All Episodes
Feb. 7, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
58:29
Truth vs. NEW$ 1 (6 February 2022) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Holly Seeliger
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome, folks, to Truth vs. News.
This is February the 6th, 2022.
And wow, have we got a show lined up for you today.
Of course, we have the best people to bring you the hottest news in the world here.
We've got Jim Fetzer, the most dangerous mind in America.
Not because he's dangerous, but because the world is so dangerous and he's countering with the best solution, the truth.
We're hitting him hard.
And we have Jim and we have Scott Bennett.
Most articulate military espionage mind who knows everything that's going on behind the scenes and how to deal with it.
And Holly is the sharpest, wonderful reporter.
I mean, she's a news analyst like no other.
I mean, it's just great.
So, Jim, let's see.
Let's start off with the money.
How about GoFundMe?
Is that a hot item right now?
Well, the fact is they got nearly 10 million bucks, but they didn't want to give it to the truckers, even though it had been donated for that purpose and declared they were going to distribute it to charities of their own selection.
Wow.
Grotesque example of theft that it created an outroar.
They've now reversed themselves and declared they're going to Automatically refund the donations to the truckers.
I predict by the end of next week, the stock for GoFundMe will have halved.
They're out of business.
They were preventing the funds from going to the truckers.
Very unfortunate.
There's no evidence of any alleged violence or unlawful activity.
They had no warranted basis for doing this.
It's a typical measure of oppressive regimes, of course, that try to take away, in this case, truckers' right to becible assembly and freedom of expression.
Meanwhile, the truckers have issued a declaration.
Listen to this.
We, the truckers of America, declare that whereas A killer virus is a mild flu.
The COVID vaccine is a gene modification treatment, harmful, often deadly and damaging to the immune system.
The COVID vaccine is unnecessary because cheap, effective remedies exist.
Administering these dangerous Experimental jabs at children is especially evil and violates the Nuremberg Code of 1947.
A PCR test is totally fraudulent and can't differentiate between COVID-19 and the seasonal flu, as the CDC and WHO now admit after two years.
The tests give mostly false positives and we're rigged to do so.
The PCR swabs are invasive, potentially damaging to the olfactory nerve and contain toxic substances.
The case data generated is meaningless junk, as the authorities now admit.
The masks are totally useless, increase the risk of disease, can damage children's brains by cutting off the supply of oxygen.
The vaccine mandates are illegal, unconstitutional, and violate our fundamental human rights and the Nuremberg Code of 1947.
The vaccine passports are illegal, unconstitutional, discriminatory, go get science, and violate the Nuremberg Code.
The news media is the PR agency of Big Pharma purveying disinformation and laws about this pandemic 24-7.
The fact-checkers are the paid mouthpieces of Big Pharma disseminating untruths and misinformation.
We hereby declare that we are not leaving this city until our demands are met as follows.
No more mandates.
No more gene-based vaccines.
No more bogus diagnostic tests.
No more masks.
No more health passports.
No more censorship by the lying news media and social media.
All the scientific findings by truth-telling doctors and researchers must be fully presented to the public.
Full compensation by the vaccine manufacturers and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to every person injured by the COVID-19 vaccines or their bereaved families.
Our demonstration is totally peaceful and lawful.
If any disturbance occurs, it's a result of FBI dirty trips has occurred at the so-called Capitol Ride on January 6, 2021.
It's time to end this scam damage.
I'm enormously impressed by their taking into account such a sophisticated arrangement, a range of issues, including the FBI participating in January 6.
Florida Governor DeSantis said it was a fraud for GoFundMe to commandeer what turned out to be about $10 million in donations sent to support truckers and give it to causes of their own choosing he will work with.
Florida's Attorney General Ashley Moody to investigate these deceptive practices.
The donors should be given a refund in the face of that threat of investigation.
They have tucked their tail between their legs and gone out at dodge.
Scott, this is so outrageous.
Your thoughts?
Well, Jim, that Trucker Declaration is the declaration that every American needs to print out and take with them into their school districts, their unified school districts, their board of supervisor meetings, their county meetings, their sheriff's meetings, and make that same declaration in writing and print it out and serve it upon all government authorities.
Every single government authority or someone that claims to have an authority over your life, that is a brilliantly written, very simple, yet profoundly deep exposure of the lies, and the solution is the reassessment and the reclaiming of freedom.
This is the most dire time that we've ever lived in in the history of the United States, where we have allowed these sickly, pathetically self-hating, delusional, violently authoritative, fearful people to sneak into the roles of government, and we've allowed them to be in these positions of government.
So it should be no surprise When our government policies, not laws, but policies and, you know, false claims of law suddenly spring out of these spiritually deformed people in the form of masks and vaccine mandates and shutting down schools and shutting down businesses and demanding that people are six feet apart and no gatherings over 100 people be allowed.
All of those individuals, in the most diplomatic terms I can express, should be scalped, skinned alive, torn, tarred, and feathered, and beaten within an inch of their life, if not beyond it.
Because grotesque injuries and evil that they have done upon people cannot be excused.
It cannot be forgiven.
It must be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
And the law is there, and the courts are there, and justice is there to be served upon them.
