All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 24, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:41:45
Global Insanity Pandemic Intensifies - Dr. Lee Merritt on Lost Arts Radio, Dec. 7, 2021
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hi you guys, welcome back.
This is Lost Arts Radio, and my name is Richard Sachs, your host, and we have a great treat tonight with our friend Dr. Lee Merritt, who's back.
We might mention some of the details about her background, but we've said it a lot before.
And a very high-level medical doctor who survived.
Her main credential, I think, is based not on years dealing with the indoctrination system, but in character and in ability to go through that system without losing the ability to think clearly and have common sense.
And the doctors that managed to do that are incredible.
And she's one of the best in my opinion, as well as a friend, which is the top credential as well.
So what we want to talk about tonight, in the very brief time that we've got, you know, I always like to go back to purpose in whatever we're doing.
So how come we're taking the time to do the show?
And I think You know, it's not just entertainment, it's not just supposed to be interesting and momentarily, oh, that was great, what's next?
But it's supposed to actually, you know, do something.
And who are we talking to?
Really welcoming the people that understand what's going on and are following that.
But it's not just to go over it for those of us that understand.
It's to see how can we still reach People that are at least somewhat slightly receptive, at least subconsciously, and might stumble into the show and, you know, those are the people that most need our help and the others just need support.
So, we'll see what we can do.
Welcome, Dr. Merritt.
Thank you.
It's incredible to have you here.
Thanks, Len.
So I thought, you know, there's so many directions we can go with this.
But taking it down to simple basics, there's a situation happening in our country and on our planet right now, because we got people listening from different countries as well.
And so there's understanding of the situation, there's understanding of our capabilities, and there's ideas of what to do in response based on where we are in the game now.
So if you had to, well let me just say a couple of quick things and then see what you think is going on.
It seems to me...
Depending on how deeply you go into what's happening, that there's a tiny control group at the very top, which, you know, where I've taken it to that, is they're getting their orders from non-human levels.
And it's beyond the time to worry about people thinking we're crazy, it's better to tell the truth.
And that's where I see it coming from.
And that small group, is very focused and determined over generations to
accomplish something, and they think they're near the end of it now.
But they can't do it without a lot of help.
And so it's largely a psychological operation, and not just the victims of it,
but really their servants are other classes of victims.
So the people who are serving the dark side and think that that's a good idea
are psychologically manipulated as well.
If the game came down and people were able to break the trance, even the servants would stop.
So, how to do that seems like the question, but let's start with, at this point, what do you think is going on at this point in the game?
Well, you know, speaking to your point about the very, very top of this pyramid, one of the things that I've been curious about for a while is the fact that we've had the Club of Rome since the 60s and all these weather, I mean these climate control people that claim that they want to decrease CO2, you know, Bill Gates, innovating to zero.
Now, we as humans need CO2.
Plants need CO2.
I should have awakened to this reality when I realized that the guys in Colorado that are growing pot, they're pumping CO2 into their tents.
Why are they doing that?
Because we are at a starvation level of CO2 for plants.
We are really way, way too low.
I actually, my friend Willie Soon, who's a He's an astrophysicist and he's an independent scientist at Harvard.
I asked him one time if he could just send me historic data on CO2 levels because I can't find it back more than 100 years.
In the last 100 years, yeah, they can show an increase, but if you look at it way back, Devonian and way back in the ages past, we're at an all-time low.
And the reason I bring that up in relation to your point is we're at 419 parts per million.
Plants like it over 1,200 or 1,300 parts per million.
Now, if you drop it lower than what it is now, we're going to starve plants that we need to live.
And my question on that is what human would want to do that?
So, it makes you wonder about the non-human aspect of this war.
As a reader of pretty much anything that comes across my eyeballs, looking at the Gnostics, talking about the Archons, and it really kind of fits the bill of AI.
Artificial intelligence.
We don't even have to be talking about foreign aliens like, you know, green men from Mars.
We could be talking about just non-carbon life forms, artificial intelligence.
So, something's behind this and you're right.
They have a very small group at the top that has taken organizational control of the medical system and the beauty of that is that most people don't look at medicine as a weapon of war.
But it certainly can be, and that's what they've done.
And they've produced, I think, a genetic toxin.
And they've also been doing other things to us for a long time, whether you're talking about fluoride or bromine to stabilize sweet.
I mean, we just seem to be poisoned.
Our electromagnetic signature around the world now is getting so dense, and we are Since 1857, we have not lived in a quiet world.
We've been bombarded with wavelengths, and that's something people need to wake up to, too.
And so anyway, there's a lot of things that could be damaging us, and here's the shocking, after all this time that you and I have been talking, and we've been looking at this outbreak, so-called outbreak, the so-called pandemic, which it's not, When you really look at what they're doing, it's based on a fraud.
I mean, it's all smoke and mirrors.
We don't really know what we're dealing with when we call it COVID.
Is it a virus?
We haven't proven that and they haven't even done the standard things you would do to prove it.
There's no isolated virus and there's no attempt to prove transmission.
You can't use epidemiology as Dr. Cowan says, Epidemiology cannot claim causation without further evidence.
You don't just look at numbers on a map.
You have to prove something.
And they employ these highly technical arguments to make us confused.
But when it boils down to it, we don't have autopsy material.
And the stuff we do, we have only 74 cases that I could find, and there might be more, but 74 cases of COVID deaths that are reported, that are clear, and they don't show viral pneumonia.
They show, you know, maybe a couple have Superimposed bacterial pneumonia, but what they all show is like vessel clotting and vascular damage.
So, there's something else going on here other than just a standard viral pneumonia.
We don't have an isolate of the virus and in point of fact, we don't have an isolate of probably any virus that I can identify.
I mean, maybe we do, but we haven't shown transmission.
So, And it's all about fear.
And then they gave us these kind of nonsensical protocols to make us feel good.
You know, in medicine, I always kind of, I do like to give patients things to do.
Now, sometimes I realize they're not going to be that effective, but they make people feel like they're participating in their care and that they're doing something to push things along.
There's nothing really wrong with that, except they're doing it in a way that is evil.
They're telling us to wear these masks that are slave masks and, you know, cut off humanity's ability to look at each other's faces. I mean, these are
what makes us human.
They're doing things that are anti-human, standing six feet away from each other.
So notice how that's persisted, that people don't want to get
close to each other anymore. It's in three directions, six, six, and six.
Interesting.
Yeah, that's right.
And well, and that's not by accident.
I mean, the six feet, I found that out that the six, I thought, because when I heard that first number, I said, six feet, that's made up.
That's not a scientific result of any experiment.
You don't get a number like six feet.
Okay, magically, the virus is going to leave after six feet.
No, that kid in satanic, whatever they want to call themselves, worship, they use, they stand in a circle six feet apart, wash their hands and wear masks.
I mean, you can't make this stuff up.
No.
You know, there's so much to talk about that's all related and all critically important for an overall understanding.
If we could, it would be nice to do a series sometime and make believe it's like a class for people that want to come, you know, because they need basic understanding of, since they've been through what I think they call it education, that's where you learn how to not be able to think anymore, and you substitute memorization of everything, and also an emotional Defensiveness against anything that's not in the program.
So, you know, you become insulated and protected against breaking the trance.
It'd be nice to do an anti-trance class starting at the beginning.
That actually is a good idea.
Well, if you're open to it, we could do it.
Yeah, we might think about that.
That would be good.
I'm actually kind of serious.
I mean, I know neither one of us have any time, but we should ignore that and just do it anyway.
Well, you know, as a physician, I've had a lot of science in my life and I am absolutely just bum-fuzzled to realize we've been lied to about basic biology.
Here's a little thing that got me going, just one single point of reference.
There was not seasonal flu until after 1855 or 1857.
We think that there was a seasonal death curve and a seasonal flu outbreak every winter for humanity, right?
Nobody points out.
No, it started in around 1857.
And what was the cause of it then?
Well, or what was the, well, why that date?
Well, that's when they laid the first telegram lines.
And it electrified the ionosphere, and ever since then, flu has come and stayed.
Now, an interesting second point to that, that I learned in Arthur Furstenberg's book called The Invisible Rainbow, that I highly recommend.
That's what it sounded like you were talking about.
Yeah, that's his book!
But that point, and then the second follow-on point is that there was a Winnipeg, I think I got it from him, there was a Winnipeg Based astronomer, and this guy looked at 300 years of flu data of these outbreaks of so called pandemics or epidemics of influenza around the world for 300 years prior to the advent of electrification so prior to telegram prior to lights prior to anything else.
Because before then, we didn't have seasonal stuff.
It was all kind of random.
You'd have an outbreak that would hit too fast to be transmissive around the world, but it would hit all around the world, and then you might not see it for 20 years.
And then it would hit again, and then it might not be 30 years or 10 years.
You never knew.
Well, he completely correlated it to sunspot activity and activity of the sun.
In other words, when the sun got more active, then our ionosphere got more charged, and we got more sick.
Now, that is a big piece of information, and it isn't new.
But as a medical student, did I ever hear it?
Did my son, who was a medical student more recently, ever hear it?
No.
Nobody's really heard that, and that's a big thing.
And also, they don't teach us that influenza has never been shown to be contagious.
They've tried.
I knew about it in 1918.
They couldn't prove it, but it turns out they've never been able to prove it.
Right.
Now they just don't try.
They just ignore that little factoid.
They figure that most of the public is so conditioned at this point they're not going to ask why about anything.
That is exactly right.
I think, and you pointed it out, that part of this is we've just gotten so afraid that we're just willing to do and believe in anything to kind of get out of that fear.
I think you said that to me one time.
But the other point is authoritarianism.
