All Episodes
Previous Next
July 22, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:12:16
What happened to JFK? Did Oliver Stone get it right? (14 July 2021; Part 1 of 3)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
...
Well, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Great Awakenings on American Media Periscope.
My name is Scott Bennett, your host, and tonight we're going to be joined by Dr. Jim Fetzer, and we're going to be exploring a subject matter that very few people have the testicular fortitude or the intellectual gravity and depth to be able to dive into and handle and articulate.
But we are doing it.
We are fearlessly doing it.
Because it is one of the pillars of the great awakenings that are occurring all over the United States.
People are waking up to everything sorted and terroristically inclined in our history as a nation in order to preserve our tomorrows, to be much more righteous and in accordance with our Republican values.
So we're going to be looking into the John F. Kennedy, President John F. Kennedy assassination with Dr. Fetzer and expose everything.
Relating to that matter, so it's going to be quite a roller coaster and we encourage you to have the stomach and the strength.
And the spirit to be able to go through this with us, because at the end of it there will be a great awakening in you and all those that you share it with.
We must see the truth in all of its color, in all of its temperament, in all of its texture, in order to really awaken and wield the truth like never before.
So, we're going to jump right in with Dr. Fetzer, but first we're going to go to Sovereign Advisors.
Hello, everyone.
John Michael Chambers here.
I am the creator and founder of American Media Periscope.
Now, the world is changing.
On June 28th, 2021, the Basel III rules changed.
For the first time, the European Central Bank is pushing the price of gold up because they need to maximize the value of their 10,000 tons of gold they control.
What is this about?
It's about global monetary dominance.
And instead of suppressing the price of gold, they are pushing the price up!
Because they need it to go up.
You can take advantage of this paradigm-shifting rule change.
The team at Sovereign Advisors with decades of experience in analyzing political, economic and social trends can help you take advantage of what may be the most monumental change in gold in the history of the world.
Call my good friend Dr. Kirk Elliott over at Sovereign Advisors 720-605-3900.
720-605-3900. Tell them John Michael Chambers at American Media Periscope sent you and request
a free consultation. Well indeed as so many other media channels and as so many
conferences that are occurring around the country with people doing a song and dance routine of
patriotism we are actually speaking the real hard truth and presenting the real patriotism.
Where few others dare to tread.
We have a great warrior and an intellectual powerhouse with us tonight.
We have Dr. James Fetzer.
And Dr. Fetzer has written quite an extraordinary library of documentations of false flag events, as well as some of the most notorious events of treason and betrayal in this country.
And one of the first and one of the cornerstones of This problem that we faced in America has been the John F. Kennedy assassination.
So, Dr. Fetzer, it's an honor to have you with us again, and I'm going to turn it right over to you to present your slides, your evidence for the viewers to walk through and discover something that they will never be the same from again.
So, Dr. Fetzer, the floor is yours.
Thank you so much, Scott.
In fact, I specialize in collaborative research by bringing together the best experts on different aspects of each of these cases so we can disentangle them and sort out what really happened.
As the first side shows, I'm going to talk about JFK with the official account and whether or not Oliver Stone got it right.
Here I allude to his celebrated film of 1991, JFK, not a more recent release from Cain, which appears to have fallen well short of establishing anything significant.
If you go to the next slide, you'll see the official narrative of three shots fired from the sixth floor window of the Texas School Book Depository.
Purportedly by a lone, demented gunman.
You can see some important buildings in the background.
The County Records Building, the Dal Tax, the Texas School Book Depository.
Notice where the third shot's alleged to have hit, where the first shot would have hit Jack in the back, the second Connelly in the back, the third Jack in the head, killing him.
Now, interestingly, as the next slide shows, Newsweek may know something the Warren Commission did not, because it shows Jack having been hit further down Elm Street, which I believe indeed is the actual location at which the shot actually That entered his right temple and blew his brains out the back of the head.
Impacted.
Circled is a location where Abraham Zapruder, a Dallas dressmaker, was located with his camera, taking a recording that we'll discuss in some detail, not this evening, but on our Part 2 on Friday.
If you go to the third, given that the Warren Commission was insisting all the shots came from behind, JFK's film, the film Oliver Stone's film, actually provided quite a contrast because he had multiple assassin teams, some in front and some behind.
He discussed the role of the CIA, of the military-industrial complex of Texas oil men, Now, I believe many Americans were simply stunned when the Warren Report emerged to claim three shots, and only three shots had been fired from above and behind.
A reason being, as the next slide shows, when Malcolm Kilduff announced the death of JFK, he pointed to his right temple and said it was simply a matter of a bullet right through the head.
Now that's pretty remarkable because the Warren Report finesses all of that.
In other words, here you've got The acting press secretary reporting the death of the president with a shot that does not figure at all in the Warren Commission report.
Moreover, as the next slide shows, it turns out that two shots were widely reported on radio and television that day.
We're looking at the left at the NBC team, including Chet Huntley, among the most important newsmen of his time.
Where they reported a small, clean puncture wound to the throat.
A wound that had actually passed through the windshield, headed toward its target.
Clearly fired from in front.
And later in the afternoon, as they continued to report, they talked about a shot that had entered the right temple and blown his brains out the back of his head, attributing that finding to Admiral George Berkeley, the president's personal physician.
