All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 11, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
57:57
Truth vs. NEW$ PART 1 (9 January 2022) with Scott Bennett and David Kenney
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
You can't handle the truth!
And welcome, folks, to Truth vs. News here on the 9th of January, 2022.
I'm Donald Ryder, producer, JD.Consultants at Live.com, and we're here with a great show today.
I've seen the preview.
Boy, you're going to want to stick around for this.
We've got some dynamite things coming up.
And, of course, our lead man, James Fetcher, who's the most dangerous man in America, author of many books and does many shows, an excellent person, and Scott Bennett, He's a very articulate military mind.
He's doing wonderful.
He's got innovation.
He's got all kinds of things happening.
He's a rising star.
And David Kenney, what can I say about this fantastic attorney out of California who has been investigating school boards and other things?
He's just great.
And I think we're going to be investigating some things from the Supreme Court today, right, Jim?
Yes, but let me emphasize, Scott's going to five days a week on his Great Awakening show on America Media Periscope, and that is fantastic.
It's good for the public, it's good for the network, and it's good for Scott.
A truth teller extreme.
Here we have the Supreme Court hearing oral arguments on the vaccine mandate, but the leftist judges give embarrassingly false data in their attempts to support the Biden administration.
You'd think when we're talking about a mandate impacting more than 100 million Americans that the justices would be well prepared and fully briefed, but In this embarrassing display of judicial outlooks, activism, and incompetence, the leftists on the court are just making stuff up.
Get this, Justice Breyer cited 750 million Americans infected yesterday.
Unfortunately, there are only 350 million Americans alive.
I mean, give us a break.
His insanity was bad enough, but then Justice Sotomayor, another leftist communist in a black
road, stated, 100,000 kids are currently in the hospital, which is false. The Omicron variant has
been more deadly than Delta, false. COVID deaths are at an all-time high, false. Worse yet, OSHA's
regulatory authority as part of federal police power, false.
That's even the issue that was before the court. How outrageous. As technophobe Frog
accurately noted, it's hard to convey the disrespect shown by Justices Sotomayor and Breyer today.
100 million Americans are affected by the Biden COVID mandates, but they showed up unprepared, inventing COVID numbers to support whatever legal conclusion they had already reached.
Unfortunately, that's emphasizing the obvious.
Meanwhile, we have a report from Washington.
Supreme Court justices seem divided during oral arguments as the plaintiffs challenged Biden's vaccine or test mandate.
The first to speak was Scott Keller, representing the National Federation of Independent Businesses, challenging the mandate, asking them to immediately stay it.
Clarence Thomas opened, how are we to decide when an emergency temporary standard or emergency temporary standards are necessary?
The liberal justices questioned the legitimacy of arguments against the mandate, citing that the COVID pandemic continues to affect hospital capacities.
They also noted the inherent ease of spread of COVID among peers.
Meanwhile, the majority raised more skepticism about OSHA's ability to issue a nationwide vaccine or test mandate.
I think there is a glimmer of health here.
This is something the federal government has never done before, said Chief Justice John Roberts, casting doubt on the administration's argument that a half-century established law, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, confers broad authority.
Meanwhile, look at this.
How many cases, how many ways have we been played?
A year ago we were told it was a hoax that vaccinated can spread COVID.
A hoax that vaccinated are susceptible to new variants.
A hoax that COVID can cause blood clots and other serious side effects.
A hoax there'd be a third and a fourth shot.
A hoax there'd be new shots every year or year and a half.
A hoax there'd be shots for young children.
A hoax there'd be Segregationist society into the vax and the unvax.
A hoax that there'd be camps for the unvaccinated.
A hoax the unvaccinated would be unable to work.
A hoax that there'd be harder access to medical care for the unvaccinated.
A hoax that secret contacts had established contracts between Pfizer and the government.
Every one of those is true.
Every one of those we've been lied to about the mainstream media and the Biden administration The situation is completely disgusting without precedent.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, the Supreme Court is not convened by the American people to offer their scientific medical analysis or concur with the propagandistic numbers of Americans that have been in hospital or sick or infected or imprisoned or died or anything like that.
They are not there to issue comment on any statistical analysis Or forecast or anything like that.
The Supreme Court exists solely for the purposes of judging whether the laws and policies of the United States or any agency or actor in the United States government is constitutional or not.
That's it.
That's all they exist for.
These black robed high priest Despotic, vainglorious idiots are now issuing their opinions on other matters and they don't have the authority to do that.
So as much as I'd like to think they come down on the side of the Constitution and the rights of Americans not to be forcibly jabbed with an experimental DNA-altering substance, that that is a violation of their bodily integrity.
That is a violation of their right to be secure in their person's papers and effects.
That is a violation of their right to life and living organically and biologically with integrity according to God's plan.
As much as I hope they side on this side of constitutionality and biological truth, I'm also keenly aware That courts and judges often make very bad decisions that sometimes leads to their execution.
