Need to Know (28 December 2021) TEXAS TUESDAY with Joe Olson and Michael Ivey
|
Time
Text
Hold on.
This is Jim Fetzer welcoming you to another Texas Tuesday.
We have Joe Holston in Houston, and we have Michael Ivey, formerly of Fort Worth, now hangs his hat in Asheville, North Carolina, but he has not forgotten his roots.
We have stories for you.
Beginning with the Democrats retiring in droves, leaving the GOP scrambling to reconfigure its original 2022 campaign plans, meaning they're going to have even more opportunities to seize seats in the House than they had anticipated.
Rising inflation, the horrific withdrawal from Afghanistan, unconstitutional mandates, all killing Biden's approval.
Democrats retiring in droves, leaving the GOP scrambling.
As a new year approaches, more Democrats are announcing their intentions to retire.
House Representatives Stephanie Murphy of Florida, Lucille Roybal-Allard of California, Albi Osiris of New Jersey all announced this past week they will not seek re-election.
No doubt many others are going to see the writing on the wall, running for the hills before they're destroyed in the 2022 midterm.
Better to go out gracefully by retiring than to be wiped out by Republicans and the red tide that is coming.
The latest, being the total of 23 House Democrats who have announced they're retiring or running for a different seat, doesn't bode well for a Democratic Party with a razor-thin majority.
Republicans only need five seats in the chamber to regain control.
I'm predicting they're going to take a hundred.
Prior to Thanksgiving, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy predicted the Democrats would be retiring instead of face challenges.
They're going to make a decision to retire at the best time so they can get another job.
When we get that retirement number higher into double digits, the whole thing becomes a different play.
Well, he's got his double digits, Redistricting is also coming into play.
Many elected officials are playing the waiting game to see what happens to them.
It, nevertheless, looks good for the GOP.
History is on the party's side.
They may need to go back to the drawing boards if more Democrats decide to get out of the way before they're taken out in an ungracious, terrible election that's going to be devastating for Democrats.
If there's any integrity to it whatsoever.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, in the 2020 election, Zuckerberg spent $419 billion of questionable funding to overthrow the elections.
And so that's coming to light.
And I think there's going to be a big pushback to make sure that kind of garbage never happens again.
Excuse me, $419 million.
The person that spent billions has been Gates, who spent $315 billion on WHO and CEPI, C-E-P-I, to force the jab thing.
So, you know, we've got a group of oligarchs that have have no regard for democracy, not even the concept of it.
And they're gonna cheat every way possible, whether it's forcing you to take dangerous jabs
or whether it's buying elections.
And there was some extremely good details on that.
I'll put it in the comment section, an article about the amount of money he spent
in five different cities in Wisconsin and a breakdown on all of that particular funding
that came directly from Zuckey Bird.
They have no regard for human life.
I know.
It's horrible.
Rockefeller grandson. So anyhow, that our Rothschild, I think he is actually a Rothschild
Yeah.
grandson. But anyhow, moving along, we'll find out what else they got going.
Well, Joe, they don't just have no regard for the Constitution. They have no regard
for human life.
I know it's horrible. Yeah.
Michael, your thoughts?
Well, there's an old phrase that relates to this and it's rats leaving a sinking ship.
The entire Democratic Party has swung way too far into woke-ism, political correctness, LGBT-ism, allowing anybody at all to come into the country and Paying for it.
Release of prisoners and destruction of law enforcement.
And hopefully all of these things that they've been into are so far removed from the common sense and common values of the American people that there's going to be a big reckoning, or at least in the numbers in Congress.
Oh, I think you got it right, a reckoning indeed.
Meanwhile, Trump says he didn't pardon Saunders Snowden due to some spying things, but nevertheless he pardoned the handler of the most damaging spy in history.
This was during an interview with Candace Owens, who's been doing a super job.
Trump, however, is disappointing me massively.
You could have had a chance to pardon these individuals, Candace, out of a snodge and snowed in.
Why decide not to do it in that moment?
You have two sides of it, Trump said.
In one case, you have sort of a spy deal going on.
In another, somebody is exposing real corruption.
I feel a little bit—I won't say which one, but I feel a little bit more strongly about one than the other.
I could have done it, but I will say you have people on both sides of this issue, good people on both sides, and you have bad people on one side.
But I decide to let that one ride, let the courts work it out, and I guess the courts are actually doing that.
There was some spying things, there was some bad things released that really set us back, really hurt us back with what they did.
Trump continued, at the same time, in many cases, these were the same people who came after me so viciously and dishonestly.
I could have, I was close to going the other way.
This is not good, in my opinion.
This reflects very badly on Donald Trump.
Assange, as we know, is being tortured in prison, recently suffered a stroke.
The U.K.
has ruled he may be extradited to the U.S., where he'll almost certainly be given life sentence and further tortured in prison.
Multiple reports earlier suggested Trump refused to pardon Assange because GOP senators threatened to convict him during the impeachment trial if he did.
Well, Trump claims he was torn about pardoning Assange and Snowden.
He had no similar qualms when it came to pardoning the Israeli handler of traitors by Jonathan Pollard, Israeli Colonel Aviam Sella, who fled the U.S.
and escaped justice after Pollard was arrested.
President Trump, this is a tweet.
On his last day in office, part Israeli Colonel Elim Saleh, the convicted handler of U.S.-born Jewish American intelligence analyst and trader Jonathan Pollard, who stole U.S.
military secrets and sold them to Israel.
After Pollard was floored to Israel on billionaire pro-Israel GOP mega-donor Sheldon Adelson's private plane.
Think about that.
And given a hero's welcome by Israeli PM Bibi Netanyahu, he gave an interview encouraging American Jews to spy for Israel and embrace dual loyalty.
That's not dual loyalty.
That's treason.
Joe, I'm very upset about this.
I want your thoughts and Michael's too.
Yeah, it's amazing.
Had there not been the WikiLeaks or the DNC emails that were downloaded to a thumb drive and given to Assange, and they only released a portion of them, but it was enough to break the momentum of Rep.
Hillary's 2020 election steal, and I mean, a 2016 election steal.
And so he would not have won without Assange.
And then, you know, he said, God bless WikiLeaks at a number of his rallies.
And then when he was asked a year or two later about Assange, I don't know who that is.
I never followed WikiLeaks.
I had nothing to do with it.
Well, he could have also easily broken the Seth Rich murder, which would have gotten a whole bunch of people at the DNC
in a whole lot of trouble.
And then he turned around and pardoned, as he was walking out the door, a three-time convicted felon, Jared Kushner, whose little son happens to be married to Trump's daughter.
So that's pretty much of a stinky deal, too.