That we have, we're educated, like you just said, with the indoctrination.
It's not an education, it's something else.
It has to do with believing in authority.
And we take authority figures and what they say and we just run with it.
You know, the CDC guidelines.
It's like, that is carved in stone more than the Hippocratic Oath right now.
That's right.
Even if they change 180 degrees, that means you change too.
Right, exactly.
Don't question it.
Right.
You know, it's kind of neat you started by mentioning CO2.
Everything is connected.
And right now, the conditioning says anybody that's against getting rid of CO2, like we said before, should turn themselves in as a terrorist right away.
And, you know, the size of the graph you mentioned, you brought up so many great things right away, the size of the graph in terms of the x-axis with the time on it.
You know, assuming that the horizontal axis is time and the vertical one is parts per million of CO2.
And you were saying that if it's only a hundred years, you might be able to show a slight increase over that time.
Not necessarily meaning that it's correlated to industrialization.
It just means that it increased.
And if you start zooming out and increasing the length of the x-axis, The whole picture changes.
And the graphs that I've seen that haven't been censored too much show no correlation at all between CO2 and global temperature.
Right.
And yet that's being pushed so much for an agenda that they're saying, I think it's in Iowa that they're rolling out machines to take CO2 out of the air.
Yes, my state!
I know.
Is that where you are in Iowa?
I am.
And Bill Gates owns 900 acres of land.
I don't know if it's related to this, but this is horrendous.
It's amazing, yeah.
And they're not really satisfied with that because that might not save humanity in time, so they want to cut down trees and bury them.
Because, you know, trees have carbon and stuff like that.
And wasn't it just the other day that we were planting trees and that Al Gore would sell you, he would promise that he would plant a tree to offset your footprint?
Yeah, I think planting trees is actually a good idea.
Yeah, yeah.
Well, and actually, one of the myths of the Midwest that I can tell you, because I live on the plains, is that the settlers came out and chopped down all the trees.
That's not true.
We actually have more trees in the plains now than we did at the time that the, you know, Settlers moved from the East Coast out to the plains when the Native Americans were still here.
Wow, I didn't know that.
That's exactly what's true.
And in fact, they're not always good trees.
Like in western Iowa, they're the very famous Loess Hills, L-O-E-S-S, and they're one of the three places in the world that have windblown soil.
But they were covered with buffalo grass, which is a neat kind of grass that it will live through everything, forests, flyers, floods, you name it, tornadoes, but it won't live through shade by other trees, and it won't live by plowing it out.
But on the hills, nobody plowed it, but we've gotten these cedar trees have kind of gotten away from us.
People like plant a cedar tree for Christmas, don't harvest it, and then it propagates and you know however they got here these red cedars
they're all over the place now and that's killing the buffalo grass and that's
actually destroying what was native. Oh interesting, wow.
So but the idea of cutting down all the trees and burying them is not that great?
No, I would say no. The other thing is you were mentioning that the flu started in 1887, something like that?
About 1857, just before the Civil War, when they laid the first telegram wires.
And here's another interesting little factoid about that.
In 1918, what do we always hear about?
The Spanish flu.
I always wondered, why would they call it the Spanish flu?
Because it's disinformation.
It started in Fort Riley, Kansas.
And guess who they were training down there?
Telegram operators.
So it turns out that the, you know, you probably know the term neurasthenia.
There was a new neurologic disease that was first documented by a Massachusetts doctor in like the 1860s sometime.
And it was where people got nervous and they had flushing and all sorts of kind of weird symptoms that people thought was psychological.
You know, Freud came along and said, oh no, that's just psychologic.
Well, actually, it correlated.
People that got it were, first of all, telegram operators, and they were the first victims of this, and they called it telegrapher's disease.
And it's just really, really interesting stuff, but it turns out we shouldn't be around, you know, 30 years ago, I thought to myself one day, probably when the cell phones started coming out, I said, you know, what does it do to us to have all these wavelengths pass through our body?
Nobody's talking about that.
And now I know, there's a reason they weren't talking about it, but it isn't good to be constantly bathed in these frequencies.
Now, your body can adapt to things if it's given time.
The question, will we adapt to 5G before it kills us?
Right, and you've already got the other G's after that planned out now, too.
Right.
These are very different wavelengths than we've been exposed to up to now.
You know, we've been exposed to longer wavelengths, but they don't carry as much data.
Now, we don't need this microwave length.
They need it for AI, for AI to be linked up and to link everything together, to transfer a lot of data.
For you and driverless cars and stuff like that.
Right.
And on the other end of the spectrum, here's the other interesting thing that I didn't read in Arthur Furstenberg, but I knew from the Navy.
You know, the Navy used ELF or extra long frequency radio waves to call the submarines, the nuclear missile submarines out from under the Arctic ice.
So, if you're a fleet ballistic missile submarine, I was stationed at Groton, Connecticut for a number of years.
If you're a fleet ballistic missile submarine, your job is to carry nuclear armaments and to go out and hide.
And the Navy doesn't even know, the Pentagon, they don't know exactly where you are.
They know that you're within a certain box, you know.
Okay.
If they need to call, but you're under the polar ice cap for example, so if they need to call you, they need something that can penetrate down to those levels and through the ice and all that sort of thing.
And the thing that, see that's not microwave, that's the other end of the spectrum.
You need long wavelengths.
Okay.
So they would use these what called ELFs and they would just, they just send a very short burst because you can't carry a lot of information.
You can't, you know, give the Gettysburg Address on ELF.
All you can say is, you know, Go here this time or something like that, whatever they did, you get it to come out of there and then it would give you the further information.
But we had so much flack.
This was, I was in the Navy at the time, I think this was in the 70s when Greenpeace was so upset because they were concerned that these little bursts of ELF were damaging the whales I don't know.
I don't remember the whole story.
They were very upset about it.
But guess what?
The same, you know, let's save the planet people have erected these huge, this also in my state and other states, these huge wind turbines.
And guess what they do?
They pump out non-stop, as long as they're spinning, they're making these long, extra long frequency wavelengths.
And these wavelengths don't attenuate.
They go on, they literally bounce off the other side of the world and back.
Wow.
And there is some problems with those too, but this is not in the short burst like the Navy was using.
That probably wasn't an issue, but this is an issue.
And they've had animal damage.
They've had, they showed that it thickens the intima, the intima layer of your arteries.
I mean, there's some bad stuff.
It seems like every time you turn around there, the guys on that top of that pyramid that you talked about there, they're killing us.
I don't think it's an accident that the technology always seems to develop in a non-human, anti-life direction.
That's a good way to put it.
I really think that's right.
And it's almost assumed that technology has to be like that, and that we need it, so there's really not an issue.
But I think it's because we haven't seen the other side of what could be developed instead.
And I don't know, I don't know what to think about all these new kind of information drops that are happening all over Telegram and some other places, but I just saw a car that was in the 1890s or 1900s, early 1900s, maybe it was 1910, and it was an electric car.
It was right after they developed cars, and it was, maybe it was 1910s or 20s, electric car, and it could go 1,224 miles, I think it was, on a charge.
Now, Teslas can only go, what, 360 or 400 miles on a charge?
Right.
What?
Well, and if the people think they're being environmentally sound by using an electric car, it really comes down to two things, the battery technology, which all gets thrown into the landfills, and the other is what energy source is charging it.
Of course.
It doesn't get rid of a coal-fired plant.
No, they're running on coal and nuclear.
They're running on coal and mostly we've expunged nuclear, even, in America at least.
I mean, look, if they banned all that new construction, we could have had great thorium plants, we could have had great nuclear plants, much safer than anything.
Like, everybody looks at Chernobyl and says, oh, we can't do that.
Well, that's old technology, you know.
That's not what we could be doing.
And I don't personally, I mean, I mean, we test drove a Tesla.
I thought it was a really neat car, but I'm not sure I want to sit on that battery now that I know about the problem.
Yeah, exactly.
So, technologies have been suppressed if they're life-friendly, just like real health information that has no negative effects.
Because, you know, what Hippocrates said is, not just try not to do too much harm and don't kill too many people.
You know, he was saying, don't do any harm at all.
No harm.
Yeah, right.
And real medicine is available that doesn't do that, and I think real energy technology too.
You know, for example, Stanley Meyer, you may have heard of him, he demonstrated driving, I think it was a dune buggy, all over the US to show people what was possible, and his fuel was water.
Oh yeah.
I didn't remember the name.
He found an energy efficient way to separate hydrogen and oxygen.
You know, which the problem with that is usually it takes more energy to break them apart in water than you get out in the hydrogen.
And he found a way around that.
And do we still know what it is?
Do we still know what it is?
Well, what happened basically is he wanted to patent it because he thought, you know, he'd be a hundred billionaire or something like that, which would have been fine, actually.
I mean, he could have taken the money and made water cars available all over the world.
So, government agents said, we'll buy your patent.
And he said, I know about you guys, we have to meet in a public place, otherwise you might do something tricky.
So they said, you know, rats, you figured us out, we'll meet in a restaurant.
So they met in a restaurant, poisoned him, he died in the parking lot, and they took everything from the meeting and disappeared with it.
And then his family still had the documents that were left over, because he didn't bring everything with him.
Right.
And they auctioned that off and said, all right, well, maybe he's dead, but at least we'll get rich.
And I'm not against getting rich for good things.
So they auctioned, they had an auction.
And somebody that we knew, Dr. Stephen Greer, was at the auction.
But so were some other people with a lot more money.
And they took it.
It was a group from, I think, maybe Canada or the Northeast US of investors.
And Stephen Greer said, you really need to be careful with what you're doing.
And they said, you know, go away, we have a lot more money than you.
