Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 17, 2021 - Jim Fetzer

01:21:56

Need to Know (16 April 2021) with Michael Ivey and Chris Weinert

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, where I'm delighted today to be joined by Michael Ivey from Asheville, North Carolina, and Chris Weinhart from Detroit, though he's on the road today.
	We're very pleased to have him with us to bring you all the news you need to know.
	Today we begin with a very serious report.
	Russian state media warned Putin's hypersonic missiles would vaporize these five U.S.
	targets in a nuclear war.
	It's rather surprising to me.
	I've never seen this happen before.
	I believe it's because the Biden administration is completely under the control of the Zionists, is being dictated by Bibi Netanyahu, and I think that Putin is having to be very, very blunt.
	Russia has said if the U.S.
	positions new missiles in Europe in the wake of the INF Treaty, it could send ships and submarines armed with these new hypersonic weapons to lurk off the U.S.
	coast.
	I believe, in fact, they're already there.
	The targets listed by Russia One's broadcast were the Pentagon, Camp David, Jim Creek Naval Radio Station in Washington, Fort Ritchie in Maryland, and McClellan Air Force Base in California.
	The latter two have been closed for about two decades, making them odd choices, according to Sputnik.
	But my belief would be, therefore, that in fact they've simply gone underground and that what is being telegraphed here is that Russia knows better, that the bases aren't actually closed.
	These all appear to be playing key roles in the U.S.
	command and control structure.
	Russia 1 claimed the Zircon missile Russia is developing actually has already developed could strike critical U.S.
	targets less than five minutes after launch.
	Fired from a submarine can cover great distances very quickly.
	Tensions have been flaring since the country's split over the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Force Treaty.
	Observers have said the collapse of this bilateral pact risks escalating an arms race.
	Russia is particularly concerned, completely legitimately, about the possibility the U.S.
	will position new missiles in Europe Putin has asserted Russia will respond to U.S.
	moves to deploy missiles closer to their border by sending its missiles closer to the United States.
	In a State of the Nation address Wednesday, Putin threatened to target countries' housing missiles in Europe and U.S.
	decision-making centers with new weapons if the U.S.
	were to take that step.
	Michael, I think this is a serious threat.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, you've got to note that it looks like it's a modern day replay of the Cuban Missile Crisis.
	Do we have it on good word that Putin actually said something like that?
	He's not in the habit of being that confrontational.
	And if indeed he is being that confrontational, then that doesn't bode well for the immediate future of peace between the two countries.
	When I first heard that story, I naturally assumed that we're being propagandized, whatever I hear from mainstream media.
	So I thought it was an effort to pump up Russia fear.
	Among our population in preparation for some level of outbreak of war in Ukraine, but I don't know.
	It could be just very serious and very up at the top.
	My opinion is this is completely authentic, that the United States has stupidly been declaring unwavering support for Ukraine.
	Ukraine has declared war against Russia.
	Russia has mobilized mass forces.
	The United States is on very thin ice.
	And I think the problem and the reason he's being so open and candid is because our foreign policy is being run by Bibi Netanyahu, not Americans, but the Israelis.
	Did you just say that Ukraine had formally declared war on Russia?
	Well, sure, Dave.
	That's not news, Michael.
	This happened before, that they declared war on Russia over the Crimea.
	That was a week or 10 days ago.
	For some reason, that slipped by me.
	Boy, that's serious.
	Of course, yes.
	Chris, your thoughts?
	Yeah, in 2014 they had a similar thing where they were almost going hot with that, the Ukrainian-backed NATO rebels versus Russia and the annexation of Crimea, as they were calling it.
	And it's funny how the international media, the Jewish Zionist media, uses these inversions, a place that had been a possession of Russia for a long, long time.
	This is a way that they really are using nuclear blackmail or these type of extortion tactics through the Deep State and through the Zionist-controlled governments.
	And I have to wonder, If Russia is really bucking them or if this is part of the transition into like the next century or the BRICS as you call it, I almost think that what they're doing here in terms of the United States in this overreach, this NATO over-aggression since the end of World War II and even after the Warsaw Pact broke up in 89, this has been the goal to not only get the private sector into Russia, into these resource-laden areas, but to also to
	To put anybody that would stop them fundamentally on the block, the butcher's block, in terms of the international media.
	So I have to wonder if maybe Putin's kicking these guys out or if this is part of the show and it's just, you know, us being conditioned into this helplessness.
	But Michael's right.
	This reminds me a lot of the Cold War that was run by the same, you know, Jewish oligarchs and, you know, the London CIA type guys, the Boston Brahmin.
	So yeah, I have to wonder if this Cold War 2.0 is legit or theater, but I have to say the weaponry that they're talking about is very real, and it's something that shouldn't be underestimated or discounted.
	I mean, these are serious things.
	I almost think that the Biden administration is here to decimate the entire American political capital, or what's left of it, and to facilitate this privatization, this looting of America, and this transition to the next empire through China, Russia, and India.
	So man, I'm seeing what this what's going on here and I think America is really going to take the fall for these robber barons unless we're really we start holding our politicians to the fire for these these overreaches.
	Very good.
	Yeah, Michael, just for clarification, Ukraine declared it was going to retake Crimea and in effect declared war on Russia.
	It was fairly widely reported.
	We certainly had it right here on this show before.
	So I think that this is a very serious situation.
	And not to be underestimated, the Russian military equipment is far superior to the Americans.
	They have better anti-ship missiles, they have better anti-aircraft and anti-missile missiles, and they have better submarine torpedoes.
	These are unstoppable weapons.
	We have nothing that compares with them.
	Hey, Fetz, can I add to that and say that most of the accumulation of military hardware by the Soviet Union and then Russia has been as a result of intellectual property theft and espionage of mostly Zionist operatives within the U.S.
	Department of Defense and its periphery.
	So this is something to be considered, too, in terms of this intellectual property falling in the hands of, you know, supposed adversaries or even allies to some extent.
	Yeah, very, very good.
	Very good.
	I had previously been under the assumption that most of the aggression shown by Ukraine was toward the eastern Donbas section of their country since they've been trying off and on to get that ever since the coup that happened seven or eight years ago.
	And I had not heard that they actually declared that they're going to take the Crimea back.
	Yes, yes, yes, they did.
	Yes, they have.
	Chris, you confirmed that, did you not?
	Yes.
	Yeah, no, I wouldn't doubt it at all, man.
	I know since 2014, it's been a hotbed.
	And I think that there's been some escalation back then as well as now.
	So yeah, it's a very geographical, it's a strong point.
	If you really think about access to the Mediterranean, the Black Sea, these are big for Russia.
	Russia cannot give up Crimea.
	And of course, historically, Ukraine was an integral part of the Soviet Union, where Nikita Khrushchev, who was an ethnic Ukrainian, declared its independence, which was inconsequential until the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991.
	Where Zbigniew Brzezinski, who is a Russophobe, for reasons unknown to me, he hates Russia, proposed in his book, The Grand Chessboard, that if you could pry Ukraine away from Russia, it would greatly weaken the bear.
	And where the Zionists, like Victoria Nuland, have used five billion in American taxpayer to promote that objective.
