All Episodes
Previous Next
March 15, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:12:19
Need to Know News (14 March 2022) with Joe Olson and Carl Herman
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, with Joel Olson from Houston, Texas, and Carl Herman from San Ramon, California.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
It begins with a brutal new poll revealing a five-alarm fire for the Democrats, where Republicans are making games with Blacks and Hispanics, gutting the Democrat voter base.
A new Wall Street Journal poll showed a majority of voters 57% disapprove of Biden's job performance.
63% believe the country is headed in the wrong directions.
65% believe the economy is headed in the wrong direction.
Those are indicators of what will happen in the midterm, those headed in the wrong direction.
These are horrible numbers for the Democratic Party.
Indeed, a majority of respondents overwhelmingly believe Biden, the head of the Democrat Party, is not focused on the right issues, disapprove of his handling of the economy, inflation, border crisis, immigration, and crime, and agree that he is not a strong leader.
The poll also found more registered voters are likely to vote Republican than Democrat, 46 to 41.
Despite all those problems, it gets even worse.
Republicans are making significant inroads among Hispanic and Blacks.
Republicans have gained 9% among Hispanic voters, while Democrats lost 21 points among Blacks.
In the November survey, 56% of Blacks said they favored Democrats, now only 35%.
The support for Republicans among Blacks rose a whopping 12 points at 27%.
Phil Kline, writing at National Review, summarized the reality.
It's fair to say, if these numbers are anywhere close to the actual results, Democrats will be massacred in November.
Meanwhile, anticipating they're no longer going to have the opportunity to loot the Treasury, they have passed a massive $1.5 trillion omnibus spending package.
The bill includes $13.6 billion for Ukraine and European allies.
It will fend the government through September 30th.
The Rules Committee held a meeting in the dead of night at 1.30 a.m.
to finalize the package.
After meeting for an hour, they released a bill at 3 a.m., less than 12 hours to read the content before the vote for 1.30.
Most weren't even awake when the bill was released.
Despite the last-minute release, the defense portion passed 361-69, domestic 260-171.
Marjorie Taylor Greene slammed Pelosi and her handpicked committee for their underhanded tactics and uploaded a video explaining how she was shocked by being blindsided by an absolutely horrendous bill she's at.
I want to tell you how corrupt Congress is.
Now, you would not believe what happened last night.
As a matter of fact, I'm still shocked about it, and the rest of the Republicans are as well.
For all of us in Washington, when we woke up this morning, we found out it was too late to go and put amendments in, try to argue back, try to get things removed from this horrendous $1.5 trillion bill.
We weren't able to do it because the Democrats knock it through.
They did not tell us ahead of time.
No one had any idea until the committee put it on its website after midnight.
This is not how Congress is supposed to work.
It's absolutely broken.
So when you look at our government and you're shocked and can't believe the things that happen here, I'm telling you, this is how corrupt it is.
No one has read it, the bill, 2,741 pages.
Like other massive federal spending packages, this one's chock full of terrible spending, horrific policy proposals, some of which have been found buried by hot GOP representatives Chip Roy and Jim Banks, calling out provisions including a massive amount of foreign spending and millions for Planned Parenthood.
Now that it's made its way past the House, it may face a tougher hurdle in the Senate, where, however, it's still likely to pass thanks to the support of rhinos like Mitch McConnell, who's been advocating for more spending for Ukraine than the Democrats originally proposed.
Joe, your thoughts?
Oh yeah, this includes $10 billion of earmarks, so that was able to buy off a bunch of rhinos.
And then it extends the Biden mask mandates and testing mandates.
So bottom line is they're keeping that little racket running.
And then it was approved by the Senate by a vote of 68 to 31, which means there was a bunch of rhinos that managed to get their special earmarks passed.
You know, get their kickbacks from the military industrial complex because Pelosi stuck on $14 billion of aid, military aid to Ukraine so we could help those wonderful freedom fighters over there get rid of Dirty Putin.
It's just, the whole thing is just beyond insane.
How stupid do you have to believe to believe anything these people say?
It's absolutely horrible, and we've got nothing in the way of a news media that even bothers to mention this stuff.
It's, you know, we're on autopilot to Armageddon.
It's disgusting.
So the Senate has already approved this package.
It's already sailed through onto Biden's desk.
That's it.
Carl, your thoughts.
I think that already makes the whole case of why need-to-know news is so important.
So regarding the poll, first of all, polling is as honest as corporate media, which means it's not going to be honest at all.
And this really is, if we have any semblance of truth, that breaks through the last election of the Democratic Party before they go into the historical placement of the Whig Party.
And remember, As long as we have Dominion voting machines, no election is going to be safe, including and especially the midterm.
And the reasons for the people's abandonment of any support of the Democratic Party, we have the COVID, the absolute attack on American freedoms, we have inalienable rights.
That was the breakthrough of the United States of America and limited government, strictly limited under the constitution.
So they've surrendered that.
They've surrendered, they've had the greatest economic attack in American history on our own people.
You had that tragic comedy in Afghanistan.
You have the inflation.
And if you go to shadow stats, economist John Williams will give you a much more accurate picture of those actual inflation numbers.
You have the Bozo show in Ukraine.
You have the election fraud, which more and more people are waking up to.
You have the ongoing Great Reset exponential debt that people are, you know, they recognize it, they see it, and they notice that neither political party have any answer to that.
And then this $1.5 trillion bill You know, just to put this in context to make the case that this is just organized looting and money laundering, 1.5 is greater than the entire proposed federal budget just back in 2005.
Yeah, the entire federal budget in 2005, this single bill.
Disgusting.
Meanwhile, Ukraine's NATO membership is not relevant or on the agenda, says the Secretary General of NATO.
It's not imminent, will not be on the agenda in the near future.
That's not the same as saying it will never be.
He emphasized Ukraine has a right to pursue NATO membership and the organization respects every nation's choice.
It's up to the 30 NATO allies to decide whether Ukraine is ready for membership.
But remember, Russia will not tolerate Ukraine as a member of NATO.
And when the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991, it was with solemn agreements from President Reagan and Secretary of State James Baker that the West would not encroach a single inch to the east.
At the time, there were 16 NATO nations.
They have now added 14 more, most of which have come from those Eastern European republics that were not to be encroached upon.
No wonder Putin is taking a strong stand.