There was a great article at Veterans Today about six months ago.
And I'll put the title and the link to that at Veterans Today, but it's Trump's association with the Jewish mobsters in New York.
And no doubt that you cannot get into the casino business if you don't have organized crime connections to open the facilities and operate them.
And you can't be in the construction business in New York unless you have organized crime figures that you're working with in order to do the construction and the material trades, and you can't be involved in politics if you don't have mobsters, and there was a very big Italian mobster connections in New York for a hundred years, and then Giuliani came in and busted the Italian mob, but he didn't bust a single Jewish mobster, so the Russians that had immigrated after the fall of the Berlin Wall set up a
Absolutely disgusting.
It's a great article.
I'll put it in.
in New York City and they had complete carte blanche to run the whole place ever since.
Absolutely disgusting.
It's a great article.
I'll put it in, Veterans Today.
Well, casino business is not only lucrative but it's perfect way to launder money.
So I believe that's a primary reason the mobs and not for the box made by the casino
but to cleanse all their other cash from illicit activities and make it appear to be clean.
Michael, your thoughts?
Well, that interview with Candace Owen just sounded like Trump was stumbling through answers to a question or several of them that he didn't really want to answer.
There is one thing that he said that jumped out at me, and that was, you know, he's stumbling around.
Well, there were some spying things.
There were some bad things that really set us back.
He's not talking about which party he's talking about here.
And then he says, but these were the same people who came after me so viciously and dishonestly.
Who the hell is he talking about there?
Could that be the worldwide Zionist mafia that he's talking about?
And that's why he didn't pardon them?
I don't know, but that's an interesting thing that he said.
And generally, something like this is just one of a huge body of evidence that indicates Trump was whatever good side he may have had was a complete tool of Israel.
He moved the embassy to Jerusalem.
He stated that the Golan Heights belonged to Israel.
He went along with the assassination of Soleimani.
You know, looking back on it, the Trump presidency was a real hall of mirrors, and it continues to be that.
It's just impossible for those of us who aren't in on these global planning meetings to know the degree to which he's acting in good faith or not.
At the first of his presidency, he pulls out of the Paris Climate Accord, and he withdrew us from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and those were great moves from our perspective.
But all the while, he's stacking his administration with CFR people, neocons, and Zionist Jews.
I think the people who are actually running this political show That we that we call the pull the Congress and leadership of the United States were unpleasantly surprised that Trump won in 2016.
But they immediately went about making the best of it with regard to their agenda.
So I think he got in some early shots before he was completely in their control.
Well, I think you make very telling points.
What bothers me the most is he's not only benefiting honest-to-God traitors to the United States like Jonathan Pollard and his handler, but he's punishing whistleblowers who are exposing corruption in the government.
That's bad!
I'm very troubled by this.
Many who have been strong supporters of Donald Trump are going to view this as a silver bullet between the eyes.
I am not happy about this, even remotely.
Meanwhile, With the support of the globalist-controlled big banks, the Chinese Communist Party appears for world domination now.
I know the Rothschilds want to model the world on the Chinese Communist model, homogenized society, no deviation tolerated, no freedom of speech, freedom of thought.
But the very idea that China itself could be taking control of the world has not really penetrated my mind.
Nevertheless, as the West struggles with the pandemic, the Chinese are feathering their nest, gathering resources and making power moves where they may ultimately take over.
While the U.S.
economy sinks into what could be worse than a Great Depression, and it looks as though that is coming, The Chinese communists have received huge amounts of money from globalist banking giant Goldman Sachs, bailing out one of the biggest companies in China, Evergrande, with U.S.
taxpayer money.
Think about that, Americans.
Goldman Sachs using U.S.
money to bail out one of the biggest companies in China.
As if this weren't infuriating enough, while they rake in U.S.
tax dollars, China is at the same time planning war against America.
They have a bee in their vomit about Taiwan, absorbing Taiwan into China while China wants to remain independent, in a sort of panic since a blockchain has been experiencing unprecedented difficulties, which appear to be promoted by the Biden administration, Where the Deputy Secretary of the Treasury has told us the supply problems won't be straightened out until every American is vaxxed, meaning it's extortion by Biden to get us vaccinated with a death jab.
That China has been warning their citizens to stock up on essential items and food for what they say could be a harsh winter or an emergency event.
In other words, they are preparing for a war.
Meanwhile, China is buying up farmland in Australia, New Zealand, and the U.S., the biggest foreign owners of farmland in all the countries.
They've been plundering protected fishing grounds around the Galapagos Island.
They've consistently been caught fishing in areas they're not entitled to fish.
They have an insatiable appetite.
Their citizens are hungry to consume everything in sight, issuing new laws, banning food waste and binge eating.
They're responsible for unleashing the COVID-19, yet there's little that will be done about it.
At the top of the pyramid sit the globalist elites, a banking cartel who pull all the strings.
It's clear They want to have a world run by the bankers, in particular by the biggest banking empire of them all, the Rothschild.
Globalists have started wars in the past.
We know that.
J.P.
Morgan supported and financed the British Boer War, the Franco-Prussian War, Gave Napoleon a loan of 10 million pounds in World War I. Rockefeller's funded Adolf Hitler and the Nazis.
If there's been a war, you can bet the banking families have their finger in the pie.
They're making money hand over fist.
Important to know who is really in control here.
The problem for both parties is the United States.
The U.S.
and American people stand in the way of the globalist plans because they, China and the elites, have been slowly chipping away and weakening the U.S.
military and economy now by vaccinating the military, which is catastrophic.
And a citizenry through media like music, movies, degrading moral values, all part of the plan.
When a country is completely demoralized, it becomes easy picking.
Who will win?
The US or China and the globalists?
Joe, your thoughts?
Well, China's got a number of problems.
There's an article in the Wall Street Journal, December 20th, the slow meltdown of the Chinese economy.
So they're having an economic problem.
There's also a worldwide economic slowdown.
They also had a loss in agricultural production.
They've got major flooding.
They've got Major bridges and dams collapsing absolutely everywhere.
The island that they built out in the South China Sea and made an airstrip and a military base on, kind of a fixed double-sized aircraft carrier, is sinking and will no longer be usable.
So, you know, it's coming up spades for these folks, and it couldn't happen to a nicer bunch.
There's no integrity in China at all.
So, anything that involves inspections or, you know, certifications, there's nothing independent of the state, and everybody in the state's on the take.
So, they have the worst quality steel, the worst quality concrete, the worst quality construction, and the worst engineering.
I don't know how their students come over here and manage to not learn anything, except that they don't really teach you anything in four years of undergraduate school, especially in engineering.
And any of the other sciences, it's pretty pathetic.
