All Episodes
Previous Next
March 22, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:09:12
The Real Deal (21 March 2021) with Mark Anderson (The Truth Hound)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Real Deal, where I'm very pleased to have my featured guest today, Mark Anderson, an investigative journalist known as the Truth Hound, who's going to give us a report about the Open Cities meeting just held, a conference in Chicago, related to the dealing with COVID and will also dwell on
some related aspects having to do with migrants crossing the border in unprecedented numbers and
how the Biden administration is dealing with them. Mark, it's a pleasure to have you here
on the show. Great to be back with you, Jim. I want you to just pick up wherever you'd like vis-a-vis
this Open Cities Conference you've been following.
Fill us in.
What's going on and why is it important?
Well, March 18th, the Chicago Council on Global Affairs held their first 2021 Forum on Global Cities, the Pritzker Forum on Global Cities to be exact.
That's the main financiers, the Pritzker family, the wealthy Jewish family that runs the Hyatt Hotel chain.
And claims one of their own, J.B.
Pritzker, as Governor of Illinois.
And this is the first year, and they announced this last year, that 2021 would be the first year that they'd break the Forum on Global Cities into segments, rather than having one big powwow in June, like they used to have when this whole Forum on Global Cities started around 2015-2016.
So, oh, about 2018 or so, the Pritzker Forum It became the Pritzker Forum, that is, and the Pritzker family dumped in a lot of money, a lot of money from the Robert R. McCormick Foundation, even though the namesake of that foundation, the legendary Chicago Tribune publisher Robert R. McCormick, who lived until 1955, would have had nothing to do with the Chicago Council's globalism and internationalism.
It's a slap in the face to his legacy.
But that, and also the Lester Crown family of General Dynamics fame, And that's the three big main financiers that have contributed money to the Forum on Global Cities.
The Pritzker family, the Robert R. McCormick Foundation, and the third one, the Lester Crown General Dynamics fortune.
So it's a lot of money that's now being poured into this.
And on March 18, they held their forum, and they focused a lot, as promised, on COVID.
The COVID cult, you might say, the COVIDocracy, the bureaucracy that's grown up around COVID, and all the profiteering going on with Big Pharma, all the revolving doors between government, Big Pharma, and think tanks.
Basically, they're really ginning this thing up, Jim, and they're trying to use COVID more than ever as a justification to increase government power in general.
But to transfer more power to the cities and mayors and some compliant state governors, complicit state governors in the process.
So it's a kind of a devolution of power down to the local level, but it's not the local control that we often think of.
This is something else.
This is a unconstitutional, unlawful shift of national like powers down to the state and local levels to sort of subvert the nation state and use COVID That certainly makes sense and fits into the Great Reset and other agendas to reorganize the world and human society under the control of a tiny cabal of despots
And when it's a global cities arrangement, you can already see that makes no sense if they're internal to the United States, why they should be global cities.
Those are occurring within counties, within states, and you presume they'd be making deference to the counties and the states, but actually, as you're implying, they're seeking to transcend Yeah, that's a good way to sum it up.
Eric Garcetti, who's the mayor of L.A., was among those that spoke in Zoom virtual forum.
of the federal government on behalf of a tiny number of very powerful people who want to
own the totality of planet Earth.
Yeah, that's a good way to sum it up.
Eric Garcetti, who is the mayor of LA, was among those that spoke in Zoom virtual forum.
They got to put on this kind of, you know, little sideshow that COVID is so, you know,
just outrageously deadly that they can't even meet in the same room and be maybe six feet
So they did this whole thing virtual.
And the 2020, the last, in October, the last forum on global cities, the Pritzker Forum, they also held that virtually through Zoom.
Again, they're putting on this idea that even they can't meet Uh, at all in the same room.
And granted, some of them are in other countries, and they would have to call in through Zoom anyway, perhaps.
But even those in the United States are, you know, using Zoom, acting like even being six feet apart is too close, really ginning up the whole, the whole COVID thing, acting like it's the bubonic plague, which it isn't, never has been, never will be.
But, but Garcetti was, was in there, Jim.
And he was among those that, especially him though, that talked about He conferences with dozens of mayors all the time.
And I think he said the number was like over 50 mayors that he's been talking to around the world through Zoom and Skype and whatnot.
And they've been talking about how they can, you know, network and adopt similar policies across the board about, you know, how to make cities function better, they say, how to battle COVID, how to make cities more equitable.
There's this big emphasis on equity and making sure that vaccines go out in the most brisk and robust way possible and that the entire world gets vaccinated as soon as possible.
They don't want any inequities.
They don't want any unfairness, quote-unquote, in how vaccines are administered.
So, therefore, if the United States only minds its own business with vaccine, well, that's vaccine nationalism.
That's a bad thing, they say.
We have to play a role in making sure poorer countries with less access, less transportation networks, you know, a reduced ability to transport vaccines.
They want to make sure that these other countries get their vaccines in a timely manner.
And the U.S.
and other rich countries must play a role in making that happen.
So Garcetti, the L.A.
mayor, has been talking with other mayors about bridging these inequities.
They love that word inequities.
Making sure that vaccination happens on a worldwide basis as soon as possible.
And again, there's this unstated, almost religious-like belief that these vaccines are absolutely safe, unquestionably safe in every aspect of their existence, which is literally impossible.
There is no medication that's ever been invented by humankind that has been totally safe.
And yet these people act as if there are no risks.
I mean, there is no mention or even the idea that there could be a risk in these vaccines, which of course, as you know, are highly experimental mRNA vaccine-like potions, which have never been used on the overall population of humanity before in all of history.
And so that even adds more uncertainty to the whole VAX question.
And again, Garcetti and his cabal of mayors are acting as if this thing is just completely risk-free and let's get it out to the poor, let's get it out to the wealthy, let's get it out to everyone.
And here's the catch, Jim.
