Need to Know News (14 July 2022) with Carl Herman and Principled Vegan
|
Time
Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman from San Ramon, California, and my favorite vegan from California as well.
We'll be with you, the news you need to know.
We begin with a former Polish president.
This is a famous guy, Weck-Wolinski, who led the Solidarity Movement.
Saying that Russia needs to be broken up, that's a bit lunatic in my opinion.
According to him, the West must force a change of the political system in Russia, or in 10 years we'll see another Putin arise.
My opinion is Putin's a good guy, so we have another Putin that would be good.
If it proves to be impossible, organizing an uprising would be another alternative.
This is really lunatic.
According to Walesa, Russia has 60 peoples who have been annexed like Ukrainians are being annexed today.
It would be necessary to stir them up.
Walesa was a co-founder of the Solidary Movement that brought down the socialist government in Poland, also argued the West should have brought Russia down, but it fell to the last Soviet leader, Mikhail Gorbachev, Well, to do that, we should have brought Russia down, but Gorbachev was too smart.
We said to ourselves at the time there was Stalin, Brezhnev, but Gorbachev is nice.
That was our mistake.
I think this is a bit loopy, and I don't endorse this.
I don't understand why he's making these claims.
There are two systems now, the democracies in NATO and then Russia and China, who've resorted to the old methods of annexation.
This is a truly simplistic way of looking at the world, in my opinion.
Back in early Feb, he still called Russia a great country that has problems.
He admitted then he respected Putin very much and supported him.
I respect Vladimir Putin beyond any other statesman in the world.
In fact, there are none in his class whatsoever.
Meanwhile, Eva Vengerbrock summarizes emerging food, energy, and farming issues with stark advice for Americans.
This is coming from the Netherlands.
She outlines what's happening with the Dutch Farm Protest and how it connects to the larger Agenda 2030 goals.
When I first read about Irish farming, mostly referencing government policy, what stood out was the open hubris and arrogance of the mindset of those who are directing all these changes, where they acknowledge that it was to control what people eat, allocate specific calories according to the goals of the climate change movement, and take over how farming is done.
The article is written from a sympathetic point of view, but the openly communist outlook is quite remarkable.
Significant food system changes needed to address food security and climate challenges, but a risk decimating farm incomes.
Here we have an image of a barren crop.
There's nothing there, nothing growing.
Sad to say.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, for Lech Walesa.
So I guess he learned nothing over the last 40 years of the US-led UK-NATO empire.
He's pretending.
He's taking actions, which I think you two are, that he really has become Lech Walensky, like Zelensky.
He's just a controlled puppet speaking for evil.
And to say the words, bring Russia down to a nuclear power, So he's either demonstrating that he's gone the way of the actor playing Biden as senile, or he really is speaking for the empire.
For the Netherlands.
Yeah, they really are going for a dictatorial control over the food systems.
This is the control of the state and the central lies in food production.
Remember my UC Berkeley graded college major was about ending.
poverty, which includes a big part of ending hunger, and two UN summits for heads of state, which had a big component of food production for healthy foods.
So that whole article, or the argument of our opponents, is a huge lie.
It would be so technologically easy to produce an abundance of healthy food.
In addition, there's a state ongoing state lie and go into the idea of the importance, the essential.
aspect of having organic food and not having your food soaked in Monsanto poisons.
Oh my fucking god!
If people could understand the attack of that, that is worse than what we're going through with COVID.
The number of life years lost because we're fed poison.
So
Best wishes to the Dutch people and best wishes to all of us that we may have this breakthrough soon because there are, if you just wanted to put a magnitude figure on it, a hundred areas where hopefully just a few years from now and hopefully our children and grandchildren will look back on us and they'll marvel at how much we got done, how attacked, crippled, and poisoned we were in ways that we didn't even imagine at the time.
Yeah, let's hope we survive it all.
The Dutch are putting up a fight about it.
I admire that.
Vegan.
Yes.
Well, going back to the Russia article, I'm concerned about possible nuclear war, obviously.
We cannot continue to push them because they Are highly advanced as well.
Um, it feels like the cold war where we were always scared and he needs to back off Biden and the whole, uh, Western forces in general.
Uh, I was in the Soviet Union back in 1989, uh, Mikhail Gorbachev.
I don't think he was that bad of a leader, but I can tell you our tour guide did not particularly care.
For him because he was wealthy and and most of the people were not speaking of food I remember a long line of about 15 people Waiting for rotted half rotted peaches.
It was outside There was a little stand and I recalled them the meat store the butcher store.
It was very sparse as well food stores were Pretty blah, bland, and sparse.
Not that I like meat, of course, but these are the memories that I recall.
Did love the people, though.
They were very, very humble.
And I guess that's what poverty does to people sometimes, or not.
That could go the opposite way.
Back to the food.
One thing about that time was there were no GMOs, and I do recall eating ice cream.
If any of you have ever been to the Soviet Union, or I don't know how it is now in Russia, but The ice cream was phenomenal.
I've never tasted anything quite like it again.
It was just so creamy.
I think that is important to people over there, to an extent.
Whereas over here, people are very uneducated about it.
There are certain people that know, obviously.
The USDA label That means a lot to me, to know that it's been approved as organic.
Whether or not it is, I don't know, because I've heard some stories that I'm very concerned, but there's a better chance that it is.
And lastly, with regards to Bill Gates, you didn't mention him, but you know, whipping up all this farmland over here, and I believe he may be doing it in Africa, too.
I'm not so sure.
Who knows if he's going to do it in Ireland.
He's totally for GMO and no organic and lab-grown meat and allowing this creature of evil to gather all this land to feed people.
You know, and the government being okay or possibly in bed with him is unimaginable.
So I absolutely feel for Ireland and the Netherlands.
I also was in both of those countries and Ireland was beautiful and they deserve to have wonderful food without all this interference.
And I do believe that people should be secure with their food.
But we can't just have the government control everything.
Carl.
So that's a great point for Bill Gates, just quote-unquote, buying up land.
So this is centralization, and Gates is an agent, and the American public are propagandized just to think, well, he is rich.
Well, how did he get his money as a convicted monopolist?
And he's skated through, and this has been a component of American history for well over 100 years, to accept these gifts of philanthropy by these psychopaths.
So the purchasing and the central control is going to be huge.
And regarding ice cream.
So my wife, daughter and I, we went to a wedding in Vermont a long time for friends of ours.
And Ben and Jerry's factory is in Vermont in Burlingame or just outside of Burlingame.
And we went and we were blown away.
If you get fresh, fresh ice cream, it is off the charts compared to the stuff that you get out of the freezer.
That's something you might want to try, vegan, this fresh ice cream.
I think you would really like it.
And they have a vegan style, too, in Ben and Jerry's.
Thank you.
By the way, Gorbachev made the mistake of believing in the West when they insisted they would not encroach one inch to the East.
The West lied and played the Soviet Union.
It's one of the greatest disgraceful acts of betrayal in international relations of all time.
After Biden lobbies to codify Roe, the president is told his bright idea is actually unconstitutional.