Like we saw in the Nuremberg hearings when judges and political officials and military officials in the Nazi government were executed, were killed, were hung, were shot, or given life sentences for the bad decisions that they made.
And this is very similar and increasingly resembling A Nazi Nuremberg Code situation with violations of the Nuremberg Act.
That Donald Trump has participated in because he failed to sign an executive order protecting Americans.
It's one thing to say, well, they don't have to, but it means nothing when it's not written down.
And now we're seeing laws spring up that they're signing that are unconstitutional.
But nevertheless, these laws are saying the health officer in the state of Florida, for example, in SB2006, Which Don and I did a previous analysis of.
This law is saying a health officer can forcibly vaccinate, quarantine, isolate by law enforcement any individual that deems a public threat having an infectious disease, including COVID.
So we're on the verge of a tyrannical breakdown or a revolutionary reclamation of our rights and our autonomy and independence.
And I think depending on how the court does, if the court sides with the people and the general instinct, of freedom and limiting the government's actions against
people and limiting the mandates, there's hope.
If the court rules against it, even goes to, as you said, Jim, ruling in favor of states
doing these unconstitutional mandates, I think revolution and overthrow is what lies before
us.
Go ahead.
Well, I think they're going to reject the federal mandate, but it's going to devolve
And just as in Florida, they have that extraordinary clause.
The governor of Washington is supporting similar actions where they can forcibly detain individuals, all the worst possible outcomes here, for an experimental vaticin.
Experimental!
David, your thoughts?
The most promising aspect about the matters taking place in the court, in my opinion, is the decision that was issued in favor of the Navy SEALs.
There were about approximately 35 Navy SEALs who had not been vaccinated, and they petitioned a court, I believe it's in Texas, United States District Court in Texas, And they refused to be vaccinated on a religious belief and personal belief exemption.
And their different contests were, one, they don't want cells from aborted fetuses in their body.
Number two, divine or revelation of an epiphany to themselves that they should not take the vaccine.
And I think, I forget the third, there are four aspects.
It was revelation, aborted fetuses, animal parts in the vaccine, they don't want into their body.
and other religious exemptions.
And what was cited in the case, which was very interesting to me, was that the Navy has a, or the Department of Defense and the Navy has a no-tolerance exemption for religious purposes.
So on the form that you fill out, it has a 50-step process, and the form itself says to be disregarded.
So this exemption goes up to the Admiral who's in charge of the Navy, and it's supposed to be on a case-by-case basis.
And none of these exemptions have been processed.
Not a single one has been processed by the Department of Defense nor Navy improperly.
And the federal court held that it's nothing but theater, and ruled in favor of the Navy SEALs.
We have 35 Navy SEALs that have prevailed against President Biden and his mandates.
Quite frankly, that's a big start because it's a lot better than having 35 regular citizens.
But we've got 35 Navy SEALs who the government has found Have prevailed against the Department of Defense and the Department of the Navy.
There's hope in that for everyone, okay?
Because I quite frankly, I believe the grounds that it's divinely inspired that they not take the revelation or take the vaccination.
But let's go on to the Supreme Court.
So the Supreme Court's taken the OSHA regulation and its application to employers We happen to have, in our own district, a dispute going on about the application of the federal mandate to the Head Start workers.
The Head Start workers in school districts, of course, take care of thousands of kids.
I mean literally hundreds of thousands of kids in the state of California.
So this brings into question what I think is a real focus, which is in the Department of Health and Human Services.
The department, if you look at the Edward R. Roybal, CDC, okay, that's, the building's named after Edward Roybal.
The current lead of the Department of Health and Human Services is none other than Javier Becerra.
So Javier Becerra is like the grandchild of Edward Roybal.
So what we're seeing is essentially this What I'm going to say is a regulatory grab of the institution itself.
In other words, Health and Human Services is supposed to be focused on protecting the health and safety of the American people.
What Robert Kennedy talks about in his book, The Real Anthony Fauci, suggests that the regulations, I concur with that assessment.
that are to be regulated have essentially grabbed control of the agency.
I concur with that assessment.
So in that sense, we have this question going forward to the United States Supreme Court.
I'm concerned about the fact that we have a predominantly Catholic majority.
They're not Protestant.
We don't have a Protestant majority.
And we also have the Pope who's recommending that these vaccines be implemented.
So I'm just concerned about that theological difference because quite frankly, I am a mixture of Catholic
and Protestant, I was born a little bit of each, but quite frankly, I side with the Methodist in me.
And I think that truth and science and the display of facts will enable the court to make rational decisions.
What concerned me was Justice Sotomayor is citing facts that are untrue.
Beyer is citing facts that are untrue.
And it's just crazy, because as I've said, and this is why, look, I talked to Deanna Sachs, I've engaged with Reiner Fulmick, And one of the things that we're focused on is identifying the background facts.
