All Episodes
Previous Next
May 26, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:14:53
Need to Know (25 March 2021) with David Scorpio and Michael Ivey
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, where I'm delighted to be joined today by David Scorpio from the exotic land of Ecuador and Michael Ivey from Asheville, North Carolina.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
We begin with Biden bringing in Islamic activists to investigate the U.S.
military for extremism.
Can you believe the Muslim Brotherhood is going to help Biden destroy America?
This is outrageous.
A decade ago, Hina Shahzami was fighting on behalf of the Holy Land Foundations, whose leaders had been convicted of providing material support to Hamas.
Of the head of the ACLU's National Security Project, she, a Pakistani citizen, had fought fiercely for the Islamic terrorists at Guantanamo Bay.
Now, if she's referring to those who were allegedly involved in 9-11, she may have been completely in the right.
Now the Pakistani advocate for Islamic terrorists has a new job, going after our own American soldiers.
Furthermore, at least as of 2017, she's described herself as a Pakistan citizen with permanent legal residency in the United States.
She's on a list of partners for the Biden administration's crackdown on extremism in the military, which appears to be devoted to ferreting out White, Christian, you know, patriotic individuals of the kind who might have voted for Donald Trump.
I believe this is part and parcel of the effort to destroy the coalition Trump put together, which the Democrats fear is going to destroy them again and again.
Well, Biden's Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin has announced that this Countering Extremism Working Group, the list of partners contains a lot of Muslim lawyers and activists.
Pretty disturbing stop.
What kind of extremism are they going after?
It looks to me like they're going after American patriots or the American military being put at the mercy of advocates for their worst enemies.
Very troubling.
They've assembled a list of activists who have no credibility when it comes to extremism.
It's not surprising in many ways they'd reach out to the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center, but these are individuals who are not qualified to engage in a purge of the American military.
Very distressing.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
This is a little confusing.
So they're going after people who have anti-Muslim sentiments.
Is that what they're doing now?
I thought they were going after white supremacists and those kind of extremists.
It's really, they're closing the walls around What is acceptable thought here?
And, you know, what I want to know is who is deciding who defines these parameters?
Well, it looks like it's the good old S.P.L.C.
and the A.D.L., of course, two completely Jewish-run organizations that have their own agenda.
And, of course, you won't hear a word about, you know, Israeli extremism or, you know, anything like that.
It doesn't exist.
It's not possible.
Not only that, but they openly admit they're going to circumvent First Amendment protections by using private companies, which is just a blatant violation of the Constitution.
They're not going to get away with that.
It's an elementary fallacy, such as I taught for 35 years, a fallacy of equivocation.
I didn't kill him.
I paid somebody else to do it.
You're equally culpable.
This is not going to play well in the courts of law.
The problem being the damage that's done Between the time they implement an unconstitutional program and the time it's actually declared to be so by the courts.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, you can't get very much more obvious than that regarding an ideological destruction of the US military.
I mean, it's so obvious.
I guess it goes back even before, but definitely got a big push with Obama's purge of the top officer corps.
I don't think it was ever publicized or revealed what the criteria for that purge of the top officer corps is, but we can put two and two together and figure that out, especially seeing what's followed.
And in general, it's just the next one more area of our American society that they're destroying from within.
I've said all along that the primary battlefield Is the human mind and and they've already gone through this ideological destruction with the news media, the school systems, especially the higher education systems.
And now now they're going for the lower education systems.
I think the court systems and others are are well on their way.
Michael, I think you made very telling points, including the education system.
Scorpio, I know you have a further thought.
Well, Jim, also, you know, don't forget that the military is being trained about the dangers of Pepe the Frog, too, as part of this extremism ideology.
So they're getting so paranoid and desperate that cartoon characters that are part of memes That the alt-right is used just to try to infuriate, you know, the social justice warriors.
That's really about all Pepe the Frog is.
That's how desperate they're becoming to try to control people's minds.
Jim, this kind of wreaks of desperation, this whole thing.
I think it does, and the Purge appears to have been one where he was questioning these flag officers, admirals, and generals as to whether their loyalty were to the President, Barack Obama, or to the Constitution.
And if they gave the wrong answer, if they were there to defend the Constitution, they were gone.
It was outrageous when history is finally told, if we can ever get it straight, Barack Obama is going to have a place in the halls of infamy.
Meanwhile, the CDC, surprise, surprise, misled the U.S.
by implying there's a 10% risk of COVID transmission outdoors, when in fact it's virtually non-existent.
The CDC claimed the risk of transmitting COVID outdoors was less than 10% if wearing a mask.
But the Times discovered the agency was grossly exaggerating.
It's likely less than 0.01 or a hundredth of a percent.
The CDC used data from a study in Singapore that combined indoor with outdoor construction.
The figure is important because it recommended vaccinated persons still wear masks outdoors in large venues and that the unvaccinated mask up in almost all outdoor settings.
The CDC's false information was used to push for mail-in voting that encouraged fraud in addition to other harmful policies.
That benchmark seems to be a huge exaggeration, said Dr. Mujcevic, a virologist at the University of St.
Andrews.
In truth, the share of transition that occurs is well below 1%, saying that less than 10% Occurs outdoors is akin to saying that sharks attack fewer than 20,000 swimmers a year, when the actual worldwide number is around 150.
It's both true, but also misleading.
It isn't just a gotcha math issue, but how the CDC is struggling to really, in my opinion, deceive and mislead the American people under the influence of none other than Those who are promoting the COVID.
Thousands have had their phones unwittingly tracked, by the way, after getting the vaccine.
Millions of people in the UK.
One in ten Brits' data was tracked in February in an issue to see if vaccinated people's movements changed after their jabs.
The scientific committee admitted the material was used without the knowledge of those being tracked, but the government insisted that data was anonymized and complied with rules for privacy.
Oxford used the data as part of work about scientific pandemic influenza group on behaviors to advise government About what to do.
Cell phone mobility data, 10% of the British population.
Looked at some 4,254 who were tracked.
But of course it was for a worthy cause.
The data was compared with unvaccinated to find that their average pre-vaccination mobility increased by 218 meters.
Privacy campaigners said Brits would be disturbed to discover they were unwittingly tracked and subjected to behavioral analysis via their phones.
