All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 20, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
59:29
Truth vs. NEW$ Part 2 (19 December 2021) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett and Holly Seeliger
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Three, two, one.
Welcome back, folks, to Truth Vs. News here on the 19th of December.
We left it in a hot topic here we gotta go back on to, to get on.
Scott, your thoughts about the COVID variant and all the reports we've had here about killing people, especially the elderly.
It's shocking stuff.
Your thoughts.
The general awakening of the American citizenry and the world citizenry is pointing in the direction that people are rising up slowly, but they're rising up, they're marching in the streets, they're holding banners, and there are many, many, probably 10 times more that are not marching in the street or holding banners, but they are firmly in the ideological camp and in full agreement With those people that they will not be getting a vaccine.
It is killing people.
It's killing their relatives.
And it's also a traumatic awakening that never before in the history of the United States or Western civilization has the government been so murderous and tyrannical against its own people.
And what you read You know, if you want to survive COVID, essentially, you have to do the opposite of what the government is telling you to do.
That's never happened in the history of Western civilization.
We've always operated under the understanding that government is an expression of the citizenry to do for the citizenry what they can't do for themselves, and keeps tranquility in order to ensure the domestic tranquility.
Peace, harmony, stability, so that people can grow and flourish in their human life for the purposes of domestic tranquility.
Governments are instituted among men.
This is not tranquility.
This is death and disruption.
This is chaos.
This is fear.
This is abuse.
This is a manipulation.
This is a coup d'etat from dark forces, globalist forces, tyrannical forces, whatever you want to call them, and people are rising up And they're going to, I think they're going to violently oppose, and they're also going to quietly in a guerrilla war way, oppose it and new leaders are going to be rising up to the political stage and say very simply very matter of factly,
Vote for me or we cannot survive any longer under this establishment that is killing your relatives and giving people a death shot and this vaccine, this Omicron variant and all this other stuff and the boosters.
All of the death is going to be coming from those who are vaccinated.
And that's going to be the division between the two camps of people.
The unvaccinated will be surviving because they have intact immune systems, and the vaccinated will be decaying and just being melted down into a slow death.
And I think that's what we're going to be witnessing in the future.
Jim?
I'm sorry to say, I think you got it right, Scott.
Paula, your thoughts?
Well, I remember several people back in 2019, people who were covering investments in the stock market.
There was something called the repo market, which actually crashed in 2019.
So there were several people, including Katherine Austin Fitz, who had said, Well, with this crashing of the repo market, there's going to have to be some sort of event to cover this up because we're going to have a massive global crashing of the economy if something doesn't happen here pretty soon for the global elites.
Well, she and other people were right.
With this crashing of the repo market, there was this major event which suddenly happened in 2020.
So, we knew that this was part of the global cover-up.
The banks were too big.
And it was a perfect opportunity for them to start to launch this Build Back Better that we're seeing being pushed everywhere and a massive asset stripping operation as well.
People aren't understanding that it's not just about killing a bunch of people.
It's about taking people's assets.
So BlackRock and others who are owned by Vanguard, who we were not allowed to know who actually owns these massive corporations.
BlackRock has acquired Over 20% of single family homes in the United States just under the past couple years.
I believe they own Zillow.
So this is part of the whole global reset where you will own nothing and you'll be happy and that even applies to your own family.
So as you were talking about people being Margaret in the nursing homes where we're going to see more and more people dying.
I actually know someone right now, I'm not going to get too much of the details, but an older woman who just got her booster shot and she seems to be losing her mind right now.
Suddenly she's got some sort of rapid onset You know, possibly dementia or something.
She's not, she's not right where she was, you know, 85 years old and fine until recently and suddenly strange things are starting to happen.
So I think we are seeing a lot of people.
I also know women who are my age who are having a massive autoimmune disorder problem suddenly where they're just, oh, the doctors say, we don't know what's going on, but it seems like your immune system is attacking itself.
So Even if you survive something like that, you are going to be siphoning off of the healthcare system and causing massive problems for both yourself, massive medical bills.
You're going to be going back to all kinds of doctors and specialists for years and they're not going to have any sort of answer for you.
And that's a huge point of all this.
If they can't kill you, which people were calling this a boomer room over back in 2020, And a lot of this has to make sure that they can't pay out, you know, Social Security or retirement benefits.
All of that stuff is gone.
The US dollar has crashed.
People haven't understood that this is happening right now.
So that money that was promised to people in retirement, in pensions and Social Security, all of that, they keep raising the debt ceiling.
I think this is the 90th time that they've raised the debt ceiling.
So instead of actually owning up and making sure, as Obama said, They're too big, too big to fail, too big to jail.
So they're just going to kill a bunch of people and then they won't have to pay out any sort of pensions or retirement.
And the plan, they've even said, you know, once you're 40 or, you know, 35 or something like Logan's run, they just want to pull it.
They want to kill you so that they don't have to pay out anything.
And yes, they killed my grandmother in a nursing home.
That was about a year ago now.
And I was, Smart enough to record some of our last conversations on the phone where she said that they were denying her water and beverages.
So she died from dehydration and they labeled it COVID and my whole family believed it was COVID.
When she never had a fever, never had any body aches, she was healthy.
She was just blind because her eyesight wasn't very good.
So they stuck her in a nursing home and this was in New Hampshire.
So this isn't even in one of the huge states like New York.
Or Massachusetts where they were killing tens of thousands of people in nursing homes.
So this is happening all over the United States and I just want people to know that that happened and they're still probably doing that to people in nursing homes right now.
