A young woman of great principle intelligence who does research, who knows what's going on with the coronavirus, but most of her colleagues or supervisors or administrators do not.
And while she has done her best to act in accordance with her own conscience, she has been paying a price for doing that.
I think this is very, very wrong that the government does not have the right to mandate that we be vaccinated, that we be tested, that this is a gross violation of international law in the form of the Nuremberg Code, for example, because all those Who are being vaccinated or not being informed of the hazards and risks they're undergoing or of the alternative non-invasive procedures like Intervectin and HCQ hydroxychloroquine, which I myself have taken, which unlike the vaccines actually is a cure.
If you have it, and a preventative if you don't.
Unlike these current vaccines, let me begin with just a few brief background observations here.
A SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated.
And since it's never been isolated, they can't possibly have a vaccine to cure it.
So what do they do?
These, what they're calling vaccines, suppress symptoms.
That's all they do.
Individuals who are vaccinated are not cured.
They remain capable of transmission.
These are not traditional vaccines, which introduce a weak strain so that your own body can develop antibodies, which means you'd then be resistant thereafter.
Instead, they use mRNA microtechnology, which performs a feat of gene splicing It turns out the risks from the vaccines are greater than from the virus, that they're only authorized on an emergency basis, and where even Anthony Fauci, whom I refer as Tony the Rat, observes that those who are vaccinated still need to wear masks.
Here's a COVID-19 vaccine update where we learn That the CDC only warns you of the following types of reactions after the first or second injection.
Swelling, pain, redness, fatigue, fever.
That's supposed to be a sign your immune system is working, but that's a joke because this is not a traditional vaccine.
Headache, muscle pain, joint pain, chills, swollen lymph nodes, general unwell feeling, nausea and vomiting.
Well, all that sounds like it might be acceptable if you are receiving some serious benefit, but you are not.
And indeed, in Europe, nearly 4,000 have died from adverse drug reactions and around 165,000 have been injured.
It's very, very serious.
This is in Europe, where they are not suppressing the data as they are here.
Look at this!
total reactions from this experimental MRNA, the Pfizer vaccine, and we have similar data
for the Moderna and for the J&J.
The Pfizer has brought about 2,540 deaths and 102,000 injuries as of the 13th of March.
to 276 that 22 congenital familiar genetic disorder to death. 2941 I disorders to death
23,074 gastrointestinal disorders 125 to 70 2072 general disorders.
102 heptobiliary disorders.
12 deaths.
1,928 immune system disorders.
11 deaths.
6,020 infections and infestation.
275.
2,198 injury, poisoning, and procedural complications.
32 deaths.
disorders, 12 deaths, 1,928 immune system disorders, 11 deaths, 6,020 infections and infestation, 275,
2,198 injury, poisoning and procedural complications, 32 deaths, 4,565 investigations, including 111 deaths,
1,567 metabolic and nutritional disorders, including 49 deaths.
Thank you.
37,365 muscular, skeletal, and connective issue disorders, 22 deaths.
55 neoplasm, benign, malignant, and unspecified, 3 deaths.
44,993 nervous system disorders, 185 deaths.
81 pregnancy, puparium, and purinatal condition, 2 deaths.
and specified three deaths.
44,993 nervous system disorders, 185 deaths.
81 pregnancy, puparium and purinatal condition, two deaths.
3,742 psychiatric disorders, 28 deaths.
525 renal and uterine deaths.
8,788 respiratory, thoracic, and medicinal disorders, 294 deaths.
8,788 respiratory, thoracic, and medicinal disorders.
294 deaths.
10,808 skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders.
18 deaths.
229 social circumstance.
Six deaths.
69 procedural medical, surgical and medical procedure, 4 deaths.
procedure for death. 4,820 vascular disorders yielding 74 deaths. And we have additional reports
showing that blindness, double vision, blurred vision, and so forth, which are indicative of
brain damage, are also taking place.
Vision loss, irregular eyesight, extremely painful headaches, lethargy, Bell's palsy, tinnitus, nausea, muscular contractions, other effects, By all the tenets of medical research, if the VAX program was being operated under randomized controlled trial protocols, this level of injury would have demanded an immediate halt to the experiment.
However, By labeling it an emergency.
Sanity is abandoned as the human toll climbs.
You can find this right on the internet, almost certainly on BitChute, because YouTube is censoring, denying us the right to know the risks we run.
And guess what?
It turns out that Fauci and his colleagues investigated the Spanish flu, perhaps the greatest pandemic the world has ever seen that brought about tens of millions of deaths, and discovered in their research that most of the victims did not die from the flu, but died from bacterial pneumonia.
And guess what?
Monique, bacterial pneumonia is promoted by wearing masks.
By wearing masks.
So Fauci is saying there's a new surge having three main causes, travel, new variants, and premature rollbacks.
But what he is saying is a monstrous lie.
This is just embarrassing.
Monique and I wanted to emphasize that by way of background because you are fully justified in having concerns about the primrose path that may actually lead to your death or serious injury and notice none of those that were being reported and that was just for the Pfizer.
Are included on the CDC list.
I mean, this is outrageous, Monique.
It means the public is not being informed.
That means they're in violation of the Nuremberg Code.
They're in violation of international law.
They're in violation of the Geneva Conventions.
I mean, this is absolutely stunning.
And the fact that you know better so that you're not simply going to allow yourself to be another experiment.
Whereas you, of course, are well aware, they claim they skipped the animal studies to go directly because it was an emergency.
Well, I'll tell you, that's not the case.
They found in the animal experiments all the animals died.
So now they're doing new animal experiments and guess what?
