All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 16, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
58:45
Beyond the Official Narrative (15 February 2022) with Richard Kary and Steven Whitener
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music.
Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music. Music.
Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome. everyone, and welcome.
You're listening to Republic Broadcasting at republicbroadcasting.org.
Today is Tuesday, February 15th, 2022.
I'm your host, Richard Kerry, and this is Beyond the Official Narrative.
I'd like to remind everyone, RBN is listener-supported, folks.
Please donate whatever is manageable.
Free speech cannot exist without being funded by we, the people.
You can use PayPal on the RBN website donate page.
You can call our RBN staff to donate via credit or debit card.
Call in to donate at 800-724-2719 extension 3.
Or you can mail in that donation cash check money order payable to RBN mailing address 2251 Double Creek Drive.
Suite 302, Round Rock, Texas, 78664.
And we greatly appreciate it, folks.
Please help ensure that RBN continues broadcasting this uncensored content well into the future.
And I have with me today a couple of gentlemen joining us, folks.
I have, first off, my regular co-host Stephen Douglas-Whitener.
Hello, Stephen.
Hello, Richard.
Hello, RBN listeners, fellow domestic terrorists.
Hello, sir.
And always good to have you here.
Folks, I also have with us again, as a special appearance, regular appearance, I've tried to make it on my show, Dr. James Fetzer here with us once again.
Hello, Dr. Fetzer.
Well, Richard and Steve, it's a delight to be back with you again.
My very first radio show was on RBN way back when, and today we're going to test that proposition, whether you can handle the truth.
Three huge stories today involving the trucker convoy up in Ottawa, the developments regarding the Durham investigation and Russiagate, and then third, a settlement of the Sandy Hook Parents with Remington, that is going to shock you.
Sounds great.
Absolutely, sir.
Well, yeah, let's kick it off with your first your first story.
Well, Justin Trudeau has invoked the Emergency Powers Act in an attempt to quell the protesters.
It gives him broad powers for 30 days.
The claim is he's not expected to call in the military, but I wouldn't rule it out.
He's invoked legislation that gives his government sweeping powers to fight a growing number of what he's claiming are illegal and dangerous blockades.
The first prime minister to invoke the Emergency Act, he said they would be time limited and apply only to specific geographical regions.
We are not prevailing the right of people to protest legally, he said, adding the military would not be deployed.
This act is to be used sparingly as a last resort.
However, it doesn't appear that there's anything illegal about the protest, nor that would warrant invoking this emergency powers act.
Hours before, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in Alberta now sees a truck full of firearms at a blockade near the U.S.
border.
Let me say how easy it is to infiltrate, to stage something like that.
If you want to claim these people had a propensity for violence, then just load a truck full of firearms Bring it into the country.
Claim to have found it.
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police probably loaded the truck itself and then claimed to have discovered it so it could support Justin Trudeau's declaration of the Emergency Powers Act.
You know, Dr. Fetzer, actually this morning I did locate an article, let's see, it was at Epoch, originally Epoch Times had it.
I found it at Zero Hedge.
And they're saying in this article, freedom convoy organizers say they notified police after being told nefarious elements plan to discredit protest.
And that included planting weapons as one of the things they heard.
Yes.
So I mean, Richard, Richard, that's absolutely I mean, this is trivial.
It's effortless.
It's like one corrupt source citing another corrupt source to make it sound as though it were news, which goes on with the Democratic Party and the commentators.
They're talking heads on CNN and MSNBC on a regular basis.
The Emergency Act, which goes into effect for a month, allows the federal government to bar people from gathering in certain locations.
It could also allow officials to conscript the use of private tow trucks.
You may recall the tow trucks were called in before they wound up joining the protest.
Meanwhile, Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland said the act would bar the use of crowdfunding website for illegal activities and punish companies whose trucks were being used in the protest.
And they did that, of course, with regard to GoFundMe, which had confiscated $10 million of donations to the truckers, which they said they were going to distribute to charities of their own choice, Richard.
This was so outrageous that the governors of several states declared their attorneys general were going to investigate.
So instead, they simply said they would return it to the donors, but that it would take seven to 10 days.
Well, Richard, this is just absurd.
That means they're depriving the truckers of the money they need by not returning it for seven to ten days.
All they have to do is press a button and the money goes right back to the donors, which they did to me in the past when I was seeking to raise money for my legal defense in relation to a Sandy Hook lawsuit that was brought against me.
I had about two grand from a dozen donors and GoFundMe simply press a button, return the money and poof.
Stephen, do you have some comments?
You know, not only did they initially plan and announce they were going to steal the money, but no, we're not only going to steal your money, we're going to give it to BLM and Antifa if we want to.
Stephen, do you have some comments?
You know, not only did they initially plan and announce they were going to steal the money, but no, we're not only going to steal your money.
We're going to give it to BLM and Antifa if we want to.
The blatant in-your-face tyranny of that.
Just one hand washing, supporting the others.
This infrastructure they built with the tech and the politicians, and it's just incredible.
It's a nightmare that we're dealing with looking at that.
I saw that the Civil Liberties Union in Canada also condemned his use of these emergency powers act, that he had no basis for it.
