All Episodes
Previous Next
March 15, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
34:21
Trad Cat Knight (15 March 2022) with Eric Gajewski
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We've got five shows going to be done for you.
I just wrapped up one.
exclusive podcast right here on the track at night.org website folks today is march the 15th 2022 i hope you all are having a very wonderful blessed day as always we continue to keep the programming moving along here at track at night your number one catholic podcast and information service folks gonna be a very busy day on the podcasting side of things for the website we've got five shows going to be done for you i just wrapped up one we've got david rodriguez from fatima center on a little bit uh later rick bear from the crusade channel
we've got jim conda jr going to be joining us we've got a dr jim fetzer joining us right now as he always done one of our longest tenured uh guests here at trad cat night and listen he's gonna be breaking down um Uh, an awful lot.
So make sure you are ready.
We got to talk new DHS rules for terrorism, new Quinnipiac poll going green.
Uh, he's going to be talking about, uh, alarm, uh, alarm, uh, fire pole, uh, uh, 2022.
I'm not really familiar with that.
So Jim's going to have to educate me on that one.
We'll hand it over to him just a second, but folks don't forget to follow a track head across all your major social media outlets, Instagram.
Uh, we're on a telegram now to the one that really been.
The kicking butt on is on TikTok.
We've amassed like 14,000 new followers on that alone over the last two to three weeks.
I'm like one strike away, though, from being banned, so I'm trying to play the game over there a little bit, which kind of stinks.
But in any case, we're trying to get the word out.
Don't forget about the Trad Cat Night Video Club, which you can access now.
Again, we were booted off of Patreon last month for medical misinformation.
So we're just housing everything internally now on the website, putting it behind the paywall.
And this is how we have to proceed, unfortunately, in 2022.
And don't forget about the Trad Cat Night exclusive movie, Marie-Jalee Jaheni, on Vimeo.
Vimeo.com, type in Three Years of Darkness.
Check it on out.
If you want to become a sponsor or a donator, well, we need donations not only for just the website, but for the next live call and radio show.
We're just going to feature Michael Snyder from the Economic Collapse blog.
He's probably one of the most read people in this country, certainly, but maybe in the world.
His articles are certainly well circulated.
We also have Professor Dave Colm going to be joining us for that one.
So please make that donation today so that we can fund this show and get it rockin' and rollin', but you can also become a sponsor here at Trad Canada across all of our platforms, anywhere, inside the paywall, outside of the paywall.
And for this month, we've got 247rosary.com, where it's playing the rosary.
It's Joe Blazak's work.
The rosary's being played every half hour, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
If you want to join him for the Wednesday night rosary call-in, you can contact him at Pray at 247.
You've got Kathleen Ohlone taking orders for Xavier Ayrault's new Catholic Prophecy Book for the End Time Remedies, Purple Scapulars, Catholic Sacramentals.
You can contact her at KathleenLOhlone at gmail.com.
Chris Gotton, he's inviting all Catholics and those like mine to please remember the dead.
Remember those who have gone before you.
I just recalled a very sad news bit from this morning where some nuns who had gone off the road this morning.
It was down in southern Italy.
Had parished three of them.
And again, you just never know, folks.
So let's keep those who have gone before you in our prayers.
We also have Cynthia Cooney's in our Cooney's Market.
And she's up here in northwest Ohio.
Fourth Generation Farm growing her own fruits and vegetables for the last 90 years.
They specialize in unpastoralizing.
Thank you so much for joining us, and stay dialed in, folks.
Here we go.
Beats, cheeses, and so much more.
And last but not least, Jeff Campos at agiftolight.com, wherein you can commemorate a special occasion or a loved one through a candle that's going to display your personal photos and or prayers or messages.
Again, that's agiftolight.com.
Having said that, I'm done with the opening spiel.
Jim, it's all yours.
Thank you so much for joining us.
And stay dialed in, folks.
Here we go.
Go ahead, Jim.
Well, that would be a five-alarm fire for the Democrat Party, Eric, that came from a new Wall Street Journal poll.
A 1,500 registered voter is showing a majority, 57% disapproved of Biden's job performance, 63%.