Biden repeated his call to codify Roe, meaning abortion should be legal until a point of birth nationwide, during remarks on the White House on the 8th of July.
It turns out, however, experts believe what he's claiming is unconstitutional.
Robert Levy, for example.
Put bluntly, it won't work.
Congress is not constitutionally authorized to prescribe a national abortion regimen.
First, there's a Tenth Amendment mandating that all powers not enumerated and delegated to the federal government are reserved to the states.
The Dobbs decision declares unequivocally there's no constitutional right to abortion, and Congress has no veto power over a court decision to apply the Constitution to the states.
So while Biden demanded Congress pass a bill to codify abortion across all 50 states, while Democrats have tried to push a bill like this before the Dobbs decision came down, it's quite clear it went beyond Roe, protecting abortion on demand, that the Supreme Court decision protecting abortion on demand, that the Supreme Court decision cannot be overridden by Congress, that this is a blunder, which means on the face of it, the Congress cannot legalize abortion.
This is something that only the states can decide, and Congress can't veto a ruling by the Supreme Court, whether or not they had the votes in their favor.
So Biden's urging Congress to violate the Constitution by do so being the highest court in the land.
Carl, your thoughts?
Comedian Jimmy Dore has an excellent reminder.
On YouTube, if you just look up Democrats could save abortion rights but refuse to do so.
He plays the film of the actor playing Biden, even in 2020, in debating Bernie Sanders, saying that If I'm president the first thing so he says that he was codified Roe versus Wade but that's what Obama did too.
He campaigned on that also and then his excuse once he got elected is that it just wasn't a priority and we've heard that before from political leadership when We pushed the Democratic leadership at that time after the 1997 microcredit summit for small loans to the poorest of the poor, which makes a profit as it ends poverty.
And we had a promise from the Clintons for their full support of the Democratic leadership.
And then when they reneged, we said, all right, so what's your excuse this time?
And they ran out.
Their excuse for not fully funding the end of poverty After the 1990 World Summit for Children, which is less than one percent of the gross income, they said, I think that it'll appear we're giving away too much to the poor.
And we refuted that with the polling data that they would be heroes.
But after they refused to end poverty while making a profit, they couldn't say that.
They just had to say what we're being told is not a priority for them.
So Campaigning for 2022, Biden and the Democratic leaderships are continuing to lie by fear-mongering about what Republicans might do in states and how they'll protect women because they care about people.
And it's just nonsense, but the clown show is going to continue until we have this breakthrough of arrests of these psychopaths.
Yeah, well, speaking of Democrat-Republican, I have a story on a local level that I want to talk about, but first with regards to pregnancy terminations.
No, Congress does not have the right.
We've talked before.
It's sad to me that abortion does exist.
I know that it has to in certain cases, but I just want to put it out there that Giving pain to any creature, aren't we all sad about that?
Some people are railing about it, I am not railing about it, and they never had the power anyway.
It's in the hands of the states.
Should it be in the hands of the individual?
I think so, but unfortunately, Some people don't think this way, just like people don't think the way I do for veganism and animals.
Some people don't.
And I can't do anything about that.
Not preaching, but this is right for me because I don't want to give any pain to animals.
So I would love for it to be private.
But when we're talking about babies that are almost full term, if that, I mean, they could be full term now.
There's a couple of states that are thinking of How do you say it?
Infanticide.
And this is criminal to me and China has done it.
I remember it was on NPR.
There was a story about how they came into this home because she already had one child, the mother, and they gave her some sort of a poison.
Nine months pregnant and the baby came out the color of black and stillborn.
And I remember sobbing in the car because that was just Too painful for me to, traumatizing for me to think about.
By the way, these gloves are to reduce the pain in my hands that I feel from EMF.
I get little sparks and whatnot, and I've gotten some peeling skin, and I also believe that I'm allergic to my cell phone, the nickel in it, just in case you're wondering what this is.
I'm not a mime.
And then I wanted to state with regards to Republican and Democrat and the mudslinging that the Democrats are doing.
So I know someone who ran for school board of a huge LA school district.
And she went Republican.
She ran Republican.
And the opposite party, whatever organization was behind this person, actually said that she had been fired as a school teacher.
We can all guarantee she was never fired.
And of course, this This made an impact.
And it's just so wrong.
They also said on the flyer, the flyer went out to loads of voters.
They also said that she was a right winger and she belonged to this constitutional class that was a hate group.
I mean, not at all.
It's just, She belonged to the class, but I mean, just the words that they use are awful.
Absolutely awful.
And I'm not for either party, to be frank, but the Democrats, we all know by now, they are the worst of the worst.
They do lie.
Thank you.
Yes, yes, yes.
And we all appreciate what you're going through, vegan.
We're on your side.
Trey Gowdy spoke a simple truth Democrats are afraid to face.
In a desperate attempt to save their fortune in the midterms, he spoke the truth.
They have no message on the economy, inflation, or gas prices because his socialist agenda sent inflation and gas prices soaring through the roof while pushing the economy into a recession.
The Democrats want to make the midterms a referendum on Roe.
But even this is betraying their weakness.
On his Sunday show on Fox, Trey told viewers the Supreme Court simply returned the question of abortion to the states, which put abortion on the ballot.
Biden is trying to salvage the midterm by attacking the court and not being subtle about it.
He said in the aftermath, this fall row is on the ballot.
Freedom is on the ballot.
It sounds like he wants the issue on the ballot, but isn't that what the Dobbs decision did?
Return the issue to state legislators and therefore to the people and the ballot?
He added, Biden doesn't actually believe his own rhetoric.
What's most telling is when he said, Roe was a decision on a complex matter, a decision with broad national consensus most Americans found acceptable.
If you believe that, Mr. President, are the people not also capable of drawing a careful balance on a complex matter?
Or is it just nine lawyers who can do that?
Gowdy said the Democrats don't really believe the majority support a motion because they're afraid to let the people vote on it.
If you believe there is a national consensus on these issues, why would that not be reflected at the ballot box?
And therein lies the question.
What are your rights?
Where are your rights to be found?
In the Constitution?
In the minds of nine lawyers in black robes?
Or the ballots?
Who decides and who reconciles any conflict between competing rights?
Meanwhile, here's a nice example.
Pennsylvania Governor Wolf signs an order upholding abortion rights in Pennsylvania.
The order ensures out-of-state residents may enter Pennsylvania to access abortion services.
I will not stand for this attack on women and pregnant people.
I'm affirming that individuals seeking and providing reproductive health services are safe in the Commonwealth from discipline and prosecution.
Everyone, whether a resident of Pennsylvania or elsewhere, deserves access to health care.
I will do everything in my power to protect that right.
We will now advance to the Republican-controlled statehouse, and if it passes, voters will be made aware of the floated change before the next election.
Because what we're talking about, this is a week after the Pennsylvania Senate approved an amendment declaring there is no right to an abortion, where he has no say in that, not even including veto power.
So the newly composed legislator will then vote on the proposed amendment once again.
Complicated, but it's at the state level where the Supreme Court has declared it belongs, Carl.
