Nov. 18, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
11:22
| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| Well, by now you know how it is with our leadership class. | |
| They never learn from failure. | |
| They only double down. | |
| They neutered police in cities like Chicago and Baltimore. | |
| And crime exploded. | |
| So now they want to abolish police completely and empty prisons. | |
| The war in Afghanistan was a 20-year quagmire, so now they're seeking another 20-year calamity. | |
| They've tried to fix social decay by throwing money at it, and the problems only get worse, so what's another few trillion dollars? | |
| Well, now all of this is playing out again in health policy. | |
| The shots have not worked the way that our leaders told us that they would, and every day it's becoming more and more obvious that they're dangerous and deadly. | |
| But they aren't backing off on vaccine rhetoric. | |
| They're going further now than ever. | |
| Now they need to force them into our children. | |
| Children who are at no risk from COVID and do pretty much nothing to spread it. | |
| But they must be jabbed. | |
| It's a religious imperative for the left in their new coronavirus death cult. | |
| They don't care how many children it might hurt. | |
| Instead, the CEO of Pfizer is going around saying that people who question the official story on the vaccines are criminals. | |
| No, the real criminals are the ones imposing this medical dictatorship on us and our kids. | |
| And the crimes could be worse than that. | |
| Biotech analyst Karen Kingston is back with us with what she says is evidence that Pfizer knew the vaccines would disable and kill children before their latest vaccine trials even started. | |
| Karen, thank you for being here. | |
| Thank you for having me, Stu. | |
| I have evidence, yes, that Pfizer knew this was going to disable, harm, and kill children prior to unleashing this on the American population. | |
| And I have additional information that not only did they know it was going to disable and harm children, they knew they were unleashing a bioweapon. | |
| One thing I want to point out is the FDA had a meeting on June 10th of this year, and they put together a document for pediatric use of the vaccines. | |
| And in this document, as well as in the EUA document for 5 to 11-year-olds and 12 to 15-year-olds, it states, depending on epidemiologic trends and adequately powered clinical efficacy endpoint trial, With sufficient case accrual across pediatric age groups may be very difficult if not infeasible to conduct. | |
| What does that mean? | |
| It means what I've said since day one since you've had me on your show. | |
| It is clinically and statistically impossible to create a vaccine that's going to be more effective than a child's natural immune system. | |
| Period. | |
| So what did they do in the trials? | |
| They did immuno-bridging. | |
| That robust immune response, if you take a look at the data, that is an overactive immune response. | |
| It's immunogenicity. | |
| What Fauci calls a robust immune response is disease that results in illness, Disabilities, harm and death in children. | |
| That's the robust immune response that they're talking about. | |
| You do not do this. | |
| They knew they couldn't create a vaccine. | |
| All the vaccine does is override the children's natural immune system. | |
| But this is the really damning evidence. | |
| If you take a look at the submission that Pfizer submitted on November 20th of last year, everyone thought that was just for 16 years of age and older. | |
| No, there was a group of 12 to 15 year old children, Stu, 12- to 15-year-old children in that study. | |
| And I'm going to read verbatim what the Pfizer and FDA published on December 20th. | |
| They stated that reogenicity data from a total of 100 adolescents 12 through 15 years of age were provided in the Emergency Use Authorization Submission. | |
| However, the sponsor, Pfizer, did not request inclusion of this age group in the EUA because the data was insufficient to support a benefit-risk determination at this time. | |
| Therefore, the data for 12- to 15-year-old children is not being presented. | |
| Pfizer, Albert Bourla, what does that mean? | |
| They knew that the safety data in the children was damning. | |
| It was damning. | |
| And so Burla said, don't make this, release this to the public. | |
| This should have never, ever been moved forward to inject in 12 to 15 year olds. | |
| Maddie DeGray, what happened to her, she was paralyzed, she's paralyzed and has a feeding tube, never should have happened. | |
| All of these heart inflammations, it never should have happened. | |
| That poor man during Ron Johnson's open public forum crying because of the death of his 16-year-old son never should have happened. | |
| The CEO of Pfizer knew in November of last year that this would disable, harm, and kill children. | |
| And what did he do? | |
| He told the FDA to cover it up, don't make it publicly available. | |
| Everyone has right to this data under FOIA, period. | |
| And what sway does he have over the FDA? | |
| That's a subjective answer, I would say, because he has sway because of Pfizer's influence because of the financial. | |
| But I can just tell you from being in the industry, the CEO knows lockstep what's going on with their phase three trials. | |
| So he can tell his panel, his panel of experts in R&D to say, look, make sure they don't make this public. | |
| And I know that, you know, you don't, you don't like to be subjective. | |
| You like to come here with facts and patents and studies and FOIA gathered information. | |
| And I appreciate that. | |
| I'm just from a person to person. | |
| I was asking and I guess, you know, Patrick Howley from National File was here. | |
| About a week ago or two and disclosed exactly who these FDA people are. | |
| The people that are on the committee that are deciding whether or not to move forward with an emergency use authorization for children and all of them have super deep ties to Pfizer. | |