In February 2019, then-Ukrainian President Poroshenko, who was a Western toady put in by means of a coup carried out by Victoria Nuland using $5 billion of American taxpayer money, signed a constitutional amendment committing the country to become a member of NATO and the European Union.
Absolutely unacceptable.
Putin said Russia has laid down red lines to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO, that Ukraine's ties with the alliance would make it a launchpad for NATO missiles targeting Russia.
NATO allies have been shy about clarifying their stance on Ukraine and NATO, clearly not on their agenda before Putin ordered the special military incursion.
As the war intensified and has caused millions to flee, some NATO leaders have admitted that it's not on the agenda and even voiced objections.
German Chancellor Schultz, for example, said on March 4, Ukraine's NATO membership will not take place.
I also made clear in Moscow in my visit this option.
NATO, including Ukraine, is not on the table and will not take place.
Trump said he shared Russian President Putin's security concern and clarified to Putin that Ukraine will not be allowed to join NATO.
Meanwhile, despite the risk of nuclear war, calls have grown for the U.S.
to impose a no-fly zone over Ukraine.
Biden said Friday a direct conflict between NATO and Russia would mean World War III, among growing calls to impose a no-fly zone.
The U.S.
and NATO would then have to shoot down Russian planes and take out surface-to-air missiles inside Russia, which could quickly turn nuclear.
Nevertheless, some members of Congress are warming to the idea.
Adam Kinzinger was among the first to call for a no-fly zone.
Joe Manchin and Representative Maria Salazar have both said they're in favor of it.
This week, Politico published an open letter signed by 27 foreign policy experts urging Biden to impose a limited no-fly zone, but since Russian air defense missiles can shoot down planes across Ukraine, the prospect of a limited no-fly zone is impossible.
It's even getting favorable media coverage.
The strongest proponent is Ukrainian President Zelensky.
So far, Biden's holding firm on not fighting Russia directly in Ukraine through a no-fly zone or boots on the ground.
We will not fight a war against Russia in Ukraine.
Direct conflict between NATO and Russia is World War III, something we must strive to prevent.
Pentagon spokesman John Kirby Friday explained why the U.S.
could not impose one.
It is combat.
There's no way you could do that without being willing to shoot and be shot.
It's combat.
I really don't think it's in anyone's interest, certainly not Ukraine, for the U.S.
and Russia to be getting into a war in their airspace.
While standing firm, the Biden admin is still risking provoking Moscow by flooding Ukraine with weapons.
And sharing intelligence with Ukraine as they fight Russia.
That's not going to go down well with Putin either.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, NATO has a really sterling record of involvement in knocking down third world countries like Bosnia and Afghanistan and Iraq and Libya and Syria.
But now they're talking about somebody that's really powerful.
And if you go to Veterans Today, there's an interesting little story.
Nuclear capable U.S.
missile bases completed in Poland just in time.
And it also says that, make no mistake, Putin will use nukes first.
You have to look at history from the Russian perspective.
The King of Sweden invaded Russia in 1709.
Napoleon invaded them in 1812.
In 1709, Napoleon invaded them in 1812.
The British invaded them in Crimea in 1856.
The British funded the development of the Imperial Japanese Navy and armies, which invaded Russia in 1905.
And then they had the Bolshevik Revolution, sucked them into World War I with a false pretense and stupid treaties, and then overthrew them with the Bolshevik Revolution.
and then funded Hitler to invade them in 19...
I don't blame them!
Jesus Christ!
1940.
So bottom line is we've had this historic evidence of the West absolutely attacking Russia relentlessly.
And Russia's had a belly full of it.
I don't blame them.
Jesus Christ.
Like they say, some of my best friends are Russians.
And I think we should all find a Russian friend and tell them, you know, we don't believe in this bullshit.
And please, if you can translate anything because their censoring is so bad.
There was a great guy interviewed that Carl had sent me last week, said, you know anything about this guy?
It was a two-hour-long video.
I didn't watch it, but this morning, he's an on-the-scenes reporter over outside Kiev, and he put up an eight-minute video about what's going on, and I linked it at Gab, and within minutes, it was removed from YouTube.
So, bottom line is they're doing everything they can to stifle anything in the way of objective analysis of the realities over there, and it's just absolutely disgusting that we have to live in this cesspool of controlled opposition and directed narrative by demonic warlords.
I couldn't agree more.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, and another example of World War I. The U.S.
stayed in northern Russia until 1920, organized with factions that they were tempted to overthrow that government into a compliant puppet state.
So, that report that NATO is off the table officially, that's good.
That's good.
Apparently Kamala Harris didn't want to talk about that.
I saw a little clip of her talking for a minute where she linked Ukraine and NATO together in another one minute of word salad from her.
She didn't cackle at the end of that.
I'm proud of her.
I'm still hoping that she can get rid of that cackle.
And then with the California Army National Guard commander sent to communication yesterday ordering all California Army National Guard to quote unquote Be to stand ready for Ukraine.
And in this communication from Army Major General Laura Yeager, she again linked Ukraine as a partner nation to the U.S.
I can't imagine that that has ever had precedent before.
And the no-fly zone, be clear, that's war.
You say you're going to shoot down anything that flies, all right, so something flies in, you shoot it down, that's war.
And that area has already been under war since 2014, as Ukrainians who get censored on American media tell you in Donbass, where they refuse to accept the color revolution, Nazi-imposed leaders by NATO and the US.
The new Ukrainian government, backed by money from the U.S.
and NATO, shelled that region, killing Ukrainians when those eastern Ukrainians refused to take a knee to those installed Nazi puppets.
Go to Carl B. Herman Blogspot, any of these shows, And if you want to have the sufficient evidence of that the U.S.
is a lying, looting, illegal, rogue state empire, my series, U.S.
Illegal, will do that.
And finally, beware of false flags.
When you hear and see American leaders, political leaders saying, oh, the Russians are going to use biological weapons.
No, the U.S.
is going to use biological weapons and blame the Russians.
When the U.S.
says, here, you're going to drop a nuke.
No, the U.S.
is going to wag the dog.
Yeah, I'm afraid you're on the right track there, Carl.
Meanwhile, it turns out deleted web pages show Obama led the effort to build a Ukraine-based biolab handling especially dangerous pathogens.
A deleted web article recovered by National Pulse revealed former President Obama spearheaded an agreement to the construction of biolabs handling especially dangerous pathogens in Ukraine.