So if you were watching television that day, and this was the occasion that made television an indispensable element of every home in America, you were hearing a completely different version of the events than those that were being offered by the Warren Report.
Interestingly, if you put together what you heard on NBC that day of the shot to the throat, From the triple underpass, in a shot to the right temple, actually from the intersection of the picket fence and the triple underpass, but in the general vicinity of the grassy knoll, with the shots that the Warren Commission would claim had occurred, including one to the back about five and a half inches below the collar just to the right of the spinal column,
And another to the back of the head, which would turn out to have been fired from the Dow Tax, but would be attributed to the Book Depository.
You'd actually get a pretty good idea of how many times Jack was shot.
I'll add the possibility of yet one more, but notice how very different it is, because once you have shots fired from in front and from behind, obviously you have multiple shooters in a conspiracy.
Which the Warren Commission was very eager to suppress.
Now we go to the next slide.
We have more than 15 indications of the Secret Service having set up JFK for the hit.
In the first place, as we see in the next slide, two of the agents were left behind at Love Field.
They would have accompanied the limousine, run along beside the limousine, were on the back.
Here you see Henry Ripke expressing dismay at being called off by Emery Roberts, the agent in charge of presidential protection.
The next slide.
Shows that.
The motorcycle escort was cut down to four and ordered not to ride forward of the rear wheels.
One of the officers involved said it was the damnedest formation he'd ever seen.
JFK's military aide, by the way, who normally sat between the driver and the agent in charge in the front seat, was moved to the last vehicle in the motorcade along with the president's personal physician.
The next slide shows that, in fact, they did not weld the manhole covers.
Open windows were not covered.
The crowd was allowed to spill into the street, sometimes 12 or 15 deep.
This is ridiculous as a mode of security because it provided basically no security whatsoever.
Look at the next slide, for example.
This is astonishing.
Look how an assassin with a handgun in that bus could have assassinated the president with no effort whatsoever.
Look at the crowd spilled out into the street, which happened in part Because the 110th Military Intelligence Unit was ordered to stand down over the vehement opposition of its commanding officer, to provide crowd control, to keep the people out of the street, and to increase the President's security.
Not on 22 November!
The next slide shows In fact, the motorcade was changed just four days before the event, where John Connally had a key role here.
I believe he actually faked a telephone conversation with the White House to gain approval.
Normally, the Secret Service lays down a motorcade route, which in this case would have had the motorcade proceeding straight on to Elm Street, In order to gain access to the Stemmons Freeway so the Secret Service can check every building, screen every occupant.
This change, however, brought the President to the scene of the assassination.
They brought the target right into the kill zone.
The next slide.
Shows that, in fact, most tellingly, all the vehicles were in the wrong order.
The president's limousine was put right up front.
That's completely absurd.
In a proper motorcade, you would have had the lower-ranking dignitaries, the mayor, then the vice president, leading up to the president.
Otherwise, everyone cheers for the president and they don't have any interest in seeing relatively minor players such as the mayor or even the vice president.
Reporters were moved to the rear and the president's personal physician to the final car, which put him in the worst location should his patient require emergency medical treatment.
Next slide.
Here we see that at the hospital where the Moorabbin president was taken, a Secret Service agent took a bucket and sponge, see the bucket there, and began cleaning up the blood and brains from the limousine.
This is outrageous!
This is the destruction of evidence at the scene in Parkland already.
When onlookers noticed a through-and-through hole in the windshield, the vehicle was moved.
The next slide shows the interior of the Presidential Limousine.
It was fairly much of a bloody mess, in particular in the back, where Jackie had been given a huge bouquet of red roses, unlike her other visits in Texas, where she'd be given a huge bouquet of yellow roses.
I believe this was for multiple purposes.
Red, of course, meaning stop, indicating Jackie was not to be harmed, and we will learn at least one of the shooters actually pulled his shot because Jackie would have been hurt, and to signify the location of the president sitting beside her.
The governor was in front of uh, Jacqueline and the governor's wife, Nellie, in front of
her.
The car was driven by William Greer, who was the oldest member of
the Secret Service at the time.
And in the passenger seat, Roy Kellerman was the agent in charge.
If we go to the next slide, here we have this, uh, Pruder film.
This is a 27 seconds.
You'll see there's a jump from Houston onto Elm Street.
All of a sudden, kaboom!
The limousine is there.
Zapruder said he began filming when the limousine came up on Houston and filmed continuously until it disappeared under the triple underpass.
Notice how the vehicle seems to disappear from view.
This, I will suggest, is because that part of the footage appears to have been taken on a tripod located inside the Pergola area.
If we could run the film one more time, and we'll also look at it again by and by, notice the spectators in the foreground who are all but motionless.
That's very odd, because elsewhere in the motorcade they were waving and cheering.
Notice Jack is clutching his throat, Jack easing him, then kaboom!
We have what appears to be the fatal shot at frame 313, where every one of these frames has its own number and has been studied extensively.
If we go to the next slide, We'll find that.
In fact, the key frames were printed in the wrong sequence to mitigate the back-and-to-the-left motion you may have observed there, which no one on the ground actually observed.
Printing the frames in the wrong order, it was minimized.
Go to the next and you'll see that if you track measurements from the videos that the limousine was supposed to be traveling anywhere from 6 to 8 to 10 miles an hour, when in fact Secret Service protocols have it, the limousine should never Go lower than 30 miles an hour, one of many, many violations of Secret Service protocols.
