And let there be no moaning of the bar, just sing out a tibium when you see that I see the M and the This is Jim Fetzer on The Raw Deal, where I'm very pleased to be joined today by Danny Saris, who has some 35 years in law enforcement.
We're going to begin with a new report from the Florida condo.
Listen to this.
So I have a few more pieces of information on the condominium collapse in Miami, and I felt like it was just too important to leave out So we'll get to that in a second.
I don't have a lot of commentary for this video.
One thing I do want to add, though, some of these 9-11 tie-ins, and to me it is intentional, are they are they screwing with us?
Because some of this is ridiculous.
I'll get to it in a second.
But here is some additional information.
I can't hear that clip.
OK, thanks.
Thanks, Mitchell.
Let me see if I can get it way up.
Okay, let's see if this is any better.
So I have a few more pieces of information on the condominium collapse in Miami, and I felt like it was just too important to leave out.
So we'll get to that in a second.
I don't have a lot of commentary for this video.
I'll work around it.
Well, we have a report coming from Florida talking about parallels with 9-11.
And to me, very disturbingly, that an Israeli defense force group is coming there to assist
in searching through the debris and recovering the victims.
Now this in my opinion suggests that there may have been more to this than simply a collapse of a structure that had a 40-year lifespan after having been constructed in 1981.
That would make 2021.
It's expected lifespan.
It's a last slab construction that is amenable to collapse.
It's not really a desirable design.
Well, I've been doing research and making special reports with Joe Olson, who is a highly qualified engineer.
Indeed, Joe is qualified in mechanical engineering, in civil engineering, in electrical engineering.
I mean, this guy is as good as they get.
And Joe has now been forced to the conclusion that in spite of the construction and the vulnerabilities, therefore, that this was a controlled demolition.
He's now convinced.
He's been looking at a rather large number of alternative possible scenarios, which he will be discussing tonight on America Media Periscope.
This is at 8 p.m.
to 9 p.m.
Central, 9 to 10 p.m.
Eastern, on The Great Awakening Show with Scott Bennett, who's a former Army intel and psyops officer, who featured me last Friday to talk about 9-11, where I was addressing three specific aspects, namely the faking or fabrication of all four of the 9-11 crash sites, During an interview I did with Major General Albert Stubblebine, who was formerly in charge of all U.S.
military intelligence, including photographic, General Stubblebine not only agreed with all of my reasons for concluding that these crash sites, all four, Had been fabricated or fake, albeit in different ways, but added additional reasons of his own why I was correct.
Then second, how the destruction of the World Trade Center took place, and where it becomes very obvious that the Twin Towers were destroyed in a completely different way than was Building 7, which only came down at 5.20 in the afternoon, about seven hours after the destruction of the North Tower.
Well, their modes of demolition could hardly have been more different.
The twin towers are blowing apart in every direction from the top down.
That required some enormous source of explosives.
Could not have been done by jet fuel, which is principally made of kerosene.
That the buildings are being converted into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust.
Every floor remains stationary.
And when it's over, there's nothing there.
They're destroyed to or even below ground level.
As Father Frank Morales from St.
Mark's Episcopal Church, who was a first responder, reported on two different interviews I did with him in past radio shows.
But where Building 7 came down in a classic controlled demolition, all the floors are coming down at the same time, at very close to the speed of freefall.
And when it was over, it was a stack of debris equal to about 12% of the height of the original, five and a half floors for 47.
Where, had the North and South Tower collapsed, there would have been 12% of 110 floors of debris for each, or about 13 and a half floors.
So what Joe is going to do, where I featured him, by the way, on my False Flag and Conspiracies conference on the 5th and 6th of December last, where you can access his presentation on where did the towers go for free, compliments of me, just go to falseflagconspiracies2020.com.
That's the URL, falseflagconspiracies2020.com.
In the upper right-hand corner, you'll get access to the archives.
You fill out a form where we're no charge, no expense.
We're just keeping track of who downloads, and then as many as you like, where you might want to download Joe's on Where Did the Towers Go?
And then Scott had me back Wednesday passed with part two, and in addition to how the buildings were destroyed, how the World Trade Center was destroyed, I addressed who was responsible and why, which becomes pretty obvious from the beginning when you put all the pieces together.
Here's a clue All four of the flights emanated from airports where security was provided by ICTS, which is an Israeli firm, where Larry Silverstein, who took charge of the World Trade Center just six weeks before the event occurred,
Where he fired the security team that had been looking after the World Trade Center since 1970 and replaced it with an Israeli company who then renegotiated his insurance coverage to include an anti-terrorist clause so that he could claim that there had been, since there had been two planes, there had been two attacks and collected double indemnity, about $4.5 billion on a $114 million investment.
They don't call him Lucky Larry for nothing.
He's a close personal friend of Bibi Netanyahu.
They have conversations over the phone every Sunday.
Those are just a few clues.
Now, tonight, On America Media Periscope, Scott will be featuring me and Joe Olson to discuss similarities and differences between the Florida condo collapse and what happened to Building 7
We stand in stark contrast to what happened to Buildings 1 and 2, the North and the South Tower, as well as Mike Harris, who's a completely brilliant guy, an astute political analyst.
So this should be quite a show.
I recommend you mark it if you have the time available this evening from 8 to 9 Central, 9 to 10 Eastern.
Check out America Media Periscope.
Danny, let me bring in you for your thoughts about all of the above.
Well, you know, it's good to be with you today, Dr. Fetzer.
You know, I've been watching that building collapse in Florida.
It's been very strange.
You know, I'm not an engineer, but I'm highly suspicious of some of the reports and some of the videos I've seen in that building.
It definitely looks like it was done on purpose.
You know, again, I don't have any proof to show that, but it's very strange circumstances altogether, for sure.
Yes, and as I say, Joe and I have now done several reports about it, and you can find them on my BitChute site at BitChuteChannelJimFetzer.
I highly recommend doing so, because we have worked our way rather patiently through all the alternative scenarios, not taking for granted any skullduggery was at work, but doing our best to systematically sort out what happened.
And you're going to find the latest update from the guy who may be the most qualified engineer in the country tonight on American Media Periscope.
Meanwhile, in multiple swing states, flash drives, USBs used in the 2020 election were reported either missing
or suspiciously inserted into the voting systems used in the election.
This is pretty damn serious.
Meanwhile, agents raid home in Maricopa County and voter data theft investigation,
confiscate eight hard drives, three computers and a bag of USB sticks.
In the State Farm Arena in Fulton County, Georgia, moreover, we identified numerous activities
where USBs were transferred suspiciously between election personnel.
One was a strange pass between a mother and her daughter, two election workers made famous due to their suspicious activities during the election.
Back on October 1st, 2020, it was reported that an election laptop and memory sticks USB were stolen in Pennsylvania.
In Wisconsin, we reported on a missing flash drive in Milwaukee at the same time the city recorded 120,000 votes all for Joe Biden on the morning of November 4th.
One IT expert reached out to us a few days after the election and shared information on the voting systems that had been used.
He located a previous audit report from an audit of the Dominion voting system in California, showing a high-level diagram of the Dominion system, which is likely similar to the setup in Pennsylvania and other locations, Which showed that there are laptops or workstations on site that some of the workers can access after ballot images are scanned in.
Our expert stated he kept thinking about the USB drives and immediately noticed this is where election data, forged or faked images, could be inserted or changed.
When a number of USBs in a location go missing or lost, the proper response would be for the location or district where the USBs went missing, to replace all USBs in the location or district with similar credentials as the missing USBs.
There is no indication this happened in the 2020 election.
This whole scenario opens the door to manipulation of votes through the USB before they were delivered to the location where they were to be counted.
The safekeeping and security of USBs used in the 2020 election were very weak or even missing altogether.
There is evidence showing a pattern of USB abuse in swing states where Biden was eventually awarded the win.
Danny, your thoughts, my friend?
You know, Dr. Fetzer, the more I look at this election fraud, it really puzzles me because we're not getting any of the details on the investigation.
You know, we're getting bits and pieces, and I'm sure that's by design.
We're not even actually sure who's officially doing the investigation behind the scenes because, again, we're getting bits and pieces.
But here's what I'd like to talk about.
