All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 23, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:18:34
Need to Know News (22 September 2022) with Carl Herman and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman from San Ramon, California, and Brian Davidson from Houston, Texas.
We are here to bring you all the news you need to know.
We begin with the GOP's hardline tactics on migration refocusing the midterm.
It's taken us off of abortion, for example, and put it where it belongs on immigration, which is destroying the country.
Governors DeSantis and Nabbitt insist these dramatic steps are needed to highlight the genuine crisis in the U.S.
at the border, where thousands stream in every single day.
Weeks away from their own competitive re-election, friends and foes alike acknowledge That these hard-line tactics have effectively refocused the November midterm elections, at least temporarily, away from abortion and toward an issue more favorable to Republicans.
Indeed, DeSantis and Abbott are pushing forward with controversial campaigns to ship thousands more migrants from Texas to Democrat-led cities and states.
I personally thought it was a good idea, even said the very moderate and restrained Republican leader Mitch McConnell.
The governor's rhetoric is reminiscent of Trump's dire warnings ahead of the 2018 midterm that a migrant caravan threatened the southern border.
He was right, even though the GOP then lost 40 seats in the House but gained two in the Senate.
The Democrats from Connecticut to California have generated momentum by campaigning on Roe v. Wade.
Meanwhile, Republicans want to raise issues about the economy, crime, and immigration, and no doubt they are going to be successful.
What they're doing is raising the salience and relevance of the migration issue, which is important to Republican voters, but not just Republican voters, to independents and to every American who cares about the country.
Governor Newsom, viewed by many as a future Democrat presidential candidate, called DeSantis a disgrace for using taxpayer money to transfer migrants to other states, where Newsom paid for campaign ads in Texas and Florida, critical of the governor.
But Newsom's a complete disaster.
He's as shallow, superficial, and narcissistic as any American politician in the history of this once-great nation.
Despite fierce criticism and potential legal liabilities for these location programs, there's been little evidence of widespread political backlash in either state.
The Abbott's been busy bussing migrants to Washington, Chicago, and New York City for months.
Abbott advisor David Carney said Texas would expand its operation to include new drop-off locations.
The federal government reported authorities stopped migrants two and one five million times from October through August.
The first time it's top two million.
Border crossings have been fueled partly by repeat crossers because there are no legal consequences for being caught under a pandemic era rule that denies a right to seek asylum.
Even so, these are extraordinary numbers.
Abbott's running against Democrat Representative Beto O'Rourke.
I don't think that's going to be much of a contest.
Immigration remains a crucial issue in Texas's booming cities, where the shifting demographics are going to turn America's biggest red state blue if the Democrats have their way, but it's highly unlikely.
Hispanics on the border, for example, Whether Republicans are making an aggressive pitch for three congressional seats are going to be successful.
This migration issue is a disaster for the Democrats.
Carl, your thoughts?
It is, it is.
But, you know, the more I see, the more that I like.
These people are psychopaths.
So, as a just-retired National Board Certified Teacher of Social Studies, as a professional academic, this is the most accurate term that I can give to our opponents, they're psychopaths.
And that means you have a veneer of appropriate behavior.
Oh, the poor migrants!
covering viciously antagonistic policies.
In this case, they're ignoring an open border.
And the bigger thing that they're ignoring, of course, is John Perkins' bestseller, Economic Hitman, is that the US does run A neocolonial empire under the pretense of democracies, but they're really just our strongmen.
And John Perkins wrote two bestsellers to describe that.
And I was talking about this, I don't know, a few shows ago, is that one of the ways to understand the American empire into Mexico is to go just across the border.
Where I grew up in LA, we would go to Tijuana, and maquiladoras are factories, international factories, just across the border, and they're able to take advantage of $1 an hour to $2 an hour wages.
That's where our empire really thrives, is exploitation.
Another word to describe our opponents, they're gaslighters!
They're ignoring the major issue, and they're ignoring the 70 flights that Biden had in the dead of night to take people from the border to Florida.
And the last term that I have for it is based upon the best-selling book on bullshit by Professor Harry Frankfurt.
And bullshit means is that you just go ahead and talk to focus groups and you get the talking points and the sound bites that sound the best, but you're really not saying anything.
It's an entire lie.
And Professor Frankfurt said that bullshitters are worse than liars because all that they do is orchestrate responses to herd people to stupefy.
And heard them, and man, but until we get a breakthrough, that's what we're going to continue to have.
Nos points, new legislation in Congress is proposing, by Democrats of course, that non-citizens be allowed to vote in federal elections, which has got a lot to do with what it's all about, plus providing cheap blade to many of their supporters.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, of all the issues I've seen come through the news, this is one of the very few that make me giggle with joy and laughter.
Watching the fake video from the hypocrites on the left deal with This issue has just been fun for me, and one thing I've got to say about it is right here.
Can you all see that?
Yeah, you'll see!
Martha's Vineyard is nice!
Martha's Vineyard is nice!
Oh, it's a It's a joke.
It's fun.
It gets the attention in the right place.
I've got a lot of appreciation for trolling.
It takes me back to Trump canceling Nancy Pelosi's plane that was headed over to Europe with all those important people on it and how I giggled at the great trolling that took place there.
Hey, I've always said the Republicans are a lot more fun than the Democrats.
Come join us over here on this side.
You know, I wish I could really be behind the party because, you know, I'm a skeptic in terms of Abbott and DeSantis.
I like what they're doing.
I like it as much as I liked what Trump was doing.
But I can tell you this, Abbott He was involved in Uvalde.
I mean, he knew something was involved there.
And I don't trust it.
I don't trust any of these guys.
And that's just the nature of the beast.
I'm a skeptic.
I don't think that these guys have the best ambitions going or the best intentions going out there.
I'm glad that this particular issue has arisen in contrast to the abortion debate, which seems to have blown over without nearly as much Fire and brimstone, as I was expecting from the left on that particular issue.
Now, if we could only just put a wall in Texas to keep the Californians out, we'll be fine.
I like that, Brian.
That's a very nice thought.
There's much more going on here.
Meanwhile, Biden's mega extremist speech has backfired, where more Americans are worried about the socialist left than the extreme right.
It seems Biden and the Democrats are running out of scare tactics and running up to the midterm.
At least, according to a recent Harvard poll, his speech that right-wing extremists pose a threat to democracy are not having the intended effect.
In fact, it turns out Americans are more concerned with left-wing socialists than right-wing Republicans.
Here, Harvard Harris Poll found a majority of Americans believe Biden's speech only divided the country and did little to help the nation.
You think?
The polls are sure to give the most ardent leftists heartburn.
