Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 20, 2022 - Jim Fetzer

01:59:17

The Raw Deal (18 July 2022) with Vegan, 818, Chuck and others.

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Not just anybody.
	You know I need someone.
	When I was young, so much younger than today.
	I never needed anybody's help in any way.
	Now these days are gone, I'm not so self-assured Now I find I've changed my mind, I'll open up the doors Help me if you can, I'm feeling down And I do appreciate to be around Help me get my feet back on the ground Won't you please, please help me
	Well, this is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal, where today I have one or more guests representing the Screen Actors Guild to discuss about how the pandemic and the sanctions and the mask mandates and all that have affected them.
	Obviously, it would be tough to perform on a play wearing a mask, but I've seen absurdities worse than that.
	They may comment on the stories I'll present during the first segment, where I want to begin with
	An outspoken member of the Republican Party who's driving other members of the party batty, House Republicans are seriously regretting giving Ukraine-born Representative Victoria Sparks a platform to speak on the war after she began lobbying intense criticism at President Zelensky and his administration.
	Drawing a rare rebuke from the Ukrainian foreign ministry who said she was trying to earn extra political capital on the basis of speculation.
	But who would be better here?
	This is a woman with vast experience.
	She's been to Ukraine repeatedly.
	She knows what's going on.
	She doesn't like the bullshit.
	According to Politico, Republicans within the conference have widespread fear that her outspoken posture will damage U.S.-Ukraine relations as though that were a high priority, and that the MAGA wing, the Trump wing, which has seen growing opposition to U.S.
	support for the war, will point to her comments as justification.
	Sparks has traveled to Ukraine about six times since the war began, released a statement earlier calling on Zelensky to stop playing politics in theater and start governing to better support his military and local government.
	Of course, not only is he playing politics in theater, but Biden, too, playing politics in theater, where it's pretty damn obvious that this is not even the real Joe Biden.
	So when you want to talk about, you know, an Academy Award performance, he's doing a Not such a good job of it, but it's pretty obvious.
	The last time we saw photos that were clearly, clearly Joe Biden was at 2017.
	Meanwhile, another senior House Republican spoke on the condition of M and it is saying, what the F?
	A third House Republican granted anonymity to speak candidly, said she had a reputation for elbowing her way into briefings and meetings.
	That sounds childish.
	The Biden admin is even getting involved, claiming her comments may damage cohesion among the Western coalition.
	I don't share her criticism, said Lindsey Graham, who's collaborated on legislation concerning Ukraine with her.
	I believe the Zelensky government and the Ukrainian people have risen to the moment.
	It is in our national security interest to stand with the Ukrainian people and their elected leadership.
	Growing up in Ukraine and visiting six times since the war started, I have a comprehensive understanding of the situation on the ground, she added.
	The stakes are too high to be reactive without deliberation.
	I think she's got that exactly right.
	I'm impressed that she's speaking out.
	We do have two members of the Screen Actors Guild with us now.
	We have my favorite organic vegan with us and Chuck Slavin.
	You're both welcome to comment on any of these stories as we proceed, and then after the break we'll turn directly to Seg.
	Vegan, would you like to comment on this woman speaking out against a war in Ukraine?
	And by the way, you did a wonderful job last night with the Conference, you organized with all the teachers in L.A.
	Congratulations!
	Thank you so much for being there.
	I wanted to make a comment on what I said last night, talking about the real Biden.
	So I really have been studying him lately and he really looks, um, ragged when you see the old pictures, you know, the, the, uh, under the eyes and just his whole skin.
	And, uh, I just know that unless he went through drastic, and I mean drastic, Plastic surgery this is not the same person and I would like to put some photos up I'd have to get it up, but very easily you could put in 2017 or 1990s and get some photos of him and then see what's What what's going on now?
	He really looks he looks like an actor right Chuck you can say that was great confidence right and Yeah, I want Chuck Slavin's comments here.
	Yes, as a member of the Screen Actors Guild, what's your take, Chuck?
	Yeah, well, first of all, I want to make sure I'm clear that I'm not speaking on behalf of the Screen Actors Guild and SAG-AFTRA.
	Absolutely.
	Yeah, and so any of these matters today, I want to make sure we clarify that I'm not speaking on behalf of SAG-AFTRA.
	Uh, so I, you know, I'm really, I've really turned out on a lot of the news.
	So I'm interested to hear what you have to say because I haven't really been paying attention to much of the news lately.
	So when it comes to the, when it comes to the Biden situation, I'm just really looking forward to the next election.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	But no doubt you followed all the controversy over whether this is a real guy or some ersatz Biden.
	Do you have any opinion on that?
	I was calling him out during the first debate.
	The ears were wrong.
	The shape of the skull was wrong.
	The eye color was wrong.
	James Woods was tweeting about it right off the bat.
	I've done several blogs where it's very obvious this is not the same guy, not the senator from Delaware, where the last bona fide photos we have of that guy were in 2017.
	And a pharmacist who, of course, has to verify signatures when he fills prescriptions to make sure no one's illegally obtained drugs has compared the signatures, and the new guy's signature is completely different.
	Than the old guy.
	I was into graphology when I was a kid, and there's no doubt about it.
	These are two different people.
	Anyone in your profession made note of this, Chuck?
	Yeah, I've heard, you know, I've heard the stories that this is potentially an issue.
	I know my own grandfather, great-grandfather on my aunt's side, he had a stroke and, you know, he had to relearn everything.
	I mean, I remember, you know, when I was a kid, I was like, why is he eating the same alphabet soup as me?
	And it was to help with his cognitive.
	I don't know.
	Potentially, you know, could he have suffered some drastic medical issue that has basically brought him back in a different way?
	I don't know.
	I don't really know.
	I'm not in his circle, so I don't really know.
	Well, we have another member of SAGNOT.
	I'm not asking him to represent SAG on these issues now, just for his personal opinion.
	Eric Nicolaisen, do you have an opinion about whether this is the real Joe or some double, some body double?
	Who, by the way, we have a White House physician, former White House physician, today reporting he believes this guy is on cognitive drugs just to make it through the day.
	Any thoughts of yours, Eric?
	No, and I just logged in, so I didn't hear whatever the previous opinions were.
	But, you know, I think regardless of the take on on who this resident is.
	There's no doubt the person's in cognitive decline and he's like vegetable status.
	Definitely a 25th Amendment material here.
	And I think both sides of the aisle are clearly seeing that.
	Excellent, excellent.
	I'm a vegan.
	Yeah, yeah, vegan.
	Go ahead, say again.
	I said I'm in vegetable status as well because I'm a vegan, but I'm still the same person I was years ago.
	Do you think that I could possibly share my screen quickly because I have a great Biden photo ready to go?
	Oh, yes.
	Let me do that.
	I have no comment about any sort of politics, but I am really intrigued that I truly believe that this is the same person.
	I'm technically making you host so you can share.
	Yeah, go ahead, Reagan.
	I mean, there's been some phenomenal makeup jobs and masks in our business.
	Okay.
	Trying to share it.
	Bear with me.
	The rainbow wheel is spinning.
	I have two or more, probably three different blogs about this.
	Very good.
	Very good.
	Go ahead and take us through what you're showing here.
	This is the real Joe.
	Yeah.
	Way back when.
	Right.
	Yeah.
	These are, and here in the lower left, look, the SOB's up.
	That's a real Joe, but that's a fake Joe.
	That's not right.
	I mean, this looks very different than here, and it has nothing to do with youth.
	Yes.
	Yes, I agree.
	I think those are excellent photographs.
	And, you know, the style of guy is different.
	Joe Biden always smiled.
	He always had this shit-eating grin on his face, especially when it was with Jill.
	When Jill is with this guy, she's looking solid.
	She used to beam.
	They'd always be walking arm in arm.
	Now, of course, she's actually having to chastise him when he mucks things up when he's up on the stage.
	He can't figure out where he's supposed to go.
	He's shaking hands with the air.
	He's reading from his teleprompter the instructions.
	You know, stop, here, turn.
	He reads, stop, here, turn.
	You know, I mean, it's right there.
	Eric, you have noticed as much, too, I take it.
	Yeah, 100%.
	And the facial differences are kind of staggering.
	There's some nice photos at the very bottom of what I mean about his shit-eating grin.
	I mean it to us all the time.
	This is like his most distinctive feature, that he would always have this big grin.
	I've never once seen that grin on this new guy, not once, which is incomprehensible if it were the same guy.
	I actually, I think that the new one, um, is actually very handsome.
	I think more, I don't, I don't want to get into looks and whatnot, but interestingly enough, he's what, probably like 20 years older.
	And I find that he's, um, I just more elegant.
	I mean, I'm not gonna, I'm not gonna say about the other things, no politics, but I mean, based on, you know, the, Physique.
	I love what you've done there.
	That's wonderful.
	I'm reclaiming host, but thank you.
	That was an excellent addition to our conversation.
	Meanwhile, I hope that if I hope that if anyone ever replaces me, that no one says that the new guy is much better looking.
	I hope that.
	Oh, Jack, you look pretty good.
	I don't think that's very likely.
	They do that in the movies all the time.
	They get someone who's better looking, right?
	You mean to blame the world when they put it up on a big screen?
	Absolutely!
	Nice, nice point.
	So, you know, what's going on here?
	We have shopping malls putting up warnings of a nuclear war.
	What should I do?
	Menlo Park Mall in Edison, New Jersey, one of many large shopping malls, publicly warning what to do if we're subjected to a nuclear blast.
	Suggesting that the Biden admin has figured out that nuclear war with Russia is not only a possibility, but has become a likelihood.
	Here's what you see at Menlo Park.
	It says, what to do in a radiation emergency.
	Get inside.
	Stay inside.
	Stay tuned.
	If a nuclear bomb goes off, they tell you to go inside, take off your clothes, take a shower, stand by, tune in, listen to government instructions coming over the radio or the television.
	Obviously, this is ridiculous information.