The truckers in Canada are doing this in the dead cold of winter, in the coldest place on earth, they are doing this.
And they are, you know, in a sense, I am ashamed that they were the ones that led this and not Americans.
We, in a sense, are a pathetic paper tiger when it comes to human rights and freedoms and liberties when we don't originate that kind of a mass uprising And convoy and declaration against Washington.
We allow ourselves to be frightened by the Merrick Garland Democrat FBI's human terrorist campaign as they launched after January 6th.
But the truckers in Canada standing up to this beta male effeminate metrosexual Justin Trudeau who's hiding under a table sucking his thumb in a fetus position somewhere.
The Canadian truckers are leading the way.
This is what real men do.
And this is what real women married to real men do.
And they go and they challenge and they stand in the face of these thug stupid cops who say, well, we're just following orders.
They're lucky to still be breathing because this is a fight that the free people will never back down from because they realize if they do they will be dead after slavery and all sorts of other punishments and vendettas are brought against them So I think this is a fight the truckers will win.
I think it is replicating in Europe and Australia.
There's a California trucker assembly gathering to go to Washington.
I personally am talking to people about assembling a protest around the Redwood City campus of GoFundMe.
That organization should instantly have the doors kicked open and investigators going in and confiscating All of their communications because they consciously sought to violate the freedom of the rights of people in America, stopping their freedom of speech.
They conspired to violate their rights and commit fraud.
So they committed fraud, they committed racketeering, they committed violation of the speech rights of people.
You can't walk that back.
They intentionally had conversations, discussions, email dialogues, saying, let's shut down these truckers, let's take their money, let's give it to the LGBTQRS and all the other liberal faggotization agencies, and we'll just do that.
Little did they know by having that very conversation and doing this initial stopping of the funds, they've made the case that they have conspired to commit a crime, they committed civil rights violations against American people, and now governments like DeSantis and others are going to be investigating and bringing crimes and prosecutions against GoFundMe.
This is something that hopefully will replicate to the same actions against Facebook and Twitter and these other social media that have abused conservatives.
Jim?
Wow.
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, Well, I think it's important that we point out the fact that a lot of this has to do with making sure that the supply chain moves forward despite what the news media and mainstream media is trying to say about this is the reason why we're having supply chain issues, why we're having a grocery store stocking problems.
Salt here locally, we're running out of water, meat, produce, milk in a lot of the grocery stores around here already.
And we're not that far from the Canadian border, but I could see the mainstream media trying to pivot this and make it seem like this is why we're having supply issues.
When we've known, we've complained about this for years under the Biden administration now, them purposefully shutting down ports.
I mean, we knew this was going to come to a head.
At some point, and thankfully the Canadians were the ones to do it.
And I really hope that, you know, Canadians are known as very polite people, just culturally.
So I'm hoping that this can go by without any sort of violence.
And if there are any, if any group in the world were to try to pull this off correctly, I think it could possibly be Canadians.
And we also need to make sure that they are protesting against like the biometric and the vaccine passports as Scott said.
They've shut down the border between the United States and Canada for going on three years now.
So I know people who have family members a couple hours away and they haven't been able to see them in years because They're in Canada and they're right across the border.
So under this this dictate by Trudeau and others who's hiding, you know, he's been in hiding.
He's had three or four vaccines.
He admits to getting booster shots several times.
And then he's sick and then he's not sick.
And then he's basically just disappeared, ran away.
And I do think the powers that be should be concerned for their own welfare.
That's the only reason or any way that we can get them to actually listen to the American public or the people of the world who are uniting right now and trying to end these mandates.
So we just need to make sure that we stand up against their plans for the vaccine passports and biometrics.
And making sure that all this is tied into travel because that's what's been going on right now for the past three years without any sort of fight at all.
Yeah, I'm just very proud that someone has stepped up.
It was Canadians.
I congratulate them.
Mark Thyssen has pointed out that Biden wants to take credit for nominating a black woman to the Supreme Court, but in the past he blocked one.
It was disgraceful.
Biden wants credit for nominating the first black woman to the Supreme Court.
Here's the shameful irony.
As a senator, Biden warned W that if he nominated the first black woman for the Supreme Court, he, Joe Biden, would filibuster and kill her nomination.
It began in 2003 when W nominated Janice Rogers Brown to serve on the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, the second most important court in the land, which has produced more Supreme Court justices than any other.
She was immediately hailed as a potential Supreme Court nominee, highly qualified, having served for seven years as an associate justice of the California Supreme Court, and the first black woman to have done that.
She had a wonderful personal history as the daughter and granddaughter of sharecroppers, grew up in rural Alabama during the dark days of segregation.
Her family refused to enter restaurants or theaters where separate entrances were for blacks and whites.
Rose through poverty, put herself through college and the UCLA School of Law as a working single mother.
She was sensational.
Biden and Democrats, however, filibustered her nomination along with several other Bush circuit court nominees, all of whom had majority support in the Senate.
While Democrats derailed her nomination, Bush, W., re-nominated her in 2005, and she was eventually confirmed.
This is to the D.C.
court by a vote of 56-43 after Democrats released her and several other Bush nominees in exchange for a Republican agreement not to eliminate the filibuster for judicial nomination.