Jim, one thing to keep in mind, you may have people, as this evolves, we've said before, you may have people going in with a vendetta and a vengeance and taking wrath upon those doctors and nurses Who have murdered other people's grandmother, wives, children in a very bloody, violent way.
Gun, all sorts of retribution and attacks may occur.
Jim?
Let me just say as an octogenarian that the last 20 years of my life has been the most rich and rewarding.
Being a grandparent is God's great gift to humanity, and I just feel sad for anyone who never has that opportunity.
It's just been joyful, joyful!
And if my life had been eclipsed at 60 or so, I would not have enjoyed the most meaningful parts of my entire life.
So let there be justice done.
Meanwhile, the maniacal Fauci is now pushing for a universal coronavirus vaccine and the media praises him as a trusted servant.
NBC reported.
The scientific quest for a universal vaccine received a boost as three top federal researchers, including Tony the Rat, outlined a path to developing new vaccines for a variety of ailments, some common colds and future viruses.
Writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, Fauci and two colleagues said the virus that causes COVID is unlikely to be eliminated.
That's an understatement, since it's ubiquitous in nature, and current vaccines are too limited to prevent the emergence of the variant.
To overcome the problem, the authors argue the research world should fully commit to develop a second generation of coronavirus vaccine.
During the past two decades, the world has seen four deadly outbreaks, including two bouts with SARS, the emergence of MERS, and now COVID-19.
The commentary offers no quick fixes.
But Fauci's endorsement of a universal vaccine approach could serve as a clarion call.
Frankly, scientifically, it's absurd.
Because every virus is different, you cannot have a universal vaccine.
It's impossible.
Many in America and around the world believe Fauci is maniacal and dishonest, never to be trusted.
I confirm that.
Among the many reasons is he sat next to Donald Trump for months and never once mentioned he had funded multiple studies in China overseen by China's military related to COVID.
Trump brought in Dr. Atlas Avermont, a Fauci and Birx running the country's campaign.
Atlas stated he believed the doctors were doing all they could to mess up the country with insane actions in their strategy and that Pence was covering for them.
Bobby Jr.
also shares the truth in his new book, The Real Anthony Fauci.
Here he discusses making millions on the COVID vaccine.
NBC appears to be publishing propaganda, not news.
Referring to Fauci as a respected actor ignores the belief of a material amount of Americans and individuals worldwide.
Don't they care about sharing the concerns about Fauci?
I mean, Scott, it's just disgusting how the media have gone all in to promote this fake pandemic and the very deadly vaccines as though they were the solution to the problem.
Your thoughts?
Well, what's always offended me is the lack of military bearing and seriousness concerning this whole matter.
It is a threat to national security if you are forcibly vaccinating the military, the police, the border services that will inevitably fall.
The military should have had Surgeons and doctors standing next to Trump.
Not a four-foot-seven Fauci munchkin from the Wizard of Oz throwback.
The military surgeons should have been in full uniform standing behind the president.
They should have been taking lead.
Peter Navarro gives a very detailed account of no military were ever present.
You're surrendering it to the FDA and the FDA undermined Trump by not putting out hydroxychloroquine despite his mandate, despite his orders.
So Trump was stabbed like Caesar from a thousand different knife wounds, but he still took it.
He didn't man up and say, get my Praetorian Guard down here and throw all these bastards in jail.
They've never treated it like the national security threat that it is.
And we are going to see the fall of Rome.
Replicated in the fall of the United States across the southern border, the spread up of these migrants into these border towns, the days of a prosperous America and what we thought, you know, was always the destiny of America.
God is going to overthrow and treat us like Egypt and bury us in a sandstorm of our own making.
So that's always disturbed me is the lack of military engagement in this whole matter And it is a national security threat, and for that reason alone, Rand Paul and all of these clowns that have stood up on the Senate and the House, that have never once had a briefing and a hearing with Dr. Minaj, Dr. Martin, Dr. Tenpenny, who I met last week, Dr. Mikovits, all of the people who've worked in these fields,
Mikovits who worked with Fauci.
They've never been at a big table at the Congress having this debate and discussion, and that alone tells me we have no leaders representing our best interest.
We have parasites, we have criminals, we have thieves occupying positions of power because they have failed to have the best experts up there to determine and define this as the national security threat it is.
And hope is rapidly dissipating for this country as a federal union.
It'll always be individual pockets of patriots, but as a uniformed country, as a unified federal union, I think this country is done, and we're going to see a rise of a city-state model in America.
Jim?
Very interesting, Scott Hawley.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, I think Scott's right about this idea of more and more states and regions taking power and having more and more autonomy as we're seeing many of the truth movement people are going down to Florida or going to other states coalescing in certain areas of the US, which is pretty fascinating.
I've seen a huge difference here just I'm I'm in like close to the border of New Hampshire and Maine and it's like night and day you know you go go over the border in Maine and people's people are scared to death they're wearing masks you know they're staying home and they're they've totally bought into everything and then you go over to New Hampshire and everything's completely normal everything's open so and we don't see it you know people dying or you know A homeless people dead on the side of the street or something from some sort of pandemic.
It's just it's all in people's minds at this point.
And it's fascinating how the local news and the politicians still have such a grip upon people where they can't even see.
I mean, we've been conditioned to believe the things that we see and hear and think and experience in day to day doesn't exist.
Meanwhile, the things on On television and what our politicians are telling us are what is actually going on.