And they went back with their documents and they called him in a panic a few days later and said, we're all being threatened to be killed.
And he said, hold on, I'll be there soon.
And when he got there, they were all dead.
And they had taken all of the documents and they're all gone.
And I've heard of a few.
This is the energy issue, not research.
Yeah, this is energy, but it does apply because we've seen some doctors die.
And look at what happened to Royal Rife.
As soon as he showed he could treat people without chemicals, he was disenfranchised, is a nice way to say it.
He actually, his office was like about five miles from where mine is now.
Wow!
That's pretty cool.
He was from Elkhorn, Nebraska, right?
Well, you know, the Rife technology is being sold now, but there's no way to know the right frequencies.
So you've got all these people selling it and saying, no, we have them, we have them.
And then, you know, they're not getting the spectacular results that they used to.
Yeah.
So that's part of the issue is that suppression.
We don't have someone with the patience and the technical ability to do what he did to get those frequencies, which was use that very elaborate microscope he built with, I think, 80,000 moving pieces or something.
It was ridiculous.
Yeah, and that's a lot of trial and error, too.
Yeah, yeah.
And he sat there for, you know, 36 hours without moving, essentially.
I don't know how he did that before the age of the Foley, but somehow he managed to do that.
But unbelievable stuff.
There are people that have the Stanley Meyer technology now, but they're hiding.
And from what I've heard, they're too terrified to come out.
So, one thing that Stephen Greer did, another medical doctor, is he put out an offer.
You know, anybody with these zero-point or free energy, clean energy devices, come to my farm in Virginia and let us Duplicate the results from a third party, and then we'll give you some money from the investors and put it out suddenly all over the world, you know, with no requirements, not for sale.
And it can't be stopped, and nobody's been brave enough to do it yet.
Wow.
But I think a lot of it is the mentality of the public.
You know, they have to be broken out of blind belief in authority.
That's really, that's really, at least that's for my profession, that's really where we are.
You know, and it's that's what's making this whole thing possible is that we have a group of doctors who absolutely have been brainwashed to believe that all vaccines are always safe in all people all the time.
And that anybody that questions that safety, now you can question the safety of a blood pressure medicine, that's not a problem.
Or you can question the safety of an antibiotic, that's not a problem.
But if you question statin drugs, or you question vaccines, I mean there's a couple of these, you're just a crazy person.
And you don't even have to question all of them, even if you just question one.
I know people that don't have a problem, now I personally, Knowing what I do now, I personally have a problem with pretty much all vaccines.
I used to say I would take a smallpox vaccine tomorrow, but now I've come around to thinking maybe that might not have been what we thought it was.
You just brought up another huge topic too.
Yeah, so that's what I guess I would say is that, I mean, it's crazy that we've been just brainwashed to believe these things.
And then we also are... I learned this watching the young guys coming out of training now.
They are taught that if it's not a 30-year double-blind study that's in a peer-reviewed journal, it's meaningless.
And I've always known that's wrong, you know, that's not the way, that's the Politburo theory of medical science, or any science, that you have three or four guys on a review board tell the rest of the medical profession, this is what you can read.
You can't read about this.
we're going to define what truth is. And then you, where it used to be, and I, and I, and I heard
somebody, and I can't remember, he's a very, he's like a young pop kind of icon kind of guy in the
pop culture, but he, a comedian type guy, but he has a serious podcast. And he was talking about,
he likes history. And he said that in history, the way you were taught in college to research
history was always to look for anecdotes.
Look at people's individual experiences and then collate them and put that together because that's a better idea of the truth than if you hear one guy's talking about something that happened 300 years ago.
Well, when you said that, it really struck a chord because I thought that's what we used to do in medicine.
We used to look at our patients and doctors would see trends, see something happening.
They might try a treatment they thought was safe and if it was effective, they might do it on the next patient and then they would do their own little studies.
I mean, it's not like you experimented on people, but you observed them.
And this is how you came to dietary conclusions and things.
But you really observed them and made judgments about them.
And then you talked with your colleagues, and then maybe you got together a series
and you published it, and somebody else either refuted or confirmed it.
And then you got more people together, and pretty soon it became accepted.
Now they purposely tell you that anything that's done like that is anecdote and meaningless.
But that is the way medical science used to work.
But there's a huge difference between a laboratory environment where you're changing one variable and trying to hold everything else the same to come to a conclusion.
Usually it's a pre-programmed conclusion, but aside from that, you know, just one variable versus real life.
You have infinite variables and most of them are unknown.
So the only thing you can do, you can't even decide what the variables really are because you don't see them, but you can observe the effects of what you do.
Like you were just describing.
And that actually works. Oh yeah. And then the fact that they wanted to hide,
then now they want to hide data. It's even worse than, you know, we knew the pharmaceutical
companies, for example, falsified their, like they made up a fake medical journal that was
purportedly peer-reviewed, but it was actually created by them to sell their products.
And then they got smart, and then they just started hiring doctors to so-called author the papers that they'd already written.
But now they've got to another level where they're actually trying to censor the data that was used Yeah, that's what they admitted, right?
Yeah, it's pretty amazing.
case of like this Pfizer vaccine, they want 55 years before the data comes out.
What does that tell you about what they're doing?
I mean, and then when a little bit comes out, we realize in the first 90 days,
they had twelve hundred and twenty three deaths.
I think that was the number I read.
Yeah, that's what they admitted.
Right.
Yeah, it's pretty amazing.
I think, you know, one thing we could do in the little bit of time we have here is
look at as an example of what you're talking about, of blind trust and authority.
look at the basic foundation of the idea of the pandemic.
You know, first of all, it's caused by a virus.
You mentioned the idea of isolation.
Why is isolation necessary to prove the existence of a virus?
In fact, most people probably don't know what that even means, isolation.
Well, you know, anybody that took high school biology and kind of looks at, knows what a Petri dish is and all that, you know, you can, you can, you can spit on a Petri dish and you can look at the different kinds of bacteria that grow on there by the color of the, the color of the, um, The colony on the Petri dish.
And many people do that in high school.
And then you could take one colony that has all one color, and you can then sterilely transfer that to another completely sterile Petri dish.
And then you have what's called an isolation, a pure colony of that.
And you can double check it because you can look at it easily under a light microscope and see it's all the same looking bug.
Right.
Pretty much.
I mean, I could do that in my bedroom with very few pieces of equipment.
The problem when you're dealing with viruses, you're dealing with things that are so, so, so tiny, they cannot be seen by a standard microscope.
They are so sub-microscopic that you have to process any specimen you have so extraordinarily in order to be able to possibly see something.
And You know, and there are lots of problems with that.
So, for example, if you look at what they called an isolate, now they never said, you know, the Chinese, they really, when questioned, they didn't say they had an isolate.
Now, the first paper made it sound like they had, we isolated, like they threw that term out, I think, like we isolated this from the lung of a patient we thought had COVID, okay?
But what they really did is, They put these things called primers, which are essentially the same thing as these tests that we're using, the PCR test, but primers are just like a dipstick and you dip it down into this lung goo that you got from this dying patient and it's not been filtered or manipulated, it's just a mixed bag of dead cells and all sorts of stuff and you dipstick that with a multitude of these primers that are pre-loaded
To resonate with or to react with certain genetic sequences.
These genetic sequences are very short.
You know, we're talking very, very short sequences.
So, they're like 18 sequences.
I think they're long.
And so, you dipstick it and you get up.
Then you put these dipsticks into a machine somehow.
They call it the aluminized sequence or mini sequence or something.
And it spits out It kind of puts together these little sequences into bigger sequences.
It says, oh, well this is 18 here and this is overlapping here by 12, so this is probably the same sequence.
So it makes some assumptions.
It makes a lot of them.
And then when they did that in this particular case, it spit out, I think it's 57.6 or 56.7 million pieces
of genetic material that was 150 base pairs long.
Now, here's what you've got to know to realize the scam here.
They claim that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is almost, you know, it's like 29,800 base pairs, like it's almost 30,000 base pairs long.
So picture now, you've got, it's like putting together a jigsaw puzzle.
You've got a jigsaw puzzle and you don't have a picture of it because you don't know, you don't have anything to compare it to.
You don't have a picture on a box.
You don't even really know what the edge pieces are, although you've got some.
And you've got 57 million pieces, but you can only use 30,000.
Now, I've got to throw away all the rest of these pieces and come up with 30,000, I think, fit, and then make a picture, right?
That's what I would do if I were doing a jigsaw puzzle.
That's essentially what they did.
So, you know that they had to have in their mind an idea of what they were looking for.
You know, I heard somebody else, maybe this was Andy Kaufman, I can't remember who said this.
I think it was Dr. Kaufman or Dr. Cowan.
They're famous for talking about this and know much more than I do.
But they basically said, imagine if you had a bucket of English letters.
And you knew that you wanted to, there was a book that you got a title of, but you only have the title and the last page, but now you want to recreate the book, and somebody dumps up this bag of English letters out, and you just make the best guess at it.
That's what we're basically doing.
And it sounds preposterous, but anybody can look this up.
When they discuss the genomic sequence of this, they talk about it as an in silico genome.
In silico, as in, in a computer.
And when the computer can't fit the pieces together and has a bunch of holes, it either fills it in through their own program to make the best fit, or you end up voting on it, which is what you and your researcher buddies get together in the lab and say, well, I think this is probably this.
And that's called a consensus genome.
And that's what we have in this thing.
They publish things like this.
So, when they talk about variants, just think how ridiculous that is, a variant.
Now, I can change those holes however I make the consensus read.
Right, so it's pretty easy to come up with variants.
