This is the third episode of Inconvenient Truths with Gary King, where Gary brings up some of his discoveries of odd events taking place around the world and presents them for my consideration and commentary.
It's a great idea.
If you haven't seen the first two, you're going to enjoy them on my BitChute channel, Jim Fetzer.
Gary, take it away.
All right.
Yeah, I'm really excited about the new Convenient Truths number three is really what I'm all about.
I can come up with this stuff all the time.
Okay, so what are our subjects tonight?
All right, in our first episode we talked about being pulled over for seatbelts and not having it on and then going through this hardcore treatment of clearing yourself as a drug dealer, as a gun runner, and never cleared of, you know, the possibility that you may be Ready to commit a crime at all times.
All right.
So let me take the screen and I'll show you what I'm talking about here.
Okay.
Now we're going to talk about climate change tonight also, but how in the world could me being pulled over with a seatbelt in Waverly, Louisiana have anything to do with climate change?
All right.
Well, let's find out.
Here we go.
Here we go.
Okay.
Jim, I didn't know that I was going to be participating in And this is out on the Facebook page.
The Bay St.
Louis Police Department will be participating with the NHTSA Click It or Ticket Blitz between May 23rd and June 5th, 2022 to include safety checkpoints with area agencies.
Now, I could probably look into that and find out a lot, but For sure, the local guys are in on.
Please plan ahead for the holiday weekend to ensure all on the roadway are safe.
So, I mean, do we need to plan ahead because there's a checkpoint ahead?
Honey?
You know what I'm saying?
So, we'll start... So you're telling me you were pulled over during this click at our ticket?
Yeah, I look back on my ticket.
I've got it right here.
Man, I could show it to you.
It's a blue paper, but I'll probably... No, no, Gary, that's fine.
I'm just joking around.
All right.
So I wanted to find out who the NHTSA was.
And come to find out, it's this fella over here.
Can you go full screen, Gary?
Yeah.
Okay, so just a little...
Background.
All right.
Cliff here.
Stephen Cliff was appointed by Joe Biden.
It's one of his top appointments of his administration.
And he is head of the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration.
All right.
So going back a little bit, come to find out he was like one of the top People in what's called the GHG Marketing and Development and Oversight Branch of the Climate Program.
All right, so if you don't know, it's greenhouse gas.
And so he's been involved with all the marketing and development.
So just a little look.
Gary, just leave it up a sec.
Okay.
Yeah, hang on.
Yeah, go ahead while I'm putting it back.
Well, the whole greenhouse gas thing is a scam.
It's a monster scam.
I've been doing a series on anti-global warming with Joe Olson, who's an engineer qualified in virtually every field of engineering.
He's a brilliant guy.
We've dissected the greenhouse gas mythology.
It turns out that over 600 million years of Earth's history, there's been no correlation between the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere and the temperature of the Earth.
None.
Lacking a correlation, there cannot be a causal relationship.
You could contrast that with, say, Vaccinations for children and autism.
There's a perfect correlation.
The more vaccinations, the more autism.
The fewer the vaccination, the lesser the autism.
Even when there's a correlation, the argument can be made that there's not a causal connection.
It's kind of like a remarkable coincidence, just as the pharmaceutical industry argued That vaccine do not cause autism.
That argument continues today.
And as in the past, the tobacco industry argued that even though there was a correlation between smoking and cancer, that smoking did not cause cancer.
It's only been in recent times, under the impact of court decisions, that they've relinquished that claim and acknowledged that smoking does cause cancer, which anyone who's been paying attention, of course, has known for decades and decades beyond.
This guy has a principle in promoting a myth about global warming that's designed to destroy the American economy by gutting what are called fossil fuels, but actually are naturally produced by Earth, a limitless supply of oil, not to mention natural gas and other petroleum-related products, which are indispensable to the economy of the United States.
So he's part and parcel of the New World Order, the global research that's intended to destroy America and seize control.
By the way, you'll love this, Klaus Schwab, who's a Rothschild, of course, and the head of the World Economic Forum, has just declared that people have to look past owning private automobiles, Gary, The World Economic Forum is promoting getting rid of automobiles, which are for most Americans a key to freedom and liberty.
They allow mobility.
This is because the World Economic Forum is promoting a return to feudal times, when the people have no power, no liberty.
They work as slaves and serfs in the field, while the rich are ensconced in their castles, known these days as Gated communities.
It's embarrassing, shocking, Gary, but there it is.
The evidence could not be more blatant.
That could be a better intro for the next poll that I have, but we still are on the click it or ticket guy who at the head of the whole blitz and Jim, do you, I remember going back.
It has to be, I can remember.
Let me think real hard.
It may have been in the 90s, but there were no tickets that could be issued for not having a seatbelt.
Now, if you ran into someone or you were speeding and you didn't have your seatbelt, they could ride it.
Okay?
So then there was a huge campaign, you know, just, no, you couldn't have a seatbelt ticket at all.
And then they only wanted As a secondary violation where they could write it after speeding or anything like that.