Kennedy did a wonderful job in his book, The Real Anthony Fauci.
And these are the facts about the historical development.
Now we have a Supreme Court grasping an important issue, and I think they're going to fail.
I'm worried, Scott, like you, that they're going to adopt the mandate and say that, you know,
employees, you know, employers with 25 plus have the authority to execute the vaccine mandate.
But I'm constitutionally opposed to it. I think it interferes with liberty. I agree with the
seals. And I think, I think, you know, we've got a hope in the seals. We've got a hope in divine
revelation. And we've got to just move forward as a country and a society that's humble,
not one to steal and to influence power and to enforce compliance.
David, those are all excellent, excellent points.
Meanwhile, we have Joe Biden delivering a blistering rebuke to Trump for election lies, blaming him for the Capitol riots, but while there is a liar here, that would not be Donald Trump.
He gave his strongest defense of democracy to mark the observance of January 6th, attacking Trump as a defeated liar, As a threat to the nation's ideals, as a traitor to the United States, it was extraordinary and outrageous, and frankly an insult to the American people.
Kamala, if anything, went even further, likening the January 6th riot to the bombing of Pearl Harbor and the 9-11 terrorist attack.
Remember, more than 2,400 Americans died at Pearl Harbor in early 3,000 at 9-11.
Harris, who participated in a BLM protest outside the White House in May of 2020, just hours after rioters attacked police and the Capitol, has gone on a campaign.
What they sought to degrade and destroy was not only a building, hallowed as it is, what they were assaulting were the institutions of values, the ideals that generations of Americans have marsh picketed and shed blood to establish and defend.
She was reading a script.
None of it is true.
Trump did not incite an insurrection.
David Marcus for The Federalist made it clear back on January 30, 2021, shortly after the event.
While Democrats and media allies are trying to convince the public that Trump's guilty of inciting an insurrection, in both legal terms and plain language, their claim is absurd on its face.
There are two fundamental reasons.
Trump did not incite the riots, and the riots were not an insurrection.
Legally speaking, incitement has a very high bar.
The standards set by the Supreme Court in Brandenburg v. Ohio, the decision held to constitute incitement to violence, speech must include intent and specific, not abstract, instructions to act.
It also required that it would likely produce imminent lawless action.
Nothing Trump did satisfied that.
I listened to the entire speech at the Ellipse, which was a mile and a half away from the Capitol, so it had taken quite a while to get there.
There was no eminence about anything, whatever actions may or may not have been lawless.
He said everyone to act peaceably, to act patriotically, to let their opposition to the stolen election be known, but none of it satisfied the requirements for incitement.
As to insurrection, At no point was the overthrow of the government a remotely possible outcome, not even close.
The idiots taking selfies in Pelosi's office, parading around with Podia, had no intention of forming a new government.
This was an expression of anger, not a realistic organized coup attempt.
Anyone among the rioters who believed their actions would result in the overthrow of the government, if there were any, were delusional To the point of insanity, this was a Pelosi-orchestrated event to have a ground to block Trump from running again for office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
It's not going to work, but not for lack of trying.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, that same standard, if it was applied to Maxine Waters, would result in her incarceration, her prosecution for inciting violence.
Because she did demonstrate intent, and she did issue specific instructions saying, quote, when you see someone from this administration, you get in their face, you push back on them.
That's an act of violence.
So Maxine Waters could be prosecuted for that.
But that being said, of course Donald Trump and no Republican conservative Trump-supporting individual engaged in an act of domestic terrorism as Ted Cruz was sternly corrected by Tucker Carlson and he came wimping and whining with his tail between his legs trying to explain this away.
No, that was a demonstration of Ted Cruz's deep cowardice.
By not standing up and giving a hero's speech, instead he gave this political slimy speech calling Americans, you know, or this event an act of domestic terrorism.
It wasn't.
It was an act of an FBI, Department of Justice, psychological operation, where trained operatives like EPS, And Stuart Rhodes and numerous others, Sullivan, were all part of an FBI DOJ operation to traumatize the American public by a fake theatrical taking over the Capitol and using that ever since under Merrick Garland, the Attorney General, to hunt down, torment, terrorize, and prosecute, imprison Trump supporters.
So they've been engaging in this ever since that day.
They will continue to do that.
That's what the Democrats know.
To torture, to abuse, to hurt and harm the American public into submission.
But I think it's gonna have the opposite effect.
I think it's going to result in an explosive rejection and, you know, a new style of civil war.
I'll end it by saying this.
As much as Joe Biden and Kamala Harris gave a speech full of lies and deceit, it was a knockout blow.
It was in a prize fight when you have the girls walking around in the bikinis holding up the signs, you know, the rounds.
That round went to Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.
Because that speech was to their base, but that speech was a knockout uppercut on Donald Trump, and he failed to stand up, to man up, and to give a speech of his own.
He has failed to go around to the people that were imprisoned on Capitol Hill.
