All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 5, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
58:44
Truth vs. NEW$ Part 2 (5 December 2021) with Don Grahn, David Kenney and Holly Seeliger
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
First is news here on December the 5th.
We got a lot of action going here.
Let's see if you go to the Walker shine out, see what happened there
down the street there, Jim.
Well, Don, it's very curious.
The guy who drove his vehicle into paraded Walker shots, complaining he's been dehumanized.
This is outrageous.
Daryl Brooks Jr., suspect in the deadly Christmas parade massacre that left six dead, including an eight-year-old boy, scores more injured has broken his silence, claiming he's being demonized and dehumanized.
As the country has found out who he is and the horrific nature of his crime, reactions have been swift.
A Waukesha court official calls it shocking.
Nick Grovin called it a monstrous act, completely irredeemable.
During a Fox interview, he said, I feel like I'm being made out to be a monster, demonized.
Fox Freaks described Brooks as soft-spoken, calm, and lucid.
He's charged, of course, with six counts of first-degree intentional homicide.
The unbelievable statements only add to the outrage.
Video taken by bystanders show the red SUV speeding through the parade route, swerving from side to side to take out more.
Just days before he was out on a $1,000 bond for assault and also notice attempting to run over his child's mother, to whom he's not married.
He's a career criminal.
He's got a 50-page rap sheet including battery, domestic abuse, reckless endangerment, charge Drug charges, impregnating a minor.
New information says Brooks was driving with a suspended license.
The FUV was driving when he committed both the attacks on his child's mother and the Christmas Parade belongs to his mother.
The DA knew he was a risk to the public but released him anyway with $1,000.
A Fox News social media page appearing to belong to Brooks was filled with anti-white and anti-Semitic language.
He's a supporter of Black Lives Matter, claimed Adolf Hitler had warned his genocide was partly prompted because he knew the Negroes are the true Hebrews, appearing to promote the views of the black Hebrew Israelites.
All the victims, of course, in Waukesha were white.
Well, they haven't released of any motive.
It appears pretty obvious.
He also was upset with the decision in Kenosha, where he seems to have believed, in accordance with fake news, that those who were shot by Kyle Rittenhouse were black, and that Kyle Rittenhouse was a white supremacist who got off easy.
Being held on a $5 million bail, but there should be no bail at all.
He actually has bail jumping in his past.
So Daryl Brooks killing five people intentionally is not terrorism, but parents speaking to school boards is domestic terrorism.
Will someone please explain the logic to me?
Meanwhile, the BLM launches a Christmas campaign against white supremacist capitalism over the holidays, Thanksgiving.
BLM accused Americans of eating dry cookie and overcooked stuffing on stolen lamb, bashing Christmas, linking to a story the holidays promote white supremacist capitalism.
This is pretty weird.
Yearning dry turkey overcooked stuffing on stolen lamb.
There's one of their mottos.
The day after Thanksgiving, BLM posted what it called a new profile pic.
Black Christmas.
Saturday.
Post it.
For seven years, BLM has been drawing connections between white supremacist capitalism and police violence with our Black Xmas campaign.
David, your thoughts?
Well, first, with respect to Daryl Brooks and his actions and conduct in Waukesha, I'm going to leave that to a jury.
I'm not going to make any statements one way or the other.
I think he's entitled to a trial.
I'll let the jury deal with him as they see fit.
With respect to BLM, Black Lives Matter, and the attack on whites as being, you know, supremacists and white capitalism, You know, that's disconcerting to me.
You know, I've said repeatedly that when I was a kid, I grew up listening to the Kennedys.
I grew up listening to Martin Luther King.
And my mom sat me down and she said, David, I want you to listen to this speech.
And it was Martin Luther King's speech, the I Have a Dream speech.
And it was a very, very moving speech.
I was so impressed.
I love black musicians.
They're just phenomenal.
I have great respect for black people, and I was taught by my mom to view everyone the same way.
Latinos, Asians, blacks, Jews, Islam, Muslims, everyone.
Everyone has a light inside of them that's turned on.
You have to respect that light and treat everyone with dignity and respect.
And I'll continue to do so.
I'll continue to advocate for that.
And I'll continue to be an unequivocal supporter of my view of how to treat other human beings.
And, you know, basically that's that.
Yes, where the essence of morality is treating other persons with respect, never treating them merely as means, which occurs in cases of murder, kidnapping, rape, robbery, treating other people merely as means.
There can be means-means relationships, employers and employees, doctors and patients, teachers and students, lawyers and clients, where each party is using the other as a means, but as long as they do so in a non-exploitative, respectful manner, that's perfectly appropriate and indispensable to social discourse and the progress of a community.
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, as David pointed out, Martin Luther King Jr.
in one of his speeches said that we should be judging people by the content of their character.
So that would be through someone's actions and their deeds in their life and not on the color of their skin or, you know, their community or however these BLM or other groups or anyone else wants to judge or not judge anyone.
