All Episodes
Previous Next
July 27, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:21:09
Need to Know News (27 July 2022) with Joe Olson and Mike Cunningham
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Joe Olson in Houston, and Mike Cunningham in Austin, Texas, for our Texas Wednesday, we'll call it today.
Here we go.
We're bringing you all the news you need to know.
We begin with evidence emerging that General Milley ran the January 6th show and may have broken constitutional law, specifically the Posse Comitatus Act, which precludes the military being used to perform law enforcement functions.
Here it is, 18 U.S.
Code 1385.
Adam Schiff, it turns out, has tucked an amendment into the National Defense Authorization Act that would prohibit any evidence collected in violation of, or about violations of, the Posse Comitatus Act from being used in an investigation.
Why would he do that?
Jeffrey Rosen had a secret on January 6th, 2021.
He was appointed on December 24th of 2020 to replace William Barr.
He assembled a team of lead and highly skilled government agents at Quantico before the Congress met to certify the results of the election.
At the time, he was rejecting Trump's last-minute appeals to investigate election fraud.
Also, however, managing a hush-hush operation about planned rallies and protests on January 6th.
He made a unilateral decision to take preparatory steps to deploy DOJ and so-called national forces.
Newsweek reported William Orkin disclosed in a bombshell report.
There was no formal request from the Capitol Police, the Secret Service, or the Metropolitan Police Department.
But the leadership of Justice and the FBI anticipated the worst and decided to act independently.
The assets they deployed included commandos with shoot-to-kill authority, and among them were members of the U.S.
military.
The presence of these extraordinary forces under the control of the Attorney General added an additional layer of highly armed responders.
The role the military played is still unknown.
FBI tell Newsweek they seconded the FBI and those on alert as part of the National Mission Force.
Little else is known about Rosen's secret mission.
His testimony to the House Oversight Committee was just as obscure.
He publicly bragged about his attempt to deter Team Trump from pursuing boat fraud days before the protest.
He said the FBI opened a multi-agency operations center, including the Department of Defense, at FBI headquarters on January 4th.
Now remember, On January 5th.
Remember on January 4th, Trump had offered 20,000 National Guardsmen to guard the Capitol, but it had to be requested from Mayor Bowser, which he declined to do.
They had their own agenda.
Each of these agencies supplied personnel beginning on January 5th and 6th, and for a period thereafter.
But if the military engaged in civilian law enforcement, including surveillance and intel, before telling January 6th, it would represent an egregious violation of the military code of conduct and federal law.
Under posse comitatus, military cannot be used as local cops or investigators.
The law is both vague and specific at the same time, which brings us to Adam Schiff.
Irrefutably the least trustworthy member of Congress, he tucked an amendment into the massive NDAA Act that would prohibit any evidence collected in violation of, or I take it, about, violations of the Posse Comitatus Act from being used in proceedings, including criminal trials and congressional investigations.
The amendment's timing, like everything else related to the infamous Russian collusion huckster, evidence forger, and photo seeker, is suspect.
Why would he need to outlaw evidence collected unlawfully?
Why is there a line on this arcane statue it passed during Reconstruction?
Julie Kelly tweets, holy shit.
This is from the DoD IG report on January 6.
DoD supposedly was a lead agency, but in reality, it was a DoD.
And it looks like Millie ran the show and This explains Schiff's amendment.
If Pentagon was involved in domestic law enforcement, including surveillance and intel, they broke the law.
All signs point to deep involvement by military working with DOJ before January 6th.
Wow!
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well, it wouldn't be the first time the president has been threatened by an internal coup.
JFK had a problem during the Cuban Missile Crisis with his Joint Chiefs of Staff, which was a guy named Ken O'Donnell.
And then also Curtis LeMay and Air Force and George Anderson Navy and they had a unanimous vote that we should go ahead and nuke Cuba in order to keep Russians from being able to nuke us and it was like McNamara said no we'll just go ahead and put a picket around the island and we'll
Quarantine Cuba so that we don't have that problem, but bottom line is, uh, the Joint Chiefs of Staff is in the line of succession, so all you got to do is push a few people out of the way, and it's like, well, I'm sorry, you're not going to use the Speaker of the House, and next thing you know, Joint Chiefs of Staff becomes the President, and I'm sure in Mr. Little Millie's mind was going that, gee, one day I could be sitting in the Oval Office all by myself, ha ha ha.
Guy's evil, absolutely evil, and it's not Undoubted that he did what they claim he did in this article.
Very disturbing, Mike.
One thing I was kind of interested about, when you take a look at the fairness of the whole idea of a legislative body investigating this, you have to make sure that it's always on the up and up.
And it kind of reminds me back to The days of Mulberry v. Madison, when the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, was actually doing two offices at once.
He was the Supreme Court Justice, and he was Secretary of State, and it was because of his failure that he ended up changing our Constitution.
I believe that Schiff in many ways is probably complicit at least to the fact that he has to be involved and that's why he's trying to cover up and in most cases like that dossier and everything else Everything that they claimed was actually what they were doing.
So it is a pretty fair game to figure out that if you claim something and that's what, not what's happened, but that's what you do, you're kind of forecasting.
So I think he's doing it there.
One thing I would like to mention though, Adam Schiff has been a very strong supporter of Armenia.
He has a large Armenian population in his congressional district, and he's been using those people for a long time to get reelected.
I think that if people start waking up and see that he's not really doing what he says he's doing, that may be a big difference.
Excellent, Mike.
I like that.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, General Senator Chuck Grassley says a DOJ whistleblower has approached him to blow the scheme on the FBI to bury negative information about Hunter Biden.
We saw this before with James Comey in relation to the Anthony Weiner laptop.
And here we're getting reports about Christopher Wray playing a similar role in relation to the Hunter Biden laptop.
There seems to be no end to the duplicity of the FBI.
Grassley is holding FBI and Justice Department feet to the fire over Biden.
Hunter demanding answer to claims they downplayed negative info on Biden in the lead up to the 2020 election.
We all knew this.
Now we have a whistleblower confirming it.
The information provided to my office involves concern about FBI's receipt and use of derogatory information related to Hunter Biden and the FBI's false portrayal of acquired evidence as disinformation, writing to FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General Merrick Garland.
Both of whom undoubtedly were in on it.
The volume and consistency of these allegations substantiate their credibility and necessitate this letter.
Here he is, grassly, demanding answers about downplaying negative information on Hunter Biden, whom his father Joe describes as the smartest guy he's ever known.
In October 2020, a month before the election, an avenue of derogatory Hunter reporting was ordered closed by a senior FBI agent at the Bureau's Washington field office.
The allegation provided appeared to indicate there was a scheme in place among certain FBI officials to undermine the derogatory data by falsely suggesting it was disinformation from Russia, of course.
The Department of Justice probe in Delaware has intensified to whether to bring charges on tax violation or making false statements on purchasing a gun with regard to Hunter.
He would have been prohibited from buying a gun because of his well-documented struggles with drug addiction.
He revealed after the 2020 election he was being investigated on a tax issue but denied any wrongdoing.
Biden's denied any knowledge of his son's business.
White House said they'll stay out of the investigations involving Hunter.
Republicans, however, are expected to probe his business deals if they retake control of Congress at the midterm elections.
