Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 22, 2021 - Jim Fetzer

01:54:46

The Raw Deal (19 February 2021)

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Here goes the metronome, see?
	For if the bomb that drops on you Gets your friends and neighbors too
	There'll be nobody left behind to grieve, and we will all go together when we go.
	What a comforting fact that is to know.
	Universal bereavement, an inspiring achievement.
	Yes, we all will go together when we go.
	We will all go together when we go.
	This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal, and while Mitchell is tracking down my special guest for today, you're going to enjoy him.
	This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal.
	And while Mitchell is tracking down my special guest for today, you're going to enjoy him.
	I want to report a rather surprising development, which is that CNN has run a story about Joe
	Biden having committed a series of gaffes, four different gaffes.
	They're documenting, claiming there are even more.
	President Joe Biden took questions from Wisconsin residents and from Anderson Cooper at the town hall in Milwaukee Tuesday night.
	We're looking into some of the claims Biden made, so the article is not comprehensive, but we can tell you now he made at least four false claims, all of them involving statistics about the minimum wage, undocumented immigrants, China's economy, and COVID-19 vaccination.
	He also made claims that could have benefited from additional contacts that he acknowledged he might not have gotten right or that there's not solid evidence for.
	They go on to give a breakdown.
	This is so extraordinary that CNN would be giving criticism of the guy they've adulated for so long.
	I think it's a sign they're planning to move Biden out and Kamala in.
	Meanwhile, I'm delighted to say I've been Joined by my guest for today, Alan Weisbacher, who has a great track record with Bandito Books.
	Ah, not here yet.
	We're looking to join him.
	This thing about Biden, absolutely fascinating.
	Let me give you a bit of a rundown.
	On the minimum wage, Biden said $7.25 per hour federal minimum wage is way too low, then said soon after.
	For example, if it went, if we gradually increased to $7.20, kept it indexed to inflation, people would be making $20 an hour right now.
	That's what it would be.
	Facts first, they say.
	This is CNN.
	This is false.
	The White House told CNN after the event that Biden got mixed up with another statistic about the minimum wage.
	Today's federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour, which took effect in 2009, would not be even close to $20 per hour if Congress had decided to link it to inflation.
	Adjusted for inflation, $7.25 in January 2009 would be $8.98 in January 2020.
	Then about undocumented aliens.
	He said of the US population of undocumented immigrants, the vast majority of the people, those 11 million undocumented, They're not Hispanics.
	They're people who came on a visa, who were able to buy a ticket to get in a plane and didn't go home.
	They didn't come across a Rio Grande swimming.
	Facts first.
	Biden was wrong to claim the majority of undocumented immigrants in the U.S.
	are not Hispanic.
	While it's obviously difficult to compile comprehensive statistics on this population group, the Migration Policy Institute think tank Estimated in 2018 that 73% of the undocumented in the US speak Spanish at home, 68% are from Mexico and Central America, with an additional 7% from South America.
	The Pew Research Center has found the Mexican share of the undocumented population has fallen over time, People from Latin America still make up 77% of the 2017 undocumented population.
	Then he has another about China's workforce.
	Biden talked about how he met with China's now President Xi Jinping while Biden was vice president, then returned to the US and mused about China's demographic challenge.
	He said, And I came back and said they're going to end their one China policy because they're so xenophobic they won't let anybody else in.
	And more people are retired than working.
	How can they sustain economic growth when more people are retired?
	Facts first.
	It's not even close to true that more people in China are retired than working.
	Even today, let alone when Biden was vice president, the Chinese workforce was younger.
	China reported having about 775 million employed people at the end of 2019.
	China reported 254 million people aged 60 or above the normal retirement benefit age for men.
	The working age population has peaked and is now declining, and referees are growing rapidly.
	So the ratio of workers to retirees is becoming less favorable, but the ratio is still greater than one, said David Dollar, an expert on the Chinese population, who's at the Brookings Institute as a senior fellow.
	Then about this vaccine situation, and I reiterate, this is to me simply astonishing that CNN is giving an extended critique of Biden about statistical issues of all things, where they
	could easily have let it go.
	Easily have let it go. Now, Biden did make a number of other rather hilarious remarks during
	this town hall meeting with Anderson Cooper, including the fact that black-on-black violence
	is overwhelmingly more prevalent than white-on-black, which is even less than black-on-white.
	Indeed, I mean, the statistics are staggering.
	The black-on-black is like, you know, 90% of the crime problem, the black-on-white 5%, white-on-black even lower.
	White-on-white, you know, perhaps a bit higher, but it's extraordinary he made that remark because that's a fact that the Democrats have been seeking to suppress, that black-on-black crime is the real problem, which is, of course, why blacks are horrified at the idea of defunding the police.
	He also made a number of other race-related observations.
	He said, the blacks have trouble getting online using the Internet, using computers, he implied.
	He also said, and this is something that's, you know, bothered me for some time, too.
	He said, five or six years ago, would you have imagined that every second or third ad on television would involve a mixed-race couple?
	I believe, in fact, this is part of a propaganda campaign to promote interracial marriage because Israeli Zionists who discourage interracial marriage believe it will weaken the fabric of American society.
	Anderson Cooper kicked the whole thing off with a softball question and he said, how does it feel now, you know, being in the White House?
	What's your experience?
	Which you would have thought he could have knocked out of the park.
	And he said, well, you know, he says, I wake up and look over at Jill and I say, where the hell are we?
	Where the hell are we?
	And I gotta tell you, when I was reporting on this earlier, I couldn't help laughing because it's so damn funny.
	Well, notice too, you may have, that Kamala Harris is calling foreign heads of state.
	That is extraordinary.
	Virtually unheard of for a vice president to be calling foreign heads of state.
	Well, I believe they don't trust this guy to answer questions that might be posed.
	She could spoke with both Justin Trudeau on the one hand and Macron of France on the other and, you know, reported about their conversation on a wide range of issues.
	But the idea that that's the vice president picking up on calls with foreign heads of state is truly extraordinary.
	Now, if you combine that These factors I'm reporting, it looks to me like they're eager to move Biden out and Kamala in, even though she's a mental midget.
	I mean, this is a woman of no discernible talent, whom the mainstream, of course, has been praising just as they have Joe Biden as though he were a knight in shining armor aboard a white steed about just the glories that come all of Harris as a wife, a mother, a businesswoman, a prosecutor and all that.
	You know, you get these absolute hundred percent disinformation artists like Joy Reid talking about her being every woman's ideal, every woman's dream.
	With those who know the score realize that you made her way in the political world on her back that she was a girlfriend of Willie Brown.
	And because of their salacious affair, he gave her a couple of appointments on government conditions and subsequently promoted her career in government all the way
	up to attorney general in California, where she did any number of scurrilous things that were
	damaging to minorities who were in prison.
	I mean, she had an outrageous record. And it's therefore, in my opinion, not surprising,
	even remotely, that Kamala Harris never got more than 2% in national polls and dropped out.
	She was, as I recall, the very first Democrat to drop out.
	She didn't even make it to Iowa.
	So what in God's name is Kamala Harris doing as Vice President of the United States?
	Meanwhile, to return to the CNN critique, which is just, I mean, it's lengthy and it's detailed, and the idea they would do this about the new Democrat president is, to me, just mind-boggling.
	The vaccine situation.
	Biden made a series of claims about the COVID-19 vaccine situation upon his January inauguration.
	He said early at the town hall that when we came into office, There was only, should have been, were 50 million doses available.
	Moments later, he said, we got into office and found out the supply.
	There was no backlog.
	I mean, there was nothing in the refrigerator, figuratively and literally speaking, and there were 10 million doses a day that were available.
	Soon after that, he told Cooper, But when you and I talked last, we talked about it's one thing to have the vaccine, which we didn't have when we came into office.
	But a vaccinator, how do you get the vaccine into someone's arm?
	They go about this now with their facts first again.
	Biden got at least one of these statistics wrong.
	In a way, that made Trump look better, not worse.
	So Biden's inaccuracy appeared accidental, but we're noting it anyway.
	A White House official said that Biden's claim about 10 million doses a day being available when he took office was meant to be a reference to the 10 million doses a week That were being sent to the states as of the second week of Biden terms up from 8.6 million a week when they took over.
	The official said Biden's claim about 50 million doses being available when he took office was a reference to the number of doses that had been distributed to states as of the end of January.
	That was less than two weeks into his term, but he could have been clearer on the time frame.
	Biden's more dramatic claim here that there was nothing in the refrigerator when he took office has a solid factual basis, though Biden could again have been clear about what he meant.
	The official said this was a reference to the fact that, as reported by the Washington Post the week before Biden's inauguration, there was no federal reserve of second doses available at the time.
	Second doses Then, a tax break for racehorse owners.
	Biden called for community college to be made free for all.
	He said this would cost $9 billion.
	Then he added, we spend almost that money as a break for people who own racehorses.
	Facts first.