What else is new?
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, Jim, it's funny how lie after lie now is being exposed about this pandemic hoax.
And some of this information is even making its way into the mainstream media.
So I think they've got a real problem on their hands.
I really do feel like the momentum is in our favor right now.
And we need to keep pushing forward and, you know, convincing people to talk about this and tell their friends
before they enact this system of tyranny upon humanity worldwide.
And you know, the whole masking thing has always been a psychological ploy,
a tool to convince people that, ooh, look, this is real, everybody's wearing a mask.
It's always been a movie prop and nothing more.
And it's amazing too, if you look at most people when they walk around with a mask on,
there's a hole in the side of the mask big enough to stick two fingers in.
So, pathetic.
And hopefully it's really coming to an end.
You know, more and more states are doing a banning mask mandates.
And, you know, Jim, this example, the article used about saying that,
well, less than 20,000 people are attacked per year by sharks
when the real number is 150 people, more or less.
This is a great example of how the mainstream media lies to people.
It's not an outright lie, but once you look into it, it's not really true.
That's a great example, and they do this kind of stuff to the public all the time.
Yeah, it was deception by suggestion, as it were.
Literally true, but figuratively false and highly misleading.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, what else is new indeed?
I agree with Scorpio, that's an optimistic outlook, and I share it, is that I think they're losing the momentum in the public mind about the people's being fooled about this pandemic.
And stories like this help, of course.
When I loved that figure that they reported that the real number for asymptomatic transmission outdoors was likely less than 0.01% and then they used the phrase virtually non-existent.
I would venture that it is actually non-existent.
And one of the main principles that they had to make people believe in early on, in order to get them to buy this whole deception, was a fear of asymptomatic transmission.
They wanted you to be afraid of anybody, whether they're sick or not, that you could get sick by being around them.
So this is just sort of eating away at that after we've had a whole year to be around other people and not get sick.
The story about the Brits unwittingly being tracked with their cell phones, that's also what else is new thing.
You know, the IT guy that we work with, Larry, Jim, he calls them PTDs, meaning personal tracking devices, our cell phones.
Okay.
Personal tracking devices, I like that.
Larry's got it exactly right.
Meanwhile, the Texas Senate has passed a bill that bans critical race theory from the classroom.
Very, very appropriate.
A teacher may not be compelled to discuss current events or widely debated and currently controversial issues of public policy or social affairs in social studies curriculum.
They're promoting the study of the moral, political, and intellectual foundations of American history and tradition in the founding documents of the United States.
Critical race theory espouses the idea that race is not a natural or evolved but socially constructed notion to oppress and exploit minorities.
It's an offshoot of the quasi-Marxist critical theory, social philosophy, promoted by the Frankfurt School of Thought.
I have done a great deal of research in evolution, published a book entitled The Evolution of Intelligence in 2005, and a sequel, Render Unto Darwin, in 2007.
And I can affirm categorically that the notion of races is scientifically, empirically well-supported.
In fact, there are as many as 26 different basic racial categories, depending upon the effects of what's known as genetic drift, where a subpopulation winds up isolated from other subpopulations and develops in its own evolutionary fashion, such as on an island.
Where the out-of-Africa hypothesis has it that humanity originated in Africa and then moved upward into Europe, into Asia, eventually to China, South Pacific, all of which had evolutionary consequences and ramifications.
Here's Lieutenant General Dan Patrick speaking about this.
Texans reject critical race theory and other so-called woke philosophies that maintain one race or sex is inherently superior to another race or sex.
Or that any individual by virtue of his or her race or sex is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, he said.
These divisive concepts have been inserted into curricula around the state, but they have no place in Texas schools or anywhere else in the U.S.
curriculum, in my judgment.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, it makes sense of this critical race theory is part of the Jewish Frankfurt School of Thought.
Let's be honest, you know, a Frankfurt School of Thought is, you know, 95% Jewish.
If you look at the people involved in it, that's not an overestimation at all.
it's just an example of the kind of corrosive thinking that can be injected into a society
where you're intentionally causing racial strife under the notion of racial justice. That's what
this is all about, all this social justice crap and Black Lives Matter. It's really about creating
racial strife and keeping the public at each other's throats so nobody looks at the man behind
the curtain. This federal government is the biggest cause of all of our problems.
And under Groper Joe, they're going for it.
They're going to do all kinds of crazy things that are not going to benefit the American people.
Oh, I think you got that exactly right, Scorpio.
Michael, your thoughts.
Yeah, I'm proud of my home state of Texas for following through on this.
I brought this up last week, if you guys remember the fact that this bill existed to ban critical race theory in Texas schools.
In that story, you'll see that even though Governor Greg Abbott is okay, I mean, he's better than the tyrannical Democrat governors around the country.
The lieutenant governor of the state of Texas really holds a lot more political power than the governor himself, and that's Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, and he's right on about just about everything.
I was really glad to see in that story that he used the phrase, state-funded racism, because that's exactly what teaching of critical race theory is.
And like Scorpio said, it's an outgrowth or evolution of what's called the Frankfurt School of the Jewish Academics, who relocated here to the University of Chicago in the early 1930s.
And the document that lays it out most specifically and classically is the great book by Kevin MacDonald called The Culture of Critique.
Yeah, Kevin McDonald's has wonderful work.
Scorpio, yes.
Yeah, Kevin McDonald's brilliant.
Michael, you made some great points.
And you know, yes, it's very important to remember that the Frankfurt School relocated to the University of Chicago primarily in the 1930s.
That's very, very important.
Thank you for bringing that up.
And also, you know, I agree with you about the Lieutenant Governor of Texas.
I didn't know that the Lieutenant Governor has, in some ways, more power than the governor.
But you know, I saw an interview with him some time back.
You know, at the peak of this whole pandemic thing.
And, you know, I thought what he said was very heartfelt.
And he said, look, he said, I'm the age of someone that's supposedly the most vulnerable to this, but we cannot shut the country down and stop children from progressing to protect old people.
You know, we have to keep society open so the younger generation can live their lives.
And I thought that was really great.
And not, you know, not that selfish kind of attitude that so many people have.
That's correct.
Dan Patrick said that?
Yeah.
And of course, the greater power of the lieutenant governor is a function of the state constitution.