	Now, they tell people to get inside, which is good advice if there were anything left standing to actually get inside of.
	The intercontinental ballistic missiles the Russians have are massive.
	Here's a map of the destruction area.
	Inside that small yellow area, everything is vaporized.
	Nothing would be left.
	No people, no building, no vehicles, nothing.
	Then you have the grayish circular area.
	Everything here will be physically knocked down and on fire.
	Then you have another circle, the larger yellow, thermal damage.
	Most of it's going to be on fire, but people there will have third degree burns.
	Then there's an area where you have lighter blast damage.
	The signs then advise, if you are outside, take off your clothes, shower and shampoo and wash the radiation off immediately.
	The problem being, there won't be any running water.
	The water will be disrupted from the blast.
	The electricity powering the pumps will be off for miles.
	Wait, then it says, stay tuned to local media and don't go outside till authorities tell you it's safe.
	But there won't be any local media.
	There won't be any TV.
	There won't be any radio.
	There won't be any cell phone service.
	There won't be any internet.
	This is ridiculous!
	Government now doesn't do things like this for no reason.
	They're putting out these public service announcements and asking large retailers to put them up because they know what's coming.
	Remember, it's the government that's provoking this war.
	So, unless America mobilizes to tell the government we're not going to tolerate a war over Russia, we're all going to be dead.
	And there's really not a lot of room for any options left.
	It's kind of a fascinating situation to be in.
	Our wives, our husbands, our kids, our extended family will all be dead.
	So, it sounds like we ought to do something about it, if we can do anything about it, before we can't.
	Vegan, you want to comment on this story?
	Yeah, I was just looking for more masks.
	Not this, but the whole thing.
	I found something, too.
	It's alarming, and I'm unsure if it's for another false flag where we need to look away because something else is happening, or that they're genuine in being concerned because of This Russia connection that we have.
	I don't even, I don't want to call it war.
	I really hate war.
	I don't like talking about it at all.
	However, I'm concerned and I'm concerned for all the actors that are up there as well as these gentlemen should be too, where, you know, they're along the East Coast.
	And I would hope that some people in their basements or if they have some sort of an underground vault would be okay.
	But other than that, You're right, everything would be disintegrated.
	Well, I think they're trying to accomplish the subtle, you know, suggest the American people, you've been warned.
	Eric, do you have any thoughts about this kind of posting as a public service announcement?
	Well, I, you know, like a lot of Americans these days, I think I've turned off a lot of their fear stoking.
	You know, it's like in one ear out the other, whether it's monkey pox or the new variant or the, you know, whatever the narrative is, I just don't even pay it any mind.
	I do get worried when you have drills.
	I had a drill in the Los Angeles area some years ago.
	It was a A nuclear explosion drill in the subway near our house.
	And that always concerns me based on we know about drills going live, as they say.
	But I don't pay much attention to this.
	I'm not investing any of my emotions or my energy into these things that try to stoke our fear.
	Well, it seems to me the Democrats are so eager to evolve, to evade the midterms, that they have two primary options.
	One is, if there were a nuclear war with Russia, then they'd impose martial law and require all voting to be done by mail, if indeed there were any voting at all.
	A new pandemic of new lockdowns and all voting by mail so they can steal the election all over again.
	Even third world countries don't use mail balloting because they know how easy it is to steal election.
	And after the 2000 mules, which documented the massive addition using those drop boxes, which a number of states have already declared to be illegal to stuff the ballot box.
	I mean, it's just stunning.
	Chuck, do you have thoughts you'd like to add on this story?
	I kind of concur with Eric on this.
	I've never felt so gaslit in the last two years when it comes to almost any of these stories that are coming out.
	It always seems as though they're trying to invoke fear and some type of reactionary response.
	So I'm tuning it out.
	You know, I think if a nuclear bomb hit me, hit around me in the next 24 hours, I don't think I would have any thoughts on it.
	That's right.
	As it were, they'd be all gone in an instant.
	We haven't been joined by Area Code 310 caller.
	If you could give me your first name rather than refer to you by your area code, I would welcome your comments on this story, too.
	Oh, it's the CIA.
	Have we got 3-1-0?
	Would you like to comment on this story?
	Okay.
	It is the CIA.
	Can you hear me?
	Go ahead.
	Okay, I'm a friend of Chuck and Eric's.
	Good.
	Sorry, I'm kind of on the run.
	I wasn't going to join the call when I heard it was you, Dr. Fetzer.
	sir.
	The fact that I've been a long, long time student of the Kennedy assassination.
	I had to jump on while I'm eating my breakfast.
	I'm delighted.
	Yeah, thank you.
	I didn't quite catch the, are you talking about them dropping a nuke on us or something?
	Yeah, they're Yeah, they're putting out public service announcements that say if there's an explosion, you should go inside, ignoring the fact that probably there won't even be a building standing, that you should take off your clothes and take a shower, but there won't be any running water, the electricity will be out, that you should listen for instructions.
	Over the media, but the radio, TV, internet, cell, all going to be on.
	So the question is, why in the world are they even making such a ridiculous announcement?
	And I'm suggesting it's to drop the hint of what may be to come.
	Yeah.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, well, you know, I, I agree with, with Eric.
	I mean, I, I, I am, I refuse to live in fear from these idiots.
	And I, you know, I'm, I, like I say, doc, I've been a, I was born and raised in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
	And at seven years old, when Kennedy was assassinated, I was fascinated by it even then.
	But what fascinated me was Lee.
	Lee fascinated me because he was born in New Orleans.
	I recognized his accent.
	I recognized his polite nature, you know, the way he would talk to the reporters and say, yes, sir.
	Of course, I was in the building.
	I worked there and this sort of thing.
	And so it really wasn't until maybe the mid, after I read Best Evidence, that's when I really, really got involved in researching.
	And I had a couple of projects that I tried to sell to Hollywood, but nobody wants to hear the truth, as you know.
	So what I'm getting at is the false flags, the fear mongering.
	I just don't look.
	Like Chuck says, if they drop a nuke on us, then, you know, after life, here we come.
	I'm just not going to live my life in fear, not from monkeypox, not from COVID, not from any of it.
	And I don't trust any of it as far as I could throw it.
	And it's just astonishing how brainwashed people can be.
	And, you know, it's, it's, it's depressing because I have an 18 year old daughter who's just starting to get getting started in her life.
	Um, but yeah, I don't, um, you know, I just try to, try to, you know, put my head down and, and move forward.
	But, uh, I'm not concerned with it.
	And, and I do believe that, uh, especially, you know, Fauci made it, uh, a statement today about monkey pox and how we have to take it seriously and all this.
	I mean, it's just, you know.
	I call him Tony the Rat.
	He's going to turn out to be responsible for more deaths than anyone else in the history of the world.
	It's absolutely staggering.
	I'll bet you've caught up with the fact that Lee wasn't even on the sixth floor.
	He was actually in the doorway of the Book Depository when the JFK motorcade came by as Harold Weisberg and Jim Garrison and others had surmised.
	We know that from the height, the weight, the build, the shirt and the t-shirt, the man in the doorway was married.
	Larry Rivera's done a close-up on the facial features, comparing Lee's with those of Billy Lovelady, who claims was the doorman, and Billy was actually in the doorway too, but it's very clear the facial features fit Lee hand-in-glove.
	So, I would bet you're up-to-date on that.
	Go ahead.
	Yeah, yeah, I'm pretty up-to-date on that.
	I, you know, listen, you know, To me, the man in the doorway, you know, peering around the corner does look like Lovelady more than he looks like Lee, but it doesn't matter because the backyard photos were faked.
	So, you know, the thing that I do know in my heart and in my research without question is that Lee was not on the sixth floor.
	He was definitely You know, when the fact that he was found 60 to 90 seconds later on, you know, drinking a Coke in the second floor break room and Marion Baker and Roy truly, uh, found him there.
	I mean, I, there's so, so much, um, you know, I, I do some NPR, um, interviews when I go back to Baton Rouge and, uh, I, you know, the, the man that I am interviewed with always asks me about, About my JFK research, because he's fascinated by it.
	And it's astonishing.
	And I know, Jim, you deal with this all the time.
	How many people will still say, well, but what about the evidence?
	What about the gun he ordered?
	What about the this?
	What about the that?
	You know, and it's like, I, what I've done now is I say, listen, if you only regurgitate Warren Commission report data, Then we have nothing to talk about because that's a prosecutor's brief.
	It's nothing but a prosecutor's brief, kind of like the January 6th stuff that's going on now.
	It's like going to trial and only hearing one side and then bringing it to the jury.
	And so when people do that and when they try to argue those points, I can argue the points, but I say that it's really, it's almost not worth it.
	I say, if you're not going to look at all sides of the issue and the arguments, then we, then there's no debate.
	There's really no debate because anybody that's really paid attention knows the Warren Commission report has been absolutely demolished, devastated.
	It's, it's, there's, there's, you know, and another thing, Jim, that I tell them is don't listen Don't just read the Warren Commission report, read the testimony.
	Like Amos Ewings, for example.
	He said there were four shots he saw out of that window, and I think it was Specter or Belkin or one of them were saying, now, are you sure, son, you heard four and not three?
	And he's like, yeah, yeah, four.
	And another thing that, for example, when Hold that thought, CIA.
	We'll pick it up right after this break.
	I'm delighted to have all you guys here.
	This is wonderful.
	Ewing's at 63 at the time.
	He said, I was standing right here.
	They also showed me at 15 years old doing an interview showing exactly where he was standing when he said he saw the the pipe sticking out of the window.
	Hold that thought.
	Hold that thought.
	CIA will make it up right after this break.
	I'm delighted to have all you guys here.
	This is wonderful.
	We'll be right back.
	Okay.
	I'm not sure.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so that free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	Hey everyone!
	It's Barbara Jean Lindsay, The Cosmic Oracle.