Now, what about the fact, you know, what David Martin talked about, that the original virus, the SARS-CoV-2, and a whole bunch of variants were already patented many years ago?
Well, and again, you can't patent nature.
No, but in silicon.
These are artificial.
Yes, so they're basically, it's easy to patent a genetic sequence, but it doesn't, as Stefan Lonka, who is a, he says, don't, he's a PhD in virology, but he says, don't call me a virologist, I'm a biologist now.
Because he said, the fact is, there's just no there there.
There's nothing in reality that actually you can compare your Experiment to to say, yep, we're right there.
It is not like the bacteria and the other thing that you know, this beautiful look at all the beautiful pictures.
We always see those spark proteins on that on that round ball looks kind of like a fuzzy weird tennis ball.
Yeah, it's all CGI.
You notice that it's like Mars Mars attacks basically.
Right, Mars Attacks with CGI.
Once in a while you will see an electron microscope picture, once in a while, but not very often.
And even that, and again, Stefan Lank has been saying this for years in Germany, that he showed in a very elegant experiment, in my opinion, that you can Because you have to make all these process steps in order to go from this unknown, now this is another part, this isn't the computer thing I just talked about.
Another way to try and look at what you've got here is to take some of that goo from the lung, for example, and to ultra-filtrate it, centrifuge it, and to try and eliminate all the cell particles that aren't very, very tiny, consistent with viruses.
We can try and do that.
That's based on the idea that there's a little bit different specific gravity of every single different thing in there.
Right, so you can throw it in a centrifuge and the big particles like dead cells and bacteria they go to the bottom and then what's left over at the top presumably are these little very small fragments of genetic material maybe that we call viruses.
Now, so then what you do is you make a petri dish now that has a special Substance in it.
It's it's auger made from cow's blood and it's got antibiotics and it's got antifungal things in it, which like are really toxic substances that we use to kill fungus.
A whole bunch of stuff, okay?
There's a process.
Then you drip some of this in and you run it down and you do all these things.
And at the end of time, if you see that cells are bursting, then you can take some of these and put them under the electron microscope after you've, you know, frozen and sliced and done all this stuff.
And you see these little spongy things that we now call viruses.
And if they're all the same shape, you say, aha, I've got this pure specimen.
Now, here's the problem.
This is what Stefan Lanca did.
He did that process having inoculated it with what they call this culture stuff that they thought had the virus in it.
But then he did the exact same process without putting anything in it.
And it came out the same?
It came out the same.
What does that tell you?
It's called artifacts.
I think coherently it should tell you a lot.
There's no meaning in the experiment.
One question I have about the process you described is when you run it through the centrifuge and you come out with what seems to be pretty uniform something at the end, small particles, how do you know if you didn't zoom in on that that there would be a million different organism types in that too?
Right, and I think that the point is that when they look at these cells and they look for the cells kind of bursting like the virus has killed the cell, and then when they put that on, and I used to do electron microscopy in college or in medical school, but it was kind of, you know, a different side of the thought.
But the point is that you can look at an area, you're not looking at just one little viral-like particle.
You can look at an area and if it all looks like very symmetric or similar things, you can say, well, that's what we see.
Now let's see what this kind of thing is genetically.
You know, now we've got this pure specimen maybe.
But the problem is, again, he showed and also Stefan Lanke showed that depending on the chemicals you use during that separation process, you can make different looking so-called viruses.
The spike protein, I think it was trypsin.
If you use trypsin, you specifically make spike proteins.
So we don't know.
So it's basically all made up.
It's pretty shaky.
Now, the thing that bothers me is, what are all these PhDs?
These are smarter people than me, all these young PhDs.
How are they not catching on to this?
And I kind of think that some of them might be, but they just don't.
But again, they're trusting their authority figures because they They're taught to do that, right?
Or they're not doing the very first steps in the process.
Very much like, if I send somebody, I'm an orthopedic surgeon, if I send somebody to the ophthalmologist for an eye problem, I trust that he knows his part, but I don't research it.
I don't verify that he's actually doing the right thing.
I trust that he's doing the right thing.
And so, that's kind of the specialization problem.
That could be what's going on.
That's a huge issue.
I mean, I think there's a reason that specialization is what's taught in school now.
It's so that, you know, nobody understands the context of what they think they're learning, and they can be misused as tools in the system, and they'll have no idea.
No, I think the guys at the top, they're being paid by pharma because when you think about it, the guys at the top have to know.
If you've been a virologist, like Stefan Lanke, who God love him, was honest, but let's say you're one of these people at the top.
You've got to start questioning some things, you know, and there's been enough people talking, there have been enough spirologists speaking out and biologists talking about this that know much more about this and can argue this, and they say, look, you're not even, you know, you think this stuff is going into cells, but maybe it's coming out of cells, because the alternative hypothesis here is that this little bit of genetic material wrapped in a lipoprotein coat is a signal, is you Changing your genome on a daily basis or a monthly basis to try to help you deal with the toxins you encounter in the world.
Right.
That's not what's making you sick.
You're sick because of toxins and so you're spitting out these things to get rid of and to change what we call phenotype.
You know, the genotype is what you're born with, the genetic sequence, but the phenotype is how it's expressed and that could be changed if you spit out little pieces of your genome.
It's a very clever idea.
Yeah.
I don't have any more way of proving it one way or another, but I like that idea and it fits what else I'm seeing.
It brings up the idea of what sickness is.
You know, not degenerative disease, but chronic so-called sickness.
What if it's, you know, and I think it probably is based on what I've seen, what if it's a detoxification process that the body's trying to do?
Right.
Stopping it would not necessarily be a brilliant idea.
Exactly!
I was joking with Dr. Lynn Finn, who's one of the researchers at AFLDS, and she was talking about this, I forget the name of it, but this new antiviral, out there now that might be a benefit.
And I said, I don't take anything that ends in mir or vir.
You know, those are all those antivirals like acyclovir and omir.
They're all these antivirals because what they do is they stop DNA, the standard things that DNA and RNA do, they just stop the replication in a way that Yeah, exactly.
it interrupts normal processes. You're just hoping it stops the viral
replication before it kills your replication. Yeah, exactly.
It's the same idea with chemotherapy. Right. And so for people out there saying,
how could this possibly be true?
My kid got chicken pox and so did the neighbor's kid.
If there's no transmission, how could this be?
Well, again, so then one of the, and this is the point, and I asked, I went up to Dr. Kaufman at a meeting, I said, okay, I've come around to your way of thinking, but my real question here is that, how do we explain chicken pox and measles?
All the things I got as a kid and my kids got as a kid.
And that the parties work.
Right, the chickenpox parties work.
Well, here's what the point is.
Let's say you're three years old, which is about the time that most kids get chickenpox.
And you've been born, you've been doing it, crawling around in the dirt and all the good things kids are supposed to do for three years.
But now your body says, okay, it's got enough of these toxins.
It's time to shed some stuff.
Now you're ready for the next stage of development.
So it makes these little particles.
or exosomes that you shed them.
And there are only some places you can shed things.
You can shed it in your skin, so you get a rash.
You can sneeze, you can cough, you can pee it out or whatever,
and you can blow it out of your mouth, whatever.
So these little exosomes come out, but they're also not just for you.
Think about plants.
We know that plants signal each other about toxins in their environment.
Why don't we think we do the same thing?
Just like men, women living together will menstruate together.
How do they know that?
That's right.
So it's not, you know, it may just be the moon, but there may be other things.
So you spread these, you're a three-year-old and you push out these little things that then get into your neighbor.
So in a sense, it's transmissible, but not in a bad way.
It's just saying, hey neighbor, you're also about my age and you probably need to do this too, you know?
Did you see Avatar the movie?
No, I think I need to watch it.
That's a pretty neat movie, yeah.
And it showed the trees interacting with each other and that all this network was below the soil level.
And it's true.
And so, like you said, why should we assume that they're the only life form that's managed to do that?
Maybe humans have done it, but on a subtle level.
I think so.
And it really is, you think about it, it's really, evolution has a lot of holes, quite frankly, it's a theory of evolution.
It's got a lot of holes.
And one of them is that in an environment that changes, you know, Fairly rapidly relative to our overall genetic ability to evolve.
Right.
You need some other, maybe you do need some other way of dealing with this and this would be a brilliant addition to that.
Exactly.
And why do people think that evolution and the existence of a spirit or God to be mutually exclusive?
If we came from this incredible non-physical consciousness source, everybody and everything came from the same thing, why could it have not projected us in a form that we could adapt?
I mean, it would be silly not to.
So you can see that level of evolution is happening every day.
Right.
We moved north, we put on fur coats.
Yeah, yeah.
You know, we had a brain.
We got a bigger brain so that we could do things.
And the body evolves a lighter skin color if you move into a place that doesn't have enough sun.
Right.
But you know, even that is questioned when you look at now that we've sequenced the human genome.
And I'll tell you, years ago, that was when I think my first kind of little, you know, the tap from reality that kind of hits you in the head and says, you know, they've been lying to you.
That's, I think, my first thing where it said, I said, huh?
It was when I heard somebody that had been on, I can't remember which project, you know, there was a public and private sequence of human genome project.
But I remember almost verbatim what the guy said and I've never heard from him again.
I don't know if he's a victim, but here's what he said.
He said, now that we've sequenced the human genome, we went back and sequenced a pure African black,
a pure European Caucasian, and a pure Asian.
You know, different skin tones, different features.
And but knowing that what we know about the ability of our genetic sequence to, you know, we have variable and hyper variable regions.
These things we talk about how you how things how fast things can evolve and how much difference it would make.
It couldn't have evolved.
