Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 12, 2021 - Jim Fetzer

01:57:13

9/11 SPECIAL (11 September 2021) in Memoriam for Robert David Steele

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is Jim Fetzer.
	I am here to extend the legacy of Robert David Steele.
	On the occasion of the 20th observance of 9-11, I had the privilege of collaborating with Robert on his 9-11 memorandum to then President of the United States, Donald Trump.
	Which I highly recommend is among the very best available resources about 9-11, which you can, of course, download for free from his website, where I am offering this contribution as an extension of his Intelligence with Integrity series.
	Which I would like to do everything I can to perpetuate.
	This man was a giant among those who are seeking to expose false flags and conspiracies, where 9-11 is among the most important.
	The Taliban continue to insist that Osama bin Laden had nothing to do with 9-11, about which they are 100% correct.
	Osama was our man in Afghanistan.
	He was instrumental in getting Stinger missiles into the hands of the Mujahideen, which they used to shoot down Soviet helicopters and planes to drive them out of that barren, godforsaken country.
	He was an officer in the CIA, Colonel Tim Osman, where an official from the agency visited him in a hospital in Dubai shortly before his death on 15 December 2001 from his medical maladies.
	It's tough to get dialysis machines in and out of those caves in Afghanistan.
	He was buried in an unmarked grave in accordance with Muslim tradition.
	There were local obituaries.
	By 26 December, both CNN and Fox News had caught up to the news and published that Osama bin Laden was dead.
	The fact is that Barack Obama Found it politically expedient to resurrect him and have him die again in a completely staged raid on a compound in Pakistan on the 2nd of May 2011, a decade after his death, in order to position himself for a triumphal re-election as the man who got the most wanted man in the world.
	But it was all political theater.
	When you know the truth, you begin to appreciate that Barack Obama was one of the great frauds of American history, and where he nullified the Smith-Mutt Act of 1948, which precluded the use of the same techniques of propaganda and disinformation within the United States that heretofore were only allowable Abroad, including riots, staged events, the whole shebang by the Smith Modernization Act of 2012, just in time to bring us Sandy Hook.
	Which would then be followed by the Boston bombing, Orlando and Dallas, Charlottesville, Parkland, Las Vegas.
	Barack Obama legalized this flood of propaganda upon the American people, who still have yet to figure out what actually happened at those controversial events, where I, among others, am doing my best to expose it.
	Meanwhile, this past week we had a development that many thought was a serious blow to the 9-11 Truth movement, but where, in fact, the opposite is the case.
	Richard Gage stepped down from leading architects and engineers for 9-11 Truth.
	Having founded Scholars for 9-11 Truth in December 2005 and bringing together experts across the board in different disciplines such as pilots, engineers, structural, civil, mechanical, electrical, physicists, and the like, where we had around 600 members by the end of 2006, I was very troubled by Richard Gage's leadership of this organization, which, because it included architects and engineers, vacuumed up most of the financial donations that the American public was willing to provide to 9-11 on the ground that it appeared to be the most competent of the organizations.
	But, get this, Richard Gage and A&E refused to talk about who was responsible and why.
	They continued to focus on Building 7 as a classic controlled demolition, about which they were 100% correct, but where Dan Rather, already on the day of 9-11, had observed that the Collapse of Building 7 resembled that we've seen of casinos and hotels in Las Vegas.
	In other words, in 20 years, Richard Gage brought us no further to 9-11 truth than Dan Rather already the day of the event, and he continued to promote the nanothermite theory of destruction.
	Which was completely indefensible.
	Well, it turns out that nanothermite only has one-thirteenth the explosive power of TNT, where T. Mark Hightower, a chemical engineer, and I published three articles in 2011 exposing That nanothermite cannot possibly have done the job, where an illustration is that of Niels Herrod, an associate professor of chemistry at the University of Copenhagen and supporter of nanothermite, who claims it would take
	29,000 metric tons of nanothermite to blow apart a twin tower.
	Think about it.
	This is completely absurd.
	There are many other methods and techniques that could be far more successful as I am going to explain.
	Meanwhile, if you were, say, watching an episode of MASH at the time, here's what you might have experienced.
	This comes from the May Brussels website.
	A very nice introduction to take us back to the events of 9-11.
	No second flight.
	It was a bomb.
	Bombing another building, not second plane.
	It was a bomb.
	We say the second plane.
	That's what we're told.
	The second plane.
	We saw it on television.
	Alright.
	Thanks a lot.
	This is...
	...idea of how much of the plane actually impacted the building.
	You know, it might have appeared that way, but from my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon.
	The only site is the actual side of the building that's crashed in, and as I said, the only pieces left...
	That you can see are small enough that you could pick up in your hand.
	There are no large tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse.
	Now, even though if you look at the pictures of the Pentagon, you see that the floors have all collapsed, that didn't happen immediately.
	It wasn't until almost about 45 minutes later that the structure was weakened enough that all of the floors collapsed.
	Jeff, it's a United Airlines plane.
	It's believed to be at that site outside Pittsburgh, isn't it?
	That's exactly right, John, with 45 people total on board.
	And one of the more profound things today, the imprint of terrorism seared, not only on Wall Street, but also on Main Street.
	Here you have an area 80 miles to the southeast of Pittsburgh, and this plane, which went down at about 10 o'clock this morning.
	We have rescue vehicles that came in earlier in the day, and they have turned up nothing.
	No one believed to be alive from this crash.
	Some of the media just getting back to the scene, which is about A quarter of a mile up on a hill back behind me, and so some of the first pictures just starting to come in within the last hour.
	I want to get quickly to Chris Konicki.
	He's a photographer with the Pittsburgh affiliate of Fox Affiliate.
	He was back there just a couple of minutes ago, and Chris, I've seen the pictures.
	It looks like there's nothing there except for a hole in the ground.
	Basically, that's right.
	The only thing you could see from where we were was a big gouge in the earth and some broken trees.
	We could see some people working, walking around in the area, but from where we could see, there wasn't much left.
	Any large pieces of debris at all?
	No, there was nothing, nothing that you could distinguish that a plane had crashed there.
	Smoke, fire?
	Nothing, it was absolutely quiet.
	It was actually very quiet.
	Nothing going on down there.
	No smoke, no fire.
	Just a couple of people walking around.
	They look like part of the NTSB crew walking around looking at the pieces.
	How big would you say that hole was?
	From my estimates, I would guess it was probably about 20 to 15 feet long and probably about 10 feet wide.
	What could you see on the ground, if anything, other than dirt and ash?
	You couldn't see anything.
	You could just see dirt, ash, and people walking around, broken trees.
	...says that City Hall in Oakland will remain open.
	It will be business as usual.
	He is urging people to remain calm, given what is going on.
	Remain calm.
	Oakland City Hall will remain open, but in San Francisco, City Hall has been closed.
	We're also just getting word here now that a second United Airlines jet, Flight 175 from Boston to Los Angeles, is now missing.
	Again, if you're just joining us, there have been four separate plane crashes.
	Three of those planes were en route to California.
	Two were heading to LAX.
	The third was heading to San Francisco International Airport.
	That was specifically the one heading to SFO United, flight number 93 from Newark to SFO.
	It apparently crashed in Pennsylvania, fairly close to the border of Maryland and not too far from Camp David.
	Why is that significant?
	Because one of the groups possibly claiming responsibility for all these terrorist attacks is the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and it was this week in 1978 that the Camp David Accords were reached.
	Is there a connection?
	At this point, we don't know, but it is important to be aware of that situation.
	In Washington, D.C., many congressional leaders have been transferred to a secret location.
	Some senators have described this as a second Pearl Harbor.
	And President Bush was in Florida this morning, but he made a brief announcement when the first attacks were clear on the World Trade Center, and he was heading back to Washington, D.C.
	At this point, we don't know exactly where he is.
	They're trying... They're not really broadcasting that information, but we are told that the president is safe right now.
	We're waiting for a press conference to start in San Francisco from the Office of Emergency Services to discuss what the situation, what the city's reaction to all of this is going to be.
	But again, right now in San Francisco... Now, notice a number of themes that are emerging right there from reports on the day of the event.
	No signs of any plane having crashed in Shanksville.
	We have United Airlines confirming a crash that does not appear to have happened.
	It was a bomb!
	No, it was a second plane.
	We saw it on television.
	What we saw on television is crucial.
	Jamie McIntyre, CNN's best correspondent.
	From my own close-up inspection, there's no sign of any plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon.
	We're going to confirm all those reports, and notice the attempt to shift responsibility or blame it on Palestinians, which turns out to have been an aspect of the political motivation.
	Now, here you see the official trajectories of the four 9-11 aircraft.
	We'll discover by and by that this is largely a fantasy, but notice in particular The security that was provided at the airports from which these flights departed was ICTS, which just happens to be an Israeli firm.
	Meanwhile, in Shanksville, here you have this hole about 15 or 20 by 10.
	I mean, it's not much of a hole in notice.
	There's no evidence, no sign that any plane had crashed there.
	Now, we're often told that you cannot prove a negative.
	Well, that's false.
	You can prove there's no elephant in your living room, which is a negative, by going to your living room and looking for signs of the presence of elephant.
	Finding none, you're entitled to infer that's because there's no elephant in your living room.
