All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 12, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
46:16
The Real Deal Part 6: Climate Change: Myth vs. Reality (12 February 2022) with Joe Olson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, your host on A Real Deal Special, continuing our climate change investigation.
Is it real, or is it a fabrication with Joe Olson?
This is now number six in our series.
I'm very pleased.
You'll find him posted on my BitChute channel, Jim Fetzer.
Joe, before we begin, would you like to say a few words?
Oh yeah, this is really thrilling.
I've always been a latent teacher my whole life, and I've been a lifelong student, so I got really good fundamental education in engineering school back in the early 70s, and it was all based on traditional scientific method, and I've studied a lot of history, particularly a lot of history about science.
And that's why I was really excited when I found the series by Karen Loves Physics and History, and we played two clips from that in our AGW5 program, and I want to cover a little bit of that, and then we'll move on with today's subject, which is going to be the unsustainable green energy scam.
Yeah, very good, Joe.
Shall I proceed with the first slide?
Yes.
Unraveling the Mysteries of Carbonic Acid.
Joe, yours?
Yes, this is an article that was printed in Science Daily, June of 2015, and by then I'd already done a lot of study, particularly the information that Timothy Casey at geologist-1011.net had on volcanic CO2.
So I knew that the ocean was at maximum saturation of CO2, and I knew CO2 was capable of combining with water molecules, splitting and forming carbonic acid.
And that's what the global warmists had been claiming was acidifying the ocean was going to eat all of the coral reefs in the whole world.
And then we were just part of the mass extinction event was because of human carbon dioxide, which is completely absurd.
Like I said, we're at maximum saturation.
It outgasses from the ocean far more than it could possibly absorb from the atmosphere, because the atmosphere is at a lower concentration level.
Learned to do partial I'm trying to remember the exact name of it.
I think it's Boyle's Law on partial pressures with fluids, but bottom line is you're not getting any human acidification of the ocean, number one.
Ocean number two has a pH of 7.8, which is alkaline, up to 8.4, which is even more alkaline, and it's lined with a balsamic calcium carbonate rock base, which is going to immediately neutralize any acids that are available in the ocean.
Now, this study on carbonic acid, like I said, was published in Science Daily June 2015, and what they discovered is that the carbonic acid is only has a half-life of 26 milliseconds if it's outside of a test tube.
So, in a natural environment, you're dealing with number one, a very weak acid, and number two, an acid that is highly reactive and is going to dissociate into other compounds very quickly.
So, it's never going to be a threat to the sea life in any way at all.
Now, one thing that I love, Karen loves, Physics and history, but she made a misstatement when she said that they were using seawater as an electrolyte in the original battery cells where they had dissimilar metals, copper and zinc, that were creating electric current.
And she's corrected on the information about the cathode and anode, but seawater is not acidic, which is what she said it was.
It's actually an alkaline, but it doesn't matter.
It works as an electrolyte.
So, that's enough on that subject.
We'll get into a little bit more about batteries when we get a little further into the discussion on sustainable energy.
Now, this is something that I had written an article about.
Yeah, we got a video coming up here, Joe.
Do you want me to play it or do you want to talk first?
Just a little bit more.
I had written an article called Greenprints of Darkness at Canada Free Press, July 16th of 2010.
Explaining the physics of how solar cells work and how that there was nothing about sustainable energy, whether it's solar cells, windmills, or biofuels, that's sustainable because all of them are net energy losers.
And then several years ago, Michael Moore, who is famous for Where's Roger and his whole series of liberal attacks on everything conservative, was approached by some people that said, well, you really want to know how bad the climate scam is?
Look at this portion of the climate scam, which is the renewable energy scam.
And so they had a movie that was already written and directed, but they just didn't have somebody for a producer.
So they got Michael Moore to produce the movie.
It's called Planet of the Humans.
We'll just show a little trailer.
It's a 90-minute long movie.
I recommend you watch it with anybody that you know that's still believing in the sustainable energy hoax.
But let's roll the clip.
Here we go.
It relies on the most toxic and industrial processes that we've ever created.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
The beauty of a solar facility, and particularly this technology, is that it is so environmentally benign.
The beauty of a solar facility, and particularly this technology, is that it is so environmentally benign.
Yeah, well...
