All Episodes
July 21, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
31:59
Trad Cat Knight with Eric Gajewski (21 July 2021)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Another edition of TranCat Night special guest podcast right here on the TranCatNight.org
website. Folks, today is July the 21st, 2021. I hope you all are having a very wonderful and
blessed day as always. We continue the program along here at TranCat Night, your number one
podcast and information service, folks. We have three guests on every day. Today's going to be
no different. We actually have four guests on the program, so hang tight. We've got another great one
here with Jim Fetzer, who has been one of our longest running
I guess he's done the radio show in times past.
Remember that back in the day, TradCat Night, folks, we used to do the radio show.
Jim was there.
He's done web conferences with us.
He does the radio show each month in and out.
And we're looking forward to another fantastic presentation.
And before we hand it over to Jim, though, folks, we do have to make mention of this.
All active TradCat Night members are going to pick up this past weekend's Earth Changes web conference featuring Dr. David DuBine or
excuse me, David DuBine from Adapt 2030.
Celeste Salome was also there.
Hour and a half long PowerPoint presentations.
It was truly fantastic.
So pick up your copy, try to get it today.
Don't forget about the Marie Jolie Jaheny video track and exclusive found on Vimeo,
Vimeo dot com type in three days dark.
Just check it on out.
And just very briefly, sponsors John Deans, Jacksbury dot com.
Chris Gagne is inviting all Catholics and those like minded to please remember the dead,
those who have gone before us.
Jeff Campos is a gift to light dot com.
Joe Blazak in his 247 Rosary dot com.
Last but not least, Richard Gratzinger and his glory and shine dot com.
Now, as I was just finishing up with my last guest just a few minutes ago on Twitter,
the hot news is apparently, according to fact checkers, I'll put that in air quotes
and you can equate that to whoever you'd like, the technocrats, the communists,
whoever, apparently HIPAA laws do not apply and that people you can be stopped.
At the front, the front door of the subway or whatever other business.
And they can ask you about whether you've been vaccinated or not.
I don't know.
Sounds like to me that that could start a little bit of a few riots here or there.
I don't know.
But Jim is here to present an awful lot of topics here.
Where would you like to begin?
We're going to talk Miley threatening Trump to assassinate Soleimani.
Where would you like to begin, Jim?
Oh, yeah.
All right.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Yes.
Chris Maynahan of Information Liberation has made a report about what I regarded as the greatest blunder of the Trump administration to win assassinating General Qasem Soleimani, who had defeated ISIS.
He was Iran's best general.
He had aided Hezbollah in defeating Israel, the fourth most powerful army in the world, during its latest attempted invasion of Lebanon.
According to this report, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Mark Miley, pressured Trump to sign off on the assassination.
Tell him you'd be held criminally negligible for the rest of your life if you don't do it, where he was aided and abetted by a group of Israel First GOP senators who could have supported Trump's impeachment.
I alone can fix it, reports Mark Miley, urging Trump to kill Soleimani, warning Trump he'd be held criminally liable.
The fashionable media narrative of late is that Miley is a noble general who has stood up to Trump.
Meanwhile, in reality, he was privately encouraged Trump to assassinate Qasem Soleimani.
The Iranian general who defeated ISIS and whose murder by the U.S.
could have triggered war was, of course, among other points, a violation of Iraqi sovereignty.
He was lured to Iraq under false pretenses, a request from the U.S.
Department of State that he assist in a peace mission.
It was outrageous and despicable and has permanently tarnished the standing of the United States among other nations.
Meanwhile, unsurprisingly, we have a report in Pennsylvania.
423,166 votes were subtracted for Trump.
A presentation of this discovery was by a team of data scientists and programmers with
experience working for the US Navy, the CIA, the National Counterterrorism Center, and
Big Four accounting team.
There were 423,116 votes subtracted from Trump in the Pennsylvania data.
If you look for Allegheny County, 145,000 absentee votes for Trump were deleted.
Over 27,000 more removed from Trump's election day vote.
In Chester County, Trump lost 41,000 from his election day total.
Nearly 50,000 from his absentee vote totals altogether.
91,000 votes were subtracted for Trump in Chester County, in Lehigh County.
Trump received an initial 66,117 votes, which were then taken away from his total.
This is something that should never occur in an additive voting process, meaning as you get each new vote, you're adding one to the former number in to produce a new number in plus one.
So if you ask yourself, How could fraud of this magnitude occur?
Look at the words of elected officials in Pennsylvania.