	And of course, led to the, so-called color revolution, deposing the Russia-friendly
	president of Ukraine at the time and replacing him with a Western stooge. Chris, go ahead.
	Yeah, I think this reeks of burisma, that's all I'll say. Reeks of burisma? Yeah. Michael. In my
	assessment of things, the reason that that new regime hasn't been able to take the eastern part
	of the country in these seven years is because the people don't want that.
	The people who actually live and populate the place don't want that.
	And the same thing is the case with the Crimea as seen by their extremely high levels of voting to be annexed by Russia.
	Oh yeah, it was like on order.
	95% of the voters in Crimea supported the annexation, which was perfectly legal and legitimate, but was characterized as an invasion of Russia.
	You can hear that today on MSNBC.
	They'll tell you Russia invaded Crimea.
	You know, it's unbelievable.
	The problem being that this kind of nonsense could actually precipitate a nuclear war.
	that will also be a Biden won that last election too. That's right. That's right. They'll tell us
	such utter poppycock is that you got it exactly right.
	Meanwhile, and this is from a rather surprising source bombshell report reveals capital police
	were ordered to stand down on January 6.
	Guess who made the call?
	In a new report, the New York Times, surprise, surprise, stated the Capitol Police were told to stand down during the January 6th riot at the Capitol.
	According to a 104-page document obtained by investigators, leaders were warned of the pre-planned violence, but instead of being proactive, officers were told to stand down and allow the riot to happen.
	The question remains, who made the call?
	Well, we all know the Capitol Police are under the control of the Speaker of the House.
	Nancy Pelosi made the call, I have no doubt.
	Here's a tweet, breaking news from the New York Times.
	The Capitol Police were told not to use their most aggressive tactics ahead of the January 6th riot, despite warnings of violence in which Congress itself is the target, according to a new report by an internal investigator.
	Remember, too, another tweet, when the police let the protesters in?
	We all watched it happen.
	The Capitol Police had clear or advanced warning about the attack than previously known, but officers were instructed not to use their most aggressive tactics.
	In a 104-page document, the Inspector General Michael A. Bolton Criticized the way the Capitol Police prepared for and responded to the mob violence on January 6.
	The report was reviewed by the New York Times.
	The subject of a Capitol hearing initiated Thursday, I presume yesterday.
	Mr. Bolton found the agency's leaders failed to adequately prepare despite explicit warnings that And here it says pro-Trump extremists, but actually it was Antifa, anti-Trump, masquerading as pro-Trump, posed a threat to law enforcement and civilians, and that the police used defective protective equipment.
	They also ordered their civil disturbance unit to refrain from using its most powerful crowd control tools like stun grenades to put down the onslaught.
	The report offers the most devastating account to date of the lapses and miscalculations around the most violent attack on the Capitol in two centuries.
	Here's another tweet.
	Little by little, the real truth finally rises.
	The New York Times has finally confirmed what many political observers have been saying about the Capitol riots.
	It was preplanned.
	The Capitol police knew it was coming, and authorities effectively gave a stand-down order.
	A couple of months ago, the mainstream thought the idea Capitol Police let protesters into the building was a conspiracy theory, but now they're reporting it as truth three months too late.
	And, of course, we know, really, the key players here were CNN paid an Antifa agitator, John Sullivan, $35,000 for videotaping while he was leading the protest, where James, his brother, Reported that he led 226 Antifa members into the Capitol posing as Trump supporters to bring about the riot.
	Michael, your thoughts?
	Yeah, like you said when you first started that story, Jim, we've already seen the videos and we've heard lots of witness testimonies and The only big surprise here is the fact that it came from the New York Times.
	The New York Times is like the flagship for the Zionist, leftist, communist propaganda that we're constantly given in this country.
	I have lots of friends here who take it, and they think that they're getting the best journalism in the world.
	One would expect the New York Times to do everything in its power to reinforce the Trump caused the terrible riot with his white supremacist rhetoric narrative.
	You'd expect them that they'd stick with that narrative.
	But here we get this, and maybe it makes me think, maybe they think they have to throw in a little truth about these things here and there to maintain the illusion that they're an objective news agency.
	Yeah, and shockingly enough, the New York Times remains our nation's newspaper of record.
	So what you read in the New York Times is supposed to be the official history of the USA, as absurd as that may be.
	Orwellian history.
	Well, we all pretty much can come up with the same common core math on this.
	The 2 plus 2 equals 5 in the New York Times should be flying the Jolly Roger for the liberals.
	Yeah, I think that nothing's changed in terms of their loyalty towards that.
	I also have to say that part of these disruptions and these acts of violence are often sent in by maybe FBI or military or mercenary type operations or NGOs to disrupt the perception of popular sovereignty.
	In other words, at a populist candidate, whether it's Bernie Sanders or Donald Trump, if you remember 2016, the Clinton folks were sending their mercenaries in left and right wearing Sanders or Trump t-shirts to start fights with anybody that would pretty much fight back.
	And this is something that they have done for a long time.
	In terms of trying to disrupt the credibility of a populist candidate.
	And I think that it's really no difference as far as what they're doing now.
	They have to maintain the illusion of popular support for Joe Biden.
	And the only way that they can do that is if people are on a limbic state of reaction and emotional duress.
	So I think that this is not an accident.
	And that whole Capitol riot staging thing, people that have seen the actual tour of that pretty much know better.
	And the mainstream media keeps going on with this narrative along with the politicians.
	I think this is a major overreach.
	It's going to slap them in the face.
	And I think that it should because they're bullshitting people and it needs to be called out.
	Very good.
	Very good.
	Very nice.
	Excellent.
	Meanwhile, we have Dan Bongino and Geraldo Rivera clashing over race and policing.
	It got pretty heated on Hannity featuring the two.
	Geraldo, who used to be doing something worthwhile when he would host a show dealing with fringe issues, but who's turned into an insignificant digit since he went legit.
	Stands up for all the official narratives.
	It was pretty clear this segment about race and politics was going to go sideways in a hurry, so Bongino finally gets a chance to reply.
	Takes a moment to collect his thoughts before responding to the bold idea Of having police wear a firearm on their non-dominant hand and the non-lethal force option on the dominant.
	Dan literally says, I don't even know how to respond to that.
	Give me a second to digest this stupidity.
	I think he had it all over Geraldo who exploded.
	You even said to Geraldo, you don't wear a badge, period.
	Not interested in your reporting on it because reporters deal in facts.
	And you brought the race card into it.
	We have to reassure the black public that cops aren't out to get them, said Geraldo.
	Dan went back to the point of saying the race card is a big part of why there's so much distrust in the first place.
	Hannity sought to restore order, redirect the topic away, talk about the staggering number of cops whose lives have been lost in the line of duty.
	Names and numbers we do not hear day after day.
	A context usually missing in how high the stakes are for the officers having to make split-second life-or-death decisions.
	Bongino said it's happening because people like Geraldo continue to pump out a race narrative with no data to back it up.
	In the course of each day, if there were a plague of police officers hunting black men down at night, And I don't understand if that's what's happening.
	Where's all the Massey body count we would see?
	He, Geraldo, is just making this up.
	No data to back it up.
	He doesn't know anything about that woman, meaning the one who claimed to have mistakenly fired her service revolver instead of a taser.