Oh yeah, well I was always curious about how something with no moving parts could take a electromagnetic radiation from the sun and produce electricity.
So I did a deep dive on this like I said in 2010 with my article Green Prince of Darkness at Canada Free Press and turns out the way you produce a solar cell is you have three major elements that are involved in it.
One is a crystalline Silicon structure which forms a cubic structure and you make it where it's about 95% pure and then you wash it so you end up with some voids in it.
Then you need an atom that has an excess fifth outer shell electron.
So it's got a fifth electron that's in the outer shell that's loosely held so when it gets any amount of excitation it
exits that electron and then you need a way for the electron to move through the crystalline structure since silicon has four outer shell electrons it's pretty much inert for that movement so you need something that's got a hole in it and they use phosphorus for that because it's got three outer shells so bottom line is you've got this matrix that's a square or you know cubic three-dimensional matrix of silicon atoms with voids in it.
You impregnate it with boron atoms that have an excess outer shell electron and then you embed it with phosphorus that has a hole that allows that electron to move through and then you put a grid on both sides of it so that you complete the electric circuit.
The electron leaves the photovoltaic cell as a one 1.5 watts per square foot, 1.5 volt DC current and goes out.
It doesn't go out and work all day long and come back and get into the electric cell so it can do it again.
This is nothing but molecular erosion.
And if you think fossil fuels are limited, wait till you discover how limited boron is going to get after more and more of this stuff is cycled and it can't be recycled.
Wait till you find out how expensive it is to manufacture the silicon that's involved in it.
So and then think about what you have in the way of a waste product that nobody considers as far as the life cycle costing of these green energies.
So in the movie, Uh, Planet of the Humans.
Michael Moore says that the way they get the high grade silicon is that there's a quartz mountain in South Carolina where they dynamite this pure quartz mountain
And then they load it into trucks, take it down to the port, ship it over to China, and then in China it's ground up, which takes a little bit of horsepower, it's baked in an oven at 1000 degrees centigrade under an almost complete vacuum in order to create the crystal silicon structure.
Now this same Construction technique is used in the IC chip industry, and those are subsidized by the government.
So, bottom line is you have a baseline product that's being subsidized by other economic streams that subsidizes part of the cost, then they add a 30% government subsidy directly to the solar cells, and then they add all along the way at the production level and at the distribution level, and then they force rate payers To include those as part of your rate.
Here in Texas, 25% of all new generation capacity has to be, quote, renewable, which means Texas has more windmills than the whole rest of the nation combined.
And you see how great they were during last year's February freeze.
So that's bottom line number one, two.
Yes.
Well, Joe, it seems to me you're talking about producing the elements necessary for the Green New Deal energy source, such as solar panels, consumes a vast amount of resources and energy, and that the cost is actually astronomical unless it's subsidized.
So they're failing to take into account the fact that it's only cheap now because of those additional inputs financially, which would no longer obtain if we were to go full solar.
There's no way a solar cell can't produce a solar cell.
Matter of fact, 10 solar cells in their whole lifetime will never produce a single solar cell.
I go into quite a bit of detail in my Green Prince of Darkness exposed article, which is the one we have up that's at Prince of Peace Scientific, because I had an additional eight years of research before I wrote that article and got it posted.
Are these people just issuing propaganda, or is this a gigantic scam?
Is this an economic conspiracy to destroy the United States, which would not surprise me, frankly.
Oh, they wanted to destroy entire civilization worldwide.
It has nothing to do with the United States being the main target.
It's all Western cultures, and then they're going to destroy the Eastern cultures as well.
These people are demonic.
They think they own the planet.
They think that they can get by with 500 million slaves and they've already created enough technology to produce the robots that can produce everything they need.
We've already mined enough material that they don't have to have any more functional mines.
We've already located We've already built enough refineries with a 50-year lifespan.
They're looking at this thing long-range.
have a 50 year supply of petroleum without drilling an additional well.
We've already built enough refineries with a 50 year lifespan.
They're looking at this thing long range.
Can we afford at this point in time to exterminate 99% of humanity and still get away with this?
Yes, we can.
And that's exactly what they're doing.
And that's why the Green Scam continues to play into part of the Health Scam.
And that's why the Green Scam includes global warming, which is a complete lie.
We've done five program series on that.