But we do manage to learn a lot in the job force after we get out of school.
And that's where most of your education occurs.
And so they don't have that environment to articulate the engineers that it takes to be able to do quality work.
And so they don't.
Michael, your thoughts?
Well, when I think of how the global control structure wants to use the Chinese, I have to go back all the way to like the French Revolution and realize that these people who have dominated the monetary systems of the Western world have continually wanted to institute a revolution and a form of communism, and it's evolved as history has moved on, and I think China
It is like their poster child.
Ever since the communist revolution there in the 40s and 50s, they've been working to set China up as the, like I said, the poster child of what they want to do.
It's been their preferred system by this international What do you call it?
Satanic banking cartel?
And as we can see these plans for what they initially are calling a vaccine passport, that's like a backdoor propaganda health measure to implement what the Chinese have been oppressed with for the last 20 years, and that being what's called the Chinese social credit system.
And, of course, they have to crash the dollar because that whole system is not working, and the Chinese social credit system fits right in with a one-world digital currency, central bank digital currency that they want to implement, which, as we all know, is a form of abject slavery.
So, summing up, I don't think there's any specific plan for China, per se, to dominate the world as much as that country embodies the kind of control of their populace that is the goal of these tyrants who want to control the whole world.
That was an exemplary overview, Michael.
I congratulate you.
That was simply excellent.
Meanwhile, the Minnesota School Board votes unanimously to allow extra pay for non-white teachers and the racial segregation of staff.
This has to be illegal.
This has to be a violation of non-discrimination laws that were passed in the past to protect blacks that now have equal applicability to whites who are being discriminated against.
This is outrageous.
The policy states professional development funds may be used as additional stipends, incentives to members of color or American Indians, support for professional learning community affinity groups within and between schools from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups, Programs for induction aligned with the school district during the first three years, especially for teachers from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups.
In other words, this is reverse discrimination gone wild.
Grants for these purposes may be used for retention strategies and protection from requested leaves of absence in the beginning years for teachers of color and American Indians.
School Board votes unanimously on a policy that would pay non-white teachers more and place them in work environments based on their race segregation.
Here, a member defends the decision.
Unreal.
Board members defended the policy of placing same-race teachers in work environments claiming it's not segregation.
When your one minority of a white majority can be very isolating and lonely, said one board member, to have a support system in place for them is not to segregate them, it's absolutely to support them.
It's not about trying to throw the few individuals we have into one building, it's about showing they aren't alone.
It creates global citizens at the end of the day.
This is lunatic.
Meanwhile, here's a piece entitled countering anti-whiteness.
What can we do about it?
Regardless of where you live, you probably encountered a black worker somewhere wearing pro-BLM attire and thought, if a white were to wear any form of comparable pro-white attire, they'd probably be fired.
Or you've witnessed non-whites acting up on the job.
If whites did it, they wouldn't get away with it.
That's what's going on.
Recently traveling through the great practically all-white state of Maine, not the first time, but I was amazed by the number of almost exclusively white businesses.
However, Something unfortunate happened on the last morning checking out of my hotel.
The individual at the front desk was a black female wearing pro-BLM terrorist propaganda attire.
Starting an altercation with her over it wouldn't have accomplished much, so I could do little than look on in disgust until later when I could actually do something about it, which was to call the hotel and speak to the manager.
He was out, so I left a detailed voice message.
What his employee was wearing and why it was wrong for her to call attention and division in such a fine establishment.
People stay on vacation.
I left a review that was in content similar to what was said to the manager.
Whether the manager will do anything about it is unknown, but he would not have done anything had I taken no action at all.
My inaction would have ensured further inaction.
Small actions can add up to something much larger.
The proof is everyone already knows a white person would be fired and viciously attacked if they wore pro-white attire while working at the front desk of a hotel.
Action by the opposition ensures that outcome, and inaction on our part reinforces it.
I personally determined such outcomes for non-whites in the past.
I went to a coffee shop a couple of years ago, attended by a black and a mestizo female who incorrectly made my drink.
I politely asked them to redo it, and they responded with typical ghetto attitudes, throwing hand gestures, rudely claiming I was wrong.
One also sought to insult me by muttering something about me being white.
I asked them to repeat what they said, and they refused.
Not only did I ultimately force them to remake my drink as I watched closely, but I called and spoke with their manager later that day.
The manager, who was white, reviewed the surveillance video and agreed that what I said had occurred.
Guess what?
She fired them both.
Whites are often verbally abused, even physically assaulted while performing everyday tasks like ordering food or a beverage in public.
Non-whites view us as passive and weak because they are used to whites not standing up for themselves, for our politeness has been used against us for far too long.
White people can effectively determine outcomes for anti-white actions and behavior if we are proactive and apply pressure.
Most don't want to be bothered with it, but they will find a way to bother with you if they haven't already.
The more you let it go on, the worse it will get for you and for the rest of us.
The same goes for politicians and other public figures.
If you see a non-white getting away with something a white wouldn't or do or say, do something.
They're not untouchable because they're public personalities, which makes these situations even easier to approach.
Call their offices.
Spam their social media.
Send them emails.
We can achieve positive outcomes through individual and collective action.
We just need to take more initiative.
Leaving reviews, making phone calls, sending email will add up and make a difference.
The more you do, the better.
Those who win are those who speak with the loudest collective voice.
Using your own doesn't require anything more drastic or involve you in having to put yourself on the line.
If you fail to achieve the desired outcome, you can deny the establishment your business, vote against the politician, boycott the actor, advise others to do the same, but you can do more.
With businesses, leave as many proverb reviews as it takes, For them to face the consequences of their action, or lack thereof.
With politicians, contact their office, comment on their social media posts about what they're doing wrong with celebrities and public figures, boycott their projects, blast them on social media, do whatever else you can to draw attention and counter anti-white action and behavior.
This is what the opposition does to us.
It's time for us to give it back to them.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, interestingly enough, Meet the Depressed had a guest on this weekend who's been trying to stay underneath the radar because she's such a scurrilous human being.
Nicole Hannah-Jones, author of the 1619 Project, stating that everything that happened in the United States is a result of slavery.
Here's what Wiki has to say about it.
So she didn't even come up with a concept, didn't even write her own book.
Hannah Jones, writers from the New York Times and the New York Times Magazine, which aims
to reframe the country's history.
So she didn't even come up with a concept, didn't even write her own book.
She admits she has no undergraduate, graduate or advanced degrees, was given a Pulitzer
Prize for her wonderful ghostwriting.
And then, in her book, her main source is Jill Biden.
And she goes back to Jill Biden's PhD, which is absolutely ridiculous.