The species they're picking on, they're experimenting with, is Homo sapiens.
You and me.
I do have a quick question because everything that you have said is true.
So far as I know, I didn't know all those different conditions, the latest, but I have read the VAERS report, vaccine adverse events, No, let me explain.
That news article with Dr. Fauci, just wanted to question where that came from,
only because I saw that on social media and I know that we're both into truth
and there had been some sort of a sentiment that that may have been altered.
So I just wanted to put that out there.
No, let me explain.
Let me explain.
Fauci found that the overwhelming majority of deaths had been caused by bacterial pneumonia, not the flu.
He did not add, he did not add the intervening variable was wearing masks, because it's mask wearing that promotes bacterial pneumonia.
So to criticize, because there's a conflation there, as though Fauci found it were the masks, What Fauci found was it was bacterial pneumonia, but Fauci knows perfectly well that it's the masks that are promoting bacterial pneumonia.
You're recycling your oxygen-depleted air.
You're killing your brain cells.
Unlike skin cells, if you had a bruise or abrasion scraped up your skin, they regrow, they regenerate.
Brain cells do not.
So we're going to have, you know, in the next couple of years or less, we're going to have massive cognitive decline for those who have taken the jab because it's killing their brain cells and they don't even know it.
They welcomed it.
They went on their way to have it.
Monique, I mean, all this is, to me, profoundly disturbing because personally, I'm distraught that five members of my family, persons who are very near and dear to me, have taken the jab.
And all my efforts have been... All your efforts.
Yes, I hear you because there's a special member of my family that I've been talking about over a year about all of this and this member said that they were not going to take it but if it meant they had to travel they would and I started crying because Because I show my emotions and I don't think that there's anything wrong with it, as long as it's with me.
Sometimes a person is just, I feel the way this world, especially America, if we can call it America, because I'm sure you know about that too, corporation versus America.
But I find that it's terribly unsettling that if somebody shows a feeling, they must automatically be Uh, unstable.
Now look, I mean, as far as I'm concerned, I'm a believer and our divine creator created emotions in us.
And if something is going to strike us as just terribly upsetting, I think that we actually have a right, you know, not to harm somebody, but I just wanted to put that out there because I, I noticed that some people are just, they're just very robotic.
And I think that that's, that's become, um, A disability in this country in particular.
One of the notable differences between human beings and inanimate machines, you know, and all the efforts to create out of inanimate things, machine-like entities, is the difference in emotion.
That human beings are endowed with emotion and these inanimate machines are not.
Now, in my philosophical work, I've done a huge amount On the theoretical differences between human beings and digital machines, the type of machines that classic computers are designed to establish why they cannot turn an inanimate machine, a digital machine, into a thinking thing.
And it has to do with the fact that the machines are governed by high and low voltage, or zeros and ones, strings of which mean nothing to the machine, so that the programmers program the machine so it will respond in ways that satisfy the programmers' objectives.
But this causal entity known as the computer and its associated components, none of what it's doing means anything to it.
For example, suppose it's adding lists of numbers.
That could be contents in a warehouse.
It could be, you know, grades in an academic setting.
It could be tickets at a sporting event.
None of it means anything to the computer.
Nothing means anything.
And that's why, though you can make them closer and closer simulations of human beings, they never become human beings.
Because human beings think in terms of signs, like photographs, or causes and effects, smoke and fire, or symbols like the word horse.
You know, we think in terms of things that look like what they stand for, or causes or effects of what they stand for, or habitually associated with what they stand for.
But nothing like that happens with the inanimate machine.
And another key difference is not only that they're incapable of thought, though they can simulate it to a high degree, but the point you're making, they lack affect and they lack emotion.
They're incapable of responding, and that's because nothing means anything to them.
See, you could show them a photograph of a pile of bodies, for example, and that's no more meaningful to them than a photograph of a crowd at a beach.
But for you and me as human beings, obviously, they assume a different emotional aspect, which with these computers, these thinking things cannot.
And Monique, I'll tell you, I'm convinced, and Bill Gates, is a part of this. They've discovered they know they cannot
turn inanimate machines into thinking things, so what they're trying to do is turn human beings
into something more like an inanimate machine. They're trying to make us more robotic because
they can't make the robots actually capable of thought or emotion. Thank you for that
explanation, but I for months have thought to that there is a transhumanism agenda.
It's quite clear, you know, before the pandemic hit America, I was going to these meetings about the harms of 5G, and there was a slide of a church in Silicon Valley called the Church of Transhumanism, and we were all, like, shocked.
And then the next month, The 5G was rolling out and we were in the middle of the plan-demic.
So... Well, you know... I believe that.
A lot of us believe that overexposure to these forms of micro-radiation induces the same types of symptoms that are attributed to the coronavirus.
And I know you're a student of this issue and recognize there's not been an increase in deaths in 2020, for example, versus 2019.
We had a study out of Johns Hopkins showing that in no age group was there an increase in deaths.
And that was supplemented by additional research that if there were all these hospitalizations from respiratory problems, then there would have been an increase, a very large significant increase in the purchase of oxygen tanks.
And it hasn't happened.
No increase in oxygen intake, not even IV drips and stans, meaning we're being played, Monique.
And the fact that you have a better understanding of this than your colleagues and administrators, it's an appalling situation because they're punishing you out of their own ignorance.
Yes, and that's probably one of the strongest reasons that I'm so upset because I have done my best to be compassionate, given the information, not blamed them, gone on a public forum at multiple board meetings where my stomach is actually hurting because I know I'm telling the truth, and they may not want to hear it or not understand.
But I've done it anyway, because I'm unsure how else to get the message across.