It's designed that way in Texas.
Fascinating.
Untrue of other states.
Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve is moving in the direction of digital currency.
I find this very disturbing.
Technological advances are driving rapid change in the global payments landscape, where the Fed is studying the developments and exploring ways it might refine its role as a core payment service provider and the issuing authority for U.S.
currency.
As a central bank of the United States, the Federal Reserve is charged with promoting monetary and fiscal stability and the safety and efficiency of the payment system, said the Fed Board Chair Jerome Powell.
In pursuit of these core functions, we're monitoring and adapting to technological innovations now transforming the world of payments, finance, and banking.
This technology offers new possibilities, including the development and issuance of central bank digital currencies, or CBDCs, a new type of central bank liability in digital form, a CBDC.
It could improve, they claim, the proponents On an already safe, effective, dynamic, and efficient U.S.
domestic payment system in its ability to serve the needs of households and businesses.
But if it's already working, if it ain't broke, why fix it?
It looks to me very much as though this is to promote the globalist agenda of getting all of our currency digital so they can control every aspect of our lives.
Remember, once this were to happen, the abolition of money, of cash money, is a constraint on our freedom and privacy.
And along with the intrusion and knowledge that the government already possesses of our medical records, our correspondence, our email, and every other record, it's going to give them greater control over our lives and the ability to shut us off anytime we're non-compliant, as the brilliant film Enemy of the state with Gene Hackman and Will Smith so cleverly and incisively displays.
If you've never seen it, check it out because this is the way things are today.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Yeah, great points, Jim.
You know, it's funny how palacing technological advances that would have happened recently.
That's complete bullshit.
They've wanted to pull the trigger on digital currency for 20 years.
It's really been a matter of sort of getting the concept to a point where the public will
accept it.
And COVID has played a big role in that because we all know that money is dangerous and has
viruses all over it now.
And you know, they've already removed the reserve for reserve Federal Reserve banking.
So you know, it used to be you had to have 10% reserve.
That's no longer the case, you know.
They can lend out as much money as they want.
There's no limits.
And once they enact a digital currency, all of the rules are out the window.
They can do whatever they want, as you're implying, Jim.
And another scenario I've heard with these, you know, UBI and, you know, universal basic income and digital currency is that Uh, the money that you receive will have sort of a time limit on it, and when that time limit expires, the money is no good anymore, so it makes it impossible to save or accumulate assets.
Wow, those are sensational points, Scorpio.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, those of us who are familiar with, uh, have dug enough over the last 20 years to know the various aspects of the agenda for world control that's being imposed on us have known all along that a digital currency was where they're going.
I'm actually surprised that they haven't gone there faster, especially over the last year when the door's been open so much.
And what Scorpio was just saying about the expiration of the money in your bank account or wherever you hold it, that's only One little thing.
They can literally make any currency rules for the people to use or not use once that kind of thing is implemented and becomes ubiquitous in our society.
These digital currencies have absolutely no privacy, absolutely no independence of people who own them.
All Official digital currencies that are being talked about would involve total control by the owners of the central banks.
And you may or may not know, but in the crypto world of cryptocurrencies right now, there are literally hundreds of different kinds of coins.
And there are some that cannot be part of their system.
And those are generally termed privacy coins, like Monero and Pirate Chain are two of those blockchain digital coins.
And they're doing quite well.
But people, when you have the power that these people are wielding, Really, nothing's stopping you.
They can outlaw anything they want or drive it into obscurity if they want.
So, digital currency is a big step in their world control.
Jim?
I think you've both made sensational points, and this is a very frightening prospect for those who care about freedom and liberty.
Meanwhile, a new poll shows 83% of Republicans would vote for Trump again in 2024.
He's looking at the possibility, but of course it would be way too early to declare.
The May 2021 poll shows Trump would come out on top as a winner, ready to run against Vice President Kamala Harris, widely expected to have already assumed the presidency.
So he'd be running against then President Kamala Harris, however bizarre that thought may be, given she was the first Democrat to drop out, didn't even make it into Iowa.
And now she's Vice President of the United States.
Give me a break.
An astounding 83% of likely Republican voters would cast their ballot for Trump in a general election.
Compared to Vice President Pence, Florida Governor DeSantis, former U.N.
Ambassador Haley, Trump took the majority lead at 57%.
Pence trailed behind at 10%, DeSantis 8, and Haley at 5.
I believe a Trump dissentist ticket would be unbeatable.
Given the fact 64% of voters believe Vice President Harris will be president, Trump seems to be in solid standing.
In a hypothetical race against Harris, Trump would claim victory in the general by 4 percentage points.
That's got to be a mistake.
It should be 40 percentage points.
Who's going to vote for Harris?
Idiotic.
A majority of voters responded unfavorably to her.
48% unfavorable, 47% favorable.
Nevertheless, she's ahead of other Democratic alternatives, including Michelle Obama, who only had 16% support Harris with 35.
AOC polled at 7, Pete Buttigieg at 6.
If Harris were to go head-to-head with Trump, she'd lose 45-49.
I believe it would be far more massive than that.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, it's funny when, you know, you mentioned Kamala Harris running against President Trump.
I had to laugh because, you know, could there be a worse matchup?
Kamala Harris couldn't even carry her own state.
She has zero charisma.
She's not able to answer basic questions.
And, of course, we all know she slept her way to the top.
Hardly a good example for women, you know.
And DeSantis is sort of the heir apparent if Trump, for some reason, does not run in 2024, even though he's hinting at it quite a bit here recently.
But it would be a great ticket, DeSantis and Trump.
DeSantis has really been on the mark this whole way through this, this scandemic, other than the fact that he's encouraging vaccinations.
But I think everyone is, all the politicians are doing that, except for Rand Paul, which is interesting.
And I don't think Mike Obama, I mean Michelle Obama, is going to run for any office.
The years have not been kind to her.
She's looking, let's say, more masculine than ever.
Yes, unsurprisingly.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, Kamala Harris couldn't win.
Any real election against almost anybody.
The Republicans run but who's to say that she can't in the system that we have now, if we don't have a viable real election system, it practically doesn't matter.
Who runs in 2024, and certainly under four years of the Obama administration, who got put in there by the system that we have now, don't expect it to be cleaned up by 2024.