Now in the next frame, you'll see how they were put in the wrong order.
In fact, it was David Lifton who first noticed this difference, that they were printed in the wrong order to mitigate the back and to the left motion.
He had his girlfriend at the time write to J. Edgar Hoover and was fairly astonished when J. Edgar Hoover actually wrote back and confirmed, yes, there had been a misprint in the production of the Warren Commission's supporting volumes.
If you take a look at the next slide, you'll see a bit of the difference.
Yeah, if you went back and forth, you'd see how different it was.
But the fact of the matter is that anyone watching the film is stunned by the violence of the back and the left motion of JFK's body.
Because it did not, in fact, occur in Dealey Plaza, but was an artifact of the alteration of the film.
If you take a look at the next slide, you'll see in Josiah Thompson's book, Six Seconds in Dallas, he superimposed frame 312 with 313.
There's a forward motion from 312 to 313, and then back and to the left from 313 through 316 and 317.
to 313 and then back and to the left from 313 through 316 and 317. Now interestingly,
David Lifton independently went to Caltech to visit with a celebrated physicist Richard
Feynman with large blow-ups of these frames.
And Richard Feynman himself took a ruler to the photograph, and in relation to a constant feature of the limousine determined there was forward motion from 312 to 313.
The next slide actually shows how dramatic it is.
That forward motion you see, constant up to 312 and then forward motion.
That's all that remains of a shot to the back of the head, where Jack was hit in the back of the head, slumped forward.
Jackie eased him back up, was looking him right in the face when he was hit in the right temple by that shot.
But instead of the violent back and to the left, he simply slumped to the left.
So they took out too many frames when they edited the film and made other revisions, I shall address.
The next slide shows...
That even the blood spray actually in frame 313 turns out to have been painted in.
The first frames from the film to which the public had access were published in Life Magazine.
Most were unremarkable.
But this, frame 313, posed special problems.
The plate was broken twice to revise Description 6, which appears to be unique in the history of publishing.
See, they create these steel plates in order to publish.
Every issue of the magazine comes off of the same set of plates.
It's extraordinarily rare for even one plate to be changed.
In this case, they changed the same plate twice.
There are many indications this and other films have been edited, including the all but motionless spectator, the driver's head turns twice as fast as humanly possible, and the blobs and blood spray, which appear to have been painted in, blood and brains across the trunk, and the driver's pulling to the left and bringing the vehicle to a halt, Had to be removed because it was such an obvious indication of Secret Service complicity in setting up JFK for the hit.
Next slide.
And here we see how the colors can be broken down into red, green, and blue light.
If you look closely at your TV, for example, you can see the little red, green, and blue lights.
The total red, blue, and green light in the frames is measured by a computer and put into a graph.
The graphs show that the spray disappears within three frames or one-sixth of a second.
According to the official analysis of Zapruder, film was taken at 18.3 frames per second.
So, three frames is only one sixth of a second.
This, however, is a physical impossibility.
Even if you dropped a lead weight from JFK's temple, It wouldn't drop to the floor of the car that fast.
Scientists were also able to show that the spray could not have been moving so fast that it shot right out of view before frame 314.
So we know there's a lot going on here.
Next slide.
If the blood could have, where would it have ended up?
It would have gone all over the condolence and the windows and interior of the limousine.
But a frame published only weeks after the assassination in color showed no blood at all.
This is not bad enough, but when the government report of the assassination was published in 1964, another frame, 323, was published, which again showed no blood, just a huge bloodless wound in the president's head.
Next frame.
So here we have one of the frames post 313.
You'll notice about where his temple would be, there's something that looks like a blob.
It moves around.
Take a look at the next frame, for example.
Well, before, internal inconsistencies.
The head wound cannot be observed in the earliest frames, that is to say, at the back of the head.
When I reviewed later frames, I found it in frame 374.
Larry Rivera, who's done some sensational work on the film and other issues we will address, discovered it's even outlined by Jackie's white glove.
Take a look now at the head wound.
You'll see here in these early frames, you cannot see because the back of the head is all dark.
It's black.
In fact, a group of Hollywood film restoration experts have studied the forensic version of the film, very high quality, and have been astonished by the amateurness of the way in which that wound was concealed.
This, of course, is actually 3-12 immediately before they hit a 3-13 in the next frame.
So, you see, there'll be a certain consistency.
3-13, but now look at 3-14.
There ought to be a visible wound at the back of the head, but you do not see it.
It's as though they had moved it to the side to try to make this look more like something that could have been the effect of a bullet fired from the rear.
Look at 315 in the next frame.
You'll see again it's moving around.
Move it.
Look one more at frame 316.
You'll see it again.
But the wound at the back of the head is not visible because it had been painted over in black.
I believe they actually blew up the frames, painted it over, and then shrunk them back down and re-shot them to gain consistency.
If you go to the next slide...
You see, well, this is now 3.17, and all of these frames really are ones they focused on to conceal the blowout, which is why it occurred to me that perhaps if I looked at later frames, they might have overlooked that it was actually visible.
Let's take a look at what I found in the next frame.
374, 375.
Now Jackie's climbing out.
She's going after a chunk of Jack's skull and brains that was on the trunk.
She held that in her hand all the way to Parkland Hospital.