They're really, you know, mortified that minorities are not getting the vaccine fast enough.
And they claim to be so full of this compassion for minorities.
But one of the media sponsors of the Pritzker Forum on Global Cities is, of course, the Financial Times, which is right out of the city of London, Bilderberg connected, a financial rag for the neoliberal free trade internationalist sect.
And Ed Luce, Edward Luce, is the Washington, D.C.
correspondent for the Financial Times.
And he said 76 percent of Washington, D.C.
deaths from COVID, allegedly from COVID, Are blacks, but only about one fourth of the black community has been vaccinated.
So therefore there's an inequity in the DC vaccination rate.
But if you flip that around and look at the underbelly of that statement, what they're saying is.
In my opinion, this is, this is how I see it that, um, blacks need to be vaccinated more.
Let's not talk about any of the vaccine risks.
Uh, the, uh, risk of adverse reactions, the risk of death, and there, there have been recorded deaths.
There have been very serious adverse reactions.
And so on the one hand, they claim that they have all the best interests in mind of the black community.
And yet they want to push an experimental vaccine onto the minority communities while claiming these statistics that I just mentioned are true.
And, you know, to say that 76% of the.
COVID deaths in DC are Blacks is presupposing that those people died of COVID.
The fact of the matter is, is there's been a lot of misrepresentation, as you know, Jim, on just what are people dying from?
Is it, is it certifiably COVID or not?
So they take it as an article of faith that these Blacks are dying of COVID in the first place, and then they want to push the vaccine on these minorities to fill these gaps, as they call them, of inequities.
And so you can see how it sounds humanitarian on one level, but if you look at it another way, you nuance it, it sounds completely, how would you say, Faustian.
It sounds, you know, inhumane in the extreme.
Let me offer some information that confirms everything you're saying.
The CDC has reported on possible reactions to COVID-19 vaccines.
Get this.
The following reactions are possible after the first or second injection.
Swelling, pain or redness at the injection site, fatigue, fever, Headache, muscle pain, joint pain, chills, swollen lymph nodes, general unwell feeling, nausea, and vomiting.
Now, those are the effects they're willing to countenance.
And of course, Mark, those per se don't sound so very serious.
Notice they don't even include death.
Well, get this.
Get this by comparison.
Here's a UK government report of the Pfizer vaccine adverse reactions as of the 4th of March 2021.
Blood disorders, 2,033.
Cardiac disorders, 1,032.
Congenital disorders, 3.
Hearing disorders, 713.
cardiac disorders, 1,032, congenital disorders, three,
hearing disorders, 713, endocrine disorders, 10,
eye disorders, 1,230, Gastrointestinal disorders, 9,360.
General disorders, 26,391.
Liver disorders, 17.
Immune system disorders, 466.
Infections, 1,863.
General disorders, 26,391.
Liver disorders, 17.
Immune system disorders, 466.
Infections, 1,863.
Injuries, 3,010.
Continued investigations to determine effects, 965.
Metabolic disorders, 525.
Muscle tissue disorders, 11,565.
Neoplasms, 20.
Nervous system disorders, 16,107.
Associated with pregnancy, 29.
Metabolic disorders, 525.
Muscle tissue disorders, 11,565.
Neoplasms, 20.
Nervous system disorders, 16,107.
Associated with pregnancy, 29.
Psychiatric disorders, 1,010.
Renal, urinary disorders, 187.
Liver disorders, 17.
Immune system disorders, 466.
Infections, 1,863.
primary disorders, 187 liver disorders, 17 immune system disorders, 466 infections, 1863 injuries.
Continued investigation again.
965.
Metabolic disorders, 525.
Muscle tissue disorders, 11,565.
Neoplasms, 20.
Nervous system disorders, 16,107.
525, metabolic disorders, 525.
Muscle tissue disorders, 11,565.
Neoplasms, 20.
Nervous system disorders, 16,107.
Psychiatric disorders, 1,235.
Renal urinary disorders.
Cyst, reproductive, 338.
Respiratory disorders, 3,575.
Skin disorders, 6,042.
Vascular disorders, 992.
Dead, 212.
338, respiratory disorders, 3,575, skin disorders, 6,042, vascular disorders, 992, death, 212,
medical and surgical procedures, 45.
I'm telling you what the CDC is acknowledging and the reality on the ground, in this case, in the UK,
which I guarantee you is giving us more accurate data than any American source is completely incompatible.
Well, see, they have to exclude death because once the public realizes that a possible consequence of taking this vaccine is death, you realize that that consequence overweighs the potential protection you're getting from the COVID, which, after all, as we know, Has something on the order of a 99% survival rate.
So, I mean, the situation is completely absurd, totally political, and clearly intended for manipulation of the public to promote a political agenda, which is not one that the American people would welcome were they aware of what was taking place.
Yeah, I've noticed that too, Jim, that despite all its faults, the UK government tends to have more accurate data For all its claims of First Amendment freedoms, the United States still, and very unfortunately, seems to live in the biggest bubble, the biggest kind of intellectual terrarium of all countries.
We think we're so well-informed, but the contrast between how well we think we're informed and how we're really not well-informed is huge.
Americans have this completely unrealistic view of how well-informed they are.
They think it's way up here when in fact they're really kind of lost in the wilderness and you can find all sorts of countries, Bulgaria, Norway, you name it, and now you're talking about the UK where you can get more accurate data and readily obtain it than in the so-called free speech United States.
That's one really, you know, uncomfortable irony that the more well-informed among us I appreciate you sharing that.
That provides a good backdrop to the Pritzker Forum on Global Cities and their claim that COVID is so serious that we need to realign the entire governance system from top to bottom, and again, equip mayors with unprecedented powers, some of them that would normally be delegated to national authorities, and basically have them sidestep the nation-state And step out on their own in their brave new world.