He has failed on so many levels, and I'm a guy who voted for him, and I'm looking going, dude, You are failing everything, and you are dropping the ball everywhere.
You are no longer demonstrating that you have the mentality to be Commander-in-Chief.
Alex Jones and Mike Adams and all these people have been walking away, running away because of his vaccine stance, and it is just adding to other things.
So this Capitol Hill event is the quintessential moment where real leaders are going to be determined who do stand up, like Gates and Monica Taylor.
Green.
But there needs to be more counteractions on this.
All these people that were subpoenaed to go to the Congress, like Bannon and others, and their refusal, I think that too is a failure, because they should have went up and read a five-minute speech that read the Riot Act to every Democrat and every fake Republican, and then said, I take the fifth.
I'm not answering any of your questions under the Fifth Amendment, but I am giving an opening speech.
And I'm giving you a five-minute speech of how much you failed the American people and how much of a communist, traitorous, corrupt politicians you are.
And the American people are watching, and they're going to remove you like they removed Nazis after World War II.
That's what they should be saying.
That's what Bannon should be saying.
That's what all of these people should be saying by going to the Capitol and testifying.
But the fact that they're not, Confirms to me we have no real manly leaders.
We have a bunch of game show hosts, Jim.
Game show hosts, I like that.
David, your thoughts?
Well, you know, I concur with the majority of what Scott has to say.
Let me see if I can state this clearly.
I would trust the 30 seals that had some divine revelation or belief that they wouldn't have aborted cells from fetuses in their body and those who don't want animal parts in their body.
But what I want to say is this, that the theater of the January 6th insurrection is nothing but a bunch of cosplay.
The truth is that President Trump just went up to the Capitol, gave a two or three hour
speech and there's no question whatsoever that there were FBI agents, there were probably
plenty of CIA agents, plenty of government officials who were facilitating this entry
into the Capitol and the resulting actions that took place.
But what just appalls me is the fact that they've taken people who had gone into the
Capitol when it was open and they're now being imprisoned and held in a jail and don't have
the basic civil rights that are accorded to every citizen of the United States for due
process, right to a quick trial, so on and so forth.
This is beyond disturbing.
This is the Third Reich.
Welcome to it.
Yes, yes, murderers and rapists are treated better than those they've incarcerated without any rights whatsoever in the D.C.
jails, some 750 by number, who appear to be subjected to torture until they can extract false confessions therefrom.
So the Soviet analogy is exact.
Unbelievable.
This is taking place in the United States this year.
Here's their target, needless to say.
Democrats quietly explore barring Trump from office over January 6th.
The Democratic Party constitutional scholars and pro-democracy advocate, right, put that in parentheses, sick.
That's absurd.
...have quietly explored the possibility of disqualifying former President Trump from holding office again in the aftermath of the January 6th attack, and I assert this is the whole reason it was orchestrated.
After the riots, it was a crescendo to take steps to strip Trump of eligibility, which have since abated.
Participants in the 14th Amendment discussion have focused on Section 3.
Here you can see it reads, No person shall be a senator or representative in Congress or elector or president or vice president or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States or under any state who, having previously taken an oath as a member of Congress or an officer of the United States or member of any state legislature or as an executive or judicial officer of any state,
...to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against this aim, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.
But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
We've already seen, by the way, that from a legal point of view, there was no incitement and there was no insurrection.
I therefore find it embarrassing when Harvard Law School Professor Lawrence Prime submits that this is an appropriate thing to do.
I am shocked!
Democrat lawmakers have found around a dozen who have discussed publicly or privately how Section 3rd could apply.
Jamie Raskin of Maryland on the House Select Committee, Jerry Nadler, head of the House Judiciary, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, scurrilous pig that she is, are among the officers who have spoken with Tribe recently.
According to those who are studying the issue, the provision is not self-executing.
In other words, to make it effective, Congress would have to take an additional step.
Several believe Congress, on a simple majority in both chambers, could find Trump having engaged in insurrection on its own and thereby implicate the Constitution.
Which then would, to allow him to run again, require a supermajority.
In the view of other experts, such as, and here, while it says tribe of Harvard, I really think they mean Jeffrey Toobin, Congress needs to go further, either by creating a fact-finding body neutral to the Trump administration, or by assigning the fact-finding role to a federal court.
After Trump's Senate impeachment last Feb, Representative Steve Cohen of Tennessee introduced a bill permitting the Attorney General to claim that an officeholder violated the provision and could be barred from holding future office before a three-judge panel.
Notice this has clearly been in the works for some time.
I'm convinced the whole contrived event was to invoke precisely this provision.
Other efforts have focused on pressuring state election officials.
They've written to all 50 states and Washington, D.C., urging the chief election officials to prohibit Trump from appearing on the ballot of future elections.
In other words, they're just taking for granted their assertion is true irrespective of the law and the Constitution.
This is disgusting.