Trump surprised them.
They thought they had it wrapped up in 2016, and then they realized that Oh, we've got to double down on on our efforts at election stealing.
And the last election was so amazingly stolen.
Everything that you say that makes Kamala Harris a horrible candidate.
How was Joe Biden any better?
I mean, if they could put a guy like that, mentally challenged guy like that into office just with vote rigging, then if the vote system isn't revamped, I don't know why we think that there's going to be a real election in 2024.
Yeah, Scorpio.
Michael, that's actually a great point. You're right. And you know, the media can create a sensation with anybody.
They can make anyone into a superstar or demonize anybody.
But I think the problem they're going to face is so many people are already suspicious about this last election.
If they try to jam through a Kamala Harris victory, it's going to be in some ways it might be a good thing because you're going to have the majority of the country losing faith completely in these phony elections and that will not bode well for the future of the controllers.
Well, Scorpio, We might not be at a majority of the country but I know there's a majority of people that are conservative patriotic white Americans, they already know it.
Whether going through another election cycle like that of four years is going to do us any good.
I mean, we're on the verge of going over the cliff right now.
So, so if it doesn't happen now, I don't think any further awakening in 2024 is going to do us much good.
Yeah, right.
All the audits are revealing the extent of the theft of the election, none more stunning than in Maricopa County, Arizona.
And just as anecdotal evidence that the Biden-era win by some 10,000 votes was a monstrous hoax, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris made a joint appearance in Phoenix just weeks before the election and local reporters were embarrassed to have to report no one, no one came.
Nobody turned out.
Where Joe Biden and Kamala Harris together, where Trump appears to have actually won the state by over a million votes, where Biden didn't eke out a narrow victory, it was stolen.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Brace yourselves now for terrible, terrible news from a leading virologist, Luc Montagnier, who is a joint Nobel Prize recipient.
What he's telling us here corresponds to what Sherry Tinpenny has reported to wit that these mRNA vaccines are perfectly designed killing machines.
Here, and I must preface by saying I am not myself an MD but a PH, I'm not a virologist, I'm not an epidemiologist, and of course neither is Bill Gates.
But I have been doing sincere reporting for over a year on these issues and I'm sorry to say this guy almost certainly has it right to wit There is no hope and no possible treatment for them, those who have received the mRNA vaccination.
We must be prepared to incinerate their bodies.
All of them will die within two years.
They will all die from antibody-dependent enhancement.
Nothing more can be said.
Serious, sobering thoughts.
Don't take my word for it.
Do research.
But certainly an excellent reason to be hesitant to take the jab.
I have five dear friends already.
Relatives.
Five dear relatives who've taken the jab.
My closest friend here in Madison has taken the jab, and I'm just petrified at the prospect here.
Meanwhile, here's a report by Gordon French.
My brother got the jab and died.
Although Jeff was not at high risk from a COVID infection, he got the shot.
To do not pass on a cold to someone or elderly because it might be deadly for them.
Three weeks later, 59 years of age, he experienced a heart attack.
Meanwhile, this is our guy, the Nobel Prize winner, saying the COVID vaccination is an unacceptable mistake.
There's no legitimate excuse for the medical police state to have unleashed vaccines for the Wuhan coronavirus.
When the jabs are known to create and spread variants of the disease, warns French virologist and Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier, calling the ejection an enormous and unacceptable mistake.
He's sounding the alarm about how they are causing and spreading the virus among both the vaccinated and unvaccinated.
It's an enormous mistake, isn't it?
A scientific error as well as a medical error.
It is an unacceptable mistake.
Many believe Montagnier is being too kind by calling a mistake when it seems obvious it was planned long in advance.
At least he's talking about it, though, while many other epidemiologists and virologists are choosing to remain silent.
It is the antibodies produced by the virus that enable an infection to become stronger, which is certainly possible.
Some variants are occurring without the help of vaccines.
The mass vaccination drive is clearly causing the bulk of the problem.
What does a virus do?
Does it die or find another solution?
It's clear new variants are created by antibody-mediated selection due to the vaccine.
Meanwhile, injecting people with chemicals directly associated with a circulating virus will only make the problem worse.
The new variants are a production and result from the vaccination you see, and in each country it's the same.
In every country, deaths follow vaccination.
Montagnier spoke out last spring as well, warning the Wuhan flu was clearly lab-created, did not come from some bats at a wet market.
He also warned the world that genetically modified virus had been spliced to contain the DNA of HIV.
Which just so happens to be what Anthony Fauci, Tony the Rat, was focused upon during the early days of his decades-long federal government career as an infectious disease authority.
The fake news media is calling new cases a breakthrough, but the sentiment being they're abnormal.
However, vaccine-caused variants are the norm.
The technology for the faux vaccine is the same as that used to produce GMO plants.
Seeds from GMO plants cannot be saved and sown the next year, which can be done with non-GMO seeds.
Why does a doctor assume a man-made virus will mutate normally?
This is another prevarication from the news media.
Meanwhile, Rand Paul declares, I'm not getting vaccinated, setting thereby an excellent example.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, it's a fascinating article, you know, and it could be very well true that Montaner is right, but it's also possible that things aren't going to play out that way.
And I think we should be careful in, you know, believing too much anything about this pandemic.
We've been lied to about every aspect of it.
And, you know, I think there's Several covert agendas, possible agendas behind the vaccine.
One is sterilization.
A second one is a slow kill through cancer or autoimmune disease, which this function would give the conspirators plausible deniability because if people die five or ten years in the future, hey, it's not our fault you got cancer, right?
And the other possible covert agenda is intentionally destroying the immune system of the vaccine recipients and making them reliant upon more vaccines in the future for survival.
And number four, There could be some kind of behavioral or mind control element inside of these vaccines.
We don't know yet, but I think those are the four big possibilities.
And what I think they're trying to do is they're trying to create a whole new system that's going to revolve around vaccination in order to participate in society.
That's their end game.
And they're playing this game out slow.
And if too many people die right away, I don't see how they're going to be able to enact that system.
So there's a lot of possibilities here.
You know, he might be completely right.
He might not.
So we should just sort of keep our minds open and see what happens.
Only time will tell.
And I do believe they're trying to spread variants of this disease through these vaccines.