I gave a notarized affidavit to the head honcho of my district institution about some of the things we're discussing, and about medical rights, about the Constitution, about my religious beliefs, and It was met with silence.
I did that to keep myself safe, but it doesn't seem like it's going to matter because now two schools have let me go because I have not consented willingly to the PCR test and to regular masks.
I do want to make mention before I forget though, a friend of mine just sent an article about 10% More deaths in, I believe, LA.
I think he had given a certain amount of months or year.
I'm gonna give that to you because, again, I always want to be on the right track.
But I've seen studies, just like you have said, and there has been no alteration of the amount of deaths.
And, of course, we all know, where have people passed away from the flu?
That's just non-existent.
It's great you bring up the flu, because last year there were 38 million cases of the flu.
This year, like 1,237.
Where has the flu gone?
They're simply relabeling, redescribing flu as COVID to run up the numbers, as Edward Hendry, of your acquaintance, and John Rappaport have been so excellent in observing.
They have played a game with an ambiguity too over the word case.
So that a case can be just a result of the PCR test and we know the PCR test is yielding like 97% false positives versus actually being infected.
Totally different.
Totally different.
But they're playing up the number of cases, which is why Hillary way back when said test, test, test, because she knew that would run up the numbers and it would lead to the lockdown of the economy and take away Donald Trump's strongest You know, a platform, namely what he had done for the economy, except the American people weren't fooled.
They realized he had been responsible for giving us the strongest economy in our history, making us energy independent.
Because of his border policies, immigrants weren't stealing jobs from the lowest paid American workers who were seeing their wages rise at the fastest rate.
This is why the Democrats had to steal the election.
You know, I mean, I can't begin to tell you how much research I've done on this.
And for those who have any doubt about it, go to my blog at jamesfetzer.org.
You can just start reading backward cases about the lawsuit, the most recent being Mike Lindell, that it's just a 58-minute presentation of a brilliant physicist who had been studying the 2010 census And Monique, he discovered that when you distribute the census results graphically, and you could do this for different regions of the country,
When they ran the scam, they used graphs for the number of registered voters that were virtually exactly the same as a graph for the 2010 census.
And then for the voter again, meaning everywhere there was a peak and valley in the 2010 census, there was the same peak and valley for registered voters and the same peak and valley for those who allegedly cast their votes, which is absurd.
This would never happen in life.
And what it showed was they used a computer program, an AI program, no doubt, that had an algorithm that was instructed to do precisely that.
This is extremely powerful proof that the election was engineered to bring about a predetermined outcome.
And I just want everyone to know That I am reporting the results of my research.
Monique has done a lot of research that led her to similar conclusions.
I'm telling you where you can find it, and where I was dumbfounded when the Supreme Court declined to hear the Texas case.
Because if you go on my blog again, just look for, you know, the Texas case, and you're going to find a delineation of how the key states of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin Violated their own laws and statutes for the conduct of the election.
In other words, it was illegitimate by their own standards.
Monique, I know you know this, but most Americans, sad to say, are still oblivious of these facts today.
So I will touch upon what you've said from what I know with the election.
First of all, as I know you are aware, this is way bigger what's happening than America or the United States Corporation, than just our country, than just the election.
But since we're on the topic, I want people to know that From some of the statements that Mr. Trump had made, I believed that he was on the right side of history.
For instance, I saw or heard a quote that he made, I believe it was in Davos.
I'm telling everyone that we are patriots, not globalists.
So I was that that that made me feel more content because I do believe that this is a global Plandemic.
So when he said that, it made me feel better.
Now, I do understand him, like many politicians, have said one thing and then they say something that's different later.
For instance, and Doctor, I think that you should touch upon this and what your opinion is.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Had said some years ago that Mr. Trump was very concerned.
I believe the story was there were a couple women that worked for Mr. Trump and said that their children had gotten autism from vaccines.
Something like that.
And Donald Trump was concerned about it.
But then he didn't follow up with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
And Kennedy said that he went on the side of big pharma.
Of course, then warp speed came along and there are many people that question,
well, why did this president, if he really had the best of intentions,
why did he bring that out?
I mean, I put that on Facebook immediately.
Natural News, it was on, it was talking about how 100 million syringes
had been pre-ordered with optional GPS tracking so they would know where the person was
that was getting the injection.
That came right down off a fake book.
I call it fake book.
But there are some people that say, well, if he didn't do that, then people would blame him for not helping People with COVID, so I really don't know what to think, but I thought he was the lesser of the two evils, and please, might I add, for those who think this is a, oh, she's a right-wing conspiracy theorist, gun-toting racist!
A little Mytheater in there, incorporated.
No, I mean, I too as a female in particular was very upset when 30 men came out
and said he had been inappropriate with them from touching or grabbing.
And I personally feel that not that many women could be fabricating this, okay?
Because the more the numbers grow, the more you have to think
that there's something going on.
Nonetheless, whether or not he changed throughout the duration of his presidency
to where we were in the pandemic, or if he didn't do it, whatever the case is,
at the end, I felt that he was the best choice.
I also want to bring up the immigration that you had mentioned.
As a female, you know, I have been Well, somewhat violated, thank God not atrociously, but from a few that I do not believe there was documentation.
Now, that's not to say that if you are documented that you won't do that to someone else, too.
So I don't want to put myself out there as his words were twisted and say that all
what he said are rapists and murderers, okay?
And he didn't say that by the way.
I'd like to say that I felt that that wall that he was building,
I felt that that was a safety measure.
A lot of people did not.
I personally felt that it was.
I like walls to protect me and most people do.
Now on the case of the immigrants, okay?