The news came the same day that Biden regime apparatchik directoria Nuland told the Senate the government is concerned about biological research facilities falling into Russian hands as a result of the conflict in Ukraine.
Originally posted on June 18, 2010, the article, Biolab Opens in Ukraine, Details how Obama, serving as an Illinois senator, helped negotiate a deal to build 11-3 biosafety lab in Odessa.
It also highlights the work of former Senator Dick Lugar, included in issue number 818 of the United States Air Force Counterproliferation Center's outreach journal.
Let me read a few paragraphs.
published 17 June 2010, BioLab opens in Ukraine.
What do you mean?
Senator Nick Lugar applauded the opening of the Interim Center Reference Laboratory in Odessa, this week announcing it will be instrumental in researching dangerous pathogens used by bioterrorists.
The Level 3 Biosafety Lab, which is a first built under the expanded authority of the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, We'll be used to study anthrax, tularema, and Q fever, as well as other dangerous pathogens.
But continuing cooperation of non-Lugar partners has improved safety for all people against weapons of mass destruction and potential terrorist use, in addition to advancements in the prevention of pandemics and public health consequences, Lugar said, in a grossly misleading statement.
Meanwhile, a 2011 report from the Academy of Science Committee on Anticipating Biosecurity Challenges explained how the Odessa-based lab is responsible for the identification of especially dangerous biological pathogens.
This laboratory was reconstructed and technically updated to the BSL-3 level through a cooperative agreement between the U.S.
DoD and the Ministry of Health in Ukraine.
The updated laboratory serves as interim cultural reference lab with a depositarium, a pathogen collection.
It has a permit to work with both bacteria and viruses of first and second pathogenic group.
Among the virus they were studying were Ebola and virulence as pathogenesis group 2 by use of virology, molecular, serologic, and express methods.
The lab provides special training for specialists on biosafety and biosecurity.
Unbelievable!
But so, Obama once again proves to be a key player in these absolutely disgraceful actions.
Go ahead, Joe, your thoughts.
Oh yeah, well here's a great article at Business Insider, September 25, 2016.
Over and over again, the military has conducted dangerous biological warfare experiments on Americans.
And this story begins with the Operation Sea Spray in 1950 in San Francisco, where they exposed 800,000 people in San Francisco to biological agents.
Just so they could track how they were able.
And, you know, we have to be able to use these weapons so we can find out how to defend against them.
But this article goes on with about a dozen different instances over the next couple of decades where the U.S.
DOD used those experiments.
But another guy that has a great interview that's posted at Veterans Today, it was on last Saturday, a guy named Jeff Brown, who's founders of Citizens for Biological Weapon Truth was interviewed by Matthew Ehert, E-H-R-E-T.
There again, that interview is on BitChute, but it's linked at Veterans Today.
Absolutely stunning.
He goes through even earlier when the U.S.
adopted all of the war criminals from the 731 unit in Korea that were operating under Japanese authority to develop biological weapons, and they prosecuted for war crimes several of the lower underlings, but they incorporated all of the larger staff into Fort Detrick so they could do a seamless incorporation of all of the Japanese biological warfare, which was far worse than anything done by the Nazis.
Absolutely insane that we have this parallel operation going on, this anti-human Nice points, Joe.
Carl?
Well, first, a level 3 biological lab.
That is exactly the type of lab that would do the research for a weaponized coronavirus.
Exactly the lab that would do that.
That is its function, to research that.
And of course the U.S.
is going to be engaged in that type of research.
Again, the documentary series that I wrote, U.S.
Illegal.
I mean, oh my fucking God, wake up if you don't already recognize that the U.S.
is the most dangerous rogue state empire in history, if you just count it since World War II.
Two world wars, treaties after each war.
You can't do war!
You can't do it!
You can't use your military unless under direct attack or imminent threat by another military.
Yet the U.S.
and the 250 military engagements by nations since World War II, over 80% of them, have been started by the U.S.
killing approximately 30 million people since World War II.
They are the most evil, psychopathic, Just withdraw all consent and demand their arrests.
Oh, Carl, I think you got that exactly right.
Meanwhile, unlike past conflicts with Russia, escalation in Ukraine risks pulling the West into war.
Policymakers in Washington need to think carefully about whether we can escalate our involvement in Ukraine without leading to World War III.
There's a growing chorus of voices, mostly in Washington and the corporate press, arguing the U.S.
and NATO need to do more to assist NATO.
Providing Ukraine javelin anti-tank missiles and Stinger anti-aircraft missiles, as well as small arms and munition, we're told, isn't enough.
Nor the unprecedented and devastating economic sanctions we've leveled against Russia, which arguably amount to a declaration of war.
To say we need to send warplanes, tanks, and advanced weapons.
Some enthusiastic neocons even argue NATO should impose a no-fly zone, directly engaging Russian fighters and targets on the ground.
At the very least, NATO should send Ukraine MiG-29 fighter jets, maybe U.S.
Patriot missile defense systems.
They gloss over whether the U.S.
and our allies can do any of this without embroiling NATO in a war with Russia.
Even setting aside the no-fly zone, which Biden has ruled out for now, we're trying to get as close to the line of belligerence without crossing over it.
Likely, it won't be possible.
Whether our leaders realize it or not, we're mindlessly marching toward war with Russia.
Proponents of escalation weigh the possibility away with appeals to history.
Our experience over the past 70 years, they say, show Moscow will back down in the face of aggressive measures by the West.
Look at the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, the U.S.
strategic airlift to Israel during the 1973 Yom Kippur War, even as the Soviet Union was resupplying Egypt and Syria.
Look at the 2018 Battle of Kashym, in which hundreds of Russian soldiers were killed when they attacked U.S.
Special Forces in Syria.
These historical examples, often paired with others, purport to show a pattern of Russian and American tolerance for the arming and training of one another's battlefield enemies.
The Russians have tolerated the West arming their enemies before.
Why should this be any different?
Consider Washington's support for the Afghan Mujahideen during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the 1980s side, or consider the Soviet advisors stationed in North Vietnam during the war, training, in some cases, actively fighting.
My friend Chuck DeVore cited these examples, knowing some 3,000 Soviet advisors were in Vietnam, a war that began in 1964, training North Vietnamese fighter pilots and anti-aircraft crews.