There's about a 10-minute long bit shoot video of this particular woman in this particular event, and I'll put that in the show notes.
But also, people need to know about the Dutch white slave trade, and that was an article that was at Veterans Today, and I'm looking up the exact URL on that.
I will also put this in the show notes.
Veterans Today, May 18, 2021.
Dutch Jews and the White Slave Trade.
The British East India Company was formed in 1599, and the Queen gave them a charter in 1600.
And they immediately started shipping white slaves from Ireland and England over to the Americas, and particularly Jamaica was real big, and there was a lot of colonies where they were growing sugarcane and making rum, which is a really good business for the British East India Company, but not so good for the white slaves.
And the Queen decided that she was no longer going to allow them to kidnap Protestant slaves.
So if you remember the Anglican Church, you couldn't be kidnapped in England or in Ireland, but if you were Catholic, that was okay.
So what did the Rothschilds do?
They moved over to their Dutch affiliate and formed the Dutch East India Company in 1603, and they were allowed to take Anglican slaves from England So that they could get around that, and that way they could bring in Protestant white slaves, too.
And there were twice as many white slaves in America as there were blacks.
And the black slave trade?
100% run by the Jewish.
100%.
So, you know, you want to know who's in charge of all this stuff?
Why don't you start digging a little bit deeper on the ugly true history that the victors do not want to write?
Tell me more about Jill Biden's dissertation.
This sounds ridiculous.
Oh, it was.
Yeah, I'll send you the article because I didn't memorize all the aspects of it, but it's about an eight or ten minute long video, and it's shocking what Jill had.
It was like 18 pages of outline.
And it was like, the guy goes through the whole thing.
I haven't read it, but just listen to him describe it.
It's like just exactly what you'd expect if your husband is the Senator of Maryland
and you're going to the University of Maryland, I mean, Delaware,
and you're going to the University of Delaware.
How hard is it for the University of Delaware people to give you a PhD in education,
which is the flimsiest degree you could possibly get.
So, you know, I have- This is very embarrassing, Joe.
I'm glad you mentioned this in passing.
Michael, your thoughts?
You mean Dr. Jill Biden is really a doctor?
Well, on that first story, I think you guys know, or at least I've talked about it before, that I had a career in the enforcement of discrimination laws, primarily in employment.
And after having a career in that field, it's quite a bitter pill for me to see these these woke groups of people implementing overt racial discrimination in their workplaces.
And it makes me wonder how they get around the fact that practices like that have been blatantly illegal ever since the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
So now I have people that used to be my friends who have been brainwashed by wokeism asking me if I'm a white supremacist and saying, well, do you have any black friends?
After I spent a career trying to help minorities not be discriminated against.
Michael, you nail it again.
You're nailing it again and again.
This is a great day for you on the show here, my friend.
Harvard chemist Charles Lieber found guilty of all charges related to Chinese research funding.
The guys at Harvard The former chair of the chemistry department has been convicted of all six felony charges related to receipt of millions of dollars in funding from China, faces up to 26 years in prison, and $1.2 million in fines.
He's living now with late-stage lymphoma, so he's probably not going to be around long.
Found guilty of two counts of making false statements, two counts of filing false income tax, two counts of failing to file reports, financial accounts.
The 62-year-old will be sentenced later, assuming he's still alive.
Lieber was arrested for concealing his affiliation with the Wuhan Institute of Technology back in January of 2020.
Harvard has placed him on administrative leave since his arrest.
He served as a principal investigator of his own research group at Harvard, which received more than $15 million in federal research grants between 2008 and 2019.
But Lieber was not forthcoming about becoming a strategic scientist at WUT and later, a contractual participant in China's Thousand Talents recruitment program.
Under the terms of his three-year contract, he was paid up to $50,000 a month Living expenses up to $150,000, awarded more than $1.5 million to establish a research lab at WUT, but failed to disclose that income to the IRS.
There's now no question Charles Lieber lied to federal investigators and to Harvard in an attempt to hide his participation in the Chinese Thousand Talents Program.
He lied to the IRS about the money he was paid, concealed his Chinese bank account from the United States.
A special agent in charge of the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General said professors like Lieber, who are privileged to be part of taxpayer-funded research, are expected to be honest in their actions.
How embarrassing.
Meanwhile, dozens of prominent researchers, including Nobel Prize winners and Harvard colleagues, had come to his defense, calling the DOJ case against him unjust and urging the agency to drop it.
Federal prosecutors convinced a jury that Lieber, by his own admission, should have over the past 10 years paid 5% more in taxes than he actually did, said Joel Fink, a materials scientist at MIT.
Fink organized his university's letter in support of MIT nanoscientist Yang Chen, who was arrested in January 2021 for failing to report his ties to the Chinese government.
When questioned by the FBI after his arrest, Charlie should have been more thoughtful in his answers, insisted on getting his lawyer instead of humbling away on his own.
No one's above the law, especially not a distinguished professor.
However, petty crimes of stupidity deserve to be punished as such.
That's an embarrassing apology.
Meanwhile, Zeng Nongzai, the former chair of Temple's physics department, was arrested in 2015 and charged with spying for China, but eventually vindicated.
From the media reports of this trial, the reasons to criminally investigate Lieber in the first place was he had many Chinese students in his lab.
Every professor who has Chinese students in his or her lab should take notice, obviously.
This case will drive home the idea that collaborating with China is dangerous.
Of course, now it's China.
Tomorrow, maybe some other country.
That sounds as though, you know, there are mixed aspects to this.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, amazingly enough, this trial was one that was sealed, so you got no even artist sketch of what was going on inside the courtroom.
There was no reporters, no cameras, nothing.
The guy was convicted on six pretty much minor charges.
And he could have been convicted for treason.
He went over with plans of how to build BSL-4 labs and actually set up and directed the development of BSL-4 labs in Wuhan, in addition to providing them with the nanotechnology to do the hydrogel delivery systems.
So this is a pretty nefarious character.
He comes from a long line of nefarious characters.
his daddy was with the RCA company and probably responsible for stealing a bunch of patents
that ended up being credited to him because that's how these folks roll.
Do you go to Aim for Truth or Americans Information Media?
I'll put the link to their article on Robert L. Lieber, who is his daddy.
They came, his grandparents came from Romania, but then they went back after 20 years
and change their senses to where they came from Russia But bottom line is here's another Jewish family that worked themselves up under David Sarnoff, who was Jewish that stole Farnsworth's patent for television and created RCA or worked for RCA and created NBC Broadcasting.
So, you know, the whole thing is just an insidious Insidious mess. Insidious mess. You know, it's horrible.
Yeah.
Michael, your thoughts.
