All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 4, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
51:27
Need to Know News (4 January 2022) with Joe Olson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, welcoming you to a Texas Tuesday Minus One.
We have Joe Olson from Houston, but Michael Ivey, formerly of Fort Worth, alas, is under the weather, won't be joining us today.
We hope his rapid recovery.
Meanwhile, who owns Big Pharma and Big Media?
You'll never guess.
BlackRock and the Vanguard Group, the two largest asset management firms in the world, combined own the New York Times and other legacy media along with Big Pharma.
But We'll get a little deeper here.
The key turns out to be who owns BlackRock and Vanguard.
Big Pharma and mainstream media are largely owned by those two assets.
Drugs company driving the COVID response and mainstream media have been willing accomplices in spreading their propaganda.
Vanguard and BlackRock are the two top owners of Time Warner, Comcast, Disney, News Corp, four of the six media that control more than 90% of the U.S.
media landscape.
They form a secret monopoly owning just about everything else you can think of, too.
Ownership in 1,600 American firms, which in 2015 had combined revenues of $9.1 trillion, When you add the third largest global owner, State Street, their combined ownership encompasses nearly 90% of all S&P 500 firms.
Vanguard is also the largest shareholder in BlackRock.
On the other hand, it has a unique structure making its ownership more difficult to discern.
But many of the oldest, richest families in the world can be linked to Vanguard.
Guess what?
So what do the New York Times and other legacy media have in common with Big Pharma?
They're largely owned by BlackRock and the Vanguard Group, the stock of the world's largest corporations owned by the same institutional investors.
They all own each other.
This means competing brands like Coke and Pepsi aren't really competitors, since their stock are owned by the same investment companies, funds, insurance companies, banks, and even governments.
The smaller investors are owned by the larger, who are owned by even bigger, and at the very top are Vanguard and BlackRock.
But it goes back to the richest families.
The word vanguard means foremost position in an army or fleet of advancing into battle or the leading position in a trend or a movement, both fitting descriptions of this global behemoth owned by globalists pushing for a great reset, the core of which is a transfer of wealth and ownership from the hands of the many into the hands of the few.
Think about that.
Owned by globalists pushing for the Great Reset.
Guess who that would be?
Vanguard, as mentioned, is the largest owner of BlackRock.
The elite who own Vanguard don't like being in the spotlight, so they cannot hide from those willing to dig, but they do their best.
Reports from Oxfam and Bloomberg say 1% of the world together owns more money than all the other 99%.
82% of the earned money went to that 1%.
In other words, the two investment companies hold a monopoly, really, around the world.
A quick look suggests, by the way, when you dig into Vanguard, Rothschild Investment Corporation and the Edmund Rothschild Holdings are the stakeholders Keep that name in mind, because after all, that's really what's going on.
The Rothschilds are out to take control of the rest of the world they don't already control.
According to Simply Wall Street, back in February 2020, BlackRock and Vanguard were the two largest shareholders of GlaxoSmithKline at 7% and 3.5%.
At Pfizer, the ownership is reversed, Vanguard being the top, and BlackRock the second most.
Here's a breakdown of the top 10 owners of Pfizer.
Meanwhile, remember, stock ratios can change at any time since companies buy and sell on a regular basis.
Why does it matter?
Because drug companies are driving COVID-19 responses, all of which have endangered rather than optimized public health, and the mainstream has been there willing to accomplish in spreading propaganda, a false official narrative that has and still is leading the public astray and fostering fear based upon lies.
To have a chance of riding the situation, we must understand who the players are, where the harmful dictates are coming from, and why the false narratives are being created in the first place.
The horrible history of Big Pharma, as we reported, has a long track record of prioritizing corporate profit over people's health.
It's utterly shameful.
Blackrock Vanguard also own the media.
The New York Times, for example.
Blackrock is second largest.
Vanguard Group owns the largest.
They also control Time, Warner, Comcast, Disney, and News Corp.
So needless to say, you can control entire nations by means of carefully orchestrated and organized propaganda disguised as journalism.
If your head's already spinning, you're not alone.
It's tough to describe the circular, tightly interwoven relationships in a linear fashion.
A key take-home is that Vanguard and BlackRock stand out, and that BlackRock and Vanguard are owned themselves by globalists, facilitating the Great Reset, the so-called Green Resolution, both of which are part of the same wealth theft swindle scheme.
Remember, Rothschild, that's the name, at the top of the heat.
It becomes even more clear when you realize Vanguard and BlackRock aren't limited to Big Pharma and the media, but work with central banks, the Fed, which is a private entity, not a public.
They also own shares in a long list of other companies, including Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Facebook, and Alphabet Incorporated, of course.