	There's no available evidence for the claim that the tax break for racehorse owners cost the government almost $9 billion.
	The White House declined to provide a source for the figure.
	Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow in the Urban Bookings Tax Policy Center at the Urban Institute Think Tank, noted that the government's Joint Committee on Taxation does not show a revenue cost to the government from the tax provision.
	Which allows for an accelerated depreciation schedule for certain resources.
	That does not mean the provision does not cost the government any money.
	It's complicated, but it does mean the committee isn't the source of Biden's claim.
	We can't call the claim flat false because we don't have definitive information ourselves.
	But it's worth noting that it's very much unclear that Biden has any source.
	And Glickman is skeptical that it's true, though he noted that Biden didn't say what time period he was claiming the $9 billion tax break covered.
	Then there was a Proud Boys exchange.
	Biden said, you may remember in one of my debates with a former president, I asked him to condemn the Proud Boys.
	He wouldn't do it.
	He said, stand by, stand ready, or whatever the phrasing exactly was.
	Facts first.
	Biden, who conceded that he might not be correctly reciting Trump's debate quote, was indeed off at least slightly After debate, moderator Chris Wallace asked Trump if he was willing to condemn white supremacists and militia groups, and Biden interjected to mention the Proud Boys in particular.
	Trump said, Proud Boys stand back and stand by.
	So Biden got Trump's stand by right, but he replaced Trump's stand back with stand ready, arguably a significant distinction.
	We don't call a claim flat false, but because Biden made clear he was uncertain.
	Then another on refugees.
	Biden criticized Trump for slashing the number of refugees allowed into the U.S.
	He said, for example, we used to allow refugees, 125,000 refugees in the United States on a yearly basis.
	It was as high as 250,000.
	Trump cut it to five.
	and 50,000. Trump cut it to five. Facts first. Biden's comparison between pre-Trump and Trump
	era refugee admissions is missing some key context.
	Biden was correct that Trump massively slashed the number of admissions, but this reduction was not as big as some viewers might have understood Biden to be claiming.
	That's because while Biden was correct that the U.S.
	used to accept more than 125,000 refugees in some years, He did not make clear that this had not happened since the 1992 fiscal year.
	In other words, Trump did not come into office with the U.S.
	accepting 125,000 refugees, much less 250,000 refugees.
	Rather, in the last full fiscal year of President Barack Obama's administration, the U.S.
	accepted 84,995 Four refugees just shy of Obama's cap of $85,000.
	Obama raised the cap to $110,000 for his final partial fiscal year 2017, but even that is lower than Biden set.
	The U.S.
	set a refugee cap of $231,700 for the 1980 fiscal year, so Biden was in the ballpark It is claimed that the U.S.
	has had a cap as high as $250,000.
	That year, the U.S.
	actually admitted $207,116.
	Biden's claim that Trump cut it to $5,000 is reasonable but takes some explaining.
	Trump set the refugee admissions cap for the 2021 fiscal year at a record low of $15,000.
	Through the first four months of the fiscal year, the US had only accepted $1,400, just about a $5,000 per year pace.
	Biden says he wants to raise the fiscal 2021 cap to $62,500.
	year pays.
	Biden says he wants to raise the fiscal 2021 cap to $62,500.
	He's proposed a cap of $125,000 for the first full fiscal year, 2022.
	Now every one of these is sufficiently subtle, involving statistics that it could easily,
	easily have been passed over.
	In other words, this appears to me to be a deliberate effort to make Biden look bad, just as I was coming down, by the way, to join you here today on Revolution Radio.
	Biden is on television giving a talk about the administration, no doubt trying to regain some credibility from this performance at the down hall meeting.
	But I reiterate, When you put together this combination of events of the town hall gaffes, and I like the ones they weren't reporting on here, for example, acknowledging that black on black crime is by far the predominant form of crime in the United States, bar none, where it turns out that white on black is relatively rare and less common than black on white.
	And that, you know, all these mixed couple race ads on television, which has perplexed me for some time, but has to be understood within the broader context of the Zionist plan to destroy America via cultural Marxism.
	And it makes sense.
	In his saying, he wakes up and says, where the hell are we?
	Oh God, I love it.
	And then you got Kamala, Kamala making the phone calls of Warren Heads of State, of Canada and of France.
	And then you got this CNN critique on actually issues that are subtle enough they could have easily been passed over.
	And I say this adds up to an attempt to Set up the public for Biden being taken out.
	And after what?
	Less than a month in office?
	Less than a month?
	I mean, the inauguration was on 20 January and today's the 19th of February?
	Boy, that was fast.
	Meanwhile, we have a military commander blowing the lid off Biden's communist plan to destroy America.
	I'm glad this is coming from a military commander.
	The Democratic Party has been trying to bring communism to America for decades.
	Well, I haven't really thought about it until I'm late, but there's no question about it today.
	I believe they're using this notion of equity.
	In reverse of equality, they're minimizing ability, they're discriminating against talent, their race-based politics, their identity politics is a disgrace.
	It's very destructive to democracy and fair play and equal competition, this business about transgenders.
	That boys and young men who declare themselves to be girls or young women are allowed into women's locker rooms and showers and women's athletics.
	These are all measures that are disgusting and disgraceful.
	Meanwhile, the party establishment tried to keep this secret, meaning bringing communism to America.
	I think it actually is in the form of communalism Which is a little closer.
	We're all supposed to be completely equal in every respect when, in fact, we're supposed to be equal in the eyes of the law.
	Obviously, some of us are taller, shorter, thicker, thinner, older, younger, smarter, dumber.
	I mean, the idea that we're all equal is, of course, just a fiction and a fantasy if you're talking literally.
	But if you're talking in terms of the law, then of course it's a fundamental principle of American society and constitutional government that we're all entitled to equal justice under the law.
	But a military commander just blew the lid off of Biden's communist plan to destroy America.
	One thing that separates the U.S.
	from the rest of the world is the right to free speech.
	The government can't restrict what you say, believe, or with whom you associate as long as you aren't committing any crimes.
	In contrast, other countries around the world are locking people up for believing or saying the wrong thing.
	And history has shown this is the first step toward communism.
	After Vladimir Lenin took control of Russia, founding the Soviet Union, intense restrictions on speech and beliefs were implemented.
	This is exactly what Joe Biden is doing, according to former U.S.
	Navy Lieutenant Commander Stephen Rogers.
	It's been reported that Biden is beginning to purge extremism in the U.S.
	military, which Rogers says is a pathway to communism in America.
	This, to me, is dangerous and looks like a political litmus test, and it's a road you would only find in communist China or in the former Soviet Union, Lieutenant Commander Rogers observed on Saturday.
	He goes on to explain that if this continues, the military will become a political weapon by the left to restrict those who challenge their doctrine.
	The military will become another arm of the government.
	I'm not talking about the U.S.
	government as we know it now, but a U.S.
	government.
	Joe Biden, the socialists, the communists want to create in this country.
	It's clear the crackdown on extremism will be used to target Trump supporters and conservatives after all.
	Joe Biden doesn't believe that left-wing extremism exists, calling Antifa an idea during the presidential debates, just as Jerry Nadler called Antifa an ideology.
	This crackdown has already affected conservatives, with Texas Army Chaplain Major Andrew Calvert being placed under investigation for extremism For stating that biological sex is real in a Facebook post.
	My God, if it ain't real, how can we be a sexually reproducing species?
	I mean, this is ludicrous!
	Lieutenant Commander Rogers went on to place a parallel between these kinds of actions to Communist China and the Soviet Union's use of political officers to purge dissenters, saying, We all know that in communist China, in the former Soviet Union, there were political offices attached to every union.
	You just read something that anti-government or criticize the government or criticize the Chinese Communist Party, you're finished there, you're done.
	And that, of course, is what they want to do to Trump supporters, calling us now domestic terrorists.
	It's absurd.
	We'll be back right after the break.
	so so
	so Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	RadioFreedomSlips.com will be right back after this message.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting This is a drill, this is a drill on bullhorns during the
	marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
	But there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tomb.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	What the heck is the truth, Jihad?
	Hey, I'm Kevin Barrett, host of Truth Jihad Radio.
	Federal prosecutors, Department of Homeland Security agents, and curious passers-by often ask me, just what is this Truth Jihad thing anyway?
	Well, everybody knows what truth is, but Jihad is a misunderstood term.
	Jihad means effort or struggle.
	The greater jihad is the struggle to be a better person, while the lesser jihad is the struggle to defend the community.
	Prophet Muhammad, peace upon him, did say that the best jihad is a word of truth flung in the face of a tyrant.
	And that's what we do here at Truth Jihad Radio!
	Every Friday, 8 to 10 p.m.
	Eastern, 5 to 7 Pacific, right here on Revolution Radio!
	Find some comfort at Willow's World.
	A variety of news, commentary and poetry at Willow's Poetry Corner, where there are comfy cushions and a tempting selection of delectable comestibles.
