Mules, which is absolutely unequivocal proof, and I haven't watched Selection Code, where Tina Peters in Mesa County, Colorado, explains the fraud of the Dominion voting machines.
But this is a A nice little post that was at GAAB this morning.
In 2020, 810,000 fraudulent ballots were trafficked by over 54,000 mules.
We know their names, their addresses, their cell phone numbers.
We know who gave them the ballots and who paid for them.
Why haven't they been arrested?
Very good question.
Very good question.
Carl.
And then when I did get fired the first time as a teacher, one of the sites that I had on my teacher's web page at La Cunada High School was professors from Princeton and Stanford.
You know, my employer, La Cunada Unified, only wanted government websites, but I had Stanford EDU and Princeton EDU where these professors explained.
So this Myers guy, you know, there's going to be a whole lot of people like him.
And because they're selfish, they're going to take a plea bargain.
They're going to turn on their masters.
Just like that.
So it is vulnerable.
Our opponents do want a pyramid scheme where everything is controlled.
And what we're trying to do is wedge away enough of the bottom To tip that over and to show that it is a structure built upon lies and control.
And if we can get enough of the truth, we're going to win.
Because 99% of the people, they want a cooperative competition of meritocracy that produces products and services with optimal performance and quality.
That's what ordinary people want.
And we don't care of Everything that people are accused of, we don't care what color skin, what sex, what background, we want performance and quality in our communities.
And that's contrasted with the 1%, as I said, the 1%.
Oh yeah, that was another part of the research, if he had gotten it done, the UC Berkeley professor, I don't remember him, but he's the guy who documents the control of assets of 1% is greater than the 99%.
But that's what our opponents want.
They want a locked, controlled structure of information where it's one source of information and that's going to keep people enslaved to the people above them in the pyramid.
Once you look at specific cases, the whole attack on conspiracy theory just falls apart, as this last one illustrated.
You claim there's no voting fraud.
Well, here's a specific case that went right down to the nitty-gritty.
It's very clear-cut.
And similarly, for the 2020 election, the Democrats yell and scream when their rigging of election fails to pay off.
That's their complaint, that they didn't rig it well enough.
That's why they went after Trump so viciously in the wake of 2016.
Meanwhile, here's another case.
If you dig in deep enough, you find that what was supposed to be a conspiracy theory is actually a conspiracy fact.
Here's the FEMA manual for the mass casualty drill involving children at Sandy Hook.
Notice how it begins at 12.13.12 at 8 a.m.
and it ends at 11.59 on the 13th, then to be evaluated as a real-time or live event on the 14th, when the shooting was alleged to have taken place.
We have the handling instructions right in the manual that was run by Tom Romano.
Well, let me tell you, I have independent verification from the scene that Tom Romano was running the drill at Sandy Hook on behalf of FEMA.
But How about this?
This is FEMA in Connecticut.
They had their actual agenda showing on the 14th of December 2012 from 9 a.m.
to 4 p.m.
now.
This is for the live event FEMA Exercise L366 Planning for the needs of children in disaster, Sandy Hook Elementary, 18 miles away at 935, which is the very time Adam Launce's ledge you have initiated.
This is bona fide, right from the Connecticut FEMA site.
It's still online.
Here's another.
They actually were, in addition, conducting classes that were conducted by one Christopher Ackley, where those who were the key participants were given instructions on how to keep their mouths shut and how to maintain the myth.
And here's a map showing how to get from the hospital in Bridgeport Where the classes were offered at 2800 Main Street, their headquarters a few blocks away was too small for the purpose, and Dickinson Drive, where Sandia Gallabentry was located, interestingly, the name of the address is misspelled.
Which is also the case for a kindergarten report posted by the man who played Leonard Posner when he came here to Madison.
A kindergarten report had the address misspelled, which obviously was therefore a forgery, since no kindergarten teacher would misspell the name of Dickinson, D-I-C-K-I-N-S-O-N, as though it had an E.
This is all outrageous.
The evidence just continues to grow.
Sandy Hook was a monster fraud brought to us by Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Eric Holder, the mayor of the city, the governor of Connecticut, the Connecticut State Police.
It was a huge scam.
And yet we're told again and again, it's just another conspiracy theory.
Joe, your thoughts.
Well, there's going to be an interesting case heard this week in the Supreme Court because Dr. Fetzer has gone to the mat with these folks, and it looks like he's got a very constitutionally supportable case.
So, who knows?
We may actually get enough evidence put out in the public record that the news media is going to have to say, whoa, maybe we did have a false flag that day.
Carl?
Well, we shall see!
We shall see.
That is definitely the hope, and certainly we can all be proud of Jim for standing for the truth, and to exercise everything all through the channels available to him.
And we do need a breakthrough before something is gonna happen.
Because it would be all too easy for the Supreme Court just to write some bullshit, and then that would be that.
That would be another episode of all the facts being on our side, and the officials will go ahead and deny it anyway.