David Weiss, U.S.
Attorney in Delaware, is leading the federal probe.
Hunter's not yet been charged with any crimes and is denied wrongdoing.
Hunter could argue that he wasn't aware of his action because he was high on drugs.
The probe is a hot potato for Attorney General Merrick Garland.
The DOJ has an unwritten rule to bring politically sensitive cases within 60 days of an election.
But Garland would face charges of Democrat favoritism if he holds back on Hunter, with some officials arguing the rule doesn't apply since Biden's name wasn't on the midterm ballot.
Meanwhile, Daily Mail revealed that a 2018 voicemail from Biden's Hunter's hardmail revealed that the president did know about his business dealings.
During a July 5th White House press briefing, Biden's spokesperson, Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, refused to comment on the voicemail to reporters.
From this podium, I'm not going to talk about alleged materials from the laptop, she shot back when asked.
Further pushed, if the administration being open with the American people, she said again, I cannot comment on any material from the laptop.
How convenient.
Files on the abandoned laptop previously disclosed and verified by Daily Mail show Hunter struck a deal with a Chinese company with millions touting family connection.
They point out C-E-F-C Chairman Yi Jinping had been arrested in China and his top lieutenant Patrick Ho had been convicted in the U.S.
for bribing African officials to help Iran evade oil sanctions.
It turns out that he met with Hunter at a Miami hotel in 2017 to discuss a partnership to invest in American infrastructure and energy deals.
The Grey Lady, meaning the New York Times.
So that was unclear whether Hunter stuck any business deal with CEFC.
After seeing the story, Joe called Hunter and left a voicemail.
Hey, pal, it's Dad.
It's 8.15 on Wednesday night.
If you get a chance, just give me a call.
Nothing urgent.
I just want to talk to you.
I thought the article released online is going to be printed tomorrow, and the time was good.
I think you're clear.
And anyway, if you get a chance, give me a call.
I love you.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well, you have a hard time draining the swamp when the swamp is controlled by the Senate Advise and Consent Section, let's see, Article 2, Section 2 of the U.S.
Constitution.
And these weasels already know who the dirty players are, and they're not going to let you appoint anybody that's not a dirty player.
So Trump is unavoidably surrounded by a bunch of swamp rats that are going, well, Mr. President, I know you'd like to appoint somebody good, but they're not going to ever approve anybody good.
So you're going to have to appoint somebody that's really snaky and rotten and hope that they turn out OK.
So that's the problem that any outsider's got, and that's the problem we've got right now, is because the swamp is so full of snakes that now we have an entire administration that is 100% full of snakes, and we don't even have somebody at the top that is even pointing out a snake or two here and there.
And so that's the problem we've got as a, quote, democracy, is that we've been monopolized by the synagogue of Satan, by the Money changers in the temple, by whatever you want to call them.
We've got some very evil forces that have captured the entire government of this country.
Nice points, Joe.
Mike?
I have four points I wanted to mention.
I think, first of all, in the first part of that story, he talked about Merrick Garland.
And remember the AG looking into Trump.
That's one of the headlines on the Drudge Report.
See if they're going to try to DOJ was going to press charges against Trump.
Remember, that's kind of interesting to have him in charge of that committee to look at.
Number two, I think this last week it broke that Hunter Biden had talked to his father 31 or 33 times about this right after different trips.
So therefore, it's very feasible that President Biden would have known exactly what his son was doing, which would negate a lot of stuff, which would end up showing why it's really important to get to the bottom of this.
The third part is I remember back in a meeting, this is back before the election, way before the election, President Biden was sitting in the Consulate Foreign Relations office and being interviewed.
And in the interview, he brags about the time that he held US federal funds that were going to the Ukraine.
And finally, I think it's now coming up in the story that much of our U.S.
the prosecutor of his son off the case, then he wouldn't leave.
He gave him so many hours to make he made the deal.
Again, that would be interesting in this respect.
And finally, I think it's now coming up in the story that much of our US Reserve oil have been sold to China and it's going to Chinese companies through Hunter Biden's connected companies.
So, Hunter Biden, in this case, should be totally investigated.
And just those four points I mentioned, plus what Joseph had already said, very important here.
Excellent.
Excellent, Mike.
Terrific.
Meanwhile, most Americans want in lifetime Supreme Court appointments for the justices.
Biden has formed a bipartisan committee to look at the merits of adding justices, as well as other potential reforms to the court.
I think these aren't going to go anywhere, but it's an opportunity for Democrats to blow off steam.
A majority of Americans want in lifetime appointments for Supreme Court justices, according to an Ipsos poll for Reuters.
Fewer than half are in favor of other efforts to reform the court.
The National Opinion poll showed 63% of adults support term or age limits for the justices.
Another 20% opposed any limits, and the rest had no opinion.
Only 38% was about expanding the court by adding four more.
Another 42% said they would oppose doing so, the rest unsure.
Liberal activists and some legal scholars have been pushing for reforms as Republican leaders build a 6-3 conservative Supreme Court majority, in part by blocking a Democrat nominee and allowing Republican President Trump to install three picks.
Some Democrat lawmakers introduced legislation to expand the court to 13, a move they believe would restore public confidence.
But the party's leadership was cool to the idea of pursuing it, and frankly it would destroy public confidence because it would be obvious they were only doing it to add Democrats to the court.
Biden has formed a bipartisan committee to look at the merits of adding justices and other reforms.
While Gronkos has the power to change the number of justices, legal scholars believe it would require a constitutional amendment to end their lifetime employment.
Only 49% of Americans have a great deal or a fair amount of confidence in the Supreme Court in their decisions.
By contrast, 43% express a similar amount of trust in decisions by the White House, 32% the same in decisions made by Congress.
That astounds me, that anyone should have that much confidence in Congress or the White House is beyond belief.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, I've got no confidence in any part of the system at this point, and that includes all of the monopolistic corporations that are sucking blood out of the country, and all the monopolistic media companies that keep hypnotizing us with garbage, and all the monopolistic rhino-dino-uniparty puppets we've got.
You know, I'm doing everything I can, along with all the other truth tellers, to make sure that we get an alternative reality constructed as quickly as possible.
And it looks like we're having a lot of effect.
Some interesting stuff happening in Ukraine, which I hope we'll get to in just a few minutes.
If not, we'll cover it in the closing arguments.
Thanks, you guys.
Oh, I'm glad to hear more about Ukraine, Joe.
Mike?
Yeah, I have a couple comments on here and I'd like to expound upon.
Number one, I don't really think the problem is the justices.
I think we need to have fair justices.
You know, people that make up their minds over the case already have their minds made up before the cases before them, and that's really important.
Number two, term limits do not help.
If you have poor people in the.
Supreme Court, and you replace it with even poorer people.
It's kind of like a person going to Las Vegas, throwing in five cards and getting five worst cards.
I mean, the idea that that would be something great is something interesting.
Number the third one is Benjamin Franklin.
When he came out of the Constitutional Convention, I was asked by a woman, she says, what type of government do we have, Mr. Franklin?
Mr. Franklin says, a republic, ma'am, if we can keep it.
Now, this brings up a point, I think, that both you, Jim and Joseph, were saying.
If we go by polls, if we go by things like that, that's basically mob rule, and that's really what the democracies and stuff are gone to.