63% of registered voters believe the country is headed in the wrong direction.
65% the economy headed in the wrong direction.
And Eric, those wrong direction polls Have been reliable indicators of the outcome at the midterms.
Those are horrible numbers for the Democratic Party, which exercises the most political control in Washington, controlling the House, the Senate and the White House.
They underscore the upper battle.
If they want to retain that control, I guarantee you they will not.
I'm predicting loss of 100 seats in the House and And three to four seats in the Senate.
The majority overwhelmingly believe Biden is not focusing on the right issues.
They disapprove of his handling of the economy, inflation, the border crisis, immigration, crime.
They agree he's weak, not a strong leader.
Phil Kline, writing at the National Review, has summarized the reality of this poll.
It's fair to say that if these numbers are anywhere close to the actual results, Democrats will be massacred in November, and they will have earned it.
Knowing they're on their way out, they want to loot the Treasury once more to line their pockets, passing this massive $1.5 trillion omnibus spending package, nearly 3,000 pages, released so late that no one could actually read it to know what's in it.
The bill includes $13.6 billion for aid to Ukraine and our European allies, and to keep the federal government going through September 30th, The Congress hasn't passed an actual budget for the United States for around 10 years.
It's unbelievable.
Tuesday, the Democrat-controlled House Rules Committee held a meeting in the dead of night at 1.30 a.m.
to finalize a package.
They released it around 3 a.m., giving less than 12 hours for lawmakers to read it, with a vote scheduled for 1.30 eastern time.
Despite the last-minute release, the defense portion passed 361-69, the domestic 260-171.
Marjorie Taylor Greene, who is, in my opinion, a great American, slammed House Speaker Pelosi and her hand-picked committee for the underhanding tactics as she announced the incident.
Greene uploaded a video to express her outrage.
Where the America First representative explained she was still shocked about being blindsided by the absolutely horrendous bill, calling the legislative process completely broken due to the Democrats' unwavering partisanship and Pelosi's corruption.
Nancy Pelosi should be completely unseated as Speaker of the House, Green observed.
Like all other massive federal spending packages, this one is chock full of terrible spending, a whole lot of pork, and horrific policy proposals, including a massive amount of foreign spending as well as millions for Planned Parenthood.
Now, the package has made it past Congress.
It's already been signed and approved by the Senate.
This is very, very disappointing that that should have taken place.
Meanwhile, we have a rather remarkable result in so far as Vladimir Putin's poll standings are getting a boost in Russia.
Apparently the Russian people understand what's going on in Ukraine far better than the American.
Vladimir Putin has enjoyed an increase in popularity and In the weeks before he launched the invasion of Ukraine, opinion trackers Levada Center, respected non-government research organizations, asked about their approval, and he experienced an increase from 69% in January to 71% in February.
This is the highest his approval rate has hit in the polling since May of 2018, when he had a 79%.
In February, Putin had 71% approval and 27% disapproval among the Russian public.
Russia's invasion began on February 24th.
A separate telephone poll conducted last week suggested 58% of Russians approve of the invasion, while 23% oppose it.
Putin received relatively modest support in comparison with typical levels in the early stages of previous incursions.
Gary Langer, a US-based polling expert, obtained the results of the study from the Russian research organization, did not identify which firms were involved.
The country has increased its censorship of the media, where two days after the war began, Newsweek reported Russia began telling its media to delete specific stories that painted the invasion in a negative light.
The country's media monitoring regulator, Roskomnadzor, launched an investigation regarding dissemination of unreliable publicly significant information against multiple Russian news organizations.
If a report referred to Russia's actions as an assault, an invasion, or a declaration of war, it would have to be deleted.
If this were not done, the government would threaten to block them.
Roscommodore has also accused outlets of publishing inaccurate information about the shelling of Ukrainian cities and civilian casualties as a result of the actions of the Russian army.
Now, if you think that Russia is being severe, it's unbelievable what's happening right here in the USA.
The Secretary of DHS has released new rules on extremism, where DHS will target anyone who believes the election was stolen or challenges Fauci's ever-changing COVID narrative.