For those who really were fearing their lives and coming over here,
I do believe that refugees need to be protected like me.
Right now, I'm feeling like I need some protection, but I am speaking out because if we don't say anything, then we can be unprotected as well.
Remember, silence can be deadly, as well as golden.
I wanna say with the immigrants, okay?
There is, and I'll give this to you, doctor.
Did you see a quote from Carol, I think her name, I'm not gonna say the last name, I'm not sure, but she had red hair, and she worked or works for the CDC.
And she said, it's a 90 second clip, that the problem with people who aren't taking the vaccines
are the white people.
So we need to get rid of the white people.
And then she started saying that the immigrants, they all wanna take the vaccines.
That's what she was saying.
She quote said, get rid of the white people.
Now let's go to the people who are immigrants.
What does that mean?
So that means because maybe they are being more vulnerable, now they're the ones that are getting the toxics injections.
And I'm not talking about COVID because this has gone back to 2009.
So they should be up in arms.
And right now I feel like I'm vulnerable within my profession because of Because there isn't this broad knowledge that we're talking about right now.
And also, because unfortunately, even some people who are questioning this, some of them are going along with it because they have to keep the job.
So let's go back to the immigrants.
When you are an immigrant, a lot of times, You don't have your choice of careers, especially if you're undocumented.
So yeah, you are going to do anything.
You are going to be perpetrated on.
So now, let's look where we stand now.
There are going to be a lot of people that are just going to do what they have to do to get by.
So now we have people from other countries working against the Americans because they want to survive.
We have Americans Working against Americans because they want to survive.
And that's what I want to say because it really has hurt the country.
And I do believe that there has to be some sort of vetting.
I am concerned that people I didn't know I didn't know all the vaccines that people had to take to just to come into this this country and I'm very disappointed about that because I've seen those ingredients and as Dr. Bhuttar The person who told me what was happening back in March or early April, not directly, but seeing his YouTube videos, every single one which has been pulled down, he said that he is not anti-vax, he is anti-stupidity.
And I don't even like to say the word stupid, but I think there comes a point When, if you are aware of something, and you want to be ignorant of something, then that will lead to stupidity.
Because I think stupidity is actually, it includes infringements upon other people's rights.
I agree with so much of what you've said here, Monique, including there's a perfect statistical correlation between the increased use of vaccines and autism.
I mean, it's perfect.
It couldn't be better.
When vaccine use increases, autism increases.
When it drops, vaccine usage drops, autism drops.
My understanding, by the way, and this has been confirmed by other sources, is that A cure for autism has been found, but Big Pharma bought it up because they want children to be autistic.
In fact, we've had projections that by 2050, at the present rate, half of our children will be autistic.
And when it comes to the Donald, my understanding is his own son, Barron, has suffered a degree of autism as a consequence of vaccinations he had as a child.
With regard to the border, you're 100% correct.
Let me just offer a contrasting case if we were moving the other direction.
Instead of going north, if we were heading south.
Mexico has two very general conditions before you can immigrate to Mexico.
Number one, you must be able to show that you have something to contribute to the good
of Mexico, that you can make a contribution to improve Mexico.
Maybe you're a dentist or a doctor or a teacher or a laborer.
There's something you can contribute to the good of Mexico.
And number two, that you have the financial resources to sustain you and whoever comes
with you, your family members before you enter Mexico.
None of this is true with this massive spigot, this flood of migrants now that are coming
into the United States and seemingly welcomed by the Democratic Party because, hate to say
it, they expect they're all going to vote Democrat.
Or the political cartoon asking this Pisachi woman who's the press secretary.
What would it take for the Biden administration to regard what's going on at the border as a crisis?
And she's shown saying, well, if we just saw evidence, they were going to vote Republican.
I think that's got a lot to do with it because they are creating a messy problem here.
They're changing the demographics of the nation.
It is very much an anti-white agenda.
So I, again, I agree with you.
Americans have taken for granted the principles on which our country was founded for so long that it's difficult to imagine how much they could be upended in relatively a short period of time by a party that stole the election In order to come in and turn everything topsy-turvy, including implementing a massive green agenda that's really going to destroy the economy of this nation with what I fear are going to be permanent consequences that are going to be of the most negative possible character.
And where, by the way, Deagle.com, this monster website, which has very good intel and military connections, has projected that the U.S.
population is going to drop from approximately 330 million Americans in 2020, Monique, to less than 100 million in 2025.
That's, in five years, a loss of 230 million Americans.
Now, how could that possibly happen?
Well, the masks are killing us slowly.
The injections are killing us faster.
Bill Gates is out buying up the farmland now.
I believe food is going to be the ultimate technique that most of us are going to starve to death.
And it's horrifying to contemplate, but this is also why they want to take our guns.
Now, frankly, Monique, I think the Democrats did themselves in last summer.
When they promoted, if you want to talk about stupidity, what has to be the dumbest platform in American political history, defund the police.
Because in the process, they let Antifa and Black Lives Matter run riot, violate laws right and left, commit arson, looting, even killing people in the process.
And there was no law enforcement response from the Democrat mayors and the Democrat governors Which I find completely appalling.
So I agree with everything you've been describing here.
You seem to me to be an unusually well-informed citizen, because in the United States, sad to say, there are very few.
There are very few, Doctor.
My dad was a World War II vet.
He passed away on Easter Sunday.
William Howard Lukens, It was April the 12th, 1998, and three Purple Heart winner.
He had to kill a few Nazis.
He knows at least two, maybe three, and he was a 39-year history teacher in the public school system.
He probably is rolling around right now in his grave, which I have to visit.
I got so well informed with regards to this pandemic, just so people know, because back in March, my employer had somewhat laid us off.