After they pried Jack's moribund body out of her arms, she composed herself and entered trauma room one, turned to Pepper Jenkins, the anesthesiologist, extended her hand and asked if, will this help?
the chunk of brains and skull. Jackie knew a lot about literature, music, theater, art,
but she knew nothing about wounds, wound ballistics, neurology, brain damage. But I noticed there
that while the attention might be focused on Jackie, you can see
something is visible at the back of Jack's head.
So the next slide shows a close-up of what you can actually see.
Believe it or not, there is a blowout Notice it has kind of a bluish gray color.
That pink thing is a skull flap.
It's about three inches crescent shape that was blown open because this was caused by a frangible or exploding bullet.
But you can see the gray matter there from the blowout at the back of the head.
Now the next frame shows that.
Those who were involved in reconstructing the home movies of the assassination, including the Zapruder, might have overlooked frames class 313 through 316 that display the wound at the back of the head where I found this image of the blowout in frame 374.
Meanwhile, the next slide shows Now, Jack and Jackie there, you see, before and after the blowout, you cannot see it in the bottom left image, but you can clearly see it to the right, confirming that they had blacked it out in these early frames, because, of course, it was the result of a shot fired from in front.
The next slide shows David W. Manteek, M.D., Ph.D., Ph.D.
in Physics, M.D.
from Wisconsin, M.D.
from Michigan, board-certified in radiation oncology, which is a treatment of cancer using x-ray therapy, entered the National Archives to study the autopsy x-rays of JFK late in David told me he thought there was too much contrast in the skull x-ray on the left, that the contrast between dark and light was much too gray, and therefore he believed he would discover that some of the x-rays had been altered.
Indeed, using a technique from physics called optical densitometry that enables you, by measuring the amount of light that passed through the x-ray, the relative density of the objects whose exposure to radiation created the image, he defined an area he referred to here as Area P that had been patched.
Either using a material far too dense to be human bone, so that unless the back of JFK's skull was nothing but solid bone, unless JFK was a bonehead, this could not be a naturally occurring phenomenon, though the similar effect could have been achieved simply by great overexposure of the x-ray at this area.
But notice, as the next slide shows, The striking similarity between Area P, David found in the patched x-ray, and the blowout in frame 374, although a bit of hair extends over the wound, or it would more closely approximate what we see in the x-ray.
Again, I reiterate, the pink is this bone flap to which I shall return by and by.
Next frame.
Larry Rivera discovered that Jackie's glove, she was wearing white gloves, also provides an outline of the defect.
In other words, you see here how extensive it was into JFK's skull.
Because virtually everywhere you see Jackie's white glove ought to have been his skull, had it been intact.
The next slide further illustrates Larry's discovery.
Notice you have a right hand one place, left hand there, really delineating.
I mean, it's just fortuitous that Jackie's Glove happened to be in this position vis-a-vis the filming of the event and remained even after they had altered the film.
Take a look at the next slide and you'll see How cavernous it was.
Larry created a 3D image using Blender.
He's become extremely skillful.
The point being this was a very substantial defect at the back of JFK's head.
Next slide.
Here again, this is another 3D rendition.
Notice right in the middle, that very substantial defect.
Hats off to Larry Rivera for this and other accomplishments I'll be sharing with you as we proceed.
Next slide.
The sign, the Stem and Three-Way sign, was wrongly placed.
Comparison of photos of the location and dimensions of the Stem and Three-Way sign reveal it was replaced by mispositioned images.
It demonstrates the sign was placed into the revised film without taking into consideration the optical distortion of the camera's lens.
Take a look here at the next slide.
You'll see what I'm talking about.
All those lines ought to have been perfectly parallel had the sign not been put in on an angle.
But as you can see on the right, it's skewed a bit.
There's also a GIF.
We may or may not be able to play, but if you go to the next slide, you'll see the discrepancy where the sign really was, which you can see in the background, versus where it was located in the Zapruder film improperly.
This is one of many discoveries of John P. Costello, also a PhD in physics like David.
Here's in the area of electromagnetism, where John's an expert on the properties of light and of images of moving objects.
And put together a tutorial about internal features of the Zabruder film, that although 98% technically perfect, 2% that are flawed, as in this instance, revealed that it was completely reworked and revised.
Where you can find his tutorial, two different locations minimally, at my AssassinationScience.com website, and also on AssassinationResearch.com, a web archive that John and I co-edited.
The next slide.
Here you can see, this is the original, and if the GIF were playing, you'd see how the superimposition of the Zapruder film image shows that it was completely put in the wrong position.
A subtle mistake, but nevertheless very telling for anyone who would want to maintain that the film has not been altered.
This is decisive disproof of any such contention.
Next slide.
The all-but-motionless spectators.
Everywhere else on the motorcade, spectators were waving and cheering.
During this portion of the motorcade, however, they were virtually motionless.
The explanation appears to be that the foreground was taken when the pilot car passed.
This was a single vehicle well ahead of the limousine, and they evidently took footage when the pilot car passed.
And for reasons we don't completely understand, they replaced the original spectators with emotionless spectators from the earlier footage.
So take a look at the next slide.
You'll see how elsewhere in the motorcade, I mean everywhere, people were waving, cheering, they were thrilled, they were ecstatic.
The next slide shows another illustration.
Here you see Jack and Jackie.
They were looking pretty happy at this point in time.