Joe Biden and DHS Secretary Mayorkas immediately opened up the U.S.
southern border once they came into office.
Biden has also set another record.
Only 59,011 illegals were deported his first year in office, the lowest number since 1995.
It should be obvious by now that the Biden intends to destroy the US before he leaves office.
I believe if you look at this, where Biden is obviously merely a stooge in a puppet and that George Soros, who's dedicated his lifetime to destroying the United States, is actually the acting president.
All the pieces fall in together.
Now Mayorkas is working on an important project rather than shut down the border.
He's released new rules on extremism, including those who question the fraud in the 2020 election or anyone who questions regime talking points on COVID and its treatments, including the mandates and the VACs.
Part of what they report.
March 2021, a classified threat assessment prepared by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Department of Justice and DHS noted domestic violent extremists who are motivated by a range of ideologies and galvanized by recent political and societal events in the U.S.
pose an elevated threat to the homeland in 2021.
The assessment points to newer socio-political developments such as narratives of fraud in the recent general election, for which, by the way, we have overwhelming proof.
Not only did Mike Lindell do a three-day demonstration of massive theft of the election, but there's a forthcoming documentary entitled 2,000 Mules that demonstrates how the Democrats use these drop boxes to stuff the ballots where the mules, those who are performing those tasks, had to take selfies in order to be paid, where they have all the selfies.
Look for 2,000 Mules.
This is going to leave no doubt about it.
The embodying, emboldening impact of the violent breach of the U.S.
Capitol.
And by the way, we know, of course, that was laden with FBI agents, that they were coordinating, they were provoking, they were leading the event, and that John Sullivan, the prominent Antifa leader, led 226 Antifa members dressed as sumptuous martyrs into the Capitol.
So obviously that was contrived.
Conditions related to the COVID-19 pandemic and conspiracy theories promoting violence.
Frankly, although I do a tremendous amount of research on conspiracies, I know of no conspiracy theorist or research that promotes violence, but challenging the COVID-19 pandemic, we have overwhelming evidence That, according to the DHS, will almost certainly spur some domestic violent extremists to try to engage in violence this year.
Over half the U.S.
population, of course, questioned the results of the 2020 presidential election.
Another half questioned the ever-changing COVID talking points coming from the medical elites, including Tony the Rad, who lied under oath about Not funding gain-of-function research in Chinese labs.
If you mention any of this, however, you may end up on their list.
These are really bad people.
Meanwhile, let me say, the going green agenda, which has been endlessly promoted by the Democrats, is based on false beliefs.
There's no scientific support for it.
Let me share with you thoughts that reveal.
Just contemplate, by the way, abstractly The idea of having electric vehicles or EVs, which the Democrats are promoting, they have a very limited range.
It consumes more energy to charge them than is saved.
It turns out that the recharging process consumes hours, unlike going up to a gas tank and filling your tank, which takes a matter of minutes.
We have no way to dispose of these batteries, which are going to become a form of toxic waste, very analogous to nuclear energy producers.
We have no way to dispose of nuclear energy.
This is another way of destroying planet Earth, not saving it.
Listen to this.
Subject going green.
What is a battery?
Nikola Tesla said it best when he called it an energy storage system.
That's an important distinction.
Batteries do not make electricity.
They store electricity produced elsewhere, primarily by coal, uranium, natural gas-powered plants, or diesel fuel generators.
So to say an EV is a zero-emission vehicle is not at all valid.
Also, Since 40% of the electricity generated in the US is from coal-fired plants, it follows that 40% of the EVs on the road are coal-powered.
Do you see?
Einstein's formula, energy equals mass times the velocity of light squares, tells us it takes the same amount of energy to move a 5,000-pound gasoline-driven automobile a mile as it does an electric one.
The only question again is what produces the power.
To reiterate, it does not come from the battery.
The battery is only the storage device, like the gas tank.
Not the gas, the tank, in a car.
There are two orders of batteries, rechargeable and single-use.
The most common single-use batteries are AA, AAA, CD, 9-volt, and lantern types.