And then I remember incrementally, they got it to where it's a primary violation that you can be pulled over.
So now it's gone beyond just a primary reason, but you have to go through all kinds of interrogation.
And you know, I can actually see getting pulled over for taking, I mean, it's all about safety, right?
But Going through the Palestinian ritual is my only problem with it.
Okay, so that's gonna lead us to another subject that we had in show number one and number two, and these are school drills.
Now, Dr. Fesser's name has come up around the world in every news broadcast, I'd say about every 30 minutes for the last week.
And this, let's just go ahead and watch this and Maybe we'll understand better.
How do you train students and teachers to prepare for a school shooter?
Often by pretending there actually is one.
These drills may help, but the drama can be intense, even if it's all an act.
And it's not just the kids who say they're scared.
Here's ABC's David Wright.
I'm gonna kill everybody!
Nobody's getting out of here!
It's every parent's worst nightmare, an active shooter on campus.
threatening to kill inno just a drill, but a terrif That's now an issue.
It m but the trauma is real.
O yesterday, parents and stu school got it wrong.
It's just a drill, but the trauma is real.
Outside Tampa, Florida yesterday, parents and students say Jewett Middle School got it wrong.
The school there held a drill without warning in which police officers showed up on campus, weapons drawn. - Our principal had announced that we were going to have a lockdown.
Seventh grader Lauren Marino and her siblings frantically texted their mom.
Police came in with guns and I'm kind of scared.
We actually thought someone was going to come in here and kill us.
Their mom was scared too.
I'm panicking because I'm thinking that, you know, a legitimate shooter is coming.
Xavier Tate was scared too.
His dad raced to the school, unaware it was only a drill.
My husband almost got a ticket coming over here yesterday.
He was doing 130.
The school has now apologized to the parents, but the school will continue to hold unannounced lockdown.
So in school districts across the country, lockdown drills are now as common as fire drills.
Some go as far as covering students in fake blood and recruiting volunteers to play dead in the hallways, all in an effort to make the drills more realistic.
The fact is, ever since Columbine 15 years ago... You remember seeing scenes like this on your TV?
I, um, no, keep it, keep it going, Gary.
I mean, what, um, this is, it's a compilation of different things.
And this is what we watched last week with the Columbine drill, where they put the body on the, on.
I do not mind seeing it again, Gary.
I would like to see it again.
Okay, well let's roll.
Columbine shooting is used even to this day as a foundation for gun legislation.
Looking at the piece of video that I just showed you, you see the children running around a body that was laying there.
That body was supposedly one of the students that was shot that day.
The only problem is that body wasn't there when the police arrived.
And in fact, I'll show you where they got it from and what they did with the body.
And you'll realize that it was a dummy.
This footage comes from the helicopter that was there on the scene.
And it's showing you the fire truck as they back it into position, get stuck in the mud and have to reposition it a few times, causing it to create ruts in the grass.
We can use that as a timeline, as a sequence of events.
So we know that what came first and in what order the rest of the videos came in.
This was the first video.
You didn't see this on TV.
Thank you.
They didn't show you these things because if they did, you would have been able to piece together what happened that day.
You will see the police, after the fire truck is situated, form a small group to go around to the side of the school and recover one of the bodies.
The fire truck is finally positioned.
You saw the puff of smoke out the back.
And now they're going around to extract the body.
Much clearer images than we had last week.
But you'll notice they grab the body by the arm and by the leg and drag it across the concrete, allowing the head to bounce on the concrete.
Whoa!
It's a bad way to be.
I don't know why I thought this was real.
Totally unrealistic to what reality would dictate.
Dragging along the concrete, bouncing the head.
Now what they do is they pull it around to the front of the fire truck, pause for a moment, take a breath, bend down, pick it up, and stick it on the front of the bumper of the fire truck.
It would be astonishing if we hadn't seen it a thousand times since.
So now they're going to get a group together and go back for the second body.
Now if you'll notice, in front of the fire truck, across the concrete sidewalk, is where they claim that the body of the first student they encountered was, but there's no body there.
That's because that body was the body that they're going to recover right now.
And drag it around and position it in front of the truck.
I don't know what the problem with the police radio is.
That's the helicopter news people commenting.
This was so amateurish because it was one of the first and it's just riddled with absurdities that are obvious.
As you can see, the first body is still pinned up on the bumper.
Well, they're in the building now.
It's going to get worse.
That's not a body.
That's a dummy.
This is another dummy that they're going to drag.
Watch the head bounce on the concrete.
Watch how loose the limbs are.
And they leave it in front of the fire truck as they step over top of it.
Bouncing head on the sidewalk.
That is a dummy.
That's the body that they use.
Wow.
Right there.
They'll pull it out so they can get the fire truck around it.
And that's the one that you see on all the press and all the media.
I mean, there, there has to be an ambulance in a situation like this.
Not one ambulance.
Okay.
Right.
No ambulances, no medevac job recalled.
Totally fraudulent, Gary.