As a result, the group claims Congress doesn't have to take any additional steps since the 14th Amendment is already in effect in a completely unconstitutional, legal, purely propagandistic, and political fashion.
This is disgusting.
Just as states are permitted, if not required, to exclude from the presidential ballot candidates who are not natural born, underage, or previously elected twice, so too should they exclude from the ballot a candidate such as Mr. Trump, who previously swore to support the Constitution but then engaged in insurrection, which he did not do.
The group's letter to the Georgia Secretary of State read, what if they refuse to do it?
Well, here we have John Boniface, who's a group's president, saying we intend to litigate this question.
Some scholars, however, believe these lawsuits would likely face serious hurdles and be challenged in the Supreme Court.
If a Secretary of State were to decline to find Trump eligible, it's far from clear who would challenge that determination.
Explain.
Professor Gerard Magliocca of Indiana University, where I earned my own PhD in the history and the philosophy of science in 1970.
The outcome of any lawsuit over Trump's eligibility would likely depend on whether a congressional fact finder had already determined his role triggered Section 3.
In the absence thereof, a lawsuit brought by Trump to challenge would be more likely to succeed.
What the January 6th panel ultimately reveals may impact the possibility.
But at stage, Nancy Pelosi excluded strong Trump supporters.
This is not a neutral investigation.
It's totally partisan and contrived.
Once that committee makes clear, as I trust it will, what took place was indeed an insurrection, says Lawrence Tribe, thereby discrediting himself permanently in the judgment of anyone who takes these matters seriously, it's difficult to imagine this not becoming a logical next step.
He is a bought and sold by the Democrat Party.
Of course, if Democrats successfully ban Trump from holding federal office, it remains to be seen how half of the country would react.
An actual insurrection could take place, not the fake one that satanic Democrats equate to being on the same level as the September 11th attacks.
I think that's a fine piece.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, as I've said before, this is no longer about Donald Trump.
This is about the American awakening and the resolve that comes from that general American awakening and the revolution that comes from that resolve Individually and collectively and the renaissance that follows that revolution.
So there's a great awakening, a great resolve, a great revolution, and a great renaissance.
Nothing to do with Donald Trump.
Nothing to do with any leader.
Or someone that claims to be a leader.
This is about what's happening in the spiritual guts of Americans.
And the churning of the guts of the American people is being done by the Democrats and the fascists and the Faucis and the vaccinated lunatics and these black-robed high priests.
Corruption officials.
All of this is being done to the American population.
Remember, the American population does not exist for politics.
It doesn't follow this stuff.
They work, they have their kids, they do their leisure, their TV, they watch football games, but they don't get into the degree of politics.
But we do, and our audience does as well, so we're a little bit cut above.
But the vast majority don't.
So, what is happening right now is this great change that's happening in America.
And I agree with the points, Jim, just to talk about the law, for example.
Congress cannot call Donald Trump an insurrectionist or a traitor with any force of law.
Trump would have to be, as any American, prosecuted in a court of law by a jury of his peers and found guilty of a crime before that badge or that brand could be stamped upon him, not the Congress.
So, the fact that they're trying to do this is another slip, another revelation of just how tyrannical they are.
But, you know, this is how they are going to try and hold onto power.
The Democrat Party is on a kamikaze, self-destructive trajectory.
They can't turn, they're like an airplane coming crashing towards the ground, the wings are coming off, the tail's coming off, and they have no ability to maneuver other than complete hysterical, you know, fist-in-your-face maniacy about, you have to submit to the tyranny of the majority, you have to get a vaccine, you have to stay in your house, you have to have a passport, you have to have a yellow star on your chest, you have to submit to wokeism, you have to give Your little boys and girls hormone blockers, you have to submit to the devil's maniacy, which is our new Democrat religion.
That's the insanity that animates these Democrat leftists.
And the American people are just quietly, like Mike Harrison said, Quietly saying, no, we're not having anything to do with you.
We're coming out of the cities, we're reforming our society, and we're doing it completely individually and autonomously.
So I think that's what we're going to see in 22, is a complete decoupling from the political fantasy of America, By the real people of this country.
And it's the Boston Tea Party all over again.
It's 1776 all over again.
But it's a quiet reformation.
It's a quiet revolution.
And I think it's only going to continue.
The question is, Is Donald Trump going to be a tragic comedic figure in that?
Or is he going to be a triumphant phoenix that rises from the ashes of his own decisions?
Because every pile of ash around him is the result of his decision.
He failed to stand, and I'll just give you this one second, He failed to stand up to the media and the Democrats about Russia.
He allowed them to put all these Russian sanctions that should never have happened.
He allowed them to shut down RT and call it a Russian intelligence factor.
He allowed the Democrats to impeach him over this.
He allowed General Flynn to be cast out over this.
He allowed the Mueller probe.
He allowed Jeff Sessions and all these other people to run with this.
