All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 2, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:02:09
Truth vs. NEW$ Part 1 (2 October 2022) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and David Kenney
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome, folks, to Truth vs. News Incorporated.
I'm Donald O'Brien, your producer and host of JD.Consultants at live.com, and this is the month of October, the second of October.
The year's three quarters gone, and has it progressed over the year, or has it regressed?
I think things are getting worse, if not better, and we have a great report today from the best people in the world.
Of course, we have Jim Fetzer, who is the most dangerous migrant in America, because he Authored and edited this fantastic book, which is now in the Supreme Court and going to have a big decision tomorrow on the 3rd.
No, no, no, no, Don.
It's been pushed back a week.
They're having the conference now on the 7th.
I'll know on the 10th.
Oh, okay.
Excuse me.
Thanks for the update.
And he's also written this hot book here.
American Nukes on 9-11.
Believe me, this is a book everybody should have.
And this is a minor correction.
I'm editing these books.
I'm bringing together experts.
You're not just getting my opinion.
You're getting a whole group of experts that I bring together.
It's a pattern I've been pioneering, a technique I've been pioneering, a collaborative research since JFK back in 1998.
Yeah, right.
That's it.
So this is either his Fantastic volumes.
Everyone at ESC has edited and oversaw it and elucidated.
And then we also have David Kinney, a Los Angeles attorney, who is just outstanding in pursuing corruption with the school boards.
And Scott will be joining us.
He's a military intelligence officer, shy person, who is right now on another interview.
And he's got some hot stuff that you're going to see coming up here.
So Jim, let's just check.
How about the weather in Florida?
What happened down there?
I understand.
Well, it's pretty stunning, Don, actually.
This hurricane has taken out major fertilizer production for North America.
That's going to lead to food shortages and massive deaths, unfortunately.
Power grid down, supply chain damages.
Mike Adams has been doing a great job of this.
The devastation of Hurricane Ian has implications far beyond Florida.
One of the largest fertilizer companies in the world, Mosaic, located right in the path.
It looks as though, by the way, this has been geo-engineered.
This is actual deliberate destruction.
Provides 50% of the granulate phosphate fertilizer for North American farmers.
12% of the global supply.
You can expect more food scarcity and price inflection in 2023 and beyond.
He interviewed Steve from Strategic Response Partners, a private company hired by hospitals, hotels, retirement centers to help handle emergencies.
It's really serious what's going on.
The Coast Guard is stockpiling body bags far beyond the numbers shown in the news.
With a power grid down and cell towers not working for a large portion of the state, satellite devices are the only means of communication.
The global supply chain collapse is going to make rebuilding extremely difficult.
Some areas look like an atomic bomb was dropped on it.
The rebuilding will be extremely difficult given the fragile state of the supply chain for construction materials.
The people of Florida deserve the credit.
There's a bigger storm coming.
We have food scarcity, fuel prices on the rise, strategic patrolling reserve nearly drained, fertilizer supply on the brink of collapse, geoengineering, weather weaponization has unleashed a drought.
That's what we're having in Florida, unleashed by the Biden administration.
Someone, and guess who, Blue up North Stream 1 and 2.
This is just outrageous.
These are both crimes against humanity by the Biden admin.
A financial storm underway as the stock market unravels.
Deranged leaders of the illegitimate Biden regime are trying to push the world into a nuclear Armageddon.
Just to confirm that this is all as though George Soros were the acting president.
They're giving 41 mil to a Soros-linked group to help illegal aliens fight deportation.
Not to keep them in Mexico, but to fight deportation.
Yeah.
The Acacia Center for Justice of Washington-based nonprofit created through collaboration between the Vera Institute and Capital Air's Immigrants' Rights Coalition has been awarded six contracts by the DOJ to provide legal services.
The whole point is to keep them in the country, to make it difficult.
But here, look at the comparison.
This is an abnormally large hurricane.
Indeed, the entirety of Charlie of 2004 fits inside the eye of Ian of 2022.
It is mind-boggling.
And we have further updates now.
Exotic weapons systems are being used to achieve global biosphere disruption.
Here's an interview with Dane Wiginton describing the weaponization of Hurricane Ian.
Modern tech can control the direction and intensity of storms and droughts.
Florida's phosphate fertilizer industry was in the direct path because it was steered there Global attacks against the biosphere target crops, fertilizer, food production.
This is leading to an extension-level event.
Absolutely staggering.
Total devastation of some areas will take years to recover.
The supply chain means parts and supplies won't be easily sourced for rebuilding.
Injuries in body bags mean stockpiled cell fires down.
There's more about it.
Now listen to this.
Mike Adams has been interviewing Dale Wigginton, but here's a report about it.
Is our weather and our climate being manipulated?
Examine the data in this short report.
Decide for yourself.
Frequency transmission manipulation of hurricanes are patented processes.
The technology is not new.
The list of weather modification patents numbers into the hundreds and continues to grow.
This is Hurricane Ian passing near the NEXRAD transmission facility in Key West, Florida.
When the transmission facilities are fully energized, they have a repelling effect on any air mass that has been saturated with electrically conductive climate engineering elements.
Patents call for such seeding into storms to be carried out from above by jet aircraft.
The NEXRAD transmission network then interacts with the storm air mass, determining where a storm will migrate and where it won't.
As Hurricane Ian is allowed to make landfall, the Frequency Transmission Facility in Melbourne, Florida is fully engaged.
This effectively slows Ian's migration inland.
The transmissions can diminish precipitation in some regions while augmenting it in others.
It lays the predicate and the foundation for the development of a weather satellite that will permit man to determine the world's cloud layer, and ultimately to control the weather, and he who controls the weather will control the world.