Here we go.
So what do they do with the first dummy?
Well, they have to get rid of that one.
They can't leave it on the front of the firetruck.
So they pull this police car that you see in the picture around to the front of the firetruck.
And you'll see them stuff the body into the back seat.
Now you'd say, oh, that's a real person.
They're taking... Okay, just to kind of paint the picture a little bit.
Supposedly there are two shooters in the school mowing people down.
They don't seem to be worried about that.
The children are in there, are supposedly, you know, hunkering down not to be shot, but that's the situation.
There's supposed to be two shooters going through the school, taking people out.
The cop car stays there.
Well, at some point that had to happen, but they haven't rescued the kids yet.
They're going to come out this door right here with their hands, you know, like this.
Now that is a new thing when they started doing that.
At this time, this is 1999.
Yeah, this is just embarrassingly bad, Gary.
This is all one continuous shot that you never saw on the mainstream media.
Because if you did, you'd know the truth about this Columbine lie.
As this is one continuous shot, we can see the other teams lining up ready to do their part of the exercise in this multi-jurisdictional drill.
Over 90 agencies showed up there that day, including NATO.
That's where they're prepping the body.
NATO?
Yeah, I was about to pause it on that one.
We had 90 agencies there, including NATO.
How harebrained is that, Gary?
That's just ridiculous on its face.
I didn't know they had 90.
I know they have a bunch of agencies, but 90 of them to come to a drill?
It's just amazing how many people are involved.
And all the way from the click it or ticket program, which is the local, all the way to the global, which comes from our boy just appointed by, and don't forget, he was in charge of propagandizing everyone with greenhouse gases.
And you couldn't have clearly more spelled that out than you did.
Dragging it around a little bit.
If you were to see this on the mainstream media shown to you that day, you would have known the truth.
that this whole entire event was a drill.
Now as we watch them run the children out, we see them running around the body, the dummy, that they left the dummy, that they left there alongside of the truck.
But they're not done with the dummy yet.
Because after this, we still see the one camera shot here as it pans to the right.
To follow this officer.
Then pans back to the left.
And we see them dragging the dummy once again through the mud Look at that!
Gary, that's just so bad!
I know.
I second that.
I mean, it looks like a girl with her skirt up.
For those of you who still think that that's a real person, Just note the arm.
There's no joint.
It's bending backwards.
It's a dummy.
The U.S.
has had more than 160 active shooter incidents.
That's about one a month.
And as we saw in Sandy Hook, even the youngest kids aren't safe.
Looks like the family is there and they're getting ready to make, uh, to come to the microphone.
So we'll listen.
- Let's start now. - Okay. - So my name's Robbie Parker.
My family is one of the families that lost a child yesterday in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings here in Connecticut.
I've been contacted by so many people and agencies wanting to know How we're doing, and I just thought that this might be the best way to share those feelings with everybody.
First of all, I'd really like to offer our deepest condolences to all the families who were directly affected by this shooting.
As we move on from what happened here, what happened to so many people, let it not turn into something that defines us.
It's something that inspires us to be better, to be more compassionate, and more humble people who've set up a Facebook page to help raise money for Emily.
And when I've gotten on that and just seen the number of people, it's been quite overwhelming.
Robbie Parker, whose daughter, a six-year-old Emily Parker, you see her there, was shot and killed.
I like that, Gary.
Just let it run on.
Yeah, I was just gonna turn it down.
Okay, back to us.
This is good.
This is good.
- Okay, back to us.
This is good.
This is good, Gary.
Let me say a few words.
Yeah, well, let me let me ask you something before you do that.
All right, we've gone from Columbine all the way to Sandy Hook, which has been in the news more than any other time and You're in the middle of it as far as anybody else.
So I just, it's amazing that you're right here to talk about it right now.
And we're both completely familiar with, you know, sanding hoax and all that.
So go ahead, Dr. Betzer.
Well, the point I wanted to make is that Alex Jones has been criticizing for suggesting that participants in the event at Well, let me give you three nice illustrations that he's got it right.
A crisis actor is someone who's enlisted or recruited to play a role that's artificial.
It's not their real persona.
It's not who they actually are.
You just saw Robbie Parker coming out there.
Now, notice he comes out of the building all jovial, smiling, laughing.
Then he sees the assembled crowd.
He pauses.
He hyperventilates to get into character.
And then he begins talking about the death of his daughter, Emily.
And notice how he talked.
He pulls out his notes.
He pulls out a script.
He goes up and down reading the script.
I just wanted to put that in.
Oh, that's great, Gary.
You know, I hadn't even noticed that myself.
That's sensational.
But of course he has a presence of mind to mention her donation website so people can keep giving money.
Here's another example.
David Wheeler, who's supposed to be a grieving father, he and his wife Francine both have acting credits.
She even did the voiceover in an animated porn feature of all things.
He's in one of these shows made for TV where he's shown pointing a gun at his head as he's about to commit suicide.