So I think that that's why like the let's go Brandon slogan became so popular been thinking about this because it literally is a woman on TV a news reporter telling people what they're hearing and we all know what people are saying constantly and so but yet we've gotten to the point where the Mockingbird media is telling us Hey, this is what you're hearing right now, and it's just turned into a bizarro clown world, I guess.
I mean, for me to go five minutes over a border and I have to wear a mask and then go back over the bridge and everything's normal and has been from the very beginning should be pretty telling to people all across the United States at this point.
So we are seeing, it's sort of like a polis or something.
It's bizarre as the federal government and all this seems to collapse around us.
Well, you made a wonderful point that the Lesko-Brandon is an implication of the fake news media as much as it is of the popular sentiment of F. Joe Biden.
I mean, it's fascinating.
You made a wonderful point, Holly.
I love it.
And you know that Titleists won't even allow their golf balls to have this.
A wonderful new figure has emerged on the scene of Sandy Hook, Mary Maxwell.
I'm so impressed she has a new book.
I have published this on my blog.
I want to go through it because she writes so clearly.
And having another independent voice take a look at Sandy Hook, I think, makes a big difference.
Get this.
Real adjudication is called for in the Sandy Hook affair by Mary Maxwell, LLB, also PhD.
It's time now to wrap up nine years of Sandy Hook.
I put quote works around the name Sandy Hook to imply I am not talking about the district of Newtown, Connecticut known as Sandy Hook.
I am referring to the Sandy Hook story.
Or, as for the actual district, I have no criticism, nor do I think ill of its people.
If anything, I sympathize with the large number of residents there who were ordered to tell lies.
The San Diego story says a massacre occurred there on December 14, 2012.
No such thing happened.
It is all fictional.
It's very important for Americans to grasp this as soon as possible.
It's quite common for the MSM, mainstream media, to put out stories, some big, some small, that are fictional.
What can we do about this?
In the old days, journalists had a code of ethics that required that they not publish as fact an item for which they had only one source.
They need to find a second source or go out and personally investigate the allegation to determine its worth.
False flags.
I do not know the solution to today's lying by the media.
On four occasions, I've been so annoyed by falsifying stories that I've gone out and investigated them myself, to the extent of writing a book.
The first three were Port Arthur massacre of 1996, the Sydney siege of 2014, and the Boston
Marathon bombing of 2013. I had considered the 2012 Sandy Hook story to be false.
I thought it was true and assumed the hoopla about it on the internet was perhaps a psyop unto itself.
I was particularly disgusted when a Connecticut citizen named William Brandon Shandley sued various newspapers.
That looked to me like a way for those newspapers to mock conspiracy theory.
The judge dismissed the case.
But I later concluded that Stanley knew the truth.
Too late to apologize to him, as he is now deceased.
Here in a nutshell is the full story of Sandy Hook Elementary School.
A guy named Adam Lanz, age 20, broke into the school at 9.30 a.m.
on a school day, went into a classroom of first graders, and shot dead 16 kids.
He then went into another classroom and shot dead four more.
Plus, he shot dead six staff members.
He also shot and wounded a staff member named Natalie Hammond, but she has never appeared in an interview, as far as I know.
There's also a wounded child whom we have never seen.
Adam, then, killed himself.
Hearing the nutshell is the correct story.
It has been common for over half a century for powerful persons in the U.S.
to arrange for real violence to occur to make us think our neighbors are to be feared.
A possible early example of a shooter killing randomly is that of Charles Whitman in 1966.
He reportedly stabbed to death his mother and his wife and then climbed a tower at the University of Texas to shoot students.
He killed 15, wounded 21, until a policeman shot him dead.
His motive?
Wikipedia settles the matter by saying In the months prior to the attack, Whitman had sought professional help for overwhelming violent impulses, including fantasies about shooting people from the tower.
An autopsy conducted after his death revealed a hypothalamic tumor.
On the contrary, I think Charles may have done all of that under hypnosis.
So there we are, torpedoed and hijacked.
We had better improve our game, and soon anyone worth a working intellect needs to join this effort, by purpose of Sandy Hook.
To create a fictional story of a child massacre would naturally require a lot of money and a lot of effort, so why bother?
What was game?
I have heard three purposes suggested.
The first is gun control.
Certainly much is made of the shooting by persons who do not want the public to easily acquire a gun.
And the bereaved families, I mean the bereaved in quote families at Sandy Hook, have taken a prominent role in the anti-gun movement.
A helpful book, co-edited by James Fetzer and Mike Palachuk, is entitled Nobody Died at Sandy Hook.
It was a FEMA drill to promote gun control.
The second possible purpose of Sandy Hook was to use it as tryout for later events, such as a Boston Marathon bombing.
In other words, a powerful way of testing the public's gullibility.
It seems we passed with flying colors.
Although there are many critics of Sandy Hook and published comments on the internet, no official action has taken place in opposition to this false flag.
Note, it took Congress nine years from its Gulf of Tompkins gullibility in 1964 to its official opposition in the 1973 War Powers Act.
I go along with those first and second purposes of Sandy Hook, nuking the Second Amendment and prepping for the marathon affair.
But I'm especially devoted to a third purpose, namely, the powerful wants to stop making any distinction between fact and fiction.
This is the premise of my book, Unreality, Sandy Hook Messes Minds.
I claim that the Sandy Hook issue is meant to expose us to huge lies, whilst we sort of realize they are lies, and finally give up on trying to distinguish between reality and unreality.
Court cases.
I mentioned before that I had until 2021 believed that the massacre was real.
This was partly because I've been a student of both the 1996 Port Arthur Massacre in Australia and the 1996 Dunblane Massacre in Scotland.