	A show that's quirkily and quintessentially British, with a unique twist, featuring Willow Andresen, your host.
	Join Willow, Mondays and Thursdays, 2 till 4 p.m.
	Eastern Time, Studio A.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we
	return you to your host.
	Among the other fascinating developments we have are some poll results suggesting Biden's
	faring surprisingly badly and Trump really quite well.
	One month into Biden's term, Joe's presidential approval poll just took a sharp turn.
	Joe Biden's been in office for several weeks, nearly a month, and Americans have been able to see what this man is really capable of.
	Has he really brought D.C.
	back to normal?
	All the security forces and guardsmen seem to say otherwise.
	What has Biden done to help Americans struggle through the pandemic?
	What has he done to secure our borders and ensure a bright future?
	Americans are watching.
	It seems they don't appreciate Biden's leadership.
	From Rasmussen Reports.
	The Rasmussen Report daily presidential tracking poll, sponsored by Slanted from Sheryl Atkinson for Wednesday, shows 50% of U.S.
	voters approve of President Biden's job performance, 47% disapprove.
	Joe Biden's approval dropped three points in just one day.
	His presidential approval index is at minus four, which means more people strongly disapprove of him than strongly approve.
	This comes after nearly a month of glowing coverage by the mainstream media.
	The liberal-leaning press refuses to acknowledge any of the mistakes and blunders of Biden's administration, which includes botching Trump's vaccination project, Which, of course, is all the more reason I found that very thorough, detailed CNN critique so surprising and unexpected.
	They also ignore that Biden's massive number of executive orders have destroyed at least 11,000 jobs.
	The estimate I've seen are up to 70,000 virtually on the very first day.
	After last night's horrible town hall, this would then have been written on Wednesday Yesterday, the day before yesterday, the media went out of its way to explain what Joe mentioned by his various gaffes and controversial comments.
	In other words, what he really meant.
	Keep in mind, they always jumped on Trump's comments and statements, taking them at face value, never giving him the benefit of the doubt.
	Yet despite the obvious kid gloves, Biden is trailing Trump on approval at the same time in his presidency is a full five points lower than Trump.
	Remember, we're still in the period known as the honeymoon, the presidential honeymoon, where they typically have a higher than 50% rating.
	Shouldn't it be the other way around?
	Shouldn't Biden have an approval rating of 60% or higher?
	It doesn't seem Americans are really impressed with his moderate and his promises of unity.
	Joe claimed he'd be a president for everyone, both Democrats and Republicans.
	Do you feel that way?
	Has Biden done anything so far to suggest to you that he's got your back?
	We said his approval might get worse as the days and weeks were on.
	We might be right.
	Key takeaways?
	Joe Biden's approval dropped three points in a single day.
	It's five points lower than Trump's at the same time in his presidency.
	This comes despite heavy protection from the mainstream media.
	And if the CNN report, which is more recent, is a sign, it's going to get worse because the mainstream is going to stop being so protective.
	Here's another report from yesterday.
	Biden takes today off.
	Kamala taking over.
	Just look at that theme.
	President Biden took a snow day Thursday, as varying forecasts called for D.C.
	to receive between one and four inches of snow.
	But Vice President Kamala Harris will be carrying on with scheduled in-person events.
	Biden postponed a trip to Michigan, where he was scheduled to tour Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine manufacturing facility.
	And the White House declared an 8 a.m.
	lid for reporters, meaning no in-person events are expected.
	The president's trip to Portage, Michigan was preemptively canceled Wednesday evening before any precipitation fell in Washington.
	Meanwhile, Republican top president poll results are in.
	Ronald Reagan is a runner up, and the winner is Donald Trump.
	This is a truly fascinating development.
	It's always a revealing and hotly contested poll.
	Who's the best president ever?
	Obviously, the answer is often different if you ask a Republican or a Democrat.
	And when you ask a Republican, statistics show that more often than not, the answer will be Ronald Reagan.
	He has been a perennial favorite among the GOP for decades.
	However, in the recent poll given to right-wingers, Reagan is no longer at the very top.
	In fact, the new winner beat Reagan by a large margin of two to one.
	This may come as a surprise to some, but not to those who continue to support America's recent and widely controversial POTUS.
	This is extremely significant for one big statistical reason.
	In 2018, 36% of Republicans voted for Reagan, only 10% for Trump.
	This is a huge shift in just a few years, therefore, and it speaks volumes.
	Perhaps Trump's latest acquittal in the Senate has fueled even more love, and many hope to see Donald on the campaign trail again.
	Interestingly enough, the poll was conducted during the Senate impeachment trial.
	That's when we really saw an outpouring of support for Trump, and that could very well explain these results.
	Even so, according to the latest poll, It hasn't damaged Trump's reputation among the citizens via the Washington Examiner.
	In the latest Economist YouGov survey, 36% of Republicans called Trump the best.
	Just 18% called Reagan that, followed by 13% for Abraham Lincoln and 11% for President George Washington.
	That's quite stunning, okay?
	We got Washington fourth, Lincoln third, Reagan second, but Trump by two to one over Reagan first.
	But it's also likely to rile Democrats, many of whom are hoping Trump will recede into the shadows.
	That doesn't appear as if it's going to happen, though.
	And another survey this week showed that 75 percent want Trump to have a prominent role in the party.
	Of course, it's no surprise to learn that Democrats continue to loathe Trump as he comes in at the very bottom of the Democrats' best ever poll.
	Overall, when counting all Americans, the results look like this.
	Obama 18%, Lincoln 17%, Trump 13%, FDR 12%, Reagan 10%. It may be odd to see Lincoln only second
	and George Washington out of the top five, but that's probably just a sign of the times.
	And Obama's fame remains very strong among Democrats, though his approval rates continue to decline and continued to decline in the latter years of his tenure.
	In the end, though, Trump topping Reagan among Republicans by such a large amount and completely reversing the stats from a few years ago is really impressive.
	Key takeaways?
	Donald Trump topped Ronald Reagan in a GOP best president ever poll.
	Trump won by a large two-to-one margin.
	It marks a stunning turnaround.
	In 2018, Reagan led Trump by 36 percent to 10.
	Democrats, unsurprisingly, disliked Trump, and the overall result put Obama and Lincoln at the top, coming from the Washington examiners.
	Meanwhile, we have these Democrat Bills that are intended to punish Trump.
	I mean, they frankly reach the point of insanity.
	Here's a Democrat bill preventing twice impeached presidents from being buried in Arlington.
	And of course, there's only one twice impeached president.
	House Democrats introduced legislation on Thursday to prevent twice impeached U.S.
	presidents from being buried in Arlington Cemetery.
	I'm not at all sure that Trump would have desired to be buried at Arlington Cemetery, but of course many are, including JFK with the eternal flame where I visited his gravesite.
	I mean, you know, it is an honor.
	So what they're doing in a punitive fashion is to deny Trump that right.
	Just it.
	House Dems have introduced a bill to ban twice impeached presidents from burial at Arlington National Cemetery and federal funds from going to buildings displaying their names or acknowledging their achievements.
	This bill is called the No Glory for Hate Act.
	Good God!
	Good God is this awful!
	Here are some comments about it.
	This is petty as F even for Democrats, but Trump doesn't seem like the type to want to be buried in Arlington.
	So I'm guessing a solid gold mausoleum on one of his own properties.
	Another.
	After stealing the 2020 election from Trump and 75 million legal votes, Dems' top priority is slander, impeach, block his pension.
	He donated his salary to charity, ban him from politics and no burial spot at Arlington.
	Unity is their war cry.
	I mean, this is just absurd beyond belief.
	Meanwhile, get this.
	The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is bankrolling a group of activists who believe that math is racist.
	They chide the concept of mathematics being purely objective as unequivocally false, And argue focusing on the right answer is an example of white supremacy.
	So I guess two plus two equaling four turns out to be racist in the eyes of Bill and Melinda Gates.
	Listen, as a student of philosophy, among the very first and most important distinctions you learn in terms of the theory of knowledge, of What we can know and how we can know it.
	What are the criteria or standards for possessing knowledge in terms of the weight of the evidence and so forth?
	Is what is known as the analytic synthetic distinctions claims that are analytic?
	Cannot be false, but they they make their claims which cannot be false at the price of having no empirical content.
	Suppose I say.
	You know, a married man has a wife.
	Well, of course, a married man has a wife because what it means to be married is to have a spouse.
	And if you're a married man, then your spouse, well, typically female, except for Democrats like Barack Obama, who's married to a man who has breast implants and a huge shaving bill.
	I mean, it's just stunning.
	And I think, by the way, It's the perversions among many prominent Democrats that has led them to promote all this transgender nonsense and to suggest that children have a choice in deciding on their sex when they're born with either male equipment or female equipment, apart from the very tiny percentage known as hermaphrodites who have both.
	But apart from the category of hermaphrodites, every Natural born child is a boy or a girl.
	And there isn't any doubt about it.