Those skin colors and those differences could not have evolved in the time we think We've been around doing these things, you know, since Olduvai Gorge and what they tell us about coming out of Africa.
If that were true, and if evolution is true, it doesn't work because it's not enough time.
And so what he said on this that caught my attention, he said, the more I look at this, the genetics of this, the less it looks like evolution, the more it looks like a genetic experiment.
So what does that mean about where the people in the North came from, if that's true?
Well, that's it.
That we may have come from different, you know... All different sources.
Different sources, yeah.
Yeah, that is interesting.
Although the body does try to add melanin when you go to a place with more sun.
Right, but you don't become African.
You know, you don't become... You can get darker, but there's no way I'll ever be black.
Not in this lifetime, but I'm just wondering if enough generations were there.
Well, that's the kind of thing he was talking about.
That based on what they understand about how genes can manipulate that melanin in their skin, it takes longer than what we have been here.
In other words, it just doesn't all fit together.
It's very much like that idea of the moths in England.
You know, they had that proof of evolution because the moths that were once white became black because the white moths stood out on the sooty-colored trees.
That was one of the cardinal proofs that they told us in grade school or high school about biology and evolution.
And the problem was, it turns out that those moths don't They don't come out during the day, so the white moth wouldn't have been picked off by the birds, like they said.
So there's more to the story.
Yeah, and in order to take those pictures, they actually had to glue moths onto the trees, so I don't know if I trust anything.
It was worth it for the sake of science, though.
Yeah, yeah, we did that for science.
I just think we've been lied to about so many things now, we've got to go back and go back to first principles.
Let's go back to first principles.
We're going to have to reclaim common sense and stop blind trust in things.
That's the bottom line.
So if the virus theory of the so-called pandemic is not solid, what about this idea of preventing disease, like you said, with the injection?
Well, so in my opinion, there's two possibilities.
I'm discounting a wild virus.
That isn't what happened.
And I think that we have so much, you know, I mean, I've got a technical talk about that.
But Prashant Pradhan and his group in Delhi showed that the spike protein S1 subunit was clearly manipulated in a lab.
And he showed that this is the part that we do have a real something to look at.
Okay, we don't have the whole virus, but that doesn't mean we don't have parts of it.
And we're able to take this little tiny stuff, this little tiny spike protein thing, and they showed that in each one of these pieces of RNA that they harvested from bats, they apparently were able to put four genetic Inserts and those cross-reference with HIV, the human immunodeficiency virus.
So there are short segments of RNA and DNA we can handle and we can manipulate apparently.
And when you look at that, they claim whatever the spike protein is, they claim that it came out of the lab.
That's what these guys are saying from the deli place.
And they were censored so heavily when they came out with this paper.
I think it's probably something that the big boys don't want us to know.
Right.
And then after that happened, you see, then when we came out with this so-called vaccine, which isn't a vaccine by any definition, a definition of a vaccine is something that stops transmission.
Okay, this is an, this by the The, you know, the actual EUA, the Emergency Use Authorization science that they submitted does not stop transmission.
All they could claim was that it decreased symptoms somewhat.
So that's a therapeutic agent, it's not a vaccine, and so it should never have been classified as a vaccine.
Right.
But whatever this is, what they do say, and this is the thing people should also know before they
run out and get this.
Under emergency use authorization, it doesn't require the manufacturers
to tell you what's in the whole vaccine or this old drug.
All it requires is them to tell you the part that they're getting approval for.
So if they claim it's a vaccine and it's to make you antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 or whatever,
they have to show you what's going to do that.
And so what they claim is that they're going to, this is what it says in the Pfizer, for example.
This produces RNA that will cause your body to produce the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2.
So if you agree, a bioweapon, by the way, is something that's made in a lab and it harms people.
So if they created this short segment of genetic material in a lab or manipulated a short segment of genetic material
in a lab to harm people.
It's by definition a bioweapon.
And it's the same thing as in the vaccine.
So therefore, A implies B, B is, that's also a bioweapon.
Okay.
And that's the problem.
So that could be one answer.
Now, the other thing is, and I've heard this, I don't think it's a complete psyop.
Something was killing the people in China.
I don't think that was completely false.
I think they, they had, but the other thing to know is that the COVID, that what we call COVID and the way those people were dying in the Chinese hospital, when we first watched it in December, It was very consistent also with electromagnetic frequency poisoning, non-ionizing radiation poisoning.
And so it could be that, that they turned on the 5G, which we know they did in Wuhan and Lombardy and New York City, and that created this whole You know, quick death at first and started the ball rolling.
I'm personally in favor of a combination.
I think that there was, I think the spike protein was a bioweapon that was created or manipulated in a lab from their harvesting this big, they've always talked in the old literature about loving this bat RNA.
So they harvested some of that, put it in, they can create a lipo, Now, Novavax bragged about this.
They can create a lipoprotein coating.
They put the genetic material on the inside.
And then they can basically spread that around and make people really, really sick at first.
And if you know the technology, they also can make these things self-disseminating, apparently, because they created a self-disseminating genetic sterilizing vaccine for rats in Australia.
A vaccine that would kill their ovaries and then disseminate to other mice by rubbing up against them.
Skin contact.
Skin contact.
So picture this.
We start out with a man-made pathogen, a bioweapon, that they spread around Lombardy, Italy, New York City, and Wuhan sequentially actually.
Wuhan, Lombardy, New York City.
And then it looks like it's transmissible because First of all, it looks deadly because people are getting this and people that get the highest dosing probably are the ones that are dying or the people with high risk factors.
But then it looks like it's infectious because they're spreading it by touching other people.
It's not coming out in the air.
If it's an airborne virus, like if there really are airborne viruses that are highly deadly, like we think smallpox is, it wouldn't stop at three cities.
It would go all around the world.
Yeah, for sure.
So it didn't do that.
It really stopped after three cities and then it kind of just oozed out.
It wasn't like a big dramatic thing.
Big bad thing at three city areas and then it kind of just petered out.
It made other people sick.
We had cumulative death, but keep in mind we also didn't have autopsies, so a lot of flu got counted as death from this.
A lot of the deaths were artificially manufactured, so that's where the PSYOP took off.
Right.
And I think you could have had, and you could have a desk, maybe it's to cover the 5G rollout.
It's also causing deaths, I think.
Yeah.
And so you could have had, we have a number of things that kill people.
You know, people say, it's got to be what they say, because people are dying.
People die every year.
And even though they're dying in a little unique way here, and they're dying, maybe a few more, there wasn't a pandemic level, by the way, we had a less death rate in 2020 than we did in 2011.
And in 2011, 12, 13, 14, and 15 had more deaths per capita per year in the world than last year.
That's why WHO had to change the definition of pandemic.
Yes, that's exactly right.
Because and it was actually 7.612 deaths per thousand per year last year in 2020, which is less than in those other five years.
So that's not what happened.
So that's what I think that was a combination of some kind of weaponized Stuff, and probably the same stuff that we're putting in the vaccine that can kill you, can make you sick.
I mean, look at what happened in Israel when the vaccine first came out.
At a time 12.5% of the people were vaccinated, 51% of the deaths of COVID, the disease we're theoretically vaccinating against, were in people that had taken the vaccine.
Right, and so they're saying that's why we need more vaccines.
To kind of recap the basics of what you said, the research on weaponized bioweapons in the labs, like in Wuhan, but there are also at least 12 major ones in the U.S.
and they're probably in several countries around the world.
That took millions of dollars.
I think they were doing something.
It wasn't like the hospitals in 2020, where the doctors and nurses were all just dancing around having holidays.
In the bioweapons labs, they really have a good work ethic, and they're supposed to produce something that's really bad for humanity, and I think they take that responsibility seriously, as far as we could tell.
But there's no evidence that what they produced was a virus.
Not in the classic sense.
But again, what do we think about a virus?
See, a virus, really, it's not about what these things are as much as what their point is, you know, what their principle use is.
So, which direction these... We know there are small bits of genetic material in little encapsulated liposomes.
The question is, what are they?
Are they little bits of toxins we're spitting out?
that then they harvest or is it it's our DNA that we're spitting out that become
these exosomes or is it viruses that are coming from the wild that go in?
In other words, where did the spike protein come from?
Well and I think that we kind of know that.
I think that came from, that's from the drastic group doing the research and things.
It seemed you could follow like Ralph Baric's lab in North Carolina and the Wuhan lab and the lab in Winnipeg and our bioweapons lab.
There's just all over the place that they were working on this stuff.
And they all were working on bat coronavirus.
I mean, but the problem is maybe we shouldn't call it coronavirus.
We should say there's some RNA that they're harvesting from these bats and they're weaponizing it.
It confuses us when we talk about it as a virus.
I think it's just harvested DNA or RNA and we don't really, you know, and again, there's why I don't have enough genetics understanding to completely understand the technology for doing it, but What we call a virus is a small amount of DNA wrapped, or RNA, wrapped in a lipoprotein coating that can get into your mucous membranes and make you sick or kill you.
That may or may not exist like that.
Those are also, that's how would you describe an exosome, something we spit out.
The other thing is, what would you call a genetic bioweapon?
Same thing, a very small amount of genetic material wrapped in lipoprotein coating in your mucous membranes and make you sick or kill you.
It's just, where does it come from?
But the name virus is really good for PR purposes.
Exactly.
Because people already know to be terrified of viruses.
And it helps promote a vaccine program.
You see, if you don't have viruses, you don't need vaccines.
If this is toxins, we can just clean up our environment.
Yeah, that would be terrible.
I mean, all these people stressed when they're losing their vaccine-related business and stuff like that.
So, we know that viruses save the world.
I mean, vaccines save the world from viruses.