It's just ridiculous to say that these are domestic terrorists up there tailgating with their kids playing Lego in the snow and call them terrorists.
But BLM that's out, you know, was rioting and burning and they called those peaceful protests and gave them hundreds of millions of dollars from these same corporations.
It's just so in your face that this is going on.
It's infuriating.
But yeah, please continue, Dr. Fetzer.
Oh, Steve, those are excellent, excellent comments.
The Royal Canadian Mount Police said Monday 11 were arrested and detained as police seized 13 long guns, handguns, multiple sets of body armor, a machete, a large quantity of ammunition and high capacity magazines.
For more than two weeks, the protesters have blocked the border crossing near the towns of Cootes, Alberta.
That would be Ambassador Bridge, I suspect.
In a statement, police said that recently they became aware of a small organized group within the larger Coots protest that had access to weapons and was said to have a willingness to use force against police if any attempts were made to disrupt the blockade.
The Alberta Premier, Jason Kenney, said the arrest and seizure of firearms underscores the severity of the situation.
That's why they plant it so they can make these claims, you know, suggesting that truckers are going violent when they're nothing but peaceful.
They know damn well they can't afford to cross any lines here and they're not doing it.
No, they've been very respectful up there.
You know, it's just it's like a tailgating thing.
And people will come in and party on the weekends.
I've seen some reports of people who were out there that were actually kind of telling the truth just more objectively.
And that was the way they They put it that it was kids at a party playing and on the weekend, people would come in to support them and and they would be they would just come into party.
So it's not this dangerous element that people have had.
And, you know, it shows that enough people have fed up and they're just not going to comply at this point.
They you know, they've had our lives ended upside down for two years now.
And the infrastructure they put in place Steve, I agree.
be there.
They've got the mechanisms where they can take our money and, you know, invoke these, the politicians invoke these acts and stuff.
And as you said, the tow truck operators would join them.
I wonder how many of the police and military will join because it's coming down to those lines too, it seems to me, that that's ultimately where this is headed.
Steve, I agree.
I think those are great points.
And as a former officer in the Marine Corps, it's, you're obligated to refuse to obey an illegal order.
Now, if he were to direct the military to act against these peaceful protesters, they aren't violating the Emergency Act, and I would not be surprised if they were to refuse to do it.
Now, he claims he's not going to, but this is all incremental.
Meanwhile, the Freedom Convoy organizers say they'll continue to protest on Parliament Hill despite the federal government's declaration of a state of emergency.
We are not afraid.
In fact, every time the government decides to further suspend our civil liberties, our resolve strengthens and the importance of our mission becomes clearer, said Tamara Lish on February 14th in anticipation of Trudeau invoking the act over the protests.
We will remain peaceful, but planted on Parliament Hill until the mandates are decisively ended.
We recognize that there is a democratic process within which change occurs.
We have never stepped outside of that process, nor we intend to do so.
This is absolutely right.
This is what they're doing, which is why they have to infiltrate and fabricate a case against them.
This is child's play to despots like Trudeau.
It was the first Prime Minister to use the Emergencies Act, which replaced the War Measures Act, last used by his own father, then Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, in 1970 during the October crisis when Quebec separatists kidnapped and killed Quebec Cabinet Minister Pierre Laporte.
The Act gives a state additional powers to deal with the protests and blockades, such as providing legal tools to cut funding to the protesters, as well as freezing the corporate accounts of companies whose trucks are used in any blockades and removing their insurance.
The province of Ontario and the city of Ottawa have also declared states of emergency over the protests.
Now get this, the Canadian Civil Liberties Union has condemned Trudeau for invoking the Emergencies Act, claiming in a Monday tweet that the Canadian federal government has not met the threshold necessary to do so.
The Emergencies Act can only be invoked when a situation seriously threatens the ability of the government of Canada to preserve the sovereignty, security, and territorial integrity of Canada, and when the situation cannot be effectively dealt with under any other law of Canada.
This is very significant in my opinion.
Another tweet from the Canadian Civil Liberties Association.
Governments regularly deal with difficult situation and do so using powers granted to them by democratically elected representatives.
Emergency legislation should not be normalized.
It threatens our democracy and our civil liberties.
The comments added, has Trudeau created a political emergency?
Enacting the never-before-used law gives Trudeau, in effect, martial law control over everything and everyone, and not all of Canada is behind him.
Here's another tweet.
Breaking.
Premieres of Alberta, Manitoba, Quebec, and Saskatchewan oppose Trudeau's decision to invoke the Emergency Act on the truckers.
His first act, it appears, was to choke off any funding for the protesters by broadening its anti-money laundering rules to cover crowdsourcing sites, threatening them with financial terrorism.
Get this!
Anti-money laundering rules to cover crowdsourcing, where citizens want to support a protest movement, make that money laundering?
We are broadening the scope of Canada's anti-money laundering and terrorist financing rules so that they cover crowdfunding platforms and the payment services providers they use, said Finance Minister Freeland.
This is about following the money.
This is about stopping the financing of these illegal blockades.
But it's not been shown that there's anything illegal about that.
Canada authorizes banks and financial institutions to temporarily cease providing financial services where the institution suspects that an account is being used to further the illegal blockades and occupations.