	I mean, it's a purely biological phenomenon.
	It's as blatant as the difference between having a penis and having a vagina.
	And, you know, for a sexually reproducing species to encounter all this sexual confusion with transgender and so forth is bizarre in the extreme.
	Now, to return to the analytic-synthetic distinctions, which is, let me say, among the most important in all of philosophy.
	Elementary, in fact, all mathematical assertions turn out to be true of necessity, given the axioms of the mathematical principles on which they are founded.
	Well, one way to look at it is in terms of strokes, you know, one stroke or line, a short line, representing one thing, two strokes, two things, three strokes, three things, and so forth, where then the word three equals one plus one plus one, two, one plus one.
	One equaling one.
	Two plus two equals four simply means if you got two or two strokes plus two, two more strokes, that equals four strokes or four.
	But it cannot be false.
	That cannot be false.
	If you understand the basic principles of arithmetic, indeed of mathematics generally,
	it's a deductive hierarchy based upon basic assumptions about the nature of mathematics,
	basic definitions, where mathematical claims are either necessarily true or necessarily
	false.
	If you claim 2 plus 2 equals 5, well that's wrong because 2 strokes plus 2 strokes equals
	4 strokes, which is not the same as 5 strokes.
	And anything true by definition, you know, if someone is a scholar, a scholar is someone
	who conducts research, who engages in publication and criticism and debate and argument.
	So if you say a scholar is engaged in research or John is a scholar and therefore he engages in research, you're saying something that cannot be false given the meaning of the word.
	What happens, however, in political discourse is that words often have their meanings changed or when a word is somewhat vague or ambiguous, you can have an outcome such as the use of the word case, CASE, In terms of the coronavirus pandemic, because a case can mean the result of a test.
	A positive result of a test is called a case.
	But the positive result of a test, which is an unreliable test, does not mean an individual, even though they have a positive outcome of a test, is therefore sick, having the COVID-19.
	And in fact, we know In fact, both the WHO and the CDC are scaling back on how many cycles of the PTR test are supposed to be used to conduct these tests, where Carey Mullis, who designed the PTR test, explained before his death, and I think they had to silence him so he couldn't critique the abuse of the test, was not for diagnostic purposes, but for research.
	It really was intended just to multiply A sample of DNA or RNA to the point where it can be subjected to study.
	It wasn't intended for diagnosis.
	And it's widely understood that if you have the PCR test, which involves these cycles of replication set too high, it will give false positives about 97% of the time.
	So that it turns out, you know, the staggering numbers of cases of COVID where we're hearing every single day on radio and television really is a fabricated and grossly inflated number because 97% of those case numbers are being told roughly are false positives and don't mean an individual actually is suffering from COVID.
	Now, that's also an interesting illustration of a synthetic claim.
	You see, if you're asking a question about how many cases of COVID there are, that's a question for the accumulation of empirical data based upon observation, measurement, and experiment.
	That's not anything you can know just by knowing, say, the fundamental assumptions of a mathematical calculus or basic definitions in language, you know?
	I mean, you can know all these things to be true.
	If John has a brother, then John has a male sibling, or if John has a brother, then John has a sibling, and John has a sibling who is male, because a brother is a male sibling.
	Right?
	I mean, those are things you can know if John, you may not even know if John does have a brother, but you can know that if John does have a brother, then John has a male sibling.
	Now, whether John has a brother or not is going to depend on which John we're talking about and the fact of the matter of whether or not he does have a brother.
	All these areas of statistics, including everything, of course, CNN was critiquing Biden with regard to, has to do with empirical data, much of which is gathered under questionable circumstances, where the objectivity of science derives from the following consideration, that if you have the same scientific investigators who are applying the same principles of reasoning on the nature of which I've done a great deal of research
	and publication, applied to the same alternative hypotheses and given the same data, then
	they'll come up with the same conclusions as to which hypotheses are supported and which
	are not, and frequently can be done with a quantitative measure.
	So you can talk about the amount of support or the percentage of confirmation that's provided by a certain body of data to one hypothesis rather than another.
	That is the objectivity of science.
	And because science is empirical, see, we're not talking about mathematic science or pure math and pure logic, where pure math and pure logic do not require any empirical investigation because they're not making claims about properties in the world, how many of this or that.
	Docs, water ponds, what have you, and what we're finding, of course, therefore, is that Bill and Melinda Gates are really seeking to destroy, perhaps, as basic a distinction as there is between types of knowledge, because pure mathematical claims are analytic, and they cannot be false, and therefore, they're purely objective.
	Now, when you take mathematics and apply it to the world, Then that's a whole other matter, just as we're doing when we talk about how many COVID positive tests there are and what percentage of them are real.
	If you want something else to shake your confidence in what we're being told about COVID, get this.
	China's chief epidemiologist admits COVID-19 was never proven to exist.
	Get this.
	Andrew Kaufman, MD, interviewed by Del Bigtree, both of whom are excellent sources of information about what's going on here with regard to this fantastic pandemic, delivers an excellent short course on the risks of COVID tests and vaccines.
	The interview is preceded by a short clip From an NBC report of 2021, January 23rd, in which China's chief epidemiologist, Dr. Wu Zunyu says, they didn't isolate the virus and that is the problem.
	Dr. Kaufman explains why that means there's no proof that a COVID-19 virus even exists and instead could be merely a variant of the common flu.
	This interview includes a summary of the debate between advocates of the germ theory and the terrain theory of disease.
	Be prepared for a deep dive into concepts and dogma that seldom is discussed, but which are critical to disease control.
	I highly recommend Andrew Kaufman, quite a brilliant guy, and you can find a lot of their work out there on the internet.
	Let me say, by the way, in the absence of my guest, I, of course, will be pleased to field your phone calls.
	And as we know, or most of you already, the number to reach Mitchell, my producer, is 540-352-4452.
	is 540-352-4452, 540-352-4452.
	And I'll take those calls when we return from the break, but I want also to notice we have other developments
	of the politicalization of the COVID program, including the following.
	Shock in Chicago.
	The mayor reportedly used $281 million in COVID relief cash to pay underfunded police departments.
	So get this.
	You got Democratic political figures like Lori Lightfoot of Chicago promoting defunding the police.
	And then, of course, when that turns out to be a catastrophe, she's helping herself to finances by using COVID relief funds to help finance her city's underfunded police department.
	Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot reportedly used $281.5 million in federal coronavirus relief funds to pay personnel in the Chicago Police Department, reports the Daily Caller.
	The use of coronavirus relief funds to pay police department personnel sparked outrage From many community members, after a summer of anti-police protests, the Chicago Tribune reported Wednesday, Alderman Daniel La Spada told the mayor Wednesday, the last thing people wanted was to send money to the police.
	Mayor Lori Lightfoot has generated An angry response from this abuse, and well she should.
	Indeed, all of the Democrats seem to me to have, in endorsing this defund the police program, set themselves up for the massive loss they experienced in running against Donald Trump.
	Even though, by the use of Dominion machines, particularly, they had it all set up to win the election handily, the outpouring of support for Donald Trump occurred again, just as it had in 2016, upsetting the Democrat apple cart, because 2016 was rigged for Hillary, just as 2020 was rigged for Joe.
	And remember, he told us himself, and this was not a slip of the tongue.
	We have put together the greatest voter fraud organization in history.
	And later, I don't need your help getting elected.
	Understanding now, because it's rigged, I need your help after I'm elected.
	Well, it looks like he needs more than our help.
	But I'm finding some of these developments hilarious, and the Democrats are doing quite a good job of discrediting themselves, even in less than a month in office, by their extensive use of these executive orders, which make this guy look very much like a dictator, where there are as many as 50 already that he's signed.
	But where my understanding is they do not go into effect until 30 days after they're published on the Federal Register, but they include, you know, completely abandoning maintaining law and order at the border with Mexico.
	And allowing any number of refugees to pour in, or they're even undertaking a semantic requirement of no longer referring to them as illegals.
	Illegals, but undocumented citizens.
	We'll be right back.
	Thanks for watching.
	In breaking news, a visiting Syrian diplomat reported today that their population is evolving
	rapidly and advancing into a fifth dimensional consciousness.
	They are seeking peace with all cosmic cultures, which may mean that the Earth will be asked to join the prestigious Galactic Federation of Light Alliances.
	Please join Debbie West and Michael Hathaway on Lost Knowledge, Saturdays 3 p.m.
	Eastern Standard Time in Studio A for the latest breaking news on the Star Visitor's peaceful contact and the ongoing project of cleansing the Earth.
	Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
	But did you know that it was an inside job?
	That Osama had nothing to do with it?
	That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
	That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
	Barry Jennings was there.
	He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
	A U.S.
	Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
	Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
	9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Read American Nuked on 9-11.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	This is Thomas, a.k.a.
	A Mad Painter.
	I'd like you to join me Monday nights, 10 p.m.
	Eastern Standard Time for Open Canvas.
	Don't forget to bring an open mind.