If you go by the whims of the majority, they're all over the place.
We're supposed to go by the Constitution, and that's really why we are a republic.
I think Joseph said that very succinctly.
And I think I would like the last comment would be a poor education system.
I believe in our public schools and in our colleges, we are not doing due diligence when it comes to what, not only what our constitution says, but we are completely created a brand new type of a deal.
When you say we're going to pack the court.
President Roosevelt tried that, and that wasn't too effective at that time.
One thing I would like to conclude with, 66% of the Constitution deals with the Congress.
The Congress is going to be the most important position, more so than the executive, and more so than the judicial.
And they looked at these people as being part-time people.
They were never meant to be full-time Good.
Excellent.
Excellent.
Excellent, Mike.
Liked it all.
and be around the theater.
Only about 5%, 5% to 7% of the Constitution deals with the Supreme Court.
Very unspecific.
And I do not think that term limits would be helpful at all.
Thank you. - Good, excellent, excellent, excellent, Mike.
Liked it all.
Meanwhile, Trump easily beats DeSantis for the 2024 Republican nomination in a "Turning Point USA" straw poll.
These are young people holding a summit in the Sunshine State on Sunday.
While certainly an unscientific reading, it indicates a youth movement of staunch conservatives is sticking with Trump.
He managed again a significant portion with 78.7, call it 80%, saying they'd vote if he launched another campaign.
DeSantis received 19, call it 20% of the vote.
No other candidate received more than 1%.
The turning point may come as a bit of a surprise, since other surveys have indicated DeSantis is supposed to be closing the gap with Trump.
A Yahoo News poll, for example, less than a month ago claimed DeSantis was only 9 points behind in a hypothetical matchup.
Continuing the trend, a Detroit news poll of likely Republican primaries showed the two GOP favorites statistically tied.
That's clearly nonsense.
New public polling from Michigan shows Republican voters increasingly willing to look at a conservative alternative to Donald Trump, even as they still view the 45th president favorably.
It's also noteworthy the summit of conservatives was held in Florida.
Meaning Trump dominated DeSantis on his own turf.
Trump spoke at the conference and hinted about a 2024 run.
He continues to, according to this report, incorrectly assert, but we know it to be a fact, that he won the election in 2020.
I ran twice, I won twice, did much better the second time, getting millions and millions of votes more than 2016.
More votes than any sitting president in the history of our country, and now we may just have to do it again.
Trump has previously hinted he's already made a decision.
He's revealed the only true dhamma is when to announce his intentions before or after the midterm.
Frankly, after the midterm is better, so it's not a distraction.
The Democrats are self-immolating.
Let them continue to do so without the distraction of Donald Trump.
In my own mind, I've already made the decision.
Trump telling New York Magazine reporters he's made his decision about 2024.
Essentially, he lays out all but saying yes, and he's running the big question is, does he before or after the midterms?
DeSantis has consistently said he's more interested in running for a second term as governor.
He's often viewed as a more professional version of Trump, just as strong behind the left in their media cohort, but in a more subtle, cutting manner.
And he sometimes earns the respect of typically left-leaning voters.
Elon Musk, for example, claims he's leaning DeSantis after voting Democrat his entire life.
The governor quipped he always appreciates the support of African Americans.
Trump believes if he runs, he could easily defeat DeSantis for the Republican nomination.
But he's left a door open to have a ticket that DeSantis would be his VP.
Joe, your thoughts?
Oh yeah, well, you know, the comedy in the theater just never stops.
Trying to find some information on actually how many students showed up for the Turning Point USA in Tampa, Florida, and I came across this interesting article in Orlando.
Yeah, we know who that is.
That's the Lincoln Project.
USA Student Action Summit in Tampa.
Holocaust Center in Florida and others have condemned the presence of protesters holding Nazi flags and posters at an anti-symptomatic imagery.
Yeah, we know who that is.
That's the Lincoln Project.
All the rhinos that are trying to discourage anybody from being a conservative rhino show up in front of a bunch of conservative youth people and try to tarnish them.
We are so sick of this ugly freaking theater that you people keep poking down our throats.
And you can take your hollyhocks museum and I swear we ought to require that the ADL Oh Joe, I think you got it right.
size Holmdor museum right next to every one of their museums so you can see the flip side of how Bolsheviks conduct their kind of genocide absolutely disgusting oh joe i think you got it right mike your thoughts yeah uh a couple thoughts to that one First of all, I think Trump is on the aggressive part now because he's attacking Brian Kilmeade for mentioning something about that poll on Fox & Friends.
So I guess that's very sensitive to his campaign right now.
Probably, I believe, in the case where you mentioned he had more votes in 2016, got more votes in 2020.
I would assume he would even get more votes in 2024.
You know, with gasoline prices being so high, food prices being so high, and everything else, people normally would vote their pocketbooks.
And probably vote him in with even more votes.
The question would end up being, how many votes would you end up having to need to beat the system?
And then maybe that's something to look at.
But the bottom line, I think, on this one is very different.
If you look at DeSantis and you look at President Trump, no one speaks in my lifetime, except maybe Reagan or maybe Roosevelt, if you go back way far.
Speaks of people like Trump does.
And DeSantis may be very good, but he is not necessarily ready for the main office, I guess, at least from a communication standpoint.
Because if you go to any of the rallies, you go to listen to him talk, or if you even go to watch it on YouTube, This man with stream of consciousness can just speak to people like truth to the heart that I've never seen happen before and this is why he's being attacked so viciously and this is why they're trying to bring up these polls or use the polls whichever way they want to go.
They must have to be scared to death because They're really worried about that.
They have nobody that would do that.
I could not imagine Kamala Harris, or I can imagine anybody in their cabinet, or I sure could not imagine Mr. Biden trying to do a hide-in-the-basement type of a program against that now, because the differences are too great.
Oh, I think you're absolutely right.
It appears the leading Democrat candidates are going to be Gavin Newsom, who is despised universally in California, and Michelle, don't call me Michael Obama, who's a man with breast implants and a huge shaving bill.
As long as the American people know who they're voting for, Michael LaVaughan Robinson, a.k.a.
Michelle Obama, put her on the ticket, but Americans deserve to know the truth about who they're voting for.
Excellent points, Mike.
I do believe we're going to see a Trump-Dukakis combo.
Meanwhile, here we have reports, get this, about Epstein Island.
It'll blow you away.
Alright, these are the people that were on Epstein Island.
confirmed by multiple sources.
Bill Clinton, George Mitchell, Alex Baldwin, Ralph Fenice, George Hamilton, Dustin Hoffman, Kevin Spacey, Liz Hurley, Laura Hunt, Janice Dixon, Naomi Campbell, Christy Turlington, Henry Kissinger, which may be one of the most evil men on the world.
He is.
Joan Rivers, Courtney Love, Mick Jagger, Courtney Guest, Phil Collins, Simon LeBond, Charlie Rose of PBS.
Richard Branson, Candice Bushell, Tom Ford, Vera Wang, Nadia Byerlin, Ko Stark, and here's some more.