You know, any trained investigator knows how to interrogate, look at evidence, And, you know, put it, put a trail, put the evidence together.
And, you know, he can figure out what's going on.
He doesn't have to be an expert on the voting machines.
He doesn't have to be an expert.
He can bring in the experts that know the machines and know how it works.
But what he's good at, the investigator's good at, is he knows when people are lying to him, especially when he's investigating them or he interrogates them.
No audio on the clip.
Can you hear Danny now speaking?
Uh, no.
Is he speaking right now?
Yeah, yeah.
Danny's been speaking.
Yes.
Yes.
I can hear, I can hear okay.
Am I still on?
Yeah, but Danny, can you, can you turn up, can you turn up your volume?
I'm up all the way, sir.
Uh, Mitchell, see if this is any better.
Danny, regroup, begin again, and let's see if we get better connection with Mitchell.
Okay.
Can you hear me?
Can you hear me okay now?
Can you hear okay now, Mitchell?
No, I hear nothing, Jim.
Wow!
Wow!
We're having a technical difficulty there.
I'll stand by, Dr. Fetzer.
Danny, why don't you call in to Mitchell and we'll get you through Skype your sound here at 540-352-4452.
Call Mitchell.
at 540-352-4452, call Mitchell, 540-352-4452.
You have the slide so you'll see where I'm going.
And we can get your audio and commentary that way.
So you can drop off.
You can drop off right now from the Zoom and go ahead and call Mitchell.
And as soon as you're there, Danny, we'll continue.
I got to get my phone set up, sir.
Okay.
Okay.
Not a problem.
Not a problem.
It's pretty clear we have more and more evidence.
What Danny is saying is that trained investigators know how to do conduct interrogations and questioning.
He feels that there ought to have been much more done already by this point.
I do believe that the results of the Arizona audit are going to blow apart the myth propagated by the Democrats that this was a clean and safe election, which is obviously an absurdity.
Thank you.
And contradicts the four years of their complaint that 2016 was stolen, which we heard 24-7 from the highest to the lowest ranking Democrat.
I mean, embarrassingly bad.
We heard four years of complaints about the theft of the election of 2016.
And now we won't hear any evidence about what happened here on 2020.
I take it, Danny, we now have you with Mitchell.
Am I right?
I'm trying to give him a call, Jim.
OK.
Oh, OK.
I thought he was going to call you.
Yeah.
Either way works.
Let me know when you got him.
In any case, I think this is a brilliant report exposing exactly how they were doing it.
but the Dominion machines we know already were designed, designed to steal elections. So,
Danny, are you good?
Can you reach Mitchell?
He was trying to call you.
He just called you.
Can you give me the phone number again, Dr. Fetzer?
Sure, sure.
But he was seeking to call you.
The number is 540-352-4452, where Mitchell reached your answering machine.
352-4452, or Mitch will reach your answering machine.
540-352-4452, Danny.
You got it?
Okay.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Here we go.
Here we go.
Danny, are you there?
Yes, yes, yes, Danny.
Go ahead and give us your critique again.
Back up and start all over.
Okay, so what I was saying on that last segment, you were talking about, you know, what's going on with the elections.
What I don't understand is, I can't tell who officially is doing the investigation or what agency is doing the investigation.
You know, they're not giving us all the details of what's going on.
Here's what I can say, sir.
You know, any competent investigator You know, he's not going to be an engineer.
He's not maybe going to understand every single facet of how the election was stolen.
But what he can do is he can interrogate everybody, and through interrogation with help from experts, engineers on the election and on the Dominion system, what he can tell is he can tell when people are lying to him.
Okay?
He's going to be able to pick up on all the different statements that they use, People in interrogation usually break.
You can tell when someone's lying to you, they change their statements and whatnot.
And you can see a lot of that going on behind the scenes.
It wouldn't be hard.
For instance, the two girls that were taken into custody in Georgia, it would have been very easy with analyzing them and interviewing them separately, especially looking at their backgrounds.
They're very easy to put together and get out of them exactly what they did.
Under punishment of jail.
You know, I've seen many criminals that are tough, uh, back in the day, but what happens is when they get into an interrogation room, okay, they fall apart.
They can't keep their story straight.
The next thing you know, they're telling you everything.
Uh, when they know they're gonna go to jail.
And I don't see any of that going on.
None of that's coming out in the public.
We don't see anything- Investigators.
If there was a real investigation going on on this, and there could be behind the scenes.
Again, we're not getting the details on what's going on.
They're not going to give this kind of stuff out to the public.
But it would be very easy to break this down and catch all the characters that have been involved with this.
Especially like in Michigan, at the election houses, where you had all that fraud with the people putting the paper or the cardboard over the windows.
And all the different shenanigans that took place that night.
It'd be very easy to interview and interrogate all these different suspects.
Then you can put it together on exactly what happened, what individuals did what job pertaining to the fraud, where they were getting their money, okay, and who was paying them.
And it would be very easy to put all this fraud together that's behind the scenes to figure out what's going on.
It wouldn't take that long.
If I was in there, I'd be interviewing everybody in detail.
I think we'd know exactly what's going on, but maybe by design, this is going on behind the scenes.
And they're not telling the public yet, or they're not giving out these details.
My suspicion would be that they have to prove that a crime was committed before they can pursue the investigation as a criminal matter, in that having established fraud in these various states, that we're going to see criminal inquiries of the kind you're describing take place very rapidly, Danny.
Meanwhile, speaking of crimes and fraud and so forth, we have what appears to me to be a highly political event.
The Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg for the Trump Organization has been indicted Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg surrendered to authorities today after prosecutors secured grand jury indictments against him in the former president's family company, which declared the move an effort to harm Donald Trump.
This occurred yesterday.
Charges against Weisselberg and the Trump Organization are expected to be unsealed later in the day in the New York State Supreme Court.
They said they were related to allegations of unpaid taxes on benefits for Trump Organization executives.
Very suspicious to me, Danny.
This is the kind of thing that can be very easily fabricated.
Weisselberg is the first individual to be charged in connection with a long-running criminal investigation by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr., a Democrat, of course, who is now collaborating with New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, of course, to investigate Trump's business practices, where Trump is
the Republican candidate of all candidates of recent past history whom they fear beyond words. No
doubt about it. This is, in my judgment, a highly political organization. Trump, in an interview
Wednesday night from Texas, where he appeared at a presidential-style event with Fox host Sean
Hannity, lumped the New York investigation with other past probes that he insists have been
politically motivated.
All nonsense, he said.
New York radical-left prosecutors come after me.
You gotta fight.
Prosecutors declined to comment.
Although the indictments could pose trouble for Trump, exposing his company to potential fines and intensifying pressure on Weisselberg, neither a former president nor anyone else in his firm is expected to face charges this week.
Prosecutors are hoping Weisselberg will offer testimony against Trump in exchange for lessening his own legal risk, but I consider that highly unlikely.
Weisselberg has worked for Trump since the 1980s, considered the most important figure in the Trump Organization apart from family members.
Those who are committed to Trump are highly loyal, and this appears to me a completely fabricated case.
We're going to come back and get your comments, Danny, after the break, which is about to hit us.
And I just add a few more words.
Vance office open.
Here we go.
We'll be right back with Annie Siras after the break.
And, we'll be right back.
Music playing.
FreedomSlips.com will be right back after this message.
I just would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support
that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing
dark world of censorship.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need the support of the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution.
Hey everyone!
It's Barbara Jean Lindsay, The Cosmic Oracle.
If you have questions about your past lives or future plans, need answers from the cosmos about your love life or career, or just want to keep your finger on the pulse of the planet, check out my show, The Cosmic Oracle, here on Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
Was it a conspiracy?
Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill, on bullhorns during the marathon?
That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
But there was no blood.
The blood only showed up later and came out of a tomb.
They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
Don't let yourself be played.
Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's BoomRockBooks.com Oh
Oh Oh
Oh Bye.
Oh Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday 8 p.m.
Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at freedomstech.com,
The People Station.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts,
guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio,
and now we return you to your host.
Now, given the number and importance of the stories Danny and I are discussing, we'll open
the lines to callers after at the bottom of the second hour, not the top, the bottom of the second
hour.
Danny, this appears to me just one more in an endless effort by the Democrats to tarnish the one opponent they fear the most.