Those dry cell species use zinc, manganese, lithium, silver oxide, or zinc and carbon to store electricity chemically.
Please note they all contain toxic heavy metals.
Rechargeable batteries only differ in their internal materials, usually lithium ion, nickel metal oxide, and nickel cadmium.
The United States uses three billion of these two battery types a year.
Most are not recycled.
They end up in landfills.
California is the only state that requires all batteries be recycled.
If you throw your small unused batteries into the trash, here's what happens to them.
All batteries are self-discharging.
That means even when not in use, they leak tiny amounts of energy.
You have likely ruined a flashlight or two from an old, ruptured battery.
When a battery runs down and can no longer power a toy or a light, you think of it as dead.
Well, it is not.
It continues to leak small amounts of electricity.
As the chemicals inside it run out, pressure builds inside the battery's metal casing, and eventually it cracks.
The metals left inside then ooze out.
The ooze in your ruined flashlight is toxic, and so is the ooze that will inevitably leak from every battery in a landfill.
All batteries eventually rupture.
It just takes rechargeable batteries longer to end up in the landfill.
In addition to dry cell batteries, there are also wet cell ones used in automobiles, boats, and motorcycles.
The good thing about these is 90% of them are recyclable.
Unfortunately, we do not yet know how to recycle single-use ones properly, but that is not the half of it.
For those of you excited about electric cars and a green revolution, I want you to take a closer look at batteries and also windmills and solar panels.
These three technologies share what we call environmentally destructive embedded costs.
Everything manufactured has two costs associated with it, embedded costs and operating costs.
I will explain embedded costs using a can of baked beans as my example.
In this scenario, baked beans are on sale, so you jump in your car and head for the grocery store.
Sure enough, they're on the shelf for $1.75 a can.
As you head to the checkout, you begin to think about the embedded costs in the can of beans.
The first cost is the diesel fuel the farmer uses to plow the field, till the ground, harvest the beans, and transport them to the food processor.
Not only is his diesel fuel an embedded cost, so are the costs to build the tractors, combines, and trucks.
In addition, the farmer might use a nitrogen fertilizer made from natural gas.
Next is the energy cost of cooking the beans, heating the building, transporting the workers, and paying for the vast amounts of electricity used to run the plant.
The steel can holding the beans is also an embedded cost.
Making the steel can requires mining taconite, shipping it by boat, extracting the iron, placing it in a coal-fired blast furnace, and adding carbon.
Then it's back on another truck to take the beans to the grocery store.
Finally, add in the cost of the gasoline for your car.
A typical EV battery weighs 1,000 pounds, about the size of a travel trunk.
It contains 25 pounds of lithium, 60 pounds of nickel, 44 pounds of manganese, 30 pounds of cobalt, 200 pounds of copper, 400 pounds of aluminum, steel, and plastic.
Inside are over 6,000 individual lithium ion cells.
It should concern you that all those toxic components come from mining.
For instance, To manufacture each EV auto battery, you must process 25,000 pounds of brine for the lithium, 30,000 pounds of ore for the cobalt, 5,000 pounds of ore for the nickel, and 25,000 pounds of ore for copper.
All told, you dig up 50,000 pounds of the Earth's crust for just one EV battery.
68% of the world's cobalt, a significant part of a battery, comes from the Congo.
Their mines have no pollution controls.
They employ children who die from handling this toxic material.
Should we factor in the diseased kids as part of the cost of driving an electric car?
I'd like to leave you with three thoughts.
California is building the largest battery in the world near San Francisco, and they intend to power it from solar panels and windmills.
They claim this is the ultimate in being green, but it is not.
This construction project is creating an environmental disaster.
Let me tell you why.
The main problem with solar arrays is the chemicals needed to process silica into the silicon used in the panels.
To make pure enough silicon requires processing it with hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, nitric acid, hydrogen fluoride, Triethylene and acetone.
In addition, they also need gallium, arsenide, copper, indium, gallium disenide, and cadmium telluride, which are also highly toxic.
Silicone dust is a hazard to the workers, and the panels cannot be recycled.
Windmills are the ultimate and embedded cause of environmental destruction.