Sustainable energy, this is our first one on that, and then the next one we'll do, we'll do on abigenic oil, how the planet produced petroleum for a billion years before there was a single life form.
It's not leftover dead dinosaur juice.
That's the trifecta of energy lies, and energy is what makes civilization work.
Well, Joe, do the advocates of the Green New Deal like AOC, Nancy Pelosi, and other Democrats, are they aware of the facts of the matter that this is a destructive program that is not sustainable?
They're not aware of anything.
They buy into the hype.
They believe the simplistic chicken little theory on climate change.
They believe the goofy jack-in-the-beanstalk on energy solutions.
So bottom line is, these people are ignorant, number one.
Number two, you cannot possibly train them or teach them because they're in this echo chamber of like-minded people.
But we're going to get into a little bit more about exactly how horrible this situation really is on the... You wanted to add a few more words?
No, I think we've pretty well covered it.
The thing is, there's an enormous amount of research here, and it doesn't benefit anybody for me to spend an hour reading and reciting stuff that I've already researched and highly published.
So these are given just as links.
You can do your own homework and read these articles.
We're going to next skip to the Rare Earth Medals, which are part of the components of windmills.
I just want to add what you've already explained shows the Green New Deal is a complete scam from an economic point of view.
It's not feasible.
It costs more energy.
It costs more resources than it provides.
It's a net loser in terms of energy.
So this is grotesque, Joe, and that it's being marketed as a politically viable solution to the nation's energy problems is just preposterous.
Yep, that's exactly what it is.
It's part of a synchronized, well-planned fraud worldwide on every subject imaginable, but certainly things that are related to science really offends me.
Okay, now we're going to get to rare earth metals.
These are what's necessary to make windmills work.
We got the Green Prince of Darkness exposed.
Okay, now we need to switch to the rare earth metals.
Slide number four.
Rare earth magnets.
I have actually three slides here, Joe.
Okay, well just put them up and I won't talk about the individual slides.
We'll just change them as I'm talking about stuff in general.
We have these rare earth elements.
They are not easy to recover.
You have to mine tons of material and use highly toxic chemicals in order to separate these things out.
And you're required to have those for windmills because windmills don't operate at a constant RPM.
In order to have actual transmissible power, which is what Tesla was able to prove against Edison in the 1880s, you have to use alternating current where the current doesn't actually travel down the wire.
What travels down the wire is the voltage potential and then a wave front that's either positive or negative on a sinusoidal basis, which is a wave of electrons moving down the line.
So you don't actually have electron migration like you do with a direct current.
The problem with having a non-constant source is you don't have a constant 60 cycle per second, which is what we use in the U.S., or 50 cycles per second of an alternating uh positive and negative field that you have with alternating current and so you cannot interject that into the same system because it would just it'd be a system disruptor you'd have a problem with anything that's sensitive
uh on on a cycles per second basis so that's why we we don't co-mingle direct current and alternating current and you can't functionally transmit direct current so the windmills because they don't spin at a constant rpm produce direct current which then goes through a Inverter and it takes the direct current and makes it into alternating current.
You have about a five percent energy loss at that point.
They're very minor producers so they have to be connected with enormous amount of lines in order to get the energy out of the windmills and onto the grid system where you can have a point source produce
Hundreds of megatons of energy in one location and connect it with transmission lines and have a reliable energy source for a century where you have a windmill that they have a projected life of 25 years before all of the components decompose to the point where they're unusable and that's the delamination and the ultraviolet penetration of the fiberglass blades, the wear out of the bearings, the wear out of the quote permanent magnets that are not permanent.
We can switch slides as we're doing this discussion.
They claim that China is the only supplier of rare earth elements, and that's actually completely 100% false.
The United States has at least equal amount of rare earth elements, but the problem is they're in rock Stratus that contain thorium and they don't want to have to process thorium because if you end up with a whole bunch of thorium sitting around somebody's going to say gee why don't we put a thorium reactor in we put one in at india point in 1963 and had three 275 megawatt thorium powered very safe nuclear generation but
Admiral Hyman Rickover, who was in charge of making the nuclear navy, having nuclear powered submarines and aircraft carriers and producing nuclear weapons, didn't want to waste any money refining anything other than uranium so that they could use it for bomb and propulsion systems.