This was Jackie's first political trip.
First political trip.
And there you can see Nellie in front of Jackie and John Connolly in front of Jack.
Next slide.
You'll see, there's the motionless spectators.
And we're gonna play again this Bruder film, which would be the next slide, so you can review again how they're not waving, they're not cheering.
It turns out that, using the techniques of optical printing and special effects, you can combine any foreground with any background.
Notice here, for example, the limousine had already been pulled to the left and to a halt.
But when you look at this version, it appears to go continuous under the Stemmons Freeway on its way to Parkland.
That's not the way it happened in fact, but that's most certainly the impression you would get from the extant version of the film.
Next slide.
There are external inconsistencies between the most important two videos taken, the Zapruder, taken from the area of the grassy knoll, actually the pergola area, where he was standing on a low colonnade.
I've actually got up there and stood there myself.
Versus the Knicks film, which was taken from the opposite side.
Now, if this is one and the same event, and they're both recording without alteration, then of course they're going to correspond in their content.
But look at this.
Next slide.
Here you have, as far as Jackie goes at the top, in the bottom from the Zapruder film, she and Clint Hill, who is Jackie's personal bodyguard, rushed up from the Secret Service Cadillac climbed up on the limousine, but this is as close as they get in Zapruder.
Take a look at the next frames, however, from the Knicks.
Notice how much closer they are in contact.
They are actually in physical contact in the Knicks.
So, we have two inconsistent videos suggesting if one were authentic, the other were fake.
The other option, of course, being that they were both altered, and indeed they appeared to have first altered the Zapruder, and then used it as a guide to alter the Nyx.
But it was done imperfectly.
Those who were involved in these activities were not rocket scientists.
Look at the next slide and you see the contrast very clearly.
There's the closest they get in the top and Zapruder, but they're much closer in contact in the necks.
In fact, Clint Eastwood actually said he pushed Jackie back down into the seat and then lay across their bodies.
At the time the shots were fired, did you look at the Book Depository building?
No.
Did you think at that time that the shots came from the Book Depository building?
Well, here we have a witness, if we can play this, when we may be unable to...
At the time the shots were fired, did you look at the book depository building?
No.
Did you think at that time that the shots came from the book depository building?
No, I thought it came from a fence between the book depository and the railroad track.
Did anyone else who you know, who you've spoken with, also believe that the shots came from there?
Most everyone thought it came from the fence behind the book depository.
Did you have occasion to speak with Forrest Sorrells, who was, of course, a friend of yours, and the Secret Service agent in charge of Dallas that day?
Yes, I did.
Did he tell you where he thought the shots came from?
He thought they were coming from the same place.
Which is?
Behind the fence.
The sound of a train.
♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
♪♪♪ Thank you for that.
Very, very few opportunities to see the Knicks films, so I'm really glad we got to see those.
By the way, Robert Grodin is among those who persist to this day that the Zapruder film is authentic and untampered.
Obviously, we've already proven that to be false.
Now we turn to witness inconsistencies.
Take a look at the next slide.
Let me just say one thing real quick, Jim.
One thing I noticed on the Groter film that was amateurish, that was taken, was a lack of a blood spray cloud that was extraordinarily visually pronounced in the Zapruder film.
But when looking from the angle of the Groter amateur film, when his head was hit and thrown backwards, there was to me a significant lack of any blood In that cloud that seemed to be present in the Zubruder film, which kind of adds to what you were saying earlier, there was a painted-in edition of a blood spray cloud that seems to be shown very clearly, the absence of that cloud in the original RAW film footage.
Go ahead.
Oh yeah, you're absolutely right, Scott.
Those are very astute observations.
I like that.
And by the way, it turns out that the driver pulled the limousine to the left and to a halt.
So this continuous motion, you know, with Clint Hill rushing up and so forth, frankly, I don't think even if the limousine had been running, you know, 11 miles an hour, Clint Hill would have had a hard time catching up to the limousine.
So something is wrong on that ground alone.
Remember, You know, a four-minute mile is a sort of thing that would be a record, and here we're talking about something much, much faster.
Meanwhile, witnesses to the head wound included at Dealey Plaza at Parkland at Bethesda.
Look at the consistency of the reports of the witnesses in the next slide.
Beverly Oliver, who was filming Toward the Grassy Knoll, Phillip Willis, Marilyn Willis, Ed Hoffman, a multiplicity of doctors.
Notice they're all putting their hand to the back of their head.
Really, very much at the location identified by David Mantic, Azaria P., Nurse Audrey Bell, Theron Ward, the Justice of the Priests, Aubrey Reich, who is the ambulance driver, helped to lift the body into the casket, an FBI agent who was present during the autopsy, several of the medical techs look at the consistency with which they identify the location of the blowout at the back of the head.
Roughly, if you doubled up your fist and put it at the back of your head, that would be where it occurred.
Go to the next slide.
This is now Clint Hill.
When they published a book about the Kennedy detail in Dallas, and to my utter astonishment, it included Clint Hill's description of what he laid down across the back seat.
He saw this gaping fist-sized wound at the back of the head.
Now remember, This by itself contradicts the Warren Commission official account, because it's a wound they insist did not exist.
In fact, they claim, based upon the x-rays, to discount all of the eyewitness reports, but they could only do that because the x-rays had been patched.