Here's another tweet breaking Trudeau regime now using terrorism laws to go after crypto and crowdfunding.
This new law applies to personal and corporate accounts and covers all forms of transactions, including cryptocurrencies.
They claim the banks will be protected against civil liability for actions taken in good faith.
In other words, Trudeau's going to use taxpayer money to protect the banks for committing crimes by withholding money from the peaceful protesters.
Stephen Richard, this is just so insulting!
Insulting!
And I have an article from Summit News pointing out that one day prior to the emergency powers enacted upon the protesters at Ambassador Bridge, to clear that bridge, the state media outlet of the CBC, they published material claiming that freedom is now a far-right concept.
You know, they were arguing freedom is now a malleable term and is open to interpretation, citing its use by the Canadian truck convoy, where the piece was suggesting it's a far-right movement.
So, you know, in like just their little slick way, they're trying to associate freedom and just, you know, far-right extremists.
Of course, the label domestic terrorist comes to mind.
Yeah, but we've had a lot of fear, it seems, pushback.
From this, in advance of anything spreading to other nations across Europe, there are a lot of lax, laxing of restrictions.
You mentioned the Canadian provinces, and then in the United States, we've had some elected officials acting in similar suit.
And even New Zealand is organized now already with a convoy.
Yes, yes, yes.
Here's a wonderful sign held by one of the protesters.
Truck you, Trudeau.
Concludes, the law gives a federal government carte blanche to cope with a crisis, including the ability to enact emergency powers that allow it to prohibit travel within a specified area or remove personal property while imposing fines or jail time on people contravening new orders.
This is basically the ability to unleash selective martial law on Canadians.
Meanwhile, one of my correspondents sent me a rather stunning report.
Get this.
Every news media who secretly took Trudeau's $61 million pre-election payoff, Trudeau has been bribing various media for favorable coverage.
This was prior to his election.
I have read this shameful 29-page list of every media outlet, nearly 1,500 companies who took from Trudeau's $61 million pre-election emergency relief.
Trudeau shoveled it out the door to them before he called the election, and he kept the list secret.
Now you can see for yourself.
Go take a list.
Look, it's 29 pages long, 49 names on each page, and it's 29 pages long.
That means there are nearly 1,500 news media who took a bribe from Justin Trudeau.
It's actually more, because it doesn't list individual reporters, but rather companies.
I mean, this is gross, giving them $61 million of public money in the middle of a pandemic as if it were a high priority.
But it's not just a shocking amount of money.
Trudeau spends more than a billion dollars a day.
It's that he's corrupted the media.
I think this is quite a telling story.
And because it's in Canada, even Americans may be able to view this more objectively and understand how governments play them for suckers and saps on a daily basis.
Richard, Steve.
I know this is this is extraordinary.
I mean, the scope that they're Trying to push this propaganda.
I mean, the amount of inability to voice your opinion, your freedom of speech, it's I don't know.
I mean, even a peaceful protest in this day and age is not tolerated by the establishment, is the impression I'm getting.
You mentioned a couple other huge, huge stories to cover today.
I don't know.
We do have a caller on the line.
It might be pertinent to this topic.
Take it.
Take it.
Sure.
Take the caller.
Yes.
All right, Dr. Fetzer.
We have Andy in Texas.
Hello, Andy.
You're on the line with James Fetzer.
Well, hey, thank you, gentlemen.
I really appreciate the opportunity.
You know, one of the things we can take from this whole Trekker thing, where they just declared the Emergency Act, and all of a sudden they're going to freeze their funds and their bank accounts and identify as people steal their Bitcoin and stuff like that.
A lesson we can learn from this, and we can use this as evidence, is they're trying to push us towards a digital currency.
This is a perfect example of what they can do once they have complete control and they have to hit one switch with the digital currency.
Here they've got to shut off Bitcoin, they've got to cut down bank accounts and all this stuff.
And I don't even know how they're going to go after Bitcoin.
I understand that that's not even something touchable, according to these crypto guys.
That's why it's called cryptocurrency.
So this is a good lesson to learn as we come into the new age of... But on another token, Uh, this could be creating something that's, uh... Do you realize the Canadians, they came out and said, send your kids home?
As if a warning that, hey, we're coming to get you.
Get your kids out of there, to the truckers.
You know what I'm saying?
So they're setting this all up and whatnot.
And then our governor from Michigan brought her equipment up there to help remove trucks from the bridge and stuff.
So everybody's in this together.
People have to realize that your governments are not your governments.
They're Klaus Schwab's governments.
And then they're BlackRock's governments.
You know what I'm saying?
None of these people are in alliance with the people and we have no recourse.
And they're doing this on purpose because they want us to fight back.
Andy, you're making such excellent points.
Just to mention about if they go to digital currency, then they control your entire life, because as soon as you start misbehaving in their judgment, they can cut you off.
You don't have any money.
You can't buy any food.
You're going to be completely constrained.
The gas in your car already will be the last gas you can get because they've cut you off.
Also, I think That Biden has done so many bad things that he came into office.
In fact, there are like 65% of Americans who can't find anything Biden has done that they approve of.