	Well, if you went to Shanksville and you were told a plane had crashed there, but you see no signs that any plane had in fact crashed there, you're entitled to infer that's because no plane crashed in Shanksville.
	Colonel George Nelson, who is an Air Force crash investigation expert, during one of our conversations, conveyed to me that it looked to him as though someone had taken a bulldozer out there, dug a trench, filled it with trash, and blown it up.
	Here's what a real crash site would look like, whether we're in Russia, Amsterdam, or Missouri.
	Completely different.
	I even suspect this photograph at the lower right has been photoshopped to introduce that smoke and debris, which was not present previously.
	Here you had that conversation with Steve Konecki, who was one of the two reporters on the scene, both of whom reported.
	The eerie aspect of the crash site was there was no sign that any plane had crashed there.
	Here's what some apologists for the government account insist actually happened.
	We're given the fanciful story of passengers taking over control of the plane or wrestling with the hijackers.
	That's where we get the let's roll story that the plane winds up crashing upside down.
	Into, according to the apologist, an abandoned mine shaft.
	This is supposed to be an area that had been heavily mined, but just think about it.
	Look, this is an airplane with a 125-foot wingspan.
	It has a tail that stands 44 feet above the ground, and there are no signs that anything like that crashed there.
	Moreover, We know what to do with miners trapped in mine shafts.
	We break out the bright lights and the heavy equipment and dig 24-7 in the hope that by some miracle, someone might have survived.
	Well, in this case, that did not happen.
	Even though on Flight 93, there was supposed to be 45 souls aboard a plane that could carry 289, indeed.
	One of the oddities of 9-11 is that these planes were only partially full.
	Flight 11, ostensibly North Tower, had only 92 of 351 aboard a 767.
	of 351 aboard a 767. 175, only 65 aboard. 77, allegedly the Pentagon. 64 out of 289 on a 757.
	And then 45 out of 289 here in Shanksville.
	How could commercial carriers possibly be profitable if they're flying transcontinental flights with only a quarter or even a fifth of their seats filled?
	It's absurd, just as is this story.
	Because we didn't break out the bright lights and heavy equipment.
	We didn't dig 24-7 in the hope that one of the 45 might have, by some miracle, survived.
	We didn't even seek to recover the plane or the bodies.
	And that, of course, is readily explicable because there was nothing there.
	Meanwhile, a resident by the name of Al McClatchy claims to have taken the photograph on the left, but it turns out that that photograph too is Photoshop.
	Notice several aspects.
	For one, the cloud looks more like that from a demolition shown in the center than it does from an airplane crash site, which would have heavy black smoke.
	Moreover, if you trace the geography, That smoke plume is coming up over a pond, not the crash site that the government has alleged.
	Here's what we see a real airplane crash site would look like.
	But notice Shanksville bore no resemblance whatsoever, none, not the least, even in the Photoshop picture.
	Well, it's evident that those who were participating in this fraud were not rocket scientists.
	It turns out that pilots for 9-11 Truth have done some simply brilliant work in this instance.
	They were able to track Flight 93 and discover that it was still airborne after its alleged crash in Shanksville and over Champaign-Urbana, Illinois.
	I shall subsequently explain this plane, the actual physical aircraft, wasn't even taken out of service until 28 September 2005, four years later.
	You begin to appreciate the enormity of the fraud.
	But remember what Jamie McIntyre told us.
	Now, the Pentagon must be the most heavily surveyed building in the world.
	They have cameras every hundred feet or so, and yet only five frames were released from a security camera, four of which show the growing fireball, one of which is conveniently labeled plain.
	And if you look above the gate mechanism here, there is something that does resemble a plane with a white plume extruding from it.
	As many have observed, the date-time stamp is all wrong, suggesting even these photographs themselves released by the Pentagon are fake.
	Here I asked my dear colleague, now departed, Jack White from JFK Research, if he could size the image of a Boeing 757 to the tail of the plane, which he did so.
	And you'll notice a 757 would be roughly twice as large or more.
	And we see just above that gate mechanism now a brilliant Research associate Dennis Camino, who was a Navy's top electronics troubleshooter until he resigned to go to work for Raytheon, has done sensational work on the Pentagon and ascertained that that appears to have been an unmanned aerial vehicle, not a Boeing 757, but a Global Hawk,
	Or Dennis and pilots have confirmed to me the white plume could not be the exhaust from a jet fighter, for example, which would be black, but from a missile being fired into the Pentagon, which appears to be exactly what happened.
	Well, as I shall explain, they appear to have set up a budgetary group trying to track what happened to the missing $2.3 trillion Donald Rumsfeld had announced the day before in order to obliterate the records and the experts who were tracking it.
	Meanwhile, further proof that no plane hit the Pentagon.
	Here's the hit point.
	On the ground floor.
	It's only about 10 feet high, 15 feet wide.
	You see chain link fence.
	You see a couple of automobiles or two large spools of cable.
	Unbroken windows.
	What you do not see is a massive pile of aluminum debris from a hundred ton airliner.
	Bodies, seats, luggage, wings, tail.
	Not even the engines were recovered from the side, where the engines are virtually indestructible.
	Notice, no points of entry for the engines here are visible.
	And that's, of course, because it didn't happen.
	Here is a comparison of, as Jamie McIntyre observed, 45 minutes later you had this section of the Pentagon collapse.
	My opinion is that Donald Rumsfeld looked at what was being broadcast of the facade of the Pentagon and felt it didn't look dramatic enough to sustain the belief that a plane had actually crashed there.
	So he directed that a section of the Pentagon there be brought down for impression, optics.
	This was political theater.
	And here you'll see part of the reason I believe those fireballs were imaginary, also photoshopped.
	There are no signs here where they're renovating that section of the collabs of any fire having taken place.
	Even notice here on like the third floor, we have a wooden stand that I believe was for an Oxford Unabridged Dictionary.
	It's not even singed!
	Unbelievable!
	Meanwhile, this is an artistic rendering of what we are told happened at the Pentagon.
	That a Boeing 757 traveling over 400 miles an hour, barely skimming the surface, crashed into the building.
	Let me make a couple of observations right off the bat.
	Had the engines been that close to the ground, they would have been churning up tremendous furrows.
	You would have seen rows Rows of furrows right up to the building caused by the engine.
	Second and more important, aeronautical engineers and pilots have explained to me That a Boeing 757 at over 400 miles an hour would not have been able to come closer than 60 or even 80 feet to the ground, where 80 feet is higher than the Pentagon at 71 feet is tall because of downdraft, also sometimes called ground effect.
	The plane could not possibly have made this trajectory.
	It was aerodynamically impossible.
	We're seeing several illustrations of the laws that cause and effect.
	If a plane had crashed in Shanksville, then that ought to have had the effect of leaving massive debris.
	But it isn't there, leading to the inference that a plane did not crash in Shanksville.
	Here you have an official trajectory by the government of Flight 77 approaching the Pentagon that isn't even aerodynamically possible.
	That means, of course, that the government is giving us a false account.
	What could be more obvious?
	Meanwhile, for further confirmation, here are two civilian lime green fire trucks that showed up to extinguish the very modest fires that remain from the alleged crash of the Boeing 757.
	Notice in particular, no furrows that would have been dug by those massive engines had that trajectory been authentic.
	And no debris whatsoever.
	None.
	Look at that clear, pristine Pentagon lawn.
	Stunning.
	There's nothing there.
	And that photograph is not alone.
	We have a vast number.
	The BBC actually came to my home near Madison, Wisconsin, and interviewed me for eight hours in relation to their new conspiracy files, 9-11, first installment.
	And part of what we find in BBC coverage, ironically, is there are no signs of any plane having crashed there.
	Here's another, even after the facade had collapsed.
	There are no signs of any plane having crashed there.
	None.
	Meanwhile, around, you know, shortly thereafter, debris began to show up.
	The most interesting piece of which by far is this, which did come from the fuselage of a Boeing 757, but notice it appears to have been peeled off.
	Does it look as though it was involved in a violent collision?
	No!
	It's not crumpled or scrunched up.
	Does it look as though it's been exposed to an intense fire?
	No!
	There aren't any indications of it even being singed.
	Plus, notice there, at the right bottom, That we seem to have a segment of a vine, not indigenous to the Arlington, Virginia area, that was captured by this piece of fuselage.
	Now, a brilliant attorney from Columbus, Ohio, retired James Hansen, recognizing that the Boeing 757 had an excellent safety record, very few crashes.
	Trace this segment of vine back to a crash of American Airlines 965 near Cali, Colombia in 1995.
	1890 font, where the pilots lost their way and crashed through a jungle where these vines
	grow in abundance into the side of a mountain.
	Bye.
	The salvage operation was conducted by an Israeli firm, which appears to have kept this piece of fuselage available so it could be planted, used for some appropriate purpose, which turned out to be planting on the lawn of the Pentagon on 9-11.
	Meanwhile, while I gave the BBC a hundred arguments of how we knew that 9-11 had been an orchestrated event and that these alleged Arab terrorists had nothing to do with it, I mentioned about the debris showing up on the lawn that I suspected that had been dropped by a C-130 that was circling the building.
	So the Pentagon went to ask the pilot about it, and he said, he replied that it was absurd.
	Notice he didn't say it was false.