But we were getting an emergency fund.
Now, while most people were at home watching Netflix, nothing wrong with watching some movies and shows, but, oh, well, I knew about 5G, started seeing it going up around my neighborhood, started contacting schools.
Hey, do you know this is going near your school?
Silence.
Then I saw some lectures by Dr. Guttar, which led from one lecture to another by others, like David... No, his name is...
David, he's the famous conspiracy theorist, but he's right on target for a lot of things.
Thank you, thank you, yes.
So he had mentioned about Event 201, he mentioned about the Rockefeller 2010 paper, and I mean, just seeing those two, the one event and the one paper, you connect the dots!
See, unfortunately, there is a lack of critical thinking skills in this country for whatever reason.
I mean, there are some people that have it, but it's like if you see an event that is a simulation about a coronavirus pandemic, Where, during the course of it, you're seeing so much panic woven in with the reporter actors and reporter doctors.
You're gonna wonder, how did they know in October of 2019 to have an exercise on a coronavirus pandemic?
October 18th, 2019, to be specific.
And then you see who is sitting there at the table, at the executive table there.
We have the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
We have the WHO, which you might as well say is owned by Bill Gates.
Let's see, who else?
We have the CDC.
We had the equivalent of what is the Chinese CDC.
We had UPS and they're doing fine bringing all the packages while people aren't leaving their home.
And then we had a representative from a bank that was connected to Australia and New Zealand.
We had Marriott there.
I don't really know how they planned all this.
I don't think they've really done anything.
Uh, who else was there that was suspect?
Oh!
Johnson & Johnson was there!
And then, Johns Hopkins.
Okay, and then someone else that I know said that the CIA was there.
I didn't see that particular clip, so you're gonna have to look into that.
That's weird.
So then you look at that, and then you look at the Rockefeller Foundation 2010 paper, which you can find online, and you go to pages 18 and 19, and it talks about a pandemic.
What was it?
I think the H1N1, if I'm not mistaken.
But it doesn't matter what the virus was.
What hits you automatically is it's practically praising China, saying that they clamped down immediately and that you saved lives, and then they start saying that America didn't do it quick enough.
And then they start talking about masks, temperature checks, biometrics, leading to an authoritarian state even after the pandemic had faded.
People were concerned about transnational terrorism and climate The climate, I guess, turmoil, I don't remember the word.
Climate change.
Yeah, yeah, I don't know if it was change, but a problem with the climate.
Well, they believe it's warming, but my understanding is where there are these global cycles, you know, along large periods of time, and we're actually in a cooling period with regard to the planet, not warming.
So, Doctor, yeah, I mean, I am one for thinking that there is, there was climate change.
Now I'm kind of thinking, well, maybe not.
Look, I'm the type of person, I don't like pollution.
I went over to Russia to visit someone that I had met after speaking a year.
They had diesel instead of gasoline, you know, that leaked on the snow.
It was gagging.
I don't, I mean, I mean, ever since I've been a little girl, I don't like to see pollution.
You know, you go to the forest, you see people have trashed a pond, you see the belly up, the fish.
You know, we should take care of our planet, but what I'm concerned about is good causes are now being twisted in order to fulfill these agendas, which will ultimately be our demise, including systemic racism, Climate change, and those are the two big ones.
And I know that we were going to talk about Mr. George Floyd and what I discovered about that, and I'll be happy to give that information whenever you decide to open that up.
Yes.
Oh sure, Monique.
I think we're covering quite a range of issues here, over and beyond the way, in my opinion, abusive I suspect illegal fashion in which you were abruptly terminated for your refusal to take a PCR test when the inventor of the PCR test acknowledged that it was not for diagnostic purposes.
What the PCR test does is simply multiply a sample.
So if you've got a microscopic sample, you can use a PCR to get a larger sample.
But it also turns out that its accuracy in terms of use for an instrument is a function of the cycles, and that the number of cycles with which it's being used are guaranteed to produce Vast numbers of false positives.
I'm summarizing around 97%.
I mean, it's outrageous.
Dig into the literature.
There's an awful lot on my blog, but many other places too, and you'll find a tremendous amount of substantiation.
I highly recommend Ed Hendry and John Robbapart.
But you know, Dr. Butaro was just sensational.
I loved his videos.
The reason you can't find them is because he was so intelligent, so compact,
so clear in his delivery that it was devastating to those who are bringing us this purely political pandemic.
And I'm sorry to say, we all have to come to grips with the reality that this is a political phenomenon.
It's not a medical emergency.
And indeed, My colleagues and I have a joint broadcast on Wednesdays on Revolution Radio, where we interviewed this Wednesday Judy Mikovits, who is one of the leading experts here.
And the very first question I asked Judy had to do with the effects of this MRA technology, that it has two apparent effects.
One is to actually weaken your immune system.
So that while initially you might feel okay, next time around if you're hit with the same threat to your body that you're going to collapse and your body's going to begin attacking itself, which turns out to be a very painful death, or alternatively that your body is being turned into a special kind of protein producer known as prions, which are responsible for mad cow disease because they eat holes in the brain And she confirmed both of my observations here.
This is a very important interview worth watching on my BitChute site at Jim Fetzer.
BitChute Jim Fetzer.
Check out what Judy Mikovits has to say.
The first hour is especially telling and powerful.
And my colleague Giuseppe Vaffangulo Who, together with David Scorpio, hosts the Wisdom Circle, which normally is broadcast the same time as My Raw Deal, which led us, because we have such overlapping interests, to merge with a simulcast now over both studios A and B together.
You can find it also on his uploading of his show, The Wisdom Circle.