Secretary of State Kathy Bookvar.
A Trump presidency would significantly weaken the U.S., driving us into a lengthy recession.
Using the title president before the word Trump really demeans the office of the presidency.
Governor Tom Wolf.
Pennsylvania had a fair and secure election, free of intervention, and our Commonwealth will not tolerate these senseless attempts to silence the voices of millions of Pennsylvanians.
It's time to accept reality and move on.
The Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Josh Shapiro, It's January 2nd, 2021, and this is a reminder that no amount of frivolous, meritless, legal, filing, chest-thumping by sycophant congressmen or tweets by the sitting president is going to change the fact that in 18 days Joe Biden will be sworn in as our new president.
Absolutely important and stunning.
Another from Josh Shapiro, the Attorney General.
I said the other day, and I'll repeat, I don't know if they need a surgeon to repair their spines or a psychiatrist to examine their heads, but something is wrong with these people that are willing to follow Donald Trump as far as he's trying to take them.
This is grotesque.
Kathy Bokovar, Tom Wolfe, and Josh Shapiro have made it very clear they have no interest in looking to where those 423,116 errors on Election Day went.
Disgusting!
Completely disgusting!
Meanwhile, Trump lawyer Janet Ellis quit the Republican Party during a live broadcast Jenna Ellis, a former attorney for President Trump, quicked the Republican Party during a live broadcast on the conservative news platform Real America's Voice.
She said she's making the move because, in her mind, it's clear the GOP does not and did not support the former president enough.
Sure, the Republicans came to be keeping Democrats in check, but only a handful of outsiders are actually speaking up.
The rest are compromising on everything.
The infrastructure bill, for example, or the second impeachment hoax, where Mitch McConnell actually stood up and ran it against President Trump for his own political gain, not for the truth.
This past weekend, she accused the RNC of lying about a story claiming the group's chief counsel questioned election fraud claims.
This is a fascinating development because Jenna is a good person.
A book about this claims Giuliani was so incensed that he called Rimmer to deliver a profanity-laced demand to resign by going against the president.
Who the F do you think you are?
How can you be going against a president?
You need to resign and resign tonight because you're going to get fired.
This is really stunning stuff, including from an RNC counsel.
The RNC, well after the incident took place in November, continued to raise money off of Trump's claims of election fraud, which of course are overwhelmingly well-substantiated, including in Arizona and Maricopa County.
Now, here's a rather fascinating development, Eric.
A new poll reveals a whopping 58% of Americans think the leftist media is the enemy of the people.
Rasmussen on Friday released his latest poll on American trust in the media, specifically asking respondents if they agreed with President Trump's assessment the news media are truly the enemy of the people.
A total of 58% of respondents agreed with his statement.
34% strongly.
24% somewhat.
36% did not agree.
13% somewhat.
23% strongly.
Only 6% were unsure.
Among conservatives, the sentiment was shared by 81% of respondents.
56% agreed strongly.
somewhat, 23 strongly, only 6% were unsure.
Among conservatives, a sentiment was shared by 81% of respondents, 56% agreeing strongly,
25% somewhat.
Interestingly, 15% of conservatives do not agree the media is the enemy of the people,
7% of whom strongly disagree.
Those who identify as liberal, unsurprisingly, weren't on board.
68% of liberals disagreed with his statement, 54% strongly 14 some what but.
There were even self-described liberals who believe the news media is the enemy of the people.
A total of 30% agreed with Trump's statement, 11% strongly, 19% somewhat.
It also divided along party lines, unsurprisingly.
76% of Republicans, 54% strongly, and 22% somewhat.
But more Democrats than liberals are with Trump on the issue.
37% of Democrats saying they agree, 17% strongly, 20% somewhat.
The Rasmussen also asked, how serious a problem is fake news?
83% of likely voters said it was either very serious, 55% 83% of likely voters, very serious 55% fake news, or somewhat serious 28.
That's staggering.
While the largest percent that agreed came from conservatives, 91% even, 73% of self-described liberals believe fake news is a problem.
Finally, do you trust the political news you're getting?
This would mean from all sources, including, for example, Fox, Tucker, Hannity, Laura.
Only 37% answered yes.
43% said no.
20% unsure.
61% of conservatives and 19% of liberals who say they don't trust the political news.
A perfect example, I think, of fake news is the reports we're getting now that Florida is the epicenter of the pandemic of the unvaccinated.
You have the president Going to speaking nationally that more of the unvaccinated are dying than vaccinate when we have stunning reports that the opposite is the case.