But the problem is, is that you know the concept of virus attenuation viruses always tend to become less virulent or whatever this is and they always end up kind of pooping out over time because otherwise we'd already all be dead a long time ago and it's important for people to keep in mind too epidemiologists are not medical doctors they're essentially just glorified statisticians
So, you know, they're not, they don't really have medical training.
A lot of people think they do.
They're really just statisticians.
And I think it's significant that Rand Paul is not going to take the vaccine.
He is a medical doctor.
And he just basically said, I don't see any reason to take it.
I already had it before.
I had the disease, so I have natural immunity.
I'm not going to take it.
And just hearing somebody that's a senator say that is really significant.
And more and more people are speaking out against the vaccine.
You know, Eric Clapton talked about his ordeal.
Other famous people have come forward.
And in fact, Clapton even was afraid that he'd never be able to play the guitar again because his hands went numb and sort of froze up.
Uh, and he had other severe side effects too.
So, um, they have a lot of, uh, PR problems right now, Jim.
Oh, I think you're right.
And, uh, Scorpio, that was a sensational commentary.
I think every word of that was very important and spot on Michael, your thoughts.
Yeah.
Um, that's, uh, I have some reservations, but that otherwise is an excellent article and Terrific points by Scorpio, especially like your delineation of the aspects of the covert agenda that's going on here.
Because I agree with all four of them.
I think we're now over 4200 deaths caused by the vaccine that's that are reported to the VAERS system.
So we as we know, we can multiply that by at least 20.
And that would render a number approaching 100,000 deaths.
So that's what's out there, and it's not being reported that way, of course.
There was a great summary of the various ways in which this, quote, vaccine, unquote, can be injurious to a person.
And it was published by Dr. Sherry Tenpenny in the last couple of weeks called 20 mechanisms of injury.
You can find that on her website.
Regarding the statement by the Nobel Prize winner, Luc Montagnier, There's only a couple of things that I would draw attention to, and the article mentioned one of those, his calling it an enormous mistake.
Now, that's what guys in that position have to say.
I mean, they're so afraid of saying anything that might be construed as conspiratorial that they call it a mistake, and all of us know that there's no mistakes going on here.
And the other is pointing to the primary problem being the creation of variants through the vaccines.
I personally am not one who gives any credence to the idea of variants.
It's not the variants of some mythical Virus, whether bioengineered or not, that are the threat, but it's the actual operation of the vaccines themselves.
And in that vein, I want to draw attention to the statement by former Pfizer Chief Science Officer Mike Yadin, and he speaks specifically saying that variants can't possibly vary in this period of time by more than 3% of their genetic sequence, which is way too small for them to oppose any additional threats to anyone who has natural immunity.
So, in my mind, it's just another avenue of fear mongering to talk about the dangers of variants.
When Rand Paul says that there's no real reason to take it, I'd like to direct everybody to a new video at the James Fetzer BitChute site entitled, If People Get Jabbed After Watching This, They Are Beyond Saving.
It's a beautiful 16-minute summary of the insanity, both statistically and medically, of taking this thing that they're calling a vaccine.
Wow, the two of you have just blown me away with your commentaries on this story.
Just simply excellent.
Really superb.
Meanwhile, an ex-Israeli pilot.
Our army is a terrorist organization run by war criminals from Global Research.
A former Israeli Air Force pilot, Yonatan Shabhira, has described the Israeli government and army as terrorist organizations run by war criminals.
Captain Shapira, who resigned from the Israeli army in 2003 at the height of the Palestinian Second Intifada, explained in an exclusive interview how he realized after joining the army he was part of a terrorist organization.
I realized during the second Intifada what the Israeli Air Force and Israeli military are doing are war crimes, terrorizing a population of millions of Palestinians.
When I realized that, I decided not just to leave, but organize other pilots to publicly refuse to take part in these crimes.
As a child in Israel, you're brought up in a very strong Zionist militaristic education.
You don't know anything about Palestine.
You don't know about the 1948 Nakba.
You don't know anything about oppression.
Since leaving, he's launched a campaign to encourage military to disobey orders to attack Palestinians because, of course, they're illegal under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, UCMJ in the United States, you're obligated to refuse to obey legal orders.
His campaign has led 27 other army pilots to be discharged by their opposition.
Israeli warplanes, of course, have waged hundreds of airstrikes, much death being brought about.
Here's a fascinating piece by Edward Henry suggesting Hamas is an Israeli-controlled radical Islamic agent provocateur.
There was an announcement today a ceasefire in the now 11-day war between Hamas and Israel.
What most do not know is that the radical Islamic group Hamas is secretly funded by Israel.
He who pays the piper calls the tune.
Israel did not want to fight a Palestinian nationalist movement like the PLO, so they created a transnational radical religious group Hamas to act as an agent provocateur.
Each Hamas terror attack has acted as justification for the Israeli government to move in with its military, seize more land, take more military and police control over Palestine.
It further justifies expansion and attack of surrounding Islamic countries because the attacks can be blamed on the more amorphous radical Islamic ideology.
It renders all Islamic companies potential targets for Israel's expansionist plans.
Radical Islam is now framed as a threat to Israel rather than a localized threat from nationalistic-minded Palestinians.
There has been a resurgence in the power of the Jewish hierarchy in Israel because of the hostile Arab nations that surround Israel, secretly encouraged by the Israeli government itself.
For example, They founded and encouraged the growth and activities of the rabidly anti-Jewish terrorist organization AMOS, fulfilling two goals, undermining the influence of the secular Palestinian liberation organization Fatah and creating a hostile Islamic religious opposition to the Jewish state affiliated with surrounding hostile Islamic countries.
According to the Islamic Weekly, this is now from the book Bloody Zion, the Islamic Association as well as the university have been supported and encouraged by the Israeli military authority.
They, the Islamic organizations, were authorized to receive money from abroad.
Meanwhile, members of Fatah in the Palestinian left were subjected to the most brutal forms of suppression.
There are several other passages.
They set up orphanages and health clinics, as well as a network of schools, workshops, create employment for women and a system of financial aid for the poor.
In 1978, they created an Islamic university in Gaza.
The military authority was convinced these activities would weaken both the PLA and leftist organizations in Gaza.
By the end of 1992, there were 600 mosques in Gaza.