I reckon, and I also have it, by the way, on Telegram.
If you go to t.me slash Jim Fetzer News, you'll find that show is also archived there along with a whole lot of others, including articles published on my blog.
Yes, Monique, we are in the midst of this trial of Derek Chauvin, who's the officer who, according to the prosecution, is responsible for the death of George Floyd.
I have followed the case rather closely.
I've published about it.
I've given lectures about it.
So I'm very keen to have your take on what's going on here.
Your thoughts.
Yes, so I'll let you know the evidence, if you would, that I've gathered.
It was more so in the summertime.
And just to close what I was saying before, when I saw that event 201 and the Rockefeller 2010 paper, that, you know, the two dots connect.
And that's where people, they have to just make these connections.
So the next connection with the George Floyd case, Well, at this point I was privy to so many different truthers.
I had to say bye to anyone who was being offensive to me on Fakebook, you know, saying that I'm a conspiracy theorist or F you or A number of other things.
And so now my social media only consists of people that want to know the truth and people who want to get the message out.
So I found out about this young gentleman.
He goes by Young Pharaoh and he was 26 at the time.
I don't know his birthday.
Um, African American or black, whatever he decides that he'd like to be called.
And he had about a three-hour lecture of the case of George Floyd, of what supposedly had happened in Minneapolis.
And he went through slide by slide.
On this one particular slide, he showed a Facebook page of an attorney who practices in Texas, He's in Corpus Christi.
He goes by Timothy Daniel Jafet.
J-A-P-H-E-T.
You can look him up right now.
I suggest not putting him into Google, though.
My favorite browser now is startpage.com.
Start to page.
So, he, on his Facebook page, talked about how he actually had been the attorney To his client, George Floyd, who passed away in 2016.
He talks about it being a synthetic marijuana reaction that happened.
He said because Mr. Floyd didn't have any family, he was assigned to him as his conservator, and they were actually talking in the hospital.
The attorney states that He wasn't as coherent as one should be.
Well he didn't exactly use that word so nicely, but that's what he meant.
And they were having a conversation.
He talks about how Mr. Floyd had played football at the former Uh, Texas A&M, it had been talked, it had been called something prior to that.
Um, he said the next thing he knew, um, Mr. Floyd had been wheeled away, and he passed away.
So, I mean, there's more details than that, and I believe you have the two interviews from, uh, Attorney Jeff Fett.
He gave one interview to someone that I do know well.
In fact, I interviewed him myself.
Who had called the attorney job bet and got an audio recording.
He goes by Lonely Desert Boy.
That's his code name.
And then there's another person I don't know who did the audio recording.
The interesting thing about that is the two audio recordings are up on YouTube, but one of them has like 700 views and one has 200.
So there really isn't a lot of coverage on this.
Well, anyway, like I said, I had an emergency fund.
I wasn't working with tasks, so I was wondering, you know, what's going on?
And I was putting in 12-hour days of investigation.
I do have a communications radio TV film.
...degree along with mathematics and an MFA in theater.
I always loved acting and music, and I did radio back in Jersey.
So anyway, um, I started a podcast when all this happened, too, to get the word out.
Um, so I contacted Attorney Jeff Fett with an activist friend of mine.
Who is now missing in action.
I'm really concerned about him.
His name is Michael Caine.
K-E-A-N-E.
No one knows where he is.
And I certainly hope that he is safe.
But we both called in July.
Mr. Jaffet talked to both of us for about 25-30 minutes.
Mr. Kane told me, hey, you should ask him if he will sign an affidavit stating that what he put up on his Facebook page is valid because if you, you know, have it in an affidavit, then now you're under oath.
I mean, putting it up on his Facebook page would be pretty risky if he wasn't telling the truth.
Right, Doctor, for a licensed attorney?
Oh, sure, and of course, and the fact that he's an attorney himself, he's not going to do that.
He's not going to make a reckless charge.
I would simply say Yes, there was a George Floyd who died three years ago.
And do we know whether there's supposed to be a connection to the George Floyd from Minneapolis who, among other activities, I mean, he was, as I understand it, a fellow in multiple offenses.
2016.
Not three years ago, 2016.
Yeah.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Go ahead.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
2016, that's fine.
But the point is that George Floyd was put on trial, whose death or, you know,
is the source of all of this controversy that inspired all the rioting and looting in Minneapolis
that spread around the nation, or so we're told, was among other things, a porn star.
You actually, there are actually videos.
I've seen a clip of one.
It's clearly the same guy that police were pulling out of the car in Minneapolis.
And did he claim there was any resemblance or that this was supposed to be the same person?
Because just as there are, you know, hundreds of John Smiths, I have no doubt there are many, many George Floyds around the country.
So the fact that one had died would not, in and of itself, imply anything for this case, unless some kind of historical or causal or other connection could be made.
Are you aware of a connection there?
Heather George Floyd and Texas would be related.
Yeah, I know that there was a connection with a sister because Jaffet said that there was a sister
that had called.
I'm She didn't come down there, I believe he had said, to Texas.
And then I believe it was the same sister up in Minneapolis that has gotten involved in this case, and I'd have to listen to the interview again that he did with the friend and the other person, because I don't recall so much exactly all the details, but the sister was in common.
And what else did I want to say about this with Japheth?
Oh yeah, so I asked if I could interview him, and he said yes, and I tried a few times, but it never happened.
And I thought to myself, should I be mentioning this?
Because I am, you know, I'm not trying to cause Japheth any trouble.
I'm sure that by him speaking, well, I shouldn't just say I'm sure.
I know that by him speaking out, it caused him some trouble because I believe I gave you three Facebook links that are still up to this day, and it's like half and half.