They appear to be targeting Florida because Ron DeSantis, the governor there, is making a lot of waves, establishing a great positive impression among not just Republicans, but voters across the nation.
So they're targeting states with a lower vaccination rates, which in my opinion reflects intelligence.
Indeed, MIT study vaccine hesitancy is highly informed, scientifically literate and sophisticated.
Vaccine hesitancy is a big problem, according to the Biden administration, where less than half of the public is fully vaxxed.
About 56% have received at least one jab.
But the goal of fully vaccinating the American public appears to have stalled.
When vaccines were first approved for emergency use only back in December of 2020, 40% of Americans expressed skepticism.
Trying to shame the holdouts has failed spectacularly.
Insulting and degrading them as morons and or ignorant has resulted in vicious pushback and a hardening of positions on getting vaccinated.
The administration plan is sending people door to door to vaccinate them only feeds anti-vaccine skepticism.
Trust in authority is at an all-time low, which makes a government-sponsored vaccine program suspect.
Still, Most experts agree some who should be getting vaxxed aren't, but the root causes and ignorance are belief in conspiracy theories.
The MIT study revealed some surprising results.
Listen to this.
Proponents of the vaccine are unwilling or unable to understand the thinking of vaccine skeptics or even admit that skeptics may be thinking at all.
Their attempts to answer skepticism or understand it end up poisoned by condescension and ended up reinforcing it.
This condescension, by the way, is political in nature and crosses party lines.
Sometimes arguments against vaccination are mistaken for rational thinking, such as the following.
Sometimes a perception of irrationality is almost accidental, because arguments are usually social interactions, not strictly logical exercises.
A vaccine skeptic may brush off a proponent by saying, it's approved for emergency use only.
It's not FDA approved.
I don't think we should require it.
The skeptic is beginning with a fact that's easily established and shareable, completely verifiable.
But when pressed, they might reveal their line of thinking is elsewhere.
There are no long-term studies, and I'm worried about possible long-term effects.
Because both objections aren't exactly logically connected, a proponent concludes it's irrationalism all the way down, but Eric, Obviously, these are two really, really good reasons for not taking the VAX.
A study done at MIT now showed a substantial portion of public health skepticism was highly informed, scientifically literate, and sophisticated in the use of data.
Skeptics use the same data sets as those with the orthodox views on public health.
The study's lead author, Crystal Lee, by the way, says the exact same data sets can be used by either side to marshal arguments.
More from the report.
The researchers combed through hundreds of thousands of social media posts and found that coronavirus skeptics often deploy counter visualizations alongside the same follow-the-data rhetoric as public health experts.
Yet the skeptics argue for radically different policies.
The researchers conclude that data visualizations aren't sufficient to convey the urgency of the COVID-19 pandemic, because even the clearest graphs can be interpreted through a variety of belief systems.
A lot of people think of metrics like infection rates as objectives, said Chris Tolley, but they're clearly not, based on how much debate there is on how to think about the pandemic.
That's why we say visualizations have become a battleground.
I'd suggest one example might be the death rate, the numerator, the number of deaths over the denominator, which could be highly variable, the number of those who have been infected, The number of those who've been diagnosed as having the virus, which we know is like 97% false positives, or the whole population, you get dramatically different results leading to, in relation to the whole population, virtually a 99.99% recovery rate, meaning there's just virtually no risk involved here.
In fact, because the data sets are used interchangeably, vaccine skepticism becomes logical and rational.
Most vaccine skepticism, if by that we mean reluctance, is not based on conspiracy theorizing.
It's based on risk-benefit calculations.
You may think it's an innumerate calculation, meaning absent a numerical calculus, but when you look at patterns of uptake in the United States, two factors stand out.
Factors that are larger in their effect than partisanship, age and density.
The older you are and the denser your community, the more likely you are to be vaccinated.
The younger you are, the more rural your community, the less likely you are to have gotten it.
This reflects the real facts about the risk of death from COVID.
People may be wildly overestimating their risk from the vaccine and underestimating the risk from COVID, but they have the directional thinking correct.
Those who are in less danger act like it.
This is why vaccine choice is so important.
I have the same mandate for someone who lives in New York City and someone who lives in rural South Dakota.
A more holistic approach to vaccine skepticism is needed if we're going to get everyone who needs to be vaccinated protected.
My opinion is the actual number who need to be vaccinated is zero.
Allowances must be made for the legitimate concerns of citizens who, for their own reasons, don't want to be jabbed.