As David Mantic so brilliantly discerned, his research was as painstaking and methodical involving Hundreds and hundreds of measurements, which was greatly aided at the time by the fact that he was extremely myopic.
So here you have a serendipitous coincidence of a man with the right technical background, not only in medicine, but in physics, Who also happens to be suffering from myopia, which made it possible for him to conduct all of these measurements with great precision.
If you go to the next slide, you'll see Even if Clint actually touched Jackie, the films don't show him pushing her into the sea, which is what he's maintained for 47 years.
When I wrote this, now it would be over 50.
In his formal report dated 30 November, about the events of 22 November, a copy of which is archived at AssassinationScience.com, he reports, As I lay over the top of the back seat, I noticed a portion of the president's head on the right rear side was missing, and he was bleeding profusely.
Part of his brain was gone.
I saw part of his skull with hair on it, which is consistent with frame 374.
But not with frames 313 through 316.
Indeed, since the record was Warren Commission Exhibit CE1024, at least some of the members and staff have to have been aware of observations by the first person to observe the head wound, apart from Jackie herself.
Even the Kennedy detail, 2010, included this sentence.
and slumped across the seat.
President Kennedy lay...
uh...
I can't quite read the word there.
A bloody, gaping fist-sized hole clearly visible at the back of his head.
I repeat, a bloody, gaping fist-sized hole clearly visible in the back of his head, and an observation of enormous significance in relation to the autopsy photographs and x-rays, as well as to the authenticity of the Zapruder film.
Next slide.
And that's from Clint Hill, right?
Now this is a diagram that was approved by Dr. Robert McClellan at Parkland Hospital.
It was a terrible, terrible wound.
If you look at the next slide, when I put together my first edited collection on the assassination of JFK entitled Assassination Science, I included diagrams by Charles Crenshaw, MD, who'd been present in Trauma Room No.
1 when JFK's moribund body was brought in, and then two days later was responsible for the care and treatment of his alleged assassin.
Now, I asked Chuck to draw for me diagrams of both the head wound and the throat wound, which we'll review subsequently.
And here you can see he drew the back of the head wound on the right and from the side, which you got an image of because Jack's head was leaning forward from Jackie's glove.
So look at all these multiple lines of evidence converge on a wound we can actually visibly observe in frame 374.
Next slide.
Here you have the mortician who prepared the body for burial who told an investigator that in addition to a large gaping hole in the back of the head, there was a small wound in the right temple and a wound on the back five to six inches below the shoulder to the right of the spinal column.
Now, he believes that the wound at the back of the head was patched using a piece of rubber and filled with plaster of Paris.
There was a smaller wound, and if you notice the writing, there was a crescent-shaped flap, three inches.
That's the skull flap, the pinkish one I mentioned before.
Now, this is rather telling.
There were small shrapnel wounds in the face that he patched with wax.
He discovered them because they were leaking embalming fluid.
David Mantic brilliantly inferred that these were caused by small pieces of glass that function as shrapnel when the bullet passed through the windshield en route to his throat.
Then we have the wound to the back, five to the six inches below the shoulder to the right of this backbone or spinal column.
His adrenal glands and brain were missing.
All the other organs were put back in.
It's very interesting, he adds, that there was no discoloration to the face, which meant that JFK died instantly.
He was dead in Dealey Plaza.
This is probably the single most important piece of evidence we have, because Thomas Evan Robinson, the mortician who prepared the body for funeral, is the only objective non-partisan involved in all these matters, from whom we have a reliable report.
But it's supported and substantiated by, for example, all of the witnesses we've already reviewed to the back of the head wound and the drawings from physicians themselves who were present at Parkland when his body was brought in.
Next slide.
Astonishingly enough, I mean this is going to blow you away, when the House Select Committee on Assassinations reinvestigated the case in 1977-78, its medical panel concluded that the entry wound, this is the one to the back of the head, it's actually in the vicinity of your external occipital protuberance, that little bump on the back of your head, Where you'd rest if you were lying in a bath tub.
They claim that that identification made accurately by the Bethesda pathologist who conducted the autopsy was wrong, and that the actual entry wound was four inches higher.
It was depicted in diagrams on the right, but not visible in photographs.
And it was found in diagrams, but not in photographs, because it didn't exist.
More startlingly, notice how they've reconstituted the back of the head.
It's as though the HFCA, when they took their investigation, decided to recover up what had actually happened and do it right.
But it created absurdities, such as you see in the next slide.
At Parkland, you had the fifth side blowout.
Well, believe it or not, That diagram in the middle from David Lifton's book, Breast Evidence, represents the result of James Humes, the medical officer in charge of the autopsy, taking a cranial saw to the skull of JFK to enlarge the wound to make it look more like something that might have occurred had JFK been leaning over
And been hit by a shot from behind.
Unfortunately, Humes did this in front of two witnesses, one of whom was Thomas Evans Robinson.
So when the Assassination Records Review Board, which was created by Congress to archive all the evidence in the Kennedy assassination, deposed him, They showed a drawing by Hume's assistant, J. Thornton Boswell, with dotted lines, and asked what that was about, and he explained, oh no, the doctors did that, because he'd actually watched Hume enlarge the skull using a cranial saw.
So look how multiply absurd we have the HFCA on the right, which is now completely reconstituted.