And I will say they're right.
Dry stuffing is a crime and that definitely needs to be stopped.
They're talking about Christmas and food and trying to mock this idea of Christmas.
I think that further idea of basically getting rid of any sort of traditions or anything that has held communities together.
So the family's been destroyed.
The culture has been destroyed.
The schools have been destroyed.
people's employment has been destroyed, starting with a lot of these lockdowns,
Easter and Christmas are canceled.
So now they need to turn to this thread or actually imposition of violent crime or violent acts
to make sure that people don't get together with family members again.
So also just, I do think we are going to see a lot of crime this holiday season,
both within homes and also from businesses.
We're already seeing that in California.
There's no bail being set for people in Los Angeles who looted Target, Home Depot.
Violent, violent crimes that people, security guards were beaten and crowbars, mallets, sledgehammers were stolen, and if it's theft under a thousand, there's no repercussions at this point.
So we are going to see more of this occurring and leading up through the holidays and afterwards.
It might start off as Christmas presents or something like that, or they may make it seem like, oh, it's just because of the holiday season and People can't afford presents, but then it's going to just expand onto everything.
You're 100% correct.
I mean, this is cultural Marxism at work, destroying, taking apart all the values, the history, the identity of a nation.
This is part and parcel of removing the statues to great American figures, trying to destroy everything that binds our community together.
You're spot on, Holly.
And the Democrats made a major contribution by promoting the absurd idea of defunding the police.
Society is held together by a thin blue line.
You take that away and it all becomes havoc.
It's breaking out and it's only going to get worse.
David, you may have a further thought about these issues.
Yours.
Yeah, I, you know, unfortunately, Jim, I agree with you.
One of the things that I want to say is, you know, I had this moment when I was working my way through law school, and you're not supposed to work when you're going to school, but I had to, and things were very difficult for me, and I went down and met with a pastor at one of our local churches, a gentleman by the name of Howard Clark.
And I've had two or three wonderful pieces of advice in my life.
And one of them came from Pastor Clark.
He said to me, first, you have to find the peace.
You have to seek the peace and find the peace.
And when you find the peace, go in that direction.
And I've always really treasured that little bit of advice in the midst of confusing times, trying times.
I always try to find the peace and go in that direction.
And I think that's a great way.
It's a great indicator on how to live.
I'm afraid that just other people are not following that very simple principle.
I'm very, very afraid of that.
Very nice.
Very nice.
Meanwhile, MSNBC Joy reads, as conservatives who defy the vaccine and mask mandates, where I have at least a dozen articles about why the masks are bad for you and damaging, and it's a form of child abuse to put them on kids, belong to a death cult.
How many more people have to die before these ghouls are satisfied?
This woman, in my opinion, is one of the foremost propagandists of our time.
She's completely repulsive in every possible way.
The readout host said Fox Nation host Laura Logan, who recently compared Fauci to Mengele, might very well be one of those in a death cult leading some of the right down a path of destruction.
Logan said Monday, concern over Omicron variant is over the top.
She's 100% correct.
What's happening over time is the entire response to COVID and everything we're told about it from the beginning is being exposed.
It's falling apart.
The lies are coming apart.
Really now?
There is no justification for putting people out of their jobs or forcing vaccine mandates for a disease that ultimately is highly treatable.
What do we see in Dr. Fauci?
This is what people say to me, that he doesn't represent science to them, he represents Josef Mengele.
Dr. Josef Mengele, the Nazi doctor who did experiments on Jews during the Second World War and in the concentration camps.
Reed, referring to Logan, said she's a white right-wing troll, began her show.
We begin the readout with a deplorable form of Republican gaslighting comparing mask mandates to the Holocaust.
Again, last night, it reached a new low when former respectable journalist and current right-wing troll Laura Logan went on Trump TV to say this about Fauci.
Now to show you how ludicrous, but also how offensive that is, let me talk about who Joseph Ben-Gali actually was.
Known as the Angel of Death, he presided over deadly and inhumane medical experiments on Jewish prisoners while serving as a physician in Auschwitz.
He described as the embodiment of absolute evil, a doctor assigned to select who would die or who would live, only to be subject to ghoulish human experiments.
Read at it.
So no, Dr. Fauci, a public servant who's seen this nation through AIDS, bioterrorism, Ebola, swine flu, and now COVID, is nothing like Nazi Dr. Bengali.
Nor is Fauci anything like the creator of fascism, Mussolini, of them being Italian.
Is that what they're getting at?
Because that too is offensive.
It's a comparison.
Tucker, a frozen dinner fame, made on his show last night.
And no, it doesn't make sense.
Making sense, she added, is beside the point when it comes to reasoning with conservatives, whom she branded today's angels of death.
It's about power and spreading lies and fake outrage.
The Omega Squad wins election.
They are today's angels of death, refusing to get vaccinated and urging fellow Americans to remain exposed even as their own parents, grandparents, and children die of COVID.