The American public knew this was all nonsense and lies, but Trump allowed it.
And Trump allowed the entire society to be shut down, like Susan Lindauer said.
He allowed the mail-in ballots.
He allowed all this stuff.
He chose to be on the side of the tyrannical government, not on the side of people's rights.
He said before, quote, you know, I'm in favor of people getting their guns taken by the courts and let the courts work it out.
No!
The Constitution says the right to the Second Amendment is inviolable.
Right.
Trump has always come down on the wrong side of this.
Yeah, it's real easy to build a frickin' wall across the southeast border.
I could do that.
Yeah, it's real easy to give people money back in their taxes.
Yeah, it's real easy not to start another war.
Those are good things that he did.
But he also did some real stupid things.
You know, the whole pulling out of the JCPOA in Iran.
Bad idea.
The whole waging war against Syria, bad idea.
The whole stealing of Syrian oil fields and the Golan Heights to Israel and moving the embassy for Israel.
That's all good for, quote, the fascist Israeli Zionist.
It's not good for the American people.
And then calling anybody that criticizes Israel un-American and illegal, that's another oddity.
And he's been doubling down on this Bibi Netanyahu, Jared Kushner thing and Ivanka Trump thing with the rainbow flags under the embassies, bad idea.
So everything that Trump's done, yes, he's done some good things, but he's done some horribly stupid things that don't reflect the character of a constitutional conservative Christian man.
And I'm tired of Christian constitutionalists holding him up like a cult of personality as if he's Christ the Savior.
He is not!
And he may not have any future in America again because of his past decisions.
Jim?
David, your thoughts?
Well, you know, Scott raises some very interesting points.
I think the seduction of Donald Trump and the American voting base is really kind of a mysterious existential grasp by the people.
I agree with Mr.
decisions. But I think those horrible decisions are from not taking grasp of the administration.
For example, when you read Peter Navarro's book in Trump time, Peter Navarro is very
convincing to me. When you listen to Steve Cortez, who was one of his premier persons
upon whom he placed a lot of reliance, and you look at the economic policies by Steve
Cortez, they're very sound.
When you listen to Steve Bannon, I call him first canon Steve Bannon,
because I'm telling you, that guy's gonna blow up this nation, and fast.
I know Scott has a little bit of hostility toward Mr. Bannon, but I admire his work.
I admire Scott's as well.
But, these Trump-ophiles
are really
latched on to a bit of history.
And I think that President Trump had a bad group of advisors.
I think he focused on economics.
He's a business guy.
He focused on economics.
He focused on foreign policy.
He focused on what he thought was good for himself and inferred that that was good for the nation.
And he's, wait, I like some of the things he's done, I like some of the policies he had, but I agree with Scott.
There are multiple failures in his policies because he had very bad advisors.
You know, I think it's Machiavelli who says that a person to be judged by the people he keeps, or the acquaintances he has, And Trump failed in that regard, and he failed miserably.
To allow a deep state to continue to operate under the control of holdovers from the prior administration was a fundamental error.
He should have just cut the heads of those agencies post haste.
Secondly, that just shows his inexperience with government.
He comes from the business world and he's got the you're fired deal and all this.
Great theater, but bad when it comes to policy because he's got all these minions of the deep state who are running the government of the United States.
And let me tell you, you know, I just started reading Kennedy's book, and he really, he sums it up when he talks about, it's the capture of the regulatory agencies.
And that's what, to a certain extent, President Trump allowed, because he's, you know, From everything I see, he's big pharma.
I mean, look at it with support for the vaccines.
He's big business.
There's no question about that.
Look at what's happened to the average everyday businessman in the United States of America.
It's been absolutely beat, you know, had his business, had the living daylights
been beaten out of its business.
And I think this goes on and on and on.
And now we have new shows like I saw this one yesterday.
My wife was cutting my hair.
Thank you.
Because I can't go out under quote lockdown.
I'm watching this Emily in Paris.
My wife's watching it.
I see it on the internet.
And here's this Emily in Paris.
And here's this little twit running around in Paris like she's the all-time American.
And it's a reprehensible display of what the contemporary American woman is.
And then there's a line in the movie that just really, very much disturbed me.
It said, some guy says, Oh, I'm from Normandy.
And she goes, Oh, yeah, like Saving Private Ryan.
And then it just went on, the script went on.
And I thought, Oh, my gosh, there's absolutely no realization whatsoever about what took place at Normandy.
It's irrational.
It's myth land.
And there's no respect for the people that had the balls, quite frankly, to get off their ships to move against the Nazi fortifications.
And I'm telling you, what we see now is the is post-Trumpisms.
We see, look, if he runs again, great.
Okay, I'm fine with that because I don't see very many voices that attack the media.
But to a certain extent, he's using the same exploitation of the media.
Basically, my instinct is to trust him, but I've lost that trust I've lost, wait, he doesn't mandate it, but I'm talking about that, just the development of these vaccines.