	But that was absurd.
	So of all the arguments I gave, this is the one they selected.
	Of the eight hours they recorded, they ran seven and a half minutes of me, three minutes of Dylan Avery, who created loose change, and four and a half of Alex Jones.
	So Dylan Avery was supposed to be the snot-nosed kid, Alex Jones the messianic creature, and I the kooky professor.
	Dennis Camino believes that the C-130 was actually controlling the Global Hawk as it approached the Pentagon and fired a missile into the West Wing.
	Meanwhile, another absurd aspect of the official account is that the plane barely skimming the ground took out a series of stationary lampposts Now, we know by Newton's third law, equal and opposite reaction, that the effect of a plane traveling over 400 miles an hour hitting stationary lampposts would have the same effect as if the plane were stationary, hit by lampposts traveling over 400 miles an hour.
	They would have broken open the wing where the fuel is stored.
	It would have mixed with oxygen in the air and exploded.
	The plane would have cartwheeled across the lawn.
	There would have been debris everywhere.
	But instead, for the first 45 minutes or more, there was debris nowhere.
	So obviously, this again is a confirmation of preposterous results, the laws that cause and effect.
	When you have the absence of the effect, you're entitled to infer the absence of the cause.
	This is one more element of a fantasy scenario we were given about a Pentagon.
	Now, this is extremely interesting.
	Two very diligent students of 9-11, who call them citizens, investigative team discovered there were a series of witnesses at the Citgo station located here that reported having seen a plane approach the Pentagon.
	So in investigating, they got the witness testimony and they diagrammed what they reported seeing in those yellow lines.
	The official trajectory is represented by the green.
	Notice immediately the green line is south of the Sitco Station.
	The witnesses were all reporting a plane approaching north of the Sitco Station.
	This appears to be the plane Norman Mineta testified to being in an underground bunker beneath the White House with Dick Cheney, where Cheney's aide came, was reporting to him, sir, it's 50 miles out.
	Sir, it's 40 miles out.
	Sir, it's 30 miles out.
	Do the orders still stand?
	And Cheney whipped around and said, of course the orders still stand.
	Have you heard anything to the contrary?
	Mineta didn't know what he was witnessing there, but it appears that Dick Cheney had given an order not to shoot down this plane as it was approaching the Pentagon.
	The aide was concerned because the obvious thing to do would have been to shoot it down.
	The planes were being used as weapons.
	In that case, you lose the passengers and the planes, but not the personnel and the property at the target location.
	Remember now, The Pentagon is not only the most heavily surveyed, but no doubt the most heavily defended building in the world.
	There are all kinds of anti-aircraft batteries there.
	The plane could have been shot down.
	Cheney's order was to not shoot it down so it could approach the Pentagon.
	And while the witnesses saw it fly toward the Pentagon in a major explosion and presumed the plane therefore had hit the Pentagon, A colleague of mine, again from JFK Research, Roy Schaefer, had a trucker buddy who just happened to be in front of the Pentagon at the time by the name of David Ball, who had told Roy how he'd seen a plane approach the Pentagon and then swerve over it.
	He was in exactly the right position to observe what took place.
	And I told Roy, I said, well, let's get Dave on the air.
	I want to interview him.
	And Roy said, came back and said, Dave was reluctant.
	And I told Roy, look, once Dave has his story out, he'll be far safer.
	I guarantee, tell it.
	But the next I heard from Roy, Dave had been found dead in an abandoned building.
	He knew he saw too much.
	Meanwhile, in the Sebring, you have this perfectly symmetrical hole, which was alleged to have been caused by a part from the aircraft, like a landing gear.
	But because it would have hit at an angle, it ought to have been asymmetrical.
	It wouldn't have looked like this.
	It would have been shaped very differently, and it just happens spray-painted on the wall.
	As further evidence, these guys were mental midgets.
	It says right there, punch out.
	Well, there was a speleochordite in the air, which is a commonly used military explosive.
	They blew out this little segment in the C-ring to prop up a fantasy scenario.
	Now, we already heard firsthand from Jamie McIntyre.
	Based on his close-up inspection, there was no sign of any plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon.
	Jamie was pressured to retract, which he did in the following way.
	He subsequently reported, only a fool Would believe no plane hit the Pentagon, meaning he'd been a fool to think his bosses wanted him to report the truth about the Pentagon on 9-11.
	He would subsequently retire, no doubt being unwilling to carry more heavy water, more propaganda for the deep state.
	He was a good man.
	April Gallup was a civilian employee who was also there, where an explosion took place when she first put a finger on her computer.
	It was as though there were cause and effect.
	She walked out the hole in the Pentagon, looked around, could not find any signs of any plane there, but felt the smell.
	She smelled the odor of explosives.
	Tremendous pressure was put on April to change her testimony, but she, like Jamie McIntyre, spoke the truth.
	Major General Albert Stubblebine, formerly in charge of all U.S.
	military intelligence, was interviewed in Germany and explained how, though now retired, He had been in charge of all U.S.
	military, including signals, photographic intelligence.
	He knew that no plane had hit the Pentagon because there was no impression of the plane on the facade of the Pentagon, which was rather porous and soft limestone.
	General Stubblebine and I would subsequently do a show together where I reviewed all the evidence I had amassed that all four of the crash sites had been fabricated or faked, albeit in different ways.
	General Stubblebine not only agreed with me but offered additional reasons why I was right.
	Meanwhile, later The rumor circulated that the Capitol was next.
	I believe that was to be the target attributed to Flight 93.
	And members of the Congress came out and when peering across the Potomac saw billowing black smoke, which as we know would be like that or similar to from a crash.
	But it was all fake.
	It came from a series of enormous dumpsters.
	I mean, I knew it had to be fake.
	Think of the lime green fire trucks extinguishing the very modest fires.
	So they had to fabricate.
	This is Hollywood.
	A member of Scholars came through Duluth and showed me 44 more frames where you could see light between the building and the domsters.
	How bad is that?
	Indeed, it turns out, and Gerard Holmgren, who was a blues musician from Australia, was the first to notice what Edward Hendry would subsequently publish, the original Bureau of Transportation Statistics chart showing no American Airlines Flight 77 scheduled to depart Washington Dulles on 9-11.
	It's not there.
	For those unfamiliar with Bureau of Transportation Statistics, they keep records on every commercial flight in the United States, when it's scheduled to depart, when it actually pulls away from the gate, when it has wheels up, when it has wheels down, all that.
	Nothing for flight 77.
	It wasn't even in the air.
	And I believe that was necessary because of all the fakery they wanted to perpetrate around the Pentagon.
	But where we have now exposed, no plane, no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon.
	Now, to ponder Richard Gage would not discuss who was responsible and why.
	It turns out in the late 1980s, Bibi Netanyahu was sponsoring conferences on terrorism and how the West can win before the concept of terrorism was in the consciousness of any of the Western nations, and where, with a dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, They formed a new organization of neocons entitled Project for a New American Century, which was advocating the idea that if the United States would only move aggressively into the Middle East and exert military and diplomatic pressure outward from that geopolitically sensitive region,
	They could create a new American empire that would dominate the world for the next 100 years.
	Well, it was a complete fantasy.
	The whole idea was to draw the U.S.
	military into the Middle East, to take out the modern Arab states that served as a counterbalance to Israel's domination of the entire region, and eventually to confront the Persian nation of Iran.
	Notice here, This was published in the mid-1990s.
	Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one.
	That is to say, of the American people Dawning realization that with the demise of the Soviet Union there is only one superpower that could dominate the entire world for the next 100 years, as though that were a worthy goal for the United States.
	The process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor.
	Remember, The anchor on 9-11 reporting some senators are even referring to this as a new Pearl Harbor.
	Well, that was part of the script.
	And here you have Wesley Clark.
	Now, he spoke the truth.
	He had served as Supreme Commander Allied Forces Europe, which means he was commanding general of NATO, returned to the Pentagon after 9-11, encountered a general of his acquaintance who explained to him that we were planning to invade Iraq, which most of them found puzzling because Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11.
	So Clark told the general to keep him posted when we returned a month or so later.
	He asked the general, are we still planning to invade Iraq?
	And the general said, oh no, sir, it's much worse.
	Step into my office.
	He said, we have just received a memorandum from Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld directing us to overthrow the governments of seven countries in the next five years.
	Beginning with Iraq and Libya, ending with Syria and Iran.
	And Clark said, well, is that memorandum classified?
	And the general said, oh, yes, sir.
	And Clark said, well, then don't show it to me.
	I may want to talk about it later.
	It wasn't until October 3rd, 2007, however, that Wesley Clark kept that promise at the Commonwealth Club of California, which laid out that the agenda actually wasn't an American agenda, but an Israeli.
	Among those who are most prominent when members of the Project for a New American Century were moved into the Department of Defense were Paul Wolfowitz on the right and Richard Perle, who are great advocates for moving forward with the Israeli agenda, who are adamant Zionists, which should come as no surprise.
	Meanwhile, in New York, The Twin Towers were masterpieces of architecture and engineering.
	They included a design of a tube within a tube, where the central tube had 47 massive core columns for support, then supplemented by 230 external steel support columns to create a vast swath of open area for work.
	Received medals and awards for design.
	Very robust.