They have ownership, as mentioned, in $1,600 with $9.1 trillion revenues in 2019.
Check out, there's a nice video about them online.
Can we tie them to the families?
Barring a public confession, we have to look and dig deeper.
When Linda Forrester Rothschild wants the U.S.
to be a one-party country like China and doesn't want I.D.
voter laws passed, I think they actually want voter laws to be passed because the voter laws the Democrats are promoting will facilitate election fraud.
So what does she do?
She held a conference call with the World's Top 100 CEOs and tell them to publicly decry, as Jim Crow, Georgia's passing of an anti-corruption law, ordering dutiful CEOs to boycott Georgia, as with Coca-Cola and Major League Baseball and even the Hollywood star Will Smith.
In this conference call, we see shades of the Great Reset, Agenda 2030, the New World Order.
The UN wants to make sure, as did the World Economic Forum founder and chairman Klaus Schwab, that in 2030 poverty, hunger, pollution, and disease no longer plague the Earth, because they've destroyed the Earth's population, and what few remain are on the dole.
To achieve this, the UN wants taxes from Western countries split by the megacorporations to create a brand new society.
For this, the UN says, we need a world government, maybe the UN itself.
As I've explained before, it seems clear that the COVID-19 pandemic was orchestrated to bring us the new world order, The Great Reset.
Just follow it up.
Joe Mercola spreads the truth, Joe.
I think the guy is just heroic.
Heroic.
Yeah, well, it's hard to draw a line between where the Rothschild money ends and the Crown of England's money begins.
They have a thing called the Privy Council and the Golden Share, where the Queen is allowed to have the Golden Share of every major corporation, so she probably owns the Golden Share of Vanguard and Blackrock No.
1.
She's the largest landowner on the planet with 6.6 billion acres of land.
Over 10% of Earth's land area is owned by the Queen.
And out of that she gets mining rights, timber rights, water rights, all kinds of other things that derive from owning that much real estate that was actually stolen from all the native peoples of the world.
Why this British...
People put up with this monarchy and this dictatorial system is beyond imagination.
They are the ultimate feudalists and they're the ones that have been ratcheting the whole economy in a constant system where they never lose but they always win.
So they're constantly playing the system because they own all the key players in the system.
And just to bring up a Friendly little reminder.
You know, we want to keep saying that Donald Trump was doing a bunch of good things.
Well, in June of 2020, he said he was going to quit funding the WHO, and everybody went, oh, that's great, man.
The World Health Organization is not about health.
It's about locking us down and destroying us.
So what did he do?
He took a billion dollars from them, and then he turned around and gave a billion dollars To the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, a Billy Gates front company called Gavi, and he gave them $1.16 billion.
So you tell me what's going on.
Absolutely insane.
Then he turned around in August of 2020 and gave $2 billion to Pfizer for a pending 100 million doses of jabs, which is, figure it out, simple math, $20 a jab.
I don't like any of this.
This is looking worse and worse, in my opinion, that Donald Trump was really in the thick of it.
I am very, very upset about this, Joe.
And now they're trying to do the- I don't like any of this.
This is looking worse and worse in my opinion that Donald Trump was really in the thick of it.
I am very, very upset about this, Joe.
We got to keep reporting because if Trump has sold us out, by God, we no longer want to support him.
Meanwhile- Oh, absolutely.
After a record-setting 2021-14, more have already been shot in Philadelphia in 2022.
I mean, this is right off the bat.
Philadelphia had a bad year for murder in 2021, the worst in the city's history.
worse in the city's history, 562, shattering the previous record of 500 set back in 1990,
the escalation of their murder rate has been drastic.
In 2019, there were only 356, but it shot up to 499 in 2020 and then went up again in 2021.
If the first few hours of 2022 were indication, things aren't heading in the right direction.
The new year is not even 24 years old, but already 14 people have been shot in Philadelphia, two of them fatally.
Emily DiCarlo of the Anti-Violence Partnership of Philadelphia said the violence of the past year has traumatized Philadelphia residents.
Philadelphia's Democratic Mayor Jim Kenney has responded by calling for Philadelphia to have the ability to set its own gun laws, supporting reforms that would improve Philadelphia neighborhoods.
But is that by making them more accessible or less?
Notably, last year, Kenny responded to pressure from defund the police activists by cutting a proposed $19 million increase.
That's not good.
While he claims to be an opponent of the defund the police movement, he's pushed for many of the police reforms that the propagandists want, the progressives.
Philly was one of more than a dozen cities that had homicide rates in 2021, records for violent crimes, Has taken, you know, the country by storm, and it's not surprising, Joe.
The Democrats have promoted it.