Well, David Wheeler played two roles that day, both a grieving father of his son Benjamin, but also as a SWAT team member walking up and down Dickinson Drive carrying an AR-15 upside down by the magazine.
Now Gary, I spent two years at Recruit Depot in San Diego, the first with 15 DIs and 300 recruits under my command, including marksmanship training.
The lowest ranking Marine recruit with no better than to carry a weapon upside down by the magazine.
So David Wheeler is a prime example of a phony, a fake and a fraud who's a crisis actor in exactly the sense that Alex Jones was discussing about crisis actors at Sandy Hook.
And here's a third.
Gene Rosen.
He has a home adjacent to the firehouse.
Now, depending upon the telling, Gene Rosen said that the bus driver came along and dropped off four, five, or six kids, and he took them into his home and gave them orange juice, and they played with stuffed animals.
Why Gene Rosen would have stuffed animals is a bit baffling to me, until they calmed down and said their teacher was dead.
Well, think about it.
Gene Rosen was not the parent or custodian of any of those children.
No bus driver is going to drop off any children at the home of someone who's not their parent or custodian.
Gene Rosen, again, has acting credits.
And how in the world could they have got a bus in or out of there?
Dickinson Drive was so crammed, no bus could have got through.
Not only that, But while the Connecticut State Police claimed that evacuation, and by the way, according to the official report on Sandy Hook by Steven Sedinsky III, there were 489 students there that day.
If you subtract 20, that meant there were 469 who needed to be evacuated, as well as around 70 staff, secretaries, custodians, cafeteria workers, The state police claim evacuation was taking place at three specific locations in time, but Gary, we have dash cam footage from those locations and times, and there's no evacuation taking place.
Now, we're told you cannot prove a negative, but that's false.
Just go to your living room and look for signs of the presence of elephant, and if you find no signs of the presence of elephant, that's because you're entitled to infer there's no elephant there.
If you go to the locations, place, and time when evacuation was supposed to be taking place, and you see no signs of an evacuation taking place, you're entitled to infer that's because no evacuation was taking place.
It wouldn't have even been possible, which further impugns the story told by Gene Rosen.
So there are three very clear-cut examples of crisis actors at Sandy Hook, to my knowledge, Alex Jones' attorney introduced no evidence of this kind, and there's overwhelmingly more.
Gary, I sought to intervene in all three of these Alex Jones cases.
We're going to get them one after another now.
There are three cases I sought to interview to point out that.
There's never been a judicial determination that anybody died at Sandy Hook.
These are all moving forward on the basis of a presumption.
In logic, it's known as baking the question, taking for granted something that requires independent establishment proof and confirmation.
It's never happened.
They cite previous lawsuits, including one involving Neil Hesselin and another involving a woman named Donna Soto, But neither of those cases dealt with this issue.
They were all decided on procedural grounds.
In fact, even the Alex Jones case was decided on procedural grounds, where the judge claimed that he failed to conform to discovery.
Robert Barnes, who's a completely brilliant attorney, by the way, has given his dissection of the case.
You can find it on my BitChute channel, Jim Fetzer, and points out that no one knows what discovery Alex Jones is supposed to have failed to produce.
In fact, he gave thousands of pages.
He sat for hours and hours of interviews.
Robert Barnstink is completely phony and fraudulent, and I'm convinced he's got it right.
Gary.
Jim, why has Alex Jones thrown you under the bus, and why is he cucking to his beliefs that we always believed in that he was trying to find out the truth?
That's my question.
Well, I think it's obvious.
You got to look at this.
The whole Jones trial is another false flag, Gary.
It's a setup.
These are show trials, and Alex Jones has somehow been compromised into cooperating with them.
It's very shameful.
Alex Jones.
Let me give you an illustration, Gary.
During his video deposition in Connecticut, Alex Jones said he'd never even read Nobody Died at Sandy Hook.
Well, that's incredible!
How can a prominent figure who's got national attention take a stand on a complex and controversial event like this?
Without reading the one objective scientific book that establishes exactly what happened.
They bring it up every 15 minutes.
They bring up the book in court all the time.
But they throw you under the bus every single time.
And what are they saying about the book?
I've watched a lot of experts do the thing, and they'll say, all right, I have some clips.
We're going to be all over that coming up.
Okay, go for it, Gary.
If you've got clips, go for it.
Go for it.
Go for it.
It's a little later in the show, so we'll be all right.
Well, let me just point out.
I brought together 13 experts on San Diego, including six PhDs.
We established a school, been closed by 2008.
It was loaded with a business and other biohazards.
There were no students or teachers there.
And then it was a FEMA drill.
Presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
I even found the manual and published it as appendix A in the book.
In other words, the book blows the whole case out of the water.
So, if they're attacking the book, they don't want anyone to read the very source that shows this whole thing is totally fake and fabricated.
I have not been spending a lot of time on the trial.
I'm busy with so many other events, Gary, but I'm delighted that you have selected clips that substantiate I'm going to go ahead and change the order of the show right now.