	Yes, folks, that's right.
	Bring an open mind to an open canvas.
	Again, that is Monday nights, 10 p.m.
	Eastern.
	UFOs to government corruption.
	This is Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com.
	You don't need to expect us.
	We're already here.
	THE END © BF-WATCH TV 2021
	Collision Course is bad, bad, bad.
	Schedule B on Revolution Radio every Saturday night, 6 to 8 p.m.
	You get outer space.
	You get honest answers, real researchers, truthful answers, and a place to engage with questions.
	Take part in the discussion.
	Revolution Radio on FrigginSlips.com hosts Collision Course every Saturday from 6 to 8 p.m.
	Eastern, 5 p.m., 7 p.m.
	Central, 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. Mountain Time, and 3 p.m. to 5 p.m.
	Pacific Time.
	♪♪♪ The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs,
	and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the
	opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener supported radio, and now we
	return you to your host.
	Oh, this is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal, inviting you to your calls.
	I'd especially encourage new callers, someone who's never called before.
	I appreciate our regulars enormously, but I'd be delighted to get new callers.
	remember the number 540-352-4452. Mitchell will handle your call and get you on the air.
	Again, the number 540-352-4452.
	Well, during the break, I've just discovered a piece published in the Daily Kos, which is, everyone may know, is an extreme liberal outlet, which is an interesting piece here because they're talking about What many of us have discussed and believe to be the case, including yours truly, it's not an analytic proposition, obviously, and all empirical knowledge is uncertain, but I do believe there are reasons to think, to conclude that this is correct, to wit,
	Donald Trump's most fervent supporters are ready for him to become the 19th president on March 4th.
	On Thursday evening, CNN reported that the close to 5,000 National Guard troops have been stationed around the Capitol since shortly after the January 6 insurgency will stay in place until March 12th.
	If it seems odd that the guard is still in place weeks after President Biden was sworn in on January, here they say 21st, but of course it was the 20th.
	The reason they're sticking around is because of another inauguration date.
	That would be the March 4th date when many QAnon followers expect Donald Trump to emerge from hiding to be sworn in as the 19th President of the United States.
	Explaining any of the above requires putting on hip waders and staggering out into the Q's swamp.
	I love this.
	Right up until Joe Biden put hand on Bible and followed it up with an actual stroll along Pennsylvania Avenue.
	True Q Trump supporters were expecting January 20th to be the storm.
	That was the day they were anticipating seeing federal troops swoop down to arrest Biden, Hillary, And all the other pizza-loving cannibals of the Democratic Party.
	When that didn't happen, QAnon, predictably, went in search of a new date for their political apocalypse.
	March 4th is the next last end of the world as we know it.
	Well, there's a lot here that's very interesting, and let me talk about why I believe January 20th didn't pan out, even though there was preparations had been taken to arrest A very large number of swamp creatures who were gathered together in one place for the inauguration of Joe Biden, or so it was anticipated.
	But it turned out they were no shows.
	They weren't actually in Washington, that the inauguration had been pre-recorded.
	Some estimate as much as two weeks in advance.
	They had a copy of it turned up seven hours before the inauguration in Spain.
	I was watching it Take place in real time, and notice it was occurring 10 to 15 minutes prematurely, meaning since the Trump administration didn't expire until noon on the 20th, and this event was taking place at 1150 or 1145, it would not even be legally valid.
	It would be null and void.
	We also know that there were multiple takes involved in the pre-recording of this event, including that you got a woman in pink and a woman in white, and they're in different positions virtually at the same time, meaning You see them here in one position and then momentarily later you see them there and there was no opportunity for them to move around and there was not only no time but there was no showing in terms of the video coverage of that happening.
	So I believe the reason why we didn't have a large-scale arrest of very prominent Democrat politicians is that they knew the risk was there and they declined to run it Which I think makes perfect sense.
	But, of course, given they were not there, given it was all pre-recorded, which, by the way, was also confirmed by a friend of mine, a research associate, who was watching on different channels and discovering on different channels they were at different stages of the inauguration, which, again, is further proof that it was pre-recorded in advance and the stations didn't all even actually coordinate when they began to run.
	The the inauguration film footage, but obviously we couldn't have an arrest if they weren't there.
	And I believe that is the explanation where we even had, you know, at the end of the inauguration, spectacular fireworks going off in the sky.
	But my understanding from those Who are in Washington have spoken to some 50 other residents of the area.
	No one, no one witnessed either the inauguration or the fireworks.
	Moreover, when Joe Biden and Jill showed up at the White House, they were locked out.
	They have not been admitted to the White House.
	So I think in a way, when Anderson Cooper asked Joe, You know, how it felt to be living in the White House.
	And he answered by saying, when I wake up and look at Joe, I say, where the hell are we?
	He literally doesn't know where the hell he is because he's not in the White House.
	We also, of course, have multiple indications that his signings of these executive orders is taking place on a soundstage.
	Which may or may not be located in Culver City at the Castle Rock Studios there, which I gather Amazon.com has recently purchased, no doubt so Jeff Bezos could exert greater control over the incoming administration.
	But where we've had such faux pas as looking at the windows behind the desk, You can see that in photographs that are bona fide of Trump in the Oval Office, the window to the left facing the desk shows foliage, trees and branches.
	But in the Biden photographs, it shows vehicles in a parking lot.
	So that's pretty telling.
	We also had the recent bizarre event that the wall cracked.
	So you're looking at Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi sitting on a sofa.
	And where the two parts of the wall for the set come together, there's a gap.
	It's got to be a couple inches wide, suggesting to me there are members of the staff, you know, the crew who are working the set who want to expose the fraud.
	And where a good friend of mine, who is a stuck man in Hollywood for nearly two decades, pointed out that The Oval Office, of course, doesn't have any straight corners.
	And yet this was a break at a corner, meaning it was a fake set for the Oval Office because it wasn't even oval.
	And where others have observed that, you know, this guy who's signing these executive orders was signing them initially with his left hand, whereas Joe Biden was right handed.
	So now he's switched over to his right hand.
	We're a pharmacist who's used to verifying signatures to ensure that, you know, illegal prescriptions aren't forged in order to obtain drugs, has noticed very appropriately that the signature on these executive orders does not resemble the signature of Joe Biden of the past.
	And it's easy to even explain I do have a couple of blogs on this issue you can find at jamesfetzer.org.
	Joe Biden's own signature is fairly heavy and he uses a straight line for J for Joe and then adds OE.
	So it's actually Joe Biden in this heavier hand.
	But The guy who's signing the executive orders, yes, uses a straight line, but it's a much fainter.
	It's with less pressure.
	Does not write O-E.
	Instead, gives a middle initial R-dot, and then Biden, it adds Junior.
	So, it's a very, very different signature.
	As a one-time student of graphology, I was fascinated by all this stuff.
	And I guarantee you, the guy who is posing as Joe Biden is not Joe Biden, but appears to be an actor.
	And, you know, almost every day I'm getting reports now about this guy who is impersonating him as not being the real Joe.
	But what's very interesting now in terms of this article in the Daily Kos, Is that it actually is talking about what I believe to be the case, to wit, that Ulysses S. Grant was our 18th President of the Republic under the Constitution of 1776.
	That Grant found the United States had gone bankrupt because of the Civil War, which was draining resources on both sides for the North and the South, and that therefore He needed to find financing to restore solvency to the United States and reached out to European bankers, including Rothschilds in the UK, who insisted that before they could lend money, the United States had to be incorporated as a corporation represented legally by United States of America, all in caps.
	Where the resources of the Republic were collateral for the corporation and where matters proceeded in that manner where we've been living as citizens in a corporation, the existence of which, for the most part, we've been completely unaware until Trump came into office.
	And because of his background in history as a businessman, He's used to creating and folding corporations, dealing with bankruptcies, and he, according to my sources, filed papers 18 months in advance in London to dissolve the corporation, where all the assets of the corporation resolved to the Republic on the 19th of January at a minute before midnight at 11.59 p.m.
	Eastern Time, 19 January.
	The day before the inauguration, so that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris were inaugurated as the president and vice president of a defunct corporation.
	I believe this to be the case, and that Trump actually, on the 9th of January, three days after the intrusion in the Capitol, and because it was a staged event, Where James Sullivan has explained his brother John, who's a prominent Antifa provocateur, led 226 Antifa members into the Capitol to pose as Trump supporters.
	Where it turns out that the reports from those who have been arrested, now over 200, most of them didn't even vote.
	Which means, of course, they obviously were not Trump supporters because Trump supporters absolutely 100% are going to vote.
	And where, to the best of my knowledge, not a single bona fide Trump supporter has been arrested as yet because of the Capitol intrusion on the 6th of January.
	But where Donald Trump signed the Insurrection Act on the 9th, that would be Saturday, the 9th of January, transferring authority for the Republic to the military and FEMA.