How ironic.
Biden voted a second time against her, never explained why.
If Brown was so radical, the Democrats had let her through, but killed 10 other of W's nominees.
Today, Biden calls the filibuster a relic of the Jim Crow era, but he threatened to use that relic to keep a black woman who actually lived under Jim Crow off the highest court in the land.
The irony is he now wants to get rid of the filibuster and still claim credit for putting the first black woman on the court.
This is all very embarrassing.
Democrats' commitment to diversity is a ruse.
Biden was willing to destroy the careers of a gobblish Latino lawyer and a respected black female judge and stop Republicans from putting either on the Supreme Court.
For Democrats, It's all about identity politics.
Indeed, Biden might not have become president had he not made the pledge to nominate a black woman, which helped secure the endorsement of Representative James Clyburn of South Carolina, which won Biden the primary there and rescued his faltering campaign.
So when Biden asks in the glory of his historic nomination, remember Janice Rogers Brown, the black woman who does not sit on the Supreme Court today because of Biden's disgraceful obstruction and filibuster of her nomination.
Scott, your thoughts?
Was I on the screen?
Well, I think a black conservative judge is the best we've got in our current status, and I think that would be natural.
The problem is Biden is picking someone just because they're black, and they're going to pick a far-left individual.
The Democrats have no ability To recognize any more political empathy and wisdom.
They are now being consumed with a very bizarre, hysterical, Democrat-Liberal-Leftist-Kamikaze ideology.
It really is consuming them like a fever.
It's like their brains are swelling And they're losing all conscious restraint and sense of decorum and balance, which is, in a sense, we should look at it as a blessing because it is driving people away from those actors and that party of insanity.
More and more to the center and to a balanced position.
So I think your predictions are going to be right, Jim.
The Democrats are going to absolutely destroy themselves in a glorious self-immolation.
Jim?
Well, here's where the great irony is, Scott.
He's nominating a black woman to a court that has ruled that discrimination for hiring on the basis of race is illegal and unconstitutional.
So here you've got the President of the United States who's sworn a note to uphold the Constitution, violating it for political purposes to a court that has declared it to be unconstitutional.
Hawley, your thoughts?
Well, it seems like for quite a few years now, the Supreme Court nominations, everything, it's been very political.
And I, like you had mentioned last week, I don't necessarily think it's going to sway the court as a whole, just having one person replaced because Breyers was super liberal and not very helpful to the Constitution.
He was not a good Supreme Court justice, in my opinion, as far as following the Constitution and actually understanding.
What, what its importance is for for Americans.
And the fact that Biden has already tried and obstructed and filibustered a black woman being Supreme Court justice means at the end of the day, they only want black people or minorities or anything that's going to tow the corporate New World Order agenda.
They don't want a free thinking, independent, constitution loving, A person of color or it's just amazing to me how quickly the Democrat Party or liberals will throw a person of color under the bus as soon as they open their mouth and they speak against any sort of globalist agenda.
They show their true colors over and over again.
I saw recently in Michigan.
I believe his name was John James.
He I think he's running for Senate now in Michigan and he was a very strong.
Candidate in Michigan, and he was completely rigged out of the election.
The Democrats stole the election from him.
He's a black veteran.
He was an amazing constitutionalist, very intelligent guy, a family man, and he was just everything that Michigan wanted, and he was rigged out of the election.
So Democrats will go to no lengths to prove and put people in their place if they don't toe the line.
Yeah, this is a defensive move.
They foresee losing the Senate at the midterm, and they know then the Republicans would block any replacement where Bayer to retire after the midterm, so they pressured him to retire now so he could have Biden make the appointment.
It's not going to change the political competition of six conservatives versus three liberals.
You're quite right, Holly.
But they were worried that it might actually lead to seven conservatives and only two liberals if they didn't act now.
Hence the urgency.
Meanwhile, speaking of Michigan, a judge has released a Dominion audit report turning out the system was designed to create or promote systemic fraud.
We knew that.
Here we have a formal report confirming it.
13th Circuit Court Judge Kevin Elsheimer released the audit report.
It covers a forensic audit of Dominion machines in Michigan's Antrim County, which received national attention when it was discovered 6,000 votes for Trump had been flipped to Biden due to an error.
The judge ordered the report protective order be lifted, allowing the details to be unsealed and released to the public.
The data firm that conducted the audit determined the machines and software showed they were designed to perpetrate fraud and influence election results.
We conclude the Dominion voting system is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.
Russell Ramsland Jr., co-founder of Allied Security Operation Group, said in a preliminary report, the system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors.
Now get this, The electric ballots are then transferred for adjudication.
The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail.
That's how they do it.
Based on our study, we conclude Dominion voting system should not be used in Michigan and that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.
Ramsland, a former Reagan administration official who worked for NASA, and the team of cybersecurity experts examined the Dominion products in Antrim as part of an ongoing case.
They inspected and performed forensic duplication on the county's election management server, which was running Dominion Democracy Suite 5.5.3-002 compact flashcards used by local districts This is very good, very thorough, totally professional, and very damning of the Democrats.
They used X-Ways forensic and other tools, including Black Make Black like forensic software and virtual box.