Yep!
Weather modification climate engineering patent holders like Raytheon and Lockheed Martin do all the weather modeling for the nation's weather forecasting personnel, the National Weather Service and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Both agencies have an illegal federal gag order on their personnel.
The scheduled weather forecasting scripts are then passed all the way down to the local meteorologist level.
The official narrative must be controlled.
All must follow the same script.
Is it any wonder that the script readers miraculously know, up to a week in advance, that a storm like Ion, which was completely unorganized, a mass of convection migrating across the Atlantic, would end up where it did?
The same with Hurricane Harvey, Sandy, and so many others.
The U.S.
military first officially deployed hurricane manipulation operations 75 years ago, Project Cirrus.
Disastrous results were reported.
In 1962, Project Stormfury surfaced as a continuation of the U.S.
military's hurricane manipulation efforts.
During the 1960s, the U.S.
military continued to expand its weather warfare efforts and knowledge in Vietnam with Project Popeye, a historical fact of record.
So the bottom line question is this.
Is hurricane manipulation real and ongoing while illegal gag orders and paid-off politicians are utilized to keep climate intervention operations out of public consciousness?
Connect the dots and decide for yourself.
I have no doubt about it.
Scott, I'm eager for your comments, but the politics of this are horrendous.
Punishing DeSantis for sending 50 migrants to Martha's Vineyard, embarrassing the Democrats, putting migration back front and center, wiping out the ability to vote during the midterm evention, making the state more dependent on the government, therefore less hostile toward Biden, And promoting the green energy agenda because they claim this is a consequence of climate change, when in fact it's deliberate manipulation.
And as they were reporting, we mastered this in Vietnam to damage the North Vietnamese by bringing about typhoons and hurricanes.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, I think that's the accurate assessment.
This is a climate change script.
religious cry.
You hear this by the mainstream media buffoons who are reading from their predetermined scripts that say this is the result of climate change, climate change, climate change, all this nonsense.
But it really is a terrible act of war.
Anyone associated with the United States government that has any party to this needs to immediately be a whistleblower officially and file reports.
They cannot be gagged when they are reporting unconstitutional activity and war against their own people is certainly unconstitutional.
When a government becomes destructive of your life and your liberty in the pursuit of happiness, as we've said before ad nauseum, it is the duty, it's compelling to the people to overthrow such government.
And I think that's part of where these people or agencies or the Biden administration, where they're going.
They recognize They're grip on power is slipping away.
The American people are not just waking up, they're being shocked awake with the horrors and the madness which define the modern liberal Democrat, transgender, woke, rainbow flag Lunatic fringe.
I mean, it is getting worse by the day.
These people are not behaving sanely.
I mean, there's story upon story upon story of this wokeism, and this sort of abuse through weather weaponry is the best way they seem to do it invisibly.
De Santis will emerge from this stronger.
De Santis will emerge as the preeminent Leader of the Republican Party, more than Trump, I think, because of this episode.
He's used to a fight and conducting himself well.
The thing that makes DeSantis different than Trump is DeSantis doesn't care if he's liked.
And in fact, he stands on principle more than the liking of other people.
Trump wants to be liked.
He thinks he can win people over and compromise That's stupid.
That's naive.
That's not a potential dereliction of duty.
You have to be prepared to stand on principle, stand on right, shut down false lies and treachery, as DeSantis has done in media interviews where he's a total reporter.
No, no, no, no, no.
You are wrong, and I understand you're trying to attack, but that is just wrong.
He is rising up, I think, more and more because of this, and the devastation, the economic devastation is very bad.
The fact that this went right through McGill Air Force Base and Special Operations Command, Central Command, that's where all the asymmetric warfare is headquartered in CETCOM for Middle East operations.
I thought that would be potentially devastating on a lot of different ways.
So, I think we're witnessing something that's only going to increase.
Jim?
Well, I think we need a vote.
Trump has such a tremendous connection with the American people.
The combination, in my opinion, is what the country needs.
David, your thoughts?
Um, you know, I think we have a combination of Biden and Blinken, which is a combination of lunacy and infancy steering, steering the country.
I don't know whether I buy the weaponization of the weather.
I just don't know that I'm convinced that this, just because of the enormous size of Ian, that it should be considered as weaponization.
But I'm going to concede the fact that There are definitely a bunch of experiments that are focusing on that.
But again, one of my major concerns, as I've always said, is that this affects and goes into taking out Uh, you know, infrastructure in the United States, and I just think that the attacks on telecommunications, hospitals, uh, you know, government buildings is just stressing that to the max, and that's what we see taking place all over the South now, that just the infrastructure is eroding.
The ability to care and respond to people's needs is at risk.
And this is just going to keep getting aggravated and it's going to get increased on a monthly basis.
And we're just in this ongoing war with migration and infiltration in our government.
I think it's high time that people recognize that.
Well, if you listen to David Wigginton is an expert in this area with Mike Adams in a part we didn't play.
He talks about the description.
It comes in, it takes an abrupt right as though we're doing a right turn.
It does all these moves.
They have the ability to control it.
And David, I appreciate your restraint because you're not convinced, but I guarantee you 100% that's what's going on.
Yes.
Well, I will say this, that, you know, I about an hour ago I was on, uh,
I was watching uh reviewing some reports and there was a now we have a hurricane or a typhoon forming off of Mexico by the name of Orleans which is supposed to make landfall in the next uh day or two and it's a category you know this guy gets on CNN and he's talking about rapid increase in the categorization where they go from a category one to category four and it's just this this
Climate change is causing this, and I'm going like, would someone just get this idiot off the air?