	He doesn't know anything about that woman, anything.
	He's injecting race into the argument because he has nothing else.
	That's why.
	Geraldo.
	You tell that to the black families who have their sons.
	There you go.
	At twice the rate, that's all you've got.
	You've got nothing else, buddy.
	That's a fact.
	You've got nothing, Bongino said.
	All you want to do is see the country burn.
	You just want to see the country burn.
	Geraldo, I want to see the country burn, you son of a bitch.
	I want to see the country burn.
	Bongino, you're making a race war out of it.
	Geraldo, you punk.
	You're nothing but a punk.
	Bongino, yeah, right.
	Geraldo, you're a punk, Bongino.
	You're a punk, Bongino.
	You wouldn't tell me that to my face.
	Hannity, we'll leave it there.
	But look at this.
	Bongino's 100% right.
	In 2013, per million members of the murderers' race, there were 55 times more blacks killed by blacks than were blacks killed by whites.
	Indeed, whites killed by blacks were 10 times more than blacks killed by whites.
	Whites killed by whites more than 10 times more.
	All the evidence suggests overwhelmingly gun violence in the United States is blacks on blacks using handguns.
	AR-15s have essentially nothing to do with it.
	And if you want more statistics, here is New York City for 2014.
	Arrests for violent crime shooting.
	75% Black.
	22% Hispanic.
	That's already 97% of the shootings.
	62% Hispanic.
	That's already 97% of the shootings, murder.
	62% Black.
	34% Latino.
	That's already 94% of the murder arrests.
	Rape.
	Hispanic, 46%.
	Black, 43.
	That's already 49%.
	If New York City were all white, rapes would go down by 93%.
	Murder by 91.
	Hispanic 46%, Black 43%, that's all right, 49%.
	If New York City were all white, rapes would go down by 93%, murder by 91%, shooting by 96%.
	Bongino had it all over Geraldo, who's guided by ideology, not by evidence.
	Michael, your thoughts?
	Yeah, Bongino said in the midst of that, you wouldn't say that to my face.
	It made me wish that he had actually been in the studio and we'd get some real fighting between those guys.
	Now, that would have been interesting.
	I certainly applaud Bongino's calling him out for his, what do you say, not even implicit, but it's like the contextual background to what Geraldo was saying.
	And he was calling him out for it, this constant context.
	of this whites killing blacks race narrative.
	And we've known for a long time that that's been one of the main strategies used by the socialist communist Marxists that are trying to undermine our society and have done a damn good job of it, I might say, over the last century is to use minorities against the white Christian majority.
	I don't know if you're going to cover it further on, but are you going to have a story about Tucker's talking about the replacement theory of the electorate?
	I have previously, Michael, on other shows.
	You're welcome, Ted.
	I mean, Tucker's been fantastic of late.
	His opening segments have just been spot on.
	And yes, yes, yes.
	He talked about the replacement theory of migrants who come in and reproduce at a very rapid rate.
	You put that together with the vaccines inducing sterility and you see a master plan to alter the demographics of the United States.
	That's right, and I was really proud of Tucker.
	You know, Tucker's wavered on some things, but after his first mention of it, the ADL and other Jewish organizations attacked him with the normal slurs, of course.
	And I find that interesting as well, that all he had to do, all he had to do was mention replacement, and they flipped out.
	That gives you an idea that that's part of their agenda.
	Well, we covered it in previous shows, but I just point out that ADL acknowledges that in Israel, they use the same argument to keep Palestinians out of Israel because they multiply more rapidly and it would lose the character of the Jewish state.
	So their hypocrisy is simply overwhelming.
	Yes, I applaud Tucker too.
	What really made me respect Tucker more was after that barrage that he took, he didn't back down at all.
	He didn't apologize.
	The next night, he did a beautiful and brilliant 20-minute monologue on exactly what he was talking about, and it all made perfect sense and logic.
	Michael, you're spot on.
	I agree with you 100%.
	Chris, your thoughts?
	Well, I think that this is an effort by the Robert Barrett's probably the people that own the stations, like the one that Tucker used to work at CNBC and now Fox, I think that it's really an effort to really create emotional reaction a tug of war.
	A situation that focuses on a distraction instead of the real issue of socio-economic oppression.
	Every single race or group or demographic has been oppressed by the same robber barons that own these networks, but they want to make sure that we start fighting with each other over minutia, stuff that's manufactured in terms of dramatic theater and exaggerated in terms of media sensationalism.
	So I have to say that these type of metrics are certainly not a genuine statistic that is something to necessarily worry about in the grand scheme of things.
	This is something that is just a minutiae that is focused in on a molehill versus mountain effect, and it's probably for quote unquote good reason, because I don't really draw those going to start talking about the social economic reasons that probably could cause most of this unrest in the world.
	That is being foisted upon this racial issue because I really don't think the problem is a racial or a religious one unless you really look at the people trying to rule the world and start talking about them and criticizing them for what they are because they would rather see us fighting amongst ourselves amongst the caste system and in the lower demographics and ignoring the top of the pyramid.
	So I think that's kind of what's going on here.
	Nice, nice point.
	Meanwhile, to reinforce what the New York Times was reporting, the Department of Justice has closed its investigation of the police shooting death of Ashley Babbitt.
	Where we have a 21-minute video just now being uploaded to my BitChute site, by the way, where you can see there are managers and directors in the crowd telling the Capitol invaders where to go and what to do, and where it follows them into the hallways, and where you can see Ashley attempting to go through the window when she's shot by a Capitol officer, but it's totally fake.
	Let me observe here.
	As members of the mob continue to strike the glass doors, Ms.
	Babbitt attempted to climb through one of the doors where glass was broken out.
	An officer inside the speaker's lobby fired one round, striking her in the left shoulder, causing her to fall back from the doorway and onto the floor.
	a USCP emergency response team, which had begun making its way into the hallway,
	administered aid to Miss Babbitt, who was transported to Washington Hospital Center,
	where she could succumb to her injuries. I did not see, frankly, an emergency response team
	where we have a video tracking the whole event.
	When he fires at Baba, she's not even in the hallway.
	She's causing no threat to him.
	It was not a justifiable shoot, but get this, here's what we're told.
	The investigation revealed no evidence to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the officer willfully committed a violation of 18 U.S.C.
	242 specifically.
	The investigation revealed no evidence to establish that at the time the officer filed a single shot at Ms.
	Babbitt.
	The officer did not reasonably believe it was necessary to do in self-defense or in defense of members of Congress and others evacuating the House chamber.
	But that's completely absurd.
	She's eight or ten feet away.
	She's unarmed.
	She didn't pose any kind of threat.
	Not only that, but to bring an indictment does not require beyond a reasonable doubt.
	That's a standard in the courtroom, to find someone guilty of an offense for which they can be punished by a loss of liberty or property or their life.
	So this is really a fabricated report ...tended to minimize what we know to be the truth, to which this appears to be a completely staged event.
	Meanwhile, as a Derek Chauvin trial goes to jury, the outcome may please no one.
	Just to undermine the role of beyond a reasonable doubt, for a jury to find an accused guilty beyond a reasonable doubt means that no alternative explanation is reasonable.