What is your take?
You know, sir, I'm going through all the notes of this the best I can, and this just looks like another hit piece, another witch hunt by the Democrats to try and dig up dirt, have something negative in the press to talk about Trump.
I don't think there's anything here whatsoever.
They don't have any hard evidence.
You know, if they did, they would have used it a long time ago.
The whole thing is highly suspicious, sir, and I don't believe any of it.
Again, I believe it's just nothing more Well, here's another case where your legal background makes a difference.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court throws out Bill Cosby conviction, orders him released from prison.
This is causing dismay to a lot of women, but appears to be on impeccable legal grounds.
Cosby, 83, has served more than two of a three to 10 year sentence for his conviction on charges
that he drugged and sexually molested Andrea Constant in 2004.
In fact, there are at least 50 women that he appears to have drugged
and then proceeded to have sex with.
Danny, I mean, I find this bizarre why anyone would want to have sex with a drugged woman.
Surely the whole idea is to engage in mutually consented Sexual activity.
Both of you want to engage in with one another, not to take advantage of a woman who can't even be responsive.
I mean, I find this bizarre in the extreme.
Now, the case began in 2005 after Constand went to then Montgomery County District Attorney Bruce Castor with her allegations.
Castor ultimately declined to file charges against Cosby in the case, but reached an agreement with a comedian not to prosecute if Cosby would set for a deposition in a civil case Constand had filed against him.
Years later, the court said Castor's successors did not feel bound by his decision and decided to prosecute Cosby notwithstanding that prior undertaking.
In other words, He agreed not to charge Cosby in a criminal case.
If in the civil case, he would give a deposition and admit to all of his activities, which Cosby, acting in good faith and, of course, in his own self-interest, proceeded to do.
From the court's decision, we hear, In 2005, Montgomery County District Attorney Bruce Kastor learned that Andrea Constand had reported that William Cosby had sexually assaulted her in 2005 at his Cheltenham residence.
Along with his top deputy prosecutor and experienced detective, Attorney Kastor thoroughly investigated Constand's claim.
In evaluating the likelihood of a successful prosecution of Cosby, the district attorney foresaw difficulties with her credibility as a witness based in part upon her decision not to have filed a complaint promptly.
Castor further determined a prosecution would be frustrated because there was no corroborating forensic evidence.
And because testimony from other potential claimants against Cosby likely was inadmissible under governing laws of evidence.
The collective weight of those considerations led him to conclude that unless Cosby confessed There was insufficient credible and admissible evidence upon which any charge against Mr. Cosby related to the Constant Incident could be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Seeking some measure of justice for Constant, Castor decided the Commonwealth would decline to prosecute for the incident, allowing him to be forced to testify in a subsequent civil action under penalty of perjury without the benefit of his Fifth Amendment privilege.
Unable to invoke any right not to testify in the civil proceedings, he relied upon the district attorney's disinclination and proceeded to provide four sworn depositions.
During them, he made several self-incriminating statements.
His successors, however, did not feel bound by his decision, decided to prosecute him anyway.
The fruit of Cosby's reliance upon Castner's decision, his sworn inculpatory evidence, were then used by Castner's successors against Cosby at Cosby's criminal trial.
We granted allowance of appeal to determine whether D. A. Castor's decision not to prosecute in exchange for his testimony must be enforced against the Commonwealth.
And they concluded that given the agreement that it was improper that he had been charged and tried using evidence he himself had provided under the circumstances assurance that he would not be prosecuted, therefore, And my conclusion, Danny, is that however morally outrageous this may appear, especially to women, but I share that sense of outrage, this was nevertheless a legally impeccable decision.
I cannot see how the court could have ruled otherwise.
Your thoughts?
Well, it sure looks like, by the evidence, sir, that the DA kind of went back on his deal that he had made.
I mean, there's no doubt that Cosby is guilty of doing what he was convicted of doing.
I mean, you know, we all heard some of the testimony and read some of the testimony of all the women that have come forward.
It's really a shame for them, because they were violated, you know, sexually, and they have to live with that for their entire life, and that abuse is very difficult to deal with.
And it's really kind of a shame all the way around, but again, it looks like it does come down to this DA that made a promise not to prosecute, and then used, you know, dug up evidence that, you know, that he shouldn't have, and he went against his prosecutorial promise that he made, and he used that to prosecute.
And if that's true, I would say the court is probably right.
No, Danny, it was his successors.
It was not the same prosecutor.
It was those who subsequently held his position who decided to contradict.
It's like, you know, Barack Obama striking the Iran deal and then Trump coming in and deciding to discount it, which I regard as a huge mistake by Trump.
I don't endorse that whatsoever.
But it was a different prosecutor, Danny.
Meanwhile, the pesky 14th Amendment hinders Biden's plans to give tax dollars to blacks for being black.
There's a very good article about this on the UN's review by Steven Saylor.
No part of President Biden's agenda has been as ambitious as his attempt to place concerns about equity squarely at the center of the federal government's decision-making.
This is pretty bizarre.
Since taking office 157 days ago, President Biden has promised to put racial equity at the center of everything he does.
Pledging in an executive order on day one to take a systemic approach to embedding fairness in decision-making as he drafts legislation, hires staff, proposes spending, and develops regulations.
But his efforts, which could radically realign the distribution of federal money and benefits in favor of people of color and other underserved communities, are running into legal and political obstacles.
I mean, here's one illustration.
In late May, Sylvotta Idari, the owner of Coca-Ve Chocolatier in Madison, Wisconsin, where I reside, was told she'd receive $50,000 from Mr. Biden's government, courtesy of the president's efforts to ensure that pandemic relief aid for struggling restaurants and food businesses would be distributed equitably.
Meaning, blacks first.
But three weeks later, she instead received an email that broke the bad news.
The award had been rescinded thanks to a lawsuit filed on behalf of white restaurant owners that successfully challenged a program's policy of prioritizing applications from women and people of color.
The check she was counting on would not arrive.
I mean, what's stunning here, Danny, is that Biden, who's been around the block,
of course, I believe this is actually simply an actor playing the role, but those who are pulling the strings
know that all the desegregation, anti-discrimination legislation on the books is gonna apply equally
against discrimination against whites as it does to discrimination against blacks.
I mean, the 14th Amendment is talking about the equal protection of the laws applicable to everyone,
but for the Biden administration, it's good for the government to discriminate against whites.
This is really outrageous.
There have been a series of additional decisions reinforcing it.
On Wednesday, for example, a federal judge in Florida echoed a court ruling in Wisconsin by ordering a halt to an Agriculture Department program to forgive the debts of blacks and other minority farmers after years of discrimination.
The judge wrote Congress must heed its obligation to do away with governmentally imposed discrimination based on race.
The small business program that prioritized people like Ms.
Zadari was forced to change its rules last month after challenges by white Americans who say the policy is racist.
And around the country, Republicans are promising to tie the president's equity efforts to a broader culture war during the 2022 midterm election, arguing that Biden is doing the bidding of liberal activists who believe that all white people are racist.
Danny, I think they got a pretty powerful argument there.
your thoughts. Danny.
.
Are you still with me?
Mitchell, did we lose Danny?
It appears he dropped off.
Let me give him a call back.
Please do.
Meanwhile, I'll continue with an additional story here.
Pelosi taps Liz Cheney for January 6th committee despite GOP leader McCarthy's threat, and Cheney accepts.
Now what we got going on here?
Ah, we got Danny back.
Excellent.
Danny, please give me your thoughts about these discrimination against white measures that are being taken by the Biden administration, which run afoul of the 14th Amendment, about the equal application of the laws.
I mean, this is just, in my opinion, totally outrageous.
Your thoughts, Danny.
Well, my sentiments exactly, sir.
I mean, you know, thank goodness it looks like they're not going to get away with this.
To me, this is just another ploy to pay off people to continue to vote Democrat.
The Democrats are looking for ways.
They know they're in extreme trouble once this fraud is exposed and how they stole the election.
You know, in my opinion, sir, they've been stealing these elections in many states, including California, for years.
We saw the fraud.
We saw the fraud of the midterms, especially in California with Newsom, when Cox was way ahead, when Fox had posted that notice that even though Cox was way ahead, they posted that Newsom had won.