There's half of the people are like, thank you, Attorney Jaffa.
We'll get to the truth one of these days.
And then others are like, oh, he's a fake.
Read what he's saying.
So he obviously went through some hatred.
Then you have the fact that We have a political organization, BLM, that, I mean...
Do they have the best interest of black people?
I mean, it seems like from the riots that they did with killing black people and burning businesses and homes, that they don't have the best interest.
And I had mentioned to an organization that's affiliated with my employment Because they were talking about something like a George Floyd day, and they were talking about recognizing BLM, and I stated that I had spoken to Jaffet, that he said Mr. Floyd passed away in 2016, and then I stated that I'm concerned that BLM has linked up with Antifa, and they haven't denounced
Violence.
I was cut off.
Of course it was in Zoom.
People were saying, you're white, this goes against anti-racism, it's inappropriate.
Inappropriate?
That was the topic.
So I brought it up.
Not to be a racist, but to tell them the information that I have been given as a citizen journalist, as somebody giving them some details that they might not know.
There was one person that said, well, maybe there's two George Floyds.
And then all of a sudden, someone said, don't encourage her.
I mean, it was awful.
There was another person that had said when I had brought it up in a different meeting, uh, your comments are racist.
So we know what's going on.
If you mention anything that is newsworthy of investigating or facts, you possibly could be labeled as commenting racistly or you're a racist yourself.
And might I add, My grandfather, he was very brown-skinned.
He was Sicilian.
His last name is Lanzarato.
That comes from the island of... I think it's Lanzarote.
I hope I'm saying that right.
But that's off of the island of... I mean, that's Spanish-owned and it's off of northern Africa.
So I'm about 25% African, at least, you know?
But it doesn't matter because To some people, if you don't look a certain way, it doesn't matter what your ancestry is.
They're just going to label you.
Let me just comment on the absurdity we have reached now, that there are left-leaning hospitals now that are going to deliver medical treatment on the basis of your race, and whites are going to be treated last.
I mean, this is racism.
This is anti-white racism.
You're not supposed to discriminate against anybody by the color of their skin or their religion or their sex or their political orientation, but they're doing something like all of the above.
Monique, it's absolutely outrageous.
Now, because there's so much- It's an apartheid.
Say again?
It's an apartheid.
It is.
We're becoming an apartheid society, and it's bizarre because I don't think any of us ever anticipated that anti-white racism would become an element of a Democratic Party agenda.
I mean, there are the principal promoters of this idea.
And where they want to give stimulus relief to minority businesses?
Look, you should give the relief and the medical attention to those who are most in need, and that's regardless of their age or their sex or the color of their skin.
I mean, Monique, this is truly outrageous that the United States has deteriorated to this low level, just as a general observation following the trial.
There's so many conflicting reports that George Floyd actually died from a fentanyl and opioid overdose, which is also- And let's stop there real quick.
Let's stop there real quick.
The fact that Jaffet said that he passed away of a synthetic marijuana reaction, that's very closely- well, they're both drugs.
So that makes me wonder too.
And then some of the details that I know that you came up with.
Young Tharo was listing them as well, and then I found some of my own.
You know, of course things could be, um, photoshopped, but I'll tell you what I've seen.
You saw where the man comes out of the store, right?
It looks like he has more hair than he does on the ground.
On the ground he looks practically bald.
Yeah.
And then there's one video that looks like he has no legs.
Again, could be manipulation, but just saying.
And then there was a really detailed documentary that I saw by, what was the The Weatherman 2 or Weatherman, an unofficial George Floyd documentary, something like that.
And we should put that up.
It's about 80 minutes.
And they went through the detail of how corrupt Minneapolis was and how some of the businesses that burnt had records of corruption that could have gotten some people in a lot of trouble.
It also talked about How there was a business that created medical mannequins, and at the end of that documentary, which I think you probably saw, they have a medical mannequin that certainly looks like the person on the ground with the bald head!
So having seen all this, I'm like, There's something very suspicious here.
And the fact that they, the fact that it happened so soon, there wasn't even, I mean they had the George Floyd t-shirts.
How did they, how did they craft those so quickly?
And the last thing I want to say about that is, I did give this information to the Department of Justice.
I have a receipt, and I gave it to them, I believe it was September.
Because I wanted to show people, look, I'm serious about this.
You have to look into this.
This is causing race riots.
This is causing me to be called racist just for saying that I talked to an attorney who said that.
Talk about shooting the messenger.
And then, you know, people are like, oh, why are you calling down there?
I wouldn't do that.
And then people are like, well, I don't even think they know how to call.
Like, I know I'm very serious.
Like, I gave several times Jacket's information.
I said, ask him for yourself.
I don't know if he would talk to them.
But I gave the license number, the email, the fax number.
It's all there.
They could ask.
They choose not to.
So that's where I stand with this.
And I feel that it was staged.
I feel there's absolute, oh, oh, and then there was another photo where it looked like he had some sort of a tattoo on his chest.
Some sort of a, what was it now?
I think some sort of a Freemason type of tattoo.
And then you didn't see it, though, when he was walking out of the store.
I think there's a lot to everything.
So what's going on?
Critical thinking!
Get back to the dots.
Connect the dots.
Having offered courses in critical thinking for 35 years, I couldn't agree more.
And for those who want to see the evidence that Monique has been outlining here, I presented it multiple times, and she may even be recounting one of my presentations.
You can find it now available to you at the website.
False?
FlagConspiracies2020.com.
FalseFlagConspiracies2020.com.
A conference that I organized and moderated on the 5th and the 6th of December 2020.