You know, it's just frightening, but they are just pushing climate change, and it's really... David, this is what they do, right?
They have gun control.
They have a fake shooting.
They need this.
They need that.
They fake it all, and here they're trying to promote and destroy the ability to upload.
I mean, What are Floridians going to do?
How are they going to get to the polls?
I mean, we must not be naive about what the hell is going on before our very eyes.
Meanwhile, we have similarly in Nord Stream pipeline sabotage, and only one country benefits.
This is excellent.
Three deepwater explosions destroyed the North Stream Pipeline.
One of the three measured 2.3 on the Richter scale, but this was no earthquake.
It was an explosion.
Bjorn Lund, a seismologist at the Swedish National Seismic Network at Uppsala, said the seismic data by him and his colleagues show the explosion took place in the water, not in the rock beneath the seabed.
They guarantee Germany and the EU won't go wobbly with regard to sanctions against Russian energy imports.
The damage will take months to repair.
Some question whether it's even going to be possible to repair.
Even if Germany were to cry uncle, as civil unrest intensifies over lack of heat and energy, even if Russia decided to turn the power back on, the conduit for Russian gas to Europe is broken.
The first explosion was recorded about 2 o'clock in the morning Monday, the second 7.04 p.m.
the same day.
Vessels passing notified the Coast Guard of the seething on the sea.
There are usually no military exercises in the area, which could theoretically cause damage to the pipeline, but there were exercises in the area recently enough, and guess who was conducting those exercises?
So, North Stream is dead, and the question becomes, who done it?
To fix a crime on a suspect, police investigate the motive, the means, and the opportunity.
If we bounce all three, means eliminates most suspects.
Only a government with an advanced naval warfare capability could have executed the sabotage that limits to Germany, Great Britain, France, the US, Russia, and China.
But Means also involves proximity.
Chinese or French naval activities would have raised red flags.
Geography would seem to preclude the U.S., except the U.S.
Navy operates in every ocean in the world.
So the list with a means is now down to U.K., U.S., Russia, and Germany.
Let's shift to Modi.
Germany had no motive to damage its energy lifeline.
Germany is highly dependent on Russian national gas.
Entire German industries are being nationalized because of a lack of energy due to sanctions against Russia.
Germans held massive protests demanding Germany pull out of the anti-Russian alliance in exchange for a return of energy.
Great Britain has also suffered under the sanctions.
The British economy is in shambles.
Forcing the UK's central bank to pivot back to quantitative easing.
Russia would seem to have a motive.
Inflict long-term pain on Europe for sending lethal arms to Ukraine.
But Russia did not need to blow up the pipeline.
Russia controls the valves that send or halt gas to Europe.
She's already turned off the spigot.
Russia paid big for the pipeline and expects to resume profitable energy exports to Europe once the war settles down.
Why would Russia cut off its own nose?
That leaves the United States.
So what would its motives be first?
The U.S.
has now become the number one exporter of liquefied natural gas to Europe once Russia cut off the floor.
German dependence on U.S.
liquefied natural gas is a carrot to keep Germany in the sanction alliance.
With winter approaching, German unrest on the rise, the State Department was concerned that Germans would go wobbly, reduce sanctions, cut off arms to Ukraine, and beg Putin for energy.
The loss of the Nord Stream Pipeline eliminates that path.
Second, The Biden family has long been tangled up in natural gas in Ukraine.
Hunter was on the board of Ukraine's largest gas company, which gave Ukrainian oligarchs access to Joe.
Hunter, who has no experience in energy, made millions from the deal.
Ukraine got a bottom paid for president of the United States.
Third, the Democrat Biden needs to staunch the popularity bleeding that threatens to kill Democrat control of Congress come November.
So only the U.S.
had a compelling reason to destroy Europe's energy lifeline.
Only the U.S.
had both a means and a motive.
But what about opportunity?
Sea Power magazine, an official publication of the Navy League, reported in June on a U.S.
exercise in the Baltic Sea directly over the spots where the massive undersea explosion took out the pipeline.
An additional critical objective was to continue to increase communication range and data capability of the operators.
This is reporting on what was going on.
More flexibility in mine hunting operations.
Advancement in communication technology demonstrated this year have shown a significant improvement in operating ranges over currently used systems.
This provides additional standoff flexibility to the Navy.
In other words, the Navy had the opportunity to plant explosives on the pipeline in June to be detonated remotely at a time of the President's choosing.
And get this, the world's largest amphibious ship, the USS Kearsage, was recently in the area.
And I mentioned in passing, during my active duty in the Marine Corps, I was at one point stationed on the USS Kearsage.
Meanwhile, the U.S.
puts energy operators on heightened alert.
No doubt they're worried about potential retaliation because they know they're guilty and it's going to be obvious to everyone.
Everybody should be on high alert, said the U.S.
Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm, warning the American energy industry, including liquid natural gas tankers, after the series of explosions disabled Russia's Nord Stream gas pipeline.
No doubt they're fearing retaliation.
Multiple officials have labeled the explosions, which occurred off the Danish island of Bornholm, as apparent sabotage, but have not blamed any one country or group.
But it's obvious we did it.
U.S.
President Joe Biden said in early February the U.S.
would end our stream too if Russian troops entered Ukraine, telling a reporter, I promise you we will be able to do it.
With NATO having tested underwater drones near Bornholm this summer, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova called on Washington to confess to destroying the pipeline.
And it wasn't only Biden who said it.
Also, Victoria Nuland declared that if Russia invades Ukraine, we will end the North Stream pipeline.
Scott, this is just stunning stuff.
Your thoughts?