And I believe that they used Dominion and other methods to rig the election and have been doing so for a long time.
And this is, again, without the fraud, sir, as the fraud is exposed, I believe, eventually, they're not going to be able to pull off this fraud forever.
They know it.
So in the meantime, they're using all the different avenues they can to drum up Democrat votes, whether it's bring in illegals, have more illegals vote, or by paying off black people using money to bribe them to vote Democrat.
That's my opinion, sir.
Danny, I think you got it exactly right.
It's a massive bribe that they're extending to Don White, trying to make it look as though it's going to pay off for them personally, financially, if they support the Democrats.
I believe this is part and parcel of the effort to deal with the reality the Democrats had to cope with.
When Rasmussen, back in December of 2019, was reporting that 40% of black likely voters intended to vote for Donald Trump because shutting down the border, his economic program, was raising the wages of the lowest earning wage earners at the highest rate.
In other words, it was working.
The Democrats, of course, have reopened the borders.
They've done away with all the good that Trump was doing, and now they're trying to compensate in an artificial way for what Trump was doing in a perfectly appropriate American fashion, making it the case that the employers were of necessity raising their wages as a function of the non-availability of cheaper labor that was pouring across the border.
Meanwhile, they also want to keep the January 6th mythology alive, where even the FBI—even Tucker Carlson has exposed that the FBI was deeply involved in the events of 9-11—I mean, in the events of January 6th, that they were planned in advance.
Where James, the brother of John Sullivan, has reported that his brother led 226 Antifa members dressed as Trump supporters into the Capitol.
Where Nancy Pelosi, as Speaker of the House, had control of the Capitol Police.
And where this was timed and orchestrated to disrupt the discussion of evidence of theft of the election, which Pelosi wanted to happen.
Well, Trump, more than anything, wanted to go forward.
So it's very clear when you look at the motivation.
Now, because the Senate refused to support a bipartisan committee, Pelosi is moving forward with a House committee And it's now appointed Liz Cheney, who is just, in my opinion, a disgusting figure.
Her father, Dick, by the way, appears to have been the executive director of 9-11 from an underground bunker beneath the White House.
There's much to this story I've explained in other places.
So, including, by the way, oddly enough, on Hannity and Combs, when they interviewed me back in June of 2006, about 9-11, in Oly North, who was standing in
for Hannity.
Well, actually, it was Combs.
Alan Combs asked me right off the bat whether I had any evidence that anyone...
No, it was Oly.
You know...
Holmes was mistaken, thinking I taught a course on 9-11, which I did not.
I was doing critical thinking courses where I'd bring up examples like the Kennedy assassination, 9-11, the war in Iraq, and all that.
But it was Ollie.
Ollie North sitting in for Sean Hannity, who asked me if I had any evidence that anyone in the Bush administration, such as Dick Cheney, had been involved.
And I said, you know, I said, I'm glad you asked that question, and proceeded to lay out the story of Norman Mineta, how an aide to Cheney came up and said, sir, it's 30 miles out, sir, it's 20 miles out, do the orders still stand?
And Cheney whipped around and said, Have you heard anything to the contrary?
Where a plane was flying toward the Pentagon and the order was not to shoot it down, which would have been the obvious thing to do since planes were being used as weapons shooting it down.
You lose the passengers in a plane, but not the personnel and property at the target.
It headed toward the Pentagon and then swerved over it.
This was a very clever technique to create the visual impression that a plane had actually hit the Pentagon when no plane had done so, as I have explained on my America Media Periscope presentations and elsewhere.
So they got Liz Cheney, who has proven to be a very zealous anti-Trumper, in an effort to try to make it look as though this is somehow a bipartisan committee, when it's again another effort to trash Trump.
I mean, look, he cleaned their clock in 2016, even though the election was rigged for Hillary, and then he was doing it again in 2020.
Where Sidney Powell released an electoral map before all the numbers were switched, showing that Trump actually had won coast-to-coast, including California and Minnesota, 410 electoral votes.
The Democrats are still petrified.
They're scared.
They are crapping in their pants because Donald Trump is such a threat to their political future.
Danny, your thoughts?
Well, I agree with what you said, Dr. Fetz, and I think this is just another hoax.
I mean, you know, we all saw the video, the censored video.
I'm not sure what the title of the video is, but it shows all the shenanigans that took place inside of the Capitol on the 6th.
And we can see all the crisis actors in there playing their different roles.
We can see the fake policemen, you know, with their weapons, pointing them all over the place.
We can see the The girl pretending to be shot in the window.
She climbed through the door where the gun wasn't even pointed at her.
We can see her fall back on a pillow.
We can see her apply blood.
You know, that whole thing was fake.
It was done with crisis actors.
Again, I would refer anybody to this video.
I think you at one time had posted the video.
It's highly censored.
We probably should, at some point, give it a title.
And get it posted somewhere where people can see it.
It's on my BitChute channel.
BitChute channel.
Jim Fetzer.
Just scroll down to what really happened at the Capitol.
21 minutes goes for the whole event.
By the way, since we're coming up to the break, I want to squeeze this in before.
We have a video clip I hope you'll be able to hear about a motorcyclist who identifies as a bicyclist.
Get this!
begins with a quote from Babe Ruth, you just can't beat the person who never gives up.
My motorcycle is a bicycle.
So I just talk to this thing and it records my voice.
Yeah, it's a microphone.
Okay.
Hello, my name is Norm Hiccup, I am a bicyclist, and this is my story.
Switching gears, the Norm Hiccup story.
Everyone knew the name Norm Hiccup in the motorcycle world.
Back then when you thought about motorcycles you'd think Harley Davidson, you'd think Two wheels?
And you'd think Norm Hiccup.
Oh yeah, of course I knew Norm.
You know, if there was a race, Norm was there racing.
Racing and racing and racing.
And losing.
That guy lost a lot.
Hey, guys!
It's not a race!
Slow down!
It was a race.
And he knew that.
Great race, guys.
But you shouldn't go that fast!
You need to slow down!
Why are you like huffing and puffing, bro?
I don't know!
I honestly don't even know why he competed.
I think he just owned a motorcycle.
He was the Michael Jordan of losing.
And then, the craziest thing happened.
So, it was shortly after losing your 65th motorcycle race that it happened?
Well, it's completely unrelated to losing my 65th motorcycle race.
But it happened directly after a loss, right?
Unrelated things happen after other unrelated things all the time.
That's a common expression.
Why don't you just tell us what happened?
I'd always known that something about me was different.
There was something wrong.
It was as if I had something inside of me as a motorcyclist that I needed to let out.
After a lot of thought and reflection, and in no way related to the number of motorcycle races I lost, I finally realized that my life as a motorcyclist was a lie.
I was a bicyclist.
A man by the name of Norm Hiccup has made history today.
Hey, this is the Handlebar Podcast, and today we're talking about Norm Hiccup.
As a tractor driving dentist, I feel Norm really represents the trans vehicle.
I love Norm!
Joining the race is Norm Hiccup!
Wait, I thought he raced motorcycles.
I never felt better.
Free to be my true self.
Live my truth.
Just be me.
And win races.
Completely unrelated.
But now that you mention it, the craziest thing happened.
I started winning races.
Can you believe it?
Things were looking up.
I was finally me, the real me.
And separately, coincidentally, happening at the exact same time, I'm a gold medal athlete.
I'd never seen a bicyclist like Norm.
Tremendous focus, deeply motivated, and his bike had a 200 horsepower engine that could go from 0 to 60 in 3 seconds.
I remember I interviewed Norm around this time.
He's a mega star, not only winning trophies left and right, but also a huge inspiration to the trans vehicle community.
And I said, Norm, when did you know you were actually a bicyclist?
And you know what he said?
He said, I was looking at a bicycle.
And I thought, my motorcycle's faster than that.
That's when I knew who I was.
But the thought and the realization just happened to be, at the same time, a total coincidence.
Did any of the bicyclists oppose Norm's decision?
Was anyone not happy about it?
Not if they wanted to keep their livelihood or reputation.
Not after Sam.
I'm Sam.
I was the greatest bicyclist in the world.
No one faster than me.
Until Norm.
And then all I said was, hey, this guy's a motorcycle.