And other examples include, supporting the two-pronged thesis, Russia will back down when challenged by American power, and Russia will tolerate the arming of its battlefield enemies by the West.
In all these cases, war never erupted, so why should Ukraine be different?
One might well reply, Ukraine represents a fundamentally different kind of conflict than those cited before.
This is not Cuba in 62, Israel in 73, or Afghanistan in the 80s.
It is not Vietnam or Syria.
All those conflicts from the Russian side were peripheral.
Cuba, not for the United States, but its usefulness in relation to Ukraine is limited.
For Russia, the fate of Ukraine is a matter of its national security, a paramount importance for Moscow.
One need not agree that it should be to acknowledge, as far as the Kremlin is concerned, it is.
So as the war drags on and Russian and Ukrainian losses mount, we should not assume Moscow will react as it has to more peripheral conflicts in the past.
Not taking for granted that Putin, who seems to have staked his regime on the subjugation of Ukraine, will cut his losses and neatly withdraw.
Awareness should inform policymaking in Washington about whether to encourage or materially support a prolonged Ukrainian insurgency if Russian forces destroy Ukraine's military, as they likely will.
Is a Biden admin willing to risk war with Russia on the assumption Moscow will be as tolerant of American sponsorship of Ukrainian guerrillas as it was of anti-Soviet Afghan guerrillas?
On the question of economic sanction, is it a policy of the U.S.
and our NATO that Russia's economy should be destroyed utterly and for people to plunge into generation-long poverty over the invasion of Ukraine?
Do they think a policy of prolonged economic warfare can be maintained without Putin at some point deciding that it constitutes an act of war?
Are we making plans in preparation in the event he does just that?
Are we exploring off-ramps with Ukraine and Russia?
Does Biden have in mind post-war scenarios or negotiated settlements?
Or is it a vision of the wars and the maximalist ones Secretary of State Blinken articulated earlier, in which a humiliated and defeated Russia withdraws completely from a totally independent and territorially intact Ukraine?
If that's the case, it seems almost certain the war is going to widen beyond Ukraine, and perhaps to avoid the end-state Lincoln describes involved the use of nuclear weapons by Russia.
None of this is to advocate the kind of isolationism propounded by some on the so-called "new right," nor is it to forswear any and all foreign intervention in the name of national interest.
It's to simply recognize this particular war is not easily explained by examples from the past when everything turned out all right.
It's to acknowledge that if the West is not willing to back a negotiated compromise in Ukraine, Our continued military assistance to the Ukrainians, as well as our sanctions against Moscow, resetting a chain of events we won't be able to control that could easily lead us into a war with Russia, of which I have no doubt.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, nuclear reactions are, in the case of a bomb, are just a continuation of a critical mass and breakdown.
And we've reached critical mass as far as stupidity on the part of this government.
And we've got a blinkin' idiot for a Secretary of State, that's absolutely for sure.
In the Domask, since 2014, 14,000 Russians have been killed by that live in in eastern Ukraine have been killed by the Nazi powered Western Ukrainians.
And the humanitarian is not of interest to the people in NATO or the people in the U.N.
So, you know, that crisis has gone on.
And then they shut off the 90 percent Russian origin people in the Crimea and Damascus.
And they've been doing systematic genocide against them.
And nobody's concerned about that other than Putin.
So, you know, it's it's disgusting that we're in this situation and we're playing chicken with somebody that has the ability to completely destroy life on this planet.
If these two sides cannot come to agreement.
And are we offering anything in the way of a peaceful humanitarian way of solving this?
Hell no!
We're just going to keep dumping more and more offensive weapons in there and hope that we can pull Putin's bluff.
Well, the time for bluffing is over, kids.
This is World War III Armageddon, serious, and we don't have anybody with big boy pants on that can walk into the ring and say something.
We have the most disgusting government on the planet.
I think you got that exactly right, Joe.
Putin is not bluffing.
Carl, your thoughts?
And that most disgusting government on the planet has been true for probably thousands of years in one form or another is just becoming so visible now and Joe you have it exactly right.
The point is is that you have this part of the color revolutionized Ukraine that neo-nazi now led by the piano playing with this dick former comedian president who has been Jailing his opponents and his opponents who would go out on the media, shutting down television stations, journalists ending up being assassinated.
That's the type of democracy that we have in Ukraine right now that has killed over 10,000 of Ukrainians in the western part of their own, or sorry, the eastern part of their own country.
But, you know, this is really the biggest issue.
It's the same thing in the U.S. The 2020 election would demonstrate, if we have accurate counting, that Americans by the ratio of three to one to four to one voted for Trump.
And yet here we have with Biden.
So this is a type of show and it does require Americans to stand up and we do need to have some sort of a breakthrough.
Otherwise, this scenario of World War III nuclear scenario is what we're dealing with.
I think that's exactly right.
The corruption of the United States is profound.
Meanwhile, as I've mentioned before, here it's showing up on March 29, 2009.
Reuters and Associated Press are owned by the Rothschild family, if you want to know why the media is so controlled.
Not a single announcement will reach the public without our control even now.
This is already being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world.
These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.
Protocols 12.4 of the Elders of Zion.
The House of Rothschild bought Reuters news service in the 1800s.
Within the last 20 years, Reuters bought the Associated Press.
Now the elite own the two largest wire services in the world, where most newspapers get their news.
The Rothschilds have control of all three U.S.
networks plus other aspects of the recording and mass industry, according to research by Eustace Millens in his book, Who Owns the TV Networks?
Read more about the Rothschild family who financed Adam Weishaupt to create the Illuminati, an instrument to achieve a one godless government in Myron Fagan's expose, The Illuminati and the CFR.
Keep in mind that almost all newspapers and TV channels in the world use Reuters and the AP as sources.
Reuters and the AP serve as international news corporations.
Meanwhile, Pfizer, giving FDA data for a fourth shot, plans an all-variant vaccine.
Pfizer's working toward a vaccine that protects people against all variants of the virus.
It's just bullshit.
Meanwhile, they're planning to send data to the FDA for a fourth dose, according to its CEO.
It's clear there's a need in an environment of Omicron to booster the immune response, so a company will submit a significant progress of data for the FDA for a fourth dose.
Meanwhile, trials are taking place for a vaccine underway that covers Omicron and all the other variants.
COVID cases and death are on the decline since they peaked in January from the highly contagious Omicron variant, but states have been lifting their vast mandates.