Both were real.
Port Arthur had about 35 adult victims and Dunblane had 16 kids and one teacher.
I am sure that in both cases were false flags.
That is, the alleged gunman, Martin Bryant, who's still in prison for Port Arthur, and Thomas Hamilton killed himself and Dunblane were not the real killers.
They were substitutes.
In any case, I got over my intellectual laziness about Sandy Hook when William Sumner Scott, who is an attorney for Jim Fetzer, showed me the case of Soto et al.
v. Remington.
This was a civil lawsuit brought by Donna Soto and eight others against Remington Arms, the manufacturer of the Bookmaster gun that was allegedly used in the Sandy Hook massacre.
The case is also called Soto v. Bushmaster.
My appraisal of the hoax, the four insurmountables.
Let me identify four insurmountable obstacles to Sandy Hook being real.
Each should have been caught by any court or any competent defense attorney or any careful investigator.
Obstacle one.
On the day of the event, December 14, 2012, a photo of eight children escaping from the school was sent to media all around the world.
It is called The Iconic Shot.
The photographer was Ms.
Shannon Hicks of the Newtown Bee.
In the shot, we see a bluish woman in the middle of the line.
She is Rachel Van Ness.
She seems to be helping the kids who are walking with their eyes closed and a hand on the child in front of them.
This piece of evidence in favor of a real massacre is surely compelling.
However, another photo, I'll call it Photo B, reveals the iconic photo to have been taken at a time other than the December 14, 2012 date.
We see the same scene with the same kids in the same position of the parked cars and the same officer, Van Ness.
But this Photo B reveals five parents standing there watching it.
They would not be standing so casually if they'd been told that many kids were murdered.
Also note, there's a case still happening in Wisconsin vis Jim Fetzer's attempt to get an appeal with that state Supreme Court over the award of $450,000 that a jury made to Leonard Posner in the defamation suit Posner v. Fetzer.
Mr. Posner claims that Fetzer in effect called him a liar by saying that his six-year-old son knew his death certificate was fake.
When Fetzer attempted to get discovery, he was denied it by Wisconsin Circuit Court Purdane County Judge Frank D. Remington.
This is a wrongful denial, as Fetzer was ready to present two expert witnesses concerning the non-authenticity of the death certificate.
Similar cases for defamation were brought against internet broadcaster Alex Jones in Connecticut and in Texas, where he lives.
Jones is still litigating them, but he has withdrawn his assertion that Sandy Hook is a hoax.
My appraisal of the hoax, the four insurmountables, let me identify four insurmountables.
Each should have been caught.
I evidently have one out of order.
I deduce that all these photos were probably taken on a day when the kids were told to act like a drill was in force.
Drills are common.
The reason critics say photo B was staged is that Officer Van Ness was trying out various arrangements of the line.
Note how, in one pose, a girl in pink Pale pink jersey is at the front.
Well, in another, a black jersey boy leads the line.
That one must have passed the test for suitability.
It became the iconic photo used by the mainstream media.
Granted, a picture could have been taken by Shannon Hicks and then misused by the media.
This often happens.
But she has said that the iconic shot is the picture that she took on that day.
Obstacle 2.
The kill-to-wounded ratio of Adam Lanza is impossible, even for a military marksman.
Adam is said to have killed 26 and wounded only 2.
I suppose one can worm out of the hoax theory by saying several gunmen did the deed, but no one has ever postulated that.
To repeat, the official story contains an impossible kill-to-wounded ratio.
Obstacle 3.
A policewoman in the iconic shot, Rachel Vandez, has signed a sword statement that she helped a few sets of kids get from the building to the safety of the firehouse down the hill from the school.
Her testimony includes the absurd statement that she walked at the back of the line.
How would first graders with their eyes shut and crying be able to walk without a leader?
Her testimony also includes a bizarre statement that she made sure no parents grabbed their child.
Obstacle 4.
Remington's demurral from demanding discovery is itself an insurmountable obstacle to the Sandy Hook Massacre being real.
Any judge would see that something peculiar was afoot.
He or she would suspect that the plaintiff and defendant are in cahoots.
Real adjudication is called for.
The massacre did not happen.
I identify many ways to analyze this in my book, Unreality.
Sandy Hook messes minds.
Do I really care about the Sandy Hook hoax?
In truth, no.
But I care about the messing up of minds.
We need our minds.
I care a lot about the lies in the Marathon bombing story and the judiciary's willingness to turn a blind eye to the exculpatory evidence in the U.S.
vs. Sarinov case.
I am an amicus curiae in that case.
See my book, Boston's Marathon Bombing.
What can law do for proof that the FBI killed Tamerlan Sernoff and that he was never in a police shootout in Watertown's Laurel Street?
I have filed a RICO suit to no avail.
See Maxwell versus FBI at all.
As stated in the title of this article, we need real adjudication.
Just think, such a huge thing as a disputed mass murder, and it has never come to court.
The defamation cases, which should have been a victory for free speech, have been judged summarily for the government.
I call upon courts to man up to this challenge.
I also urge the participants who never really wanted the hoax to occur to speak out and be rewarded.
A heartfelt apology is due to any underage person who was instructed to lie.
There must be thousands of people in Newtown, Connecticut who are sick of the whole damn thing.
If necessary, a citizen-led grand jury can be convened to help in this vital matter.
Vital matter?
Why vital?
Because our countrymen need to find out pronto the extent to which governments create unrealities such as the vaccination passport bullshit.
It's got to stop.