Frank Gowdy makes an excellent point, and as a U.S.
government teacher, is that he's really showing the actual American democratic process that we support and we encourage.
Because what we have is we have a push towards a nanny state to dictate what is right and what is wrong.
And they don't debate about this.
They're just going to attempt to dictate.
So what Gowdy is talking about, the real democratic process involves education.
So you let Anybody who thinks that they have something important to say to lay their facts out for public consideration.
You have debate, you put up top people on soapboxes, and then after the debate you allow open questions, public conversation, and then a democratic policy choice.
Now the beauty of this system Is that as soon as you make a policy choice, that generates data, and therefore further opportunity for education, and the process just repeats, and that's what freedom looks like.
You're going to make mistakes along the way, but in the process of good faith education, debate, public considerations, the most important questions being answered, and a democratic process where you can revisit issues, It's the best that we have.
And Governor Wolf, what a slimeball.
I mean, that's what we have for leaders, is that he constructs this ridiculous strawman argument characterizing anybody who doesn't agree with their position as attacking women.
And then he throws in, for good measure, his LGTBQABC support.
And the plus, remember, so he's advocating, or at least some of these groups are, is that you remove all restrictions for any type of sexual experience and expression, including age limits for minors.
And he throws in there is an attack on women and pregnant People.
So that's what we have for leadership from the left.
Megan.
Yeah, so speaking of different sexualities, absolutely people are using what they like and what they don't like.
But again, I feel that we could just all be solid in our morals if celibacy was put in there somewhere.
That's all I'm going to say.
I don't want to preach.
But interesting, the WHO, they're now looking into more than binary genders.
So how many are there going to be?
I mean, are you going to have different degrees of being a female or a male?
Governor Wolf is also the one who Will or will not, he does not want to, currently sign a bill that states that transgenders can't compete in the category of the biological gender.
And we all know that it's just not fair if someone, if a big man is coming in and competing against biological females.
You can't.
This is just a game, I feel.
It's a distraction.
It's more of a degradation of society.
I don't even know if some of these politicians know exactly what they're doing.
You know?
I think some of them are truly afraid that they will be branded as being prejudiced.
Because you say any little thing, and of course you're like, you're part of a hate group.
Which is ridiculous.
I believe that simple is better, male and female.
I know that we all have male and female in us.
I know that for six weeks you guys were female in the womb.
But when it comes to pronouns and stating like I'm not this gender, I just believe it's getting out of control.
Oh, there's no doubt about that, Regan.
There is no doubt about that.
Meanwhile, Wisconsin officials called for the decertification of the 2020 election.
Wisconsin Representative Ramthon, running for governor, and Karen Mueller, running for attorney general, and others held a press conference They have declared that the outcome of the 2020 election is to be decertified here, given that the Wisconsin Supreme Court has ruled the drop boxes were not legal.
The GOP candidate shared that since that's the case, the ballots that were collected were not delegitimate.
The number outweighed the margin of win given to Biden.
Thus, Representative Ramtham said the election should be decertified.
There are remedies for this.
The most prominent over the past 30 years is to do the election over.
Meanwhile, you see a way in which managers have been handled in the past in various elections in various states, whether they were local, state, mayors, what have you, or even federal, to do over the election.
The blame goes to the public officials who put in the ballot boxes, not the voters who were victims.
They were magnets for fraud.
2,000 mules was all over this and identified any number in Wisconsin.
How can you keep an election result you know to be contaminated with hundreds of thousands of illegitimate votes when the winner was given the race by much less?
There's a whole manual about how to correct these administrative mistakes and blunders.
And here you'll see, in Detroit, a perfect illustration of what was going on.
Massive theft here.
Watch this.
The massive delivery of ballots.
This is inside the TCF Center now the local media.
said that this never happened.
Hattie actually called me on November 4th.
She was inside the TCF and she said, Jim, you won't believe it.
I just heard that a van dropped off boxes of ballots in the middle of the night.
And she was working inside the TCF that morning.
So we put in a request to get this video.
It took months.
And we got this a gateway point.
If we put this up on Twitter, you know, on our site, we tweeted about it.
And that's when we lost our Twitter account, by the way.
By putting up this video.
There's a lead car, an escort car that comes in, you can see here.
Each time he adds something to the people inside and then this van drives in.
And they actually came in twice.
Now we had local media, one of the top reporters there, I'm not going to mention his name.
He said that this never happened.
He was there all night, there was no fraud, nothing happened.
So now we have the video of that.
Which of course implies that they're dealing with a liar.
Unbelievable.
But then the whole Democratic Party has been lying about this from the beginning.
Just outrageous.
Carl, your thoughts?
And this is why need to know news is so important over corporate media.
So the demonstration of election fraud is so obvious.
Although, you know, we're talking about this ongoing condition in my observation that only about 2% of the people can hear the truth on matters like this.
That's 1 in 50.
Dominion voting machines.
So having these unaccountable, non-transparent voting machines does not meet the definition of an election.
We don't have an election with the Dominion voting machines.
We don't have elections in the United States.
The leading academics for stating the obvious had been since for close to 20 years from Princeton and Stanford to say the obvious.
These machines do not guarantee a fair election.
And then 2000 mules, if you haven't seen it, you should.
That is in.
So the highest academic and professional standard for demonstrating a case It's called, you start off with prima facie evidence.
Prima facie is Latin.
Prima, first, facie, face.
So on its face, that looks like election fraud.
So you would proceed, thereby you would have to have arrests of the people involved.
An arrest, people think that's a bad thing.
An arrest is a legal tool To stop an apparent crime in progress, because that's what we have, and then you would do an investigation.
But you arrest these people to stop them, and then you take steps.
But we have something that is just this dictatorship pushing along, virtue signaling that it cares.
In addition, if we did have a fair system, we would go back to exit poll data, and it would have to be transparent.
What we get instead is just another layer of propaganda, but the exit poll data has really been moved against, it's been removed from consideration, but that For decades was a gold standard to have independent exit poll data matching the official results, because that should be off no more than 1%.
And the ideal of just counting the votes, if you have a community of let's say 20,000 people, All of those votes could be counted in a transparent way in a high school gym.
And you could have a party, and you could even involve students in this for the transparent counting of the votes, where everybody sees all of the ballots.
You count them all up.
And then you save them.
And if anybody has any problem, you can revisit them.
So we have solutions as always, but all we're going to get from our opponents is being pushed into this one party unicorn, rainbow unicorn system of the opposite.
You're willing an opposite of accountability where they're just going to dictate what happened.
Regan.
Yes, I totally agree with you, Carl.
We've wanted a rest for over two years now, right?
We've had a few with this whole pandemic.
You know, the people that were involved in what they were doing just then, I wonder if they all knew what was going on, and should they be held accountable if they did not know.
Because there are people that are truly unaware of rules and regulations if it does not apply to them.
So I don't know what to say, but I would hope that they would know that that was illegal that they were doing.
To me, they seem like they probably were just toeing the line of what was the right thing to do in their mind, even if it was wrong.
That's my opinion.
I have no idea who they are.
I do want to state, though, that I am sorry that the person that was explaining what was going on I'm sorry that he was of the Caucasian color.