I believe, you know, look, you gotta, you gotta, you gotta put your stake in the ground somewhere.
And I'm telling you, my stake is going into this ground.
I believe that this whole pandemic is nothing but a planned event to take over humanity and we're going to find the
people who did it and we're going to get them and Quite frankly, they should be taken out and hung
They should be given a fair trial before we take them out They should have the right to a fair trial and then be
taken out and hung. That's right. That's absolutely right Depending on the findings, depending on the findings.
Thank you for the career.
Of course, of course.
Take the guilty bastards and give them a fair trial and then take them out and hang them.
I couldn't agree more.
Meanwhile...
Several other developments.
The Attorney General says he has no higher priority than prosecuting January 6 rioters.
You would think those who were looting and burning and committing arson all last year might be a priority for him.
No, no, no, it's the rioters on January 6.
Meanwhile, Garland vows that DOJ is going to do all it can to protect voting rights.
That's the effort by the Democrats to federalize the vote.
Here it comes.
Biden and Harris used January 6th to demand a federal takeover of elections so they can steal elections all over the country in a centralized way.
They're referring to the multiple Democrat-led bills that would federalize local and state elections and overturn election security laws.
This is incredible.
The vice president said the violent protests of the 2020 election on January 6 were evidence of how fragile American democracy has become.
The fragility of democracy is this.
If we're not vigilant, if we do not defend it, democracy simply will not stand.
It will falter and fail.
This is about as nonsensical as it gets.
Biden was less direct about election legislation but condemned Republican efforts to secure future ones.
The former president's supporters have decided the only way for them to win is to suppress your vote and subvert our election.
It's wrong, it's undemocratic, and frankly, it's un-American.
Classic example of projection by the Democrats.
Let me add now, To fight racial disparity by arresting black criminals.
Manhattan's new black district attorney is going to downgrade armed robbery to a misdemeanor.
Do you have any idea the explosion in armed robberies that's going to take place when now the criminals know they're only going to be facing a misdemeanor?
Manhattan's new DA has ordered his prosecutors to stop seeking prison sentences for hordes of criminals and to downgrade felony charges in cases including armed robberies and drug dealing.
This is incredible.
The Assistant District Attorney's must now also keep in mind the impact of incarceration, including whether it really does increase public safety by removing a threat, potential future barriers to convicts involving housing and employment and financial costs in prison, and the racial disparities over who gets time.
In other words, taking criminals off the street where they can no longer be a threat does not appear to factor here.
ADA should use their judgment and experience to evaluate the person arrested and identify those who suffer from mental illness, who are unhoused, who commit crimes of poverty, who suffer from substance use, consistent with the goal of providing services to such individuals, and for God's sake, yes, don't prosecute them if they're black.
This is all ironic because the mayor himself is a former NYPD captain elected on a law and order platform.
I have a lot of respect for DA Bragg, a former prosecutor.
He has a real vision, he once observed.
Al Sharpton, of course, is very concerned, right?
Alvin Bragg is going to redefine the prosecutor's office at Adams in the past.
Not criminalizing young people, just terrorize citizens and make them move out.
Meanwhile, we do now appear to be in a cold civil war.
Despite Biden's promise of unity during his campaign, his administration has failed to unify the people.
On the contrary, his divisive rhetoric means Americans are more polarized than ever.
I would argue America has already fallen into what might be termed a cold civil war.
We the people do not see eye to eye on significant issues.
It does not help many were thrown at us all at once, beginning with COVID-19, the first lockdown that fumbled the economy, and fierce odds with almost everything else, especially COVID-related.
We disagree over vaccines, vaccine cards, mandates, and masks.
Biden's doing nothing to douse the flames with his divisive language.
In February, he demanded COVID compliance for all federal workers.
In September, he shocked America with his remark, his patience is wearing thin with millions who don't want the shot.
A bizarre statement from a U.S.
president, especially since Americans, including those who choose not to be vaccinated, are the people he ostensibly works for.
The same time our country has been battered with back-to-back crises, including record high crime, the never-ending pandemic, Biden can't shut down, Americans are being simultaneously forced into poverty, hyperinflation, not seeing the era of Jimmy Carter, middle and lower classes are struggling, gas prices are soaring, food is more expensive, now we have a housing market, only the wealthy can afford to buy single-family homes.
Still, Well, enough to make an already frustrated population increasingly agitated, fearful, and angry.
This is only the surface of what deeply divides us.
Just under are two camps of political ideology, always at war, but now the heat has been dialed up.
Half the country, do not forget, voted for Donald Trump.
Many believe he won.
To add fuel to the fire, we had the unfortunate January 6th event.
Capital insists it was an insurrection.
The other side regards it as a mass protest gone wrong.
We're divided over critical race theory and the incessant pushing of race war by often deceptive and shameless media.
Many Americans no longer trust the media anyway.