Every act he's taken has weakened America, as Ron Johnson has pointed out.
I would observe that there's an explanation, if you think back upon it, when Kamala Harris was Appointed to be vice president was not by the DNC or the Democratic Party.
It was by Alexander Soros, the son of George Soros, whose favored open borders and has devoted his life to destroying America.
If you assume George Soros is actually the president behind the scene and Biden is merely a sock puppet, all of the actions he's taken since becoming president fall into place.
It's unbelievable, but we have an administration that's dedicated to destroying America.
And you know, I just, I just listened to a video of George Soros talking to, uh, to, uh, some CNN reporter and it was just crazy.
He said, no, we, uh, we started a foundation.
He said, do you have any, you're into throwing over, you know, installing better government.
So they speak.
And then he said, Are you in Ukraine in any way influencing what's going on in there?
This is a good question, to be honest with you.
And he came up with this.
He said, long before this started, we had a foundation that I put together just before this all started and stuff.
And now, this foundation is in a position to where we can really influence what happens over there in Ukraine.
What?
So he's in control of that.
I mean, there's so many kings and so little warriors.
You're making excellent points, Andy.
I'm really glad you called in.
Excellent.
That's really what we have. - You're making excellent points, Andy.
I'm really glad you called in.
Excellent, excellent call.
The next story we got to address, it's a biggie, is that the Durham investigation has definitively shown, definitively shown, Hillary Clinton funded the Russia collusion hoax.
This is stunning.
We've been saying it for years, but now you have Durham certifying it based upon his massive and extensive and detailed investigation.
According to a report just filed by special counsel Durham, lawyers for Hillary's 2016 presidential campaign paid a technology company to infiltrate servers belonging to Trump Tower and the White House in order to fabricate a narrative connecting Donald Trump to Russia.
Durham's filing focuses on potential conflicts of interest related to the representation of Michael Sussman, a former lawyer for the Clinton campaign.
Sussman has been charged with making a false statement to a federal agent and has pled not guilty.
The indictment alleges that he told then-FBI General Counsel James Baker, less than two months before the 2016 election, that he was not working for any client when he requested a meeting in which he provided the FBI with purported data and white papers that that he was not working for any client when he requested a meeting in which he provided the FBI with purported data and white papers that
Trump's fine says Sussman's billing records reflect that he repeatedly billed Hillary's campaign for his work on the Russian bank allegation.
In a section filed titled Factual Background, it's revealed that Sussman had assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two specific clients, technology executive, tech executive one, not given by name, and a U.S.-based tech executive one, not given by name, and a U.S.-based internet company, internet company one again, not given by name, and the Clinton campaign.
Sussman and Tech Exec One had met and communicated with a law partner who served as general counsel on Hillary's campaign.
Fox has reported the lawyer is Mark Elias.
Per Durham, in 2016, Tech Executive One worked with Sussman, an American investigative law firm, several cyber researchers, and employees at multiple internet companies to assemble the reported data in white papers.
The filing states, in connection with these efforts, Tech Exec 1 exploited his access to non-public and or proprietary Internet data.
Tech Exec 1 also enlisted the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university for receiving and analyzing large amounts of Internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract.
It goes on and on and on.
The former chief investigator of the Trump-Russia probe for the House Intelligence Committee, Kash Patel, said the filing definitively shows that the Hillary Clinton campaign directly funded and ordered its lawyers at Perkin Coy to orchestrate a criminal enterprise to fabricate a connection between President Trump and Russia.
During Sussman's trial, Durham will establish among the ill-begotten data foraged by Tech Executive One and his associates is the domain name systems internet traffic pertaining to a particular health care provider, Trump Tower, Donald Trump's Central Park West apartment, and the executive office of the President of the United States.
In other words, they were surveilling all.
Meanwhile, another report.
They knew.
Former National Intelligence Director Barack Obama and Joe Biden were briefed on Hillary's dirty plan to falsely accuse Trump of ties to Russia.
They were in on it.
This week, a shocking story broke that a law firm hired by Hillary's campaign used sensitive government data to spy on President Trump while he was in office.
The story is a new development of the Durham probe shedding light on how deep ran the corruption in Hillary's campaign and the bogus FBI investigation into Trump's Russia ties.
Now, a former director of national intelligence under Trump has revealed that both Barack Obama and Joe Biden were briefed on Hillary's plan to falsely link President Trump to Russia using shoddy intelligence.
Get this, even Democrats believe Clinton should be questioned over these Russia allegations.
We have the bottom of the hour break, Dr. Fetzer.
We'll continue that when we come back.
Stick around, folks.
We'll be back in a few minutes.
I want the truth!
You can't handle the truth!
You're listening to Republic Broadcasting Network.
Real news.
Real talk.
Real people.
Because you can handle the truth.
Are you sick of censorship?
TLB Talk is the cure!
TLB stands for Truth, Liberty, and Balance.
We are the newest and most unique social media platform to hit the internet.
We were built out of necessity because Big Tech, Big Pharma, and Big Brother are out of control.
The only thing bigger than them is when we the people are united.
With that vision, TLB Talk was born.
Our battlefield is in cyberspace.