This is very good, very thorough, totally professional, and very damning of the Democrats.
Meanwhile, Donald Trump, who doesn't miss a trick, vows to ban biological males from women's sports should he win in 2024.
"We will ban men from participating in women's sports," It's ridiculous.
This is in Conroe, Texas over the weekend.
Then turn to Leah Thomas, a biological man competing in women's swimming at the University of Pennsylvania, who set all kinds of records.
Did you see the man who was in a swimming team that I know very well, refusing to refer to him by his preferred pronouns?
The record held like for 11 years, and he beat it by 38 seconds.
Having relatives engaged in swimming, they're typically settled by seconds or fractions of a second.
Even more likely, 38 seconds is unheard of.
Thomas beat the closest rival in the 1,650 freestyle by a clear 38 seconds, setting a record for the event, not beating the record itself by 38 seconds.
Thomas, notice, previously competed for the school's men's swim team for three years before deciding it would be easier to compete against the women.
Young girls and women are incensed are now being forced to compete against those who are biological males.
It's not good for women.
It's not good for women's sports, which worked for so long and so hard to get where they are.
A Gallup poll released last year showed the vast majority of Americans, 62 to 34 margin, believe transgender athletes should only be allowed to play on sports teams that correspond with their biological sex.
Or introduce men's sports, women's sports, and transgender sports.
Get them the hell out of women's sports for sure.
Olympian Caitlyn Jenner, who is Bruce, is still considered by many to be one of the greatest athletes of all time, weighed in on the issue.
I've been pretty consistent.
We have to protect women's sports from something like this.
Liam Thomas, first of all, I respect her right to live her life authentically.
Suffering from gender dysphoria is a horrible lifelong struggle, and every story is different.
Tulsi Gabbard, who's keeping her oar in the water, introduced a bill in Congress in 2020 that would force Title IX to be applied based on a person's biological sex.
Our legislation protect Title IX's original intent based on the general biological distinction between men and women athletes based on sex.
Tulsi, I like that she's keeping her hand in and she's taking very appropriate positions and I see her featured on Tucker maybe every three weeks or so.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, I grew up in a very Scottish home where men were men and women were women, and we didn't have any of this nonsense, and I will never, ever accept it in any way, shape, or form.
If you had a penis as a little boy, you were born with a penis, you're a boy.
You don't, you're a little girl.
There's no trading and shifting.
This is all a mental, emotional abuse and a schizophrenic breakdown of society.
President Vladimir Putin was right when he said this is a crime against humanity.
Wokeness and transgenderism, a crime against humanity.
And why is it he's the only leader of the world that has the gall to say that?
Not Boris Johnson, not Trump, not Merkel.
No one else has said that but Russia's president.
That's the hope of the future.
That's the only country and people and culture that will be shielded from the Sodom and Gomorrah destruction that is coming upon the West in the beginning of schizophrenia.
Never forget Nebuchadnezzar went out and ate grass for seven years because of his arrogance.
Our leaders in the West have been condemned to that same fate.
They're eating grass of madness.
I don't know how long, it could be forever, and this country could just disintegrate.
This whole transgender idea, despite the You know, the chemical changes and the estrogen and stuff in the milk and all the flora, I understand all that, but the basic fundamental needs to be maintained.
Little boys are little boys, and little girls are little girls, and they're meant for each other, and there's no other arrangement.
And the fact that we have gone down this road is a confirmation of the insanity that has been insidiously bleaching into the American mind.
And we need to repel it and reject it and vomit it out.
And I would say, too, you know, the voting revelations, Jim, that you're talking about, you know, I was there.
I gave a report on Dominion voting machines being bought out with Staple Street Capital, which had a partnership with Union Bank of Switzerland.
Which the Chinese Communist Party had approached back in 2012, I think it was, 2010, 11, 12, and promised them a significant portion of the Chinese wealth market if they created this subsidiary and bought Dominion voting machines for this very purpose.
So that was a conspiracy to overthrow the election of the United States.
Chinese Communist Party, Union Bank of Switzerland, Dominion Voting Machine, Staple Street Capital.
And I'd lastly say the revelations of all of this needs to be made public because if you discover that someone bought your car and you look at the money and half the money is paper, monopoly money, blank sheets of paper that aren't money at all, Would you still allow your car to be sold and owned and controlled by this person that gave it to you?
Of course not!
You would throw that money down and say, you're committed fraud, I'm taking my car back, here's your fake money back.
And now the Democrats are trying to say, Well, the deal's already made, the car's already sold, you've already accepted the money, your votes have already been cast, and Biden was the choice.
No!
These votes were fraudulent.
I'm taking them back.
I own this vote, and I will decide how it's done, and it's not going to be sold, and Biden's not going to be made the president when it was entirely based on fraud.
This is the same eruption that needs to happen in America, as you see happening in Canada.
And the revelation and making it very simple about this fraud and Biden the fraud will, I think, generate the outrage and turn the country back.
Jim?
Well, I'm a different-strokes-for-different-folks kind of guy, but I'm adhering to Abraham Lincoln's observation that if you call the tail of a dog a leg, how many legs does it have?