	And that the military in FEMA have been in control since and where the matter of, you know, digging deeper into all the layers of government that are corrupt that need to be taken up in this gigantic exercise that I anticipate will take place prior to the 4th of March.
	They're also having to line up qualified individuals to replace them so that the government doesn't simply collapse.
	By removing all of the individuals who are going to be indicted for crimes committed against the United States, but also including pedophilia, where the longer version of the story has it as follows, that the military approached Trump and encouraged him to run for president because they were dismayed by the corrupt activities taking place in the Obama White House, Whereas those of you who've been listening to the show are aware, among the WikiLeaks revelations was that Obama spent what turned out to be $65,000 of taxpayers' money to fly pizza and hot dogs from Chicago for a private party at the White House, which of course makes no sense at all, given that the White House refuses food from outside sources to circumvent the prospect of food poisoning.
	And where actual hot dogs and pizza flown from Chicago would be soggy and inedible by the time it reached Washington, but where in pedo-speak hot dogs are little boys and pizza little girls, so that when you understand the context here, just as CNN was emphasizing the context for the statements made by Biden that they were taking pains to find at fault, In an extraordinarily surprising development from a mainstream media that has been overwhelmingly praising of Biden and critical of Trump,
	The WikiLeaks revelations show that 70% of the American political elite are engaged in pedophilia.
	If you want to get a review of it, go to jimtheconspiracyguy.com and scroll down, where I have 65 Shows mostly about major conspiracies, Parkland, the New Zealand shooting, but also in this case, in particular, Pizzagate, where you're going to want to watch the whole thing if you have the stomach.
	Because it turns out that if they simply went in to arrest all these people, as Trump responded initially to the military, the government would have collapsed.
	So they solicited him to run, that he has their back, that they are conducting operations now for what I believe is going to be a major draining of the swamp.
	I mean, think about this.
	Donald Trump has seen this coming.
	He's been planning for it, including the signing of the executive order of 12 September 2018.
	Giving him vast powers to deal with foreign intervention in the American election, where Dominion is based in Canada, where Seidel is based in Spain, where the Leonardo satellites that were used to actually manipulate the count are out of Italy, nominally under control of the Vatican.
	My understanding, from multiple sources, is this is taking place, and while it sounds fantastic, and of course there are plenty who want to deny it, just as we have this piece in the Daily Kos, which is seeking to lampoon the very idea.
	I think, in fact, the basic story here is correct, and all their lampooning is not going to make any difference.
	It's still going to come to pass.
	Remember, Trump's been very good at keeping his promises, and first and foremost of them all was to drain the swamp.
	And there are multiple indications, by the way, too.
	And I know Paul is standing by, and I'm going to bring him in momentarily.
	Not only was Biden locked out of the White House, not only is he resorting to these studio stages to pretend to be conducting the official business of the country in the White House, But he recently passed by, you know, Marines, and he's being told everything to say and what to do.
	And he was told by the radio control to salute the Marine.
	He not only didn't salute the Marine, but he blurted out, salute the Marine.
	And what I, as a former Marine Corps officer, find even more instructive is the Marines did not salute him.
	We're disciplined in the Marine Corps, particularly for assignments like that are so rigid.
	That the only way in which the Marines would not have been saluting Biden were if the Pentagon did not recognize him as the commander in chief, and it instructed these Marines not to salute.
	So that among the ways in which they've tried to offset this by visual forms of propaganda, We recently saw a stage event.
	We drove out to what appeared to be a private airfield.
	There was a plane, appeared to be a commercial private plane made up to look like Air Force One, but it was not.
	And there were two individuals who saluted him when he went on board, but they weren't Officers of the Marine Corps.
	They weren't officers of the United States military, and whereby I include non-commissioned officers, because usually it's like sergeants and staff sergeants who have these kinds of billets or moles.
	It was firemen.
	It was guys from a local fire department who were saluting Biden.
	And here's another.
	Biden recently—and my understanding is that Biden has been instructed he may not set foot on Pentagon grounds—but he took a 25-vehicle entourage over to the Pentagon, and guess where they went?
	To the visitor center.
	Where any American can visit the Visitor Center.
	You put all these pieces together and you find that a picture is emerging here that actually Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are not in charge, that they're playing a role.
	They may be hoping something is going to happen to come to their aid.
	Maybe they're counting on the CIA somehow.
	I'm sorry.
	Hello?
	them bona fide authority, but it appears to me they have none, that they're faking it
	from A to Z, and that the military is in charge and making preparations for the massive swamp
	drain that's going to occur. Meanwhile, we have Paul standing by. Paul, join the conversation.
	I'm sorry. Hello?
	Go ahead.
	Where am I?
	Where am I?
	Where the hell am I?
	I know I love it.
	Isn't that amazing?
	I have an announcement for everybody, all the listeners out there and the country in general.
	I have decided I'm going to build back better.
	It just makes sense.
	I mean, we need to build back anyway, right?
	Don't we?
	We have to build back.
	And if we're going to build back, we might as well build back better.
	Additionally, since we're experiencing this terrible global warming with all the CO2, I've decided to restrict my breathing.
	I think breathing is overemphasized anyway, right?
	Who needs all this fresh air all the time?
	So I'm going to start worrying, not two, not three, but I'm going to wear five masks to do my part and reduce the CO2.
	Meanwhile, I'm going to be waiting for my government check, and when the food shortages start to occur, we have the assurance of Mr. Klaus Shroush, whatever his name is, Klaus Schwab, he's going to give us a protein package, a plant-based protein package.
	Did you see that?
	I feel so much better.
	I know!
	We reported that pause just ghastly.
	The very idea is ghastly.
	Good Patreon, by the way, has a brilliant short piece that everyone should see.
	I've got it on my BitChute channel and also on my new channel on Telegram.
	Let me just say, Twitter wiped me out this week.
	I had over 6,000 tweets.
	I had around 5,000 followers and Twitter this week just wiped the slate clean.
	All gone, vanished overnight.
	I got a report from them that I violated some policy and not responded to notifications, but I had received no notifications.
	Two hours later, I got a notification about some obscure copyright violation.
	And I said, you know, I didn't believe I had, but if you simply eliminate that tweet, that's okay with me and you can restore me.
	And instead, they just hit the delete button, Paul, and all was gone.
	So I'm now, you can find that, you can find me on Telegram, which has a very simple addressing system.
	I really like this.
	It's just the letter T, lowercase T dot M E, for me, all lowercase slash.
	And then the name of your channel.
	So I've got two channels there, t.me slash Jim Fetzer News and t.me slash Need to Know News.
	And on Jim Fetzer News, I've actually put up the Good Patriot video, which is just sensational, talking about everything Paul's addressing here.
	I love it, Paul.
	You're absolutely right.
	We've only got a minute or so before the break, but squeeze in a few more observations and we'll continue thereafter.
	Well, on a personal note, I think all the listeners know, and of course I know, that when you ask for new callers, to me that's like telling the family dog to go sit in the corner while I invite other dogs from the neighborhood to come in and eat out of your bowl.
	Oh, I would never have thought of it that way!
	I just like, you know, I just like getting a mix of views.
	So, you know, that's my.
	I know.
	Yeah.
	I was going to I was going to I was going to give you more time.
	I'll let you go on your own.
	But you started dissecting Joe Biden's signature and I couldn't take it anymore.
	I had to call.
	That's all right.
	That's all right.
	That's good, Paul.
	Good, good, good.
	I mean, the situation is really stunning.
	I find it fascinating that the Daily Kos is actually Yes.
	You know, look, you're in good company.
	The bottom line is, look what they did to RFK Jr.
	I mean, if they can say, you know, Robert Kennedy Jr., who you can't think anything other than what a good soul who has basically devoted his life for fighting essentially for You know, the underdog and for injured people and taking on big corporate power.
	And now he's he's been, you know, banned, right?
	It's just unreal what we're looking at.
	Well, if you can ban the president of the United States for crying out loud, you know, you can ban anyone.
	I mean, it's just outrageous what's going on here.
	Well, if the break is not forthcoming, I'll go with a little bit more material, just so just recently I watched a video where They went over the 25 point platform of the National Socialist Party in German.
	Now, a lot of it is, of course, tailored to the situation in Germany at the time, because the first couple of points, you know, talking about the Versailles Treaty and reuniting the German people, and that's all good.
	But point 11 and 12, I think, was very fitting for the time, which, one, is all unearned income not derived or based upon work will basically be eliminated.
	And also that all non-Germans will not, no non-Germans will be allowed to own any German press.
	And for example, that all large enterprises, all large commercial industrial enterprises will engage in profit sharing with the community.
	How do you like that?
	Some people think that's communistic, but the bottom line is they were doing what was right for the nation and the German people.
	Most of the other 25 points would solve a lot of the problems we're having in this country
	right now.
	I just want to mention, like I said, one day, just for the fun of it, I could print them
	out and we could just go over them.
	They knew what was happening to their nation at the time, and it's the same thing happening
	here.
	One of the other tenets was that all war profits will be confiscated.