And the next thing I know, Teen Vogue magazine runs over my racing bike with a steamroller and kidnaps my children.
Yeah, are you not hearing it?
Are you not hearing it again?
Oh God, I'm so sorry.
Just know this is a motorcyclist who identified as a bicyclist and began after 65 losses, he began winning races with his motorcycle and just became a hero.
He was recommended and featured on all the magazines.
It's just like all the men who are identifying as women now.
And who are winning all the races against the women and the girls.
What we need clearly is a category, a third category of sports.
We gotta have men in sports versus women, girls versus boys, and then transgenders competing against themselves.
This is an absurd situation.
We'll be right back.
Was it a conspiracy?
Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill, on bullhorns during the marathon?
That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration pond would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bombswap activities.
And that one would be set off in one minute in front of a library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
But there was no blood.
The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
Don't let yourself be played.
Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourselves.
It gets worse.
Because we know who they are, and what they do.
is what they do, and we must fight back!
You can torture us, and bomb us!
Fire is catching.
And if we burn, you burn with us!
Please...
Are you awake yet?
I hope.
We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
The time is over.
Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers
and the elites.
.
The war is coming, and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
Denial is not a choice anymore.
Revolution Radio.
FreedomSubs.com.
The number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Not giving up.
revolution radio even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
But did you know that it was an inside job?
That Osama had nothing to do with it?
That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building.
Barry Jennings was there.
He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
The U.S.
Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons, and the Department of Defense and the Mossad.
Don't let yourself be played.
Read American Nuke on 9-11.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener supported radio.
And now we return you to your host.
And now we return you to your host.
Danny, I want to begin with your take on this fellow Hiccup who realized that he was a bicyclist,
you know, when he lost six, after losing 65 motorcycle races.
And once he realized his true identity began winning races, as I've already mentioned, we're going to take calls after, you know, at the bottom of the second hour with so many stories to cover Danny, your thoughts.
Well, you know, I saw that report, Dr. Fetzer.
You know, what a farce.
I thought it was a joke at first.
I mean, you know, the world really is going lunacy.
I just don't understand, you know, how they could even conceive this story in the first place.
I mean, you know, a 200 horsepower motorized vehicle does not belong in a race that is Well, Danny, it is, of course, a joke.
It is satire.
But the fact is that it just nails the absurdity of this transgender movement of allowing men to compete in women's competitions when the physiological differences are enormous, the greater body mass, the greater capacity to discharge energy over a shorter period of time.
We've got one situation.
It may or may not be true.
This huge guy is winning the women's weightlifting contest because, you know, he can lift hundreds of pounds more than any woman.
I mean, it's just insulting beyond belief.
So you are right in the beginning to think it was a joke.
It is a joke, but that's what the Democrats—they are reducing us to accept absurdities, and if they can do that, it's been well observed, then they can induce us to commit atrocities.
So You know, these intellectual shortcomings, where we even have now some states or jurisdictions where they're allowing no sex to be put on the birth certificate, so it's not going to be born a boy or a girl, but, say, to be determined later.
I mean, how absurd is that?
And where it's a same-sex couple, they're not requiring the biological parents to be identified.
How bad is that?
Think of the chaos that's gonna generate for law enforcement, Danny, which you know so well.
Well, they're just trying to create chaos.
I mean, I'm not sure what their end goal is, totally, with all this confusion.
You know, somehow, somewhat, I believe that it's a population movement.
You know, it does remind me of Lance Armstrong.
If you remember all the controversy he had with the supposed steroids, the whatever, losing its medals
you know it's it's just one thing after another you know this whole thing of having uh... men compete in
women's sports because they put on a way to go or whatever
you know can you imagine back in the day it bruce jenner
you know who won the olympics can you imagine back in the day if he would have
put on a wig and walked over to the women's side
and started competing in all the other things and said hey i know even though i won the men's competition i now
identify as a woman for the rest
and i i i'm gonna go ahead and compete in all these events and then he dominates
and wins uh... you know all the gold medals on the women's side
you know or what if what if one of the fastest runners in the world right now
hussein bolt you know that we all saw in the olympics put on a wig
and went over to the women's side and just dominated all the races
I mean, they're just destroying sports as we know it.
I don't know what's next.
So it's totally absurd.
And I just try to tune it out for the most part.
Danny, I remember the sense of elation I and most of the country experienced when the Congress passed legislation that created women's sports as separate and equal to men.
And, you know, it's just outrageous what the Democrats are doing.
I mean, they're stealing elections, they're flooding the nation from our borders, they're promoting this transgenderism.
They're allowing the homeless to accumulate on the streets.
And Danny, Danny, every one of these moves is deliberate.
And I think you're 100% correct.
They're trying to foment chaos to turn the U.S.
into a lawless nation.
So, It may be.
They can summon the United Nations in to restore law and order.
It's something like that, I guarantee you.
It is to promote the globalist agenda, just as is the case with a pandemic, where Bobby Kennedy Jr.
warns, don't take a COVID-19 vaccine under any circumstances.
The nephew of former President JFK recently issued a public statement urging people everywhere to avoid the COVID-19 jab at all costs because it contains an untested new technology known as mRNA, the long-term side effects of which are completely unknown.
But as to, you know, what are known, it's all very, very bad.
MRNA directly alters the genetic material of those who receive it, much like what happens when scientists genetically engineer GMO food crops like soybeans or corn to make them resistant to bugs or drought.
This intervention can be compared to genetically modified foods, which are also very controversial.
But to the best of my knowledge, those GMO foods won't kill you, whereas Sherry Tenpenny, among others, has described the mRNA vaccines as perfectly designed killing machines.
Even though the media and politicians are currently trivializing the problem, even foolishly calling for a new type of vaccine to return to normality.
This vaccination is problematic in terms of health, morality, and ethics, but also in terms of genetic damage.
As opposed to older vaccines, many of which can be detoxified following injection.
mRNA COVID vaccines live on in perpetuity inside the body.
The damage they cause, in other words, is forever.
You will have to live with the consequences because you will no longer be able to be cured simply by removing toxins from the human body, he explains, comparing the genetic damage to the type that causes Down syndrome or cystic fibrosis.
mRNA is almost like a continuous vaccine engine that repeatedly vaccinates a person for the rest of his or her life.
Because of this, there is no way to fix or cure any problems that arise.
This clearly means if a vaccination symptom develops after an mRNA vaccination, neither I nor any other therapist will be able to help you.
As a damage caused by this vaccination will be genetically irreversible.
It's actually absolutely stunning what's going on here.
And I want to add, we also have multiple indications that those who are vaccinated are shedding, meaning they can affect those who are unvaccinated, of which I appear to be a beneficiary because Contrary to all my entreatments, my wife and other members of the family have gone ahead and been vaccinated.
We just had a visit from my favorite niece and nephew.
They too were vaccinated.
So now, since some are with Moderna, others are with Pfizer, I'm now in the position of being exposed on all sides, and no doubt will endure such consequences as gonna follow therefrom.
Danny, your thoughts?
I think Bobby Jr.
has done a great service here by warning the country to avoid the jab at all costs.
your thoughts.
Mitchell, did we lose Danny again?
I'm I'm so sorry.
Can we get him back?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I mean, listen, the masks are also, of course, extremely dangerous.
I just went to my own clinic.
It's only a mile away from home, but I had to put on a mask.
But I had to put on a mask, and I told the aide who was there screening those who were entering that these masks are bad for us.
Tucker just did an exposé about how the OSHA standard for CO2 in your bloodstream for a month, I think, was 10,000 per million parts.
And that a child tested after only wearing a mask for maybe, you know, a few minutes or an hour had 25,000 parts per million in their stream already, and that was just for a short-term exposure.
I'm very sorry that we've lost Danny, and I'm going to be as non-conspiratorial about it as I can, but I was most certainly glad to have him here.
I'm going to pick it up then, and we'll take callers at the bottom of the hour with further stories we have.
And hopefully if Danny rejoins us, he can add his comments and consideration.
Here's one.
The mortality rate from the Delta variant is about eight times higher in people who have been fully vaccinated.
Get this.
According to the latest statistics, people who got COVID-19 or CCP virus vaccine or two are up to eight times more likely to test positive or have to be hospitalized.