Darth Sidious. I haven't followed this case much, but it's one of curiosity to me that it makes me wonder who he
pissed off or what's the agenda here.
Because why a DOJ led by a guy like Merrick Garland, who seems to be a pea in the pod with a guy like Lieber.
Why would the DOJ prosecute him in the first place?
Since he seems to have done exactly what these globalist criminals needed him to do, guys like that usually walk between the raindrops like Tony Fauci is now doing, even though RFK Jr.' 's new book lays out the hard evidence for several felony crimes on Fauci's part.
And it just makes me curious about this whole case.
Makes me wonder if the story itself serves some propaganda narrative, like the pandemic coming from China or something like that.
I just don't know.
Well, think about the fact that the whole trial was sealed, that there wasn't any public.
I mean, that seems to me a violation of the law right on his face, and all trials in the United States are supposed to be open to the public.
So something scurrilous was going on, and I would suggest he may have been revealing American secrets.
You know, as you say, Garland, why in God's name Garland is pathetic and bad and on the wrong side of every issue?
Why would he prosecute?
Good questions.
Meanwhile, We'll be right back.
I want to point out that on the new JFK Show, which we've revived after a coronavirus hiatus, we're taking a look at Oliver Stone's new film, JFK Revisited, with a considerable dismay.
We're breaking it into four half-hour segments.
It runs approximately two hours.
Part one is already up on my mid-shoot channel, Jim Fetzer.
Oliver Stone's JFK Revisited would better have been never made.
He's done his reputation great damage by relying upon the mediocrity of mediocrity's Jim DiEugenio for a script that is severely dated Most of which has been available for 50 years.
Indeed, the opening sequence is fluff that occurred the weekend of the assassination.
It would have been better to begin with Oliver Stone at the pergola.
But spending the next 20 minutes on the magic bullet was unforgivable, where nothing new is revealed.
And the appearances of Deborah Conway and Gary Aguilar, both of whom are flyweights, contributes nothing.
Where David Bantech and Henry Lee were appropriate choices, but their best stuff does not appear here, and I seriously doubt it will show up later in this colossal waste of time, money, and effort.
Just compare this with my JFK special from 18 November 2021 to appreciate what could have been done.
An opportunity lost.
It is embarrassing.
Meanwhile, Fox News host Incendiary Fauci comments follow a network pattern.
Comments by Jussie Waters, host of The Five, were in keeping with previous derogatory remarks about Anthony Fauci by hosts and conservatives coming from the New York Times.
A Fox News host used notably violent language this week during a gathering of conservatives to confront Tony the Rat, the nation's foremost infectious disease specialist, referring to tabloid-style surprise interviews, he said in a speech, activists should ambush Fauci with adversarial questions that he deemed the kill shot.
Describing the imagined effects of such a film confrontation, he added, boom, he's dead, he's dead, he's done.
Fauci called the comments horrible, apparently misunderstanding, in thinking he meant a literal assassination, in an interview with CNN and said Waters should be fired on the spot.
No freedom of speech for Anthony Fauci.
Fox has not disciplined Waters.
The network said the comments were twisted completely out of context, and it's more than clear that Jussie was using a metaphor for asking hard-heading questions to Dr. Fauci.
The host's amped-up language was in keeping with the tone of prominent conservative figures who are speaking of Fauci in a derogatory fashion, in my opinion, completely appropriately.
Here are recent developments at Fox.
Fauci comments Jesse Watters used notably violent language urging a gathering of conservatives to publicly confront Fauci.
January 6th text.
Three prominent Fox News hosts, Laura Ingraham, Sean Hannity, and Brian Kilmeade text Mark Meadows during the January 6th riot, urging him to tell Donald Trump to try to stop it.
What's wrong with that?
Chris Wallace departs.
The Anchors' announcement he was leaving came as right-wing hosts have increasingly set the channel's agenda.
God knows Chris Wallace was a disgrace.
Contributors quit.
Tony Goldberg and Stephen Hayes quit the network in protest over Tucker Carlson's Patriot Purge special, but Tucker was spot on.
Governor DeSantis, widely viewed as a leader of the Republican Party, reviewed DeFauci as a COVID authoritarian at a fundraiser this week.
We cannot allow our communities to become Faucian dystopias in which people's freedom are curtailed and their livelihoods destroyed, he wrote very appropriately.
Meanwhile, Jussie Waters flattens the clown Fauci after Fauci called his firing over a more-than-clear metaphor.
Fox News host Waters apparently refuses to back down.
Waters on Monday made a speech at Turning Point USA, saying Americans should have no reservations about approaching Fauci in public, filming the interaction, hitting him with hard questions.
He said the kill shot with an ambush deadly because he doesn't see it coming.
This is when you say, Fauci, you funded risky research at a sloppy Chinese lab.
The same lag that sprung this pandemic on the world.
You know why people don't trust you, don't you?
Boom.
He's dead.
He's dead.
He's done.
You do that.
30 seconds all you need.
Now you get that footage.
Just get the Fox.
Imagine Tucker teasing with that.
In response to the remarks of Furious, Fauci said Fox should immediately terminate Waters.
The guy should be fired on the spot.
Waters blasted Fauci, saying he and ongoing National Institute of Health President Francis Collins are clowns for their botched response to the coronavirus pandemic, as well as funding dangerous experiments.
And indeed, Collins appears to be every bit as a traitor to the United States as is Fauci himself.
Waters added he believes blue cities and states will try to shut down schools in response to the Omicron.
To top it off, Vice President Harris just admitted the administration didn't see it coming.
Gee, you mean Biden's brain trust?
Fauci and Collins couldn't foresee any of this?
Why am I not surprised?
After all, these are the same clowns who thought funding dangerous experiments on the coronavirus at the Wuhan lab was a grand idea.
Fox News Tuesday said they're standing behind Waters.
No disciplinary action, let alone termination.
In a statement, Tablaza, spokesman for Fox said, Based on watching the full clip, reading the entire transcript, it's more than clear that Jussie Waters was using a metaphor for asking hard-hitting questions to Fauci about gain-of-function research, and his words have been twisted completely out of context.
No doubt about it.
Thank goodness at least that Fox is standing with him.
He did everything right.
He did nothing wrong.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, there's a lot of evidence now that we're approaching the 800,000 dead mark.
And then also there was a great video on about the public execution of all these different athletes.
339 heart attacks on videotape of professional and college athletes collapsing in the field.
And out of those, 193 of them died.
So it's getting a little hard to keep scraping kitty litter on top of this poop, and it really stinks.
Fauci, Francis Collins, and Debra Briggs are all war criminals and they all need to be tried.
And when found guilty, they need to be executed.
Joe, I agree 100%.