Why?
Because...
Every time that somebody points something wrong with discrepancies and someone is Caucasian, they'll point the finger and say, well, they're racist.
So I wish that we could get some people of color to discuss what that gentleman was talking about.
That would be great.
I did see 2,000 mules.
I do believe that it should have some impact quickly.
Now, I've seen things online.
And I can't believe it.
Maybe you do, Carl.
But I've seen where Biden is going to be overthrown soon.
It seems very QAnon to me.
And I don't believe that.
But I know that there's too much evidence not to do anything in Uvalde.
With the alleged school shooting, I found that some of the same maybe types of people that were behind the the the mulling, they were They were on the poor side, maybe, and, you know, they had bad acting, right?
The one said the daughter, another one said she didn't know what grade her daughter was in.
To me, they were not upscale, and I feel that these are the types of people that are recruited But they still need to be held accountable.
Because just because you're poor does not mean that you should have no accountability.
Just as if you are very, very wealthy, like our friend Bill.
He should be held accountable.
By the way, I hope that you saw that training.
I believe it was a training video, the Uvaldi, where they were all like backing off and you heard the shots.
God forbid if I'm wrong, but I'm still not convinced that that was right in Uvaldi.
Last thing I want to say.
Unfortunately, like back in the early days, I was against the mask.
You know, we all need to breathe.
But they always lump anything that is against the mainstream democratic narrative as you are with Trump.
So I couldn't even say anything medically without being accused of, or questioned, are you a Trump supporter?
And I'm very, very dismayed that people have went there.
You want to respond by saying, am I right or wrong?
It's got nothing to do with whether you are or are not a Trump supporter, whether you are or are not a racist.
These people aren't racist.
It's the poverty of their inability to argue that they don't have any evidence that they resort to ad hominems of that low quality.
But this is pervasive in the Democrat Party because they have no evidence, they have no policy, they have no accomplishments.
They're destroying America and they're unapologetic about it.
It is a disgrace, and they're going down big time in the midterms, which is why they're going to do everything they can to avoid their even taking place.
Meanwhile, look at this.
A friend sent me.
We have Trump.
Going into his hotel in Las Vegas, the man behind him appears to be carrying the football.
You never see this with a fake Biden.
That suggests, at some level, the military may continue to recognize Donald J. Trump as President of the United States.
Meanwhile, China bank collapse underway, Saudi distancing itself from the petrodollar to join BRICS.
Chaios and collapse are spreading.
Sri Lanka now has two of the three days of bread left.
The government, the economy, in a state of collapse.
The people are rioting.
They've gone after the president, the prime minister.
They've invaded their homes.
They've vacated their country.
Bankruptcy, meanwhile, is spreading across China.
Some of the countries have announced a free and sound withdrawal, effectively declaring a bail-in scenario where people do not get their money back.
A bank froze millions of dollars in deposits telling customers they were upgrading their internal system, but they've not issued any communication on the matter since.
On top of this, Newsweek is reporting, and the conservative treehouse is covering, that Saudi Arabia is now openly declaring it will drop the petrodollar and embrace world currencies, even join the BRICS with Russia and China.
This will have catastrophic empire-ending ramifications for the U.S.
dollar and the collapse of the U.S.
economy, and, sad to say, for the quality of life in the United States.
While the Crown Prince has sought to enhance cooperation with the U.S., the Saudi royal has also expanded ties with Russia and China, Joining Brex would demonstrate commitment to Rihad's resolve in dealing with other powers and mark a significant win for the effort to boost economic frameworks established outside the auspices of the U.S.
and its immediate allies.
This session, if Saudi joins it, will balance the world economic system, especially since the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is the largest exporter of oil in the world, and it's in the G20.
If this happens, it will support any economic movement and development in world trade and economy and record remarkable progress in social and economic aspects if Saudi Arabia should have partnership with every country in the world.
Meanwhile, this is just a comment on myocardial cases in the United States, which have dramatically expanded by the introduction of the vax.
The numbers do not lie.
Stunning.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, for the football, maybe same general size.
It could be.
It's a fascinating picture.
For China, who knows what's going on there with their banking system, with the BRICS.
We can give a lot of factual background that the overview of our economic monetary system is dominated by the US petrodollar.
The US cut a deal with the Saudis that the US military would protect Saudi Arabia In exchange for the Saudis only and always selling oil for US dollars and then they have Some kind of an arrangement where Saudi is going to use some of those profits to buy U.S.
debt securities.
So this is an absolute scam.
The idea of using debt for money is its Orwellian opposite.
Carl B. Herman, Blockspot, any of these shows, the Looting Trillions section, and I can walk you through some of the key points of the data.
And the bottom line is what we all see is we have an aggregate debt curve that is exponential in growth.
Exponential growth is not sustainable.
The interest will become too tragic comic and it will collapse upon itself.
The good news for that is it's all on paper and that if we can get a transparent monetary system, even in the system that we all understand, if we have public banking, which would be a state-owned bank, To transfer the too big to fail bank's profits back to the public, a 5% mortgage and a 5% credit card, that revenue stream alone will abundantly pay for all state taxes.
So whatever goes out of this, just understand that the fear-mongering is that the real economy is labor and resources and technology.
And if we Can defeat the parasites will have a breakthrough with suppressed technology that our opponents did not want us to have.
In addition, the ruble is now connected to gold, and that will attract people rather than the US dollar, which is just backed by hot air and nonsensical hot air coming out of the actor Biden's mouth.
And one more thing for Saudi Arabia.
If you want to talk about having a principled stand against racism, you know, I think the most racist thing you can imagine is a family claiming to own an entire country.
Because Saudi Arabia, it's the Saud family, so it's not like, you know, we're racist for One, people who look a particular color.
No, no, no, no, no.
We're racist is that we want the specific genetics of our bloodline only.
And the history of that goes back to the divine right of kings and a convoluted history going back thousands of years where you have these representatives, these political leaders, using force, claiming to be representing God.
And that opens up another whole can of worms of who these people really are and what type of God they're promoting.
There was a Biden gaffe, interestingly enough, talking about the midterms, and he kind of let out that he mentioned the word ball.
B-A-A-L.
I think he was trying to say pal, but it came out as ball.
And it might be that our Luciferian opponents really do worship and promote this satanic thing of that's their god that they're talking about.
So they're all for that type of genetic racism.
Very good.
Yeah, speaking of genetic racism, I've been reading a little bit about that GINA clause, where if you are discriminatory against people's DNA, which obviously could be done with these PCR tests that don't seem to have worked for the past couple years, you might have a case.
And I do encourage anyone who is being Coerce to take that jab or anything else that's under an EUA that could harm you to look into filing with your local or federal discrimination Organization going back to the China Bank.
I did see the the video thanks to Mike Adams a health ranger on Brady on and And those people were very upset.
Now, I didn't quite get, is that still stemming from April?
They haven't gotten their money since April.
Do any of you know?
I believe that's correct, yes.
So, can you imagine not having any money since the spring?
Well, some people haven't, but at least they have unemployment around here, maybe.