Thanks to the Mossad, the Islamists were allowed to reinforce their presence in the occupied territory.
Hamas then launched a carefully timed campaign of attack against civilians one day before the meeting between Palestinian and Israeli negotiators regarding the formal recognition of Israel by the National Palestinian Council, events that were largely instrumental in the formation of a right-wing Israeli government following the May 1996 elections.
Hamas built its strength through various acts of sabotage of the peace process compatible with the interests of the Israeli government.
In turn, Israel sought to prevent the application of the Oslo Accords.
In other words, Hamas was fulfilling the function for which it was originally created, the prevention of a Palestinian state.
And then in this regard, Hamas and Ariel Sharon saw eye to eye on the same wavelength.
Here's a nice summary overview from Confessions of an Ex-Mossad Agent in his book, By Way of Deception, which I recommend everyone ought to read.
Hamas acts as agent provocateurs under the control of Mossad.
The subterfuge of provocation by Hamas justifying a retaliatory response by Israel is exactly the strategy of Israel, as explained by Moshe Sharett, the first foreign minister of Israel, NPM from 1954 to 1956.
Sharett stated Israel must keep a state of moral tension.
that is necessary for Israel to invent dangers, where the invented dangers function as provocations for
Israel to retaliate.
Hamas is just such an invented danger in keeping with a Mossad motto,
by way of deception thou shalt do war. Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, it's nice to hear, you know, an Israeli pilot speaking out.
Unfortunately, voices like that are few and far between, but at least this man has a conscience and is trying to tell people his experiences.
Hamas has been a very suspicious organization from the start.
Either they are controlled opposition and, you know, bribe the members within it by Israel, or they're incredibly incompetent.
As one of the two, most likely the former.
And, you know, they do use this strategy of having some kind of boogeyman that's always a threat to Israel.
And, of course, the real endgame is they want to take all the land, get rid of the Palestinians, bulldoze all of Gaza, all of the West Bank, everything, and just build settlement homes and Jewish cities.
And that is the goal.
In fact, they want to take all the land from Euphrates to the Nile River.
That's what the two blue lines are on the Israeli flag.
People should also remember that Israel has never declared formal borders.
So they want to expand Israel greatly.
And this is all part of the process.
And I just wanted to point out one other thing, you know, there's these stories of, you know, random Jews being attacked by Palestinian activists.
That's all fake.
I've been looking into it.
There's even an article written by Max Blumenthal, who's a Jewish guy and a very honest journalist.
He's, you know, a liberal guy, but He's honest and he shows these videos how they're just edited together.
There's even a video of one of these supposed victims that...
You know, wasn't really attacked.
Some people yelled at him.
And the guy, the Jewish guy, pretends he's hurt and he lies down on the ground and acts like he's, you know, near death, even though he wasn't really attacked.
This guy has it all on a collection of videos here on the Grayzone.
You can look it up.
And, you know, again, it's a plea for sympathy as they kill men, women and children, and they've made Up to 70,000 people homeless, destroying over 1,000 homes.
The mainstream media is even admitting that.
Other people say it's closer to 4,000 homes have been destroyed.
These are war crimes, and if anyone else in the world was doing it, there would be outrage all over the world.
But since Israel and the Zionists own the media, they can try to cover it up.
But I don't think it's working so well this time because of the Internet.
Well, the staging of these fake attacks and so forth was a preoccupation in Syria, gas attacks by Assad.
We have footage of local residents rushing out in the street, lying down as though they'd been victims.
They shoot the scene, then they get up, brush themselves off, and no doubt collect their paycheck.
It's just outrageous.
And yes, in case anyone missed the memo, the final solution for Israel is to load all the Palestinians aboard a ship, float it out to sea, and sink it.
That's the goal.
Absolute elimination of every Palestinian from Palestine.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, Scorpio, I'm glad you mentioned Max Blumenthal.
He is a truth-telling journalist who's also Jewish.
There are several of them out there who have not stayed on the Zionist plantation.
So that they have sometimes really good insights into what's going on.
I love that just that one guy, that Israeli Air Force pilot coming out and telling the truth that he he's working for a terrorist organization.
It reminds me of the movie, They Live, where the aliens realize that the main character can suddenly see through their outer disguise as being normal human beings and they talk to each other and say, oh, we've got one here who can see.
And the Edward Hendry article is also wonderful.
It sounds entirely likely and logical to me that the Hamas organization is being funded and controlled by Israel, and it would be in accord with that Stated M.O.
by way of deception, thou shalt do war.
It's really simplistic.
It's the same create an enemy if you don't have one strategy that the Western Empire has done with first Al-Qaeda and then ISIS.
And so the people of the empires out here practically need a scorecard to know the names of the enemy de jure.
Well, look how brilliant it is to create a new enemy.
You don't want to go after the Palestinians.
The whole world is on the side of the Palestinians.
So take out Yasser Arafat, which was an assassination, and create a new enemy, Islamic radicals.
Everyone's opposed to radicals, Islamic or otherwise, and you deftly solve one problem and benefit yourselves in the process.
It's outrageous, clever, not surprising, Michael, yes.
It just occurred to me a funny thing.
They could just import the Islamic radicals from the Middle East, get rid of them there, and put them on a committee to revamp the U.S.
military over here.
Yes, yes, that sounds like a plan.
That sounds like a plan.
Meanwhile, Iran says the International Atomic Energy Agency access to nuclear sites has ended.
A three-month monitoring deal between Tehran and the United Nations expired Saturday.
Iran's parliament speaker told the country's state TV adding access to images of nuclear sites would cease.
The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Rafael Grossi, is to hold a news conference on Sunday.
Iran's state TV also quoted an unnamed official saying the agreement between the agency and Tehran could be extended conditionally for a month.
If extended for a month, and if during this period major powers accept Iran's legal demands, then the data will be handed over.
Otherwise, the images will be deleted forever.
Western diplomats have warned that not exceeding the deal could seriously harm efforts to salvage the nuclear accord.
Which aims to keep Iran from being able to make nuclear arms, which Iran says it never wanted to build.
I have done my best to convince the Iranians that they need to have nuclear weapons, that it would issue in a period of stability in the Middle East, just as existed for roughly 50 years between the United States and the USSR, mutually assured destruction.