Let it stop by your clamoring for Sandy Hook truth.
Send me your email ideas you want to marymaxwelllb at gmail.com.
Scott, your thoughts.
Wow.
Well, I'll tell you, Jim, I can't wait to testify as an expert in psychological warfare at your trial.
I'll pay for my own way and everything, because I will resemble Al Pacino in that quintessential classic scene, the scent of a woman saying, I'm going to take a flamethrower to this whole place, verbally and rhetorically.
The Sandy Hook revelation is, you know, I think it's going to come out and perhaps be the vomit point for the American people because, you know, there's so many things that have been captured that have been false about this.
And she does an excellent job at nailing it all down.
A couple points I wanted to raise.
It's very important to understand there's a drug called Olanzapine.
You and I have talked about this before.
Olanzapine is an anti-psychotic drug.
My guess in theory would be to FOIA all parties, FEMA, Department of Justice, FBI, Olanzapine, Sandy Hook, Adam Lanza, and you may come up with the email that says let's call our key crisis actor perpetrator Adam Lanza, based on a Lanzapine, because it might just be the straw that breaks a camel's back.
The other thing is Chris Kyle, the American sniper, was president of Kraft International, which was present at the Boston Marathon bombing.
Chris Kyle was not a full-blown sniper.
He was taken out of sniper training, or I'm sorry, SEAL training, and put into a rack, and he was killing civilians, going in, hopping fences, shooting goats with AK-47s to cause the indigenous people to come out and then shoot them.
Not many people know about that, but Chris Kyle was assassinated, no doubt, for all this stuff and others that he knew.
But that's remarkable that Chris Kyle, Kraft International, Boston Marathon palming, which we have shown, of course, in your work, Jim, Was a false flag training exercise too.
The Kraft International guys being caught on tape wearing jackets and such.
I wouldn't be surprised if perhaps Chris Kyle was one of those guys.
So the Sandy Hook, the forensics are all there.
Where is the autopsy photograph of this Adam Lanza, you know, shooting himself?
The absence of a photo of that shows the absence of a person entirely.
And we could go on and on about The FBI SWAT member who's carrying his gun upside down by the magazine in a light brown uniform and then suddenly appears on Bill Moyers as an aggrieved father and then also exposes crisis actors and then the other crisis actors that are laughing and giggling and smiling and then they go up to the podium and they're all full of drawn, gaunt, sad faces.
This again and again and again shows us The great division in this country.
Those who are stupid, sick, and lost in a sleep in the matrix.
And those of us who are not only waking up, but are waking up with a fury and a firm resolution to overthrow this tyrannical, parasitic, vampire government and media that is killing our people slowly.
Jim?
Oh, Scott, yes.
Those are excellent comments.
I'm fascinated by your Adam Lanzapine.
Scott, that makes great sense.
I think it's a subliminal marketing message.
Very, very astute of you to make that connection.
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, I think that's an excellent piece by that writer.
I think we will see more and more people writing about this event, especially as like the 10th anniversary
comes up and people can kind of step back because I know so many people had questions about this
event and so many other events that have happened
in the mainstream news, but they have been conditioned by peers, the peer pressure to be quiet
and to think of the children, think of the families and parents, and you're a monster
if you question anything within the media, all of that is so strong within people
that they have lost their ability to use any sort of basic critical thinking
and to question the motives of the media.
And I think as she pointed out rightly, the biggest casualty to all of this
is people's critical thinking abilities and our ability to discern truth.
We were just talking about that with the let's go, Brandon, the media will literally lie to your face
while hundreds of people are screaming F Joe Biden and tell you what you are hearing
and what you are thinking and what you're believing.
And that has been the biggest for them.
You shared a great article this morning with me, Jim, talking about how so many of these people in the NIH are upset that more people didn't get the jab and they had miscalculated on their amount of propaganda that they had to use, basically, is what they're admitting.
They're saying our propaganda campaign leading up to this wasn't strong enough to convince people to believe us.
There wasn't enough fear.
There wasn't enough carrot or stick.
Like, you know, they're scrambling right now because they really believe that they had people
hook, line, and sinker.
And I think part of their acclimating people, and they have all these drills and events to try to see
and in real time using stuff like Cambridge Analytics and other real time tracking, they can see how people react.
And one of the things that they've done, they've stabbed themselves in the foot really,
is the more that they censor, the less they're able to actually use
that real time tracking to see if people believe something or not.
So, well, they're so busy censoring everything now that they can't read what our thoughts are exactly
until, you know, they roll out whatever biometric tracking or whatever they, I mean, these people are such psychopaths
and they're so hell bent on control of every single little thing
that they wanna be able to lie to us 24 seven and think that they're gonna get away with it.
I just know from personal experience and other people that I've known, you know, growing up in New England, there were so many people who weren't buying this official narrative who were going to that area in Connecticut.
There was actually, like, a conspiracy tourism around that area to where people actually wanted to see, like, let's see the school, let's see the homes, let's see how this whole thing laid out.
They bulldozed Adam Lenz's home, they bulldozed the school, They got rid of everything.
They cleared out that whole, the whole memory of that whole event.
They claim it was, you know, because of the memory of the children, this and that.
But if you look at history of a lot of these events, they have to have a cleanup act once afterwards.
So who's never heard of them like bulldozing the home of someone afterwards after an event like this?
The school and everything so they had to do a big scrubbing operation because there were so many people who were driving down there and actually talking to people and actually get trying to get some actual information as to what happened there.
Oh Holly, that was just all wonderful, wonderful stuff.