I also heard that it was, I believe it was the CEO that stole Four billion dollars?
I think that's what he was saying.
So, where is he?
Where is he?
But of course, we all know that this vaccine that's not a vaccine, besides being about depopulation, is being used as a distraction for finances.
Money that has been stolen from, I believe, everyone around the world, thanks to the Federal Reserve.
But Carl, quick question.
Do you think that anyone's gonna step in?
It is so huge.
It is huge, and I do personally.
I'm at 95% that the White Hats are managing this.
As a show, and it's taken so long because of the military operations of the Black Hats and especially the Dumbs, the deep underground military bases and the weapons that our opponents have had, we're really the hostages.
So whatever is going on behind the scenes, that said, you guys speak for my belief, that's what I believe, but I'm a scholar and I go on facts, baby.
So the most important fact is the fog of war is that we really don't know.
So, if good guys are back there, I mean, that's great.
I would prefer to win.
I would prefer that, rather than the psychopaths continuing.
But, either way, even if the White Hats are there, I think our responsibility is still the same, to be personally responsible for everything that we can do to expose and end this criminal empire.
Yep, you can't just depend.
You have to take some sort of action in your own backyard.
Hope for the best, but brace yourself and prepare for the worst.
Meanwhile, Twitter sues Musk over his pullout from the $44 billion deal.
This has ironic aspects.
Twitter's filed a lawsuit after he opted out of his $44 billion offer.
Of course, the whole issue of the hesitancy came because they wouldn't reveal how many of their accounts actually were bona fide, how many were fake or merely bots.
Musk hasn't issued a public comment yet, but until recently, he believes he's free to change his mind, trash a company, disrupt its operations, destroy stockholder value, and walk away.
The lawsuit from Twitter alleged Twitter also negotiated to hire and fire employees, including executives, without having to seek Musk's consent.
He highlighted some of his Twitter posts as alleged evidence he was working to violate their contract.
His tweets of May 13 and 14 violated his obligations under the merger agreement, including provision prohibiting public comments not consented to by Twitter, disparagement, misuse of information, and so forth.
The bombshell filing, MustWantsOut, claims Twitter is awash in spam bots and automated accounts, that he sought the data, but Twitter has refused to comply.
At the same time, he's criticized Twitter for using moderation policies that favor left-wing users and censor conservatives.
He wanted to make a free speech site.
There's an irony now.
Twitter is asking the Delaware court for an expedited trial in September.
The social media shares have plunged even further to 34.06.
That's about 35% down from the announcement when Twitter shares were trading above 50.
Get this.
They said I could buy Twitter.
Then they wouldn't disclose bot info.
Now they want to force me to buy Twitter in court.
Now they have to disclose the bot info in court.
They put themselves in a bind, Carl.
This is blowing it big time by Twitter.
Yeah, and going back, Vegan, about what I believe is happening in the background.
I mean, I've been paying attention for 45 years with Most Important Issues, and there's just tons of stuff in the background.
Everything that we're seeing right now is very encouraging, because there are so many areas of vulnerability that could destroy the deep state, and this is one of them.
So we have these again, guys like Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Jack Dorsey, they're front men.
They're not real.
If we had some independent people who knew what they were doing, pushing in on the money, that story would collapse.
These are people pushing a propaganda.
So you have Musk also.
Now one of the things that I read about a week ago is that Musk attempted to determine for himself the bot data.
Now if he's a white hat, if he was a dark asset or a gray asset turned to the white, then everybody knows what's going on on the inside of this.
And the story was is that Musk did data sampling and found that of course Twitter underrepresented the bots by perhaps up to 90 percent and that Twitter's response to that information was an attempt to sue Musk for violation of his non-disclosure agreement because Twitter itself
When it was pressed, it said, oh yeah, well, how we know our bot data is we checked on 100 people.
That's so funny, isn't it?
Carl B. Herman blogs about any of these shows.
I do have one published paper via the Claremont Colleges, and part of that paper was to demonstrate That the reasons for the wars, formerly known as on terror, were lies known to be false as they were told by corporate media to be able to demonstrate that corporate media is not making any innocent mistakes or the best intelligent of the time.
No.
They are giving lies known to be false as they are told.
And if you really wanted to construct a propaganda mechanism, then you would have no limitations.
So Twitter would be the answer.
How many bots are in Twitter is that?
Well, it's what the data experts said that we needed in order to push the propaganda.
And when that didn't work, we just added more.
That's going to be the realistic answer, and I hope we get a breakthrough to demonstrate that soon.
Yeah, although Elon is kind of a good-looking guy.
I don't know.
He's losing a little bit, in my opinion.
I'm just kidding.
So, I don't feel that he is such a good guy because of those 5G satellites that he put up in space without any new studies since, what, 1996?
With EMF, which Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
insisted that they do, the FCC, but that was after Elon put those thousands of satellites up.
So I really don't have any respect for him.
Twitter, I'm glad that he, I'm still glad, regardless of, you know, what side he's on, I'm glad that he put out the, uh, the bot, uh, story, because we do know that there's a lot of bots online.
Facebook, right?
How many of you have had your account swiped away, and then, oh, you need your ID to get back on?
On Bitchute, I believe that there's a lot of bots.
Right, Carl?
And then, um, I was listening to something by Musk's babysitter.
Now, I don't know if this is true, but it's a bit too goody, and she was being interviewed by a gentleman.
They were talking about her mother was a prostitute, and they were talking about how they were involved with Elon Musk's mother.
Who may or may not have been along the same lines.
I'm not sure.
I don't know.
Don't sue me.
But this video is somewhere in there on Bitchute.
But she was explaining how Elon was whisked up into some sort of portal and that he is to be the chosen one.
That's what her mother said.
I am gonna have to find that video.
You do not have to believe it but listen to it.
It is very very interesting and Who knows but going back to The The lies, yes.
One thing that I wanted to mention that I saw was the Vatican and the Georgia Guidestones.
They were discussed by Truth Lion.
There were fires on their explosions.
We know that Guidestones was an explosion.
I'll have to look more into this.
But I did see something on Facebook that I, it probably was a joke, but it said Dollar General Did any of you see that?
I think it was a joke.
Okay, I hope so.
Well, not really, but why am I bringing this up?
Because there is so much discrediting and I do believe that, like you said, Elon Musk is a front man, a fall guy, not as bad as Bill Gates though, that's for sure.
Thanks.
Well, just to offer my two cents, I think Musk is a brilliant entrepreneur, and I think he's played this Twitter thing brilliantly because now he's in the court where Twitter has to reveal the information they were withholding from him that caused him to pause about moving forward with the movement, and they have blundered.
This is a massive legal blunder.
There's good reason for Elon Musk to be laughing.
And his mother is modeling now, big time.
She's modeling on Sports Illustrated, if you saw that.
She's pretty attractive, too.
Elon Musk's mother.
His mother is modeling on Sports Illustrated?
Yes, she's an elderly woman.
You got me there, Megan.
Here we got Gayle King defending Jill Biden after the tacos insult to Hispanics.
That's not who she is, says Gayle King, who of course is Oprah's best buddy.