To which the answer is four, because calling the tail of a dog a leg doesn't make it a leg, and calling a man a woman doesn't make him a woman, and the Democrats have just gone stark raving mad, and every sane person in America recognizes that Believe it or not, about a third of the population is completely demented.
They're hurting girls.
They're hurting girls.
Let me just say that.
That is the worst thing that infuriates me, is they're hurting little girls.
Jim?
Yes.
Holly.
I just, I do, I feel like it's sexist and I think just having to deal with all this and listen to it.
I had the radio on NPR for a minute while I was driving today and they were talking about, I know right, and they were talking about pregnancy and They kept saying a pregnant person and I was just I was getting disgusted I could I could hear you know it was a woman talking about oh well pregnant people and a pregnant person this happens to a pregnant person of course it was like a thing where
Uh, they were talking about making sure that pregnant people got their vaccines, which we all know was, uh, I mean, I just, I was just getting like red in the face listening to this because the layers of the agenda is so strong right now.
And to that average person, they might not be able to pick up how, uh, how often they're trying to basically, you know, uh, Use mental abuse with their words and their actions and using this against women.
And as a woman, I just found it very offensive.
They were talking about a pregnant person.
It's a woman that is pregnant and has children.
And if people really believe that You know, transgender sports is so important.
Why don't we just start a whole other, you know, there's plenty of Democrat money to go around.
They could start their own trans sports and see how many people actually watch that and how many people actually want to pay attention and who actually care about that if they want to start their own.
But the fact that they've abused Title IX and they've made it so women don't have a space anymore is just really sad to witness right now.
And look at their ignorance.
The Pfizer trial showed every pregnant woman who was given the vax had a miscarriage.
Right.
So what they're doing is promoting miscarriages, stillborn, you know, all kinds of harms.
Holly?
Yes.
Well, Scott, it's right.
It is anti-human.
Putin's right.
I mean, people think that this is silly or far-fetched, but they're trying to create something that is not human.
They want to be growing Growing things and creating things and patenting things.
This is anti-human and they're putting it off as, you know, equal rights.
And it's actually literally anti-human.
They're having babies born with all black eyes.
The white part of the eye is all black because they've introduced DNA that changes our structure.
It's grotesque.
It is grotesque.
Meanwhile, here's how President Trump could become president before 2024.
You probably haven't heard this before.
Here's the idea.
We have a record number of members of Congress retiring or not running.
That plus a disaster of the Biden regime, Republicans are going to take a massive red wave of new seeds.
They could easily conduct an impeachment of Biden and Harris, and Jim Jordan suggested they would do it over the mass migration, not enforcing the laws for immigration to such an astounding degree.
I think it's clear-cut.
It's beyond any argument.
Here's where it gets interesting.
What if massive fraud were uncovered just before the red wave?
What if it were crystal clear, even to CNN and MSNBC, that Biden and Harris stole the election?
Well, you would try to have the election unwound and decertified, but as we know, that's an incredibly long process.
What if there were a quicker and easier way?
What if you impeached Biden and Harris?
And as I say, it wouldn't have to be on the basis of election fraud.
If you had a red wave, you could do it in a few days.
No decertification, no constitutional problem, just immediate impeachment and removal.
Here's where it gets fun.
Who's third in line to become President?
The Speaker of the House!
So what if Trump were appointed to be Speaker of the House by the same red wave?
I previously thought Farfetch'd because he's not running for a seat in Congress, nor would he want to.
But the Constitution does not require the Speaker to be an incumbent member of the House of Representatives, even though every Speaker thus far has been.
Here, too.
As the Constitution does not explicitly state the Speaker must be an incumbent member of the House, it's permissible for representatives to vote for someone who is not a member of the House at the time, and non-members have received a few votes in various Speaker elections over the past several years.
Guess what?
How about that?
So what if this were the plan all along, which I don't believe for a second, but here's what's being suggested here.
What if this had been a sting operation launched on November 3rd, where they captured all the cheating live and in real time?
They did do that, as the 2000 Mules video reflects.
They've had it for almost a year and a half.
I don't know that.
It may be true.
They can't release it until the red wave of 2022 is done.
Well, it's going to be released like this week, I believe.
Then roll out and there's nothing anyone can do about it.
Here's a critical part of the plan.
The best part, if Trump takes office for two years from 2022 to 2024, they will not count against him.
So he gets those two and then wins in the biggest landslide ever in 2024 to serve a total of 10 years in office.
You better believe this happens the next six years will be unlike anything you've seen in your lifetime.
I believe he had to lay low in his first term, catch the election fraud, so decades of thefts in America could finally come to an end.
He did some great things along the way, but I believe the first term was mostly getting into power so he could catch the fraud in progress.
You don't really think it was caught off guard, do you?
You don't really think it didn't have a plan, do you?
Of course not!
They launched the most extensive and detailed sting operation we've ever seen, and they have it all recorded, all of it.
The plan was more brilliant than any of us ever expected.
Here's more to come in the video way.
Scott, your thoughts about all of the above?
Well, I'd like that.
I'd like it to happen.
But you know what?
She neglects to talk about some of the serious injuries that we've suffered in this country as a result of allowing this fraud.
I was back there.