Borrella insists that the biggest question remains how to stay ahead of the virus.
That includes creating effective vaccines to fight the disease.
Money, money, money, money, money.
Noting his company is also working on a vaccine that will not only lower the numbers of hospitalization but prevent infection from happening.
Fat chance.
Making long-lasting vaccines is also a priority.
We can't have vaccines every five or six months.
His comments came two years to the day the WHO declared COVID a pandemic on March 11, 2020.
After vaccines were cleared for use, about 81% of Americans age five or older have gotten at least one dose of Pfizer, Moderna, or J&J, according to the CDC.
Meanwhile, Joe, when you say that this latest legislation reinstates mask mandates, the people aren't going to follow it.
They've rejected.
They've had enough.
So this is going to breed disrespect for the law and for Congress.
This is way overplaying their hand.
I can't believe they've done this as we approach the, you know, leading up to the midterms.
It's going to make matters worse and worse and worse for the Democrats.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, well, one disgusting defect in the Constitution is that we don't have the power to recall or impeach elected officials that once they're in office turn completely corrupt and cheat us out of every election possible, which is what's the system that we currently have.
Amazingly enough, we know for a fact that the Wuhan disease, if it exists at all, was manufactured in a lab, and we also know that it was distributed by governmental players.
But here's an interesting other side effect.
Two of the initial outbreaks that were the worst were in Milan, Italy, and in Wuhan, China.
And both of those were lead cities on the deployment of 5G radio weapons.
And here's an interesting article that's at the ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
Evidence for Connection Between Coronavirus Disease-19 and Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation from Wireless Communications, Including 5G.
This is about a 10-page long article.
That was published in October 2021.
We'll post it at Prince of Pia Scientific, but down in the show notes, if it's not deleted by the time you get there, I'll put the link down there so that you can read this yourself and have absolute proof that they know that these radio waves are dangerous And the power that's going into these transmission stations is absolutely incredible.
You've got like a micro watt power transmitter in your cell phone and in certain conditions that signal can travel 25 miles.
Why are they putting these towers every 1,500 feet?
Joe, you're calling it out.
They're murdering us.
They're setting up the weapons for our mass slaughter before our very eyes.
on exterminating large forms of life everywhere inside their radiation area.
This is absolute insanity, and we have nobody that's standing up against it.
Joe, you're calling it out.
They're murdering us.
They're setting up the weapons for our mass slaughter before our very eyes.
Carl.
Well, for the Rothschilds article, Carl B. Herman, Black Spot, I have one published paper via the Claremont Colleges, and in that, I put in what I found was the furthest genesis of the corporate media being captured by our I put in what I found was the furthest genesis of the corporate media being captured by A congressman, I believe he was from Ohio, named Oscar Calloway.
Requested that the House investigate J.P.
Morgan because he had received evidence that J.P.
Morgan had purchased control over the editorial boards of the leading 25 American publications in 1917.
However, Oscar Calloway didn't have the votes to get that investigation, and those same 25 publications denounced Calloway as being unpatriotic for his 1918 election, and he was never elected.
Again, in that paper published by the Claremont Colleges, right next to Chris Hedges' paper, Is that I take a look at the three elements of empire, which is important for people to understand how we're being controlled.
And historically, through empires, through authoritarian governments, you need to have at least these three.
One, the government to control the policy, so you can get done what you want to get done.
Two, the money in order to enrich yourselves and pay the minions.
You need to have the media to tell the adults it's all good, and you need to have education to tell the kids that it's all good.
And I have another article series, U.S.
Public Education Bullshit to Train Stupefied Work Animals, that I recommend so I can document the text of our own school books to prove that they're just pimping this empire to the kids and whitewashing it.
And finally, that fourth dose of the Pfizer.
I sent you guys that little less than one minute clip of corporate media asking a softball question to the Pfizer CEO saying, do you think it will be necessary for a fourth shot?
And the CEOs, I've never seen a human neck do that.
It bulged out kind of like Jabba the Hutt.
Or I had the image of like a reptile bed getting ready to shoot out its tongue to grab another thing to stuff down his corpulent.
It's crazy.
Oh, Carl, you got it.
You got it exactly right.
Unbelievable.
Meanwhile, over and over again, the military has conducted dangerous biowarfare experiments on Americans.
This was published back on 25 September 2016.
Why should we be surprised at biolabs in Ukraine?
We've been doing it forever!
On September 20, 1950, a U.S.
Navy ship off the coast of San Francisco used a giant hose to spray a cloud of microbes into the air and into the city's famous Falk.
The military was testing how a bioweapon attack could affect the 800,000 residents of the city.
The people of San Francisco had no idea.
The Navy continued the test for seven days, potentially causing at least one death.
This was a germ warfare testing program that went on for 20 years, from 1949 to 1969, to determine the use of biological weapons against the U.S.
and allies to retaliate if deterrence failed.
The 239 known tests in that program.
239 known tests.
San Francisco was notable for two reasons.
According to Dr. Leonard Cowles, documented in his book, Clouds of Secrecy, the Army's germ warfare tests overpopulated areas right here in the USA.
Hospital staff were so shocked at the appearance of a patient infected with a bacteria, S. marcellinus, that had never been found in the hospital and rare in the area, they published an article about it.
The patient, Edward Nevins, died after the infection spread to his heart.
S. marcellinus was one of the types of bacteria the Navy ship had sprayed in the Bay Area.
It wasn't until the 1970s Americans learned that for decades they had been serving as experimental animals for agencies of their government.
San Francisco wasn't a first or last on citizens who hadn't been given informed consent.
Other experiments involved testing mind-altering drugs.
One incident studying the effects of syphilis on black Americans without informing them, telling them instead they had bad blood.
But it was a germ warfare test Cole focused upon.
All these others, while terrible, affected people a hundred or most.
When you talk about exposing millions to potential harm by spreading chemical or biological agents, the quantitative effect of that is just unbelievable.
From Minneapolis to St.
Louis, A military tested how a biological or chemical weapon would spread throughout the country by spraying bacteria as well as various chemical powders, including an especially controversial one called zinc cadmium sulfide.
Low-flying planes would take off sometime near the Canadian border, would fly down through the Midwest, and drop their payload over cities.
They were tested on the ground too.
Coal sites military boards documenting Minneapolis tests where chemicals spread throughout a school.
The clouds were clearly visible.
