All Episodes
Previous Next
July 25, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
51:48
"Inconvenient Truths" Episode 1 (23 July 2022)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
My colleague Gary King had the idea for a kind of conversational exchange between him and me about issues of current interest.
They're going to take quite a diverse variety and variation.
So we're going to call it Non-Random Thoughts with Jim Fetzer and Gary King.
Gary, give us a sample here, my friend.
See how it's going to go.
All right.
This is our brand new show, and we're going to be bringing up non-random topics to discuss with Dr. Fetzer.
So as we go, we want to bring it in front of the You know, Dr. Fetzer here and have him comment on it.
And I'm going to also do the same.
So I'll be bringing the information or the topics ahead.
So what I'm trying to do, I would like to focus it on a little bit on what's happening in your part of the world.
All right.
Now we know you're around Wisconsin.
I'm in New Orleans.
I can just tell you, and though this is not the subject, most of the people around here are ready to put on masks as soon as they give the signal.
You know, so I'm just saying that I'm experiencing that in my own world, but that's for later on, but that's just to give you an example of how we want it to go.
All right.
So I'm going to give you a little bit of an example of how it's going.
And I actually have a home near Bay St.
Louis and the other day, it's going to be about local police enforcement.
All right.
So I'm going to tell you a little story and then we'll talk about it.
And I have looked into it a little bit more than you would think.
All right.
So here we go.
I normally take one ride to go to the interstate but because of an accident I went through a smaller town called Waveland.
All right so come to find out Waveland is what they call a pirate town or a overly aggressive police department that is literally looking to pull you over For any reason and then to subject you to what we'll talk about in a little while.
This is to make make money for the town on the basis of drivers by rigid enforcement of driving laws.
I get it, Gary.
Yes, yes, yes.
Yeah, well, that's the old stuff.
And it's a little more to it.
And of course, it's the usual suspects.
So.
All right.
Anyway, I'm driving through Waveland and I stopped at the Shell station.
I fill up with gas and I get on the road.
And I didn't put my seatbelt on just yet.
I was going probably 30 miles an hour and then whoo, here they come.
So we have a cop behind me.
So he pulls me over.
And by the way, um, my wife is a respected hairdresser and she dresses the part and we're both, um, you know, we're not spring chickens anyway, but we do look the part.
All right.
So I own a music school.
My wife owns a hairdressing school.
And I got out of the car and I pulled my driver's license from the police officer.
Gary, Gary, Gary, why did you get out of the car?
Well, because I thought that's what you do, you know?
You get out of the car and you hand them your driver's license.
I've had plenty of interactions with cops.
They don't want you to get out of the car.
They want you to just sit there patiently till they come up and ask you or tell you what to do.
Yeah, that's exactly right.
I would say right off the bat, that was a mistake.
It was a mistake because as soon as he got out of the car, he said, get back in the car!
Back in the car now!
And he got on his radio and he said, he jumped the car.
We have someone to jump the car.
And then he came running.
There was another cop.
Now we're talking about small town now.
We're talking about small town.
They don't have a lot else to do, Gary.
So then they came and pulled right in front of me.
And then the other one was behind me and they're running our licenses.
They come in, they stick their head in and looking all around and they want both of our licenses.
So they got both of our licenses.
And then they go to the back of the car, they run our licenses, and after a little while, you have to figure that they knew that we were citizens.
Okay?
But they came at us.
Now, what we had were three young men that were in full military outfits.
They had bulletproof vests.
They had bulletproof knees.
And boots.
They had a Glock weapon here.
They had a camera across here.
And the first thing that they wanted to know is if we had any weapons.
And they asked if we had, are you ready?
Wait for it.
Any grenade launchers.
What do you mean, Gary?
You didn't bring your grenade launcher with you when you drove through Waveland?
They looked in the car and they figured they needed to look.
Can we look in your car?
I said, you can look in my car.
Oh, so the next thing you know, we have people with all this, um, you know, hardcore police outfit stuff with taser guns and all that.
And we, um, We let them search, you know, looking at us and all that.
And so then the first thing they wanted to know if we had any weapons.
All right.
Now they were all fully weaponized themselves, but I said, no, we don't have any weapons.
Then secondly, secondly, they wanted to know if we were gun runners and drug addicts.
I mean, gun runners are after they cleared us of being They went to the second thing all right they wanted to know if we had drugs in the car and if we had anything that they needed to see and they were all walking around the circle like this okay I said y'all can take a look you can do whatever you want and I said look and so they we got out the car and then
They said, all right, up against the vehicle right here, and don't move.
I said, why are y'all doing this?
I mean, haven't y'all figured out that we're citizens of Bay St.
Louis?