	If you have questions about your past lives or future plans, need answers from the cosmos about your love life or career, or just want to keep your finger on the pulse of the planet, check out my show, The Cosmic Oracle, here on Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	Amazon banned my book, so you know what really happened, Sandy Hook.
	It was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
	Then they sued to shut me up.
	And the Wisconsin courts played along.
	I have the proof and the law on my side.
	What I don't have is the money.
	They want to do to us what they've already done to Canada.
	Take guns, impose tyranny.
	It's on the way with Remington's help.
	First insurance, then registration, then confiscation.
	I'm asking SCOTUS to stop it.
	GiveSendGo.com funding Fetzer.
	Check it out.
	This is for all the marbles.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill on bullhorns during the marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
	But there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com Moonrock Books
	Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday at 8 p.m.
	Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen.
	With host, Zen Garcia.
	At freedomstuff.com.
	The People Station.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com.
	100% listener supported radio.
	And now we return you to your host.
	Well, I'm disappointed we've lost our LA friend who we were referring to humorously of the CIA because he knows quite a lot.
	I regard Best Evidence by David Lifton as the single most important book ever published on the assassination.
	I have sequels, what I regard as sequels to Lifton's work, where I brought together the best experts to ever study the case, and Assassination Science 1998, Murder in Dealey Plaza 2000, The Great Sepulveda Film Hoax 2003, and more recently to update about Lee and the Doorway, The Fabrication of Backyard Photographs, where he's exactly right, it was Roscoe White, who was a The Dallas cop with ties to the CIA who played the role.
	Larry Rivera has also found a wonderful photo of Roscoe and you can see fills out exactly the build of the man in the back door photographs, whereas Lee was quite slender by comparison and can't begin to compare with Roscoe's torso.
	But most importantly, something I would be willing to bet The CIA does not know is that Sam Kinney was one of the secret service agents in the Kennedy detail.
	Oh, here he comes.
	Here he comes.
	Good, good.
	I'm glad you're back because I was talking about, you know, about you and your comments and how I regard Lifton's Best Evidence as a single most important book ever published on the assassination.
	And that I regard mine as sequels to Lifton.
	But I was going to say, I bet there's something you may not know, which is this, that Sam Kenny, who was one of the Secret Service detail, confided in his neighbor, not to be released until after his death, that he had found a pristine bullet of the limousine and put it on a stretcher in Parkland, which turned out to be the magic bullet.
	And believe it or not, Oliver Stone in his new film, you know, just talks only about the magic bullet.
	He doesn't even report that fact.
	I mean, what a waste of time and effort, even when he had good people on like Doug Horn and David Manic.
	He didn't talk about their important research, but about this silliness, this triviality about the magic bullet.
	Yeah, go ahead.
	Go ahead.
	No, listen, I only came back because I was, I got a text that you were upset that I left.
	I, as I said, when I joined, I'm really, I'm, I'm rushing to go get to an appointment.
	So I only joined, but let me just say that, that, let me just say that, that, uh, uh, the, the, the Matt, the, uh, the lost bullet by Max Holland, it shows Amos Ewings.
	And I'm, I'm pretty sure I was the first one to bring this to the attention on Facebook and then even then people were like, oh, no, no, no, even people that should be believing what I was saying is that the Bell film was re-digitized in the in the program, The Lost Bullet.
	So in that same program, they show Amos Ewing talking about where he was standing.
	They show him at 15 years old talking about, I was standing behind this pillar looking straight up right in front of the six floor window.
	And he talks about what he saw.
	And then they show the Bell film, which has been re-digitized.
	And sure enough, what does the Bell film show?
	Exactly where Amos Ewing said he was standing.
	And guess what?
	He's not there.
	And not only is he not there, there are two young women standing on the pedestal, which is only about four feet high.
	So if he was standing where he said he was, he'd be literally, I hate to say it, but looking right up their skirts.
	They were literally blocking his view.
	So he was not there.
	And that was one of the Warren Commission's best witnesses because he claimed to Listen, I want to have you back as a guest to talk about JFK, and I'm delighted you came back for this.
	And I want you to make your appointment, so I put my email address in, which you can easily find, and I want you to write, and we'll set it up.
	I'm delighted you could join us for this brief period.
	Excellent.
	Just excellent.
	Meanwhile… Okay, buddy.
	Thank you.
	Yeah, thank you so much.
	Thank you.
	Yes, sir.
	Thank you all.
	Wonderful.
	Bye-bye.
	Bombshell reports those $44 billion of COVID money was sent to states that push critical race theory in schools.
	This is unbelievable.
	Well, it's all too believable.
	Roughly $44 billion in the relief was sent to states that implemented elements of critical race theory.
	The $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan authorized the Department of Education to spend more than $120 billion on elementary and secondary relief.
	It turns out that several Democrat-run states used that money to subsidize programs that promoted critical race theory, which of course promotes a racial view that the nation is founded on white supremacy, that white Americans are inherently racist.
	It's complete nonsense.
	Contradicted by the history of the United States, a Civil Rights Act, affirmative action, a host of others, probably no nation has made as much effort to overcome its past than has the United States.
	Fox News, the Gateway Pundit, has covered CRT extensively, how the communists laughed at pussy racist garbage.
	We even know that Merrick Garland has been involved now as an adjunct.
	Vegan has something about the mass that she wants to add here, so I'm going to screen share with you again, Vegan.
	I'm going to make you the host again, and go for it!
	Add this about, and then we'll get comments from Eric and Chuck.
	Go ahead.
	Very good.
	Gosh, I have comments in the CRT, but I'm going to have to hold myself for another time on that.
	Here I go, I'm sharing, and here you will want to See about Biden.
	Oh, there you go.
	Look at that.
	Look at that.
	Under his chin.
	That flap.
	Look at that.
	That's 660 miles.
	Under his chin.
	Going to day six.
	That flat.
	Show up.
	They're enthusiastic.
	Well, isn't it a slight cleft?
	And you're seeing the throat there.
	No.
	See it?
	Are you thinking this is a Biden mask?
	Yes!
	Wow.
	Well, Chuck and Eric, I'll bet, have comments on that.
	Chuck, what do you think?
	Could this be a Biden mask?
	I'm not sure.
	I'm driving, so it's hard for me to look.
	Where, guys?
	Look, I'm going to scroll through, though, quickly so that you could see.
	Can you see the images, Chuck?
	Look at that.
	Yeah, see?
	I see a dot.
	Again, I'm driving.
	Look at that light in dark areas.
	It looks as though it could be a latex mask.
	Over, is that possible?
	Yeah, I mean, it's pretty sophisticated latex now.
	A lot of them go way past the neckline, so.
	Like this guy has, it goes way past the neckline.
	He's got one that goes further down.
	Eric, do you think this is possible that we got somebody wearing a Biden mask?
	You know, I don't I don't know how necessary that would be.
	I just think that what they can do with digital stuff these days is is otherworldly.
	And that's only the technology that we know about.
	I think we've seen a few Biden press conferences where hands go through microphones and stuff.
	So, you know, I think they've kept this guy insulated for whatever reasons.
	And, you know, it may very well be just a digital, you know, It was getting pretty interesting there, some of the additions that we didn't quite get to see that Vegan was showing.
	that's presented on the media platforms these days. - It was getting pretty interesting there, some of the additions that we didn't quite get to see that Vagan was showing.
	Chuck, do you have any thoughts about this? - I have a multitude of thoughts.
	I'm not, I'm just not, again, I'm not sure.
	I mean, I would have to see it firsthand.
	I don't know.
	I'm not really, I'm not really.
	You know, again, I know what the technology is for deepfakes and there's a lot of technology and I have seen some suspect things like windows where you can tell that it's green screen behind.
	So I don't put a lot past a lot of people to ensure that whatever it is that they're projecting is perfection.
	As we know, a lot of times on magazine covers, they airbrush the actors and such so that they can look as perfect as possible.
	There's a lot riding on the presidency, and so I wouldn't put it past some people to do things that may not be what we want them to do.
	Yeah, I think that was good footage there.
	I'm going to skip past all the debates about politics and who's going to run and all that, because there are a couple of stories here I wanted to ask you guys about because of your role in relation to... Can I make one thing about the CRT before we go too far?
	Yes.
	Oh yeah, yeah, yeah.
	And Began can too.
	Go ahead, go ahead.
	Eric.
	I just want to, oh this is Chuck, but I just want to ensure like for me personally, you know, one of the things is I have two sons, you know, I really find it very important that we teach them How to think, not what to think.
	And a lot of times when they talk about this colonizer thing, I always go back to my Viking roots, which I always think of, you know, I'm not a colonizer, we're invaders.
	You know, we didn't like anybody.
	Everybody was in our space.
	So, you know, I don't know.
	I don't know this whole thing.
	I feel like at some point we got to move past a lot of this stuff and just be one happy family as human beings.
	And it seems like a lot of people out there don't want to let these things go.
	And part of the healing process is to let things go, forgive and move on.
	And it seems as though it's just a perpetual motion of living in the past.
	So.
	Well, it's a progressive wing of the Democrat Party that's promoted defunding the police, critical race theory, and a host of other atrocities.
	I mean, from an intellectual point of view, this is absurd.
	On the one hand, they want to defund the police.
	On the other hand, they don't want to be possible to own guns.
	So who the hell is going to defend you if the police won't be able to do it?
	And they were never really in the position to get it instantly there.
	If you had an intruder in your home, if you couldn't defend yourself, you're going to be in deep trouble.
	And as we have the food shortage and the gangs start coming out and the others raiding the suburbs for food, and I'm predicting this is going to happen because they've already laid all the pieces in place.
	They've destroyed somewhere between 50 and 100 food processing plants.
	They're wiping out sources of food around the world.
	I think now it's inevitable that it cannot be stopped.
	And yet the Democrats are offering these harebrained ideas, trying to take guns away from people.
	It's not going to happen.
	The American people aren't going to give it up when the Supreme Court's on their side.
	I'm very glad about these Second Amendment rulings coming from the new court.