Seth Green, James Gunn, Dan Schneider, Steven Spielberg, Tom Anks, Stephen Colbert, Kevin Spacey, Kathy Griffin, Oprah Winfrey, Sean Carter, Beyonce Knowles, Anthony Kiedis, John Legend, Christy Teigen, Jim Carrey, Steven Tyler, Ben Affleck, Stephen Collins, Will Ferrell,
Uh, Eminem, Jeffrey Jones, Victor Salva, Mark Rector, Charlie Sheen, Tyler Grasham, Madonna, Katherine Hudson, Gwen Stefani, Stefani Grimalta, James Franco, Will Smith.
Oh, has Will Smith been in the news lately?
Justin Rowland, John Cusack, Anderson Cooper, Demi Moore, Brian Affleck, Meryl Streep, Wanda Sykes, Chelsea Handler, Michelle Wolf, Pharrell Williams, Quentin Tarantino, Robert Downey Jr.
They are petrified of that list and what those films are getting out.
They have all the videos of all those people at work.
Really?
Yep.
It's going to get ugly.
They're in panic mode.
So are they going to release those videos?
Or what do they do with them?
I'm told, well, it's looking like they're holding it back, that one person has control of that.
But I'm told other people have them and are going to release them at the right time.
So we shall see.
How disgusting is that?
And it all appears to be well documented at this place.
Meanwhile, the anti-New York Times reports, the downfall of Italy's Prime Minister has raised concern about Europe, of the power of populist movements, and whether they'll erode unity against Russian aggression.
Mamma mia, indeed.
So much globalist butthurt coming out of Rome and all other Western capitals.
St.
Mario Draghi is finished.
Italy will not be falling back into their hands so easily after all.
From the article.
Just over a month ago, Prime Minister Maria Draghi asserted their resolute support for Ukraine in the face of Russian aggression.
The pictures of the men tucked in a cabin around a wooden conference table evoked a clubby style of crisis management reminiscent of World War II.
Crucial to Draghi's success was not only his economic bona fides as former president of the European Central Bank, but also his unflinching recognition that Russia's war presented an existential challenge to Europe and its values.
All this has been thrown into jeopardy since a multi-plank populist rebellion stunningly torpedoed Mr. Draghi's government this week.
Snap elections have been called for September.
Polls showing an alliance dominated by hard-right nationalists and populists is heavily favored to run Italy come the fall.
Whatever shape that politically chaotic Italy's one-millionth government since World War II will assume, it's certain that the incoming coalition will be much more sympathetic to Russia, much less committed to a European Union, that's beginning to fray to such an extent many people expect it to dissolve in the future.
Draghi's fall is a win for Putin and for the Italian far-right.
Traders are hedging risk.
Italy leaves Euro after Draghi resigns.
Mario Draghi's enemies are doing Putin work, Minister says.
Meanwhile, the Draghi character was a real piece of work.
A number-crunching banking technocrat straight out of elite Italian quackademia.
A quick glance at his resume shows which team he plays for.
75 to 81, Professor of Economic and Financial Policy at the University of Trento, then of Macroeconomics at Padua, later Mathematical Economics at Venice.
91 to 2001, Director General of the Italian Treasury.
2002 to 2005, Fellow of the Institute of Politics at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard, Vice Chairman and Managing Director of Goldman Sachs International.
2006 to 11, Governor of the Bank of Italy.
11 to 19, President of the European Central Bank.
Here you see photographs.
Super Mario, as you might expect, stood with Ukraine and was an advocate of totalitarian stupid 19 policies who blamed the far right for the spread of the imaginary disease.
Artificially buffed up to demigod status by both the Italian and international deep state media, but now Super Mario is Finnish.
Brothers of Italy, the far-right party on the cusp of power.
She's very charismatic.
Could Giorgio Meloni become Italy's first far-right leader, says Mussolini?
The future is Italy, and it's bleak.
At a time, 2017-18, when centralized dark forces of the New World Order, notwithstanding what was believed to be the temporary Reagan-like anomaly of Donald Trump, Still appeared to reign supreme and invincible over the planet.
Q specifically told us changing the guard associated with the storm would be worldwide.
Lo and behold, all across the free world, the popularity of the once unassailable, sainted scum of the earth is collapsing.
Trudeau, Macron, Merkel, Sanders and successors, Johnson, Draghi, A. Dern, Biden, et al.
I've been taken down a notch, if not outright replaced by white-hat imposters, and Putin and Trump continue to grow stronger and stronger.
How much longer before the final implosion collapses the already hollowed-out structure of the New World Order in spectacular fashion?
The November congressional election rout of the Marxists will be an epic moment.
We have Macron, a France, Johnson, UK, and Trudeau.
The shine has faded from their stars, and quite frankly, they, like Biden, All look like imposters.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well first on the list of folks that went to St.
James Island with Maxwell and Epstein.
Yeah, he left a few off the list like Alan Dirtbagowitz, And then, just a short little submarine ride away from St.
James Island, down in the Virgin Islands, is Necker Island, owned by Richard Branson.
So, we have somebody who got her submarine operator's license, and we have a submarine underwater docking port at St.
James.
I'm wondering how hard it would be for folks like, oh, Blair and and little baby Bush to either go to Branson's island and have little girls and little boys delivered there from St. James or just to get in the submarine and go over to St. James and practice the sacrificial Blair and and little baby Bush to either go to Branson's island and have little girls and little boys delivered there from St. James or just to get in the submarine and go over to St. James and practice
So, you know, that's the problem we've got.
We have hundreds of people who have compromised videos that the FBI has copies of and they did nothing with it.
The FBI had copies of all of the WikiLeaks emails from 2015 from Reptillery and the snuffing of the guy Seth Rich.
And we have the the wiener laptop with the frazzled drip torture of a young girl by Huma and Reptillery.
And then we have the FBI covered up Hunter laptop.
We have the most rotten excuse for a Federal Bureau of Investigation imaginable, complemented by the most rotten DOJ in anybody's world history.
This group of thieves and liars is Irrepressibly bad.
They need to be exterminated.
I'm sorry, there's no other way around it.
We just need to have trials and we need to execute these crimes against humanity, people.
Right on point, Joe.
Mike?
OK, as far as Epstein goes, I think we should probably consider that.
How does a person end up dying while he's in custody and eliminate him off that and consider if you probably had 250 or 300 most powerful people compromised?
I'm pretty much going to guarantee that that information will knock it out unless you have a real coup d'etat and change it up.
So Joe's just right on that.
It just kind of shows how rotten things are, but it's not going to change.
On the Italy part, Italy's a very interesting country.
I cannot add up on my hands and toes and fingers and everything else how many governments that they've had since World War II.
It's a very left-run country.
And today there's a great schism developing between the liberal Catholics and the more conservative Catholics.
And remember that Italy at one time was a Catholic country, but today I think mass attendance is down to like four or five percent.
So they have been ripe for socialism.
They try to replace the G in God that they believed in with the G in government.
And I think that government has misled them down a very bad path.
So I can actually see where a charismatic person would be able to try to lead them back out of that.
Now, with that in mind, the Pope has been visiting Canada.
The rest are in part of Canada on a apologetic tour talking about how the natives were treated so bad.
I thought this was very interesting because he hasn't done that in other countries where the native population was much greater than Canada.
At one time, you could consider almost 90% of the native people that lived in North and South America were eliminated through diseases and stuff as Europeans came.