I was going to go into where our climate change guy is part of today.
Oh, no, no, no.
Hey, you played Columbine, which ties into Sandy Hook.
Never mind the climate change.
We can come back to that on another occasion.
It's almost like it would be it would throw the whole show off if we didn't do it.
Let me get the screen share.
You know, it is a live show, people.
Okay, here we go.
Now, I'm going to play this clip of you, three or four years ago, standing up for your rights.
Okay?
Now, I want to know, Dave of Moonrise Books comes in later.
I'm not sure if you want me to play that part or not, but I'm going to go ahead and play this one.
You can play any damn clip you want.
I'm not here to... Against a man who called the mass shooting a hoax.
A Wisconsin jury ordered James Fetzer, who co-wrote a book called Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, to pay $450,000 for defaming Lenny Posner.
Posner's six-year-old son Noah was killed in that 2012 shooting.
And Posner has made it his mission to change tech company policies to protect victims from online bullying.
He's made progress, but also enemies.
And as a result, we agreed not to show what he looks like for his own protection.
That's ridiculous.
He doesn't want to show you what he looks like because he doesn't look like all the photographs you've seen of the guy who's supposed to be Lenny Posner.
His real name is Ruben Vabner.
I was making this point from my very first answer in court.
The judge just set it all aside and wouldn't pursue it.
Keep playing this.
Keep playing this.
I want to stop and hear your comments, Jim.
Lenny Posner has been forced to move at least a half dozen times since the death of his son Noah.
Yeah, your name went by there.
and six adults killed in the 2012 shooting at Connecticut Sandy Hook Elementary School.
While still grieving, Hosner faced a new shot.
The strangers claimed that the shooting had never really happened.
What did you find out on the talk of conspiracy theories, the talk of crisis actors, the talk of a staged event?
Yeah, your name went by there.
I'm sorry your name is.
Most people probably would have just walked away and you didn't.
I never thought I had the option to walk away.
Because... Because that was my life now.
The father of a murdered child.
And the name associated to an online conspiracy theory.
How did I funnel this anger into action?
Asking social media platforms to take down the posts.
At first, with little luck.
Most of the time, it was an automatic or robotic response.
You're not even dealing with a person.
It never even got to a person.
But in the years since, this unlikely activist has not only succeeded for himself, he's helping others through his organization, Honor Network, whose volunteers keep an eye on the internet, protecting victims of tragedy, cyberstalking, and harassment.
There's a third.
Gary, pause that a second.
Go back a second.
Yeah, let me turn the volume down.
There's a big discrepancy between your volume and the clip.
All right, go ahead.
Well, if you would go back and see the photographs that have been broadcast worldwide of the guy who's supposed to be Leonard Posner.
I was wanting to show it to you.
If you'll go back, go back.
Okay.
And cut.
Go back just five seconds.
There it was.
There it was.
No, no, Gary, you had it there.
Cool.
All right.
There.
See right there, the third one from the left?
Uh-huh.
The second from the right?
Yeah, him.
This guy that you can't see does not look like this guy because it's not this guy.
This guy is the guy who they have promoted as Leonard Posner, but he appears to be a fiction.
The real guy who came and testified is the same guy who's being interviewed here who won't let his face be shown, and that's because he doesn't look like this guy.
Look at this, Gary.
This guy's image has been broadcast millions of times around the world, published.
So if it's the same guy, why would he not want his image to be shown?
Everyone already knows what he looks like.
It's because it's not the same guy.
All right, here we go.
We'll pick it up from here.
I got to work this volume.
...protecting victims of crashing, cyber-stalking, and harassing people like Amy Parker. I felt sick. Oh!
After his daughter Allison was shot to death on live TV.
Just real quick, they're going to another fake shooting.
We've covered this 100%.
This is-- All right, that was one of the most phony fraudulent of all time, this little thing here.
And it's just embarrassingly bad.
The American people swallow this stuff hook, line, and sinker.
Absolutely.
All right, let's go through with it.
And-- The conspiracy theorist reposted the video, again, claiming it was a fake.
Parker contacted YouTube to get the videos taken down.
I thought I could do it just, you know, one time and be done with it.
And they said, no, you have to do it for each video.
It's kind of about the same.
Watch your daughter's murder and then tell us why.
More crisis actors, by the way, Gary.
More crisis actors.
His daughter and the others involved in this.
Yeah, I've got pictures of him on Broadway with a sword and a pirate outfit.
Very good.
Literally an actor.
Literally an actor.
You know, Parker, get the rights to the video.
Allowing him to force the removal in bulk on copyright grounds.
And it worked.
It was just a matter of who can help me with this.
And I knew it was winning.
More recently, many large tech companies have updated their policies on harassment.
So what role do you think you personally played in getting Facebook and Google and YouTube and WordPress to change their policies?
I think that had I not shamed them publicly using the press, that none of that would have happened in the way that it has happened.
I just want to say this is the very beginning of the purge of all the thousands and thousands of channels that are going to go down on YouTube.