	The prosecution and defense have both rested their case in the trial of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin.
	After two weeks of testimony from 38 witnesses caused by the prosecution, Chauvin's defense attorney, Eric Nelson, concluded a roughly three-day presentation of jurors with seven witnesses poking holes in the state's argument.
	Both sides will have their final shot at appealing to juries in closing arguments that begin on Monday, which could take hours, days or weeks to wit the deliberations.
	What Chauvin's defense has done will be enough to persuade the jury is a close call, said Minnesota defense attorney Mike Brandt.
	While the state put forward a strong case, the defense doesn't have to prove anything, just cast reasonable doubt.
	Meanwhile, University of Minnesota law professor David Schultz, teaching a class on the trial, said he would be totally stunned to be shoved and acquitted on the two murder and one manslaughter charges based on the evidence he describes as pretty overwhelming.
	However, Shultz said he also believes a hung jury, in which jurors can't come to agreement on one or more of the charges, to be the most likely outcome, at which point the judge may declare a mistrial.
	Let me review the bidding.
	While the prosecution was presenting its case, the defense was doing very good cross-examination, including a video where George Floyd is heard saying, I ate too many drugs.
	Toxicology tests showed massive quantities of of drugs were in his system, including methamphetamines and
	cannabis and other, which were of a serious nature. He apparently swallowed the drugs which had been
	provided by his dealer, so they wouldn't be evidence here, including fentanyl, in that
	it had an effect on his body because he overdosed.
	One of the effects of a drug overdose is on its respiratory system, making it difficult to breathe.
	So that George Floyd was heard to say repeatedly, I can't breathe, I can't breathe, Long before he was prone on the ground with Derek Chauvin's knee on his neck.
	In fact, the judge has ruled the knee wasn't actually on his neck, but only in the area of his neck, which raises further doubts.
	Not only that, but the carotid artery, which would have been depressed by the knee, is on both sides of the neck.
	So if he were cut off blood supply to his brain on one side, it would have still continued on the other.
	What this means is there is grounds for an alternative explanation that he died,
	not because of Derek Chauvin's knee on his neck, a technique which, by the way,
	the Minneapolis police are instructed to use on a suspect who's resisting.
	But also that the drugs appear to have been responsible for his death,
	in which case a hung jury appears to be highly probable.
	Because in order to achieve a conclusion beyond a reasonable doubt,
	no alternative explanation must be reasonable.
	But in this case, there's an obvious available, reasonable alternative explanation.
	Nobody's going to be happy at the end of this case, said Justin Hanford, a Howard University Law School professor and Black Lives Matter activist who runs the university's Thurgood Marshall Civil Rights Center.
	If Chauvin gets off, it's going to be like a Rodney King situation, referring to the 1992 riots in L.A.
	following the jury's decision to quit the officers who brutally beat Rodney King.
	If he's convicted, the prosecution's case is that he's a bad apple.
	Neither the defense nor the prosecution narrative is going to make the protesters happy.
	A trial's conclusion comes among a resurgence of unrest following a police killing just 10 miles away, for Daunte Wright, an unarmed 20-year-old black man, was fatally shot by a Brooklyn Center police officer during a traffic stop on Sunday.
	Let me observe several points about this matter.
	The officer, a woman with 26 year experience, claims she mistook her service revolver for her taser.
	That is not reasonable.
	Her service resolver is on the handed side of her body.
	If she's right-handed, on her right side, with a taser on her left.
	If the officer were left-handed, the service revolver on the left side, the taser on the right.
	Tasers are usually identified by being colorful.
	Yellow or orange.
	The heft and weight of a taser is very different than that from a weapon, a service revolver.
	When she fires after saying, taser, taser, taser, there is no sound of a shot.
	There is no recoil.
	The weapon does not automatically reload.
	Indeed, there's no impact of a bullet, which had Daunte Wright been shot by that weapon at that range, he would have been unable to drive anywhere.
	Indeed, after he drives off and she says, shit, I shot him, the other officers are stunned and surprised, which would have been preposterous had she actually shot him, since they would have heard the shot.
	The suburban city has been flooded with protesters every night since.
	Civil rights leaders gathering to call for justice, highlighting connections between the cases.
	But this all appears to be very interesting in light of a massive law enforcement response.
	They declared the assembly in Brooklyn Center to be unlawful.
	They imposed a curfew.
	I've been very heartened by the fact that At long last, the city administration took a hard line, which I believe was probably induced by business leaders calling up and saying, if you don't crack down on this, you're going to be ridden out of town on a rail to the mayor.
	Michael, your thoughts?
	Yeah, we've got three shootings you just went through, Jim.
	The first one, the Ashley Babbitt one, is A fake shooting that was necessary, in my mind, for the producers of the whole January 6th incident stage theater to have someone die so that they could keep using terms like deadly confrontation at the Capitol that day.
	And then, oh, I wanted to mention that your coverage of that Is going to be posted at the Jim Fetzer bit shoot site entitled what happened at the Capitol on 6th January, so it'll be easy to find.
	The Derek Chauvin trial is kind of a difficult one for me to comment on in as much as the temptation is to get into the weeds and to do a normal job of weighing evidence that we're hearing.
	We're hearing a lot of.
	evidence coming out of there, but all of it is in the context, in the background, of the whole story itself being a false story in the first place.
	So it's hard for me to take very seriously the weighing of evidence in any other but a propaganda Context where they're going to have to come up with a conclusion.
	And the weighing of evidence is going to lead them to a conclusion that'll probably be either an acquittal
	or a hung jury, as you say, and neither of those conclusions
	is going to make the protesters happy.
	To me, this is all racial strife theater.
	her.
	And it's a big aspect of the principle of divide and conquer.
	All three of these shootings, to my intuition, feels like media false theater to me, to divide and conquer.
	Well, I think that Chris is going to agree, as do I. But I think, in fact, a hung jury is the best possible outcome.
	No clear cut for either side doesn't give really a strong motive for the riots to continue.
	And no reason to rejoice.
	I think it's clearly conflicted and they could not come to the conclusion a unanimous verdict beyond reasonable doubt.
	Chris, your thoughts?
	Yeah, you know, I'm thinking about all the times that these that you guys have named in the past, whether it's the Malice Green here in Detroit or the Rodney King thing or the OJ verdict or many of these things, even in the 60s with the, you know, Brown vs. Board and the school thing and the Southern Governors, the Southern Manifesto.
	You know, the mainstream media is always there to sensationalize both sides of this argument and to present selective half-truths or limited information that is mostly generated to sensationalize, like Michael says, a racist response.
	Uh, and to provoke people in demographics of race and to make an issue about race.
	In many cases, it's not, and I can't necessarily say that these cops are racist or not, but the media is out here trying to make it into something like that.
	And more importantly, uh, look at the amount of ratings that the media is getting and how often the media has been involved with these types of operations, sensationalizing these things, only to find out posthumously, 20, 10 years later, that these guys are part of a COINTELP operation.
	And that the CIA is involved with not only the manufacturing of these theatrics, in some cases actual murders or even false flags, but then you got the mainstream media doing what they're doing to try to take every bit of rights and constitutional liberties from the citizenry while pretending to be this moral hierarchy or this moral high horse.