For starters, they asked, are you more concerned about the socialist left and the power they're gaining or afraid of the mega-right and the power they are getting?
Only 45% were more troubled by the mega-Republicans.
55% were more concerned about the socialist left.
In addition, the question asked, are you worried about tens of millions of dangerous mega-Republicans backing violence and trying to overthrow the Constitution, or is that a gross exaggeration and distortion?
54% thinks the number of dangerous mega-Republicans is a gross exaggeration.
46%, which dumbfounds me, said they believe there are tens of millions of dangerous mega-Republicans.
Turned out 73% of Democrats, 42% of Independents, and 20% of Republicans have that view.
Meanwhile, 56% have doubts about Biden's mental fitness, compared to 44% who have no doubt, who must not be paying attention at all.
As to who are the top political figures most favorable in the country, Trump top spot easily.
Biden only fourth, after Mike Pence and Bernie Sanders.
Why Mike Pence should be so high is a very good question.
By the narrowest of margin, 51% think the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago was politically motivated.
TC tweets.
Maybe people are starting to wake up.
How the hell can America be offended by this slogan, Make America Great Again?
Majority more concerned about socialists left than mega-Republicans.
They also asked respondents what they thought about Biden's Soul of the Nation speech.
56% of polls opposed the speech.
60% said it was divisive.
40%—how this can be true is beyond me—thought it would be unifying for the country and move it forward.
Another 54% said it was fear-mongering.
46%, however, said they believed those fears were justified.
Just a day later, Biden was walking back saying, I don't consider any Trump supporter a threat to this country.
Meanwhile, probably too little too late, Kyle Becker tweets, the Socialist Left is not going to back off.
They've been building up for cultural hegemony for decades.
They believe, and this is very important, all of our institutions and morality represent illegitimate power structures, and thus, they are justified in doing things we consider immoral to destroy them.
This is without any doubt a cultural Marxist perspective.
The media wasted no time after Biden's speech to help deliver the message Republicans are a threat to democracy.
A far-left MSNBC guest, Ellie Mistal, was unimpressed with Biden's extremist speech because she thought he didn't go far enough.
I'm sure there are some white supremacists who will vote with white supremacists who don't think they are white supremacists.
It's not for me.
And unhinged Roland Martin at CNN said, this means war.
This is where we are.
We are at war with these people.
These folks are evil.
They have allowed evil into their house with Donald Trump.
He has now dominated the party this evil is spreading.
This is ludicrous.
A majority are not buying Biden's extreme mega-Republican line, though.
Makes you wonder what they're going to think of next.
Here's Carolina Costillo tweeting, Why are more Democrats leaving the Democrat Party?
Most voters, like myself, believe the Dem Party is unrecognizable and has moved far left.
Voters are waking up.
Thank God.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, what we do here on Need to Know News is that the truth is going to win.
And that is the contest, whether the objective and independently verifiable data is going to win, or more mule-infested Dominion insurrection machine results giving us more true leaders like Kamala Harris and Joe Biden are going to win.
And for the Republicans, yeah, Brian, I can't embrace anything until we've cleaned house.
The Bush-Cheney type leadership, Pence.
There is a split, and the American empire had to capture both wings, the left and right arm.
And they did.
And anybody who speaks out for truth is going to get marginalized and removed.
You can have opposition if you can control it, such as Congressman Dennis Kucinich from Ohio, a colleague of mine.
And you can get Dr. Paul on the right.
And as long as it just gives the appearance that oppositional voices can exist, then that's fine.
But if they cause any real trouble, then you got to remove those people.
So a poll from Harvard, huh?
That's got to be skewed.
That institution from the left that I have a degree from.
There's that Harvard patch.
Got a little cold this morning.
I actually wore that.
So I think those numbers from the Harvard poll are either skewed or they're going to be worse.
And the poll gaslights by even framing the question to ask if there are tens of millions of dangerous MAGA Republicans when we know for sure it was the 2020 Summer of Love.
And it was really those arsonists and murderers and insurrectionists.
Those people were the dangerous Biden, Harris, Pelosi Democrats.
And yet I didn't look at the poll, but I'm sure that the Harvard poll said nothing about that, otherwise the article would have been eager to report on a fair distribution of those types of questions.
So all we're going to get is this inversion of reality from our opponents, and they're going to project what they're doing upon the enemy.
That is the game plan over and over and over again.
Projection and an inversion of reality.
And to speak for the hypocrisy to the left, if you take a look at the federal government or even California, where I am, With a super majority of Dominion-selected representatives, nobody brings up universal health care.
And if you ask progressives what they think, if they rank their policy priorities, universal health care is among the leaders.
When I attempted to work with progressives, that was one of the things that I kept goading them to stand up in support of the 50 cost-benefit studies that I've studied.
All of them indicate that we would save hundreds of millions of dollars by getting rid of the parasites in the middle, but they don't take any action because they want the parasites, they want control, they want pain, they want fear, and another day of the war will go on.
I wouldn't be surprised if the poll were skewed 10 to 20 points because the idea 46% think there's a mega movement out there that's a threat to democracy is absurd.
That 40% you know I mean it was just some of those numbers were ridiculous so I think you make some good points.
Brian?
Yeah I I thought it seemed like the numbers were low too, so I actually looked up everything I could about the poll and learned everything I could.
There was actually 1,854 people that responded, and by the way, those are people that signed up to be a part of the poll.
So, you've got to sign up by the second of the month, and it's supposed to be open to 2,000 people.
They only had it, for some reason, 1,854 people sign up for it.
I have a feeling that The people that are interested in going to poll in a Harvard poll are generally leaning to the left up in the Boston, Massachusetts area.
There's 329 million people in America, as far as I can tell from 2022 census numbers.
So 2,000 or 1,854 is a little bit ridiculous.
I have a feeling that we have more momentum on the conservative side than we've ever really imagined.
And as for MAGA, this reminds me of 12 years ago, about 2008.
Remember something called the Tea Party?
A bunch of people would start to get together at local parks and in fields and they'd have their little meetings and they'd talk about the budget.
Those people were having a hard time with the fact that the debt was rising and it was $10 trillion in 2008.
That's just 12 years ago.
Any idea where it's at today?
$70 trillion or so.
20 trillion or so 24 24 trillion dollars so were those tea party people that cleaned up after themselves and left the grounds looking spectacular when they left were they were they really all that threat threatening to society You know, you go watch a Trump rally and you see what I see.
Are generally good, responsible citizens that care about their communities and care about our government and care about the way things are going.
They're against crime, they're for paying their fair share of taxes, they're for hard work and advancement, and they want their classrooms clean enough and not overloaded with low-end students that they can actually teach their kids something, something Good.