Michael, your thoughts?
As do I. I applaud Jesse Waters for treating Tony the Rat with exactly all the respect he deserves, which is zero.
And speaking of zero, that reminded me of this new Omicron variant, you know?
Dr. Tom Cowan was saying the other day that it occurred to him that it's being written sometimes with a too large O in front so it struck him that it this might be another joke that these globalists are playing on us like
The O being a zero, so it says zero micron.
Micron being a measure of length, so anything that's zero microns doesn't exist.
So they're putting it right in our face, like O zero micron is the name of this variant that doesn't exist.
So back to Jesse Watters.
I'm surprised that Fox News is allowing Watters to attack Fauci like that, because I guess I just don't have a concept of Fox News that they're any kind of real journalistic organization like all the other mainstream media.
But that list of recent developments at Fox in the New York Times story all sounded like Good developments to me, which is the exact opposite that the New York Times writer was saying, of course.
I agree completely, Michael, and of course Omicron is an anagram for moronic.
Moronic!
So they think we're morons if we go along with this nonsense, and indeed we are.
To the extent we believe any of this bullshit, we are revealing ourselves to be morons.
Meanwhile, a CNN religion commentator says the unvaccinated should not be attending Christmas services.
How bad can it get?
CNN religious commentator Father Edward Beck, a Roman Catholic priest, said in an appearance on New Day that unvaccinated Christians should not attend Christmas services.
Father Edward Beck tweeted, Yep, I said it.
I don't think unvaccinated people should be gathering in churches for Christmas Eve Day masses.
Love thy neighbor, says the Savior.
This is disgusting.
Most Christian denominations, including the Catholic Church, consider Christmas among the holiest days of the year.
Christmas Eve services are regularly among the most attended.
Beck, however, claimed Jesus would not want Christians who are unvaccinated to participate in the holiday instituted to celebrate his birth.
Can you believe In the segment, host Jim Scioto begins the discussion by asking Beck how churches can get people to come back to services in light of the fact more and more are withdrawing into their homes, unprompted.
He turned the occasion into an opportunity to lecture the audience with a non-responsive answer, focusing on the importance of keeping certain people out of worship services and church.
I think what we're trying to say to people is you have a social responsibility.
If you do gather, you know, Christian churches, many are gathering this evening.
Some are still not requiring vaccination, which I disagree with, showing the man's a complete blithering idiot, completely ignorant of the subject.
He has no idea what he's talking about.
I think that part of caring for one another, you know, the dictum of Jesus, whom we celebrate, is love one another, show compassion, show mercy.
I think the message is if we want to act like Jesus, we take care of each other.
He did not offer a scripture that would have suggested Jesus would have excluded people from worship who made health care decisions Yet different than his opinion, but he continued, If we're going to gather in celebration, we have to do so safely, comfortably, and give one another that gift of peace, part of which is health, feeling like we're gathering in a healthy environment.
So I really hope as people gather in celebration to celebrate the birth of Christ, we keep that in mind.
Rex's comments were roundly condemned on Twitter, over 3,000 almost uniformly negative replies compared to just 500 likes.
That is truly disgusting.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, amazing!
Jesus cleansing the leopards was one of his miracles, found in Matthews 8, 1-4, Mark 1, 40-45, and Luke 5, 12-16.
So, I think these guys are better than Jesus, because they don't even want to waste their time on those dirty leopards.
Let them stay outside the church.
What a bunch of hypocrites!
You want to know why people aren't going to church?
It's because the people in the pulpit don't belong in the church.
This priest deserves to be defrocked.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, a CNN religious commentator.
He's probably an actor getting paid to act like a Christian minister, just like that Dr. Lena Nguyen they have as a medical expert periodically.
Every time she comes on, I almost grit my teeth.
And what he's saying, of course, is based on a ridiculously bad understanding of what's happening with the pandemic and all the real science, Associated with it.
It really made me laugh, that line that Jesus wouldn't want Christians to celebrate Christmas.
It's like, is this another CNN comedy routine?
That's like an Aztec priesthood telling the people that the sun god needs some sacrifices, so bring us your children.
This is another indication of why CNN is completely collapsing.
If there were a real news network, they would get somebody like Pastor Chuck Baldwin on there, and he'd have a few things to tell them that they do not want the people to hear.
There are good Christian ministers in the USA who understand that this pandemic tyranny is a scam.
This priest was a complete disgrace.
I find that disgusting.
Meanwhile, after thousands of parents refused to comply, California's school district reverses the child jab mandate.
San Diego.
Forgoing any legal Democrat process, multiple school districts in California began mandating vaccination for children earlier this year.
Set to go into effect in January, any child 16 or older who did not get the jab would be banned from the campus at all San Diego public schools.
The authoritarian move caused a massive backlash.
Thousands of children and parents refused to comply.
The refusal set the stage for a showdown to unfold on January 24th when the children would be kicked out of school for non-compliance.
There will be no showdown, however.
A San Diego judge struck down the mandate this week, accurately pointing out A school district has no authority to mandate medical procedures for children.
CBS7 reported Superior Court Judge Jonas Meyer granted a writ of mandamus for a lawsuit filed by the group Let Them Choose, which sought to keep the school's vaccine mandate from going into effect by arguing it did not comply with state law.
Meyer noted in the ruling, the district's mandate cannot move forward because it conflicts with state law, which says any decision to mandate vaccines must be made at the state level, must include a personal belief exemption if the mandate is not imposed by the state legislature.
San Diego's unified policy did not contain this exemption.
It appears to be necessary and rational in the district's desire to protect its students.
That is commendable.
Unfortunately, the field of school vaccine mandates has been fully occupied by the state, and the roadmap directly conflicts with state law.
Naturally, the school district disagreed, claiming they had the right to dictate what children can and cannot be injected with.
For now, however, their objecting is meaningless.
Children and parents who don't want to take the vaccine will no longer be forced to do so.
I am overjoyed.
We knew our legal argument was strong when we brought this case on behalf of thousands of concerned parents and students.
To hear the judge say no student should be coerced was just a wonderful thing to hear, said the founder of the group behind Let Them Choose.
As reported earlier, the school district, the second largest in the country, made a similar move and mandated all shots for children age 12 or over.
That's the Los Angeles Unified School District.
Students were told they'd be banned from campus on January 10th if they failed to comply.
NBC4 spoke to an attorney following the case, Jennifer Kennedy, explaining school districts do not have the authority to mandate medical procedures.
Just as the San Diego school district did not have the authority, the LA Unified School District does not have it either.
These grotesque contests and displays of treatment and candy and gifts and favors, raffles and cash prizes to induce kids to take the vaccine.