And I think as you indicated, Jim, that fits in to the great reset as described by Klaus Schwab, who is truly the, you know, completely diluted despot of the day in terms of those at the international level, one of the top names.
But yes, it's something else.
There were a number of speakers there.
Ed Luce.
was interviewing Dr. Marcella Nunez-Smith, who's the head of the Biden Task Force on Health Equity.
And there were several others.
Marvin Rees, the Bristol UK mayor, was another speaker.
And he talked about building trust, and, you know, talked about all sorts of matters.
And building trust, of course, was code for kind of Winning over the public, you know, through propaganda campaigns.
They want to build trust.
Well, the way to build trust is to be honest.
The way to build trust is to tell people they're part of a medical experiment.
Whenever a vaccine goes into emergency use authorization, you and I know, Jim, that it doesn't become non-experimental.
It remains experimental and it's not licensed.
And the FDA gives it a clearance because of a so-called emergency.
Otherwise, that vaccine would be on probably a two-year or longer trajectory of more testing.
But all that testing is forgone under emergency use.
Therefore, anybody getting the vaccines, if you want to call them vaccines, is unwittingly part of a medical experiment, which is against all the international codes and against U.S.
law.
To not be informed that you're part of a medical experiment and to not give informed consent Even if the vaccines were the greatest thing in the world, is still unlawful.
And this is the thing that you don't hear from these Global Cities people.
They don't want to talk about the legal ramifications, let alone the medical ramifications that you just mentioned, Jim.
And so they're using COVID in the most disingenuous way possible as leverage, once again, to push for this restructuring of governance for Global Cities.
You're making very telling points, Mark, and of course we know that the Nuremberg Code, which is also codified by the Geneva Conventions and by the UN Charter, requires that any individual, before they can be the subject of a medical experiment, must be informed of the risk And the benefits and of the alternatives to undergoing those procedures, which in this case would include, for example, hydroxychloroquine and intermectin, both of which are non-invasive, meaning they don't involve a jab.
They involve taking a medicine, pills.
I've taken HCQ myself.
Which doesn't run any risks of the hazards and defects that go along with these injections, when we just had a very comprehensive survey coming from the data in the UK, which is a, you know, large-scale experimental subject pool, and where we know that The risks, in my judgment, overwhelmingly outweigh the benefits, where in addition to those we've enumerated, Sherry Tenpenny has explained they have an anti-fertility ingredient that clicks in three to six months after you take it, so that in fact what you're doing is sterilizing yourself
Not only that, but the use of the mRNA appears to affect a form of gene splicing so that while you may temporarily feel robust, we're already getting reports of individuals who've been vaccinated that continue to test positive for COVID Which almost certainly is because the test actually doesn't prevent you from getting COVID, nor does it prevent you from transmitting COVID.
And even Anthony Tony the Rat Fauci has said you have to keep wearing your mask even after you've had your injection.
I mean, the public reaches a point where it's completely absurd to bother with a vaccine because you get no benefit from it.
And I think it's outrageous that your points are really spot on, Mark, and the situation is even more deadly and serious because among the reports I'm getting from highly qualified medical experts are that it actually has the effect of weakening Your immune system.
So that, say, a year from now, when you're exposed to similar environmental hazards that ordinarily you'd be able to just shuffle off like water off of a duck's back, they will attack your body and your body will respond by attacking itself, which leads to a very miserable form of death.
So, I mean, the statistics Are only barely scratching the surface.
And in a recent interview, Bill Gates very smugly implied that while people are trying to avoid the, you know, the vaccinations now, wait till the next wave, smirk, smirk, smirk, because he knows there are going to be millions of deaths.
A year after this first round of vaccinations and a percentage of those who had already been vaccinated who died are going to be astounded.
Everyone thought they were being protected, Mark, but actually they were making themselves vulnerable, totally unknowingly, which means all this is in violation of the Nuremberg Code, international law.
Even the Hippocratic Oath, first, do no harm.
Yeah, and so it's even worse, Jim, It's one thing if this was happening purely on the medical level, as bad as the allopathic medical system is, the way it's completely shoved to the side, naturopathic and homeopathic disciplines.
You know, there used to be three schools of medicine, naturopathic, homeopathic and allopathic.
The Rockefellers threw their weight around in the early 20th century.
They knocked out the schools of medicine for the other schools of thought.
and left only allopathy in its place.
That's become dominant, especially in America under the AMA, the American Medical Association.
And they define what healthcare even is, right?
And health insurance largely only pays for their modalities.
And so we've all been sort of herded into this idea of what medicine even is.
Logically, good health consists of good nutrition and exercise and avoiding certain substances like tobacco and this and that.
It's not just a matter of drugs and surgery like we've been propagandized to believe and vaccines are of course just a riskier part of the overall big pharma element and so we're given this model but it's bad enough that that it's that it's that medical bureaucracy but then for cities to take that and use the COVID aspects of all this and use that as leverage to restructure governance unconstitutionally and really Outside the knowledge of the vast majority of Americans, most Americans have no idea what the Global Cities Movement even is, or that it even exists, let alone what it's about.
So this is really doubly injurious and harmful to our body politic, our body politic in terms of our physiology and the health of our population, but also the structure of our governments.
These people talk as if they own the narrative, as if they have a perfect understanding of this whole thing.
Again, they don't consider any alternative views on vaccinations or on COVID.
And so it's just full steam ahead.
And there were many things that were discussed at the forum on Global Cities, March 18.
There's, you know, there's other things like Peter Spiegel of The Financial Times, there was two or three Financial Times representatives there.
He's talking also that, you know, the cities that want more powers, powers normally reserved to national governments, in some instances, they want free trade and globalism.
They don't want nationalism and protectionism.
And Peter Spiegel of Financial Times went on to say that the Black Lives Matter riots and arson campaigns last year, We're merely protests, he calls them.