And by the way, If you have any doubts about this enormous expansion of the wound, when I published Assassination Science, I included the Bethesda autopsy report as an appendix, and you can see it described there in mathematical detail.
It was huge!
David Lifton, rather ingeniously in my opinion, Reached out to a physician of his acquaintance and without identifying the patient, read the description of this massive wound to the physician and asked him what he thought had occurred to the victim.
He said it appeared he'd been hit in the head with an axe.
It was that monstrous.
But if anyone has any doubt about the extent of the cover-up, there you have here in a single image, a devastating indictment, not only of the Warren Commission, but of the House Select Committee on Assassinations, which tried to redo the cover-up even better.
Next slide.
And here you have one physician after another discussing the extrusion of cerebellar as well as cerebral brain tissue.
Now, the cerebellum is a small compact part of the brain right at the base, right above the brainstem.
Whereas the cerebral tissue is the rest of the brain, the ordinary brain tissue.
They look very differently.
Cerebral would look more grayish, maggoty in character.
Cerebellar, more reddish, hamburger-like.
And we have one physician after another reporting extruding cerebellar tissue as well as cerebral.
Now, if you looked at the wound from, you know, this could not have happened had he not had, by the way, the rupture of the tentorum, which is a very tough membrane that covers the cerebellum, which led Dr. Robert B. Livingston, world-famous leading expert on the human brain and also an expert on wound ballistics, To conjecture that the bullet that hit Jack in the throat hit Bone and fragmented, part going down into his lung, the other upwards to rapture the tentorium.
Because, and this is in his, in my opinion, definitive analysis, even the impact of two shots to JFK's head at the location specified, the back of the head that the Bethesda pathologist correctly identified, and the other entering the right temple and so forth would
not have allowed cerebellar tissue to extrude. Therefore, the Tentorium had to have been ruptured.
And I believe that Bob Livingston, who explained this to me personally when we were on a
flight on the way to Dallas for a conference in 1993 where he and David Manning would present their
findings, got it right. Turn to the next slide.
Here we have Bethesda autopsy photos up here, not to be of JFK.
Now, these photographs at the bottom are from Robert Grodin.
I actually was with Grodin in Des Moines, Iowa, where we'd both been invited to speak before an advanced high school class about the assassination.
And when he and I, together alone, were having a conversation, Grodin offered for me to use his photographs.
And I turned to him and I said, yeah, but they're fake.
He made no response, because they are fake.
Notice, by the way, there's like a little piece almost looks like duct tape at the right tempo.
Notice more.
I'll comment as we look at the next slide.
This is pretty interesting stuff.
That's perhaps one of the most famous.
There was no photograph like this.
Jack's wound was not of this character.
You'll notice the eyes are open.
I'll comment on that because Chuck Crenshaw explained to me that the last thing he did when he assisted loading JFK's body, wrapping it in sheets, into the bronze ceremonial casket was to close his eyes.
So what in the world is going on here that now we have what purports to be the corpse of JFK, but his eyes are open?
You can look for other features.
I don't believe the ears are the same either here.
And ears, we know, are as distinctive as fingerprints.
But look at the next slide.
Look at the next photograph.
Here we have again a side-by-side, side-by-side.
And by the way, those who worked in the morgue said they did not have an aluminum stirrup to support the head as you find here.
It was not present at the morgue in Bethesda where the autopsy took place.
Now, the next is a GIF, but it may or may not work, where Larry superimposed a photo of JFK over the body here, and you'll find they do not match.
Now, Robert Morningstar, who's a serious student at JFK, believes that Jefferson Davis Tippett, the police officer, was shot in Dallas, was shot at least in part because he bore a striking resemblance to JFK.
Now I obtained the Tippett autopsy photographs and in my opinion Tippett did not look that much like JFK.
I guarantee you this is not Tippett with his head in the stirrup.
Dennis David, who is the non-commissioned officer in charge of keeping records of everyone who was admitted to the autopsy or not, reported that he was instructed not to record a casket for a major, which was in violation of protocol.
I believe the major was the individual they used as a stand-in for JFK to make these autopsy photographs, which are not the real guy, indeed.
Both Bobby and Jackie, when contemplating having an open or a closed casket, agreed he didn't even look like himself.
For which I believe the explanation is that's because it wasn't JFK's body they were observing.
We can look at one more slide perhaps to see where we are.
Yeah, I'll come back to the throat wound next, our next discussion, Scott.
We've covered quite a lot for everyone to absorb, and I'm just simply delighted to have this opportunity to share the results of this massive collaborative effort.
I really, truly have benefited from the research by the best students ever to undertake research on the assassination of John F. Kennedy.
It's striking in so many ways, but the most The most striking and encouraging aspect of this is that there are Americans that rise up to the challenge and don't retreat and don't surrender, but dig in and attack this whole fraudulent assassination.
They use their expertise.
They are driven, I think, by a divine hand that, in good time, all things shall be known, all things that will be revealed.
And vengeance is mine, saith the Lord, I will repay.
There will be vengeance upon all of those eternally and in this world who participated in this assassination and the cover-up and the multiple layers of fraud and the special effects manipulation.
I know we're going to get into more of it.
So I'm going to wait with great expectations as we enter into the second part.
And we may even require a third, Jim, as I'm thinking and watching.
This is so extraordinarily important for people to have a foundation of this This time in American degradation where this false flag, and if people haven't seen JFK's film, I would strongly recommend they do it and you can stream it on Peabody and some of these other streaming services or just rent it.