They basically said, go out and commit all the crimes you want, especially shoplifting, burglary, robbery, and so forth.
We're not going to do anything about it.
And in fact, we're going to take guns away from law-abiding citizens, and we're going to defund the police so there's no one around to stop you.
Joe, this madness must end.
Hey, man, Philly's got nothing on the Windy City.
They killed six over New Year's Eve weekend, including a 12-year-old boy, which I'm sure somebody can claim that was self-defense.
Yeah, it's pretty crazy out there.
I wouldn't want to live in a Democrat-controlled city.
Oh, wait a minute, I do.
I live in a county with Lena Hidalgo, the The Soros clown for county judge and Sly Turner, the Democrat judge, Mayor of Houston.
So I'm stuck with these SOBs at this point in time.
But yeah, it's pretty sick.
You know, I don't know what to say.
It's only going to get worse in every other jurisdiction where they have control.
Yep, I know, Joe.
I mean, it's just crazy.
Anyone who would think the Democrats ought to be continued in office or control of Congress really ought to look, take a good look at what's happened to the country.
Meanwhile, Hillary posted an old photo of herself for New Year's Eve with a caption, looking ahead.
In her tweet for New Year's Eve, she shared an old photo.
The caption reads, Looking ahead to 2022, wishing you a happy, healthy, and fabulous New Year.
The surprise image she chose was one posted in a 2016 montage of Hillary versus Trump, a flop piece for Hillary when she was running against him, published in 2016, almost six years old.
It looks to me like it's actually much older than that.
Hillary resurfaced with her masterclass, where she read the acceptance speech she'd prepared but was unable to deliver when Trump defeated her.
She still seems to have great emotions over it.
It's bizarre.
Here's a photograph she posted, which she thinks looks like herself.
How many years old is that, Joe?
Take a look.
Ridiculous.
Jamie Carino's 2016 flop piece was titled, The Making of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, subtitled, Hillary has spent the past five decades fighting for kids and families.
Trump has spent five decades lining his own pockets.
Shuffle through the years to see what each candidate has been up to since they began their careers.
How grotesque is that?
Hillary is one of the great criminals of our time.
Simply put, press the shuffle button and a random year will be selected and then show what both Hillary and Don were doing that day.
This is just ridiculous.
Meanwhile, she warned the Democrat Party to keep a clear eye on what wins elections, a tacit warning its progressive wing could have Republican victories in the midterm, Willie Gesp of MSNBC interviewed Hillary.
She said Democrats need candidates who can win in purple states to make sure Congress does its job.
Her remarks reflected divisions in both parties as centrists wrestle with the ideologies of those on the fringe.
The Democratic Progressive Wing, with AOC and Ilhan Omar, of course, is creating great problems for the Democrats.
They're going down hard.
I have no doubt.
Regarding the Democratic Party, Hillary said, we've got to be very clear-eyed about what it's going to take to hold the House and Senate in 2022 and to win the Electoral College.
Because Republicans are doing everything they can to create an environment in which winning the Electoral College, even narrowly the way Biden did, will be out of reach for Democrats.
That's just ridiculous.
As Democrats prepare for a backlash against Biden, she makes her remarks shortly after the party's defeat in Virginia and preparing for losses, which are going to be massive.
Despite the trillion-plus infrastructure bill, many of Biden's critics, like Ilhan Omar, oppose its progress unless it were accompanied by the far bigger social spending program, which now is going down to defeat because Joe Biden won't support it.
But it was an absurd proposal anyway, Joe.
Unbelievable how the Democrats are mismanaging every issue under the sun.
Well, I have my own nickname for HRC, and that is Reptillery, a scaly, cold-blooded, fork-tongued predator nearing extinction wearing a frazzled drip mask as she tortures her victims.
Yeah, she's a pretty much a real piece of work.
What a genuine psychopath.
And it turns out her daddy was involved in the Chicago mob.
So that's how she got her start in politics, was that she already knew how crooked the system was, and her daddy was a bookkeeper for the Chicago mobs.
But moving along, we have a trial that just ended last week, and Gislaine Maxwell was found guilty of five of six counts.
And so she's going to prison, but a judge has just approved her to get her COVID booster shot.
So she hasn't committed Arkansas yet, But it's not impossible that it could happen someday soon.
And then on a related subject, Virginia Roberts is suing Randy Andy, the prince of, uh, wherever it is.
In England, the number two son from QE2, and he's claiming that she signed an agreement for $500 million with Epstein that she wouldn't sue any of his other victims, I mean any of the other perpetrators.
So that's what he's trying to hang his head on in New York today in court.