The numbers prove it.
We're at America's highest rate of COVID death and the lowest rate of vaccines.
They are literally killing people.
This is just disgusting and 100% contrary to the facts of the matter.
It's embarrassing.
This woman is even on television, but she's part of a campaign to destroy America, and she's putting her whole heart and soul into it.
David, your thoughts?
Well, and she's being paid, I'm sure, handsomely.
This is nothing more than a fundamental assault and an attack on Judeo-Christian values that are inherent in our culture.
I'm often disturbed by the tenor of her comments, the abject racism that motivates it.
Her feelings toward white people are, I think, suspect.
But most importantly, Dr. Joseph Mengele used to conduct experiments on people.
Dr. Fauci is conducting an illegal clinical trial on the United States and the rest of the world.
So the analogy is actually quite correct.
Um, if we look at some of Fauci's history, too, as well, I understand he's had just horrendous results with experiments with mice, with dogs, and monkeys, and it's just shocking to me that That this funding of such experimentation takes place, but what we're really talking about, I don't know whether she's on, you know, every time I see her, I turn her off.
I don't know if she's on CNN or MSNBC, which of the networks is it?
MSNBC.
MSNBC, okay.
So, you know, MSNBC is, you know, far left-wing, advancing its own causes, but I had an idea of what we should have is we should have some type of a show called Stopwatch and just put at the end of that show those channels and those people that are inciting violence, recommending violence, ensuing greater hatred, and so it would be Stopwatch Joy Read, in my opinion.
Stopwatch the readout.
So I just don't think if that's a voice that gets an opportunity to To be heard in other voices of calm, reason, sharing information, delivering the truth.
If those people are shut out so these people get a megaphone, I think that they're entitled to be hit by the megaphone.
Right.
Paula, your thoughts?
Well, CNN and these other mainstream news platforms are just hemorrhaging viewers, and they just fired Andrew Cuomo.
He's off the air, so that's some great news.
Chris, Chris, the brother.
Yeah, the other, the other, his creepy brother.
Yes, get the two of them confused.
They're hard to tell apart sometimes.
Joy Reid, I don't foresee her being on air much longer.
I don't think people are going to really fall for the race baiting and really think that that's appropriate for news or even enjoyable to watch.
I mean, I don't understand how any of that could be informative or helpful to the American public.
As I've said many times, I think the mainstream news is an enemy to the American public at this point.
getting them off of the air, I guess, just by our wallets and our checkbooks
and not paying for cable anymore at this point and starting to invest in alternative media sources,
some great shows, radio programs that Jim's on and American Media Periscope,
these other up and coming type of platforms, if you will, that are out there and growing
and fighting the mainstream news narratives out there, and tremendous, I mean, we wouldn't be this far right now
if we didn't have these platforms and this ability to actually be online.
I think things would be much, much worse.
I think many more people, just think of 10 or 20 years ago, if you think during the 9-11 era, if they had tried to force, if they had the technology to have the forced vaccines or something like that during this point.
I think there will be it would be absolutely devastating for Americans.
I think we have had tremendous success.
I think in the truth truth movement on the past 20 years where more and more people are at least able to humor.
The fact that there could be another narrative or another agenda that's going on right now that the mainstream media does not have the American people's best interest in mind.
And unfortunately, I have to make this my last comment of the day.
Hopefully, Scott Bennett will be able to join you.
And I do also want to say happy birthday to Jim, because I know his birthday is pretty soon.
So many more, many more birthdays, Jim.
We love you and really appreciate everything that you're Doing both in the truth community and everywhere your work over the decades and look forward to another show with you.
And I hope you have a fantastic birthday, Jim.
Thank you, Holly.
Tomorrow, actually, is my birthday.
We're celebrating it today with a family after the show.
Good.
Good.
All right.
Thanks, guys.
It's wonderful having you here, Holly.
Nice to meet you.
Nice to meet you, David.
Nice to meet you, Holly.
Thank you for those birthday greetings.
Great, yeah, and if John wants to put my link to PayPal or Patreon, the more support I get, the less I have to work this other job, so just FYI.
Thank you.
We're with you, Holly.
Good luck.
Love you.
Take care.
She's just wonderful.
Yeah, she's very articulate, a bright young lady.
Yes, indeed.
Get this, here you got a question, you know, about schools and kids.
Listen to this.
You can't hear it?
I'll try again.
inclusive and supportive schools. One change that will be implemented this school year
relates to our school bathrooms. In compliance with new federal guidelines-
You can't hear it? I threw it up again.
Gone. My mistake. Here we go. I'll try again. This should be better.
All CPS. To create more inclusive and supportive schools.
One change that will be implemented this school year relates to our school bathrooms.
In compliance with new federal guidelines, all CPS students and staff will have fair and equitable access to bathroom facilities that align with their gender identity.
We will be providing all schools with updated signage that makes our bathrooms more inclusive.