Biden, this is Jill, made a remark during a speech between the Unidos U.S.
Annual Conference in San Antonio.
That you need us present, y'all, to help build this organization with the understanding that the diversity of this community, as distinct as the bodegas of the Bronx, as beautiful as the blossoms of Miami, and as unique as the breakfast tacos here in San Antonio, is your strength.
King said that, well, her comments didn't come out correctly.
They weren't an accurate picture of her character.
When you know Jill Biden, that's not who she is.
Pretty odd.
Here's a tweet from Curtis Hook.
CBS gave 81 seconds to Jill, taking some heat from comparing Latinos to tacos, saying it was something many found offensive.
Leave it to Gayle King to rush to Jill's offense.
Meanwhile, the National Association of Hispanic Journalists issued a harsh criticism, saying the First Lady and her speech team should spend time in the future to better understand the complexities of our people in our communities.
We are not tacos!
Additionally, she received mockery for her mangled pronunciation of bodega, sounding like bo-duh-doos instead of bodegas.
Once again, Biden Jill butchers the Spanish language in furtherance of pandering to a client constituency.
Earlier, Biden staffer Michael LaRosa said in a brief tweet the First Lady was sorry for her comments.
She apologized.
Her words conveyed anything but pure admiration and love for the Latino community.
What happened to Latinx?
Did they finally figure out that didn't go well with the Latino community either?
This is just a clown show.
Carl, your thoughts?
It is, and so is Sports Illustrated.
I did look it up, I didn't know, but sure enough, Mae Musk was the cover model for Sports Illustrated Summer Swimsuit Edition.
Now, there was a time in my life where I would be completely briefed on the content of Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition every summer, But I've lapsed for several years for that.
For Joe Biden, it is just pandering.
But it pales in comparison to Joe Biden's campaign in 2020.
Where he gave a speech to some Latino community and he said, wait a minute, wait a minute.
And he pulled out his phone and he played Despacito, I believe, was the Latino song.
Nice beat to that song.
And he pretended to be vibing to that.
That's pandering.
Or Hillary Clinton pulling out some hot sauce from her purse in front of, she thought that that would help him with that collective.
Group of voters now for the content unique as a breakfast taco personally with that statement.
I don't mind And, you know, as a teacher for 38 years now retired, most of my time was with students with Spanish as a primary language.
And the culture is varied, and you have all the people from Cuba to Mexico to South America all speaking Spanish and Spain.
So I didn't come out right, but what's really not coming right out Is the American public's recognition and more and more is with whatever it is, the eighty five percent of Americans thinking we're on the wrong track.
That's getting the better idea.
And just to understand that whatever comes out of these these pimp's mouths is just a lie for empire.
Vega.
We lost.
You're muted.
There you go.
There we go.
Yeah.
No, the breakfast time.
She's not a comedian, you know?
If she was on the stage and that might just be funny.
It depends.
It depends on the audience.
I think that some Latinos would actually laugh if she was on the stage, but she wasn't.
And she needs to know what's appropriate and what's not.
But look, these people come from Delaware.
They're kind of like, you know, your bar folks.
And she's, she's elderly.
I don't think she really, you know, I don't, she wasn't thinking correctly.
That's what I think.
So, you know, definitely not the best choice of words.
Interestingly enough, it's funny, Dr. Fetzer, that you had talked about Latinx.
Because I thought that this is what we were supposed to state.
I did not think we were supposed to state Latinos any longer.
And I put Latinx as a compliment to some people that I work with.
And they got very angry at me, and I just said, I'm sorry.
I didn't know!
And Mae Musk, I put her link in the chat.
You might want to show some of her swimsuit photos.
She's 74 years of age, and she had a ball doing it, so whatever!
I don't know her from Adam, but it was an interesting photo shoot that I saw.
Well, this is all such pandering.
I mean, it's just embarrassingly bad.
What are we going to have?
Purient thoughts about a 74-year-old woman?
Carl, your thoughts?
So, the Latinos, I think that they're going to get offended by calling them Latinx.
A lot of them are going to think that you're questioning their sexuality from just looking at them.
It would be as if, you know, if you if you didn't call Jim a man and you called him just a penis person, he might take offense of that.
He's not.
Just just call me a man.
Don't call me a penis person, OK?
It's probably just like that.
Maybe.
Well, my mother was happy the other day because she was driving slow and kind of not knowing where she was going, and she got a honk in back of her, and somebody on the street said, Stop already, ya D-I-C, put the last letter on the word, and you'll know.
My mother was thrilled, and she doesn't like cursing, but she loved it, so maybe, maybe.
Very funny, very funny.
Meanwhile, to catch up with our story, Are you seeing the screen, by the way, as I'm flipping through to get to our story?
Yeah, yeah.
Okay, very good.
We have one left.
It's a doozy.
Liberal law professor tells Republican he's transphobic in a second in exchange that lowered the IQ of the entire room.
I can't believe this is a law professor at Berkeley?
Josh Hawley waged a war of words with a liberal law professor accused of being transforming because he does not believe men can get pregnant.
During a Senate Judiciary hearing about Dobbs, law professor Carai Bridges made repeated references to a person with a capacity for pregnancy instead of using the word woman.
At one point, with questions from Senator John Cornyn, This is the absurdity of the democratic ideology!
dehumanizing praise for women five times within one minute to be inclusive of females who identify as males or another gender and can still have children.
This is the absurdity of the democratic ideology.
Cornyn, do you think a baby delivered alive has a value?
Do you think a baby delivered Demo abortion witness.
Yes.
Cornyn, do you think a baby that's not yet born has value?
Demo abortion witness.
I believe that a person with a capacity for pregnancy has value.
How bizarre!
It was about his turn to ask and Hawley asked whether Bridget was talking about women and whether abortion was solely a women's issue.
If men can have abortions too.
Many women, cis women, have the capacity for pregnancy.
Maybe cis women do not have the capacity for pregnancy.
There are also trans men who are capable of pregnancy as well as non-binary people who are capable of pregnancy.
So this isn't really a women's rights issue, Hawley said?
Choosing to pick a fight over the definition of woman?
We can recognize that this impacts women while also recognizing it impacts other groups.
Those things are not mutually exclusive, Senator Hawley.
She sneered.
Hawley, why are you using the term person with a capacity for pregnancy instead of woman?
Bridges!
Your line of questioning is transphobic and open trans people to violence.
Holland, you're saying I'm opening up people to violence by saying women can have pregnancies?
When the senator followed up, Bridges grew wide-eyed and lectured him about how his questions were a threat to transgenders.
So, Oum, I want to recognize that your line of questioning is transphobic, and it opens them up to violence by not recognizing them.
Wow.
You're saying I'm opening up people to bios by asking whether or not women are the folks who can have pregnancy?
Is that in a sardonic tone?
So I want to know that one out of five transgender person have attempted suicide.
She stated for the record.
Because of my line of questioning?
So we can't talk about it?
Because of my line of questioning?
Because denying that trans people exist and pretending not to know that they exist before Hawley cut her off.
I'm not denying trans people exist by asking if you're talking about women having pregnancies.