I'm just delighted with your comments today and I think you're right.
More and more people are going to come out.
Meanwhile, could aggressive U.S.
rhetoric against Russia be the result of Biden's poor standing at home?
Take my word for it.
Scott will elaborate.
Meanwhile, seven signs that war with Russia just got even closer from zero hedge.
In this article, which is authored by Michael Snyder, a very smart guy, I'm going to write about something the vast majority of the U.S.
population couldn't care less about.
Sadly, most Americans simply do not care about Ukraine, Russia's military preparations for war, or pretty much anything else that happens on the other side of the globe.
But over in Russia, Things are completely different.
There's constant talk about the potential for war with the West, and there's a lot of pessimism that will be able to be avoided.
To the Russians, this really is the biggest crisis with the West since the Cuban Missile Crisis of the 1960s.
Russians have repeatedly warned that Western missiles must not be stationed in Ukraine, and they have repeatedly warned that Ukraine must not become a member of NATO.
They are using the same rationale we used during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
We didn't want the Russians, really the Soviets, to have missiles in Cuba that could potentially hit our major cities within just a matter of a few minutes.
And likewise, the Russians don't want missiles in Ukraine that could potentially hit their major cities within just a matter of a few minutes.
The only way that Vladimir Putin will ever authorize an invasion of Ukraine is if one of his strategic red lines is crossed.
But instead of easing tensions and trying to talk things out, Western leaders just keep provoking Russia.
If they keep on recklessly provoking the bear, at some point a mistake will be made and we will have a war that nobody wants.
The following are seven signs that war with Russia just got even closer.
First, Despite the fact that Vladimir Putin has said that such a move would cross one of his red lines, Ukraine was just told it will eventually be allowed to join NATO.
Facing a building threat from Russia, Ukraine's president sought security guarantees from NATO's chief in a meeting Thursday and came away with a renewed commitment that his country could eventually join the military alliance despite stiff objections from its Russian neighbors.
They will not let that happen.
Second, Ukraine has shocked the world by opening up bomb shelters in Kiev.
Ukraine has opened bomb shelters in the capital as fears of a Russian invasion soar on Wednesday.
A Ukrainian minister and former top spy warned the conflict could spread globally.
Third, ABC's Martha Raddatz is reporting that after Joe Biden's recent call with Vladimir Putin, the Russian moved an additional 10,000 troops to the border with Ukraine.
Fourth, The EU is warning of massive costs for Russia if there's any more aggression toward Ukraine at this point in time.
Russia is choosing an aggressive posture vis-a-vis its neighbors.
And as the European Union and its G7 partners have made very clear, further aggressive acts against Ukraine will have massive costs for Russia, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said Wednesday.
Fifth, banks in Belarus are preparing to switch to Russia's version of SWIFT due to imminent sanctions by the West.
Belarusian banks are preparing for tougher Western sanctions by signing up to Russia's alternative to the SWIFT, the international financial messaging network that underpins the global banking system.
Russia's Minkowski-Komsolets tabloid has reported Russia's system for transfer of financial messages, SPFS, has more than 400 domestic users, practically every licensed Russian lender, but is used by only 38 banks from 9 other countries.
developed in 2014, SPFS, is designed to keep banking transactions
in the event of Western sanctions disconnecting Russia from SWIFT.
Six, it's being reported that Russia has begun to move towards short range surface to air missile systems
to the border area with Ukraine.
Seventh, a bipartisan group of US...
Senators wants to formally designate Russia as a terrorist state.
Needless to say, the Russians are not happy about this.
On top of that, as if it were not incendiary enough, the U.S.
wants to designate Russia a terrorist state if its forces further invade Ukraine.
Such a designation of a nuclear superpower is unprecedented.
It is an insane move that would make diplomacy and negotiation all but impossible.
It's tantamount to declaring war.
We should want to try to find a way to have peace with Russia, but we just keep on moving closer to war.
And when war eventually comes, it may be global.
Most Americans don't realize this, but Russia and China just announced a brand new security alliance.
On Wednesday, it was announced that Russia and China had agreed to terms on a security alliance.
President Xi said regarding the deal, at present, certain international forces under the guise of democracy and human rights are interfering in the internal affairs of China and Russia and brutally trampling on international law and recognized norms of international relations.
So could the U.S.
find itself fighting both Russia and China at the same time someday?
Yes, that is entirely possible.
Meanwhile, European powers are warning that talks to revive the Iran nuclear deal are rapidly reaching the end of the road.
A joint statement from Britain, France and Germany issued on Tuesday said, we are rapidly reaching the end of the road to save the 2015 Iran nuclear deal after the Iranian side accused the West of stoking a blame game atmosphere.
Iran's continued nuclear escalation means that we are rapidly reaching the end of the road, France's ambassador to the United Nations, Nicolas de Riviera, announced.
He added that Iran's consistent blowing past development and uranium enrichment limits, all while blaming the U.S.
for pulling out of the deal, means we are nearing the point where Iran's escalation of its nuclear program will have completely hollowed out the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.
The Israelis have already been practicing for an attack on Iran and if these stocks collapse, it will make a conflict between Israel and Iran inevitable.
Of course, a new war in the Middle East would give the Biden administration a way to distract us from our growing internal troubles at this point.
Only 26% of Americans believe the country is headed in the right direction.
A new Economist You've Got Polls shows that almost 75% of Americans are either unsure or believe the country is headed in the wrong direction.
Only 26% think things are going well worse.
Just 4% believe the economy is excellent.