The battle we're in can be won by clicks of buttons and voting with your wallet.
DLD Talk has no hidden agendas, no corporate funding, and we do not sell, trade, or give away any of your information.
Our platform runs off of generous donations of members and merchandise profits.
So please, check out our site.
It's the best around.
And be sure to stop by our store.
It's loaded with items that'll have you feeling a sense of member pride and victory.
Come unite with us today at TLBTalk.com and join the social media revolution.
My name is John, I'm the founder of Black Owl Coffee and I started Black Owl because I really love coffee.
I've always loved coffee and after traveling so much to Europe, South America and trying so many different coffees that were so good and every time I came back To the U.S., I was so disappointed with the coffee, so I figured that I had to do something about it.
The biggest difference is really is on the beans and the roasting process, how we roast it, and how fresh it is.
The fresher the roast, the better the quality.
Here, like all of the coffee, it's roasted within one to two days prior to being shipped.
So it literally gets to consumer's house within three to five days after being roasted.
If you like coffee, you have to try ours.
It's fresh roasted, it's one of the best beans that we can get, and you will definitely see the difference.
Visit blackoutcoffee.com and use the coupon code REPUB10.
R-E-P-U-B-1-0, that's R-E-P-U-B-1-0. - Homeowners, if your lender has gone out of business or sold your transaction to another lender or servicer, you may be the victim of a wrongful foreclosure resulting in the loss of your home.
If you've already lost your home, are in foreclosure, or even in good standing, you can challenge the mortgage transaction's illegal issue and your property can be restored to you, and your foreclosure can be stopped or reversed and the mortgage transaction declared unenforceable.
State laws, U.S.
title codes, the Uniform Commercial Codes, and U.S.
Supreme Court rulings have upheld that defective mortgage documentations can reverse or stop foreclosures and enforce property title claims in favor of the homeowner.
We are having successes in stopping the process of foreclosure, the enforcement of the foreclosure judgments, the sale of property, and evictions after the sale.
We are not attorneys, and we don't give legal advice.
We are a professional team of legal researchers providing forensic mortgage audits and expert witnesses.
We have the knowledge to produce the evidence and enforce laws regarding your legal issues.
We've been in business for 12 years without a complaint.
Consultations are free, and we provide a free title search to confirm if your mortgage has legal defects.
Please call 855-253-3748.
855, the number 2, keep it today.
253-3748-855, the number two, keep it today.
What I see with old eyes, and every time I turn around another guy's think about this.
This world's gonna kill.
This vision is bad for doing a war.
We are back, folks, beyond the official narrative, Republic Broadcasting.
Richard Kerry here with co-host Stephen Douglas Whitener and our special guest today, James Fetzer.
And so, Dr. Fetzer, this confirms much of the information we've been hearing in the independent media, how things were plotted against Trump all along, not just by the Hillary campaign.
But I mean, we had the entire government basically working against him then and even after he was a standing president in office.
So this is extraordinary for all this information to come out.
But will anything ever come of it?
Will we ever even hear it mentioned on MSNBC, for example?
Right.
That's the issue.
Well, this is leading to legal action.
I think this now reflects that the Durham investigation was bona fide, that Durham's for real, and that he's going to bring this suit against Sussman.
It's going to be devastating.
Get this.
Democrats who believe Clinton should be questioned over the rush allegations have increased from 44% in October of 2021 to 66% in February of 22, but that's prior to learning this information. but that's prior to learning this information.
So that percentage is going to go up.
The former Director of National Intelligence under Trump, whose name is Ratcliffe, revealed Monday that John Brennan, CIA Director under Obama, told then-President and Vice President Biden—that would be then-President Obama and Vice President Biden in 2016—that About the allegation Durham revealed that Hillary was seeking to link Trump to Russia.
What did John Brennan tell President Obama in the Oval Office in 2016?
Bill Hemmer asked Radcliffe during an interview Monday on Fox.
Well, I can talk about this because this part has been declassified.
He briefed President Obama and Vice President Biden and other members of the national security team about the specific intelligence John Durham is now about Hillary's plan to falsely accuse and vilify Donald Trump with a scandal and the discussion around that and whether or not it was good intelligence.
In other words, Obama knew.
Biden knew.
They did nothing about it to prevent this form of sabotage of democracy.
I even have a book about it, which is confirmed by this latest revelation entitled Exposing the Russia Hoax.
Where I describe Russia hoax mythology was blown apart by the appearance of Robert Mueller before the Congress.
He had never heard of fission GPS.
He did not know what was in his own report.
And the world discovered that it had all been nothing but political theater to promote the Democrat Party's assault on Trump.
Every American must understand exactly what happened here.
We have been subjected to nearly three years of propaganda where the key players knew it was a fabrication.
The public deserves to learn the truth about this monstrous deception.
It's all here between the covers of this book.
You don't want to miss it.
Now confirmed by Duren's report.
This is just stunning, Richard and Stephen.
Stunning.
Well, it is.
Part of me on one level says, so what?
Because what mechanism remains for justice to come out of this Federal Bureau of Instigation and this Just Us Department?
You said that Brennan talked about it.
I mean, it almost sounds like he was bringing them in on it when he was in the Oval Office there.