And he says these protests happened amid COVID hitting minorities harder, and those minorities again, lacking vaccine.
There's that argument again, that minorities have supposedly been scientifically proven to be dying more of COVID than the white population, and therefore, These minorities need to get more, a larger share of the vaccines even faster.
And, and all the cynical views on, on race that that brings with it.
And, um, there were, you know, there were some of these miscellaneous things.
I'm going back over my notes that were talked about at that, uh, global cities forum.
But the vast majority of it was that, um, That we need to roll out these vaccines as fast as possible, give people a new lease on life, supposedly.
And now they're saying something like 80% of Americans live in metropolitan areas of one size or another.
And that cities are the wave of the future, even though under COVID, a lot of cities were gutted.
New York City, for example, businesses shuttered by the hundreds, if not thousands.
And yet these global cities advocates are saying that cities are still the place to go, even though COVID In many ways, decimated parts of our largest cities.
How can they justify that, Mark?
I mean, it's such obvious bullshit.
I mean, that they should be trying to propagate such a position in the wake of the devastation.
I mean, when you look at the riots and the looting and the arson, they can call it protests, but they were most certainly not peaceful protests.
And in fact, they were aided and abetted by Kamala Harris, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters.
Other Democrats wanted more and more and more.
Not all these riots, which they tried to describe as peaceful against a background of buildings and businesses aflame, were peaceful when they obviously were not.
I mean, how dumb are we supposed to be?
Oh, yeah, no doubt about it.
And exactly.
I concur.
Another thing that was brought out by Edward Luce of the Financial Times, speaking again to Dr. Marcella Nunez-Smith, the head of the Biden Task Force on Health Equity.
Well, she said, economic suffering has also been uneven in our country.
Race and place are extraordinary drivers of health inequities.
And she went on to say that we should see vaccine increases in In proportion to racial vaccine shortfalls, we need to meet people where they are.
And this has to do with taking vaccines mobile and going right into the neighborhoods and probably door-to-door, Jim, with vaccines in these so-called deprived racial minority neighborhoods that are being shortchanged by not getting vaccines fast enough and are, again, are supposedly dying at a greater rate from COVID than non-minority populations.
Once again, not proven, just speculation in those statistics.
And, um, she said, we need, we need to meet people where they are with vacs, vaccinations, and all three of the emergency use authorization vaccines are safe and effective.
Uh, this Nunez Smith said unequivocally, and this, this needs to be, uh, made convenient.
It needs to be made free to all, especially minorities, no cost.
And we need extended hours at, uh, at, uh, you know, established as well as mobile vaccine clinics, vaccination clinics, and apply them the vaccinations through community organizations, uh, to get those, uh, vaccinated to those, uh, who most need them to get the vaccines to those who most need them.
And again, to have mobile units to those that need them the most.
And so they really want to take this right to your front doorstep eventually, Jim.
And the Ed Luce of Financial Times then very briefly noted that there's a mistrust, generally speaking, of the medical system among blacks and other people of color.
And that indicates something that came up a lot also in this forum, Jim.
There's this underlying notion that all European-rooted Americans, what are euphemistically called whites, I mean, This piece of paper is white.
Do I look white to you?
Okay.
You know, whites is just such a cheap thing to call European peoples, just like blacks is a cheap thing to call African-rooted peoples or people of African extraction.
That's just my personal opinion.
I think that language is very flippant and kind of crude in a way.
That aside, there's this underlying theme at this Pritzker Forum on Global Cities that whites, as they're called, Have this inherent economic advantage and that there's almost no white poverty, and that only people of color are discriminated against.
And this is something that comes up again and again, of course, in liberal circles, but it was especially strong at this Global Cities Forum, as if as if the white population suffers from no inequities and no problems almost, almost at all.
And so, therefore, they're able to justify this sort of pseudo Mercy and pseudo concern about people of color so they can get justify getting more vaccines that are so safe and effective to these people of color and eliminate any discrimination and getting vaccines out within America, but also make sure there's no discrimination outside of America.
And so all countries get the vaccines fast enough and within each nation in an equitable fashion.
So people of color are not left out.
Mark, we know these vaccines are neither safe nor effective.
Persons who are testing positive for COVID, they explain explicitly that getting the vaccine does not mean you can no longer transmit it.
It doesn't mean you're cured of it.
I mean, you begin to ask what possible rationale is there for the vaccine other than as a mechanism for big pharma to make big bucks Out of your pocketbook.
I mean, it's outrageous.
And remember, we've already been surveying many of the problems.
And when there are cheaper, readily available, and proven safe, effective methods, such as HCQ, Which has been around for 65 years for the use of treatment of malaria.
In 2005, the journal Virology published an article extolling the virtues of HCQ, that it would cure it if you have it and prevent it if you don't.
It was a wonder drug.
For these COVID SARS viruses, which means Anthony Fauci has known at least since 2005 that HEQ was the way to go.
It's cheap, it's inexpensive, but it doesn't make a lot of money for pharma.
So they demonized it, and now they're doing the same.
With Invermectin, which also has proven to be, in essence, 100% effective.
I remember in the early days, we had physicians who had hundreds of patients, some of whom were serious enough to be hospitalized, to whom they gave HCQ.
And I think of those hundreds and hundreds of patients, there was only one loss.
And I suspect that was from other conditions, independent of the alleged COVID infection.
Where we also know, Mark, that based on a study that slipped through the cracks from Johns Hopkins, that if you compare the number of deaths in different age groups from 2020 versus 2019, there's no significant difference.
And that means there isn't a pandemic.
People aren't dying in large numbers.
And to contradict the claim that the hospitals are overflowing with COVID patients, if that were the case, because this is a respiratory disease, they'd be consuming more and more oxygen through the sale of more and more oxygen tanks, but that also is not taking place.
Not to mention that IV drips in stands, which would be required also.