And they actually told me, Jim Fessler, they said that they had watched the film down at headquarters, I'm not exaggerating, where a 95-year-old woman who had no record Had never had a moving violation or any trouble with the law whatsoever.
Blew a police officer across the highway with a big shotgun.
I don't believe it, Gary.
I think that's just made up.
That's just phony.
Of course it is, but what an insult to every person that... See, it takes 95 years for you to have a 95-year record with no violence and no tickets and a great citizenry record, and then to have them literally holding you back and never at one point did they Back off on the possibility that we could just blow him across the door, the room.
And I told him, I said, y'all know we don't have any weapons.
He said, look, we can't take a chance.
We have families.
We have to go home and we want to go home tonight.
So stay against the car.
And so I started thinking to myself the next day, I said, wait a minute, what, what happened here?
And I'll tell you what happened.
Come to find out where do the United States, I mean, the local police chiefs get their training.
These guys were trained in Israel, Gary.
Yes.
Yes.
I can believe it.
Okay.
So I was wondering, wait a minute.
Why would they treat me like a Palestinian?
And now I know exactly why.
So I have a little bit of a video here.
We can watch and you can tell me what you think about it.
Sure.
U.S.
police are training in Israel, and that's something every American should be concerned about.
As protests sweep across the U.S., it's becoming increasingly clear that law enforcement has become more militarized, treating the people they're supposed to serve and protect as a hostile foreign population.
Part of the reason why is that since the 90s, and especially after 9-11, U.S.
law enforcement, including police departments, the FBI, CIA, and immigration officials, have been trained by Israeli agents These exchange programs are exacerbating the violence in both places and lifting up the Israeli occupation as a global gold standard for policing.
And communities of color in the U.S.
are disproportionately paying the price.
Police-sensitive origins have been a racist and brutalizing body.
But over time, their efforts of brutalization have taken on a new character.
That new character is police exchanges.
Hey everyone, I'm Dina.
And as a Palestinian-American journalist who's reported from the occupied West Bank... Put the camera down.
Okay, okay!
I witnessed firsthand how Israel routinely targets unarmed Palestinians with force as part of its decades-long illegal military occupation of Palestinian land.
I've also seen the militarized U.S.
response to peaceful protesters in places like Standing Rock.
And in this historic moment of uprisings in the U.S., the parallels between how American and Israeli forces crack down on civilians are more glaring than ever.
So why is U.S.
law enforcement receiving training from Israel, a flagrant human rights offender?
And what does it mean for people on the ground?
Now, it's important to keep in mind that the U.S.
police and military have historically brutalized communities of color and repressed movements for justice well before the existence of Israel.
But now they're building on that by learning from a state that has mastered racial profiling, crowd control, and surveillance.
To understand why these trainings are so problematic, you first need some background about how Israel systematically dehumanizes the Palestinian population it completely controls.
Israel's creation in 1948 enshrined a nationalist policy of Jewish-Israeli supremacy at the expense of the native Palestinian population.
Most of whom were forced to flee their homes, becoming permanent refugees.
In 1967, Israel began its repressive military occupation of what remained of Palestinian land.
Subjugating the entire Palestinian population, denying them the rights of citizenship, and crushing any dissent against its policies.
Since then, Israeli forces have routinely fired tear gas, skunk water, rubber-coated steel bullets, and even live ammunition at online protests.
So this is a state that violently controls and suppresses the rights of an occupied people, and U.S.
police are learning its tactics to use against American citizens.
Thousands of law enforcement officials from all corners of the country have traveled to Israel to learn police strategies and exchange tactics.
These trips became increasingly common after 9-11, as pro-Israel groups used the so-called War on Terror as an opportunity to push for a closer, unconditional alliance with Israel, which had marketed itself as the world's leading counterterrorism expert.
On these trips, High-ranking U.S.
officials are visiting Israeli checkpoints and prisons, places where human rights groups all over the world have documented Israeli discrimination and repression and torture and killing of Palestinians.
I spoke to Stephanie Fox from the Jewish Voice for Peace.
Her organization was part of a campaign called Deadly Exchange, which outlines the dangerous consequences of U.S.
police training in Israel.
Why do you think Israel is so attractive to U.S.
law enforcement agencies?
U.S.
policing has always been both about enacting a war on Black and brown communities in the U.S.
and around the world.
So I think that the two being both rooted in So who runs these exchanges?
They're organized by pro-Israel groups like the Anti-Defamation League, which calls itself the world's leading anti-hate organization.
The trips are funded privately, as well as through grants from the Israeli and U.S.
governments, including the Justice Department.
The ADL boasts that they've trained more than 15,000 law enforcement professionals.
and have sent more than 200 high-ranking U.S.
officials to Israel.