So, you know, that's an interesting part.
And finally, I'd like to talk a little bit about why this is extremely important.
The concept of Italy is considered next to Spain, and the EU is basically falling apart.
The parity with the prices, you know, we have a really bad economy today, but the euro and the dollar are relatively almost the same amount of money.
How can the United States money be worth that much?
Or how can the EU be going so far down if they're doing such a good job?
And Italy is one area that needs to really help out because remember, just like Spain and just like Greece, they are not the most affluent of all the European areas.
Thank you.
Very good points, Mike.
And the ruble is surging.
It's become the strongest currency.
The dollar is falling.
We're not going to have the dollar as a reserve currency for transactions worldwide.
BRICS is emerging.
We're entering a new bipolar world where the West, U.S.
and Europe, are relatively antiquated, and the rest of the world is surging.
Yes, Joe.
Yes, Professor.
Turns out the Canadian repaired Siemens gas compressor was defective, and so now Russia's not able to put it online.
They've got another one that's starting to act up, so now they've reduced gas flows to Europe to 20% of what they previously were.
Latvia, where they decided that they would join the other Baltic states and get tough with Mother Russia, Their electricity prices have gone up 186% in less than a year, so they've got a little bit of an internal problem going on.
The Prime Minister of Germany, Ulf Scholz, is in desperate straits because their economy is going to absolutely 100% collapse with the collapse of gas.
And then we have this goopy low-level royal Which, uh, when you have your name as Von Daer, that means that you're, oh, you're like a baron or a duke or a, you know, it's, it's a, it's a German nobility title that her family's had for centuries.
And so she's just playing on that.
And these are the same people that were very, very much, uh, her relatives were all Hitler supporters.
So, you know, but anyhow, so she's still head of EU, but it looks like that's a slippery slope for her as well.
So, bottom line is, this is per Alex Kristof's channel, and I actually heard him pronounce his name properly, but I'm not going to be embarrassed about me mispronouncing it, because I also heard him mispronounce nitrous oxide as nitric oxide, and another bunch of mispronunciations.
So, I'm not alone in mispronouncing somebody's name or a word or whatever, but Bottom line is he said that they have got a tentative agreement to reduce their gas use by everyone in Europe by 15% so that they can supplement the gas use that Germany needs just to be able to survive a mild winter and that's not even keeping their industries alive.
These people are absolutely on the death throes.
Yeah, the sanctions have totally backfired.
They work to Russia's benefit, not the West.
Meanwhile, cancel counterproductive climate compromises.
If the upcoming elections cause a partisan shift in Capitol Hill's leadership, conservatives need to make sure their assent isn't compromised by colleagues who are willing to cut deals.
This is particularly important when it comes to environmental regulation.
That's why National Center senior fellow Bonner Cohen, Ph.D., suggests that in the Daily Caller, lawmakers adopt a democratic oath used by doctors, first of all, do no harm, when developing future legislation.
If only our physicians today had followed that.
In this case, Bonner is referring to the so-called Conservative Climate Caucus, which has been critical of the global industrial era on its website, despite the fact it's brought comfort and prosperity to so much of the world.
Seeking to reach across the aisle, Bonner suggests it will only weaken efforts to end the Biden admin's intention to install key parts of the Green New Deal through bureaucratic means.
Instead of playing a game of Me Too, why not turn the tables on our would-be green masters?
Today, runaway inflation, the Supreme Court recent decision curtailing the power of the Federal Regulatory Bureaucracy, the EPA specifically, and the energy disaster unfolding in Europe provide a favorable backdrop for a counterattack.
And there are means to take the White House to task.
Specifically, Bonner pointed out how Congress could ground Biden administration climate czar John Kerry.
Environmental initiatives at the Treasury and Securities and Exchange Commission could also be targeted for defunding.
While there's nothing Congress can do to force the administration to end the war on fossil fuels, the next Congress could use the power of the purse to limit Biden's White House ability to force-feed the nation a steady diet of destructive green policies.
Meanwhile, the Uvalde School Board delays action on their chief pleas.
We'll stop with climate first.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well, Jim and I are experts about climate.
If you want to see anything about climate, go to BitChute and put in AGW.
We've got a series one through nine where we spend about an hour on multiple different aspects of that.
And like I've mentioned before, I wrote my first article on climate at InfoWars.
Which was posted April 13th, 2009, and I've since written about 200 articles that cover that particular subject.
I've done five interviews on Coast to Coast AM, like Jim and I mentioned, hundreds of bit shoot videos, and I've been a co-host on TNT Radio since the 1st of February, and we cover this on a pretty regular basis.
So yes, we're very well informed And anytime John Kerry wants to debate me, I would be delighted to do that, Mr. Kerry.
Oh, Kerry's just such a disappointment.
One time I thought he was a good guy when he was a critic of the Vietnam War.
But he's turned into an establishmentarian stooge, no less.
Very, very shameful.
Mike.
And a Skull and Bones member.
A Skull and Bones member.
Same class with Baby Bush.
Right, right, right.
That's, I believe, why he didn't contest the election when it clearly was contestable.
Mike.
Yeah, I think regulation is not the problem.
I kind of believe like Ronald Reagan said, we're from the government, we're here to help you.
This idea of regulation by bodies that aren't elected, the bureaucratic things that end up eating up your taxes is really bad.
And then what's really crazy is you got to look at their premise.
The premise is we're going to fix the problem worldwide by trying to regulate things that are happening in the United States.
But if you look at our production bases and look at the amount of alleged CO2 or whatever's coming out, our problems are not here in the United States.
And whatever we could fix, even according to them, would just make a very little difference when you don't regulate China and India.
So this is all a rouge.
You guys have studied and done that a long time.
I think I will.
And a steady diet.
This is something that's really, really important.
You know, you take a look at a lot of people today, and one of the major killers as you get older is going to be diabetes.
You take a look at other things like this, and instead of worrying about the real problems of maybe what's going into our food, We're worried about these fake problems about oil and stuff like that.
We're going to have enough oil.
Well, the foods that we have today are actually killing us.
You take a look at the idea, and I just want to mention one.
In 1984, we went to the high fructose corn syrup to put in instead of sugar.
And it was for two cents less a ton or something that is very inexpensive.
Our bodies can adjust to sugar.
Our bodies does not really just really well to high fructose corn syrup.
And then you take people like the former mayor of New York, Today, Coca-Cola is the number one producer of Coca-Cola in the world is Mexico.
And one of the reasons why Mexico's number one producer of Coca-Cola is the old Cokes, like we had when we were kids, will taste very similar because they were sugar-based.
They only have the aftertaste or anything like that.
And what the mayor wants to do down there is take sugar out and put high fructose corn syrup.
I think there's a parallel between what the government has done or what business is doing, what Joseph had said earlier.
And that's why I think regulation is really not really helping this out at all.
Very good points, Mike.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, Vivaldi's school board delays action on the police chief.
This is kind of peculiar.
Why should they delay?
While the Uvalde Consolidated Administrative School District Board unanimously passed a resolution to ask Republican Governor Abbott to convene a special session of the legislature to raise the age for purchasing semiotic rifles from 18 to 21, It took no action against District Police Chief Pete Arradaro after the May 24th school shooting, that we have been told, left 19 children and two teachers dead.