Not a reliable source of information.
How could we understand each other under these circumstances?
But our left versus right feud is not simply about politics or a failing economy who did or didn't get a vaccine.
It's not about race or gender either.
If that were all, we'd actually be okay.
But we have a greater hurdle in front of us.
At the root of our civil discord are opposing beliefs about our fundamental rights and bodily autonomy, how we should raise and teach our children, and the place of God and religion in our institutions and in our culture.
Even if we vehemently disagree on mass politics, vaccine, immigration, guns, the environment, and more, we need to fight for our right to exist as a nation.
If we continue to allow the ruling class the unprecedented authority it has acquired under the cloak of COVID, they will use any excuse to control every aspect of our lives and our freedom will be eroded the same way one goes broke, gradually and then all at once.
That's the real war being waged now.
Long past time we wake up and see it, whether you're a Republican, a Democrat, or neither.
We can go back to arguing about politics en masse after we regain power for the people.
But for now, we have to fight for those who would love to see us self-destruct.
So let's begin 2022 with these Y words and share them widely.
We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, ensure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Scott, your thoughts.
Well, you know, starting out with the last part that you wrote, you read there in the establishing of justice and the promoting the common defense and ensuring the general welfare.
Providing for the common defense does not obscure or nullify your providing for your individual defense and the individual defense of a person's family or business.
And the Second Amendment is created for that.
So, when you have laws like New York that is trying to allow armed robbers to come into your store and just charge them with a misdemeanor, you know you've entered the breaking point.
Any robber that comes into a person's store with a gun, with the intent to rob, who pulls that weapon, I don't care if they've got it by their side or not, they should be shot in the head and killed instantly.
Because they're coming in to kill you.
Whether you give them the money from your cash register or not is going to determine that.
But they walked into your store with the intent to rob you and kill you if necessary.
That's Augustine's entire regiment on the right to self-defense and killing those who are trying to kill you.
So, I think Americans, again, this is common sense.
And Americans are coming back to common sense while the political ruling class is going to no sense, complete nonsense, and self-delusion and narcissism and hysteria.
I'll simply say, if everybody in Washington D.C.
was killed And everybody in Sacramento was killed.
Who cares?
It doesn't influence our lives as citizens.
We don't need Pelosi or Biden or Mitch McConnell or Trump or anybody else to live and move and have our being.
The welfare is shut off because everybody's been killed in Sacramento or Washington.
Who cares?
Go out and get a job, digging a ditch, picking a fruit tree, sewing, being a doctor, whatever.
We live our lives as individual human beings on the face of the planet, and it is irresponsible For us to think that the leadership in Washington or Sacramento or any of our capitals manages and conducts and allows us to live.
We don't.
We live by our own animation and by God that gives us that.
So I think the Great Awakening is the departure from Washington is having any relevance in our lives because they don't.
And the other thing is going to be the general societal separation Scott, I think many would believe that if the population of Washington, D.C.
and Sacramento were wiped out, we'd all be better off.
I agree.
David, we can initiate your comments and then extend them after the break.
I welcome your initial observation, perhaps a capsule summary of what you'll elaborate upon subsequently.
Well, you know, I think that we're looking at a terrifying series of events.
You know, Scott and I have talked about this for years now, that things are going to get worse, and they are getting progressively worse on a day-by-day basis.
You know, we look at the performance of the United States in terms of handling COVID.
It's, you know, 2,000 people per 100,000.
We look at Tanzania, it's one person, 2,000 per million.
We look at Tanzania, it's one person per per million. I mean, it's just, it's God awful. We look at
the cost of quarantines and the deaths that have taken place, the food chain, supply lines, etc.
It's just frightening. And look at the economic destruction that's taken place. You know, it's
an interesting situation that we're in because what we're seeing is the economic and destruction
of the middle class and the lower classes and we're seeing the shifting of wealth upward.
Kennedy details that in his book, Regulatory Capture, and that's what's taking place in the United States.
Let me make myself very clear.
Let me make myself very clear.
The government of the United States has been captured.
The government of the United States has been captured.
By corporate interests, by corrupt interests, and it's time for the American people, whether you're Republican or you're Democrat, to start releasing our agencies from this capture.
And I believe that when we get sufficient leadership in the White House, in Sacramento, you know, we've got a chance of finding our way out of this mess.
But if we don't, we're headed into the abyss.
I think you're absolutely right in that 2022 is going to be a bloodbath for the Democrats.
So they're going to try to find a way to thwart it, whether it's the stealing the election again, initiating a new war, whatever, by God, they're going to try it.
They are the most corrupt party ever in the history of the United States, bar none.
Don, take us out for the end of this first hour.
Well, what are you?
Come on.
Dang it.
Take us out with a tune, Don.
This is Truthless in News, and what an hour this has been.
The next hour is going to be even hotter, so you want to come back for that.
So, thank you so much.
▲
Export Selection