This is the beginning. - The misinformation in Posner has also changed minds.
I think it could be summed up with the term "standing hopes." Dave Geharie's company published James Fetzer's book, "Nobody Died in Sandy Hook," which prompted Posner to sue in the first place.
But as Posner spoke at a deposition, Geharie had a revelation.
I listened to him and I decided, I determined that what he was saying was authentic and that I wanted to do what I could do to not contribute to the negative things that he's experiencing.
Gehary settled the case and now Fetzer is on the hook for a $450,000 verdict in Wisconsin.
And Posner says his work is just getting started.
So is this fight, crusade, mission you're on, does it pick up your life?
I mean, is this what you do?
This has become my life's work, yeah.
This is your life's work?
Yeah, that's what it's turned into.
Does it still feel good when you get something taken down?
It feels great.
Lenny Posner is also suing internet personality Alex Jones for defamation for spreading false information about the Sandy Hook shooting.
Jones, his attorneys, are using free speech arguments to try to get the case dismissed.
Posner says this is not about other people's free speech.
It's about people like him and other victims, their freedom from harassment and terror online.
Absolutely.
Yes, and considering what he's gone through, it's very sad that this has to be his life's work.
Yes.
That he would now be subjected to that.
Tell you what, he is making progress.
It's very hard to do.
It's fascinating that it took a copyright situation to pull a video down when something that was toxic and hateful was allowed to stand.
The tech companies don't know how to deal with grieving parents, but they do know how to deal with lawyers and the fear of lawsuits.
It worked.
It worked.
Shouldn't have to end with that.
All right.
I had the far-reaching efforts in one state to tackle...
That was me with my...
I've never seen these...
I mean, I've seen a little bit of, you know, Lenny out there with his face blocked out.
But I repeat, here's a man who ostensibly had his image broadcast millions of times all around the world.
Why would he be concealing his face if it's the same guy?
We already know what he's looked like.
The reason, of course, when you stop and think about it is obvious.
It's not the same guy.
The way I got the clip, I was watching TV and it came up that it was going to come up in a few minutes, you know, after a commercial.
So I grabbed my camera.
Here it is right here.
And I pulled it up.
Good work, Gary.
Good work, good work, good work.
Because my hand was getting tired of holding it up.
All right.
Okay, let's move on to the next part of the show.
Have you got more clips in from Alex Jones Trial?
Not all lined up for now, but they're out there.
They're all on 153news.net.
But I went through them all.
They do bring up your name about every 15, 30 minutes.
But Gary, tell me, what are they saying about me and what are they saying about the book?
They're saying, have you read the book?
And then they'll say, no, I haven't.
I haven't done anything.
They always distance themselves from you are the book.
They don't, they say you've never read it.
It's radioactive.
I'm saying what they say.
And I guess as a source of truth about Sandy Hook, it is radioactive.
It really hurts.
I mean, I like Alex Jones and I want to say this during the COVID event.
I have to say, everything that he said, I agreed with, and nothing needed to be said more than the problems with COVID and everything like that.
However, it breaks my heart to see him, I don't use this word, but he's cucking under.
He's sold out, Gary.
He's sold out.
Yeah.
It's ridiculous.
I still, I mean, I got my vitamin drops over here.
I have my iodine.
So it hurts to see a truther like that, because you remember, we're 100% truthers, and there's only a few of us, and there's two of them on this show right now, and I have to exclude Alex Jones as a 100% truther, and it's an exclusive club, and he ain't in it.
He's clearly folded, Gary, there's no doubt about it, but I think his attorneys have betrayed him as well.
All right, here's a little 39 second clip.
Oh, this is a part of the Alex Jones trial here.
You'll see what I'm talking about.
But I don't, can't play the whole thing though.
Need to go like around 39 seconds, right around here.
Let me ask you a little bit because you talked about the, I don't know if you use the term, are you familiar with the term Sandy Hook Truthster?
I am.
The truthster community.
Yes, I'm familiar with the Joneses.
Now, um... You know who Dr. James Spencer is?
I hadn't heard his name until today.
Are you familiar with a book called Sandy Hook?
I think it's Sandy Hook Never Happened or Sandy Hook No One Died in Sandy Hook.
He doesn't even know the name of the book?
I was never brought up to you by the, anybody?
And, um, how about Dr. James Tracy?
Not familiar.
And, um, how about Steve Pacheco?
No.
Did you at the time go on to, let's say during this- Who is this guy, Gary?
Who the hell is this guy?
I think he's in charge of making sure that cyber security, that hoaxes are looked into, and I don't know his title though.
How can this guy not even know the name of the book?
I mean, that's obvious because they don't want to reinforce people might look for Nobody Died at Sandy Hook.
But it's incredible how sloppy, how slovenly all of this is, Gary.
This is just, this is a sham trial, which was a conclusion of Robert Barnes as well.
I mean, this is not merely my opinion, but everyone else I know who's of good repute, who has the ability to analyze these things that concluded this is a total sham.