It will identify the fixtures available in each restroom and make it clear that all restrooms are open for use by anyone who feels comfortable.
Staff will continue to have staff-only restrooms available to them.
This is an incredibly important step to increase gender equity for all, which is why we will be requiring all schools to post this signage by December 1st of this school year.
Our district's Office of Student Protections in Title IX is also working On a long-term plan to create more permanent signage for our bathrooms.
I encourage you to visit our website at cps.edu forward slash osp to learn more about our comprehensive approach to creating more inclusive equitable and safe schools.
If you have any questions you can email us at osp at cps.edu.
We look forward to having a safe and successful school year at every school in every neighborhood across Chicago.
Thank you.
It's not just the new virus, it's moronic.
It's these Democrats who are affecting public issues.
This is insane beyond belief.
And the mischief that's going to follow from it and the problems are going to be horrendous.
David, your thoughts?
You know, I was at, when I started doing my research into the 50 articles, scholarly articles dealing with Coronavirus, and then took a look at Martin's patent work, I also found some things that concern me, but I was getting more acquainted with genetics, and I have to admit, I'm not a geneticist.
I'm certainly capable of learning it, but I picked up a book at the local library or at the local thrift shop, I believe, on genetics, and I started reading into it.
And I was surprised because within the first two or three chapters, it started talking about children who are born with multiple organs.
And I'm sure the confusion that results from that.
So I understand the existence of that situation.
But whether that is so profuse or whether that abnormality, for lack of a better word, Let's say aberration.
Whether or not that's endemic to children is another question.
And I think the vast majority of children are either boys or girls.
And if I'm wrong in that, I'm sure there's a small percentage that have cross or confused genitalia.
But in that regard, it looks to me as if we're making a sociological Shift where we're saying everybody has to be a B or X and if if we're making the X take a choice
Um, I can understand that, but, but this combining of bathrooms, this, uh, reassignment of gender, this saying a boy can be a girl and a girl can be a boy, you know, I I'm just against that.
I I'm kind of, you know, I hate to say it.
I don't hate to say it.
It's true.
Look, I believe, I believe boys are boys.
I believe girls are girls and I believe they grow up and they become men and, and, and the boys become men and the girls become women.
And I'm big on, you know, I was big on the Boy Scouts.
I was big on the Girl Scouts.
I've always thought they're great and wonderful ways to train kids with values and with codes and with morals.
And nowadays, it's just a degradation.
And it's really offensive.
And the problem I have Is do you really want to be sending your child, your own child, to a school where this kind of indoctrination rather than education is taking place?
Education, to me, has to be inspirational in nature.
You know, it's a great line that, you know, virtue cannot be taught, it must be caught.
And I think, I think our schools have gone more into indoctrination rather than education.
And so, you know, quite frankly, nowadays, I really would have a hard time putting my child into a public school.
Fortunately, you know, my wife and I have a young daughter who's made her way through high school, college, and university,
and she's out.
But when I see this and I think about having a five-year-old starting in this system of schooling,
I really don't wanna have anything to do with it.
I know.
It's really, it's indoctrination, it's not education.
Education, as I said, has to be inspirational in nature.
You fall in love with education because it's so interesting, because it's so fascinating, and it expands all the fields, and they're all open to you.
What I see now is indoctrination.
You can only think this way.
You can only think that way.
And there's no liberty interest.
This is just putting blinders on people.
And it's ripping apart the fabric of our nation.
I agree with you, Jim.
But most of all... Well, even for a sexually reproducing species, if you don't have men and women, you don't have a continuity of the species.
I think a lot of this sewing of gender identity is deliberate to promote Homosexual relationships, lesbian or gay, which are non-reproductive.
And it is true there's a tiny percentage of the human population known as hermaphrodites that have the sex organs of both species.
I believe this is because the clitoris is actually a vestigial penis, so if you have enough activation hormonally That someone born female could develop the male organ as well.
But the very idea to champion this, to promote it, they want to treat every single, their concept of equity is every single person be treated exactly the same regardless of their ability, their attribute, their accomplishments.
It's one size fit all and it is completely insane and it's promoting a dysfunctional society which appears to be the objective The goal they want to attain.
Don, you have a thought?
Well, that's a comment.
David, you mentioned the word genetics, and I should let you know, way in the past, I do have a master's in population genetics, so I'm on to this kind of stuff.
Male or female, God created them, and that's the way it should be.
Anyway, natural is best.
That's all I can say.
This is pretty bizarre, but it's going on.
Meanwhile, a pollster to Democratic candidates in 2022.
We have a problem.
Could lose a ton of races.
I'm predicting a hundred seats in the House are going to be lost to the Republicans and four or five or more Senate seats.
A Democrat pollster tasked with performing an autopsy of voting trends.
Following the massacre in Virginia, said he'd tell 2022 midterm candidates, we have a problem.