And that's why they advocated switching to that form of nuclear energy for light water reactors, so they could subsidize the mining of those war materials using domestic energy production.
And just like I mentioned in my article, Exposing this Jenga game at Veterans Today.
The components that take up the building of the World Trade Centers, which were vaporized that day by gamma rays, are the same components that are used to manufacture light water reactor plants, which would be iron, calcium, carbon, and silicon, and together they have 102 isotopes.
When you build a nuclear reactor and pressure vessel, And you use the light water thing, you're getting a lot of gamma ray absorption into those materials and you get embrittlement and over a 50-year life cycle, the plant becomes radioactive and decays to the point where it's no longer safe to operate and you have to seal it for 100,000 years.
There's nothing sustainable about building 200 of those things nationwide in our country as we presently have.
Absolutely insane.
Joe, let me get this straight.
You're telling me there could have been perfectly safe, completely dependable and reliable nuclear energy based on thorium, but Admiral Rickover wanted to preserve this as one of the multiple sources for...
Military weapons that were nuclear powered, such as submarines, and therefore he recommended the use of the uranium for the reactors, which destroy themselves by virtue of their radioactivity.
They make them, they turn them into fragile building structures that are going to destroy themselves, Joe!
I know, and then they build them over fault lines.
This is insanity!
This is insanity!
Well, like Art Baltwag said, thorium was killed in its infancy by the sins of uranium.
You know, bottom line is we had a potential to develop a very safe nuclear technology in the early 60s, and we willingly chose not to.
There's another advantage to thorium that you don't have with uranium light water plants, and that's called superheated steam, which at about 2200 degrees Fahrenheit you get a 15% bump in the available heat capacity, and you can do that with two current known methods.
One of them is clean coal, where you can increase your plant efficiency by 15% using those higher temperatures, and the other one is thorium reactors, which operate at those temperatures.
But we'll get into that when we get a little more detailed.
You're telling me sometimes we had a real smart guy like Rickover, but he had a bias.
He had a preference for military technology, so they compromised and created a civilian technology that would be non-sustainable.
And then on the other hand, you have these ignorant Democrats, these complete scientific morons who are trying to promote solar energy, not even understanding It too is non-sustainable and consumes more energy than it saves.
I mean, Joe, this is just stunning.
And they think they're saving the environment when they're doing enormous amount of destruction.
Wait till you see how you refine the materials for your lithium batteries in your stupid little electric cars, you know?
I have wind turbines.
We're going to get into a little bit of batteries.
I have wind turbines, birds and bats up, Joe.
Okay, yeah, Sierra.
Sierra Club.
Yeah, them and the phony baloney Ottoman Club pretend to care about birds, but this is the Ivanpah solar cell reflector system out on the border between California and Nevada.
And this thing has steerable mirrors because if you have just fixed mirrors you get a tiny fraction of the quote available sunshine.
So these things have what are called heliostats.
They solar track so that the mirrors change and keep the sunlight reflected up to a tower where it's heated up to They claim a thousand degrees Fahrenheit, but anyhow, whatever the claim is.
And these things have been killing massive amount of birds.
A million birds a year are killed by windmills.
Well, the Ivan power plant is killing tens of thousands of birds every year.
And they call them the Ivanpah smokers.
Birds in mid-flight will get into that reflected light stream and be incinerated to the point where all of their feathers burn off and they fall down to the ground as fully cooked smokers.
But a lot of birds are damaged to the point where they don't end up inside the collection area, which they extend five feet outside the field, and anything that dies outside of that area is not counted.
On the Jeppesen flight manuals, you look at their their maps, and they have a 50-mile radius around the Ivanpah Reflector site saying do not fly it during the daytime over this location.
It is a flight hazard for pilot blindness.
Now how many birds are blinded within the 50 miles of that thing that they get the high intensity light they don't notice that it's burning the back side of their retina?
How many blind birds survive out in the wild For any length of time at all.
They're instant prey.
So you have multiple methods of killing animals using this form of sustainable energy.
And you have the Audubon Society and the Sierra Club.
The Sierra Club goes on and on about how great nuclear power is, disregarding all the information on that.
And how birds are killed by so many other things.
We don't need to worry about the few birds that are killed by the Ivan power.
You know, the Ivanpah power system and windmills all across the country.