"Each weighs 1,688 tons, the equivalent of 23 houses "and contains 1,300 tons of concrete, 295 tons of steel, "48 tons of iron, 24 tons of fiberglass, "and the hard to extract rare earth, 24 tons of fiberglass, "and the hard to extract rare earth, neobidium, "praseybidium and
Each blade weighs 81,000 pounds and will last 15 to 20 years, at which time it must be re-blazed.
We cannot recycle used blades.
Sadly, both solar arrays and windmills kill birds, bats, sea life, and migratory insects.
There may be a place for these technologies, but you must look beyond the myth of zero emissions.
I predict EVs and windmills will be abandoned once the embedded environmental costs of making and replacing them become apparent.
Going green may sound like the utopian ideal and easily espouse catchy buzzwords, but when you look at the hidden and embedded costs realistically with an open mind, you can see that going green is more destructive to the Earth's environment than meets the eye for sure.
Had this been titled, The Embedded Costs of Going Green, would you have read it?
Please share this as widely as you can.
Meanwhile, There are those who are realizing that the $73 million settlement against Remington is backdoor gun control.
You can find this article on my blog at jamesfetzer.org.
Just as you can find a series about climate change, I'm doing with Joe Olson on my BitChute channel, Jim Fetzer, where from the beginning we have been exposing that the whole green agenda is a sham.
For example, the claim is that CO2 is an environmental hazard, but CO2 in the atmosphere is indispensable to life, actually cools the planet in four different ways.
Moreover, there is no correlation between the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere and the temperature of the Earth.
Over 600 million years of Earth's history, there is no correlation.
If there is no correlation, there is no causation.
Even in the presence of correlation, as in the case of vaccines and autism or smoking and cancer, big pharma and big tobacco fought tooth and nail denying there was a causal relationship in spite of a correlation.
In the absence of a correlation, there can be no causation.
CO2 is not only indispensable to life, but cannot possibly be responsible for global warming, which has taken place periodically throughout the history of Earth on a geological scale.
Nothing wrong now is taking place that entails CO2 or shifting to a green economy.
Regarding the settlement, when it was proposed at $33 million, I was calling it out as an insurance scam.
The obvious reason is that there's been no judicial determination that anyone died at Sandy Hook, as I explained there.
Upping the ante to $73 million is all the more insulting.
I am making an effort to intervene in the Remington bankruptcy case to defeat the fraud, now a bankruptcy scam, where I am demonstrating to the bankruptcy court that the underlying issue has never been addressed and that this would be a blatant abuse of the rights of stockholders, stakeholders, and ultimately taxpaying citizens of the United States.
As I explain in my Defending the First and Second Amendment, which you can also find on my blog, they want to use insurance to require registration, which will be followed by confiscation.
That's the plan.
Remington Arms, America's oldest gun manufacturer, settled for $73 million in a wrongful death suit brought by several families purported victims of the Sandy Hook shooting.
The settlement followed seven plus years of litigation, two Remington bankruptcies, and a previous settlement offer of $33 million, which they declined.
It's being described as a victory over the gun lobby, and Biden has called it historic.
The anti-gunners are wrong, however.
The settlement was neither a victory nor historic, but instead revealed yet another way political actors can undermine your gun rights.
Which is why they're so excited about it.
Gun manufacturers are protected by the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act that makes it difficult to sue gun manufacturers.
It does not provide blanket immunity because Gun manufacturers can still be sued on multiple grounds, including traditional product liability.
A gun is defective and causes injury.
Negligence.
They transfer the gun to someone else they had reasonable cause to believe was prohibited from owning it.
And violating laws surrounding the sale, such as falsifying applications lying on the books.
They packed the lawsuit with a slew of allegations that were dismissed early, but eventually the Connecticut Supreme Court allowed that moving forward based upon the manner in which it was advertised would be permissible.
The plaintiffs cited marketing slogans such as, consider your man card reissued, or clear the room, cover the rooftop, rescue the hostage, none of which are inherently violent, certainly do not appeal to young men to commit mass murder.