The result led a third way, a centrist group to seek out pollster Brian Stryker, a Democrat, discovered numerous issues with the party's messaging and branding.
The number one issue for women right now is the economy.
The number one issue for black voters is the economy.
The number one issue for Latino voters is the economy.
Pollsters, blunt warning, we have a problem.
Steiker, in an interview with the Times, said voters found Democrats too focused on social issues.
Not enough on the economy.
Laughed at attempts to draw former President Trump into the race.
Said the party's problems are deeper than a lot of people suspect.
When asked what he would tell a Democrat running in 2022, he was blunt.
The latest data combined with Virginia election results seem to join with the pollsters' assertion the party's in serious trouble.
If they don't turn things away, I'll tell you right now, it's too late.
Remember the focus groups of Virginia voters before Thanksgiving?
Stryker proceeded to address Democrat Terry McAuliffe, who lost to Youngkin, in his insistence on linking the Republican candidate to President Trump.
He suggested that tactic may have been the best McAuliffe had to offer, but didn't strike a chord with the voters, because while they may dislike Trump personally, they don't dislike his policies.
He added future candidates compelled to run against a weak link to Trump will suffer the same fate.
If we are in that position again, we're going to lose a ton of races.
Meanwhile Live Monitor tweeted Democrat strategist who advises major donors
that too late were F'd.
I believe that is exactly spot on.
I've tweeted since day one Biden's cabinet of policy being shoved down the throat of voters
will have significant consequences for Democrats.
It's too late to salvage 2022.
Politico also notes presidential approval ratings are a measure closely tied to a party's performance
in midterms.
They show Biden's at 36.3%.
Independents 29.3%, Democrats 65%, GOP 8.2%.
36.3% approve, 59.1% disapprove, 46.6% no opinion.
Independence 29.3, Democrats 65, GOP 8.2, 36.3 approved, 59.1% disapproved, 46.6 no opinion.
David, your thoughts?
Well, you know, I go back to first canon Steve Bannon.
You know, I keep hearing Mr. Bannon week by week telling us how Biden's losing the grip on the economy, how the debt ceiling, making every effort to lift the debt ceiling, and just how Republicans across the board who are seated are not Defending their home state interest in protecting just the citizens of their own state.
I think that the election in 2022 is going to be a welcome disaster for the Democrats.
I think, you know, I'm fundamentally an independent.
I lean right, but I'm fundamentally an independent.
And I just think the outlandish, ridiculous policies that are being advocated by the left are so straining and breaking apart our country that even myself, you know, and other independents start to move right to a certain extent.
Now, I've gone from being an independent to being a Republican, but the The fact is that the Democratic Party in America has identified so strongly with the Communist Party and with the Socialist Party that it's losing its own conservative Democrats, and they're hightailing it to be independents, or they're hightailing it over the Republican Party, and they're being welcomed with open arms.
Sure.
You're just going to see in 2022, you're going to see the Republicans take over Congress without a doubt.
And you're going to see Fauci in a world of trouble.
And those who are leaving the Democrat Party, they are not going to vote for the Democrats.
There's no doubt about it.
Meanwhile, prosecutors revealed Ghislaine's slick crime.
She served up kids for VIP pedophiles to haunt and rape.
This is pretty damn disturbing.
Prosecutors in the Ghislaine Maxwell Elite Pedophile Ring Trial told the jury that Maxwell helped to serve up children to powerful elites who hunted and raped them for decades.
The prosecution told a stunned jury that Maxwell, the former child sex procurer for powerful politicians, members of the royal family and wealthy businessmen, was well aware of what she was doing when she groomed young girls to be raped by the rich and famous.
Maxwell is charged with eight counts related to the sex trafficking of children to VIP elites between 1994 and 2004.
The prosecution described Epstein and Maxwell as partners in crime who had a playbook for targeting children and deploying them to their wealthy friends.
In her opening statement, Prosecutor Laura Pomerantz declared one of Maxwell's victims was just 14 years old when she met the pair, marking the beginning of a nightmare that would last four years.
Fox News reports, describing Maxwell and Epstein as partners in crime and the best of friends, Prosecutors said that two targeted other young girls, often the daughters of single mothers, making them believe their dreams could come true, promising to pay for school or help them become actresses or models.
Maxwell has pled not guilty to six counts, including conspiracy for allegedly enticing and transporting minors for the purpose of sex trafficking.
A pilot was a first witness to take the stand on Monday.
Maxwell's was Epstein's closest associate and second-in-command, Pomerantz said, as a socialite moved to get the girls comfortable with sexual contact with Epstein by first introducing massage.
She allegedly would massage Epstein in front of the girls, encouraging them to massage Epstein and sometimes touch the girls herself.
Once a 16-year-old victim traveled to Epstein's Ranch in New Mexico and was isolated, Maxwell took steps to normalize sexual contact under the ruse of massage, telling the teen to get into a massage table before she began touching the girl's breasts.