He's an internet investigator for internet crimes, is what this guy is.
So, now what do you think about bringing up Steve Pachenik?
I like Steve Pachenik.
He's right almost all the time.
So, I mean, I'm glad to be mentioned in the same sentences with James Tracy and Steve Pachenik.
That's not a problem for me.
I like that.
Well, here's another name you might be okay to be involved, I mean, brought up in.
His name is Howbig.
Wolfgang, my friend.
Let me just say this.
How big takes most of the punches?
I know, I know.
And that's because they had featured him on InfoWars.
Okay.
Alex never for those things, but when families would send me links of things complaining about the process for us as the state police is, I will take a look at what they were complaining about to see if there was a criminal aspect to it.
And if it was something that we would handle, then we would investigate.
But a lot of times it will go to the local police department because that's who has jurisdiction.
Or if it was on a bigger scale and involved other states, then we would forward it to the FBI.
for a team that did investigations on you.
You can affirm that you became aware of hundreds if not I'd say hundreds of different videos that were circulating on YouTube from the truther community.
I knew there was a large amount of propaganda or something.
And you know that the vast majority of it was not produced I don't know.
It wasn't our position to try and backtrace that.
It's going to have a criminal nature to it.
And talking about that, as a police officer, documenting information is very important, isn't it?
Correct.
And it's one of the first things you learn in the academy, right?
Correct.
And you want to be accurate in what you document, right?
Yeah.
Because not only do you have to rely on it, Absolutely.
You might not be available, right?
Correct.
Another officer might have to leave.
Yes.
Or someone else.
How many offense reports or police reports do you have from Mr. Hessler and Ms.
Lewis about paper grounds?
I don't know a number of reports.
Fair to say you don't have them?
I'm not sure if there were reports that were done after that initial allotment, as the case was continuously open and closed, depending on new information to include, if it was anything that we actually investigated.
Some of those were just simply referrals to us.
Yeah, this is a long clip.
I mean, basically he's about to, they're going to bring up how big and all that kind of stuff.
But, um, uh, Go ahead and talk to us about that.
I mean, that was the number one in all the shows, Truth or Shows and all this, and in the mainstream media, that was the number one, one of the top stories of the week last week.
Well, of course it was, Gary.
I mean, the media is completely controlled.
They're going to promote all the disinformation, all the propaganda that they think benefits them and their operation.
I mean, the jury here is being played.
You got a lawyer that doesn't even know the name of the book when he's demonizing me.
He knows the name of the book.
He's deliberately obfuscating so it won't be reinforced in the mind of the public.
Nobody died at Sandy Hook.
It was a FEMA drill to promote gun control.
He can't even read the whole title.
He can't even give you the whole title because it blows the cover on what was really going on, where we even found the manual, which I included as appendix A, as I previously observed.
I just wish Alex Jones would be saying what you're saying right now.
Okay.
I reached out to him repeatedly.
He wouldn't accept my help.
I offered to be an expert witness to one of the attorneys.
I think the attorney himself saw the whole thing was rigged and he wanted to get out himself and they wouldn't let him.
Go for it, Gary, whatever you got.
Okay, so at the beginning of the show, we had our guy with the Click It or Ticket, and we backtraced him and come to find out he's all in on the global climate change and has got quite a few skins on the wall or feathers in his cap as far as climate change.
But how far does climate change go back?
Well um this is old Spock if you remember him so let's see this is like 1976 if I'm when I was in high school.
At least eight times in the past million years it has advanced and retreated with clockwork regularity.
If we are unprepared for the next advance the result could be hunger and death on a scale unprecedented in all of history.
What scientists are telling us now is that the threat of an ice age is not as remote as they once thought.
During the lifetime of our grandchildren, Arctic cold and perpetual snow could turn most of the inhabitable portions of our planet into a polar desert.
In 1977, the worst winter in a century struck the United States.
Arctic cold ripped the Midwest for weeks on end.
Great blizzards paralyzed cities of the Northeast.
One desperate night in Buffalo, eight people froze to death in maroon cars.
Pat Bushnell was on the road that night.
Traffic just absolutely stopped.
I was afraid of being stuck in the car all night long with the cold and the wind running out of gas.
And then what?
I think that if we had to go through a real bad winter, just like we just went through, I think we'd have to think about moving someplace else.
Move where?
The brutal buffalo winter might become common all over the United States.
Climate experts believe the next ice age is on its way.
According to recent evidence, it could come sooner than anyone had expected.
At weather stations in the far north, temperatures have been dropping for 30 years.
Seacoast, long free of summer ice, are now blocked year-round.
According to some climatologists, within a lifetime, we might be living in the next ice age.
Of the nine planets in our solar system, only Earth has conditions favorable to human life.
All right.
So that's going back to Spock.
Are you telling me they actually recruited Leonard Des Moines to make that ridiculous statement about climate change?
Gary, this is just a shock.
It's pseudoscience.
This is totally fraudulent.