Hospitalization rates and absolute mortality related to the Delta variant are significantly higher among the vaccinated than among the unvaccinated, according to a preliminary statistical analysis.
The data shows people who are fully vaccinated, meaning they received both doses of an mRNA injection, had a nearly eight times higher mortality rate among those who tested positive for the Delta variant.
The evidence in England now clearly shows people who have been injected are to blame for the spread of Delta, and the more people who receive the vaccine, the more Delta spreads.
The Delta variant infection rate of people who received at least one dose of vaccine Is lower than that of fully vaccinated people, while higher than that of unvaccinated.
This is in line with recent data from Public Health England, which found those who have been vaccinated are 600% more likely to die from Delta than those who have not been vaccinated.
This is reminiscent of the antibody-dependent enhancement phenomenon that's been seen for other vaccine that's been expressed as a point of concern among many scientists for the COVID vaccine.
Vaccines experience researcher Stephanie Seneff at MIT's Computer Science and AI Lab told LiveSite News.
This is very, very troubling, and you add it to the reasons why you ought to be concerned.
Meanwhile, a sinister agenda behind California's wider water crisis, looming food supply catastrophe, Let me tell you why this is so terribly important.
We know that Deagle has projected that the U.S.
population is going to drop precipitously from 330 million in 2022.
million in 2022, it now projects 65 million in 2025.
So in five years, we're going to lose around 200 million.
Over 200 million Americans are going to die.
Now, I believe it's a three-pronged strategy that the first is the masks, which are killing us slowly.
The second is the injections, which are killing us more rapidly.
But the third is starvation.
And if you have any doubts about it, listen to this story.
It will curl your hair.
The ingredients are many, but central is a severe drought in key growing states of the Dakotas and Southwest, including agriculture-intensive California.
So far, Washington has done disturbingly little to address the crisis, and California Water Board officials have been making the crisis far worse by draining the state water reservoirs into the ocean.
This is as irresponsible as any action one could imagine.
So far, the worst-hit farm state is North Dakota, which grows most of the nation's red spring wheat.
In the Upper Midwest, the Northern Plain States and the Prairie Provinces of Canada winter brought far too little snow following a 2020 exceedingly dry summer.
The result is drought from Manitoba to the Northern Plain States.
This hit farmers in the region just four years after a flash drought in 2017 arrived without early warning and devastated the U.S.
northern Great Plains region comprising Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and the adjacent Canadian prairies.
As of May 27, Adam Icke, state climatologist, 93% of the North Dakota state is in at least a severe drought category, 77% in an extreme drought category.
Farm organizations predict unless the rainfall changes dramatically in the coming weeks, the harvest of wheat, widely used for pasta and flour, will be a disaster.
Let me mention, by the way, we know how to control the weather.
We could cure this problem if those in control of the weather modification apparatus were so disposed.
This doesn't have to happen as is taking place now.
The extreme dry conditions extend north of the Dakota border into Manitoba, another major grain and farming region, especially for wheat and corn.
There, the lack of rainfall and warmer than normal temperatures threaten harvest, so it's still early for those crops.
While not as severe, farm states Iowa and Illinois are suffering abnormally dry conditions.
In 64% for Iowa, 27% for Illinois, about 55% of Minnesota is abnormally dry as of the end of May.
Drought is measured on a scale from D1, abnormally dry, to D3, severe drought, to D4, exceptional drought.
The severe dry conditions are not limited, unfortunately, to North Dakota or other Midwest farm states.
A second region of very severe drought extends from western Texas across New Mexico, Colorado, Arizona, Nevada, and deep into California.
In Texas, 20% of the state is in severe drought and 12% extreme.
Nearly 6% exceptional drought, the worst.
New Mexico is undergoing 96% severe drought and of that 47% exceptional.
The situation in California is by far the most serious in its potential impact on the supply of agricultural products to the nation.
There, irrigation and a sophisticated water shortage system provide water for irrigation and urban use to the state for their periodic dry seasons.
Here, a far larger catastrophe is in the making.
A cyclical drought season is combining with literally criminal state environmental politics to devastate agriculture and the nation's most important farm-producing state.
It is part of a radical green agenda being advocated by Governor Gavin Newsom and fellow Democrats to dismantle traditional agriculture, as insane as that may sound.
Few outside California realize that the state most known for its Silicon Valley and beautiful beaches is such a vital source of agricultural production.
California's agricultural sector is the most important in the United States.
Leading the nation's production in over 77 different products, including dairy and a number of fruit and vegetable specialty crops.
The state is the only producer of crops such as almonds, artichokes, persimmons, raisins, and walnuts.
California grows a third of the country's vegetables, two-thirds of the country's fruit and nuts.
It leads all other states in farm income with 77,500 farms and ranches.
It's also second in production of livestock behind Texas.
And its dairy industry is California's leading commodity in cash receipts.
In total, 43 million acres of the state's 100 are devoted to agriculture.
In short, what happens here is vital to the nation's food supply.
The California crisis has been man-made.
Listen to this.
The water crisis in California is by far the most serious in terms of consequences for the food supply in a period when the U.S.
faces major supply chain disruptions owing to the absurd corona lockdowns combined with highly suspicious hacks of key infrastructure.
On May 31st, the infrastructure of the world's largest meat processor, JBSSA, was hacked, forcing the shutdown of all its U.S.
beef plants that supply almost a quarter of American beef.
The Green Lobby is asserting, while presenting no factual evidence, that global warming, increased CO2 man-made emission is causing the drought.
There's no evidence to support that claim, but the media repeats the narrative to advance a Green Deal agenda with frightening statements such as claiming the drought is comparable to the worst mega droughts since 800 CE.
After 2011, California underwent a severe seven-year drought.
It ended in 2019 as major rains filled the California reservoir system to capacity.
According to state water experts, the reservoirs held enough water to easily endure at least a five-year drought.
Yet, two years later, the administration of Governor Newsom is declaring a new drought and threatening emergency measures.
What his administration is not saying is that the State Water Board and relevant state water authorities have been deliberately letting water flow into the Pacific Ocean.
Why?
They say to save two endangered fish species that are all but extinct, one a rare type of salmon, the second a delta smelt, a tiny minnow-sized fish of some two-inch size that's all but disappeared.
In June of 2019, Shasta Dam, holding the state's largest reservoir as a keystone of the huge Central Valley Project, was full to 98% of capacity.
Just two years later, in May 2021, Shasta Lake Reservoir held a mere 42% of capacity.
Almost 60% down.
Similarly, in June of 2019, Oroville Dam Reservoir, the second largest, held water at 98% capacity, yet by May 2021 was down to just 37%.
Other smaller reservoirs saw similar drops.
Where has all the water gone?
Allegedly, to save these fish and varieties, during just 14 days in May, according to Christy Denier, a California water expert and farmer, 90% of Bay Area Delta inflow went to sea.
It's equal to a year's supply of water for a million people.
Denier has been warning repeatedly in recent years that water is unnecessarily being let out to sea as the sea faces a normal dry year.
She asked, should we be having water shortages at the start of our second dry year?
No!
Our reservoirs were designed to provide a steady five-year supply for all users and were filled to the top in June of 2019.
In 2008, at the demand of environmental groups, a California judge ordered that the Central Valley Water Project send 50% of water reservoirs to the Pacific to save an endangered salmon variety, even though the G&E admitted that no more than a thousand salmon would likely be saved by the extreme measure.
In the years 1998 to 2005, an estimated average of 49% of California managed water supply went to what is termed the environment, including feeding into streams and rivers to feed estuaries in the Bay Area Delta.
Only 28% went to maintain agriculture water supplies.
Get this.
The past January, Felicia Marcus, chair of the California State Water Resources Control Board, who oversaw the controversial water policy since 2018, left at the end of her term to become an attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, one of the most powerful green NGOs, with a reported $400 million in resources to wage legal battles to defend endangered species.
Appointed by Green Governor Jerry Brown as Chair of the State Water Board in 2018, Marcus is directly responsible for the draining of the reservoirs into the ocean after they filled in 2019, using the claim of protecting endangered species.
In March 2021, with Marcus as attorney, the NRDC requested the State Water Resource Control Board, Marcus headed until recently, take immediate action to address perceived threats to listed salmon in the Sacramento River watershed from the Central Valley Project.