It's very deep, this corruption, and what hope do we have?
It is stunning, but what do we do about it, Dr. Fetzer?
That's what balls up in me.
It's like, where do we go?
And my thought, Dr. Fetzer, is similar to with the COVID situation.
The courts aren't really hearing any cases fairly regarding the mandates or the shots Uh, one article at Global Research is entitled, corrupt judges and elected politicians in lockstep with COVID mandate, a power grab at levels never before seen in the history of the world.
And, you know, similarly, I mean, it seems like the politicians who the establishment push for, promote, can do no wrong, you know, and the courts won't hear cases on that, won't hear cases about all the nefarious business with COVID.
We have heard that a Pfizer vaccine data, a document dump, It has some bombshell evidence because it's Pfizer's own data, and it confirms as of a year ago, February 2021, Pfizer had already received more than 1,200 reports of deaths allegedly caused by the vaccines and tens of thousands of reports of adverse events.
Now, this is their own data, and they're suggesting, well, many are suggesting over at, well, Michael Chodowski, Professor Writing for Global Research thinks that could be able to start turning the tide in the courtrooms, having the vaccine manufacturers own data.
If we can't with that, and what hope is there?
But okay, so you're hopeful that the courts haven't abandoned us completely.
We can still attempt legal recourse in some of these matters in this day and age.
Oh, yes, I think that's absolutely correct.
And you know, Reinhart Tullmach, this brilliant A German attorney, I mean, he's sensational, has initiated the hearings and substantiation of his complaint with the International Criminal Court.
For violations of, you know, rights of crimes against humanity, genocide and the like against Pfizer and Moderna and Antony, Tony the Rat Fauci, Bill Gates and all that.
It's going on as we speak.
And Ron Johnson, whom I'm proud to say is my senator here from Wisconsin, Did a COVID-19 second opinion with leading experts, including Robert Malone, who actually designed the mRNA technology, and Peter McCullough, who is the most widely cited medical expert, perhaps in the world, explaining what was going on here.
Now, what I think is going to happen vis-a-vis these revelations from Durham is that the Democratic Party is taking another devastating blow to the body.
This isn't going to lead to an even greater loss in the midterms.
Any talk of Hillary becoming president one way or another, one suggesting that Biden step down for reasons of mental health and then Kamala appoint Hillary to be vice president and then Kamala step aside, those are all dead in the water.
These are acts of such a grotesque magnitude, a form of treason against the United States.
Hillary's political career is finished.
Caput, stick a fork in her, she's done.
Wow.
And you mentioned another top story worth noting, some updates on the Sandy Hook situation?
Some sort of settlement?
Oh yeah, well, this is of special significance to me.
What we've had is a settlement with Remington where a lawsuit had been brought by Sandy Hook parents against Remington.
Normally a manufacturer of a weapon would not be liable, but the judge in Connecticut, and this was in my opinion a grossly mistaken ruling, Declared that because this was a military-style weapon, which it is not.
I mean, it may look superficially as though it were, but military weapons are a full automatic.
This is only semi-automatic.
It's the most popular and versatile rifle on the market today.
It would be an ideal weapon for multiple purposes, whether you're talking about protecting your home or your community or having to deal with a tyrannical government, which increasingly appears to be the case.
I had published about it that this $33 million offer that had been made by Remington was an insurance scam.
I published about it on my blog at jamesfetzer.org.
You can find it there.
And now if you go, you can see my latest is about what's happening here.
When I sought to intervene in this case, which was Donna Soto et al.
against Bushmaster Firearms, when I sought to intervene in this case, because they never resolved or addressed the question whether anybody had died at Sandy Hook, that has never been adjudicated, and it would be very difficult to establish because it's false.
Nobody died at Sandy Hook.
When I sought to intervene in the case, and I went through all the legal motions, submitting motions and briefs, I was opposed.
Get this, I was opposed by both the plaintiff, that would be the Sandy Hook parents, which is unsurprising, but also the defendant.
That the plaintiff should object was not surprising, but Remington too.
If you turn to my blog at jamesfetzer.org, you can see plaintiff's objection to petitioner's motion to intervene, but also Remington's objection to the motion to intervene.
Does that give you the least hint that the fix was in?
Considering my attempts to make the court and counsel aware have been repeatedly rebuffed, it appears that whether this was a stage event, actually a two-day FEMA mass casualty exercise involving children, for which we even found the manual and published as Appendix A to Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, 2015, second edition, 2016, doesn't matter to the parties in this case.
Think about it.
I published before that this $33 million lawsuit was an insurance scam.
NYME told they settled for $73 million, and the first-name plaintiff Donna Soto, mother of Victoria Soto, who is supposed to have been a teacher at Sandy Hook, also played the role of Susan Brough, the mother of Heather Heyer, alleged to have died in the car crash in Charlottesville.
They're just rubbing our nose in it.
This is grotesque.
And if you go to my blog, you can actually access the FEMA manual, which I included in the book.
It's actually linked there in my earlier article about the $33 million lawsuit.