But JFK as a film, aside from some of the elements you've laid out with the body and the shooting and all that, Oliver Stone based a lot of his film on Jim Mars' book and I think it gives, although he does have to embellish it for entertainment purposes and stuff, you walk away from that film with a very solid
Healthy sense of suspicion and wonderful, wonderful cinematography and storytelling, but he brings it together in an entertaining way that will add an appetite for people as they digest some of this more technical complicated body of evidence that you are so expertly laying out for people.
So I would strongly encourage people to watch that film for entertainment purposes and just to let it speak to them in a sense.
And we may extend this to a third part because as you know, Jim, when we did a conference of this, I think it was back in December or so, One of the things we talked about was Jack Ruby and the death of Oswald and I think that's a significant part of the entire drama of the JFK assassination because that too seems to have been totally fabricated and people, you know, Oswald's assassination was not done the way that we thought it was done.
But there's a whole other drama to that.
So this entire JFK assassination is layering drama upon drama, lie upon lie, revelation upon revelation.
Witnesses in the 1960s too.
People were a stronger group than they are now and you see that in the clarity of language and the seriousness that they address this matter.
And you wisely identified how people were so enthralled with Kennedy and they were so enchanted and smiling and waving.
They were not the morose bystanders who were watching a funeral procession.
Perhaps that was part of the CIA's PSYOP, was to prepare people for a funeral procession, the inevitability of it, by putting these photoshopped people that were just standing solemnly and quietly watching as the car went by.
And we have to also remember, why did this happen?
Well, I think a lot of it goes back to Kennedy's stance on exposing the CIA as a tremendous criminal racketeering operation, his exposure of certain masonic, luciferian elements, and a variety of other tenacious actions that he was moving towards, plus getting us out of Vietnam, stopping that war before it ever took off.
For all of these things, the government of the United States and potentially some other countries conspired and murdered the President of the United States.
And it was not done the way the official narrative that the Warren Commission laid out, much as the 9-11 Commission Totally falsified and fraudulently misrepresented the 9-11 attacks to the American people.
So this is extraordinarily important for people to watch and understand and absorb because as we go into it, we're going to lay out more information in Part 2 and I think Part 3 as well.
But Jim, it was fabulous.
I'm going to hand it back to you to give us your closing assessment summary and what you expect in Part 2.
Go ahead, Jim.
Well, look how from the beginning, Scott, the government was insulting the American people.
I mean, they didn't even report the shot that entered the right temple, reported by the acting press secretary at the time of his death.
It was inconsistent with the live coverage going on the day of the assassination.
In fact, that evening, When the story became to come out that all the shots had been fired from above and behind, Frank McKee, who was nobody's fool, said, this is incongruous.
How can the man have been shot from in front, from behind?
And that was a conundrum the Warren Commission sought to resolve.
If you were to compare the Warren Report with Oliver Stone's JFK, there's no contest.
JFK is the most accurate, complete, and comprehensive presentation of what actually happened in Dealey Plaza on 22 November 1963, ever presented to the public through the mass media.
And it has withstood the test of time.
By way of covering the rest of the event, I'll explain the ways in which it's flawed.
But the themes presented by Oliver Stone were absolutely right-headed.
And it appears from the reports I'm getting now about his JFK revisited, which is a documentary style.
It's actually a regression.
He's gone backwards.
The original JFK appears to be more powerful and informative than what he's actually got in his new sequel, which really is a totally different animal that doesn't draw any conclusions about who is responsible and why I'm really at a loss as to why he even Did what he did, because the story is here.
You're seeing it documented.
Oliver Stone could have read the books I published with all these expert reports.
Even Vince Bugliosi, who had published a 1,500-page tome reclaiming history, attempting to stand up for the Warren Report.
For which I believe he was paid a million dollars, acknowledging in passing that mine were the only exclusively scientific books ever published on the assassination of JFK.
If only he had taken their findings to heart.
Well, ladies and gentlemen, we encourage you to go to Moonrock Books and see Dr. Jim Fetzer's work on these and other false flag issues.
We will be returning on Friday for part two, and we may even continue for part three to see how much we get through.
There are so many different elements of this, but they all need to be brought together.
They all need to be shown and explained so you will know the truth and the truth will set you free.
This is a difficult subject for some people.
It stirs up a lot of memories.
But we have to understand what the truth is behind this so that we can never be deceived in the future by any other similar event.
And let me just say this, Jim, I've said it before and I'll say it again.
I do anticipate that they will quite possibly do the same thing to Joe Biden and Kamala Harris as they did to Kennedy in order to justify and earn and create a political momentum That carries this country into a police state status.
You already see it on the Department of Justice, FBI using formants to entrap people in a Capitol Hill insurrection, as they call it, all that propaganda.
I foresee them becoming so desperate that they could use this same tactic as they used against Kennedy against Biden and try to blame it on a Trump supporter, try and blame it on an anti-vax person who is suspicious of the COVID-19 death shot that so many people are dying from.
So this is why we look at the JFK assassination so that we are very clear about what happened in the past and we will not stand by and allow it again to happen in this future.
So we are very thankful to have Dr. Fetzer who is sharpening our swords and strengthening our spirits to carry through.
We will see you on Friday.
God bless you.
▲
Export Selection