This, as the state is facing a new drought emergency.
In 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom, a protégé of Jerry Brown, signed Senate Bill 1, the California Environmental Public Health and Workers' Defense Act, which would send billions of gallons of water out into the Pacific Ocean, ostensibly to save more fish.
It was a cover.
It was a cover.
Don't be like that.
Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com We'll be right back after this message.
Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made
Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing
dark world of censorship.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need the support of the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution Radio, Radio, Radio, Radio.
The sound of the Korean National Anthem.
The Korean National Anthem.
Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday 8pm Eastern.
Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at freedomsuch.com, the people's station.
Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
But did you know that it was an inside job?
That Osama had nothing to do with it?
That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
Barry Jennings was there.
He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
The U.S.
Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
Don't let yourself be played.
Read American Nuke on 9-11.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your
host.
Okay, I'm opening the caller lines for anyone who'd like to call in the number 540-352-4452.
540-352-4452.
Happily, we have Danny back.
I want to read just a bit more of this report because it's so devastating and revealing as to how the Democrats have gone stark raving mad.
I mean that literally.
You don't have to be a psychiatrist to see it.
Get this.
In 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom, a protege of Jerry Brown, signed Senate Bill 1, the California Environmental, Public Health, and Workers' Defense Act, which would send billions of gallons of water out to the Pacific Ocean, ostensibly to save more fish.
It was a cover for manufacturing the present water crisis, and specifically attacking farming, as incredible as it may seem.
The true agenda of the Newsom and previous Brown administrations is to radically undermine the highly productive California agriculture sector.
Governor Newsom has now introduced an impressive-sounding $5.1 billion drought relief bill.
Despite its title, nothing will go to improve the state reservoir water availability for cities and farms.
Of the total, 500 million will be spent on incentives for farmers to repurpose their land, that is, to stop farming.
Suggestions include wildlife habitat, recreation, or solar panels.
Another $230 million will be used for wildlife corridors and fish passage projects to improve the ability of wildlife to migrate safely.
Fish passage projects is a clever phase for dam removal, destroying the nation's most effective network of reservoirs.
They are doing this deliberately!
They are doing this deliberately!
You've heard the phrase, the lunatics are running the asylum.
That is literally true in California.
Danny, your thoughts?
Sir, can you hear me?
Yes.
Sir, can you hear me?
Yes, Danny, go ahead.
Yes, sorry, we're having difficulties here.
You know, it is absolutely atrocious what they're doing in California.
To me, what it looks like, this is a man-made crisis.
They're creating a water crisis.
They're trying to force people out of California.
They're trying to stifle crop grow.
I think their next move is to create a food shortage in the United States.
And they're doing everything they can to disrupt the food.
I think this is another depopulation move.
Somehow it might be tied to the election fraud.
Uh, you know, with what's going on behind the scenes with the audits, you know, there's no way to really get into that and know, but you know what?
It makes no sense with all the smart people that we have running and engineers running the dams and running our food supply in California.
Why would they make these decisions to purposely destroy the crops and destroy our water and create a drought?
It's obvious what they're doing.
The only thing is, they're not going to come out and tell us exactly why they're doing it.
Danny, the consequences and ramifications for the nation are simply devastating!
Devastating!
This alone is going to contribute to a massive food shortage, which appears to be, therefore, the cleanup act of how they want to take out most of the hundreds of millions of Americans who are projected to die between 2020 and 2025.
It is appalling.
And the Democrats are doing this deliberately.
Remember, so much of this is based on the absurd contention that CO2 is bad for the climate
when trees and bushes process CO2 into oxygen.
We know how bad it is because CO2, as Tucker was reminding us,
is recirculated through the bodies of everyone who wears a mask,
where the OSHA standard had a maximum exposure to CO2 to not harm
was on the order of 10,000 particles per million for a 40 hour week.
But Tucker reported that for children put in masks, they were up to 25,000 parts per million
in a matter of minutes.
I mean, this is utter insanity.
The Democrats are promoting projects that are gonna kill our children
because they're seriously gonna damage adults and they're gonna lead to mass starvation
throughout the United States.
The Democratic Party is responsible.
Gavin Newsom, Jerry Brown are exemplars.
You're from California.
I was born in California.
This is a travesty beyond imagination.
Danny.
You know, sir, this reminds me of another subject.
Danny, are you there?
I I think it's clear that there's interference taking place, so Danny's voice cannot be heard.
Let me see if I can find another way to get him back.
My gosh. What is it with Danny's connection? I think it's got to be sabotage.
I mean, there's no other reasonable explanation.
So let me see.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Here's a further thought here by this brilliant article by...
I've sent him a link to get him back on Zoom, and that way he may be able to contribute.
This brilliant article by William Engdahl continues after the fact.
I'm going to stop sharing my screen.
Actually, here's the concluding paragraph.
The systematic dismantling of one of the world's most productive agricultural regions using the seductive mantra of environmental protection fits into the larger agenda of the Davos Great Reset and its plans to radically transform world agriculture into what the UN Agenda 2030 calls sustainable agriculture, no more meat protein.
The green argument is that cows are a major source of methane gas emission via burps and farts.
I mean, this is just absurd!
How that affects global climate, no one has seriously proven.
Instead, we should eat laboratory-made fake meat, like the genetically manipulated impossible burger of Bill Gates and Google, or even worms.
Yes, in January, the EU-European Food Safety Agency approved mealworms, or larvae, of the darkling beetle as the first novel food cleared for sale across the European Union.
I mean, Mitchell!
Mitchell!
This is insanity!
Complete insanity!
Meanwhile, while we await Danny, and I'm hoping he will rejoin us, and we have no callers on the line, Donald Rumsfeld, the controversial architect of the Iraq War, has died at 88 years of age.
Now, let me remind everyone that Donald Rumsfeld was Secretary of Defense on 9-11, the day before, on 9-10.
Secretary Rumsfeld admitted That the Pentagon was missing $2.3 trillion from its budget that it could not account for.
This is something that an experienced Washington hand like Donald Rumsfeld would not do had he not known something was going to intervene in the meanwhile to obliterate that report from consciousness of Americans so he could waltz into the halls of Congress and ask for hundreds of billions more in defense spending, which is exactly what he proceeded to do.
The controller, the chief financial officer of the Pentagon at the time, Dov Zockheim, was not only a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen and a rabbi, but had a company for manufacturing remote control devices for aircraft, which I believe was the original plan in New York City.
Until they discovered that no physical airplane could actually make an entry into the buildings because of their robust design, that they would have crumpled external to the building and fallen bodies, seats, luggage, wings, tail to the ground, where we have photographs beneath the facades of both the North and the South Tower, and there's nothing there.
No aircraft debris.
Rumsfeld, therefore, was profoundly involved and given That no plane actually hit the Pentagon.
You can see, given that was our nation's command and control center, they had to fake a Pentagon hit in order to justify this as an act of war rather than merely an act of terrorism, even though, as I have most recently reiterated and reaffirmed, All four of the 9-11 crash sites were fabricated or fake.
You can find now my most recent presentation.
With Scott Bennett on American Media Periscope for last Friday and now this Wednesday, and where I reiterate this evening, Joe Olson is not only qualified as a structural and civic, but also a mechanical and electrical engineer.
In other words, Joe covers all the bases.
We'll be discussing tonight the similarities between the destruction of the condo in Florida and Building 7 in New York and the differences of those two collapses with a demolition, not collapse, of the Twin Towers.
Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Ehud Umer and Bibi Netanyahu appear to be the principal perpetrators of the events of 9-11, which were brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense, and the most sought.
I have a whole book about it you can find at moonrockbooks.com.
This is one of those cases where every American needs to be informed of what actually happened here.
Just to mention, by the way, I founded Scholars for 9-11 Truth in December of 2005, shortly before my retirement after 35 years in higher education.
In June of 2006!
The organization took off like a rocket.
By the end of 2006, we had on the order of 800 members in four different categories.
Alex Jones organized an American Scholars Conference in Los Angeles that June and invited me to be the keynote speaker.
And then on Sunday, C-SPAN did a panel discussion Where each of the members of the panel, Steve Jones, a physicist from BYU who might appointed my co-chair when I found his scholars, Bob Bauman, a Korean War ace who'd shot down 101 MiGs in the Korean War, but also had been the scientific advisor by virtue of having a PhD in nuclear engineering.