I gave the AFL-CIO documentations that was a secret document that they were conspiring with the senior executive service bureaucrats.
To engage in these disruptive activities on January 6th.
We gave that to them when I was there.
Pat Byrne and Joe Flynn and Cindy Powell and a whole group of people.
I was back there.
And they failed.
They dropped the ball.
Pat Cipollone, Mark Meadows, all of these clowns.
Pence stabbed him in the back.
And it was allowed to happen.
That rubs me raw as a military guy, because you're commander-in-chief to stop the very actions that occurred.
And if you don't stop them from doing this, you're going to suffer, and people are going to suffer, and our country is going to suffer.
And we have suffered.
How many military men have been injected with this?
How many military men have been kicked out of the military because of this?
Because they've been recognizing executive orders from a man who's not the president.
I will never acknowledge Biden as the president.
I will never follow any of his orders.
And I'll die fighting because my oath to the Constitution is not to a fraud and not to a liar, not to a Chinese agent.
So the fact is, we've got a vaccine that has decimated the population.
You've got a lot of conservative Republican Christians who have gotten this vaccine because Trump didn't stand up and write the executive order that we gave him that should have said, you know, no American will ever be forced to get this vaccine.
And he should have said, ladies and gentlemen, if you want to get it, that's up to you.
But I personally would not get it.
Instead, Trump has been saying the opposite, so I got a lot of problems with that because of the suffering and the military disintegration.
We've been invaded by enemies across the southern border who are now infecting this country, and it is a full-on invasion.
The country is in a state of civil war, and it doesn't even realize it.
So I have a lot of problems about people with these fantastical theorems and strategies, and just wait, and Q says this, and let's just stand back and wait.
He's got a plan.
You don't think that he'd be so dumb, would you?
Well, I hope to God not, but the evidence and the impact that we've suffered since November 2020 has been only bad.
There's nothing that's happened that's good.
Thousands of millions of people are dead because of it.
Now you're on the verge of triggering a war with Russia or trying to set one up.
You're flying planes over the Black Sea and probably going to blow one up.
You're doing all sorts of false flags.
This is the most tumultuous, dangerous time this country's ever had, and we've allowed it to happen, and Trump allowed it to happen.
And people are trying to say that there's a strategy and a plan behind the whole thing.
Well, how many people have died because of this plan?
And it should have been handled a different way, and it wasn't.
So I've got a lot of problems with this, and I'll tell it to anybody's face, including Trump.
He should have handled this a different way.
And half these people are saying, well, you know, there's a plan and all this, and it should be done.
I've got a real degree of skepticism about all of that, because something just doesn't seem right, and we can't depend on anybody but ourselves.
So we have to take this country back, town by town, county by county.
Jim?
Well, the trouble is we ourselves can't run for president.
He's the only guy I can see on the scene where DeSantis is a very distant second who can actually marshal the United States to do the right thing.
I agree with your indictment of all of his flaws, Scott.
There's no question about it.
But it seems to me he's the one who is in the most powerful position to set things right.
Hawley, your thoughts.
Holly, your thoughts.
Sorry.
Well, I think there's a lot of ways, you know, that Trump could have gotten back into power, including, like Scott said, you know, actually addressing the fraud or everyone thought the military was going to get involved.
And now they're saying, well, people need to wake up to the fact that, you know, the broader population has to wake up to all of this and wake up To the fact that there's fraud and there's corruption, which is just so hard for me to believe at this point that the American public is so ignorant of all of this, especially, you know, living since the 9-11 era.
Just it's so blatant and in our face at this point that I think most people are just just willing to turn a blind eye and say, hey, I've got, you know, family to feed or I've got a job to work or, you know, there's There's TV on or something.
There's some sort of distraction of the day to try to keep people from looking at the bigger issues here and not desiring more for themselves and more for their families.
I think people have Uh, basically accepted a race to the bottom.
And that's why we're living in a country now where people can't afford a home.
They can barely afford a car.
They've got maybe $500 in savings.
So the people are facing catastrophic failure if they have a medical bill or something that needs to be paid.
And we've had this race to the bottom now.
And, you know, I'd love to see someone take over, you know, whether it's Trump or someone else that could fix things better than Biden coming in through the Speaker of the House or something like that.
But just looking at American history, by and large, something like that has never happened before.
Things have basically stayed in a sense of homeostasis where all of this has just kind of progressed.
And unfortunately, the presidents that seem to do actually some good work and actually fight the central banks or fight the globalist powers.
They either end up, you know, with a bullet in their head or they're pushed out after a term or, uh, they're just allowed, uh, to be completely a lame docket in office.
And, uh, that's, that's why I think there's a lot of, there's a lot of hopium what people say, but I'm definitely seeing a lot of writing on the wall that things aren't going to get better anytime soon.
Well, I agree with that, Holly, but the Republicans are going to take the House and the Senate at the midterm.
I have no doubt about that.
There will be a new Speaker of the House.
Why not make it Donald Trump?
Why not impeach Biden and Harris?
They deserve it.
God knows if we ever had an administration that deserved it as Biden and Harris.
I don't think it's really to be ruled out.
I think it could come to pass, and it might be more effective and make an improvement in our lives faster than any alternative.