I mean, if you think about this flood of illegal immigrants, just imagine what it does to a classroom here in Texas.
If these teachers are trying to teach their curriculum, and they've got four students that don't even understand the basics, Of what this stuff is about because they just walked into the class yesterday.
They're going to have a really hard time keeping that class going where it's supposed to go.
So this I think this isn't even necessarily about the cost of the medical care and the Medicaid and the cost of the food and the housing and the cost of the policing and all this.
I think it's designed to make the next generation of kids so freaking stupid that they're totally ineffective and I am for MAGA.
I am pro-conservative.
I am pro-large groups that do this stuff.
And, you know, just because I don't trust the politicians doesn't mean I don't trust the people that are a part of the movement.
And I do.
I like them.
Great points.
The sample size is large enough if it were randomized stratified sampling.
The fact that this is self-selected biases the poll from the beginning to the left.
So it's remarkable, given the bias, that it's still showing what it shows, which is basically a rejection of the propaganda coming from the Biden team.
I don't even believe that was a real Joe Biden up there on the stage, given the way he was contradicting himself the following day.
I suspect it was a hologram, because they didn't want him to fall apart reading the teleprompter.
Meanwhile, Kevin Newsom comments about migrants, but they're backfiring.
Like many Democrats, Newsom is seething over illegal migrants being removed from border states to left-wing sanctuary cities.
But sanctuary cities declare themselves open to migrants, so there shouldn't be a question here.
He claims it's immoral, calling for the DOJ to investigate the states that were transferring the migrants.
He's picked a fight with Governor DeSantis, demanding DeSantis debate him.
I'd like to watch that.
This menace would take him apart piece by piece.
There's no more shallow and vapid political figure on the American scene than Gavin Newsom.
As he voices his outrage, he's not talking about a similar program he himself oversaw when he was the mayor of San Francisco, called Homeward Bound, which allowed homeless people to get free bus rides to other communities.
Newsom's outrage is deeply hypocritical.
When Newsom led San Francisco, he described Homeward Bound as an avenue to help folks turn their lives around.
Here's Brian Murray tweeting, oh the irony, when Mayor of San Francisco Gavin Newsom launched Operation Homeward Bound where they brought homeless people one-way bus tickets out of town.
The contortions these people make always amaze me.
Here's a letter to Attorney General Garland where he's asking for the investigation of the governors of Florida and Texas.
The then mayor even said homeless in San Francisco had relatives or loved ones who could help them out.
That homeward bound was only the means providing necessary transportation.
It actually had the effect of moving the overwhelming majority of homeless outside of California, not just outside of San Francisco.
Clearly, he's not eager to talk about it today because it undercuts the staged anger he's directing toward the GOP governors.
As he escalates his attack against them, especially DeSantis, he's taking a lot of heat on social media, not just because of Homeward Bound.
Americans have suggested he should be less worried about Republican governors, more focused on his own state.
It's outrageous!
Outrageous!
To this day, California remains overrun with homelessness, growing crime, high taxes, and unaffordable cost of living.
The state's electric grid isn't doing so well either, as it continues to attack Republican governors, People are leaving states like his and moving to states like Florida.
California's population decline was so swift, it lost a seat in the House after the 2020 census, and I guarantee you it's going to continue.
Carl, your thoughts?
Governor Newsom.
What a snake in a suit that guy is.
I'll tell you a story about that clown.
So when he was mayor of San Francisco, one of the things that I've done is helped create this movement for public banking.
And the Public Banking Institute is one of the leaders for that.
I'll show you an example of the benefit of public banking.
But Newsom was the mayor of San Francisco, and some of our people got a meeting with Newsom.
And Newsom told the volunteers about public banking for San Francisco to join in for a public bank, either aligned with different cities or counties or some combination.
Newsome told or a volunteer said that Newsome looked very sincere and said, what a great idea, except Is just not legal for me to do.
And so our volunteers were prepared and said, here's the fucking bill.
Stand with us to back it.
And we have other ways that you can do around it, working around with the counties.
But he went silent after that.
So that's all they do.
They're going to virtue signal and care, but they're not going to do anything.
Now, the benefit here in the San Francisco Bay Area, we have a relatively new Bay Bridge that goes from the East Bay where I live.
So it crosses over in Oakland into San Francisco.
And that new version, we're told, costs six billion dollars.
It was funded by bonds and the funding for that for a 30 year bond is going to be roughly about double the initial cost.
So it would cost the taxpayers of California 12 billion instead of six.
But if we had a public bank, our own bank, we can create the credit in house and at cost.
And that removes 50 percent of the cost of infrastructure.
North Dakota is the only state out of 50 to have its own public state bank and it's the only state out of 50 that is increasing budget Surpluses.
And for Newsom, so he was recalled.
We had the votes for recall.
But then it went into those mule-infested Dominion insurrection machines and officially Newsom got 666 of the vote.
No, no, no.
66.6% of the vote.
I thought that was an interesting comp.
No coincidence there.
And he is the governor of Homelessness, as he, during the the so-called pandemic, he was photographed at some rich Napa County winery, like $200 a person dinner and wine thing, maskless, at the same time that he was ordering our school children to be shot and masked.
Oh, you're absolutely right.
Yeah, the Secretary of State of California changed voting to allow everyone to print their own ballot.
That's the only way he survived.
He's universally despised in California.
And exposing the hypocrisy of these figures destroys their credibility.
Brian?
Well, I think the only credibility that anything Newsom does is Make the statement credible that the Puppet Masters are on a touch with with the audience.
Look, the only time I watch and listen to a puppet show is when I want to be entertained or I want to be taught or retaught a childish lesson.
The idea that Governor Newsom is going to lecture Texas or Florida or anybody else on what the right thing to do is just, it's purely laughable.
Why is he focusing on what we do?
Why is he focusing on Bussing or flying out migrants.
When he has the biggest problems in the nation right now, people are leaving his state by droves.
The state is financially irresponsible.
It's falling behind.
They're having to sell every interest they got just to keep going and make up for the taxable revenue that they're losing.
It's a joke.
And just to confirm my suspicions, I went ahead and logged into Twitter using what's called a sock puppet account on a VPN, which means the computer has no idea who I am or where I'm coming from, because I didn't want it giving me A predetermined outlook as if I'm Brian Davidson conservative.
So I went ahead and did this process and I just put in Gavin Newsom and started reading the comments from the top to the bottom.
I'm telling you something.
This guy has no credibility.
Every other issue that they control, you can tell that they're controlling it pretty well, but not when it comes to Newsom.
People hate this guy.
People are tired of this guy.
And I'm telling you that the only way he's going to get elected to anything is if they fix the machines.