And I report here the story they give about how the parents brought this class action lawsuit and some of the evidence they cited, including the photograph of a policewoman leading a line of children from Sandy Hook Elementary School on December 14th, including the photograph of a policewoman leading a line of children What the story left out is there was a second photograph taken a few minutes earlier where you can see parents are present.
There were a whole lot of presence there, arms folded, hands in their pocket, not being alarmed or concerned whatsoever.
When you compare the two photographs, and this is all on the blog, the comparison shows they rearranged the kids to get a better shot.
And if you do a close-up in the background, you can see parents in the background casually looking on, which has led me to call this photograph lounging at the massacre.
Now, there's a principle under the law, Richard, falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, which means false in one thing, false in everything.
A Roman legal principle indicating a witness who willfully falsifies one matter is not credible on any matter.
The underlying motive for attorneys to impeach opposing witnesses in court, the principle discredits their testimony if it's without corroboration.
This whole event was a charade, and neither the courts nor the defendants appear to be the least interested in separating fact from fiction.
Richard, Steve, have at it.
Excellent points all there, Dr. Fetzer.
Anyone who hasn't looked into this at all finds it hard to believe that no children died.
I mean, you know, the name of your book, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook.
But even just looking at the evidence of how Uh, how much of a state of disrepair, uh, the school was in, uh, there, there, there is no way, if you look into that alone, there is no way any, uh, functional school, uh, would be possible under those building conditions.
And, and that alone, uh, should get people to look further down the rabbit hole on this topic.
If they have trouble believing, you know, that no children died that day.
Uh, Stephen, do you have any thoughts here on, uh, on, on just, well, any of, any of this?
We have a caller as well.
Maybe we can try to fit him in quickly, actually, before we add more comments.
Patrick in Texas has been on the line patiently.
Hello, Patrick.
We have you on the air with Dr. James Fetzer.
Yes, Dr. Fetzer.
Familiar with your work.
I was wondering how that trial turned out for you.
But it's nothing new, like a Bundy standoff.
The Fed spent $1 billion going after these guys up there.
They just fumbled it.
Somebody ratted on them and told them they got cameras over here.
Uh-oh, we better back out of this.
It was Henry Waxman behind Mueller that went after Trump for four years.
They called him a legal terrorist.
This is the way they operate.
Paul McCloskey, he was a Senate Congressman.
He said AIPAC terrorizes Congress.
And this is where they work.
They'll take you down, as Jim Trafficker said.
You know, if they can't beat you in the polls, they'll put you in prison.
I'll take my call.
Yeah, yeah.
No, I'm glad you called, Mike.
I was sued over four sentences, three in a book and one in a blog, separately published by Robert David Steele, for asserting, which I cannot reaffirm.
I'm just telling you what I was sued over, not affirming it for the truth of what was said, that a death certificate that Lenny Posner had circulated for his son Noah was fake.
It had no File number, it had no town certification, it had no state certification.
It turns out that in Connecticut, an uncertified death certificate is not legally in the possession even of a parent.
So something very odd was going on there.
But the judge, even though I had this massive evidence, and I am just talking about, you know, reviewing some of it here with you now,
Rule that I could not introduce that evidence during the proceedings, the judicial proceedings on the ground that whether or not anybody had died at Sandy Hook had nothing to do with the authenticity of the death certificate, even though the death certificate claimed that the decedent had died at Sandy Hook of multiple gunshot wounds.
I mean, it was just an astonishing Ruling by the court.
That meant I wasn't allowed to make a defense.
Not only that, but even when we solely focused on the death certificate, I introduced the testimony reports of two forensic document experts, both of whom agreed the death certificate was fake.
The judge just set them aside as someone else's opinion.
I'll never forget The conversation he had with a plaintiff's attorney right in front of my very eyes, he said, you know, if I exclude this as evidence, then that'll be ground for an appeal.
So I'm just going to set it aside as someone else's opinion.
It was completely outrageous.
Moreover, even though I had an extensive history as a journalist, I published dozens of books, hundreds of articles, had many, many, I probably published a thousand blogs, you know, individual blogs on the various blogs I've had over time, even though I was being sued for sentences in a book where I was a co-author of one chapter of the book that had this sentence specifically.
But the editor of the book and the other was in a blog that I wrote, the judge would not rule on my status as a journalist.
And they never made the determination that I'd done anything wrong.
So this was a case of liability without fault, which is against all judicial practice.
You cannot have liability without fault.
Well, no, just it's just it's been an extraordinary show trial every time you've been in court related to Sandy Hook, sir, yourself and others.
And yeah, a complete kangaroo court just just for perception to back up the establishment.
You know, we have a another caller you may recognize.
We have Paul in California on the line for you, Dr. Fetzer.
Hello, Paul.
Hey, imagine my pleasure tuning in to your normally slow-paced show to hear Jim Fetzer lightin' a fire.
How are you, Paul?
Hangin' in there.
So, I will make a couple of quick comments.
First of all, I am not going out on a limb here.
I think we can all rest assured that that Remington settlement for $33 million, or whatever they say it is, is fake.
Okay, I don't believe it for a word.
How could the shootings be fake and no children die and the whole event just be a state's event?
But somehow we have a real lawsuit and a real, you know, trial and there's a real jury award.
I mean, the $33 million is what gives it away in my opinion.