The military pretended they were testing a way to mask the whole city to protect it.
It was the test involved efforts to measure the ability to lay smoke screens around the city.
They told the authorities to hide it in case of a nuclear attack.
The potential toxicity of that controversial compound is debated.
One component, cadmium, is highly toxic and can cause cancer.
Some suggest that zinc, cadmium, and sulfide could degrade in cadminium, but a 1997 test concluded the Army's secret test did not expose residents of the U.S.
and Canada to chemical levels considered harmful.
Very unlikely.
It also admitted, however, that stunt research was sparse, mostly based on limited animal studies.
1966, a study of the vulnerability of subway passengers in New York City to go for an attack with biological agents.
The New York subway system experiments are among the most shocking.
In a field test, military officials tried to see how easy it would be to unleash biological weapons in the New York City subway.
They would break light bulbs of bacteria on the tracks to see how they spread.
Clouds would engulf people as trains pulled away, but documents say they brushed their clothing, looked up at the grading apron, and walked on.
No one was concerned.
In a 1995 Newsday story, a reporter, Dennis Dugan, contracted retired Army scientist Charles Senseney, who had testified about the experiments to a Senate subcommittee in 1975.
He declined to reveal anything, however.
I don't want to get near this.
I testified because I was told I had to.
I better get off the phone.
Experiments continued in New York for six days using Bacillus subtilis, then known as Bacillus globali and S. marcinens.
Particularly controversial tests involved Norfolk Navy Supply Center, where they packed crates with fungal spores to see how they'd affect the people unpacking the crate.
Portions of a report about an Army test in 1951 involving a Speralis fumigatus indicated the Army intentionally exposed a disproportionate number of blacks to the organism.
Many of the experiments were first investigated by what we might consider questionable sources.
For example, A 1979 Washington Post story discussed open-air experiments in Tampa Bay involving the release of pertussis, or whooping cough, in 1955.
State records show whooping cough cases spiked from 339 one deaths in 54 to 1,080 with 12 deaths in 1955.
Hard to trace the accuracy of the information because it came from the Church of Scientology.
Which formed a group called American Citizens for Honesty in Government that spent a significant amount of time investigating these experiments by the Army and the CIA.
They uncovered a number of documents related to these experiments.
I have no reason to believe any of this, however, isn't real.
He actually obtained the documents, copies of them, and found they had the same deletions as the ones he obtained.
Meanwhile, others were observing.
This was a Cold War mentality that prevailed in the time.
How much information is still missing?
Many details about the Army's tests over a populated area remain secret.
Most of the tests are still classified or can't be located.
Among those available, sections have been blocked out and pages are missing.
Military officials were called to testify in 1977 after info about these bio-warfare experiments was revealed.
At the time, officers said determining just how vulnerable the U.S.
was to biological attack required extensive research and development to assess our vulnerability, the efficacy of our protective measures, and the tactical and strategic capability of various delivery systems and agents.
So what's happening now?
Cole said it's hard to see these events now from the perspective people had then a different mindset.
Part of what the military knows about how clouds of chemicals spread come from these chemicals, gleaned from them, information about the U.S.
reaction when reports came about potential use of chemical weapons in the first Gulf War, which, by the way, I have no doubt were deployed by the United States.
People say the obvious question now on people's minds is what's happening now.
If secret tests occurred then, what about now?
He doesn't think it's likely, but I would say this is years ago, and what he's saying here is ridiculous given the history.
I'd never swear on your life or mine that nothing illegitimate is happening based on what I do know.
I don't have any sense.
There's illicit activity now that would involve risking exposure to tons of people, as happened in the 50s and the 60s.
Biological agents are still studied, but informed consent is more widely appreciated now.
Right.
Still, more recent reports show experiments in the area went on longer than we thought.
In 2001, a New York Times report revealed projects testing bioweapons under the Clinton administration and under the second Biden.
The 1972 treaty theoretically prohibited developing biological weapons, But the program justified with it the argument new weapons needed to be studied.
This is outrageous and showed nothing new here about our biowarfare labs in Ukraine.
We just moved them offshore to conceal them from the American public.
Joe.
Yeah, well, not only did we import the entire research staff from Japan's 731 biological weapons program, which killed hundreds of thousands of Chinese during World War II.
Let's not forget that.
But also under Operation Paperclip, we imported a few Nazis.
One Nazi who probably did come was Dr. Erich Traub, a medical doctor and director of the Third Reich's Virological and Bacteriological Warfare Program during World War II.
Documentation exists that the Nazi germ work Warfare work was once I came to America.
They experimented with poisonous ticks dropped from planes to determine if ticks carrying Lyme disease were a viable method for biological warfare.
Plum Island, opened in 1954 as a biological weapon research lab on the end of Long Island in New York, is within just miles of Lyme, Connecticut, where the Lyme disease gets its name.
And let's not forget that it was Fort Detrick's anthrax that was sent to the anti-war members of the media.
and the government in order to provoke an additional attack at the end of September in 2001.
So, you know, they're not object to killing postal workers and reporters and senators who oppose the war machine in order to make sure that war happens.
So, you know, we have a really disgusting government here that we need to address as grownups, and these people need to be severely punished.
Oh, I think you got that exactly right, Carl. - Well, cool.
Great article and great recount of some of the valid history, Joe.
There's really so much history.
I mean, we forget it all.
I often say to people if they're into some topic, like let's say 9-11, and really if we wanted to quantify how many different areas of that scale of importance we have of game-changing facts, I just say it's literally about 100.
There's about a hundred.
This is probably one of them, the testing of ways to kill.
So as a professional historian, I find it useful to put things in historical context.
And one of the most important questions to ask is, who are sheeple to these wannabe masters?
Well, we're just an enslaved work race and we work, we do physical work on the planet to take care of the physical stuff to live.
Uh, are bred for various areas of work.
There's the entertainers and athletes and actors, the sex kittens, the super soldiers.
That's all for a culled and controlled and GMO modified, uh, breed to best accomplish those purposes.
It's the same way that we ordinary humans would breed any type of a work animal or even a play animal like a dog.
To get the characteristics that they want, and the characteristics that they don't want, they make sure that not only do those not breed, but you will go ahead and assassinate those people through corporate media or public education.