But if indeed individuals are doing their own risk-benefit calculations, it would help enormously if the left would refrain from their sickening condescension toward those with serious legitimate questions.
In fact, if you want to get a grip on how serious it is, even Alex Jones has been reporting that the deadly COVID mRNA shot is made to murder you while Big Tech censors the victims.
No question about it.
But it's not only Alex Jones who's reporting what's going on.
Official data shows twice as many people have died due to the COVID-19 vaccines in six months than people who have died of COVID-19 in 15.
This is stunning stuff.
Here's another report, even more shocking.
45,000 dead from COVID-19 vaccines within three days, sparking a lawsuit against the federal government for covering up the true numbers of what's going on here.
This is why I believe that the censorship by big tech, the social media is so terribly important here and injurious to the American public, not only to their physical well-being, but to their mental health.
Indeed, we have another report from the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.
This is the premier scientific medical society within the United States.
Majority of U.S.
physicians declined COVID shots.
Of the 700 physicians responding to an internet survey by the APS, nearly 60% said they were not fully vaccinated against COVID.
It's contrasted with a claim by the American Medical Association that 96% of practicing physicians are fully vaxxed.
That was based on 300 respondents.
Neither survey represents a random sample of all American physicians, but the AAPS survey shows that physician support for the mass injection campaign is far from unanimous.
It is wrong to call a person who declines a shot an anti-vactor, states AAPS Executive Director Jane Orient, MD.
Virtually no physicians or antibiotics or anti-surgery, whereas all are opposed to treatments they think are unnecessary, more likely to harm than to benefit an individual or inadequately tested.
All of which, of course, I add are true in this case.
The APS survey also showed 54% of physician respondents were aware of patients suffering a significant adverse reaction.
Of the unvaccinated, 80% said, I believe risk of shots exceeds risk of disease.
80% said, I believe risk of shots exceeds risk of disease.
30% said, I already had COVID.
Other reasons for declining included unknown long-term offense, effects use of aborted fetal tissue in the shots,
its experimental availability of effective early treatment, reports of deaths, and blood clots.
It's because of those blood clots, Eric, that I recommend everyone should be taking an aspirin a day.
We've all heard the joke, take two aspirin and call me in the morning.
Well, aspirin is a counteractive to the formation of blood clots.
Everyone, as a precaution, ought to be taking an aspirin a day, in my opinion.
Not a physician, but I've done a huge amount of research on all of this.
And I've been reporting virtually every single day for well over a year.
For the second week in a row, by the way, there were more COVID-19 vaccination deaths and COVID-19 deaths in the United States, according to the CDC and its own VAERS website, which we know is only reporting 1%.
I'm looking at a graph here, and the total death for a COVID vaccine is just skyrocketed of late, skyrocketed of late.
I believe this is because, this is because it has a delayed effect, that it weakens the immune system, and then, you know, makes individuals vulnerable, though we're having major, major accounts Other horrors taking place.
Five JetBlue airline pilots dead.
Media intentionally hiding Vaxfears.
Five JetBlue airline pilots are confirmed dead.
Current JetBlue pilot whistleblower confirms a push for the jab continue.
Very, very serious.
Nuclear.
FDA knew on October 22nd, 2020, get this, October 22nd, 2020, the FDA knew that the death jay would maim and kill, cause heart damage, clotting, and ravage children.
Some, and I recommend this website, vaccinehoax.com, are doing their best to get it out to the public, just as we had anti-war protesters going out along major highways and holding signs.
He's got a wonderful one warning, COVID-19 vaccines equal mass murder, genocide.
Vaccinehoax.com, check it out.
Meanwhile, if you want a big picture, 1% control the world.
4% are their puppets.
90% are asleep.
5% know and try to wake the 90%.
The 1% use the 4% to prevent the 5% from waking up the 90%.
I have coincidentally been doing a series about the assassination of JFK, a three-parter on AmericanMediaPeriscope.net.
Episode one was on last Wednesday, the 14th of July.
Episode two on Friday, the 16th of July.
Episode three will be this evening on The Great Awakening Show with Scott Bennett at 9 p.m.
Eastern, 8 p.m.
Central.
The theme has been What Happened to JFK?
Did Oliver Stone get it right?
And I'm not talking about this more recent quasi documentary just seen viewed in Canes.
I'm talking about Oliver Stone's original.
A film of 1991 where he suggested there were three teams of gunmen and that JFK was assassinated by a conspiracy involving members of the deep state, the Fed, Texas oil men, the military, and Lyndon Johnson.