The fact that the Iranians really are principled, I respect, but it's not pragmatic in my opinion.
If Iran were simply to come into possession of nuclear weapons that they knew were functional, of course, I believe it would stabilize the Middle East and transform politics.
Meanwhile, Netanyahu building on what we've been discussing of the Faking of Hamas declares new rocket fire will be met with a whole new level of force, meaning he's going to obliterate all of Gaza.
Mark my words.
As a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Hamas held Friday, Israeli PM Bibi Netanyahu threatened any future rocket fire out of Gaza.
Which they can create at the drop of a hat, would be met with a whole new level of force.
If Hamas thinks we'll tolerate a drizzle of rockets, it's mistaken.
We will respond with a whole new level of force to every instance of aggression against the Gaza envelope communities or anywhere else in Israel, where Gaza envelope refers to areas of Israel in range of the crude rockets fired from Gaza.
In the 11-day bombing, at least 248 Palestinians, including 66 children, were killed.
At least 12 in Israel, including two children.
Netanyahu touted the onslaught as an exceptional success.
The U.S.
stood firmly behind Israel during the violence, which is pathetic.
Biden's even promising to help replenish Israel's Iron Dome missile defense.
While he had plenty of condemnation for Hamas' rocket fire, he did not denounce Israeli killing of Palestinian children.
This is all completely outrageous, completely predictable, I'm convinced.
This is a reason why Israel went all in for Joe Biden and against Donald Trump.
Trump would never have stood for it.
And Bibi, who's in deep political trouble, thought this would bolster his support within Israel, which it has done.
Scorpio, your thoughts.
Yeah, all of Netanyahu's political scandals are down the memory hole for now.
The guy's indicted for all kinds of crimes.
Great time to start a war.
And frankly, Jim, I don't believe that 12 Israelis have been killed.
I haven't seen any credible damage of any I'm sorry, any real credible evidence of damage in Israel.
The footage I've seen, it's all very short footage.
You don't get to see the images for very long, and it looks like a staged kind of thing to me.
I saw one footage of You know, this apartment was on fire, a raging fire inside the apartment, but no damage outside of the building.
How does that work exactly?
I guess the rocket went through the window and blew up inside, but didn't do any damage to the walls outside.
You know, it looked to me like Footage of a fire that they filmed, like, look, here's a proof that the, you know, the rockets are falling.
And the other footage I saw recently was an apartment that was supposedly hit by a rocket.
There was a hole about this big in one of the walls, and it looked like they'd taken the furniture and just sort of piled it up in the middle of the apartment and knocked stuff over.
No smoke damage, no indication that there was any kind of explosion inside the apartment.
The walls were still white, yet this was, oh look, a missile hit this apartment.
Isn't this horrible?
I just don't buy it.
I don't see any evidence.
I'd like to see some.
I haven't seen any real evidence of damage, but of course the damage in Palestine is very real.
They're taking out entire city blocks at once and using controlled demolition to blow up apartment buildings as well.
And you know, I'm just amazed at why people are supposed to care whether or not Iran gets nuclear weapons.
If they're smart, Iran will get nuclear weapons as soon as they can, because as you said, it'll be a deterrent to prevent Israel from coming in and carpet bombing Uh, the country using their older brother, their bigger, older brother, the United States to do the dirty work for them.
Uh, and you know, for God's sakes, you know, Pakistan has nuclear weapons and so does India.
No big deal, apparently.
Uh, and Ukraine is even threatening to get nuclear weapons if they're not allowed into NATO.
Nobody seemed to care about that, but somehow we're supposed to care that Iran gets nuclear weapons.
It's the end of the world somehow.
It's only because Israel wants to destroy Iran and that's the only reason it's supposed to matter.
I could care less.
In fact, I hope Iran does get nuclear weapons because it'll actually calm things down.
Yeah, I couldn't agree more.
And of course, you're talking about Hollywood special effects of a fire raging inside an apartment with no visible access.
That's just fake.
That's classic Hollywood.
And Netanyahu, of course, is a past master.
I think all your points were really spot on, Scorpio.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, like you guys, there are many commentators, especially the ones who actually know Iran well and their history of not attacking anybody, who have speculated that it would be the best thing for them to do to actually develop nuclear weapons.
But they're working with a strong traditional version of Islam.
And it's interpreted as that nukes are anti-Islamic because the use of nuclear weapons would inevitably involve the killing of non-combatants, which is against the teachings of Islam.
So it's sort of an odd juxtaposition, the warlike nature of early Islam and the extreme peaceful nature of modern Islam.
What you can say, I mean, what can't you say about Netanyahu that hasn't already been said?
He's an egregious war criminal and head of a terrorist state.
And he's another guy who would qualify for the joke, rope, tree, Netanyahu, some assembly required.
Yes.
Yes, I agree.
Scorpio?
No, no.
I was just laughing.
That's funny.
Good observations by Michael.
Some assembly required.
We want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
Here's a comment from Beverly.
President Trump talked up the vaccines far more than he did HCQ.
I don't remember him mentioning ivermectin.
He should have issued an executive order making HCQ available to all who wanted it.
This is especially true once he saw the White Coat Summit frontline doctors speaking in D.C.
Why didn't Trump meet with these doctors to learn more about how they were treating patients?
Once he learned their methods, he should have issued an order making HCQ and whatever else they used available to anyone, and most important, created an 800 hotline to access these doctors for advice on treatment protocols.
I wonder if Trump was threatened by the deep state to not promote and make available therapeutic methods.
Ignorance about the virus is not an excuse, once he heard the frontline doctors.
Meanwhile, update.
The following may seem like I'm tooting my own horn a bit, and in the first paragraph I am, but what I'm saying here, as a conclusion, is extremely likely to happen.
Just watch it.
The magnetic spots are very likely to spread due to the fact the shot is genetic modification, and magnetic everywhere may end up being the new normal.
Every last thing you are reading on the web about magnetic vaxes and the fact that the vaccine can't go to an MRI if they did not get the saline started on this site.
All others are building on what started here, and since I was the first with this, I'm going to take it a step further and tell you the next step in all of this in sequence, with the last part of the sequence not admitted to yet, but eventually will be.
The shots are not vaccines.