So we'll have something interesting to talk about later in the week as to whether the judge agrees with that kind of a Dismissive behavior on the part of the...
Prince and future king, but bottom line is I'm done with royals.
I'm done with political elites of every form in this whole country.
It's just absolutely absurd.
So I can't wait for the 2022 primaries so we can get rid of some rhinos that we definitely don't need going forward and 2022 general election where we can restore the House and Senate to some sanity and get rid of the Pelosi speaker that we've been enduring for way too long.
Oh, you're right, Joe.
On all counts, it's unbelievable and disgusting.
Meanwhile, polls show strong support for secession in both red and blue states.
How stunning, not surprising.
How can the word secession have even made it this far in the margins from the margins of political debate when half of the developing world is struggling to get to the U.S.?
And yet, both red and blue states are so seriously divided It isn't simply among the far right or the far left.
A lot of extremists support their state seceding.
But, shockingly, so do a lot of non-extremists.
One poll is a collaborative effort by the VA Center for Politics in Home Fire just this past September showing a majority of Trump voters think the political divide in America is so great, they support a move by blue states to secede from the Union.
52% of Trump voters lead towards secession as a solution.
41% of Biden voters feel the same about the blue states.
Take a look at the map there, Joe.
I think Georgia has really got to be red.
I mean, this is just ridiculous.
They just manipulated and stole the vote in Georgia.
The rest of the map, and of course Colorado is a peculiarity there, seems to me to be pretty much where we have predominant differences between the blue and the red, though I would count Wisconsin, actually a purple state, not so strongly going either direction.
The Bloomberg piece knows there's a chasm separating Republican and Democrats in their definition of truth.
Republicans seem to be something entirely different.
On the contrary, the definition of truth is, or should be, the truth facts.
One party consistently lies to the extreme while the other, to a lesser degree.
Who wants to live among the lies?
The underlying bit from Richard Kreidner's Break It Up.
Americans must choose between joining together to build a truly incisive unified country, a multiracial democracy politically and economically, We're going our separate ways.
We can't put it off much longer.
We must finally finish the work of Reconstruction or give up on the Union entirely.
Some Canadian friends, serious people, not the least bit sensationalistic that they're getting very nervous about the possibility of Trump or a Trump phone were to become president in 2024.
Could violence erupt and secession become a serious issue?
Raj Limbaugh, just two months before his death, born Americans appear to be heading down a path where secession would become more popular.
A Medal of Freedom recipient, legend in broadcasting observed, that's the direction the country is headed.
I see more and more asking, what in the world do we have in common with people who live in, say, New York?
And you've heard peaceful grumblings from others who believe there cannot be peaceful coexistence between two complete different theories of life, theories of government, theories of how we manage our affairs.
I'm not quite sure that secession is the solution, Joe.
I think it would have devastating effects.
I don't even believe it's constitutionally possible, with perhaps the exception of the state of Texas, which entered the union under different circumstances than the rest of the states, but I welcome your opinion.
Yeah, well, Texas was an independent nation from 1836 until 1845.
We had our own constitution, our own president, our own state government, complete operation.
We had our own army and navy.
So, yeah, we entered the United States as an equal with several different conditions.
One of them was we kept all of our state land instead of turning it over to the national government.
Another one was that we had the right to divide into five states since we were such a large area that up to five states in the future if we decided that we needed that to get proper representation in the national government.
And then we also had a clause that we could exit the United States if they didn't conform with their agreement.
So we had a legally binding situation.
Now whether that changed as a result of us inadvertently joining the Civil War, which We did everything we could to avoid that.
Sam Houston was our senator in Washington in 1859.
He resigned his Senate seat and came back to Texas and ran for governor on a platform of no involvement in the Civil War, which had we not been
involved in it, the Civil War would have been a lot shorter.
Number one. Number two, we could have gone to an independence nation, nation status at that point as well.
But he won the vote in 1860 with 60% of the vote in the state of Texas.
But unfortunately, the legislature was elected by the plantation owners, and they impeached Governor
Sam Houston. And so that's why Texas ended up going into the Civil War.
But if we don't do things that way, there's other things that are also currently adrift.
And that is that there's about a dozen counties.
that want to switch from either Virginia to West Virginia or switch from Oregon to Idaho.
So we could end up having some state boundaries moving and that could end up influencing the political structure as well.
Also, California just passed a thing where every voting from henceforth is 100% mail-in voting and that's the same fraud that they've been pulling and Washington and Oregon for decades, so expect California to just go further and further down the tubes, because we all know how easy it is to manipulate electronic voting, and especially if you're allowed to just print your own ballots at home!
What could go wrong?
It's just incredible, Joe.