So, it has to be a virus to need the vaccine.
That's right!
And the way that the initial bioweapon, which was probably built around the spike protein idea, May or may not have other components.
How that was spread to the cities that you mentioned, we don't exactly know the details of that, right?
Right.
I mean, it could be contact poison.
It could be spraying.
Who knows?
I mean, that depends on what kind of envelope they put it in, if that's really what happened.
Right.
They would be designed in favor of contact.
There was a video way back where it showed a woman in a Wuhan computer store, just like an Apple store, like opening up computers, touching the keys, shutting them, opening, touching, shutting, opening, touching, shutting, and then moving on, not looking at the computers.
That's the kind of thing you might do to spread something on those kids.
And she may not have even known that that was her job.
She thought she was an inspector or something.
The 5G component is really interesting because it looks to me like all the G's from 1 on up have been weaponized frequencies disguised as communication technologies and 5G being the worst of those so far.
But my question is that some of the people who got this respiratory distress syndrome and were lucky enough to
get real therapy such as ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine and vitamins that are critical to that,
you know, zinc and all that. They recovered even though they're still in the 5G environment.
Well, you know, the body, the canon's law of the body, the body responds to rate of
change.
So it's maybe, you know, the problem, and I'll just say this about the, not everybody, first of all, not everybody is equally susceptible.
It looks like people that have some abnormality of their porphyrin production, which is what makes hemoglobin, it's a pathway in your body to make hemoglobin.
If you have an enzyme system that's not quite right there, You might be more at risk, and one of the signs of that is you get pink urine when you're toxified by things like this.
One thing to look for.
So, it's not maybe the only thing that gives you that, but that's one of the signs that they, back in the 1800s, that they recognized that the people that had that, that reported that, were the more likely to have neurasthenia, that they had the problems of the, they were sensitive to the electricity.
Is that limiting their access to oxygen too?
Well, and that's, this is how we know this is happening.
So, at some, you know, and different levels of electrical impulses, wavelengths are going to do different, different damage to that.
Apparently, there's a 5G wavelength that you can actually make oxygen unavailable for us to breathe.
You turn it on and we just all die.
I mean, that would be horrible.
I don't know much about that, but I've heard that that is true.
But what is definitely true is that the rate in which you are exposed matters.
In other words, if I get slowly exposed, maybe my body has more time to adapt to it.
Mm-hmm.
What happens is when you suddenly turn these things on, so the guys in the hospital, and it's dose related,
the guys in the hospital in Wuhan, not only have they turned on these towers in Wuhan,
but they suddenly put them in that particular hospital where Dr. Li was.
So you couldn't get away from it.
They couldn't get home and sleep without it.
It was everywhere.
Hospitals are full of technology that's wireless too.
Right, and planes.
There's lots of areas you go that you get more of it than other places.
I mean, I hardwired.
When I started having time because I wasn't employed anymore as an orthopedic surgeon, I started reading all sorts of things.
I stumbled across this.
Not having ever really, other than thinking about it years ago, what all these things are doing to us, when I really started researching it, I turned around and I told my husband, who is an IT guy, I said, we need to hardwire the house.
Right, right.
Get rid of all this Wi-Fi, because you need to get away from it, at least in our house.
Yeah, and that means minimizing your use of the smartphone as a computer.
Yes, and that's my problem.
I have to admit that, you know, the problem I have is in the middle of the night when I can't sleep, the smartphone has a light on it.
It's the perfect nighttime reading tool.
You know what I'm saying?
I mean, I do.
But I really have to, I keep saying, okay, what I'm going to do is I'm going to, I'm going to unplug it from the electricity.
I'm going to turn all electric circuits off near my bed and I'm going to put it far away from me.
I don't normally have to get up early.
I don't need an alarm clock.
Right.
And rarely use it.
I'm going to try not to use it because that really is my biggest time that I sit with my cell phone.
It's raining.
If you did need a light, you know, they have these lamp things that you can get that plug into the wall and stuff.
Oh, I know.
I've tried those.
They either wake my husband up or they don't work.
I've tried that little thing you put around your neck.
None of it's focused enough.
None of it's focused enough, but I do think that the reason, and why do these drugs work if we're talking about electricity?
Because one of the things that this does is, and the way it bothers you, if it doesn't strip, if it doesn't damage the oxygen, if it's not at that frequency, when you're an electrode, and this is why Certain diseases are just becoming more prevalent, not only in us, but in animals.
They're not having psychiatric breaks, they're not carrying around cell phones, but they're getting fatter, they're getting cancers, they're having problems too.
So, bees, why are we having this problem with bees not being around?
That should be our canary in the mine moment.
But the thing that it does is that we all have mitochondria, these little powerhouses in our cells that take our food metabolism and then eventually convert it down an electron chain to produce our energy.
It's our cytochrome oxygenase chain.
And that requires electron transport.
And when you're in these electrified environments, apparently it strips the electrons from your electron chain.
Another thing in favor of this is, so you just, so you can't, your metabolism becomes less and less efficient.
Now cleaning up your diets, doing things, this is why things, and vitamin C is extremely important at that level of metabolism.
So maybe that's why vitamin C is a big deal here.
That's why they were using IV vitamin C to save people in Wuhan.
Right, right.
Now, so that's a big one, is stripping the electron away from that system.
But another one we've seen is people take the vaccine, for example, or they, I think with COVID, I think they've seen it in COVID, but in any case, they see what's called Rouleau formation of the red cells.
And I'm not saying we completely understand this or I completely understand this, but one of the things to know about red blood cells is they have a negative uh charge all around the outside so you have two cells that have negative charge and they repel each other but if i have something that strips those electrons away and now suddenly i don't have enough buffer then they start clumping up right and when we give things like carbon 60 or something that's an electron donor uh they unclump
Mm-hmm.
So there's a lot of, you know, in my opinion, there's a lot of little evidence points here that points to this, the 5G being a real deal, or the, in general, electrification of our world being a real deal.
It makes sense.
And then once, if you're on the top and you're trying to achieve extermination of life, which I think is what they're after, Then you just have enough of a justification to need to be saved with vaccines and let the vaccines do the rest.
They're discovering more and more ingredients in the vaccines now.
And you know, what was it in Spain?
They had that laboratory that identified visually graphene oxide.
But then after that, which I don't think is in the original bioweapon, so the vaccines do more damage than whatever was there in the beginning, being called a virus.
But now, they've had this expert in Germany, and I don't mean by his credentials, I mean he knew about activated carbon more than most people in Europe.
Right, you've probably heard about him.
Noack, yeah.
Yeah, Noack, he made this video saying, he didn't deny that graphene oxide is in there, but he said that there's a difference between that and graphene hydroxide, and hydroxide is the physical nanoscale razor blade.
Right, but see that's where I have a little bit of a problem and I don't know, I mean maybe he's right, I'm not saying he's not, but I have a friend that really is, used to work for NASA, really is a nanotechnology carbon chemist.
Yeah.
And what he's saying about that, I sent him that video, I said, do you think this is right?
Because I can't figure out, I can't, I always try and check things and I couldn't find out that guy's background.
Right.
Well, he found his PhD stuff, he found stuff and he said, He's really an activated charcoal guy.
I'm not sure.
And he said the only thing I don't, I don't know that I don't think he's right about the size thing, because when he's talking about these being like little razor blades, you got to keep in mind, you could probably those, although you can make big sheets theoretically of this, and I'm telling you this from somebody that knows carbon chemistry of nanocarbon particles, not me, I don't.
Yeah, yeah.
But basically what he said is, yes, you can make big sheets of graphene, but when you take it off the backing, you can't keep it big.
They all devolve into little nanoparticles.
And you can put 250,000 of those nanoparticles in a red blood cell.
Theoretically.
I mean, these could be that small.
So how, you know, that doesn't sound like something that's going to do a mechanical damage.
Now, I could be wrong there.
I don't know.
Yeah, I don't know.
It is suspicious that they murdered him or that looks like he got murdered.
That's usually the government seal of approval.
I mean that's the seal of truth anyway.
So I'm still looking into that.
I just don't know about it being truly a lacerating thing, but it's not good.
I can tell you the minimum is, which could have the same effect or worse, graphene is an incredible, even just plain graphene, but graphene oxide probably too, it's an incredible Conductor of electricity.
It's an electron transport.
It's a superconductor.
So if you're going to blast somebody with 5G and you've got a bunch of graphene, who knows what that does?
But it could be a receiver of some kind.
That's right.
It could be that could be there.
Now, I will tell you, I think that they did have this for a reason in these what these things that we're calling vaccines are not vaccines.
They were actually designed to be what they call viral based genetic therapies.
And we know that from the FDA Circular, they sent to their own researchers about the problem of shedding.
So, we know what they were called, viral-based genetic therapies and they were used for gene therapy and oncolytic therapy or cancer therapy and as such they have to be targetable.
You don't want to drop genetic therapy that's going to get rid of a cancer into the non-cancerous area, you want to drop it on the cancer.
So, if you're dealing with liver cancer, don't drop this stuff in the brain.
So, in theory, I think the graphene oxide was there To allow them to externally drive this material over to the put it in the liver.
That's interesting.
It's either that or it's to... The other thing that Charles Lieber worked on was so that it would drop the load when it got to some area.
Okay.
So it has something to do with targeting release.
Some kind of a control mechanism.
Targeting release, I think.
Yeah, interesting.
And there's so many other things that have been found.
I mean, Dr. Maté, remember, had pictures of parasites, synthetic and natural both, in a sample of the vaccine.
I mean, we have to do a series if we can figure out time to do it, but just to touch briefly, you mentioned that you originally had gone along with the doctors that rush to say, but I'm not anti-vaccine, this is not a
vaccine.