The defendant walked the girls into a room where she knew that men would molest them, and there were times when she was in the room when it happened.
Making it all feel normal and casual.
She preyed on vulnerable young girls, manipulated them, served them up to be sexually abused.
The defendant was trafficking kids for sex.
That is what this trial is all about.
In another instance, the prosecutor said she recruited a 17-year-old victim randomly, telling the driver to pull over after spotting the girl in the parking lot.
She took the girls on shopping trips, asked them about their lives, their schools, their families.
She won their trust.
She discussed sexual topics with them.
She helped normalize abusive sexual conduct.
She put them at ease, made them feel safe so they could be molested by a middle-aged man.
She knew what was going to happen to those girls.
In the 1990s, prosecutors say Maxwell and Epstein used the cover of Monitoring Young Girls and promising scholarships and opportunity to invite them on trips and transport them across state lines, slowly introducing them to massage as a way to sexually abuse their victims.
Maxwell, who once dated Epstein, acted as the lady of the house at Epstein's various properties, including a villa in Palm Beach, a mansion in Manhattan, a ranch in New Mexico, an apartment in Paris, an entire private army island in the U.S.
Virgin Islands.
She fired and hired staff as she pleased, imposing strict rules for employees demanding a culture of silence.
While this horrific abuse was going on behind closed doors, the defendant was jet-setting at private planes, living a life of extraordinary luxury.
The girls were just a means to support her lifestyle, a way for the defendant to make sure that Epstein, who demanded constant sexual gratification from young girls, remained satisfied so the defendant could stay in the lifestyle to which she was accustomed.
Then, by 2000, they both no longer had to recruit girls themselves.
They created a pyramid scheme of abuse, encouraging girls to bring in other girls, playing an essential role in the scheme.
Allegedly, Maxwell could just call girls to schedule massage appointments and hand them cash afterwards, overseeing the operation, normalizing the abuse by showing the young girls that she and older Reportedly, respectable women have no problem with the paid sex acts that were taking place during these so-called misogynists.
She knew exactly what she was doing.
She was dangerous.
She was setting up girls to be molested by a predator.
Epstein's Palm Beach Villa and Manhattan Mansion each have a room used for massage, filled with photographs of naked females.
He brought girls into the room every single day.
The defendant painted a different story in its own opening statement, arguing Maxwell was being used as a scapegoat for a man who behaved badly.
Attorney Bobby Sternheim told the court prosecutors relied on the story from four accusers based on events that happened between 15 and 25 years ago.
Each is expected to testify have received millions from Epstein's estate.
They will recount their memories, memories that are a century ago, memories that have been corrupted by things that have happened throughout the years, manipulated by narcissistic men and self-interested civil lawyers and a desire for a big jackpot of money, Sternheim said.
Further arguing, Maxwell has been used as a bullseye of anger for women who were or otherwise believed they were victimized by Epstein.
Meanwhile, Bill Clinton with 14-year-old Rachel Chandler on one of his non-existent 27 trips to Pet-O-Island.
Bill Clinton swears he's never been on the Lolita Express, never met Rachel Chandler, never been to Pet-O-Feel Island.
But here's a photograph of Bill with a 14-year-old Chandler on the Lolita Express on the way, one of his 27 trips to Pet-O-File Island.
Be ashamed if this photograph were to be shared around the world.
Grotesque.
David, your thoughts?
Well, a picture speaks a thousand words, number one.
But, you know, the whole aura of Jeffrey Epstein is It's a mystery that, of course, ends with a crime.
And that crime is the so-called suicide of Jeffrey Epstein and his cell.
I, for one, believe that he was extracted from his cell and that there was like a body double or something used.
And I believe Mr. Epstein may still be alive.
I'm probably one of a thousand people that think that.
But what concerns me is the the not just the I'm going to say confiscation of the innocence of the children, but the use of those children for purposes of getting political officials into compromising positions.
That's what really concerns me.
You have pictures of Bill Gates, you have pictures of Bill Clinton with Jeffrey Epstein, you have hundreds of people who've gone in and off The island and and I think it was a I think it was an operation.
I think I think Ghislaine Maxwell has much more information.
They're just focusing on the information that they can use to prosecute her and and her abusive conduct with regard to these children is just frightening.
They had an innocence.
They deserve to have that innocence protected.
And it was invaded and stolen from them by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
And this is indeed disturbing.
It's most unfortunate.
And whatever happens to Ghislaine Maxwell, she's invited every single little bit of it.
And so be it.
I couldn't agree more also that Epstein was sprung out of jail, that he's alive and well.
I say he was sipping Mai Tais in Tahiti, but more likely on his own island in the Caribbean.
Don, you're wanting to add some suggestions?
Talk about Epstein's alive or dead.
Well, of course, he actually hung himself by a bedsheet in a jail cell, but The mark on his throat here, if this is his throat, is more like a cable, a computer cable or something, around the neck here, and being strangled from the back, because it's found here instead of up here, where he would be hung.