| So that's the answer. | |
| The answer is money. | |
| Financial ties. | |
| Yeah. | |
| I mean, Scott Gottlieb, former FDA commissioner under the Trump administration, is now on the board of Pfizer. | |
| Shocker, right? | |
| So there's deep ties. | |
| That's absolutely it. | |
| But I just also want people to know the CEO is not oblivious as to what's going on with the phase three trials. | |
| They're very much aware of it. | |
| And this evidence shows that they conspired to commit aggravated assault and murder of children with a bioweapon. | |
| And maybe your audience or naysayers are saying, you have no evidence this is a bioweapon. | |
| Yes, I do. | |
| Take a look at the biological license application that was submitted, actually submitted in May | |
| of this year. And what it says under the product description verbatim is the mRNA Comirnaty is a | |
| single-stranded mRNA encoding the full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein derived from the Wuhan-HU1-1 | |
| isolate that was uploaded to GenBank by China. It is the bioweapon. That's what it is. And it's | |
| literally called the Wuhan-HU1-1 spike protein. We know that's a bioweapon. | |
| If you still don't believe me, take a look at the patent that was issued on January 10th of 2017. | |
| And it was issued to actually MIT and Harvard, but this all rolls up into the master patents. | |
| And who funded this? | |
| It says, under state government support, the invention was made with the government support awarded by the NIH. | |
| But if you go to Section 9, what does it say, Stu? | |
| It says that this nanotechnology vaccine will deliver a molecule. | |
| In some embodiments, the small molecule is a toxin. | |
| In some embodiments, the toxin is from a chemical weapon or an agent of biowarfare. | |
| The NIH patented a vaccine to deliver a bioweapon. | |
| That's what we're administering right now. | |
| Unbelievable. | |
| I mean... | |
| And right now, NIH and Moderna are in court to find out who's getting the royalties for unleashing a bioweapon in a mass genocide across the globe. | |
| That is what's going on. | |
| And Francis Collins is very proudly dragging Moderna to court so he can get his fair share of killing the global population. | |
| Insanely demonic. | |
| It's demonic. | |
| And I don't know what to tell people to say, we're at war. | |
| I mean, the patent says we're going to make a vaccine that delivers a bioweapon. | |
| The FDA approval authorization license says the vaccine produces the Wuhan HU1 bioweapon. | |
| We are at war, Stu, and people who are thinking our government is coming in to save us, I'm sorry. | |
| Everyone's making way too much money. | |
| Way too much money. | |
| Here in Carlsbad, you know, my backyard, Quidel just announced that they built a new plant. | |
| They're a diagnostic company. | |
| They're going to produce 600 million COVID-19 tests a year. | |
| This is a huge market. | |
| and people don't understand nobody wants the money to go away. | |
| COVID-19 is a product. It's a brand being marketed and these demonic satanic capitalists, | |
| I guess you could say that they are and I'm not an anti-capitalist but I am anti-Satan | |
| and I am anti-demonic. These communists are making a killing by using this branded and | |
| marketed product and they're using it also in a nefarious way by rolling out a bioweapon in | |
| the name of that product and now they're injecting your kids with it. | |
| Trillions and trillions of dollars in the marketplace have opened up as a result of this. | |
| Jeff Bezos, look at his net worth and what it did over the lockdown period as President Trump was duped into that. | |
| You know, this EO, we're going to start digging in on that executive order as well that was signed by President Trump. | |
| I don't know. | |
| We're going to take a look at this. | |
| Was he duped? | |
| Did he know? | |
| Did he sign it on purpose? | |
| Is he involved? | |
| Is that why he's avoiding, you know, coming on platforms like this one, where he knows that we're going to ask him questions about this vaccine? | |
| Why does he continue to push it? | |
| Is he backed into a corner? | |
| This is all stuff that, but if I hear 5D chess one more time, I think I might vomit. | |
| We have kids that are dying out here, and this thing needs to be stopped right now. | |
| And there's the proof. | |
| We are at war. | |
| Karen Kingston, thank you so much. | |
| Appreciate it. | |
| Thank you, Stu. | |
| When you hear step on socks dot com, I know that you're thinking gifts and I know that you're thinking feet and I know that you're thinking socks, which is great because that is the flagship product. | |
| These high quality, all cotton, 100% designed Patriot socks. | |
| They come in a whole bunch of different versions. | |
| The original globalist. | |
| You could step on Obama, Clinton, Fauci, Gates, Pelosi, Biden. | |
| But how about the trader Joe? | |
| The trader Joe is back in stock. | |
| The Save Our Kids sock. | |
| Probably show everybody where your priorities lie. | |
| My favorite is the Trust in God sock. | |
| The Trust in God. | |
| I think I have it right here. | |
| As a matter of fact, I do. | |
| The Trust in God sock right here. | |
| You can step on sins all day long. | |
| And all sorts of different versions of socks. | |
| You can step on your local snake, your local tyrant, your local globalist. | |
| Also, when you're thinking steponsocks.com, don't forget to think silver. | |
| Yes. | |
| Yes. | |
| Precious metals, real silver, available at StepOnSocks.com, as well as Second Amendment flags, Trump One flags, a beautiful cross-bearing flag, a fist pulling back the stars and stripes, all glory revealing the cross there because we're a nation founded under God. | |
| Great gift ideas, great foot apparel, red pill technology. | |
| That's what this is. | |
| Go to StepOnSocks.com right now. | |
| Make sure that you mention Stu Peters. |
Export Selection