Oh, you're absolutely right, Brian.
Yeah, car broke.
Yeah.
And one thing, Brian, going broke at the state level is part of the grand plan, because when you roll in the Great Reset, you want to have responsible leaders like Gavin Newsom tell the public in California, it's sad, but it's true.
You're going to have to own nothing and be happy.
So they have to be broke and they have to gaslight people and virtue signal that, oh, we tried, but Yeah, I am convinced that homelessness and the revolving door is all part of the agenda to destroy America, generating a massive number of homeless so they can come in and offer universal guaranteed income, which makes everyone dependent on the state.
Destroy private property in Illinois as of 1 January.
The police no longer have the authority to remove trespassers.
If homeless people occupy your home when you're gone, you come back, there's no way to get them out.
I'm from Washington.
I moved down to Texas 22 years ago.
I can't stand going home.
And visiting with all my, I mean, I love Washington.
It's a pretty state.
I grew up there.
I walked through the fern gullies and the forest and enjoyed everything I could about it.
But now every time I go up there, I'm just, I'm just disgusted with the culture and all my friends, even my liberal friends can feel it sitting down and having a beer at the 30 year reunion.
They're all sitting around going, so, uh, can you really still buy a house in Texas for $300,000?
Or is that just some sort of lie?
I'm like, uh, yeah.
Yeah, you can.
So, no wonder they're coming here in droves.
And no, we don't have an income tax, but not that I'm inviting anybody, I'm just saying.
Hey, a lot of people are moving to Florida and to Texas, my friend, for good reason.
Meanwhile, there's so much with the Alex Jones trial going on, we want to bear in mind that a lot of people have called out these phony shooting events.
Here's Steve Buchenek.
Hi, this is Dr. Steve Buchenek and this is Steve Talks.
Hello, this is Dr. Buchenek and Dr. Steve Talks.
Now let's get to Parkland.
Parkland has been no more than another extension of the false flags that we've had since Sandy Hook in 2012 when the so-called Adam Lanza, a contrivance by the FBI created and manufactured by the dysfunctional FBI,
And the children who were never killed, created by Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, and Obama, the 20 little children who were never killed, and the six adults who were never killed, that false flag and that narrative continues on through Parkland, through Orlando, through Fort Lauderdale, and Governor Scott has to be warned, enough is enough.
We, the people, will not tolerate this nonsense.
Whether you care about gun control or not is not relevant to us.
We will not pay for a dysfunctional FBI.
We will not pay for dysfunctional officers on the police force.
And we will not pay for this nonsense.
Now, let me get down to other issues.
But that's the one we want to address.
He's excellent on it.
Trump declares a border wall and remain in Texas where effective as indeed they were.
Even as records continue to fall and the border crisis continues, Trump has reminded America that his policies for securing the border were largely successful.
Customs and Border Patrol report a new record of 2.15 million encounters in the last fiscal year, with still a month to go.
This is the sixth straight month of over 200,000 apprehensions along the border, the number in this case being 203,597.
Posting on his Truth Social platform, he reminds America, only two years ago we had the strongest and best southern border in U.S.
history.
The numbers are difficult to argue with.
According to the Border Patrol figures, there have been 2,150,639 illegal migrant encounters in the first 11 months of the current fiscal year, topping last year's record of 1,734,686.
Compare those to 2019 or 2020, even though the latter was affected by the pandemic.
2019, 97,509.
2019, 97,509. 2020, 458 and 88.
Breaking Bill Moogland tweets.
It's official for the first time.
Migrant encounters at the border have surpassed 2 million in one year.
CBP reports 203,598 migrant encounters at the border in August, bringing the total for fiscal year 22 to 2,150,370, and there's still a month left to go.
Trump noticed migrants knew it would be hard to enter and even harder to remain in the U.S.
That's the best border policy of them all by far.
A wall was built, and along with remain in Mexico, the combination worked to stave off what's now become a border crisis by design.
The remaining Mexico forced illegals to stay on the Mexican side while their asylum requests were heard in U.S.
courts.
Biden ended that policy.
Republicans are counting on Biden's border mess to play into their hands in the November midterm election.
Republican National Committee Chair Rona McDonough wrote Monday, safety is a major concern when considering the Democrats' dereliction of duty.
And it's all intentional.
Carl, your thoughts?
It is all intentional and that's why we're so motivated at Need to Know News and the Digital Army is so motivated because we've had direct experience of the lies.
So Steve P., a great patriot, he's telling the truth, is that pretty much everything is a false flag event.
Anything in past history, current events, they're all at the minimum spun And usually they're creative to give the big push and this political narratives to have a population that we see the agenda now is to have the population shot.
Chipped and vax passported and then culled.
They haven't gotten to the culling point yet, but we can see enough of the dangers of the vaccines that it is culling in their agenda.
So the big picture that psychopaths like Newsom are lying about is that we do have a double, the official figures, now who knows what's correct and what isn't about that, but even the official numbers shows that Biden has doubled The migrancy from south of the border doubled.
That's huge!
But Newsom isn't going to talk about that.
And it is just a race to the bottom, and it is intentional.
And you want to, in order for the Great Reset to happen, and for the criminals to remain in power, they're going to have to destroy the American independence.
You can't have entrepreneurial free thinkers out there You have to have people who are sheepalized and can be herded.
And that's the main bottom line of this AMREP 2.0.
It's either going to be the Great Awakening, where the truth is out there and the criminals are arrested, or the sheeple are herded down the path to the Kulig.
You can't combine open borders with a welfare state.
It's economically unsustainable.
They're bringing about deliberately the collapse of the American economy.
So I can move in with a whole new system, getting rid of private property.
This is all part of the Great Resets and the Democrats are 100% committed there too.
Brian.
I applaud Perchenik for standing up and saying what's true.
It's so rare these days.
It's one of the reasons I'm still A huge fan of James Fetzer.
He's the one guy that...
Held out for the truth when I knew the truth when I had studied the truth when I learned the truth and started doing my own analysis of false flags.
You were the you were the last man standing in terms of people that were willing to a lot of other people gave it a shot, but you've been doing this so long and doing this so well that I say here here and I'm glad to see pachinko.
I wish there was a thousand others that would stand up and be just as loud as for the border wall, you know, there's not A whole lot more for me to say about it.
Trump was on the right path, obviously.
These guys want to see these people bust up to the border.
They do not walk 2,000 miles across 10 different countries from Venezuela.
They're being brought up to the border and forced to cross the border.
And it's just laughable that these people in Martha's Vineyard are sitting there saying, we've used them, we've brought them up.
And we lied to them.
Who do you think's doing the lying down south?