And some officers fresh off these trips have high praise.
This was an outstanding experience, something that I'll remember for the rest of my life.
They've obviously given us a lot to think about, a lot of best practices.
This is, in fact, the finest training initiative that I've ever been a part of.
But we've seen the ramifications of these trainings here in the U.S., with police departments treating American citizens who are exercising their constitutional right to protest as though they're under occupation.
Especially communities of color.
Take Ferguson, Missouri, for example.
After the 2014 police killing of Michael Brown, the officers' response to protesters mirrored some of the tactics used by Israeli forces against Palestinians, which civil rights icon Angela Davis has drawn attention to.
The tear gas that was being used in occupied Palestine was the same tear gas that was being used in Ferguson.
And she's right.
Officers in Ferguson used the same U.S.-manufactured tear gas and flashbang devices to disperse crowds that Israeli forces regularly use against Palestinians.
But that's not all.
In 2011, the Sheriff of St.
Louis County, where Ferguson is located, traveled to Israel on one of the ADL-sponsored police exchange trips.
And then, three years after the Ferguson uprisings, which catapulted the Black Lives Matter movement to the international stage, The city's police chief also traveled to Israel for training.
He said he was blessed to be part of the exchange.
And throughout all of this, Palestinians have recognized the shared struggle, even tweeting support and tits to American protesters.
But Ferguson is just one example.
Other cities and counties where officers have received Israeli training later became the sites of high-profile police killings.
That includes Hennepin County, home to Minneapolis, where George Floyd was killed by police, and Atlanta, where Rayshard Brooks was fatally shot by an officer.
And who could forget the militarized response to protesters in Washington, D.C.
after the death of George Floyd?
Officers from several agencies, including the U.S.
Park Police, fired on protesters with tear gas and flashbangs.
And it turns out that many officers from D.C.
travel to Israel for training, including the U.S.
Park Police Chief and a police commander.
And then there's surveillance.
Israel's massive surveillance system has inspired U.S.
officials so much so that after a former police chief visited Israel in 2008, his city adopted its techniques.
Our video integration center in downtown Atlanta is modeled after the command and control center I saw in the old city of Jerusalem.
Atlanta has installed over 10,000 surveillance cameras, which have raised serious privacy concerns.
But to really get a sense of Israeli inspiration, look no further than New York City.
After 9-11, the NYPD and the CIA created a sprawling covert spying operation that surveilled and infiltrated mosques in Muslim neighborhoods in the New York City area.
This led to widespread and unprecedented profiling of the region's Muslim community.
A police official told the Associated Press that the program was modeled in part off of how Israelis spy on Palestinians in the West Bank.
That program was heavily scrutinized in the U.S., but widespread surveillance of citizens continues today.
During recent protests, U.S.
officials surveilled demonstrations in 15 cities using drones and helicopters.
They've recorded almost 300 hours of footage which federal agencies and local police departments across the country can access.
But it's not just the U.S.
that's learning and implementing new strategies at home.
In 2016, Israel copied New York City's highly controversial and racist police policy of stop and frisk.
The Israeli version primarily targeted young Palestinian men who were detained and searched without probable cause.
All that said, a few communities have stood up to these police exchanges and won.
In 2018, Durham, North Carolina became the first U.S.
city to ban its police from training in Israel.
I spoke to Ajamu Dillahun, a student and activist with Black Youth Project 100, who campaigned to make this happen.
I saw the interconnectedness between... Yeah, I just want to make a comment, Jim.
All this, you know, surveillance and all this militarization and all are basically built upon false flags.
As far as I can tell, the George Floyd was no different.
Yeah, stop the share, Gary, so we can see each other.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah, you're absolutely right.
They're built on false flags.
I mean, 9-11 was an orchestrated event brought to its compliments of the CIA, the neocons, and the Department of Defense and the Mossad.
And they used that to reorganize, to create the Department of Homeland Security that took 35 independent government agencies into one behemoth, and it was modeled after the Stasi, the East German secret police.
Now, I'm very interested in whether in Waveland you know that they were trained in Israel.
I went willing to bet they were.
The tactics they were using on you were ridiculous.
Even the idea that they were wearing bulletproof vests.
You know, Gary, I mean, give me a break.
We're talking about a seatbelt being pulled over for a seatbelt.
Gary, it's ridiculous.
Now, you never completed the story.
How long did they keep you up against the car?
How long did they take to search your vehicle?
About 10 minutes or so, but the main point is that at no time did they ever release us from being highly dangerous suspects until they drove away and let us go.
Okay.
What did they say?
What did they say in the end?
What did they say in the end?
You can go.
They wrote me a ticket for $75.
We're not having a seatbelt on, but they want $75.
Yes.