...are not showing any increase in sales.
That means, from the point of view of the actual statistics and the sales figures, there's no pandemic taking place.
It's all a mind warp, and what they're doing is reclassifying the deaths from the flu as COVID deaths.
We even have deaths from automobile accidents, from murder, from suicide are being classified as COVID deaths.
Mark, I mean, it's insulting beyond belief, but the American people are so conditioned to pay attention to what they hear from the television that they are being bamboozled, and in many cases, I'm sorry to say, promoting their own demise by going far with injections Which I'd emphasize again that is a bottom line issue here because this is a major depopulation program.
Deagle.com, a website with quite profound intel and military connections has projected The demise of the U.S.
population by more than two-thirds in five years, from around 330 million in 2020 to less than 100 million, to 99 million plus in 2025.
And Mark, it appears they've got three methods to bring that about.
Number one is a face mask.
It turns out that Anthony, Tony the Rat Fauci, and his colleagues actually did a study of the Spanish flu, and they discovered that most of the deaths were not from the flu, but from bacterial pneumonia.
And guess what?
Bacterial pneumonia is caused by wearing face masks.
I mean, that promotes bacterial pneumonia.
So the face masks are a slow kill, then you have the injections that are faster kill, but ultimately it looks as though they're going to squeeze the food supply and starve the rest of us so that they're going to bring about the demise of 230 million Americans in less than five years, Mark, and we're already embarked upon that that path.
I mean it's just disgusting And such a monster effect that most Americans can't begin to get their minds wrapped around it.
I mean, they have a hard time imagining the government could lie to them about 9-11.
I mean, it's just really tragic, the loss of critical thinking in the United States, which I taught for 35 years as university courses.
And when my students came in, I'd explain to them that if they come to the university to take only one course, this was the course to take.
Oh, absolutely.
Yeah.
I mean, I'd like to think, Jim, and, you know, in my heart of hearts, I'd like to believe that what you just said, Will not be the case that they wouldn't embark on such a Malthusian, steep and dramatic population reduction.
I've been to the Georgia Guidestones.
That was about 11 years ago.
I don't know why anyone would put up those stones, this sort of internationalist, you know, testimony, you might say, this testament in stone to the internationalist credo, and that is to reduce the global population to about 500 million, and right now the population is over 7 billion.
You do the math.
I don't know why they put that up if they didn't at least have the general intent on trying to bring that about.
No one has ever definitively shown who put up the Georgia Guidestones.
I've long suspected it was Stephen Rockefeller, who I believe without looking it up was Nelson's nephew.
Or grandson, one or the other.
And I believe he was at a New England University for a number of years.
And one time down the Hudson River, the Rockefellers were behind the globalist Ark of the Covenant.
They floated what looked like the Ark of the Covenant down the Hudson River.
But this new arc, which looked just like the biblical one, contained the secrets and solutions
from the internationalist system on how to make our planet better,
on how to achieve this utopian existence, as they would define utopia,
and to have a carbon-free future, and all these things, all these strategic,
or excuse me, sustainable development goals under the UN.
And so they represented that with a pseudo-arc of the covenant.
This is why I suspect the same people probably put the Georgia Guidestones together.
And again, the Georgia Guidestones called for this, you know, terrible drop in the population.
So, again, I'd like to believe that what you said isn't true, but we have to allow for that distinct possibility.
Unfortunately.
The nominee I've had is Ted Turner, who's advocated a 95% reduction in the world's population.
Right.
Let me just make two points about this.
The first is, the Masons seem to be playing an important role behind the scenes.
Whoever is behind the agenda is committed to the proposition that you must announce to the public what you are doing before you do it.
And then if they fail to respond and cope with it, that's their responsibility and others as shifting of the burden for consequences that follow by announcing.
I believe, by the way, this was a part of Joe Biden's statement that wasn't just misspeaking when he said that they'd assembled the greatest voter fraud organization in history.
And where he later said, we don't need, I don't need your help getting election only after I'm elected because they knew with the Dominion voting machines and all the other techniques they were going to employ, they were going to steal the election big time, which is precisely what happened.
But I'd also observe that if indeed these vaccines have the deleterious effects we are considering, which include death actually, then promoting the black community as candidates for the vaccination is really Moving forward with a depopulation involving killing off a large percent of the black population of the world, which would not surprise me in the least, and they do it in the name of equity.
So, here's a term they're using as a pseudo-justification for almost any measure they take based upon Race and location, as you mentioned, race and location.
But race is clearly the primary desideratum in respect to this diabolical agenda.
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
Yeah, the New Orleans mayor who was there with the Cape Town, South Africa mayor, the Bristol, UK mayor.
I mentioned the Los Angeles mayor.
These were some of those, several of those that the Pritzker Forum on Global Cities, March 18th in Chicago, which was done virtual with Zoom.
And the New Orleans mayor, she said, along those lines, that out of the 700 City of New Orleans alleged COVID deaths, she didn't say alleged, she just said 700 or so New Orleans COVID deaths, 550 of those, she said, were Blacks.
550 out of some 700 African American deaths.
So therefore, she concluded, we need to backstab Those in neighborhoods that are the most vulnerable.
And so therefore, once again, she wasn't the only one.
She was among those that brought up, we need small mobile vaccine units that we can park in neighborhoods.
People from their homes can go right to these vaccine units that are right there.
I suspect that that would even include some in-home visits.
If people were homebound, let's say maybe had mobility problems and, um, uh, testing sites would have much the same approach.
Not just your big centralized testing sites, you'd have mobile testing sites just as you'd have mobile local vaccination administration clinics.
And she went on to say that New Orleans supposedly leads U.S.
cities with a 24 percent vaccination rate.
In other words, New Orleans supposedly is leading the pack with one quarter of its population vaccinated.
Some interesting statistics there.