	Indeed, this design is fascinating because the steel thickness varied enormously from the sub-basements, where it was six inches thick, to five, to four, to three, to two, to one, to the very top, where it was only one quarter inch thick.
	That's fascinating because we're talking about the upper cube of floors, say 14 floors, of steel that's only a quarter inch, representing a tiny percentage of the mass of the steel of the building, and yet the government He wants us to believe that it was that part of the floor collapsing that led like a pedal driver to the rest of the building collapse, where when we take a close look, it's not only a physical absurdity, but we're not witnessing a collapse of any kind.
	Here we have a diagram of the World Trade Center, where you can see in the sketch, you know, Building 1 and 2, these massive 110-story buildings, and the World Trade Center 7, 47 floors, would have been like the tallest building in 37 states.
	Had it not been surrounded by 110 monoliths.
	It turns out that the buildings which were under construction from 1966 and opened in 1970 had large amounts of asbestos fireproofing which would have necessitated costly removal had they remained standing Now get this, the buildings could not be taken down by classic controlled demolition, because it would have released all that asbestos and other heavy metals into the atmosphere.
	So that was ruled out.
	Building steel scaffolding around 110-story buildings to undertake its removal, however, would have run about a billion dollars a building.
	So that would be cost prohibitive.
	How convenient that a terrorist attack just happened to take down those buildings.
	And then Christie Whitman, the head of the EPA, said, oh yes, the air was safe to breathe.
	Well, if it would not have been safe to breathe under a controlled demolition to remove the asbestos, how could it be safe to breathe?
	Under a situation where you had the, you know, the destruction of the buildings that released all of those harmful ingredients into the atmosphere.
	Christy Whitman deserves universal condemnation.
	And the health effects have been devastating.
	Meanwhile, it's as though all and only buildings with a WTC designation had been targeted.
	The destruction of the World Trade Center was very comprehensive.
	Actually, simply stunning.
	In fact, the World Trade Center had only come into private possession six weeks before 9-11.
	Four key members of the Port Authority, Frank Lowry, Paul Eisenberg, Ronald Lauder, All of whom were vehement Zionists.
	I believe all dual U.S.-Israeli citizens undertook the move for which there was no obvious or appropriate reason.
	No good reason.
	I suppose they might have claimed the Port Authority didn't want to deal with the asbestos problem, but it was put into the hands of this man, Larry Silverstein.
	Now, get this.
	As soon as Silverstein took control of the World Trade Center, he fired the security firm that had been looking after the buildings, the World Trade Center, since 1970 and replaced it with an Israeli firm.
	He also renegotiated insurance to include an anti-terrorist clause where He alleged, since there'd been two attacks, two planes, he was entitled to double indemnity and pocketed around $4.5 billion on a $114 million investment.
	They don't call him Lucky Larry for nothing.
	He and his daughter, who also worked there in the World Trade Center, every morning would have breakfast in windows on the world atop of the North Tower.
	That day, neither he nor his daughter were present.
	Harris Crowell, the Israeli security firm that was hired to look after the World Trade Center, where we're beginning to see a theme emerge, Odego was an Israeli messenger service that appears to have notified everyone who was Jewish who worked in the World Trade Center not to come to work that day.
	I had a little old lady call me from Brooklyn to inform me that their rabbi had informed the members of her synagogue not to travel into Lower Manhattan And they were not alone.
	Willie Brown actually explained that he had been warned not to fly on 9-11, where it turns out, based, you know, ferreting out who warned him, it appears to have been Condoleezza Rice, obviously in the know, who embarrassingly, in my opinion, is still being interviewed on national television about what happened on 9-11.
	Meanwhile, there's no actual evidence that the 9-11 hijackers boarded any planes that were involved.
	11-77-93 or 175.
	But they were at one point in an airport, and the FBI claimed that in a suitcase Mohammed Atta had left behind.
	They found a list of the 19 co-conspirators.
	Now think about it.
	If you were about to perform a suicide mission, are you going to leave behind a list of your co-conspirators?
	I mean, this is simply absurd.
	And in spite of the fact that we have overwhelming evidence that all of this was a fantasy, the FBI has refused to change its attribution.
	It turns out that the 9-11 hijacker passports were issued by the CIA, where a consulate whistleblower explained.
	This is very, very bad.
	The company, Apitek, moreover, another Israeli firm, had access to all FAA databases for two hours on the morning of 9-11.
	Are you beginning to get the picture?
	Here is that announcement Donald Rumsfeld made the day before on a Monday.
	That $2.3 trillion was missing from the Pentagon budget.
	He directed the section chief to bring all the documents and records into the West Wing because it was embarrassing.
	He'd had to make this announcement.
	He wanted them to get to the heart of the matter, bring all the documents and records, so that when I reviewed the list of reported Pentagon victims, I found Three dozen.
	Three dozen budget analysts, financial experts, accountants, and so forth.
	They had been in the West Wing, which had recently been innovated, reinforced.
	The only wing of the Pentagon to be reinforced So, there's Modi for you.
	Bullhawk missile fired into the West Wing. Destroyed, killed, 36, these experts and the
	documents and records. So there's Modi for you. And we know the chief financial officer of the
	Pentagon at the time, Dov Zorkheim, is not only a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen, but also a rabbi.
	Razakheim had a flight maintenance company where you could remotely control takeover an aircraft in case it had been hijacked and you can regain control.
	I believe the original plan was to use remotely controlled drones to hit the North and the South Tower Until they discovered that, because of the design of the building, it would have been physically impossible for the planes to enter the buildings before they exploded, which they needed to have a pseudo-explanation for why the towers would collapse, as we have been told over and over again.
	In spite of the fact that it's inconsistent with the observable evidence and the Twin Towers did not collapse.
	Meanwhile, there was a French film crew called the Naudet Brothers.
	N-A-U-D-E-T.
	Or Naudets, N-A-U-D-E-T-S, who just happened to be in a location that Leslie Raphael, a Scottish student of 9-11, has determined required the satisfaction of a hundred improbable circumstances where the cameraman could just swing his camera up to capture the hit on the North Tower.
	Now, if you contemplate, think about sound versus the speed at which the planes were traveling.
	By the time the sound of the approaching plane had hit the film crew, the plane would have already been well distant.
	The idea he could simply swing his camera up means they knew what was happening.
	And it turns out even the word, the name Naudet's is actually an anagram for Duane Street, which is the location where they were filming.
	Here's what an actual Boeing 767 would have looked like in relation to the North Tower.
	Here's, however, what we have, which Rosalie Grebel, also known as a web fairy, now departed this Earth, described as looking like a flying pig.
	She's certainly right.
	This doesn't look anything like a Boeing 767.
	Here's a flash frame from the first hit.
	Something odd going on there, but look at this.
	Here you see the initial hit looked like a Z on the side, but after it clears, it's an elongated V. And notice this, they even extend what happened here with a wingtip, which is highly fragile and could not possibly have Broken through the massive steel supporting columns, but then all of this has to have been fabricated or faked one way or another.
	Well, we have evidence of fakery right there!
	Meanwhile, the cutout appears to have taken place behind the cloud of smoke and debris.
	There are actually a whole lot of flashing lights beneath, leading me to conjecture perhaps this is what George H. W. Bush meant by a thousand points of light.
	For it appears that the cutouts were being made behind the scene at this very moment.
	The plane was intersecting with seven different floors of the North Tower, where each floor consisted of a steel truss connected at one end to the massive core columns at the other to the external steel support columns filled with four to eight inches of concrete.
	Now that variance is because there were v-shaped grooves in the trusses, so in some places it would be four inches thick and others eight.
	Because the buildings were 208 feet on a side, that means each floor consisted of an acre of concrete on a steel truss.
	Think about it.
	Meanwhile, when you take a close-up look here, there's no sign of any plane in any of these.
	You can study the photographs ad nauseum, and you're not going to find any component of any plane.
	One student, Steve Duck, with whom I've had debates, believes that a missile could have been fired to create the cutout.
	I believe there's an alternative explanation that offers a simpler explanation, but he's certainly right that these cutouts were manufactured The explanation I offer is the following.
	There were some 200 Israeli, I'm convinced, Mossad, who were entered into the United States as art students.
	Some of them were in the World Trade Center.
	They were known as the Gelatin Group.
	They were undertaking performance art even outside of the building.
	Here you see a photograph with boxes upon boxes of fuse holders.
	Now, why in the world would Israeli art students need fuse holders?
	My submission, in contrast to Stephen Dock, is that they were using those fuse holders to implant Thermite at various locations to create the cookie cutter-like cutouts in the side of the building that resemble, if anything, a Roadrunner cartoon, where a coyote passes through a building and you see an exact silhouette.
	I'll return to the role of these Israeli art students on 9-11, which turns out to have been considerable.
	Meanwhile, Bureau of Transportation Statistics chart also shows no American Airlines Flight 11 was in the air that day.
	I mean, look, it's really stunning the amount of evidence we have that neither Flight 11 nor Flight 77 was in the air that day.
	But I'm presenting it for your contemplation.
	Meanwhile, among the events that were taking place on 9-11, the New York Police Department was being kept very, very busy.
	The dancer art student groups had a variety of tasks among them.
	Planning jammers on buildings to block Port Authority dispatchers and first responder radios.