Just remember O.J.
Simpson got sentenced to 33 years for those escapades?
And, you know, he was out on the golf course in Florida just a few years ago.
He's been seen multiple times.
So the whole thing is a charade.
My other quick comment is... Go ahead.
I was just going to add, it actually turns out to be, I'm told, the settlement was for $73 million.
They jacked it up.
Yeah, I don't believe a word of it, and I don't think you should either, and I'm pretty sure you might not.
The other thing I was going to say, based upon everything you've talked about so far in the first part of the show, and, you know, what I see, you know, reading the lay of the land, so to speak, I'll just make a simple statement, and it's this.
You cannot play fair with people that don't play fair.
And what this is showing, this is, in my opinion, and I almost wish I wasn't around for it, because I don't think it's going to be...
Smooth, and I think things are going to get ugly, but this is a watershed moment in our human history.
I mean, I think it's either we are going to have to fight back and win, or we're just all going to lose our freedom and our souls to this new technocratic tyranny.
I mean, these people, I think it has probably occurred to them as probably enough of the Canadian citizens and the truckers That we're not dealing with rational, real people.
That we're just dealing with front men of an evil tyranny and they revealed themselves to be deceivers and murderers, let's face it.
These shots they're trying to stick into you.
What's the difference between a shot and a bullet?
I think a lot of men out there are probably going to come to that conclusion fairly quickly because I don't see a good outcome for this Trucker thing.
They're going to keep playing dirty.
They're not going to abide by the rules.
They want us to abide by their rules.
But the men that we say no, well, it's just going to get ratcheted up as you've covered.
So anyway, that's my comment for the moment.
Thanks for hearing it.
Yeah, well, I think that the lawsuits are real because they're trying to take down the The weapons manufacturing industry in the United States, Paul.
I do think it was contrived.
I do think whoever has bought up Remington is in on it, but I think it's real because they're trying to sabotage the Second Amendment.
With 130 million armed Americans, and if they go too far, that there's going to be blowback and that the numbers are very much on the side of the American people.
So I'm sorry to say that even though I believe the lawsuit was contrived and orchestrated, that it's real because they're making a real effort to sabotage the Second Amendment.
I have another point.
Paul, I'll come back to you.
I have another point from one of the best commentators on my blog who added this on the very article you can find at jamesfetzer.org.
Jim!
You know as well as I, the government cannot and will never admit they were involved in a false flag, a halse, or a cover-up unless it benefits them or their Zionist rulers.
Evidence and solid proof has nothing to do with the outcome.
It's a terrible travesty and an outrageous miscarriage of justice, and at the expense of your character and relentless exposure of lies.
That is what it is, and right now I see no change coming unless we all have the balls to do what the truckers are doing.
Shut down the entire stinking putrid system and refuse to budge until the entire rotten-to-the-core government vacates D.C.
and we, the people, regain our status above the corporate autocracy.
We don't have any time.
Listen to me.
Just listen quickly.
The gun sales have done nothing but gone up.
This has been shown.
After all these major shootings, gun sales go up.
They're doing a brisk business in guns more so than ever.
So I think you're misreading this.
The bottom line is this has been covered by other people.
These gun manufacturers owned by these big players, they're not going anywhere.
But other than that, I 100% support all the other stuff you talk about.
I'm always glad to get your opinion.
Yeah, Richard and Steven, your thoughts?
Well, I just wonder your thoughts, actually, on the shots.
I mean, do you think that there is DNA manipulation as a main goal, infertility to reduce population as a primary goal?
Oh, 100 percent, 100 percent, Richard.
I've been reporting on this Actually, I began every single day, seven days a week, back in March of 2020.
I've probably done 500, maybe 1,000 reports on COVID and the pandemic.
The pandemic is fake, but the vaccine is real and deadly.
And the problem is, most Americans have been sold the false belief that it's safe and effective when it's neither.
If it were safe and effective, then you have the choice between running the risk of COVID, where there's already a 99.9% survival, Running the risk of COVID by taking a shot, where if it's real, then maybe you have saved yourself some benefit.
And if it's not, then you merely had an inconvenient injection.
But once you understand this mRNA vaccine is actually changing your DNA, then it's got all kinds of putrid inclusions in it.
It's got little parasites.
It's got little microprocessors.
It's got Graphene oxide?
The graphene oxide sets up an interface between your brain and electromagnetic sources such as 5G, where I believe what happened at Astroworld in Houston, where they just turned on the 5G and they required everyone be vaccinated who attended, was to show how they could control your behavior by manipulating if you've had the vax.
Richard, thanks for having me back.
It was a pleasure, as always, Dr. Fetzer.
We'll be in touch, have you back on soon.
You got it.
Thank you, Dr. Fesser.
Thanks, Richard.
My pleasure, Steve.
Yeah, always a pleasure to have you as well, Steven.
And thanks to the callers, listeners.
Please support RBN to keep all of this going.
Continue to have all of this excellent information, all these great guests.
Stick around for Patrick Slattery with National Bugle Radio.
And please support RBN, folks.
Therefore, we will speak again soon.
Transcend the construct.
Thank you, Richard.
▲
Export Selection