Joe, you're telling me even the Sierra Club is basically ignorant of the fundamentals of physics and engineering involved here.
Even the Sierra Club, which touts itself as an expert in relation to the environment and its protection, even they are promoting not only non-sustainable methods for developing energy, but ones that are harmful to the environment, including birds and other species they claim to be protecting.
Well, if you want a real education and you've never been to a Sierra Club meeting, you really need to go see what the Birkenstock and Alfalfa Sprout crowd is really up to.
They're the biggest bunch of nitwits that I've ever met on the planet.
I went to talk to them back when I was doing my rail proposal.
And I had a woman who had actually been a former officer of the Sierra Club invite me to go there, and she tried to talk them into letting me speak about how the Disney crooked illegal rail system for Houston was not what was beneficial to the city, and the Sierra Club would not allow me to speak.
And they virtually, you know, if I mentioned anything about global warming, They virtually ran me out of the meeting, so it's like these people have been complete mind-numb robots, and the administration of all of these things have been completely captured, as Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
says about all of the agencies in charge of the drug cartels in the United States.
So they're all weaponized.
So let's get into the I think I have another slide on the Ivanpah.
Is that slide number six?
How many birds are killed by solar farms?
Yeah, that's a good one.
Should we?
I mean, I've got it up.
Yeah, I had the Ivanpah.
How many birds are killed by solar farms is up now.
Did you want to go past that?
No, just that this is your reference.
You can pull this article up and you can read for yourself the enormous amount of damage that this one particular solar facility has.
Now, I've added a slide called 7.5 Crescent Dunes, Nevada.
I don't see that, Joe, if you added a sign.
I've got the next is on becoming obsolete, how a high-tech solar plant found its way to bankruptcy.
Yeah, that's it.
That's it.
Yeah, that's the Crescent Dunes Nevada plant.
And the important things from this is to look at what this subsidized electrical solar plant had in the way of competition.
They were competing against standard production methods, which in Nevada would be the hydroelectric, and then you also have some gas-fired units that are in Nevada.
And they were producing electricity at $30 per megawatt hour.
The Crescent Dunes was producing at 135 megawatts per hour.
The Nevada Power Company had signed a deal where they would participate in this program, but they wanted to have a member of their group selected to be on the board of directors.
And when the numbers kept coming in so bad, the DOE said, well, we're going to rewrite the charter and only DOE employees can be directors of this corporation.
So they could modify the numbers and lie to everybody.
And at that point, Nevada said, you know, we've already wasted enough money on this stupid project we're pulling out.
And the project went bankrupt.
So, you want to know how great this is?
There it is, folks.
And one of the claim technologies that they're using on this is called molten salt.
We used molten salt central plants back during the Jimmy Carter era as a way of storing energy that you could use during off-peak hours.
When you build a Building in a commercial building in the United States, you're required to meter your peak kVA, which is the peak amount of power that you draw, and now with smart meters, they're able to actually separate out peak kVA during time use, and so they developed a different category.
It used to be They would set part of your rate on what your peak was because that determined the amount of generation you had to have, but when they found out there was a whole lot of simultaneous peaks, then they started to do peak service time overcharges, and that meant that it became economically feasible.
If you could run your refrigeration plant at night when you were off peak hours for air conditioning for the rest of the grid, then you could get lower rates and you could lower the size of your incoming electric service and had, you know, claimed benefits.
But by the time you do the cost of the molten salt, well, what they're saying is the molten salt system out there has a 30-year lifespan.
So you go through this enormous cost to produce this, quote, energy storage system, and the storage system has a 30-year life that cannot possibly be amortized over the cost of electricity by conventional means.
It's absolutely insane.
And the same thing applies to every other, quote, storage method, which would include chemical storage batteries, capacitors, flywheels, pumped storage where you pump water up into a dam and let it flow back down.
So you pump it up during your off-peak hours and then you let the water flow back down.
They've made minor little bits to stabilize the system and recover energy that way, but it is bottom line.
You do the Carnot cycle.
Every one of those things is a net energy waster.
So the lunatics really are running the asylum.
Oh, it's insufferable that we have to deal with this level, number one, of ignorance on the part of the general public, but this level of malicious lying on the part of the people that absolutely have to know, at the upper levels of management in this system, that this is absolutely absurd.