As we know, there was a tragedy that occurred at Rob's school, taking the lives of 19 with a rifle an 18-year-old could walk in and purchase, said the superintendent, in bringing up the resolution.
There's no reason for an 18-year-old to have something like that.
Calling for Abbott to convene a special legislative session, it passed unanimously with applause from the public.
As Abbott said from day one, all options remain on the table as he seeks available resources to support the Uvalde community to heal.
The board adjourned without acting against Arradondo for his role in the failure of more than 300 law enforcement officers to enter the classroom for 77 minutes, ostensibly allowing the slaughter to continue.
A 77-page Texas House report found that Arradondo did not assume his reassigned responsibility of incident command, was unable to effectively implement staging or commanding control of the situation.
They delayed acting on calls from the public to dismiss him at the request of his lawyer.
The delay did not go over well with members of the public.
You've known about this.
You know how we feel about this.
I understand procedure.
I understand protocol.
I totally get it.
But don't hesitate firing Arradondo.
As a board, hold each other accountable.
But we have lots of reasons to suspect this was fraudulent.
We have the oddity of shooting his grandmother, making this parallel to Sandy Hook, where Adam Lanza allegedly shot his mother.
Then instead of going to an elementary school and shooting 21st graders, he goes to an elementary school and shoots 19, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th graders.
He's got access to the school through a door that ought to have been closed.
The whole thing just reeks of absurdity.
There are members of the elite border patrol tactical unit reach the classroom, but we had these officers sitting around on their thumbs for 77 minutes.
They've tried to find someone adorable as Emily Parker or even Noah Bosner to promote here, and they chose Amory Joe Garza.
But the narrative fell apart.
Amory turned out to have a different father on two different networks.
Check this out.
I'm sorry for your loss.
You're holding a picture of your daughter.
She had just won an honor roll.
What do you want people to know about her?
She was just trying to do the right thing.
She was just trying to call the cops.
That's... She... This is literally like her worst fear.
She talked about something like this.
So I... I'm a med-aid.
So when I arrived on the scene, they still had kids inside.
They started bringing the kids out, and I was... And Joe Garza talking about his daughter, who has died here, 10 years old.
10-year-old Amory Joe Garza was another 4th grader at Robb Elementary.
She was a real good student.
She was a very good daughter.
Amory loved to draw, do science experiments, and make people laugh.
She was the perfect daughter, yeah.
She was the perfect daughter.
When he heard about the shooting, Alfred Garza III raced to the school.
While waiting for news about his own daughter, Garza says he tried to comfort the children who did manage to get out.
They were just overwhelmed.
It's hard to even wrap your mind around something like that.
This is the last photo he has of his baby girl, posing proudly with her honor roll certificate just hours before the shooting.
I just want to honor her name.
I just want her to be remembered as the type of person that she was.
This is just absurd.
How could Amory have two different fathers on each network?
They all have the same last name.
A massive screw-up, observes Jim Stone.
Two different crisis actor dads claim the same daughter with the same name and honor roll certificate as their daughter.
Both dads claiming the same last name broadcast on two different networks.
They can't be the same girl with two different dads.
It would have to be daughter and stepdaughter, and they wouldn't have the same name.
This is just absurd.
Bullshit.
Complete bullshit.
As narrative shifts are leading, the shooting story evolves.
Stop people from pointing out problems.
Time for a freeze-frame.
Meanwhile, get this.
The shooting occurred on the 24th, but this is a report from May 20th.
They got it early, and there are others just like this.
Not only that, but we had a teacher who was supposed to have died at Sandy Hook, Vicky Soto, also making an appearance, a reprise, in Uvalde.
You mentioned Victoria Soto.
That's her on the right.
Resurrected as Eva Morales in time to be shot at Uvalde.
Jim, did you know our favorite Muslim, Dr. Oz, had a kid on his TV show who supposedly survived Sandy Hook?
The Turkish doctor asked him a few softball questions.
Are you proud of your teacher?
Where he shrugged and said, yes.
After this continued, the child got frustrated and said it was a drill.
What?
In Oz there's nothing with a bomb this kid just dropped?
Can't anyone see the ridiculousness of all this?
Meanwhile, we even have the appearance of Wayne Carver at Uvalde.
I'm convinced this is indeed the same guy.
But the healing will take place.
It's just going to take a while.
But...
The... healing will take place.
It's just gonna take a while.
The same glasses, the same silhouette, the same profile.
But the healing will take place.
It's just going to take a while.
But the healing will take place.
It's just going to take a while.
Just absurd.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well, we had a really great prophet who was a former U.S.
military intelligence officer, William Cooper, who warned us many, many moons ago that they were going to be using MK ultra zombies and they were gonna be put on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and that there was gonna be mass school shootings everywhere.
And then one of his final warnings was in like July of 2001 when he said that the twin towers were gonna be destroyed by nuclear weapons.
Yes, thank you folks.
And that's when they had decided that he was such a threat to the security state that they went out and assassinated him at his home.
But one of the people that he mentioned was a guy named in Eugene, Oregon, named Kip Kinkle.
And he watched a great video a couple of days ago, about 30 minutes long, with William Cooper going through all of the evidence on that particular case.
Looks like that was the genuine event.
So what we've got is either you've got genuine events, you've got hybrid events, or you've got false flags.
And it's just a matter of what Whether you want to believe anything that the media that you know lies to you all the time is saying, or if you just want to remain skeptic and wait for enough evidence to prove that everything they're saying is a lie because it's pretty much proven almost everything they say is a lie.
Oh, you got it right, Joe.
Mike?
Yeah I have a quite a few comments on this one and it may be a little bit different you guys because I want to try to expose something else here.
Uvalde Consolidated Independent School District is located not too far from the border not about 60-70 miles I guess from Del Rio and full of Disclosure, I lived in Del Rio for a couple years, so I'm very familiar with the Uvalde area.
Now, the problem is, here across the state of Texas, school districts have gone, well, let's back up a little bit.
In 1993, William Jefferson Clinton started a crime bill.
inside the crime bill to make jobs for policemen that were being laid off.
They were going to institute policemen and put them into the, I guess, for a jobs program.
But it doesn't necessarily make sense for justice.
And then, because enabling legislation from the Supreme Court is New Jersey versus of 1985.
And in that case, it was a 5, 4 ruling and rule that the school principal had more power than the police officers.
So, the school principal can do all kinds of stuff that the police officers cannot do inside the school.
So in the state of Texas, fast forward to 2019-2018, all of a sudden these independent school districts decided that we are no longer wanting to pay because federal funds have gone down.
We no longer want to pay to have trained police officers in there.
We are going to have our own police forces.
So a lot of school districts have developed their own police force.
This is like what you see in the evolving.
And if let's say if everything was on the up and up, they are supposed to be trained.
But the real reason why this independent school districts went to it was because it was going to cost less money.
How are you going to get a trained person for less money to do something and it's not to their benefit?
So at the most, you're going to see tremendous more problems like this coming down the pipe.
Potentially, this could allow even a firing of a superintendent or a liability superintendent or liability school district for not protecting their child as well.
Poorly trained, schools in charge here, and this is one of the reasons why inside the school, this is something from a school law you would look at, those police officers actually speaking even in a shooting position, the You've all the independent school district police officers had more power because they were under the offices of the school.