All the regular vaccines are great and they've saved the world from smallpox and polio and
everything and they didn't really know the whole story.
And the programming is so strong even in these really intelligent, very brave doctors that
tell as much truth as they know.
I'm not going to mention names because I don't want to say bad things about them, but they're not realizing the real history of vaccines.
Right.
When I looked at it back to Jenner, 1796 or whenever that was in the UK, I can't find evidence that they've ever really prevented disease at all.
Well, I think you've got a good point.
The big ones we talk about are polio and smallpox, but let's look at the world today.
The vaccines are causing more polio than clearly are in the wild.
That's why Bill Gates and his group got thrown out of India because they could clearly show that that program was causing the polio.
You know, the other thing with smallpox is there was a doctor in the South that showed that if you didn't have bed
bugs, you didn't transmit this stuff.
You didn't get it, even an outbreak if you didn't have bed bugs.
So by putting people in a clean environment, it went away.
Okay, now that doesn't, we have parasites and we have, we have things that, you know, can be transmitted from
mosquitoes like malaria.
There's no question about that stuff existing.
So whatever this is, it's possible that's true that the exosomes or whatever they are, maybe these aren't truly viruses, that they get transmitted though through bedbugs.
What we don't seem to have proven anywhere is that there are viruses going airborne and infecting people.
You know, in that being the case, these vaccines, what are we vaccinating against?
You know, I looked at the statistics for flu vaccine because I got into it.
I didn't, you know, I believed everything everybody told me.
My professor at the University of Rochester was Louis Lasagna, professor of pharmacology, went on to be the head of the FDA.
I thought I got really good training in pharmacology and I believed everything they told me.
Sure.
But No, it comes around 2000, what?
2012 or something like that.
And the nurses came to me and said, what is this?
You know, what do you think about this forced vaccination of us for flu vaccine?
And I said, well, nobody should be forced to have a vaccine ever.
It's a forced medical procedure that's never indicated ethically, but let me look into it.
And when I looked at the actual data, I realized it was a big fraud and a dangerous fraud.
It was actually killing people.
So, you know, I mean, flu vaccine, one of the statistics I just saw lately is 67% of Americans, now this is a CDC or WHO owned data, I think it's WHO, so whatever, we can argue whether this flu exists the way we think it is, but at least this is their belief and their data.
They say 67% of Americans take the flu vaccine and our mortality from flu is 0.02%.
5% of Estonians take the flu vaccine and their mortality from flu is 0.02%.
Same mortality.
Big difference in vaccination rates.
So, what's it really doing?
There was a really interesting project called the Control Group Project done in California recently.
Do you know about that?
Yep.
Brilliant.
What's that lady's name?
She was a guest on the show.
I should remember.
They're just looking at something that the vaccine companies have never done.
Unvaccinated children.
Well, and they want to make sure the control group doesn't exist.
And if you'd really have universal force vaccination, it won't.
Right.
But that hasn't happened yet.
And so when she collected the data from those rare people that have had no vaccines ever, every disease was radically lower.
Yeah.
All the chronic degenerative diseases, the heart attacks, cancer, everything.
Arthritis.
I mean, it was just clear correlation.
Well, we had a doctor lose their license simply by adding up and presenting data that the CDC presented on the amount of aluminum in childhood vaccines.
This was CDC data.
Right.
And they just by putting it all together and showing it, they lost their license because they were saying this exceeds the EPA level for toxicity by a long shot.
Right.
And that's the kind of crazy world we're in, and it's not randomly crazy, it's evilly crazy.
I think there's so deep corruption and deception that it's hard for people to grasp.
It is, absolutely.
Because one thing that comes up commonly is, how could there be that degree of coordination?
Right.
And you know, I'm going to quote J. Edgar Hoover, not that I quote him on much, but this is a really good quote.
He said that the individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous that he cannot believe it exists.
Yeah, exactly right.
And that's from J. Edgar Hoover, who had reason to know about these things.
Yeah, exactly.
So, you know, I think that's the problem, is that people don't understand.
But I tell people, look at Enron, okay?
Enron, that company that really went bankrupt, ultimately, but did it in such a corrupt,
they knew they were having problems, and so they stole from the people's pension funds,
and they made these people have no pension funds in the process of going down.
Well, this is a big company.
So if you don't think conspiracies can exist, it doesn't take a lot of people to have the conspiracy.
It's all segmented.
It's all compartmentalized.
People see the nice employee level people are just normal.
Right.
And then the corruption is at the top orchestrating it.
Yeah, they're just normal.
I literally have a family member by marriage who's working for Pfizer Doing quality control in their gene lab and I just wanted to say get out, get out, get out.
I know.
It's like the little people working at Auschwitz but people don't see that.
They don't see that they're contributing to this and that this whole thing is not, it doesn't take a lot of people in the know of the huge conspiracy, it just takes a few.
Right.
And then you have to have a sophisticated system of educating the people to serve you and giving them each level the right motivation to think that they're doing something important.
And they're blind to the big picture.
Yeah.
They're also blinded to the big picture.
That's why universities focus on specialization.
Right.
And, you know, years ago, there was this little booklet.
I don't know if I mentioned this last time I was on, but have you ever read this book, Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars?
Yeah, I read that.
Right.
Okay.
Well, remember that one of the things they talk about for controlling The narrative for controlling the population is to control education to the degree that they don't catch on to these very subtle weapons because they proved in this book or they show in this booklet that was not meant to be a book of notes taken from a meeting in the 50s that economic principles follow the same principles as does electricity.
So, you know, the basic No, that would be terrible.
It would be really stressful for the rulers to do that.
the physical equations that determine the electricity, properties of electricity also
determine the economy and you can use them interchangeably and they say in that, you
know, we don't want people smart enough to realize what the Harvard guys figured out.
No, that would be terrible. It'd be really stressful for the rulers to do that.
Yeah.
So basically, you know, in wrapping up this part, If people understand, or at least consider,
The basics of the so-called pandemic are based on fraud.
I mean, people don't want to talk about that because they realize it's dangerous, but I don't think we do our job by not telling the truth.
You know, there's no proof that that virus exists at all, except in silico, in a patented computer file from many years before, because David Martin has done a good job exposing that and others.
And you know, the guy from Canada, Patrick King, Yeah, exactly.
I mean, you know, he just asked for proof of that, because he was being charged $1,200 for being in a demonstration over 10 people.
And you know, part of this is so obviously unscientific fraud.
This is what bothers me.
The level of gullibility that people have that they really believe that you know that that it makes sense to say you have to stand six feet apart or that you are you are dangerous wearing a mask six feet into the into the restaurant but then you could safely take it off to sit at the bar or safely take it off to sit at your table I mean that's your educational idea that you were just mentioning is that right in the public health schools they're literally teaching that whatever the order is if it's from the right agency
It's true.
If you don't think it's true, you don't graduate.
So what do you think?
Is it true?
Yes, absolutely.
And they make themselves think that they're telling the truth because they don't want to think of themselves as dishonest.
So it's got a self-reinforcing thing where they're not consciously lying.
Yeah, I think that's right.
So people that don't think it's a conspiracy that's this big, consider the fact that they misdid the PCR test all around the world.
I mean, the PCR test, it wasn't the right test.
It should never be used for diagnosis.
We know that from Kerry Mullins, but they also overcycled the test 40 on average, 45 times around the entire world of the Western civilization.
Now, I read the brochure that came out with some of these like thermal fissure and things.
When they made the test, they tell you right in there, you only cycle it from 20 to 30 times.
If you go over 30 times, 30 to 35, you'll get some false positives.
But over 35, it's just junk.
It's like the broken clock that gets the right time twice a day.
It means nothing.
That's right.
How did, if it's not a conspiracy, so there's only two worldviews.
I mean, either they were told to do this and that would have had to been by definition an international conspiracy because it was all over the world and it harmed people by making people afraid.
So they were either instructed, these lab managers that are highly trained to set up tests and never do this kind of thing normally, or they suddenly had some kind of hissy fit where they all had a psychosis and they all erred in the same direction.
None of them accidentally under-cycled.
A huge coincidence.
Yeah, and it can't just be random because they never know under cycles.
I don't believe in the world psychosis of the lab manager theory.
Even the companies that are manufacturing those tests are very careful of their language and they don't say if the cycles are set right, it's a correct diagnosis.
Oh no, they just tell you you'll get a, they show you an S-shaped graph and they show you that at this point you're magnifying junk.
That's what happens.
Yes, yes, yes.
They don't say that at the other points you're not.
Right, that's right.
In fact, I think I've read one where it said this is not meant for diagnosis.
Right, so what it's meant for is to show that people are getting sick with something, which they just decided to call COVID-19, and therefore they need vaccines.
And the other treatments that actually help those people, whatever did cause it, whether it was 5G or toxins or spread bioweapons or whatever, Those things are suppressed, like hydroxychloroquine and vitamin D and IV vitamin C and all the helpful stuff.
And the ones that are pushed are the ones that kill you, such as the intubation, right?
Remdesivir.
Remdesivir.
Yeah, you know, there's, in fact, I have it on my Telegram site.
There's a And I think I got this from Lynn Finn, but it's like they looked at melatonin and then they looked at remdesivir.
And there are many, many manufacturers of melatonin.
There's only one, Gilead, for remdesivir.
And melatonin is patented and it's cheap.
It's really cheap.
Whereas remdesivir is not patented, but it's, I mean, I'm sorry, melatonin is not patented.
It's all over the place.
And remdesivir is patented and it's very, very expensive.