Let me go back to the map and talk briefly more about this idea of a secession.
I mean, look at that.
You don't have geographically contiguous boundaries.
You got half of what would be the blue nation, you know, distributed all these different parts.
There's greater integrity in the red.
And what are they going to do?
Are they going to have their own armies, their own navies, their own IRS?
You know, I mean, I think it's really quite a fantasy.
I think it's a symbolic expression of Disenchantment with a status quo, but I don't think it really has a serious prospect of taking place.
So let me continue further.
Here we have the new JFK Show with Gary King and Larry Rivera.
We're going through Oliver Stone's new film, JFK Revisited.
Here we're reviewing the second half hour.
Find no more merit here than we did with regard to the first.
More on the magic bullet, but nothing new.
Once again, the utilization of David W. Mandic and Doug Horn, who are two of the world's leading experts on the assassination, was wasted.
Featuring more of Gary Aguilar was nauseating where he hasn't made a contribution of note to research on JFK for 30 years of trying.
It's painful to watch and embarrassing to think that Oliver Stone could be so easily played as to trust Demi DiEugenio as his screenwriter.
A complete waste of time, effort, and money.
Meanwhile, we now return.
Rand Paul says Fauci may be responsible for thousands of needless deaths.
There's no doubt about it.
Tony the Rat is a liar and the whole world knows it.
He continues to peddle data that's not true or scientific and employed to keep his face plastered across the fake news media.
Now Rand Paul is calling him out.
Senator Paul and Fauci have made some serious fireworks in the last year and a half, where he hasn't hesitated to call out Fauci for the fraud he is and the lies he's told.
He said what many have been afraid to say.
During his Liberty Report, he laid it all out.
I think Fauci is of the philosophy that vaccines are incredibly successful and a way to go versus therapeutics, for example.
So with regard to AIDS, he was involved as the AIDS epidemic came up.
He wanted to develop a vaccine.
A senator, himself a medical school graduate, a doctor, went on to explain there's nothing wrong with wanting to develop vaccines, which can be great for polio or smallpox, but it did not work for AIDS.
At this point, he contrasted Fauci's dismissal of therapeutics, which could be lifesavers.
The therapeutic angle ended up being the best, but he was biased toward the vaccine and is the same way now.
Here, the gloves came off.
I would venture to say, said Rand Paul, that thousands of people die in our country every month now from COVID because Fauci de-emphasized the idea that there are therapeutics.
Getting monoclonal antibody treatment, for example, is one of these most bureaucratic events any person will have to go through.
The government red tape surrounding the process is astounding.
That's interesting.
I had the monoclonal antibody treatment when I was briefly hospitalized here a few months ago.
Fauci, Biden, and the Democrats don't want Americans to have access to the treatment because it downplays the need for their untested, unproven vaccine that's killing and maiming people by the hundreds of thousands, even millions.
That has proven the antibody treatment cuts the risk of death for a high-risk patient by 70%.
Reduces the chance of infection among the members of your household by 80.
Antibody treatments have been wildly successful in Florida, where DeSantis continues to push back against Biden and Fauci's authoritarian mandates.
The fake news media, of course, as well as the leftists, are ignoring the success of monoclonal antibody treatments and lives are being lost as a consequence.
No surprise there, Joe.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, well, in regards to the first story, the JFK movie, at 30, Oliver Stone, in a lasting impact of America's most dangerous movie at the Washington Post, Oliver Stone defied Washington, Hollywood, and history itself to make a controversial JFK drama.
It's Legacy Endures.
So apparently, he pushed a few buttons at the post, even though we know he didn't push the right buttons for truth.
But then getting back to the The COVID hoax that's going on.
The monoclonal antibodies, those are manufactured by Eli Lilly.
They have an emergency youth authorization only, and I would be cautious about taking anything from any of those big drug companies at this particular point.
And then also there's a great We've got a discussion on the pending Supreme Court hearings that are going to be on Friday this week, January 7th.
And that is with Viva Free, who's a Canadian attorney, but he's not a criminal defense attorney and he's not U.S.
constitutional law attorney.
But he's talking with Robert Barnes, who is a criminal defense and constitutional lawyer.
And he's talking about the two hearings that they're going to have on Friday.
They're going to introduce arguments to overturn the mandates that Biden imposed for OSHA and for Medicare.
And what they make a very compelling argument that if you don't have any oversight on the part of the legislature, and you have a judiciary that bends over backwards to say that, well, whatever the government says is right, so we can't argue with them, then you don't have a tripartite government.
You have just nothing but a fiefdom.
And that's exactly what we're dealing with at this point.
So I'll put a link to their bit shoot video on that.
It's very good information.