I think it's a grotesque miscalculation and a confirmation of the stupidity, blindness, mental delusion that the West is going through because they've totally misunderstood, as they've misunderstood Iraq and a lot of their prior warmongering, the way to look at this and its effect on the psychology of the German people and Europe, but particularly the Germans.
I'm half German.
I know their being and their dogmatism.
It's as though if someone came into your garden, Jim, and plucked up and ripped out all of your vegetables, your carrots, and poured oil all on the soil, so it was just done, ruined.
Your garden is dead.
And you knew that the person who said, well, we're going to eliminate anybody who grows their own vegetables.
They're just not going to have them.
And then you knew that this person was the one who did it.
And he says, Oh, well, I'm sorry to hear that.
I don't know who did it, but you can buy vegetables from us.
The miscalculation is the pride.
The pride, the furor, the emotional boom, all sorts of chemical physiological reactions kick in.
This is not a chess game.
This is not a checker game.
You do not move and react in linear fashion when emotions and this whole sense of pride is struck.
That's what Blinken and Biden and all these fools don't understand, especially among Germans and I mean Europeans in general.
They're a different breed.
They are different.
I'm Scottish.
I was born in Scotland.
My mom's Scottish.
My dad's German.
They are different.
When this sort of thing happens, a whole other level kicks in that we haven't seen and the American media has no ability to understand and cannot report it, and the politicians in America have no fathoming, nor do the CIA, nor do the American military.
They have stepped on a landmine, they have destroyed the garden of Europe, and they think that they're going to be able to sell vegetables to Europeans?
No, the Europeans are about to go overthrow the table.
Say, this is what you do?
This is your hypocrisy?
This is your climate change?
This is your global warming nonsense?
You go and you do something like this?
We're supposed to be your allies and you go and destroy our ability to stay warm?
How many people are going to freeze to death and starve to death because of this?
All sorts of emotional, personal injuries start bubbling up.
That's why Europe is going through a major right-wing political revolution, and people are coming into power in Sweden and Italy and elsewhere that are right-wing, that are saying our first priority is to represent the interests of our country.
The female prime minister in Italy is saying, We're not going to look at other people's interests.
We're looking up to our interests.
That's code for, hey, watch out.
We want to stay warm.
Ursula, go take a hike.
We don't care about the European Union.
We don't care about your values.
We care about Italian values.
That's going to replicate.
We've been saying this.
And this Nord Stream, a pipeline attack, the Russians know.
They've been talking about it, written about it.
They know it was Poland.
They know it was Ukraine.
They know it was the U.S.
They know it was the consortium.
They know all the satellite technology and the sonar technology shows without any doubt that the U.S.
naval operation was responsible for this.
They're caught red-handed.
They're bad liars.
But I think the major miscalculation is that this, and mark my words,
This is going to shift the political affections of Europe away from the United States and closer to Russia and may have been the trigger for igniting the spark that leads to the black powder fire trail that it eventually will blow up the keg of explosives come January, February, when the frost starts settling on the dead corpses of the German grandmothers that are now laying in the streets of their old folks home because of what the Americans did here and now, Jim.
Scott, I think you're making impeccable points.
Let me just add, in order to convert this gas into a liquid to ship it by tanker, it has to undergo a process of temperature reduction that's extremely expensive, and then it has to be reversed.
That means you buy your vegetables from me at four times what you would have paid before.
And Russia was such an obvious, this was going to be an era of peace between Germany and Russia.
It was going to antiquate NATO.
It was going to restore a semblance of rationality to Europe.
But that's what the military-industrial complex of Biden admin and the globalists had to prevent.
David, your thoughts?
Well, you know, I differ with you guys across the board on this one.
I actually, from my perspective, I think this was implemented by Kamala Harris.
I think she convinced North Korea to send one of its subs over into the North Sea.
And, uh, release this explosion and get it blamed on the United States.
I'm going to blame Kamala Harris for that.
And, of course, Kamala Harris was swimming on a dolphin to do that.
That may have been the case.
But, you know, she's such a statesman.
She went to South Korea and declared our eternal friendship with North Korea.
The interesting thing, though, when you think about the energy, the effect on energy, the tactics employed, the maneuvering that's taken place, this just has Kamala Harris all over it.
It does!
But they're using incompetence as a camouflage.
All this is deliberate sabotage, have no doubt about it.
The incompetence is really just a veneer.
What does all the world say?
That's the other thing, Jim.
We're not playing a tennis match alone with Russia.
We're playing with every other nation watching!
India, Iran, China, all of the East Asia.
Africa!
Look at what's happening in Africa!
They're going all pissed off about things.
The colonial powers of France and Britain and America.
And Germany, but Germany's really falling apart.
The whole world is looking, and South America is going, oh my god, this is what you do?
And you're a pirate!
And I think the contempt is only going to get more and more palpable in the rest of the world towards us because of this sort of event.
The hypocrisy and the warmongering savagery is definite.
You're absolutely right, Scott.
The rest of the world is not the gullible saps the American public turn out to be.
Meanwhile, the Putin annexation reverberates.
Russian President Putin signed treaties of annexation for four regions of eastern and southern Ukraine.
Putin made the announcement in a lavish ceremony at the Kremlin, which territories?
For the Donetsk, Luhansk, Kyrzym, and Zaporizhzhya regions of Ukraine.
This is the will of millions of people, he claimed in his speech, which appears to be exactly right.
The U.S.
claimed it was a violation of the U.N.
Charter, but it appears to be no such thing.
Here, this report claims Russia is a prime suspect in the sabotage of the pipeline, which is simply idiotic when you consider motive means an opportunity.