	And it's really a selective tokenism or like a victimization that is put onto a demographic that in many cases
	represents reality, but in many cases, it's exaggerated by the circumstances in many cases.
	You know, there's people that are patrolling hard places and they have tough jobs that are, you know, the cops,
	and maybe some of them shouldn't be cops.
	But in this case, you know, it seems to me like the Floyd George case that it was like an overdose.
	And really, you know, at what point is the officer responsible for the safe custody of people
	that have really done this damage to themselves?
	So yeah, this is really, like I say, selective truths, half-truths that are being emotionally presented for a political purpose.
	And I think that really, who wins in this?
	It's the 1% when we squabble with each other and they loot us blind.
	Nice points.
	Michael, did you want to add?
	No, no, I'm right on board with everything Chris just said.
	Very nice.
	Very nice.
	Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
	Here you have your annual COVID passport.
	Certificate of vaccination with your passport number.
	Look at the image.
	Captured it exactly.
	Mandatory vaccinations, check.
	Negative anal swab test, check.
	Permission to travel, check.
	This is the way they want to control our lives permanently and forever.
	Meanwhile, William DeBerg published a pandemic that wasn't, which seems to me to make wonderful points, at my blog at jamesfetzer.org.
	Many have argued since its inception COVID-19 was not the pandemic governments and medical establishments and the media have led us to believe.
	The COVID-19 outbreak on the Diamond Princess cruise ship in early March, still the best controlled COVID-19 data, was a first telling sign.
	Over 3,000 passengers tested.
	712 found COVID virus positive.
	13 died.
	The case fatality rate of 1.8% was higher than for the flu, but lower than for SARS or MERS.
	Limited medical treatments were available during the ship outbreak.
	The median age of the passengers was in the mid-60s, so that the age adjusted risk of COVID for the general population would be less than 0.05% in the normal flu range.
	Then in October, as we reported, Genovese Beyond of Johns Hopkins published research, since retracted, actually suppressed by the university, that showed there were no excess deaths in the United States in 2020, with most COVID death attributions a result of classifying other sources, principally heart disease, as COVID.
	It's easy to argue this or that with projections and assumptions, but the saying goes, one cannot cheat death.
	One either dies or does not.
	Microtrend annual death rate data provides unassailable evidence there was no COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.
	The death rate for the entire world remained the same in 2020 as in 2019.
	Nor did death rates for individual nations change more than a couple of hundredths of a percent.
	New Zealand, the United States, but supposedly hard-hit COVID hotspots like the UK and Italy actually saw their death rates decrease.
	in a cross-check of a dozen nations. Australia, Brazil, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy,
	Russia, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States, and New Zealand. None had its death rate changed
	by more than a fraction, plus or minus 0.01 percent from 2019 to 2020. Not surprisingly,
	the world's population now almost 8 billion, pressed on with another 80 million humans
	added last year, the same as 2019. So, So where was the pandemic?
	It was most obviously a reclassification of cause of death, Promoted by world and national health agencies in the U.S., for example, everything from heart disease to pneumonia to the normal flu, even gunshot fatalities were attributed to COVID in 2020.
	Did some individuals die exclusively because of exposure to the coronavirus?
	Quite possibly.
	Were some indirect deaths, such as suicides, elevated because of the lockdowns?
	Quite likely.
	But did it cause a spike in deaths or life insurance premiums?
	No, it did not.
	One can presume there was, at a minimum, a conspiracy of government officials, the media, and the medical establishment to push the COVID pandemic fantasy onto the public in many nations.
	A leaked document provides proof in one large Western nation, Germany.
	But why?
	There's been an enormous transfer of wealth worldwide from poor nations and individuals to mega-rich elites in the West since a pandemic charade was promulgated.
	There's also been a dramatic loss of personal and public freedom in much of the world as well, thereby tightening the grip of the elites.
	One of the end goals of all this COVID fear was to vaccinate most of the world's population, whether because of the hidden content and purpose of the vaccines, genetic engineering, or because of vaccination controls such as passports that further enslave the general public.
	A funny thing happened on the way to the Elite's Great Research, however.
	The number of those in the U.S.
	willing to get injected leveled off in mid-March.
	It may have even peaked in early April.
	The total number of vaccinated Americans falling below expectations.
	The supply is more than adequate, so the decreasing interest in vaccinations could be a sign that the unvaccinated remainder, overwhelmingly below the age of 50, has finally begun to fear the vaccines more than COVID itself.
	Not surprising, since there have been over 10,000 reported deaths and serious injuries due to the vaccines in the U.S.
	alone.
	And the WHO questions both the concept of vaccination passports and the long-term efficacy of the vaccines, even if a large minority or even a slight majority, after a year of intimidation and propaganda, reject the elites off of vaccination salvation in favor of non-vaccination damnation.
	This throws a big monkey wrench into their imagination moving forward.
	The outcome of the battle for tyranny versus liberty all boils down to the balance of fear.
	As so aptly put by John Basil Barnum in 1914, when the people fear the government, you have tyranny.
	When the government fears the people, you have liberty.
	And a large percentage of the American people are rejecting being vaccinated against a non-existent viral pandemic promulgated for nefarious reasons by American and world elites, offers hope that liberty may yet prevail in the COVID war.
	Michael, your thoughts?
	Jim, it's been an increasing point of curiosity to me how they put this thing together.
	It's just amazing what they've done in a criminal genius type of way.
	The phrase Military industrial complex is famous from Eisenhower's message when he was leaving the presidency.
	And it's my understanding that he wanted to make that military industrial political complex.
	We've had that for many years, and people have a certain concept of that, but what has been building all this time is the medical-industrial-political complex, and this whole experience is showing us all the connections that have existed and all the money that's flowed In order to make this possible, to do this worldwide pandemic scam, if there's any one statistical point that speaks volumes about the fraudulent nature of the pandemic, it's what you were covering at the first part of that article, and that's the fact that there were no increases in death totals for practically all the countries
	That this horrible killer virus was supposed to have infected.
	And it's also the case that there's been a continual buildup of legislative and treaty agreements over the years that have made this possible.
	That one that I just heard about that I didn't know about before was that in 2007, The charter of the World Health Organization was modified to make it legally binding on all hundred 94 individual states that when the, the who the World Health Organization's declares a global pandemic.
	What the WHO says and how to handle it supersedes the laws of the individual nations.
	That's part of a treaty that was signed with 194 individual states in 2007.
	So I'll give it back to you there.
	That's extremely telling.
	Yes, yes.
	Eisenhower wanted to address the military-industrial-congressional complex, but his advisor suggested since he was delivering the speech to Congress, it might be inadvisable to include that qualifier.
	Would that he had.
	Chris, your observations.
	Yeah, you know, I think there's a thing that we're missing here that's the Federal Reserve and it's usually the Class A shareholders in many cases are foreigners or maybe people that have dual or citizenship or loyalties beyond the United States.
	So I have to say that this private foreign interest that has been running our economic system had defaulted in 2019.
	And I have to say this COVID thing, this emergency comes in at the perfect time to deliver this thing.
	This whole frenzy under duress where people are voluntarily eliminating themselves and they're facilitating this depopulation voluntarily under duress.