It's about a 40 minute long discussion, but expect some fireworks to be happening
by the end of the week.
And they also point out the three clowns that Orange Man appointed to the Supreme Court
and how flaky all three of them are.
And it's just really hard to read the tea leaves and figure out where they're going.
But it's pretty certain that Angelee Bearer or whatever her name is, is going to flip flop
and go with the liberals because she's like never seen a government program that was ever anything but
wonderful.
So, Amy Cohn and Barrett, and then Kavanaugh's another flake.
So, you know, who knows how this is going to turn out.
You're talking about Roe v. Wade.
No, no, no.
I'm talking about the OSHA and the Medicare.
Oh, the mandates?
Yeah, vaccine mandates.
It's going to be heard on Friday.
Opening arguments.
And you think they're going to uphold the mandates?
Uh, well, let's put it this way.
There's 22 states that have submitted amicus briefs for it, and they're all saying they want those mandates removed.
And so, you know, you need to listen to the program, because it's going to be pretty nuanced.
And we can cover it more in depth on Thursday, because I'll do some more research between now and then, too, and we'll share some articles on it.
But, yeah, we need to tee that one up so that everybody knows what's going on on Friday.
Excellent.
Good.
Yes.
Very good.
Very good, Joe.
I like that.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, Indiana Life Insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18 to 64.
Listen to this.
Here's the harvest from what they have sown.
The head of Indianapolis-based insurance company One America The death rate is up a stunning 40% from pre-pandemic levels among working-age people.
We're seeing right now the highest death rates we've seen in the history of the business, not just at One America, but data is consistent across every player in the business.
One America is a $100 billion insurance company with its headquarters in Indianapolis since 1877.
They have 2,400 employees, sell life insurance, group life to employers.
The increase in deaths represent huge, huge numbers.
Not elderly who are dying, but primarily working age people, 18 to 64, who are the employees of companies with group life insurance plans through One America.
What we saw just in the third quarter, we're seeing continue into the fourth.
Death rates are up over 40%.
To give you an idea of how bad it is, a three-sigma or a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be a 10% increase.
So 40% is just unheard of.
Most claims for deaths are being... Sorry.
Trying to get this thing to stop.
Yeah, I'm trying to get it to stop.
Okay, it won't do that.
Okay, never mind.
Yeah, on the insurance story, it was linked at Jim Crushaw's and Mike Adams both did a program on it recently where we had posted that insurance information back in March of 2021 at Principia Scientific.
It was a DC Clothesline article that That the insurance companies were going to default not only the life insurance but also the health insurance companies were going to say that we do not cover things due to experimental vaccines and that's definitely going to happen because otherwise they're going to go bankrupt.
There's going to be way too many people and then they won't be able to adjust their rates fast enough to cover their with their premiums to cover their losses.
Expect the failure of both of those insurance systems, life and health.
And I apologize.
That's okay, Joe.
Listen, I've been emphasizing in the past how insurance companies weren't increasing their rates because of the pandemic, but now they're increasing them because of vaccines.
In other words, people are dying from the vaccines.
They weren't dying from COVID.
Let me just add a few more words here from this report, which I didn't quite finish.
At the same conference, the deaths were for people of all ages.
However, the information referenced by Davidson was for working-age people, employees of businesses with group insurance policies.
Brian Tebor of Indiana Hospital Association said hospitals through the state are being flooded with patients of many different conditions.
Unfortunately, the average Hoosier's health has declined during the pandemic.
In a follow-up call, he didn't have a breakdown showing why so many were being hospitalized or for what conditions or ailments, but the extraordinarily high death rate quoted by Davidson matched what hospitals are seeing.
The point is, we need to understand, this is not from the virus.
This is from the vaccination.
The number of hospitalizations is now higher than before the vaccine was introduced and higher than it's been in the past five years.
Just 8.9% of ICU beds are available in hospitals in the state, a little further year and lower than any time, but the majority of ICU beds are not taken up by COVID patients, just 37%, 54% by people with other illnesses or conditions.
A moving average of daily deaths from COVID is less than half of what it was before at the pandemic's peak.
But I just say, Joe, as you're explaining, The insurance companies are going to deny coverage that resulted from taking the experimental vax.
I mean, this is something the public didn't understand, that their insurance wouldn't apply if they were taking an experimental procedure.
And the CDC and the FDA and the government didn't explain it.
This is something else wrong with Donald J. Trump.
He should have explained to the American people what the hell was going on.
I'm getting really furious with this guy for his role here, Joe.
Furious.
Well, you know, and part of informed consent is that when you agree to be part of a test subject, you're no longer going to be covered by your health and life insurance policies.