Are you?
She jabbered.
Do you believe men can get pregnant?
No, I don't think men can get pregnant and bridges pounds.
The Democrats say what they really think.
Men can get pregnant, and if you disagree, you're transphobic and responsible for violence.
So you are denying that trans people exist?
Thank you, she triumphantly exclaimed.
Bewildered, Holly asked, and that leads to violence?
Is this how you run your classroom?
Are students allowed to question you, or are they also treated like this when they're told that they're opening up people to violence by questioning?
Oh, we have a good time in my class.
You should join.
You might learn a lot, the professor told Holly.
Wow, I would learn a lot.
I've learned a lot just from this exchange, he replied.
Extraordinary!
Carl, this is just lunatic!
It's a tragic comic.
So, as an undergraduate from UC Berkeley, I know exactly where the law school is there, across from a little coffee shop that I always walk by.
I'd always walk by the law school, going to school, 40 years ago.
So, John Yu, Y-O-O, is one of the professors at UC Berkeley's law school.
And you was famous in the Bush Jr.
administration for coming up attempting a legal argument to support torture in violation of all of the laws against torture.
And so for her to care about trans people is just a ruse because that's what our opponents do.
They divide to conquer.
They want to come up With some marginalized group to virtue signal that they care about, but they don't care.
They don't care.
They're just pushing for this plus agenda.
That's really what they want for the God of Ball to be embraced.
And that sexual orientation and people like Big Mike and children, they're just gradually pushing that agenda in.
So Kiara bridges that Law professor, she's a great example of what we're seeing.
She's kind of like a Kamala Harris in that faculty, because research universities, of course, the empire would have to capture them to prevent truth from coming out.
And the you thing is important to understand.
Professor Yu at a law school that isn't under protest for supporting torture is that they'll ignore those big questions, and then they'll hire somebody like Bridges saying, yeah, okay, so you'll be a professor here, and just make sure that you keep writing about these plus issues.
And besides, this is embarrassing.
She's a scholar, and what a good scholar is going to do is going to settle issues of factual question.
And the real issue is, is that, okay, so a biological female has the capacity to get pregnant, barring any other issues, and a biological female may have rhetoric, may declare themselves as out of, you know, the UK has 152 different genders.
Who the fuck cares?
But, you know, if you want to exercise your First Amendment right and say what you identify as, That's fine.
I don't care.
It doesn't change the fact that you're a biological female, and it doesn't change the fact that a biological male does not have the physical capacity of pregnancy.
This is just lunatic.
Absolutely lunatic.
This is why the Democrats are becoming despised, ridiculed.
Millions are leaving the Democratic Party because of this lunacy.
Vegan.
Yeah, I see myself freezing.
I'm, I apologize.
Like I said, I do have a friend, he felt like he was a female inside, and now he's on those hormones.
I don't agree with it, but what am I to do?
I'm not a liberal, so I just let him, her, live their life.
And I do know that some of them are truly sensitive, because I told her, him, that she did not look like a female.
They were extremely hurt.
So, you know, I don't know what to say anymore.
I don't even think I wanted to get into the conversation, but I have told HimHer that this is, it's popular because it is being used to divide.
And HimHer actually agrees with that and doesn't like the vaccine, by the way, and is very much in our mind frame.
But I do believe that this particular aspect is feeding into this person because we are allowing it.
Definitely, it's bizarre that we can't state that a female can be pregnant.
I mean, I just think that that's bizarre.
I mean, you are female inside, even if you are a male and have taken those hormones.
And by the way, those are so bad, those synthetic hormones, to alter your gender.
You can get blood clots, heart attacks, you can get cancer.
So I find that it's very a shame that this is being just tossed around like it's nothing.
It's very scary to speak the truth, unless you're on this show, of course.
And even then, some of us don't use our real names.
I'll forget this.
I was going to give a personal story.
Regarding the lawyer, yeah, I'm very concerned with the attorneys that really haven't done anything to help in any of these odd things that are going on during the pandemic.
They are in lockstep.
with the lie and I want to make mention when people are angry at people that are liberal actors entertainers they're not all like that because I know a growing amount of actors that are very disgusted with what's going on and they can't work These are working-class actors.
Not everyone gets millions on their contract.
They do background.
They have one-liners.
And these people haven't been able to work for a long time because they refuse the job.
And the union, Screen Actors Guild, is pretty much in lockstep with, I would have to say, the government.
The Democratic Party!
So you need to know that not everyone is thinking this way.
Unfortunately, the little guy is always pushed down.
And I was on a group meeting yesterday, and I can tell you, they were very, very unsatisfied.
And there's a lawyer in there that's discrediting major, major doctors that are saying that these vaccines can harm people.
Last thing.
I know that this doesn't have to do with this story.
You must know that there is a musician who lost eight of his fingers.
Blood clots.
He took the vaccine.
He wanted to keep his mom safe.
He woke up with a tube in his mouth.
He's a singer too.
He had to have prosthetics on his fingers and he's trying to regain his singing voice.
So this is what happens when people lie.
Transgender movement, push, push, push.
Some of these people are going to have internal accidents.
And you're going to be responsible for pushing this on people.
And little kids.
Makes me angry.
Carl.
So when we get the truth, one of the things I predict we're going to find out is that part of the poisons in our food has been to confuse gender.
It's another attack.
So you hear the talking point of toxic masculinity.
They want to crush any of the male power to protect and defend to work.
So we're called toxic for masculinity.
Women are under attack by having biological males win beauty contests, biological males To compete in sports.
So this is an attack on the feminine, the divine feminine, and an attack on the divine masculine.
They attack on every front that they can, and what they want is they want us to be crushed as a work animal species, GM-mode, and then culled, and then adjusted over time By, you know, because they're going to claim the right to shoot us with whatever, as the best work animal species possible.
Carl, the short answer is it's just crap.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Here we have Beverly writing about abortion.
Blame the Democrats for Roe v. Wade's demise.
The Democrats could have enacted legislation making abortion legal instead of leaving the matter at the mercy of the courts.
Eight years of Clinton, that's Bill.
Eight years of Obama.
Two years with a Democrat congressional majority and zero attempt to end the abortion adieu.
And silence during both administrations from pro-choice advocates, including Democrat Congress members who are now beyond hysterical about SCOTUS ruling.
Pro-choice protesters are storming the lawn of Justice Kavanaugh.
Why aren't they storming the lawn of Obama?
Obama campaigned on making the Freedom of Choice Act a law, which would allow access to abortion, thereby removing the courts from the issue.
Shortly after his installation in office, however, he said the Freedom of Choice Act was not a priority, and he did nothing to push the issue for eight years, including two with a Democratic majority, which would have made passage much easier.
And again, No screeching from pro-choice groups should demand Obama act on his promise, so they need to sit down and STFU now.
They had two Democrat administrations for two terms each and did nothing to push for a law granting access to abortion.
As usual, this is all about politics from both sides of the aisle.
The Dems you issued like abortion to raise money and get votes come election time.