And we also have, among those hundred areas of game-changing proofs, you have the public assassinations of JFK, RFK, and MLK to demonstrate that if they can't control somebody any other way, Just go ahead and kill them, and then make up some fairy tale about, oh yeah, it's just another lone nut, you know, a communist.
That's why we need more money for the military.
That's always the communication for there.
And these will continue.
And again, the bottom line that I emphasize is that you need to demand arrests of these people for these wars centered in lying, looting, and war.
Excellent, excellent commentary, Carl.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, some gun owners are catching on.
The $73 million settlement against gun manufacturer Remington is backdoor gun control.
Editor's note, you can find the article on my blog at jamesfetzer.org.
When the settlement was proposed at $33 million, I was calling it out as an insurance scam.
The obvious reason is that there's been no judicial determination that anyone died at Sandy Hook, as I explained there.
Upping the ante to $73 million is all the more insulting.
I'm making an effort to intervene in the Remington bankruptcy case to defeat the fraud, now a bankruptcy scam, where I am demonstrating to the bankruptcy court that the underlying issue has never been addressed and that this would be a blatant abuse of the rights of stockholders, stakeholders, and ultimately taxpaying citizens of the United States.
As I explained in my defending the First and Second Amendments, they want to use insurance to require registration, which will be followed by confiscation.
That's the plan.
Remington Arms, America's goldest gun manufacturer, settled for $73 million in a wrongful death suit filed by families of several of the victims, reported victims, of the Sandy Hook shooting.
Bushmaster, the company that manufactured the rifle, is owned by Remington Outdoor Company.
The settlement followed seven-plus years of litigation, two Remington bankruptcies, and a previous settlement offer of $33 million from the gun manufacturer, which the plaintiffs declined.
The outcome is being touted by anti-gunners, the corporate press, and Democrat politicians as a victory for the gun lobby.
President Joe Biden called the settlement his story.
Meanwhile, the anti-gunners are wrong.
The settlement was neither a victory nor historic, but instead revealed another way political actors can undermine gun rights, which is why they're so excited about it.
Not your typical taste.
Gun manufacturers are usually protected by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, known as the PLCAA, which prevents the manufacturer being sued for misuse or criminal use of their products by third parties.
Gun control advocates claim the PLCAA provides blanket immunity from lawsuits, but it's untrue because gun manufacturers can still be sued on multiple grounds, Traditional product liability, the guns in effect, they were caused injury, negligence.
They transferred the gun to someone they had caused to believe was prohibited from owning it, violating laws surrounding the sale, such as lying on the books.
The plaintiff's attorney, Joshua Koskoff, packed the initial lawsuit with a slew of allegations dismissed by a Connecticut lower court because they were invalid under the statute.
However, the Connecticut Supreme Court in 2019 ruled the wrongful death suit could move forward on the basis of a wrongful advertising claim, including the original set of allegations.
Koskoff argued the Remington knowingly marketed and promoted the Bushmaster for use in assaults against humans.
The plaintiffs cited marketing slogans such as Consider your man card reissued and clear the room, cover the rooftop, rescue the hostage.
None of these claims, however, are inherently violent and certainly not an appeal to young men to commit mass murder.
Ford, for example, claims that Trump were built with military-grade aluminum, which would mean the victims of the Waukesha massacre should be able to sue Ford.
Why would a truck need anything military-grade unless it's supposed to be rammed through 80 people?
While the case was allowed to move forward, the Supreme Court acknowledged winning would be a Herculean task.
They'd have to prove Bushmaster's marketing contributed to the shooter's decision to commit the atrocity, since the shooter himself did not even buy the gun, but instead, according to the official narrative, murdered his mother and stole it.
It's not hard to see how the claim that advertised was relevant would have been a stretch.
If the case was virtually unwinnable, why did Remington settle?
Death by a thousand lawsuits.
Actually, Remington did not settle.
The four insurance companies representing it did.
Moreover, a settlement by definition meant Remington did not accept liability.
The idea this was a victory is asinine.
The point still stands, however.
The bank Remington and its agents settled because winning the case in law would have been even more costly than settling because of the additional legal fees required.
Keep in mind, litigation had been going on for over seven years.
It is astronomically less expensive to be a plaintiff since they're generally paid from the settlement after legislation is finished.
Litigation is finished.
The defense, however, needs to pay up front.
Activists can keep hurling frivolous lawsuit after lawsuit until something sticks.
No big deal if a case gets thrown out.
Take note and try again.
Since government legal system is slow and awful, the amount of attorneys needed enormous financial burden on gun companies.
Despite how big and powerful they're supposed to be, they're actually rather small because selling guns is a low margin business.
Ruger, for example, the leader, has a market cap of around a billion.
That sounds substantial until you realize Google makes that profit every single week.
The amount of money required to defend could easily bankrupt many gun manufacturers, which means they're forced to settle, and their liability insurance pays.
This was exactly the plan.
Either kill Remington with legal fees or insurmountable insurance costs.
One plaintiff admitted they wanted to send a message, this is a high-risk market, not profitable, and you will be held accountable.
No, this wasn't historic.
It was a dirty old trick.
This type of lawsuit was commonplace prior to the passage of the statute won almost bankrupt Smith & Wesson.
Ridiculous, long-shot lawsuits were a favorite among anti-gun activists and politicians in the 1990s and 2000s.
Handgun control.
Now, the Brady campaign began a coalition with big city mayors in 1998 to create lawsuits and bankrupt gun companies.
Ed Rendell, Philly's mayor at the time, explained the suits were intentionally designed, one, to prevent consolidation, Which means the defendant would need to retain lawyers for each case, two, target handgun manufacturers that were smaller than long gun and ammo companies, and three, make claims designed to expand existing case law and set precedents that would open up more avenues of attack.
Virtually none of them went to trial, but that wasn't the point, but rather impose a financial burden on gun companies and drive them out of business.
In the case of Smith & Wesson, pressure them to capitulate and submit to a manufacturer's code of conduct that would force them to add certain features to make guns safer, a goal of the lobby for years.
Gun control has been a losing item for years, but if this settlement becomes precedent, that could change.
If gun control loses in legislatures or courts, activists can simply abuse the legal structure to enforce de facto gun control by driving the makers out of business.
The end result?
Restricted access to guns for the law-abiding at least.
This won't end with Remington.
The floodgates have been opened.
Even Mexio is now suing the gun industry for gun violence perpetrated by cartels.