So the mass casualties involving children, as a professional historian, that's in the category of documentary evidence, and it is prima facie evidence of a crime involving the leadership of government.
For this false flag attack and to in destruction of the Constitution to remove weapons in line with taking over the entire country.
So the whole thing is in the light of treason.
Now, in an ordinary world where people would see the factual nature of this, we would demand an independent investigation for that criminal activity.
And what we're looking at is in a system that's been totally previously captured by evil, we require some sort of assistance for a breakthrough.
And breakthroughs, by definition, are unpredictable and unimaginable.
But, you know, the Emperor's New Clothes condition persists.
If we can get some sort of breakthrough where a critical mass of people will look with their own eyes, and it doesn't matter, it could be Sandy Hook, it could be the Wars, it could be Hunter's laptop, it could be looking at Big Mike Snake, it doesn't matter.
If we have a sufficient Yes, yes, yes.
Sad to say.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fanmail proacon to live-need-to-know at gmail.com.
Yes, yes, yes.
Sad to say.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, bro or con to live need to know at gmail.com live need to know at gmail.com.
I just got a huge chuckle out of this, Jim.
Thanks for posting.
No better way to start my day.
This jive says we are winning over many.
Not so much to our way of thinking, but proving over and over again the establishment is the empire of lies.
They have enforced a censor on such a massive scale they have become the hole in the dike repair gang.
They don't have enough fingers for all the holes.
I wrote a song.
I don't play a lot, but after this I plan to feature it.
Lines in the sky.
No need to wonder why.
Just take your ambient tab and your flu shot jab.
It goes right over most people's heads until grandpa drops dead of dementia.
The Mind Control Ministry program's all you need to know.
Here's your school shooting du jour.
Please be generous to the poor.
They aren't coming to disarm us.
No, they would never harm us.
But what about above-ground nuclear tests?
We survived their very best.
Attempts to kill us all in one fell swoop are slowly one by one.
They got quiet weapons for a silent war on humanity and the tragedy no seems to notice.
They're dumping aluminum by the ton.
Pilots must be having fun.
Lines in the sky.
No need to wonder why.
Just take your ambient tab and your flu shot jab.
It goes right over most people's head until Grandpa drops dead of dementia.
Yes, UNESCO exempted the January 6th insurrection, for which there's zero evidence, and the Trump-Putin P dossier, for which there's a lot of evidence, none of it real.
Every new attack on people, like you and me as an attack on someone's grandparent or parent or sibling, now not a wise move to gain popular support.
Just passing on some interesting information.
The net worth of Dr. Anthony Tony the Rat's Fauci household soared a whopping 66% over the course of the pandemic, according to a new financial disclosure obtained by OpenTheBooks.com.
Fauci reported a January 1st, 2019 net worth of 7,523,624 by January 1st of 2022 and it had grown to 12,677,530, but hey, it's just by January 1st of 2022 and it had grown to 12,677,530, but It has nothing to do with a vid to think otherwise.
It's just a conspiracy theory.
I haven't heard the theory that Michael is a lizard, But I have heard the theory that he transitioned into a plausible female.
How can transgenderism be a conspiracy theory when it seems to be baked into law?
If large numbers are in fact transitioning to a different gender, why would we not believe it?
I heard more often the belief that Hillary is a lizard.
Lizards are said to be cold-blooded creatures.
That's certainly an apt description of Hillary's personality.
And the skin tone of her face is very lizard-like, as it is very wrinkled.
Her makeup has the appearance of auto-body bondo.
Is it a conspiracy theory to say Hillary is a very lizard-like personality and skin tone, or is it scientific fact?
Maybe the U.N.
can answer that one.
As for election fraud, I think Russia's referendum in the Russian territories at Donbass and Lugansk seemed to be completely above board, and the results should be believed without question.
As for the present U.S.
pretendent, I think her brain should be medically examined to determine if it's Composa banana pudding.
We all know the moon is made of green cheese.
When the American public did not accept the judgment of the Warren Commission, as had been prompted to do by the major media and government of the U.S., which wanted to convince the population of the need for American intervention in Vietnam, there was a crisis in which the major media and government have tried to suppress by denigration of conspiracy theories, that is.
Natural speculation on circumstantial evidence that powers of government and finance have acted in concert to promote illicit objectives.
This tendency of thought is not only illegitimate but indispensable to understanding truth and survival of our species And is now being attacked on a worldwide scale from the United Nations, which is a deeply corrupt organization, with their preoccupation of climate change, which is quack science, and their craze for vaccination to combat COVID, which is quack medicine.
It's important not to overstress conspiratorial thinking, as illustrated by moon landing skepticism, which is clearly not rational in light of key evidence which has been ignored.
But a healthy mind should allow for inferences from circumstantial joint action in concert by powerful interests to accomplish wrongful purposes.
Jack Remington Graham, a retired professor of law, who still seems to believe that we went to the moon.
Final thoughts, Joe?