	Viggen, you wanted to say a trick, a race theory, please.
	Yes.
	Well, I don't believe we have that Where I work and I'm going to keep the name out, but when I started seeing the anti-discrimination, I'm not giving the exact title of it.
	It wasn't discrimination.
	It was, I don't remember, but let's just say that I saw the word whiteness in there and it was really upsetting to me because I've been friends since I've been little with, you know, black people.
	And I've been in plays with them and in the entertainment industry, and I wish everyone well, as long as they're nice to me.
	And to tell me that, because what I look like, that's automatically a A way of life and how I treat people.
	That just hurts me.
	And when I called out the George Floyd scenario, as you did, I was calling it out in my teacher's union.
	They did not like it at all.
	And I called it out because they wanted to celebrate his birthday and they were talking about BLM coming into the schools.
	And I said, of course, black people should be respected and honored, but I don't condone violence.
	And that just set everybody off to be throwing insults at me, telling me I'm white and this goes against anti-racism.
	And rewrites history.
	Rewrites history?
	No, buddy, you're rewriting history.
	Because you're not looking into it like I looked into it, and many, many other people looked into it.
	Now, you don't have to say that it's correct or not, but at least hear me out and don't treat me like I'm some sort of a racist, or like I'm some sort of an ugly person.
	It's horrible.
	And I also had an instance before this whole pandemic where I was supposed to get a certain code so I could be somewhere.
	And I wasn't getting that code.
	And the person that wanted me to come in was getting angry with me, although that person knew that I needed that code.
	And I said, well, I was afraid.
	And this person happened to be a person of color.
	And She said, what are you afraid of?
	That I'm a black woman?
	I take offense to that.
	And I didn't say that I was afraid because she was a person of color.
	I was afraid because I wasn't allowed to go in because I didn't have the code.
	So I'm just stating that it's gotten out of hand where you accuse people that mean no ill whatsoever.
	And I'm getting the chills because I'm probably speaking too much, but you know what?
	I don't care at this point.
	Because people have to wake up.
	We can't just tiptoe on like, Oh, I'm afraid.
	No, you'll be afraid of me because you're hurting me.
	Oh, I know.
	I'm getting too emotional.
	That's all right.
	When they first introduced political correctness, I was still on the campus, Duluth's campus, University of Minnesota.
	We had a lot of women faculty.
	I knew this political practice was bad news because it was a form of censoring thought.
	You weren't being allowed to express yourself.
	You had to think about what you were going to say before you said it.
	It couldn't just be a sincere expression because you might be hurting someone's feelings.
	Well, hurting feelings has nothing to do with freedom of speech.
	In fact, it's designed to protect those who are making statements that no one wants to hear.
	You don't have to protect popular speech.
	You don't have to protect polite speech.
	You don't have to protect mild speech.
	You have to protect people who are saying strongly things you don't want to hear because they just might be true, even if it's unwelcome news.
	I'm delighted to have Chuck and Eric here, and I want to ask them about ethics in reporting here.
	You have Chris Cuomo, who appears to be reporting live from the Ukraine war zone, but he was spotted 24 hours later in the Hamptons.
	So what's going on here?
	Clearly he was using a green screen.
	Former CNN anchor Chris Cuomo was spotted at the Hamptons a day after he appeared to be reporting live from Ukraine while rebranding himself as a free agent in an effort to rehabilitate his career.
	He looked relaxed in a casual t-shirt and ball cap as he strolled around Sag Harbor, New York with actor Greg Bellow, a friend who supported the ousted anchor since his December 4th firing from CNN.
	There they are.
	Now I want your opinion, Chuck and Eric.
	Is this a legitimate use of a green screen to make it appear that he's there?
	They're presenting him as though he's actually in Ukraine, and of course he's in the Hamptons or wherever the hell they got him broadcasting from.
	Chuck, your thoughts?
	First of all, it's Chris Cuomo, right?
	He was let go, wasn't he?
	Yeah, he's been fired.
	He's now a pre-agent, but he's making reports.
	I've seen this before.
	A lot of newscasts, you'll see somebody that says that they'll put a backdrop up to give the illusion that they're in somewhere like Boston or something.
	You know, I mean, it's kind of like, it's Zoom now with these backdrops, right?
	These, you can put up Seattle behind you and talk to people and people think you're in Seattle or such.
	Right.
	So, again, I don't know, a lot of this stuff, I think you really have to trust and verify what you're watching as news.
	You have to do, it's something called the crap test.
	Have you heard of this test?
	C-R-A-A-P.
	It's called the crap test.
	No, but tell us, tell us.
	Yeah, it's basically with any sort of news source, it's a way to verify whether or not the news source is accurate.
	You put it through what's something called the CRAP test.
	And I can look up, I'll look up the acronym name for it, but it's C-R-A-A-P.
	Okay.
	And that's how you're supposed to, that's how you're supposed to verify.
	So it stands for currency, relevancy, Authority, accuracy, and purpose.
	So, whenever you're watching something.
	So, if it comes to the Ukraine stuff, I mean, we know there's a narrative, there's an agenda there for sympathy and distraction, right?
	Our country is going through record inflation, gas prices through the roof, and so we're going to talk about Ukraine, you know?
	And it's interesting to drive around and see more flags for Ukraine than I see, a lot of times, I see them for our own country.
	So, it's a strange, we're living in strange times.
	The point I'm making is, you go to the theater, you see a play, people say all kinds of things, and you know it's theatrical, it's honest, there's nothing dishonest or deceitful.
	What we got here is something that's a pretense.
	Pretending he's in Ukraine, it's being presented as though he were.
	It seems to me that's unethical, but it's a common practice.
	Eric, your thoughts?
	Yeah, again, I just don't buy into anything that the media is pumping out.
	I just, I have no faith in the integrity of any of the reporting.
	I think it's very, very likely.
	I mean, we saw that 30 years ago in Iraq.
	You've seen all the wonderful behind the scenes footage of the journalists in Iraq that claim to be in a war zone.
	And it's nothing, it's nothing close to that.
	So, you know, it's a lot of wag the dog going on.
	Yeah, I think you're right.
	There's one more clip I want to show and then we're going to turn to SAG and the mandates and all that.
	Here you have someone talking about these are actual performances of Biden.
	Get this.
	There's something wrong with Joe.
	The evidence is just overwhelming.
	And I'm sorry, I'm not making fun of dementia or anything like that.
	But for the political leader of the free world, it's just getting really awkward.
	The and some of them.
	I hate seeing this actually.
	When the political coverage.
	The question that has baffled some of the greatest minds on planet Earth.
	The and some of them.
	Some of this is actually quite sad.
	to stand every time I hear hail the chief wonder where the hell is he?
	Took me a long while to think I'm joking, I'm not.
	Turn around and where's the president?
	Some of this is actually quite sad, it's almost like it's a cry for help.
	She's fine.
	It's me.
	That's not together.
	This doctor talked about signs of dementia back in 2020.
	This is Dr. Grande.
	Does he have some type of dementia or is he exhibiting early warning signs of dementia?
	And although the doc was quite skeptical at the time, look at what he said and compare it to how Biden has behaved since.
	Memory problems really stand out, especially short-term recall.
	And we're also joined today by Larson and... Have you decided, sir, whether to go to Saudi Arabia?
	No, not yet.
	It happens to be a large meeting taking place in Saudi Arabia.
	That's the reason I'm going.
	It's that short term recall that is much more noticeable in terms of looking at symptoms that point to dementia.
	And the presence of Saudi Arabia.
	Next we see difficulty concentrating, losing track of the topic.
	I'd like to be able to... Anyway.
	America is a nation that can be defined in a single word.
	I was in the foothills of the Himalayas with Xi Jinping.
	- Oh look. - Getting lost when outside the house, Sometimes people also get lost in their own house.
	this is considered a more severe symptom.
	This is a very severe symptom.
	Well, there's a whole lot more where that comes from.
	That's supposed to be the President of the United States!
	I mean, that's appalling!
	Chuck, do you have any thoughts about this?
	I mean, I'm just stunned.
	I actually, as I watch that, I see hope.
	I see hope that almost anyone can be President, right?
	And I see the hope and change that we've always been promised with presidential candidates.
	I see that is a prime example of hope and change.
	So anyone can be president.
	Nice.
	Eric, your thoughts?
	No, I just I hope there's some sort of resolve there.
	That guy's got supposedly got the new codes.
	We'll be right back after this break with representatives of Street Actors Guild talking about the impact of the sanctions and the mandates.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting This is a Drill, This is a Drill on Bullhorns during the Marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
	There was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourself. - No.
	because we know who they are and what they do.
	You can torture us and bomb us Fire is catching.
	Burn with us!
	Are you awake yet?
	I hope.
	We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
	Time There's an electrical issue with our producer and the electricity is going in and out.
	They're having to make some adjustments there.
	So he's apologetic.
	We'll just deal with it.
	Don't electrocute the producer.
	Love it, love it, love it.
	And by the way, Viggen is pointing out that it's really a SAG, AFT-AFTRA, which is a whole title, including broadcasters and reporters. which is a whole title, including broadcasters and reporters.
	So the reporters who may be, you know, putting us on are actually under their umbrella.
	So this all works.
	And I'm just delighted to have you here to comment on these stories too.
	Hopefully, We'll be reconnected momentarily, but we're going to have the whole show here in the video broadcast, even if we're interrupted, going out over Revolution Radio for a few minutes.
	Well, whatever you need, Jim, you let us know.
	I will.
	I will.
	I will, Chuck.
	I think maybe he's I'm getting an update now from my producer.
	Thank you, sir.
	Okay, the report is okay, but...
	Okay, he's telling me we're continuing live, so I wanna continue with he's telling me we're continuing live, so I wanna continue with the discussion Chuck White, take the lead and tell us about how all this business is impacting your profession and your allies and associates.
	It's in a big way, I take it.
	Your floor, my friend.