Russia has sought to cast blame on the U.S.
by circulating Out of context clips of Biden lambasting the North Stream Pipeline, but they aren't out of text.
What it means for Ukraine?
Here you have the district.
You can see why from a military and strategic point of view, these were very appropriate to guarantee access to Crimea, which Russia will not give up.
He's launched World War III under the cover of Hurricane Ian.
We've already been reporting this.
The timing was certainly curious, just as Hurricane Iran, one of the worst ever to hit the United States, was post of Siam, Florida, dominating new headlines.
Parties not so unknown blew up the Nord Stream pipeline, sending the biggest-ever burst of methane, the most potent climate-change gas, into the atmosphere and condemning Europe to a cold, dark winter of potential mass starvation.
This is coming from Kevin Barrett.
The terrorist attack on Nord Stream immediately followed a Donbass referendum in which voters in the Eastern Russian-speaking regions voted to rejoin Russia.
The pipeline attacks had all the earmarks of a U.S.
response to the impending Russian annexation of the Donbass.
Shortly before the attack, Germans and other Europeans had been protesting in the streets, demanding the pipelines, closed under U.S.
pressure in a misguided attempt to punish Russia, be reopened immediately.
By blowing up the pipeline, the Biden admin ensured the German government continue to obey U.S.
orders and ignore the will of its people.
It's thunderingly obvious that the U.S.
and no one else blew up the pipelines, even if it were subcontracted to the British or Israelis or Blackwater or CIA-trained Ukrainians.
Only the top of the U.S.
command chain could have authorized the operation, and Biden, the theoretical U.S.
commander-in-chief, had already announced he was going to do it.
The truth about this cataclysmic act of terrorism has a potential to spark a mass uprising in Europe.
It could inspire Europeans to overthrow their U.S.
puppet leaders, disband NATO, get out from under the dying U.S.
empire, and make peace with Russia and China for that reason.
And because the truth is so politically embarrassing to perpetrators, the U.S.
High Command chose to ensure this catastrophic act of international terrorism, which may very well be seen in retrospect as a spark that set off nuclear World War III, would not dominate the headlines.
They buried the story under Hurricane Ian.
It's not as crazy as it sounds to wonder whether they created Hurricane Ian and or steered it into Florida at precisely the right moment for precisely that purpose.
The timing of the attack on Nord Stream was primarily dictated by the need for an escalatory response to Russian annexation of the Dawn Pass.
It wasn't as if Biden's neocons were sitting around waiting for a hurricane before they could blow up Nord Stream.
They needed to attack the pipeline shortly after the Dunbass Referenda, and it seemingly just so happened that a huge hurricane showed up at exactly the right time.
Those who have investigated weather warfare know that classified post-harp technology may very well be capable of intensifying and steering hurricanes.
As shown in this screenshot above the Washington Post, consider the biggest single act of economic and ecological terrorism industry to be only the fourth most important story of the day, behind Ian Threatens Florida, Ian Hits Cuba, and the House Postpones January 6th Hearings Due to Ian.
It's as if Big Brother decided to send a hurricane through the brains of America to wash away their awareness of the colossal crime their government had committed in the North Sea.
But while a Florida hurricane may be big news domestically, Europeans are more concerned about how they will obtain food and fuel as winter approaches.
Biden may have gotten away with a pipeline attack in terms of it not affecting his polling numbers, which are already in the pits, but across the Atlantic, people may see things differently.
If Russia doesn't quickly use nukes to defend its non-best territory as its strategic doctrine dictates, which could lead the planet going up in nuclear flames during the coming weeks, the Europeans may decide to keep warm this winter by rioting in the streets, overthrowing their public governments, and retaking their sovereignty.
Listen to Tucker.
He nails it.
Good evening and welcome to Tucker Carlson.
Tonight, I hate to start a Tuesday evening on a grim note, but one of the environmental catastrophes, one of the great environmental catastrophes of our time, is unfolding tonight off the coast of Denmark.
The Nord Stream pipelines, which are enormous Russian-owned conduits that carry natural gas from Russia to Western Europe, have been breached.
As we speak, Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 are pouring millions of cubic meters of natural gas into the Baltic Sea.
Pictures from the air, which you can now see on your screen, show a toxic bubble field more than half a mile wide.
You can only guess at how many marine mammals are being killed right now.
Countless.
But the lasting damage may be to the atmosphere.
Natural gas is comprised of up to 90% methane.
Methane, as Joe Biden has often told you, is the key driver of global warming, which is of course an existential threat to humanity and the planet.
So if you're worried about climate change, what just happened to the Nord Stream pipelines is as close to the apocalypse as we have ever come.
So the question is, how did this happen?
And it turns out it was not an accident.
At the very same time that leaks in these pipelines were detected, Swedish officials recorded two powerful undersea explosions, each one of which was equivalent to hundreds of pounds of TNT.
Nothing in nature can account for that.
Almost immediately, the pipelines began leaking in three separate places.
So there's only one explanation for what happened.
This was an act of industrial terrorism.
That was very obvious to the Prime Minister of Poland, and he wasted no time in saying so.
Watch.
Today, we are also dealing with an act of sabotage.
We do not know the details of what happened yet, but we can clearly see that it is an act of sabotage.
An act that probably marks the next stage in the escalation of the situation we are dealing with in Ukraine.
We can clearly see, he said, this was an act of sabotage, an act of terrorism.
Well, yes, we can see that.
So the question is, who did it?
And of course, the prime suspect is obvious.
It would be the same man who caused domestic inflation here in the U.S.
and stole the 2016 election from Hillary Clinton.
That'd be Vladimir V. Putin.