So definitely, that is not a mark of somebody who got hung by a bedsheet.
Yeah, and I don't think it's Jeffrey Epstein.
I don't think so either.
Except in my ties.
So David, I think you're absolutely right.
It would be good for these issues to be brought to the fore.
Is Roe v. Wade about to be overturned?
In the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health, the state of Mississippi is asking the Supreme Court to overturn the 1973 decision Roe v. Wade, which in my opinion was among the wisest ever rendered by the Supreme Court.
When the federal government cedes power to the states, allowing most to effectively overturn the scheduling of cannabis in the Controlled Substance Act of 1971, or U.S.
municipalities adopting an official policy of becoming sanctuary cities for immigration in violation of federal immigration policies, for example, it's called devolution.
As the court hears arguments this week, America is witnessing a decades-long complicated legal question brought to a head in a case that puts the president of Roe v. Wade and KCB Planned Parenthood on trial for their constitutionality and upholding federal limits on state power to make and enforce policies restricting abortion within their borders.
Proponents of Mississippi's abortion law are merely asking the court to uphold the Magnolia State's gestational act of 2018 but overturn Roe v. Wade entirely.
The Mississippi law made abortion illegal after 15 weeks, making it an exception for medical emergencies and severely abnormal pregnancies.
It's the first of several new restrictive state abortion laws that defy Roe v. Wade that have made it to the court.
Texas even more restrictive law, the Texas Heartbeat Act, prohibiting abortion after a second heartbeat is detected, usually occurring around six weeks after conception when most women don't even know they're pregnant yet, has reportedly led to a decline in abortions in one of the most populated states by as much as 80%.
Because the anti-abortion pro-life movement has been million strong and actively fights for what they see as living generation's most terrible and urgent civil and human rights crisis.
State challenges to Roe v. Wade were inevitable after Trump appointed three new justices in one term, Neil Gorsuch in 2017, Brett Kavanaugh in 2018, and Amy Coney Barrett in 2020.
Now with Roe and Casey on the chopping block, mainstream news sources from the AP to local news affiliates, NBC and New York Times seem to broadly agree, since your court took up oral arguments, that most conservatives on the court make it likely that Roe v. Wade will be overturned.
Justice Thomas, for example, who has gone years at a time without saying a word in oral argument, was very active on Wednesday.
Ben Domerit reported in The Federalist.
Lee Littman reported at NBC News.
The court's conservative could overturn Roe v. Wade over the word viability.
A critical part of the case is modern technology has given us more insight and understanding about pregnancy than we had in the 1970s.
The New York Times reported the court seems poised to uphold Mississippi's abortion law, but it's unclear if Roe v. Wade will be overturned in this case.
Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor said the move to overturn federal abortion precedents appears politically motivated.
Will this institution survive the stench that this creates in the public perception that the Constitution and its reading are just political acts?
I invited John Remington Rand, a retired professor of law, to offer his reflections on my blog, which he's done in a marvelous way, observing that abortion has largely been permissible in the past.
This is a fascinating document to which I added the following editor's note.
During my 35 years offering courses in logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning, my students and I engaged in endless debates about abortion, where I was simply astounded at how much more they knew about birth control than the varied circumstances under which a woman might find it inadvisable to bring a new member into her family.
My own opinion is that Roe v. Wade has been among the wisest decisions ever rendered by the U.S.
Supreme Court Predicates the first right to life comes into existence at the onset of viability, which is the ability of the fetus to live outside the intrauterine environment, which turns out to be a function of the development of the lungs rather than of the heart or brain at the end of the second trimester of pregnancy.
Prior to that state, the fetus has a standing of a special form of property, and thereafter becomes a person with the social, legal, and moral rights that attend that status.
So, the key question is that of personhood, or any abortion thereafter other than to save the life or health of the woman qualifies as murder.
The right of a woman to choose whether or not to carry a fetus to term appears to me to be hers alone, in the absence of which a woman would be consigned to reproductive slavery.
It follows that, in my opinion, the pro-choice position, which does not force anyone to carry an unwanted fetus to term or to undergo an abortion when they want to carry to term, represents the only moral, respectful, democratic stance on this extremely controversial issue.
Because my dear friend and retired professor of law, John Remington Graham, has given this matter much thought.
I invited him to share his reflections as I now do.
David Kenney, my colleague here today, your thoughts.
You know, Jim, this is a very challenging issue.
There are personal liberty interests, there are medical interests, there are state interests, and that's what underlies the wisdom of Roe v. Wade in the first place.
Uh, I forget when it was was in the 70s that Roe v. Wade was was 73 I believe it's run for it's had a good run of 50 years as being um a guiding precedent for our country and I think it has it has done so uh I'll say somewhat respectfully, I happen to believe that my own personal belief is life begins at the moment of conception and of course everything that follows after that is what follows after that.