To Presidents Reagan and Ford.
Webster Tarpley had published a brilliant book, 9-11, Synthetic Terror Made in the USA, and me as the founder of Scholars, where I gave a top 10 list of how we know that the 19 Islamic terrorists were fraudulent and fake, where, by the way, a half a dozen of these guys turned up alive and well the following day and made contact with the British media.
Mitchell's informed me that we have Danny back at last.
Danny, please comment on any or all of the above.
Yes, yes, go ahead, go ahead.
Danny, we got it.
Go ahead.
Okay, what I was going to say, sir, when I was cut off, we were talking about the water supply situation and what they're doing to destroy the city and the food supply.
You know, it's obvious they're trying to manufacture a food crisis throughout the United States.
That's going to be their next act on top of all the other crises.
But what it reminds me of, sir, is the construction crisis.
A lot of people are following this closely, but they created and manufactured a construction crisis through the COVID.
And what I mean by it is the Democrats have control of five different Uh, a lumber manufacturing plant.
There's five main ones that caused the bottleneck, and they were, uh, purposely raising the prices on materials, uh, and bottlenecking the construction.
And what I mean by that is the main, the main components would be 2x4s and 2x6s, and then also the sheathing that goes on the outside of the house.
It caused the prices of construction materials to go up, 8 and 10-fold.
An example would be normally a 2x4 costs around $2 a piece for an 8-footer to build a standard stud wall.
And the piece of 4x8 sheathing OSB chipboard that they use for sheathing homes on the outside, putting the outside skin on, runs anywhere between $9 and $10 a sheet, historically.
Well, recently the cost of a 2x4 has gone up as much as $8 to $10.
And a piece of sheathing I've seen the other day for almost $90.
Now at those prices, sir, nobody can afford to build.
It is absolutely stifled construction.
And to put that into better perspective, the cost of a building just a standard 3-bedroom, 2-bedroom, 2-bath home went up by $50,000 to $75,000 per home just for the high cost of product.
So they've manufactured this construction Uh, this lumber crisis to stop or halt all construction.
Prices are starting to fall this month, but again, it seems to me, sir, overall, that the Democrats are manufacturing crises in every industry they can in order to create chaos in the United States in any way they can.
And this new water, letting the water out of the reservoirs, nobody can understand why they're letting the water out.
Well, we know why.
Because they're trying to create a farming crisis that will lead to a food shortage in the same way we're coming out of the lumber shortage and the lumber crisis that stifled construction, sir.
That's my opinion.
Well, it looks like they want to transform America by means of a Green New Deal, even if the public doesn't want it, even if science doesn't support it.
They're going to do it by manufacturing these crises that are going to leave us in a desperate plight.
I mean, when they encourage farmers to stop farming, And to go back, allow it to return to a wilderness habitat and put out solar panels, there's something loopy going on.
It's not just that the Democrats are ignorant of science, which does not support any of this, it's that they have been obsessed with an ideological conviction that overrides logic and evidence.
They're doing things that are harmful to human beings that are going to be destructive of the United States.
And frankly, This is part and parcel why they had to get Donald Trump out of the way, why he was an obstacle to going forward with a destruction of America and its conversion to a Green New Deal, which is a lunatic's fantasy.
And Danny, I can't begin to tell you, I voted Democrat most of my life.
I voted for Bill Clinton twice.
I voted for Barack Obama twice.
But when it came to Donald Trump versus Hillary, it wasn't even close.
Hillary's a monster.
She's one of the most malignant influences in American politics in our history.
She's a completely despicable person in every possible way.
And Donald Trump came in as a breath of fresh air.
The American people responded to him.
He wasn't a professional politician.
He was an entrepreneur.
He was a successful builder.
He had great relations with members of every race.
You cannot succeed in that profession.
If you were even remotely racist, you would be smoked out immediately.
He also was the first prominent figure to declare something was wrong on 9-11.
He gave an interview that very day with a local New York television network and explained that those who had constructed the Twin Towers, the World Trade Center, were working for him now, and that there was no way that planes hitting the building could possibly have caused them to have collapsed.
And that something else must have been involved.
He even used the word bombs, meaning powerful source of explosive, about which he was 100% correct.
We have been joined by Scaredy Cat.
Scaredy, go ahead.
Take the floor.
Yours.
Hi, Jim and Danny.
So I have a question about Danny's such a good investigator.
How can he get himself involved?
Danny, you're talking like an outsider, like you're looking, standing outdoors, looking through a glass of what the other investigators are doing to count Um, or to trace the evidence of, um, election fraud.
How can you or yourself get involved?
I mean, do you have to have a job with the FBI?
Um, and also the second question is paper ballots.
Do you know of even one precinct, um, voting precinct in America which has definitely, uh, put into law that we are going to have Everything by hand, paper ballots, no machines at all, and everybody just eyeball after the polls close at 8 o'clock that we're just going to... I think Jim called it hand counting.
Go ahead.
You want me to take that now, Professor?
Yes, Danny, please.
Okay, well, to answer the first part of her question, you know, There's no way that I can be involved with that other than, you know, working through Dr. Fetzer to analyze the evidence that comes out.
I think what you're saying is how are the investigators involved with this behind the scenes?
They're being appointed by different agencies that are involved in the investigation, whether it's local FBI, state officials, state police.
It's hard to say at this point because there's so much confusion on who's actually running the investigation.
There's no way to really know.
They're not even really letting the details out to the public.
But like I said earlier, you know, any competent investigator on any level would be able to get in there and break this thing apart and show the election fraud.
You know, when you start interrogating suspects and you're an appointed investigator, in other words, you have peace officer power, you're sworn, and you're doing your job, you have the ability to prosecute, arrest, Excuse me, at least arrest and put people in jail.
You know, these people that break these crimes, they will break down under interrogation immediately.
They will give up their sources, they will give up who's paying them to do this, you know, and it leaves you on a trail breaking this thing open.
For all I know, that could be going on behind the scenes in Arizona and some of these other states, and they're just not leaking out the details.
But, you know, I know how these things can go, and we'll just have to wait and see.
Uh, because they're being kind of tight-lipped on all the investigative details for sure.
Uh, that's pretty much how that works.
Hopefully that answers your question.
Scaredy!
Uh, thanks Danny.
So, again, um, how would somebody, uh, support you?
In other words, like you personally, do people hire you as a private investigator so that you can make some income?
Yes, yes, yes, yes.
Yes, Gary, I think you're on the right track there.
You're on the right track there.
the local election officer. Yes, yes, yes, yes. Yes, Gary, I think you're on the right track
there. You're on the right track there. The states conduct the election.
Do you know of even one precinct that exactly does it how the good guys like Jim wanted hand
counting in paper?
Is it actually existing somewhere in America?
Personally, I don't know.
There's been a lot of talk about it.
Ever since the election, machines have come into play.
We know that we've had fraud.
In California, it's very corrupt.
The system of the recaps is very corrupt.
You know, they've hijacked our elections many years ago.
There's no auditing taking place.
All the audits are always blocked.
It's just a catastrophe over and over every single election cycle in California and many other states.
But right now, I don't know any states that personally are moving officially to a hand count, which is really the only way to restore order in the United States and get the votes correct.
You know, the electronic voting machines have destroyed elections all over the world, much less in the United States.
And hopefully, based on the recounts that are going to take place right now, and are taking place, hopefully the information comes out to the public, it raises enough awareness, puts pressure on Congress, and we finally throw out these voting machines and move towards, you know, restoring our voting.
With voter ID and hand counts so we can avoid all this manipulation.
As far as me being involved with any investigations, you know, I'm far retired.
I appreciate you bringing that up, but there's many competent investigators all over the United States from different and local authorities, sheriffs, departments, state police, or what have you, that can crack this thing wide open.
It's going to come down to who's running it behind the scenes, who does the appointing,
and who's pulling the strings.
At this point, there's really no way to know exactly who's in control of the investigation
and who's controlling the investigators and who's controlling the flow of information.
Danny Scaredy, Danny Scaredy, I want to thank you both.
I wish everyone spend all the time you can with your family and friends.