	Through the misinformation of the mainstream media and the medical community, in many cases, the same medical community that is funded and run by these exact same robber barons that create our foreign policy with the CFR or our medical protocols with the CDC.
	So arguably speaking, this is a UN hostile takeover by the banks.
	And this whole pandemic thing was in fact planned.
	If you look at many of the evidence that indicates this was something that they knew about well in advance of the actual outbreak, And this thing is more importantly, a Niall Ferguson simulation model is what I can see.
	And like you say, these real fatalities have not gone up in number, but the actual claimants in terms of social security, the actual deaths from from peripheral things like the vaccination, which seems to me a massive depopulation agenda in itself.
	Uh, will be normal and will be voluntary.
	And the people that are being victimized by this are doing so on their own volition under the, uh, the scope of fear that is being sensationalized by the mainstream media who have getting, who have been getting most of their revenue funds.
	65% of their ad revenue comes from this exact industry, the big pharma.
	So to me, there seems to be not only a vested conflict of interest here, but an absolute series of war crimes that are hell bent on turning the constitution into the Georgia guidestones.
	Very, very nice.
	And I think Michael made a great point about the WHO assuming this great authority across the states, having legal significance by way of a treaty.
	In my opinion, a clear indication of what was going to emerge in the following years.
	Michael, you had an additional thought?
	I was just saying that phrase could be expanded to the medical, pharmaceutical, industrial, political, media complex.
	And it's definitely something to beware.
	Yes.
	Yes.
	100% correct.
	Yes.
	Eisenhower is doing his best.
	Meanwhile, get this.
	The lockdowns are destroying all competition for the companies owned by the 30 Illuminati families.
	This is devastating.
	I have suggested some questions a DC swamp creature should answer.
	Jean-Luc Montagnier won the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 2008.
	He said COVID-19 was made in a lab.
	It contains strands from the HIV virus.
	The spike protein was engineered from SARS into COVID.
	This allows it to enter human cells.
	Four new sequences were engineered into COVID from the HIV virus, including the GP-41 envelope, Which is a key for HIV to infect human bodies.
	Dr. Francis Anthony Boyle, who wrote America's bioterrorism law, Francis Boyle, who's a professor of law at the University of Illinois, agrees it was made in a lab.
	Question, do you support a criminal investigation with criminal charges and a death penalty for all those involved in killing millions of people worldwide?
	If not, why not?
	If assuming the COVID-19 virus was made in a lab at the University of North Carolina, asserted here to be the fact, Fauci sent funds from NIH to the lab in Wuhan to enhance the contagion abilities of COVID-19.
	He also covered up the funding process so others would not know what he had done.
	Question.
	Should Dr. Anthony Tony the Rat Fauci be the first?
	We arrest for bioterrorism and mass murder for the creation of COVID-19.
	If you don't want him arrested for killing people, why not?
	Epidemiological studies show 70% of Americans and around the world are deficient in vitamin D. Scientific studies reveal we could reduce the COVID death rate by 80% by giving everyone minimal doses of vitamin D. Also, Invermectin has clearly shown an ability to cure COVID as well, of course, as HCQ.
	Would you support adding vitamin D3 and Invermectin to the standards of best medical care for COVID?
	Would you support criminal charges, hefty fines, possible civil court cases against any doctor, clinic, or government official who resists using cheaper and more effective treatments such as vitamin D and Invermectin, and I add HCQ, and instead pushes expensive and ineffective treatments to enhance the profits of Big Pharma?
	If not, why not?
	On September 10, 2001, Donald Rumsfeld went on CBS, admitted neither he nor the Pentagon controller, Rabbi Dov Zockheim, a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen, could trace $2.3 trillion missing from the DoD budget.
	The following day, of course, the Pentagon was attacked.
	Question.
	Would you support the release of all crime scene photos from the interior of the Pentagon so we can determine what actually happened that morning?
	If not, why not?
	There was a comics vault containing gold and silver billion in the basement vault four levels down of World Trade Center Tower 4.
	Were you aware a billion dollars in gold and silver went missing from that supposedly secure vault the night before 9-11?
	Does this convince you many Americans in elite New York circles knew 9-11 was going to happen?
	On September 11, BBC announced a collapse of World Trade Center 7.
	23 minutes before it actually collapsed.
	They've been told that by the Rothschild-controlled Reuters News Service, Tower 7 had already collapsed.
	How can a 47-steel frame structure come down at approximately freefall?
	Would you support a criminal investigation into the deaths of the 3,000 who died that day?
	If not, why not?
	It continues making key points about 9-11.
	Dr. Mark Skidmore has demonstrated at least $35 trillion has gone missing from government accounts since 1998.
	Would you be willing to support a grand jury criminal investigation into the theft of the missing trillions?
	If not, why not?
	He's also observed discrepancies.
	Trillions of dollars in the sale of U.S.
	Treasury bonds.
	They all have concluded wealthy men are allowed to make money from the sale of Treasury bonds and stick it in their deep pockets.
	Would you support a grand jury criminal investigation into the theft of trillions from the sale of U.S.
	Treasury bonds?
	Do you know the U.S.
	M1 money supply is growing faster than Argentina's?
	At the current rate of growth, the money supply will grow by at least 2,000 percent from October 2019 to summer of 2022.
	What is your plan to stop this runaway inflation of the dollar?
	Several states are looking to pass laws.
	Congress declared war before state National Guard troops can be federalized and set on long deployments in combat zones.
	Would you support such efforts?
	COVID-19 was designed to kill the economy so you could blame the virus and not the bankers who have robbed us of tens of trillions of dollars.
	David Rothkopf was the managing director of Kissinger Associates back in the 1990s.
	He wrote the book Superclass, in which he said the world was run by 30 families and their 6,000 minions.
	The 30 families are the New World Order.
	Lockdowns destroy all competition of the companies owned by the 30 Families and their 6,000 Minions.
	Do you not see lockdowns are integral to the NWO plan for the Great Reset, which will forever reduce everyone to slavery?
	Everyone not a member of one of the 30 Families?
	Would you support congressional investigation into the 30 Families or 6,000 Minions and the NWO for the lockdowns?
	The kings of ancient Sumer and Babylon painlessly ended depressions by canceling debt.
	The Bible writers called it a jubilee, since the self-appointed elite stole tens of trillions from the taxpayers.
	Don't you think it's just we arrest the guilty, seize their assets, and use them to fund worldwide debt cancellation?
	We'll probably need to declare martial law when our cities are being burned down by rioters in search of food.
	The junior military officers could easily turn martial law into justice, a justice-based military coup, and arrest the bankers who stole those tens of trillions, seize their assets, and fund worldwide debt cancellation.
	Do you think worldwide debt cancellation funded by seizing the assets of our criminal elite is a good idea?
	Michael, that's a tough one to disagree with.
	Your thoughts?
	It certainly is, and I don't disagree with it.
	There were a lot of good questions in that article from 9-11, the financial situation, and the COVID-19 pandemic.
	I wanted to make a comment about it started with the Jean-Luc Montagnier and Francis Boyle's observations that they thought We were looking at a gain-of-function bioweapon there, and I just want to say that what those high-level researchers are looking at is our genetic sequences that were assembled by computers from tiny fragments of virus samples that had been mixed with all kinds of other materials before they tried to get a genetic sequence out of them.