So then the next thing I think we were going to get to was number eight, the dendrites.
Yes.
Yes, okay.
Dendrites, the original hypothesis on those, and I think it's correct, is that they occur from impurities that are inside the components that you use to manufacture chemical storage batteries.
So, for instance, if you've got a lead battery, you can't get all of the other elements that are inside the battery out.
Theoretically, you had pure lead and you had pure carbon and you had pure sulfuric acid and all the elements that go into making whichever type of battery you're talking about.
It doesn't matter whether nickel hydride or lithium ion or lithium cobalt.
No matter what type of chemical battery you're talking about, there's a certain level of impurities that from a cost efficiency standpoint, you can't afford to get out.
So you have these impurities in there and in the process of charging and recharging, you've got current going back and forth and between the impurities in the anode, cathode and electrolyte, you're going to end up getting deposits.
And the deposits will actually start building up to the point where they cross the plates and then the plate shorts out.
And that causes your battery failure.
And a lot of times it ends up causing fires.
And so that's what this particular thing is.
This is research on various ways of limiting the amount of dendrite and they claim to be able to get up to a thousand cycles of charge recharge where typically your charge recharge cycle on chemical storage batteries is about 400 cycles maximum.
So, there again, you've got an enormous amount of energy required to dig out and process and refine the materials necessary to make the batteries.
You have the lowest available energy storage of any possible system.
Any liquid fuel or solid fuel has a high, far higher energy storage density than what you get out of these.
And that's why you're not going to see, you know, electric Passenger planes flying across the ocean because you couldn't possibly get batteries big enough to do it and you can't possibly put enough solar cell area on top of a plane to collect solar cell on your way over and that would only be for flying in the daytime so bottom line is These are such devastating points, my friend!
I mean, talk about lunacy!
I am stunned.
Every time we do one of these shows, Joe, I'm just blown away.
I mean, it's just astounding how politics is based on totally unscientific, massive ignorance and gullibility of a public by people who Appear to be no better than con men for a discredited technology that can't possibly save the earth.
And you know what really offends me the most is that there's people that are smart enough to figure all this stuff out but they're so compartmentalized and they're so indoctrinated that they cannot speak out.
I went on to Spectrum which is the magazine that's run by IEEE, International Electronic and Electrical Engineering Society.
And, you know, as an engineer, you know, I should be able to post comments on there.
They would delete every one of my comments because I would be opposing with the same exact facts that we're just now discussing, which are irrefutable.
But they also will not allow any discussion of the dangers of 5G, because they make a lot of money from the electronics industry.
So they're not going to speak bad about electronics.
They're not going to tell you that there's some negative biological impacts from being irradiated constantly in the electromagnetic spectrum in frequencies that have been proven to be dangerous for 50 years.
Absolutely insane.
Just to draw an analogy, It would appear 5G is to human bodies what nuclear radiation is to nuclear power plants.
I mean, it's radiating the power plants to the point that they're going to self-destruct.
The 5G is going to, you know, affect human bodies in the similar way.
It's going to be massively biologically destructive, Joe.
I think you put your finger on it.
Well, it's even more destructive in certain resonant frequencies in biological systems.
And so just like Raymond Reif discovered that he could find the frequency for any pathogen on the planet, it didn't matter whether it was, you know,
mold or fungus or virus or bacteria everything had every living organism has a resonant frequency where if you can project that resonant frequency into it you can break apart the cell walls and actually kill it and so he developed a system in the 1930s which was very effective and now that all of his patents have expired and they managed to bust up all of his machine and label him a crack and drive him insane now the
Certain groups are actually reusing Raymond Rife R.I.F.E.
machines, and I recommend that you do your own little research on that, because it's a very fascinating and heartbreaking story about what they did to that man.
But, you know, it goes on and on.
That's the way the system is set up.
It's set up by a bunch of lying, thieving pirates that have stolen everything they can.
And like Karen, when we mentioned in our AGW5 series about who invented the light bulb.
It's actually, it wasn't Thomas Edison in 1879.
It was, you know, 1705.
Francis Huckbee.
So Huckbee.
And so, you know, they lie about that.
But she recently did another series on radio, which was really fascinating.
It's a two-part series, and it's on a guy named Howard Armstrong.
First of all, Tesla submitted four patents to the U.S.