Who's paying for them?
They're not.
It's, it's, it's just absolutely stupid.
And you know, I'll tell you, these puppet masters really do think that we're stupid.
I mean, they really do think we're going to buy this asylum crap.
You know, it's just, it's ridiculous.
And all I want to say about it is it's important to me because of what it's going to do to the classroom.
That's where it hurts the worst.
Our students and our educational system have been so dumbed down, Brian, it's staggering.
Here it is, breaking.
Dems vote to give illegal aliens the ultimate right.
Today's illegals, tomorrow's Democrats.
The House Judiciary Committee Democrats voted to support non-citizens the right to vote in our elections.
They can't win if they don't cheat.
They want open election to match their open borders.
They truly hate this nation.
The vote to insert language to permit any non-citizen to vote in a federal election or to encourage or require a state ... political subdivision to permit any non-citizen to vote in a state or local election, interpreted as meaning nothing in this section may be construed as allowing that, was shut down by Democrats in a 21 to 12 vote.
They want illegals to have the vote in America.
Not one Democrat voted with the Republicans on the McClintic Amendment.
Let the whole world vote.
Why not?
The historic fraud in the 2020 election wasn't enough for these demons.
There's no hiding it.
Democrats want non-citizens voting in our elections.
It's shocking, but that's exactly what they want to happen.
Trump.
The left needs non-citizen vote.
They can't win on the issues with American voters in November.
Ohio has the opportunity to stop this destructive campaign.
The Citizenship Voting Requirement Amendment will ensure only U.S.
citizens are entitled to vote in federal elections.
Sounds pretty straightforward and obvious, doesn't it?
The Democrats, however, don't want to hear it, Carl.
Yeah yeah it's uh it's right here at the end game and yeah of course that's what they want they need a justification for the democratic party becoming the one people's democratic party and therefore justify winning all the elections because their policies are so popular to include everybody they're the party of inclusion not exclusion and then of course you know for a totalitarian nation from a republic then you're going to have to
Demonize and criminalize the opposition.
You're going to have to label them MAGA Republicans or truthers.
And we got a hint about the talking point from Fauci last week.
He used the phrase anti-vaxxer attitudes.
And I thought, That's a good one!
Because see, with the existing CDC policy to put into health camps those who aren't vaccinated, see, so now you just conjoin the anti-vaxxers to an anti-vaxxer attitude and you call them violent and domestic violent extremists so that you literally remove
You censor and remove the political opposition, and that is where we are at.
The documentation to resist Carl B. Herman Blackspot, any of these shows in the context section, I give you my best hits to be able to stand where we're saying that this is an oligarchy, they're Orwellian criminal, the facts are obvious, and that you need to reject their control, remove your consent, and demand their arrests.
Well, the estimates have up to 4.9 million migrants come in.
They were flying them all over the country, but especially to swing states where they're going to make a difference when they're given the right to vote.
They're also here for cheap labor, for the company's agribusiness, for example, which is a reason why blacks had gravitated toward Trump, as the Rasmussen poll in 2019 reflected.
40% of black likely voters were going to support Trump because he had created a surging American economy and the lowest earning wage earners were seeing their wages rise at the highest rate, especially because he'd clamped down on the border.
The Democrats want to reverse all of that.
Brian?
Well, there's certain Rituals that we all are involved with in society that are considered sacred.
Some people go to church and they consider it sacred.
Some people it's different things here and there.
One thing that I've always considered sacred was the right to vote, which I must say made me a much harder person and much Different than I always was on the morning of November 21st, 2020.
I was convinced going into that that Trump and MAGA had, that we were going to take all 50 states, that there was no way they were going to continue to pull that out.
And when I went ahead and put my head down to sleep on my pillow on the night of November 22nd about 10 30, I was like, This is in the bag.
So to wake up the next day, I was walking around in an absolute stupor.
It felt like my heart had been ripped out of my soul and that I was displaced, like I had died in the bed and was somehow in some place other than America.
The right to vote is sacred as an American citizen.
People have been arrested for voting in our elections illegally, thrown in jail.
The fines are tremendous for voting in our elections illegally.
People ought to be prosecuted for voting in our elections illegally.
I pay taxes.
I live in this society.
I contribute.
I know I contribute more than I take out in terms of my overall fair share.
I am sickened by the idea that my voting power has been Displaced or kicked out of its position in society because some liberal organization brought some Venezuelan criminal up to the border to cancel out my vote.
I'm pissed!
I'm generally angry about it.
It needs to come back, and you know what?
If there's a place and a time for a war, that's gonna be it.
All the other issues I can laugh at and let go, but if you take away my right to vote, I am going to stand up and fight, however I have to, to get that back for my children.
There's a special place in hell for the Democrat politician who are promoting these massively un-American agendas.
Carl?
I think Brian is channeling the heart of America there, and that's why coming up to the midterms, I don't think that the Dems can have another one of those experiences where people the next day say, what the fuck?
The true numbers.
I read 250 pages of Attorney Cindy Powell's affidavits from the 2020 election, and it's overwhelming that Trump won 3-1 to 4-1.
That's going to be somewhere in the margin and close to all 50 states, yeah.
So something is going to break, and it's going to break soon.
And I love feeling Brian's passion on that, and I hope that that resonates with everyone in America.
Agreed, 100%.
Yeah, he seems to have taken 410 electoral votes.
So who is Javier Salazar, the Texas sheriff investigating Florida Governor DeSantis?
This is bizarre.
Sheriff Javier Salazar, a Democrat, is supposed to be investigating whether or not the largely Venezuelan immigrants sent to Massachusetts to Martha's Vineyard were promised jobs or other enticements, something DeSantis has denied.
Chatting with people and looking around online, I see not too many people are familiar with Salazar, so who is this guy?
Brendan Leslie tweets.
Bexar County Sheriff Salazar marched for George Floyd, campaigned for Joe Biden, fired a prison guard for supporting Trump, and slammed the Roe v. Wade ruling.
Something tells me this has nothing to do with law enforcement.
At the press conference announcing his investigation, Sheriff Salazar stated, We are opening up a case.
The facts of the case at this point are on Wednesday, September 14th, here in Bexar County in the city of San Antonio.
Our understanding is that a Venezuelan migrant was paid what we could call a bird dog fee to recruit approximately 50 migrants.
They were promised work, promised a solution to several of their problems.
They were taken to Martha's Vineyard.
For what we can gather, little more than a video op, and then they were unceremoniously stranded.
Sheriff Zalazar claims the migrants were lured under false pretenses onto planes.
It is way too early for me to start naming any suspects.
We do have the names of some involved that we believe are persons of interest in this case, but I won't be parting with those names.