As I say, go to my BitChute channel, Jim Fetzer, and check out Joe Olson, AGW, Anti-Global Warming.
We have done nine episodes just taking it apart.
It's totally bullshit.
100% bullshit.
And you got airheads like AOC and the Biden admin, which is all fraudulently behind all this because they're into the Great Reset and want to destroy America.
It's shocking what's going on here, Gary.
But every action that this guy, this fake Biden has taken since it came into office has been a negative impact on the United States.
So what do you got here?
All right.
This is proof that we have been warned.
By someone I admire.
I haven't done much looking into Paul Harvey, but hear what he's got to say.
And with the willing complicity of headline-hungry media, a recent crisis of the month had to do with global warming.
An ozone hole is opening up over the United States, we were told, the effects of which were already measurable in an increase in Skin cancer.
On the contrary, destroying chlorine around the polar vortex has been declining since January.
A major objective of a recent shuttle mission was to determine the scope and scale of the so-called ozone hole, and the silence since has been deafening from those whose livelihood depends on creating crises.
Recent data from the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellites affirms that any problem is less, it's not greater.
Ozone levels fluctuate all of the time, partly because of volcanic activity and solar flares.
But MIT's Technology Review has made an exhaustive study of worldwide ocean temperatures.
1851 has concluded that there appears to have been little or no global warming.
over the past century.
In fact, the net rise in world surface temperature during the last century, which was about one percent, almost all occurred before 1940, and that was before aerosols, and that has since been reversed.
Former NASA chief Robert Jastrow and former scripts director William Nirenberg, past president of the American Academy of Sciences,
Frederick Sipes all have concluded in a scathing rebuke of those who make money by predicting global warming, quote, if we allow ourselves to be influenced by press release, we could spend a trillion dollars over the next decade destroying what's left of the American economy in an utterly unnecessary attempt to repeal the Industrial Revolution.
Wow, is that exactly what's going on today?
I mean, the whole thing is about, you know, destroying the economy.
In fact, I've got a clip of a... Yeah, here we go.
Paul Harvey, you had one of the greatest voices for radio of anyone I've ever heard.
Yeah, it surprised me to see the teleprompter.
It really did.
Okay, let me find it.
Here we go.
Now, this clip, a lot of people have seen, but this is what they're talking about, and this is what Paul Harvey was talking about.
That's probably, on this moment, the main cause of it all.
We're not talking about nitrogen.
No, they just want to reduce the national earth.
Well, every farmer all around the world, and also every citizen, knows that cutting back the earth isn't the cause of any problems.
You know, we are producing food.
Two-thirds of agricultural land on the planet can only be grown by grass, and you need cows like this for making grass into meat or into milk or whatever you want.
Whatever problem with emissions, with pollution on the world you are asking about, whether it's not chemical, but farming is probably a part of the problem, but most of it all, it's part of the solution.
Well, Dutch farmers now are getting angry every day more.
Government is not listening.
And what we are fearing for is we have to leave our land.
And that's also a deeper agenda behind it.
In Holland, they just want to have farmer's land.
62% of the area in Holland is farmed by farmers.
And what they want to do is they want to have the land cheap, so they're making it nature first.
And when they have the land in their hands, they can build houses on it.
Houses we don't need by Dutch citizens, because average Dutch couple is getting 1.8, 1.9 kids.
So what's the problem of the demand for houses that we get 100,000 refugees in this country every year.
That's why they have to build houses.
Well, that's a shortcut of our problems right now.
Farmers are getting angry.
They're not listened by the government.
Every solution we came home with, they don't take it.
And what we see right now, when we have to reduce our national herd, when we have to reduce our herds by ourselves, farms will break down.
On this moment, when the plan of the government is coming through, probably 30, 40, 50% of the farmers have to fear for the future.
That's why we're on the streets.
That's why we're protesting.
That's what climate change is.
It's called your enslavement.
I thought he was excellent.
He made a lot of great points.
I got the impression he was from the Netherlands, and of course the farmers there are in revolt against the efforts now to cut down on the availability of fertilizer and the like.
It's one of the countries where the protest against a global warming agenda has been the strongest.
Americans need to get their heads screwed on right.
They're being played once again, Gary.
It's embarrassingly bad.
And I'm very glad you're bringing out such crucial issues of our time, because you really, truly are revealing inconvenient truths.
Yeah, do we have 10 minutes left?
I have a couple more.
I have like three more hours with Eclipse, but do we have 10 minutes left, you think?
Gary, Gary, Gary, I have to do another show today.
I'm sorry to say, but I mean, this will be great for our next show to continue.
Pick it up here.
Got it.
Okay, that's what we'll do.
We'll call it a show, which I barely even got started.
Barely even got started, Gary!
You got a great idea for this series of Inconvenient Truths.
This is Jim Fetzer thanking Gary King for another fascinating episode.
You can find this on my BitChute channel, Jim Fetzer.
Thanks for joining us.
Back next week with another Inconvenient Truths with Gary King.
You can also find it on 153news.net, one of the two places.