But, you know, all of this is based on These assumed deaths being from COVID, way back a year ago, Jim, the National Vital Statistics System, or NBSS, a division of the CDC, March 24, 2020, almost exactly a year ago, the NBSS announced a new ICD code for COVID-19 deaths.
They started with a question and then answered it in their literature.
The NBSS said, word for word, Should COVID-19 be reported on the death certificate only with a confirmed lab test?
Then the answer was COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents or dead people where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.
So there's the key words where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused.
By the way, there are established criteria for when vaccination is appropriate.
It includes that the vaccine has been shown to be safe and effective, that there are no available alternatives, And that the threat that the vaccine is intended to deal with is greater in its risk than those from the vaccine.
And I would submit none of those criteria are satisfied in this case, because you've heard an enumeration of the consequences of taking these vaccines, which are clearly not safe.
We've spoken of ACQ and Intermectin as alternatives that are safe and effective and involve no invasion by means of an injection into your body, where Katherine Austin Fitz has been emphatic that these do not deserve to be called vaccines because that implies a health benefit and there's nothing with regard to them that constitutes a health benefit.
And then, of course, since the actual risk from COVID appears to be extremely modest, Whereas the risk from taking the vaccine appears to be anything but.
It's very clear this whole agenda would never be medically warranted and therefore is the consequence of political, not medical, not scientific considerations, Mark.
I think that's manifest here throughout the entire debate.
And may I say I have dozens of articles about this on my blog at jamesfetzer.org and several extended studies reporting my own research on my website at jimtheconspiracyguy.com, the very first being on the coronavirus phenomenon Real or a fantasy where you can follow the history in how mortality statistics in European countries were not increasing at the very time they were supposed to be spiking and where citizen journalists were going to hospitals in Europe and in the United States that were supposed to be overflowing with COVID patients and discovered them to be empty, just empty, barren.
Where many of these hospitals are having to send home staff because they have nothing for them to do, Mark.
It's outrageous.
Yeah, I mean, the statistics that you've listed, Jim, and the ones I've listed, including the recovery rate being so high throughout the whole thing, including what I just got done saying that the NVSS said that you don't need to have a lab test to claim a COVID death on your data that doctors use for recording deaths.
And when you consider the PCR test, which is so sensitive, it picks up all sorts of biological material and interprets many of those things as COVID, even though they have little or nothing to do with COVID.
So all these cases, the big caseload is just a big ginning up of the numbers from these inaccurate PCR tests.
And then you've got the high recovery rate and you've got the dishonesty built into how COVID deaths are recorded.
And yet all that flimsy data is used to justify these vaccines to begin with.
But on top of that, again, whether the vaccines are deemed safe or not is almost secondary because you're not supposed to be an unwitting member of a medical experiment.
They're supposed to be informed consent.
The absence of informed consent means that experimental vaccines that are not licensed and are still in a trial stage making the people guinea pigs who are receiving them That making, doing away with informed consent basically invalidates the whole thing on the legal plane anyway.
So it's, it's almost secondary on how safe or not safe they are.
This is an unlawful administration of an experimental vaccine to an unwitting public who has not given their informed consent.
And you would think these mayors at the Global Cities Forum would be aware of legal liabilities because Big Pharma is protected from being sued from adverse vaccine reactions and deaths, we know this, but people that are administering the vaccines, hospitals, clinics, nurses, doctors, you name it, they're probably legally vulnerable to breaking what some generally call the Nuremberg Code, just giving it sort of a shorthand name, you know.
These mayors are really wandering into a legal minefield, in my opinion, based on what I've seen so far.
And yet, they're ginning this up, and I'll explain in a couple minutes what their governmental vision is, as was announced a little bit at this most recent Global Cities Forum.
They're really looking for a lot of power, and to put the nation-state in their rearview mirror in the process.
I have no doubt.
We don't want to conclude our conversation today, Mark, without discussing how the handling of the migrants at the border vitiates any concern for COVID, where they're not only welcoming into the country by the bushel basket as though there were no borders whatsoever, The latest report I have from a friend following this is that the Biden administration is putting these migrants up in hotels at taxpayer expense.
So they're not only coming into the country illegally, which means they're criminals, but they're being given hospitality, probably with room service at taxpayer expense.
And where, in addition, they're now considering flying migrants to states near the Canadian border for processing.
What they're doing, Mark, is polluting the entire nation with these illegals from other nations, and it appears to me to be a manifestation of the Callergy Plan, which was to infest Europe with migrants from Africa The plan was to promote intermarriage and to destroy the culture of Western Europe, and I believe similar objectives are taking place here.
When I was actively tracking the very idea that these people had walked a thousand miles, which sounded utterly preposterous, I found they were being brought up in truck convoys and that the trucks had on their doors the Star of David.
So I suggest that this is, in fact, an Israeli opt.
It's a Zionist opt to destroy the United States.
And if anyone finds that unbelievable, let me say in 2000, Bibi Netanyahu made the following observation.
He said, America is the golden calf.
We are going to suck it dry until there's nothing left but the world's greatest welfare state, because that's what we do with nations we hate.
This is a present Prime Minister to whom Donald Trump was so generous, whom Americans believe naively is our ally in the Middle East, but is actually working actively to destroy America, its culture and its resources, those they cannot turn to benefit Israel, which, by the way, in passing, I mention, I'm convinced, Their control of the mainstream media was used to benefit Biden and attack Trump because Trump refused to bomb Iran.
I guarantee you that's what they think they can get out of this malleable new administration, the opportunity to bomb Iran using American military forces, just as in the wake of 9-11.
They used American military forces to take out the modern Arab states that had served as a counterbalance to Israel's domination of the entire region, which they then intended to use to turn against the Persian nation of Iran, but where they were brought to a halt in Syria by the intervention of Russian and Iranian troops at the request of the democratically elected president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad,
And Mark, I can't tell you how many Americans think we're in Syria to bring democracy to Syria, which is impossible because Syria is already a democracy.