It should be protected all the way through.
But I do have a major concern with the issue of abortion because I've heard recently about late-term abortion where, you know, up to the eighth month and stuff are, you know, just frightening and that to me is equivalent to outright first-degree murder.
But I want to talk about the aspirational content of the law.
You've got a number of Supreme Court justices who've decided to take another look at Roe v. Wade.
I don't want to prejudge their decision.
I don't want to guess what the majority will be.
You know, it's a tough issue.
But between, you know, a law professor once said this to me, and I really agree with it.
You know, the Supreme Court of the United States gives us the supreme law of the land.
And it is between the conscience of those justices who decide between themselves and the Almighty what the law should be.
And I've got to believe that each one of those justices will take into consideration all the arguments, all the countervailing consideration, all the facts, and I would just hope for the benefit of this nation, they settle this issue once for all.
Respect also respecting the law of states.
Um, but if I think uniformity is the goal, and we can't have the different states having such a wide variety of laws on abortion because it just seems to me to be inconsistent with the objective of having a uniform federal I'm going to reserve my statement and wait to see what the court decides before I offer any criticism or praise for their decision making.
I'm just terrified at the idea you'd have this patchwork quilt and women would be resorting to back alley abortions with coat hangers.
Many a woman died an agonizing death by virtue of an infection that was imparted.
Women are not going to carry unwanted children to term, and we know from sociological demographic data Unwanted children become juvenile delinquents, they become criminals, they become a burden on society.
The best way to launch a life for any human being, and it's not actually a question of when life begins, obviously a human life begins at conception, but the question of personhood.
When is that life entitled to the legal, social, and moral status of being a person and deserve protection under the law?
Where I believe the court ruled wisely and it was at the end of the second trimester, but that it Having a loving, nurturing family is by far the greatest launching pad for a successful, joyful life, and that's not going to happen with unwanted children.
I don't believe that adoption is universally applicable, though of course I think it's highly recommended for those who are willing to carry the term.
But the reasons why a woman might not want to do that are, in my opinion, decisive.
Marry it.
Marry it.
And I respect a woman's right.
David, further thought?
Yeah, I agree.
Yeah, I totally get your view, and I respect it.
First off, I think Roe v. Wade, as I've said, has had quite a success in guiding the American people over the last 50 years.
But I cannot project what the court would do.
Yes.
You know, it's just it's unfathomable for me to think it's either going to be A or B. I think it's going to be once again somewhere in between.
Very interesting.
We shall see.
Meanwhile, I have my second false flag and conspiracy conference, this time for 2021, which will be 11 to 12 December.
Wrong year there, 2021.
Conspiracies are as American as apple pie.
In my first scholarly article about conspiracy research, Thinking About Conspiracy Theories 9-11 and JFK, I explain How the principles of scientific reasoning can be applied to conspiracy theories and illustrated with regard to the current issue of the New York Times, its stories on every page dealing with conspiracies.
Once authentic evidence has been separated from fabricated, the cases tend to fall into familiar patterns and become amenable to resolution.
It will be broadcast next Saturday and Sunday, mix and stream, 9 a.m.
to 9 p.m.
It looks like I'm going to have 20 to 24 presentations, and believe me, these are good ones.
So mark that, mix, capital N, stream, 9 a.m.
to 9 p.m.
next Saturday and Sunday, 11 and 12 December.
And David, I want to thank you for coming in today.
I think you've been excellent, as you have in the past, and I'm just delighted you could join us.
Well, thank you very much.
I would like to reiterate one of the things that's really weighed very heavily on me, especially after reviewing Dr. David Martin's The Illusion, The illusion, I forget what it is, but the illusion of a pandemic, essentially.
But he has his work on putting those patents in chronological order in identifying the Everything from the evolution of coronavirus to the distribution of rights and the manifold interests that follow the evolution of coronavirus.
It's an astonishing work and it deserves recognition.
As I mentioned, I had the opportunity to review 50 different scientific articles.
Let me be real clear.
I've put them in chronological order.
I've read the abstracts on a developing basis.
I'm not a scientist.
I don't have the background in genetics and biology and taxonomy, but I can tell you that when you take a look at what Dr. David Martin has put together, and you take a look at the scholarly articles, They go together like this, okay?
And it's a fascinating study, but there's a lot of concerns that reach into this nefarious, and I'm going to say it, evil scheme that's taking place, and our basic liberties are under attack.
I am alerting, I'm cautioning, and I'm warning the American people.
Be prepared.
David, wonderful.
Thank you, Jim, for the time, and thank you, Don.
Nice to see you.
Thank you, David.
Don, take us out.
Oh, yeah.
This is Tahiti.
It is so much better than the United States.
It's going down.
It's just up here.
Anyway, thanks so much for watching Truth vs. News here on the 5th of December, and we'll see you next week, I hope, after the conference that Jim's going to be on.
▲
Export Selection