24 presentations that are now available to the public for free.
So go to falseflagconspiracies2020.com.
In the upper right-hand corner, you can access the archives.
Put in personal information, just so we're keeping a record of who's downloading.
But then you can pick and choose all the 24 you want.
They'll show up in your cart in red, and you just click on them, and they'll download right to your desktop.
It's very simple.
And if you want to see the evidence that Monique has been describing, check out One of my three presentations, there was one on Sandy Hook, there was one on applying scientific reasoning to these complex and controversial political events, and there was one entitled Deception Galore, Faking Hate Crimes and More, and you'll see where I go through among other issues that Jussie Smollett in Chicago, George Floyd in Minneapolis, and Bubba Wallace, NASCAR,
Uh, and you'll judge the evidence for yourself.
I do believe, Monique, that in fact the trial will be such that there are conflicting reasonable explanations, which means that they will not be able to find that he was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, because there's an alternative reasonable explanation that it was actually a drug overdose.
He seems to have been engaged in illegal sale of drugs and to conceal them, he actually
consumed some of them.
So we have him on tape saying, I ate too many drugs.
And one of the symptoms of a drug overdose is difficulty with your respiratory system
leading you to say, I can't breathe, which this figure says some 18 times.
And it's also been observed that if he couldn't breathe, he wouldn't be able to say, I can't breathe 18 times.
Where Derek Chauvin apparently wasn't actually putting his knee on the neck, but rather behind the neck, such as the judges ruled they cannot say that the knee was on his neck.
So we also have alternative autopsy reports.
And I'm just my point is the following.
In order to find Chauvin guilty of one of the offenses, they got second and third degree murder and then I think some kind of negligent homicide.
You need to find those conclusions beyond a reasonable doubt.
But that means no alternative explanation is reasonable.
In this case, there is an alternative explanation that's reasonable.
I therefore believe they're unable to satisfy the standard to convict, and he will therefore be found not guilty.
And what we have to experience, Monique, is the realization of the threats Black Lives Matter activists have been making, that if it's not found guilty, then there's going to be hell to pay.
They're talking about 33 cities.
Isn't that interesting?
Because that's a very important Masonic number.
And we'll just see if the Democrats are just as casual and leisurely about not enforcing the law in the face of looting, arson, and possibly killing as they have been in the past.
Monique, I just want to thank you for joining me this evening.
I think you've been put in a very difficult position.
I think you're a very responsible citizen.
I like your depiction as a citizen journalist.
I think that's correct.
And that we all have to do that because a fake news media has absolutely abdicated its responsibility to report honestly and accurately to the American people.
Is there anything you'd like to say by way of conclusion?
Oh, well, with regards to the media, I lost my whole YouTube account a week or so ago, five years worth of videos, because I had put three videos up about the protest at Dodger Stadium for the injection.
Although I didn't attend, I was in the car taking video footage.
I got two strikes.
I wasn't allowed to put up anything else for 90 days.
That didn't matter because they used one of the other videos that was up.
That was the third strike.
They terminated the account.
Before that happened, There was news coverage talking about these protesters being right-wingers, anti-vaxxers, and right-wingers.
I didn't even see an American flag.
Not that that means you're a right-winger.
And I called up the news station that had put up one of these Um, these articles, because there was a, there was a doctor saying that this should be criminal.
The Dodgers Stadium closed down for, for a week, for a hour, and all those vaccines could have spoiled.
Well, I called up, and I said, you're labeling people you don't even know!
I have footage!
And they said, well, well, maybe we can interview you.
So they did, me and two others.
I had about a 20-minute interview, and then I had to get off to continue back to work.
They didn't use any of my footage, and I'll tell you why I think.
Because they didn't catch me in some sort of a, like, uh-uh moment.
But the other two, there was one, and he kind of stumbled a bit.
He had said so many amazing things, but not this one thing.
What did the mainstream media use?
That sound clip.
I'll give that to you.
I will give that news clip to you and people can judge with their own critical thinking.
Not the least of the observations that have been made about the filming they have, which appears to be from multiple takes, but the price of diesel was 99 cents.
And I don't think it's been that low since something like 1987.
So there are many anomalies here.
There may be a theatrical component to this, but for the reasons I've outlined, and for others that Monica has tossed into the harbor, I doubt very much they can bring a guilty verdict against a police officer.
Who has even taught to use this technique to restrain uncooperative witnesses, suspects.
It's more complicated than this, needless to say, but we're going to let it go at that now.
And I'm just pleased very much, Monique, that you reached out to me for us to have this conversation tonight.
Thank you for allowing me to have the voice to be out there.
I've been very general because I can't give names and whatnot, but people need to know what is happening.
And if you see this and you're a colleague, I'm asking you to please speak out.
Put it in writing because the doctor is right.
You put that mask on you, you're there for eight hours in a day, you don't know what you're breathing.
Not to mention, and I think you might have mentioned this or saw it, there's these nanoparticles they're finding in these masks now and parasites.
I've seen it on video and it's very disturbing.
And then the cheap ones, you can choke on the plastic.
That gets, it's like asbestos.
So now, why can't I wear a full gosh darn respirator if I have to that you can see my face?
But I'm not going to put this on, which means I'm a muzzled slave.
And not only that, from what I understand, and I know masks can be used in different ways, but from what I understand, I read that When you're initiated into the religion of Satanism, some of them use masks.
So, do we really know why we're putting this on?
I know why we're not putting it on.
I know why I'm not putting it on, because I want to breathe!
Thank you very much.
That's right.
You and George Floyd have that in common.
You want to breathe.
All of us do.
I thank you so much for being here with me tonight.