How bad is that?
Yeah, well, there's a lot to unpack there, Jim.
I'd have to look up some of that and independently verify it.
The possible Israeli involvement in actually bringing migrants to the border, if you want to use the word migrants.
I want to try and independently verify that.
That's very intriguing.
Certainly, The global mayor system and the global city system, and as I've mentioned before on your show and others, has been involved in sanctuary cities.
Libby Schaaf, the Oakland mayor, Oakland, California, openly said, and she had been at a Chicago Council on Global Affairs meeting around that time.
This was probably 2016, 2017.
She openly said that she intentionally defied Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, federal officers, when they got to Oakland to apprehend illegal aliens, some of whom had criminal records, and she openly defied them and helped them avoid arrest.
So a lot of, at least some of the mayors involved in the Global Cities Movement are involved in sanctuary cities, knowingly and willfully maneuvering to help the Illegal immigrants avoid being apprehended and deported by federal immigration authorities, which of course is, if you or I did that, we'd be arrested as accessories in criminal activity as accomplices.
And, but they can get away with it.
Nobody pays any price with this stuff.
And so now what we're seeing, uh, with all these migrant children, uh, being trucked up to Dallas to the big, uh, stadium convention center there.
And then from there reportedly being taken to hotels.
At least any country that I can think of without being quarantined at a hotel at our own expense before we can go out on the streets of, let's say, the UK.
So these people can just storm our border and immediately get sanctuary, stay in hotels, probably not being required to wear masks.
And I'm not saying that healthy people are spreaders.
I don't believe that asymptomatic spreading thing at all.
I think it's minimal to zero, but there's other things besides COVID.
Tuberculosis, TB, is a big thing.
I live in South Texas by the border.
I know firsthand that TB is a big thing with people from Central and South America and other countries that are funneling through Mexico into Texas and into Arizona, New Mexico, California.
TB and other illnesses, many of them communicable, not all but some, and so There are other things besides COVID, and we used to have Ellis Island in New York Harbor where people were, you know, scrupulously screened and rigorously reviewed in terms of their personal background, their medical background.
Why are you coming to the United States?
And now it's just open season.
probably again, the Codenhove-Kalergi Plan, the Austrian diplomat and a wealthy magnate there,
oligarch, you might say, that promoted what was known as the Kalergi Plan.
And that again was to have the third world countries basically overrun the European countries
and the American countries and intermingle so much that the original national stock of any given nation
would basically fade away over time.
And this was his idea.
This is not something you and I are making up.
Kalergi openly and very audaciously promoted what's called the Kalergi Plan.
And.
And so this has all the makings of that, that's for sure.
I'd like to do a little more research to get some more precise cause and effect on that, along with the Israeli claims, the Star of David on the trucks and all that.
But all that being said, this is an extremely reckless thing to do.
I mean, by the criteria of the COVID people, the COVIDocracy that say COVID is so serious, The last thing you'd want to do, according to their view of COVID, would be to take people from another country or scores of other countries and then just recklessly invade a neighboring country without any real screening going on.
You would think that that'd be the last thing they'd want to do.
But those that say COVID is so serious, especially those in power, are suddenly very quiet when it comes to these immigration invasions.
Where these people are being exploited by coyotes and human traffickers.
And that's another thing.
The human traffickers, the drug cartels, the coyotes, they want open borders in the U.S.
That's what gins up and enables them to have a market for their human trafficking, where they make up to $20,000 a head, more than they do on drugs in many cases.
And I've had Border Patrol agents tell me that personally here in South Texas.
And so, You can see the huge double standard and hypocrisy of those that profess to have such a concern for these illegal immigrants, many of them children.
And I've heard rumors, I'll just call them rumors for now, that some of these migrant children, using the word migrant loosely, are actually kidnapped from their home countries without their parents' knowledge, unless the parents are selling the kids out for money out of desperation.
But the kids are brought up here against their will, possibly without their parents even knowing their kids were snatched.
And so many of these kids without parents that were told about through the news media very well could be, and this is highly speculative right now to be sure, but they very well could be simply kidnapped and that they were not brought up here with their parents and their parents and them just got separated along the way, which is how the media makes it sound.
All their parents and kids were together.
They're heading up.
They're getting New Mexico City, they're heading north and they got separated.
Well, it very well could be that the parents are still at home and these kids were simply kidnapped from their hometowns.
Uh, this requires more investigation, but just like in the global cities thing, those that are so concerned about minorities want to push these hazardous vaccines on them that are still in their experimental stage and are still licensed.
And that at the, at the border level.
These same internationalists that have so much concern, so much compassion for these children are actually putting them in the clutches and putting them at the mercy of human traffickers in all their egalitarian concern.
Mark, you've done a marvelous job of presenting all this information about the global cities movement and its ramifications.
I do believe a consequence of the situation we're in, especially this idea of polluting the nation with these migrants by flying them into these other states, Which seems to me to be a perfect exemplification of the clergy plan is going to met with tremendous resistance by the states.
And when we have an administration of dubious legitimacy in the first place, by leaders who have no idea what they're doing, implementing programs and proposals that are hopelessly ineffective to replace those of Donald Trump, which actually were successful and working, but because they were successful and working, But Donald Trump programs are abandoning them.
I don't think that's going to play well with the American people.
I think a long-term consequence is going to be the assertion of greater and stronger states' rights in response to this weak federal administration, which is doing so much damage to the nation in so little time.
You're welcome for whatever you'd like to say by way of closing, Mark, to tie things together.
Yeah, I think it'd be very helpful, Jim, to give a little bit of a wrap on the Pritzker Forum on Global Cities, March 18th itself.
Again, one of several programs this year, whereas it used to be one big confab in June.