	Plan explosives on the New Jersey side of the George Washington Bridge where the cables are anchored to collapse the bridge.
	Explode a truck in the Lincoln Tunnel.
	Explode a truck in the Holland Tunnel, park trucks with demolition devices in specific parking areas of the Twin Towers, and allegedly to coordinate with Muhammad Adda and his group.
	But that's of course just fictional again, because Muhammad Adda and his group had nothing to do.
	They were the Patsy's.
	They were just as much patsies for 9-11 as Lee Harvey Oswald for JFK or Sirhan Sirhan for Bobby.
	Meanwhile, there was a group of five known as the Dancing Israelis who observed at Liberty State Park Cheering and celebrating, taking selfies.
	They were filming the destruction of the World Trade Center.
	A local resident thought this was very odd and reported them, where the police apprehended them, and where the driver said to the officer, we are not the problem.
	Our problem is your problem.
	The problem is the Palestinians.
	And where they found traces of explosives, box cutters, passports, money in an Urban Moving Systems van that even had a mural painted on it of a plane in relation to the Twin Towers.
	Rather suggestive.
	Surprise, surprise, Urban Moving Systems is another Israeli asset.
	Now, these guys were apprehended and held for 71 days until an assistant to then Attorney General John Ashcroft directed their release.
	They went back to Israel.
	Three of them appeared on Israeli television explaining they were there to document the destruction of the World Trade Center, which obviously implied foreknowledge.
	Where the assistant who directed their release was none other than Michael Chertoff, who would become, lo and behold, the second head of Homeland Security after former Pennsylvania Governor Tom Ridge.
	This is a very nasty piece of work, Michael Chertoff, and I was dumbfounded to see him being interviewed on national television in the last couple of days about an event where he played a key part in covering it up.
	Now, everyone has seen footage of what they have taken to be flight 175 approaching the South Tower.
	Here is one frame.
	But there are actually as many as 52 different videos.
	It turns out that analysis of those videos, including by pilots for 9-11 Truth, have ascertained that the trajectory of the aircraft Approaching the South Tower is aerodynamically impossible.
	They appear to have taken the cruising speed for a 767, and remember in New York it was two Boeing 767s allegedly involved, whereas in Shanksville in the Pentagon, two Boeing 757s And it was actually exceeding the stress capabilities of the aircraft.
	In other words, had this been a bona fide 767, it would have come apart in the air under the stress.
	They appear to have taken the cruising speed at 35,000 feet and assumed it could also be attained at 700 to 1,000, where the air is three times more dense.
	As John Lear explained in his affidavit, Which you can find on the Scholars for 9-11 Truth discussion forum at 911scholars.ning, N-I-N-G dot com.
	You can read John Lear's affidavit, where John Lear is our nation's most distinguished pilot by far, qualified in all areas of maintenance and flight on multiple types of aircraft, holding 15 world records for flight, That because of the increased density of the air, the turbines couldn't suck it through and begin functioning as brakes.
	So this is one more proof of a fantasy that as the approach to the Pentagon was aerodynamically impossible because of ground effect or downdraft, what we have here is the impossibility because a plane would have come apart physically in the air as pilots document in their brilliant documentary, 9-11 Intercepted.
	Nevertheless, what we have is this plane appears to simply disappear, melt into the north, the South Tower, leading some to describe it as Butter Plane, meaning it was as though the South Tower were a massive 110-story cube of butter, or the Ghost Plane, because there are no collision effects.
	Now, once again, we have the intersection of a plane with, in this case, eight different floors, each as described representing an acre of concrete on a steel truss.
	The formidable external support columns would not have allowed the plane to transit.
	And yet, what do we have here?
	This is from the Evan Fairbanks video looking upward.
	The plane passes through its entire length into the building.
	In the same number of frames that it passes through its entire length in air, which is a physical absurdity unless a massive 500,000 ton steel and concrete building poses no more resistance to the trajectory of an aircraft in flight than air.
	In the lower left here, you see a bizarre phenomenon where the nose pops out on the other side when this happens.
	The national networks all faded to black.
	Here you have them recording the most historic footage ever in the history of the United States, and they fade to black.
	Some hand-eye coordination problem allowed the nose to pop through, which is, of course, the most fragile part of an airplane, loaded with electronics.
	If any part of a plane could not have survived a collision with a heavy surface, it would be the nose of a commercial carrier.
	What should have happened?
	The planes ought to have crumpled external to the buildings.
	Bodies, seats, luggage, wings, tail fallen to the bottom.
	Yes, the engines might well have penetrated because, as I have previously observed, they are virtually indestructible.
	War to come.
	But the plane could not possibly have entered the building.
	So what we're witnessing is more fantasy.
	We have more explosion.
	I believe this was previously positioned jet fuel or even napalm.
	It's really quite spectacular.
	But after the first 15 seconds or so, that had all been consumed and only very modest fires remain.
	We know, by the way, there were no collision effects, because we have photographs beneath the North and the South Tower of the street, and we find they're bereft of bodies, seats, luggage, wings, tail, no evidence of any plane having collided with the North or the South Tower.
	Meanwhile, an engine component was found at Church and Murray.
	You can see it there on the upper right.
	It's underneath a steel staff holding a canopy, which are undamaged.
	Notice, in particular, the sidewalk is undamaged.
	Now, anything that massive at high trajectory would have gouged the sidewalk.
	It would have been ripped up.
	Jack White once again discovered Fox News footage of a van at Church and Murray, where four or five guys in FBI vests appear to be unloading something heavy.
	They may have even used the dolly in the foreground.
	But again, indicating those who were engaged in this really were unsophisticated, not very smart.
	They used an antiquated engine that wasn't in service at the time, so this was an obvious plan.
	What's more, we have a Hollywood-style theatrical event.
	Meanwhile, if a bird doesn't vaporize in the process of slicing a wing, then a plane shouldn't vaporize during the process of slicing steel and concrete.
	Where is the evidence that a plane created these holes?
	Once again, I emphasize, there are no parts of any aircraft in either of the holes of the World Trade Center 1 or World Trade Center 2.
	Here's a further indication of the damage that birds can do to aircraft.
	Well, small birds weighing only ounces can do this kind of damage to a plane, or in some cases, a few pounds.
	How could a plane possibly cope with a formidable external steel support column seen in the lower left to create a gash like that seen in the lower right?
	It's absurd.
	Some have cited the Sandia crash, where a fighter aircraft, an F-4 Phantom, was put aboard a railroad truss and propelled by a rocket into a nuclear-resistant bunker, and it just blew apart into millions of tiny pieces.
	Now, The plane is made out of a synthetic material.
	It was filled with water and run into the barrier, but notice it did not penetrate the barrier.
	It blew into a million pieces.
	It's completely absurd to suggest anything like that should have happened.
	Either in Shanksville or the Pentagon or the Twin Towers.
	Just ridiculous.
	But that's a level of argument to which apologists for 9-11, the official report, have been reduced.
	So obviously we're dealing with fakery.
	The question, how was it done?
	Rosalie Grebel, whom I've mentioned already, believed it was computer-generated images, CGI.
	Ace Baker, who produced a brilliant 9-1-1 sci-opera, believes it was done using video compositing, where there's a 17-second delay between the time that a video is actually recorded and the time it's broadcast to the public, that the images of the plane were added then.
	Third, The idea that it was actually a sophisticated projection of a hologram, which initially may sound rather ridiculous, but where, as I'm about to explain, the evidence substantiates that indeed that was what took place.
	Let me mention right off the bat that if it had been a CGI or video compositing, then there would have been no Visible playing in real time, it would only have become visible in the broadcast footage, because those images would not have existed prior to the broadcasting of the footage that had been altered by CGI or video compositing.
	Since we have hundreds of witnesses who report seeing what they took to be a real plane approaching the South Tower, including a couple hundred firemen, even though the reports are completely varied, some say it was a large plane, some say a small, some say military, some say commercial, It was there in real time, which rules out the use of CGI or video compositing.
	Now, a brilliant guy in the UK by the name of Richard D. Hall put together his Flight 175 radar data 3D analysis.
	What Richard Hall did was to take out of those 52 videos, finding some 27 or 28 were sufficiently precise that he could actually plot the location of the
	plane at a time as it approached the South Tower and created a plot. Now it turned out that NIST also
	had similar plots that they attributed to radar data. Well, Richard looked at the radar data and
	thought it appeared suspect, but he discovered there was actual real radar data. What's
	fascinating about the radar data is that it shows a plane 1,200 feet to the right of the plane whose
	trajectory he had plotted, leading him to conjecture that this had been done by the
	plane, the real plane, 1,200 feet to the side projecting the image of a hologram, which account for
	the impossible impact physics, the lack of any collision, and
	And notice in some of these frames, it even appears to have missing wings, which would be the case for a hologram from different points of view.
	Impossible speed, because a plane that was approaching the South Tower projecting the image was flying faster than a 767 could fly at that altitude, perhaps, to preserve the integrity of the image.
	And moreover, The radar detected the real plane, but not the projected image because it was not a solid object for radio waves to bounce off of.
	So we seem to have the explanation here, as Richard B. Hall advances it, of this plane traveling 1,200 feet to the side, projecting the image of the plane that everyone was seeing in videotaping.