For example, Ford claims its trucks are built with military-grade aluminum, which would mean that victims of the Waukesha massacre should be able to sue Ford after all.
Why would a truck need anything military-grade unless it was intended to be rammed through 80 people during a Christmas Day parade?
Although the case was allowed to move forward, the Connecticut Supreme Court acknowledged winning would be a Herculean task because they'd have to prove Bushmaster's marketing contributed to the shooter's decision to commit the atrocity.
Since the shooter did not buy the gun himself, but rather murdered his mother and stole it from her, according to the official narrative, it's hard to see that the claim that advertising was relevant would be a stretch.
Technically, moreover, Remington did not settle.
Four insurance companies that represented it did.
By a settlement, by definition, means Remington did not accept liability.
The idea this is a victory is asinine.
The bankrupt Remington and its agents settled because winning the case in a court of law would have been even more costly than settling because of the additional legal fees entailed.
It's astronomically less expensive to be a plaintiff since they are generally paid from the settlement after litigation is finished.
The defense, however, needs to pay up front.
Activists can just keep hurling frivolous lawsuit after lawsuit at gun manufacturers until something sticks.
No big deal if the case gets thrown out.
Take notes and try again.
Since the legal system is slow and painful, the mountain of attorney fees needed to defend faces an enormous financial burden on gun companies.
It turns out companies are low margin business.
Ruger, the largest in the industry, has a market cap of around a billion, which sounds substantial until you realize Google makes that much in profit every single week.
So, this was the plan.
Kill Remington with legal fees or insurmountable insurance costs.
Once the plaintiffs admitted they wanted to send the message, this is a high-risk market, it is not profitable, and you will be held accountable.
This type of lawsuit has been common in the past.
Gun control has been a losing item for years, but if this settlement becomes precedent, that could change.
If gun control loses in legislatures or court, activists can simply abuse the legal structure to enforce de facto gun control by driving gun makers out of business.
The end result is the same.
Restrict access to guns for the law abiding at least.
The criminals are not about to surrender theirs.
This won't end with Remington.
The floodgates have been opened.
Even Mexico is now suing the gun industry for gun violence perpetrated by cartels.
Remington's settlement serves as a stark reminder the left will use whatever means necessary to advance their agenda, in this case, your disarmament.
Let me add, Eric, that I'm in the middle of a situation where I may be able to do something about it.
I was sued over my book with a manufactured lawsuit that was allowed to go forward in violation of the constraints that are imposed upon what was used in this case as summary judgment.
Where no issue is allowed to be in dispute in order for a judge to merely apply the law.
In this case, the judge ruled early on that I could not introduce the massive evidence I had published in the book.
Nobody died at Sandy Hook to make a difference.
On the ground, it had nothing to do with the accuracy or the truthfulness of the death certificate, which was uncertified that I'd published for a decedent alleged to have died at Sandy Hook on 14 December 2012 of multiple gunshot wounds.
Then, focusing solely on the death certificate, when I introduced the reports of two forensic document experts who testified reported it was fake, The judge merely set them aside as someone else's opinion when he had to send the case to a jury for resolution.
When I appealed to the Wisconsin Court of Appeals Fourth District, they merely reiterated the official narrative in spite of the fact that no judicial case has actually been settled on the basis of the merits where mine came the closest.
And when I appealed to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, they denied my petition for review without a word of explanation.
I have 90 days to submit a writ of certiorari to the U.S.
Supreme Court.
I have the evidence and the law on my case.
But because of the expenses for attorneys that have been so well described here, I need your help.
Go to, check out, givecentgo.com slash fundingfetzer.
If you believe my standing up for the First and the Second Amendment, as well as the Fifth, make a difference to you, then you might want to toss a few bucks into the kitty.
I need your help.
Eric, I'm so grateful to have this opportunity to join you for these presentations on a regular basis.
Yeah, thanks so much, Jim.
Another powerful, jam-packed, information-laced show with Dr. Jim Fetzer.
Looking forward to another one next month.
And folks, listen, we gotta keep the shows moving along today.
We now have to get ready for Jim Condit Jr.
▲
Export Selection