	And none of them have ever been proven to cause disease.
	That's why we can honestly and logically say that there's been no real isolation of any COVID-19 virus since this whole thing.
	As a matter of fact, the whole field of virology has been trading on an equivocation of the term isolation for decades now.
	That when you actually look at the methodologies from which they claim isolation, it's not isolation at all.
	And many of the good doctors like Paul from California was talking about Cowan and Kauffman and And Stefan Lonka and others point this out.
	And they say that, look, virology these days is a king with no clothes, the emperor with no clothes on.
	And Tom Cowan says that modern virology exists somewhere on the spectrum between misunderstanding and abject fraud.
	Chris, your thoughts?
	Yeah, I think it's if this were the 1950s, we'd all been snatched up and lobotomized by the Rockefeller Board of Medicine already.
	But yeah, in today's modern times with today's modern media, I don't think they can keep getting away with these type of things and using the agency and the APA to do so.
	Yeah, I think that they really got to come up with these type of more complex scams.
	These are the original Highwaymen, these 30 families, the Illuminati, whatever you want to call them.
	They've used things like religion or law or money or economic sorcery or any of these things, deception, guile, to really aggrandize themselves in the way that they have.
	Offering these fear-based golem enterprises and extorting the population from these type of enterprises, where they send in both the lawmen and the outlaw alike.
	Departmentalize them and turn them against each other in many ways for the sake of not only dividing the people, but so that people pick sides in this supposed war that is controlled on both sides in many cases, whether it's nation states, whether it's, you know, cities or even for like mining rights or any of these situations, they can be universally applied in the same formula and probably summed up with a degree of accuracy if you really look at anything that is in today's industrial production or industrial relevance.
	They're trying to run out the small businesses, they're trying to run out the mom-and-pop shop, really make it so they're the only game in town.
	And I think that this is an overreach by the oligarchy, and they've always been at war with human labor, and they've always been trying to run out, you know, any fight for humanity in terms of disregard.
	So yeah, if they can pretty much replace us all with robotics and phase in this fourth industrial revolution under the guise of these enterprises, they're going to try because it's ultimately
	about the almighty dollar in the bottom line and these people would rather strangle
	your children than to pay due with what the social contract and what you pay into in
	your entitlements.
	They'd rather do that than to give you what you're entitled to.
	So yeah, it doesn't shock me what they're doing.
	I think that at least the illusion of justice and diligence has to be pursued, if not the real thing, just for the sake of free markets and credibility.
	Does it, you know, you can't have something like this happen.
	You can't have every market being manipulated.
	You can't have the mainstream media running the gambit on everyone.
	It's like every single table in this casino culture is a crooked rig game and it's filled with Coolers and shills and magnets on the table and stacked decks.
	So yeah, at some point in time, whether you're going to actually deal with these things or not, you have to at least land the impression of doing so for the sake of the unsuspecting public to continue this type of Ponzi scheme.
	Well, you know, something that's baffled me forever is how, with a massive depopulation, they're going to have any customers to purchase their products.
	I mean, what's going to happen to economies and industries where there's no one out there making money, earning revenue, that they can buy their products?
	It seems to me the whole thing is going to dwindle into a death spiral economically and in every other way.
	Might take these guys once they get a control of all the resources and there's really no need for human labor they got robotics then it's pretty much just these guys left amongst themselves and I tell you these scumbags can't trust anyone and let alone themselves and they'll be the the last 30 people that are pretty much going to kill each other like the the Della Scala family or the Scalia families or whatever so yeah this is uh you know brothers versus brothers you get into family members versus family members in this bloodline And robots really aren't actual suitable replacements for human beings.
	as well. So I guess ultimately, until they pull their head out of their ass and join
	humanity, I don't think these guys have much hope.
	And robots really aren't actual suitable replacements for human beings. They're by necessity pre-programmed.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Well, I just agree with all that.
	interpret minor changes in the environment that may have enormous significance that a human would perceive and
	respond to, but not a robot.
	So I think they're moving in the wrong direction. They think they've got a handle on it, but in my opinion, it's
	fundamentally misconceived. Michael, you wanted to add?
	Yeah, it's pure hubris.
	Yeah, yeah. Well, I just agree with all that. I think they think that if they get down to about half a billion people
	in the world and have total control of them through this digital slavery system, then basically they can live the
	high life and pursue whatever transhuman pursuits they think is in the future of humanity.
	And as long as they can control What a certain number of people left over to do their bidding, then they'll be fine.
	But it's the word that Chris just used.
	It's a ridiculous amount of hubris, and like he said, it's not going to work.
	They're going to hit the wall at some point from one source or another.
	Yeah, I think it's not going to work.
	They're basing it on preconceptions that it will not be bound out, worn out.
	Meanwhile, Iran's Supreme Leader?
	U.S.
	proposals are not worth looking at.
	I have to agree with Ayatollah Khomeini warning the U.S.
	against dragging out the talks regarding the Iran deal, also known as a Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.
	The talks shouldn't become talks of attrition, he said on press TV.
	They shouldn't be in a way the parties drag on and prolong them.
	It's harmful to the country.
	But America has lost its credibility.
	Biden's claim to be ending America's war in Afghanistan, moreover, is misleading.
	He's announced he'll end by withdrawing U.S.
	troops on the 20th of and won 9-11 terrorist attack. Over 6,000 NATO troops will
	also be withdrawn at the time.
	He claims, you know, we've achieved the objectives, going in with clear goals, bin Laden is dead,
	al-Qaeda is degraded, but al-Qaeda and bin Laden had nothing to do with 9-11.
	It was the CIA and the neocons of the Department of Defense and the most sod.
	Biden's claim that he's ending the war, however, is even under those terms misleading, as the New York Times.
	As reported, the U.S.
	would remain, after the formal departure of U.S.
	troops, with a shadowy combination of clandestine special forces operators, Pentagon contractors, and covert intelligence operatives.
	Their mission will be to find and attack the most dangerous al-Qaeda or Islamic State threats.
	Current and former American officials said, I'm telling you, the U.S.
	is setting it up for a massive onslaught by the Taliban.
	They're not going to accept this idea of diddling around.
	They are not.
	As of January, more than 18,000 contractors remain in Afghanistan, when official troop totals have been reduced at 2,500.
	Believe me, the Taliban can count.
	They're not being played here.
	It's only the American people are being deceived.
	And I predict, if we don't get out, the Taliban is going to take us out.
	Here you have it.
	Taliban promise nightmare for U.S.
	troops in final months of Afghanistan war.
	Since President Biden is breaking the U.S.-Taliban peace deal by pushing back the May 1st withdrawal deadline to September 11—May, June, July, August, September—nearly six months, the Taliban said it's ready to attack U.S.
	troops again and turn the final months of Washington's almost 20-year-old war into a nightmare.
	Mind you, they can do it.
	Meanwhile, after Putin threatened the United States not to bring its warships into the Black Sea, the United States has shown the prudence of pulling them out.
	This was a wise move.
	The Russian military equipment is far advanced over U.S., and this was a provocative action that was going to have very dire consequences.