So, we need to try to look at.
Maybe changing some of these whole ideas, because why in the world would you want to have people who may not be properly trained?
And then you just have to go through, like, eventually the.
The Border Patrol person didn't just went in and disregard that and take your own life in your hands in your own career.
Unless you have somebody like that, they just held up the whole thing.
So if it was going to be a false flag or it was going to be hydrant, this would be a perfect place to have them.
And you'll start noticing more and more places like this.
If it wasn't, it's still going to be a breeding ground for things to happen.
Excellent.
Excellent, Mike.
I like all that.
Very, very good.
Meanwhile.
Straight ahead on Law & Crime Daily.
The Parkland School Shooter Penalty Phase Trial.
He had a big, well right now I know it's a backpack, but for me in that time it was a case.
Hear from the Uber driver who delivered the gunman to the school and Just weeks after the murder conviction is overturned, prosecutors want another trial for Tex McIver.
Plus, jury selection begins in the first of several defamation trials against Alex Jones.
And later, Brad Pitt vs. Angelina Jolie.
Which A-list actor won the latest round as the pair face off in a legal battle?
Law & Crime Daily covering court cases from coast to coast.
Welcome everyone to Law & Crime Daily.
I'm your host, Brian Buckner.
The penalty phased trial of the Parkland School shooter enters week two as jurors hear from more survivors of the massacre and the woman who drove the shooter to the school.
17 people were killed and 17 more injured when a then 19-year-old gunman opened fire at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in 2018.
In October of last year, the shooter pled guilty to 17 counts of murder and 17 more counts of attempted murder, which prompted his case to head straight into the penalty phase.
It's now up to a Broward County jury to decide whether the shooter is sentenced to life in prison or given the death penalty.
On Monday, jurors heard from another survivor of the massacre, 21-year-old Justin Colton.
He explained he was just a freshman in high school when he was shot and injured.
I was in fourth period just sitting there writing an essay and then heard loud sounds like the gunshots and then everyone began to run in the classroom.
I had ran towards the back towards the teacher's desk and I was on the ground.
I had my hand and I was crawling against the ground.
And then we sat there for about 20 minutes, or less than 20 minutes probably, and then the police head came into our classroom and escorted us out.
Did you get shot?
Yes.
Alright, when did you get shot and where did you get shot?
When I was sitting or sitting or running towards the back of the room in my right arm and my lower right back.
Okay, so what happened as a result of your injuries?
I have a couple fragments still in my lower back and then I have a scar on my arm as well.
Jurors also heard from Laura Zacchini, the Uber driver who dropped the shooter off at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.
Let's skip ahead.
She hasn't been really... ...up to 80 pounds of methamphetamine over the last year.
Guest was previously arrested and sent to prison on similar charges.
More.
...as he sat behind her.
During the trial, there was... ...doesn't need to be detained.
He's already... ...several days later, Here we go.
she was reported missing.
Well, protection.
Let's get to Alex.
Here we go.
The trial is just beginning for Jones and his Sandy Hook conspiracy, as damages have yet to be awarded in separate cases in Connecticut.
Jones has since said he believes the shooting happened, but claims he had a right to say it didn't.
Opening statements are scheduled to begin Tuesday.
Terry, why is the trial in Austin?
Let me just say, Alex Jones began as a skeptic and it was well-founded, and then he compromised himself by claiming it was real.
I think he left himself in a hopelessly untenable position.
He was found guilty in a proceeding that didn't entail a jury trial on procedural grounds.
This had nothing to do with whether what he said was true or was false.
The only case that came close to addressing the question Did anybody die at Sandy Hook was mine, which was dealt with by a bizarre summary judgment procedure where the judge in effect conducted a non-jury trial and was able entitled to determine the facts on the basis of their reasonableness.
He thought the official account of Sandy Hook was reasonable.
Anyone who disputed it was unreasonable, which is why I'm before the Supreme Court.
This is an absurd way to perform The judicial process, and I believe the Supreme Court is going to agree with me.
Joe, you're—and by the way, Parkland, it was a holiday, Valentine's Day.
They sent the 3,500 students home at 1 o'clock.
This student is faking it.
He's lying.
They had fake doctors, fake wounds.
If they'd been shot by an AR-15 in the lower back, for example, he'd not be walking around.
He'd be flat-out dead.
We had doctors talking about girl students shot in the torso and in the chest, claiming those are serious wounds, but young people heal fast.
All bullshit.
I have books on Parkland and Sandy Hook and other of these, which, of course, the media and Amazon.com is doing their best to suppress, with, sad to say, considerable success.
Joe, your thoughts?
Oh yeah, history's riddled with provable false flags.
I mean just one after another.
So you can just pick your event and guaranteed there's surrounded by multiple false flags.
So it's real easy to be skeptical of all of these school shootings.
And when you start putting together all the evidence and it becomes even more reasonable to be skeptic.
So one of the big mistakes that Alex made is that he lives in Austin.
His company is in Austin and they're both in Travis County where the district court judges are elected and you can't get elected unless you are an absolute red diaper.
Uh, doper baby, as Michael Savage used to call him, and so he should have immediately applied for a change of venue and gotten out of Travis County, and if he had gotten two or three counties away, he'd have had a chance with not only having a more open-minded, honest judge, but then he could probably have demanded a jury trial, and then he would have been able to present evidence in front of a jury, but Uh, he's pretty much made his own bed.
Now he's having to sleep in it.
I feel sorry for him because, you know, even though I disagree with him on a lot of things, he overall has done a lot of good, woken a lot of people up.
And like I said, he published my first major web post article.
In April of 2009 at a point where I had written to every major newspaper in the country and sent editorials about global warming and none of them published them and I thought my best chance would be with the Washington Times because they were conservative.
I ended up talking to their stupid editor about a half dozen times, and he kept going, well, this article is too technical.
I can't understand it.
Well, I can dumb it down a little bit, but once you get below high school GED level, you can't convey anything worthwhile.
And so I never got a single thing published, and I was at the point of just about giving up trying to be able to write my way out of this.
When Jones posted me so I'm very grateful for that opportunity and I wish him well in his trial but he's going to have to hope for an appeal and there again the appeals are on courts that are in regions in Texas and it'll end up having to go to the state supreme court in order to get any justification in this in this case.
Long, tedious, expensive process.
Mike?
Yeah, he's got a big road to home.
In the news this morning, they had some clips about Alex Jones because the trial started yesterday and he was saying that InfraWars is bankrupt now.
They cannot pay any money.
And he got his information off the Internet.
I find that to be sort of difficult for defense, especially here in Travis County.
I actually I live County South, but in Travis County, like Joseph was saying, it's probably the bluest of all the counties in the in the state of Texas.
So even though we live in a red state, Austin's probably by far the most liberal and.
I think that they may be going after him with quite a bit of outside information stuff as well.
On the Parkland one, this is kind of going back to some issues I want to discuss.
Number one, who's responsible for these prosecutions?
If for fact that these were drills, how can we convict innocent people?
And how can the government do this without, you know, looking extremely bad?
Number two, when you have that person on the witness stand, how come the prosecution doesn't have to prove that they were actually shot?