The Washington Post got right to it.
Putin, they declared, is now weaponizing the Nord Stream pipelines.
According to the Canadian ambassador to the U.N., Vladimir Putin has decided to use, quote, pollution as an act of war.
Progressive Twitter strongly endorsed this conclusion.
Putin did it!
And that makes sense, until you thought about it for just a moment.
Vladimir Putin may be evil, they tell us that he is evil, but is he stupid?
Probably isn't stupid.
And yet, and here's the strange part, if you were Vladimir Putin, you would have to be a suicidal moron to blow up your own energy pipelines.
That's the one thing you would never do.
Natural gas pipelines are the main source of your power and your wealth, and most critically, your leverage over other countries.
Europe needs your energy, now more than ever, with winter approaching.
If you can't deliver that energy, then countries like Germany have no need to pay attention to what you want.
You're in the middle of a war, an all-hands-on-deck war, so you need all the leverage you can get.
Under these circumstances, there is no chance you would blow up Nord Stream 1 or 2.
Not now, obviously.
In fact, it's so obvious that even our famously dim Secretary of State, Tony Blinken, seemed to acknowledge it.
Sabotaging Nord Stream, he said today, is, quote, clearly in no one's interest.
Right.
But really only half right.
It is true that blowing up Nord Stream does not help Vladimir Putin.
He would not do that.
Why would he?
But that doesn't mean that other countries wouldn't consider doing it.
They would consider it.
And we know they have considered it, because at least one of them has said so in public.
In early February, less than three weeks before the war in Ukraine began, Joe Biden suggested on camera that he might take out these pipelines.
Watch.
If Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the border of Ukraine again.
Then there will be no longer a North Stream 2.
We will bring an end to it.
But how will you do that, exactly, since the project and control of the project is within Germany's control?
We will, I promise you, we'll be able to do it.
Notice how he phrased that.
And he's the president, doesn't phrase things by accident, particularly when he's reading off cards.
He didn't say, I will pause the delivery of gas from Russia to Germany.
He said, there won't be a Nord Stream 2.
We'll put an end to it.
We'll take it out.
We'll blow it up.
How will you do this?
He was asked.
I promise you we will be able to do it.
They thought this through.
And yet those watching, very much including us, didn't take Biden seriously when he said it.
This is the president who has declared climate change the most pressing emergency in the history of the world.
This is the man who lectures you about using a wood stove or driving an SUV because of its emissions.
This is the guy who spent billions trying to mitigate cow flatulence because methane.
Would that guy really blow up a methane pipeline in the middle of the Baltic Sea?
It was hard to imagine.
That would be an unimaginably reckless act.
That would be the kind of thing you would do if you wanted to start a nuclear war.
It would be insane.
And yet, in retrospect, it's obvious they were thinking about this because Joe Biden wasn't the only person to suggest it.
Toria Nuland at the State Department said pretty much the very same thing.
Nuland is a lifelong war cheerleader.
She worked to bring about the Iraq invasion, never apologized, kept going.
She helped engineer the coup that overthrew the Ukrainian government some years back.
So capable, clearly she's capable of anything.
But environmental terrorism?
Even for Toria Nuland, that seemed too much, too extreme.
And yet, here she is in January.
With regard to Nord Stream 2, we continue to have very strong and clear conversations with our German allies, and I want to be clear with you today.
If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.
One way or the other, we'll stop Nord Stream.
Now looking back, those words seem chilling eight months later as natural gas pours into the Baltic Sea and into the atmosphere.
So you have to ask, could the Biden administration really do something like this?
We can't say for sure.
We don't know for sure.
We can tell you that close allies of the Biden White House believe they certainly did do it.
Radek Sikorski is a Polish politician.
He's chairman of the EU-USA delegation in the European Parliament.
He's connected.
He's also the husband of regime stenographer Anne Applebaum of The Atlantic magazine.
Sikorski is so close to Joe Biden that he's got a picture of the two of them together in his Twitter profile.
So when the pipelines blew up, Sikorsky responded immediately, and here's what he wrote.
Thank you, USA.
So once again, did the Biden administration really do this?
There's no question the Biden administration did it, Scott.
This is an act of crime against humanity.
It's among the most disgusting actions ever taken by any nation against another.
Your thoughts?
Well, the question isn't, did Biden actually do it?
It is, are they going to get away with it?
Are they going to be allowed to not be prosecuted by international UN World Court, whatever complaints, are they not going to have a tit-for-tat?
I don't think Russia is going to be restrained.
It is going to be strategic.
It is going to be very careful.
I mean, they are brilliant chess players, but they will have their moment.
If they're smart, I think they are.
They recognize, like I said earlier, this is going to reverse the tide in favor of Russia rather than against it.
Because now, as I've been saying too, Russia needs to make direct appeals to The people of Europe and the United States that, you know, we're ruled by tyrants and police state lunatics that are trying to capture the entire economic life of Europe.
That's what Blinken and these fools have celebrated by saying, oh, we're going to export all this natural gas.
Yeah, four times the price.
To Europe, they're barely going to be able to survive this.
I don't think that's going to win friends and influence people in a positive way.
Let me shift over to Putin's speech.
I saw his speech, and I have to tell you, Jim, I think that speech was the most masterful he's ever given.
It was a distillation and a synthesis of everything that he has witnessed and experienced, and the Russian people have witnessed and experienced since 1989.
And I was back there in those days.
I know it.
I can follow the whole evolution of this relationship.
And he nailed it on so many levels.
I thought, my, he seems to be maybe listening to some of our shows because the language he's using is very familiar.
Dismemberment.
The hysterics of the West.