Patent Office for radio, and it sat in the patent office for four years while they found a suitable puppet to steal his patents, and that puppet was Marconi.
And Marconi was a minor noble in northern Italy, and they brought him over to England, created a lab for him, showed him exactly how to use a Russian patent to create a single
Full band electrical signal or radio signal that had a really limited range and because it was only a wide band it wasn't able to be split into separate bands and so you could only have one communication system with it but he got him a UK patent then they came over the United States stole all four of Tesla's patents and that's why they set him up as a front man and created Radio Corporation of America.
One of the people in charge of doing that was a guy named David Sarnoff.
David Sarnoff went on to produce AM radio with RCA and then also started national broadcasting NBC and he had a good friend named Howard Armstrong who managed to get a lot of the static out of the AM signal and make it more usable using a super heterodyne
And then he said, well, we still have some static issues when you pass under power lines or you go under a building, you get static on your AM radio.
There are certain frequencies in the electromagnetic spectrum that are not affected by that.
So he developed FM radio.
And at that point, Sarnoff said, well, I'll pay you a million dollars for your patent.
And the guy says, no, I think it's worth 10 times that amount.
And Sarnoff said, I ain't going to pay you.
I'll steal your patent.
And he spent 30 years stealing Howard Armstrong's patent to the point where patent jumped out of a window and committed suicide in New York City.
But Pat, his wife went on and Beat Sarnoff and NBC on all 10 of the patents that they stole and collected 10 million dollars from Dirtbag Sarnoff.
And Dirtbag Sarnoff is the same one that stole Philo Farnsworth's patents for television.
And this is, you know, he's one of the few Came over here as an immigrant from Russia, one of the few, set up as a bandit to steal and lie and rob and that's exactly what he did and he didn't mind who he crushed on the way to do it.
He had a team of lawyers from the few that were able to go in and make sure that he won in every case and there was probably a lot of judges that were from the few and so bottom line is we've had these pirates and tyrants running our planet 500 years easily documented, and they have completely captured the United States.
They've captured our news media, our education system, our government, and so you can't get a word in edgewise with these people.
There's nothing sustainable about any green energy, and biofuels are even worse than the the other stuff.
It takes 110 Gallons?
110,000 BTUs of input energy to create one gallon of ethanol that has 80,000 BTUs of available energy that you mix with gasoline that has 120,000 BTUs to reduce your fuel BTUs of available energy that you mix with gasoline that has 120,000 BTUs to reduce
There's nothing sustainable about ethanol products as a fuel, and there's no excuse for us not using hydrocarbons because hydrocarbons exist throughout the universe.
The original atmosphere on planet Earth was methane and ammonia.
Where did the methane come from?
There wasn't a single cell life form for the first billion years on life.
The first life forms came from the hydrocarbons that were being formed as a chemical process from the breakdown of the nuclear radiation inside the planet.
And that's covered very well in my From Muscle Power to Carbon Empowerment.
The history of technology is as corrupt as it could possibly be.
to my fifth interview on Coast to Coast AM with George Norrie last March.
So that's a great interview.
The hidden history of technology is as corrupt as it could possibly be.
I am stunned.
Yep.
Everything you know is a lie.
And just like William Casey told Ronald Reagan in February of 1981, we'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the public believes is false.
It wasn't Ronald Reagan, it was his staff when he had the first staff meeting as director of the CIA, appointed by Ronald Reagan.
And I know a woman who was present to hear him say it.
We both know her.
Hi, Barbara!
So anyhow, now we have the Department of Homeland Security that's identified the biggest problem to our democracy, and that is this.
Dis and mal information, which they are now calling MDM information.
Yeah, you and me talking about historic and scientific truths is dis, mis, and mal.
Get over it.
We're going to continue to tell the truth until you admit everything you're saying is freaking lies, and we don't deserve this as humanity on this planet, and you will not be part of the future.
You will own nothing, and we will be happy.
Joe, this has been another sensational episode of our series against global warming, exposing the fraud known as green energy.
I'm just astonished.
I so admire you, my friend.
You're a veritable mental wizard in putting all this together.
This is Jim Tretzer, your host on this Real Deal special on climate change, reality or illusion.
We'll be back next week with the next installment.
Stand by.
You're going to be as astonished as I as we continue this series.
▲
Export Selection