Yes, well, I want to recommend three videos on another provable conspiracy that the bioweapon WuFlu disease and the bioweapon mRNA vaccines are a genocide program.
And that would be an interview that Karen Kingston did with Stu Peters, where she goes through the patents on the single wall nanotubes, the quantum dot self-assembling.
Quantum dot.
Sometimes I can't read my scribbles.
Quantum dot self-assembling that react to the 5G radio waves.
And then also, former flight surgeon with the U.S.
Army, Dr. Teresa Long, on the post-spike DoD jabs.
And this is a video that's at BitChute under Tim Truth.
Absolutely heartbreaking.
It's a 30-minute rendition of all of the things that are absolutely 100 provable by the DOD military adverse reaction charts that go back to 1991.
And trust me, they're going to do the same thing they did with the weather charts.
They're going to go back and start inflating this stuff.
But luckily, she has enough screen saves from two decades, three decades of documented data showing flatline.
And then all of a sudden, when they started doing the forced injections, just this rapid ramp on one after another of medical impacts, which are absolutely horrifying.
And then another one that's good is on Rumble with Maria Z, interviewing a doctor Rima Lebeau and she's a Zionist so you know the only thing she could do is rant about how horrible Hitler was and massacred all the Jews but she never wants to mention the Jews Bolsheviks in Russia massacring oh I don't know 60, 80, 100,000 people that the communists in China massacred.
Oh, I don't know.
60, 80, 100,000 people that the Rothschild banking interest that ran the British East India Company for 150 years.
That committed the opium wars and killed 100 million Chinese.
She didn't want to mention any of that, but here's the thing that she said that was really horrifying.
They've already identified the next five pandemics that are going to be coming and that the WHO already has over 500 vaccines that they're going to start demanding that people take because this is an emergency and we have to do whatever the WHO tells us to.
This is an absolutely rogue agency and the treaties that they forced people to sign or tricked goofy world leaders into signing are all illegal and they all need to be absolutely revoked and we need to disband the UN because they have not fulfilled their mission of stopping war.
Not one war has been stopped by these clowns since they were created in 1947.
They are an absolute rogue agency out to destroy all of humanity.
Excellent points, Joe Carl.
And take into consideration that it might be what our opponents do in order to have a criminal area of occupation is that they first have to create an agency to pretend to protect rights in that area.
So it might be that is the whole name of the game of in the playbook of our opponents.
They have a Federal Reserve System, which they say is to protect the integrity of the value of our monetary system when they're actually looting in the trillions.
We have a Department of I do appreciate our audience members for their intellectual integrity and moral courage.
It's just the total opposite of what's reality.
I do appreciate our audience members for their intellectual integrity and moral courage.
I like what that audience member said about the empire of lies and the analogy of fingers in the dike.
Yeah, I don't think they're going to be able to keep it together.
I think it is going to be crashing down.
And I like too that the guy translated that into the lyrics of a song.
A song is just another use of our voice and part of maybe the divine I mean, they kill millions of us all the time, and a history of killing millions of us.
That as beings in these physical bodies, I mean, they kill millions of us all the time.
And a history of killing millions of us, it seems like outrageous stuff.
But it might be that the side benefit of it is that we do get to raise the quality of our own voices for introspection of what we care most about.
And in the environment of an open competition where the stakes are high, introspection.
It's as high as you can imagine, so I don't know if this is some sort of an intense spiritual sport, an extreme spiritual sport or what, but we do find ourselves here and we can take advantage of this crisis for ourselves to raise the quality of what we think and what we say and what we do.
And finally, audience members and colleagues, be prepared if we have this breakthrough event It might be an opening for the adults in the room, those who have seen The Central Facts, to be able to step up and make a contribution to help our sheeple-ized brothers and sisters.
Well, thanks to Joe and Carl for simply excellent commentaries.
Joe mentioned Dr. Liebow, who is in fact the widow of Major General Albert Stubblebine, who was formerly in charge of all U.S.
military signals, including photographic intelligence.
As a founder of Scholars for 9-11 Truth, I got deeply involved, especially with regard to the crash sites.
And I interviewed Major General Stubblebine to review all the evidence I'd amassed that all four of the crash sites had been fabricated or faked, albeit in different ways, that two of the planes were not even in the air that day, Flight 11, North Tower, Flight 77, Pentagon, and that the other two, Flight 93, Shanksville, and Flight 175, had in fact not crashed but were still in the air four years later.
Major General Stubblebine, a formidable source in this instance, not only agreed with me about all four of the crash sites having been faked, but added additional reasons why he got it right.
But then, of course, the media can simply dismiss this because, after all, it's just another conspiracy theory.
Stand by, we'll bring you the latest.
Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your family, your friends, your loved ones.
We do not know how much time we have left.
And with a Biden administration essentially bombing Florida with a hurricane and taking out the Nordstrom in a criminal act of international proportion, believe me, the situation is more uncertain than it's ever been in our lifetime.
Thanks for joining us.
▲
Export Selection