And so that's run through the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, headed up by Ivo Daalder, the President of the Council, a former U.S.
Envoy to NATO.
But at the March 18th forum, where Dr. Fauci was the keynote speaker, by the way, at the end of the forum, This was one of the first times that Big Medical has collaborated with the Global Cities Movement in a formal sense.
So that's, that was a big highlight there.
Think about that.
Maybe I can mention a little bit in my wrap up of what Fauci had to say, but I think it's almost more important because Fauci just gave sort of a cliche report on COVID mostly.
I think it's almost more important, Jim, to talk about the wrap.
And that was where Marvin Reese of Bristol UK was talking.
And then Garcetti, the mayor of LA, by the way, I mentioned earlier that he had spoken to 50 some mayors through Skype and Zoom.
The number was actually about 45.
I just wanted to make sure my number was accurate.
In networking, I just, you know, I want to make sure we're rock solid here.
But, but Garcetti started wrapping things up by saying, universal basic income, free transit for Mass transit for 80% of Los Angeles residents, getting rid of any bias toward people of color in mass transit, getting rid of any bias toward people of color with vaccinations.
And get this, Garcetti in terms of Los Angeles talked about reparations, even reparations, which is a pretty radical thing when you consider all that these mayors like him are doing.
And then Jillian Tett, A lady who's a reporter for the Financial Times, again, the main media sponsor of this event, and they don't report about the event, they take part in the event.
Typical of media at Bilderberg, typical of media at other globalist confabs.
Gillian Tett is talking with Marvin Rees, the Bristol UK mayor, and she says, and Rees is agreeing, we're living in a post-national world.
In many ways.
Again, we're living in a post-national world, meaning we're living in a post-nation-state world, according to many of these global cities' mayors and their confreres.
Sadiq Khan, the radical internationalist mayor of London, also had a few words.
He spoke for about four minutes.
He talked about inequities, once again, and that we have to get rid of all gaps in terms of How people are treated according to social class, race, skin color, gender.
There can be no gaps, no inequities in terms of vaccinations, in terms of mass transit, all sorts of city services.
We need well-paid jobs in the green community.
These things were brought up by several of the mayors and racial justice and gender equality must be assured.
And Pete Buttigieg was there, the former South Bend, Indiana mayor, who is now Biden's Secretary of Transportation.
And they talk about, of course, he's the first openly gay cabinet member.
We remember Buttigieg as being one of the presidential Democratic hopefuls.
And he talked about a number of things, most of them kind of sundry things.
But the big takeaway, Jim, was that the vaccination thing is being used as leverage so these mayors can can strive for a post-nation-state world.
And this is their words, not mine.
Oh Mark, you're 100% spot on.
This is also part and parcel of the radical democratic agenda to redistribute wealth in America.
We saw it with the COVID stimulus bill, only 9% of which was actually devoted to COVID, but where the farm component gave 50% to minority farmers, even though they represent only 1 14th of the farming community.
50% to the minorities and only the other 15% to the 13 of the 14% who are white.
So this is really, in my opinion, a racist agenda, an anti-white racist agenda that's being promoted in the name of equity, Mark, would have no doubt about it.
It's intended to take wealth away from whites and give it to minorities.
Whether the minorities are competent or incompetent, that's where we're heading in government.
They're making appointments based on race and gender orientation, not on ability and accomplishment.
So you're going to have a lot of very diverse cabinet of various levels of competence that are going to bring the country to a deplorable state economically, educationally, socially, and every other fashion.
And you can see it moving forward apace with Biden and Harris.
It is a disgrace.
Yeah, there was, in my opinion, and I'm not just saying this because you said it, there was this Subtle and sometimes not so subtle implication that whites are second-class citizens.
But I think that a lot of that is just a ruse so they can carry out reparations like Garcetti, the mayor of LA talked about, and all these other visionary plans.
Again, I think what they do is the old-fashioned tactic of playing people of color off of whites.
I'm using their terminology.
Playing them off each other to create social conflict because that keeps people preoccupied with blaming each other for society's problems and not looking to these oligarchs that are running things, not realizing they're the ones that are playing everybody for a fool and playing populations off of one another.
I believe it's all really just so they can create that social friction, that social tension That helps feed their power and helps divert people away from who really has the power and keeps the powerful from being challenged in their machinations.
And so that's basically it.
Much more could be said.
Fauci mentioned, the keynote speaker, Fauci, your friend and mine, right?
America's doctor.
As if there are no other medical authorities to consult, as if Fauci knows it all.
Fauci mentioned vaccine hesitancy.
This is what they call people that don't want the jab.
You're engaging in vaccine hesitancy.
And this is a problem that Fauci believes will return to normal.
He said vaccines are down to about 50,000 to 70,000 a day, whereas it was 300,000 a day.
And so they're trying to get the baseline of the number of vaccines per day backed up to 300,000.
Right now they're down to about 70,000 or less.
That's one thing that Fauci mentioned.
But of course he said the cliches, the global pandemic deserves a global response and on and on and on with a number of other cliches.
But that pretty much sums it up in sort of a thumbnail sketch approach to this Global Cities Forum, Jim.
Well, it's a great job you've done, Mark, and I'm so appreciative of your bringing all this information to the attention of the public.
We need to understand reparations is just another word for wealth redistribution.
They want to take it away from those who have earned it.
Who owned it and give it to those who have not.
That's their agenda.
It's a radical agenda.
They're doing it in the name of equity, but that has nothing to do with treating people equally under the law, and it has nothing to do with justice or American principles.
It's undemocratic.
It's totalitarian.
It's more of a communist movement than it is an American.
So, Mark, I cannot thank you enough.
You're doing a superb job as a truth hound.
You are going after the truth.
This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Real Deal.
Thanking Mark Anderson for his excellent presentation today and all of you for joining us here.
We'll see you again soon.
▲
Export Selection