	I was sent a page from an Australian military manual for an airborne holographic projector, which appears to have been used here.
	A holographic projector displays a three-dimensional visual image in a desired location removed from the display generator.
	The projector can be used for psychological operations and strategic perception management.
	It's also useful for optical deception and cloaking, providing a momentary distraction when engaging an unsophisticated adversary.
	Well, the American people are an unsophisticated adversary.
	There are those, by the way, who believe that holograms can only be projected onto a hard surface, and therefore thought perhaps it was cloaking a missile or other object approaching.
	But the fact it doesn't show on the radar data indicates that's not the case.
	And a recent study showed a new technique for holographic projection onto air molecules, which serve as a transitory screen.
	So I believe we have the answer here.
	Well, Richard Hall, whom I'm given to understand, has now abandoned his theory.
	Let me assert I adopted and affirm it.
	This is how the public was fooled on 9-11, and where they use the same technique for the North Tower, as Richard Hall himself affirmed.
	Meanwhile, get this.
	Surprise, surprise.
	Pilots for 9-11 Truth also discovered that by virtue of this air-ground communications system, they were able to track Flight 175, which turns out to have been over Harrisburg and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, after it had crashed into the South Tower.
	I'm telling you, this was a monstrous hoax.
	Meanwhile, Donald Trump was the first personality in the world to contest the official version of the attacks of 9-11 on television that very day.
	After having noted that engineers who built the Twin Towers were now working for him, he declared on New York's Channel 9 it was impossible that Boeing's going to burst through the steel structures of the Trower, which is absolutely correct.
	He continued stating it was also impossible Boeing was going to cause the towers to collapse with that jet fuel.
	He's absolutely correct.
	He concluded by affirming there had to be other factors of which we were, as yet unaware, using the word bombs.
	100% correct.
	Go back to that opening footage from the May Brussels site, where the witness right there on the ground said, no planes, bombs.
	But the reporter affirmed, well, we saw the plane on television.
	Indeed, we did.
	We saw the plane on television.
	Meanwhile, it turns out that in relation to the purported hits, there were coordinated explosions in the sub-basement of both the North and the South Tower.
	You see some smoke here from that.
	From those explosions in the north, blew out windows in the lobby, fairly substantial.
	They were actually captured by a seismic blast.
	Notice here, for the first impact on the North Tower, second impact on the South, versus the more massive, for what they're calling a collapse, the destruction of the South Tower, and then of course, of the North.
	Now, it turns out, Gordon Ross and Greg Furlong, two very diligent students, discovered that if you compare the radar data for when the planes hit the building and the seismic data, the seismic data for the explosion took place in the case of the North Tower 14 seconds before the plane made contact,
	And in the case of the South, 17 seconds before the plane made contact, which meant they set off the explosions too fast.
	The explanation was supposed to be that jet fuel fell through the elevator shafts all the way into the sub-basements and caused these explosions, but The timing was wrong.
	There were only a couple of elevators that went all the way down.
	In fact, what you had to do was get off, go down 30 floors, get off, go down 30 floors, get off, go down 30 floors.
	Time-consuming.
	Where Willie Rodriguez, who was a senior janitor in the North Tower, explained to me how he had a fellow custodian who was trapped in one of the elevator shafts and who survived, which would not have been the case, had jet fuel fallen through the elevator shaft.
	He had another, however, who had, you know, skin just hanging from his body from the massive explosions, and how As we had dinner together with Kevin Barrett after he spoke here in Madison, he watched the sub-basements fill with water.
	When then I realized why they had to have those fire explosions, namely to drain the sprinkler systems in the North and the South Tower of Water, in the absence of which they'd be unable to extinguish the very modest fires that remained after those spectacular fireballs had consumed the previously possession jet fuel in, I suspect, Napalm.
	So there you have it.
	There's in fact been a massive fire in the North Tower in 1975, as I recall, on the 11th floor, where the temperatures got up to 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit.
	And yet the steel, which had been certified to that temperature by Underwriters Laboratories, Withstood the problem.
	There was no difficulty.
	They did not have to replace the steel.
	They did, but only for psychological, not for physical or engineering reasons.
	And it was at that point in time, they installed a sprinkler system throughout the North and the South Tower, which had to be neutralized.
	Meanwhile, what many do not understand is that the North and the South Tower were built below the water level of the Hudson River, so that they had to be protected from being flooded by means of a substantial dike that was colloquially known as the bathtub.
	Here you see the remnants of the bathtub, which were not seriously damaged.
	Had they been compromised, you would have had Hudson Water flooding beneath lower Manhattan, the most valuable real estate in the world.
	So, what they had to do was to invent, to contrive an ingenious mode of demolition whereby the bathtub would not be seriously, adversely affected.
	And they did!
	Now, we're told that this was a collapse.
	But remember, in a collapse, all the floors come down at the same time, and you typically have a pile of debris equal to 12% of the height of the original, as I shall explain.
	Well, here's the North Tower.
	We're not witnessing any collapse.
	We're witnessing the building blow apart in every direction from the top down, which required some enormous additional source of energy, just as Donald Trump was observing.
	Bah!
	Some massive source of energy.
	We're seeing each building, each floor remain stationary, waiting its turn to be blown to kingdom come, in the memorable phrase of Morgan Reynolds.
	And when it's over, there's no massive pile of debris in the footprint, a point to which I shall return.
	Now, according to the government, as I've already implied, The jet fuel was supposed to weaken the steel, which caused a collapse of the uppermost floors upon the lower floors, like a pile driver.
	But when you understand that the steel was only a quarter inch thick, it represents maybe 1% of the mass of the steel in the buildings.
	The whole idea of that pile dryer scenario is absurd, where John Skilling, the chief engineer in the designing of the buildings, Observe that they've been built with a safety factor of 20, meaning each floor could carry 20 times its expected live load, where the live load is the dead load plus, meaning empty load, plus all the furniture, toiletries, computers, equipment that would eventually appear there.
	A collapse of the Twin Towers, as Donald Trump observed, actually was physically impossible.
	Here you have a calculation by Chuck Baldwin, who's a retired high school math, physics, and chemistry teacher, who calculated that the weight of even the top 16 floors, call that one unit, was opposed by 118 units of upward force of resistance.
	In other words, you hear so often from the propagandists on television about the force of the planes hitting the building, but they don't talk about the resistance posed by these massive 500,000 ton steel and concrete buildings that meant that the planes approaching these buildings is like throwing a beer can against a brick wall.
	No matter how hard you throw it, it's not going to penetrate.
	It's not going to make a difference.
	Those are aluminum tubes, mostly air, traveling at, yeah, higher velocity, but impossible speed.
	I mean, you put it together and you realize what a fantasy to which we have been subjected.
	Lies compounded by lies.
	But where consideration of the laws of cause and effect, and when you understand the nature of the collision effects that ought to have taken place, and the aerodynamics of planes in flight, and what could or could not have happened at the Pentagon, you realize it's always an enormous charade.
	Look at this!
	Could anyone possibly imagine that this is a collapse?
	This is a North Tower!
	This is a North Tower!
	Notice in the foreground you have Building 7, which would only be destroyed in a classic controlled demolition at 520 Eastern Time, seven hours after the North Tower was completely demolished, as you see here.
	And look at this!
	Here we see the molecular disintegration of the remaining core columns of the North Tower.
	They're being converted into very fine dust.
	Where, by the way, therefore, what we're witnessing here is not only the buildings blowing apart in every direction, each floor waiting patiently its turn to be blown to kingdom come, but the buildings are being converted into Millions of cubic yards of very fine dust, which incidentally is a signature of the use of nuclear weapons.
	Now there's part of that massive dust cloud which would turn out to be a resource for research by the U.S.
	Geological Survey It appears it was done with a mini-nuke in the sub-basement that we had the inner tube destroyed from the bottom up, and then, as an effect, the outer tube destroyed from the top down.
	Now, what's interesting about this diagram of the South Tower is, as you notice in the photograph on the lower left, The top of the South Tower, the top 30 floors started to tilt to the side, and then were blown and completely destroyed.
	Fascinating.
	Even Stephen Jones, who made my co-chair when I founded for scholars, a physicist from BYU, claimed to have been completely baffled by what happened here, and yet it holds one of the keys to the whole fraud of 9-11.
	Here's what we have with the North Tower, where you didn't have that tilt from the side.
	And in fact, I believe it's because of that tilt that you never see on television, the South Tower, because that tilt would raise too many questions about what really had happened.
	Now, it turns out that Judy Wood, who's advanced the theory of directed energy weapons having been used, has focused on what she calls the toasted cars.
	Well, this is a great question.
	Just to show I don't have a Judy Wood bias, I featured Judy on my radio shows 15 times, beginning on the 11th of November 2006.
	Indeed, I believe this is why Steve Jones and others decided I was wandering off the nanothermite reservation and inviting theories might actually explain what had happened, where I regarded Judy's theory as far more plausible than the nanothermite theory, and where he and his buddies went about sabotaging scholars.
	We were doing too much good work.
	Now, experts in nuclear vans, including the engineer Joe Olson, who's qualified in mechanical, structural, civil, and electrical, have done excellent work in explaining the toasted cars as being effects from the radiation from the nuclear devices that were used here.