	Imagine that.
	Basically, there was a little bit of a lead into it where it said that, you know, war is just tremendously destructive enterprise.
	It costs a nation and blood and treasure.
	And therefore all war profits will be confiscated by the state and all war profiteers, you know, uh, many cases will be accused of treason and tried.
	It's just, it's really amazing when you think about it, it's like so many other things where you could You could take things from the past and they fit what's happening today.
	So among the other things that was interesting about it was that people, aliens, could have their own press.
	They could have their own periodicals, such as newspapers and magazines, but they couldn't be in the German language.
	So they weren't banning these people totally from society, but they established two classes of citizenship.
	Germans, fully German people, were full citizens.
	But people that were not German were subject to the law of aliens.
	That was interesting.
	And of course, again, they said that no non-Germans could participate in the German press.
	So, we know who's running the press here, do we not?
	And by the way, I had never seen her face and only saw her name a while ago that I saw the picture.
	Have you seen a picture and seen the name of the female doctor head of the CDC?
	No, no, I'm scared!
	What do we got, another transgender?
	Another transgender call?
	No, I'm just gonna be crude here.
	It's another hook-nosed Jew.
	Okay, what a shocker, right?
	So the head of the CDC, a woman, is a hook-nosed Jew.
	Anthony Fauci is a Jew.
	He doesn't have quite the hook nose that so many others have, but how about that Jamie Rankin, right?
	Does he fit that profile or not?
	How about Chuck Schumer?
	How about Adam Schiff?
	How about Jerry Nadler?
	Nadler, however you want to say it.
	And on and on and on, so we all know what the problem is.
	And I don't do it on every call, but you know, I don't know.
	That doesn't mean that it's still not there in our faces.
	Well.
	Paul, I wish I could tell you you're wrong, but there's so much about what you're saying that's right.
	I'm just terribly troubled by how the Israelis want to destroy America and use us for their own purpose to attack Iran.
	I have no doubt.
	In fact, there's a story I would like to have reported already that the mullahs in Iran are debating about the use of nuclear weapons.
	I actually was invited to participate in a conference In World Trade Center One, New York City, on the life and death of Qasem Soleimani, the great Iranian general that Trump assassinated outside the Baghdad airport in Iraq, which was
	Not only an act of war, but a violation of Iraqi sovereignty and an act of treachery because he's been invited there to aid in a peace mission.
	So this was a truly despicable act, probably the worst that Trump has ever authorized.
	But where I was explaining to the Congress that in spite of Trump having done that, Which I deplore that Trump was being targeted by the Israelis because he was not willing to bomb Iran and that Biden on the contrary, although you think he's going to be helpful to reconstitute the
	The Joint Plan of Action, so-called, also known as Iran Deal, actually he's going to sabotage it.
	It turns out this new guy, Blinken, that he's appointed as Secretary of State, who also is a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen, has told the Iranians that there's not going to be sanctions relief until they discontinue their enrichment of uranium.
	Which is completely absurd.
	I mean, these sanctions are violations of international law because they're a form of collective punishment that's proscribed by the Nuremberg tribunals and by the UN Charter, collective punishment for the actions of the political leaders.
	And of course, they're having tremendously negative effects on the quality of life and the health and well-being of Iranian citizens.
	Just as the no-fly zone over Iraq, which was another form of sanction, led to the deaths of some 500,000 Iraqi infants.
	Which Madeleine Albright just dismissed with the back of the hand, you know, as though this were all acceptable, as though it were even humane to allow such a thing to happen, which we deliberately brought about.
	So, I was encouraging them to appreciate that the way to bring stability to the Middle East was for Iran to acquire nuclear weapons, because then you'd have A standoff between Israel, which has a vast stock of undeclared nuclear biological and chemical weapons, and Iran with a new stock of nuclear weapons that would resemble the Cold War between the United States and the USSR based upon mutually assured destruction, which actually brought
	A great deal of stability to the world.
	So I was glad I recommended that.
	I had actually written in an article I was asked about Soleimani for an Iranian newspaper that I'd written that recommendation that in my opinion Iran Would be best off to usher in an era of stability if they were to acquire nuclear weapons.
	And for the only time I can think of, they edited out that sentence because when I inquired, it was in conflict with the position of the Supreme Leader.
	And I explained, well, I'm not speaking for the Supreme Leader.
	I'm offering my opinion about what would be best, which I reaffirmed with a great deal of contextual explanation at this conference where I participated by Zoom.
	As to why Iran would be far better off if they were to acquire nuclear weapons.
	So I was pleased to see an article that the subject is actually being debated in Iran, because that's easily the best way to secure stability in the Middle East and peace for Iran.
	Otherwise, the Israelis are 100% committed to manipulating the United States, particularly this very weak Biden administration into Into bombing Iran and where Biden has a history of subservience to Israel.
	I mean, it's just staggering how much Biden has been involved in.
	Here's an article I discussed yesterday on Need to Know, bought and paid for.
	Biden's long history pandering to the Israeli lobby.
	It's a really significant, substantial, long article.
	So, this is a bad, bad situation for Iran.
	Although they would think superficially Trump is their enemy and Biden is their friend, the reality of this situation is precisely the opposite.
	Trump is their friend insofar as he would not bomb Iran, and he's the only one of our last six presidents who didn't initiate a whole lot of wars.
	Uh, you know, I mean, Ronald Reagan, seven, Bill Clinton, five.
	I mean, you just go through the list.
	The only one who had zero wars initiated is Donald Trump.
	Paul, back to you.
	Well, I just think the idea of, uh, you know, a country possessing nuclear weapons, uh, you know, that brings stability to the region is just a, It's just a horrendous concept to the bottom.
	The only problem in that region is that the Jews are in a volcano somewhere and the land is returned to the original inhabitants, the Palestinians.
	There's never going to be peace in this world as long as those people are allowed to have any sort of power.
	You know, I used to think about, and you read about and you hear comments about you, we need to wipe them out, you know.
	And they need to be exterminated from the earth.
	I've heard all these things and even thought all these things.
	Of course, they're the rational thoughts.
	If somebody once said an anti-Semitic society is a healthy society.
	But in the end, structuring your country, your nation, your society in such a way as to eliminate these problems is the smart thing to do.
	The problem that Germany had is that all the enemies were run by Jews.
	Britain was run by Jews.
	The United States was run by Jews.
	Russia was run by Jews.
	So basically the Jews of the world ganged up to crush Germany.
	Because when the world was able to witness what they did in their country, just using the one thing, eliminating fractional reserve banking, Right.
	Just having a strong German currency that didn't have as its basis debt, you know, borrowed from some international Jewish bank.
	Then the country started to prosper.
	So, you know, the bottom line is until the Jews are eliminated from all positions of power, all positions of banking, media, education and so forth, then we're just not going to have peace and prosperity and abundance.
	We're always going to have this situation.
	Because this is what they do.
	They stir it up and they bring it about.
	So then, now you're faced with the argument of, okay, well, but if you leave them in the country, they're just going to agitate, right?
	They're just going to constantly, you know, propagandize and brainwash.
	Oh, we're just the victims.
	Oh, we're discriminated against.
	Oh, we, we can't be politicians.
	We can't, we can't hold office.
	We can't do this.
	We can't do that.
	So the ultimate solution is just to get rid of them, dropping them in a damn volcano and be done with it.
	Sorry, I was sort of, that's my just open field thinking.
	Anyway, did you ever think, I mean, there must have come a time in your life, you know, where you just cross, you cross so many bridges, just like I've crossed it.
	If you go back 25, 30 years, did you ever think you would be talking and thinking in this way in this manner?
	And also looking around at everything being a fraud?
	I just looked at a full two page spread in USA Today.
	Uh, just the other day about this, this, the newest fake Mars mission that isn't occurring where, you know, it's so such great drawings and artists renditions of, of, uh, you know, the parachute opening and then dropping down to the Martian surface and all this crap.
	And of course it's all a lie.
	They've never had a Mars mission ever, not once.
	And they've faked it all here on earth and either Greenland.
	Or Devon Island and the Arctic Circle and filmed it, and then just lie to us and tell us, Oh, look, we put a rover on Mars.
	We put a robotic mission on Mars.
	No, you didn't.
	You didn't do any of it.
	You're a liar.
	Just like NASA is a liar.
	Just like everything is a lie.
	There was no insurrection.
	Anyway, we could go.
	We both could go keep doing this.
	You know what I bring to the show?
	I don't know what the hell.
	I just I just fire from the hip most of the time.
	Well, I'll tell you, it is very, very peculiar, this Mars thing.
	And it is all animation.
	You're absolutely right.
	And of course, we didn't go to the moon.
	Could we have actually got an unmanned vehicle to Mars?
	It sounds like a stretch.
	I do agree.
	We didn't go to the moon and we didn't go to Mars, but we took the money anyway.
	You know, hey, look, sorry about this.
	I didn't build you a house, but I still need you to pay me.