Personally, I do not believe that we will see a major war erupt before the end of 2021, but the new year is just a few weeks away and I have a bad feeling about 2022.
Over the past couple of years, we've been hit with one thing after another, and the perfect time that is now upon us threatens to go to an entirely new level next year.
Michael Snyder's new book entitled Seven-Year Apocalypse is now available in paperback and Kindle on Amazon.
Scott, I think that's a very sober, accurate analysis.
Your thoughts?
Well, there's so many things there, of course.
Russia is not engaging in malicious, aggressive acts against the West.
The West is engaging in acts against Russia.
They did it in the beginning of the coup d'etat in Kiev with Victoria Nuland and Kagan and all of these clowns.
Interesting how Fox News is having Kagan do commentary.
Means Fox News is gone.
But Russia is in a defensive war position.
And defensive wars, defensive positions are always superior.
You cannot, you know, really win against that.
So Russia is not going to engage in aggressive maneuvers I don't think it will engage in a punching of the nose maneuver.
I think it will grip the face of NATO when they invade the Black Sea, invade the Donbass, and push them backwards by annihilating their technological weaponry.
And the Russians are good at that.
They've done it in the USS Donald Cook in the Black Sea.
It does rekindle a Cold War, of course, with the former Soviet Republics rising up, rejecting the European Union, rejecting NATO, rejecting the core immorality that is animating the West right now.
And I always come back to that because The immorality of the West is like a turpentine substance that they have painted the edifice, the structure of the West, with.
And it is drawing out all of the moisture, all of the morality, with homosexuality, transgenderism, transvestite-ness, all of the sicknesses and the pathologies and the mental schizophrenia that has afflicted the West is sucking out any semblance of morality.
And for that reason, you're seeing people, when they listen to President Putin speak at the Valdai Conference, and Don and I did a show on this, and it is essential that everyone listen to Vladimir Putin's speech at the Valdai Conference, because he says, wokeism in the West is a crime against humanity.
By trying to teach little boys to become little girls, it is wrong and sick and everything.
Every conservative or a person of character and moral conscience would have said, yes, I agree with him.
So we're witnessing a shift ideologically and religiously and morally on people towards more of a conservative base, and it almost, you know, it's it's tearing apart the West, not Russia, not not Iran, not even China.
So, Russia and China entering into this defense pact, too.
I think Iran is going to be part of that.
And I do come back to, I think they're so desperate for a war to create the fire and smoke that the Democrats think they can hide within.
I think they're going to do a false flag event.
They're going to destroy CENTCOM at Qatar using a Lousitania, Gulf of Tonkin sort of maneuver.
And I also look at Iran.
I think Israel is going to try and launch attacks against Iran, but it's a very difficult geographic position because they can't get across Iraq.
Iraq will shoot down everything that flies across their airspace, and they can't attack from the Persian Gulf because Unless they do a submarine attack, but then again the Persian Gulf can be shut down by the Iranians.
So we see the defensive countries of Iraq, of Taiwan, of China, and Russia simply holding the line, and the West is trying to probe for vulnerabilities that it can trigger a false flag to try and, you know, maneuver people behind the war.
And like you said, I think it'll have the opposite effect.
It'll show people the West has completely lost its mind.
And it is because of the mercy of Russia and Putin that they are not counter-acting, counter-striking.
Unless they try and do a nuclear event against Moscow, then you'll see a nuclear event against Washington.
And perhaps that's what the Democrats want.
You know, lastly, I'd say too, Mike Harris brought up a very good point.
Taiwan is the number one manufacturer of computer chips If Taiwan is taken out by China, it essentially takes out the United States because we run out of our ability to manufacture technology, computer chips for our high F-35 and other programs.
So China and Taiwan is an area where I think the US is The military going to try and try and defend at all costs, but it is it is a it is a messy situation, Jim, but I do think the Democrats are gearing up trying to get a war because their survival depends on it domestically because they know their crimes here, Jim.
Well, Scott, that was a wonderful commentary.
Let me observe.
In 2008 and then again in 2009, I was flown to Buenos Aires to give lectures on JFK and 9-11, the second time to be the keynote speaker at an international symposium on 9-11 truth and justice held in the National Library, sponsored by the government.
There are a couple of hundred VIPs there, other speakers, but I was a keynote.
There must have been a dozen cameras.
In other words, in Argentina they actually have respect for research, for scholarship, for intellectuals that you do not find in the United States.
I couldn't get one camera for me to give a talk to the public about 9-11, much less a dozen.
When I was there in 2008, I was invited to speak to a mosque.
And while I was there, I asked for a private conversation with the Iman.
And when we had that conversation, I said, it is indispensable that Iran enter into a joint defense pact with Russia and China, that this is the future.
He was, I think, Unable to assess exactly who I was or what I was saying, but my advice then was as good as then as it is today.
And I've reiterated that point in several other conferences with Iranian press leaders and intellectuals.
So I think it's really indispensable.
Those three nations can hold the key to the future peace of the humanity and I see no other way because the United States has been taken over by the Rothschild.
We're just being used for their own amusement and entertainment and to bring about just a plethora of death unprecedented in world history.
Holly, Holly, your thoughts?
Well, I think your personal experience, Jim, is pretty telling about the amount of control that is going on in the United States with the mainstream media.
And as I've said on many of our programs, I think the biggest enemy to the American people right now is the mockingbird mainstream media right now, because we can't even have a regular conversation as to what actually goes on in our country right now.
What is truth and what is news, right?
As our show is named after.