	If you want more on this specific, go to My False Flags and Conspiracies 2020 Conference, which was held on the 5th and the 6th of December last, where I made all the presentations available, and you can download Joe Olson's presentation on the use of nukes on 9-11 for free!
	For free!
	Use the URL falseflagconspiracies2020.com.
	falseflagconspiracies2020.com.
	Falseflagconspiracies2020.com.
	What this means is the nuke hypothesis can explain everything that the do hypothesis can explain,
	but the do hypothesis cannot explain other phenomena the nuke hypothesis can, including
	debris ejected from the North Tower at a 45 degree angle into the Winter Garden, which one of my colleagues
	describes as where dews and nanothermite go to die.
	Get this.
	Jet fuel fires, even if they burn hot enough and long enough, which they did not.
	In fact, the billowing black smoke from the North and the South Tower indicates oxygen-deprived fires that are not burning at an optimal temperature, which would still have been a thousand degrees too weak to cause steel to melt, would cause the buildings to sag and gradually collapse, which is not what happened.
	Jet fuel, the principal constituent of which is kerosene, could not have ejected 300 tons up at a 45 degree angle and 600 feet outward into the winter garden, nor could directed energy weapons.
	To explode steel, it turns out, an explosive needs to have a detonation velocity of 1600 meters per second.
	To explode cement, A far less challenging task, a detonation velocity of 3,200 meters per second.
	Kerosene, the principal constituent in jet fuel, has a detonation velocity of only 1,600 meters per second.
	But get this!
	Surprise, surprise.
	Nanothermite has a detonation velocity of only 895 meters per second, meaning you couldn't possibly have blown apart even concrete, much less steel, with nanothermite.
	It's absurd.
	And yet we had Richard Gage and architects and engineers and Steve Jones promoting the nanothermite hypothesis to this day.
	Many nukes, by contrast, would have had the observed effect.
	Now the U.S.
	Geological Survey studied dust samples from 35 locations in lower Manhattan and found a host of elements that would not have been present had this not been a nuclear event.
	Barium and strontium.
	Neither should ever appear in building debris in these quantities.
	The levels never fall before 400 parts per million for barium.
	Never drop before 700 parts per million for strontium.
	Reach over 3,000 parts per million for both in the dust sample at Broadway and John Street.
	Thorium and uranium.
	These elements only exist in radioactive form.
	Thorium is a radioactive element formed by uranium by decay.
	It's very rare.
	Should not be present in building rubble ever.
	So once again, we have verifiable evidence that a nuclear fission event has taken place.
	Lithium.
	With the presence of lithium, we have compelling evidence this fission pathway of uranium to thorium and helium, with subsequent declay of helium into lithium, has taken place.
	Lanthanum.
	The next element in the disintegration pathway of the element barium, yttrium.
	The next decay element after strontium, further confirming the presence of barium, chromium.
	The presence of chromium is one more telltale signature of a nuclear detonation.
	Tritium, a very rare element, should not be found at concentrations 55 times normal in the basement of WTC6 no less than 11 days after 9-11, another telltale sign of the use of nuclear devices.
	And by the way, Before I organized or conducted the Vancouver hearings in June of 2012, I posted a five-star review of Judy Wood's book, Where Did the Towers Go?, explaining that while I felt she had ruled out the use of large nukes, she hadn't ruled out the use of mini nukes.
	Well, in spite of five stars, when I returned from the Vancouver hearings where a great deal of evidence was adduced of the use of nuclear devices to destroy the Twin Towers, I found my review had been attacked thousands of times by supporters of Judy Wood.
	So I revised my review, changed it to three stars, and explained how Judy Wood was unwilling to take into account the results of the U.S.
	Geological Survey, which had discovered elements that would not have been present had this not been a nuclear event, some of which only exist in radioactive form.
	And would you believe, subsequently, There have been thousands upon thousands of comments where now it appears Amazon has abandoned allowing comments on comments, but it was stunning.
	My point being that as a scientist, You have to respond to new evidence and alternative hypotheses, which may require rejecting hypotheses you previously accepted, accepting hypotheses you previously rejected, and leaving others in suspense.
	Judy Wood has not done that and has abdicated her status in the scientific pursuit of knowledge of what happened on 9-11.
	Moreover, and this is also inexplicable in relation to the use of directed energy weapon, the number of cancer cases among 9-11 responders and survivors triples to more than 5,400 in less than three years.
	This was published back in August of 2016.
	The number of those affected now by the effects of the use of nuclear devices is around 70,000, including a host of abnormalities, multiple myeloma, leukemia, esophageal pancreatic cancer, very similar to the pattern at Chernobyl.
	After the nuclear reactor meltdown that took place there.
	So, here again, we have more proof that this was a nuclear event.
	Guess what?
	Surprise, surprise.
	The records for the reported WTC renovation work on the elevators has disappeared.
	Allegedly destroyed on 9-11.
	Let me just comment how absurd this is in the day of computer technology, where we should have records in multiple available on computer systems all over the world.
	Similarly, in relation to Building 7.
	All kinds of documents and records for the Enron scandal, for example, for major investigations against Wall Street firms were purportedly destroyed.
	But remember, that's actually an excuse for obliterating all the records because they ought to have existed in computer files in multiple locations.
	So you can see this is a very large operation and indispensable to why George Bush and Dick Cheney had to When the election of 2020 by the theft of the election in Florida where Jeb Bush was then governor, which however ever pales in comparison to what happened on 2020 when the Democrats went all out in fear Donald Trump was going to clean their clock, just as he had in 2016, which would indeed have been the case where Sidney Powell has actually released an electoral map
	Before all the numbers became change, showing Trump was virtually red nation, coast to coast, taking California and even Minnesota, which I had been predicting with 410 electoral votes.
	That gives you some idea of what the Democrats have been doing here.
	Meanwhile, here's a bona fide collapse in Pakistan of a concrete slab building.
	What we saw with Building 7, as architects and engineers have endlessly reminded us, was a classic controlled demolition.
	You had a little kink at the top, All the floors coming down at the same time, meaning all the support columns had been taken out simultaneously.
	And when there was a pile of debris equal to 12% of the original height of the 47 tower floors or equal to five and a half floors for building seven.
	Now, Barry Jennings just happened to be in Building 7 that morning.
	He'd gone there because Rudy Giuliani had a command and control center, two floors with their own air and water supply.
	When he showed up, he found half-eaten sandwiches, still steaming cups of coffee.
	A fireman came along and said, we got to get you out of here.
	While he was inside, there were explosions taking place.
	This was an extremely robust building.
	It was erected over two electrical generators, providing backup electricity for Manhattan.
	It was designed to never collapse.
	So I believe that's why it wasn't a part of the original scenario.
	It was just built too well.
	And Barry Jennings inadvertently tripped into their continuation of working to take down Building 7, where Larry Silverstein would claim that in a conversation with a fire commander that afternoon, he was asked what they ought to do, and Silverstein said, with there being so much death and devastation, perhaps the best thing to do is just bring it down, take it down, pull it, Which is a construction term for a controlled demolition.
	And he said, and they made the decision to pull and we watched it come down.
	There you have from Larry Silverstein himself.
	Or apologists who want to contest everything I'm telling you.
	I mean, it's absolutely stunning.
	So if you want to know whether someone's on the side of truth or not, compare what you're learning here with what they're trying to get you to believe.
	Embarrassingly bad.
	When Barry Jennings got out, he explained that not only did he hear explosions going off, a stairwell had been blown up beneath him.
	At one point, he felt himself stepping over dead bodies, but in the pitch black, he could not see them.
	Now, one of the major complaints about the 9-11 Commission report was it did not even mention Building 7.
	So NIST went about putting together a separate report on Building 7, which would attribute its destruction to these very modest fires, which is completely impossible, utterly preposterous from the point of view of physics and engineering.
	And where Barry Jennings, who would have been in the position as an eyewitness to contradict that report, died mysteriously just days before.
	Meanwhile, here you can see the contrast.
	Take a look over on the left.
	You see, you know, the five and a half floors from Building 7.
	And here, notice where Building 1 ought to have stood.
	There's basically nothing.
	In fact, in my Wisconsin State Journal, we have today an image there of some of the remnants of the external steel support columns.
	But what's missing?
	Thirteen and a half floors of debris that ought to have been there had this been a collapse.
	Using that formula, 12% of 110 floors.
	They are not there.
	Indeed, I had Father Frank Morales, a first responder from St.
	Mark's Episcopal Church, come on my shows twice.
	And both times, Father Frank affirmed that those buildings were destroyed too, or even slightly below ground level.
	Meanwhile, we had a glitch between the media and the intel agencies in the official script, because a BBC reporter, James Stanley, announced at 4.57, 23 minutes before the event would take place, that the Solomon Brothers building had collapsed.
	Well, the Solomon Brothers is another name for Building 7, when it actually was still standing, and you can see it over her left shoulder.
	The BBC has never been able to explain this glitch, you know, they'd like to paper it over.
	But if there's ever been, you know, a goof-off major getting ahead of the script, this was it.
	Meanwhile, You heard that during the live broadcast, the report was given that Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine was declaring the responsibility.
	Well, it's easy to fabricate or fake phone calls.
	I mean, the Israelis, the Mossads are the past masters of false flag attacks.