	Awesome, thank you.
	And thank you for having us on.
	I want to I'll begin again by just saying, you know, we're here speaking as individuals and not on behalf for representatives of SAG-AFTRA.
	And so what we've seen over the last three years with this COVID emergency declaration by all these organizations and all these companies and You know, the government and all and such.
	We've seen that a lot of these organizations and institutions have been implementing brand new rules when it comes to how they how they're handling COVID and how they're shaping some of their decisions as an organization with very little oversight or very little recourse to the decisions that they're making.
	So in SAG-AFTRA, for example, During the time when COVID first came out, they shifted the leadership ability of the National Board, which is a board that is elected primarily of all the constituents throughout SAG-AFTRA, the 160,000 members.
	There are a couple of vice presidents that anybody listening who has some intricate knowledge of SAG-AFTRA would argue those people are voted at convention by the delegates.
	So they would say that they're not technically broadly elected.
	By all members of the union.
	But such the case, a majority of that board is elected by all the members of the union.
	And during COVID, they shifted that body's power from the collective to a small executive committee.
	on the executive committee is made up of national board members, but national board via the president and the executive director and such assign each local certain vote tallies and certain vote counts.
	So when you go into something like an executive session, it changes the structure that we all know is like how they play the game.
	So they changed the structure to where the executive committee was allowed to be the ones that would make drastic decisions during this time that they're calling staff conservation.
	And in the beginning of this, they claim that the reason why they had to make this shift is because it would be too unruly to have a Zoom of 70 plus people making decisions, which we find very odd because they were doing it Prior to the COVID situation, they were doing it on video conferencing with both New York and LA, and they were doing all these things.
	And then once this went down, they started using Zoom, which makes everything much easier, just like we're doing now.
	It's an easy situation where you could have as many people on Zoom to make decisions, mute them, you know, people raise their hand, you do it through Robert's Rules.
	But they shifted it to the Executive Committee.
	Given some time, they created a situation where they sat down with the other organizations, other entertainment labor organizations, such as the Teamsters, the DGA, IOTSE, and the AMPTP, which is the employers on the other side of the table.
	And so they said, we need to get back to work.
	We need to find a way to get back to work.
	And in this moment, they implemented masking, they implemented social distancing, they came up with All kinds of new stringent rules that would, in their estimation, would make them able to bring everyone back to work.
	And so the executive committee at that time voted on it.
	Now, hence that they had a second extension.
	And before the second extension, the executive committee Handed over its authority to the National Executive Director to make the decision on how the return to work agreement was going to be bargained.
	So during the second inundation and I may I may get it off between the second and the third.
	They implemented the vaccine protocol, which said that members had to be fully vaccinated in order to go back to work, but in this they said that you know if you had a medical religious exemption, you were going to be allowed to submit and be able to work via those accommodations.
	Um, and as time went on that wasn't the case.
	Um, we've spoken to several members many members throughout our union, who are not being granted religious or medical exemptions.
	So then they, then they went into another.
	Another set of negotiations on extending this return to work and they added boosters.
	So now many members who weren't originally vaccinated are now being kept from work because they're also not boosted.
	And some folks who have been vaccine injured, I know several cases, have been vaccine injured with the first set of vaccines.
	They have been told now because they can't be boosted, they can't be on set.
	So we're seeing what's becoming a crisis, a discriminatory practice that is happening with the employers where the employers have been given our body autonomy as members, and they've been granted this ability to institute these vaccine protocols and in doing so they're discriminating against medically and religiously exempt individuals, you know, protected classes.
	And they're having no they're having they are looking to the union, which is where we all look for support for the people to support us and help us, and they're really getting no resolve.
	And so, so there's a collective of members were.
	We're organizing and trying to figure out what it is that we can do to push back on this, what we believe is, you know, being bargained in bad faith.
	And so I think that's the story in a nutshell.
	I mean, you know, I think everybody sort of gets it.
	I mean, you know, and I think You know, our vegan here had written it in the chat, you know, the fact that they're even being told that they have to submit these accommodations, you know, in many cases, the protocols are coming up even for submitting an accommodation is just not fair.
	I mean, they're telling people that it's going to take three, four, five weeks.
	You know, in many instances, these jobs, they get a call, they say, can you work tomorrow?
	And now they're saying yes.
	And then they're saying, well, you must be fully vaccinated.
	And the people are saying, well, I have an accommodation.
	And they're saying, well, that's going to take a whole month to figure out.
	So we can't hire you.
	And that's not the way, you know, that's not the way the law is written.
	And unfortunately for many of us, um, in our, in our organization, you know, the law never really catches up to the truth until it's, you know, one, two years later.
	So we're trying to push back.
	Um, and we're trying to make it known that we don't agree with this.
	Chuck, I'm happy to let anybody weigh in.
	Go ahead.
	Yeah, I want to bring Eric in right away, but are you taking legal action?
	Do you have an attorney?
	Are you being represented?
	I mean, these are serious issues.
	Go ahead.
	Let me just say this real quick.
	We've been exploring all the legal avenues that we could take in this situation.
	We were trying to, for the last 70 days, we've been trying to work with the president of our union to explore what the path may be to stop this.
	Just two days ago, they handed out a new set of protocols, and included in those protocols were two new stipulations that they agreed upon, which was one, they will not provide hot meals for anyone unvaccinated.
	And the second, yes, yes, yes, it's shocking.
	Yeah.
	And the other one is that they will allow the vans prior prior to this happening.
	Now, this goes back to sort of, you know, the gas prices today.
	They've decided that now before you could only have three to four people in a van.
	Now you can fill the van with people, you know, because obviously gas prices are so high that they have to they have to concede on that one.
	So it's two interesting new stipulations, and again, we're trying to look at what the path is.
	Look, personally, I'm an elected official.
	I'm on the New England board.
	Again, not speaking for the board or for the union as a whole, but I've been fighting internally with the leadership currently because I don't believe in these protocols.
	I do not have any faith in them, and again, I took a fiduciary oath to the members of my union.
	And when we are not honoring that fiduciary pledge to all members of the union, I feel a real problem.
	It's a real problem.
	And we can't sit back and let this go down the way that it's happening.
	And so my brothers and sisters in leadership, I call on them to join us in this fight and to aid the members, the members that are in this quote unquote minority, which we believe is a majority.
	And fight back.
	Excellent, excellent, excellent, Chuck.
	Eric, your thoughts?
	Yeah, adding to what Chuck was saying, there's a battle on multiple fronts here.
	These producers, basically our union, who's tasked with the duty to represent us in areas of our rights and our employment, they have stepped out of the way and they have allowed the employers to have free reign on those rights to employment and the rights to our civil rights and our body.
	And that's a that in our eyes and in a lot of the court size, it seems is is a breach of their of their most basic duty of fair representation.
	So we have a we have a battle with the union.
	And the union officials who have arbitrarily done this to dues-paying members.
	And we also have a battle with our employers who are actually enacting these policies.
	And to what we've seen from boots on the ground, adding to what Chuck was describing, we see HR departments of these big media giants saying, we need you to tell us what your medical disability is.
	Thank you very much for your medical exemption.
	But you need to please disclose your medical problem with us.
	We will see if it meshes with the CDC's contraindications and we'll let you know if we're going to grant your medical exemption.
	This is an HR department of a production company.
	This flies in the face of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Title VII and a whole lot of other state and federal laws.
	So you've seen a lot of individual cases.
	Around the nation that have challenged these from individual actors and there are settlements in the million dollar figure range that are that are coming out now.
	The wheels of justice turn slow, as they say, but they grind fine.
	And we're hoping as more and more of these come out, these production companies are going to go, well, this isn't going to work out in our favor.
	So we have battles against the producers and we are actively pairing up our members with the best and brightest lawyers around the nation.
	And additionally, we are gearing up our own lawsuits against the producers as well as against our union.
	So it's a long, hard battle, but we think the truth is on our side and it sure looks like justice is on our side as well.
	Well, I couldn't agree more, and I've been very distraught at how the leadership of the whole Medical Association, the whole medical establishment in the United States, has been bought and paid for.
	And I'm terribly worried that some of the leadership of major unions may be in the same status.
	I'm very skeptical and concerned when they're not acting in the best interests of their members.
	We've been joined by Ericode818.
	Please offer your thoughts, if you would.
	Yeah, I've been on the, I was on the board of directors of SAG-AFTRA for about 10 years.
	I left this year, I run the safety committee at SAG-AFTRA in Los Angeles that we represent about 81,000 members.
	We've asked our leadership for documentation, any kind of medical documentation that would support these current mandates and they've given us Nothing.
	We've requested at least 10 times formally.
	They haven't answered one information request, which basically is against the SAG-AFTRA Constitution, and it's against Title V of the LMRBA.
	They're completely stonewalling the members that have a right to know what they're basing their decisions on.
	And I asked some members of the, so quote-unquote, safety committee, which is made up by actors, no medical professions, no medical professionals, In fact, they were recommending the experimental emergency use authorized vaccination.
	Consistently, SAG-AFTRA was, and the National Executive Director Duncan Crabtree, Ireland, was recommending this.
	He does not have a medical license.
	SAG-AFTRA is not a medical body, and it is unlawful for them to recommend any medical procedure, nor put or recommend Supporting any mandates that ask you to take a medical procedure, experimental one that comes with the laws of informed consent as a condition of employment.
	That is against the Nuremberg Codes.
	And the bottom line is, also, if you're going to work somewhere, I believe this will be decided in the Supreme Court, like they did with OSHA.
	OSHA had no authority to authorize, you know, such a mandate They're not authorized to do so.
	Now corporations will come up against the Supreme Court because if a corporation asks you to take a medical procedure as a condition of employment, that is the textbook definition of coercion.
	When coercion is present, there is no informed consent.
	There can be.
	It's like you're under duress.
	Yeah.
	So there's many laws that I believe have been broken.
	Many members and people all over the country have been have been injured by this experimental drug.