And they wanted to bust me.
They wanted to ruin my life that day.
If they possibly could, they went in there, stick in there.
See the reason they want to stay in the car, so they can stick their head in.
And see what they can see or, you know, and like I said, first of all, it's weapons.
Gary, Gary, Gary, Gary.
Yeah.
No, they want you to stay in the car because it gives them greater control.
They know exactly where you are.
No, that's a security thing.
That's absolutely standard procedure, Gary.
Believe me, I've had my share of traffic tickets.
And when you said you jumped out of the car, I knew that you were in trouble because that was the wrong thing to do.
On the occasions when I've got out of the car, similar to you, the officer directed me to get back in the car right away.
I immediately complied.
I did the same thing too.
I didn't jump out like I had a gun on me.
I got out and actually pulled my pants up.
Gary, Gary, Gary, Gary, Gary.
I get it.
I get it.
But I'm just telling you, that's standard procedure.
You're supposed to stay in the car.
Now, I think your point about Israeli training is impeccable.
I think that's 100% accurate.
Now, I had a little incident the other day.
This was actually, I say the other day, it was probably a year and a half, maybe two years ago.
On Sunday, I go up to the local Kwik Trip to pick up a paper and some donuts, okay?
And on this occasion, and it's very rare, I didn't put on my seatbelt, and when I came up to a turn where I had to curve to the right, there was an Oregon cop, and when I slid to the left because I didn't have my seat, he immediately put his light, pulled me over, And I handle it very poorly.
There have been two occasions when I had tickets and I did not handle it right, and this was one.
Because he was just asking me about the seatbelt and Bob was going back and I said, you know, aren't you only supposed to write a ticket for not wearing a seatbelt when you committed another offense?
And he said, who said anything about a ticket?
And then he went back to the car and he wrote me a ticket, but it was only for $10.
Gary, I felt so bad about that that I went out of my way to call him up to try to reach him and tell him how apologetic I felt for being a bit of an a-hole for having made an issue of it because I sat a little more and a little more emphatically than I'm reporting here.
Did he have a bulletproof vest on?
No, of course, Gary.
Okay, did he ask you if you had weapons and grenade launchers?
No, of course not.
Gary, Gary, I get it!
But in Bay St.
Louis, they are!
No, not in Bay St.
Louis.
Gary, Gary, I get it!
Man, I'm agreeing with you!
Yeah, I'm with you.
So, all right.
So, I guess we can close that, you know, that little one.
So, we'll move on to the next one.
I do think training in Israeli is a horrible idea because they do have the community, the local police treating American civilians as the Israelis treat Palestinians, which is with brutality, with brutality.
So if you want a community friendly police department, we all want that.
You don't want Israeli training because it's counterproductive.
It undermines good relations with the community.
No.
What I have.
My biggest objection is the insulting idea that anyone, including a 95 year old, perfect record senior citizen can blow you across the highway.
Insults me.
That's where I'm at.
Gary, Gary, Gary, I don't believe that for a second.
I mean, that just is utterly ridiculous.
Why would an old lady do that?
I think that's Hollywood.
That's propaganda.
That's made up.
That's a made up story, Gary.
Right.
I'm aware that what the cops saw was fake, but they don't think it was fake.
Of course we know that.
All right.
Okay, Dr. Pesce, what do you think of the first part of the show?
Well, I mean... Pretty wild there, huh?
There are communities that go out of their way to, you know, make money off of those out-of-town drivers who are just passing through.
I'm hip to the tickets and all that kind of stuff.
I just don't like being treated like a Palestinian.
Okay.
Now.
Palestinians don't like it either, Gary, and the Israelis are known for their brutality.
I mean, it's just awful that taxpayer dollars would be used to make our police less friendly.
Go ahead.
There you go.
All right.
We're going to talk a little bit about weather modification and chemtrails.
And though we know what a disgusting individual this man is, at least we can gather bits and pieces from him.
Well, in 1962, he was still vice president, of course.
Well, he was... In 62, he was vice president?
Of course.
Okay.
Well, he was the vice president of JFK, of course.
Okay.
I was thinking he might have been a senator.
I have another picture.
He might be a senator.
I'm not sure.
But anyway, it's... 1962, Gary.
Think about it.
Lyndon was Jack's vice president.
That's why he took a math so he could become president.
Yeah, that's right.
In one year, my math is bad.
All right, so it says, it lays the predicate and foundation for the development of a weather satellite that will permit man to determine the world's cloud layer and ultimately to control the weather.
He who controls the weather controls the world.
And I find that a little, you know, and then.
Yeah, very disturbing.
We see a lot of weather engineering.
So Lyndon was very much on this.
Oh yeah, Lyndon was in with the cabal.