I think, to be fair, everybody on this call knows who those names are already, so I won't be naming them.
Suffice it to say, we will be opening a case.
Interesting.
So why is this Texas sheriff opening up a case for those unfamiliar?
Bexar County is not on the border.
It's the home of San Antonio, about 150 miles north of Nuevo Laredo, Mexico.
Jason Delgado tweets, "Bexar County Sheriff Jeffers Salazar isn't pulling pungent.
His office is opening an investigation into the migrant flight from Texas to Florida and finally to Martha's Vineyard.
Jamie R.J. Hanna adds, "53 died in the back of a truck on Bexar County Sheriff Jeffers Salazar's Looked like Sheriff Salazar is the one who needs investigating.
So who is he?
He became sheriff in 2017 after years in the San Antonio Police Department.
Re-elected in 2020.
Number of controversies related to him.
In April 2011, Deputy Armando Lopez was fired after it was determined he falsified several confidential informant payment vouchers.
In December of 2018, Lopez was rehired by Salazar.
A search shows that Lopez had contributed to then-candidate Salazar's campaign to be re-elected sheriff.
The donations, the contributions totaling 4,000, stretch from December 2015 to September 2016, just weeks before the election.
Salazar is also not afraid to align his elected office with his political beliefs.
In June, Following the SCOTUS ruling overturning Roe v. Wade, he announced he would not attempt to charge women in San Antonio who sought abortions.
He ripped into both the Supreme Court and Texas lawmakers for trying to impose their supposed morals on others.
He added, they will not use my badge or the color of my office to do so.
My job is chasing predators, rapists, and human traffickers, not someone exercising a right.
Meanwhile, Representative Anthony Sabatini tweets, Governor Abbott must remove Bexar County Sheriff's Jabberer Salazar from office immediately based upon his insane political threat against Governor DeSantis.
If Abbott believes he doesn't have the authority, he must call a legislative session and pass a law granting him removal powers.
At least at one point, Salazar's own deputies did not think highly of him.
In April of 2019, the union that represents Bexar County deputies filed a class action lawsuit against him for what they claimed was blatant political pandering and contract violations.
regarding deputy firings.
According to lawsuits, Alza was in violation numerous times of the Texas government code and the union's collective bargaining agreement by firing deputies who hadn't been arrested prior to investigating any charges.
They also point to statements made by him that were disparaging.
In an interview with a local ABC affiliate, for example, he said he'd give his own job performing an A.
Even though he'd not left with a Super Bowl team, and mentioned his deputy's lack of training.
Adding to the attraction of Sheriff Zalazar, the Bexar County Jail, as of September of 2019, had mistakenly released 12 inmates from the jail, two within a 12-hour period.
Bexar County Judge Nelson Wolfe commented at the time, He tells me he's doing everything he can, and I believe he's trying.
But there's many indications over the past several months, incidents over the past several months is unheard of.
At a press conference addressing the inmate releases, Salazar unknowingly channeled a future vice president and stated, though there were investigations following every release, he was still looking into the root cause of why they were occurring.
Note to Governor DeSantis, Be on the lookout for Bexar County's answer to Sheriff Boofer T. Johnson's NBC News tweets.
In Bexar County, Texas, Sheriff believes that migrants were preyed upon.
Here's a Whiskey Noodle tweet.
I didn't know the Bexar County Sheriff had jurisdiction over Florida.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, that article starts out with the appropriate phrase, saying that the national spotlight, quote unquote, is on the South.
And that's exactly what it is, is that they find these people, and he's a crisis actor, he may have a real job too, but he is performing a script that is ordered upon him, because that's all that we really have.
So, George Floyd, he was involved in that, huh?
Well, the most damning evidence that we covered a lot on this show, and that Jim is really a champion for, is the film evidence that the alleged George Floyd was picked up and put onto a gurney to be placed in an ambulance, but what was picked up wasn't a human being, it was the top half of a dark-skinned dummy that is used for medical training.
And we know that that's true, that it was the top half of a dummy, because That's what the film showed, the top half of the dummy legs, and it looked exactly like the one that you can buy online.
So this guy is a sheriff in law enforcement.
I'd be very curious to see what he did and what he said in the summer of love of 2020, where it actually was an insurrection.
So the Salazar said it is, quote unquote, our understanding that these migrants were lied to and lured and preyed upon.
I'd love to see the factual evidence for that, but that whole brilliant paragraph where all he does is slime and smear and say no names, that's the bullshit innuendo that we always get from these psychopaths.
Let's see.
So he was reelected in 2020, huh?
Yeah, yeah.
It was those infested Dominion selection insurrection machines.
I wonder about that.
But if we can win this thing, what will be coming likely in this country?
is truth and reconciliation and the deal with truth and reconciliation.
And that's part of what I wrote for first when I started writing in 2009, is that when the truth comes out, people are going to have accusations and they're going to be concerned about who's dirty and who was just stupid.
And if this guy is dirty, which it looks like it will from that 2019 lawsuit, then the truth will come out and people will know.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, we have a saying down here.
It goes, that dog don't hunt.
And I guess what I have to say about this is I can't currently think of any Democrat that appears competent, with the exception of Tulsi Gabbard, In terms of how they're performing their duties in political office, they feel like they're universally sold to some common interest that's pulling strings.
I mean, look at this lady in Chicago.
Look at this New York Attorney General.
Look around and ask yourself, is there a Democrat anywhere that is thinking and operating independently?
Man, I miss the days of debates with Bill Clinton's staff.
Carville, I miss the days of a little bit of resistance.
These guys are No more effective than a turtle crossing the road in the face of a semi-truck, in terms of convincing people that they're out there for the good, with the exception of the sheep.
And they're out there!
I was at the grocery store, old man, nice respectful conversation, walking from the registers out into the car, and he said, you know how I know what's going on?
It's because I watch CNN.
And I thought, wow, I just don't run into that every day.
And granted, it's getting more rare.
I don't see the Democrats that are on the streets being nearly as loud as these Democrats that are playing these roles in these positions.
I see them actually beginning to notice that it's a lie.
It's all a lie.
And I'm glad for that, because I do think people are going to wake up.
Now, I think that the Puppet Masters also believe that, because it feels to me like they're getting ready to push a climate change type of false flag.
Almost like a Project Blue Beam or something, where they've got to have some major event coming.
That's going to help them solidify themselves and scare people into believing in climate change.
That's kind of the thread that I'm seeing through all the propaganda lately.
Look, they want to bury this story about immigration as fast as possible so they can get to what serves them well and serves them quickly.
And I think they will.
And I feel a false flag coming, and I just hope we've got the sense to figure it out when it hits.