The cannibalization.
I'm like, wow, nobody talks like that except us.
But he was speaking.
With a great deal of historicity.
He was saying, here's what the West has done for 30-40 years.
Here's what they did before this, too.
France and Britain, and going back to China when they had the opium wars, and they got China addicted with opium.
He went back and talked about the colonial of empire powers of enslaving and turning countries into vassal states and they tried to do it with Russia.
But Russia is not the Soviet Union anymore.
He said that too.
And he did speak directly to the people of Europe and elsewhere by saying there are those who are standing up and standing with us because we value traditional family values.
We believe in family.
We do not believe in transgender sec- Assignment surgery.
Putin was saying that in his speech, and I think every decent, rational conservative is on that exact same side.
And, you know, that's the side of healthy, sane humanity.
Family, God, traditional values, religious piety and humility, peace and sovereignty.
Things that we have expelled when we put on the mantle of empire.
And, uh, you know, Lindsey Graham and these rhinos and, uh, you know, Lindsey Graham is a sodomite with a rainbow flag.
He hates Russia, uh, because of these traditional family values.
And, uh, you know, I don't subscribe with what Susan and others have said, you know, well, you know, he's, he's, he's, he's, he's for traditional family.
No, he's not.
He is a sodomite who's out there with a rainbow flag and he's been doing unseemly pervert things since God knows how long.
He is not a conservative Republican.
The sooner he's out, the better, as well as the rest of them.
Gavin Newsom and the rest of these clowns.
But I thought Putin's speech was a good summary of the toxic effects and toxic policies the West has been pursuing that are now at an end And that is why these regions, by the way, in Lugansk and Donetsk and Kursan, all reunified with Russia, was to preserve their lives.
And I've said on interviews, these regions of Eastern Ukraine simply did what the United States founding fathers did in 1776.
When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary to dissolve the political bands that bind us, They did.
And when a government becomes destructive of our life and liberty, which Ukraine's government has been doing since the coup d'etat with murdering and genociding these eastern Ukrainians, it becomes necessary for them to declare independence, to survive.
And for the Americans to criticize this, again, shows absolute hypocrisy, stupidity, and insanity, because We did the same thing in 76 and also we've tried to do the same thing in Moldova and breaking up these other countries and declaring their independence.
So the hypocrisy is absolutely ridiculous and it's making us look ridiculous and this kind of environmental violence against Germany, against Europe, that they're going to feel And they're going to barely be able to get by.
I think it's going to cause a tidal wave of resentment that our political leaders have no clue or understanding how to define it or how to deal with it.
And I think part of the other climactic tidal wave that's going to crash against them on both sides is the domestic tidal wave of the overthrowing of these Democrats in the November election.
And if there's a shutdown of society, if there's a suspension of the election, if there's some more traumatic false flag events, I think all games are off.
I think America and Americans are going to recognize, nope, this is now the martial law communist takeover.
This is how they do it.
False flag events to try and usher in martial law controls, suspension of the election.
And then you're going to really have a 1776 all over again, Jim.
Well, Scott, remember, the American people are the most intellectually compromised population in the world by all the manipulation of the news.
I only worry that they're anticipating there'll be an uprising.
In many ways, they've been trying to provoke it, and you have to anticipate what they intend to do as a consequence.
Bring in U.N.
troops as beekeepers?
I worry about this.
David, your thoughts?
Yeah, I have really deep concerns about this escalation, this blowing up Nord Stream 2.
I think, as I said, Biden, his policies are lunacy, Lincoln, infancy.
They don't have the vision to see that the best interests of the United States are at risk.
The, the one thing that's clear to me is this is an unprecedented attack on Europe itself.
It's a, you know, look, you take out Germany, you know, Germany's a big, a big partner at play in NATO.
And, you know, now it's right in the core, it's right in the center of Europe, and it's gonna be struggling this winter.
You're gonna see all these Effects of this that not only are for Germany, they're going to be also for England.
And you're going to see this response.
We're going to have American carriers, ships taking over LNG, which are going to be like sitting targets, going to be a redraft of the submarines and the Wolf submarines in World War II.
And this is just the infant stages of World War III, and it's taking place right before our very eyes.
What's interesting is the terrain now has changed.
The terrain used to be the Ukraine.
Now it involves a wider theater, and that theater has increased To the sea, to right there off the coast of Germany, off the coast of Denmark.
So this involves a real shift in tactics.
But one of the things that concerns me is it provides a justification for a response.
And I think, as Scott said, you're not playing with an idiot.
And so, while I constantly encourage and discuss the aspirational and inspirational goal of seeking peace, I'm afraid that in this event, a justification exists for a formidable response.
And I'm concerned about that because you have Putin, who has stated that he's He's himself concerned about tactical nuclear weapons.
He doesn't want to release these things.
And yet you have America just building up this escalation between the two.
It is imperative that the United States does not engage in any aggressive or any hostile actions toward Russia.
And I think that's in the best interest of the people of the United States.
It's in the best interest of the people of Europe.
It's in the best interest of the people of Russia.
So let's start finding the de-escalation.
Let's start finding that shift in public policy and in diplomacy.
I think there needs to be an immediate focus on improving the dialogue and improving the diplomacy.
This act of industrial terrorism is without excuse, without justification, and it is a wartime attack on civil infrastructure. - Sure.
The problem, David, is we're not dealing with a community of goodwill.
We're dealing with oligarchs, and it is in their interest that they perform these travesties.
That's the problem.
They are rich, they are powerful, they are in control, and all the goodwill in the world.
Every point you made was right if you assume an ethical community.