I guess you'd say whether he knew it or not is an open question, you know.
But all right, so here we go.
You want to read that one for us, Dr. Petzer?
Sure.
Control of space means control of the world.
Okay, now I've always said you can't romanticize all the time about JFK.
to control the Earth's weather, to cause droughts and floods, to change the tides and raise the levels of the sea, to divert the Gulf Stream and change temperature climates of rigid.
Vice President Lyndon P. Johnson.
Okay, now I've always said you can't romanticize all the time about JFK.
Yeah, we know he had good looks, you know, but here's a quote from him.
Be my guest.
Here's Jack on 25 September 1961.
We shall propose further cooperative efforts between all nations in weather prediction and eventually in weather control.
But bear in mind, Jack was thinking about that for beneficial and peaceful purposes.
With Lyndon, it's a whole nother matter.
Yeah, I can totally see that, Dr. Presser.
You know, where Lyndon would just know how you could take over the world.
And JFK is trying to provide for the world.
It's just such a contrast.
It's startling.
You want to end the share?
Go ahead.
All right.
So this is Senator... Let's see, what's his name again?
He'll be on there, but I did a little research.
This is between 2007 and 2013, this particular senator was actually in office.
So here we go.
Can you turn up the volume?
Yeah, I have to switch speakers.
...weather tampering techniques so that the New World Order will be able to start Millions of Americans and to control the rest.
Would you explain what you were trying to say?
Well, what I was trying to say is exactly what I said.
There is weather control techniques.
We have a complete package on that, which I did not bring, but I certainly will see to it that it is brought in for the record.
Gary, can you get rid of that sound thing?
Just pull your cursor down.
Complete statement and story of his own, that not only does it exist, but that we even utilize it as far back as the Vietnam War.
You might want to touch base with Senator Ted.
I just want to repeat before we turn to questions.
But we do have all that information.
You're saying the government has created weather tampering techniques so that the quote new world order will be able to starve millions of Americans.
Worldwide.
Millions of Americans and to control the rest.
Yes, sir.
And that's my belief.
As bizarre as that sounds, when if somebody had told me that that equipment even existed 10 years ago, I would have thought they were nuts, sir.
And at this point in time, we have all the documents to prove it.
And if you think that 85 tornadoes takes place in the middle of our growing area by simultaneous accident, I'm sorry.
The equipment that's already set up internationally And as bizarre as that is, it is proven and documented.
We will supply you with those documents.
As bizarre as that is, I would say that weather wars, and this is quoting actually Senator Claiborne Pell himself, that they are the greatest weapon ever created in the world, and that's the senator's own statement.
So yes, I have to do stand on that.
Thank you, Mr. Fletcher.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Thank you very much.
Well, Herb Cole was a good guy, Gary.
He was a Wisconsin Senator who had the interests of people at heart, just as Ron Johnson today is a good man from Wisconsin.
So I'm proud of him.
He was obviously trying to get to the bottom of it, but it's gone far, far beyond, you know, this idea, space, weather modification.
They fulfilled Lyndon's vision, I think, to a high degree.
Gary, we can't hear you.
All right, Dr. Fetzer, that was actually back in 2007.
We go back to LBJ, JFK talking about weather modification.
And I just really fear that what we're going to be facing with this climate change is we're going to be facing more and more weather weapons actually perpetrated on the American people.
Gary, you're talking about apples and oranges.
Climate change is based on pseudoscience.
They claim that the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere affects the temperature.
That's false.
It's provably false.
It's just nonsense.
It's a myth.
I've done a series about global warming with a A wonderfully educated engineer has qualified four different areas of engineering on anti-global warming, where in the very first episode, and you can find these all on my BitChute channel, Jim Fetzer, Joe Olson explains how over 600 million years there's no correlation between the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere and the temperature of the Earth.
Lacking correlation, there can be no causal relationship.
In fact, CO2 is beneficial to life on Earth.
Plants transform it into oxygen.
Without CO2, we could have no life on Earth.
Plus, CO2 actually warms the Earth in four different ways.
So this whole climate change agenda is based on utter nonsense.
It's bullshit.
On the other hand, Weather modification and those are weapons of war.
They can manipulate.
They can create tornadoes.
They can create droughts.
They can create torrential rains.
All of that is correct, Gary.
It's just that these are two different areas that have different agendas and purposes and roles.
Yeah, well, climate change means you're enslavement.
You just have to look at current news.
The Dutch farmers are having to call their herds over climate change It's all nonsense.
Of course, Gary.
I agree completely.
It's all nonsense.
as part of the new world order, using the World Economic Forum and a whole lot of bullshit about climate change to implement not just reductions in livestock, but reductions in the human population by up to 90%.