I think it's possible.
We need those rhinos out, though, Jim.
There's some real scumbags in the Republican Party.
What's going to happen at the midterm is going to be so devastating.
The Reynolds are going to hide.
The Mitt Romneys are going to crawl up their own behinds out of desperation.
They are so sick and pathetic and weak.
Meanwhile, the Army, unfortunately, has immediately begun enforcing the vaccine mandate.
I'm very troubled by this.
U.S.
Army commanders are to initiate involuntary administrative separation proceedings against any soldier refusing to get a COVID vaccine and potentially put himself to death, the Army said in a statement Wednesday, citing a fresh directive by Secretary of the Army Christine Wormuth.
There's a long story there.
The order applies to regular Army soldiers, active duty reservists, and cadets.
The only exceptions are those who've approved or pending exception requests.
Personnel's requests on medical or religious grounds have been rejected, can appeal the decision, but will have just seven days from the final refusal to begin a vaccine regimen or face dismissal.
Unbelievable!
Soldiers set to leave the force or begin transition before July 1st will also be granted an exemption.
All other cases, however, will lead to processing separation actions as expeditiously as possible.
Army readiness depends on soldiers who prepare to train, deploy, fight, and win our nation's war, said Christine Wormuth.
Unvaccinated soldiers present risk to the force and jeopardize readiness.
Now that's just a blatant falsehood.
She has to know better.
This is completely disgusting.
We're weakening our military, making us incapable of responding to a national security need.
The Pentagon made vaccination mandatory back in August of 2021.
By mid-December, the Army had a 96% vaccination rate, saying at least 98 had received one dose.
The Army said it had not discharged anyone solely refusing to receive a jab so far, but it had relieved six Army leaders, including two battalion commanders, and issued 3,073 reprimands to personnel.
The Air Force has already adopted such a measure and has sacked active-duty airmen by the dozens over the issue.
Edward Hendry, who's doing a brilliant job here, has done calculations suggesting a 40 percent increase in U.S.
mortality rate during 2020, announced by the insurance companies, are caused by deaths from the COVID-19.
That's an increase in mortality in 2021 over 2020, when 2020 should have had a massive increase because COVID was everywhere, but there was no such increase.
Genovese Beyond Assistant Program Director at Hopkins critically analyzed and found there was zero increase in deaths across the United States between 2018 and 2020.
That means the COVID scare was not real.
It makes no sense that 2020 should show zero increase in mortality and 2021 should show a 40% increase when the same alleged pandemic spanned both.
The increase in the death, therefore, can only be attributed to the vaccine, since that's the only material variable that changed for 2021.
Indeed, he's spot on.
As of December 31st, 21,382 deaths were associated with a vaccine.
The Avir's data shows correlation can't be taken as proof of causation, but in its absence there could be no causation.
So, the existence of correlation is consistent with causation, but a strong inference can be drawn when the deaths happen close to the onset of the illness.
This is why, of course, the CDC doesn't want to count anyone who's vaccinated for weeks after because they know how many die shortly thereafter.
Megan Redshaw, for example, determined 41% of those reported as dying after receiving one of the vaccines died after becoming ill within 48 hours of injection.
That's sufficient to establish reasonable belief the vaccines were the cause of the deaths.
Thus, we come up with a conservative figure of 8,766 who have probably died from the vaccines.
But an HHS-funded study shows the database is only catching 1%.
That means each of the above numbers can be multiplied by 100, To get the true scope of the damage.
So the 8,766 actually represents 876,600 deaths.
There are 329 million in the US.
That effort 2019 showed a mortality rate of 0.87.
876,600 deaths.
There are 329 million in the US.
Data for 2019 showed a mortality rate of 0.87.
That means we could expect out of 329,000 If you add 876,600 by COVID, by the vaccines, we come up with an expected increase in deaths from the vaccines of 30%, which is close to the 40% arrived by the insurance company.
76,600 by COVID, by the vaccines, we come up with an expected increase in death from the vaccines up 30%, which is close to the 40% arrived by the insurance company.
The disparity may be due to the conservative assumption vaccines cause only 41% of the avir's death.
The actual causation percentage is likely much higher, No doubt the life insurance statistics are more reliable because their business, their survival to avoid bankruptcy depends upon the accuracy of their accounting.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, it is an unlawful order for any member of the military to accept these jabs because that compromises and weakens and destroys their ability to serve as members of the military to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, the continental United States land, and the people of the United States.
This vaccine, this jab, has proven without a doubt to be destroying bodies And they should not accept the discharge either.
They should fight this as a violation of their oath.
The military does not exist to serve a political end.
Biden is violating, of course, the Constitution, but every military member needs to stand against this.
And if the military needs to go into a state of civil war, if the military need to have real leaders rise up and say their battalions, their brigades, their units will not be accepting any vaccine from the COVID-19, So be it.
That needs to happen because the integrity and the safety of the United States will be destroyed as the military is destroyed by this vaccine, as the numbers indicate, and Tom Rents, the attorney, has proven.
And they are planning on substituting the dying off members of the military with these third world Hispanics and Haitians and Dominicans and every third world person who's invading the southern border So this is an existential threat to the United States, and the military need to rise up and assert that they will not be getting this because it violates their oath of the Constitution, Jim.