Kids in California cannot consent to vaccination.
The LA Unified School District does not have the power to add a vaccine to the California school schedule.
If you couldn't do it if you were a podunk school district and you can't do it if you're L.A.
Unified, the second largest in the nation, you don't have that legal authority.
Several parents filed suits against L.A.
Unified over the mandate the line in the sand posed the school to postpone their mandate last week after a whopping 28,000 children refused the jab.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, amazing.
Where is the state medical board?
Because I don't think any one of those members of those boards in any of these school districts are medical doctors, number one.
Number two, I don't think they've examined every one of the students that they are forcing this jab on to verify that the students don't have other complications that would make the jab very dangerous beyond what we already know is dangerous.
So where is the state medical board?
They should be charging every one of these people with felony practicing medicine without a license and bust them so that they can never be on a school board again.
We don't need these kind of tyrants in our lives and unfortunately it's only a three or four year election cycle for school board members and what the little school boards do is tricks in Texas Is that they schedule school board and bond hearings on weekends when there's nothing else to do.
And so they get a 10% voter turnout.
And guess what?
About 5% of the people in the school district are either employees of the school district or they're direct beneficiaries because they have contracts with the school district.
So that's who votes for all of these bonds and that's who votes for all of these puppets.
And that's how we ended up with these rotten school boards and these rotten curriculums and these failing students across the board.
Absolutely insane.
Get involved in your school board and throw these clowns out.
Nice point about practicing medicine without a license, Joe.
I like that.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, those are good points, Joe.
I just think it's great to see any form of pushback, and this is apparently a pretty large one, this backlash My parents and backed up by a judge who made the right decision.
You know, it's it's optimistic to see something like that.
And it indicates that there are some judges with integrity still out there, even in a woke place like California.
You know, as Naomi Wolf has been saying for over a year that all these forms of vaccine permissions and passports are a Trojan horse for individual digital platforms that will contain all of our information and all of our economics.
And it's a key element, going further with the plan, of the implementing something like the Chinese social credit system worldwide.
And that's a form of slavery.
These vaccine passports have always been the holy grail of this entire coronavirus pandemic agenda, probably with strong secondary agendas of depopulation.
And oh, by the way, let's make a massive amount of money while we do this.
Oh, you got it so right, Michael.
You got it 100% spot on.
Over the target.
Meanwhile, New Orleans is forcing children ages 5 to 11 to show proof of vaccination to enter restaurants and other businesses.
How bad is this?
There is virtually no proof children have been seriously affected or dying from COVID or any of its variants.
Those who refuse to take their children for COVID jabs are very wise.
They should be applauded for not subjecting them to experimental unnecessary injections that have been proven to cause serious injury and death.
In response to increased COVID cases and the rise of more infectious variants, Mayor LaToya Cantrell expanded New Orleans' indoor vaccine and negative test requirement to children ages 5 to 11, and the New Orleans public school system mandated vaccination for school children ages 5 and over.
Looks like we're going to have an instant replay here of what's happened already in California.
The indoor mandate will go to, in fact, January 3rd.
Children will be required to show proof of at least one vaccine dose.
Four weeks before Mardi Gras on February 1st, the requirement will be two doses.
New Orleans is the first city to announce a school vaccine requirement for children as long as five.
Only the LA Unified, the nation's second, has imposed a similar mandate for children age 12 and up, which, as we know, has been put on hold.
Officials in California and New York have indicated the school mandate will expand to all ages once a shot is fully approved by federal agencies.
A two-shot Pfizer, the only one available to kids under 16, remains under emergency use.
Dr. Jennifer Avegno, head of the New Orleans Health Department, said she expects some pushback from parents.
Louisiana's laws that allow for religions are a philosophical exemption from a required school immunization along with a medical exemption.
Exemptions for immunization are so broad in Louisiana that if you don't want this, you can sign the form.
But she pointed out that because immunization compliance in New Orleans is typically high, she hopes the new requirement will provide an additional push for parents to get their kids shot.
Our parents generally favor immunization.
I'm sure some folks will be unhappy, but they have the ability to opt out.
Meanwhile, Bobby Jr.
explains why they're going after the kids.
It's not what you think.
The PrEP Act provides immunity from liability for the COVID-19 vaccinators.
The purpose of the law?
To protect Big Pharma.
Bobby recently revealed why Big Pharma and Fauci are going after the kids and babies.
Because the vaccines that are recommended for children get liability protection.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., quote, They're never going to market a vaccine, allow people access to a vaccine, and approve vaccine without getting liability protection.
Now the emergency use authorization vaccines have liability protection under the PREP Act and under the CARES Act.
So long as you take an emergency use vaccine, you can't sue them.
Once they get approved, now you can sue them, unless they can get it recommended for children.
Because all vaccines that are officially recommended for children get liability protection, even if an adult gets the vaccine.
That is why they are going after the kids.
They know this is going to kill and injure a huge number of children.
But they need it for liability protection.
Joe, should we be surprised?
Well, if I'm not mistaken, the EUA for the three jabs that are allowed in the United States expire on January 31st, along with the EUA on the RT-PRC fake test kit.
So now they're scrambling around to come up with a new fake kit called By NACS now, which is made by Scott Abbott Laboratories, and it's questionable, but also the Comirnaty, which is the only one that's received full authorization, has not been manufactured or distributed in the United States to our knowledge.
So we don't know what the hell's going on with this stuff.
Any school board member, and there again in New Orleans, you're practicing medicine without a license if you're ordering kids to get jabs.
That's up to the patient and the doctor and their parents of these children.
So I think it's absolutely disgusting and I hope the pushback they get is more than they've ever seen in their lives.
Yes, yes.
Michael.
Yeah, those are both good articles there, Jim.
It really angers me.
Sometimes I need to kind of take a walk at any time that anybody is doing anything, much less mandating these things that causes this kill shot to be shot into innocent children.
And to me, it's like a blatant indication of the satanic, evil nature of the people running this global pandemic tyranny.
An excellent video that explains what you just touched upon there as the real reason why they want this all the way down to five years old is provided by a woman named Alex Mayer in an interview with Dr. Mercola about a week ago.
Alex Mayer is the president of Bobby Kennedy's Children's Health Defense Organization.
It's for the California chapter.
And this interview can be found on Dr. Mercola's BitChute site.
It's called the Quasi-Approval of Comernati Interview with Alex Mayer, spelled A-L-I-X.
And she's got an excellent set of PowerPoint slides there that really lays it out in clarity what they're doing.
Very good.
Very good.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Andrea Snowack, brutally beaten to death from Michael.
Dear Jim.