	Michael, your thoughts?
	Um, as far as Biden's statement about withdrawal from Afghanistan, or Iraq, I see that as just more smoke and mirrors.
	They're not leaving the most productive poppy fields in the world and all the lithium deposits there just to be good guys.
	You know, they took them in there, they're going to keep them.
	I have a Fairly good friend here that I speak to fairly frequently, who was an Iraq war vet.
	It wasn't the first one, Desert Storm.
	It was the second one, whatever they called that, and he's in line to go back to Iraq and Afghanistan as a private contractor.
	Making $175,000 a year.
	So that's, to me, that's indicative of a general principle of outsourcing most, if not all, government functions to private corporations and the private corporations and the owners of those Private corporations are those same 30 families you were talking about in the previous story, and those are the people who are actually running the world, and they just do end runs around government functions in the private sector whenever they want to, and Afghanistan and Iraq is another one.
	Chris, your thoughts?
	Yeah, I think that there's definitely a strong vested interest of the private sector, and I feel that many cases these private owners of many of these assets are infiltrating many national governments to put their operatives in, in many cases to destroy the authority function of many governments.
	And I have to say that the United States especially is crucial in that regard, because it would be the last policeman that could ever stop these guys, first of all.
	Second of all, I think that really If they can demoralize the United States in such a way that the private sector could not only loot everything in the United States, but around the world and put their new One Belt, One Road thing in.
	And I think Afghanistan is a hotbed for that area, so is Iran.
	And I think that in terms of a long-term play, this seems to be the goal of this vested interest, the 30 Illuminati families, whether they got to use the BRICS to do it, or the IMF and the World Bank, or this Cold War 2.0 situation.
	This to me seems to be what the goal is, extorting both civilian populations Very, very nice.
	the pretense of this escalation where they're just using it as a means to distract us and
	to focus us on things that are controlled by them all along and to allow the status
	quo to be adjusted in a way that it has under these fog of war situations that in many cases
	I think are being manufactured.
	Very very nice.
	Very nice.
	Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
	Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
	Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
	In response to William DeBerg, the pandemic that wasn't, It's hard to know.
	Steve Bannon's group is convinced it's a modified virus using gain-of-function to make it more infectious in a communist Chinese microbiology lab and was deliberately designed as a bioweapon.
	This lab was created from funds provided by the infamous Dr. Faustus Fauci, a man who changes positions as often as a common housefly.
	If it's a bioweapon, the worldwide death rate shows it's not very effective.
	I noticed the medical-industrial establishment is all in on the virus, wherever it came from.
	They take your temperature and force you to use hand sanitizer when you come into the clinic and have you sit well-spaced out within the room.
	my most recent visit to my doctor who is very much an establishmentarian. He was wearing two-face
	masks of the type that are known not to be particularly effective against anything,
	not even sawdust. They leak around the edges, never form a good seal. What I find alarming
	is that HCQ and later on, Invermectin were trashed by Fauci, and the establishment media
	claimed they were not only ineffective but dangerous. This was contrary to the testimony
	of people who've been very sick and found immediate relief when given the medications early on.
	It's not hard to believe they would be ineffective when a person was very close to death.
	The bottom line is that from the outset, the medical industrial complex
	really had no effective treatment.
	It actually pulled off from the market treatments that were at least somewhat effective when given early.
	Something is better than nothing, except in the case of ventilators,
	which were killing people as was discovered early on.
	Now we have the rush vaccines, which are killing some and making others very sick.
	There are several reports people who've been fully vaccinated
	are still coming down with the virus.
	given the death rate is about the same as it's always been.
	It seems it's much more a case of much ado about nothing, and the vaccines are not improving the situation.
	Claims of the efficacy of the various vaccines are as spurious as Bill Gates' claims.
	Windows is an innovative operating system.
	Windows is only used because it was forced on people, much like the vaccine.
	Given a true choice on a level playing field, people would rather choose something else than the Monopoly product.
	Meanwhile, my BitChute site, where Michael posts wonderful stuff, bitchute.com slash channel slash Jim underscore Fetzer.
	Meanwhile, False Flag and Conspiracy 2020, now available to the public for free.
	Go to falseflagconspiracy2020.com and take your pick.
	Remember, the secret of freedom lies in educating people, the secret of tyranny in keeping them ignorant.
	When they come for our guns, the time has come to use them.
	Final thoughts, Michael, yours.
	That was a really good comment and good writing by that guy who wrote that comment that you just read, Jim.
	I don't know who that was, but he also used phrases like medical industrial establishment.
	Um, for a closing comment I'd like to read just a section of something that you submitted to your bit shut a shoot site, Jim, that it, Mike.
	Mike Harris interview with Alan Sebrosky, and Sebrosky, he asked him to sort of give an overview of what he thought, and he said, Sebrosky says, my conclusion is actually very disturbing.
	Our principal domestic enemy is a true axis of evil, which is the modern Democrat Party, which has no relationship whatsoever to the Democrat Party of Harry Truman or John Kennedy.
	And radical movements such as Antifa and BLM are functioning as its street soldiers.
	This is our principal domestic enemy.
	Of course, those things are funded by higher-ups like George Soros and others.
	And back to Sobroski, and they are in concert with our principal international enemy, which is Israel and global Zionism.
	We are the target.
	We are the preeminent target.
	And the rest of the world, the rest of Western civilization in Europe is the second target.
	I think that's absolutely right.
	Chris, your thoughts?
	Yeah, man, it seems to be like if you're not at the table, you're on the menu.
	And it seems to be that most of the average people are on that menu and we are being utilized and harnessed and harvested like tax cattle.
	So Yeah, I think it is disturbing to see what's going on.
	And, uh, I think that really the awareness that is being, uh, awoken right now, uh, is probably a little overwhelming for them.
	And I think that's why they're doubling down on, on a lot of the, uh, the ham handed, uh, bullshit.
	And I think, uh, really we got to keep pushing harder and harder and, um, really taking back the dialogue and the conversation and our lives and our freedom.
	So, uh, yeah, this is, uh, not going to be easy, but it will be worth it.
	Well, it's terrific to have the benefit of such intelligent, insightful commentaries as those provided by Michael Ivey from Asheville, North Carolina, and Chris Weinert of Detroit, Michigan, now on the road.
	I would observe that the feeble Biden-Harris administration, illegitimately imposed on the American people through voter fraud, is not impressing the rest of the world.
	America's weakness is being perceived very clearly.
	The United States no longer has standing in the world as a power to be reckoned with.
	Putin is pushing back with our fetal efforts to claim we're going to come to the aid of Ukraine.
	It ain't going to happen, and if it does, we aren't going to like the consequence.
	Biden may think he can change the date for a pullout after an agreement with the Taliban.
	The Taliban is going to retaliate in a way that is going to be Dreadful and horrific for any families who have fathers or sons there.
	The Taliban will slaughter them.
	Iran recognizes that the United States, the word of the United States, cannot be trusted.
	We have become no longer a power in the world, but an international embarrassment.
	The consequences are going to be enormous, not only for ourselves, but for our progeny and the future of this once great nation.
	Thank you for watching and joining.
	Have a weekend with your friends and relatives.
	Be dear.

▲