	And, you know, the last thing I want to say peacefully is that there's a lot of, you know, monetary issues here.
	If they would give people repurposed drugs, any kind of repurposed drugs, which would be, you know, fluvoxamine, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, dexamethasone, any of these drugs that we've had around for years, they're all FDA approved.
	Our leadership think that it's dangerous to take proven, you know, some Nobel prize winning efficacious repurposed drugs, as opposed to taking an experimental medication that has no complete longitudinal cohort and animal studies without as opposed to taking an experimental medication that has no complete longitudinal cohort and animal studies without the data to, you know, look out years And, And now we see prevalent myocarditis and
	And myocarditis and pericarditis and encephalitis and Bell's palsy and all the neuropathies and the nine-page Pfizer dump, it's been prevalent.
	And for them not to recall Pfizer's experimental drug based upon the nine-page report, really based upon a medical fraud, is really telling to me.
	I mean, what happened to, you know, common sense and safety?
	Historically, if you had 50 deaths in a vaccination and approved when they would recall it, we've had 25,000, according to VAERS, and according to Malone, they think hundreds of thousands.
	So even with over 50, why hasn't it been recalled?
	Why aren't these questions being asked on mainstream media?
	It seems that common sense isn't so common anymore.
	Your points are impeccable.
	Under the Nuremberg Code, no one can be required to take an experimental medical procedure absent voluntary consent, which required they be fully informed of all the pros and cons, all the risks and the benefits, and the risks in this case overwhelm the benefits.
	Also, of any alternative non-invasive procedure like ivermectin or HCQ, it's just been monstrous how the CDC and the FDA and the NIH and the WHO have just trampled the rights of every citizen on the planet to have their rights violated with a death jab, actually.
	We just had a report of a dozen tourists in Italy have just dropped dead, and they're saying they're baffled why they dropped dead.
	Well, every one of them was vaxxed, I have absolutely no doubt.
	Vegan, you did a wonderful job last night of lining up your speakers.
	I was very impressed.
	Give us some thoughts of yours about what we've just heard here, because I think Chuck and Eric and 818 have it exactly right.
	Well, I've been in Screen Actors Guild since 2000.
	And I've had some speaking roles, but I will state that the majority of my income has actually come from background work while teaching and doing other creative endeavors.
	I have not been able to do any background work since the pandemic started.
	And then June 2020 is when the PCR tests were implemented.
	And right away I started emailing and stating the hazards of them, how they didn't work.
	I gave all my links as usual, didn't hear back.
	And finally, I did get a call from a lawyer from SAG.
	His name was David back in January of 2021.
	And he's like, well, it's not Screen Actors Guild that makes the decisions.
	It's the production companies.
	I said, yeah, but you're telling the production companies what they need to do.
	So anyway, um, that didn't work out.
	And, uh, I continued to wait to see if anything changed, which it didn't.
	I had to, Drop the calling service that I had, which was Extras Management.
	I've been with them for, I think, I don't know, close to 10 years, maybe.
	They couldn't get me anything.
	So anyway, it stands where I have not gotten any paid union work since this pandemic started.
	And it's because of these mandates.
	I'm just Not going to submit myself to fraud and anything that could hurt me, especially the injection, which I don't really like to call a vaccine because, you know, it wouldn't have been a vaccine.
	It's not medicine.
	It's no form of medicine, yes.
	Exactly.
	I find it so uncomfortable that the people that are supposed to be lovey-dovey, you know, artists and whatnot, will be fine with having their colleagues pass away of this or putting toxins into their bodies.
	I've met many actors, especially the women and men, that are more on the holistic side, and I just can't understand why more of them aren't standing up.
	I thank Chuck for wrangling everyone together.
	And the last thing that I wanted to state is, That some of the entertainers who have been maimed or have passed away, I just...
	I just can't believe that the unions would be fine with it and possibly covering things up.
	And I want to put it out there.
	It's not factual, but I still think that people are wondering about Ms.
	Betty White, because as far as I know, she was in very good health.
	Yes, she was almost 100.
	We all get that.
	But she had just come out with an article.
	I mean, she could have said she was great and not been great, but I just find it Curious that she passed away.
	And I do believe that she was boosted, not positive, but I do believe she had something.
	And I just feel that there needs to be more investigation into that.
	And this musician, I don't know his name, but he lost eight fingers due to the vaccination.
	He's talked to the Children's Health Defense Fund, and he believes that there should be recourse for this.
	And he's trying to get his singing voice back together because he had a tube down his throat when he woke up from whatever.
	Yeah.
	Eric Clapton had an issue.
	He spoke out against it, and they tried to give him grief in the UK because he couldn't move his forearms.
	He's a guitar player, obviously, a very famous one.
	It's prevalent and I wanted to talk about a little data.
	So if we have a 99.9% survival rate and the over 78% of the deaths are with the comorbidity of people over 70 years old with three or more comorbidities.
	Now just using that data, common sense would say That you would protect those people and you put the workforce back to work.
	You put everybody else back to work.
	And if you're trying to say now, even Fauci came out and said that the experimental drug that they're calling vaccines don't work very well.
	Now he's stating it doesn't work very well.
	Then the doctor named Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize winner who discovered the HIV strain, a very famous doctor from France, Came out almost two years ago and stated that you should never give any vaccine to anyone during the pandemic because it creates super variants.
	Then Dr. Robert Malone comes out and says, now we have vaccination imprinting, which which makes basically the vaccines useless to more prevalent variants.
	So that needs to be studied.
	But with the data here, with These particular experimental drugs not causing immunity and not causing you doesn't prevent you from being contagious, then how is that going to protect performers in front of the camera?
	They're being told that that if you take a experimental drug and you have natural immunity, you have better protection than than healthy people.
	Well, respectfully, when in the history of the country have healthy people quarantined You know, and sick people have been allowed to go and work.
	So, commonsensically and medically, scientifically, it doesn't make sense.
	There is no danger.
	Healthy people can't get anybody sick.
	So, if people get tested and they're fine, they pose no risk.
	And then there's a lot of medical studies that have come out that said the more shots that you take, the more it destroys You know, one's immune system.
	And you can see in the UK, a report came out where over 90% of the deaths in the UK were people that were, I don't want to use the word vaccinated, but people that took the experimental drug, experimental vaccination under emergency use authorization.
	And why would they do that?
	Because if you introduced repurposed drugs that could combat it, you wouldn't get emergency use according to the law.
	And they had hydroxychloroquine, which in the Lancet, they provided a false study that was funded by the Gates Foundation, that they use 2,300 milligrams, I believe, in the dose of HCQ.
	And the proper dose for HCQ is 200 milligrams twice a day.
	That's 400 milligrams.
	So if you're giving people lethal doses of a medication and then saying that it doesn't work, that's basically false information.
	They had to pull that study down.
	And yet they still had already done the damage in the public saying that it doesn't work because our president, our former president, Mr. Trump, had said that it was good and it worked.
	Well, you know, hydroxychloroquine has an anti-malarial.
	It's been around for 65 years.
	It works really well.
	I took it when I went to Africa and worked.
	I had to take one a week just as a prophylactic to prevent against malaria.
	But, you know, the bottom line is they're not recommending vitamins or vitamin D3 or zinc, you know, or vitamin C. In fact, the FDA created somebody's, a doctor's facility because he was giving intravenous doses of vitamin C and other vitamins that a Dr. Marone in Houston was using at his hospital with ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and other protocols of medicines.
	And he had the lowest death rate in the country.
	So, They're using things and they're saying things that certainly lack truth.
	And I believe that the population deserves transparency in order to operate.
	But I have compassion because there's a lot of people that got left to die with COVID because nobody gave them any proper treatment.
	Just go home and quarantine for two weeks.
	And if you get so you can't breathe, come to the hospital and they put a ventilator.
	Then the hospital's renumerating Uh, COVID tests and ventilators and they're paying these particular fees, uh, for these hospitals to implement certain protocols.
	And then the new protocols were Rebdesivir, which is toxic to your kidney and liver.
	And what, how much, uh, how many fatalities did that cost?
	And if your treating doctor wanted to give you ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine or dexamethasone, Or any of these treatments, if it wasn't on their list prescribed by the CDC's protocols, they couldn't give it to you.
	What happened to first do no harm?
	What happened to a doctor and a patient being able to treat the individual based upon their individual needs?
	That has been the law of the land and is a part of the Hippocratic Oath, you know, for a hundred years.
	So why isn't that being enforced?
	So these are the commonsensical questions.
	That I have.
	And the last thing I want to say is, I want to know, and I've asked the National Executive Director of SAG-AFTRA, if they are getting paid to promote the protocols of the CDC, as they had a lawsuit in Canada because a union had accepted a $50,000 bribe, or I don't know what you would call it, to promote these particular
	Protocols, and I've asked that, you know, at least 10 times, and many other people have asked it, and we haven't gotten an answer back, you know, from our union.
	And respectfully, a safety committee of a certain amount of people made up of actors that have no medical license, have no right and no authority to dictate what other beings do with their body.
	SAG-AFTRA supported Roe v. Wade, my body, my choice, how dare you obfuscate medical freedom, reproductive rights for women, and yet when it comes to the same ethics, in medical practices where you have body autonomy, where you support it with Roe v. Wade, but then you don't support it when it comes to these experimental drugs that appear to be violating the Nuremberg case.
	Let me just say I've been covering a pandemic since March of 2020, reporting virtually every single day, including Saturdays and Sundays, recently taking weekends off, but even sometimes then also on Sundays, recently taking weekends off, but even sometimes then also on Sundays, for And you are extremely well informed.
	Luc Montagnier, Predicted that everyone who took the vaccine would be dead within five years.
	And the next thing we know, he's dead because he was sounding the alarm.
	Fauci has been just disgusting, promising from the beginning that if he got the vaccine, you would be free.
	You wouldn't get COVID.
	You'd be safe.
	You wouldn't be hospitalized.