The Georgia Guidestone described there would only be half a billion, 500, half a billion, 500 million.
That would be the ideal population.
How did they come up with that number?
I mean, we're doing just fine with 8 million.
The Earth is not overpopulated.
That's merely in the minds of these genocidal globalists who want to control the entirety of planet Earth, Gary.
Well, All I know is they're manipulating the public based on false beliefs, phony contrived events, all that you're a hundred percent correct.
My friend, that's what's going on here.
All right.
Being played and we're being played massively hard.
Okay.
But it's not just there.
All right.
So we're going to go to our third and final segment of the night and There's something a little fake about this, Dr. Fetzer.
So you know how there's probably what, five different Bidens, you know, minimum.
So this particular one here, I want you to kind of, I mean, this could have been manufactured, you know, without her being on the stage.
All right.
So we're going to go to the agenda of grooming children.
Please give a warm drag race welcome to the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi.
Oh my gosh!
Oh my gosh!
Welcome back!
My honor to be here to say to all of you how proud we all are of you.
Thank you for the joy and beauty you bring to the world.
Your freedom of expression of yourselves in drag is what America is all about.
I say that all the time to my friends in drag.
Now, Speaker Pelosi, with all the challenges facing our nation, what words of wisdom do you have for us?
Well, the single most important thing I can say is to vote.
With the midterm elections coming up, it's very important for people to make their voices and their vote heard.
Well, thank you so much for the work you've done and the work you continue to do tirelessly for our freedom.
Your tenacity is something that we all look up to.
We throw the word masterclass around here all the time, but that sarcastic, shady clap you do was f***ing epic.
It was completely unintentional.
We have prayers in our hearts to keep you strong.
Well, thank you for that.
May God bless America.
Can I get an amen?
Amen!
Thank you, Madam Speaker.
Jim Fesser, we're in trouble.
We're in -- That's a polypathy.
Pelosi's into pedophilia.
She and Hillary, Uma Abedin, John Podesta, his brother Tony.
Pedophilia is a major problem.
The crack detective in pedophilia cases in New York, Jim Rothstein, who's a gold shield detective, now retired, told me when I reported to him how I discovered that many cases of pedophilia were brought to the district attorney and then refused to be prosecuted on political grounds that, in his estimate, Seventy percent of American political figures are engaged in pedophilia, Gary.
Seventy percent.
And anyone who wants to learn more about pedophilia, go to my blog, jamesfetzer.org, and check out jimtheconspiracyguy.com, the 65 shows, because if you scroll down, you'll find One on pedophilia, the American pet on, on Pizzagate, the American franchise of Pedogate.
And you'll learn more than you wanted to know about how extensive this is right here in the USA.
I'll admit I've been in a bit of denial about that.
Sometimes you just don't want to look.
I mean, I hate to say that, but, um, it's really something else.
Now I had to do a little fact checking here.
So, um, I couldn't believe it's true.
But here's a couple of Barbies that we have.
And maybe I'll have a little explanation, you know, for some of this in just a minute.
All right.
So that's actually a Barbie doll that you can buy.
Here's another one.
The one with the penis.
You're kidding me.
They got a Barbie doll that is made like that?
Try any Barbie.
I mean, every time I ever looked under the skirt of a Barbie, I didn't see anything.
Right.
They don't display genitalia on Barbies?
And this one, I have to wonder if it's real or not.
If it is, then for certain we are in even more trouble than Then I can imagine, you know, we really are.
So, all right.
So, um, I have a video.
It's not that long.
And I think it explains a little bit of all this.
So let's do that.
And then we'll close out the show.
Dr. Benson.
All right.
Yeah.
Yeah, let me pull it up.
Okay.
It's a new phenomenon called grooming.
And come to find out, many of the gay people are completely against grooming.
I mean, you know, they're they're saying it's not enough to be gay anymore.
You have to push these type of things.
So, all right.
Is there a soundtrack?
Yeah, there is.
It comes... I'm going to bump it up a little bit.
Yeah, let's go ahead.
It's just a minute in.
I could play my guitar.
Or the music.
- Go back to the beginning, Gary.
Yeah.
We don't wanna miss.
Go back to the beginning.
- Yeah, let's go ahead.
It's just a minute in.
I could play my guitar.
Or the music.
- Just get rid of the... - Yeah.
- Yeah.
So...
It's really shocking what's going on, Gary.
I mean, that's really shocking.
You want to read that before it goes up?
Exposing the worrying degree to which politicized divisive ideologies.
Sorry.
Hold on.
We'll get it right back.
Come on.
Here we go.
Including gender theory, critical race theory, queer theory, and transgender cool kids are being taught to our children through personal social health and economic education.