This gentleman uploaded to the world the finding that graphene hydroxide, OH-composing C6 ring, structured in rows in a 50 nanometer strip, monolayered at one atom thick and relatively wide, behaving as a razor blade, wreaking havoc on the epithelium of veins, causing blood clots and myo- and pericarditis.
This is killing millions around the world.
Probably are severely damaging recipients of the vax.
Today I saw a 30-minute video showing almost 50 vax people who hit the floor like a soaking wet pound of a 100-pound sack of potatoes within 15 minutes of being vaccinated.
It's been five weeks since the killing, and nobody knows where the goddamn body is.
Saturday, December the 11th, a dozen presentations.
Nick Kohlerstrom on the Gun Potter Plot.
Holly Seliger on Bacon's Rebellion.
Next Generation Stoop was Pearl Harbor.
Really a surprise attack.
Me on JFK.
Ann, my collaborative research on 9-11.
Another student, COVID.
Conspiracy or act of nature?
Kelly Watt, fake news about a pandemic.
David Kenney, California COVID swindling the public.
Dina Sax, the vaccine was a legal perspective.
Susan Bradford, Politics and Business, Abramoff and Enron, Sarah Westall, The COVID Conspiracy and Mind Control.
My special featured guests, Dr. Katherine Horton and William Bill Binney, who is our nation's leading expert on cybersecurity.
Sunday, another dozen, again, leading off with Nick Kohlerstrom on who wrote Shakespeare's plays.
Alison Sonny Menard about two unusual cases of young women who may or may not be dead.
Me on a tale of two cities, Kenosha and Waukesha.
Russ Winter and others taking a closer look at Waukesha, which raises questions of whether it had the aspects of a PSYOP.
Ron Avery on the Posner versus Fetzer lawsuit, and again on a case involving himself.
Fake news and fake law in a police state.
Joe Olson on the fall of America.
Carl Herman, American Revolution 2.0.
Scott Bennett, The Coming War in Ukraine.
Harry Macko, Jacob Rothschild, Equality is the End Game.
Jack Mullen and Stephanie Sledge, Where Are We Heading?
and Ole Damogard, How My Last Name Became a Verb.
You can find it all.
Go to jamesfetzer.org.
Find the False Flags and Conspiracies 2021 Conference.
We're going to have it up for a year.
You can get single access video 12 times for 6 months for $5.
Unlimited access to all 24 for 1 month for $25.
Unlimited access for a year from the event for $40.
It is going to support my efforts.
Just to defend the First and the Second Amendment.
So you're getting a return for your investment, because by God, I'm doing everything I possibly can, intervening in the Remington bankruptcy case, even taking the Sandy Hook promise to tax court and doing everything I can to show through the judicial system that Sandy Hook was a humongous fraud And believe me, the evidence is mountainous, compelling, and increasing day by day.
Joey, your final thoughts?
Yeah, a hot-button issue with me has been CPS recruiting for pedophile rings and their mistreatment of families, in particular fathers.
And in the state of Texas, this was pretty much under the radar until 2013.
A two-year-old Girl in Travis County was taken from her family because her dad admitted that occasionally he smokes a joint to relax in the evening after his daughter had gone to bed.
So they placed her in a foster home with a guy who had two convictions for selling marijuana and on his form listed that he was a recovered crack addict.
The child was in their custody for about two or three weeks when she went one Saturday morning and opened the refrigerator to get out a bottle of water.
And her step-mommy, her foster step-mommy, beat her to death.
Unbelievable!
Absolutely horrifying!
So, there's a state senator in Georgia, and her name was Nancy Schaefer, and she's got a 15-minute video on Bitchute.
I'll put that down in the links, but she was murdered for her investigations of CPS, and this is something I think we ought to dedicate a show to in the near future to cover, but Just looking up the statistics for 2020, because we know that 2021 is going to be worse, and those statistics won't be available for another couple of months.
But in Texas and California, over 64,000 children are removed from their families because of CPS.
The runner-up states are Michigan and Florida, where over 33,000 are removed from their families.
Excellent points.
The death rate among children in foster homes is six times higher than the death rate of the general population.
So you can't tell me that you're taking them out of a dangerous environment when you're putting them in an
environment that's far more dangerous.
We need to end this child and family abuse on the part of the court system. Absolutely horrible.
Excellent points. Joe, Michael, your final thoughts.
Yeah, something I wanted to say last week and I didn't get around to it is there's there's a correspondence between
criminal activity and collusion and racketeering between.
You know, Dr. David Martin has been putting out a lot of really good statements these days.
You had me post one to BitChute that was fabulous and has about 24,000 views now in just two days.
And one of the statements that David Martin points to Uh, is a statement made by Peter Daszak in 2015 to a room full of investors where Daszak said that in order to sustain funding,
We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures, such as a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine.
Like, they want to make one that everybody is forced to take.
And it says a key driver is the media and the economics will follow the media hype.
We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues and investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.
That's the statement that David Martin points to as not just not just implying, that's a statement of intent.
Then about three weeks ago, what did Tony Fauci say?
He said that we needed a what he called a universal coronavirus vaccine.
So Daszak was calling it a pan coronavirus vaccine, essentially the same.
As Fauci came out with saying, we need a universal coronavirus vaccine.
So, David Martin says, that is not a public health statement, talking about Daszak's statements.
That is a statement of intent from a mercenary, a mercenary of death.
What Peter Daszak said in 2015, I'm quoting David Martin here, is collusion.
That is racketeering, and under Section 802 of the Patriot Act, it is domestic terrorism, unquote.
Excellent, excellent, excellent.
I love Texas.
Tuesday here we have two terrific minds, Joe Olson from Houston, Michael Ivey, formerly from Fort Worth, now from Asheville.
Watch David Martin.
He gives you the lowdown.
He even talks about how Donald Trump got played by Fauci and Birx and other scoundrels, but where, in my opinion, Trump cannot be let off the hook.
Look at this.
There cannot, from an evolutionary point of view, be a universal vaccine.
Viruses as living organisms are constantly evolving.
Look, we're being told why there can't be a universal vaccine.
We're told the vaccine we had in the past might not work for Delta, or the one we thought would work for Delta won't work for Omicron.
Don't be dumb.
Don't allow yourself to be played.
There cannot be a universal vaccine, but there can be a RICO effort, a coordinated criminal conspiracy to murder humanity for fun and profit.
That's taking place before your very eyes.
We're glad you joined us because we're trying to lay out for you all the news you need to know.
You'll find it here.
Not on CNN or MSNBC or any of the major networks or in the New York Times or in the Washington Post.
You'll find it here.
Be glad you did.
Stay safe.
Spend time with your friends and loved ones because we do not know how much time we have left.