Brian, I think you're right, and it is the case.
The hallmark of Democrat governance is incompetence, whether it's the Speaker of the House, or the Mayor of Washington, D.C., or the Mayor of Chicago, or the Sheriff down in Texas.
I mean, it's incredible.
Every damn one of them is just incompetent, incapable of performing the duties for which they are responsible.
Here we have Alex Jones making an appearance outside of his second trial for damages.
By the way, there will be a third.
They're dragging this out right up to the midterms.
Incidentally, I sought to intervene in all three of his trials.
I was not only opposed by the Sandy Hook parents, which was unsurprising, but by the defendants as well.
My point?
No one has ever established whether anybody died at Sandy Hook.
They didn't want to hear it.
They didn't want to deal with it.
I was pointing out, as my book established, it was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
Here's a crisis actor who got booted after he himself observed that was what was going on, that it was a FEMA drill.
They fired him after taking him in.
I submitted a motion to stay the taking of my blog, jamesfetzer.org, and of my book, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, to the Supreme Court, the Justice Amy Barrett.
She declined.
I had the option at that point, then, of selecting another justice, and I selected Neil Gorsuch.
Turns out that A fellow who's rather well known to many named Miles Mathis picked up on Alex Jones' second fake trial and went on to claim that my whole case before the Supreme Court is also fake.
It's pretty ridiculous.
The timing was exquisite because Neil Gorsuch, as you'll see in that bottom line of the second block, has just referred my Application for a stay to the entire Supreme Court, which is most certainly something that does not happen with any application that's fake.
I did a raw deal just Wednesday here with Paul from California and Mike Sledge about Miles Mathis and how he blew it.
He's completely ignorant of the nature of the law.
He even declared That having a summary judgment without a jury trial was impossible, just displaying his incredible ignorance.
A summary judgment does not entail a jury trial.
It's used as an alternative when there are no disputed facts for the jury to resolve.
I mean, if this guy wanted to make himself look like a moron, he succeeded.
As almost everyone knows now, I passed through 10 of the 12 stages to get to the Supreme Court, actually be heard before the court.
All four of the stages in the left block, all four of the stages in the middle, I'm down to the third on the third block.
Well, the justices will meet in a private conference where they vote to either grant or deny certiorari.
Four votes are necessary to proceed.
My motion and my petition have now been moved to the 3rd of October, where I should know the outcome by the 10th.
Anyone interested in the history of the case, check out GiveSendGo.com slash FundingFetzer.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, first with Alex Jones.
Alex was, I guess, the person that I learned the most from the earliest.
And Alex reprinted, on a regular basis, articles from Washington's blog, and the owner of that blog and I were the two primary writers for years.
And then about 2017, Alex stopped reprinting any of our articles.
And, you know, it may just be my opinion, but I thought that what we were hitting upon was some of the most important articles that you could possibly hit upon, and he previously carried it and then he stopped, and now he's on the wrong side of history with Sandy Hook.
So, the court system is a psychopathic, controlled, and owned system also, at least to date, and If there is a court case where it really doesn't matter who wins to the controllers, then they may just tell the judge, listen, this is your court, it's your game, because that's what it is for them.
So they won't care, they won't intervene.
But if there is an important case, like something for an assassination, or an election, or Sandy Hook, then the real question is who's in charge?
If the Blackhats are in charge, then they're going to have a veneer of appropriate behavior.
They'll point to all these documents and the history, and they'll have legal papers.
But it's going to all be bullshit, as it has been so far.
In this case, you have a Wisconsin judge who destroyed the constitutional duty he has as a judge for a fair game because the Constitution clearly allows for Jim to have a jury trial and instead no jury trial, no evidence.
just a declaration of guilt and and here pay pay this amount uh for your guilt and so if the white hats are in charge we may have a reversal uh who knows there is a lot of interesting chatter that the 24th of this month which is two days from today It's going to be some sort of an event.
I don't think that we can make it to the midterms without some sort of a huge event or false flag or claim by the Democrats that we can't have the elections, we just have to put it off just a little bit, just like two weeks to flatten the curve and whatever crisis they want to manufacture from that.
But man, this is near the endgame of this AMREV 2.0.
Very exciting time and I encourage our audience to Stay true to your highest thoughts, words, and actions.
Just two points.
Wisconsin's out of whack in relation to summary judgments.
It allows the court to judge himself based upon his subjective opinion to decide the facts.
And if he finds the facts are not reasonable, he can set them aside as though they did not exist.
The plaintiff and I in this case could not have been at more opposition.
I asserted nobody died.
He said he had a son who died there.
I said it was a FEMA drill.
He said it was authentic.
I said this was a political to control gun control.
Even the document we were debating the authenticity of In all of its versions, and there turned out to be a total of five, stated that DeSena died at Sandy Hook Elementary School on 14 December 2012 of multiple gunshot wounds, and yet the judge decided, based on his exercise on reason, that my contention that nobody died at Sandy Hook and all the evidence I had was not relevant to the accuracy of it.
Truthfulness.
I thought it was legally absurd from the beginning, and I'm now in the position of appealing to the Supreme Court to do something about it.
The other point I make is this.
Alex Jones, during this interview, was saying, I'm not the Sandy Hook guy.
He kept saying, I'm not the Sandy Hook guy, but no reporters start to ask him, well, Alex, if you're not the Sandy Hook guy, who is?
Because the answer was, I think, all too obvious.
Why it wasn't said or the reporters don't ask is baffling to me, Brian.
We did an independent analysis of Sandy Hook.
I didn't let Jim's position influence my independent analysis as a private investigator.
I went and downloaded the photographic evidence from the Connecticut State Police's online archive where they released everything without metadata and cleaned all the information off to make anything possibly usable in court.
My conclusion is the same as Jim's.
There's not enough blood in the room to indicate anybody was shot.
There's not enough bullet holes to indicate anybody was shot.
There's not blood where it should be.
The school was completely out of order.
The time of day is all screwy.
Why were the windows open?
Sandy Hook is there and it's obvious for anybody who wants to see.
And Jim, I'm going to say this.
You did right.
And let me point this out that I happen to be a relatively religious person.
I read my Bible.
I attend church.
I believe in spiritual forces of evil and right and wrong.
Jim, I can tell you that Even if you lose in court, I don't believe you've lost.
I believe that you, even you, have freed more minds in this country than I could ever dream of with a hundred years of contributions at my skill level.
Jim, you are a hero, win or lose.
And by the way, I hope if you lose, word gets out.
Because I believe you're here for something much bigger and more important than winning this stupid court battle against these fake puppets that are running this show.
The truth is the truth.