The United States is just as guilty of this subversion and has few exceptions to this practice.
How schools sexualize your children.
Groomed.
Yeah.
And, um, like I said, I'm really glad to hear that the gay community is finally, um, Not happy about it.
I mean, why would you be happy about any of this stuff?
I'm really trying to get rid of that thing.
There we go.
All right, so.
Not so long ago, our children went to school to be educated, not indoctrinated.
Reading, writing, arithmetic.
When it came to the thorny topic of sex education, it was traditionally a teacher's job to equip children with the basics to allow them to stay safe from unwanted pregnancies, sexually transmitted diseases, and sexual predators.
And whilst most parents were happy to leave the birds and the bees stuffed to the teachers, sex education weren't compulsory, leaving some parents the choice to opt out.
However, in the new hyper-sexualized culture of 21st century Britain, a perfect storm of fear and opportunity has arisen.
A new wave of activists and sex-positive liberals saw an opportunity not just to educate and inform children, but to sexualize and radicalize them.
Pull your cursor down.
To many parents, our children's education has become riddled with unproven, unscientific, radical sexual identity politics.
The Declaration of Pronouns is enforced with rigour.
Rejecting biology in favour of gender theory is the new normal.
Exposing ever younger children to complicated ideas about sexuality is becoming an imperative.
In particular, PSHE, or Personal Social Health and Economic Education, which includes relationships and sex education, RSE, has become a horror show.
Sex education is a good example.
That used to happen in secondary school.
The Conservative government, for some reason, pushed through RSE as a replacement for sex ed.
And now we have relationships and sex ed all into one bracket, which means it's being pushed further down into primary school.
We now have primary kids being taught about masturbation, which I think is inappropriate.
And I think most parents would.
But this is the slippery slope, isn't it?
There's no age appropriateness anymore.
Drag queens, whose very names are often laden with sexual innuendo, are routinely invited to read books to primary age school children.
This is Miss Diva, one of the performers involved in Bristol's Drag Queen Storytime.
And in Paisley, a drag queen named Flo Job was invited to read books at Glencoats Primary School.
Following a parental outcry when Flo Job's highly sexualized social media history was uncovered, SMP MP Mari Black, who was with Flo Job at the school event, lashed out, accusing those with concerns of, yes, you guessed it, homophobia.
Mari said she completely applauded the school for putting on such a great day.
Last summer in London, the Labour Council invited a rainbow dildo butt monkey to host children's reading groups in libraries.
Drag Queen Story Hour, which does exactly what it says on the tin, has now become a huge growth industry in our schools.
However, the apprehension of having drag queens perform to young children is also shared by some drag queens themselves.
I have no idea why you want drag queens to read books to your children.
I have no idea.
A drag queen performs in a nightclub for adults.
There is a lot of filth that goes on, a lot of sexual stuff that goes on.
And backstage, there's a lot of nudity, sex, and drugs.
Okay?
So I don't think that this is...
An avenue you would want your child to explore.
Would you want a stripper or a porn star to influence your child?
And then you just move your thumb up and down like that, and that's twerking.
As the outcry about drag queens in schools grows, efforts by the left and the educational establishment to get them into schools will become increasingly aggressive.
Taking the lead from New York City, where Mayor Eric Adams pledged to continue the practice even after it was revealed the city had spent over $200,000 on drag queen events for young children.
These extracurricular activities are bad enough.
The most worrying of all is the British curriculum itself, which now teaches children as young as four about masturbation, consent, and the chilling concept of good secrets.
This education comes from the World Health Organization, United Nations, CECAS, McKinsey Institute.
The first thing that startled me, made me aware, was the early childhood masturbation from age naught to four.
I'm a criminologist, so child sex abuse and exploitation are my fields.
So I want to know who is saying children are sexual from birth?
Who is saying children can masturbate from birth?
Straight off, for the beginning, for the four-year-olds, they were actually learning about masturbation, which is now spoken about, it's called self-stimulation.
So we discovered this in 241 schools in England.
The self-stimulation has a barrier to disclosure, which means it prevents children from disclosing abuse, basically.
It programs all children in the whole of the country away from what we call a non-verbal disclosure.
As it goes on, we look at children that are taught to behave sexually in a non-offensive way, whatever that means.
It's a labelled body part.
It is not head, shoulders, knees and toes.
It is nipples, scrotum and vulva.
In secondary schools the menu is even more X-rated as pupils are taught about anal sex, facial ejaculation and bondage.
Many parents are starting to ask questions at school and the schools are saying we cannot share the resources with you because they are under copyright and we're not privileged to share them with people.
First of all, that's a lie.
To share the resources with a parent is perfectly acceptable and any school that uses copyright as an excuse not to show parents what they're teaching their children should be questioned further.