So someone like you is actually, you know, revered and, you know, best case scenario here in the United States is people don't know who you are.
Worst case is that, you know, you're attacked or demonized or thrown in jail like Scott, you know, just horrible, just harassed.
And I think all of us have gone through some sort of bizarre harassment for just talking about the truth or talking about What an alternative viewpoint from what politicians, the media want us to do.
And I think so many of the enemies, if you're talking about another world war, the buildup to it, so many of our enemies are already here in the United States.
You know, the biggest enemies here are actually here on the ground right now.
And if anything, this whole jab mandate, global jab mandate, is pretty telling as to what sort of global control system
that we're under right now.
So another world war, I would not be surprised if something started to become hot,
but we are involved in a world war right now.
And that's the global elites who are trying to call humanity right now.
And usually they try to kill people through some sort of a disease or something,
what they call a disease or some sort of mass killing that end to so many years of propagandizing people
and causing fear at all points.
And then they can utilize this concept of the other to create a hot war,
and then they can kill more and more young men and reduce the population further.
So all of this has to do with controlling the masses.
And there's billions of people on this planet right now, and that's just way too many
for them to control at this point.
So that's mostly why they try to put in these world wars as we have seen
over the past couple of centuries, that the point is really to just kill a bunch of people
and to destroy families, destroy cultures, destroy monetary systems.
So that's how you have a buildup like what we saw in before the buildup of World War II.
We saw the collapse.
We see this Weimar Republic that we see right here in the United States
where we have false politicians collapsing economies, debauchery, people who are poor and desperate,
and weaponizing families, and even trying to get ahold of the children.
So, same playbook is what they're always doing right now.
So, we already are involved in a world war, in my opinion.
Two points about that.
When we can't even take care of our own homeless people, what are we doing inviting in hundreds of thousands and giving them the red carpet, the other more direct?
Just last week, I was invited to submit a commentary to an Iranian publication about the next world war, and I wrote to them, we are already engaged in it, and it's a bio-warfare.
So I couldn't agree more, Holly, and I'm seeking to share that view, which I know Scott shares as well, with the rest of the world.
Trump says Jewish Americans don't like Israel.
He says Israel's absolute power over Congress has vanished, and he blames Jewish voters and Democrat lawmakers.
This is fairly extraordinary.
Former President Trump, in a previously recorded interview circulating on social media, said Jewish people in the U.S.
don't like Israel.
The Jewish people either don't like Israel or don't care about Israel, he said in an interview with Israeli journalist Barak Ravid, author of the recently published book Trump's Peace, Abraham Accords, and the Reshaping of the Middle East.
The former leader blamed many Jewish Americans for their voting record.
It used to be that Israel had absolute power over Congress.
Today, I think it's the exact opposite.
He said his predecessor, Barack Obama, and President Biden, both Democrats, were responsible for what he claimed is the lack of congressional support for Israel, adding, yet in the election they still get a lot of votes from Jewish people.
Over the past few years, some have said the Democrats are slowly tilting against support for Israel, a position that has been a bedrock of U.S.
foreign policy in the Middle East for decades.
They point to the actions of progressive Democrat lawmakers like Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib, who have sought to end military assistance to Israel, and emerge as vocal critics of the Israeli government's policies toward Palestinians.
Tlaib and Omar have floated legislation in support of Palestinian-led boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement known as BDS.
But I've been unable to gain the support of their wider party.
Many say they represent a small section of the Democratic Party.
Earlier this year, the Congress, controlled by the Democrats, passed a mammoth defense spending bill, including U.S.
military assistance to Israel.
Recent comments by Trump are not the first time he's criticized Jewish Americans for voting Democrat.
In 2019, he said Jews who vote for the party are guilty of ignorance and greatest loyalty.
Jewish Americans, who account for just 2.4% of the total U.S.
population, have long been a reliable Democratic voting group.
According to Pew Research, in 2021, 70% of U.S.
Jews identify with or lean toward the Democrats.
But the same poll showed signs of an emerging division between Orthodox Jews, trending younger in age, and other branches of the faith whose followers are aging.
In 2020, 75% of Orthodox Jews identified as Republican and overwhelmingly supported then-President Trump.
In his comments with Revit, Trump also said evangelical Christians love Israel more than the Jews in this country, where evangelicals were a key part of Trump's base in his 2016 bid Voted overwhelming for him in 2020.
Seen as reliable supporters of U.S.
policy for Israel, though a recent poll showed that may also be changing with younger members.
Trump went on to slam the New York Times, stating they hate Israel, pointing out Jewish people run the paper, a reference to the Jewish origins of the family that publishes it.
But of course, the Israelis, the dual citizens, control our media.
Scott, I believe this will be our final opportunity for comments today.
Yours concisely?
Israel has nothing to do with Christianity or Jewishness.
It is an ancient piece of land just like Mount Ararat up in Turkey.
So Israel shouldn't be any part of American policy.
I'll hand it to Holly.
Holly, a final thought?
Yeah, I think it's become obvious with the jab mandates and everything like that, that Israel is dangerous to the Jewish people.
And as we have discussed with this before, going at least back to the Balfour Declaration, Israel is a Rothschild project.
Don, take us out.
Wonderful comments, you guys.
You were simply terrific.
Don, your final thoughts?
Well, it may be a shorter day for a Christmas show.
And Christmas is usually on the 19th of December.
Well, this was tremendous.
You got to share this, watch it.
And I mean, these are the facts that are going to save us for next year.
Otherwise, I think we're going down faster than history can record.
God bless.
▲
Export Selection