That seems to me an important factor, whether you want to get yourself jabbed or not.
There's an enormous increase in autoimmune diseases.
Then we also have the myocarditis and the pericarditis.
And then there's a great Greg Reese report, five minutes long, with a discussion between Arnie Burkhart And they went through 70 different autopsies and they said absolutely all of the 70 patients that had died in these autopsies were the direct result of ingredients that are in the vaccines causing their deaths.
So, you know, at some point we're going to have to say, whoa, but I'm afraid they're just going to keep pushing until we say, whoa, really, really loud.
And the problem is, we have all of the state medical boards that are involved in this, the AMA, we have the hospital associations and their group of bureaucrats. We have the rotten federal government,
which is rotten in every branch.
The FDA is absolutely horrible. CDC, horrible. NIH, horrible. They're the ones that created this
stuff. So I don't know how we turn this around. I feel sorry for the 30,000 troops that are no
longer part of the military, but they'll be there to build the new military once these guys fall
out because there's almost guaranteed you're going to be dead within three years from taking these
shots or you'll be severely debilitated.
So, we're witnessing an intentional extension of events.
Right.
The Secretary of Defense made a trip abroad and he came out wearing a welder's mask?
He came off the plane wearing a welder's mask?
Because he's tested positive for COVID even though he supposedly had two shots and a booster.
Yeah, Lloyd, show us how it's done there, big boy.
Crazy.
Just absurd.
Meanwhile, the real deal.
You and I did a climate change myth versus reality.
While the Earth has undergone periods of warming and cooling, they turn out to be unrelated to CO2, where the absence of a correlation between increased CO2 and global warming means there cannot be a causal connection, or at best, only subtle, slight, and highly convoluted links between them.
A correlation between two variables is a necessary condition for their causal connection and, in this case, that correlation does not exist even over 600 million years of climatology.
Even when there are correlations, such as between smoking and cancer or between vaccinations and autism, there have been heated debates over the existence of a causal connection.
Principally motivated by profit motive on behalf of the tobacco companies and of the vaccine manufacturers in the cases cited.
But in the absence of correlation, there is no causation which is not open to bona fide debate.
Hence, Well, climate change does occur in Israel.
There's no correlation between Earth's temperature and quantities of CO2 in the atmosphere, which means the whole movement is flawed from the beginning.
Joe, I want to encourage everyone to check this out.
Here you see the vast variation in warming and cooling stages over 600 million years.
Well, that one is particularly over the last 4,500 years.
Here you have the greater, over the 600 million of years, the atmospheric CO2 and global temperature.
Notice they are not correlated.
They do not follow in tandem.
Meanwhile, there are four known scientific ways carbon dioxide curls the earth.
Here you see an actual correlation between the vaccinations and autism.
That's what you need to establish a causal connection, which is missing for climate change.
Joe, I thought you did a super job with that, and we're going to do a second, of course, here in a day or two.
Yes, yes, yes.
Looking forward to it.
I'll put a link to that program down in the comments so that people can find it real easily.
But yes, we did cover it pretty well.
Earth has 259 billion cubic miles of mostly molten rock.
Uh, weight-wise, that would be 5.9 to the 10 to the 24th kilograms of weight.
So the important factor there is the 10 to the 24th power exponential notation.
Uh, and then atmosphere has 5.1 times 10 to the 18th.
So there's a million times more mass For every pound of air that there is in the atmosphere, there's a million pounds more mass of the planet.
And you're not telling me that out of that one in 10,000 parts
in the atmosphere that is the 400 parts per million that is carbon dioxide, that that's what's
causing the million times greater pound of Earth to be warmed up.
And the fact that out of that one in 10,000, only 12% of that is human produced.
And so you're talking an enormously small amount of human produced CO2 trying to wag the, being a tiny tail,
trying to wag the biggest dog imaginable.
It is absurd on absolutely every level.
And it's nothing but chicken little science.
And then they turn around and use Jack and the Beanstalk green energy solutions.
And it's all led by Pied Pipers that are being overpaid for teaching clown science in college.
It's ridiculous.
Absolutely absurd.
I'll debate anybody Any time, anywhere, because this is false.
And they won't debate us.
They won't even debate each other.
I went to the only debate that I know of between a global warmest and a lukewarmest, and that was Gary North.
And Richard Lindzen.
Gary North is a climatology professor at Texas A&M, and Richard Lindzen was a MIT climatologist.
And Lindzen says carbon dioxide only warms a little bit, and Gary North says, oh, it warms a whole lot.
And I attended the only debate that those two people ever had at the Petroleum Club in Houston luncheon, and then later that evening at Rice University.