We're talking about Grotesquely immoral miscreants who are willing to sacrifice most of the world's population to promote their own interests.
David, I know you want to add, say.
All I want to say is then they are not a part of the nobility.
But David, I'm just saying, you gotta be more realistic about what the hell.
The Rothschilds own already 80% of the wealth of the world.
They just want to make it 100%.
I mean, it's tragic and it's insane, but that is what we are up against.
It says a tremendous amount when Tucker Carlson, the leading conservative voice in America, is raised up on RT and his videos are played.
And don't think for a second Lavrov and Vasily Besnev of the Moscow representative to the United Nations and Putin himself don't see Tucker Carlson as emblematic of the conservative mind.
And that's who I believe Putin was in an indirect way, recognizing that conservatives who believe and follow and agree with what Tucker says, myself included, conservatives who represent the Tucker Carlson views are not hostile to traditional family values, marriage between a man and a woman, religious piety, peace and sovereignty, and the end of international interventionist wars.
He's right, we don't support that.
So Tucker and his audience and Putin and the Russian people in general are on the same side.
That's what's very, very, I mean, Very bizarre, but also, I mean, it's emblematic of the shift that's occurred in America.
These people, like you said earlier, I would add to your definition of them, Jim, besides being very immoral and corrupt, they are mentally insane.
They are really falling into the delusion that they are believing their lies so religiously that they are unable To breathe truth anymore.
I think it's like someone who's, you know, essentially you've acclimated to breathing underwater.
You can no longer breathe oxygen in the land area.
That's what these Democrats and these Blinken types, they believe their lies so much, they breathe them so much, they are no longer able to reason or to, you know, I mean, to really function.
Go ahead.
Well, you want to bear in mind their goals are not the same goals as humanity.
Meanwhile, just to illustrate how badly we're being manipulated, the vast pro-Ukrainian bot army designed to influence Western policymakers has been exposed.
Researchers at the University of Adelaide ...have published a landmark paper on bot accounts on Twitter.
They discovered between 60 and 80 percent were fake accounts, and 90 percent of the fake accounts were pro-Ukraine.
They have hashtags, stand with Ukraine, stand with Zelensky, I support Ukraine, and mislike the ghost of Kiev, a fictional fighter pilot, Ukrainian, farcically alleged to have shot down 40 Russian jets within hours of the operation initiated.
Significant spikes were recorded at key points in the initial stages, such as Russia's capture of Kyrsan on March 2nd and the Zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant on March 4th.
They're overwhelmingly in the English language.
They're seeking to drive more disruption in English-speaking countries and influence a variety of user groups negatively toward Russia.
They were successful in stimulating discussions and trends, kick-starting an increasing online discussion about a number of subjects.
This is the first analysis of social media content related to the conflict.
It covers a very small time period, just two weeks.
It's almost inevitable the level of pro-Kiev sentiment expressed by users, troll and organic alike, We'll have increased even beyond the 90% recorded during that time frame.
Numerous commenters have observed the weaponization of Twitter, Facebook, and all in support of the Western proxy war.
In Ukraine, one need only spend a few minutes scrolling major media networks to identify a profusion of anonymous, recently registered users pumping out pro-Ukraine, pro-NATO, pro-war propaganda, attacking anyone critical of its Senate Western narratives.
It is, in the words of writer Caitlin Johnstone, the most aggressively told war of all time.
Unsurprisingly, though, the Western media has universally ignored the bombshell findings of this academic paper.
One can only imagine the blanket coverage if the findings were related to Russia.
On August 4th, Amnesty International published a report on Ukrainian troops facing forces in weaponry in residential areas.
In other words, They're really reporting events where the Ukrainians were doing the bad thing, and yet they were demonized.
Three days later, CBS broadcasted a documentary showing just 30% of Western arms shipments to Kiev actually reached the front line.
Such was the incendiary response to these reports.
Amnesty was successfully bullied into apologizing for anger and disgrace its disclosure had caused.
CBS went even further and pulled its documentary from the web.
The academic study suggests much of this counterblast was in fact attributable to automated accounts deliberately intended to create a false impression that condemnation of both organizations was omnipresent.
It raises an obvious question about the true nature of something called NAFO, the North Atlantic Fellows Organization, a leading force in online counterblast against Amnesty and CBS.
They have a history of harassing pro-Russian voices and mass reporting accounts until they are temporarily or permanently suspended.
Many prominent officials have praised the group as receiving positive profiles in the Economist, Politico, and even the Washington Post.
As is so often the case, dubious tactics and conduct, of which Russia is widely accused, cease to be villainous when it's Western countries and their allies doing it.
One might reasonably ask whether the entire mainstream media controversy over Kremlin bots on social media was just a smokescreen for a far larger and more effective operation much closer to home.
I have no doubt about it.
Scott, you may be able to squeeze a few minutes in as we hit the break.
Or are we there?
You're muted, Don.
Yeah, David, we were there all right, but David wants to do 30 seconds.
Let's go ahead, David, would you like to add?
No, I was just, I was, I was just going to mention, if we have 30 seconds, I was just going to mention that Claire Daly, the minister from Dublin, member of the Dáil in Ireland, has a wonderful sense of peace and justice.
In the public interest, and a scaling rebuke of the military-industrial complex, and if people are going to access that, it's a wonderful, wonderful statement.
Okay, so anyway, this is Truth Versus News on October the 2nd.
What an hour this has been!
It's hot, and hopefully you had your seatbelts fastened, or picking yourself up from the floor right now, because this is hot.
So come on back for the second hour.
I'm sure we got more stories that will knock your socks off.
Thanks so much, gentlemen, for a hot hour.
▲
Export Selection