Republicans cheer about their victory in overturning Roe, which also nets them votes, but rest assured if any of them find themselves wives, daughter, girlfriend, casual hookups in need of an abortion, They and their Democrat colleagues have a doctor who will help them out.
The rich and powerful always have had that option, and always will.
Meanwhile, if perchance you're considering suicide, please think again.
A real possibility of death is to merely get the COVID jab.
If you're pregnant and wondering about an abortion, forget that.
Just rush to your local clinic and get the COVID jab.
Over 80% of pregnant women who've had the COVID jab will suffer a dead fetus.
Think of the advantages.
You have your abortion and you have all the benefits of the COVID jab.
It's a win-win.
Meanwhile, remember, my petition is on the docket of the Supreme Court.
While I originally believed it was a First and Second Amendment case, the summary judgment protocols in Wisconsin allowed the judge to decide whether or not my facts were reasonable and exclude them if, in his subjective opinion, they were not.
As you will see from my petition, which you can download to your own desktop, the Court of Appeals, Forest District, and the Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed.
In other states such as Texas, however, the case against me would have been tossed or else sent to a jury for determination of the disputed facts.
But in Wisconsin, the court couldn't in effect determine the facts, regardless of my evidence.
It turns out this is a national problem, and I'm teeing it up for the SCOTUS to make summary judgment protocols uniform throughout the nation.
I believe they're going to do just that and set things right.
For more, visit GiveZenGo.com slash FundingFetzer.
GiveZenGo.com slash FundingFetzer.
Final thoughts, Carl, yours.
I appreciate our audience and applaud and salute their intellectual integrity and moral courage just to speak the truth.
Beverly is absolutely right.
I talked about that earlier that the Freedom of Choice Act was something that Obama and Biden campaigned on.
And then, you know, it's like any other campaign issue that they just lied and then treat people as stupid and the media treats people as stupid.
They'll never revisit those promises that are for campaigns and campaigns alone.
You know, one of the areas, too, is that we have suppressed technology, and I'm very interested in the suppressed technology for what we call free energy, and for our health, our general health.
And one area that I would predict is that if we unleashed The facts that we could get much better options to prevent unwanted pregnancies, rather than the limited choice that we're given now of a possibility of an abortion.
And for Jim's case, that's so this is really an Emperor's New Clothes moment.
If we care about Truth under the law, as much as we care about, for example, sports law.
I was at the San Francisco Giants afternoon baseball game yesterday, and an umpire also has dictatorial control.
Now, that said, If that power is abused.
For example, if a pitch 10 feet over everyone's head was called a strike, the game would stop.
It would be, nah, the umpire says, I get to say what it is.
Nah, this is a crooked game and we're not going to continue under these circumstances.
It's the same thing with the judge in Jim's case.
Jim had verified experts to be able to demonstrate that there were, how many versions?
Five different versions?
of an alleged death certificate, all of which were fraudulent, all of which were missing components, all of which were different!
So the judge, if he was ethical, he would have used his power of summary judgment to dismiss the plaintiff, to get rid of Posner as opposer, saying that your case should never have even gotten this far.
So we shall see.
We're still in this Emperor's New Clothes condition.
We're still in this clown show.
And there's nothing I see to do other than to continue to exercise our intellectual integrity, to exercise our moral courage, faith, spirituality, whatever you want to call it, to stand for truth, justice, and the American way of inalienable rights over a limited government.
Vegan, your final thoughts?
Well, I think that asking questions to people is probably a good way to go because it's softer.
You don't get as much slap back.
I'm going to just say that story.
It has nothing to do with anything, but it does at the same time.
I finally got my nails clipped and it was at a salon.
There were a couple of women there, Asian.
And I said that I was interested in massage a while ago because, you know, they massage the feet.
And I said, but I found out there's too many perverts.
And I said that loud.
I thought they would think it's funny.
I thought that they would agree.
And instead, I like got looks and whatnot, including from a family member.
But it is true!
I mean, I lived in L.A., and I knew some massage therapists that went to people's homes, and they were hit on, and what about Jeffrey Epstein?
I mean, I'm not saying that that's what happened, happens in the nail salons, but you don't know!
You touch somebody, and all of a sudden, they're getting a little bit fresky!
So, you know, here, I was so innocent, and, you know, I just got looks, but just saying, you gotta be careful with how you say things.
People take it the wrong way.
Um, we are living in a confusing time, even though we can all see that some people have clothes, but we want to think that they don't.
That's the scenario right now.
I'm not talking about the storybook.
Um, there was a video that just came out, very upsetting, and I agree with the person to an extent, but it was unfortunately a person of color on the ground, and there was a dog that had his arm Now the officer was trying to get the dog off and he was a person of color.
Well, the person that posted this video said that the police were trying to attack a man, a black man, on the ground with the dog and were like trying to abuse him.
What I saw is he was trying to take the dog off and he was the same color.
So, but I don't know.
Like, I mean, I do agree that they should know how to handle their dogs, but it didn't look like he was abusing.
So, this discrepancy for what we're seeing, it truly is dividing people and creating hate.
There is toxic masculinity, I do want to put it out there, but not to the extent where people are trying to use it to divide.
That's my opinion, though.
That's my opinion.
With abortions, I know somebody, she was a model, she said she had three of them.
She was from an Eastern European country, and she said that they felt good.
To me, that's very sad.
So I agree with you, Carl.
There are other things that can be done.
i'm not going to get into it but it was very very i felt good freezing i i got three in the last segment but i don't like to see people be bamboozled and then their health fails and then their dreams are taken away We've gone through a lot the past couple years, and I'm trying to claw my way back up to health.
Okay, it's not because I'm a vegan that I'm so thin.
I went through an enormous amount of stress.
I breathed something in that caused me sinusitis.
I went to see someone the other day.
I had to have endoscopy.
I have something off with my larynx reflux.
So look what this did to me.
I wish I could have been more zen, but I went full force, and I was trying to help teachers, and my voice would, like, rise and fall.
Elderly teachers that didn't understand what was going on!
They don't know how to use the internet, some of them, and look in the cogs of what's really happening.
So here I, you know, I messed myself up trying to help others.
So that's why I get angry.
I apologize for my screechy voice.
I'm doing the best that I can.
Lastly, suicide.
There's always a way out.
Not that way.
You know?
I mean, even if you don't believe in God, look for something that gives you a higher purpose.
I do believe that if you have peace in your heart and if you believe in a higher power, that that is absolute help.
I was helping someone yesterday, his friend.
He said that the wife cheated.
On his friend, and he said that his friend said he had a loaded gun and was going to kill himself.
Well, I gave the suicide hotline prevention number.
And anyway, the friend is okay.
I saw the text between them back and forth.
And he said, I love you, man.
Thank you for saving me.
I mean, it brings tears to my eyes.
I'm, I'm a sensitive person.
So if you're going through a hard time, just remember so many people are and you were put here on this planet.
For a reason.
Maybe you're a star seed.
Look that one up.
Thank you.
Well, it's going to be hard to top this show between Carl and vegan and pregnant men and Latinos who are tacos.
I'm not even going to try.
I'm going to say, spend as much time as you can with the people you love.