How come they don't have any medical evidence or anything to show that, you know, that that's a whole nother thing.
Can't just say that the wounds have healed because they're young.
And the third one is, I thought in the United States, we are innocent until proven guilty.
And in most of these cases, whether it would be like yourself or Alex Jones or anybody else, they had this assumption that you are guilty as soon as you say something and you have to almost prove yourself innocent.
Yeah, I'm sorry to say, Mike, I think you got all that right.
And I don't know what's going to happen in Alex Jones's case or even in the case of Parkland there.
They have to they have to have a level of proof, which they do not.
They don't hold the other side to giving that level of proof.
You are basically toast when you go in.
Yeah, I'm sorry to say, Mike, I think you got all that right in Texas.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Truth vs. News on Jim's Bitchute presented quite a lively debate between Scott Bennett and Jim in the following video.
Bennett wants no part of Trump.
I'm siding with Jim on this one.
Trump is not perfect, but who else is there?
Why change horses in midstream?
Trump has a passionate following, the likes of which I've not seen even a seasoned politician in recent memory.
Add DeSantis to the mix, and we have an unbeatable duo.
But the midterms are not in the bag for the right.
The Dems are capable of anything.
They have not come this far to back downtown.
The January 6th circus is an obvious bust for anyone listening closely.
A third world war is not off the table, but I'll be damned to promote that possibility.
Here's the show on my witshoot channel, Jim Fetzer, Truth vs. News.
Meanwhile, they have imposed a taking order that I believe is completely inappropriate to seize control of my blog, jamesfetzer.org.
As of 5 p.m.
tomorrow, Thursday, jamesfetzer.org will point to a pesner PosnerVFetzer.com, which has documents related to this taking.
I regard it as completely wrong.
I've submitted a motion for reconsideration that lays out why it's improper and cannot legally be done.
I've also submitted a motion to stay since I have the case before the U.S.
Supreme Court, which could reverse all of this.
But I now understand why they're rushing the cadence because of the Alex Jones trial.
They want to block up my blog so the vast repository of Sandy Hook information available there will not be accessible to the public.
Meanwhile, I'm having to create an alternative blog at jameshfetzer.org, jameshfetzer.org, which I hope to have up and running in the immediate future.
Meanwhile, remember, 1% control the world, 4% are their puppets, 90% are asleep.
5% know and try to wake the 90%.
The 1% use the 4% to prevent the 5% from waking up the 90%.
Final thoughts?
Joe, yours.
Yeah, so I mentioned that I was red-pilled many, many moons ago when my grandfather's property was taken down on South Pottery Island in 1972, and then I got involved in the S&L crisis in the 80s, and then at the end of the 80s, 1989, I made a presentation to City Council, which was probably the greatest tour de force of civil engineering ever presented to a municipality anywhere in the nation.
And I was on local news NBC affiliate with an audience of about 400,000.
It was the largest market in Houston at the particular time.
They gave me three minutes on night cast and launched my civic activism as far as the corruption here in Houston and then expanded nationally and internationally.
I've got that video, the three-minute-long newscast, waiting to be posted at Fetzer's as soon as I write the intro for it.
So look for it later this afternoon.
I'll make sure I put a comment link to it.
I've got genuine bona fides.
I've been fighting rampant government corruption for 32 years, and in the process of my rail proposal, I found out that the Disney illegal no-bid monorail contract included $200,000 in that billion-dollar rail project, so we'll all get rich on it.
Direct quote from the fired head of Metro who turned out to be a future mayor of the city of Houston.
This is an absolute cesspool of a city.
Yes, yes, very telling.
Joe, Mike.
Yeah, my final comments, I guess I'd like to talk a little bit about the justice system.
The justice system seems to be as orchestrated as our governments, and our governments seem to be manipulated, and it looks like our justice system is being manipulated, too.
That quote that you had a little poster is is really correct.
We need to wake up and we need to wake up and we need to start taking over like our local school boards.
If your school wants to try a local police force, you might want to question that.
And we need to start actually asking questions.
I think that as individual people, we can make a difference.
And it doesn't necessarily just have to throw up our arms.
I know you fighting in the Supreme Court will make a large difference too, but that's just one individual.
And one individual can make a difference.
We should never forget that.
Just like that one individual asked Benjamin Franklin and said, what kind of government do we have?
And then Benjamin Franklin said, a republic if we can keep it.
We're at the point right now where Benjamin Franklin said, I don't know if we can keep it or not, and it's up to you.
Absolutely right.
Benjamin Franklin got it right, a republic if we can keep it.
Joe Olson and Mike Cunningham have done a wonderful job today bringing in their background, extra knowledge, additional resources here to enrich our discussion of these developing events.
My Supreme Court case, yes, is my case, but it affects every president of Wisconsin.
They have a bizarre summary judgment procedure that enables a judge to make up the facts in accordance with his own subjective personal opinion.
The court, not only at the circuit court level, but also the appellate court level, and evidently the Supreme Court level in Wisconsin, all felt it was unreasonable to challenge the official narrative of Sandy Hook.
As a consequence, they simply set aside my evidence, no matter how powerful, no matter how convincing, And it did not matter or affect the outcome, even including two forensic document expert reports that were on my side.
They were simply set aside as someone else's opinion and treated as though they were unreasonable.
I believe the court will take this case because it's a violation of the right to a jury trial, to have a judge conduct a non-jury trial where he makes up the facts instead of a jury of our peers.
Not only that, but this practice has been going on in Wisconsin and affecting tens of thousands of Wisconsin residents who are being subjected to an improper judicial procedure that needs to be corrected.
Under the 14th Amendment, we're all entitled to equal justice under the law with regard to summary judgment.
Wisconsin is an outlier.
This gives the Supreme Court an opportunity to set things right, make a ruling that standardizes summary judgment throughout the nation.
A retired professor of law observed to me after reading my petition.
Summary judgment is the greatest judicial problem in the United States because it is commonly amused.
Not only will they correct a major problem, but they'll also illustrate, because mine is a high-profile case, that even a controversial party such as myself is entitled to a fair trial.
I'm already through 10 of the 12 steps, going to a conference where they determine which actual cases are going to be discussed by the Supreme Court for which writs will be issued.
If four or more justices select mine, and I anticipate that is going to happen, then they'll issue a writ, they'll obtain the entire file from Wisconsin, and set oral hearings where each party has a half an hour to present their case.
Let's see what happens here.
I feel good about it.
But in the meanwhile, I'm having to cope with problems at home because as a consequence of the case that originally led to this Supreme Court petition, I'm being subjected to a taking of my blog.
It's quite wrong.
I realized last night That the reason for the urgency was the Alex Jones trial is going to generate huge interest in Sandy Hook.
There's probably no repository more rich in information about Sandy Hook and what did and did not happen than jamesfetzer.org.
As a consequence, since it's going to disappear at five o'clock tomorrow, I did too call them emergency blogs Check them out, share them as widely as you can, where I made access to a host of evidence.
I think that's something you don't want to miss.
Meanwhile, after tomorrow at 5, you'll find I'm creating a new blog at jameshfetzer.org.
Thank you for joining us today.
The situation is pretty bleak, pretty devastating, but there are occasional signs of life that we may be able to survive, God willing.
Thank you for being here.
▲
Export Selection