	Then he gradually went back, rolled it back, back, back.
	Now he's admitting, of course, since that is overwhelming, That it's not really offering very much protection.
	You mentioned the UK data.
	It's absolutely staggering now.
	I have a report on my blog at jamesmetzer.org.
	You were referring to that report showing that The 94% of those who have died are among the vaccinated, and those who've been double or triple vaxxed have the highest death rate of all.
	And so when we have these tourists in Italy dropping dead and they're baffled as what happened, it's nothing baffling about it.
	It's obvious.
	It's expectable.
	I have more issues to raise here about your union, but I want to go back to Chuck and to Eric and see if they have further thoughts they'd like to add.
	Chuck, you first.
	No, I think that nails it on the head.
	I mean, the fact of the matter is that, you know, again, asking somebody whether or not they've accepted money, you know, they may not want to dignify the response, but at the same time, Anyone with a clear and truthful conscience is going to say no or yes.
	It's a very simple question.
	So, you know, again, I think we're dealing with stuff here that is just whether or not someone is, you know, I've said this before, whether or not someone is on the take when it comes to these vaccines or any of this stuff that's going on is pretty clear.
	There are people being paid.
	And what is happening now with the power and the way that they're able to circumvent a lot of the old rules, it really doesn't matter.
	They're on the take regardless.
	Whether it be the fact that they're shifting things around in the organizations or in the companies, you know, they're doing things that they would not normally do.
	So in this instance, they are gaining an advantage by changing the rules and doing these things that is suspect, in my humble opinion.
	Oh, Blayton, it's so obvious to me as an outsider hearing what you're describing that there needs to be a regime change within your organization.
	I'm wondering if there are referenda, reform, if you can recall them.
	You need to replace your board.
	They're obviously, obviously betraying the members of SAG and all your associates.
	Eric, your thoughts?
	Yeah, on that tip.
	Yeah, I think I think the board and anyone involved in these decisions can probably be expected to be named in a lawsuit here shortly.
	But going back to what 818 said to pin down specifically some of the references on on how people are receiving money.
	There's a nonprofit group out of Tennessee that's uncovered these egregious amounts of monies provided by the federal government through the PrEP Act and the CARES Act.
	that are being allocated for public schools and hospitals.
	And initially we were told hospitals were getting a $13,000 bonus for COVID diagnoses and $39,000 for intubations.
	But What we've come to find out that that number has varied, and they've uncovered that in, say, Nebraska, hospitals are getting something like $315,000 per COVID case.
	So, and the same goes for schools.
	You see schools that are having to show every quarter, the federal government, that they're pushing these experimental injections.
	They are requiring masking, and Also, keeping to the narrative of social distancing, etc.
	And then, they receive their monies.
	And these monies are insane in terms of how much money we're talking here.
	And what that's doing is it's prolonging this thing.
	It's keeping this scandemic alive.
	And we want to know, are our union leaders on the take?
	And to date, they have not answered.
	But I think in Discovery, we're going to find, indeed, these folks are definitely lining their pockets.
	That would be my inference.
	I mean, obviously, I can't claim that with certitude, but I can tell you the evidence all makes that, in my opinion, the most likely hypothesis to explain what's going on here, because they're obviously not acting in the interests of the members.
	Vegan, your thoughts?
	Yes, I have lots of thoughts.
	Well, first of all, the president of Screen Actors Guild had breast cancer some years ago, so now she has a holistic educational company, and I'm just really disappointed that she can't speak out loud enough to make an indentation.
	She states that it's the National Board that made the decisions before she even came in, and that is true.
	And I do believe that she is being manipulated, but she still is the president.
	Also, an expert doctor, and I'm not sure if I should use his name.
	So I won't, but you know who he is.
	And he actually had a discussion With some of the board members, and he seemed to believe that it was the attorney of all of SAG.
	I won't say his name either unless 1 of the gentlemen 1 to his name is Duncan country.
	Okay.
	It'd be named Dr fielding should be named because it's my understanding.
	From talking to some of these people on the Safety Committee, that they've never seen a document.
	They've only gotten the information third party through hearsay through Duck and Crabtree Ireland.
	And if that's true, because we requested the documentation, then they're, they're basically going, basing their decisions on what the National Executive Director of SAG-AFTRA is telling them, which to me is, is really a sign of the times.
	If anybody wants to call themselves a Safety Committee, And they're relying, they're hanging their head on information they've never seen on a study they've never seen based upon somebody's word.
	And we've requested other frontline doctors come in to debate them to give this SAG-AFTRA and ABORT a different point of view, so then they can make a decision instead of based upon respectably fear, not data.
	Because if you're looking at some of the data that all of us have given, there's certainly no reason.
	Because They're hanging their hat on the situation where they're saying, they're telling the safety committee that they're 50% better protected if they took a vaccination.
	And it's 50% more likely that people that are healthy... It's just the opposite.
	It's just the opposite.
	You take the vaccine, you're putting your life at risk.
	I mean, this is outrageous.
	Outsider, just looking at an organization, if you wanted to control it, especially with regard to legal activities, who better to control than the attorney for the organization and the president?
	I mean, it's just obvious on its face.
	I'm not asserting That to be the fact.
	Here, I'm saying, that seems to me the most plausible hypothesis.
	Vegan.
	Yes, well, when this first happened, I was calling attorneys with another activist friend of mine in California.
	None of them wanted to get involved.
	They seemed even scared.
	So we stopped and we only called attorneys that we found that were doing something with regards to the masks.
	And they were not in California, I can tell you that.
	So, you are right, Doc.
	I wanted to mention too, since you had mentioned Luke Montanay, So, Dr. Judy Mikovits was friends with him and she has a new video out.
	It's very alarming.
	Her husband passed away of many years, by the way, and she believes that he was murdered in the hospital.
	They gave him remdesivir.
	I never could say that.
	Yeah, that's just terrible.
	They have it as a standard protocol and it'll kill you.
	It's absolutely something verboten.
	You should not be taking it.
	It's outrageous.
	They would impose that on patients.
	I believe it was done without her permission or his because I know that she knew about it.
	It's very very recent that it happened so say a special prayer because she really cared for him and then Oh boy, I think that if it hasn't been made yet, a public records request, if that's possible, should be made to SAG with regards to any income that's coming in from their negotiations with this injection.
	And let's see.
	Lastly, there is a suit already with General Hospital examinations.
	It came out in June.
	Crew members sue ABC over unconstitutional COVID vaccines and religious discrimination.
	So.
	Well, Judy Michovitz has just been magnificent.
	There are a whole lot of others.
	Peter McCullough is simply excellent.
	Joe Mercola is quite good, but there are a host of others.
	Dr. Butera, for example.
	The frontline doctors out in California were sensational.
	All these people who have spoken out have been basically cut off at the knees.
	I mean, there's been a tremendous effort to silence them.
	Because we're in the grip of a monstrous plot.
	I mean, there's no question about it, to take control of the entirety of planet Earth.
	So what you're doing is fighting an action in a limited area, but it's just one part of the puzzle that's much larger and just absolutely stunning.
	It's ghastly.
	Well, we're getting predictions now that the vax is going to kill 15% of the world's population.
	Well, we're talking about billions of people.
	We got about 8 billion.
	The Georgia Guidestones want to reduce it to 500 million, a half a billion.
	That's getting rid of 7.5 billion.
	I think they're going to get a long way in that direction.
	I think we may lose a couple billion over this.
	818, I'm just very impressed with how much you know and in such detail.
	I mean, really, truly, I follow this a lot.
	I have friends who are experts in the area.
	And you're right on top of it.
	So I got to compliment you.
	You've been really, you really put it together extremely well.
	And I just, any form of support I can give.
	Go ahead.
	Yeah.
	I have a question for you.
	So in Congress, we all witnessed, they were talking about Gain-of-function research.
	Now, if Rand, who was questioning Dr. Fauci, and then the two heads of the NIH had resigned, and several of them didn't approve giving these experimental drugs to children, which brings me back to the insurance companies, you know, stating that, you know, obviously the all-cause death
	Has gone up quite significantly, but it's not from COVID.
	So if it's not from COVID, then what is it from?
	So what's the other cohort?
	You have to take a look at this experimental vaccination injury, because if all-cause death is going up and it's not from COVID, what is it from?
	Heart disease, people die from heart disease yearly, 584,000 people.
	620,000 people die yearly from hospital error and prescription drugs.
	574,000 people from cancer.
	And then globally, 1.6 million die from tuberculosis.
	That's globally on the tuberculosis metric.
	But in the U.S., when you're talking about it, if the news, if mainstream media put on the news, oh my God, another heart attack.
	Oh my God, another heart death.
	If they did that every five minutes in the news, all of a sudden everybody would get paranoid, and they would look at, well, I better go to my doctor and get a heart checkup.
	But this has never, the light has never shone on those statistics.
	And I can go further and go, why does the FDA, they approved Vioxx, they approved, obviously, Oxycontin, and Pfizer is the one that approved Vioxx, and respectfully.
	Most of these organizations have been trying over $50 billion for getting convicted of violating the False Claims Act, which means what they state they do and the effectiveness of the medicine has been false.
	So they've gotten these convictions.
	But as somebody else pointed out, with a PrEP Act, there's no liability.
	And by the way, as long as they say EUA, there's no liability emergency use authorization.
	So, you know, these particular questions are interesting because if it, if they did prove that it was gain of function and it was created in a lab, that would be a bioweapon.
	Now, bioweapons, if they're created, they've been doing that for years and years.
	Every country has done that.
	That's pretty much common knowledge.
	But if that's the case and that was the origin, then where is the accountability for that?
	And why is an unelected bureaucrat controlling the health of the entire country as opposed to medical professionals?
	And why is it in Congress?
	Anytime you bring out a medication, they usually have a debate in Congress.
	They bring the medical professionals out and the people in Congress ask questions to the efficacious levels of these medications.
	And they would talk about the studies of these medications.