If you want to know how close he came to getting it exactly right, check out the show tonight.
Where I go through six of the eight shooters we've identified, I go through and explain who they were, where they were located, what shots they took, and what effect they had, and expose the brains, the mastermind behind the assassination.
Meanwhile, a fellow named Clarence Malcolm has published on Facebook a warning, urgent, please share.
Deep state spooks presently plotting to assassinate our 45th president, Donald J. Trump.
Listen to this.
Early this morning, July 20th, 2021, I dreamed twice in a role a deep state spook crew is plotting to assassinate President Trump.
This is bad.
All my life, I've seen my dreams come true when they occur repeatedly on the exact same subject.
But proper action taken can prevent a dreamed outcome.
Evidently.
Deep state operatives are extremely upset that President Trump, one, is doing his rallies and drawing gigantic crowds.
Is promoting and endorsing non-RINO GOP candidates across the nation and thereby displacing Democratic Party politicians.
Three, is actively and aggressively exposing the massive felony 2020 presidential election fraud and treason, along with big media, big tech, social media, and Democratic Party intentional complicity.
They also do not like the fact President Trump is exposing Democrat Party resistance to and interference with the Maricopa County forensic election audit and other forensic election audits in the process of developing in other states.
Remember, President Trump never conceded, and this has really pissed off the deep state, the globalists, the Biden regime, and Democratic Party criminal cabal.
Number four, waking up millions of Americans to the massive, entrenched crime and corruption in Washington, D.C., the DNC, big tech, and the mass media, thereby further eroding public trust in the government and controlled news bureaus.
Five, Most of my repeat dreams have come true.
running for president in 2024, and after certain victory, he will reverse everything.
Illegitimate POTUS president, a deep state Biden, a deep state puppet has done to destroy
the US.
Most of my repeat dreams have come true.
My former boss Ted Gunderson told me on more than one occasion that my dream warnings had
come true.
One time I had the same night, repeated dreams, that Ted was driving his car and pulled into
a rest area to use the bathroom.
He was standing at the urinal when three men walked in and began stabbing him repeatedly.
They stabbed him to death.
I told him of my dream and asked him to please stay alert.
About a week later, Ted called me when he was out on the road and told me he needed to urinate badly, pulled into a rest area, began walking toward the restroom when he observed a vehicle pull into the parking space less than 100 feet from where he had parked.
He said three men exited the vehicle and headed in his direction.
Seeing this, he promptly turned around and casually walked back to his car as though he'd forgotten something.
He jumped into his car and sped away.
When he called me later, he told me everything that had occurred, saying, Malcolm, your dream came true.
I believe those men were plotting to follow me into the restroom and kill me.
Back to my two dreams exposing the plot underway to assassinate President Trump.
I observed in my dream the faces of several of the men planning to kill President Trump.
I overheard their conversation.
They are definitely plotting to take him out and make it look like a random terrorist attack.
Let me simply add, Eric, we don't really need Clarence Malcolm's dreams to know that the deep state would like to take out Donald Trump.
I believe this simply reinforces the grim reality of the situation and the motives they have for removing him.
In my opinion, Donald Trump is the one man who can set things right and save the nation.
Back to you.
No, fantastic presentation, as always, Jim.
On point, so many different topics, so diversified.
Jim, could we get to do a little shameless self-promotion here?
Let's get all the books out there.
Let's get the websites, wherever you are, social media.
I know you're one of the most targeted individuals, if you will, censored people out there, but maybe we could have the newer Track At Night members know where we can find your work.
Well, that's terrific, Eric.
You can go to jamesfetzer.org, which is my blog, and you can especially take a look at my, as it were, valentine to Dr. Katherine Horton and Bill Benny, who recently wed.
Where I included a four part how to spot a false flag series I done with Dr Catherine Horton where she added her own comments and observations about a dozen to 15 false flag attacks.
That's for your benefit and education.
If you go to false flag conspiracies 2020 dot com, that's a URL.
You can also gain access for free to all of the presentations that were made during the conference I held on the 5th and the 6th of December 2020, a virtual conference.
Go to false flag.
Conspiracies2020.com.
In the upper right-hand corner, you get to the archives.
You fill in a form just so we know who's downloading what, and you can download as many, up to all of the presentations.
Check it out.
There are some for sure you don't want to miss.
Yeah, good stuff, Jim.
As always, folks, we thank you for tuning into today's program.
Look for Jim, as always, next month.
Export Selection