Instead, they are GMO shots that program your body to rob its blood of iron and build with that iron.
I've not seen anyone else state even step one elsewhere yet, but this is the reason for the clotting.
This is coming from Jim Stone.
Avoid the corona jab at all costs, even if only out of self-respect.
I was surprised by this, how audacious the people who did these shots really are.
Snopes would debunk this because the Link Report does not have the word epidermis in stratum cornicum in it, when the fact those cells have to be involved to make the magnet stick is obvious.
And number four, Once the top layer of epidermis dies to make stratum cornicum, the magnetic properties would be smack dab on the surface.
Once this really comes home to roost, the skin that flakes off will stick to a magnet.
God only knows how much losing iron from the body that way is going to impact people and kick off problems with anemia, but you can safely bet the creators of the shot don't care.
Maybe that's why they're now working so hard to stifle meat consumption.
Speed up the impending slow kill.
Meanwhile, here's the revised EGLE estimate.
Population U.S.
down to 65 million in 2025 from 330 million in 2020.
in 2025 from 330 million in 2020.
Stunning.
Meanwhile, there's been a development in my legal case.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court was going to deny it as having been untimely, but my attorney, Richard Bolton, filed a motion to reinstate, which has been granted.
The petition for review has been accepted, and now the plaintiff, Leonard Posner, has been required to file within 14 days of the order.
I'm very pleased by that.
Having published a dozen books at moonrockbooks.com, it's important to understand how busy Amazon has been in banning them, six of them.
Not just Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, but also, and Nobody Died in Boston either, but also, and I suppose we didn't go to the moon either, but also from Orlando to Dallas and beyond, but also from Political Theater in Charlottesville, but also the Parkland Puzzle, how the pieces fit together.
There are reasons they are banning these books.
They blow apart the official narrative.
If you want to understand how much you've been lied to by your own government, go to Moonrock Books.
Take advantage before they ban even more.
Meanwhile, remember, False Flag and Conspiracy 2020 Conference now available to the public for no charge.
Go to falseflagconspiracy2020.com.
Remember, the secret of freedom lies in educating people.
The secret of tyranny, in keeping them ignorant.
Final thoughts.
Scorpio.
Oh, that was a really good email from Beverly.
And yeah, you have to wonder why, you know, if we were facing this deadly pandemic
and you know, hundreds of thousands of people are dying from COVID,
you'd think that they would have just said, look, let's get ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine
available at every pharmacy, you know, without a prescription,
give people the basic protocol is actually very simple.
Ivermectin, I think you take two the first day and one the second day and you know, one the next day,
depending on how severe the symptoms are.
And it's also based on your body weight, but that didn't happen.
Same with hydroxychloroquine.
The protocol is very simple.
Why didn't they make an all-out effort just to say, hey, you know, we're not sure if this works, but it can't hurt because we're dealing with a deadly pandemic.
That didn't happen.
And of course, all along it was set up so that the only possible solution was a vaccine.
And you have to ask yourself, why?
Why was it so important to make the vaccine the only outcome that could help people when there was those two medicines are very well documented to help very quickly especially if people take them at the onset of symptoms and I think they would work for the regular flu or a cold too.
I don't think this thing is much more than that.
And it does look like Trump was threatened.
If you recall at the very beginning, Trump tried to out this and say that, look, this is just, you know, this isn't a big deal.
Let's not worry about it.
And he even referred to it as a case of the sniffles, which I thought was very funny.
But then if you recall, Trump, you know, contracted COVID 33 days before the election and went through this whole charade that he was sick and went to the hospital and blah, blah, blah.
It happened 33 days before the election.
I doubt that's an accident.
So I think, you know, when you have as many financial assets as Trump does, he's got a lot of debt.
He was bailed out by the bankers.
I think they pulled the plug on his resistance using his financial assets and possibly other things.
That's how it works when you play this game at the level that they're at.
It's a dirty game and not for the weak of heart.
Michael, your final thoughts.
Yeah, I want to say, and I suppose we didn't go to the moon either, is one of the best titles for a book of that nature that I've ever heard.
The Jim Stone piece, I wanted to make a comment when he talks about pulling iron from the body and the top layer of epidermis dies and the magnetic particles would You know, evolve in that manner.
That's reminiscent of the biblical prophecy of the Mark of the Beast, because it says one effect of the Mark of the Beast would be to get sores all over your body.
So that came to mind.
C.J.
Hopkins is a really good satirical writer.
He's an American living in Berlin, and he publishes on UNZ.com.
And I wanted to read a short quote here of his regarding masks, face masks.
It goes like this.
We've understood for at least 100 years that masks are ineffective against viruses.
They don't stop viral transmission.
And then suddenly, oh, no, they do.
And the masks were imposed.
They were just very obviously a way to symbolically, theatrically generate the atmosphere of disease and panic and plague that would not be there otherwise.
If you imagine that everyone just took their masks off and just went about their lives, then how many of us really would be aware of a deadly apocalyptic pandemic that's devastating the world?
The mask is theater.
If you get millions of people to put hospital masks on and walk around acting as if there's a plague, then in the minds of the people, there's a plague.
And that gets back to what I have always said.
This is a battle being fought in the mind of humanity.
Good point.
Excellent, excellent quote, Michael.
I can't thank you and Scorpio enough.
From the exotic land of Ecuador, David Scorpio, and from Asheville, North Carolina, Michael Ivey have made wonderful contributions, very perceptive comments.
When he mentioned the title of one of my books, I must say, about its origin, it was my series editor and colleague, Mike Palachuk, who suggested the title, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook.
And then when we planned the sequel, he suggested what one might say in response to hearing the title of the first.
And I suppose we didn't go to the moon either, because it sounds so bewildering.
But the fact of the matter is, nobody died at Sandy Hook.
It's an elaborate sham.
We're being played again and again and again.
The coronavirus, even the creation of Hamas, as we're learning here, are for additional political stunts intended to mislead and manipulate the American people.
Let me say from the bottom of my heart, do your best to protect yourself and your loved ones from the threats that we now confront from this artificially manufactured pandemic.
Do everything you can to avoid the shots.
Everything you can.
It's no hyperbole to say your life may depend upon it.
In this case, it does.
Thank you for joining us.
▲
Export Selection