The truth will set you free.
And Jim, you've been true to it.
Stick to your guns and you'll be okay.
I don't know about Alex Jones.
I know about you.
I'm quite touched, Brian.
Those are very moving words.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to live need to know at gmail.com.
Live need to know at gmail.com.
Here we have a commentator observing.
Well, the first investigation and prosecution must be of the Department of Justice, the Bureau, the company, DHS, and AIPAC.
These are part of a very large RICO crime syndicate that murders, mass murders, covers it up.
Example, they murdered Seth Rich and many more and did 9-11.
Murrah, Ruby Ridge, and more.
Because of the murders, there's no statute of limitations on this large USG RICO crime syndicate, and because these entities all have dirty hands, none can be involved in these domestic terror investigations, and all will have to be done by special U.S.
Navy military tribunals.
Meanwhile, from one of the commentators on my blog, Try not to miss yesterday's raw deal.
Most of the show deals with Myle Mathis' attack on Dr. Fetzer.
He actually believes Jim's trial is staged.
In truth, I've never had much faith in Mathis.
Some of his theories were just off the wall.
Others had some validity.
For me, this reeks of controlled opposition.
Paul mentioned someone with whom he had spoken, felt that Mathis is more than one person.
I tend to agree.
If you check into his endless scientific findings, there's just no way one person could have done all this research in one lifetime.
Hundreds of years ago, mastery of science would have been much easier.
Consider someone like Immanuel Swedenborg, who mastered all of science at the time and then delved into the spiritual.
After reading the FPDF at the end of this comment, that is, the Mild Mathis article, it becomes obvious Mathis has done little, if any, real research into Wisconsin summary judgment law.
If you read the following article, it's easy to see how far off course Mathis really is.
Cross motions for summary judgment should be treated as agreement for the court to decide the case upon the legal issues presented, but only when the court independently determines there is no genuine issue of material fact with regard to each party's separate motion.
The court documents are all on the StolenJamesFetzer.org site.
I have to agree with Mathis when it comes to the Alex Jones Show trial, but he's way the hell off course when it comes to Jim's trial.
And for Mathis to claim even Jim's appeal to SCOTUS is fake is simply ridiculous.
Mathis, or all those who may use his name, is part of the problem and part of the show, not part of the solution.
Meanwhile, final thoughts.
Carl, yours.
Well, I too consider myself a spiritual person.
I've read the great religious texts and have taken them quite seriously as a professional historian.
And by the way, the individual most studied by professional historians is the life of Jesus.
So, I see where we're at is that we still need to have a breakthrough, because we're on the precipice, we're at this endgame position, and the two outcomes are, one, is that it'll be the Great Awakening, and the truth will emerge, and all we need is a breakthrough of truth in one area to crack that psychopathic veneer of acceptable behavior, and then all the people will say, well, where else are they lying?
And we'll help him out with that.
And then we'll have the Star Trek-like future of really unimaginable, unpredictable breakthroughs, the release of technology, the discovery of all the poisons and the propaganda and the lies.
See, that's what we're Building!
And, you know, Brian was talking about education for our kids, and wow, that would be a fun place to live if we have unleashed humanity!
And the other option is the Great Reset, and we're being pushed into a civil war as one of the options our opponents want to keep available, and that is part of the purpose of the wording of that Harvard poll, is to Legitimize that there are a bunch of Democrats.
You see tens of millions of dangerous on the Republican Party.
So, our opponents, they're not they're not here to solve any problem.
They're here for control and as a professional historian.
I see it, the most accurate term, as a rogue state empire.
That's what the U.S.
is.
Carl B. Hermann Black's bought any of these shows.
I document that in an 11-part series, that that is the best academic description.
And for our writer to say murders and murder and mass murders, yeah, like the wars.
And we can quantify that.
And as a scholar, I easily quantify that the rogue state empire annually kills millions, harms billions, So exercise what we have and for sure what we have is what we think and what we say and what we do.
And I'm with Brian is that I do stand for divine justice and we do forge our own path forward.
And if you want to be a truthful, honest person with a good heart and empathy and love, then there's a whole bunch of options and opportunities of a heavenly-type future one way or another for you.
And if you choose to be a psychopathic liar, then good luck with your future.
Turn around if you can, but that's your call, not ours.
Brian, your final thoughts?
Yeah.
Ignorance is bliss.
And there's a lot of people out there walking around that we know that we all run into on a daily basis that are seeing the world through a very, very foggy, dark place right now.
They can't tell what's right.
They can't tell what's wrong.
And I got to say that the only way to break out of it is to start from scratch.
If you've spent your entire life being Propagandized and brainwashed into the world's platform.
You can take one tiny bit of truth and use it to put light in a dark place and to clear the fog out of it.
Start with a false flag.
That's where I started with.
It took me months to break through my first one, Orlando, and do so independently with my own mind.
But after that, Truth started rolling on in and now I can walk down the street or go to the grocery store, step into a lawyer's office or a court or whatever, and I feel confident that I have a good feeling for what's true and what's right and what's noble.
And what it's done for me is it's made me more compassionate as a person.
I no longer see the person across the street as the enemy.
I see the person across the street as somebody I can help see the truth.
And I hope that Just gives you a feel for it.
I don't want my neighbors to be in an ignorant state of bliss.
I don't want them to have that anxiety that comes with not really knowing what's true.
I want to help people out and that's what I think I'm here to do on this show is to just do that the best I can and take one step at a time.
And you and Carl are doing a sensational job at it.
You bring not only your keen intellects and your background knowledge, but real passion and moral values for what matters to America and indeed to all humane human beings, of whom it turns out there's a remarkable scarcity in the Democrat Party today.
It's dumbfounding.
My case before the court isn't really just for me.
My case is for all the citizens of Wisconsin who have been subjected to this improper summary judgment procedure introduced around 1957, to which tens of thousands have been improperly subjected.
It's also for citizens of the United States.
The United States Supreme Court has the opportunity here to affirm that the Seventh Amendment applies to all 50 of the states, oddly enough.
It turns out that of the first 10 amendments, only the 7th has not been affirmed by the Supreme Court to apply to all 50 states.
And at the same time, it gives them an opportunity to ensure the standards that are used for summary judgment are uniform across the nation in accordance with the 14th amendment.
So I've teed up the ball.
I believe the court can knock it right out of the park and that they're going to do so.
And I'm very touched and appreciative of comments like those we've heard today.
It affects me greatly.
Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your friends, your family, people you love.
We do not know how much time we have left.
Carl's suggesting two days hence something may happen that could affect each and every one of us.
Don't miss the opportunity to spend time with people you love and care about.
▲
Export Selection