But they have a gutless leader in the Secretary of Defense, and it does not appear it's going to happen.
You're right about what should happen, Scott.
I'm just sorry to say it does not look as though it's going to.
Hawley, your thoughts?
Well, just quickly, I think the fact that insurance companies are actually, you know, inadvertently blowing the whistle on this whole project is pretty telling.
It always comes down to money, and I'm sure these insurance companies are concerned.
they're going to start to want to put in a clause if they haven't already to where they're not going to cover people who are vaccinated because it's just going to cost them too much money.
It's becoming obvious to them that people who have had these multiple doses are more likely to die and more likely to die in the near future as well, or to be maimed or to cost the families so much money as people become seriously ill. or to be maimed or to cost the families so So these insurance companies definitely see the writing on the wall and that could really open it up even to the layperson for them to actually actually look and see.
I mean, mainstream media loves to say, oh, we're going to deny you health care or we're going to deny you insurance if you don't get vaccinated.
But at the end of the day, it's going to be the vaccinated who are going to Blow this whole thing open just with the statistics just from the past year.
It's astronomical what we're seeing.
I was at a I was at a yoga class the other day and there was one person who was talking about how they went to their vaccinated side of the family for Christmas and magically everyone got sick.
And another person who said that she became extremely ill and couldn't do anything for more than a week after getting a shingles vaccination.
So she was starting to question things.
And then there was a man in his 40s saying that he was just diagnosed with pericarditis.
So I think there are people who are actually who have been vaccinated.
We're talking amongst themselves and saying, hey, this is kind of strange what's going on.
Why is everyone getting sick?
I was promised this and we're seeing family members get ill and people dropping dead.
And none of this makes sense.
We're still getting ill.
So I think between the statistics and Just the lay people seeing family members get ill and die right now.
All of this is going to come to a head very soon.
I think you're right.
In fact, the perps are desperate to get everyone vaxxed because it's showing up now.
It hasn't happened at the rate they expected.
And everyone's going to understand the dimension to this scandal in a relatively short period of time henceforth.
Stunning stuff!
Before the break, we can squeeze in, at least begin one more story, a very depressing one.
British children up to 52 times more likely to die following a COVID shot.
Now, you've got to understand the British government, their Office of National Statistics is far more responsible and doesn't fudge the data.
This is a stark increase in deaths among children, both single and double jabbed, compared to their unjabbed counterparts.
How bad is this?
Britain's Office of National Statistics has released data indicating that children who receive the COVID jabs have suffered a death rate 54 times greater than their un-jabbed counterparts.
The EPS published age-standardized data on mortality rates in five-year age stats in Britain grouped by the vaccination status for the COVID shots from the period January 1st to October 31st of 2021.
Monthly age-standardized mortality rates by age group and vaccination status per 100,000 person-years presented the data only for ages 18 and over.
However, the JABS are available to children as young as 12, and those allowed to receive the shot against their parents' wishes.
In limited cases, children as young as 5 have been given a reduced dosage.
Nevertheless, A separate table outlining deaths in person years by vaccine status includes five-year age groups from 10 years old and up.
From the data provided, a calculation of the mortality rate per 100,000 person years can be made.
The rate of 100,000 person-year delineation is used in preference over the simpler 100,000 population calculation to better represent mortality rates over a specific period of time, as people in one vaccination group, such as unjabbed, single-jabbed, double-jabbed, soon move into the next group.
Table 9 of the report shows, for the entire 10-month period, the unjabbed, 10 to 14 year group represented 2,094,711 person years.
15 to 19, 1,587,072 person years.
24,711 person-years, the 15 to 19, 1,587,072 person-years.
From the above table, the 100,000 person-year calculation can be made.
The younger group comes out at 20.9 unjabbed per 100,000.
The older group at 15.9.
Following this, a mortality rate per 100,000 person-years is worked out by dividing the number of deaths in each group by the 100,000 person-year calculation.
The result is That for the 10 to 14 year group, the unjabbed mortality per 100,000 is 4.6, while the unjabbed mortality rate per 100,000 for the 15 to 19 is 10.1.
Using the same data set, the mortality rate for 10 to 14 to receive one dose turned out to be 45.1, while 15 to 19 with one jab, 18.3.
Among those who received two doses, the death rate was higher yet with 32.9, and in the 15 to 19, a staggering 230.
The data shows stark increase in deaths among children, both single and double jab.
For children aged 15 to 19, the risk of death increased by almost double if they take the first shot, and by three times, tripled if they take the second.
The 10 to 14-year-olds are on the risk of dying by almost a factor of 10 following the first dose.
Second dose, 51.8 times greater risk than death if they remained unjabbed.
On the average, showing between 10 and 19 who received at least one shot had a 3.7 times greater chance of dying last year than if you were unjabbed.
Don, I'm certain we're right there at the time limit, so why don't we take a break and we'll return to this issue afterwards.
Oh yeah.
Time for a break.
I mean, we've had so much to handle here this hour.
We need a break to absorb it all.
So do that and get ready for the next hour of Truth vs. News here on the 6th of February, 2022.
Export Selection