Each and every parent, if they go into their school and they ask to see the PSHE or the trans inclusion across the curriculum, they will find their schools to be evasive.
And that should frighten each and every one of us.
Because if you don't know what your children are being taught, how on earth can you say that you are a committed parent to the safety and wellbeing of your children?
You just can't.
Yeah.
Let me interrupt just for a second.
Now, like I said, Is any of this going on around you or your family or your town?
And the fact is, yes it is.
My granddaughter went to one of the most prestigious schools in New Orleans and she was completely turned into a left wing.
All of this stuff is okay and it was pushed into her.
Now, after she graduated from the Gary Gary, this is this is good for us to discuss.
We don't need this on the screen.
I mean, this is this is shocking.
This is shocking stuff.
I mean, yeah, I was going to put it back on.
Well, I don't know if you even need to.
I mean, the point is made, this is awful, absolutely dreadful.
Having little kids exposed to premature sexualization, that's just grotesque, grotesque.
And you're telling me you've experienced this in your own life with one of your own relatives.
Absolutely.
And my daughter went there with five other parents and they voiced their displeasure at them being even told That they could choose their gender or not, or is not LGBTQ friendly, is a bad person.
And worst of all, they teach the children that your parents, which are the only ones that are going to intervene, That they're old-fashioned, and they're stupid, and that's just the old way of thinking.
And you know, they really- Get your kids the hell out of those schools.
I have the best that I can, and they're gonna be- No, I didn't mean you specifically, Gary.
I mean just the public in general.
If you're up against this, this is outrageous.
This is gonna distort.
This is gonna warp their lives.
This is warping children's lives for the duration.
It's absolutely happened.
And then when they went in and they had a meeting with the... I'm not sure who informed them that they get grants.
They said that.
They said, we get funding from the states and part of these curriculums are part of these grants and the money... Oh, then reject the grants.
This is corrupt.
This is morality versus politics.
This is...
Left-wing zealotry, hyper-sexualization, bizarre.
Gary, you're absolutely right to be outraged.
This is insulting that this should be taking place.
I am stunned.
Flabbergasted.
It goes on in New Orleans.
It's called the Children's Museum on Julius Street, not far from where Lee was running his thing.
And they have a tranny story hour there.
They've been having that for a while.
And people go in there, and they all seem to be happy about it.
And, you know, it's very disturbing.
So in our case, my daughter is moving out of New Orleans, and it's very important as she goes to look for a new place.
And you know where it's looking more and more?
It's Florida, because they don't put up with that stuff as much.
Oh, and you know, from what I understand, so I hope that's true.
I think one of the reasons they wanted a demanded guy to be president is so that the forces behind the throne could do anything they want with the country, including promoting horse shit like this.
This is garbage.
It has no place in a public schools.
And the idea that the Department of Education should be supporting it, that it should be receiving taxpayer funding, shows our government has lost its way.
The government of the United States has no credibility whatsoever.
This is horrendous stuff, Gary.
Just horrendous.
But it's not just...
It's not just the government taxpayer money.
State Farm has received a lot of criticism because they were actually paying for the books that were going in.
You saw the ones that were in the video, you know, like, My Daddy Thinks I'm a Girl and all that.
That was State Farm, and they did actually pull back and stop buying that program.
You mean State Farm Insurance Company?
Yes, they did.
Why would State Farm Insurance Company have anything to do with any of this?
Well, I don't know.
They have a big triangle emblem.
But look, State Farm is a creepy, creepy company.
They're huge.
And it seems like they're your neighbor and all that.
But they were funding that.
And not just them.
These are funded by lots and lots of... Almost like COVID.
Didn't every corporation back it up 100%?
And most of the corporations are doing this.
I mean, they... Yeah, but COVID, Gary, is much more tricky.
It's much more illusive.
You can't see COVID.
You can see all these penile implants and all this happy stuff.
I mean, it's unreal.
This is grotesque.
This is grotesque.
And I no longer think...
The show should be described as non-random thoughts.
It should be described as inconvenient truths, Gary.
You're really digging up some dirt here that needs to be exposed.
So I endorse what you're doing.
I think we probably covered enough of the territory to get the point across.
Indelibly, indelibly, Gary, and I salute you.
For wanting to bring these issues to the attention of the public.
Everyone needs to know this is going on because it's a disgrace, it's corrupt, it's wrong, and it needs to be brought to an end as soon as possible.
And it's coming to a town near you because it's already in mind.
All right, Dr. Fesser, I think we should call it a show.
Gary, for the first episode of Inconvenient Truths, I think you've done a spectacular job.
All right, we'll crank it up again real soon.
We'll figure out how often we want to do it.
▲
Export Selection