Peer-reviewed published papers, they had 10 papers on this for melatonin, so it's not like it's out in the woods, but my favorite one is the mortality risk reduction when they looked at melatonin for COVID was 79% versus remdesivir 26% if it even reduced it at all, because the toxicity level for remdesivir is very, very high.
And that's the problem, is that they're willing to accept this toxic drug with less benefit than they are this other.
It definitely parallels to the use of promotion of AZT a while back.
Funny thing, same people, isn't it?
Yeah, it's amazing.
So, the thing is to avoid being in... Oh, I keep thinking of... I want to say one more thing and ask you one more question, but in a country based on individual freedom, which in theory the United States was started on that idea, which is its value for the rest of the world in a big sense, even if a pandemic is real, You can't suspend unalienable natural rights at all, even temporarily.
And there's a lot of people that are saying with cities, you're bad because you went beyond the six months that your ordinance says you can extend the suspension of rights.
No, in America, if they go by the original ideals, which nobody's fully lived up to yet, but we should, and still could be done, you can't ever suspend for any period of time Natural, unalienable rights, or else they're not unalienable.
And from that point on, you don't have any.
And so the founders understood that, and they said we'd rather die of a real pandemic or whatever, than not be free.
Yeah, and that is what we're discussing here when it comes to like mandates of these vaccines, which I just heard, I guess, New York City, like you said, it's just mandated the whole city.
Well, it's not about what's in this vaccine or what's not in the vaccine, whether it's good or bad.
It's about principle and that is if you can accede to the notion that the government or your mayor or your boss can tell you that they have the right to force you to put something in your body.
Right.
Then they own your body, not you.
And that means you're by definition a slave.
And that's the only thing we're debating here is freedom versus slavery.
Look at Australia.
Dear God, look at Australia.
They're putting these videos out there where these people are not only confined to these little cubicle Huts sitting on the porch and they're supposed to have a mask on their porch and they're going to get a $5,000 fine if they don't and if they just walk over to do their laundry.
I mean these are people that are asymptomatic and not testing positive.
They've been interred just because they are living in a tyrannical takedown.
And they're victims of this but so are the guards who are taking money to believe that they are saving the world by You know, confining these people and enforcing... At some point, though, let's just point out, history doesn't look favorably upon those guards.
No.
If you look at past history, you know, seven doctors were hung at Nuremberg, including Carl Brandt, who I really think was a good guy.
He wasn't a bad guy, evil guy, but he was in a bad system and he didn't get out of the bad system.
And so his signature caused people to die.
Well, you know, that's the problem here.
These guys may not be intrinsically bad people, and they may not be evil people, but they're in a system that's doing very evil things, and just like the little guys that swept the floors in Auschwitz and baked the breads and kept the furnaces running or whatever, they didn't think of themselves as evil people.
They weren't, but They weren't.
They were just complicit in mass murder. They were just not realizing that they were, you know, Eichmann didn't make
make These places run. He just ran made that, you know
He was a good organizer People that made the work there made the places run and if
you stop working for evil evil will not survive Right, but you won't be you know after the war
Hometown justice took over in those little villages in Germany and a lot of these guys were killed by the by their
Yeah, so it would be better for the servants of evil to wake up now too.
It'd be better to get on the right side of history.
Yeah, they're victims, but they don't have to go along with it once they realize that.
Right.
There are other jobs out there.
Come on, guys.
There are, and besides the other existing jobs, and maybe we can talk about this in a future installment, we really need to be creating a new civilization before the old one is gone.
That's exactly right.
A parallel World of freedom.
Yeah, exactly.
So maybe we can talk about that next.
Anyway, awesome.
We could go on for 10 hours and I want to but we should have some little breaks between so thanks for being here.
I mean, we're all your fans.
So well, thank you for having me.
I love your show and I appreciate all you're doing.
Hold on.
We'll say goodbye in the break here unless you wanted to say one more thing.
No, that's good.
That's good.
Okay.
Okay.
Hold on.
So there goes Lee Merritt, you guys.
I hope you got a lot out of that discussion.
I thought she was great and I really appreciate people like her, either as doctors or in other positions of influence, operating from a position of character and ethics and honesty.
It would be good for that to spread everywhere, actually, throughout all of society, and that's why we ended up talking about the necessity of starting a new civilization, as many of the others we've talked to lately have mentioned.
I first came up with Peggy Hall, talking to her, and she's doing that, and so are a lot of other people.
Christian Northrup talked about it.
And I'm sure we're all involved in whatever way we can be.
Even if you don't do anything, you know, major changes in who you're dealing with on the outside now, if you just make a change to come from absolute integrity, if you're not 100% there already, that changes the world.
And we have to have Lee Merritt back.
Dr. Merritt, as soon as we get a chance, maybe every couple weeks or something.
And I think she's interested in doing that, so that could get a lot more of this vital information out to everybody.
And she's really right that a lot of the problems that we're dealing with come from the blind trust of authority that we've all been taught that we have to have, you know, especially, I mean, all kinds of authorities.
You're just not allowed to question them.
News anchors, famous news anchors, commentators, university people, corporate leaders, people in commercials, celebrities, doctors, hospital people, health authorities, public health leaders.
These are all people we've been trained to have just unquestioning blind trust in.
And that's threatening life on earth without any exaggeration right now.
So people like Dr. Merritt and all the other great ones that we've interviewed recently and in the weeks to come, they're trying to break through the hypnosis that we've all been afflicted with.
And it needs to break out soon because time is of the essence.
You can feel all the dark forces accelerating right now and that means the forces of light like you have to accelerate too.
Even if you're not physically in touch with very many people, if you change your own consciousness, it affects people at a distance.
And that's not some new age, amazing, you know, silly theory, conspiracy theory or whatever.
It's based on what quantum physics and all comes from, which is the basic way things are set up.
And we are all networked together.
And we're networked with everybody.
So the frequency which we generate, which everybody is broadcasting, whether they know it or not, most of us don't, is impacting everybody.
And if that becomes focused and conscious, then you can have as much influence on healing the world as you'd like to.
And it's hard to even grasp that concept, that it might be real.
But from what I've found so far, it is real.
And we're going to take it further every day, all of us that are interested in that.
That's what we're working on in Planetary Healing Club, which you can access if you want at planetaryhealingclub.com.
But it's what we're all having the opportunity to work on every day, all day, all night.
We're doing it now, just in a very scattered, unconscious way, most of us, and that can be changed.
So anyway, that's a long subject.
That's PlanetaryHealingClub.com and we'll be trying to put references to it and bits of it that we can on the public platforms too.
So either way, we'll try to share it with you as much as possible.
Dr. Lee Merritt has a website called Drleemerrit.com.
D-R-L-E-E-M-E-R-R-I-T-T.com.
You can also get there by going to themedicalrebel.com.
They go to the same site.
And there are all kinds of videos that she's got there that she's been interviewed by people.
And she's got her own podcast, which she mentioned in the show, Mondays.
And I haven't seen it before.
I didn't know about it before.
But I will definitely be interested in that.
And I would imagine that that will be on her website as well.
So I think that's the main thing and share the link.
This is one that gets censored and shadow banned and everything.
Dr. Lee Merritt's not acceptable to the mainstream, which means she's got a lot of vital information and she's a really good person, you know, from my point of view.
Risking your life to share this stuff, so I think it's worth our time to share it to get over the shadow banning and the censorship and get the recording of Lee Merritt into the biggest networks that you can or even if you have a small one, get it into your own email network and share the link.
I think that's about it.
The main message as always is just take care of yourself, incorporate, learn and use the real health information that's being hidden.
It's still available and you can get hold of it in a lot of different ways.
Transform your health, get off as many drugs as you don't need.
Some doctors will actually help you do that.
There are a few conscious doctors that realize, wait a minute, There's something wrong with taking poisonous chemicals and swallowing them and thinking that's going to make you healthy.
I can't put my finger on it, but there's something wrong with that.
They're realizing it.
Even if they're called medicine, it's what they are that matters, not what they're called.
And there are positive, real medicine things to learn about which, like Hippocrates said, do no harm.
They don't just hurt you a little bit or kill one out of every hundred people or something.
They don't hurt anybody.
That's real medicine.
And it's not as profitable as the medicine that makes you sick all the time because then you think you need more and more of it.
So learn about it and use it.
Help your families and your friends with it, whoever's interested.
And then you can do your real work of healing the world much easier if your body's feeling good and you're not sick all the time.
Just a suggestion.
And to stay in touch with where we are on the air and not censored, go to LostArtsRadio.com.
All the links are there to the live shows and the different kinds of platforms that we're on, audio and full video.
And if you have resources and you want to help us stay on the air, since we're not getting in money from most normal sources, we're not doing commercials and stuff like that, we're very appreciative of assistance on any size.
Donate button is at lostartsradio.com or the subscribe star link there, subscribestar.com slash lostartsradio.
If you have the means to do that, that would be great.
Otherwise, please share the videos and benefit from them.
That's the whole point.
Take the information that's coming from these great people and use it to help your life, and that will accomplish the main goal.
Even if you say nothing, you influence everybody else all the time.
So, that's about it.
That's our Sunday show, and we have a Saturday show, Lost Arts Radio Live, in the afternoon and evening in US time.
That's linked on lostartsradio.com.
And also, after the live show, we have Planetary Healing Club live meeting.
Doug and I are there every week in person.
And we go over all kinds of incredible, incredible information beyond what we can share on the public venue.
So that's PlanetaryHealingClub.com.
I think that's about it.
And hope you have a good night.
Thanks for giving us your time.
And I hope you got a lot out of listening to Dr. Lee Merritt today.
And I'll look forward to seeing you next time.
▲
Export Selection