And I've also been lectured in person by Fred Singer, Roy Spencer, Judith Curry, you name it, Anthony Watts, everybody that claims to be a skeptic and I will debate any of them and we will go into more detail on them and also about Michael Mann and his silly little hockey stick when we do our next program.
You got it, Joe.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Volkswagen Conspiracy virtual conference available online.
You can pick up a ticket.
Go to jamesfetzer.org and check it out.
Wonderful program.
12 speakers on Saturday, another 12 on Sunday.
Some of the leading experts in the world like Nick Kohlerstrom kicked it off with a gunpowder plot, Holly Siedliger on Behnken's rebellion, a next-generation student was Pearl Harbor really a surprise attack, me on what happened to JFK in a special report on 9-11, Another next-generation student on COVID, conspiracy, or act of nature?
Kelly Walk on fake news about a pandemic.
Dave Kenney, J.D., California COVID swindling the public.
Nina Sachs, J.D., a vaccine war is a legal perspective.
Susan Bradford, Ph.D., politics of business.
Abramoff and Enron.
Sarah Westall, the COVID conspiracy and mind control.
Special featured guests Dr. Katherine Horton and William Bill Benny, our nation's leading cyber security experts.
Sunday, Nick kicked off again with Who Wrote Shakespeare's Play?
Alison Sonny Maynard on The Undead, a couple of unusual legal cases, me on A Tale of Two Cities, Kenosha, and Waukesha.
Russ Winter and others on high strangers aspects of Waukesha that suggest it was a psyop.
Ron Avery on the Posner vs. Fetzer lawsuit and again on fake news and fake law in a police state.
Joe Olson on the fall of America.
Carl Herman, American Revolution 2.0.
Scott Bennett on the coming war in Ukraine.
Henry Mekow, Jacob Rothstein, Equality is the End Game, a Most Disturbing Interview.
Jack Mullen and Stephanie Sledge, Where Are We Heading?
and Ole Damogard, How My Last Name Became a Verb.
Check it out.
JamesFetzer.org or MixMIX, capital N, Stream.
You'll find it.
False Flags and Conspiracies.
Meanwhile, your final thoughts, my friend.
Yes, well, great quote by Samuel Johnson.
Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.
The comment was made on April 7th, 1775, and it's widely believed that he was speaking of the William Pitt, 1st Earl of Chapman.
But anyhow, January 6th is coming up, and they're already planning great celebrations to wrap themselves in patriotism and make sure that we don't realize we've got a Congress full of scoundrels.
There's a great article at National File this week and I'll put a link to that on in the show notes or in the comment section and there's an attorney who's representing Kelly Miggs who is an oath keeper who's one of the ones who's been in jail And he's gonna subpoena the Oath Keepers who have not been in jail, who were the ringleaders of the whole thing, and that would be Stuart Rhodes and Ray Epps, along with the Antifa BLM guy who was briefly in jail but is no longer in jail, John Sullivan.
So it's an interesting article.
And we need to do everything we can to push back against the narrative they're going to try to keep poking down our throats that just like the PP dossier that they poked down our throats for four years and just like the fake phone call to the Ukraine's that they use for the Fake impeachment and just like the January 6th that he's for the second fake impeachment.
We have to deal with a group of scoundrels that are wrapping themselves in the flag and trying to claim what happened on January 6, 2020 was the greatest insurrection that ever happened in the history of this country when they are the greatest insurrection that's ever happened to this country.
Well, it's great to have Joe Olson here on a Texas Tuesday, missing one of our sidekicks, Michael Ivey.
We hope he has a rapid recovery.
Let me add that it's turning out that the whole January 6 thing was completely contrived, just as contrived as the pandemic, to justify the facts, in this case, in that to try to go after insurrectionists, where they now want to claim that anyone who had anything to do with the insurrection is not Eligible to run for Congress, and of course, or for a government federal office, and of course that means Donald J. Trump, who cleaned their clock, and they're afraid it's going to happen all over again.
So they're going to extraordinary lengths out of extraordinary concern for an extraordinary candidate, Who wiped them out.
If all the voting had been legitimate in a massive way in 2020, they couldn't allow him to come back.
Even though, and I must say, I'm increasingly disturbed, even to a profound degree, with the role that Donald Trump appears to have had in bringing us not only the lockdown, but promoting the vaccines, which he continues to do to this day.
And if he does not get his head screwed on right, He's going to lose massive support.
My God, he's losing mine.
If he doesn't come around and declare that the vaccines were bad, that no one should take them, that they're causing death and devastation, he will not deserve your support or mine.
Thank you for joining us.
Remember, spend as much time as you can with your family and friends, because we don't know how much time we have left.
▲
Export Selection