Remington settlement serves as a stark reminder the left will use whatever means necessary to advance their agenda, in this case, your disarmament.
Joe.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, well for decades I was a member of the NRA and I disagree with a whole lot of their policies and certainly a whole lot of their quote political endorsements where if anybody voted for any type of gun legislation they got an A plus from the NRA regardless of how fascist they were in every other aspect of their voting life and I complained to them about it but finally had an absolute dose of those folks
When they appointed Ali North to be their executive director, here's a guy that was eyeball deep in the Iran-Contra situation, bringing drugs into El Toro Air Force Base in California and turning it into crack and turning all of LA into nothing but a drug den, absolutely disgusting human beings smuggling missiles and Polish-made AK-47s into South America.
So when he became executive director, I gave up my NRA membership and never looked back.
But interestingly enough, there's an article at tactical-life.com, Remington Settlement with Sandy Hooks.
And here's their excuse.
The National Shooter Sports Foundation from the NRA didn't intervene in this case because this was a case between insurance companies and...
and the manufacturer and had nothing to do with the shooting sports.
So there again, you have a rollover organization that claims to represent the gun owners of America.
I'm going to send you this article.
We can discuss it tomorrow on Texas Tuesday, and maybe we can post it.
But absolutely disgusting how the NRA has been able to walk their way back from this lawsuit and allow this travesty of justice from a corrupt executive branch, corrupt legislative branch, and a corrupt judicial branch to take effect against our constitutional rights.
I've been donefounded that none of these gun companies are willing to support me and my efforts to expose the fact that these are all based on the sham illusion that people died at Sandy Hook.
They're not willing to lift their least digit.
It's insulting beyond belief, Joe.
They're not willing to stand up for the Constitution or those of us who are fighting the good fight.
Carl.
Yeah, it's a captured industry, and they'd rather pay the $73 million to the alleged victims rather than for you to expose the truth, obviously.
And Joe, with that drug trade into Northern California, that was briefly exposed by journalist Gary Webb from the San Jose Mercury News about the drug trade.
However, our opponents had an answer for him is that it was reported in those same newspapers that briefly exposed the drug trade run by the CIA that reported that, unfortunately, I guess the pressure was too much.
And Mr. Webb committed suicide by shooting himself twice.
In the head.
So that 73 million, you're right, Jim.
That is just another contrivance to make it more difficult and more expensive to own a gun.
And the legal argument is pathetic on its face, because you could make the same argument, well, I guess hammer manufacturers need to be similarly liable if a hammer is used, or even a pencil.
Or how about Evian Water, if their product was used to waterboard and then drown somebody?
So it is ridiculous, and it is legal lawfare against anything that has the public stand up.
You got it exactly right, Carl.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, BrewerCon, to LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
Here's a pitch about what I'm about.
Listen to it.
It fits perfectly, this story we've just reviewed.
Amazon banned my book so you wouldn't learn what really happened at Sandy Hook.
It was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
Then they sued to shut me up.
And the Wisconsin courts played along.
I have the proof and the law on my side.
What I don't have is the money.
They want to do to us what they've done to Canada.
Take guns, impose tyranny.
And it's on the way with Remington's help.
First insurance, then registration, then confiscation.
I'm asking SCOTUS to stop it.
Givesandgo.com Funding Fetzer.
Check it out.
This is for all the marbles.
Remember, 1% control the world, 4% are their puppets, 90% are asleep, 5% know and try to wake the 90%, the 1% use the 4% to prevent the 5% from waking up the 90%.
A 1% use a 4% to prevent a 5% from waking up the 90%.
Meanwhile, final thoughts, Joe, yours. - Oh yes, there was a special report yesterday at Jim Fetzer BitChute channel.
And this is an interview with Brian Davidson, private investigator, teaching people how to use the internet for open source research to be a citizen journalist.
Absolutely stunning interview.
He's a private investigator, like I said, in Texas, and he's got a Thanks, Joe.
format with over 200 different programs and he walks Jim through the outline of the program but there'll be more detail in upcoming episodes it's really a great program it's already had 1200 views let's make this thing go viral it's a great program thanks Joe Carl your final thoughts yeah data soto
So one of the areas that I helped contribute to understand this case of Sandy Hook as being a fraud is that the 20 alleged victims' mothers averaged an age giving birth to those alleged victims of 36 years of age for 20 mothers.
That does occur.
About one in every nine mothers is age 36 or older.
But if you get all 20 of them averaging that age, that would be one ninth Raise to the 20th power which produces a number with about 70 zeros behind it and therefore the that proof alone Demonstrating that those women cannot have been the mothers of those children.
It's the odds are so powerful It's more likely that you would win the super lotto three times in a row than it is for those women to have been mothers of those alleged victims And finally, as the events become more and more intense, you get into any area of speciality paradoxes.
And one paradox here is that we do encourage and appreciate everyone to engage as much as they can in this war.
So fully active, fully engaged, and at the same time, you know, you surrender to the broader Will of God?
Will of evolution?
Or you could just picture it as, you know, people are doing all this work together, and there will be a critical mass where something is going to break open.
But, you know, I claim no confidence to know when that's going to happen.
So we do engage as great as we can, while at the same time surrendering to the peace of to be able to do this in the long term, as long as possible.
Well, special thanks to Joe Olson from Houston and Carl Herman from San Ramon, California, for the excellence of their commentaries week after week after week.
Let me say, this effort to disarm the American people is as serious as it gets.
As Dave Hodges has observed, in the 20th century there were 19 democides involving the slaughters of whole societies by the government, every one of which was preceded by gun confiscation.
Through this Remington suit, they have a new technique.
They're going to promote insurance for weapons.
But to have your weapon insured, it must be registered.
Once it's registered, the government knows where it is and can confiscate it.
We must not allow America to become number 20.
I've been cast in this role through a set of circumstances not of my choosing.
But I'm willing to fight the good fight.
I have the law and the evidence on my side.
I need your help.
If you think the United States is worth a damn, this is the time to put up a small amount, a contribution, 20 bucks, 30 bucks, 40 bucks, from a large number, we'll make this happen.
I only have 90 days to submit my writ of certiorari to the U.S.
Supreme Court.
I would not be asking for your help if I did not need it, and the matter did not warrant your participation.
Thanks for joining us.
Spend as much time as you can with your friends, your relatives, the people you love, because we do not know how much time we have left.
▲
Export Selection