	Between the destruction of the North and the South Tower, they showed footage of Palestinians rejoicing.
	And I knew immediately this was fake, that this had to be archival footage from Palestinians rejoicing from some previous political or religious event where they had reason to be happy.
	And I was 100% correct.
	The Palestinians were just as slack, jawed, and stunned by what was taking place as the rest of the world.
	But they just happen to have this at hand.
	It's been confirmed that, indeed, this was archival footage.
	And I tell you, this is a sign of Israeli overreach.
	They go too far in trying to blame their enemy, in this case the Palestinians, where we all know that the final solution, from the point of view of Israel, would be to load all the Palestinians aboard a ship, float it out to sea, and sink it.
	Well, here was an equivalent to sink the Palestinians politically by suggesting that 9-11 was something they supported.
	Rudy Giuliani, I'm very sorry to say, appears to have been deeply involved.
	Let me offer an illustration.
	Rudy, who is just concluding his second term as mayor and hoping to be elected to a third The vote was supposed to take place that day, I understand.
	Had arranged for 115 dump trucks to start hauling away the debris the following day.
	Well, think about it.
	I would venture to say in New York it would take you a month to line up one dump truck.
	Rudy Giuliani lined up 115.
	And this was over the protests of the fire commanders and the police who wanted a forensic investigation to be conducted as to what had actually happened.
	Judy Wood, among her many brilliant observations, noticed that not only were those trucks being used to haul away the debris improperly prior to a forensic study, but bringing in tens of thousands of tons of dirt, so that in fact the debris pile actually the first several days was growing because they were dumping this massive quantity of dirt On the debris pile, just as the Soviets had done at Chernobyl, bringing in massive quantities of dirt to absorb the radiation.
	So I'm sorry to say Rudy appears to have been very much involved in 9-11.
	Not only have we discovered that Flight 11 and Flight 77 were not even in the air, not only have we, thanks to pilots for 9-11 Truth, discovered that Flight 93 was over Champaign-Urbana, Illinois, after it had officially crashed, and that Flight 175 was over Harrisburg and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, after it had purportedly hit the South Tower.
	But I obtained FAA registration records showing that the plane, the airplane that was used for flight 175 and the airplane that was used for flight 93, well remember, the same airplane could be used one day from Tampa to Chicago, the next from New York to San Francisco.
	We're not even formally deregistered or taken out of service until 28 September 2005.
	So, how can planes that weren't even in the air have crashed on 9-11, and how can planes that crashed on 9-11 have still been in the air four years later?
	This was completely fraudulent.
	Indeed, of the alleged 19 suicide hijackers, 15 turn out to be from Saudi Arabia.
	None, to my knowledge, were from Afghanistan.
	But then we know Osama had nothing to do with this, as David Ray Griffin makes the very first point of his magisterial work.
	The 9-11 Commission report omissions and distortions.
	Half a dozen of these guys turned up alive and well the following day and made contact with the British press, which unlike the American actually reported it.
	Mohammed Adda's father reported getting a phone call from his son telling him they were desperate and worried that they were going to be killed, so they couldn't talk.
	Absolutely legitimate concern.
	David Ray Griffin makes this his very first point.
	I mean, think about it.
	If no planes crash, then no passengers die, and no Islamic hijackers cause them to crash.
	And if no Islamic hijackers caused them to crash, then there was no warrant or any justification for the war on terror.
	This has all been an elaborate charade of abrogation to benefit our gallant ally in the Middle East by coming in to do its dirty work and take out a modern Arab state that served as a counterbalance to its domination of the entire region and to eventually confront the Persian nation of Iran, which hasn't succeeded.
	Fortunately, by virtue of the intervention of Russia and Iran on behalf of Syria at the invitation of its democratically elected president Bashir al-Assad, where I hate to disabuse any who think we're in Syria to bring democracy to Syria, because Syria is already a democracy with a democratically elected president.
	Now, Henry Kissinger was originally invited to be the chairman of the 9-11 Commission, but he would have had to reveal his financial entanglements and decline the honor.
	Instead, they turned to Philip Zelikow, who has a most interesting history.
	As a professor, he was an expert in the area of the creation and maintenance of public myths.
	M-Y-T-H-S.
	Philip Zelikow, expert in the creation and maintenance of public myths, which is what he brought us on 9-11.
	I am personally convinced Philip Zelikow authored the script for 9-11.
	Now if you think about it, regard the 9-11 theory as suspended in space and then connect it to the evidence by links that come down to the passengers, the crashes, the cell phone calls, the debris at 9-11 and the like.
	We've investigated every one of those links and none of them withstand critical scrutiny.
	A.K.
	Dudney, for example, who is a professor now retired at Western Ontario of Computer Science at Western Ontario, was so concerned that he had actually made flights with three types of cell phones and found that it speeds over 200 miles an hour and altitudes over 2,000 feet.
	It's impossible to maintain a cell phone connection because they can't switch from one tower to another fast enough.
	So all those stories, with all the peculiarities that attended them about the cell phone calls, were all fabricated and fake.
	But so was the entire business, where Zelikow notably completed an outline of the 9-11 commission report a year before he shared it with any member of the staff.
	Who better to put in charge of the 9-11 investigation than the guy who wrote the script?
	I'm embarrassed to say, having taught there twice, as a visiting associate professor in 1977-78, then returning as a visiting full professor in 1981, that Philip Zelikow is on the faculty of the Department of History at the University of Virginia.
	Mr. Jefferson's University, where he's been dedicating himself to deceiving and misleading the American people for the sake of the neocon agenda.
	Meanwhile, they've also bottled up legal cases by means of Alvin K. Hillerstein, another avid Zionist, a judge for the District Court in the Southern District of New York, Lawsuits against the planes, against ICTS, security, World Trade Center owners, Boeing and all that, they've all been bottled up by Alvin K. Hillerstein.
	So you see how the system is manipulated and covered.
	Here you have the men who are, in my opinion, the masterminds behind 9-11, Ehud Umart on the left and Bibi Netanyahu on the right, whom I regard as the masterminds, which was then implemented with collusion between Americans, including Dick Cheney in particular.
	Where Michael Rupert has published a book, Crossing the Rubicon, based on publicly available sources.
	Where it turns out that Dick Cheney appears to have been the executive director of 9-11, as it played out in real time, from a bunker beneath the White House.
	And where W is just a figurehead who is largely kept in the dark about what was taking place, lest he blow their cover.
	As he actually did in part when he reported having observed the hit on the North Tower in real time.
	He said, man, when I saw that first hit, I thought, what a terrible pilot.
	He said this on more than one occasion.
	And even on the day of 9-11, which is remarkable because of the Day Brothers footage, for example.
	Wasn't broadcast until the following day.
	This appears to have happened while I was on his way to a Booker T. Washington Elementary School in Bradenton, Florida, where I resided several years while I was on the faculty of New College of the University of South Florida.
	And had to have watched it on a Secret Service closed television network.
	That's the only way he could have seen it, which in turn implies further involvement, because there would have been no reason to have a camera directed at that facade of the North Tower where nothing of interest one would surmise ought to have been taking place.
	And yet he watched that terrible pilot while he was sitting in a classroom with a book about my pet goat upside down.
	Andy Carter's chief of staff came in and told him there'd been a second hit and America was under attack.
	But it was all a fantasy, all a fabrication, all ridiculously contrived.
	This is Hollywood meets Washington for 9-11.
	Let me emphasize as we participate in the 20th observance that Thierry Meyssan got it right.
	You can find this on my blog at jamesfetzer.org.
	Today everything agrees with Thierry Meyssan, to which I added the following editor's note.
	When Thierry Meyssan published The Boeing and Pentagate in 2002, he was making the key point that no Boeing 757 had hit the Pentagon, which meant that as the U.S.
	military command and control center, the entire 9-11 operation had to be a fraud.
	He was right about that, where I have embedded the results of collaborative research by members of Scholars for 9-11 Truth, which I founded, as confirmation across the board.
	Where you have those results here before you today.
	Those who are interested in pursuing more, I bring together, it's my area of specialization now, groups of experts on different aspects of these cases to take them apart and dissect what really happened.
	We have here this book, not banned by Amazon, unlike six of my other books, America Nuked on 9-11 Compliments of the CIA, the Neocons, and the DoD and the Mossad, with contributions from 17 experts.
	17 experts.
	Edward MD, Jeff Prager, Susan Windauer, Preston James, PhD, Dennis Camino, Jack White,
	Nicholas Kohlstrom, PhD, Mike Palachuk, T. Mark Hightower, Jim Fetzer, PhD,
	Steve Farney, an aeronautical engineer, Joshua Blakeney, Don Fox.
	You can find this available at amazon.com or better yet,
	go to moonrockbooks.com, which Mike Palachuk and I co-founded when Amazon banned my
	book, our book, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook.
	Let me conclude by saying I was a huge admirer of Robert David Steele and collaborated with him not only on the memorandum about 9-11, but another on Sandy Hook.
	That his research here on 9-11 remains as viable as it was then.
	Check out, whatever you can, any resources you find on the website of Robert David Steele.
	Meanwhile, let me say, we honor his memory.
	And I shall do everything I can to perpetuate the legacy of that great man, Robert David Steele.

▲