	And if you're telling me or anybody that this is garnered under emergency use, there has to be proof that there's nothing else available that could mitigate the risk, which they never did that.
	So they basically, you know, put this through without due process, which is concerning because, you know, these companies should go through due process.
	A normal vaccination that's approved by the FDA takes 7 to 14 years.
	And this is done in like 16 months, 14 to 16 months.
	So there's a lot of questions that are not following procedure.
	And then lastly, the definition classically, historically, of a vaccination is a drug that causes immunity and one that prevents you from being contagious.
	Like, I didn't have to take three months vaccinations.
	I didn't have to take, you know, four measles vaccinations.
	You know, I took one.
	So when I was a kid, and that's before I had any consent, because if I'm seven years old, my parents made decisions for me like they did, like they do now.
	And a lot of people are falsely comparing this.
	Well, you have to take a vaccination to go to school.
	Yes, you do.
	But you take an FDA approved vaccination, not an experimental drug.
	And a lot of times people are conflating the issue.
	People are saying that you have to take it to go to school.
	This is no different.
	Yes, it is.
	It's completely different.
	Because it comes with informed consent.
	And why hasn't Pfizer been prosecuted for violating informed consent, being that that nine-page document that came out with a FOIA request, Freedom of Information Act request, why did they try to withhold it for 75 years, A?
	B, why didn't that particular drug be recalled based upon the nine pages alone?
	Things don't seem to be making sense.
	The law doesn't seem to be followed here.
	And I think these questions should not be censored like they've been.
	They should be asked publicly by the people in our Congress.
	And some have.
	And respectfully, it seems to be lost in the shuffle.
	Nothing, you know, appears to get done.
	So those are the concerns that I have.
	And then there's no liability for any of these companies.
	If if people, you know, should have fatal or catastrophic reactions to these experimental medicines that have been given out.
	Eric, your thoughts.
	Yeah, I just wanted to add, I think 818 is giving a little too much credibility to the standard, quote unquote, vaccinations as well.
	I was a student of that game for a long time.
	He referenced the the mumps vaccine and that that MMR vaccine has never they've never had a vaccinated versus unvaccinated study.
	And the.
	These biologicals skirt liability.
	They go around, they're not considered medicines, and they aren't held to the same standards as medicines.
	And yeah, I don't think that they work like people think that they work, and they have not been safety tested or efficacy tested like people think they do.
	So be careful not to give too much credit to what we consider traditional vaccines either.
	You guys have done your homework.
	I mean, I'm really, really impressed.
	Yeah, 818, you wanted to respond?
	Yeah, go ahead.
	According to Andy Wakefield, who was a high-level doctor who directed the documentary VATS, he basically stated that previously the MMR used to be given separately, mumps separately, measles separately, rubella.
	He stated in his documentary that the evidence portended that Yes.
	when given together, it increased the autism level 90%.
	You had a 90% higher chance of getting autism if you took them together and they give them at 18 months old.
	Why not wait till the immune system is stronger?
	Why give kids who have a developing immune system such toxicity all at once?
	So you can comment on that more than me. - Oh, you're a hundred percent correct.
	I mean, there's a perfect correlation between increased VAX, using the multiple, and autism.
	It goes up, it goes up, it goes down, it goes down, and there are projections that by 2050, at this rate, half of our children will be autistic.
	And Dr. James?
	That's desired by the corporations, because autistic kids can do repetitive activities without being bored or tired or whatever, so I think they like that, just as they want to reduce those of us who remain after the culling of the herd to serve as serfs and slaves in the field, while they, the masters, are ensconced in their castles.
	Yeah, vegan, yeah.
	I wanted to state that people with autism are actually much more dedicated to their job, much more focused, and therefore can be taken much more advantage of.
	I know one person, absolutely, things were done where they shouldn't have been, but he kept going, going, going.
	And then another thing with regards to people with autism, they actually will get angry if you believe that vaccines could create this condition.
	You don't have to tell them directly.
	If they just hear you, they will call you an ableist and they will state that It is a conspiracy.
	Not everyone, but this has happened to me, where I asked a neurobehavioralist, I had no idea that they had the condition, and this person was very upset, stating that she would be educating her, educating about the conspiracy theories around autism.
	And then... Go ahead.
	Another person stated, well, this factor, well, I know.
	I would like to know if something is causing a condition.
	It doesn't mean that you're any beneath people that don't have it.
	And in fact, you're much higher than people that don't have it in some cases.
	But I'm just stating that, again, it makes it difficult to discuss again because of the political correctness.
	And by the way, I do believe that some political correctness
	Is needed some as so not to hurt people don't say things and you don't Discuss things then you are hurting So just like I said on your show about you know people that are very overweight and that insult it and so we just see people that are getting increasingly overweight and
	And it's harmful to their health.
	And then everybody else in the society thinks, oh, well, that's the way it is.
	And then if you're thin, there must be something wrong with you.
	I mean, obviously too thin is, you know, we all know what that is.
	But I'm just putting it out there that the society, it's become very difficult to discuss these things.
	Dr. Judy Michovitz, by the way, she swears that no one should ever take another vaccine.
	That's her opinion.
	I personally, I don't agree with them.
	As a vegan, and if fetal tissue is in them, and all the other yuck that's in there, we should really be talking about preventive medicine, vitamins, but we don't.
	I mean, some people do, but as we come to the conclusion of our conversation, some final thoughts, Chuck, you have a would you like to add a final thought?
	Yeah, go ahead.
	Oh, yeah, I think I think this again.
	We're waging a war on all fronts here when it comes to what's happening with many people when it comes to discrimination that's happening with those that are medically and religiously exempt from the vaccination, not to mention the fact that those who choose not to take the vaccine for their own holistic health.
	I think we really have to be aggressive and we have to, you know, We've fully exhausted the process, I believe, in our union.
	I don't believe there's going to be a change in this.
	They doubled down on it in the last few days.
	So again, I think we just have to go now a legal route and explore our legal avenues to the fullest extent that we can.
	Because in order to make this change, It's it's something here that people people are getting in their psyche that being vaccinated somehow equates you to some supreme immunity over natural immunity and it's and it's inaccurate.
	None of the science proves that we've asked for that as Pete as 818 mentioned.
	We have asked for this data.
	We have asked for the peer-reviewed studies.
	We've asked for all this, and they cannot provide it to us.
	And so, that on its own head is enough, in my estimation, to show that they are acting in bad faith.
	So, we continue down the path, and we're gonna hopefully right the wrong for many of our fellow members who have been wronged by a breach of their fiduciary trust.
	Yeah, this is based on pseudoscience, fact science.
	Eric, your final thoughts?
	Yeah, I'm here.
	I just want to tell anyone that's listening that you're not alone and help is on the way.
	As it stands, we've been pairing people up in Hollywood with lawyers.
	We've been helping with religious and medical exemptions.
	And we're happy to help people.
	It's defeating if you think you're alone.
	And unfortunately, the whole way this Hydro works is to keep people feeling alone and isolated and only blast out one solitary narrative.
	But we are here.
	Reach out to us.
	I don't know if Chuck's email is available.
	You can also email medicalfreedomfighters at protonmail.com.
	Tell people that are involved in Hollywood about what we're doing.
	We could use your support now and in the future, because the battle's just heating up, and the more of us, the better.
	818, your concluding thoughts.
	My thoughts, remember Dark Waters, the film Mark Ruffalo, about the F-Pass, about Teflon, about the toxic nature of the cancers, that was, you know, fought very hard by The corporations that put it out, Aaron Brockovich, in regarding to the water, you're always getting big resistance.
	And then the fact that the FDA allows, you know, high fructose corn syrup, sorbitol, mannitol, exaltol, and chemical additives that get people addicted to sugar, which, you know, sugar, you know, is the biggest destroyer of the human self.
	That has been allowed.
	In 1994, in front of Congress, Big Tobacco testified that nicotine was not harmful and not addictive, was not harmful to your health and not addictive.
	And they had peer-reviewed medical studies where they paid the doctors to actually support that information.
	And then you have the Gulf of Tonkin, and you have all these issues that we've seen throughout history.
	And how are we to believe anything when we have been given so much?
	You're knowledgeable.
	I support you a hundred percent.
	Revolution Radio.
	This is going to be blogged on my BitChute channel, Jim Fetzer.
	You don't want to miss this.
	These people are fighting the good fight.
	Support them to the max.
	Hey doc, the last thing I'd like to say is that if we don't deal with the, with the rainforest issues where, They keep cutting the rainforest.
	None of this will matter, because in the year 2050, there won't be enough food or precipitation to sustain life for human beings on this particular planet.
	And they're not addressing that.
	If I had a job that I would really love to do, it would be the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, because with biodiversity out of balance, all you have to do is look to nature.
	When nature is in balance, There'd be harmony restored back on planet Earth, and that needs to be, you know, studied by the highest order of divinity and consciousness.
	Mother Earth is a living spiritual entity, and we're basically committing physical and spiritual suicide by polluting our planet, you know, with the seas, the rivers, the oceans.
	The plants, animals, birds, insects, and mammals are getting extincted at alarming rates.
	This needs to be addressed first and foremost, because if you're looking myopically at what's going on now, I mean, respectfully, throughout history, it's very similar.
	And that's another conversation.
	But thank you.
	You guys are doing a great job.
	I support you 100%.
	I'm going to archive this at BitChute channel, Jim Fetzer.
	I'm going to share it with you.
	You're welcome to share it as widely.
	And I hope you get a lot of support out of this.
	It was a real honor to have you on today.
	I can't thank you enough.
	And if anyone reaches out to you, Doctor, please, you can feel free to put them in touch with myself or Eric or any of us and A18.
	You know, anybody can be connected.
	I don't mind.
	And Chuck, is there sort of a fund someone has started for legal action?
	Not yet.
	None of the legal stuff.
	We're still exploring all the avenues.
	We'll be announcing something soon.

▲