	That's the Jew world we're living in, huh?
	We have been joined by Scaredy Cat, and I'm very pleased she's here.
	Scaredy Cat, go ahead.
	Give us your thoughts about these issues or any others you like.
	Hey, Paul and Jim.
	Hey.
	I am the lady dog who was going to stay out at the porch and wasn't going to come in and give room to the other lady dog.
	But it's cold out in the porch so I came in.
	Maybe I can be your Felix feline.
	Sorry, vegetable.
	You're fine, Skarity.
	Go ahead.
	Go ahead with more.
	Okay.
	So I, the summer I wanted to just learn a little bit of German and I was looking up
	some words and just you know how the letters are compared to English because my husband
	always said you know English is so close to German.
	When he as a young man he visited Germany and he heard from behind his back, come here
	and he turned around but of course it was come here in German.
	Some you know some people were talking to other people and so like.
	Come and see here.
	Come and see here.
	Yeah something like that.
	Yeah come and see here.
	Yeah anyway.
	Come and see here.
	You know better than I do.
	So let's also like the famous German music composer Wagner.
	We write it with a W in the original German but and of course the original German pronunciation
	is Wagner but we in English say Wagner.
	And like Volkswagen, they actually pronounce it Volkswagen, the people's car.
	But so stuff like that.
	But to my shock, the web page that first turned up like a language company, you know, selling tutoring and so on.
	It was a happy, very happy, smiling, good looking black girl with a huge big afro.
	And I was he didn't like it because it Erasing the German people, it should really be, you know, a typical blogger, you know, with nice braids or something.
	And I think that's because Germany is a defeated country.
	As Paul was saying, you know, defeated by, well, I'm adding to Paul,
	by the English Prime Minister Winston Churchill, who was captured by the Jew culture's money.
	And so this goes to the erasure of every human culture.
	Another ad I saw was a Chinese chef.
	So this was a food advertisement.
	And he was, I think, saying, take cooking classes or something.
	And he was, you know, he cooked and cooked and cooked, and it looked very delicious.
	And then, you know, towards the end, oh, I caught him saying, oh, falafel,
	this is a very traditional Israeli food.
	And that's, you know, what is it next?
	Tacos are going to be Israeli food.
	Mexicans didn't really invent the taco.
	Is that going to be it?
	Pizza is not an American food or an Italian food.
	Pizza is a very famous Israeli food.
	So I'm of course being I'm giving you examples of the erasure of every human culture.
	You were talking about it's because you talked a little bit about cultural Marxism.
	So that's a couple of things that came to my mind that I just saw recently.
	How you were saying the race marriage.
	of the cultural Marxism puzzle you.
	And it's not what solves the puzzle or to understand the mystery and not be puzzled.
	It's just the erasure of every human culture, including America.
	That's a good point.
	Punched.
	Mitchell, would you have thoughts you'd like to add to our conversation here today?
	Mitchell is actually, I think, adding someone else to the list.
	Paul, go ahead with further thoughts of yours.
	Well, so the one, you know, good point that, you know, Scaredy Cat mentioned.
	I'll go ahead.
	Hey, I wanted to tell Jim.
	Yeah, in March, I don't see Trump becoming president.
	I think it's a better chance that Trump will be declared the missing Lindbergh baby in March.
	But yeah, I tell people now, read between the letters, P and R, and you know, public relations, and you'll find Q.
	Um, you know, that's how I view that today.
	I love that.
	That's good.
	But yeah, I think Paul's equally skeptical.
	I'm not sure about Scaredy Cat.
	Paul, your thoughts, right?
	You, you agree with Mitch over here.
	This isn't a long shot at best and almost certainly not going to happen.
	Well, I, I wanted to happen and it's all very interesting.
	And, uh, you know, I'm going to buy a round of drinks at the tavern, you know, when it does, um, I'll send Jim a jar of moonshine if it happens.
	Hell!
	You know what I've said about it.
	I've made my wager.
	I would wager more if you were to allow it, but I understand you're on a budget there, Jim.
	I would increase my wager.
	Let me invite Scaredy Cat about her thoughts about all of this, whether she thinks it's just an illusion or is there something to it?
	Yeah, I think realistically, I'm sorry to leave you by yourself in your corner of the
	boxing ring, Jim.
	Yeah.
	So I don't think any of these wonderful scenarios we want to happen will actually happen.
	But Jim, I want to also tell you a little bit to explain it.
	I don't really care.
	I never really care about what happens.
	I just want us, each of us, to do a little something every day towards what we think is right.
	And just not care, not, not, not, not, not don't care, but care about it, but don't become upset or flattened out if something doesn't happen.
	Because it's a big universe and everything is related to each other.
	The Hindus have a wonderful philosophy.
	about this, which is expressed in the book, the Bhagavad Gita, which is, Gita, of course, is song.
	So it's God's song, song with God or conversation with God.
	And it's the warrior, Arjun, he is riding the chariot towards battle.
	And of course, the battle is basically nuclear annihilation because It's such a, like a mortal battle that the whole world dies except one soul remains.
	And what is that?
	Alert, alert, I'm giving you away the end of the story.
	Only one soul remains and he slowly, slowly walks to the heights of the Himalayas.
	That's the ending, sorry, sad scene.
	So all of humanity is wiped out.
	But before the battle, the warrior Arjun is riding on the chariot and the charioteer, the one who's driving the horses, is God, Krishna.
	And so Arjun is very worried because the opposing side is his family, it's his cousin.
	So he's going to battle his cousins and he doesn't want to do it, he's against it, but God advises him.
	You know, you just have to do what you think is right.
	And this is the time for battles, the season.
	It needs to be done.
	So don't worry about the consequences.
	And and in other words, do what's right for today, what you think is right.
	And to us in the modern age, that was probably, you know, a song written 5000 years ago.
	Today, it's just let us just do What we think is right.
	Don't analyze too much.
	Just look at the past in big brush strokes.
	It brought us to this present day and each minute today is precious.
	And just let's just do it.
	So quickly.
	Don't get discouraged.
	Basically, go ahead.
	So that's all well and good, and it's a nice.
	It's a nice way to think it to live, I would maybe add to also make sure you have weapons and ammunition in store.
	There's a there's a hardcore reality that's that's coming.
	If we let it happen and if we can see it and we can just we can just look to Venezuela.
	What's happening right now?
	There's a like a project to save Venezuela online.
	I was recently made aware of and there was photos attached to what's going on.
	Starving animals, starving dogs.
	It's very sad to see.
	People roaming the countryside in search of food, people abandoning their homes, leaving, looking for food.
	OK, and why?
	Well, they said when there is available food in the marketplace, it's so high priced that most people can't afford it.
	So how does that happen to a country that at one point was, of course, a vibrant, thriving country with, you know, well-known European cities, right?
	OK, so it's it's you know, it's very simple.
	These Jews have a recipe, a formula, and they crash the economy and kill the currency first in most cases.
	And there's no reason that we can't have sufficient material comfort in this world except for Jews who want to take it away from us.
	So that's why we need to have a determined plan.
	It's nice thoughts that you expressed, and nobody's going to object to them, Scaredy Cat.
	They're very lovely.
	And this book that you mentioned is actually a very nice book, and I've read excerpts of it.
	But the bottom line is, I don't think that we should allow these people to destroy us, and I think that instead we should destroy them.
	And that's just because I'm a Nazi.
	Sorry.
	I mean, let me pull back Mitchell and see if he can give us, you know, what he expects to play out here in the next couple of months.
	If he says he doesn't think the cavalry is going to ride to the rescue.
	Mitchell, how do you see all this playing out?
	More delay, more distraction, more more layers piled on top of the conspiracy onion to hide everything that they've done already.
	Uh, it's just gonna be more delay, more diffusion.
	Biden is gonna just poke along and, um, it's the delay, delay, delay tactic as we see everything
	kick the can down the road.
	It's the same way, you know, with the Q crew.
	So, um, yeah, we got about two minutes or under two minutes, Jim.
	Yeah.
	Just a reminder, all these things that they're doing, it's very long-term, slow and incremental.
	Sometimes it seems fast, but it really is slow and incremental, and they're conditioning us.
	You mark my word, a year or two from now, we're still going to be talking about these masks and everything else.
	You didn't think it was going to occur last year.
	You wouldn't have thought you'd been talking about it a year from then.
	But guess what?
	Coming up on March, it's been one year since we were just going to flatten the curve.
	Look where we're at.
	And Anthony, Tony the Rat Fauci, of course, knows what he's doing when he recommends even wearing multiple masks.
	He did a study of the Spanish flu, which was the greatest disease disaster in world history.
	Killing, you know, over 10 million and his study resulted in discovering that most of the deaths were not from the flu but from wearing masks.
	So I think they've got a layered here method that wearing masks are killing us slowly, that the coronavirus vaccine kills us a bit faster, and then they're going to have a massive food shortage to starve us to death.
	Thank you all for being here.

▲